bridge pier
TRANSCRIPT
-
7/29/2019 Bridge Pier
1/18
Centre to centre of pier 20.00 m
RBL 551.00 m
Bed level of canal 570.00 m
Hard rock level; 549.50 m
Thickness of pier at top 1.20 m
Sode slope of the pier 12V:1H
Base width 2.53 mWidth of the trough 5.55 m
Depth of flow of water 4.80 m (including surge)
Thickness of bed slab of trough 0.75 m
Ground level 560.00 m
Top of deck slab of catwalk 575.65 m
Thickness of bearing 0.50 m
Thickness of bed block/pier cap 0.75 m
Assume thickness of well cap= 1.25 m
Size of the base 2.53m X 5.00m
Bottom of deck slab 569.25 m
Top of bed block level 568.75 m
Bottom of bed block 568.00 mHeight of pier 8.00 m
Horizontal seismic coefficient 0.08 g
Deepest bed level 549.50 m
Thickness of steining 0.70 m
Pier length below corbel 5 m
DESIGN OF WELL CAP
1
-
7/29/2019 Bridge Pier
2/18
2. TENTATIVE SECTION OF THE PIER
575.65m
V1=343.93t V1=343.93t
on each bearing
H=37.22T
1.20m
1 1
12 12
V2=191.446t
2.53m
560.00m
551.00m
V1=
D
h
.50m
2
-
7/29/2019 Bridge Pier
3/18
5.00m Myy
2.53m
Mxx
+VE
+VE
+VE
3
-
7/29/2019 Bridge Pier
4/18
3. EVALUATION OF FORCES:
a)Dead load of super structure
R.L.of section under consideration 560.00 m
SL.NO. DESCRIPTION OF LOAD NO. V(t) transition
I TROUGH PORTION
1 Weight of side beams 2 20.00 X 1.00 X 4.02 X 2.40 385.92
2 Weight of fillets 2 20.00 X 1.50 X 0.78 X 2.40 111.60
3 Weight of chamfers 2 20.00 X 0.65 X 1.21 X 2.40 75.63
4 weight of bed slab 1 20.00 X 2.50 X 0.45 X 2.40 54.00
5 Weight of bottom stiffener 6 0.50 X 4.00 X 0.65 X 2.40 18.72
6 Weight of top stiffener 6 0.50 X 5.50 X 0.75 X 2.40 29.70
7 Weight of top wedge/ext beam 6 20.00 X 0.40 X 0.35 X 2.40 40.32
8 Weight of side stiffener 6 0.70 X 2.19 X 0.50 X 2.40 11.06
9 Weight of cat walk beam 1 20.00 X 0.30 X 0.75 X 2.40 10.80
10 Weight of cat walk slab 1 20.00 X 0.90 X 0.20 X 2.40 8.64
11 Weight of water 1 20.00 X 5.50 X 4.80 X 1.00 528.00
12 weight of wearing coat 1 20.00 X 1.65 X 0.08 X 2.40 5.94
13 Weight of railing 6 20.00 X 0.25 X 0.25 X 0.79 5.89
14 Live Load 1 20.00 X 1.20 X 1.00 X 1.00 24.00
15 Add for unforseen loads 5% 65.51
TOTAL 1375.72 1500 125.25721
II PIER CAP
1 pier cap 1 1.80 X 8.00 X 0.75 X 2.40 25.92 15.967145
III PIER
1 weight of corbel portion 1 1.18 X 5.15 X 2.00 X 2.40 29.05 93.482906
2 Weight of pier 1 1.87 X 5.00 X 7.25 X 2.40 162.40 3500
217.37 432
III FOUNDATION
1 Well cap 1 3.14 X 8.41 X 1.25 X 2.40 79.26 216.22
79.26
Total with well cap 1672.35
Total without well cap 1593.09 2148.22
4
-
7/29/2019 Bridge Pier
5/18
Earthquake forces
H= 15.65
DESCRIPTION OF LOAD NO.
