br302252 · head recovery va horner till i well g-4 s->-test no. 4 berks landrll 1^0-34. ......

NOVEMBER 1084 TABLE 1 , 813-6773REMEDIAL INVESTIGATION, BERKS LANDFILL

SUMMARY OF HYDROGEOLOGIC TEST RESULTS

WELL • G-4TESTNO. • ' . - ' . . - : , . - 4 - - . . ' •

DRILL ROD DIAMETERBOREHOLE DIAMETERBOREHOLE DEPTH (FEET BELOW GROUND SURFACE)

LENGTH TESTEDDEPTH RANGE OF TESTED ZONEDEPTH OF ZONE BELOW PACKER ASSEMBLY TO BOTTOM OF BOREHOLEDEPTH OF ZONE ABOVE PACKER ASSEMBLY TO WATER LEVEL

STICK-UP 'TOP OF CASINO ELEVATIONGROUND SURFACE ELEVATION

1 • ' - - , ' - ' I * _ ' - - ' . '

DEPTH TO WATER (BELOW TOP OF CASING)GROUNDWATER ELEVATION

INITIAL HYDRAULIC HEAD (Hi)HYDRAULIC HEAD AT THE BEGINING OF SLUG TEST (Ho*)MAXIMUM HYDRAULIC HEAD DIFFERENCE (Hi- Hot) ,HYDRAULIC HEAD AT THE BEGINING OF RECOVERY TEST (Hoi)HYDRAULIC HEAD DIFFERENCE (Ho»- HOT)

TEST ELAPSED TIME TO BEGINING OF SLUG TEST (t:T«0)TEST ELAPSED TIME TO BEGININQ OF RECOVERY TEST ft T • 0) ,

2.65 INCH3.78 INCH

277.00 FT BGS -

,20.60 FT135.05 FT BGS TO 166.45 FT BGS158.45 FT BGS TO 277.00 FT BGS0.10 FT BGS TO 133.05 FT BGS

13.00 FT465.00 FTMSL :. " .482.00 FTMSL .

12.10 FEET BELOW TOO452.81 .FTMSL

452.05 FT420.76 FT23 0 FT

. 448.61 FT16.78 FT

20.13 MIN32.33 MIN

SLUG TESTRESULTS OF HVORSLEV ANALYSIS

(W-H1V(HI-H2)(T2-Tl)x60HYDRAULIC CONDUCTIVITY

TR2DATA16.76102.00 SEC6.0E-04 CM/S

RECOVERYTESTRESULTS OF HORNER ANALYSIS

AVERAGE FLOW RATEd(HYDRAUUC HEAD)/dILOQ CT/T)1HYDRAULIC CONDUCTIVITY ,

1.3804 GPMNANA CM/S

BR302252

IoLU

LU>O

o:

•(/)' £"Do . • • «£ _ ow r •*• • H M

i' i

J2

LU2 +

I D ^ C M O 00 tO^ C M ' O 00 * O ^ - CMO 00l O i f J m IT) •* •* ^ 's*- •* fO IO IO K V r O C M•* •¥'.•* •* ^ "fr • * • * • * • * • * • * •* ,•*••* "*

(isn u) av3H onnvaaxH

•«• N*5 913-6773DSL

AS SHOWN08/17/93PA21-344

Msueirafi 11

ARITHMETIC PLOT OFHYDRAULIC HEAD vs TIME

WELL G-4TEST No. 4

Colder Associates BERKS LANDRLL 1 0-32

i i i i i

04

00CM

04

CM

PLJ2 +

CM »— ,

COO

CM ^ tO 00 T- CM ^ <O 00 CM CM - tO CO IOO' ". O- O' O. I »- »- r^ '. *-J I CM CM CM CM I • rv«I I I I I I I I I I I I C S J

. ' • ' . - . . ' ' ' ' . • - • • ' . - . - ; / . • ' • • " ' C D. . • . ' • • • • ' . - . . • ' • . : . • - - c o.'"/'•• • • ' . . • - • . - . • • . • • • , - . o s .

OLLVa OV3H

joe NO: .913-6773 AS SHOWN08/17/93PA21-368

SEMILOQ PLOT OFHEAD RATIO V8 TIME

WELL G-4TEST No. 4

Golder Associates G-33

,; h1ori£1 1 I* !G

•~> «Om

(T R

O °j,0 #LU ~

KLU ,

- z:OX

. . . . - . ' , . . ' . • ' " . ' . ; . • " ; . .

. ' ' , . . ' ,

" % . • • ' ' • '

•

' }

. l • -.• - •

' -f'

±

1 ,

1 . -

\

\V

1 •-

' ' •" ' • '1 1 1 1 1 ^ 1 1

tO ^ CM O CO . tO -<fr CM

(id) QV3H OH

X»KU 913-6773««* DSL .0*8* C5K--

y $LiO •

sw«: AS SHOWNo*™» 08/17/93nuH*i PA21-355M SJ8TI1V& I)

Colder Associates

«

.' '- . -

• ' . • ' • ' "..' • ' ' • ' ' . -

••'•' ' ' ' : . - . . - ,

" "• ' . ' .^

: • .. ' ' •' -

- - . • • . —

.' ' • / .• .

• |-

' . . • ' ' . • ' • ' • '——

\

. . ' " • , - * . • • • _ _

•' '.' ' - - . - ''•

^

--, '•'• ". ': ',: --*.

• ' . - " • • • - .

..;•'; .. . ••• -;. "*.

i i i i i i

-: - -

O' r

CM01 . - • . - .

6\ ' ' • . '

to. : ' •o " • . ' ' ' -

• • :

00 ' ' ' '.' .Q ' . ;I • , . ' •

T p_ .si CM^ • •-CM §

T "*,:"4- : ':\JT ,-'*: '•'•••'T00 ; "' ; ':

T ' . ''V-V'.CM " .1 ; . • .

.. . , • " • :O 00 tO ^ CM O 00•<t.K) t O f O tO lO CM

• " • ' • ' • ' ••-'-. .' • . , .

SEMILOQ PLOT OF .-HEAD RECOVERY va HORNER Till i

WELL G-4 S->-TEST No. 4

BERKS LANDRLL 1 0-34

NOVEMBER 1894 TABLE 1 013-6773• BERKS LANDFILL. REMEDIAL INVESTIGATION

SUMMARY OF HYDROGEOLOGIC TEST RESULTS «

WELL G-4TESTNO. $


LENGTHTESTEDDEPTH RANGEOFTESTED ZONEZONE BELOW PACKER ASSEMBLY TO BOTTOM OF BOREHOLEZONE ABOVE PACKER ASSEMBLY TO WATER LEVEL

STICK-UPTOP OF CASING ELEVATIONGROUND SURFACE ELEVATION ' . . ^ '.

DEPTH TO WATER (BELOW TOP OF CASING)GROUNDWATER ELEVATION - , " . ' .

INITIAL HYDRAULIC HEAD (Hi)HYDRAULIC HEAD AT START OF SLUG TEST (Hos)MAXIMUM HYDRAULIC HEAD DIFFERENCE (Hi • Hos) 'HYDRAULIC HEAD AT START OF RECOVERY TEST (Hot)HYDRAULIC HEAD DIFFERENCE (Hos - Hor)

ELAPSED TIME TO START OF SLUG TEST ft T«0) 'ELAPSED TIME TO START OF RECOVERY TEST ft T«0)

2*5 INCH3.78 INCH

277.00 FT BGS

20.60 FT115.85 FT BGS TO 138.45 FT BGS138.45 FT BGS TO 277.00 FT BGS0.46 FT BGS TO 113.05 FT BGS

3.00 FT465.00 FTMSL482.00 FTMSL •

12:48 FEET BELOW TOO452.64 FTMSL

452.69 FT434.91 FT17.68 FT452.64 FT17.63 FT

41.00 MIN43.63 MIN

1 • • • • • •


(HI-H1V(Hi-H2) : " ' . "(T2-T1)JC60HYDRAULIC CONDUCTIVITY ,

TR2DATA TR4DATA6 3 . - 6.73

103.80 SEC 103.80 SEC8.3E-04 CM/S 7.43E-04 CM/S

RECOVERY TEST . .RESULTS OF HORNER ANALYSIS

AVERAGE FLOW RATEd(HYDRAUUC HEAD)/d[LOG (T/DtHYDRAULIC CONDUCTIVITY

• "

2.70 GPMNANA CM/S

FDt:g4HtS.«k1

/

(is/rid) av3H

JMN«I 913-6773o*Bft DSL

AS SHOWN08/17/93

nu MM PA21-345tl


WELLQ-4TEST No. 5

Giddier Associates BERKS LANDRa C-3

o »- CM ro •<*• in to N ,oq o> »- w CM • K) < m to i^o d d o o. o "'d "o d I •-• ^ ^ ^ ^ ^: I I I I I I I I I I I I i l l i

(id) ouva QV3H onnvaoAH NI

JOB ito: 913-6773M BITS 0SLCMC Vti

WV IT.

AS SHOWNOATS 08/17/93

PA21-869OR

8EMILOQ PLOT OFHEAD RATIO vs TIME

WELL G-4TEST No. 5

Golder Associates BERKS LANDFILL 1 0-36

O

LUt

,o • * • j s

a:o

I I I I I I

.foQ_>-

CM £

^3 '• ... \ ..: ••••:"-.•• -|7 s+'R«O •**

to^ i toT

LU00

CMd

I

todI

I

CM

oo <o •* CM CM po tc; ^ CM "• oq to ^ CM o oq too i c M CM cM'2 *- r-'^ ^ 2 - d odd 2 oioiin m 10 ' «n . m m t n m ^ m m m m ^ •* «*••

(ISVM id) av3H onnvaoAH

913-6773OSL

««•»


PA21-366on susmict

SEMILOQ PLOT OFHEAD RECOVERY V8 HORNER

WELL G-4TEST No. 5

Golder Associates BERKS LANORnounC-37

NOVEMBER 1W4 TABLE 1 613-e773BERKS LANDFILL. REMEDIAL INVESTIGATION ,


WELL G-4TEST NO. 6 DUPLICATE

DRILL ROD DIAMETERBOREHOLE DIAMETER 'BOREHOLE DEPTH (FEET BELOW GROUND SURFACE)

LENGTH TESTEDDEPTH RANGE OF TESTED ZONEZONE BELOW PACKER ASSEMBLY TO BOTTOM OF BOREHOLEZONE ABOVE PACKER ASSEMBLY TO WATER LEVEL

STICK-UPTOP OF CASING ELEVATIONGROUND SURFACE ELEVATION

DEPTH TO WATER (BELOW TOP OF CASING) .GROUNDWATER ELEVATION

INITIAL HYDRAULIC HEAD (Hi) ' • V~HYDRAULIC HEAD AT START OF SLUG TEST (Ho*) ..MAXIMUM HYDRAULIC HEAD DIFFERENCE (Hi - Hos)HYDRAULIC HEAD AT START OF RECOVERY TEST (Hor)HYDRAULIC HEAD DIFFERENCE (Ho* -Hor) /

ELAPSED TIME TO START OF SLUG TEST (t; T«0)ELAPSED TIME TO START OF RECOVERY TEST (t: T«0)

2.65 INCH3.78 INCH

277.00 FT BGS

.20.80 FT116.85 FT BGS TO 13645138.45 FT BGS TO 277.008 7 FT BGS TO 116.85

3JX> FT465.00 FTMSL462.00 FTMSL

12.27 FEET BELOW TOO452.73 FTMSL

452.88 FT435 6 FT17.63 FT452.W FT17.47 FT

38.23 MIN .40.63 MIN

FT BGSFT BGSFT BGS

. -

' • ' • ' • • -*. ' .

SLUGTEST .RESULTS OF HVORSLEV ANALYSIS

' . ' . • • . " • ' • ' .(Hi-H1«Hi-H2)(T2-T1)xeOHYDRAULIC CONDUCTIVITY

TR2DATA TR4DATA1.82 - NA40.20 SEC 40.20

7.6E-04 CM/S NASECCM/S

RECOVERYTEST iRESULTS OF HORNER ANALYSIS

AVERAGE FLOW RATE •dCHYDRAUUC HEAD) /d[LOG (T/THHYDRAULIC CONDUCTIVITY

- , • • ' • • '

3.31 GPMNA :NA C*VS

FH*:g4tst6b.wfc

•<*• io CM » - o o » oo .f» to in •* ro CM *- o o> oo- •

id) QV3H

*•"»« 913-6773

CMStt

AS SHOWNturn, . 08/17/93«"*» PA21-348MSUBD1U&

ARITHMETIC PLOT OFHYDRAULIC HEAD V3 TIME

WELL G-4TESTNo.58

o

Golder Associates BERKS LANDRLL/.———AR3Q2261 C-38

CO O> «- ' »- CM IO

(id) ouva QV3H onnvycUH

JOB no: 913-6773OR itsCMC IT.

AS SHOWNDATE 08/17/93

PA21-370CRSU8WIE:

SEMILOQ PLOT OFHEAD RATIO vs TIME

WELL G-4TEST N0.5DUP

Golder Associates BERKS LANDRLL C-39

1

h10.•-J_iLU p3: trl '?h- toO •-J P.A t£ *LI, mUJ ]> 0 1OI I «1 1 1 5*te

rv i-L-t- I/)LU

CT ". LUz:C£OX

1 1 1 1 l - l 1 1 1 I I I .

.' . •'•''-' ' ''" •.. ' - • • . - . . • .

. ' i ' p L - .

\ . . • -

3 &. ' ' ' " ' • ' • • • ' ~• » - ' • • ' , . ' . • • ' .

! ~§. ' ' ' "

^ ' ' ''"'."'- . • ' . ' - • ' • -

+ '- '' ' ' ' ' •" • ' ' • '. .' -'''" • i" ' .•'.••''••• " ' . : •'• \ ' ' ' " ' ' • ' ' • • • • • ; : • . '"'"••• • V ' '• '. :; ; /'"•'.• t ' ,:._.• '. • .."•/ .

T ' " ' • ' • - : - ' ' ' ~-; ' I •'.-'.. ' • '. .'..'.• .'...' •'' ".'. .

- . . . \ • . ' ' • ' ' ' • • ' • ' . ' . ' • • ' '' ' A ' ' ' ' '•: '. '' . • . ' ' '.;•' ' ' " ' -

T • ' > • • •• -" ' : I • * • • • » ' '.' ; \' ' " • • ' ' • ' - ' ' , : '.:

•- \\ . + . ; •'• /•. •'• • ' \- ; •. ; '..-

• • • • - • ' ' . ' ' • . • ' • • \•~ ~ . • . • • " . ' ' > '.'.' ,' • • • i " ' '

. . . • < . ' ' . . ' . ' " . ' . . - • ' •". ' p • ' •'• ~ • • •f '' • • ~ «1 ' . , '' * '

i i i i i i i i i i i i i i i i i i i

(

O

CMd1

. .-dI 'tod ..-."-,

00d!

T F_•>.P-fl\

2 ,§ +-1 ' "'

'"t ' '•T«> •'T00 . ' \1

CM ;i ' . :

m - * t o c M » - o o > o o r ^ t o i n ' ^ - t o c M ' - o o > o o i > . t o i ni n i n i n m i n m ' ^ ' * t ' 4 ' ^ i ^ - < < t ' ' ^ - ' ^ - i < < - t o t o t o t o i o•*-^'*-^--*'«*-^-<^- •* •<* •* .«*—*•*•* •* •* •* •* •* "4-» ' . . • •

' • . . . ; ' . • - . " ' • ' - , • • • . ' ' . - . •

Cisw id) QV3H onnvaoxH . •

. ,\

'•

. -i

. . . . • •

t ' '-~ -\, w

/ .

. '' - •(

COA£»CMCMCDCOm«t

*»«" 913-6773 *** AS SHOWN SEMILOQ PLOT OP°*« osu »** 08/17/93 HEAD RECOVERY va HORNER Til' j**•** £&i. "*"" PA21-367 WELL G"4ROM f&U* wsuarmc H TEST NO.5DUP

Gctiller AfifiOCfalteA BERKS 1ANDFILURU0&JL XmOOXrX afcllX'Cy . A D *Tl 1 7x t\^ """C-40

NOVEMBER 1994 TABLE! . 813-0773'BERKS LANDFILL. REMEDIAL INVESTIGATIONSUMMARY OF HYDROGEOLOGIC TEST RESULTS

WELL , . G-4TESTNO. 6





INITIAL HYDRAULIC HEAD (Hi)HYDRAULIC HEAD AT START OF SLUG TEST (Hos)MAXIMUM HYDRAULIC HEAD DIFFERENCE (Hi - Hos)HYDRAULIC HEAD AT START OF RECOVERY TEST (Hor)HYDRAULIC HEAD DIFFERENCE (Hot - Hor)

ELAPSED TIME TO START OF SLUG TEST fcT-0) ,ELAPSED TIME TO START OF RECOVERY TEST (t; T«0)

-. - • . '. ' "-,

. / 4.65 INCH3.78 INCH

277.00 FT BOS•

. ' ' . - . ' SOJSO FT85.85 FT BGS TO 116.45118.45 FT BGS TO 277.00

8.38 FT BGS TO 83.95

3.00 FT4B5.00 FTMSL402.00 FTMSL

12.38 FEET BELOW TOG, '452.62 FTMSL

452.71 FT436.65 FT16.06 FT v447.87 FT

, 11.22 FT

.. 40.70 MIN41.83 MIN

FT BGSFT BGSFT BGS

' • ' . • • • ' - . ' . . . .

SLUG TEST ' 'RESULTS OF HVORSLEV ANALYSIS

(Hi-H1V(Hi-H2)(T2-T1)X60HYDRAULIC CONDUCTIVITY

TR2DATA TR40ATA4.26 - 3.0048.00 SEC 48.00

1.4E-03 CM/S 1.0E-03SECCM/S


AVERAGE FLOW RATEd(HYDRAUUC HEAD) / dJLOG (T/T)IHYDRAULIC CONDUCTIVmf

2.63 GPMNANA CM/S

Fllt:g4Mte.wkl

I I -I I I I I II I I 1 I—I—I—I—1

|2o

/«-•»z2 CM

LU1 +

to m •* to CM •*- o o> oo i>> to m ^ to CM' .*- o> o>, ooin in inin in in in •*^ ^. • i • 3 * 5^:* 3! Q 5to to

id) av3H

913-6773MBW DSLew

AS SHOWN08/17/93PA21-347

M sueirat 11


WELL G-4TESTNo.6

X

Colder Associates BERKS LANDFILL C-41

oqd

UJ

o

CMd

o «- CM to <j m to i-> cq o> •*- »- CM to •* ,m tod d d d d d d d d I ^ ^- , _: ' • .>jI t I I I I I I I I I I I I I

(id) onvy QV3H onnvaoAH N~I

JOB KM 913-6773DSL

WV8YS

AS SHOWNDATS 08/17/93

PA21-371

SEMILOG PLOT OFHEAD RATIO V8 TIME

WELL G-4TEST No. 6

Golder Associates BERKS LANDRLLAR30220G C-42

10-J •_J

• LU^ t1 __ ._1 ^2O to_i ^Q. o

• >- tC£ «nUJ £

O ~7% <°O =*»UJ fccr £C£LUz:QCOX

•• ' ' . . • ' : . • ' • - , - . • "

• '• " 1'!

.

V

,

l lm •<*• tom m m'.•*•*••*•

joawu 913-6773»** DSLCMC B* f/T tC,

RWBTS J !Sl->

Golder

s . . • ' • • . • •= . ';--.' v .''..-

•> ' ' * ' '' • '•";..

• • ' • . - -. ' ' ' . " •' ~

l

- ' ' , . ' '-

- • ' —• • - / .

'

• ' - ' . ;v

1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1C M ^ - O O > ' O O I s ' U > i O

.' (1S Id) QV3H

«Aifi AS SHOWNOATO 08/17/93«•*• PA21-3S8MSU8DTI& 11

Associates

' ™

" • • ' ~• • ,.. • • -'

- — ~. . . • ' ' • -

. . . . . . -

i i i i i r i i

. . \.O " N«— 0

CM '• • - - '

' .- - - .

dI

.to-' • ,- - ' ' • ' .d . - . . • •/I

00d ' . . . .I

'7 p. •CM 22-- s +, •1 • ' '

'•*i - V j1

to7 '00

.7 .• . '•'•'CMi : • ' -• . "• . .

•

i* to CM «- o d> oo i*» to

: ' ' - -•• • ' • '. ' ' • • ' •

SEMILOQ PLOT OFHEAD RECOVERY va HORNER TlfcT

• WELL G-4 \JTEST No. 6

BERKS LANDFILL 0-43

MOVEMBER19M . . ' , ' . TABLE 1 . 013-6773, BERKS LANDFILL, REMEDIAL INVESTIGATION


WELL G-4TESTNO. ~ 7

DRILL ROD DIAMETER ,BOREHOLE DIAMETERBOREHOLE DEPTH (FEET BELOW GROUND SURFACE)

LENGTHTESTED. .DEPTH RANGE OF TESTED ZONEZONE BELOW PACKER ASSEMBLY TO BOTTOM OF BOREHOLEZONE ABOVE PACKER ASSEMBLY TO WATER LEVEL


DEPTH TO WATER (BELOW TOP OF CASING)GROUNDWATER ELEVATION -

INITIAL HYDRAULIC HEAD (Hi) 'HYDRAULIC HEAD AT START OF SLUG TEST (Hos)MAXIMUM HYDRAULIC HEAD DIFFERENCE (HI - Hoc)HYDRAULIC HEAD AT START OF RECOVERY TEST (Hoi)HYDRAULIC HEAD DIFFERENCE (Hot - Hor)

ELAPSED TIME TO START OF SLUG TEST (t;T«0)ELAPSED TIME TO START OF RECOVERY TEST (t; T'«0)

2.65 INCH3.78 INCH

, 277.00 FT BGS

20.60 FT76.05 FT BGS TO 08.45 FT BGS98.45 FT BGS TO 277.00 FT BGS«.40 FT BGS TO 73.85 FT BGS

3.00 FT465.00 FTMSL462.00 FTMSL


452.68 FT424.26 FT28.43 FT452.12 FT27.86 FT

23.47 MIN '25 7 MIN

SLUG TESTRESULTS OF HVORSLEV ANALYSIS .

(HI-H1V(HI-H2)(T2-T1)x60 ' ,HYDRAULIC CONDUCTIVITY

TR2DATA TR4DATA2 2 NA48.00 SEC 48.00 SEC '

7.4E-04 CM/S NA CM/S' ' . . : . • • . • -


AVERAGE FLOW RATEd(HYDRAUUCHEAD)/d[LOG(T/r)) 'HYDRAULIC CONDUCTIVITY

' t _ , '

4.11 GPM 'NANA GNUS

ftR302268

tO 't CM OOO tO **• CM OOO to •* CM O 00 tO **•m m m m -*• ^t •**• •* ' to t o t o t o t o c M C M C M•* •* ^fr- •*. •* .•*, -* - •* •<*• -<<• '. •* "t "f •*-?!• "<t •*

id) av3H

913-6773OtB*

CMISft

AS SHOWN08/17/93

fa. N<U PA21-348

ARITHMETIC PLOT OFHYDRAULIC HEAD va TIME

WELL G-4TEST No. 7

Golder Associates BERKS LANDFILL nounC-44RR302269

X

Q-tO o>

in

teUJo..-.

toQ£ '£,1 •/" • • • • / . • • loLU ' 7

i t i i i i - i i i t I——I——I——I

to

CM

o z- -5 M

LJ

CMd

O »- P«J rq ,rt; in tO r>- OO C>' .»- r- CM tO * in tOo d d d d odd d I »-" «-" <r-* ^I I I I I I I I I l l I I I i

, (id) ouya av3H onnvaaxH NT

Na: 913-6773ORBY! DSL

ow rr. CSC

AS SHOWNOAIE 08/17/93FUMa: PA21-372ORiueimx: 11


WELL G-4TEST No. 7

Colder Associates 'C-45

- • ,

t-10

_JLU— ^ ^

u«

O 3t ^••J Q

x t[V mUJ S

O £O ?LU 8^LUz:0 "X

If• If

• ' • .

ii3

- . . • ' , ' ' . . . v . '

- • ' . .

•

' i ' '. , i

. ;- ' ' ; . '

• ' • ' ' • ' ' • / • •1 • • - • . . '.-

r i i i i i i i

/_. - -, " . . * •

• - »

' . ' '• - ' " '•:• ' -

- ' ' ' • . ' • '

^

.' -

. ' • • . • . -

• / . . • ' • / /

. . s'

1

I I 1 1 I I I

o . . v ; \^

CM ' •- ' .. •O1

• * " ' . "d

1 •tod .

oo0I

•T' . F--. X. CM

h- t-

CM 'g^ 3 +1

T : V '.0*°.

1 ' . ' - '

cq •1

CM

> •* CM, O .00- <O •* C M - O O O t O - « t C M O 00 t O 1 *) m in m ^ ^- ^ •<*• ^- to to to to ro CM CM CM

' (ISVM id) av3H onhvaoAH .

jotwu 913-6773 *** AS SHOWN°»«* DSL W16 08/17/93°" ** /i!bSci, "* "*•.-'•. PA21-369itevsn ftt> M susrmfi 11

Golder Associates

SEMILOQ PLOT OFHEAD RECOVERY vs HORNER W

WELL G-4 \ JTEST No. 7

BERKS LANDFILL 1 0-46nnoutfc' •

NOVEMBER 1»4 . TABLE! 813-6773BERKS LANDFILL. REMEDIAL INVESTIGATION

SUMMARY OF HYDHOGEOLOGIC TEST RESULTS

WELL G-4TEST N O . ' • ' • ' . - , ' 8

DRILL ROD DIAMETERBOREHOLE DIAMETERBOREHOLE DEPJH (FEET BELOW GROUND SURFACE) ' . _ . "


STICK-UPTOP OF CASING ELEVATIONGROUND SURFACE ELEVATION '

DEPTH TO WATER PELOW TOP OF CASING)GROUNDWATER ELEVATION

INITIAL HYDRAULIC HEAD (HOHYDRAULIC HEAD AT START OF SLUG TEST (Hos) vMAXIMUM HYDRAULIC HEAD DIFFERENCE (Hi - Hos)HYDRAULIC HEAD AT START OF RECOVERY TEST (Hot)HYDRAULIC HEAD DIFFERENCE (Hot -Hor)

ELAPSED TIME TO START OF SLUG TEST (t;T«0)ELAPSED TIME TO START OF RECOVERY TEST (t; T'«0)

2.65 INCH3.78 INCH

277.00 FTBGS

20.60 FT65.05 FT BGS TO 76.45 FTBGS78.45 FT BGS TO 277.00 FTBGS8.40 FT BGS TO 63.85 FTBGS

3.00 FT465.00 FTMSL462.00 FTMSL

12.40 FEETBELOWTOC452.60 FTMSL

451.45 FT r , ....••444.11 FT7.34 FT

451.15 FT7.04 FT

68.72 MIN60.37 MIN ,

. , ' . ' ' : * ' ' ' . ' ' -

. ' • ' • '


(Hi-HlV(Hi-H2) '(T2-T1)X60HYDRAULIC CONDUCTIVITY

, TR2DATA TR4DATA2.30 NA18.00 SEC ~ 18.00 SEC

2.1E-03 CM/S NA CM> - • • ' . • • , ' . ' . , . , • • • . • • '


: • * • » .

AVERAGE FLOW RATEd(HYDRAUUC HEAD) / dlLOG (T/T)IHYDRAULIC CONDUCTIVITy

2.87 6PMNANA CM^

FU«:g4ttta.wtt

RR302272

O

UJ

LU1 Eoo00F, «•111 0>>irim

Q S,

HYDRAU

a% • . ~m - • • .<LU UJX •*-O

I

'

in •* to C M * - o . a> oo r ^ t o m •*in in in in m m ^ ^^ ^ • • * •. •3- •* • * - ^ - •* •* '*•,-. .^ .. «* • : .<*, •^•'t

av3H

JOB NO: 913-6773atn

sc«* AS SHOWMOATS 08/17/93

PA2 1-349Msueniufi n


WELL G-4TESTNO.S

Golder BERKS LANDFILL 1 0-47ftfi3.022.73

tod

Tf

0

LJ

CMd

o »- CM to ^ in to , r- oq oy »- «- CM to ^- md do d do odd -1 ^ ^ ;J JI ' I I I I I I I I I I I I I

i

(id) ouva QV3H onnvadAH NT

•»"•» 913-6773o« sr, DSL

(tEVBYi

AS SHOWN08/17/83

FUN« PA21-373M SJBWIlt

8EMILOQ PLOT OFHEAD RATIO VS TIME

WELLQ-4TESTNO.S

Golder Associates BERKS LANDFILL C-48AR302271*

• • -

1Q_J_JLJ3:

O •*'' _ I j£.CL g>- t1 1^ " l^^

C

^ ^ rt

o .«1 LU £^

LU

OX

•If• T

- .

