boiler effy

Upload: ezhil-vendhan-palanisamy

Post on 04-Jun-2018

230 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

  • 8/13/2019 Boiler Effy

    1/32

  • 8/13/2019 Boiler Effy

    2/32

    Boiler Efficiency

    Air Heater Performance

    Presentation Outline

    1 March 2011

    T K Ray NTPC 2

  • 8/13/2019 Boiler Effy

    3/32

    Loss due to moisture in air.

    Loss due to moisture in fuel.

    Loss due to comb. gen. moisture.

    Dry Exhaust Gas Losses~ 4.6%Fuel Energy100%

    Heat gained by boiling water 38%

    Hot gas

    Flue gas

    Heat loss from furnace surface.

    Unburned carbon losses.Incomplete combustion losses.

    Loss due to hot ash .

    Heat gained by

    SH & RH 38%

    Heat gained by economizer & air pre-heater 11%

    1 March 2011 T K Ray NTPC 3

  • 8/13/2019 Boiler Effy

    4/32

    Boiler EfficiencyFor utility boilers efficiency is generally calculated by heat

    loss method wherein the component losses are calculated

    and subtracted from 100.

    (Boiler Efficiency = 100 - Losses in %)Commonly used standards are

    -

    ASME PTC 4.2: Coal Pulverizers

    ASME PTC 4.3: Air Heaters

    BS 2885 (1974) IS: 8753: 1977

    DIN standards1 March 2011 T K Ray NTPC 4

  • 8/13/2019 Boiler Effy

    5/32

    100*)(

    B H

    hmhm

    f

    iiee

    +

    =

    &&

    Boiler Efficiency determination

    The % of heat input to the boiler absorbed by the working fluid

    i. Input /output method

    100*100 B H

    L

    f +

    =

    ii. Heat Loss method

    1 March 2011 T K Ray NTPC 5

  • 8/13/2019 Boiler Effy

    6/32

    Parameters required for computing Boiler Efficiency

    AH inlet and exit FG O 2 / CO 2 /CO

    AH inlet and exit FG temp

    Primary / Secondary air temp at AH inlet Dry/Wet bulb temperatures

    Ambient ressure b r bs

    Proximate Analysis & GCV of Coal

    Combustibles in Bottom Ash and Fly ash

    1 March 2011 T K Ray NTPC 6

  • 8/13/2019 Boiler Effy

    7/32

    Boiler Losses Typical valuesDry Gas Loss 4.56Unburnt C Loss 1.50

    Hydrogen Loss 3.29Moisture in Fuel Loss 2.53Moisture in Air Loss 0.12

    oss .Radiation/Unaccounted Loss 0.89Total Heat Loss 12.93

    Boiler Efficiency 87.51Heat credit 0.44

    1 March 2011 T K Ray NTPC 7

  • 8/13/2019 Boiler Effy

    8/32

    DFG Loss (kJ/kg of fuel) =

    DFG Loss (%) =Seigert formula:2%

    )(

    CO

    T T K air fg

    )(6.30*)]267100

    ()(12

    100[ _2

    air fg Ain T T C S C

    COCO+

    +

    fgt pg

    air fgt pa L fg T C

    T T C AT +

    =

    100*

    )(**

    90

    *90 _2_2

    +=

    L

    inout A

    COCO

    O2 in / CO 2 in measured, A L known

    K ~0.63 for bituminous coal

    100*9.0*21

    100*9.0*

    _2

    _2_2

    _2

    _2_2

    out

    inout

    out

    out in L

    OOO

    CO

    COCO A

    =

    =

    1 March 2011 T K Ray NTPC 8

  • 8/13/2019 Boiler Effy

    9/32

    Typically 20 0C increase in exit FG temp ~ 1%

    reduction in boiler efficiency.

    temp in AH outlet common ducts leading to ESP.

    1 March 2011 T K Ray NTPC 9

  • 8/13/2019 Boiler Effy

    10/32

    Wet Flue Gas Loss (kJ/kg of fuel) =

    )]25(2.42442)25(88.1[100

    9air fg T T

    H M ++

    +

    1 March 2011 T K Ray NTPC 10

  • 8/13/2019 Boiler Effy

    11/32

    Moisture in combustion air loss (kJ/kg fuel)=

    )(*88.1** air fga T T h M

    a M =Dry air for combustion kg/kg of fuel

    h =kg moisture per kg dry air

    1 March 2011

    )267100[.