seismic
factor He Ve L1 L2 M1 M2
m m t m m t-m t-m
I TROUGH PORTION
1 Weight of side beams 1 11.65 0.09 34.47 17.24 11.65 2.50 401.62 43.09
2 Weight of fillets 2 16.20 0.12 13.86 6.93 16.20 2.50 224.57 17.33
3 Weight of chamfers 2 12.75 0.10 7.39 3.70 12.75 2.50 94.27 9.24
4 weight of bed slab 1 16.53 0.13 6.84 3.42 16.53 2.50 113.07 8.55
5 Weight of bottom stiffener 6 15.98 0.12 2.29 1.15 15.98 2.50 36.63 2.87
6 Weight of top stiffener 6 15.40 0.12 3.51 1.75 15.40 2.50 54.01 4.38
7 Weight of top wedge/ext beam 2 15.28 0.12 4.72 2.36 15.28 2.50 72.14 5.90
8 Weight of side stiffener 2 14.86 0.11 1.26 0.63 14.86 2.50 18.71 1.57
9 Weight of cat walk beam 1 15.43 0.12 1.28 0.64 15.43 2.40 19.70 1.53
10 Weight of cat walk slab 1 15.55 0.12 1.03 0.52 15.55 1.60 16.02 0.82
11 weight of wearing coat 1 15.55 0.12 0.71 0.35 15.55 2.50 11.01 0.89
12 Weight of railing 6 16.25 0.12 0.73 0.37 16.25 1.60 11.92 0.59
TOTAL 78.10 39.05 1073.68 96.77
II PIER
1 pier cap 1 16.03 0.12 3.18 1.59 16.03 1.6 51.04 2.55
2 weight of corbel portion 1 14.65 0.11 3.26 1.63 14.65 2.50 47.80 4.08
3 Weight of pier 1 10.03 0.08 12.48 6.24 10.03 2.50 125.15 15.60
0.00
18.93 9.47 223.99 22.23
III FOUNDATION
1 Well cap 1 0.50 0.00 0.30 0.15 0.50 2.50 0.15 0.38
0.30 0.15 0.1519407 0.38
total 97.339 48.670 1297.818 119.383
SL.NO. h
H
1.5 ah
5
-
7/29/2019 Bridge Pier
6/18
Y1= 2.45 ey= -1.186265 m
X1= 26.67 ex= -24.16586 m
HYDRODYNAMIC FORCES (trough)
He
Horizontal hydrodynamic force=He=0.726pe y
Moment about C.G=Me=0.299pey2
y [m] 4.80
h[m] 12.40
i Dueto upstream water
a= 21.337 o
Cm= 0.570
Cs= 0.403
pe= 0.400 t/sq.m
He= 27.88 t
Me= 100% 55.12 t-m
-+
-=
h
y2
h
y
h
y2
h
y
2
CC m
s
h
y
6
-
7/29/2019 Bridge Pier
7/18
Dynamic force in the longitudinal direction in the trough
Discharge in the trough(max) 47.25 cumec
Cross sectional area of flow= 26.640 sq.m
Perimeter of the flow of water in the trough 15.150 m
Kinematic viscocity= 1.14E-06 sq.m/sec
Flow velocity 1.77 m/s
Reynolds No. 7500
Drag Coeffcient 0.123
Drag force 37.22 t
Hydraulic mean depth 1.758 m
Shear force due to water/m length= 1.758 kg
Total force 0.533 t
R.L. of application of force 578.050 mHeight above the bed block= 10.050 m
Increase in reaction due to drag force= 37.221 t
Force due to sliding friction:
Reaction sliding end when the loads are so placed as to produce maximum reaction on the other end
L.L reaction= 24.00 t
Impact factor 25.00%
Impact load 6.00 t
Impact load 6.00 t
Dead load reaction 41.27 t
Load due to water in flow direction force 37.22 t
84.49 t
Friction in sliding (Coeff of friction= 0.25 21.12 t
R.L. of point of application of force 568.00 m
7
-
7/29/2019 Bridge Pier
8/18
Wind force
The inensity of wind pressure depends on the height of structure exposed to the
wind. Two cases are dealt for computing wind force
(a). When level of water in the river is at HFL
(b). When there is minimum water level
Average height of pier above GL= 8.00 m
Area of exposed structure 148.27 sq.m
Height of pier above GL= 10.00 m
Intensity of wind pressure 121.77 kg/sq.m
Area of exposed structure 148.27 sq.m
Add for catwalk area 30.00 sq.m
