board of supervisors building addendum 2
TRANSCRIPT
-
8/8/2019 Board of Supervisors Building Addendum 2
1/200
ADDENDUM NO. 2
County of Santa Barbara Board of Supervisors Building522 Lakeside Parkway, Santa Maria, CA 93454
County Project No. 8676
County of Santa Barbara, General Services DepartmentFacilities Services Division
912 West Foster RoadSanta Maria, California 93454
October 11, 2010
To all bidders submitting bids for the construction of the County of Santa BarbaraBoard of Supervisors Building, Project No. 8676, this Addendum No. 1 is herebymade a part of the Contract Documents to the same extent as though it wereoriginally included therein.
CONTRACTORS: PLEASE NOTE YOUR RECEIPT OF ADDENDUM #1ON THE SPACE(S) PROVIDED ON THE BID FORM.
CHANGES TO PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS:
1. Please find revised drawings:a. T-1b. T-2c. A1.0
d. A1.2e. A1.3f. A2.1g. A2.2h. A3.1i. A4.1
j. A4.2k. A6.1l. A6.2m. A6.3
2. SWPPP enclosed3. Hydrology report enclosed4. Response to RFI spreadsheet5. Original RFI submittals
-
8/8/2019 Board of Supervisors Building Addendum 2
2/200
Board of Supervisors Building 10/11/2010
County of Santa Barbara Project Number 8676 Ravatt Albrecht and Associates
Project No. 380
RFI Log
RFI # Requestor Responsible
Party
Question Response
1 Signet Controls
Inc. Signet-001
County of
Santa Barbara
HVAC Instrumentation and Control System
Signet Controls would like to propose Alerton Technologies, as a non-
proprietary open protocol BACnet based control system in order to provide
competitive bidding on the project. Alerton Technologies BACnet system
complies with and in some cases exceeds the functional aspects of the Digital
Control System in Specification section 15975. We have attached additional
information regarding the proposed substitution product Alerton Technologies.
We request you to please approve Alerton Technologies as an approved
manufacturer so that we can provide a competitive proposal for the project.
Please feel free to contact us for any further clarifications you may need.
On April 20, 2010 the Santa Barbara County Board
of Supervisors made a finding to allow the sole
sourcing of Trend IQ (successor to Novar IQ with
interface capabilities with Novar Logic O ne) HVAC
Direct Digital Controls and software.
The purpose of this finding was to allow the use of
directly compatible components and software that
is consistent with what the MaintenanceDepartment is currently using to manage the
HVAC Controls in many Co unty facilities, and
specifically the Betteravia Government Center.
No substitutions will be allowed.2 Diani
Construction
#001
Cannon and
Associates
1. Sheet S3.20 Elevation E shows a reference to Detail F/S4.40. We are unable to
locate Detail F on S4.40. How are we to proceed?
2. Sheet S3.20 Elevation G shows a reference to Detail 6/S4.3 and calls out TYP @
HOLDOWN SIM. We are unable locate Detail 6 on S4.30. Please define what is
TYP @ HOLDOWN SIM and how are we to proceed
3. Sheet S3.10 Elevation 4 shows a reference to Detail J/S4.50. We are unable to
locate Detail J on S4.50. How are we to proceed?
1) Callout should be E/S4.30
2) Callout should be L/S4.30 (also applies at elevation
H/S3.30) Holdown bars refer to detail G/S4.30. It is
"Sim" at panel G/S3.20 because holdown connection
and bars are not at the end of the panel.
3) Callout should be H/S4.50
3 Diani
Construction
#002
Cannon and
Associates
Sheet S3.20 Elevation D shows TYP @ Detail G/4.30. Sheet S2.10 in the same
location shows Detail C/S4.30 TYP @ CORNER.
1. Which Detail is correct?
2. Please explain what is typical about these Details?
G/S4.30 is for holdown bar attachment to foundation
where holdown bars are identified on the panel
elevations. C/S4.30 is for panel to footing reinforcingdetail at corners. Both of these details apply at this
location.
4 Floor Connection
#1
Ravatt
Albrecht and
Associates
1) On plan A6.1 Finish Plan and Schedule, rooms 210 and 216 show carpet to be
C4 in the finish schedule, but the finish plan shows carpet C2. Room 211 is
scheduled for carpet C2, but shows carpet C4 on the plan. Please advise which is
correct. 2) On plan page
A6.1, room 304 is scheduled for carpet C2, but the pattern shown on the plan
appears different than the other areas receiving carpet C2. Is carpet C2 the
carpet desired in this Room? 3) On the plan A6.1,
in room 302, is the carpet to be wrapped on the steps, or should the carpet be
installed with stair nosing?
1) Room 210, and 216 shall be C2. Room 211 shall be
C4. 2) Room
304 shall be C2. 3) Room 302,
Install ADA compliant stair nosing. Clarificataion:
Room 302 shall be carpet C3, New Demographic, Sense
of Place
5 O'Keef fe's Inc. #1 Ravatt
Albrecht and
Associates
Spec Section: 055000 - Metal Fabrications Product submitted for approval:
O'Keeffe's Aluminum Access Ladders
Please bid per plans and specs. Substitutions will be
considered after close of bidding.
-
8/8/2019 Board of Supervisors Building Addendum 2
3/200
6 Diani
Construction
#003
Ravatt
Albrecht and
Associates
1. Sheet A6.2 Note # 2 calls out: Gypsum Board Ceiling, Paint per Finish
Schedule. Are these ceilings wood framed or suspended? Will details be
provided for these ceilings?
2. Sheet A6.2 Rooms 101, 302, 303 & 304 shows a boarder soffit and Note #7 is
called out in a few areas showing a suspended gyp board ceiling. How are these
ceilings suspended? Will details be provided for each condition?
3. Sheet A5.1 Note #14 calls out: Wood Soffit per Detail. See Structural. We are
unable to locate any of these soffit conditions on the Structural Drawings. Will
details be provided?
1) Ceilings to receive gyp board are wood framed.
Short span framing 2x6 minimum framing @ 24"o.c.
Maximum span 16ft. 2)
Details will be provided in addendum #2. 3)
Details will be provided in addendum #2.
7 Diani
Construction
#004
Ravatt
Albrecht and
Associates
Sheet S2.10 exterior columns calls for 3 diameter standard pipe.
Sheet A2.1 same columns calls for 5 diameter powder coated pipe.
Which is correct?
5" diameter pipe is correct.
8 Diani
Construction
#005
Ravatt
Albrecht and
Associates
Sheet A3.1 Note #14 calls out Photovoltaic Panel System per Specification doc.
We cannot locate this Specification Section. Will one be provided?
Please find enclosed the solar panel specification by
REC solar
9 Diani
Construction
#006
Ravatt
Albrecht and
Associates
Sheet A3.1 Note #14 calls out Photovoltaic Panel System per Specification doc.
We cannot locate this Specification Section. Will one be provided?
Duplication (see above)
10 Diani
Construction
#007
Ravatt
Albrecht and
Associates
1. Sheets A4.1 & A4.2 Note # 4 calls for a grooved panel smooth painted see
detail. Where is this detail located for the groove size and location?
2. Sheet A4.1 & A4.2 Note # 16 calls for decorative panel groove see Structural
Drawings. Where can we find the size and layout for these grooves in the tilt uppanels?
1) See detail 54/A8.2 typical. 2)
Note 16 revised to read 1/2"x1/2" decorative panel
groove per detail 54/A8.2. Follow tilt-up panel
elevations for vertical joints. Structural sheets S3.10,
S3.20, S3.30.
11 Diani
Construction
#008
Ravatt
Albrecht and
Associates
Sheet A2.1 at the main entry calls out Detail 34/A8.1. This Detail (34/A8.1) calls
for a traffic grate and refers to the finish schedule and Detail 54/A8.6 this detail
(54/A8.6) refers to finish plan. Finish plan shows detail 53/A8.5. This Detail
(53/A8.5) doesnt show a traffic grate.
1. Is there a traffic grate?
2. If so who is the manufacture?
3. And is the traffic grate deleted in Alternate #4?
1) Yes. 2) CS
(Construction Specialties). Flooremetry 201, Flat mesh
insert. See enclosed cut sheet. 3) No traffic
grate to remain and install in concrete floor.
-
8/8/2019 Board of Supervisors Building Addendum 2
4/200
12 Williams Flooring
America #1
Ravatt
Albrecht and
Associates
1.Carpet to be Broodloom or Carpet Squares ?
2. Room #302 No Carpet under seats?
3. Room 301 Public seating carpet squared up to outside walls? into Room 300?
/differant color C1? If You can get back to us ASAP we would appreciate it.Terrie
1) Broadloom. 2)
Correct. No carpet under seats. See finish plan A6.1.
3) Public Seating Carpet to extent shown on SK12
attached
13 Collier Group #1 Ravatt
Albrecht and
Associates
Concerning Section 085113 Alum Windows on this project:
1. Symbol B on window schedule (sheet A6.3) calls for a Type 7 (an entry system
on the north elevation at the Break Room that contains Door #60). Door #60
indicates a type H. Remarks indicate that the sidelites are to be by the door
manufacturer. Does this mean that the 4 section transom is to be a Fleetwood
product with 2 operable awnings and 2 stationary units? If so, are the operable
awnings to be motorized?
2. There is an exterior window G designated on the floor plan at the mensrestroom. Is there a window at this location?
3. There is an exterior window K (type 3, 2 section) designated in the CSBTV
office. It is shown as a 3 section window on the West Elevation. Please advise.
4. Note 11 on sheets A4.1 & A4.2 says color to match P1 on schedule sheet A6.3.
Does this mean that all Fleetwood windows (Section 085113) are to match this
color (Sherwin Williams SW 7689 Row House Tan)?
5. Is the specified finish (baked enamel finish) to meet AAMA 2603 acceptable?
Please see AAMA specs attached.
Specify AAMA 2604 for aluminum window finish. 1)
In this case sidelites and transom awning windows are
by window manufacturer and opperable awnings are
motorized. 2) No. Omit window G at
restroom wall. 3) Window K is type 4 (3
section). 4) Yes. Provide AAMA 2604
level finish for aluminum window finish. Custom color
to match wall finish.
5) No. AAMA 2604 level acceptable.
14 Collier Group #2 Ravatt
Albrecht and
Associates
1. Window D on schedule is a 90 degree corner unit (in CEO Office). The schedule
calls it out as a type 5.
Floor plan and north elevation shows a 2 section 8 wide window (not a 3 section12 wide per type 5). Please advise.
1) Window D is two section 8' wide per plan.