' • • . ' • ' ,'' • ... -

- . . . '

•

c tor *•

1

. • - \

-•

-x

CM .«-• •m m•* t

•

• ' ' .

I I

O 0>m •*

. . ' -

• ' : . . : - " • . . : . ' ' . "

" '•• • '. - • \ . ' ~\ . ' . -

•. • . "™

' —

. ' ' ' . . • . " -

v

. . ; - •." • .'-'

• • • • ' - • ' : . - - ' ' . ; "

- ' -

- ' ; •

1 ' 1 1 l- 1- ao r^- to in ' *;

o X i

CMo .'.••'. . ' . '

d

to

00o .

- t

T P. ' • • ;.CM g

i* - - '.: .' ]7 ^~sto

• 1

.T .CM1

. • -• ,

• ' - '- ' . • '

(ISIM id) av3H onrwaaAH .

M MM 913-8773<* . « * • • • ; OSLeww g(RWBft jfii>

Golder A

SCAtL

OAtti

fUHoa

AS SHOWN08/17/93PA21-360

OR SUoilllZt 11

SEM1LOQ PLOT OFHEAD RECOVERY V3 HORNER TIM"

WELL G-4 v /TEST No. S • •• l V7

BERKS LANDFILL '17*0*49

NOVEMBER 1904 TABLE! 013-6773BERKS LANDFILL, REMEDIAL INVESTIGATION


WELL G-4TEST NO. , • DUPLICATE


LENGTH TESTED "DEPTH RANGE OF TESTED ZONEZONE BELOW PACKER ASSEMBLY TO BOTTOM OF BOREHOLEZONE ABOVE PACKER ASSEMBLY TO WATER LEVEL .

STICK-UP,TOP OF CASING ELEVATIONGROUND SURFACE ELEVATION


INITIAL HYDRAULIC HEAD (Hi)HYDRAULIC HEAD AT START OF SLUG TEST (Hot)MAXIMUM HYDRAULIC HEAD DIFFERENCE (HI - Hot)HYDRAULIC HEAD AT START OF RECOVERY TEST (Hot)HYDRAULIC HEAD DIFFERENCE (Hot - Hor)

ELAPSED TIME TO START OF SLUG TEST fc T-0)ELAPSED TIME TO START OF RECOVERY TEST ft T«0)

£.65 INCH9.78 INCH

277.00 FTBGS


3.00 FT465.00 FTMSL462.00 FTMSL .

12.38 FEET BELOW TOO452.62 FTMSL ,

452.74 TT444.08 FT

8.66 FT452.62 FT

8.54 FT

30.42 MIN31.48 MIN

•' -. . '; • . • ' . . ' . ' • . . ' .'.'. • •SLUG TESTRESULTS OF HVORSLEV ANALYSIS ' .,

(HI-H1KHI-H2)(T2-Tl)x60HYDRAULIC CONDUCnVITY

TR2DATA17.4865.80 SEC ~ "

2.3E-03 CM/S -• • • . ] .

RECOVERYTEST ,RESULTS OF HORNER ANALYSIS

AVERAGE FLOW RATE 'd(HYDRAUUC HEAD) /<1[LOG (T/T)}HYDRAULIC CONDUCTIVITY

2.14 GPMNANA CM/S

V J FB«:B«l»t8b.wk1

BR302276

e>

UJ.3tLJ

SCO o

LU 8> o.Q-g

Xo_iZ>C£

CMo'CM

•* to CM *- • o o> oo Is-' «o mm m m-m m«* •* .^t • • •* i - •*''

u) QV3H

JMNO: 913-8773» Bt> DSL•HK ffft JL lCx '

«e» s* ySi*?

.»** AS SHOWN«»» ' 08/17/93«*« PA21-350WSUOTlia ||

Colder Associates ,

ARITHMETIC PLOT OFHYDRAULIC HEAD vs TIME ;-"

WELL G-4 , JTEST N0.8DUP "

BERKS LANDRLL I C-SOAR3022//

IDd

LJ^ +

CMO

o »- CM to •* in~ <o h > . o q oV r- »-. CM to ^- inodd d d d . d d d ' ^ ' ~ •-: -" I I I I I I I I I I I I I i

(u) ouva QV3H onnvyQAH NI

*•"«. 813-6773DSL

CHKBYi

AS SHOWN08/17/93PA21-374

OR


WELL G-4TEST NO.SDUP

Colder Associates BERKS LANDFIIFILL A.0070C.C. I V

C-51

\

1O

_JLU

• m

."O _J o

t

RECOVERY

IT #8 DUPL (55.95

i r uj

LUZ

OX

It

: ' " 1 • . " . . . ' . '

' ' ' ' " t

:

'

'

•'

1 1 1 1 1

h'.. 'tO CM ' ' i- O O»> m m m m <^-

. ' • ' ' ' . -

' - • .^

.'.'•'•' •'' "

• . ': • ' - . . -

-

• '. - ' - ' . -

• ' . ' ' . / .

' • • ' . •

1 1 1 1

oo r» 10 m ^•<*• ^ •* •* ^

V ^

CM . •d '' ." / ' . •

.•*''• . 'Q. "'. ' '

d

ood •1

7 •"

7^ . iTiq . . :

1

oqT— '

1 " . -. ' '

V

CM1 ,

|- '•• ' .

• - " ' • ' * ' J ' ' , ' ' " • • '

(nsw u) av3H onnvaaAH

MH04 913-8773 sous AS SHOWNMB* OSL °*m 08/J7/93°*B* «\}S«— ru"*> PA21-381"**«* /ft> MSUOTTUS 11

Colder Associates

SEMILOG PLOT OFHEAD RECOVERY vs HORNER TIM

WELLQ-4 \ JTESTN0.8DUP ^

BERKS LANDFILL I C-SS

AR302279

NOVEMBER1884 , TABLE 1 813-6773BERKS LANDFILL. REMEDIAL INVESTIGATION

SUMMARY OF HYDROGEOLOGIC TEST RESULTS .

WELL G-4TESTNO. 8

DRILL ROD DIAMETER ,BOREHOLE DIAMETER

LENGTHTESTED .DEPTH RANGE OF TESTED ZONEZONE BELOW PACKER ASSEMBLY TO BOTTOM OF BOREHOLEZONE ABOVE PACKER ASSEMBLY TO WATER LEVEL


DEPTH TO WATER (BELOW TOP OF CASING) '.''"-GROUNDWATER ELEVATION > •'

INITIAL HYDRAULIC HEAD (Hi)HYDRAULIC HEAD AT START OF SLUG TEST (Hos)MAXIMUM HYDRAULIC HEAD DIFFERENCE (HI - Hos)HYDRAULIC HEAD AT START OF RECOVERY TEST (Hot)HYDRAULIC HEAD DIFFERENCE (Hos - Hot)

ELAPSED TIME TO START OF SLUG TEST (t: T-0)ELAPSED TIME TO START OF RECOVERY TEST (t: r-0)

2.65 INCH3.78 INCH

277.00 FTBGS

20.60 FT35.85 FT BGS TO 66.4568.45 FT BGS TO 277.008.00 FT BGS TO 33.85

3.00 FT465.00 FTMSL462.00 FTMSL

12.00 FEET BELOW TOO ,453.00 FTMSL

456.82 FT. 483.00 FT !26.08 FTNA FTNA FT

40.77 MINNA MIN

FTBGSFTBGSFTBGS

-

x_


(HI-H1WHI-H2) ,'(T2-T1)X60 ,. . . ' ' . .HYDRAULIC CONOUCTIvTTY

TR2DATA TR4DATA1.34 . 1.87

236.40 SEC 236.406.6E-05 CM 1 JE-04

SECCM/S


AVERAGE FLOW RATEd(HYDRAUUC HEAD) /d[LOG (T/niHYDRAULIC CONDUCTIVITY .

. NA GPMNANA CM/S

"S-

AR302280

LU

LU

0010 - --r—•———.———i————————————^j. <gS6 .4° .

o

-tLU •§

JO

LUXO

i i i i ' i i l i t r i i l i t

o(O

S CM

oCM a

IO * . CM OOO tO - - t C M O 00 «O -*CM O 00 tO T l - C M Ooo oo oo oor* r^ r>- r^ r>> *o*o «oto to in m in m m

u) av3H onnvbdAH

«• •*• 913-8773OHMCHRBft

potent

AS SHOWN08/17/93PA21-381

,11

ARITHMETIC PLOT OFHYDRAULIC HEAD vs TIME /-

WELL G-4TESTNo.9

Golder Associates BERKS LANDFILL FKUflCC-53

coo*'-'- CM tod d d d do do d II I I I l i . I I I I J'v i; I I I I I

(u) onvy QV3H onnvaaAH

913-6773o» its DSL

0*"

AS SHOWNDA16

PA21-362M JUBUIVt 11

SEMILOQ PLOT OFHEAD RATIO VS TIME

WELL G-4TEST No. 9

Golder Associates BERKS LANDFILLncuREC-54

AH302282

NOVEMBER 1994 TABLE1 913-6773BERK3 LANDFILL. REMEDIAL INVESTIGATIONSUMMARY OF HYDROGEOLOGIC TEST RESULTS

WEU. G-4TESTNO. 10

DRILL ROD DIAMETERBOREHOLE DIAMETER ,BOREHOLE DEPTH (FEET BELOW GROUND SURFACE)

LENGTH TESTEDDEPTH RANGE OP TESTED ZONEZONE BELOW PACKER ASSEMBLY TO BOTTOM OF BOREHOLEZONE ABOVE PACKER ASSEMBLY TO WATER LEVEL


DEPTH TO WATER (BELOW TOP OF CASING)GROUNDWATER ELEVATION . '

INITIAL HYDRAULIC HEAD (HI)HYDRAULIC HEAD AT START OF SLUG TEST (Hot)MAXIMUM HYDRAULIC HEAD DIFFERENCE (HI -Hoi) ,HYDRAULIC HEAD AT START OP RECOVERY TEST (Hoi) 'HYDRAULIC HEAD DIFFERENCE (Ho»- Hor) '

ELAPSED TIME TO START OF SLUG TEST (C T-0)ELAPSED TIME TO START OF RECOVERY TEST (ft T«0)

2.55 INCH3.78 INCH

277.00 FTBQ3

20.50 FT25.85 FT BGS TO 46.4548.45 FT BGS TO 277.008.60 FT BOS TO 23.85

3.00 FT465.00 FTMSL462.00 FTMSL

11.60 FEET BELOW TOC453.40 FTMSL >

458.48 FT .468.78 FT - '11.31 FT461.71 Ft8.03 FT '

48.48 MIN71.75 MIN

FTBGSFTBGSFTBGS

', '

SLUGTESTRESULTS OP HVORSLEV ANALYSIS '

(W-H1V(HI-H2)(T2-T1)X60HYDRAULIC CONDUCTIVITY

TR2DATA- . - • '1.32 ••• . •'

375.00 SEC3.3E-05 CM/S '


AVERAGE FLOW RATE *d(HYDRAUUCHEAD)/d[LOa(T/ni 'HYDRAULIC CONDUCTIVITY

OJ08 GPM. N A - : , . . • • 'NA CM/S '

' ' '

&R302283

i o t o « o x o « o m i n m m

10

CM

'I +

D

u) av3H onnvydAH

913-6773m-m DSLOW BY:

AS SHOWNOATD t 08/17/93«."« PA21-862en sueinLt


WELL G-4TEST No.10

Colder Associates BERKS LANDFILLFKUREC-55

ftR30228U

toQOCSJCSJ

'. ' •'• • . • - • • ' ,' ' : CD. • . • . - • • • • - . - . . . • " - - ; ; , ; . . • o poiivy QV3H onnvaoAH N~I ' '...•§

913-6773

ROTBlft

AS SHOWMo*m 08/17/93

PA21-373OR

SEMILOG PLOT OFHEAD RATIO vs TIME

WELL G-4TESTNo.10

Golder Associates nounC-56

1o_J_JLJ5 £1— in02_ 1 ^Q- ov fcfy mLU S>O4

O 2o *•LU fc01 ••£

••'££LUz:o:oX-

.

i i i

. • - . " " •

. - . ' - • • ' • ' . •

, ' ; -fe

• t•' **

. • . ' • ' • • . - . ' - K,: • ^

** •¥?

' . ' • • •

1 1 1 1 1 I I I

' . . ' - ; ' • -

• • • —'

v

- r ' ^*

.; - " .. ' ' -

• . - ~

, • —

gj T

— -^— — "p . . • • . -

->l" . . ' • - . ' • " .

-• . ,' ' . • .'• ~- • . • • ' . .* '

' " ' - . . .

3* . ' ' ' - - • ' - . ,, . % • f . ^

-'•

i i i i i i i i

\ .

p .

CMd' •1

d1 . .•

d100dI

_ , - . ' . . . _ .

fe s2 : § • + • • ' •I : • ' .-•...

,_: ' •I • , ' • '

(O

T- -'• ^ ..'•-.' ' .. .

00

T

CM ' .1 , - • . - •

*- o o> co i to in •<*• to CM *- o o> oo i- «o m j- .to CM *- ZIt>- r-» to <o to to to t o t o t o t o i o i n m i n t n i n m i n m in »O. ' ; . • ' " "

•

- ; - . ' ' . . - . - . • • • - • • " • C M. ' • " . . ' • • • • '.-. ' - . C D '

' - ' : ' . ' ' • • . ' c o- . • - ' • ' • •..-..' n* •-(id) av3H onnvaaAH ^c :

•\ 'y "• ' ' . ' • ' ' . ' . " , ' ' . - ; • ' - . '

'

*••« 913-6773""•* DSLOK -eft iTV Cx'«w«ift 51

Colder A

«** AS SHOWN•»« 08/17/93rat MO: PAS 1-363OR SJSTlUt if ;

ssodates

SEMILOG PLOT OFHEAD RECOVERY vs HORNER TIME

WELL G-4TESTN0.10

RFRic*Q i AMnni i I"00*/1* cfDtU\t\d L/MNUTIL - I \ "*O i

. \.

Analyses and FiguresWell G-5 .

RR302287

NOVEMBER 1094 _ TABLE 1 , . 013-4773BERKS LANDFILL. REMEDIAL INVESTIGATION


WELL G-6TESTNO. 1


LENGTHTESTEDDEPTH RANGE OF TESTED ZONE .DEPTH OF ZONE BELOW PACKER ASSEMBLY TO BOTTOM OF BOREHOLEDEPTH OF ZONE ABOVE PACKER ASSEMBLY TO WATER LEVEL



INITIAL HYDRAULIC HEAD (Hi)HYDRAULIC HEAD AT THE BEGINING OF SLUG TEST (Ho*)MAXIMUM HYDRAULIC HEAD DIFFERENCE (HI - Hot)HYDRAULIC HEAD AT THE BEGINING OF RECOVERY TEST (Hor)HYDRAULIC HEAD DIFFERENCE (Hot - Hor)

TEST ELAPSED TIME TO BEGINING OF SLUG TEST (t; T • 0)TEST ELAPSED TIME TO BEGINING OF RECOVERY TEST (t; T' • 0)

' • • - . ' • • - .

£.65 INCH6.25 INCH

277.00 FTBGS

25.70 FT262,00 FT BGS TO 236.30268.10 FT BGS TO 277.003.92 FT BGS TO 233.60

6.00 FT618.00 FTMSL613.00 FTMSL

8.92 FEET BELOW TOC609.08 FTMSL

609.08 FT493.68 FT16.42 FT802.25 FT6.69 FT

6.20 MIN11.67 MIN

FTBGSFTBGSFTBGS

SLUGTESTRESULTS OF HVORSLEV ANALYSIS

(HI-H1WHI-H2) .(T2-T1)X60HYDRAULIC CONDUCTIVITY

TR2DATA TR4DATA2.26 -. 2.38

388.20 • SEC 388.208.7E-05 CM «.2E-OS

SECCM/S

S . " - , . ' - . • ' ' - . - ' - " • •


AVERAGE FLOW RATEd(HYDRAUUC HEAD) / dlLOG {T/T)]HYDRAULIC CONDUCTIVITY

0.35 GPMNANA CM^

FBt:gSt*l1.Mk1

AR302288

N«- o o> oo r* <o m "* to CM •- o en to r*> to m ^ to»— »— O O O O O OOO O O O> O O> C7t O> O) C7>in m min m mm m mm mm -^ •^•^ ^*-^j- •* ^t

id) av3H onnvaoAH

913-6773DSL

ew em

AS SHOWN08/17/93PA21-279

MSUBDIIE: . 11

ARITHMETIC PLOT OFHYDRAULIC HEAD V8 TIME r

WELLG-5TEST No. 1

Gidder Associates BERKS LANDRLLrwuaC-58

1 <LU±1 CM

(id) oiiva QV3H onhvaaAH isn

913-6773 AS SHOWN08/17/93PA21-296

OR susimt


WELL G-6TEST No. 1

Golder Associates BERKS LANDRLL nouttcC-59

RR302290

LOIO

Ld

sCM

>.. t

oX

bJ> _(~ ' . . . ^

bJ "* 'Of

bJoqT

CMI

I I I I L I I I I I I I I I

CMd

I-

(OdI

oodI

o ov co I*- 10 in •<*• to CM «- o 'o> OQ r 10 m ^ to^ - o o o o o o o o o o o v C T » a > o > o » o a >m m in m mm m m m in m •<* . ^ •<<• •<*• •* •*• •*

id) av3H cinnvaaAH

CM

7 1 +

*» "*= 913-6773tun . 03.CMCBti

fXVBYi

AS SHOWNOATS. 08/17/93fit HO: pA21-288M SU3T1TU:

SEMILOQ PLOT OFHEAD RECOVERY V8 HORNER TIME

WELL G-6TEST No. 1

Colder Associates BERKS LANDFILL

AR30229!

NOVEMBER1994 TABLE 1 813-8773. BERKS LANDFILL, REMEDIAL INVESTIGATION

SUMMARY OF HYDROGEOLOGIC TEST RESULTS '

WELL ' G-6 v .TESTNO. 2. - '. . •

DRILL ROD DIAMETER 2.65 INCHBOREHOLE DIAMETER tJK INCHBOREHOLE DEPTH (FEET BELOW GROUND SURFACE) 277.00 FTBGS

LENGTHTESTED . . 25.70 FTDEPTH RANGE OF TESTED ZONE 237.00 FT BGS TO 211.30 FTBGSDEPTH OF ZONE BELOW PACKER ASSEMBLY TO BOTTOM OF BOREHOLE 243.10 FT BGS TO 277.00 FTBGSDEPTH OF ZONE ABOVE PACKER ASSEMBLY TO WATER LEVEL 4.11 FT BGS TO 208.60 FTBGS

STICK-UP. 6.00 FTTOP OF CASING ELEVATION 618.00 FTMSLGROUND SURFACE ELEVATION./ , 613.00 FTMSL

DEPTH TO WATER (BELOW TOP OF CASING) --9.lt FEET BELOW TOOGROUNDWATERELEVATION 608.88 FTMSL

INITIAL HYDRAULIC HEAD (Hi) ' 608.54 FTHYDRAULIC HEAD AT THE BEGINING OF SLUG TEST (Hos) 489.76 FTMAXIMUM HYDRAULIC HEAD DIFFERENCE (Hi-Hos) ' 18.78 FTHYDRAULIC HEAD AT THE BEGINING OF RECOVERY TEST (Hor) '. ... 606.33 FTHYDRAULIC HEAD DIFFERENCE (Hos-Hor) ,16.57 FT

TEST ELAPSED TIME TO BEGINING OF SLUG TEST (t;T*0) 21.33 MINTEST ELAPSED TIME TO BEGINING OF RECOVERY TEST (t;T«0) 46.27 MIN


i • ' ',

(Hi-Hiy{Ht-H2)(T2-T1)x60HYDRAULIC CONDUCTIVITY .

TR2DATA2.14

1490.40 SEC2.1E-05 CM/S

TR4DATA2.27

1496.40 SEC •2.0E-OS CM/S

- •' • ''• '• ^ - ' • • . ' . - .

RECOVERY TESTRESULTS OF HORNER ANALYSIS !

AVERAGE FLOW RATEd(HYDRAULICHEAD)/dtLOGfT/r)! ' 'HYDRAULIC CONDUCTIVITY

0.18 GPMNANA CM/S

FH*:g5ttt2.«k1

RR302292

inIo

bJ^bJ^ £I— o

IN-toCMin

" -tbJ ^

O

Q £ «Bf : •• • . HS<C t-bJ ^

o(O

to

z >1 pUJ? +

.«- «- o o o o o o o o o o o>' o» o> o> 01 o> o> en 01 o> oom in in m m in in ininmm'ini*i*i*'t<«*-'*'*^t'*<'t'<i-

id) QV3H onnvaoAH

X'

913-6773MB* DSLCHRBft

AS SHOWN03/17/93

«**« . PA21-280


WELL G-6TEST Na2

/•

Golder Associates BERKS LANDFILL nowtcC-61

• (id) ouva nv3H onnvaaAH N~I

913-6773 AS SHOWNBATE 06/17/93

«£ HO.: PA21-2970« JUBTlUt

SEMILOG PLOT OFHEAP RATIO V8 TIME

WELL G-6TEST No. 2

Golder Associates BERKS LANDFILLncuRtC-62

RR30229ti

-'

inorjbJ;>F^ oP .85h_J CMa. .. e>- tfy (<•) •

" S

O bJ so: "o:bJ"QZOX

• - ,

• • ' -• • ' . " . ' " • •

'•'. ' '"• •. ; . .

• ' ' ' ' V ' " ' • • ' • '

1 '

' ' . ' ' ' . • " '

f'- '

.

- '

'

: . ' ' /. '•

Jf ' '•- 1 : • • • - . , • • • ' . •• • ' - ' - • I : . -

' ,| ''. .'• •' ' • ' • '

' . . ' ' j. . ' . "

I /:;:t i i i i i i i i i i

• «- o o» co -i^ to m <*" to 'CM »-• o<— » - o o o o o o o o o oin in m m in m in m m m in in

* .

' > . - ' - —

.'.••'' • .~* " ' *"

' • ' - ' ~

'''•"''' ' - • • • •. -" ' . ' • ' " ' . ' . ' • . 1

- . . . ' ' " .. . •• ' '• • •' ' •"•' '' • ' ~

• " ' ", ' . - • ' • ' - . - • • " ' -

; ' . '

; ' '

i l l i i " i i i I i

' r

\

CMd .1

d

10dI

dI

. '1 P-> P .

CM S22 3 +1

^

'

s'-,.. •'•• Vito •"• '.' •'- • "Toq

7 • '

en oo r^ «o m ^ to CM »- o o> :C f t C f t C f t C f t C f t C f t C f t C f t C f t C f t O O

1 . .

' (isw id) QV3K onnvyoAH

JOB NU 913-6773 s*wl! AS SHOWN» •» - DSL °*lil 08/17/93a*Btt rfiC «*"<« PA21-289RWB* ygT*-" M»8inU:, 11

Colder Associates

' • • * I '

SEMILOQ PLOT OFHEAD RECOVERY V8 HORNER TIME,-

WELLG-5TEST No. 2 -

C-63

/

\

NOVEMBER 1094 TABLE 1 013-6773BERKS LANDFILL, REMEDIAL INVESTIGATION

SUMMARY OF HYDROGEOLOGIC TEST RESULTS ,

WELL G-6TESTNO. ' • • .. ' _ • - ' ' . * . : ' • . • ' ' • ' • . ' • . ' ' - • . . '

DRILL ROD DIAMETER 2.65 INCHBOREHOLE DIAMETER 6.25 INCHBOREHOLE DEPTH (FEET BELOW GROUND SURFACE) 277.00 FTBGS •

LENGTHTESTED 25.70 FTDEPTH RANGE OF TESTED ZONE 212.00 FT BGS TO 188.80 FTBGSDEPTH OF ZONE BELOW PACKER ASSEMBLY TO BOTTOM OF BOREHOLE 213.10 FT BGS TO 277.00 FTBGSDEPTH OF ZONE ABOVE PACKER ASSEMBLY TO WATER LEVEL . 4.00 FT BGS TO 183.60 FTBGS

STICK-UP 6.00 FTTOP OF CASING ELEVATION 618.00 FTMSL ''GROUND SURFACE ELEVATION • 613.00 FTMSL

DEPTH TO WATER (BELOW TOP OF CASING) ' 0.00 FEET BELOW TOCGROUNDWATERELEVATION 609.00 FTMSL .,

INITIAL HYDRAULIC HEAD (Hi) . 608.82 FTHYDRAULIC HEAD AT THE BEGINING OF SLUG TEST (Ho«) 493.05 FTMAXIMUM HYDRAULIC HEAD DIFFERENCE (Hi-Ho*) 14.67 FTHYDRAULIC HEAD AT THE BEGINING OF RECOVERY TEST (Hor) 603.35 FTHYDRAULIC HEAD DIFFERENCE (Hos- Hor) 0.40 FT

TEST ELAPSED TIME TO BEGINING OF SLUG TEST (t;T«0) 6.27 MINTEST ELAPSED TIME TO BEGINING OF RECOVERY TEST (t;T'»0) 17.07 MIN _______



TR2DATA3.08

708.00 SEC• - . " , ' 6.6E-05 CM/S

, •TR4DATA

3.35708.00 SEC6.3E-05 CM/S


AVERAGE FLOW RATEd(HYDRAUUC HEAD) /dlLOG (T/T)lHYDRAULIC CONDUCTIVITY

' • • • . . ' " '

0.21 GPM1.87

6.4E-05 CMS

' "

FII«:oSltl3.«k1

AR302296

\

eft oo t^ to m "t to CM »- oov oo.r* to in ^ toO O O O O O O O O O C f t C f t C f t C f t C f t O Y C f tm. m m m in m in m m m in m ••* <* •* •* •«*• ••*• ^

id) av3H qnnvaaAH

913-6773ORB*

CWBft

RCVB*

AS SHOWN08/17/93

ni ttu PA21-281MSUBIIIlfc

ARITHMETIC PLOT OFHYDRAULIC HEAD V8 TIMS

WELLG-5TEST No. 3

Golder Associates BERKS LANPnU-

(id) oiiva av3H onnvaoAH NT

*•««.- 913-6773WBT.

CHKtti Jtt.

AS SHOWNMIC 08/17/93

PA21-298OR tUBlTU: 11


WELL G-5TEST No. 3

Golder Associates BERKS LANDFILLnouteG-65

AR302298

-

•to1Q-J_JLd

fc "oO CM-J S0,0>- tQC *>LJ 8> -Oto

=M.

'•'£ ft-bJ LUan *-CEbJ21fV0n:

^ . • . . ' • f , ' .

. ' ' • • . ' • ' v

• - - ' ' • . . * • ' - - . ' ' " • '

' • • . ' • 4 t • - ' • . ' ' - ••' M ' ' ' ' ••' ^. ' • ' ' 'm • •' « • ; -^\ '• % :a. ' ' ' '

":»' ¥ •• , •' •H T' •j^ . •- > •'• '" ' '

"> •'H>• • . • •£ '•."." . .\\1

" ' T\

'' - " • ' TT1T•/• ' ' • .. •

i i i i i i i i i^ »- o o o o o o o om m m m m in mm mm

• ' OlSW id) QV3H

*»><» 913-6773 *"* AS SHOWNMM OSL W116 08/17/93^ 135C rUHai PA21-290REVBtS XfA MSUffmU! 11

Golder Associates

'. t - ' . .x . • —

••..'•. . . ' . —••

... •

• .:.-••"" • : _,-- ••-,. ' "-

™

/ • ' ' - " ""

•' .

—

\

. ' < • ' - • ' . • - ' • -

, .»'