Total area= 178.27 sq.m
Total wind force on the structure= 21.71 t
l1 6.40 m
l2 3.60 m
y= 5.713 m
RL of point of application 565.71
8
-
7/29/2019 Bridge Pier
9/18
MOMENT OF INERTIA OF PIER AT BASE:
Area of the base
B= 2.533m
L= 5.000m
A = B x L = =12.67 m2
M.I. Of the foundation:
=6.77 m4
=26.39 m4
Coeff. Friction at the bearings= 0.90
12
3LB
Ixx=
-
12
3BL
I yy =-
LBX
X
Y
Y
1
4 3
2
9
-
7/29/2019 Bridge Pier
10/18
SL.NO LOAD HX HyDIRECT
STRESSX
BENDING
STRESS
(fx)
BENDING
STRESS
(fy)
t t t t/sq.m m t/sq.m t/sq.m
1 DEAD LOAD 1593.09 125.77 negligible
-do- dry CONDITION 1065.09 84.09
5 FORCE DUE TO SLIDING FRICTION 21.12 8.00 31.60 0.00
6 WIND FORCE 21.71 16.21 0.00 33.34
13 EARTQUAKE FORCES -48.67 97.34 97.34 -3.84 as above 0.00 112.77
222.56
14 HYDRO DYNAMIC FORCES 27.88 10.31 5.22
DETAILS
10
-
7/29/2019 Bridge Pier
11/18
CASE V Hx Hy F/A Sfx Sfy f1 f2 f3
t t t t/sq.m t/sq.m t/sq.m t/sq.m t/sq.m t/sq.m
1 STATIC & DRY CONDITION 1065.091 21.707 84.086 0.000 -33.341 50.75 117.43 117.43
2 1593.091 21.707 21.123 125.770 0.000 -33.341 124.03 190.71 127.51
dirction of eq. along flow
4 CASE(1)+E.Q(NO. WIND FORCE) 1016.421 97.339 118.462 80.244 0.000 46.084 302.81 302.81 -142.32
5 CASE(2)+E.Q(NO. WIND LOAD) 1544.421 125.224 118.462 121.928 10.307 51.306 386.39 386.39 -142.54
dirction of eq along the bridge
6 CASE(1)+E.Q(NO. WIND FORCE) 1016.421 97.339 118.462 80.244 0.000 46.084 -32.52 193.01 226.35
7 CASE(2)+E.Q(NO. WIND LOAD) 1544.421 125.224 118.462 121.928 10.307 51.306 51.07 276.60 276.60
dirction of eq across thebridge
Min. stress -32.521 117.427 -142.539
Max. Stress 386.395 386.395 276.597
max Tension= -142.539 t/sq.m
Max. Compression= 386.395 t/sq.m
STATIC & WHEN THERE IS WATER (
IN TROUGH)
CONDITION
11
-
7/29/2019 Bridge Pier
12/18
Design of well cap:
Diameter of well(internal) 4.40 m
External dia 5.80 m
Effective dia= Min of L+d or L+t 5.10 m
depth assumed 1.25 m
Intensity of loading= 95.985 t/sq.m
Assuming well cap to be partially fixed moment,
Moment at mid span= 78.018 t-m
Grade of concrete M 20
Permissible stress in steel 1900.00 kg/sq.cm
Permissiblebond stress= 8.00 kg/sq.cm
Permissible tensile strength in concrete= 20 kg/sq.cmWhether with Earthquake considered(Y/N)
Permissible compressive strength of concrete= 7 N/mm2
m= 13.3333
k= 0.3294
j= 0.8902
Q= 10.2634 bd2
Depth of well cap= 87.19 cm
Steel required at mid span & bottom of well cap (+ve moment)
Dia of the bar 25 mm
Area 4.91 sq.cm
Overall depth= 102.19 cmSay 125.00 cm
Effective depth= 117.50 cm
Area of steel= 39.26 sq.cm
Spacing= 12.50 cm c/c
Say 125 mm c/c
bQ
Mx
105
12
-
7/29/2019 Bridge Pier
13/18
Steel required at bottom in lateral direction(across width of pier)
Moment= 39.009 t-m
Depth of well cap= 25.32 cm
Dia of the bar 20 mm
Area 3.142 sq.cm
Overall depth= 39.32 cm
Say 125 cm
Effective depth= 117.5 cm
Area of steel= 19.629 sq.cm
Spacing= 16.0 cm c/c
Say 150 mm c/c
Distance from face to of the support upto which radial reinforcement is to be
provided
Location of zero radial moment from centre= 1.47 m
Therefore distance from support= 1.43 m
Add for thickness= 2.13 m