-
8/8/2019 Board of Supervisors Building Addendum 2
5/200
15 Diani
Construction
#009
Ravatt
Albrecht and
Associates and
Cannon Assoc.
1. Sections 52 & 53 on A4.1 call for a powder coated steel pipe column at grid line
4 between grids N & O per Structural. Structural (S2.10 & S2.20) do not show a
pipe column at this location. Please Clarify.
2. Sections 52 & 54 on A4.2 call for a powder coated column per Structural near
grids J.5 & 8. There is no call out for a pipe column on the Structural (S2.1 or
S2.20) at this location. Please Clarify.
3. A2.1 has a callout near grids 6 & A to see Detail 41 on A8.1 and another near
grids H & 11 to see Detail 31 on A8.1. Both of these are calling for 5 powder
coated pipe per Structural. S2.10 shows a circle at these locations but provides no
designation. There is a callout to see Detail E on S6.20 indicating there are
columns at these locations. Can you please furnish a little more information on
these pipe columns?
1) To be answered in addendum #2. 2)
To be answered in addendum #2. 3) To
be answered in addendum #2.
16 Sierra SchoolEquipment
Company
#1
RavattAlbrecht and
Associates
1. Section 126100 Part 1 G eneral; 1.2 Summary; Letter B, Related Sections: No.1 and Part 1 General; 1.8 Coordination, Letter A, No. 1 & 2 references power and
data to be included for the seating, however, no junction boxes for this
component are noted on the architectural nor electrical drawings for the seating.
Please confirm if power and data components are to be provided for the seating.
2. Section 126100 Part 1 G eneral; 1.3 Action Submittals, Letter B, No. 2
references left and right tablet arms.
Please confirm if tablet arms are to be provided for the seating.
3. Section 126100 Part 1 General; 1.5 Material Maintenance Submittals, Letter
A, No. 1 references Chair Seats and Backs: Furnish a quantity of full-size units
equal to 5 percent seats and backs. Replacement seat and back covers is usually
requested in lieu of the entire upholstered seat and back assemblies.
Please confirm if replacement seat and back covers are required in lieu of the
entire upholstered seat and back assemblies.
4. Section 126100 Part 1 G eneral; 1.6 Quality Assurance, Letter B, No. 3
references to comply with Full-Scale Fire Test: Comply with California Technical
Bulletin 133. If the room is equipped with fire sprinklers, complying with
California Technical Bulletin 133 may not be necessary, however the local Fire
Marshall may still require compliance with TB133.
Please confirm if TB133 compliance should be provided for the seating.
1) No power and data will be required for he seating 2)No tablet arms are to be provided. 3)
Replacement seat and back covers shall be provided.
4) TB133 compliance will NOT be required. 5)
There are no floor defusers. 6)
Veneer face is acceptable, cherry stain finish. 7)
Basis of design for chair fabric: Mill:
GUILFORD of MAINE
Pattern: Upholstery 3400 Playful\color: Chestnut 100%
Nylon
Weight: 20.8 + 1.0 oz./lin. yd.
Abrasion Resistance (ASTM D4157): 200,000 Double
Rubs cotton duck.
Clarification:
Revised Seating spec 126100 - fixed audience seating
enclosed
-
8/8/2019 Board of Supervisors Building Addendum 2
6/200
17 Integrated
Marketing
Concepts #1
Ravatt
Albrecht and
Associates
We are requesting approval to have Construction Specialties, Inc. added as an
approved bidder for Section 10705 Exterior Sun Control Devices. Construction
Specialties (or C/S) has been manufacturing fixed and operable sun control
devices for over twenty years. These products have been featured on such high
profile architectural projects as the Getty Museum and Stanford Universitys
Center for the Visual Arts. I have attached a copy of the C/S catalog for Sun
Controls. Presently, only one manufacturer is listed in the specification and no
substitutions are permitted. Please consider our request to permit C/S to also bid
and provide a competitive proposal on your project.
Substitutions will be considered after close of bidding.
18 Polar Bear
Services, inc. #1
Ravatt
Albrecht and
Associates
The Mechanical Schedule (page M2-0 of the plans) for the new Board of
Supervisors Building indicates that A/C units #4 and #5 are each 10K CFM units.
However, the Mechanical Floor Plan (page M3-0 of the plans) indicates only a
Supply and Return of 10K CFM.
Since these two units are ganged together and have common plenums used tocool the IT spaces, it would seem logical that the total flow would be 20K CFM.
Please advise soonest!
AC-4 & 5 are designed to run in a lead and standby
mode. Only one unit will be in operation at a time.
See Mechanical controls sequence of operations (7 on
Sheet M4-0).
19 Tremco Roofing Ravatt
Albrecht and
Associates
John,
Contractors are calling me asking about the details for the Supervisors Bldg for
roofing. The details were supposed to be revised changing "Dura-Last" to
"Hypalon". This is causing confusion to the roofing contractors.
Also, please have the Architect change the paragraph 2.02 From:
TRI-POLYMER ALLOY MEMBRANE
A. The membrane shall be CSPE (HYPALON), a tri-polymer alloy, polyester
reinforced
roofing membrane supplied by Tremco, Inc., Beachwood OH, USA. The sheet shall
conform to the properties listed below.
1. Color: White (top)/Gray (bottom)
2. Roll Size: 76 wide x 90= long
3. Weight: 8.0 oz. ft24. Thickness ASTM D-751: 60 mil (nominal)
(nominal)
5. Breaking Strength ASTM D-751: 350 lbs x 325 lbs
6. Seam Strength ASTM D-638: 90%
7. Elongation @ Break ASTM D-751: 40% x 30%
8. Heat Aging ASTM D-3045: 80% x 80%
9. Tear Strength ASTM D-751: 100 lbs x 100 lbs
10. Low Temperature Bend ASTM D-2136: Pass (-40......
11. Permeance ASTM D-96: 0.003 Perms
12. Dimensional Change ASTM D-1204: 0.3%
13. Hydrostatic Resistance ASTM D-751: 400 psi
14. Ozone Resistance ASTM D-1149: Pass
15. EMMAQUA Test ASTM E-838: Pass (2.7 million Langleys)
Please find enclosed the revised roof specification
075423 - Single Ply Roofing
-
8/8/2019 Board of Supervisors Building Addendum 2
7/200
20 Pugliese Interiors
Systems (Newton
Construction #1)
Ravatt
Albrecht and
Associates
1) On Sheet A6.1 Note #13 calls out for Tecbase Access Floor by Haworth per
specs, but the specs I found appear to be performance specs, which we can meet
with the Tate Access Floor system. Will we be allowed to bid this job? 2) On the
Finish Schedule Sheet A6.1, the flooring material called out for the IT Room
(#402) and IT Office (#413) is "SC" with a color of "CO3", which is sealed conrete
with a clear sealer. Please advise what finish is supposed to go on top of the
access floor panels?
1) Please bid per plans and specs. Substitutions will be
considered after close of bidding. 2) The
subfloor is concrete with a clear seal. The raised floor
is Tecbase, Tecrete with concrete finish and clear seal.
21 Diani
Construction
#010
Ravatt
Albrecht and
Associates
1. The Finish Schedule on Drawing A6.1 calls for the flooring material in the IT
Room (#402) and IT Office (#413) as SC with a color of C03, which is sealed
concrete with a clear sealer. Please advise what finish is required for the top of
the access floor panels?
2. Are any airflow panels required in the IT Room? If so, can you provide the type
and quantity?
3. Please advise if the server cabinets will be installed on top of the access floor
or if they will be installed on their own stands?
1) The subfloor is concrete with a clear seal. The
raised floor is Tecbase, Tecrete with concrete finish
and clear seal. 2) 22
count perforated floor panels shown. Coordinate with
mechanical CFM air flow requirement.
3) On top of the access floor per manufacturers
requirements. Provide siesmic straps as required per
CBC for freestanding fixture restraint.
22 Melchiori RFI 1 Ravatt
Albrecht and
Associates
In the Notice to Prequalified Bidders there is reference to Prevailing Wages for
both California Labor Code Director of the Department of Industrial Relations and
Davis-Bacon, In the Special Conditions there is only reference to Davis-Bacon.
Are the Prevailing Wage Rates for this project going to strictly be based on Davis-
Bacon or the higher of the two rates?
Higher of the two rates.
23 Melchiori RFI 2 Ravatt
Albrecht and
Associates
Question: On the Floor Plan sheet A2.1 at Grid Lines C and 6 on the west wall of
the Board Hearing Room there is a reference to a Note 15 pointing to something
round on the wall. Key Note 15 says See Site Plan for Exterior Courtyards and
Access. Please clarify what this note should actually be.
Omit note 15 at grid line C/6 in Hearing Room
24 Melchiori RFI 3 Ravatt
Albrecht andAssociates
Question: Please refer to the Finish Schedule on Sheet 302.
1. The wall finish callouts on the north and south walls for the color call for SP/P9,there is no SP on the Finish Notes for the walls. Please clarify if this is meant to be
AP.
2. There is nothing listed in the color column on the east wall, please clarify what
this should be.
3. On the Finish Notes for Acoustical Panels there are two AP3 listed. Which is the
correct AP3?
4. On the Interior Elevations for the Hearing Room on sheet A6.6 on the north,
south and east walls there are numbers 1,2 and 3 shown. Are we to assume these
are referring to the AP numbers on the Finish Notes? Also on the west elevation
what are the wall finishes to the left and right of the stone wall?
1) Room 302 on sheet A6.1 as follows: North - AP1,
East - AP2, South - AP1, West - ST 2)East - AP2 3) AP3
Decoustic Quadrillo. AP4 Owens Corning Select Sound
4) These are not in reference to AP numbers. Numbers
are in reference to furred direction of panel. Omit
numbers. Left and right walls are painted gyp, note 3.
25 Templeton Floor
Company Inc. #1
Ravatt
Albrecht and
Associates
Room 301, Public Seating: Plans call out Terrazo and Carpet for flooring. What is
the extent? A2.1 and A6.1 Per Plans: dont show where start and stops. Re:
Bldg D Expansion: Need carpet manufacturer, pattern name and rubber topset
selection.
Please find enclosed revised sheet A6.1. Please find
enclosed revised sheet T-4 and additional sheet T-5.
-
8/8/2019 Board of Supervisors Building Addendum 2
8/200
26 Diani
Construction
#011
Ravatt
Albrecht and
Associates
We are unable to locate requirements for Builders Risk Insurance. Will
contractors be required to provide Builders Risk Insurance for this Project?
No. Not required.
27 Floor Connection
#2
Ravatt
Albrecht and
Associates
On plan page T-4 Proposed Floor Plan D, areas are indicated to receive new
carpet and base, with a note to see the finish schedule. The finish schedule on
plna A6.1 shows only finishes for Buildin E. Which carpet style and base color are
to be figured for Building D?