    _2

    2 Aina C COCO M

    ++

    =

    N2, CO 2, CO=% volume in dry gasC, S=% in fuel

    T K Ray NTPC 11

  • 8/13/2019 Boiler Effy

    12/32

    Incomplete gas (CO) loss (kJ/kg fuel)=

    23717 kJ/kg = CV of burning 1 kg of carbon in CO to CO 2

    23717*)]267100

    (*)(3

    7[*

    28

    12_

    2 AinC

    S C COCO

    CO+

    +

    1 March 2011

    CO 2, CO=% volume in dry gas

    C, S=% in fuel

    T K Ray NTPC 12

  • 8/13/2019 Boiler Effy

    13/32

    Measure of effectiveness of Combustion processand Mill performance

    Loss in kJ/kg of fuel: c= % of carbon in ash

    Combustible in Ash Loss

    33820*100cA

    = ass o as g g o ue Carbon burnt to CO 2 =33820 kJ/kg (8077 kcal/kg)

    Compute Boiler efficiency loss % due to c in Ash

    1 March 2011 T K Ray NTPC 13

    23717 kJ/kg = CV of burning 1 kg of carbon in CO to CO 2

  • 8/13/2019 Boiler Effy

    14/32

    HEAT CREDIT

    Heat Credit due to Coal Mill Power

    = [MP * 859.86 * 100] / [Coal FLOW * GCV * 1000]

    Coal Flow Rate Coal FLOW Tons/Hr

    Total Coal Mill Power MP kWh

    GCV of Coal Kcal/Kg

  • 8/13/2019 Boiler Effy

    15/32

    Probable measurement errors and resultingerrors in efficiency calculations

    Parameter

    Measurement

    error, %

    Error in calculated SG

    Efficiency, %

    Heat value (coal) 0.50 0.03Orsat analysis 3.00 0.30

    Exit FG temp 0.50 0.02

    1 March 2011

    Inlet air temp 0.50 0.00Ult. anal. of coal (C) 1.00 0.10

    Ult. anal. of coal (H ) 1.00 0.10

    Fuel moisture 1.00 0.00

    T K Ray NTPC 15

  • 8/13/2019 Boiler Effy

    16/32

    Unburnt Carbon Loss (Controllable)

    Cunburnt is a measure of effectiveness of comb. process

    Cunburnt includes the unburned constituents in FA and BA

    Focus to be on FA due to uncertainty in repeatability and

    +50 PF fineness fractions to be < 1%

    1 March 2011 T K Ray NTPC 16

  • 8/13/2019 Boiler Effy

    17/32

    Influencing Factors - Unburnt Carbon Loss

    Type of mills and firing system Furnace size

    PF fineness (Pulveriser problems) Coal FC/VM ratio, coal reactivity

    Air damper / register settings

    Burners design / condition

    Burner balance / worn orifices

    Primary Air Flow / Pressure

    1 March 2011 T K Ray NTPC 17

  • 8/13/2019 Boiler Effy

    18/32

    Dry Gas loss reduction requires

    Boiler operation at optimum excess air

    Cleanliness of boiler surfaces Reduction of tempering air to mill

    e uct on n a r ngress Cleaning of air heater surfaces and proper

    heating elements / surface area

    1 March 2011 T K Ray NTPC 18

  • 8/13/2019 Boiler Effy

    19/32

    Air Optimization

  • 8/13/2019 Boiler Effy

    20/32

    Air Heater in Fossil Fired Plant

    The rotating cylinder packed withthousands of sq m of specially formed

    sheets of heat transfer surfaces.

    As it revolves, heat of FG is absorbedthrough one half.

    1 March 2011 T K Ray NTPC

    The accumulated heat is released to the incomingair as the same surfaces pass through other half.

    The heat transfer cycle is continuous as the

    surfaces are alternately exposed to the outgoinggas and incoming air.