I I 1 I I I 1 1

« iCM -c>1

.

d.I . , ' . . . .

to000 ,d1 '

^- •I j- '>,-P

CM g^ 3 »+,1 ..• '

T N-10

T,

•cq ', ':•;.. . • . ;.T

.. -

CMI - ' -• ; •

O O Cft ' Cft Cft Cft Cft Cft Cft ' -

onnvaoAHSEMILOQ PLOT OF

HEAD RECOVERY V8 HORNER TIMEWELL G-6TBOT MM OICOl NO. O x

BERKS LANDFILL C-BB

&R302299

NOVEMBER 1004 TABLE 1 013-8773BERKS LANDFILL, REMEDIAL INVESTIGATIONSUMARY OF HYDROGEOLOGIC TEST RESULTS

WELL G-6TESTNO. 4

DRILL ROD DIAMETERBOREHOLE DIAMETER <

LENGTHTESTEDDEPTH RANGE OFTESTED ZONEDEPTH OF ZONE BELOW PACKER ASSEMBLY TO BOTTOM OF BOREHOLEDEPTH OF ZONE ABOVE PACKER ASSEMBLY TO WATER LEVEL


DEPTH TO WATER (BELOW TOP OF CASING)GROUNDWATER ELEVATION '

INITIAL HYDRAULIC HEAD (Hi)HYDRAULIC HEAD AT THE BEGINING OF SLUG TEST (Ho*)MAXIMUM HYDRAULIC HEAD DIFFERENCE p - Hot)HYDRAULIC HEAD AT THE BEGINING OF RECOVERY TEST (Kor)HYDRAULIC HEAD DIFFERENCE (Hos - Hot)

TEST ELAPSED TIMETO BEGINING OF SLUG TEST (C T -0)TESTELAPSEDTIMETOBEGININGOFRECOVERYTESTftr.O) /

/ •

2.55 INCH6 5 INCH

877.00 FTBGS

25.70 FT187.00 FT BGS TO 161.30 FTBGS. 103.10 FT BGS tO 277.00 FTBGS

4.14 FT BGS TO 168.60 FTBGS

6.00 FT618.00 FTMSL619.00 FTMSL

8.14 FEET BELOW TOC608.86 FTMSL •

608.00 FT490.88 FT •17.12 FT602.26 FT11.38 FT

10.30 MIN03 3 MIN '

• ' . . ' - . ; •.':'• , ' • ' . . . . . _ •

SLUG TESTRESULTS OF HVORSLEV ANALYSIS . •


TR2DATA TR4DATA2.03 .2.00

4975.80 SEC 4876.80 SEC6.0E-OB CM/S 7.0E-06 CM/S

RECOVERY TESTRESULTS OF HORNER ANALYSIS ;

AVERAGE FLOW RATE ,d(KYDRAULIC HEAD) /d[LOG (T/T1)]HYDRAULIC CONDUCTIVITY

0.04 GPM0.22 ^

I.8E-05 CM/S '

FR*:g5tsM.wk1 .flokltrAtteetott*

AR302300

L L I I I I I I I I I I I»- o o oo i^ to m -^ K> CM «- o eft oo rv to m ^- ro CM «- o

id) QV3H onnvaQAH

913-6773DSL

«** AS SHOWN«*» 08/17/93

PA21-282


WELL G-5TESTNo.4

t

Golder Associates c-67

"• (id) buva av3H onnvaaAH NI

*•"« • 913-6773DSL

CMC re. OSt,


PA21-299OR sueunc 11


WELL G-5TEST NO. 4

Golder Associates BERKS LANDFILLFKUREC-68

RR302302

mIo

. LU^ - ™ N

• ~ LL.h- o

1 ^Q

.CL ot—

>- ^fV *oLU 5> c.

^ O *,0 J

. C£a:LU

ct:oX

- . ' • • " ' • . ' ' ' . • '

' '

*

• .'• ",

\ r i

i" •• •• 'JF"•« •• • ~ . ' ' ' ' ".2 ..•-•I. ••"%•'•• . •'Jji .

IE '« • '

' » ' ' •^fc ' • 'Jt~ '• - • '^& •

' * • • ' " ' . ' . -T* ' •

'• Jt ' 'S

'"»3- •"•'.. .&Jlu

' IP "f. , . , ' . , - , , 1 , ,

'. - —

• ' -. '•'" • . . ' . ' . ' —

' . ' • • ' • ' : : . - 'i . , . •

r - • ; •. . '• . -A * - - . .. . . ' • -' - • v• . " • ' '~

•

• . •

'''.•'• "• "•' •-\ ' '

, . \ , • •• '• '• •_

i i i i i i i t i

• •

-%;

0 -V>

CM 'd1

••*dr

d

ood ,IV

T .p_• h> £ ,

CM "O^ 3 +^ "•

F'

T ^*toT00 '

T . ' . ' • 'CM

/ »- o eft oo r^ to m •**• «o CM ' ' «- o o> oo i^ to m •* to CM '«- o

, (isw id) QV3H onnvaaAH .

MM*: 913-6773»«* DSLCMC B« - fcfflS '

r&trt. f?$L*

SCAU: AS SHOWNwit 03/17/93rer *« PA21-291wsosmit ' , 11

Golder Associates

SEMILOQ PLOT OFHEAD RECOVERY vs HORNER TIME

WELLG-5 /TEST No. 4 v /

BERKS LANDFILL 0-691ftR302303

NOVEMBER 1094 TABLE1 013-6773BERKS LANDFILL. REMEDIAL INVESTIGATION


WELL ' G-6TESTNO. 6 .

DRILL ROD DIAMETERBOREHOLE DIAMETER ' . .

LENGTHTESTEDDEPTH RANGE OF TESTED ZONEDEPTH OF ZONE BELOW PACKER ASSEMBLY TO BOTTOM OF BOREHOLEDEPTH OF ZONE ABOVE PACKER ASSEMBLY TO WATER LEVEL



INITIAL HYDRAULIC HEAD (Hi) ' 'HYDRAULIC HEAD AT THE BEGINING OF SLUG TEST (Hot)MAXIMUM HYDRAULIC HEAD DIFFERENCE (Hi • Hot)HYDRAULIC HEAD AT THE BEGINING OF RECOVERY TEST (Hor)HYDRAULIC HEAD DIFFERENCE (Hos - Hor)

TEST ELAPSED TIME TO BEGINING OF SLUG TEST ft T « 0)TEST ELAPSED TIME TO BEGINING OF RECOVERY TEST (t; T « 0)

2.65 INCH6 5 INCH

277.00 FTBGS

25.70 FT162.00 FT BGS TO 138.30168.10 FTBQSTO 277.00, 455 FT BGS TO 133.60

6.00 FT518.00 FTMSL613.00 FTMSL


606.10 FT40U3 FT14.87 FT604.82 FTis.es FT24.17 MIN44.03 MIN

FTBGSFTBGSFTBGS


' " •' ^ ••

(Hi-H1MHi-H2){T2-T1)X60HYDRAULIC CONDUCTIVITY

TR2DATA TR4DATA3 6 . , 3.47

1245.60 SEC 1245.603.0E-06 CM/S 3.7E-05

SECCM/S


AVERAGE FLOW RATE .d(HYDRAUUC HEAD) / d[LOG (T/T)|HYDRAULIC CONDUCTIVITY

0.17 GPMNA .NA CM/S

V

V J . . FB«:8St«t5.«*t

IO

I I I I I I I I I I I I I I«- : d a* oo IN. to m •* »o CM "«- oo> oo r* to in1* JO-CM *-«- *- OOO O O O OO O O Cft Cft Cft O> Cft Cft CftO) Cftmm m m m mm m mmm m •* •*• •*i^: t •<*• -^ <-

id) QV3H onnvaoAH

913-6773OSL

cm em

AS SHOWNOATSI 08/17/93FUI«U PA21-283


WELL Q-5TEST NO. 5

Gdder Associates BERKS LANDFILL C-70u-.... rtl n T

(id) ouva ov3H onnvaaAH NT

JOB No.: 913-6773ORBYt

CMC IT.

AS SHOWN08/17/93PA21-300

ORSUBVHE:


WELLQ-5TEST No. S

Colder Associates BERKS LANDRLLFIGURE

C-71

LU

3°- g>- t

O m=

oUJ S ' Q

..

LJ

I

bJCO

CMI

I I I l l l I I I I I I I I

CMOI

•d

(OdI

00dI

c o r ^ t o i n - * r o CM *- o o> oo r ^ t o i n . ^ - t o C M » -O O O O O O O O O Cft Cft Cft Cft Cft Cft Cft Cft Cft

id) av3H onnvaoAH

«• *~ 913-8773DSL

CMCBT.

REVBTi

AS SHOWNOATS 08/17/93FU N*: PA21-292DM SUBTITLE:

Colder Associates

SEMILOQ PLOT OFHEAD RECOVERY Vd HORNER TIME

WELLQ-8 yTEST No. 5

IncuRi____ C-72

AR302307

NOVEMBER 1W4 TABLE 1 • 613-6773. BERKS LANDFILL, REMEDIAL INVESTIGATION .>£


WELL G-6TESTNO.- 6

DRIU ROD DIAMETERBOREHOLE DIAMETERBOREHOLE DEPTH (FEET BELOW GROUND SURFACE)

LENGTHTESTEDDEPTH RANGE OF TESTED ZONEDEPTH OF ZONE BELOW PACKER ASSEMBLY TO BOTTOM OF BOREHOLEDEPTH OF ZONE ABOVE PACKER ASSEMBLY TO WATER LEVEL ,

STICK-UP • • • . . .TOP OF CASING ELEVATIONGROUND SURFACE ELEVATION N


INITIAL HYDRAULIC HEAD (Hi) • ,HYDRAULIC HEAD AT THE BEGINING OF SLUG TEST (Hos)MAXIMUM HYDRAULIC HEAD DIFFERENCE (HI - Hot)HYDRAULIC HEAD AT THE BEGINING OF RECOVERY TEST (Hor)HYDRAULIC HEAD DIFFERENCE (Hos -Hor)

TEST ELAPSED TIME TO BEGINING OF SLUG TEST (t; T « 0)TEST ELAPSED TIME TO BEGINING OF RECOVERY TEST (t; T • 0)

• '

2.65 INCH6.25 INCH

277.00 FTBGS

25.70 FT . '' ,137.00 FT BGS TO 111.30143.10 FT BGS TO 277.004X2 FT BGS TO 108.60

6.00 FT- 618.00 FTMSL613.00 FTMSL ,

B.02 FEET BELOW TOO608.68 FTMSL

618.87 FT480.82 FT • .29.0C FT -498.11 FT«.18 FT

32.80 MIN85.10 MIN

FTBGSFTBGSFTBGS

•-

' . - • , ' , • ' • • •' . . . ...• . • •. ' ' • . • ' ' • ' • • • ' • ' "

. , • ' f " '. •' • . . . . • • -- ' . • - 'SLUGTESTRESULTS OF HVORSLEV ANALYSIS

(HI-H1V(HI-H2J(T2-T1)X60HYDRAULIC CONDUCTIVITY

TR20ATA TR4DATA1.S9 NA

3738.00 -SEC , 3738.003.7E-06 CM/S NA

SECCM/S

' . ' . . • ' , '


AVERAGE FLOW RATE .d(KYDRAUUC HEAD) / dlLOG (T/T)lHYDRAULIC CONDUCTIVITY

0.03 GPMNANA CM/S

•

-

F1to:gstste.wfci

AR302308

to

I I I I I I ICM o co to **•' CM o ' oo to -<t CM o oo, to ^ CM O oo

O ' O O O Om mmm m» — » - » - O ' O O O O C f t C f t O > C f t C f t O O•*•«*•

id) av3H onnvaaAH

913-6773DSL

CHKB«FEWBT.

sc*c AS SHOWN08/17/93

nu NW PA21-28411

ARITHMETIC PLOT OFHYDRAULIC HEAD VS TIME

WELL G-5TEST No. 6

Golder Associates BERKS

oto

o ,

=5 CM

2 +

OCM

*~ ^ *""? 1 "? •" • *°. ^ °P °id d d o d o d o dl I I I I I I i I

(id) oiiva QV3H onnvaoAH N~I

OR913-6773

CMC ft

AS SHOWN08/17/93PA21-301

OR SUBT1TIX:


WELL G-6TEST No. 6

Colder Associates BERKS LANDFILL ncutcC-74

LOIO

O

o*O

0. p"~

>- ta: •->LU ^Oto=

to

01 \ r-', - ^ '.:-. " ibJ

oqT

CMI

f

I I I I I I I I I I I I t I I I

CM OOO tO1* CM O CO tO •<* CMO O O t O •* CM OCM CM «- «- »- »- » - o o o oo c f t c n eft o> enm m m m in m m m m m m i n •* •*:* •* •*

id) av3H onnvaoAH

CM

todI

oqd

CM*•I

913-8773out* DSLCMC BY!

RtVBT.


PA21-293cususimii 11


WELL G-6TEST No. 6 X

Colder Associates BERKS LANDFILLncuoi

SR3023II

NOVEMBER 19W , TABLE 1 813-6773BERKS LANDFILL. REMEDIAL INVESTIGATION

SUMMARY OF HYDROGEOLOG1C TEST RESULTS

WELL G-6TESTNO. 7

DRILL ROD DIAMETER ^BOREHOLE DIAMETERBOREHOLE DEPTH (FEET BELOW GROUND SURFACE)

LENGTHTESTEDDEPTH RANGE OF TESTED ZONE 'DEPTH OF ZONE BELOW PACKER ASSEMBLY TO BOTTOM OF BOREHOLEDEPTH OF ZONE ABOVE PACKER ASSEMBLY TO WATER LEVEL



INITIAL HYDRAULIC HEAD (Hi) .HYDRAULIC HEAD AT THE BEGINING OF SLUG TEST (Hos)MAXIMUM HYDRAULIC HEAD DIFFERENCE (HI - Hos)HYDRAULIC HEAD AT THE BEGINING OF RECOVERY TEST (Hot)HYDRAULIC HEAD DIFFERENCE (Hos -HOI)TEST ELAPSED TIME TO BEGINING OF SLUG TEST ft T • 0)TEST ELAPSED TIME TO BEGINING OF RECOVERY TEST ft T* « 0)

2.65 INCH6.25 INCH

277.00 FTBGS

25.70 FT112.00 FT BGS TO 36.30118.10 FT BGS TO 277.004.63 FT 60S TO 83.60

6.00 FT618.00 FTMSL613.00 FTMSL


603.65 FT '476.80 FT26.85 FT482.67 FT15.77 FT

33.37 MIN62.10 MIN

\

FTBGSFTBSSFTBGS

: • • " ' . - . ' ' • • - • . . • ' • , ' • • • . •


(Hi-Hiy(Hi-H2)(T2-Tl)x60HYDRAULIC CONDUCTIVITY

TR2DATA TR4DATA2.42 ' 2.30

1123.80 SEC 1123.803.3E-05 CM/S 2.8E-05

SECCM/S

. . . . . . . . - . , • •RECOVERYTESTRESULTS OF HORNER ANALYSIS

AVERAGE FLOW RATEd(HYDRAUUCHEAD)/dILOG(T/T)l • -HYDRAULIC CONDUCTIVITY

'.

052 GPM •3.18

3.4E-05 CM/S

AR30E3I2

inIo

bJ

bJ

qCMCO *:

-^ om |-to00

Q<bJ

O

QlQ

o.to

CM

o'-ar** -uj

OCM

o .m o m • o m " o in o mCM • » - • » . . o o o> o> o o ' o o r - vm .m in m- m - « 4 - •* •<*• •* •*

id) QV3H OnnVdQAH

MUM 913-8773W B« QSL

" * \Ffifo

re*8* /GV

sc« AS SHOWNOATS 08/17/93«*» , PA21-288Msuwra* 11

Colder Associates

ARITHMETIC PLOT OFHYDRAULIC HEAD V8 TIME ^

WELLG-5 v >TESTNo.7 -

BERKS LANDFILL I C-TB

(id) Oiivy dv3H onnvyaAH

913-6773OR e*««•*


PA21-302OR SUBTTOt


WELLQ-5TESTNo.7

Colder Associates BERKS LANDRLLncutc.C-77

. ' < ' ••

o, — j:. '•bJ

31Q- o' • • . i—>- tbJ g0 '£0 fcbJ £9^-rcbJ

0

cc. - • u

• " • • - ' V . • • • / - . ; , : ' ' ' ' ' "

' ' ' ' '

!

^

3 2•> m

i

«• » 913-6773«*•* DSLo»tns £j£RCTBt! J S**'

Colder A

I1

' ' 1I\

i i io m o^- 00in. . m m

(tSIrt Id) QV3H

xfut AS SHOWNOAifc 08/17/93nti NO: PA21-294M SUBTITLE: n

ssodates

'.' '.

.'' . . • • ' ' . • . •

— *

:'

• • ' . ' • • ' • . . ' '' .

1 : " 'l - 1 |

. ' ' •/• ~,'f

CMdi : .•<*•dl.

too :' • ' . • .1

CO -d1

T F-H^ P

2 •§+':•

I sto

* . •' ' '

| . ' . . . ' • .

°p - \ '1

t

CM . • . . • ' ' .

m o m o ' inO> Cft .00 '00 f

onnvaoAH .

. SEMILOQ PLOT OFHEAD RECOVERY V8 HORNER TIME

WELLG-5TESTNo.7 -i

BERKS LANDRLL C-781SR302315

NOVEMBER 1894 TABLE 1 813-4773. BERKS LANDFILL. REMEDIAL INVESTIGATION

SUMARY OF HYDROGEOLOGK5 TEST RESULTS

WELL G-6TESTNO. • , ' . . - . . 8 .


LENGTHTESTEDDEPTH RANGE OF TESTED ZONEDEPTH OF ZONE BELOW PACKER ASSEMBLY TO BOTTOM OFfiOREHOLEDEPTH OF ZONE ABOVE PACKER ASSEMBLY TO WATER LEVEL


DEPTH TO WATER (BELOW TOP OF CASING) 'GROUNDWATER ELEVATION

INITIAL HYDRAULIC HEAD (Hi)HYDRAULIC HEAD AT THE BEGINING OF SLUG TEST (Hos)MAXIMUM HYDRAULIC HEAD DIFFERENCE (HI - Hos)HYDRAULIC HEAD AT THE BEGINING OF RECOVERY TEST (Hor)HYDRAULIC HEAD DIFFERENCE (Hos - Hor)

TEST ELAPSED TIME TO BEGINING OF SLUG TEST (t; T" 0)TEST ELAPSED TIME TO BEGINING OF RECOVERY TEST (1; T1 . 0)

£.55 INCH€.25 INCH

277.00 FTBGS

25.70 FT82.00 FT BGS TO 60.3083.78 FT BGS TO 277.004.32 FT BGS TO 88.30

6.00 FT618.00 FTMSL .613.00 FTMSL


608.37 FT607,76 FT1*1 FT

608.12 FT1 M FT

23.17 MIN26.03 MIN

FTBGSFTBGSFTBGS

''•'•' ••• ••:--. ", '• •.. ' - • ' • • .- " •• " •'.'-'-.SLUG TESTRESULTS OF HVORSLEV ANALYSIS

(W-Hiy(Hi-H2)<T2-T1)xeoHYDRAULIC CONDUCTIVITY '-.' •

TR2DATA6.44 ' • - . ' - . . ' . . .

171.60 SEC4.6E-04 CM/S


AVERAGE FLOW RATEd(HYDRAUUCHEAD)/d[LOG(T/T)]HYDRAULIC CONDUCTIVITY

0.13 GPM,N A ' . • - . .NA CM/S

FH*:o5tft8.wk1

AR3023I6

m in m

id) av3H onnvaaAH

913-8773OSL

AS SHOWNOAT* 08/17/93ncwxi PA21-280MSUBimfi 11


WELLG-5TESTNo.8

Odder Associates noun__________ C-79

- 00

LO

(id) ouva QV3H onnvaoAH NT

JOB no: 9t3-6773ORB*

CHKBtt

AS SHOWN08/17/93PA21-303

OftfUBIIU:


WELL G-6TEST No. 8

Colder Associates BERKS LANDFILL C-80ftR3023!8

00-

crUJ

crLUcroX

dLO _______

o ' ' t^ "^

Eo

O ;<o HT^ j J y +O ^2-UJ £

i i i i i i

CMdI

IOd

oqd

CM

oqT

CMI

o» oi o> eft eft °° oo . oo 0 oo 0 c oo o t- rr>o o o o o ^ o o o o o o o o o ^ o o om m m m m m ,m m m m m m m m in m m

(id) QV3H OnnVddAH

t—CM

oo

913-8773DSL

CHKB*REVBT.

SCAU: AS SHOWNoa/17/93

f»iM»s PA21-293MSUSmi: 11


WELL G-6TESTNo.8

Colder Associates BERKS LANDFILLAR3023I9

NOVEMBER 1894 TABLE 1 813-6773BERKS LANDFILL. REMEDIAL INVESTIGATION >

. ' . ' " " ' 6UMARY OF HYDROGEOLOGIC TEST RESULTS

WELL G-6TESTNO. «DUP

DRIU ROD DIAMETER 'BOREHOLE DIAMETERBOREHOLE DEPTH (FEET BELOW GROUND SURFACE)

LENGTHTESTED . 'DEPTH RANGE OF TESTED ZONEDEPTH OF ZONE BELOW PACKER ASSEMBLY TO BOTTOM OF BOREHOLEDEPTH OF ZONE ABOVE PACKER ASSEMBLY TO WATER LEVEL

STICK-UPTOP OF CASING ELEVATION ' .GROUND SURFACE ELEVATION


INITIAL HYDRAULIC HEAD (HI)HYDRAULIC HEAD AT THE BEGINING OF SLUG TEST (Hot)MAXIMUM HYDRAULIC HEAD DIFFERENCE (HI - Hos)HYDRAULIC HEAD AT THE BEGINING OF RECOVERY TEST (Hoi)HYDRAULIC HEAD DIFFERENCE (Hot - Hor)


-

2.65 INCHCIS INCH

277.00 FTBGS

25.70 FT- 81.00 FTBQSTO 66.00 FTBGS83.78 FT BGS TO 277.00 FTBGS4.18 FTBGSTQ 78.30 FTBGS

6.00 FT618.00 FTMSL613.00 FTMSL


818J1 !FT617 7 FT •

1.64 FTNA FTNA FT

24.07 MINNA MIN

' ' • . ' - . ' • • • . i • • • \ ' •SLUG TESTRESULTS OF HVORSLEV ANALYSIS •

(Hi-H1)/[HI-H2)(T2-T1)X60HYDRAULIC CONDUCTIVITY

TR2DATA3.48 . ; ' ' • ' • . ' • .86.00 8EC

6.4E-44 CM/S .

RECOVERYTESTRESULTS OF HORNER ANALYSIS / ;

AVERAGE FLOW RATEd(HYDRAUUCHEAD)/d[LOG(tfr)IHYDRAULIC CONDUCTIVITY -

NA GPMNANA CM/S

.FN«:B8t(t8.wk1

AR302320

nlO *>,o: %LU Qn ^

Vgo "

10 • < -1CM

q

i i *

s|

i i i i l i t i i i i . i i i " T i l l

00

3 CMoq ^ •-O UJ

(0d

\

CMd

o »- CM ro •* in 10 s- oq' eft «- T- CM ro •* in to i ; oq eft CMd d d d d d d d d ' --- ~ -1 '—' ^ -~ -~ Il l I I l I I I l , 1 l i l l l I I l

(id) oiiva av3H onnvaaAH

«•»«••- 913-8773t* mCMC re

AS SHOWN08/17/93PA21-304

onsusim&

SEMILOQ PLOT OFHEAD RATIO vd TIME

WELL G-5TESTNo. 8DUP

Colder Associates BERKS LANDRLLFKMt

C-82AR30232I

inIo

LU

LU

00

CO P

00LJ e>--t.<,*.LU fc

O

C£Q>-X I I I I I I I I I I I

o o~> oo r* <o m . - ro CM . «- o o coCM i- • *- »- - .»- «- •- . '»- .^• . *- »- ' o ' om in m m m in m in m in in in in

Oisvrid) QV3H onnvaa^H

« *». 913-6773OR ffft DSLewe* £g(KVBTfi /ft,/

«"«= AS SHOWNo«& 08/17/93« N<» PA21-287t* SUBTITLE: 11

Odder Associates


WELL G-6TESTNo. 8DUP

BERKS LANDFILL C BO ^ V fc -^ ^ J fc

Analyses and FiguresWellG-13

AR302323

NOVEMBER 1004 TABLE 1 013-0773REMEDIAL INVESTIGATION. BERKS LANDFILL


WELL : G-13TESTNO. '. 1

DRILL ROD DIAMETERBOREHOLE DIAMETER /BOREHOLE DEPTH (FEET BELOW GROUND SURFACE)

LENGTHTESTED . .DEPTH RANGE OF TESTED ZONEDEPTH OF ZONE BELOW PACKER ASSEMBLY TO BOTTOM OF BOREHOLEDEPTH OF ZONE ABOVE PACKER ASSEMBLY TO WATER LEVEL

STICK-UP / - - • ' .TOP OF CASING ELEVATIONGROUND SURFACE ELEVATION

DEPTH TO WATER (BELOW TOP OF CASING) "' xGROUNDWATER ELEVATION

INITIAL HYDRAULIC HEAD (Hi)HYDRAULIC HEAD AT THE BEGINiNG OF SLUG TEST (Hp«)MAXIMUM HYDRAULIC HEAD DIFFERENCE (HI - Hos)HYDRAULIC HEAD AT THE BEGINING OF RECOVERY TEST (Hor)HYDRAULIC HEAD DIFFERENCE (Ho* - HOT)

TEST ELAPSED TIME TO BEGINING OF SLUG TEST fcT-0) .TEST ELAPSED TIME TO BEGINING OF RECOVERY TEST (t; T - 0)

. '. ' "N . •'

2.76 INCH6.76 INCH

170.00 FTBGS


0.80 FT450.80 FTMSL450.00 FTMSL


431.35 FT427.81 FT8.64 FT ' . ' . ' . '

430.48 FT8.68 FT

33.82 MIN34.70 MIN

' • - ' ,• . ' . • . ' ' • • ' ' . ' . . ' . • , . ' " "SLUGTESTRESULTS OF HVORSLEV ANALYSIS

(Hi-H1V(Hi-H2) t * '(T2-T1)x60HYDRAULIC CONDUCTIVITY

TR2DATA3.88 '45.00 SEC

1.8E-03 CM/S


AVERAGE FLOW RATE .dfHYDRAUUC HEAD)/dILOG {T/T)JHYDRAULIC CONDUCTIVITY .

1.11 6PMNA ,NA CM/S

FHt:g13t*M.wk1

*-/

o T - C M ro ^ t i n 10 r«; 00 o> *- ,»- C M I O?.-?•'?? ? ? ? ? '? ' 7 T T

(id) oiiva QV3H onnvaaAH

JWNO: 913-6773otitk

AS SHOWNOATS 08/17/ 3

PA21-3110« SUBTTU:


WELL Q-13TEST No. 1

Golder Associates BERKS LANH4232S C-84

CM

= +

CMCOCMOCOas

±j) QV3H onnydOAH

JOB NO.: 913-6773ORB* • DSL

Vrev BY:

AS SHOWNDATE: 08/17/93

«£ No.: PA21-331


WELL G-13TEST No. 1

Golder Associates BERKS LANDnLLFIGUREC-85

. ; . •

fO

To_ 1 LU t* 00in

£*•LU t

'O.I-O ~LU =*C£ fcLUITLUz:0X

•. - cf

1 " . - * •

. ' . ' , ' . ' • " • " - • ' ' - . ; " • 'T S*V '

"S*-

•

1 1M m .. »-^ r^ ^

•"a*? 913-6773 »**om» QSL MTCCMC m iO$£_ ' " "*•'

' •' ;

1 .•'- . ' ,v '

' J \ -

• >. '.

1 1m od 2ro ^

(iJ) QV3H,

AS SHOWN08/17/93PA21-321

RCVB* fr-> W SUBWlfc f)

Colder Associates

. ' . ' , ' • ' • ' ' -

- '• . ' ' . ' ' . . *

' ' " '' ' • ; . ' -

«* •

I I 1 1

'o' ' .- ' V

CMdl

. l

to .

COd

•7-ip;-,.7

'7' ' ;'oq . ,7 ,

CM1

in : • o> i in oo in.oi 5f cd 2 i<CM ^ CM ^ CM

onnvaoAH

SEMILOQ PLOT OFHEAD RECOVERY V8 HORNER TIME ,-

WELLG-13 TTESTNo.1 S

BERKS LANDFILL 0-861

J

.•

<:

RR30232T

NOVEMBER1094 TABLE 1 823-6773REMEDIAL INVESTIGATION. BERKS LANDFILL


WELL . 6-13TESTNO. - 2

I ' '

DRILL ROD DIAMETERBOREHOLE DIAMETER ' .BOREHOLE DEPTH (FEET BELOW GROUND SURFACE)

LENGTHTESTEDDEPTH RANGE OF TESTED ZONEDEPTH OF ZONE BELOW PACKER ASSEMBLY TO BOTTOM OF BOREHOLEDEPTH OF ZONE ABOVE PACKER ASSEMBLY TO WATER LEVEL

STICK-UPTOP OF CASING ELEVATION ',GROUND SURFACE ELEVATION


INITIAL HYDRAULIC HEAD (HQHYDRAULIC HEAD AT THE BEGINING OF SLUG TEST (Hos)MAXIMUM HYDRAULIC HEAD DIFFERENCE (HI - Hoi)HYDRAULIC HEAD AT THE BEGINING OF RECOVERY TEST (Hot)HYDRAULIC HEAD DIFFERENCE (Ho« - Ho)

TEST ELAPSED TIME TO BEGINING OF SLUG TEST (t: T «0)TEST ELAPSED TIME TO BEGINING OF RECOVERY TEST (t; T • 0) -

2.76 INCH6.76 INCH

170.00 FTBGS . .

15.40 FT48.00 FT BQS TO 61.40 FTBGS63.40 FT BGS TO 170.00 FTBGS20.00 FT BGS TO 44.00 FTBGS

0.80 FT450.80 FTMSL450.00 FTMSL

20.80 FEET BELOW TOO430.00 FTMSL . ,

431.06 FT421.73 FTfl.33 FT

42841 FT6.68 FT

29.08 MIN31.42 MIN

' ' " , ' I ' - ' " .