Please find enclosed revised sheet T-4 and additional
sheet T-5.
28 Diani
Construction #12
Ravatt
Albrecht and
Associates
There are no call outs on the Project Plans indicating where the Traffic Coatings
Specified in Section 071800 are going to be applied.
Is this coating on the onsite pedestrian walkways? Or is it on all site concrete
including curbs & gutters, offsite city sidewalks, curbs & gutters, monument sign,
seat walls & etc? Please provide areas where this coating is to be applied. How do
we proceed?
Please find attached revised sheet A1.0 note 37.
29 Diani
Construction #13
Ravatt
Albrecht andAssociates
On sheet A6.5 note #60 calls for an adjustable art panel in one location in
elevation 52. In the elevation it looks like there are 6 of these art panels.1. Are these art panels owner supplied and installed?
2. If these are contractor furnished and install how many of these panels are
needed? And who is the manufacture and what are the model numbers?
1) Yes. 2) There are 7 total. This is a custom panel per
detail.
30 Diani
Construction #14
Ravatt
Albrecht and
Associates
See the examples below where the finish schedule, finish plan & interior
elevation do not match.
1. Rooms #111 & #201 call for gyp. Board ceiling on the finish plan and on the
schedule it is acoustical panels.
2. Room #409 calls for carpet on the floor, gyp .board walls & acoustical ceilings
on the floor plan and tile in all three areas on the schedule.
3. In room #304 on the finish plan it references A6.9 for interior elevations. There
is no sheet A6.9
4. In room#300 & #301 on the finish plan and schedule calls for gyp. Board walls
with paint and refers to interior elevations on A6.6. The elevation for these room
are on sheet A6.5 And the elevation call for accent wall finish and wall covering
on some of the elevations.These are just a few examples of finishes that do not match up. Will there be a
revised finish schedule, finish plan and interior elevations?
If not how do we proceed?
1) Room 111 and 201 are AP. See also ceiling plan. 2)
Room 405 revised per schedule TL, TL, TL, GW, GB. 3)
Reference A6.8 for interior elevations . 4) Reference
A6.5. Yes, there are special finishes at these locations
in selected ares on the interior elevations. Please find
enclosed the revised sheet A6.1.
31 Diani
Construction #15
Ravatt
Albrecht and
Associates
1. Window / Door Frame #7 is called out as aluminum in the window schedule,
but there is not an Aluminum Storefront & Door Specifications Section. Is the
door and frame to be hollow metal? If so, how does the aluminum window
integrate with the hollow metal frame?
2. We do not find Specification Sections for the following:
Glass & Glazing
Aluminum & Storefront Windows and Doors
Will these Specification Sections be issued?
1) Provide aluminum system compatible with window
configuration, Fleetwood, Westwood 350 or equiv. 2)
Glass and Glazing assemblies are identified within
sections: 08511 - Aluminum windows, and 081113 -
hm doors & frames
-
8/8/2019 Board of Supervisors Building Addendum 2
9/200
32 G and J T ile #1 Ravatt
Albrecht and
Associates
1) STONE VENEER TILE AS REFERENCED AT DETAIL 53 ON SHEET A 8.3. WHICH
SPEC SECTION IS THIS TO BE INSTALLED UNDER?
2) DETAIL 54 ON SHEET A 8.5: THERE IS A REFERENCE TO 5/8" WP GYP BOARD O/
WP MEMBRANE EA SIDE. INSTALLING A WP MEMBRANE BEHIND GYP BOARD IS
CONTRARY TO INDUSTRY STANDARDS. IF A WP MEMBRANE IS DESIRED AT TILE
WAINSCOT AREAS USE TCA METHOD 245 (IE.DENSHIELD )
3) KEYNOTE 5 ON A6.1: CAN YOU PROVIDE A MORE SPECIFIC MATERIAL SPEC
AND DETAIL?
4) WHAT IS THE DETAIL BETWEEN THE TZ TILE AT LOBBY WITH THE CARPET INLAY
AREA?
WILL THIS CARPET AREA BE DEPRESSED AND FILLED IN LATER? ( BY WHOM?)
WILL THERE BE A METAL STRIP?
5) TILE SPECS INDICATE TILE FLOORS TO HAVE A CRACK SUPPRESION
MEMBRANE.
THEY ALSO INDICATE
MORTAR DEPRESSIONS (TCA F112 AND TCA F132) ARE YOU ADDITIONALLY
ADDING A CRACK SUPPRESION MEMBRANE ON TOP OF THE MORTAR BEDS?
NOTE: IT MAY BE A LOT EASIER TO ELIMINATE THE MORTAR DEPRESSION AT THE
TZ TILE AREAS. SEE QUESTION 4 ABOVE. YOU COULD USE TCA F 125A ON TOP OF
A CONCRETE SLAB AT THIS LOCATION.
6) WHICH DOORS ARE THE STONE THRESHOLDS TO BE INSTALLED AT?
1) 093033 - stone tiling. 2) Ea. side refers to a single
assembly on both sides of the wall. 3) Schluter-
SCHIENE, or equiv. 4) Flush installation. Provide metal
strip edge, compatible color. 5) This is a contractor
means and methods issue. Please bid per plans. 6)
Restrooms only. See attached revised sheet A6.1
33 Vision
Communications
#1
Ravatt
Albrecht and
Associates
I do not see communications cabling details referenced in the project manual or
plan set, only the locations are referenced.
Are the quantities and types of voice/data cables, outlets, equipment specified in
the documents? If so can you point me to them?
(For instance, how many cat5e/cat6 cables required per location, is plenum or
pvc rated cable required, and manufacturer or equipment type/modelpreferences, etc.)
Can you confirm that the communications cabling (telephone/data) is
included/excluded from the scope of this bid?
If contract is directly with owner can you please provide contact information for
the person/group responsible for bidding out that portion of the work?
Telephone and Data Cabling is excluded form the
Board of Supervisors building Construction Bid
Documents. Telephone / Data Cabling will be
provided through internal County Telephone Services.
-
8/8/2019 Board of Supervisors Building Addendum 2
10/200
34 Melchiori RFI 4 Ravatt
Albrecht and
Associates
Question: 1. As per the description in Addendum 1 of Bid Alternate 4 could you
please further clarify what the extent of the planting and irrigation are to be
excluded in the base bid at the parking areas. For example is the planting in the
well at the south east corner of the hardscape surrounding the building next to
the handicap parking to be included or excluded? Perhaps you could provide a
site plan outlining the exact areas to be excluded in the base bid.
2. If the irrigation in the parking areas is to be excluded as part of the base bid but
the trees are to remain how will the trees be watered?
3. There is a detail H on sheet L-5 for a Cobble Drain Sump, we can not locate this
sump on the site plan. Please clarify the locations of this sump detail if required.
Also this detail calls for the 3 perforated drain to be connected to the
downspouts and hardscape drainage but the Civil plans C-1 note 15 calls for the
downspouts to empty onto concrete splash blocks or to daylight at grade. Please
clarify which plans govern Landscape or Civil. If per Landscape plans could you
please provide a drainage plan?
1) Exterior perimter of parking lot only on South and
East perimter. 2) Irrigation to remain for Trees only.
3) Sump Location The sump is to be located at the
low end of the drain line at the southwest terminus of
the cobble swale slightly north of the Centerpointe
Parkway entry. Civil plans take precedence.
Downspouts to splashblock is required to meat
drainage requirements.
35 Voorhis Tile #1 Ravatt
Albrecht and
Associates
1) For room #301 Public Seating, is the TZ2 tile only used as a boarder on three
sides of the carpet with a small 6" border +/- at the exterior wall sides. Am unable
to located any detail about carpet tile layout. 2) Is the
wainscot height 4'-10" per 51 A6.4, or 48" per item #21 under heading 22 typical
shower mounting height on A2.2 staff restrooms. 3) Finish schedule A6.1
spec. tile TZ1 as 16"x16" and TZ2 as 12"x12" trim? On page 093000-4 Part 2
products, sub 2.2 Tile products, A-1 states provide product indicated on drawings
Wausau tile: Terrazzo Tile (where are these)? Also #2 states face size of 32"x16".
Need some clarification. 4) Who is responsible foir the removal of
any bond breaker product used on the slab for pouring of the tilt up walls? Also if
the concrete slab in those areas receiving floor tile is steel troweled finished it
will need to be mechanically scarified by others prior to setting tile over it.
5) There are eight discrepancies in the tile spec for the base trim and wall tile at
the bathrooms. The elevations say one thing and the finish schedule page says
another, this could affect the tile pricing. Can I get the correct selections?
1) Please find enclosed revised sheet A6.1 2) Wall
hieght 4'-10" per interior elevations 3) See finish
schedule A6.1. 4) This is a means and methods issue.
Please coordinate with general contractor. 5) Please
find enclosed revised sheet A6.1
36 Diani
Construction #16
Ravatt
Albrecht and
Associates
Sheet A6.3 the Door Schedule does not provide hardware groups and the
Specifications do not list hardware groups. Will hardware groups be provided?
Will a revised Door Schedule be provided with hardware groups listed?
Please find revised sheet A6.3 with added hardware
requirements
37 Jensen Audio
Visual
Ravatt
Albrecht and
Associates
We have been looking through the plans for the Board of Supervisors building
and have found the groundwork laid for the Audio Visual needs , but no products
specification in the bid.
1) Will the AV come out in a separate bid?
2) Will it come out soon or later on down the line?
3) Will it be direct to the county?
4) Has the AV design work already been completed?
1) YES
2) To Be Determined
3) YES
4) YES
-
8/8/2019 Board of Supervisors Building Addendum 2
11/200
38 Newton
Construction #1
Ravatt
Albrecht and
Associates
Regarding the solar estimate by REC in Addendum 1, is the intention of the
county to utilize this number as an allowance or just to depict the system
requirements? If so, should the contractor be deducting the grants and rebates
out?
Just to depict the system requirements. Contractor to
deduct the grants and rebates out.
39 Vernon Edwards
#1
Ravatt
Albrecht and
Associates
1. Reference: Title Sheet-Bidding Information- Deductive Alternates.
Question: Base bid package per the note calls for the base bid to be total package
minus alternates. If the alternates are already deductive shouldnt the base bid
include the deductive alternates?
2. Reference: Sheet C-1 Grading & Drainage Plan
Question: There is a note 5 in the parking lot off the southeast corner of the
building. Is this a typo?
3. Reference: C-1 Grading Plan
Question: Can we use the adjacent lot for either importing or exporting 200-300
yards for fill?