    20

  • 8/13/2019 Boiler Effy

    21/32

    Air-in-Leakage (~13%) Gas Side Efficiency (~ 68 %)

    X ratio (~ 0.76)

    Flue gas temperature drop (~220 0 C)

    Air side temperature rise (~260 0 C)

    The indices are affected by changes in entering

    air or gas temperatures, their flow quantities and

    coal moisture.

    1 March 2011 T K Ray NTPC 21

  • 8/13/2019 Boiler Effy

    22/32

    AH Leakage The leakage of the high pressure air to

    the low pressure flue gas due to

    Differential Pressure

    increased seal clearances in hot condition seal erosion

    improper seal settings.

    Direct flow of air through gaps betweenrotating and fixed structure

    Leakage gap area x (density x P)1/2

    Entrained air in elements carried via

    rotation from air side to gas side

    Rotor Turndown HE grows

    radially more than the CE,rotor goes outward and

    downward

    1 March 2011 22

  • 8/13/2019 Boiler Effy

    23/32

    Leakage paths

    Increased AH leakage leads to

    Reduced AH efficiency

    Increased fan power consumption

    Higher gas velocities that affect ESP performance

    Loss of fan margins leading to inefficient operation and at times

    restricting unit loading1 March 2011 T K Ray NTPC 23

  • 8/13/2019 Boiler Effy

    24/32

    AH Leakage

    Typically air heater starts with a baselineleakage of 6 to 10% after an overhaul

    What we measure is mainly leakagethrough radial seals at hot & cold end

    substantial and has a major effect on heat

    transfer but nominal effect on APC

    Leakage is expressed as a % of inlet gas

    flow and not a % of fan input flow

    1 March 2011 T K Ray NTPC 24

  • 8/13/2019 Boiler Effy

    25/32

    This leakage is assumed to occur entirely between air inlet and gas outlet

    Empirical relationship using the change in concentration of O2 or CO2 in

    the flue gas

    100*9.0*21

    100*9.0*

    _2_2

    _2

    _2_2

    =

    =

    inout

    out

    out in L

    O

    OOCO

    COCO A

    %1.17

    100*9.0*7.5218.27.5

    _

    =

    =

    Method of determination of O2 or CO2 should be the same at inlet

    and outlet wet or dry (Orsat)

    O2 dry = O 2 wet / (1- FG Moisture)1 March 2011 25

  • 8/13/2019 Boiler Effy

    26/32

    Data Collected / MeasuredO2 or CO 2 in FG at AH Inlet

    O2 or CO 2 in FG at AH OutletTemperature of gas entering/leaving air heater

    Temperature of air entering/leaving air heater

    Diff. Pressure across APH on air & gas side

    1 March 2011 T K Ray NTPC

    CO 2 measurement is preferred due to high absolute values; In case of any

    measurement errors, the resultant influence on lkg. calculation is small.

    26

  • 8/13/2019 Boiler Effy

    27/32

    Factors affecting APH performance

    Operating excess air levels PA/SA ratio

    Inlet air / gas temperature

    Coal moisture

    Air ingress levels

    Upstream ash evacuation Soot blowing

    No. of mills in service

    Maintenance practices

    1 March 2011 T K Ray NTPC 27

  • 8/13/2019 Boiler Effy

    28/32

    Boiler Efficiency

    Air Heater Performance

    Presentation Outline

    1 March 2011

    Use of Performance Evaluation Software

    T K Ray NTPC 28

  • 8/13/2019 Boiler Effy

    29/32

    /

    1 March 2011 T K Ray NTPC 29

  • 8/13/2019 Boiler Effy

    30/32

    &

    Accurate determination of Boiler Efficiency & Air Heater

    performance poses many challenges.

    Acceptance Test accuracy is not cost justified, but theres a

    need to obtain representative & accurate performance

    data & trend the same. Diagnostic tests are required for the following

    Root cause analysis of different problems

    Identifying reasons for boiler inefficiency

    To verify the feedback from online instruments

    1 March 2011 T K Ray NTPC 30

  • 8/13/2019 Boiler Effy

    31/32

    &

    1 March 2011 T K Ray NTPC 31

  • 8/13/2019 Boiler Effy

    32/32

    Thanks

    1 March 2011 32

    [email protected]

    T K Ray NTPC