board of regents and its periodic presidential...

Minutes are not final until approved by the Board of Regents at the October 2008 meeting

BOARD OF REGENTS and its PERIODIC PRESIDENTIAL EVALUATION COMMITTEE (NSC)

NEVADA SYSTEM OF HIGHER EDUCATION Thursday, February 28, 2008

Friday, February 29, 2008 Nevada State College

Basic and Water II Building, Room 203 311 South Water Street, Henderson

Members Present: Dr. Kenneth Dobbins, Chair Regent Mark Alden

Regent Cedric Crear Regent Steve Sisolak Ms. Hannah Brown

Members Absent: Ms. Sherry Colquitt

Others Present: Mr. Daniel Klaich, Executive Vice Chancellor Mr. Bart Patterson, Chief Counsel Ms. Chelsie Adams, NSC Dr. Erika Beck, NSC Ms. Angela Brommel, NSC Dr. Rene Cantu, NSC Dr. Connie Carpenter, NSC Mr. Brian Chongtai, NSC Ms. Elizabeth De La Torre, NSC Dr. Lesley Di Mare, NSC Mr. Louis DuBois, NSC Mr. Matt Garland, NSC Dr. Andy Kuniyuki, NSC Dr. James LaBuda, NSC Ms. Annie Macias, NSC Mr. Tom Madison, NSC Dr. Francine Mayfield, NSC Dr. Joan McGee, NSC Mr. Michael Milek, NSC Dr. Lori Navarrette, NSC Mr. Buster Neel, NSC Ms. Nicole Norian, NSC Mr. J. Russell Raker, NSC Ms. Patricia Ring, NSC Dr. Gregory Robinson, NSC Dr. Tony Scinta, NSC Ms. Cindy Stella, NSC Mr. Spencer Stewart, NSC

(BOARD OF REGENTS' CONSENT AGENDA 10/02/08 - 10/03/08) Ref. C-1d, of 46

Periodic Presidential Evaluation Committee Minutes 02/28-29/2008 Ms. Stacey Adams, NSC Classified Council Ms. Pam Allsop, NSC Classified Council Ms. Holly Primka, NSC Classified Council Mr. Arturo Torres, NSC Classified Council Dr. Kevin Graziano, NSC Faculty Senate Dr. Kebret Kebede, NSC Faculty Senate Dr. Lawrence Rudd, NSC Faculty Senate Ms. Ruby Wertz, NSC Faculty Senate Ms. Ashley Brown, NSC Student Ms. Carrie Bass, NSC Student Ms. Tori Glass, NSC Student Mr. Daniel Grassian, NSC Student Ms. Krystal Martinez, NSC Student Mr. Cameron Robinson, NSC Student Ms. Velanie Williams, NSC Student Mr. Ryan Crowell, Nevada State Student Alliance Mr. Zhiai Feng, Nevada State Student Alliance Mr. Kavon Jones, Nevada State Student Alliance Assemblyman Morse Arberry Jr. Ms. Selma Bartlett, Regional President, Bank of Nevada Mr. Bob Cooper, Director, Economic Development Division, City of Henderson Mr. Randy Garcia, CEO, Investment {via telephone} Counsel of Nevada Mr. Mark Howard, CEO, Mountain {via telephone} View Hospital Mr. Bruce Spotleson, Greenspun Media Group Senator Dina Titus Chair Kenneth Dobbins, President, Southeast Missouri State University, called the meeting to order at 8:14 a.m. with all members present except Regents Alden, Crear and Ms. Colquitt. Mr. Bart Patterson, Chief Counsel, reported that Ms. Colquitt had to excuse herself from the Committee. Chair Dobbins remarked that it was an exciting time for NSC as a new college. He stated that the Committee will evaluate and assess President Maryanski’s role to identify his strengths and areas where he may grow. The process will also serve to ascertain what should be done within the College. Chair Dobbins stated that a culture will begin for NSC that will last for decades and this evaluation will guide President Maryanski. Regent Sisolak asked about Chair Dobbins’ relationship with President Maryanski. Chair Dobbins explained that President Maryanski attended his class at the New Presidents’ Academy. Regent Sisolak requested that students be contacted and encouraged to participate in the evaluation.