4. Reference: A1.2 At Staff Courtyard
Question: The sidewalk/landing from the building is called out to be concrete.
However it looks like a herringbone pattern. Do you want standard grey concrete
at this location?
5. Reference: Detail 42/A1.3 At Monument Sign
Question: The section view shows the footing for the wall but no footing for the
concrete elements. What is the planned footing at this location? Should we use
footing at detail 12 same sheet?
1) Enclosed revised sheet T-1 with add alternates. See
also addendum #1 with revised alternate language. 2)
Omit note 5 at this location. 3) Yes. Coordinate with
County. 4) Yes. Concrete at this location. 5) Yes.
-
8/8/2019 Board of Supervisors Building Addendum 2
12/200
40 SBS Corporation
#1
Ravatt
Albrecht and
Associates
1) Will a SWPPP plan be required inclusive of the NOI permit requirement and
cost, or is
the Erosion Control Plan Sheet C-4, the full extent of the SWPPP for this project
and do they fulfill this requirement?
2) GC Para 5.8.1- Refers to allowances per sub-para. 10.1.1 allowances, which
does not list any.
Please verify there are no allowances on this project.
3) Will the County of Santa Barbara require the prime contractor to provide
builders risk insurance coverage, on this project.
4) Sheet A1.0 Note # 30, refers to detail 42/A1.2 for the vehicle access area. This
detail is actually for the trash enclosure.
Please clarify.
5) Sheet A1.0, Note # 33 refers to detail 42/A1.2 for the green screen. Detail
42/A1.2 refers to the site plan for the green screen.
6) Detail 44/A1.2 calls for 48 high concrete forms per detail 21/A1.3.
Detail 21/A1.3, detail 21/A1.3 refers to Detail 11/A1.3, which is the seating
7) Sheet A2.1 calls out detail blow-up 34/A2.2 @ the IT Room. Detail 34/A2.2 is
for Staff Restrooms 406 & 410. 8) Is a City of LA
welding certificate acceptable in lieu of the required AICS?
1) Please find enclosed the SWPPP in addition to sheet
C-4. 2) No allowances. 3) No. 4) Reference is for
swing gate, similar. 5) See site plan for location only.
6) Detail 11/A1.3 refers to construction details
necessary to build the gate column. 7) Omit call out
34/A2.2 at IT Room. 8) No.
41 Santa Maria
Electric Inc RFI
004
Ravatt
Albrecht and
Associates
Sheet E1.0, Note 7
Are the existing "Sleeves" actually stud outs that we would connect to; or are
they oversized sleeves that we must install the new 4" conduits into?
They are oversized sleeves. See enclosed sheet T-2.
Contractor to verify.
42 Partition
Specialties Inc.
Ravatt
Albrecht and
Associates
1. Confirm that a 1250lb panel is sufficient foryour project
2. Confirm that a standard, non-conductive high pressure laminate finish is
acceptable (colors Cheyenne & Gray Starlight are typically in stock)
3. Verify that raised floor understructure should be designed to meet current
code requirements with no additional requirements.
4. Verify the quantity of perforated airflow panels/per A6.1 there appears to be
22.
5. Clarify if computer server racks will sit on the floor or on a rack stand 6.
Confirm if DSA will require that the raised floor pedestals are to be attached with
post installed expansion anchors or if adhesive is acceptable/FYI it's a DSA issue
not a code issue, without specific instruction it can be open to interpretation.
1) Clarify 2) Clarify 3) Yes. Meet current code
requirements 4) Yes 22 panels. See revised sheet A2.1
enclosed. 5) Floor mounted. 6) Install per
manufacturer requirements to meet current code.
-
8/8/2019 Board of Supervisors Building Addendum 2
13/200
43 SLO Plastering Inc Ravatt
Albrecht and
Associates
1. Screen wall on 52/A4.1 note 14 references CMU with plaster finish. Note 23 on
A2.1 notes detail 44/A1.3 which follows 54A/A1.2 which references colored block
with contrasting grout. Which is the corrent finish for this screen wall.
2. Note 7 on A4.1 notes cement plaster on canopy entrances. Section references
on A5.1 note 44/A8.3 which shows cement board. Which finish is desired?
3. 54/A4.2 canopy between lines E&J notes stucco while detail 14/A8.4
references shows hardie board. Which is correct? (similar situation at 52/A4.2
between lines 2&6 exist). 4. At main
entry canopy, will hardie plank return at lines 4 & 7.5 back onto roof to a distance
of 9'6"? 5. What type of
connection should be used at the hardie plank to stucco intersections?
6. Spec section 092400 2.5)D notes cement based stucco finish & 3.6)F notes
acrylic based finish sytem. Which is correct?
1) Smooth plaster 20/30 float finish. 2) Hardie Panel
finish. 3) Hardie Panel 4) Yes. 5) Connection per
manufacturer with stippled heads for good paint
adheason.
45 Vernon Edwards
#1
Ravatt
Albrecht andAssociates
1. Reference: Project Manuel
Question: I cannot find the hardware schedule in the hardware specs. Will one be
provided?
2. Reference: Sheet A3.1 Note #14.
Question: Is REC solar the chosen contractor or can the contractor use their own
solar company?
3. Reference: Sheet E5.0:
Question: The fixture schedule calls out for fixtures NR-A, NR-B and NR-C that
refers to Norman Russell Plans (Sheets VL-1 and VL-2). The Norman Russell Plans
do not list a spec for these fixtures. Can we please get the manufacturer and
catalog number for the light fixtures specified on the Norman Russell Plans?
1) Added to sheet A6.3 2) Contractor can use their
own Solar company. 3) Please find attached cut sheetsfor fixtures ECT S4 and ELLIP.
46 Diani
Construction#017
Ravatt
Albrecht andAssociates
Add alternate #4 tells us to Provide complete planting and irrigation as per
construction documents. Complete landscaping with 5 gallon plant sizes,complete landscaping and irrigation at Parking area.
Base Bid: Revise and provide all 5 gallon planting shown on sheet L-4 to be 1
gallon plants. Exclude all landscaping irrigation and all planting at parking areas
on east side , south side and interior parking plant wells. Trees to remain.
1. It is a little confusing the alternate is tell us to provide complete planting and
irrigation as per documents and for the base bid is telling us to Exclude all
irrigation and planting at the parking areas. Is all of the irrigation and planting
including the drainage swale, header boards, DG path and etc. to be excluded in
the base bid and added in the alternate for the complete project?
2. If only certain areas are to be deleted in the base bid then added in the
alternate can these areas be clarified in detail?
1) Alternate 4 Clarification: Omit planting at perimeter
of parking lot on South and East perimeter. Trees toremain. Irrigation for trees to remain. 2) see 1 above.
-
8/8/2019 Board of Supervisors Building Addendum 2
14/200
47 Diani
Construction #18
Cannon and
Associates
1) On elevation F/ S3.20, detail G/ S4.50 cuts through the corner @ gridline 7,
and shows a HSS section that spans an opening in the tilt - up wall. On the same
elevation F/ S 3.20, detail G/ S4.50 also cuts through the corner @ grid line 9. At
this location there is no opening, and there is no HSS section shown. Should we
assume that the corner bracket HSS and embeds shown in the detail occur here,
even though they are not shown in the elevation? This occurs several other places
as well.
2) Detail K/ S8.20 shows a HSS 6x4x1/4 support brace. We could not find this on
any plan views, please locate for us.
3) Cant find details K/ S4.50, H,E,F,G/ S7.10, H,G/ S8.20?
1) Disregard G/S4.5 callout at F/S3.20 grid 9. 2) Detail
not used 3) K/S4.30 F, G H/S7.10 not used E/S710
referenced from low canopy plan on S2.20. G and
H/S8.20 are referenced details.
48 Diani
Construction #19
Cannon and
Associates
1) Detail 11/ A8.1 shows a square HSS section in corner by window which is called
out with a powder coat finish. Does this apply to the corner brackets as shown in
detail G/ S4.50?
2) S2.20- HSS 4x4x1/4 beam on line N between lines 2+3. What is the connection
on the (left) south side?
3) Do the (2) HSS 5x4x3/8 columns on grid N between lines 5+6 starting at the
foundation plan on S2.10 end at the HSS 10x8 beam in the low canopy framing
plan, or do they continue to the W16x67 beam in the high roof framing plan ? On
these same columns what is the connection at the beam(s).
1) Yes. 2) See attached detail labeled RFI )19 from
Cannon Assoc. 3) HSS 5x4 posts extend up to HSS 10x8
beam. See referenced detail E/S7.10 per low canopyplan.
49 Diani
Construction #20
Ravatt
Albrecht and
Associates
We received the following request for clarification from a subcontractor:
Upon further review of the Finish Schedule (Sheet #A6.1), it appears that the
finish on the access floor panels is to be sealed concrete. If this is correct, then
this is a proprietary process from Haworth that cannot be supplied by any other
manufacturer!
Since this is a public job, we would hope that the county would allow more than asingle source to bid this scope of the work. Will T ate Access Flooring Systems be
allowed to be bid for this scope of work?
Sealed conrete is in reference to the subfloor not the
raised floor finish.
50 Maino
Construction
Ravatt
Albrecht and
Associates
Note 3, Sheet A4.1 references a 'course aggregate finish' at lower panel sections.
How is this finish achieved? Is this a simulated course aggegate using a form
liner or expose the aggregate by sand blasting? Please clarify.
Detail 54/A8.2, 1/2" x 1/2" revel @ 6" OC, below opening in panel - please
confirm this is the 'decorative panel grove' described in Note 16, Sheet A8.2.
Sand Blasting is appropriate. Yes.
-
8/8/2019 Board of Supervisors Building Addendum 2
15/200
51 Clarification Ravatt
Albrecht and
Associates
1. Exhaust fans shall be rated for .5 inches of water static pressure at the CFM as
shown in the Exhaust Fan Schedule, Sheet M2-0.
2. Fire/Smoke Dampers shall be Class 2 per the specification. Provide a dedicated
120 volt circuit breaker with appropriate raceway and conductors from nearest
power panel for damper power requirements. Contractor to include control and
associated smoke detection for fire/smoke dampers as a part of the fire alarm
differed submittal.
Clarification.
