brandology semio2014

32
Brandology: New Generation of Marketing Knowledge assist. prof. Dimitar Trendafilov, PhD New Bulgarian University – Sofia Round table: “Semiotics of Brand”, 17-18 th of Sept. 2014 Chairmen: prof. Antonio Caro-Almela, PhD and assist. prof. Dimitar Trendafilov, PhD XII World Congress of Semiotics (IASS/AIS) New Bulgarian University - Sofia, Bulgaria ‘New Semiotics. Between Tradition and Innovation’ 16-20 th of September 2014, Sofia

Upload: dimitar-trendafilov-phd

Post on 14-Jul-2015

115 views

Category:

Education


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Brandology Semio2014

Brandology: New Generation of

Marketing Knowledge

assist. prof. Dimitar

Trendafilov, PhD

New Bulgarian University –

Sofia

Round table: “Semiotics of Brand”, 17-18th

of

Sept. 2014

Chairmen: prof. Antonio Caro-Almela, PhD and assist. prof. Dimitar

Trendafilov, PhD

XII World Congress of Semiotics (IASS/AIS)New Bulgarian University -

Sofia, Bulgaria

‘New Semiotics. Between Tradition and Innovation’16-20th

of September 2014, Sofia

Page 2: Brandology Semio2014

IntroductionThe brand discourse exceeded the corporations’ boardrooms and

business schools auditoria probably in the early 90’s and entered the

agenda of sociology, anthropology, linguistics, etc. This fact

demonstrates two fundamental changes – brands are not discussion

topic reserved only for marketers any longer, since obviously it’s more a

socio-cultural phenomenon than strictly commercial one, and in the

same time, marketers and the new generation of managers should be

ten time more careful for and prepared dealing with the brand matter.

“Brandology” is neither newly born buzz nor yet convenient academic

mix of management, modern social media theories and applied

semiotics. Yet it’s something more. Therefore, despite of its a little bit

pretentious ‘-ology’ ending, such a ‘science’ or at least ‘discipline’

deserves more attention since it offers different knowledge beyond the

sum of the well-known marketing mix and communication theories that

have been dominating the topic recently.

Page 3: Brandology Semio2014

“McDonalization”

(mid 90’s) was a multilevel metaphor describing increasing role of brands

Source: “Dark Shadows”, Warner Bros. Picture, 2012

Mephistopheles!!!

Page 4: Brandology Semio2014

Standing on the shoulders of giants…

Aaker

(1991, 1996) -

Keller (1998, 2001) –

Kotler

(2010) contributions

Brand

Page 5: Brandology Semio2014

…but…the “brand equity” concept redirected branding from the boardrooms to the realm of people seeking for their attention and attitude. Media, lifestyles, symbolic exchange, subcultures, cool factors, online communications and value adding lead the agenda of the complex relationship between production and socio-cultural environment of today.

Brand topic tuned to be common axis for usually different and distant scientific discourses – sociology, anthropology, (social) psychology, etc., which together form the new knowledge network on this phenomenon.

New Wave – markets are more social and communicative than ever before. Brands as a part and active agents of culture came into the stage.

Page 6: Brandology Semio2014

“Consumerization

Continuum” Mary Goodyear (1996)

Selling

Marketing

Classic Branding

Postmodern Marketing

Consumer Driven Branding

Brands as IconsSymbolic Advertising

Creative ResearchSegmentation Based on Usage

Saturated Marketplace

Company BrandsCynical ConsumerDistructured

Advertising

Needs-based SegmentationElectronic Data Capture

till late 80’s

Page 7: Brandology Semio2014

Why (not) Brandology?

Futurology, Spanglish…?

Hi, I’m BrandFuturist!

Age of HybridSciences and

Interdisciplinarity

Try to forget the past…

not the brand!

Images: http://www.gizmag.com/martin-lindstrom-makes-times-top-100/11617/

& woopig.net/board/index.php?topic=83114.125

[13.09.2014]

Page 8: Brandology Semio2014

(Brand) Knowledge /1

Science (= "knowledge") is a enterprise that

builds and organizes knowledge in the form of

and about the universe. Also

refers to a body of knowledge itself, of the type that can

be rationally explained and reliably applied.

Source: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Science

[01.09.2014]

systemic

predictions

testable

explanations

Page 9: Brandology Semio2014

(Brand) Knowledge /2

Knowledge is a familiarity, awareness or understanding of

someone or something, such as facts, information, descriptions,

or skills, which is acquired through experience or education by

perceiving, discovering, or learning. Knowledge can refer to a

. It can be

implicit (as with practical skill or expertise) or explicit (as with

the theoretical understanding of a subject); it can be more or

less formal or systematic.