This will be greater of the following
1. Ld=fs/4tbd = 148.44 cm
2. Point of inflection+d 220.75 cm
3. Point of inflection+12f 132.00 cm
Maximum= 220.75 cm
Say 220 cm
3
R
13
-
7/29/2019 Bridge Pier
14/18
Area of reinforcement /width for -ve B.M. Mr at edges(radial rods)
Moment= 78.018 t-m
Depth of well cap=
Dia of the bar 25 mm
Area 4.909 sq.cm
Overall depth= 125.00 cm
Effective depth= 120.00 cm
Area of steel= 38.439 sq.cm
Spacing= 12.770 cm c/c
Say 125 mm c/c
Column dowel reinforcement:
Tensile stress -142.54 t/sq.m
Tensile force= -57.64 t
Area of steel= 30.34 sq.cm
Dia of the bar 25.00 mm
Area 4.91 sq.cmSpacing= 16.18 cm c/c
Say 150.00 mm c/c
2
16
2WR
14
-
7/29/2019 Bridge Pier
15/18
Distribution steel at top
Dia of the bar 20 mm
ast= 3.14 sq.cm
Area of steel= @.12% of Ac 15 sq.cm
Spacing 20.94 cm c/c
Say 200 cm c/c
At the edge of slab, the mesh bars are free and are not capable of taking full tension. Therefore
20mm dia at 200 c/c circumferentail steel is provided for a length of up to 1.30m from the inner edgeIn the cntral region provide 20mm dia @ 200 c/c both ways
Check for shear
shear force= 607.91 kN
Shear stress 0.52 N/mm2
% of steel= 3.14 %
correction factor= 1.30 k
Permissible shear stress= 0.44 N/mm2
Permissible Shear stress kt 0.57 N/mm2
Balance shear - N/mm2
15
-
7/29/2019 Bridge Pier
16/18
-50.00
0.00
50.00
100.00
150.00
200.00
250.00
0 5.00
STRESS(t/sq.m
)
BASE WIDTH(m)
PIER DESIGN -STRESS AT FOUNDATIONCASE-6 (STRESS ES AT POINT1 & 2)
0.00
50.00
100.00
150.00
200.00
250.00
300.00
0 5.00
STRESS(t/sq.m
)
BASE WIDTH(m)
PIER DESIGN -STRESS AT FOUNDATIONCASE-7 (STRESS ES AT POINT1 & 2)
0.00
50.00
100.00
150.00
200.00
250.00
300.00
350.00
400.00
450.00
0 5.00
STRESS(t/sq.m
)
BASE WIDTH(m)
PIER DESIGN -STRESS AT FOUNDATIONCASE-5. (STRESS ES AT POINT1 & 2)
0.00
20.00
40.00
60.00
80.00
100.00
120.00
140.00
0 5.00
STR
ESS(t/sq.m
)
BASE WIDTH(m)
PIER DESIGN -STRESS AT FOUNDATIONCASE-1 (STRESS ES AT POINT1 & 2)
16
-
7/29/2019 Bridge Pier
17/18
0.00
50.00
100.00
150.00
200.00
250.00
300.00
350.00
0 2.53
STRESS(t/sq.m
)
BASE WIDTH(m)
PIER DESIGN -STRESS AT FOUNDATION
CASE-3(@1 & 3)
0.00
50.00
100.00
150.00
200.00
250.00
0 2.53
STRESS(t/sq.m
)
BASE WIDTH(m)
PIER DESIGN -STRESS AT FOUNDATIONCASE-2(@1 & 2)
122.00
123.00
124.00
125.00
126.00
127.00
128.00
0 5.00
STRESS(t/sq.m
)
BASE WIDTH(m)
PIER DESIGN -STRESS AT FOUNDATIONCASE-2 (STRESS ES AT POINT1 & 3)
0.00
20.00
40.00
60.00
80.00
100.00
120.00
140.00
0 2.53
STRESS(t/sq.m
)
BASE WIDTH(m)
PIER DESIGN -STRESS AT FOUNDATION
CASE-1(POINT@1 & 3)
17
-
7/29/2019 Bridge Pier
18/18
-200.00
-100.00
0.00
100.00
200.00
300.00
400.00
0 2.53STRESS(t/
sq.m
)
BASE WIDTH(m)
PIER DESIGN -STRESS AT FOUNDATIONCASE-3(POINT@1 & 3)
-200.00
-100.00
0.00
100.00
200.00
300.00
400.00
500.00
0 2.53STRESS(t
/sq.m
)
BASE WIDTH(m)
PIER DESIGN -STRESS AT FOUNDATIONCASE-4(POINT@1 & 3)
-50.00
0.00
50.00
100.00
150.00
200.00
250.00
0 2.53
STRESS(t/sq.m
)
BASE WIDTH(m)
PIER DESIGN -STRESS AT FOUNDATIONCASE-5(POINT@1 & 3)
0.00
50.00
100.00
150.00
200.00
250.00
300.00
0 2.53
STRESS(
t/sq.m
)
BASE WIDTH(m)
PIER DESIGN -STRESS AT FOUNDATIONCASE-5(POINT@1 & 3)
18