(Hi-H1V(Hi-H2) .(T2-T1)x60HYDRAULIC CONDUCTIVITY

TR2DATAS£4 . . '

140.00 SEC SEC6.0E-04 CM/S CM/S


AVERAGE FLOW RATEtf(HYDRAUUC HEAD)/<QLOG (T/TllHYDRAULIC CONDUCTIVITY

0.87 GPMNANA CM/S

F1l«:gl3ttt2.vk1

AR302328

u) QV3H onnvaaAH

Nv 913-6773DSL

AS SHOWN08/17/93


ru N<U PA21-332 WELLTEST No. 2

Colder Associates BERKS LANDFILL "C-87HB302329

:

roO_J_JLU ,

1— £O *Q_ o>- ta: oMI <o^ 2,o si£ *

• 'Q,

LU"x"

aX .

ch

I • • " - •Hr • •

\

• •

• J' ' '

y. v ' . :>• ' : . - . • - ' . ' •

. - / • . ' . ' - ' - • ' • '

\ : ••;,V- - :;

\ • .

' - ' • ' • ' •

•' 1 1 1 1 ' 1M *- O O> , 'CO t^O K) K> CM CM CM

"a*" 813-6773BR •» DSLeHK8Yt OScLrever. £$\A

sc* AS SHOWNo*it 08/17/83recNa: PA2 1-322OR SU8TITU:' • H

Colder Associates

' ' ' • ."

• ' • ' . ' '. . - • • .--

' ' * '

. • • v " '

' '.- .' ' •

- •" . s • '.• :•.•'.' ' ' ~

' . . - - s

- ' • -;'. •• • . .

1 - ^ - '• • • ' • : -

' --' " •v

• ' f " -'-

i i i i i

o '

CM -O '

'.' '.. "' ' '•'

d

d . • .• I . ; - - •

00 • • ' -d -

I f - -

2 '§ + ..--..•

7 ' \ '•

Y ..-•" . ' . 'CO

• « • ' ' ' . ' . • ' . '

CM1 ' ' '

i o . m •<• ro CM- «— ,;C M C M C M C M C M C M


WELL G-13TEST No. 2

BERKS LANDFILL " C-fia&R302330

Ot

LU «^ -

O §ELd

O

toI ^ -ICM

I i i I I————I————L

(u) ouva av3H onnvaaAH N~I

v .

<O

CM

oo ._.d z

ui3 CM

^ CM ^> t in to r > . o q o>o o o o d o d o dI I I I I 1 , 1 f i

JOB HO: 913-6773'«* DSL

AS SHOWNOAT6 08/17/93

-PA21-312Msusmu: 11

SEMILOQ PLOT OFHEAD RATIO V8 TIME f

WELLQ-13 \TEST No. 2

j

Golder Associates BERKS LANDFILL routeC-89

NOVEMBER 1804 , TABLET 813-6773REMEDIAL INVESTIGATION. BERKS LANDFILL

SUMMARY OF HYDRO6EOLOGIC TEST RESULTS

WELL G-13TESTNO. • . - • » • ' : 3


LENGTH TESTED 'DEPTH RANGE OF TESTED ZONEDEPTH OF ZONE BELOW PACKER ASSEMBLY TO BOTTOM OF BOREHOLEDEPTH OF ZONE ABOVE PACKER ASSEMBLY TO WATER LEVEL


DEPTH TO WATER (BELOW TOP OF CASING)GROUNDWATER ELEVATION '

INITIAL HYDRAULIC HEAD (HI)HYDRAULIC HEAD AT THE BEGINING OF SLUG TEST (Ho*)MAXIMUM HYDRAULIC HEAD DIFFERENCE (Hi -Hot)HYDRAULIC HEAD AT THE BEGINING OF RECOVERY TEST (Hor)HYDRAULIC HEAD DIFFERENCE (Hos - Hor)

TEST ELAPSED TIME TO BEGINING OF SLUG TEST fc T« 0)TEST ELAPSED TIME TO BEGINING OF RECOVERY TEST fc T « 0)

2.76 INCH6.76 INCH , •

170.00 FTBGS


o:»o FT •450.80 FTMSL450.00 FTMSL . .

20.SO FEET BELOW TOO430.00 FTMSL

428.85 FT417J1 FT11.04 FT425.68 FT

7.78 FT

21.60 MIN23.17 MIN

' - • • ' ' • • ' . . . ' ' ^ ' ; ; ' ' ' ' • ' • ' ' • ' ' • ' '

SLUGTESTRESULTS OF HVORSLEV ANALYSIS •

(Hi-H1WHI-H2)(T2-T1)x60 -HYDRAULIC CONDUCTIVITY

TR2DATA3.39 .

100.20 SEC7.2E-04 CM/S

RECOVERYTESTRESULTS OF HORNER ANALYSIS ;

AVERAGE FLOW RATEd(HYDRAULJC HEAD) / d[LOG (T/T)IHYDRAULIC CONDUCTIVITY

1.44 GPMNANA CM/S

FUr.g13tlt3.wk1

MI-302331.

10 CM »— • o o> oo'

CM »- o o> oo

ro

'5 CM~ •-UJ2 +

QV3H onnvaaAH

913-6773OSL

CHKB«

REVBlft

AS SHOWN08/17/93

.«•*" PA21-333

. ARITHMETIC PLOT OFHYDRAULIC HEAD V8 TIME

WELLG-13TEST No. 3

/

Golder Associates BERKS LANDFILLftR30233j C-90I

K) '

5 ,•'.— JLU p> u.

• - tiO^ _ r

o: g

o 'So £-LU •"«

S.LU

031

. ' . • - - - t :

- ' . ' . " " '• • . ' ' -t - ' •

.' 1\

'

'

1 1

• ,-

' • ' •

. (

• . *

'/ : ;'/.

' • . . ' ,

i r iCM »- o • CT> oo r>- • to inrO to ro CM CM CM CM CM

* - - "

-

""

. ,- . ; —

• ' : .' -

. ' . . : ' - • - • - . • • ' " -' . ' . ' - ' • ' ' ' • • -

. . ,' ' . ^

^

L.

' ' • . ••—

i i i i i i i

o

CMdl

dl

(0 .dl

COd -' • ' '

f P-

'2 i +. T> 'TID

CO

TCM'1

•<• K) CM '«- O O> 00 1 •CM CM CM CM CM T- T- • ,- •

\ ' • ' "

(r\s\n U) OV3H onnvaaAH

«e N<U 913-6773 **«••MI* osL OMtOict*.. /0&- «£"~KEVIYt / ("O » SUBTIIlfc

GoM

AS SHOWN08/17A3PA21-323

11

ter Associates


WELL G-13TEST No. 3

BERKS LANDFILL """C-SIRR30233U

o •«-

(u) ouva QV3H onnvyaAH NT

913-6773MBft OSL

CHKBft

BtVlft

sc«fi AS SHOWNOATS 08/17/93

PA21-313


WELL GH13TEST No. 3

Colder Associates I FIGURE

C-92II LJ Jll J i •*!•AB302335

NOVEMBER 1094 TABLE 1 , 813-6773REMEDIAL INVESTIGATION. BERKS LANDFILL , -

.'•.-. V SUMMARY OF HYDROGEOLOGIC TEST RESULTS .

WELL - G-13TESTNO. 4A


LENGTHTESTEDDEPTH RANGE OF TESTED ZONE ,DEPTH OF ZONE BELOW PACKER ASSEMBLY TO BOTTOM OF BOREHOLEDEPTH OF ZONE ABOVE PACKER ASSEMBLY TO WATER LEVEL

• • < - • \ ' : '

STICK-UPTOP OF CASING ELEVATIONGROUND SURFACE ELEVATION '

DEPTH TO WATER (BELOW TOP OF CASING)6ROUNDWATER ELEVATION

INITIAL HYDRAULIC HEAD (HI) 'HYDRAULIC HEAD AT THE BEGINING OF SLUG TEST (Hot)MAXIMUM HYDRAULIC HEAD DIFFERENCE (HI - Hos)HYDRAULIC HEAD AT THE BEGINING OF RECOVERY TEST (Hor)HYDRAULIC HEAD DIFFERENCE (Ho* - Hor)

TEST ELAPSED TIME TO BEGINING OF SLUG TEST ft T - 0}TEST ELAPSED TIME TO BEGINING OF RECOVERY TEST (t ;T - 0)

" •'• ' - ' -"'x

2.76 INCH6.76 INCH

170.00 FTBGS

16.40 FT . ,76.00 FT BGS TO 01.40 FTBGS03.40 FT BGS TO 170.00 FTBGS20.00 FT BGS TO 73.30 FTBGS

0.80 FT.450.80 FTMSL'450.00 FTMSL

20.80 FEET BELOW TOG' 430.00 FTMSL

429.25 FT423.74 FT

6.61 FT427.09 FT

4.25 FT

23.62 MIN25.17 MIN


(H1-H1WHI-H2) -(T2-T1)x60 . ) ' • • • .HYDRAULIC CONDUCtlVlTY ,

TR2DATA4.33 . , '.76.00 SEC

1.2E-03 CM/S


AVERAGE FLOW RATEd(HYDRAUUCHEAD)/dlLOG{T/r)! ^HYDRAULIC CONDUCTIVITY .

1.05 GPM0.70

U2E-03 CM/S

Fll«:p13ti!4«.wk1

ftfl302336

o

LJ

inQ£LJ>

t* I . , *-* . . _____. -I N—- i i . e • • • - . : . . . . i e 0

N UJ. X I H * " i- - . : . - • • 1

LU

o,i i v •. ri m -i- 'O

o"fr

O 'ro '

— o o> co5 9 -. § I

u) av3H

JOB MI 913-6773DSL

AS SHOWN08/17/93PA21-334

Golder Associates


WELL G-13TEST N0.4A

BERKS LAMpfa0233 'nousC-93

_

\ ' .' '

K)

o_JLU

*~" *_J CDQ_ o •

. •:>-• t

LU S>

•' t- J sjja

O H-| t 1 LJ

P

rxLU^

0X

»- f

- • . ' . • . . *

•• ... • . . • .•' . •' . ' , •'•••-

v

'-

•v

'

1

'•%' ' ^'•%.'-'-

\V' / ' • • •\1\

• i ^ .' ' . . . . ' . - • ' , ' • '

\ \

; • ; • . . ' " . . -

: ' . ' . ' " .

' • . ' . - . . . . • ' ' • '

•-

' ' - ' • .-

i i i

O

CMdl

V

d • .-'•l

d

COd ' -l

^' ' . • •' £~

H^ P

« IV.

T . '. 'ID

1_

CO

' . ' • ' • .

CM1

- o en co S to m <t ro-5 , ro CM CM CM . CM '..'. CM CM CM

*•*" 913-6773ORB* 0SLCHK BTft rf«r

KVBIft j fP

Colder A

««* AS SHOWN•** 08/17/93««*••• PA2 1-324OR JUBTlTlt 11

ssociates

6EMILOG PLOT OFHEAD RECOVERY V8 HORNER TIME

WELLG-13TESTN0.4A

BERKS LANDRLL n°U'C-94

K>

7O

zilLU -°»3: etQ qOS

LU

oCMd

i i i i i i i L i t r i

CM

oqd

«q 2 <d •*-<••.

LJ1 CM"

O «•* CM IO •<*• IO <O >•;; CO O>. «-' '«- CM rO •* »O «3 r>; CO CJ> CM C >

? ?'?.? ??.???' 777 7 7 77 77 '. . ' • • • ' . • . •• • • . . . . • ' . • • • . . . . - • • • • . • . o

'•.-....•- • - • ' '' ,. , • • . ' . c>(u) ouva av3H onnvaoAH N~I • . Q[

JOBNOI 913-6773

cm n

AS SHOWNOAT!, 08/17/93niH« PA21-314MSUSTU:

SEMILOQ PLOT OFHEAD RATIO vd TIME

WELL G-13TEST No.4A


NOVEMBER 1894 . TABLE 1 , . 013-0773REMEDIAL INVESTIGATION. BERKS LANDFILL

, , SUMMARY OF HYDROGEOLOGIC TEST RESULTS

WELL 6-13TESTNO. , 4B, ^ i / . -


LENGTH TESTEDDEPTH RANGE OF TESTED ZONE '•DEPTH OF ZONE BELOW PACKER ASSEMBLY TO BOTTOM OF BOREHOLEDEPTH OF ZONE ABOVE PACKER ASSEMBLY TO WATER LEVEL

STICK-UP ,TOP OF CASING ELEVATIONGROUND SURFACE ELEVATION


INITIAL HYDRAULIC HEAD (HI)HYDRAULIC HEAD AT THE BEGINING OF SLUG TEST (Hos)MAXIMUM HYDRAULIC HEAD DIFFERENCE (HI -Hos)HYDRAULIC HEAD AT THE BEGINING OF RECOVERY TEST (Hor)HYDRAULIC HEAD DIFFERENCE (Hos T Hor)

TEST ELAPSED TIME TO BEGINING OF SLUG TEST ft: T • 0)TEST ELAPSED tlME TO BEGINING OF RECOVERY TEST (t. T « 0)

2.76 INCH .6.76 INCH

170.00 FTBGS


0.80 FT450.80 FTMSL450.00 FTMSL

20.80 FEET BELOW TOC430.00 FTMSL .,

428.77 FT424.14 FT6.63 FT

428.67 ,FT4.43 FT

17.76 MIN18.76 MIN

SLUG TEST •RESULTS OF HVORSLEV ANALYSIS

(HI-H1V(HI-H2)(T2-T1)xWHYDRAULIC CONDUCTIVITY

TR2DATA4.0160.00 SEC

1.4E-03 CM/S• . . . ' ' , . - ' ' ~ .


AVERAGE FLOW RATEd(HYDRAUUC HEAD) /dlLOG (T/T1)!HYDRAULIC CONDUCTIVITY

1.37 GPM ,6.60

2.0E-04 CM/S

FV«:g13t>Mb.wk1

RR3023UO

u) av3H onnyaaAH

"*

913-6773OHM OSL

AS SHOWN08/17/93PA21-335

MSUBTTOC 11


WELLG-13TEST N0.4B

Colder Associates IFMURt

QO

Q-K

CM

0>

p-tq«o

CO

(O

K)

7•o_,1—1 'CM

LU 5. .d

LUCM.

O I- H-

CMd

,- CM ro •* iO to S oq oy

(u) oiiva QV3H onnyaaAH N~I

JOB M&: 913-6773wer. OSLcwcrft , fcy fREV •* / f *-

SCM£ AS SHOWNPATS 08/17/93m«as PA21-316ORRB-nut 11

Golder Associates

' SEMILOG PLOT OFHEAD RATIO V8 TIME

WELL G-13TESTN0.4B

BERKS LANDFILL ITC-OT

K)

0-JLU

S :_ I o>0.0

>- fco: LU g,O ™=*sft f1 t \ LJ

°

cdLU~7'_.C£a

cf• _ "<

) ' • • . - . . . • • • • v ' .

.;

1

%V

' ; ')

^

... ; -

: - • • • . '

i i i

" • " . • . • ' : . ' • • ' • -

• ' . , '

' • ' ' . . • •

-' . . ' "' •

' .

- ,- . . ' . •

• - ' '

1 •' 1 1

^

CMdI

d

«oT00d . '•:I ' ' . - - .

2 3 .*•.',•I

* ' ^•I..- '

to7

• iodT " ,' . . .CMI

M ' «- O O> CO " Is* »O if) •* .^ ro ro CM CM CM CM CM CMt ** •* ••*..'*. . •* , "* "fr . •*

(iSrN id) av3H onnvaaAH

*•«« 913-6773M«* DSL**"* dOS/«nrn {

Golder A

sw»* AS SHOWN»»»• 08/17/93ru MM . . PA21-325ORSUBTOC 11

ssociates

. SEMILOQ PLOT OFHEAD RECOVERY vs HORNER TIME

WELLG-13 \TE8TN0.4B S

BERKS LANDFILL I C-OSl

NOVEMBER 1W4 TABLE 1 013-6773REMEDIAL INVESTIGATION. BERKS LANDFILL


WELL G-13TESTNO. 6


LENGTHTESTED .DEPTH RANGE OF TESTED ZONEDEPTH OF ZONE BELOW PACKER ASSEMBLY TO BOTTOM OF BOREHOLEDEPTH OF ZONE ABOVE PACKER ASSEMBLY TO WATER LEVEL

STICK-UPTOP OF CASING ELEVATIONGROUND SURFACE ELEVATION • '


INITIAL HYDRAULIC HEAD (HI)'HYDRAULIC HEAD AT THE BEGINING OF SLUG TEST (Hot)MAXIMUM HYDRAULIC HEAD DIFFERENCE (HI -Hos)HYDRAULIC HEAD AT THE BEGINING OF RECOVERY TEST (Hor)HYDRAULIC HEAD DIFFERENCE (Hot - Hor)

TEST ELAPSED TIME TO BEGINING OF SLUG TEST (t: T - 0)TEST ELAPSED TIME TO BEGINING OF RECOVERY TEST (t: T - 0)

• - • • • . ' • ' . : . • t •2.76 INCH6.76 INCH

170:00 FTBGS


o.eo FT450.10 FTMSL450.00 FTMSL


431.60 FT407.16 FT24.35 FT427.72 FT20.67 FT

25 5 MIN33J38 MIN

' • ' - ' - ' -


(T2-T1)x60 , • ' - • • 'HYDRAULIC CONDUCTIVITY

TR2DATA6.44

40S.80 SEC '2.2E-<34 CM/S

v . . _ .RECOVERYTESTRESULTS OF HORNER ANALYSIS

AVERAGE FLOW RATEd(HYDRAUL1C HEAD) /d[LOG (T/T)1HYDRAULIC CONDUCTIVITY

0.76 GPM 'NANA CM/S

Flt*:g13HtS.wk1

I I I I I I I I00 tOo o•<* -•*• •*

(id) av3H onnvaaAH

913-6773

*»«*

AS SHOWNOATS 08/17/93rax HM PA21-338


WELLG-13 "TEST No. 5

Colder Associates BERKS LANDFILL ' I C-99Inoua

i r!

• .

• ' •K)

o..-JLU

- /— s

h- £o 2i _ I OQ___ 0

>- tu£ oLU ->O)

O £{• O K-

LU 8C£ "'rvLU, . z: . •QlOX

' . ' • ~ - • • • . ' ' " . , . - " .

'•-,' . ' . - ; • •

•

-.

*

:

• •. '

" • •

• ' • • ' . ' . : - ;

*" . .

l ' ' ' ,

" ' ' ' "'

'. . '•':,'••- ; '» ' '

.' .' . • • : ' "

i i i i i i

'•'..";-.- . " • ' . •

- ' . , . . . • —

- ' • ' ~

t-

*- . . «

i . ' • ' _

- . , . • —

,' . : ' —

• ' ^

' ' • • ' . . • ' • • '

1 1 I I 1 1 1

o

CMd1 :

dl ' •to

?oodl

.«-'• ',' $ £.CM Q i i

^ _l +1^J." . - - •

" i " ' • - . ' • ' 'to

*«"• 'CO

TCM1. •••

•* CM O O O t O ^ C M O 00 tO •* CM OCO to

(ISVN id) QV3H onnvyoAH

**«« 913-6773°" •* DSL*K its I 5CKV«= xir

*** AS SHOWNWTE: 08/17/93«•»»•• PA21-326M SUBTITLE: 11 .

Colder Associates

6EMILOGPLOT OFHEAD RECOVERY V8 HORNER TIME

WELLG-13TEST No. 5

BERKS LANDRLL 1??-1OO

—J toUJ 2^•eQ.t

o S-*— o>s»LU =%toUJ

I II I MI...'L I I 'I I I II——I——I

2 -»•

.CM

*- CM ro •* in to r cq O) *- '»-.'' CM ro •* in ,to r oq d> CMd d d d d d d d d l^^:^:^^^^^^ II I i i l l l l i l l I I I I l I I

(id) ouva av3H onnvaQAH NT

913-6773otws OSLows*


PA21-310OR SUBTOt 11


WELLQ-13TEST No. 5

Golder Associates \ • • nouficBERKS LANDRLL C-101

NOVEMBER1894 TABLE 1 813-6773REMEDIAL INVESTIGATION. BERKS LANDFILL


WELL . G-13TEST NO. . e


* ' " . i




INITIAL HYDRAULIC HEAD (HI)HYDRAULIC HEAD AT THE BEGINING OF SLUG TEST (Htx)MAXIMUM HYDRAULIC HEAD DIFFERENCE (HI - Hos)HYDRAULIC HEAD AT THE BEGINING OF RECOVERY TEST (Hor)HYDRAULIC HEAD DIFFERENCE (Hos -Hor) .


2.75 INCH6.75 INCH

170.00 FTBGS

16.40 FT106.00 FT BGS tO 121.40123.40 FT BGS TO 170.0020.00 FT BGS TO 103.30

0.80 FT450.80 FTMSL450.00 FTMSL


432.01 FT404.64 FT27.37 FT423.31 FT18.67 FT

32.60 MIN40.60 MIN

FTBGSFTBGSFTBGS

V . ' • • • - • . ' ' . . . . . - ' . , '-.. .• ,


(HI-H1V(HI-H2)(T2-T1)x60HYDRAULIC CONDUCTIVITY

TR2DATA3.16

480.00 SEC1.4E-04 CM/S

RECOVERY TESTRESULTS OF HORNER ANALYSIS

AVERAGE FLOW RATE 'd(HYDRAULIC KEAD)/d[LOG (T/DIHYDRAULIC CONDUCTIVITY

' • " . ;'

0.72 GPMNANA CM/S

• F««:al3tste.wk1

RR3023U8

O

LU^LU

CM

CO to

LUtoG)

< fcLU £•

o

a:Q

i i i i r i i l I——\——I——I——I——L

O

rO

O

oCM

vJ

tO "*• CM O 00 tO •* CM O 00 »O «t CM O C O l O ' - tro ro ro ro CM CM CM C M C M <~ »- r"T T QP Q

("isw id) av3H onnvaaAH

«• NM 913-6773OSL

**«•*RWSTS #±

AS SHOWNDATE, Q8/17/93

PA21-337DM suBTrne 11


WELL G-13TESTNa8

,-

Golder Associates BERKS LANDFILL C-102RR3023u9

-J-*—I s-LU'.-

o:LJ

g

o

i i i i i i i i i i i l l i i i l i t

CO

to

CM

2 +

O T- CM ro " f) tO r*; CO CT)*- «- CM ro •* if) tO.' l>.00 C\ CMd d d d d d d d d ' « ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ » ^ » ^ . lI l l II l I I I I I I l I I I l I

(id) oiiva QV3H onnvyoAH MI

913-6773

CHKtY.

AS SHOWNOAT& 08/17A3

PA21-317OR «UBTiUt 11

SEMILOQ PLOT OFHEAD RATIO ve TIME

WELL G-13TEST No. 6

Colder Associates BERKS LANPniL

roOJ_JLU

'*!. 0 *I CM

RECOVERY

PI

TEST #6 (106.0 FT TO 1

o:LU2lcro

. X

(t, f'• ^

' • • ' ' •

' ' . . • .

• i ' ' • : * •' ' : '~i . ' " • '" . - -\ ' . - .. . - p • . • '..'."> • - . . . . .: ' • ' - • ' . ' : • ~

' * • . . • - .- . • . . • • -

• ' \ ' ' • " • ' ' • " ' V "

• ' • • \ ' - " ' • • *" •

l " . ' -

'' . ' . , ' ' • ... '< • ' .. - -'

I I I ! I 1 I I 1 1 1 ' J 1 | |

. • , . *0 SCMd1 • : ' , ' • • -

«t

?

tod, .

00 ' '• •o

7 <CMl-> 1-

^3 +f — i "^1 , .;

Tf7 .-• :\toTcq

I

CM '1

!> *f CM O CO tO "t CM O CO IO -t CM O ' CO tO ' t .

•T ^ " T T > T T '

(id) QV3H

Mita: 913-6773 *** AS SHOWN»•* DSL a*16. 08/17/93«<8* itfflL run*: PA21-327««•»• /£&> ONSUOTTU5 t1

Gold£r Associates

• ' , i -

<" . . ,

pnnyyaAH

SEMILOQ PLOT OFHEAD RECOVERY va HORNER TIME

WELLQ-13 -vTEST No. 6 T

BERKS LANDFILL |TKC-104|

NOVEMBER 1894 TABLE 1 .013-6773REMEDIAL INVESTIGATION. BERKS LANDFILL


WELL G-13TESTNO. ~ -•' 7

DRILL ROD DIAMETER .BOREHOLE DIAMETER .BOREHOLE DEPTH (FEET BELOW GROUND SURFACE)


STICK-UP -TOP OF CASING ELEVATIONGROUND SURFACE ELEVATION


INITIAL HYDRAULIC HEAD (HI) . ' . -HYDRAULIC HEAD AT THE BEGINING OF SLUG TEST (Hoi)MAXIMUM HYDRAULIC HEAD DIFFERENCE (Hi -Ho*) .HYDRAULIC HEAD AT THE BEGINING OF RECOVERY TEST (Hor)HYDRAULIC HEAD DIFFERENCE (Ho* - HOT)

TEST ELAPSED TIME TO BEGINING OF SLUG TEST (t; T - 0)TEST ELAPSED TIME TO BEGINING OF RECOVERY TEST (t; T « 0)

2.76 INCH6.76 INCH

170.00 FTBGS


0.80 FT450.80 .FTMSL .450.00 FTMSL •

20 M FEET BELOW TOO430.00 FTMSL

428.05 FT401.93 F T • ' - • • '27.12 FT403.34 FT1X1 FT

25.33 MIN56.67 MIN

SLUG TESTRESULTS OF HVORSLEV ANALYSIS '

(H!-H1V(Hi-H2)(T2-Tl)xeOHYDRAULIC CONDUCTIVITY

TR2DATA -1.05

1880.40 SEC1.6E-06 CM/S

- • . . - . • . . - •RECOVERYTESTRESULTS OF HORNER ANALYSIS

AVERAGE FLOW RATEd(HYDRAUUC HEAD) /d[LOG (T/T)1HYDRAULIC CONDUCTIVITY

'

0.01 GPM12.69

6.4E-07 CM/S • •

FH»:jl3Ht7.irt1

ftR3023S2

K)

UJ

LJ

•<*to*

_, 2in t

QLJxo

O 2 vs_xLU

8 e+

OCM

ift O IT) O «f) O if)ro fO CM CM " •»- ^ O

(id) QV3H onnvaaAH

913-6773

RWST.

AS SHOWN08/17/93PA21-338

ORSUBTITte


WELL G-13TESTNo.7


(Id) OlXVa QV3H OlinvaOAH NT

*» •« 913-6773DSL

CHKtti

RCVVK

AS SHOWNMTE 08/17/93

PA21-318Oft SUBTmt

SEMILOG PLOT OFHEAD RAHO V8 TIME

WELL G-13TEST No. 7

Colder Associates BERKS LANDFILL „ , g.J C-106name

.'•• . •

K>

O' .'• -J.

-JLJ^ ~£

o 2-J £Q. g

• >- tQS'o>'5" v_x

° £orLJ {3o: ;•»-.a:LJzCEOX

' v • . v ' • ' ' , ' " " * *

" " • i '

•

. . . " • H

;»

^ j

' .

,.-

i i itO' • ••* CM Oro ro ro K)•* "*• •<* •*

- • . • • • •

*••*• 913-6773 *«*M •* DSL B*16

r

9

1 " ,

g "

•

h - •

' \

-

I I 1 1 1 .

« . .

, —

> • _

' . . • • ' " . - ' . . '-.-• • _

i '' -

. - —

-' . ' \

- . : " " , ' • • X

. " . ^

- ' ' . • ••«

i

'•

*\ —

1 I I I 1 ^ 1 I I I

f/

-. ' s0

CMdI^ . .' ' . ' •9I '

todI

COd .•"..

