bray 24 may 2002 arias intensity attenuation

Upload: akhilamanne

Post on 06-Apr-2018

212 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

  • 8/3/2019 Bray 24 May 2002 Arias Intensity Attenuation

    1/4

  • 8/3/2019 Bray 24 May 2002 Arias Intensity Attenuation

    2/4

    Definition of Arias Intensity

    Arias Intensity is defined by Arias (1970) as:

    =0

    2)(

    2dtta

    gI

    a

    Equation 1

    where aI is the Arias Intensity in units of length per time, )(ta is the acceleration-time history in

    units of g, and g is the acceleration of gravity.

    Empirical Equation

    The median Arias Intensity can be predicted by Equation 2. Figure 1, shows dependence of thepredicted median Arias Intensity on distance for a strike-slip fault 3 different site categories and 3

    different magnitude earthquakes

    =)ln( aI

    RN

    DC

    FfFf

    SMssSMss

    hRcMcMcc

    +

    ++++

    +++++

    21

    22211211

    22

    4321

    ))6(())6((

    )ln()6/ln()6( Equation 2

    where:

    aI : Arias Intensity in m/s (average of the

    two horizontal components)

    M: moment magnitude

    R: closest distance to the rupture plane in

    km

    SC, SD: both 0 for site B, 1 and 0 for site

    C, and 0 and 1 for site D

    FN, FR: both 0 for strike slip, 1 and 0 fornormal, and 0 and 1 for reverse

    or reverse oblique faults

    c1, c2, c3, c4, h, s11, s12, s21, s22, f1, and f2:

    coefficients determined by the regression

    shown in Table 1.

    The error term in Equation 2 is normallydistributed with zero mean and standard

    Figure 1 Median value of Arias Intensity

    against distance for three different site

    categories and three different magnitude

    earthquakes for a strike-slip fault

  • 8/3/2019 Bray 24 May 2002 Arias Intensity Attenuation

    3/4

    deviation tot . It is dependent on magnitude (M), median Arias Intensity ( aI ), (coefficients are

    listed in Table 2) and site category (Table 3).

    22 ),()(),,( siteIMsiteIM aatot += Equation 3

    0.611 for M 4.7() = 0.611 - 0.0466 (M - 4.7) for 4.7 < M < 7.6 Equation 4

    0.476 for M 7.6

    1 for aI 0.0132 m/s

    (Ia, site) = 1 0.1064 ( ))0132.0ln()ln( aI for 0.0132 < aI < 0.1245 m/s Equation 5

    2 for aI 0.1245 m/s

    Table 1 Coefficients of Empirical Equation for Median Arias Intensity

    c1 c2 c3 c4 h s11 s12 s21 s22 f1 f2

    2.799 -1.981 20.724 -1.703 8.775 0.454 0.101 0.479 0.334 -0.166 0.512

    Table 2 Parameters for Computation of the Site Dependent Error Term ()

    B C D

    1 1.181 1.166 0.965

    2 0.942 0.972 0.726

    Table 3 - Bray and Rodriguez-Marek 1997 Site Classification Scheme

    Site Category Description

    B Rock, most unweathered California rock cases (Vs 760 m/s or < 6m of soil)

    C Weathered soft rock and shallow stiff soil ( < 60 m of soil)

    D Deep stiff Holocene or Pleistocene soil ( > 60 m of soil and no soft soils)

    Example Calculation

    The median and plus one and minus one standard deviation are computed for a typical

    earthquake scenario in the Bay Area of a magnitude M=7 strike-slip earthquake at R=10km fromthe fault rupture on a D site .

  • 8/3/2019 Bray 24 May 2002 Arias Intensity Attenuation

    4/4

    Median Arias Intensity

    418.0)ln( =aI median 5.1=aI sm/

    Error Term

    504.0)7.40.7(0466.0611.0)( == M

    726.0),( = siteIa , because 1245.0/5.1 >= smIa and Site = D

    867.0726.0504.0 22 =+=tot

    16% and 84% levels of Arias Intensity

    16% 64.0)867.0418.0exp( ==aI sm/

    84% 6.3)867.0418.0exp( =+=aI sm/

    For further information

    See Travasarou et al. (2002) referenced below, or contact Thaleia Travasarou or Jonathan Bray

    by e-mail at [email protected] and [email protected].

    Acknowledgment

    This work was supported in part by the Pacific Earthquake Engineering Research Center throughthe Earthquake Engineering Research Centers Program of the National Science Foundation under

    Award Number EEC-9701568.

    References

    Arias, A. (1970). "A Measure of Earthquake Intensity," R.J. Hansen, ed. Seismic Design for

    Nuclear Power Plants, MIT Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts, pp. 438-483.

    Bray, J. D. and Rodriguez-Marek, A. (1997). Geotechnical Site Categories, Proceedings, First

    PEER-PG&E Workshop on Seismic Reliability of Utility Lifelines, San Francisco, CA, August.

    UBC (1997) Uniform Building Code

    Travasarou, T., Bray, J.D., and Abrahamson, N.A. (2002). "Empirical Attenuation Relationship

    for Arias Intensity," submitted toEarthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics, April, 2002.

    Keywords

    attenuation relationship, Arias Intensity, engineering demand parameter, ground motion, intensitymeasure, performance