-
8/8/2019 Board of Supervisors Building Addendum 2
16/200
-
8/8/2019 Board of Supervisors Building Addendum 2
17/200
Diani Building Corp.Contractors
295 NORTH BLOSSER P.O. BOX 5757SANTA MARIA, CALIFORNIA93456-5757
PHONE (805)-925-9533FAX (805)-928-2150
REQUEST FOR INFORMATION
TO: John Green [email protected] RFI No. 010
FROM CONTRACTOR: DIANI BUILDING CORP. Date: 10-6-10
PROJECT: Board of Supervisors Building
SUBJECT: Access Flooring
Reference Drawings A6.1 Specifications: 096900
DESCRIPTION OF PROBLEM/ CLARIFICATION/ INFORMATION REQUIRED:
1. The Finish Schedule on Drawing A6.1 calls for the flooring material in the IT Room(#402) and IT Office (#413) as SC with a color of C03, which is sealed concrete with
a clear sealer. Please advise what finish is required for the top of the access floor panels?
2. Are any airflow panels required in the IT Room? If so, can you provide the type andquantity?
3. Please advise if the server cabinets will be installed on top of the access floor or if theywill be installed on their own stands?
CONTRACTORS PROPOSED SOLUTIONS:
Please provide requested information.
By: Fred Roinestad Date:A response is needed by to avoid any delays
RESPONSE:
Response by:
Firm: Title: Date:
-
8/8/2019 Board of Supervisors Building Addendum 2
18/200
Request for Information No.1Date: 10/6/10
Project: County of Santa Barbara Board of Supervisors
Building
MCC Project No.: TBD
Submitted To:John GreenProject ManagerCounty of Santa Barbara General Servicese-mail: jlg [email protected]
Submitted By:Phil OrrMelchiori Construction Company809 De La VinaSanta Barbara CA. 93101Phone (805) 962-9505Fax (805) 962-8776E-Mail [email protected]
Subject: Prevailing Wages
Cost Impact:Schedule Impact:
Question:In the Notice to Prequalified Bidders there is reference to Prevailing Wages for both California Labor Code Director of theDepartment of Industrial Relations and Davis-Bacon, In the Special Conditions there is only reference to Davis-Bacon.
Are the Prevailing Wage Rates for this project going to strictly be based on Davis-Bacon or the higher of the two rates?
Answer Required by:
Answer:
Answered By: Date:
Team Distribution: Subcontractor Distribution
-
8/8/2019 Board of Supervisors Building Addendum 2
19/200
Request for Information No.2Date: 10/6/10
Project: County of Santa Barbara Board of Supervisors
Building
MCC Project No.: TBD
Submitted To:John GreenProject ManagerCounty of Santa Barbara General Servicese-mail: jlg [email protected]
Submitted By:Phil OrrMelchiori Construction Company809 De La VinaSanta Barbara CA. 93101Phone (805) 962-9505Fax (805) 962-8776E-Mail [email protected]
Subject: Key Note Clarification
Cost Impact:Schedule Impact:
Question: On the Floor Plan sheet A2.1 at Grid Lines C and 6 on the west wall of the Board Hearing Room there isa reference to a Note 15 poin ting to something round on the wall. Key Note 15 says See Site Plan for ExteriorCourtyards and Access . Please clarify what this note should actually be.
Answer Required by:
Answer:
Answered By: Date:
Team Distribution: Subcontractor Distribution
-
8/8/2019 Board of Supervisors Building Addendum 2
20/200
Request for Information No.3Date: 10/6/10
Project: County of Santa Barbara Board of Supervisors
Building
MCC Project No.: TBD
Submitted To:John GreenProject ManagerCounty of Santa Barbara General Servicese-mail: jlg [email protected]
Submitted By:Phil OrrMelchiori Construction Company809 De La VinaSanta Barbara CA. 93101Phone (805) 962-9505Fax (805) 962-8776E-Mail [email protected]
Subject: Hearing Room Wall Finishes
Cost Impact:Schedule Impact:
Question: Please refer to the Finish Schedule on Sheet 302.1. The wall finish callouts on the north and south walls for the color call for SP/P9, there is no SP on the
Finish Notes for the walls. Please clarify if this i s meant to be AP.2. There is nothing listed in the colo r column on the east wall, please clarify what this should be.3. On the Finish Notes for Acoustical Panels there are two AP3 listed. Which is the correct AP3?4. On the Interior Elevations for the Hearing Room on sheet A6.6 on the north, south and east walls there are
numbers 1,2 and 3 shown. Are we to assume these are referring to the AP numbers on the Finish Notes?Also on the west elevation what are the wall finishes to the left and right of the stone wall?
Answer Required by:
Answer:
Answered By: Date:
Team Distribution: Subcontractor Distribution
-
8/8/2019 Board of Supervisors Building Addendum 2
21/200
-
8/8/2019 Board of Supervisors Building Addendum 2
22/200
-
8/8/2019 Board of Supervisors Building Addendum 2
23/200
Diani Building Corp.Contractors
295 NORTH BLOSSER P.O. BOX 5757SANTA MARIA, CALIFORNIA93456-5757
PHONE (805)-925-9533FAX (805)-928-2150
REQUEST FOR INFORMATION
TO: John Green [email protected] RFI No. 011
FROM CONTRACTOR: DIANI BUILDING CORP. Date: 10-6-10
PROJECT: Board of Supervisors Building
SUBJECT: Builders Risk Insurance
Reference Drawings N/A Specifications: General & Special Conditions
DESCRIPTION OF PROBLEM/ CLARIFICATION/ INFORMATION REQUIRED:
We are unable to locate requirements for Builders Risk Insurance. Will contractors be required to
provide Builders Risk Insurance for this Project?
CONTRACTORS PROPOSED SOLUTIONS:
Please provide requested information.
By: Fred Roinestad Date:A response is needed by to avoid any delays
RESPONSE:
Response by:
Firm: Title: Date:
-
8/8/2019 Board of Supervisors Building Addendum 2
24/200
-
8/8/2019 Board of Supervisors Building Addendum 2
25/200
Diani Building Corp.Contractors
295 NORTH BLOSSER P.O. BOX 5757SANTA MARIA, CALIFORNIA93456-5757
PHONE (805)-925-9533FAX (805)-928-2150
REQUEST FOR INFORMATION
TO: John Green mailto: [email protected] RFI No. 012
FROM CONTRACTOR: DIANI BUILDING CORP. Date: 10-07-10
PROJECT: Board of Supervisors Building
SUBJECT: TRAFFIC COATINGS
Reference Drawings SECTION 071800 Specifications
DESCRIPTION OF PROBLEM/ CLARIFICATION/ INFORMATION REQUIRED:
There are no call outs on the Project Plans indicating where the Traffic Coatings Specified
in Section 071800 are going to be applied.
Is this coating on the onsite pedestrian walkways? Or is it on all site concrete including
curbs & gutters, offsite city sidewalks, curbs & gutters, monument sign, seat walls & etc?
Please provide areas where this coating is to be applied. How do we proceed?
CONTRACTORS PROPOSED SOLUTIONS:
By: Fred Roinestad Date:A response is needed by to avoid any delays
RESPONSE:
Response by:
Firm: Title: Date:
-
8/8/2019 Board of Supervisors Building Addendum 2
26/200
Diani Building Corp.Contractors
295 NORTH BLOSSER P.O. BOX 5757SANTA MARIA, CALIFORNIA93456-5757
PHONE (805)-925-9533FAX (805)-928-2150
REQUEST FOR INFORMATION
TO: John Green mailto: [email protected] RFI No. 013
FROM CONTRACTOR: DIANI BUILDING CORP. Date: 10-7-10
PROJECT: Board of Supervisors Building
SUBJECT: ADJUSTABLE ART PANELS
Reference Drawings A6.5 & A8.6 Specifications
DESCRIPTION OF PROBLEM/ CLARIFICATION/ INFORMATION REQUIRED:
On sheet A6.5 note #60 calls for an adjustable art panel in one location in elevation 52. In the
elevation it looks like there are 6 of these art panels.
1. Are these art panels owner supplied and installed?
2. If these are contractor furnished and install how many of these panels are needed? And who is
the manufacture and what are the model numbers?
CONTRACTORS PROPOSED SOLUTIONS:
By: Fred Roinestad Date:A response is needed by to avoid any delays
RESPONSE:
Response by:
Firm: Title: Date:
-
8/8/2019 Board of Supervisors Building Addendum 2
27/200
Diani Building Corp.Contractors
295 NORTH BLOSSER P.O. BOX 5757SANTA MARIA, CALIFORNIA93456-5757
PHONE (805)-925-9533FAX (805)-928-2150
REQUEST FOR INFORMATION
TO: John Green mailto: [email protected] RFI No. 014
FROM CONTRACTOR: DIANI BUILDING CORP. Date: 10-7-10
PROJECT: Board of Supervisors Building
SUBJECT: Finish plan, Finish Schedule & Interior Elevations Do not Match
Reference Drawings A6.1, A6.4-A6.8 Specifications
DESCRIPTION OF PROBLEM/ CLARIFICATION/ INFORMATION REQUIRED:
See the examples below where the finish schedule, finish plan & interior elevation do not match.
1. Rooms #111 & #201 call for gyp. Board ceiling on the finish plan and on the schedule itis acoustical panels.
2. Room #409 calls for carpet on the floor, gyp .board walls & acoustical ceilings on thefloor plan and tile in all three areas on the schedule.
3. In room #304 on the finish plan it references A6.9 for interior elevations. There is nosheet A6.9
4. In room#300 & #301 on the finish plan and schedule calls for gyp. Board walls with paintand refers to interior elevations on A6.6. The elevation for these room are on sheet A6.5
And the elevation call for accent wall finish and wall covering on some of the elevations.
These are just a few examples of finishes that do not match up. Will there be a revised
finish schedule, finish plan and interior elevations?
If not how do we proceed?
CONTRACTORS PROPOSED SOLUTIONS:
By: Fred Roinestad Date:A response is needed by to avoid any delays
RESPONSE:
Response by:
Firm: Title: Date:
-
8/8/2019 Board of Supervisors Building Addendum 2
28/200
Diani Building Corp.Contractors
295 NORTH BLOSSER P.O. BOX 5757SANTA MARIA, CALIFORNIA93456-5757
PHONE (805)-925-9533FAX (805)-928-2150
REQUEST FOR INFORMATION
TO: John Green mailto: [email protected] RFI No. 015
FROM CONTRACTOR: DIANI BUILDING CORP. Date: 10-7-10
PROJECT: Board of Supervisors Building
SUBJECT: Glass & Glazing / Storefront
Reference Drawings Specifications
DESCRIPTION OF PROBLEM/ CLARIFICATION/ INFORMATION REQUIRED:
1. Window / Door Frame #7 is called out as aluminum in the window schedule, but there isnot an Aluminum Storefront & Door Specifications Section. Is the door and frame to be
hollow metal? If so, how does the aluminum window integrate with the hollow metal
frame?