Source: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Knowledge

[01.09.2014]

theoretical or practical understanding of a subject

Page 10: Brandology Semio2014

(Brand) Knowledge /3

A discipline (= specialism) is knowledge or a concentration in

one . A discipline

incorporates expertise, people, projects, communities,

challenges, studies, inquiry, and research areas that are strongly

associated with academic areas of study or areas of professional

practice.

The scientific method is a body of techniques for investigating

phenomena, acquiring , or and

previous knowledge.

Source: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Discipline_(academia)

/ http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Scientific_method

[01.09.2014]

integratingnew knowledge

academic field of study or profession

correcting

Page 11: Brandology Semio2014

Brand Knowledge /4

Everything aforementioned witnesses that nowadays we have

new, independent of marketing, object of study and a huge range

of perspectives as well as big data-base on it:

systemicpredictions

testable

explanations

theoretical or practical understanding of a subjectintegrating

new knowledgeacademic field of study or profession

correctingIn brief, it’s business-oriented social science

Page 12: Brandology Semio2014

Brand Knowledge vs. Brand Knowledge

“From the perspective of the CBBE model,

brand knowledge is the key to creating

brand equity, because it creates the

differential effect that drives brand equity.

What marketers need, then, is an insightful way

to represent how brand knowledge exists in

consumer memory”

Image: http://www.tuck.dartmouth.edu/newsroom/articles/brand-champion

[10.09.2014]

Kevin L. Keller (2012)

Consumer perspective [memory-recall system], but what exists in the managers’

mind?

Page 13: Brandology Semio2014

Brand Knowledge vs. Brand Knowledge

In the first place, manager has to have knowledge on brand on his/her

part, in order to be able to create brand equity (as a knowledge for

given brand) as a specific relation with consumers.

Prof. Keller’s detailed explanations and bulk of examples are highly

useful to understand how brand equity (i.e. inimitable value of

particular brand) could work successfully, considering consumer’s

psychological and economical characteristics, but not what is it “by

nature”.

The management perspective is at least as much important as the

consumer’s one, thus, the statement is that semiotics was the key that

opened the gates for new knowledge on brand and branding…

Page 14: Brandology Semio2014

Brand Knowledge vs. Brand Knowledge

Images: www.flickr.com

& www.rickscloud.com

[11.09.2014]

The power of science is in examining the objects and phenomena in various perspectives and to fix objective laws.

Semiotics is known with its focus on sign systems, their social use and life as well as on knowledge creation and sharing. It maintains that we are not able to know our world without signs mediation…

…therefore, it is natural to be powerful and useful enough to help managers to understand and control their brand in better manner.

Page 15: Brandology Semio2014

Where Brand Came from?Classical marketing theory can’t answer this question easily. Historically brand is highly bonded up with Product since, first and foremost, a brand should stand on something and, secondly, for something.

Properly speaking, communication in the broad sense (i.e. not only in terms of Promotion – took narrowly as “communication”, but Placement, which makes Points-of-Contact, and Price, which most often is a tool for quality indication) is what fills up the simple “name”with associations, motivation, images, and added value (eventually). Hence, brands speak to us and we speak to them and through them in an endless and intensive process.

Consumer culture, in fact, supported by global media and growingtrade connections worldwide, provided the infrastructure needed for the “brandelution” that burst approx. in late 80’s.

Page 16: Brandology Semio2014

Art/Design

Product/s

Promotion/Communication

POS/P

BRAND

Social lifeBrand Community

Brand Meaning/Concept (management)

IP/TM

Augmented reality/Theme parks

Media

Online presence

The more communication means we have the bigger and more intensified consumption of signs, images, myths, lifestyles, etc.

Why Brand is a Complex Phenomenon?

Corp. Reputation

Page 17: Brandology Semio2014

What the Famous AMA’s Definition Says about It?

"A brand is a customer experience represented by a collection of images and ideas; often, it refers to a symbol such as a name, logo, slogan, and design scheme. Brand recognition and other reactionsare created by the accumulation of experiences with the specific product or service, both directly relating to its use and through the influence of advertising, design, and media commentary.“

Hence, the contemporary notion encompasses brand as a concept/entity, the aggregation of virtual and real contact with it, and the crucial role of media. But put in semiotic terms, we aretalking about a collection or combination of signs and process of symbolic exchange.

