bonneville power administration bpa debt restructuring presentation to the energy northwest board...
TRANSCRIPT
Bonneville Power Administration
BPA Debt Restructuring Presentation
to the
Energy Northwest Board
Audit, Legal, and Finance Committee
March 28, 2002
2
Bonneville Power Administration
Refresher on Debt Restructuring
• Debt Restructuring Program resulted from the examination of Federal and non-Federal debt as single portfolio to be optimized in terms of cost and access to capital.
• The heart of the program is to:1. Extend the tax-exempt Energy Northwest (ENW) debt to the 2013-2018
period.2. Use the cash savings from the lower ENW amortization to advance
amortize Treasury bonds.3. Issue short maturity Treasury bonds for new capital to allow advance
amortization and avoid costly call premiums.
• The results of the program, if carried out to the maximum potential, will be to:1. Replenish Treasury borrowing authority by up to $3.3 billion between
2001-2012.2. Reduce BPA’s total interest expense by an average of over $20 million per
year through 2018, a net present value savings of over $240 million (using a 6.5% discount rate).
3
Bonneville Power Administration
Program Objectivesas of June, 2000
BPA is proposing to undertake a program of prudent debt management that:
1. Reduces total debt service costs of BPA and lowers rates to ratepayers,
2. Sustains delivery capability of capital programs, and
3. Allows more variable rate debt as recommended by Energy Northwest.
4
Bonneville Power Administration
Potential Program Magnitudeas of June 2001
• Maximum size of program is $1-2 billion, if Federal amortization opportunities are limited to Power.
• If Debt Optimization proceeds can be applied to Transmission amortization, the program could expand to $2-3 billion.
• Given uncertainties about other sources of funding, BPA would like to preserve all cash flow opportunities in the near-term.
5
Bonneville Power Administration
Results Update
• Four bond sales have been completed to date.
• Approximately $950 million of cash flow from the Energy Northwest debt extensions to date will be used to amortize additional Federal debt.
• $183 million of additional Federal amortization has been made (FY 2000/01) to alleviate the pressure on borrowing authority.
• A public process on inter-business line transactions (“interfunctional loan”) is planned to test the use of debt extension proceeds for transmission investments, which would allow the potential of the program to increase to the $3.3 billion level.
6
Bonneville Power Administration
What We Have Achieved So Far(Dollars in Millions)
2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 Total
2001A 51.1 31.1 13.7 14.5 36.4 38.4 185.22001B 97.3 97.32002A 31.6 23.8 43.3 39.7 59.5 45.0 50.6 50.7 24.0 33.6 401.82002B 179.6 21.6 11.6 12.1 12.9 13.7 14.5 266.1Other 85.5Total 85.5 97.3 262.4 76.4 54.9 39.7 59.5 57.1 63.5 78.1 38.5 70.0 53.0 950.4
Potential 86 97 262 315 346 314 337 369 393 407 319 70 53 3368
7
Bonneville Power Administration
Energy Northwest Extension - To Date
050
100150200250300350400450500550600650700750800850900
2001
2002
2003
2004
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
($ M
illi
on)
2001-A Refunded 2001-B Refunded 2002-A Refunded 2002-B Refunded
2001-A Refunding 2001-B Refunding 2002-A Refunding 2002-B Refunding
BPA Capacity
8
Bonneville Power Administration
Transmission
• Infrastructure plan reflects an additional $775 million over BPA’s current 2002-2006 expenditure plan of $1.3 billion.
• Estimated use of the new facilities is expected to be high enough to generate sufficient revenue to recover the costs without rate increase.
Power
• Infrastructure plan reflects an additional $600 million over BPA’s current 2002-2011 expenditure plan of $670 million.
• Major investment categories include generation enhancements, reliability investments and hydro optimization.
• Conservation and Energy Web Funding capital requirements are $300 million over currently planned FY 2002-2006 expenditures.
Infrastructure Project
9
Bonneville Power Administration Infrastructure Has a Significant Effect onRemaining Borrowing Authority
10
Bonneville Power Administration Effect of Debt Restructuring on Remaining Borrowing Authority
Projected capital spending for FY02-12 from FY03 budget submittal and projected by staff for FY13-21.
-3400
-3200
-3000
-2800
-2600
-2400
-2200
-2000
-1800
-1600
-1400
-1200
-1000
-800
-600
-400
-200
0
200
400
600
800
1000
1200
1400
2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021
Before Debt Restructuring
After Debt Restructuring
11
Bonneville Power Administration
FCRPS OUTSTANDI NG PRI NCI PAL BEFORE DEBT OPTI MI ZATI ON
0
2000
4000
6000
8000
10000
12000
14000
2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020
Mil
lio
n $
ENW Principal Outstanding
Federal Principal Outstanding
Before Debt Optimization
12
Bonneville Power Administration
Debt Optimization To-Date
FCRPS OUTSTANDI NG PRI NCI PAL WI TH DEBT OPTI MI ZATI ON TO-DATE
0
2000
4000
6000
8000
10000
12000
14000
Million $
Federal Principal Outstanding
ENW Principal Outstanding
13
Bonneville Power Administration
Maximum Debt Optimization
FCRPS OUTSTANDI NG PRI NCI PAL WI TH MAXI MUM DEBT OPTI MI ZATI ON
0
2000
4000
6000
8000
10000
12000
14000
Million $
Federal Principal Outstanding
ENW Principal Outstanding