2. We do not find Specification Sections for the following: Glass & Glazing Aluminum & Storefront Windows and Doors
Will these Specification Sections be issued?
CONTRACTORS PROPOSED SOLUTIONS:
Provide Specifications.
By: Fred Roinestad Date:A response is needed by to avoid any delays
RESPONSE:
Response by:
Firm: Title: Date:
-
8/8/2019 Board of Supervisors Building Addendum 2
29/200
From: Green, John L.
To: Michael N. Demartini; Paul A. Reinhardt
Subject: FW: RFI Board of Supervisors New Building
Date: Thursday, October 07, 2010 2:31:02 PM
Please find Bid RFI.
Thanks,
John GreenProject Manager, Capital Projects
County of Santa BarbaraGeneral ServicesSupport Services Division- North County912 West Foster Road Santa Maria , CA 93455tel. (805) 934-6229fax (805) [email protected]
-----Original Message-----From: John Vesnaver [mailto:[email protected]]Sent: Thursday, October 07, 2010 9:45 AMTo: Green, John L.Subject: RFI Board of Supervisors New Building
Dear Mr. Green
RE:Questions concerning contract documents
1) Stone Veneer Tile as referenced at detail 53 on Sheet A 8.3. Whichspec section is this to be installed under?
2) Detail 54 on Sheet A 8.5: There is a reference to 5/8" WP GYP BOARD O/WP MEMBRANE EA SIDE. Installing a WP MEMBRANE behind GYP BOARDis contrary to industry standards. If a WP MEMBRANE is desired at tilewainscot areasuse TCA method 245 (ie.Denshield )
3) Keynote 5 on A6.1: Can you provide a more specific material spec anddetail?
4) What is the detail between the TZ tile at lobby with the carpet inlayarea?Will this carpet area be depressed and filled in later? ( By whom?)Will there be a metal strip?
5) Tile specs indicate tile floors to have a crack suppresion membrane.They also indicatemortar depressions (TCA F112 and TCA F132) Are you additionally adding acrack suppresionmembrane on top of the mortar beds? Note: It may be a lot easier toeliminate the mortar depressionat the TZ tile areas. See question 4 above. You could use TCA F 125A ontop of a concrete slab atthis location.
mailto:[email protected]:[email protected]:[email protected]:[email protected]:[email protected]:[email protected]:[email protected]:[email protected] -
8/8/2019 Board of Supervisors Building Addendum 2
30/200
6) Which doors are the stone thresholds to be installed at?
7) Is there any tile work in the Building D remodel?
Thank You
John Vesnaver
G and J Tile Company3148 El Camino RealAtascadero, Ca. 93422
ph: 805 466 5899fax 805 466 5911cell: 805 423 8370email: [email protected]
-
8/8/2019 Board of Supervisors Building Addendum 2
31/200
From: Green, John L.
To: Michael N. Demartini; Paul A. Reinhardt
Subject: FW: RFI for SB County Project 8676
Date: Thursday, October 07, 2010 2:39:45 PM
Please find bid RFI.
Here is the answer for this one
Telephone and Data Cabling is excluded form the Board of Supervisors building Construction Bid
Documents. Telephone / Data Cabling will be provided through internal County Telephone
Services.
Thanks,
John GreenProject Manager, Capital ProjectsCounty of Santa BarbaraGeneral ServicesSupport Services Division- North County912 West Foster Road Santa Maria , CA 93455tel. (805) 934-6229fax (805) 934-6144
From: Mike Follett [mailto:[email protected]]Sent: Thursday, October 07, 2010 9:00 AMTo: Green, John L.Cc: Gabaldon, Amy; Mike Follett; Christy L. Leth; John HuntSubject: RFI for SB County Project 8676
I do not see communications cabling details referenced in the project manual or plan set, only the
locations are referenced.
Are the quantities and types of voice/data cables, outlets, equipment specified in the documents?
If so can you point me to them?
(For instance, how many cat5e/cat6 cables required per location, is plenum or pvc rated cable
required, and manufacturer or equipment type/model preferences, etc.)
Can you confirm that the communications cabling (telephone/data) is included/excluded from the
scope of this bid?
If contract is directly with owner can you please provide contact information for the person/group
mailto:[email protected]:[email protected]:[email protected]:[email protected]:[email protected]:[email protected]:[email protected]:[email protected] -
8/8/2019 Board of Supervisors Building Addendum 2
32/200
responsible for bidding out that portion of the work?
Thank you
Mike Follett
Mike FollettVice President, Senior Engineer
1421 State Street, Suite FSanta Barbara, CA 93101www.visioncomms.com
805.690.4411800.404.9954 [email protected]
Think before you print.CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: This e-mail and any attachment to it may contain confidential and legally privileged information. Thisinformation is intended only for the recipient named above. If you are not the intended recipient, take notice that any disclosure,copying, distribution or taking of any action based upon this information is prohibited by law. If you have received this e-mail in error,please return it to the sender and permanently delete this copy from your system. Thank you.
http://www.compuvision.com/mailto:[email protected]:[email protected]://www.compuvision.com/ -
8/8/2019 Board of Supervisors Building Addendum 2
33/200
Request for Information No.4Date: 10/7/10
Project: County of Santa Barbara Board of Supervisors
Building
MCC Project No.: TBD
Submitted To:John GreenProject ManagerCounty of Santa Barbara General Servicese-mail: jlg [email protected]
Submitted By:Phil OrrMelchiori Construction Company809 De La VinaSanta Barbara CA. 93101Phone (805) 962-9505Fax (805) 962-8776E-Mail [email protected]
Subject: Landscaping and Irrigation
Cost Impact:Schedule Impact:
Question: 1. As per the description in Addendum 1 of Bid Alternate 4 could you please further clarify what theextent of the planting and irrigation are to be excluded in the base bid at the parking areas. For example is theplanting in the well at the south east corner of the hardscape surrounding the building next to the handicapparking to be included or excluded? Perhaps you could provide a site plan outlining the exact areas to be excludedin the base bid.2. If the ir rigation in the parking areas is to be excluded as part of the base bid but the trees are to remain how wil
the trees be watered?3. There is a detail H on sheet L-5 for a Cobble Drain Sump, we can not locate this sump on the site plan. Pleaseclarify the locations o f this sump detail if required. Also this detail calls for the 3 perforated drain to be connectedto the downspouts and hardscape drainage but the Civil plans C-1 note 15 calls for the downspouts to empty ontoconcrete splash blocks or to daylight at grade. Please clarify which plans govern Landscape or Civil. If perLandscape plans could you please provide a drainage plan?
Answer Required by:
Answer:
Answered By: Date:
Team Distribution: Subcontractor Distribution
-
8/8/2019 Board of Supervisors Building Addendum 2
34/200
-
8/8/2019 Board of Supervisors Building Addendum 2
35/200
Diani Building Corp.Contractors
295 NORTH BLOSSER P.O. BOX 5757SANTA MARIA, CALIFORNIA93456-5757
PHONE (805)-925-9533FAX (805)-928-2150
REQUEST FOR INFORMATION
TO: John Green mailto: [email protected] RFI No. 016
FROM CONTRACTOR: DIANI BUILDING CORP. Date: 10-7-10
PROJECT: Board of Supervisors Building
SUBJECT: DOOR HARDWARE
Reference Drawings A6.3 SECTION 087100 Specifications
DESCRIPTION OF PROBLEM/ CLARIFICATION/ INFORMATION REQUIRED:
Sheet A6.3 the Door Schedule does not provide hardware groups and the Specifications do not
list hardware groups. Will hardware groups be provided? Will a revised Door Schedule be
provided with hardware groups listed?
CONTRACTORS PROPOSED SOLUTIONS:
By: Fred Roinestad Date:A response is needed by to avoid any delays
RESPONSE:
Response by:
Firm: Title: Date:
-
8/8/2019 Board of Supervisors Building Addendum 2
36/200
From: Green, John L.
To: Michael N. Demartini; Paul A. Reinhardt
Subject: FW: 380 Betteravia Board of Supervisors" Building County Job 8676
Date: Thursday, October 07, 2010 3:10:34 PM
Please find bid RFI.
Here are the answers to these questions.
Will the AV come out in a separate bid? YES
Will it come out soon or later on down the line? To Be Determined
Will it be direct to the county? YES
Has the AV design work already been completed? YES
Thanks,
John GreenProject Manager, Capital ProjectsCounty of Santa BarbaraGeneral ServicesSupport Services Division- North County912 West Foster Road Santa Maria , CA 93455tel. (805) 934-6229
fax (805) [email protected]
From: Julie Fishman [mailto:[email protected]]Sent: Thursday, October 07, 2010 2:14 PMTo: Gabaldon, Amy; Green, John L.Cc: John Salgado; Eric KalpakoffSubject: RE: 380 Betteravia Board of Supervisors' Building County Job 8676
Hello Amy,
Here are the questions that I have about the bid information below.
We have been looking through the plans for the Board of Supervisors building and have found the
groundwork laid for the Audio Visual needs , but no products specification in the bid.
Will the AV come out in a separate bid?
Will it come out soon or later on down the line?
Will it be direct to the county?
mailto:[email protected]:[email protected]:[email protected]:[email protected]:[email protected]:[email protected]:[email protected]:[email protected] -
8/8/2019 Board of Supervisors Building Addendum 2
37/200
Has the AV design work already been completed?
Thank you in advance for the support.
Regards,
Julie Fishman
Marketing Communications ManagerJensen Audio Visualwww.jensenav.comTel: 805.962.0110Fax: [email protected]
P Please re-consider before printing this e -mail. Re-use and recycle! Thank you.
From: Gabaldon, Amy [mailto:[email protected]]Sent: Thursday, September 23, 2010 9:11 AMTo: Julie FishmanSubject:
Hi Julie, thank you for your interest in this project. No. 3 is probably the easiest way to view the
plans and specs.
1) Tri-Co Reprographics
513 Laguna Street
Santa Barbara, CA 93101
Tel: 805.966.1701
2) Coastal Reprographic Services
2295 A Street
Santa Maria, CA 93455
Tel: 805.928.7469
*Purchase through the PlanRoom, go to www.coastalreprographics.comand click PlanRoom plan
for your project.
*The project is under the name of 380 Betteravia Board of Supervisors Building County Job
8676.
3) County Website
PDFs of the Plans and Project Manual are also available at this website:
http://www.countyofsb.org/gs/default.aspx?id=19794
Best,
Amy GabaldonCapital Projects Group
Project Assistant
http://www.jensenav.com/http://www.coastalreprographics.com/http://www.coastalreprographics.com/http://www.countyofsb.org/gs/default.aspx?id=19794http://www.countyofsb.org/gs/default.aspx?id=19794http://www.coastalreprographics.com/http://www.jensenav.com/ -
8/8/2019 Board of Supervisors Building Addendum 2
38/200
-
8/8/2019 Board of Supervisors Building Addendum 2
39/200
From: Green, John L.