^

1 f- '$ P' '

CM g^ s +I

j

::••' V-i 'to1— ',1oqT

CMi

oa «> •* CM o ao <o •* CM o oo1 10 "*• CM oCM C M C M C M C M '-'-'- ' - ' - O O O - O O• _i: . _ _k « . _i. _•. _k _ . . . ' . —*. ^"T ^ ^T ~ ~ 'q- . T T "^ T -^ "«" >T . -^- ••«-

1 ' i

(isw id) av3H onnvaoAH

AS SHOWN' 08/17/93

Oi(** OSC «."•*•-. PA21-328RtVBti Ajj 0« SUBTITLE JJ

Colder Associates

SEMILOQ PLOT OF

\

HEAD RECOVERY V9 HORNER TIMEWELL 0-13 vTEST No. 7 H

BERKS LANDFILL 115-107

j

NOVEMBER1894 TABLE 1 »13-€773REMEDIAL INVESTIGATION. BERKS LANDFILL


WELL . . . G-13TESTNO. 8


LENQTHTESTEDDEPTH RANGE OF TESTED ZONEDEPTH OF ZONE BELOW PACKER ASSEMBLY TO BOTTOM OF BOREHOLEDEPTH OF ZONE ABOVE PACKER ASSEMBLYTO WATER LEVEL

STK5K-UP •TOP OF CASING ELEVATIONGROUND SURFACE ELEVATION


INITIAL HYDRAULIC HEAD (Hi)HYDRAULIC HEAD AT THE BEGINING OF SLUG TEST (Ho*)MAXIMUM HYDRAULIC HEAD DIFFERENCE (HI - Ho*}HYDRAULIC HEAD AT THE BEGINING OF RECOVERY TEST (Hor)HYDRAULIC HEAD DIFFERENCE (Hos - Hor)

TEST ELAPSED TIME TO BEGINING OF SLUG TEST (t; T • 0)TEST ELAPSED TIME TO BEGINING OF RECOVERY TEST (t T « Q)

2.75 INCH6.50 INCH .

170.00 'FTBGS


0.80 FT450.80 FTMSL , '450.00 FTMSL

20 JO FEET BELOW TOO430.00 FTMSL

1 - • ' -

431.92 FT404.31 FT27.61 FT . . • ' ; ' .416.82 FT12.61 FT

25.83 MIN65.60 MIN ;

' . . ' ' ' •' . • ^ :SLUG TESTRESULTS OF HVORSLEV ANALYSIS

(H!-H1V(HI-H2)(T2-T1)x60HYDRAULIC CONDUCTIVITY

TR2DATA ' ,1.83

1780.20 SEC2.0E-05 CM/S -


AVERAGE FLOW RATE . .d(HYDRAUUCHEAD)/«!lLOG(T/r)I " .HYDRAULIC CONDUCTIVITY

0.13 GPM

1 E-05 CM/S

FIM:gl3titS.wki

id) QV3H onnvaoAH

I JOIN*: 913-8773IWB* v DSL

iREVBli

AS SHOWNOATH 08/17/93

PA21-339

Golder Associates

ARITHMETIC PLOT OFHYDRAULIC HEAD vd TIME

WELL G-13TEST No. 8

BERKS LANDFILLnoufttC-10818]

(id) ouva QV3H onnvaaAH NI

JOB"" 913-6773,•••». OSLCMC 81ft JQC/

KVBti V*f J

««* AS SHOWNHATE: 08/17/93«£"«.: PA21-319ORSUeTTttt ^1 ^

Colder Associates


WELL G-13TEST No.8

BERKS LANDRLL IIS-109

O

LJ

I— t"fr

>- tzo: oLU 8

oiUJ SC£ "

LUZCEO

(isw id) av3H onnvaaAH

CMO

l

I

00d

CM

T

CMI

O> C O r » *O 1O " t r O ' C M «- OCM CM CM CM CM CM CM CM CM CM•

913-6773»«* DSLCMCBYl

REV BY:

AS SHOWN08/17/93

nt HO: pA21-329MSUBDTlt:


WELL G-13TEST No. 8

Colder Associates BERKS LANDFILL JJC-110

NOVEMBER 1894 . x . . TABLE 1 813-6773' REMEDIAL INVESTIGATION. BERKS LANDFILLSUMMARY OF HYDROGEOLOGIC TEST RESULTS

WELL , . 6-13TESTNO. 8 .

DRILL ROD DIAMETER 2.76 INCHBOREHOLE DIAMETER 6.60 INCHBOREHOLE DEPTH (FEET BELOW GROUND SURFACE) 170.00 FTBGS

' • - * -

LENGTH TESTED 16.40 FTDEPTH RANGE OF TESTED ZONE 146.00 FT BGS TO 161.40 FTBGSDEPTH OF ZONE BELOW PACKER ASSEMBLY TO BOTTOM OF BOREHOLE 163.40 FT BGS TO 170.00 FTBGSDEPTH OF ZONE ABOVE PACKER ASSEMBLY TO WATER LEVEL 20.00 FT BGS TO 144.00 FTBGS

STICK-UP 0.80 FTTOP OF CASING ELEVATION ' 450.80 FTMSL •GROUND SURFACE ELEVATION • ' 450.00 FTMSL

DEPTH TO WATER (BELOW TOP OF CASING) , 20.80 FEET BELOW TOGGROUNDWATERELEVATION 430.00 FTMSL

INITIAL HYDRAULIC HEAD (HI) 459.16 FTHYDRAULIC HEAD AT THE BEGINING OF SLUG TEST (Hos) . 402.47 FTMAXIMUM HYDRAULIC HEAD DIFFERENCE (HI-Hoe) . 55.68 FT ~HYDRAULIC HEAD AT THE BEGINING OF RECOVERY TEST (Hor) 403.02 FTHYDRAULIC HEAD DIFFERENCE (Hos-Hor) 0.65 FT

TEST ELAPSED TIME TO BEGINING OF SLUG TEST (t;T«0) 23.67 MINTEST ELAPSED TIME TO BEGINING OF RECOVERY TEST (t;T«0) , 62.60 MIN ,


(Hi-H1V(HI-H2)(T2-T1)x60HYDRAULIC CONDUCTIVITY

TR2DATA1.01

. 1729*0 SEC3.4E-«7 CM/S !


AVERAGE FLOW.RATEd(HYDRAUUC HEAD)/d[LOG CT/T1)!HYDRAULIC CONDUCTIVITY

0.006 GPM6.16

7.8E-07 CM/S

RR302360

O Om ^-. ro CM ' '*- o oin m in m m in

id) dv3H onnvagAH

«

913-6773IWBY,

lavs*


PA21-340OftSUBTlTUD

ARITHMETIC PLOT OFHYDRAULIC HEAD VS TIME

WELL G-13TEST No. 9

Colder Associates I noun___________C-1i1

• •* •

K)

/- IO £

— 1 t'

J — 1 ^

tzo SLd 5*0 >_:> £oLJ-

i

• . c

\ . . ' .. " ' "

"* H- '

.£"

T

3fe.

i3 . o• .?

JOB HO: 913-6773«•* DSL«"•* Cftc-RCV BY. /M" ***

. • • • ; ' . .

• ' - ' ' ' . . .

.'. ~ . - ' ' . •

-' V

/ • • • • , •

- . . - s

•

1 1 1 1(LCM ro ^- mO O O Od d d d1 ' I l

(id) onya av3H

•c*1* ' AS SHOWNDATD 08/17/93

TUHc.: RA2 1-320ORSUBTITlt |

Colder Associates

. ' . . ; . ' ' • -

• -

_

• '

•': • - • -

—

' ' • • ' ^. ••' ' -

f"

'•• /

' - • . ' . • -

' • t *

I I i i

COCM

CM

.8-, '. ._••••' .

2 , " • • • • - '

LJCM 2.'.+*~ *~

co • ,

- • • ' - ; •

o

o q q q ^d d d d i1 l l 1

onnvaaAH NT . . .


WELL G-13TEST No. 9

fWUREBERKS LANDFILL f C-11O

K)

O -i . HoI

LJ

0-2I ^Q-g

to

LJ

O o»o .-*Lul tt

O

LJoqT

id) QV3H onnvaaAH

«£>dl

COd

CM

CMI

O O O O O O O Or>. • to ' in~ ^ ro CM »- o-

CM :dt i

oo •f

OH BY!

MB*

REVBTi

913-6773DSL

AS SHOWNO»TS 08/17/93nun*: PA21-330Msusrmi:

• SEMILOQ PLOT OFHEAD RECOVERY V8 HORNER TIME

WELL G-13TEST No. 9

Golder Associates BERKS LANDFILL Tc-1 13AR3023.5T

APPENDIX D

PHASE 1A, PHASE IB, AND PHASE 1C SAMPLING AND ANALYSES PROCEDURES

RJV30236U

March 1995 D-l 913-6773

APPENDIX D* • - -

PHASE 1A, IB, AND 1C SAMPLING AND ANALYSES PROCEDURES

This Appendix provides a detailed discussion of the environmental sampling andanalyses conducted during Phases 1A, IB, and 1C of the RI.

Phase 1A Groundwater Monitoring Well Sampling and Analyses

The following nine groundwater monitoring wells were sampled during Phase 1A:

» C-3S (existing deep open borehole, downgradient of Wood Dump);

• C-3D (existing deep open borehole, downgradient of Wood Dump);

• C-5 (existing deep open borehole, downgradient of eastern landfill);

• MP-18S (existing shallow screened well, in area of former landfillequipment maintenance quonset hut, and downgradient of easternlandfill);

• MP-16 (existing shallow screened well, downgradient of Stabatrolarea); ..

• GR-18D (replacement for MP-18D, deep screened well, downgradientof eastern landfill); N

,, • G-l (new, shallow screened well, downgradient of western landfill);

• G-2 (new, shallow screened well, south and upgradient of Site); and,

• G-3 (new, shallow screened well, south and upgradient of Site).

Each monitoring well was purged prior to sampling until at least three wellvolumes were removed and field pH, temperature (T), and specific conductance(SQ readings stabilized. On limited occasions, where well recovery was slow, thewell was evacuated and allowed to recover prior to sampling. Grouhdwater

Colder Associates

March 1995 D-2 > ' 913-6773

samples were collected using new, decontaminated teflon bailers. Each monitoringwell was fitted with a dedicated bailer. Laboratory sample bottles were filleddirectly from the teflon bailers, except for samples for filtered metals which werefield filtered.prior to being placed in the oamplo botflos|

All groundwater samples were analyzed for the complete list of TCL and TALparameters (including both filtered and unfiltered metals) and inorganic list A andB constituents. In addition, field measurements of pH, T, and SC were recordedduring sampling.• ' • . . ' / ' • • ' ' • . • • ' •

TetraTech provided oversight of the groundwater sampling procedures, andcollected a split sample from" monitoring well G-l.

Phase 1A Residential and Business Well Sampling and Analyses. ; ; . • ' • . - ' - • " • . • / . - • • . ; - : ; • • • • • , - \ .The following thirteen residential wells and one business well (Auction House)were sampled during Phase 1A:

• Nein residence; '

• Cass residence; <

• Roberts residence;

• • • . . . Reifsnyder residence;'• ' . ' . • • ' • • .• > •. • • - •• • /•

• Heinz residence;. . - : ' ' ' , . •

• Buller residence (shallow well);. - " ; ' . ' , • ' - ] , ' -• . - . . - . '

• Buller residence (deep well);

• Berkel residence; "

Colder Associates

RR302366

March 1995 D-3 913-6773

• Breitegam residence (presently Bino);

• Faust residence;

• Bechtald residence;

• Cremer residence; and,••• v . • ' . . '

» Auction House well.

The Nein and Cass residences and the Auction House well are located within theSite boundary. All other residential wells are located off-site.

Similar to monitoring well sampling, each residential and business well waspurged and pH, T, and SC readings were recorded prior to and during thecollection of groundwater samples. Laboratory sample bottles were filled directlyfrom the hard piped spigot at each location. '

Each residential and business well sample was analyzed for TCL VOCs. Inaddition, the Nein, Roberts and Cass residence well samples were analyzed forTCL SyOCs and P/PCBs and TAL metals and cyanide.

TetraTech observed the residential well sampling procedures and collected a splitsample of the Nein residence well. . . .

Phase 1A Surface Water Sampling and Analyses

The Work Plan specified three locations for surface water sampling during Phase1A: SW-6 (Station K); SW-7 (Station C); and SW-8 (Station D). The location of thesurface water samples were selected at pooled reaches of the stream where thestream velocity was lowest (potentially worst-case locations) immediatelydownstream of the eastern and western landfill. Surface water samplingproceeded from the furthest downstream location (SW-8) to the upstream location

Colder AssociatesftB302367

March 1995 D-4 913-6773

(SW-6). Surface water samples were collected by direct immersion of laboratoryv / " . ' • - . ' • • • . - • • , • • : ' • ' - • 'V J ' _..-__;_1 • l_^*<1 . .!_ _.i ll.** ~.£ j.1_A Ai___.l_. 'f'i ^ ^ ^ ^ f l ^ ^ iJt'f^ :J:-'^:' t•* sample Dotttes at trie centerime or me srxeain.i5Tj:!:.]E£!<a>ie;i3*®!j^

Each surface water sample was analyzed for TCL VOCs, SVOCs and P/PCBs andTAL metals (total) and cyanide. In addition, field measurements of pH, T, SC, anddissolved oxygen (DO) were recorded during sampling.

. ( . ' • ' " . . . - . • ' . .

TetraTech observed the surface water sampling procedures but did not split asurface water sample.

• - . ~\ . ' . ' ...

Phase IA Sediment Sampling and Analyses. - " . ' ' ' ' ' " • i ' ' . " •

The Work Plan specified three locations for sediment sampling during Phase IA:SED-5 (Station K); SED-6 (Station C); and, SED-8 (Station D). The locations of thesediment samples were selected at pooled, low flow velocity (potentially worst-caselocations) areas which contain a.greater proportion of fine-grained sedimentsrather than riffle and run areas of the stream which have higher proportions ofcoarse grained sediments immediately downstream from the eastern and westernlandfills. Sediment sampling proceeded from the furthest downstream location(SED-8) to the most upstream location (SED-5):

, ' ' - • • ' • ' '

Sediment samples were collected by scooping sediment directly off the stream bedusing decontaminated stainless steel spoons. A bucket with a hole cut out of thebottom was placed over the sediment sampling location to minimize the loss offines from the sample due to the stream current

A sediment sample for VOC analysis was collected from title stream centerline ateach location and added directly to laboratory bottles without mixing. Sedimentsamples for the remaining analyses were collected from several locations across the

Colder Associates

RR3023&8

March 1995 D-5 913-6773

stream bed to form a composite sample which was thoroughly mixed in a stainless '' ,steel bowl prior to filling the laboratory bottles. "•

1 • • . . . • • :

Each sediment sample was analyzed for TCL VOCs, SVOCs, and P/PCBs and TALmetals and cyanide.

TetraTech observed the sediment sampling procedures and collected a split of the 'sample collected at SED-6 (Station K). ' .

Phase 1A Soil Sampling and Analyses

The Work Plan specified the collection of six leachate impacted soil samples duringPhase 1A. Three of the samples (SI-EL, S2-EL, and S3-EL) were collected on theeastern landfill in separate quadrants and three samples (Sl-WL, S2-WL, and S&-WL) were collected on the western landfill in separate quadrants. Because thePhase 1A soil samples were designed to identify COPC in soil, the samplelocations were selected where leachate had contacted soils as determined by fieldobservations (potentially worst-case locations). These locations were initially

1 ' " ' ' 'identified by Colder during site reconnaissance and subsequently- approved byUSEPA and TetraTech in the field.

• • •i - ' ' ' ' . ' ' "

Each soil sample was analyzed tor TCL VOCs, SVOCs> and P/PCBs and TALmetals and CN. The samples for TCL SVOC, P/PCB and TAL constituent analyseswere collected from the surface to a depth of 6 inches using stainless steel scoops.

** ' • . • •These samples were first added to a stainless steel mixing bowl, thoroughly mixed,then added to laboratory sample bottles. The samples for TCL VOC analyses werecollected from depths ranging from 12 inches to 24 inches below the surface usinga stainless steel bucket auger. The VOC samples were transferred directly fromthe sampling equipment to the laboratory sample bottles without mixing.

G..d«A«oelat.»ft:R302369

March 1995 D-6 913-6773

TetraTech observed the soil sampling procedures and collected a split sample fromlocation S2-EL

Phase 1A Leachate Sampling and Analyses, " . ' - • • , . • • »

The Work Plan specified the collection of six leachate seepage samples and oneleachate lagoon sample during Phase 1A. Three leachate seepage samples werecollected on the eastern landfill (LI-EL, L2-EL, and L3-EL) and .three leachateseepage samples were collected on the western landfill (Ll-WL, L2-WL; and L3-WL). The leachate lagoon sample was collected from both the.upgradient linedLagoon No. 1 and from manhole MH-1 locations.

Because the Phase 1A leachate samples were designed to identify COPC, thesamples were collected at apparent worst-case locations as determined by fieldobservations. The Phase 1A leachate seepage sample locations were initiallyidentified by Golder during site reconnaissance and subsequently approved byUSEPA and TetraTech in the field.

Prior to collecting the leachate seepage samples, depressions were hand dug usinga decontaminated shovel in order to allow a sufficient volume of leachate toaccumulate. Leachate seepage samples were collected from the depression usinga decontaminated 500 ml glass laboratory beaker which was used to fill thelaboratory sample bottles.

Samples Ll-WL and LI-EL were analyzed for the complete list of TCL and TALparameters". The remaining four leachate seepage samples L2-EL, L3-EL, L2-WL,and L3-WL were analyzed for TCL VOCs. In addition, field measurements of pH,T. and SC were also recorded during sampling.

Golder Associates

AR3Q2370

March 1995 D-7 913-6773

TetraTech observed the sampling protocols and collected a split sample from Ll-W L . " - ' - • ' . . • • • ' • • ' ' ; ' • ' ; ' • . ' • '

Manhole MH-1 is located at the confluence of the leachate collection drains for the .eastern and western landfills prior to discharge to lined Lagoon No. 1. It wasagreed to with USEPA and TetraTech that to minimize the loss of VOCs, theleachate lagoon sample for TCL VOCs would be collected from the manhole andmat samples for the remaining parameters be collected from lined Lagoon No. 1.

.', - • . ' . •' • . ••._'. -. . ; / . • ' - • .; - " v .The sample from MH-1 was collected using a dip sampler consisting of adecontaminated 500 ml laboratory glass beaker mounted on a 15-foot rod. Sampleswere transferred directly into laboratory VOC vials from the 500 ml beaker. Field'measurements of pH, T and SC were recorded during sampling.

The samples from lined Lagoon No. i were collected with a similar dip samplerwith a 6-foot rod. The glass beaker was inverted and pushed into the lagoon \• .. • . , ' . . • • . . , " ' ' • • • . ' -water to a depth of approximately 2 feet to 3 feet where it was slowly turned tothe upright position and allowed to fill. Laboratory sample bottles were then filleddirectly from the beaker. Field measurements of r3H, T and SC were recordedduring sampling.

The sample from MH-1 was analyzed for TCL VOCs. The samples from LagoonNo. 1 were analyzed for TCL SVOCs and P/PCBs, TAL constituents and inorganiclist A and B parameters. .

t . • . • ' •' '

Assessment of Stabatrol Area Material

Hollow stem auger borings (WL-A4, WL-A6, and WL-A8) were advanced todetermine location and depth of Stabatrol area materials. Subsequently/ boringsWL-A5, WL-A7 and WL-A9 were advanced for the collection of Stabatrol area .

Colder Associates .

RR3023H

March 1995 D-8 913-6773v , . • _ • , ' . • , • •

material samples. Three samples of the Stabatrol area materials were collectedusing decontaminated split spoons: SV-1 (from boring WL-A5),SV-2 (from boringWL-A7), and, SV-3 (from boring WL-A9). The split spoon samples were transferredto a stainless steel bowl, .thoroughly mixed, then placed in the laboratory samplebottles.

Each Stabatrol area sample was analyzed by the Toxicity Characteristic LeachingProcedure (TCLP) for the following metals: arsenic, barium, cadmium, chromium,lead, mercury, selenium, and silver.

TetraTech observed the sampling protocols and collected a split of sample SV-1.

Phase 1A Air Screening and Methane Survey

the objectives of the Phase 1A air monitoring program were to:

1) screen ambient air and landfill gas to assess the locations and typesof monitoring, if any, to be conducted during Phase IB;

2) screen ambient air and soil gas .to assist in the characterization of- ' certain areas including the Wood Dump and Stabatrol area; and,

3) assess the presence and potential for lateral migration of methanegas in the shallow subsurface.

; ' . ' / • •-...-.•. ' . • .•

In order to meet these, objectives, the following air .monitoring activities wereconducted during Phase 1 A:

! • • " . - • " " ' ' ' . ' ' •

• : " ambient air screening of VOC along traverses on each landfill, at theWood Dump, and Stabatrol area, and adjacent to leachate seepagelocations and leachate lagoons;

• screening of landfill gas from passive vents along traverses on eachlandfill, and in the Wood Dump and Stabatrol area; and,

Colder AssociatesRR302372

March 1995 D-9 913-6773

• monitoring of methane gas in the shallow subsurface.' '' - '• •'. ' • ' ' '.

The following paragraphs present a summary of the Phase 1A air monitoringactivities conducted.

Ambient Air MonitoringAmbient air was monitored for total non-methane VOCs and for methane.Monitoring occurred continuously and at 100-foot intervals along predefinedtraverses on both the eastern and western landfills, at grid spaced locations onboth the Stabatrol area and Wood Dump, at leachate seeps, and at each of thelagoons. At predefined locations ambient air measurements were generally madeat both 3 feet and 3 inches above the ground or liquid surface. Ambient air wasmonitored first using a 10.6 eV Photovac Microtip and then using a 10.2 eV HNuPI-101 photoionization detector (PID) for non-methane VOCs. Methane wasmonitored using an MSA 361 Combustible Gas Indicator (CGI).

. ; . • ' . • ,In addition, with concurrence from USEPA, a portable gas chromatograph wasused to provide semi-qualitative* and semi-quantitative information regarding thepresence of VOCs in ambient air.

Landfill Gas Monitoring •Landfill gas was measured in the following locations:

• below the ground surface along traverses crossing both the easternand western landfills;

• below the ground surface along grid spaced locations on both theWood Dump and Stabatrol area; and,

• within the passive vents.

Golder Associates mn Q Q 2 3 7 3

March 1995 D-10 913-6773

Initially, a PID (Photovac Microtip) was used to screen landfill gas in the shallowsubsurface and in the passive vents. The subsurface gas and passive vent readingsobtained were erratic and not reproducible. A second survey was conductedduring Phase 1A, using a HNu PID, which also produced similarly erraticreadings. Subsequently, with the concurrence of USEPA, a portable field gaschromatograph was used to screen the presence of VOCs in the subsurface at theStabatrol area, Wood Dump, and at the passive vents. It was expected that thereasons causing matrix interferences on the Photovac Microtip and HNuinstrumentation would be reduced by the chromatographic processes. Thesescreening results were used to select locations for more rigorous sampling andanalyses during Phase IB.

Methane Migration Survey , -Methane was monitored in bar-punch holes along the perimeter of each landfillusing a MSA 361 CGI. At locations where methane was detected above 5 percentof the lower explosive limit (LEL), additional measurements were made in a radialdirection from that point outward until readings less than 5 percent LEL weredetected.

Phase IB Groundwater Monitoring Well Sampling and Analysis

The following thirty-three wells were sampled during Phase IB and included tenexisting screened monitoring wells:

MP-3, MP-14D, MP-17>and,MP-6, MP-15S, MP-19S; NMP-11, MP-15D, ,MP-14S, MP-16S,

two existing shallow, open boreholes:

C-landC-2;, j ' •" . •. • .

Colder Associates

March 1995 D-ll 913-6773

• ' . • • • • ' - : • ' • . - . ' • ' " • . ' Veight existing open boreholes retrofitted as screened monitoring wells:

C-3S, C-6S,C-3D, C-6D,C-4S, C-7S, andC-4D, C-7D; and,

• . . . ' • ' > 'thirteen screened, monitoring wells installed during Phase 1A or Phase IB:

G-l, G-6, G-12,G-2, G-7, G-13, and,G-3, G-8, GR-19D. . .G-4, ' G-10,G-5, G-ll,

In addition, groundwater from one mine drainage opening (MD-2) was sampled.

Each groundwater sample was analyzed for TCL VOCs and SVOCs and both total . ' J'and filtered metals. Field measurements of pH, T and SC were recorded duringsampling.

' . ' '' ' ' • .TetraTech observed sampling protocols arid collected a split of the sample collectedfrom monitoring wells C-4S and C-4D.

Phase IB Residential and Business Well Sampling and Analyses

The same residential and business well locations were sampled during Phase IBas they were during Phase 1A. As specified in the Work Plan, four quarters ofresidential well sampling are included in Phase IB.

/

All samples were analyzed for TCL VOCs. During the first and second quartersof Phase IB, samples from the Nein, Roberts and Cass residential wells were also

Golder AssociatesAB302375

March 1995 D-12 913-6773

analyzed for TCL SVOCs and TAL metals. In addition, field measurements for' • ' - ' • i

pH, T and SC were recorded during sampling. During the third quarter of PhaseIB, TCL VOCs were sampled in the Nein, Roberts, and Cass residential wells. Thefourth quarter of Phase IB (which will repeat the third quarter sampling) isscheduled for April 1994.

TetraTech observed sampling procedures and collected a split of the samplecollected from the Cass residence during the first quarter of Phase IB.

Phase IB Surface Water Sampling and Analyses

The Work Plan specified the collection of twelve surface water samples at locationsSW-1 through SW-12. Prior to sample collection, representatives from USEPA, USFish and Wildlife Service (USFWS), and Golder walked the streams anddrainageways at the Site and discussed and agreed upon the Phase IB surfacewater sampling and analysis program which was summarized in a letter to USEPAfrom Golder dated June 18, 1993. The agreed revisions to the Phase IB surfacewater sampling program as per USEPA and USFWS included the following:

• surface water samples would be collected from.locations SW-1through SW-4 and SW-9 through SW-12, as specified in the WorkPlan;

• surface water sample location SW-5 was deleted; ;

• surface water samples at locations SW-6, SW-7, and SW-8 weredeleted and replaced by sediment samples SED-5B, SED-6B, andSED-8B, respectively; and,

• new surface water sample location SW-13 was added.

. The sample at location SW-2 could not be collected. This location is believed tobe an ephemeral stream and was dry at the time of sampling.

Colder AssociatesflR302376

March 1995 D-13 913-6773

In summary, eight surface water samples were collected during Phase IB at thefollowing locations: -

SW-1 (Station A); SW-9 (Station G); SW-12 (Station F> and,SW-3 (Station I); SW-10 (Station L); SW-13 (Station J).SW-4 (Station H); . SW-11 (Station B);

Each surface water sample was analyzed for TCL VOCs and SVOCs and TALmetals (total) and CN. In addition, surface water samples were also analyzed foralkalinity, and hardness in the laboratory and T, pH, SC and dissolved oxygen(DO) in the field.

TetraTech observed the Phase IB surface water sampling procedures and collecteda split of sample SW-10:

Phase IB Sediment Sampling and Analyses

The Work Plan specified the collection of six sediment samples for COPC analyses(SED-1, SED-2, SED-3, SED-4, SED-7, and SED-11) and six sediment samples forconventional parameter analyses (SED-1, SED-3, SED-7, SED S, SED 9, and SED-10)during Phase IB. However, similar to the final determination of surface watersamples, USEPA, USFWS and Colder performed site reconnaissance and agreedupon sampling the following eleven sediment locations during Phase IB:

SED-1 (Station A); SED-7 (Station B);SED-2 (Station I); SED-8B (Station D);SED-3 (Station H); SED-9 (Station L);SED-4 (Station E); SED-10 (Station G); andSED-5B (Station K); SED-11 (Station F).SED-6B (Station C);

Further, the precise sampling point expected to contain the highest proportion offine grained sediments at each of the sampling locations was also agreed upon by

G8'd"A"°"*" 3R302377

March 1995 D-14 913-6773

USEPA, USFWS, and Golder. The Phase IB samples were collected from thesepoints. x

Each sediment sample was analyzed for TCL SVOCs and TAL metals with T, pHand SC measured in the field. In addition, the following conventional parameterswere analyzed in the laboratory: total organic carbon (TOC), grain sizedistribution, percent moisture, and percent solids. . ,'

TetraTech observed the sediment sampling procedures and collected a split samplefrom SED-1. • / ' . " > . . ' '

Phase IB Soil Sampling and Analysis

The Work Plan specified the collection of seven soil samples during Phase IBwhich included a leachate impacted sample at each remaining quadrant on eachlandfill (S4-EL and S4-WL), a non-leachate impacted sample on each landfill (S5-ELand S5-WL), and three background soil samples (Sl-BG, S2-BG, and S3-BG).During .the site reconnaissance to identify surface water and sediment samplinglocations, USEPA and USFWS requested that ari eighth soil sample (S6-EL) becollected at the base of the rip-rap lined surface water drainage channel on thenorthwest corner of the eastern landfill.

' * ' . ' ' • . ' " . ' '' " ' ' • '

In addition, the Work Plan also specified that a soil sample be collected north ofWheatfield Road at the suspected location of waste disposal in the vicinity of minedepressions. Because it was determined during Phase 1A that insignificantdisposal practices occurred in this area, USEPA agreed that the collection of thissample, designated in the Work Plan as SO-8, was unnecessary.