Source: https://www.ama.org/resources/Pages/Dictionary.aspx?dLetter=B

[10.09.2014]

Page 18: Brandology Semio2014

Therefore…

…a brand has several different dimensions as:

Business format (managerial strategic approach to the segment/s and competition)…

Product (attributes, benefits, innovations)…

Medium (something to speak for, company’s communication platform)…

Cultural leader (communities, symbolicity, rituals, values)…

Social mediator (identification, events, interpersonal messages)…

Experience provider…

From top to bottom consumers have at their disposal more and more ways to ‘meet’

brands and to decide their fates by participation both in

their production process and social life.

Page 19: Brandology Semio2014

So, let’s deconstruct it…

Image: www.iconfinder.com

Page 20: Brandology Semio2014

BRAND(entity)

BRANDING(set of acts/-ivities)

SOCIOCULTURE

Verbal

VisualSpace

SoundsValues

Channels

General Positioning

FashionW-of-M

Communities/Sub-cultures

Experience

Competitors

Product placement

IdentitiesInner

Branding

‘Entity’

is not a ‘thing’, an object, but living unit in the Universe no matter actual or

fictive.

The Core…

Responsibility

Global trade

brand concept

Page 21: Brandology Semio2014

BRAND(entity)

BRANDING(set of acts/-ivities)

SOCIOCULTURE

Verbal

VisualSpace

SoundsValues

Channels

General Positioning

FashionW-of-M

Communities/Sub-cultures

Experience

Competitors

Product placement

IdentitiesInner

Branding

Responsibility

Global trade

The Action…

‘Branding’

means making one brand happening, to create its sign system visible on the

market landscape/map (from name and packaging to retail/online space and communities).

Page 22: Brandology Semio2014

BRAND(entity)

BRANDING(set of acts/-ivities)

SOCIOCULTURE

Verbal

VisualSpace

SoundsValues

Channels

General Positioning

FashionW-of-M

Communities/Sub-cultures

Experience

Competitors

Product placement

IdentitiesInner

Branding

Responsibility

Global trade

The Infrastructure…

“Socioculture”

is a structured but liable to change environment driven by communication,

e.g. various sign systems and channels, shared meanings, subjects, institutions, etc.

Page 23: Brandology Semio2014

BRAND(entity)

BRANDING(set of acts/-ivities)

SOCIOCULTURE

Verbal

VisualSpace

SoundsValuesChannels

General Positioning

FashionW-of-M

Communities/Sub-cultures

Experience

Competitors

Product placement

IdentitiesInner

Branding

Responsibility

Global trade

“Meaning”

should be considered as “producing meaning”

(= process)…

… since it is not fixed and needs context and interpretation in action ...

Page 24: Brandology Semio2014

Brand Meaning = Consumer Brand EquityEverything valuable in life and in market is meaningful, especially consumer-oriented brands, no matter in which (FMCG, luxury, sports goods etc.) sector they usually operate.

Meaning gives one stable reason to consumer to buy many times, to prefer, to have positive attitude, to seek and to share information and his/her interest/s with other consumers.

As Mark Batey puts it, meaning “refers to the semantic and symbolic features of the brand, the sum of the fundamental conscious and unconscious elements that compose the consumer’s mental representation of the brand” (2008:111 ff). In other words, brand is multidimensional entity (again) since it embraces public and personal, rational and emotional, prominent and hidden layers but somehow consistent. Just like our brain which reflects and tidy up the experience we have every day.

Page 25: Brandology Semio2014

What’s the role of Brand Semiotics then?

Yuri Lotman

Analogy is not a mare figure of speech but a scientific method which allows us to draw out the deepest specificities and characteristics of the object under study.

It’s like…

It reminds me of…

As if it’s…

Let’s imagine that…

Could be a parallel…

Page 26: Brandology Semio2014

So, Any Useful Analogy?

If Market is like a Cellar Full with Brands put in Barrels,

then Brand Semiotics Studies…

Please, Anyone!?

Page 27: Brandology Semio2014

…THE ANGEL’S SHARE

Images: http://www.architecturelist.com/2011/09/02/spanish-interiors-wine-cellars-for-vega-sicilia-by-fernando-salas/

& https://www.pinterest.com/major42/party-like-a-king/

[11.09.2014]

Page 28: Brandology Semio2014

What Brand Semiotics Studies?

Brand equity is neither a company’s property nor shareholders’, but

stakeholders’. Wine and whiskey lose about 2% of their liquid

annually during the maturing process but this makes them of high

quality.

Don’t get me wrong though! In fact, there are no angels in the

market and semiotics deals with real people but they are true angels

that makes our brand/s strong and resisting against the competition

despite of all the whims, fads and continuously changing moods.

The ‘spirit’ that our brands lose from their products year after year

transforms itself in (“human” as Kotler et al. put it, 2010) spirit of

loyalty and commitment that build meaningful long-lasting brands.