To: Michael N. Demartini; Paul A. Reinhardt
Subject: FW: Board of Supervisors Question
Date: Thursday, October 07, 2010 3:13:38 PM
Importance: High
Please find Bid RFI.
Thanks,
John GreenProject Manager, Capital ProjectsCounty of Santa BarbaraGeneral ServicesSupport Services Division- North County912 West Foster Road Santa Maria , CA 93455tel. (805) 934-6229fax (805) 934-6144
From: Gabaldon, AmySent: Thursday, October 07, 2010 2:39 PMTo: Green, John L.Cc: '[email protected]'; 'Eric Newton'Subject: FW: Board of Supervisors QuestionImportance: High
John, this is for you.
Thanks,
Amy
From: Beverly [mailto:[email protected]]Sent: Thursday, October 07, 2010 2:35 PMTo: Gabaldon, AmyCc: 'Eric Newton'Subject: Board of Supervisors QuestionImportance: High
Regarding the solar estimate by REC in Addendum 1, is the intention of the county to utilize this
number as an allowance or just to depict the system requirements? If so, should the contractor be
deducting the grants and rebates out?
Thank you,
Beverly Armijo
Office Manager
Newton Construction & Management, Inc
805-544-5583
Fax: 805-544-5584
mailto:[email protected]:[email protected]:[email protected]:[email protected]:[email protected]:[email protected]:[email protected]:[email protected] -
8/8/2019 Board of Supervisors Building Addendum 2
40/200
-
8/8/2019 Board of Supervisors Building Addendum 2
41/200
31416 Agoura Road, Suite 135 Westlake Village CA 91361 818-597-4363 Fax 818-597-4368 License no.742782
October 7, 2010
John Green
Project Manager
County of Santa Barbara
General Services Dept.
Facilities Services Division
1105 Santa Barbara Street, 2nd. Floor
Santa Barbara, CA 93101
RE: Santa Barbara County, Board of Supervisors Building RFI/Clarifications.
Mr. Johnduff,
Please review and provide clarification of the following:
1) Will a SWPPP plan be required inclusive of the NOI permit requirement and cost, or isthe Erosion Control Plan Sheet C-4, the full extent of the SWPPP for this project and dothey fulfill this requirement?
2) GC Para 5.8.1- Refers to allowances per sub-para. 10.1.1 allowances, which does not list any.Please verify there are no allowances on this project.
3) Will the County of Santa Barbara require the prime contractor to provide builders riskinsurance coverage, on this project.
4) Sheet A1.0 Note # 30, refers to detail 42/A1.2 for the vehicle access area. This detail isactually for the trash enclosure.
Please clarify.
5) Sheet A1.0, Note # 33 refers to detail 42/A1.2 for the green screen. Detail 42/A1.2 refers tothe site plan for the green screen.
Please provide information and details for the green screen.
-
8/8/2019 Board of Supervisors Building Addendum 2
42/200
2
Page 2
September 27, 2010
Oakbrook Park Improvements
6) Detail 44/A1.2 calls for 48 high concrete forms per detail 21/A1.3.Detail 21/A1.3, detail 21/A1.3 refers to Detail 11/A1.3, which is the seating plan.
Please clarify.
7) Sheet A2.1 calls out detail blow-up 34/A2.2 @ the IT Room. Detail 34/A2.2 is for StaffRestrooms 406 & 410.
Please clarify.
Your attention and clarification to the above would be greatly appreciated.
Regards,
Ray Balderas
Project Manager
-
8/8/2019 Board of Supervisors Building Addendum 2
43/200
- - - - - - - - ---
SME PAGE 0110/05/2010 14:23 8059255539
San'ta Mari .-----Iectric, Inc. REQUEST FOR INFORMATION
To - & u : : f L ~ ( I 4 c L t f ~ ! : Y Z l J c . R F ~ : : / m - 2 - - - - ~ < - ' ~ ~ ____________ .._ . _ _____ Project: ~ 1 ' W ' 1 ' ? " p > t I f A I l : . V ' l s ~ cJ4;q
Contract No. - - ~ - - - -SME Job No ~ . ~ : r . ' O N S"1CIA\ ' ~ : ) , ! ~ < FIFTY YEARS
E.
TRANSMITtM.
TO' PROMMike Dimartini Robert Kaminski IICOMPANY, [V.TI',Ravatt Albrecht & Assoc 1017/2010f'A;X Nllt,AnT;,rt: TOTAl. NO OF l'./IGES ING.I ..umNC r . c ) V I ~ l \ ; 805-786-4792 3I'J.lO"E Nl'MllElt
1\1'sa 1Board of Supervisors Bldg===:
URCif.NT FO R 1 1 . E V J ~ W 0 P1.EASE COMMENT 0 Pl.EASr: REPLYNO,.ICSfCC>MMENes
Mike, Please clarify/confirm the following regarding the raised floor scope. 1) Confirm that a 1250lb panel is sufficient for your project (detail sheet attached)2) Confirm that a standard, non-conductive high pressure laminate finish isacceptable (colors Cheyenne & Gray Starlight are typically in stock)3) Verify that that raised floor understructure should be designed to meet current
code requirements with no additional requirements4) Verify the quantity of perforated airflow panels I per A6.1 there appears to be 225) Clarify if computer server racks will sit on the floOf or on a rack stand (by others)S) Confirm if DSA will require that the raised floor pedestals are to be attached withpost installed expansion anchors or if adhesive is acceptable I FYI it's a DSAissue not a code issue. without specific instruction it can be open to interpretation
Robert Kaminski III PSI - LA PH 5 6 2 ~ 7 3161 FX 562-404-0567Email: [email protected]
12342 McCann Dr. Santa Fe SpringsCa 90670 I Contractors Lic. #921993
http:///reader/full/URCif.NTmailto:[email protected]:///reader/full/URCif.NTmailto:[email protected] -
8/8/2019 Board of Supervisors Building Addendum 2
45/200
10/07/2010 10:11 56241347563 PAGE 02/03
ConCore: CC1250 Panel-24"
SY!'tem pc!rformllnt:e' Crltorl" Sy&l('m IJ8riOII'I"nce c,lIf1
@2008 Tate A c c e s ~ Floors, Inc,R 9/19
Welded3!l8111'1'bIy III"omasllnd ' - . . .p ~ r l m e l e f
Fug MId coldr o j t ~ d steellOP ~ h e e t \
oSPECIFICATIONSGeneralln/om'lstion PAnel welghl : 8.0 l o ~ , I f t bMI!. 1318 '"cnee d e ~ p "'II'! no eovMng. All ~ ' i ! 6 1 welded eo"structlon fillecl Internllily wil/\ :IicementkloU$ core ,."oterlal. f'rotec1E:tI (rom corrOlllon by en epDxy p ~ l n t f l n l ~ h , C1as& A flame spread ,.'Ilng, Noneol1l!)URtIbI$ mlllelllll,UNDERSTRUCTURE OPTIONSo F r e O ~ l 3 n d l . , q o Po&ilockCl 2' 8 o l ! ~ String.... o 'I ' B o ~ e d StringerTOP VIEW
Inlt9rF1l&hllpe I'OCkCI (I8,lgn"tid l o e ~ t l n g leo (Dr p o ~ i ! l v e IntAfBllOlcnl1on and laceti011with or withOut screw!!.
CORNER DETAIL
Bere Panel
COVERING OPTIONSTile f"clory Inmlnoled wll/llOlegmi trtm ad$llla 119" HP l _ (CoIOI)_____ _(J H1S" Hf'l (COIOI)________o 118" Conductive HPL____ (Colo'I____ _o 1118" Cond"Cllv8 loIF'L (Colo'),____ _For addltlon'lllemlMle o ~ l I o n e contA"t Insldl! S s l . ~ 8nro Peln\()d Panel O p t l o n ~ Cl B ~ ' " Palnl"'; FiniSh 10 aCC(IIl1 Cl!t'pI'I11I1e "ppllcsllon(J Bale P ~ l r n e d f ' l r l I ~ h to ocoapt Po!llTile ~ n p l l c : a l k : m
Tile w/lmegral Trim
-
8/8/2019 Board of Supervisors Building Addendum 2
46/200
r , e P n ~ I I " b l l l u n .'" ",'' ' ' ' ]1"_____\, ! t I ~ . ' ______IB/B7/2BIB IB:ll 5524847553 PAGE 03/03
Bolted Stringer Understructure for ConCoreand All SteelFloor Panels-24". Type 5EF Pedestal.
