bric and mint countries’ environmental impacts rising ...€¦ · per capita, and (c)...
TRANSCRIPT
APPENDIX
BRIC and MINT countries’ environmental impacts rising despite alleviative
consumption patterns
Laura Scherera,*, Arjan de Koning
a, Arnold Tukker
a,b
a Institute of Environmental Sciences (CML), Leiden University, Leiden, Netherlands
b Netherlands Organisation for Applied Scientific Research (TNO), The Hague, Netherlands
* Corresponding author. E-mail address: [email protected]
Additional figures
Fig. A1. Environmental impacts of Russia. Columns represent (a) total environmental impacts, (b) environmental impacts per
capita, and (c) environmental impacts per EUR. Red indicates carbon footprints, green indicates land footprints, and blue
indicates water footprints.
Fig. A2. Environmental impacts of India. Columns represent (a) total environmental impacts, (b) environmental impacts per
capita, and (c) environmental impacts per EUR. Red indicates carbon footprints, green indicates land footprints, and blue
indicates water footprints.
Fig. A3. Environmental impacts of China. Columns represent (a) total environmental impacts, (b) environmental impacts per
capita, and (c) environmental impacts per EUR. Red indicates carbon footprints, green indicates land footprints, and blue
indicates water footprints.
Fig. A4. Environmental impacts of Mexico. Columns represent (a) total environmental impacts, (b) environmental impacts
per capita, and (c) environmental impacts per EUR. Red indicates carbon footprints, green indicates land footprints, and blue
indicates water footprints.
Fig. A5. Environmental impacts of Indonesia. Columns represent (a) total environmental impacts, (b) environmental impacts
per capita, and (c) environmental impacts per EUR. Red indicates carbon footprints, green indicates land footprints, and blue
indicates water footprints.
Fig. A6. Environmental impacts of Nigeria. Columns represent (a) total environmental impacts, (b) environmental impacts
per capita, and (c) environmental impacts per EUR. Red indicates carbon footprints, green indicates land footprints, and blue
indicates water footprints.
Fig. A7. Environmental impacts of Turkey. Columns represent (a) total environmental impacts, (b) environmental impacts
per capita, and (c) environmental impacts per EUR. Red indicates carbon footprints, green indicates land footprints, and blue
indicates water footprints.
Fig. A8. Decoupling between household expenditure and environmental footprints in Brazil.
Fig. A9. Decoupling between household expenditure and environmental footprints in Russia.
Fig. A10. Decoupling between household expenditure and environmental footprints in India.
Fig. A11. Decoupling between household expenditure and environmental footprints in China.
Fig. A12. Decoupling between household expenditure and environmental footprints in Mexico.
Fig. A13. Decoupling between household expenditure and environmental footprints in Nigeria.
Fig. A14. Decoupling between household expenditure and environmental footprints in Turkey.
Fig. A15. Projection of environmental impacts by Brazil.
Fig. A16. Projection of environmental impacts by Indonesia.