Page 29: Brandology Semio2014

What Brand Semiotics Studies?

Metalanguage (description/deconstruction) of brand and branding

activities which goes beyond the usual market/ing discourse.

(let’s repeat once again) “…correcting and integrating the previous

knowledge and acquires new one…” (in marketing, consumer

behavior, Globalization, material culture, cognition, etc.)

It discusses and addresses the future more than the present (trends

observation, meaning management, ads pre-testing, etc.).

Could be helpful with respect both with every single element or act

of brand/ing and with the whole entity (i.e. single sign and entire sign

system of a given brand).

Page 30: Brandology Semio2014

New Brand Knowledge in Education

Bearing in mind what has been said, new look on the topic and new approach in teaching in branding and brand management should be adopt, no matter if we consider higher education or companies’ inner training. Branding is another/next level of doing marketing.

More knowledge in humanities, cultural and social sciences should be put in management courses’ curricula to enrich and widen the market picture in branding. Moreover, a lot of people overlook the fact that, by its very essence, marketing is not a mathematical but social discipline, dealing with resources/products allocation (put simply) – an activity as old as human history and culturally constructed.

Also, case studies, especially cross-cultural and consumer behavior ones, could make the matter more clear and human-oriented than tables and figures actually do.

Page 31: Brandology Semio2014

Aaker, David A. (1991), Managing Brand Equity. Capitalizing on the Value of a Brand Name, New York: The Free Press;

Aaker, David A. (1996), Building Strong Brands, New York: The Free Press;

Arvidsson, Adam (2006), Brands. Meaning and Value in Media Culture, USA/Canada: Routledge;

Batey, Mark (2008), Brand Meaning, New York/London: Routledge;

Chevalier, Michel and Mazzalovo, Gerald (2004), Pro Logo. Brands as a Factor of Progress, Hampshire, New York: Palgrave Macmillan;

Codeluppi, Vanni (2001), Il Potere della Marca. Disney, McDonald’s, Nike, e le altre (The Power of Brand. Disney, McDonald’s and the Others), Italy: Bollati Boringhieri.

Floch, Jean-Marie (2001), Semiotics, Marketing and Communication, Houndmills/New York: Palgrave Publishers Ltd;

Fog, Klaus, Budtz, Christian, Munch, Philip, and Blanchette, Stephen (2010[2001]), Storytelling. Branding in Practice (2nd ed.), Berlin/Heidelberg/London: Springer;

Holt, Douglas and Cameron, Douglas (2010), Cultural Strategy. Using Innovative Ideologies to Build Breakthrough Brands, Oxford/New York: Oxford University Press;

Keller, Kevin L. (1998), Strategic Brand Management. Building, Measuring, and Managing Brand Equity, New Jersey: Prentice Hall, Inc.;

Keller, Kevin L., Apéria, Toni, Georgson, Mats (2012), Strategic Brand Management. A European Perspective (2nd ed.), Harlow, England: Pearson Education Ltd;

Klein, Naomi (2000), No Logo,UK: Flamingo.

Kornberger, Martin (2010), Brand Society. How Brands Transform Management and Lifestyle, Cambridge University Press;

Kotler, Philip, Kartajaya, Hermawan and Setiawan, Iwan (2010), Marketing 3.0., Haboken, NJ: Wiley & Sons, Inc.;

Lury, Celia (2004), Brands. The Logos of the Global Economy, London/New York: Routledge;

Marrone, Gianfranco (2007), Il Discorso di Marca. Modelli Semiotici Per il Branding, Roma-Bari: Laterza&Figli;

McCracken, Grant (2005), Culture and Consumption II. Markets, Meaning and Brand Management, Bloomington, USA: Indiana University Press;Mick, David Glen and Oswald, Laura (2006), The Semiotic Paradigm on Meaning in the Marketplace, in “Handbook of Qualitative Research Methods in Marketing”, Belk, Russell W. (ed.), Cheltenham, UK/Northhampton, MA, USA: Edward Elgar Publishing, pp. 31 – 45.

Oswald, Laura R. (2012), Marketing Semiotics. Signs, Strategies, and Brand Value, Oxford/New York: Oxford University Press;

Ritzer, George (1993), The McDonaldization of Society, Fine Forge Press;

Sherrington, Mark (2003), Added Value. The Alchemy of Brand-led Growth, UK: Palgrave Macmillan.

Wan

naKn

ow M

ore?

Page 32: Brandology Semio2014

THANK YOU FOR YOUR ATTENTION !

[email protected]://newbulgarian.academia.edu/DimitarTrendafilov

©2014Extended version