Each soil sample was analyzed for TCL VOCs and SVOCs and TAL metals.

Colder Associates

&R302378

March 1995 D-15 913-6773

TetraTech observed the soil sampling procedures and collected a split sample at'location S4-WL.

Phase IB Leachate Sampling and Analyses

. . ' • ' • tThe Work Plan specified one leachate sample to be collected from Lagoon No. 1.Similarly, for Phase 1A, samples for TCL VOC analyses were collected from MH-1and samples for TCL SVOC and TAL metals analyses were collected from Lagoon.No. 1. The samples from MH-l were collected using a dip sampler and thesamples from Lagoon No. 1 were collected using a coliwassa sampler whichobtained deeper discrete samples than obtained during Phase 1A as requested byUSEPA.

TetraTech observed the Phase IB leachate sampling procedures and collected asplit sample of MH-1 and Lagoon No. 1.

' ; • .Phase IB Air Sampling and Analyses .

The Work Plan specified ambient.air samples be collected from at least threelocations: one leachate seep; the southernmost leachate lagoon; and, one existingpassive gas vent The samples were to be collected using Summa evacuatedcanisters and analyzed for VOCs according to USEPA Method TOU. The WorkPlan also stated that data collected during the Phase 1A air screening programwould be used to confirm or possibly modify, if necessary, the Phase IB AirSampling Program.

A modified Phase IB Air Sampling Program, which was based on the Phase IAscreening results, was submitted to the USEPA in the November 1992 MonthlyProgress Report The modified program consisted of four VOC soil gas locations

'- ' • ' , ,

(two at the Wood Dump and two at the Stabatrol area), three passive gas vents;

Golder AssociatesAR302379

March 1995 D-16 913-6773

. (two vents on the eastern landfill and one vent on the western landfill), anambient air sample at Lagoon No. 1, a leachate seepage ambient air sample, anda collocated sample at one of the passive gas vents. USEPA reviewed andcommented on this modified Phase IB air sampling program in March 1993. Theproposed Phase IB Air Sampling Program was revised based "on USEPA'scomments and subsequently approved by the Agency.

Air samples were collected from three passive vents, two on the eastern landfill(ELPV07 and ELPV13) and one on the western landfill (WLPV01). Samples were .collected in SUMMA passivated canisters for VOC analysis by EPA Method TO-14and in tedlar bags for Non-Meth«me Organic Compound (NMOC) and hydrogensulfide analysis. Gas flow rates in the veiits were determined by either an airvelocity meter or by measuring the time it takes to fill a known volume plastic

, • " ' f '• ' - ' • • . " ' • • • ' . ' •

container (plastic bag). .

Soil gas samples were collected from two locations on the Stabatrol area (SVSG1Aand SVSG6A) and two locations on the Wood Dump (WDSG2C and WDSG8B).A collocated sample was collected from the Wood Dump sample WDSG8B. Toassess soil gas in the vicinity of the Nein residence, a*sample of soil gas (SGNEIN)was collected for VOC analysis at one location between the Cacoosing Creektributary and the Nein residence. The Nein residence had not burned down at thetime of sampling. Samples were collected in SUMMA passivated canisters forVOC analysis by EPA Method TO-14 and in tedlar bags for hydrogen sulfideanalysis. Also, methane monitoring of the soil gas between the stream and theNein residence was determined at six barpunch locations in a similar manner as

' • . . • ' • • . ' ' " " . . ' '

described for the Phase 1A methane migration survey.

While soil gas and passive vent samples were being collected in SUMMApassivated canisters, samples were also collected for field GC analysis in a similarmanner as described for Phase 1A sampling.

Colder AssociatesAR302380

March 1995 ' D-17 913-6773

Eight-hour ambient air samples were collected in SUMMA passivated canisters .from two source locations. An 8-hour sample was collected from approximately \~S6 feet above the ground surface on the berm between leachate lagoons No. 1 andNo. 2 (Lagoon 8-hour) and a leachate seepage location on the southern portion of

/ . . -

the eastern landfill (Leachate seepage 8-hour). The location of the leachate lagoonand seepage samplers were field approved by USEPA. Samples were collected inSUMMA passivated canisters for VOC analysis by EPA Method TO-14. TetraTechobserved the air sampling procedures and collected a split sample from theLagoon 8-hour location.

Twenty-four-hour ambient air samples were collected from three locations at theSite. The selection of the sample locations was made based upon the prevailingwind direction, i.e., only locations downwind from the landfill were sampled on ,a given day. One sample was collected on the Western Landfill (WLF-24hr-i),three samples were collected from the eastern landfill (ELF-24hr-l, 2 & 3respectively), and three samples were collected from the location an equivalent , jdistance between the lagoons and the'Nein residence (24hr-NEIN-l, 2 «Sc 3,respectively). As discussed with USEPA, the 24-hour ambient air samples were notselected adjacent to the Nein residence because of tree coverage in the area.

Phase 1C Soil Sampling

While not specified in the Work Plan, Phase 1C sampling was conducted to collecteight additional surface soil samples on the existing caps of the landfills. Golderproposed the Phase 1C soil sampling program to USEPA which was approved andconducted in the fall 1993. Five surface soil samples were collected on the easternlandfill (S7-EL through Sll-EL) and three surface soil samples were collected onthe western landfill (S6-WL through S8-WL). Each sample was collected similarly „to the procedures for surface soil sampling in Phase 1A and Phase IB and wereanalyzed for TCL VOC and SVOC and TAL metals.

Golder AssociatesflR30238l

APPENDIX E

CITIZENS UTILITIES WATER AUTHORITYWELL NO: 23 ANALYTICAL DATA

flR3J)2382

«. •= -

COKftCNkEALTH CF PENNSYLVANIAD5FAR7MEM OF ENVIRONMENTAL RESOURCES

LABORATORY REFORT KECEIVst, FOR SAFPLE KUfcBEfi H901C736 REPORTED 3/14, • - . • . . .. . _ • • , • .,COLLECTOR t.KAVANAGH CEC1 SAPPLIN6 6/TE 2/15/5CCOLLECTOR fcO. 1127156 SAMPLING T1HE 1UCCgSTABLISHPEKT CITIZENS UTILITIES HATeR STAhtAKD ANAL 160C»S5 KJJFS CC. CF FA TYPE COCE . . 01FACILITY FliS 2C6CC69II> CODE O J J STREAK C09E

**P RIVER MILE

TEST DESCRIPTION RESULT CCNC VERIFY BY VERIFY DATE

00403 PH LAB 7.7CCO 6 H-S . 2/U/9C00410 T ALK C.U03 92.COCO H6/L 6 hWS 2/U/9C0050G RSSItUE TCT 218.COCO »»G/L G *L£ 2/26/9CC0615A T JIGZ-KV^V^I** C.CCAO I«E/L s ELF 2/22/900062CA •.'T'l|€2-«l/V.»4t'w^tJ . £.5500 K6/L S ELF 2/22/9C0090CA T HAFD CAC03 T y9"*:'12C.CCGO rs/L 6 KLS 2/16/9C01002Y AS,TCTAL Arj««'»< 4.0CCO U6/L € D£S 2/27/9C01007X GARILf* < 5CC.COGO UG/L 6 REV, 2/21/9C01027Y CD TCT U6/L <C^w« C.20CO UE/L 6 EHL 3/C2/9C01034Y CR TCT L'E/L <CW« ^ 4.CCCO UG/L G EHL 3/02/5CC1551Y PE,TCTAL <Le»^ 4.COCQ UG/L 6 SDM 3/Q2/9C01147Y SE,T AS UG/L </f)em»o* c.CCCO UG/L 6 CHS 2/28/SC7190CX KERCIRY < 1.CCCO U6/L 8 iRt 3/14/5C82079 TURE < 1.COCO NTU 6 W

TCTAL JiUKHER OF TESTS FOR ThIS SAMPLe 14

RR302383

.§§ te I * EJ S 8 8RS fc£

••<"»• IA IO *O Ift IO. tft in• / • • « - • • - • > . "

8 8 8 888 8'

o C: C/ tu u u u 5 «.-• C C |t S'5 t 5 ——ir—— uj uj

HisBSSi - § H 8 5 5 5 8 5 8 5e. o . . • •-.•-' •tr* P* J - •

tj • UJ UJ UJ CJ UJ

8 8 8 8.88 8 8C g J ' • • . ' ' . • ' ' • - " " . - ,

^1 8 888 8 8 8 ,8 * -^' *^ " • • " • - . ' • •.

^ uj uj 17 uj uj uj «J •BK• 8 5 88 8 8 88;J-fi! - • - . • . • .' •

II: •uv in • in :• in in • u% u%

•8-8 v 8 v 8' :*/ v >/.'•%.

.:» 8 8 88 8 8 8-8

OKII

g

§^58w|tanBRc •P 4 ^ •

11^^S o ••x»

DO "*•' "•' "•' *• ""• • i • •§33- . g ev 11^ 9 5 5 5 9 985SiS 2&. *5 §• sSfc§§ & fi ss a ft « S 5 ° =*O O 7:9> tO O «n

Ml I !•$!• i M-

vO

3 . j fc " «Q «?«•} l? "S"? «9 "3„ .S 53 5 8 8 5 958 8

III 111* x * ^ J «3 ^ "3 "? "J <U3 «3 "35SI 3g 9 8 8 5 8 5 9 8

9.CM S

',3§ 5 8 5 5 5 5 5 9_ L o ; • • . . ' . . "15^ / ":. : .— U J U J U J U J U J U J U J U J , • •

1 8 5 5 5 5 8 58to • -..- -.•-..• •-. : ;:-S '• ••.;.: : ;-••;•• • : :/ • '

- . U J U J U J U J U J U J U J U J . * - - '

«a ? 5 55 88 8 8 V :;^

§11 :•- J-;':' -;:. • ••;- ; •'-.-.".'{. . -..'•«?uj . u^ uj uj uj uj uj uj ' ' '> .8 5 8 5 5 8 5 V8 i ":- -,

si* V I/" -:". ^-:; '• !.-v" 'Iss s b . •:• • «. • ... • §uj in uj m uj uj uj •9 S 9 '.9 • 9, 9 9 .5

$ „ . IBS -'.- v,.- .;. - v ;r§ 5 T&—— »7 «0 5 «J «••} '-0 "3 ' ">8 2% S| 5 5 85 5 8 5 5g £ Bo-a ' :••'"• ! . ' -..- • :1^ . §g£ t -.; f::/ ,•:•.:_. ;

uj uj'uj uj u j u j u j u j ;5 5 5 5 5 5 9 5 5 .«ss i& j ••"••• i - . • .

i i§i •• TT8—**'•** ** ^,"5.."5 «? S B*s . s § § 5 ° 55 r °

§§i ;:'-, ,v: ?' V; ! : i^: i 111

E

ggM 5 Q E

V C5 CJ . fil ^C2 C3 * Q ' C

?£53S?53i8S 833

g. gPslSpgs8

3' aaa

?.9«fil

s

§<*! B

S 1I 5 0305=12 wao'S1 Sslrlai^lsi

B355|2?3;*3• n n-a n, a H n n Mt'o q

<j

y«

BRB«ite B^ ~ s cw

§ g . : • . , • • ' . . • ' . • • • " • • ' -1 . ., ... .,•\

*»i .Hi w iw; L? p C

s^s s <«i £ $S « » w « J "< o.

. %

•. •. '• •. 4•. • J 'i • •?

. !

• - . A

. I.

UJ .UJ UJ L-J UJ UJ UJ UJ

98 8 9 8 8 8 9

r.- _ SB6- e __5- ' 5 T^—— u« "5 uj uj uj uj . uj. ujg •§.; .31 8 88/8 5.5 8 8§•' £ ' » § J : " " • « : • ' •!|jf ... . 98* ••••,! ,::,--•; -.!•

J°9 33——'«Q •• "0 «3 "3 «3 «J «3 »0Sll 3° 9 5 5, 5 8 5 8 853 'C? «2 J 5s * ° ' *•gig lt§ '• ; ; .''H E T3—~~ *0 «*3 «3 »0 «3 - U> cj «38lf§ ?« 5 8 5 8 8 8 8 8• • " ' ......;35.U • • • ! " - • - . - •

in1s r s 1 s 2 «III ssisiRlUils

cft?C

5

s s

Tft "uj >g «; «v ••• ,_88 59 8 999

5 9• •

«3

i*«MiO i^o **

5 8 9 9 8 5 5

i i.

I I'l I I r;I f

I'l

uj uj u;- uj uj uj uj uj ^ • •..5 -8 $:•' 9 8. 8 5:.-8 ;::•; •..'; ~ CM

• r : '•-••• v;..'. •• :- • 3 CD••. •'. '. • ••'•. _. •: ~ . CO

uj uj uj . uj (V : / S -'S'88 05 9 5 8- 5 ;•':.;;.-. . ^

• .r. . • *-^ . _ \ . - __ • *• " ^j

O O CO S ••. O O ' ' i~ L • §

o p". o ' Q a Q - a ; ." «^ •: •• • • :>:••• F- •• - . : : i ^ -.' | i||§S2 § ^. 'o --o- ^ o1 o b •- 1 3i^55^ SrS8 SS 2 5 S .,;< -• > « -.. :.-.-•; I ^eT^Sa:— ' — U <*» •- *-• «- * •«- '•: . , . S tJ &S M cJ tf8 S 88 8. S 8 ..8 ;,_•. y . \ |s§

i§i§

s

uj 1.7 uj uj uj isj ft ujS-. 3 Q 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 85 '• ' *

B £?SM V5 a££ S E5 fc o 8 "8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8

o fi O iu r-.o P C 1 5 E?u t o o e

u> ' t7 UJ »O to. to

. .5 5 5. ' .5 8 - 5 8 5 tO .- '•>• •

«3 "«3 V3V: «3 .«3 "?Vr55 8_ 8 8 >5 8 8

s « j : : « j - tj-t-7 uj:-o q .t-8 5 5/:5 5; .«'.-

uj uj ,-uj uj':",-cv88 8 8 S/..; *

« ..-• ^ r - ?^ f/? e '•;.•-.- :-:-•:S * S«c? •:-.-.• i-:-V »..?•:. ' : . v'•;•» '*'.•£4.••";:-?j .

""^•* ^* * *******til k" P E » B E E B H E3 J

B

e-8-*-. :« sS Bg8E»g»o E E w S 5? .

2 B Q ;W »r«

•i.

3o •«BE?•t

t > n u i i « n t « n a n

*• . • •«3 «•? «3 «3" «3 «3 ! . ' . * 1

8 .8 8 8 88 8 -8 .: I

uj in tn in u> uj to in . • - , • - •. * • - • • - * • * • • * • * . • • • ..

5 8 5 5 59 5 5 : ." :'-• •' . '...'•. .- A.- .. • r\-T./

~~ '"' '"

»-»1 2.

*' * " r3 O^

II

s* E! a £2 V« Pi * •* •• P* *2

to '« in in *»^ _? •-•-..•• •

i

S 3

O O 00 O* «* *(• +t> • *f

m « « n

gi< .;.*•' -;..sss •••-••:. ---^ ;-.-.in •« in.:- in in• • • • - .• •' ••-. •O • O O '•:• O ^ . '** / ** *• '. ^ %••,-;....

Rg^ •'•-"'•: ••>•' • S-§S£ . ' .; V"-:>:;- '?',V';

?• *3 ' *•' * "2 ' *S -'o • d d • d . d

in in : in in• • • •o o - o o

in • in « • « trio ^ o d d

llg3 O 5 • . ; ;

.«» in in n •. in in_j _j • • • • • •42 E O o o o o5 O *•• * « %* ., •«»

fe 2 - » « «• «O _1 _J • • •8« S: gg S. S ,S

^2 S^i ' / >^ 25 g «*—— in n in in in

O O O O

ID e "k? . '- • : • -- 'a ' . S «* 5 . - •-. •. . • . ; - . - . .. C5 . • ' • ' • ' • •• f5 o o o o o : Ii '**•*&+* * * + * • . i§««i : - f - v ."••*-^SSSS :•.:-.• . -:V.;'. .-••- '

111 j Ll - IJ I afSSu.S_

3 5ecl era

""-~aaa2|IB sel•^ • » v* v* A »r:ss:-rgs»- .,s.e g'.' • B e 2 £ «- «-s s

El

in in in

in • m in « in

w in in n• ••.• • •o o • o o

in in in in

g g g Bi;E

St -»r-efc

•2

=» H'. ^» . . - • ~~ ^ ^ III J'J. * . «

'•> s»

IO

a.

tt

CTr.o c> tJ . • :•: • -y » s* a a a s* ^ E!k« b•* ? * CM"

a 3 3 s a s

few

,11u:*j» .»

§f lj.u:: &. CO-

SB s s <**

33 co-ir* 03,

rS'S-S-P. *L W .jj

: •?<• •.•w .sf ^5-

SR( j.!SVKv«:S 5 -It 3 §5:*St?I ?;-

Kir *1* *" "~

APPENDIX F

PHASE 1A AND IB LANDFILL CAP INVESTIGATION

Contents: '

F-l Phase IA Cap Investigation Field Data; - ' • - * . ' • • . (

F-2 Phase 1A Grain Size Distribution Testing Results

F-3 Phase 1A Standard Proctor Compaction Testing Results

F-4 Plwse 1A Permeability Testing Results" ' ' - ' • ' • . - ' < • . '

F-5 Phase IB Cap Investigation Field Data ,\.

F-6 Phase 16 Nuclear Density Gauge Results andCalibration/Operation Data

F-7 Phase IB Grain Size Distribution Testing andAtterberg Limit Testing Results

F-8 Phase IB Standard Proctor Compaction Testing Results

F-9 Phase IB Permeability Testing Results

F-10 Settlement Plate Surveying Results

AR302391*

Appendix F-l

Phase 1A Cap Investigation Field Data

RR302395

Appendix F-lMarch 1994_______'_______=1-____________ 913-6773

EASTERN LANDFILLIn-situ densities and moisture contents were recorded at four points on the easternlandfill. A test was conducted in each quadrant of the landfill. Measurements atthese four points are as follows:

Location ELSSP-3 \

Soil encountered: ' Brown clayey silt and gravelDepth of nuclear probe: 6 inchesDry density: 108.7 pcfWet density: 129.7 pcf ,Moisture Content: 19.3%Gap Thickness: 27 inches ' „ ; . ' • •

This point is on the slope of the northeast quadrant of the easternlandfill. The test vicinity is sparsely vegetated and the surface is

; covered with .gravel and cobble-sized material. No refuse .wasencountered during recovery of the laboratory test sample.

Location ELSSP-4

Depth of nuclear probe: 6 inchesDry density: 115.1 pcf _Wet density: 136.4 pcfMoisture Content: 185% ;Cap Thickness: Winches

This point is near the crest of the northern slope to the eastern' landfill. Nuclear density gauge readings at this location were

collected on October 30,1993, using Troxler nuclear densimeter No.3440 (Density standard «= 3483, Moisture standard «= 683).

Location ELSSP-6i ,. • •

Soil encountered: Brown clayey silt some cobbles and gravelDepth of nuclear probe: 6 inches vDry density: 795 pcfWet density: 104.6 pcfMoisture Content 315% •Cap Thickness: 15 inches

. Golder Associates

AR302396

Appendix F-l .March 1994 __________ ; _____ -2- • ' • ' _________ 913-6773

The landfill was heavily covered with grass and brush/shrubvegetation in the vicinity of this point No refuse was encounteredduring recovery of the cap sample. The excavation for landfill capsoil sample ELSSP-6 progressed to approximately 15 inches.

Location ELSSP-7

Soil encountered: Brown clayey silt some, cobbles and gravelDepth of nuclear probe: 6 inches ' ' ) . ' " •Dry density: 1148 pcfWet density: 133.4 pcf :Moisture Content 162%Cap Thickness: . 6 inches

Landfill refuse was exposed at the surface immediately adjacent tothis point .

The results of the auger investigation to characterize cap materials and assess thelandfill cap thickness for the remaining points on the eastern landfill are presentedbelow. l ' ^ '•/

EASTERN LANDFILL ,

Location ELSSP-1Landfill cap thickness: 24 inches . 'Landfill cap soil: none recorded

Location 1LSSP-2Landfill cap thickness: 12 inchesLandfill cap soil: Brown silty clay with some gravel

Location ELSSP-5 ,Landfill cap thickness: 22 inchesLandfill cap soil: Brown to darkish gray silty clay.

Surficial soil included many cobbles.

Location ELSSP-8 •Landfill cap thickness: 12 inches Auger refusal at 6 inches.Landfill cap soil: , Brown silty clay to black organic clay

Cobbles encountered, pick-axe was usedand enabled excavation to 12 incheswhere refuse was encountered \ )• - i i —"

Golder Associates

Appendix F-lMarch 1994______- -______&_________________913-6773

Location ELSSP-9Landfill cap thickness: 15 inchesLandfill cap soil: Dark brown to grey silty day

Location ELSSP-10Landfill cap thickness: 23 inches .Landfill cap soil: Brown to grey silty clay/clayey silt

\ Cobbles on ground surface.

Location ELSSP-11Landfill cap thickness: more than 30 inchesLandfill cap soil: Brown silty clay, some cobbles on

. ground surface

Location ELSSP-12Landfill cap thickness: less than 6 inches ' '

• , Landfill cap soil: Light brown sandy silt above dark, finegrained material, possibly organic matter.

Location ELSSP-13Landfill cap thickness: . 15 inchesLandfill cap soil: Brown silty clay above grey moist clayey

( j V . silt Cobbles sized 05 inches to 2 inches~ ^ were present on the ground surface.

1 i .' . • - . ' ". '

Location ELSSP-14Landfill cap thickness: 29 inches .Landfill cap soil: Not recorded

Location ELSSP-15Landfill cap thickness 30 inchesLandfill cap soil: . - Not recorded

Two points within the portion of the eastern1 landfill directly behind theequipment building were also sampled as requested by USEPA. Similarly to theother cap investigation points, the landfill cap thickness was determined and thesoil type used for capping noted. These results are provided below: .

' . ' . . - • ' . - ' ' -

Location ELSSP-16Landfill cap thickness: 8 inchesLandfill cap soil: . Brown clay to clayey silt intermixed with

plastic and glass

Golder AssociatesAR302398

Appendix F-lMarch 1994_______________^_________________913-6773

• . • ' •' - l ' ' ' • . . " .

Location ELSSP-17Landfill cap thickness: 6 inchesLandfill cap soil: x Brown clayey silt intermixed with rubber,

wire and plastic. Cobbles are also- present in the cap matrix. Three probes

.••••-".. augered adjacent to this . probe. encountered refusal from cobbles at

about 6, inches. Cap thickness mayactually be greater.

WESTERN LANDFILL, » . -

Presented below are field observations and measurements made for me westernlandfill during the Phase 1A Cap Investigation for points where in-situ densitiesand moisture contents were recorded by the nuclear density gauge.

Location WLSSP-1

Soil encountered: Brown silty sand to silty clayDepth; of nuclear probe: 4 inchesDry density. 842 pcfWet density: 106.3 pcfMoisture Content 262%Cap Thickness: 18 inches

The test area was lightly grass covered, The nuclear density gauge ;probe} could not be inserted more than 4 inches due to an'

' obstruction. As the laboratory test sample was being recovered, anintact concrete-like material was encountered at a depth of 4 inches.The low density measured may reflect the shallow probe depth;Sample WLSSP-1 was collected from a point immediately adjacentto the nuclear density gauge test point using a shovel to a depth ofapproximately 18 inches. The soil type at the sampling location wassimilar to that encountered at the nuclear density gauge test point

Location WLSSP-4

Soil encountered: Brown and black silty clay/clayey siltDepth of nuclear probe: 6 inchesDry density: 101.7 pcfWet density: : 121;4pcf

Golder Associates -RR302399

; Appendix F-lMarch 1994 913-6773

Moisture Content: 19.4%Cap Thickness: 14 inches

The test point is on me west slope of the western landfill. Rockfragments 1/2 inch to 2 inches' in diameter were on the groundsurface in this area. Sample WLSSP-2 was collected for geotechnicaltesting at the test point using a shovel to a depth of approximately14 inches. No waste was encountered at this depth. Thickvegetation, from small shrubs to trees, covered the landfill in thevicinity of this point

Presented below are field observations and measurements made for the westernlandfill during the Phase 1A Cap Investigation where only cap thicknessmeasurements were taken.

Location WLSSP-2Landfill Cap Thickness: 25 inches (average of two measurements)Landfill Cap Soil: reddish brown silty clay with rock

. fragments 2 inches or greater in size

Location WLSSP-3Landfill Cap Thickness: 28 inches (average of two measurements)Landfill Cap Soil: reddish brown silty clay with small

rock fragments

Location WLSPS-5Landfill Cap Thickness: 0-5 inches (exposed refuse in area)Landfill Cap Soil: : brown silty with small rock fragments

" " • i ' ' ^ • ' '•

Location WLSSP-6-Landfill Cap Thickness: 30 inchesLandfill Cap Soil: brown silty clay wim small rock fragments

Golder Associates

Appendix F-2

Phase 1A Grain Size Distribution Testing Results

AR302MM

PARTICLE SIZE DISTRIBUTION ASTMD-421 AND 422US STANDARD SIEVE OPENING SIZES

- ' r r 1* .w jav 4 10 » « « wo sooi

. ' * .

P

SS to-IN ••«•O

to-

**•

. - . woo

uses

•ifco

COBBLES

\

\ssK >> >

•>Sv

^

s\

,

i* «.1

Grain size in mflfimeters

COftTM Fine

GRAVEL

C Mod Fkw .

SAND

obt

. - .• '.. _•

. c.dot

FINES (S1H or CJay)

TECH: RODDATE: 9HI92CHBXED:fl?£$.REVIEWED:

SAMPLE IDELSSP-J

W%

"

LL PL n C* DESCRIPTIONDut browne-fORAVELmdr-ttSAND.ioneCaci

Sample Type: BULK DateTcned: 9IW2

BERKS PRP/RIFS/SPRING TVtT PA

GOLDER ASSOCIATES INCMTXAUREL.NJ

HR302U02

••

70- •

P „A. *S ^S ;I 40N

«r-

20-

\ ~

1000

trees

PARTICLE SIZE DISTRIBUTION ASTMD421 AND D422US STANDARD SIEVE OPENING SIZES

9 V 1JT .79- J7S1 4 10 20 40 00 100 200 .

•

. 100

COBBLES

TECH: TK

\

:

%s»S^

'•

s

^

/

*

s1 /X

Grain siza In miDimatera ,

Coan* Fine

GRAVEL

DATE: 11/11/92CHECKED- >VjVREVIEWED:

S

SAMPLE IDELSSP-4

ample Type:

PRP/BERKSLANDFILLyPA9134773

Cor U«d Fine

SAND

• s '

S

' ,

:

S

V

s,

abi

! » _

(

.

H

0.501

FINES (SIR and Clay)

*. : • - - • -\ ' :

w%17.6

LL PL PI-"

Gi2.63 E

f-K

DESCRIPTIONark browna SAND aad FINES,xnegnvel

BULK DateTested: 11 92

J

V

1

'.\

Organic material in umple, tooto throughout.

GOLDER ASSOCIATES INC

—— N.

J

flR302U03

* •-•psI0

* - . •--

• . •*•

' • ' - . . 1 6 -

. KOO

uses


' • ' &>•'-•• '•••"' • ' ••z\:;\ -;" ' • ..'• - '• ' ' •r r 1* .79- an? t 10 to « eo too 'aoo

-

160

COBBLES

\LV\ ,

N

X •>V'

'

t ^X

k ' '

S

* - 0.1

Grain size in millimeters

Coa/M Fne

GRAVEL

c Mod Fine

SAND

• •-

obi

•

^

•

• .

• .

cufat/

FINES (Silt of Clay)

. - , . " : ' • ' • . . . . --•

TECH; RDDDATE: «/7/92CHECKED:,

SAMPLE IDELSSP4

W%2X0

U. n. ni

Gt DESOUFTIONDaikbrowB •to SAND and FINES, -soaef-e (ravel •

SimpJeTypt: BULK DauTnted «/«92 .

BERKS PRP/RIFS/SPRING TWP PA§13-6773

COLDER ASSOCIATES INC,MT.LAUREUNI

AR302l*OU

70-PA eo- •S

. • **"I

^O

30-

20- •

10-

1

uses

r 3

.

(

100

COBBLES

PARTICLE SIZE DISTRIBUTION ASTMD-421 AND 422US STANDARD SIEVE OPENING SIZES .

f 1.SP .7SP .378- 4 10 20 40 00 100 200

\<\,

•s.

S

•

V,

'

\

X^

• fo aiGrain size in mflOmeters

Coara* Fine

GRAVEL

C U«d Fine

SAND

0.01

•

• - o.