I
II, II:i!: II
L E ~ ~ ; : I , 1. Access floor panel
2. Rollformed gruvannealedsteel slri"ser3. 114" 20 X 1 3/4" screw4. 11 gao die formed galv.steel head5. SteP.1 stud7/8"9UNC I6. Nul with vibration proof I Ilocking device ! I7. B 8 ~ with 11/2" 0.0. hot ( Idipped galv. tubing I II t 6" )( 6" x .18S" hot dipped I I I'''.. ~ ' ' ' _ ~ ' ~ i i ,
_ ~ F " " : - ~ - i I, ~ ' " , / " I I ' , -// j L....(9) "'-''', < ~ ~ - j >
~ ~ ~ -" .. 0$/ '"., ' ' '''"
Base with Crimped Tube Base with Swaged Tube
PEDESTAL SPECIFICATIONSP C d e ~ ! a l A s s e m ~ Assl!mbly up to 48" FFH shall provide an 8.000 lb.Qxlal II)9d wlthoUI perm9nent deformallon. Assembly shall provide e 2" lOlel adju$tment. All pedeslal components ancl fasteners are completelyelectro-zirrc free,P ~ ! H e a d 11 911, die forme(! ho t dipped galvanized pedeSit'll headwith fillet wetdM stud and adjustment nut. $ t r t n g e r ~ tlhall be attached with 1/4"20 nat-heads ~ s ,
Pedestal head shalt be tapped for engagcme!'ll of$trll'l9!U scrows. S teel stUd shalt ba 718" 9 UNC. 7/S" 9 lJNC ildjusttllble nul with corrosion M&lstantcoating Shall provide antI-rotation featuR! whenengaged with balie assembly,Ped,el\tal Bss! Pedestal tube to be 1.1/2" diameter hot dipped
galvanized tubing and shaM bo redvced to ~ ' l n n e r diameter by sWll9lng or crimping. S w ~ g Q d and crimped tube6 shall have idenllcal loadperformance lind sh!lllindude Identical anli-rotl!lllonfeatures to prevMI rolation of adju:;tmerrt nut. Sase pl9trt to 00 36 SQuare inch hot dipped galvanizedsteel and shall have (4J 7116" diameter holes formeManlC91 fastening Bppllealions . t r i f . l . 9 ~ Heavy duty roll formed steel stringer shall be H/4"
deep X 3/4" wide and shall withstand 450 Ib, mId-spanlood. Stringer shall have gaivanneliled coating to praventcorrosion Stringer grid pattern shall be 4' by 4' baslle-lweave,
Tate Aece$$ Floors, Inc. @ 2008 Tale Access Floors, In
-
8/8/2019 Board of Supervisors Building Addendum 2
47/200
1e/e5/2e1B 15:51 BEl5-'32BfH 35 RAVATT ALBRECHT PAGE 01/ElI10108/2010 WED 18:23 PAX 805 341 4118 SLO PLASTERING INC III001/001
PLASTERTNG,INc.October 6,2010
. Ravatt Albrecht & Associates, Inc.P.O. Box Santa Marlli. CA 93456
Re Board of Supervisors' Building - Project No. 8676
R.F.1.1. Screen wall on 52/A41 note 14 references eMU with pl.lter finish. Nota 23 on A2.1notes detail44/A 1.3 wnicn follows 54AJA1.2 which references colored block withcontrasting grout. Which is the correct finish for this screen wall?2. Note 7 on A4.1 notes cement plal50ter on canopy entranees. Section references on AS, 1note 44/A8.3 which shows cement board. Which finish Is desired?3. 54/AA.2 canopy between lines E & J notes stucco while detail 14/AS.4 reference showsnardie board. Which is correct? (similar sItuation at 52JA4.2 between linei 2 &evxist).4. At main entry canopy, will hardie plank retum at rines 4 & 7.5 beck onto roof to adistance of9'6".?5. What type of connection should be used at the hardle plank to stucco interaet1lons?6. Spec ,.ction 092400 2.5)0 notes cement based stucco finish & 3.6)F notes acrylic
based finish system. Which is correct?Thank you for Y O ~ . I ~ Ihes:.mattors,Keith Jones Estimator
4180 Vachel Lane San Luis Obispo California 934Q1(805) !)41 ~ 7 6 0 Fax (805) 541...01115
-
8/8/2019 Board of Supervisors Building Addendum 2
48/200
PO Box 5849Santa Maria, CA. 93456Ph. (805) 614-9909 x11Fx. (805) 614-9906Lic. # 486458 A, B, C-42
Bid Questions
Job Name
The following questions/clarifications apply to the above
project we are bidding.
1. Reference: Project Manuel
Question: I cannot find the hardware schedule in the
hardware specs. Will one be provided?
2. Reference: Sheet A3.1 Note #14.
Question: Is REC solar the chosen contractor or canthe contractor use their own solar company?
3. Reference: Sheet E5.0:
Question: The fixture schedule calls out for fixtures
NR-A, NR-B and NR-C that refers to Norman Russell
Plans (Sheets VL-1 and VL-2). The Norman Russell
Plans do not list a spec for these fixtures. Can we
please get the manufacturer and catalog number for the
light fixtures specified on the Norman Russell Plans?
Please advise.
-
8/8/2019 Board of Supervisors Building Addendum 2
49/200
PO Box 5849Santa Maria, CA. 93456Ph. (805) 614-9909 x11Fx. (805) 614-9906Lic. # 486458 A, B, C-42
Bid Questions
Response:
-
8/8/2019 Board of Supervisors Building Addendum 2
50/200
Diani Building Corp.Contractors
295 NORTH BLOSSER P.O. BOX 5757SANTA MARIA, CALIFORNIA93456-5757
PHONE (805)-925-9533FAX (805)-928-2150
REQUEST FOR INFORMATION
TO: John Green mailto: [email protected] RFI No. 017
FROM CONTRACTOR: DIANI BUILDING CORP. Date: 10-7-10
PROJECT: Board of Supervisors Building
SUBJECT: ADD ALTERNATE #4
Reference Drawings ADDENDUM #1 Specifications
DESCRIPTION OF PROBLEM/ CLARIFICATION/ INFORMATION REQUIRED:
Add alternate #4 tells us to Provide complete planting and irrigation as per construction
documents. Complete landscaping with 5 gallon plant sizes, complete landscaping and irrigation
at Parking area.
Base Bid: Revise and provide all 5 gallon planting shown on sheet L-4 to be 1 gallon plants.
Exclude all landscaping irrigation and all planting at parking areas on east side , south side and
interior parking plant wells. Trees to remain.
1. It is a little confusing the alternate is tell us to provide complete planting and irrigation asper documents and for the base bid is telling us to Exclude all irrigation and planting at
the parking areas. Is all of the irrigation and planting including the drainage swale, header
boards, DG path and etc. to be excluded in the base bid and added in the alternate for the
complete project?
2. If only certain areas are to be deleted in the base bid then added in the alternate can theseareas be clarified in detail?
CONTRACTORS PROPOSED SOLUTIONS:
By: Fred Roinestad Date:A response is needed by to avoid any delays
RESPONSE:
Response by:
Firm: Title: Date:
-
8/8/2019 Board of Supervisors Building Addendum 2
51/200
Diani Building Corp.Contractors
295 NORTH BLOSSER P.O. BOX 5757SANTA MARIA, CALIFORNIA93456-5757
PHONE (805)-925-9533FAX (805)-928-2150
REQUEST FOR INFORMATION
TO: John Green mailto: [email protected] RFI No. 018
FROM CONTRACTOR: DIANI BUILDING CORP. Date: 10-8-10
PROJECT: Board of Supervisors Building
SUBJECT: Structural Details
Reference Drawings SEE BELOW Specifications Structural Steel
DESCRIPTION OF PROBLEM/ CLARIFICATION/ INFORMATION REQUIRED:
1) On elevation F/ S3.20, detail G/ S4.50 cuts through the corner @ gridline 7, and shows a HSS
section that spans an opening in the tilt - up wall. On the same elevation F/ S 3.20, detail G/
S4.50 also cuts through the corner @ grid line 9. At this location there is no opening, and there is
no HSS section shown. Should we assume that the corner bracket HSS and embeds shown in the
detail occur here, even though they are not shown in the elevation? This occurs several other
places as well.
2) Detail K/ S8.20 shows a HSS 6x4x1/4 support brace. We could not find this on any
plan views, please locate for us.
3) Cant find details K/ S4.50, H,E,F,G/ S7.10, H,G/ S8.20?
CONTRACTORS PROPOSED SOLUTIONS:
By: Fred Roinestad Date:A response is needed by to avoid any delays
RESPONSE:
Response by:
Firm: Title: Date:
-
8/8/2019 Board of Supervisors Building Addendum 2
52/200
Diani Building Corp.Contractors
295 NORTH BLOSSER P.O. BOX 5757SANTA MARIA, CALIFORNIA93456-5757
PHONE (805)-925-9533FAX (805)-928-2150
REQUEST FOR INFORMATION
TO: John Green mailto: [email protected] RFI No. 019
FROM CONTRACTOR: DIANI BUILDING CORP. Date: 10-8-10
PROJECT: Board of Supervisors Building
SUBJECT: Structural Questions
Reference Drawings SEE BELOW Specifications Structural Steel
DESCRIPTION OF PROBLEM/ CLARIFICATION/ INFORMATION REQUIRED:
1) Detail 11/ A8.1 shows a square HSS section in corner by window which is called out with a
powder coat finish. Does this apply to the corner brackets as shown in detail G/ S4.50?
2) S2.20- HSS 4x4x1/4 beam on line N between lines 2+3. What is the connection on the (left)
south side?
3) Do the (2) HSS 5x4x3/8 columns on grid N between lines 5+6 starting at the foundation plan
on S2.10 end at the HSS 10x8 beam in the low canopy framing plan, or do they continue to the
W16x67 beam in the high roof framing plan ? On these same columns what is the connection at
the beam(s).
CONTRACTORS PROPOSED SOLUTIONS:
By: Fred Roinestad Date:A response is needed by to avoid any delays
RESPONSE:
Response by:
Firm: Title: Date:
-
8/8/2019 Board of Supervisors Building Addendum 2
53/200
Diani Building Corp.Contractors
295 NORTH BLOSSER P.O. BOX 5757SANTA MARIA, CALIFORNIA93456-5757
PHONE (805)-925-9533FAX (805)-928-2150
REQUEST FOR INFORMATION
TO: John Green mailto: [email protected] RFI No. 020
FROM CONTRACTOR: DIANI BUILDING CORP. Date: 10-8-10
PROJECT: Board of Supervisors Building
SUBJECT: Access Floor Manufacturer
Reference Drawings Specifications: Access Flooring
DESCRIPTION OF PROBLEM/ CLARIFICATION/ INFORMATION REQUIRED:
We received the following request for clarification from a subcontractor:
Upon further review of the Finish Schedule (Sheet #A6.1), it appears that the finish on the
access floor panels is to be sealed concrete. If this is correct, then this is a proprietary process
from Haworth that cannot be supplied by any other manufacturer!
Since this is a public job, we would hope that the county would allow more than a single source
to bid this scope of the work. Will Tate Access Flooring Systems be allowed to be bid for this
scope of work?
CONTRACTORS PROPOSED SOLUTIONS:
By: Fred Roinestad Date:A response is needed by to avoid any delays
RESPONSE:
Response by:
Firm: Title: Date:
-
8/8/2019 Board of Supervisors Building Addendum 2
54/200
-
8/8/2019 Board of Supervisors Building Addendum 2
55/200
1) Sheet S2.10 exterior columns call for 3 diameter standard pipe. On sheet A2.1, the samecolumns call for 5 diameter powder-coated pipes. Please verify which is the correct size to use.
2) Detail 51 on A8.6 shows shadow mold. Is this mold required throughout? Or is the shadow
mold only called out in one room? On the detail, it says "Art Wall" and "Non Art Wall" whichseems to indicate that it is required at all locations where ceiling tiles are called out. Please
clarify.
3) The specs call out for the fabricator and erector to be participant of the AISC Quality
Certification Program and is an AISC certified plant. Can this be waived or is it a strict
requirement for this project? Can LA-certified subcontractors be allowed to work on thisproject? Please clarify.
4) Sections 52 & 53 on A4.1 show a note 21 calling for a powder coated steel pipe column atgrid line 4 between grids N & O - per Structural.
Structural (S2.10 & S2,20) does not show a pipe column at this location.
Please clarify.