boxed ego artificial autoscopy for fun and work alvaro cassinelli and masatoshi ishikawa...
TRANSCRIPT
Boxed EgoArtificial autoscopy for fun and work
Alvaro CASSINELLI and Masatoshi ISHIKAWAMeta-Perception Group
devices that alter perception
dap
Boxed ego
Autoscopy, hyper-stereo (miniaturized “avatar”) & time delay
I. Altered self-perception (body scheme, and “ego-location”)
• Pathological conditions (Alice in Wonderland syndrome, out-of-body experience, autoscopy, heautoscopy…)
• Experiments in cognitive neurosciences (inverted goggles, rubber hand, TMS, etc)
• Medially mediated perception (artistic experimentation with mirrors, video, art installations)
• Human-computer interfaces (augmented perception, sensory substitution systems, teleprescence)
Sensed presence and spatial distortions of
body size can be induced by TMS
Out of body experience: from phantom limb to phantom body?
• Phantom limbs can occur in non-amputated people
• OBEs have a distinctive experiential character
• a specific brain area involved (temporo-parietal junction)
Artificial OBE in a controlled environment: cognitive neurosciences
O. Blanke research at the Laboratory of Cognitive Neuroscience, EPFL , Switzerland, (2007)
Artificially relocated body parts and telexistence
Haptic telexistence (Tachi Lab)
"Telesar" (Tachi Lab)
Eliciting a true sense of tele-existence may be key to performance here
Explorations of the self in the media arts: the magic of the mirror…
Dan Graham’s «Present Continuous Past(s)», (1974)
...point to a sensory-motor theory of the perception of “being” in time and space!
Bruce Nauman, «Live-Taped Video Corridor» (1970)
…beyond the mirror
II. But can the sense of self can be considered a modality of perception?
Perception of what? The body scheme, the body image
Phenomenology: there is something that it is to “be there”
(in the sense of the sensory-motor theory of perception)
Hypothesis: Probably (enactive) knowledge in all “classic” modalities of perception
(visual, tactile, propioceptive and auditory), but not enacted the perceived object, but rather to the fact that there is a perceiver!
Phenomenologically speaking, the felt self-presence (the “qualia” of being) is not an inference, but rather the knowledge you have that certain movements will affect sensorial input in a way compatible with the fact that you have a human body.
This SMC-based hypothesis can accounts for dislocated self-perception a phenomena.
Good grounding for practical design of devices that alter perception of the self.
But which sensory-motor knowledge is involved?
Augmented awareness on public places (personal orientation and elimination of blind spots)
Enhancement of training mirrors…
An example practical application: autoscopic display
“Altered” is a matter of degree: the self has changed enormously with technology, and will
continue to change (tranhumanism?)
Conclusion
“Sense of self” may result from an innate/learned capacity to enact sensory-motor knowledge and to recognize on these patters special egocentric features.
Therefore it can be altered by artificially manipulating:- the structure of sensory-motor contingencies for each modality of
perception and- the inter-modality contingencies (time correlations and delays!)
Sense of Self may suffer from “perceptual illusions” such as “filling-in” body schema, attentional “self-less”…
Devices that alter the perception of the self may enable a lot of experiments and have a lot of practical applications
Questions?