FINES (Silt of Clay)

lot

TECH: ROD^ DATE: 9/7/92

CHECKED:/

SAMPLE nxELSSP-7

Vt%7.4

LL• i.

PL PI Ga

/

DESCRIPTION -., •Brownf -a SAND and FINES, ,lomec-f gravd

Sample Type: BULK Date Tested: 9/4/92

BERKS PRP/RIFS/SPRING TWP PA9134773

GOLDER ASSOCIATES INC,MTXAURELJU

N-

. )

' ' • tOO-

J . „• j

eo-• %'.' :. •

.70-PA CO*SS • an-IU 40-

o

to-

.0.lobo

uses

PARTICLE SIZE DISTRIBUTION ASTMD^Zl AND 422US STANDARD SIEVE OPENING SIZES

••• : T W1 ,7P J75- 4 tO KJ 40 CO 100 200

-

too

COBBLES

s s^•>N k.\

i

tto

Ooaree

'" sSX'

^\x

• s.C.t

Grain *Jze in mlliimeters

Fine

GRAVEL

c ; Med Fine

SAND

0.01j

•

1

0.001

FINES (Sm or Clay)'

TECH: RDD/CHDATE: 9/7/92CHECKED: Wi

SAMPLE IDWLSSP-1

W%

W

LL PL PI G*

i

DESCRIPTIONLight jwOowuh brown .f-m SAND and e-f GRAVEL,tome Tine* •

Sample Type: BULK Date Tested: 9/5/92 •

BERKS PRP/RIFS/SPRING TfVP PA913-6773

GOLDER ASSOCIATES INCMTXAUREUNI

RR302U06


' - 100 • •• . 3P 15P .791 J75P 4 10 20 40 M 100 200

eo-

pA 00-'SS so-IO

10-

idbo

uses

-

100

COBBLES

~V

•

to

Coarse

S kXv: i i ,

vS

^v

Grain size In millimeters

Fine

GRAVEL

C Med fine

SAND

•

0.01 a

FINES (SW or Clay)

i

»t

TECH: RDDDATE: 9/7/92

REVIEWED:

SAMPLE IDWLSSP-4

W%11.8

LL PL PI G* DESCRIPTIONDark brown -FINES and f-e SAND, _looMfgnvd

Sample Type BULK Date Tested: 9/4/92

BERKS PRP/RIFS/SPRING TWP PA913-6773

GOLDER ASSOCIATES INCoflXAURELJU

Appendix F-3

Phase 1A Standard Proctor Compaction Testing Results

RR302U08

MOISTURE/DRY DENSITY CURVEASTMD698

130

120-

80'

ZERO Aim VOIDS C=2.80

DR t«Y

D 110E. '' .. ' :N6 105

i . \\\- X lGs=2.60v 100

(pel)

• K-

URVES

0% 6% 10% 15% 20% 25% 90% 95% 40%

MOISTURE CONTENT -

SAMPLE IDENTITYELSSF-4

W»(%)m

LL

1

PL PI

MAXIMUM DRY DENSITY (pcOi H9JOPTIMUM MOISTURE CONTENT: 13.7%

SAMFLETYPE: BULK

DESCRIPTIONDark brownteSANDaadFINES.little (ravel

DATETESTED; 11/12/92

not caDATO UAM2

UVBWHk

PRP/BERKS LANDFILL/PA•LM773

COLDER ASSOOATESJNC.UTXAUREUNJ

MOISTURE/DRY DENSITY CURVE ~————jASTMD698 r~

DRY

DENSITY

MOISTURE CONTENT

SAMPLE IDENTITYELSSP-S

W»(%)210

LL PL PI

MAXIMUM DRY DENSITY (pcf* 1010OPTIMUM MOISTURE CONTENT* 17.7%

SAMPLETYPE: BULK

DESCRIPTIONDarkbrorar-ai SAND aod FINES;•otDtf-Ctnvel

' • . •DATETESTED: 10/I«/9t

TECH: tttRDODATBi

BERKS PRP/RIFS/SPRINC TWP PA9134773 '•

GOLDER ASSOCIATESJNC.MTJAUREL.NJ

DRY

D .ENSITY

(pcf)

MOISTURE/DRY DENSITY CURVEASTMD698

'

MOISTURE CONTENT

SAMPLE IDENTTTY• ELSSP-7

W«(%)7

LL PL PI

MAXIMUM DRY DENSITY <pcf> UtSOPTIMUM MOISTURE CONTENT. 110%

SAMPLETYFE: BULK

DESCRIPTIONBrawn 'f-m SAND aod FINES,tooec-f {ravel

DATETESTED: U/W92 '

TECH; BMDATE: mam

• CHECKED.REVJEVUk

BERKS PRP/RIFS/SPRING TWP PAM3-CT73

GOLDER ASSOOATES NCMT1AUREUNI

ftR30'2U-U'

DRY

DBNSITY

MOISTURE/DRY DENSITY CURVE . . ————jASTMD698 '.r~ <

- , 10% 1$% 20% 23% 3<J%. 3^% 4(5% > . . V J.

MOISTURE CONTENT

SAMPLE IDENTITYWLSSP-1

W»<%»7.0

LL

•j

PL PI

MAXIMUM DRY DENSITY (pef)i 1112OPTIMUM MOISTURE CONTENT* IO»

SAMPLETYPE: BULK

DESCRIPTIONUeblycDowkk brownf.'mSANDindc-f GRAVEL,MCMfine*

!• •

DATE TESTED: 10/10/92

TECH: BMDATE: 1VW91

REVIEWED!

BERKS PRP/RDFS/SPRING TWP PA9134773

GOLDER ASSOCIATES4NCMT.LAUREUNJ

DRY

bENSITY

(pel)

MOISTURE/DRY DENSITY CURVE,ASTMD69S

10% 15% 26% 25% 30% 35% 40%

MOISTURE CONTENT

SAMPLE IDENTTTYWLSSP-4

W«(»)114

LL PL

'

PI

1

MAXIMUM DRY DENSITY <pef)i ll&SOPTIMUM MOISTURE CONTENT. 145%

SAMFLETYPE: BULK

DESCRIPTIONDaitbrownHNES and f< SAND,*omef(ravtl •

• • 'DATETESTED: 10/W2

' TECH: CHDATE: warn

CHECKED: flfltffll

BERKS PRP/RIFS/SPRING TWP PA9134773

GOLDER ASSOCIATES NC.MTXAUREL.NJ

Appendix F-4

Phase 1A Permeability Testing Results

flR302Ull»

f!

1

I]

2

iisB <a

-.1. -8

B

ii

* < <tn

Id?'fj |f* B J gS §Illfllli

31

« i.i sIt if;*

1

i

ss

s

fii. g

iii

B Z A

t

!>

HUli>a<SE->«S(3

rt m

to m 2 2j a < | <*.*• w'I' •«111i

$ < <, §§

* s Ita 5 s ««f 3 d -a SII kill 11

Sb

!. ^

13- j •** *

'3.1

I

3385.

3?

IHi

ssa «s

*

s.

2

id S

% ^ - V1! W> ^

g 1 od 2 5 orf *g

e sr§SS§

ins i

fiC

1

-e8

ft ft•5

jf<5 * r -h §§

fuii-iyii!

in i

ii9 - -

1

53

IIIII

i!I

I

1

a.

51

I iii

9 "133333

3IS.

t»» ft

§*

sf J £ 3 ± 1 i afJllglfij

*

*.?

CO O"< <§§

lllillliilil

a i•II

3393§§3«

3325?•J el 'rf «X

I§3333

\

\R302UI8

w

1

i

fii

fi

o

8

I Q R « « * « g ^ . j

8Iffill!8

Ift ft

iii* ™~ " '" "Hf--Mil.*

<,!..•« .slilll£lll

i

< <ii

I

isssaV V * *

2

mi§§51

SS

s'S'lS e.

AR302I*I9

• Appendix F-5

Phase IB Cap Investigation Field Data

ft'R302U'ZO

Appendix F-5March 1994_______________-1- ' 913-6773

Field observations and measurements made for the eastern and western landfillsduring the Phase IB Cap Investigation are presented below. Phase IB in-situdensity and moisture measurements are presented in Appendix F-6.

EASTERN LANDFILLLocation SCE-01 ;_...,Cap thickness: 18 to 20 inches (no refuse)Soil description: red-brown fine sand and silt, some clay,

little coarse sand throughout; gravel and*. numerous cobbles at surface.

Location SCE-02Cap thickness: 24 inches (no refuse)SoU description: brown fine sand and silt, some gravel

throughout; predominantly gravel and- cobbles from 1-5 inches at surface.

Location SCE-03Cap thickness: 12 inches (no refuse)Soil description: red brown sandy silt, some , gravel

• throughout some large cobbles at' " ' • . . ' " : ' . . ' -;Surface. ' ' ' . . • . . - • ' .

Location SCE-04Cap thickness: 24 inches (no refuse) 'Soil description: red brown medium to fine sand

- . < '' ' throughout grey silty material at about4 inches.

Location SCE-05Cap thickness: less than 3 inchesSoil description: r<ed brown fine sand 0-3 inches, 3-10

inches gravel and cobbles.Notes: Nuclear density gauge test not performed

« because of obstructions, no samplecollected for geotechnical testing becauseof insufficient cap soil.

Golder Associates

• ' - ' • A- ' Appendix F-5March 1994 __________ -2 913-6773

• . • ,' ' ' . ' .',••... • 'Location SCE-06Cap thicknessi less than 3 inchesSoil description: grey soil at surface with two inches of

. gravel below.Notes: Nuclear density gauge readings taken,

'.' • '-• geotechnical testing sample not collectedbecause of insufficient cap material.

Location SCE-07Cap thickness: 24 inchesSoil description: 0 to 9 inches: red brown fine to medium

. sand, some silt and little fine gravel.' . 9 to 15 inches: grey brown fine sand and

silt with little clay.

Location SGE-08Cap thickness: 33 inchesSoil description: 0 to 24 Inches: fine sand and silt; little

medium sand, some fine gravel.24 to 31 inches: uniform fines

LocationCap thickness: 24 inchesSoil description: , fine sand/ little gravel, little clay

, , throughout

Location SCE-10Cap thickness: 36 inches (no refuse)Soil description: '. , silty fine sand, trace clay, little fine

: gravel, trace gravel throughout

Location SCE-11Cap thickness: 3 inchesSoil description: red brown soil at surface, grey green ash

line, silty sand below at 3 inches.

Location SCE-12Cap thickness: 30 inches (no refuse) /Soil description: red brown silty fine sand, little coarse

gravel throughout .

Golder AssociatesRR302H22

Appendix F-5March 1994 ______;______-3-________________913-6773

Location SCE-13Cap thickness: 27 inches (no refuse) -Soil description: red brown silty fine sand, little fine

gravel, trace coarse gravel throughout; soil became finer at depth.

Location SCE-14Cap thickness: 18 inchesSoil description:, medium fine sand, some silt and clay

throughout

Location SCE-15Cap thickness: 3 inchesSou description: red brown soU, 3 to 8 inch cobbles

^ present at surfaceNotes: Nuclear density gauge testing not

conducted because of cobbles and. exposed debris at surface.

Location SCE-16Cap thickness: 24 inchesSoU description: red brown fine to medium sand

throughout 2 to 6 inches cobblesprevalent at surface.

Location SCE-171 Cap thickness: 36 inches ,

Soft description: 0 to 8 inches: red brown soU.8 to 16 inches: greenish grey soU somerefuse. .

. . 16 to 36 inches: grey sUty clay, little finesand arid red brown silty fine sand withsome refuse.

Location SCE-18Cap thickness: 20 inchesSoU description: . brown fine sand and sUt little medium

sand, some broken glass and small metalpieces throughput

Location SCE-19Cap thickness: 12 inchesSoU description: red brown fine sand and sUt little

! . medium sand, little clay throughout

Golder AssociatesAR302U23

Appendix F-5March 1995______•________-'-4- • - ' . ' . •_______913-6773

LocationCap thickness: less than 3 inchesSoU description: none recorded.Notes: Nuclear density gauge probe could not •

be adequately set sample collected forgeotechnical testing.

Location SCE-21Cap thickness: 8 inchesSoU description: red brown fine sandy sUt little medium

sand, root matter.Notes: Prevalent 2 inch gravel prevented proper (

setting of nuclear density probe. Sample. for geotechnical testing collected. "i

Location SCE-22Cap thickness: 30 inches (no refuse)SoU description: red brown and grey fine sand and silt

some medium to coarse sand throughout

Location SCE-23-Cap thickness: 36 inches (no refuse)SoU description: . red brown fine sand and sUt some .

coarse sand and fine gravel throughout v Jsome 3 inch gravel. , "

Location SCE-24Cap thickness: •'. 18 inches (no refuse)SoU description: brown fine sand and sUt little clay, some

coarse sand throughout

. WESTERN LANDFILL

SCW-01Cap thickness:

SoU description: brown loamy fine sand, refuse mixed inv / "• • . soU to 36 inches.

SCW-02Cap mickness: 27 inches (no refuse)SoU description: possibly undisturbed native soils.

Golder Associates

, Appendix F-5March 1995 ______________^_________________913-6773

. Notes: Location may be outside eastern limit ofrefuse by approximately 8 to 10 feet

. . Nuclear density gauge readings nottaken, geotechnical samples collected.

. . -' SCW-03 • ' ... ' . '''-• '- ', . ' ';Cap tiiickness: 24 jnches (no refuse)SoU description: brown sUt and fine sand, little clay, little

coarse sand throughout

SCVV.Q4_ Gap tiiickness: 15 inches •SoU description: red brown sUty fi ie sand, some gravel

throughoutNotes: , Refuse at nearby locations as shaUow as

5 inches, numerous cobbles in area,thickly vegetated. Nuclear density probecould not be set (no readings), samplecoUected for geotechnical testing.

- •• sew-as ;' ' '.•'.•' •. ••' .. • • . ; .' • ' - ' ;.Cap thickness: less tiian 2 inchesSoU description: greyish soils and refuse mixed to 36

inches below surface.Notes: No nuclear density gauge readings taken

due to inadequate thickness, sample of; greyish soUs taken from 3 to 4 inches

below surface for geotechnical testing.

-" scw-06 : " • .'••,;, . • .' , •• . •".. ; V . ;Cap thickness: 4 inchesSoU description: brown loamy fine sand, some gravel and

gjass fragments throughout

Golder Associates .

AR302U2S

Appendix F-6

Phase IB Nuclear Density Gauge Results andCalibration/Operation Data

RR302U26

Appendix F-6March 1994 _______ ; _______ 4- ____ : 913 773

Troxler Nuclear Density Gauge DaUy Calibration ProcedureThe Gauge was calibrated daUy by taking a standard count The standard densityand moisture count was taken using the standard block. The standard block wasplaced over a dense material in an open area. The standards were recorded in thegauge's standard count log. The acceptable density standard was ±1% of theaverage of the previous four days' density standard. The acceptable moisture

' • , • .- ' / ' • " • • ' • " .

standard was ±2% of the average of the previous four days' moisture standard.All calibrations passed.

Field Measurement ProcedureThe test surface was smoothed using the scraper plate. Care was taken tominimize surface roughness. The scraper plate was placed on the test surface.The drUl rod was placed through me scraper plate guide and a hamrher was usedto drive the drUl rod to a depth of 8 inches. The drill rod was then extracted. The

~ ^ scraper plate was removed and the gauge was positioned within the outline of thescraper plate. The source rod was lowered into the drill rod hole aridmeasurements were taken of the dry and wet density, moisture content, andpercent moisture of the soU.

Determination of Field Density and Moisture Content .The measured density and moisture counts were compared to the standard countsto derive a count ratio. The resulting count ratios were looked up on the TroxlerElectronic Laboratories, me. calibration table (attached) to find the correspondingdensity and moisture value.

Golder Associates

March 1994 ;- 913-6773

PHASE IB NUCLEAR DENSTTY GAUGE READINGS ANDRESULTING FIELD DENSITY AND MOISTURE CONTENT

Standard Taken: 9/21/93 @ 09:05 Standard Density Count - 2824 (PASS)Probe Depth: 3 inches . Standard Moisture Count - 699 (PASS)iipfiliiillM elliiilSCE-09 .SCE-07SCE-03SCE-13SCE-12SCE-10SCE-14SCE-11SCE-17SCE-19SCE-18SCE-16SCE-22SCE-23SCE-24SCE-04SCE-06

p l ^itliiinllltftl;

09:4010:1510:3511:1011:3011:5612:2012:4514:0515:0015:4015:5516:1016:3016:4817:1517:50

llIli ll:®5iiEillilPil||

172417211132 ^

. 18391511152319361281126614871697152616281560161316691465

i:;:i:M<5fcai;::B

249 '278246 '228284296290353278

; 294213241294255338324310

i Rlii$Slil!||G6(;rp!|:

0.6100.6090.4010.6510.5350.5390.6860.4540.4430.5270.6010.5400.5760.5520.5730.591' 0.519

BStJS iilllimmmm0.3580.3930.3520.3280.4080.4230.415 -0.5050.3930.4210.3050.3450.421

' 0.3650.4840.4640.443

|lP BrM$pl

. 121.5121.5137.4119.0126.4

'•• 126.1117.2132.7133.1127.0122.1126.0123.6125.2123.3122.7127.8

||Mt*SpifiEi|||

19.9522.4219.6318.1422.9623.9723.4428.8322.4223.7916.8519.2423.7920.45 ••27.6023.4125.17

Standard Taken: 9/22/93 Standard Density Count - 2823 (PASS)Probe Depth: 8 Inches Standard Moisture Count • 698 (PASS)

SCE-01. SCE-02SCE-03SCW-03SCW-06SCW-01

09:1009:2309:4510:4511:2011:40

172420091169167721732649

297378242234213262

0.6110.7120.4140.5940.7700.933

0.427.0.5430.3480.3360.3130.376

121.5115.8136.2122.5112.9105.7

24.1731.1619.4218.7617.3621.15

pcf - pounds per cubic foot%- percent

NOTES:V Field density and moisture content values determined from measured count ratios (Cr) onTroxler Electronic Laboratories, Inc. calibration table.

Rl«r\6773\eparll\appxM-6lbl.wkl Golder Associates ,. Pagelofi

AR302428

-,•-• V-.VT- - BSTO Mroxier Electronic-LaboratftorieE, -rl«er *~'- ' S TST ' "*:••: ' :.;;-iii ^ :--' •• •: " > f ; > - ^ ^ - ,>;: f

iauge model :r-3401B» ~:.-v, v' • •••••'•••-:.:••. . ,\~*-' \<?f .C&iib.:--6e&et 10-16-1931 :": -••;--->B« iaT:*i3i84( ^ ' ^ :

*- --•<*-.- V'*-'*•'-'j *^ *X*V - :v'• .-.'s-v-f*-.-: ^ aSx S ^ /V .-•.-<• Ref. :Btd/'.cnti--*«-£969. - ? s.fcAr''r*, •: •••'-::*:: ; -i-;. • * • .."".~......'.''»,^.ri { .. ., • * ••• • . ••y • '.w. • • '"••«* "• • ••. ':• •' *. •*-". - ' . - . ' - *" . . * . . . • - . .Dens V - ' C ^ D e r ' - ^ ' C r - .-:-- ~ DeniF

3. O37'••:- : 71. 000ti>*' 1.6773.668 "71.500*:- 1.659

96.000 1.186 1£1.000 . O.775 146.00096.500 * i.176 121;50O O.768 146.500

£.976 . 7£.000 1.64£ 57. OOO 1.165 1££.OOO 0.76£ 147. OOO£.950 72.500 1.825 97.500 1.155 122.500 0.756 147.5002.5£1 73.0OO 1.606 96.000 1.145 123.006 O.750 146. OOO2.6SS 73.5OO 1.751 98.500 1.135 1£3.5OO 0.744 146,500£.664 74.000 1.774 99.000 i.l£5 124.000 O.738 149. OOO£.637 74.500 1.757 99.500 1.J15 1£4.5OO O.73£ 149.500£.609 75.000 1.741 100.OOO 1.1O5 125.OOO O.7£6 150. OOO£. 78£ 75.5OO 1.725 1O0.5OO 1.095 t 1£5.5OO 0.721 ISOiSOO£.755 76 000 1.709 101. OOO S.O66 1£6. OOO O.715 151. OOO£.7£6 76.500 i:693 101.500 1.076' 3E6.500 O.705 151.50O£.7C£ 77.000 1.677 JOS.OOC X.067 l£7,000 <>. 704 :.5c, OOO£, 67£ 77.500 i.66c- l'0£. 50C i.OSfc ;£7.5OO 0.698 :5 .500£.6£C 78.000 1.646 103. OOO k.049 '£6.000 O.6S3 i53. OOO£.62 78.500 1.633.103.500 1.040 I£8.500 0.667 153.500£.599 79. COO 1.616 104.000 J..OSJ- iSS.OOO 0.66£ 154. OOO£. 57A 75.500 1.6O1 104,500 llO££ i£5.50O 0.677 154.500£.549 60. OOO 1.566 105,000 i. 013 L30. OOO 0.671 155. OOO£. 5£5 80.500 1.572 105.500 I. OCA ;.30- SCO 0.666 155.500£.500 6i.OOO 1.557; lOfe. 000: O. 996 .-??!. OOO' 0.661 156. OOO£.476 61.50O 1.543 1O6.500 0.967 131.5OO 0.656 156.5OO£.4££ fiS.OOO l.££9 107.000 0.575 ;3S, OOO 0.651 .157. 6tO£.*£S 62.500 1.515 iO7.500 0.970 i32.5CO 0.646 157.500£. 40£ 63.000 i.SOi 1OS.OOO 0.56£ 133. OOO O.641 156. OCO£.38£ 63.500 1.487 1O8.5OO. 0.954 133.5OO 0.636 158.500£.360 64.000 1.473 109.000 0.946 134.OOO O.631 159. OOO£.337 64.500 1.460 109.500 0.936 134.5OO 0.6£7 159.500£.315 65. OOO 1.447 11O.OOO O..930 135. OOO O.6££ 160.OOO£.£93 65.5001 1.433 .110.500 .0.9££ 135.5OC -' O.617 160.500£.£7i 66.Obb V;:' 1.4£0 111. OOO 0.914 136.:do6 O.613 161. OOO£. £49- 86i-5b0 fe-1.408 111. 5OO 0.906 IS&.SOb* - 0.608 161* 500£.££8 67 000 -1.395 11£. 000 0.695-137.OOO'V-* O. 6O3 16£, OOO ?.£.206 5:flT:5b. '1.382 .112; 500 ' • 'O -BSlV: 137 0 ' 0.599 "

" .113.000.. . *:0.8BA'; •>-i38*bOO. S.vp.iS95".!,i63.'OOQ ;-t:88. 500 /f> i .'357.113. 500 •.-'J'i;*. b. B7€>-.\f i 38• 5OO.V iVv • bi 530 4 63. .500 ;.; ;

£;:i£4 ':£.1O3"£.083

•f -£.1O3

§' £.0642,044;;:2.r6 5 s;. 9£ CpO 1 £74-*1.17.bOO. . ;,Q.6£7:, i42.jObb ..;;.p.56i; .:2. QOG- .'.92.SO^Ji i'.'.': 417.SOO . O.8£0.; i4£. 500. *.' O.557 :167.SOO:.,1.567. " g .ooo SH fisi :iite.oob' " / o' iBis 143.000 "' o.553 166.000•"1. S66 93.500 .<.;' i. £40 116. 500 0. 607 143.500 0. 549 168.5001.949 94.0bp.:-: I.££9 119.000 0.6OO 144, OOO . . ,0.545 169. OOO1.S31 94iv5OO ^ ;li;£16 119. 500 •'- :b. 794°-144i'5OO f.i|r b. 541 V 169.50b r1.513 95. obo: C"l?£O7 120,000 - p, 7fi7 145.000 ;.:;" 0.537 170. OOO;.S95 , S57506':;rK197 1£O.SOC":".' 0.781- 145.500 '' 0.533 170J500

?i?pfL __. _„......,„..„„,.,..Gauge wodel -34blB7l ;. ; >V . .- vCalib^tiatej iO-l&-1991

:'-.-'-:. ;; "•-•-C-4 inch D.., T. density - •-'-- V : :: .' - "'." '' ..' ••• ' ' W 'sfd. cnb. » 29S9,-- r i: v -;v';-; , :

Cr Dens Cr : Dens Cr Dens - Cr - - Dens

3.38S 71. COO 1.931 56.000 1.191 121.000 0:732 146.0003.35£ 71.500 1.970 96.500 1.179 121. SCO O; 725 146.500-3..?ie> 72.000 1.350 . 57.000 1.167 122.000 0*719 147. COO-r. 23: 7E.50C 1.923 97 50C '.-.1.153 122.50O 0.712 147.5003. £46 7-.. 000 1, SOS 93. 000 i.: 44 i £3. 000 0.7O5 148. OOOV£i: 73.5OO 1.390 93.500 1.132 1£3.500 0.699 143.5OO•>. :77 76.000 1.870 99.000 l.'lfii ISA. 000 0.632 143. OOO.":. .1*3' 74.500 2.S5G 33*500 liilO j£4.500 0.686 143.5003, >OS 7E.OOO 1.631 300.000 J. 039 125.000 0.680 ISO. OOO:?. v7& 75.500 1.312 1O0.500 l.'CSS 125.5OO 0.674.150.500-?;i:iji 7S.OOO 1.793 • SOI.000 1.077 126.0OO 0.667 ISI.OOO

7£. SOC 2.775 ICi.SCO •.. C67 126.500 0.661 151.50077. <:CO J..727 iO£,OCO J..uS6 S C'OO . 0.655' 152.00077.£.rx; . :.73S . 7. Of, 50-.7c-. OO-.J 1.720 1-03. 000

: £7. too 0. oAS 152., 500C;3t ; if.. 000 0. 643 i 53. OOO

1*6. SCC 0. £sa 153.5007S,0-::0 i.£E£; : 04. COO 'i.CiE '•';£9. 000 0. 632 154. OOOV7..50C I,fe6o- 104.£.':0 i, 003 Ic2. £CrO 0, ££6 154.500•feo.or.c :,. ss:, 105. ooc o. sse. : :;o, ooo o. 6£0 155.000«W.i,OC r.'fe,? I05.tv.it: t: V;Kr. iSC.StiJC 0.615 155.500 v )c,;.;>-':c 'r.si? los/occi O.S7& :,:-,:., ooo c-.-eos 156. ooc O1"—x.£:.. c.-C: i.feOO- JO6. f-vO 0. £L? 1 Sir 500 C. 604 556.5OO££.. COC: .'1.594', ;.C7. COO 0. 557 ;3fc;.OOO- O. 595 157, OOO^ ?:(:' * :it.V "07.'S«.JO C, -5 5; ': 38.5OC' 0. ESS 157.500 ' ,. •. ..000 1.551 :-.CS, OCO O.S3S' :.22.0CC Or 568 • 156.OOO ••^.1-iOU •••!•. 52S 103.5C-". O..S30 133.200 0.5S3 156.500ftA.CCO 1.52C r.03.000 0.521 :S4.000 O.578 153. OOO '. •

-.'•*'S?. 6 . f'OO :.5O4 109.500-"' C. 9l£ ; 34.500 0. S7£ 153.500S'.R13 3?.000 1.AS9 ilO.OOO' 0. S03 135.000 . 0.567. ISC.OOOs. .- £5.500 1..474 : 10. SOO 0. o:'4 135. SCO" 0.562 160.500f--',C.3 Sft.OOO 1.459 111.000 O.56£ 12S.OOO 0.257 161.OCO.• 33 3S.SCC .....1.444- 111.500 O, S77 136.5OO C. £53 161.5001. iT;7 67.000 1.A23 112. COO O.S£3 137.000 0.543 162.0004*3n£ 37.500 :' -1,415 112.5OO 0. i£>60 137.5OO- . 0.543-162.500£'. 357 SS. COO: V 1. 4OO 113. 000 ., " . 0. £52 .:. 33. 000 •* - 0. 338. "j63. OOO .S. J?£ ea.500: 2.336 113. SCO 0. c44 . :38. SCO.' •' J C; 53A--; 163.50O:-..20? S3.COC 1.37? 114.000 C.S36 539.000 p;. 529 r JS4. OOOf. ££3 6?. 500' ' 1. 353 114. SCO 0. £5:3 :35. SOO 6.524 1S4.500?.££3 50.000 :1.344 'US. OCO C.e£CX4CS.OOO 0.520 155. OOOc. >.T5 90.500 1.331 llS.SOOf 0.812 140.500 O. SIS ' 165.500?p£12 91.OOO 1.317 116.COO O.B05 l^J.OCC O.Slf 165.00OS. l£ 5 91.500' 1.304 1.15.500. 0.737 141.300 0.507 166.500£.156 32.000 ~\1-£91 ".117.000-;'. 0.783\; 142,000, ;.,\p.502*\\57.bOO • •..,••': 1*3 92.500 'i.273 ii'7."50a. 0.732 142.500 ~. 0.498 ".167.500 . ,£.:.?: 93.000 1.265 113.000 0.775 143.000 O.494 163.OOO { ,£.053 93.500 1.252 113.500 0.7£7 143. SCO 0.430 163.500 V-XP.075 54.000 1.240 119.000 C. 750 144.000 0.485 169.COO2. C55' 94.500 •'• •'. 1- 227 119. SCO 0.753 144. SCO 0.432 -159.500c.033 95.000'' 1.215 120.000 0.746 145.OCO 0.473 170. COO£.0:2 95.500 1.203 120.500 0,733 145. SCO 0.474 1 SOO

eei»lAl-« o « -'';-?* - : - ^ ^ * ;W ^ —":-*•'"•' '•' '•- n-*_^--i-i-J^V^'•»>*•*OK t **d AGauBe model _-3401 S Cilib d.tir3cgl( 99i>

i

Cr Dens Cr -:/ Dens >'--"':*Cr •• Dens'*-.-~ Cr -V!-*?< "Dens%?.-* ' __ . : • - * -. . . - " . * * _ " ' - "*"•->.'*'**;. - . ?•<• •

•N

.«•M: .

