bray 24 may 2002 arias intensity attenuation
TRANSCRIPT
-
8/3/2019 Bray 24 May 2002 Arias Intensity Attenuation
1/4
-
8/3/2019 Bray 24 May 2002 Arias Intensity Attenuation
2/4
Definition of Arias Intensity
Arias Intensity is defined by Arias (1970) as:
=0
2)(
2dtta
gI
a
Equation 1
where aI is the Arias Intensity in units of length per time, )(ta is the acceleration-time history in
units of g, and g is the acceleration of gravity.
Empirical Equation
The median Arias Intensity can be predicted by Equation 2. Figure 1, shows dependence of thepredicted median Arias Intensity on distance for a strike-slip fault 3 different site categories and 3
different magnitude earthquakes
=)ln( aI
RN
DC
FfFf
SMssSMss
hRcMcMcc
+
++++
+++++
21
22211211
22
4321
))6(())6((
)ln()6/ln()6( Equation 2
where:
aI : Arias Intensity in m/s (average of the
two horizontal components)
M: moment magnitude
R: closest distance to the rupture plane in
km
SC, SD: both 0 for site B, 1 and 0 for site
C, and 0 and 1 for site D
FN, FR: both 0 for strike slip, 1 and 0 fornormal, and 0 and 1 for reverse
or reverse oblique faults
c1, c2, c3, c4, h, s11, s12, s21, s22, f1, and f2:
coefficients determined by the regression
shown in Table 1.
The error term in Equation 2 is normallydistributed with zero mean and standard
Figure 1 Median value of Arias Intensity
against distance for three different site
categories and three different magnitude
earthquakes for a strike-slip fault
-
8/3/2019 Bray 24 May 2002 Arias Intensity Attenuation
3/4
deviation tot . It is dependent on magnitude (M), median Arias Intensity ( aI ), (coefficients are
listed in Table 2) and site category (Table 3).
22 ),()(),,( siteIMsiteIM aatot += Equation 3
0.611 for M 4.7() = 0.611 - 0.0466 (M - 4.7) for 4.7 < M < 7.6 Equation 4
0.476 for M 7.6
1 for aI 0.0132 m/s
(Ia, site) = 1 0.1064 ( ))0132.0ln()ln( aI for 0.0132 < aI < 0.1245 m/s Equation 5
2 for aI 0.1245 m/s
Table 1 Coefficients of Empirical Equation for Median Arias Intensity
c1 c2 c3 c4 h s11 s12 s21 s22 f1 f2
2.799 -1.981 20.724 -1.703 8.775 0.454 0.101 0.479 0.334 -0.166 0.512
Table 2 Parameters for Computation of the Site Dependent Error Term ()
B C D
1 1.181 1.166 0.965
2 0.942 0.972 0.726
Table 3 - Bray and Rodriguez-Marek 1997 Site Classification Scheme
Site Category Description
B Rock, most unweathered California rock cases (Vs 760 m/s or < 6m of soil)
C Weathered soft rock and shallow stiff soil ( < 60 m of soil)
D Deep stiff Holocene or Pleistocene soil ( > 60 m of soil and no soft soils)
Example Calculation
The median and plus one and minus one standard deviation are computed for a typical
earthquake scenario in the Bay Area of a magnitude M=7 strike-slip earthquake at R=10km fromthe fault rupture on a D site .
-
8/3/2019 Bray 24 May 2002 Arias Intensity Attenuation
4/4
Median Arias Intensity
418.0)ln( =aI median 5.1=aI sm/
Error Term
504.0)7.40.7(0466.0611.0)( == M
726.0),( = siteIa , because 1245.0/5.1 >= smIa and Site = D
867.0726.0504.0 22 =+=tot
16% and 84% levels of Arias Intensity
16% 64.0)867.0418.0exp( ==aI sm/
84% 6.3)867.0418.0exp( =+=aI sm/
For further information
See Travasarou et al. (2002) referenced below, or contact Thaleia Travasarou or Jonathan Bray
by e-mail at [email protected] and [email protected].
Acknowledgment
This work was supported in part by the Pacific Earthquake Engineering Research Center throughthe Earthquake Engineering Research Centers Program of the National Science Foundation under
Award Number EEC-9701568.
References
Arias, A. (1970). "A Measure of Earthquake Intensity," R.J. Hansen, ed. Seismic Design for
Nuclear Power Plants, MIT Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts, pp. 438-483.
Bray, J. D. and Rodriguez-Marek, A. (1997). Geotechnical Site Categories, Proceedings, First
PEER-PG&E Workshop on Seismic Reliability of Utility Lifelines, San Francisco, CA, August.
UBC (1997) Uniform Building Code
Travasarou, T., Bray, J.D., and Abrahamson, N.A. (2002). "Empirical Attenuation Relationship
for Arias Intensity," submitted toEarthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics, April, 2002.
Keywords
attenuation relationship, Arias Intensity, engineering demand parameter, ground motion, intensitymeasure, performance