bonferroni: friend or foe? multiple testing in cardiovascular medicine

23
Bonferroni: Friend or Foe? Multiple Testing in Cardiovascular Medicine Dhruv S. Kazi, MD, MSc AHA Cardiovascular Outcomes Research Fellow Stanford University [email protected]

Upload: helki

Post on 24-Feb-2016

29 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

DESCRIPTION

Bonferroni: Friend or Foe? Multiple Testing in Cardiovascular Medicine. Dhruv S. Kazi, MD, MSc AHA Cardiovascular Outcomes Research Fellow Stanford University [email protected]. “Off hand, I’d say you’re suffering from an arrow through your head, but just to play it safe, let’s get an echo.”. - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Bonferroni: Friend or Foe? Multiple Testing in Cardiovascular Medicine

Bonferroni: Friend or Foe?Multiple Testing in Cardiovascular Medicine

Dhruv S. Kazi, MD, MScAHA Cardiovascular Outcomes Research FellowStanford [email protected]

Page 2: Bonferroni: Friend or Foe? Multiple Testing in Cardiovascular Medicine

“Off hand, I’d say you’re suffering from an arrow through your head, but just to play it safe, let’s get an echo.”

Page 3: Bonferroni: Friend or Foe? Multiple Testing in Cardiovascular Medicine

Deat

h fro

m C

ardi

ovas

cula

r Cau

ses,

No

nfat

al M

yoca

rdia

l Inf

arct

ion,

or S

troke

= 9 billion dollars

Yusuf, S, et al. N Engl J Med 2001;345:494-502

CURE

Page 4: Bonferroni: Friend or Foe? Multiple Testing in Cardiovascular Medicine

Liver

Clopidogrel

Cytochrome P450-dependent oxidation

Binds to P2Y12 Receptor on Platelets

Ticagrelor Binds to P2Y12 Receptor on Platelets

CYP2C19

Page 5: Bonferroni: Friend or Foe? Multiple Testing in Cardiovascular Medicine

Potential Strategies

Clopidogrel Ticagrelor

Which one would you want?

Page 6: Bonferroni: Friend or Foe? Multiple Testing in Cardiovascular Medicine

Cannon, CP, et al. Lancet 2010; 375: 283-93.

Primary Efficacy Endpoint in the PLATO-Invasive RCT

Page 7: Bonferroni: Friend or Foe? Multiple Testing in Cardiovascular Medicine

Cannon, CP, et al. Lancet 2010; 375: 283-93.

Page 8: Bonferroni: Friend or Foe? Multiple Testing in Cardiovascular Medicine
Page 9: Bonferroni: Friend or Foe? Multiple Testing in Cardiovascular Medicine
Page 10: Bonferroni: Friend or Foe? Multiple Testing in Cardiovascular Medicine
Page 11: Bonferroni: Friend or Foe? Multiple Testing in Cardiovascular Medicine
Page 12: Bonferroni: Friend or Foe? Multiple Testing in Cardiovascular Medicine

Methods

Cohort: 100,000 patients who present with ACS and undergo PCI, age at entry – 65 years

Analytic Horizon: Lifetime

Perspective: “Ideal Insurer”

Interventions– DAPT 12 months from last ACS or PCI, whichever is

later– Aspirin monotherapy for life thereafter

Page 13: Bonferroni: Friend or Foe? Multiple Testing in Cardiovascular Medicine

Possible Explanations?

Page 14: Bonferroni: Friend or Foe? Multiple Testing in Cardiovascular Medicine

Possible Explanations?

True Difference Chance Finding

Fraud?

Page 15: Bonferroni: Friend or Foe? Multiple Testing in Cardiovascular Medicine

The Multiple-Look Problem

Number of analyses

Cum

ulati

ve p

rob

of

a po

sitive

ass

ocia

tion

0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 1000

0.1

0.2

0.3

0.4

0.5

0.6

0.7

0.8

0.9

1

Page 16: Bonferroni: Friend or Foe? Multiple Testing in Cardiovascular Medicine
Page 17: Bonferroni: Friend or Foe? Multiple Testing in Cardiovascular Medicine

So how do you get around this?

Traditionally, “don’t run multiple subgroups” unless:- The analyses are pre-specified- The analyses are biologically plausible

And if you must, conduct rigorous statistical adjustment!

Page 18: Bonferroni: Friend or Foe? Multiple Testing in Cardiovascular Medicine

Bonferroni Adjustment

Conservative Assumes independence 1-(1-α)1/n ~ α/n

But does this make sense?BMJ. 1998 April 18; 316(7139): 1236–1238.

Page 19: Bonferroni: Friend or Foe? Multiple Testing in Cardiovascular Medicine
Page 20: Bonferroni: Friend or Foe? Multiple Testing in Cardiovascular Medicine

How Do We Proceed? (Do you still want the drug?) Multiple testing is problematic (even if pre-specified) The challenges of a priori hypotheses

Page 21: Bonferroni: Friend or Foe? Multiple Testing in Cardiovascular Medicine

Conclusions

Multiple testing is a complicated question: with real clinical consequences

Statistical adjustment is a necessary but imperfect solution

Trial and Error. Kaul S, et al. J Am Coll Cardiol 2010;55:415–27

Page 22: Bonferroni: Friend or Foe? Multiple Testing in Cardiovascular Medicine

Conclusion

The p value is no substitute for a brain.

Page 23: Bonferroni: Friend or Foe? Multiple Testing in Cardiovascular Medicine

Thank You!

[email protected]