£r'lc-'* '

~ •••-

tj.

T'fr|-•J\%,K

#•'i

3.09S*.'• vwO

S.Cfil:?. 534i. 24 £,?. Si C£. S7?2. '£*-£:£'.£07£.773£i.7*03.706'•VC74. . .' ', :-. •"•?". «L V ' * *'* '

-i, T"'.~.' c . r.-*-£.•-T. IT* .?-.: . 4 ec,':.. ••."i'f; •

-* ••/» /z. * *£ r*c** *?• £ T

:•. 5.?"?— » £ .- *y*-.•:f.:<c . "££ v •.: . tc'c

•» ..*. *«•. , r.C i£. T vx.?.;*6J", *c;£:£.'057 'c, f.7£

' £.,04?"•' £.-'J?2

':l.'S9c '1. 57

V 1.9501. ?27:,304

• • 3.861*:' -:.65£'r':: 1.836

I. 614/ , 792

S~ 1.771. 1.750

1.7251.706.

71.00071.5007;?. CCC'7-r e/1-' v. •' wv %.*».••r ** '»'• • te»» W W*

73. ?CC7X-, ftOC7i, £007E.OOO75. SOO76,0007f . «y~C77 k <iOO" ~ « f.C C'."« . v::'"0 '7 , JV.f:7Bi. C'O-.." r. f..' :,;"• .'. C-I\.

r; . ;:-": :'•'-.. iT-'-'.."• . i..".

. ;T."-. f-r K'f.-'. , -•;.>;'•: .->. ?oc£5.0COG5. £r.Gf f . C-v.O;:o-£C57,000e-7.5OO£S. OOOS5. EI>O '69. COC-o?-. SOOSO.COCTf-, C'S"'-v. w?-'v9*1 , OOOS3. 50052. COC52.50053. 00053. 50054.00054.50055. 00095.500-

1 . 688-.££81.648

' ;.6281.6093.590.1.571

/ i . 5521.5341.5l£1.4S6a. 4801.46S'*• . •'A'S'•»'•« *f c. £1. 4; 51 . 354::. 37£

• 1.362" , 345• *i f:A ' V/Ov'

1,314rr£;9S :.1- £6?>•:-. . £Sr; . ??53S '. £36•..££41.210 .* 1 ej*; 'i> 19*!• '•• e* •'•A . * O ..-..1681,1541. 140

..'. 1-127Vi-i 1 J' K1"'

1. 101-. • j; 088-1.0761.0631. 0511.038

••""'' 1VOS6*'*-'l':'- •''•'ltOl5'':'-. -liOOS-0.991C. 9300.9680.9570. 946

96.000 '95.SOOV97.00097.5009S.OOC98. SOO93.OOO99.500100. OOO1OO. SOO101. OCO1O1.5OO102.0CO'.5O£. 5001 03. 0001 OS.. SOO104. OOO104. SCOI 05. OCO

* «"i£ '* s* **J. \*&* «L V'V

306. 5OO -1C7..000* 07. 500iCfi.'OOC." " -'106.500'105,0003 09. 5OO110.000110. SOO1 11 . OOC '•11 ,500112.000; -;;i;i£ 500,"'.USiOOp1; .'' 'i'i 37*500 T '*ii4j;bob'; v. ii4'i-500;.S '-?"•"• iis-ooow5:US.' SOO1.iie.obb :\ ,•i-ie 5op>vj.

"".lA£7i!!DOOVv;T--l SO v '

r?i' iB' OOb 11 - 'He.' soo113. OOO119 500.i£b b'bb'visbrsoo*"

0. 535O.9£50.514O.9030.653C. 8530.6730.8630.6530, £43O.634. 0. S£4o.er.50. OE,0. 7 £,&'C. 757O."7"0, 77 OCr 76 1

0..75?-. '•• / /V.'. i*

0. 7350. "-i~r-. ~:; •:C.7M0, 7C30, £SS0. £67O.£SC0. £7£O.6C5O.657O. £50

' O.t43. 0. 63£"'C. e-56O.££2

• 0. £.15- O* 6060.601O.595

.'. C. 588' 0.5S2""C. £750.565O.S63O. 5E70.5510.545C. 539

121.000121.500l££.0003 £&. £00: £ 3, 000123.500t,£4,000rS^f-OO:£5.oooi25.f.OO•££.000l££. 500:.£7. OCO. -•'"}. r:-"C: id C.-OC

• : ,?£-.. J'v-C-."•'£3* OCO"• -CI-Q * •"• A.- « - * * o V

'.-•"l 30. 000"/;. iO-s.

. ^ .; i .-C"'..' . ~ • C. '• ."

.- •*• f m •-t\t-

'. w '. C0%>'. '». ?" •' • "..

: I.;;. ':C«.: Sc.v IvO: 2^, ooo:.34,fOO .•1S5.-OCO;35. ?0013£. 000'136.-5OO137.000

. 137.500•13ft. OOO136. 500:• is. ooo:39.f.OO140.000•1*0.500.:.-«i. oob-.3.41.500.142. OCO142.500143.000143.500144.000144.500145.000' 45. f OC

0.533:o;s£7;C.5££0.516O. 5100.5050.499O. 4340.4690.484C.4790.473'0.466Ci f>40,4 3O, *-5*C.,449

.

Ci.440

0,4310.4&5-0. 4c£0. 4x70,43.3O. «OS:;.4040^400.0.396C.352O.3660. 3840.36O-0 376;

' ' O; 373 '" o;:3£9 '0.365

• O.362-0.3580.3540.351-Oi347

"; 0.344?' 0:'S46""0 337'0.3340.3310.3£7,0. 3£4 %O.Sfil

J46VbOO146 .500 "147. OOO,147 5OO"'*146. OOO "148.500149: ooo:-149. 500150. OOOISO. SOO151. OOO,1 51. SOO'15£. OOO*15£. 500i53. COOiss.soo154. OOO254. SCO155. OOOI55.5OO156, OOO156.500157. OCOi57. 500156. CCO158.500155. COOISS.SOO16O. OOO-,160.500"161. OOO I-161. soo.;1.6£. OOOV,162.500 -."163. OOO'- v-' *1 63 w 500"T'' 'i64;ooo164i50O>£165. OOO^165.500-166. OOO"-16£.50Or*?-iST-oodg;:-;t.-soof3166".OOO168.500169. OOO469w500£-170.006'-.170.500-:'

„-.--=- model -3401B '.-.." '..-. Calib dates 10-16-1991">-(\-iii seriai-1384O , ., '.-.•'• •...'-•'••':.. .... - r . . Print, dates 10-16-1591

10 inch D» T. density^ . . V s!-• -. - -• - _ _ _ _ . -..,,._._ . .-.. -. — .-••• - _ • . i .: ..*..-<f.-... . .»£

Dens . Cr Dens Cr Dens Cr Dens

1.865 71.000 O.31S 36.0CO 0.369 121.000 0.175 "145.000.1.335 71.500 0.305 95. SCO .0.363 121.500 0.173 145. SCO1.305 72.000 C.7S£ 57. OOC 0.357 122.000 0.171 147. OOO1.775 7*,50C 0.773 97.500 0.35£ :22.500 0.153 147.5001.745 73.CCC 0.767 33. OCO 0.347 1S3.000 0.165 143. COO1.717 73.500 O.754 93.500 0.341 1£3.500 0.154 148.500 -1.633 74.000 0.74E 33. OOO Q. 336 l£4.000 0.162 143. OOO1.66X 7 .500 0.730 33.500 0.331 ISA. SCO 0.160 143.5001.634 ,75-CCO 0.713 100.000 O; 326 1S5.000 0.157 150. OOO1.607 75.50C- 0.707 100.500 0.3£3 3£5.500 0. 155 150.5001.530 76.000 0.556 101.OCO O.316 J.£5.OOO 0.153 151. OOO1.5S4 7fi.5CO 0..684 30J.500 0.311 J£6.SOO 0. 151 251;5001.525 -7. COO O.£73 10£. OOC 0.-3O7" 127.000 0.145 152. COOv.SOi 77. SOO -0. £62 i a*, 500 C. 30? 1 7.,£0;: 0-147 i5£.500i.4.75 7£. OOC . . O.65£ 103. OOO 0. £:S7 liS. OOO O. 145 i53. OOO'•1.455 7S-500 0. £.*»c 103.500 0.533 1S6.500 ,. 0.14.3 2 53.SOO1,431 7=.vX)0 ' 0.631 -504. OC-0 l 0, i:£3 1 S3. 000 0-141 154. OOO:.-i07 75. 00 0.6?) 104.500 O, cSA 129.500 0.140 154.5001.3S4 ec.OOO- O.6I1 105.000 O.£SO 130.OOO 0. 13S 153. OOOi.^fc* S.-:.50C. 0.602 VC3.50C 0. c:7£ :3C. SCO C. 136 155.500;,S25 r;.;:;:-;-: 0,r-i5£ : Cfc. OOC O. ?7.=: 131. POO 0. lc-4 156. COOi.?s7 l.SCC O.53S ;OS,5O6 C.263 131.5OC 0. 33£ 356.500l-£-5£ .r.-\ 000 0.573 '-107. OCO C.&6A 132.000 0,531 i57.iOOO%-S7A 55-500 C:56* 1C.7.5QO C, ££C , : 3£. SOO C.i£3 157.500'l.f.SS ?.5.:;OC> 0.555 3 OS, OOC C.2E6 133.000 0. i£7 153. OOO:.c.33 53,5C-0 0.54-7 iCS.500 0. £52 133. SOO C. :£S 153.500 /i.£13 S4.COC 0.536 x09,000 6.543 134.OOO 0. l£4 153,000S. :53 '£A.«CC '. O.Sc-5 iOS. 500 0.245 334.500 0,i£3 153.5001.173 SS.OCp O.S2J liO.OCO O. £4-3 135. OOC 0.121 160.COO3. !5A ar..5rsc 0.513 i 1C, ?CO C.23S i 35.500 . 0. ; £0 ' 160.5001.135 SS.OGQ 0.5C5 ' 111.000 0.234 135.COC 0.113 151.OOO5.117 &£,5C.O 0.457 111..SOO . O. £31 135.500 .„; 0.117 161.5001,035 6?;000 b.4£2 11£.000 . O.£27 137.000 .0.115 162.OOO1.CS1 .,37.500 r'-.0.431 112.500 - 0.224vxl37«5OC,.r-:- C. 114. 162-500 A1. 053 - SS. OOC -! 0. 474 :113. OOC ^ p;££l'V; 33 pJpb-.JV0«wO; 112 - '363; OOO \--" .£i.-cxB*- ssvsoo' b.466T">i3;soo.•'x-oi'si'e sssispipry 'p iii. issrsoo'V if,

. 1.0S3" "•-83.00C "' 0.4S3 114.0OO .''••••O.aiS .133.000 -' -'b. lip I64i OOO ^ ?/1.0V2 S9.:500 -••• 0.452 ll .SOO 0.21 r I ISS SOO :-'OJiOS ' 154 300 ^ -'0.935 \ 20.000 0.445 115.000 " 0.2O8-; J.4O7bbb*Vs->:b l07 155. OOO ;' :'O.S75 50,500 0.433 I35.5CO ,0. £05: J4O.5OO." O.'lOS 16S.50O V6.563 51,000 0.431 115.000 O.2O3- 141.OCO?... 0.105 16S.COOO.S4S. -91.500 O.4S4 115.500 '.' 0.200 14i;500; V'.-'0.103 166.500 ; ''*0.332. *2: OCp"" 0.413 "llTi'ppd - b l97fTl 42 Cbp'*::" "0. 102 :167.COO ^ •" '*'?:o; 517-V-32T50Q 0.411 117. 5OO '." ;o> 134;'i:427500';" o lOr 'fi&7'. SCO' •.' ". *0.902 - 53.000 :* 0/4O5 113.000 0.191 143.000r'- 0.100 168.OOOo.aas 53.500 0.393 113.see o. iss 143.sbo o.099 iss.soo \ J.O.373 54.000 0.352 .113.000 0.135 144.000 0.037 165. COO XN-XO.S53 34.5OO 0.336 113.500 . 0.1B3-..144. SOp; s> 0.036 163.50O >O.S4S 3S.OCO " 0.330 120.000 0,131* "143.000 0.03S 170. OOO ".0.832 35.500 0.374 120. SCO 0.'173"'145.500"~ 0.034 170.500 '

dates 10-16-1991date i 10-16-1991 •' 4~

... _ • - .Cr Dens

2.476 71.000 1. ££6 96. OOO: - , p. 618..', 121. COO 0; 322 146. OCO£.441 71.500 l.£C9 96. SOO " "bi 610 " 1£1.500 0,318 146.500£.407 7£,000 1.19£ 97.0OO • O.6O2 122.000 C.314 147. OOO£.373 72.500 1.176 97. SOO 0.594 :22.50C 0.3:1 347. SOO£.333 73.000 1.160 56. OOO 0.566 123. OOC 0.307 146. OOO£.306 73.500 1.144 98. SOO 0.576 123.500 0.303 146.500£.£74 74.0CO 1.126 S3.OOO 0.570 124.0CC O.SSS 145.OOO£.£4£ 74.500 1.113 95. SCO O.563 1£4.5CO 0. £2£ 149. SOO£.£11 75.000 1.057 .100.000. O.55S IfiS.OOO O. £S£ 15O.OOO£.160 75.500 1.062 1OO.5OO 0.546 325.500 0.266 150. SCO£.149 76.000 1.. 067 101. OOO 6.541 1 £6,000 0.265 151.OOO?. 119 76.500 1.053 101. SCO 0.534 126.SOC 0-?33 152.SCO2,065 77. OCO ;:..02£ :«.C£,GOO 0.5£7 127,000 0.£7£ : S£. CCOi.OfcO 77,Si;C: -'i.Of* 10£'.5OC 0.5f:0 : =7. E GO ••"' e-. i-7£ riE^.SOO£.031 7E.OGO... • i. 010 S 03. OOO O.533 '.'}. £8.000 ''' V-,£7r. :.S3. COO£.003 78.500 0.9Sfe- 103,500 0.506 :£8.&2b iJ.'££.£ 253. SOO

.375 79.000 C.S6£ 104.000 0.5OO -i£9.CCO' O. £££ 154. OOO

.347 79.5;C:0 '-0.963 ;.04.5OO C. 453 l£S, EOC C. £££ 154. SCO

.92r: SO.OCO O.S5£ 1C5. CCO 0.467 130. CCO O, St8 155. OOO

.6?3 5C. 3CC. 0. 94-3 :.0£. TOO 0,480 :?C..500 C.2^-5, '55. SOO

.866 -61. OCO' , 0.530 iCS.OOC O.474 iSl.CCO (:,£££' 156. OCO

. 540 SI. ECO- 0. 917 : O£, SCO O. 466 '. 31.T-OO :-- « « i5&, 500.615 £1.GC:: , 0, SO4- :C7,OOr» O,4£S v3f.C.CC- O. RA£ 157. OOO- 7€5 fe£. SC;: 0. S9?/ ;C7.5OO C. 456 :-3£. £.1C . ; :-.*3 157.500.764 63.000 S.660 1 OS. COO C. 450 J.33.0CC O.-£4: 156. OOO;74C £3. f.CC C. 866 iOa,5OO 0. *44 132.'EGO ". £2£ 2 58.500.715 84,000 0.65£ iCS.OOO O.436 34.000 O.c35 155.OOO.691 £*.500 "O.-645 1C3.5OO O.A33 134.500 \>. £32 159, SOCv.666 65.000 0.633 130.CCO 0.427—135.000 0.'S£9 160,000. 64 . as. 50D O, fe££ 11 D. EOC O* 421 :35.500 C, ££7 160. SCO.6££ 6£.000 0,611 111.000 O.416 136. OOO O. ££4 16i.OOO.559 66.50C 0.600 Hi1. SCO 0. 11' 13£.50C 0,£££ 161. SOO.577 67.0CC 0.7S3 112. OCO . '. 0.405 i37.CCC O.£l3 16£. OOO

1.555 ~S7.500 0.776- 1.12.500 r::*. ;o 400n.l37.500 C.£56 16£.50p1.533-68.000 0.76S 113.0OO- /rOi:395 " :138.0CO 0,214 < 163.OOO1.512 oS.SOC. -.: C.757 113.500 'V'0.390 ; 3 38.'500 O.glS 163.5OOi.45i 69..OCO, 0.747 114.0OO >>;.p.>3B5- l39.:pCO 0.2C5 2.64. OOO

/ :.-47-0 ••-•'S9.5CO- 6. 737 114. SCO•,".-. 0.360-4 135. 500 C. £07 164. SOO1,450 50.000 0.727 liS.OOO 0.375-140.000 0.204 165. OOO1.425 90.500 C.757 US, SCO . .;O.371 14-0.500 0.2G2 165. SOOJ.410 91.000 0.7O7 116. OOO .-.•*•; 0.366" 141,000 0.200 166. OOO,i. 390 91.500 p. 696 116.SOO'W>.ub:.;36l"rv-141.£OO 0. 197- -166.500

1.371 ..-'92.000 -"••* 0.669 ii7.OOOc-- Oi357 14£.000 O.I 95 =167. OOOIi35£ 3£,500 0.679 117.5OO-:-O*j35£ * 14£. 500 0.193 167.5001.333 93.000 0.670 118. OOO 0". 346 143.000 O. 151 168. OOO1.315 93.500 0,661 118.500 0.343 143. SCO C. 189 168.500l.£S6 54.000 O.6S2 119. OOO p. 339 144.000 " 0.167 165. OOOl.£78 5 .500 0.644 119. SOO O7335" 144.500 0.165 169.5001.261 35.000 0.635 1£O.OOO - O.331 145.000 0.163 170.OOO1. £43 55.500 C. 627 120. SCO 0.3£7 145. SCO 0. iflJL , 1 0, SCO

'Troxler Electronic Laboratories^ Inc.'

Gauge model.-34O1B - - Calib dates 10-15-1991serial-13,340* : :';'-"' ;;;Print dates' 10-15-1391 '

' . . ' • ' * • ' • . ' * . • . . * ' • • * * •

- ---r.•--.. ./.., r/., . - .12. .inch D.. T. .density.,..,,*,;.:.;:-.**«•--»'*•-'.:, -v.v,...„»• - . -•' "• .'.• '->-: .-•• Ref. .std. ent. « '2969 ..-.:-• -?-*•-V-. '•••• -.''•--.•'--;' ;?::- ••'>.';

Cr. Dens Cr Dens Cr Dens Cr Dejns

1.304 71.000 O.5;0 35.000 0.203 121.000 , 0.093 146.0001.23O 71.500 0.501 95.500 0.205 121. SOO • O>09S M46.50O '• '' •1.255 72. COO C.4.S2 97.000 0.2O1 122.000 O.O31 147. OOO2.232 7£. 5OO 0.4£2 97.500 0.133 1££.5CO 0.033 147.5001.203 73.OCO O.474 S3,OOO 0.194 123.000 0.083 148. OOO1.185 73.500 0.455 93. SOO 0.191 123.500 C. 037 143 500lilS4 74.000 0.457 5S.OOO O. 188 124.000 O.O86 149. OOO1.142 74.500 C.-A45 ' 5S.3OO' 0.185 12*. 5OO 0.084 143.5001.121 75.0CO 0.4 1 100. OOO 0.1B2 1£5.000 0.083 150. OOO1.1OO 75, SOO 0.433 ;OC. SCO 0.173 1£5.500 0.082 ISO. 5001.073 76.000 O.4SS 101.000. 0.175 126.000 0.081 151.OOO '1.053 75.500 O.*i7 101.500 0.173 12S.5OO O.O80 1S1.50Q1.O3S 77.500' C.*-CS i Cg. 000 O. i70 127.000 0.079 15£. OOOr.OcO "77, SCO '•.•;.*;-•£ :Ct.SOv -" O. 167 • :£7.50O 0.078 152.50O '1.000 7S.OOC 0. ?-SS 3 03. OOO 0.164 126-OOC 0.077 153. OOO v0.3S£ 7&, SOO 0.33S 103'. SCO 0.363 1S8.5OO ,0.075 353.500 . -0.353 75.000 0.3&1 104. COG 0,159 123.COO 0.074 154. OOOC. S4S 73. tf-OC C,c;7i i0 .300' Oj 3£i=. l£S.3CC C. 073 154.5000.928 •.• SO. 000 ••'." '0.3&7 1 OS. OOC: O. 15^ 130. OOC 0.073 155. OOO

. C. 91O PO.SCO ' O. :$?,' 'fir SOi"; 0. .'?? 130,500 0.07&. 355,300 ^ )0.353 fc:.0:.)r. •*. Z-:SA S.CE.OOC 0.145 131.000 0.071 155. OOO "*.S77 ei.?00 C:..34S 1.O&.5OO 0. J4£ 131,500 0.070 156.5000,860 .6£.frfiC'-. C. S*: :.p7.'Cp6 . 0. 144- 132.000 0.055 157. OOO0. BAA 68.-300 O.'SSS-' • O7,5i':C 0.342 132.500 0.053 157.500 ,r0.3£9 33.000 0.225- iOS.OOC , O.133 133.000 0.067 153.00OC. 813 83.50C 0.3;=- ;Ofi. SOO 0.137 133. SCO '. 0.065 158.5000.753 84.000 0.37'6 105; 000 0.135 134.000 0.063 155. OOOC. 733 64.500 0.312 103. SOO 0.133 134. SCO 0.065 153.5000.763 85,000 0.3O7 llO.OOC O, 131 133. COO - 0.064 -160. OOO0.75* S3, SOO -,.O.,30: 150.500 0.123 135.5OO • -r .6.053 . 160.500O.740 65.000 ,O.c3.£ 131.000 0.127 136.000';: O,O62 161.0000.727 35. SOO 0. 25: lit. SCO O. 3 25 136. 500 •;- O. 063 151.50Ob.713 87.COC .' O.££5 1J2.0OO 0.123 137.000 • -- 0.051: 162. OOO0.700 87.500 "-::. O. 280.; .-1J2.500 ; 0.121 1374 500 060; 162.500 j.O. 687 -83. OOO iOip.STS V;113. 000 0.119.'133. OOCi OiJpSB- ^ 163.' OOO COp. 674 63.SCO ;; ',0 27; -.113.300 0. 117: 138. 500'- b,;059 j/163.500 f6.652 33.000 V- 0.265-114.OOO -. 0.115 133.OOO \.V.0,0584.164. OOO CM0.630 89,500' - - .'0..261 . 114.500 : 0. 113 139. SOO,; -;.H Oi057:<,Kl64.500. CD0.533 30. OOC " 0. £57 1 IS. COO ' 0. 112 140.000 . '': - O.;057. 165.. OOO COO.S2S 90.500 ; 0,25£ 113.SCO. . 0.11C 140.500 .-0.056 ' 165.500 OSO.614.. 31.000. j : .p.'24S .iJ6.000 O.1O8 141*.OOP. X:>p.055 v 155. COO tcr0. 6O3- 5iv 50O -''50.244 »-li6. SCO 0. 1O7 141. 5OO-<U^ >O.-055 166. 5000.592 '••• 92.000 * «O £39 117iOOO > 0. 105 . -I42iOOOH»«* Oi 054-*r!67. OOO •0.531 92,500 0.235 117*500 O. 1O3 142. 500 ? O* 053 :>: 167. SOO "0.570 33.000 0.231 113.000 0.1O2 143.000 '•- 0.053 163. OOO , ;0.550 93.500 C.227 llS.SOO ' 0. 100' 143. SOO 0.052 368.500 ^0.550 34.000 0.££3 119.000 - 0.093 144.000- 0.052 16S.COO0.539 94.500: •••' X) 2i 9 119.500 O. 097 144; 5OOr OiOSl"- • 1S9.50O0.530 95.000 0.216 120.000 O.036 145.00O0,5£0 33.SOC O.2i£ 120.500 0.095 145.500.

Troxier: Electronic Laboratories, Inc-3401B _ .:^. ,. .. ,_ ,,._

..v VY rfe:'.:iv:.y — ^ ;-Vv- .'•• >"• Print datet u-03-1993.-•.••'" 'Hoi«iure content" : ":*.".- - --

Rof . fit.d. cut. • 711 :

51 —. If Cr Mol*^ cr Mois • cf ^ Hole0.041 0.250 0.205 10.250 0.37O 20.250 O.B3S 30.2SO0.046 0.500 0.21O 1O.600 0.374 20.500 O.S39 30.5000.049 0.750 0.214 1O.7SO 0.379 20.750 0.643 30.7500.053 1.000 0.216 11 .OOO 0.383 21 .OOO O.fe47 31 .OOOC.OB7 1.250 0.222 11 250 0.387 21.250 Q.bS* 31.250O.061 i.SOO 0.226 11.500 0.391 21,500 0.556 3} .6000.065 1.760 b.230 11.75O 0.395 21.7CO O.C60 31.7500.070 2.000 0.234 12.OOO 0.399 22.000 0.664 32.0000,074 2.260 0.238 12.250 0.403 22.250 0.568 32.250O.078 2.600 0.243 12.SOO C.407 22.SOO 0.672 32.5000.082 2.750 0.247 12.750 0. 11 22.760 0.576 32.750C.086 3.000 0.251 13.000 0.416 23.000 ' 0.580 33.OQO0.0-30 3.?&0 0.255 13.260 O.420 23.250 0.5Q4 33.2600.094 3.BOO 0-.269 13.500 b.42fl 23.SOO 0.589 33.600O.098 3.750 0.263 ' 13.760 0.426 23.760 O.£93 93.7600.102 4.000 0.267 14.000 O.432 24.000 0.597 34.0000.107 4.250 0.271 14.260 0.436 24.250 O.601 34.250

- \1 4.5OO 0.276 14.500 0.d4O 24.SOO 0.606 34.600\ >J.S 4.7SO 0.280 14.750 0.4<4 24.760 0.609 34.7600.119 5.000 0.284 IS.000 0.449 25.000 0.613 35.OOO0.121 fi.2fiO O.288 1&.26O 0.453 25.2&O 0.617 35.2600.1?7 S.500 0.292 15.500 0.457 25.500 0.622 36.6000131 R.7RO 0.296 15.7SO 0.461 25.750 O.626 35.7500.1 ;<b .000 O.OOO 16.OOO U.46S 26.000 0.630 36.0000.140 6.250 0.304 16.250 0.469 26.260 0.634 36.2500.144 6.500 0.3O8 16.600 C.473 26.500 O.63G 36.BOO0.140 6.760 0.313 16.750 0.477 26.750 0.642 36.7500.152 7.000 0.317 17.000 0.482 27.OOO 0.646 37.0000.156 7.250 0.321 17.250 0.486 27.S60 0.650 37.2900.160 7.600 0.325 17.500 0.490 27.600 0.6S& 37.6000.164 7.750 O.329 17.750 O.494 27.760 0.669 37.760O.166 e.OOO O.333 1C.OOO 0.498 28.OOO 0.663 38.0000.179 . 6.250 0.337 18.250 0.502 28.250 0.667 3U.P500.1/7 O.COO 0.341 16.500 O.506 26.600 0.671 38.5000.181 6.750 0.346 ie.7&O O.510 28.760 O.675 38.7&O0.3U5 9.000 0.350 , 19.000 0.5*4 29.000 0.679 39.0000.169 9.250 0.354 19.250 0.519 29.250 0. 63 39,3500.193 • 9.500 0.35& 19.600 0.523 29.500 0.687 39.6000.197 9.760 O.362 19.75O O.S27 29.750 O.692 39.750O..20I 10.000 0.366 20.000 O.531 3O.OOO O.696 -40.OOO

RR.30?.11.35

br302252 · head recovery va horner till i well g-4 s->-test no. 4 berks landrll 1^0-34. ......

Documents