(BOARD OF REGENTS' CONSENT AGENDA 10/02/08 - 10/03/08) Ref. C-1d, Page 2 of 46

Periodic Presidential Evaluation Committee Minutes 02/28-29/2008 1. Information Only-Discussion of the Evaluation Committee Process – Chair Dobbins

discussed the process of the periodic evaluation of the performance of Dr. Fred Maryanski as President of Nevada State College (NSC) (Ref. PPEC-1 on file in the Board office).

Chair Dobbins preferred not to assign questions to the Committee. He would like to

have President Maryanski speak and then have a question and answer period. Chair Dobbins will explain to each interviewee that they have 15 minutes; 5 minutes to speak of their relationship and interaction with President Maryanski and the College, and 10 minutes for questions and answers.

2. Information Only-Initial Meeting with President Fred Maryanski – The Committee met

with President Maryanski to discuss all matters relating to the periodic evaluation, which included reviewing and discussing strategic plans, goals, objectives, resource allocation policies and major challenges and successes.

President Maryanski reported that the past three years were concentrated on elevating the status of NSC from uncertainty to a typical, normal, contributing member of the NSHE System. He felt those accomplishments were attained by relationships developed with Regents, other presidents, the community, city government and the legislature. He worked to build relationships internally, to listen well, and have an open communication about where NSC is and where it is going.

Regent Crear entered the meeting.

President Maryanski felt a big issue was working through the process of transferring 500 acres of land from the city of Henderson to the campus. He continued that 300 acres would be used for the campus itself and the other 200 acres would be available to generate revenue for such possibilities as an office park, faculty housing, a K through 8 school and a medical services facility. President Maryanski reported that in the last legislative session, a 30 year tax increment area was granted, allowing NSC to keep the property taxes on any commercial or residential structure built on the campus. President Maryanski remarked that at his first legislative session in 2005, the Chancellor helped obtain the funding for the Liberal Arts and Sciences building. That building was constructed at 25% under budget, which resulted in a $4 million saving. Senator Dina Titus assisted, taking the lead, with $3.3 million for the design process of the nursing building.

President Maryanski reported that NSC enrollment grew steadily with a 12% headcount and an 8.3% full-time equivalent (FTE) enrollment increase; up from one year ago. Nursing and Teaching were developed in response to critical shortages. The Business Program grew rapidly while Biology and Psychology are expanding.


Periodic Presidential Evaluation Committee Minutes 02/28-29/2008 2. Information Only-Initial Meeting with President Fred Maryanski – (continued)

President Maryanski reported that the teaching evaluations were outstanding. Faculty are doing an excellent job in the classroom. NSC graduate teachers do not go through the same orientation as other teachers because they are prepared to step directly into the school district. He continued that there was a 100% pass rate with the 96 Education graduates. He reported that 93% of those graduates took jobs with a Nevada school district, while only two left the state. Regent Sisolak inquired about the stability of NSC since being President. President Maryanski felt there was a positive difference, but there are those who still question NSC’s permanence. He believed that NSC should be more visible, but that would require a major marketing campaign, which was not in the budget. President Maryanski understood that the great challenge is developing the campus. Regent Sisolak asked about the Foundation’s participation. President Maryanski reported that it could improve. He stated that Mr. Russ Raker, Development Officer, has strong organizational skills, which will help structure the Foundation and other areas of the College. President Maryanski reported that the Foundation has $1 million; half in endowments and the other half are either uncommitted or in the operating fund. In the near future NSC will make a request to the Board to create an endowed scholarship, the bulk of which will be used for the Nursing Program. Chair Dobbins asked about raising money. President Maryanski felt it was important for NSC to develop community relationships and to meet their needs. Alumni and parent-giving are not sources at this time. Ms. Hannah Brown asked about the College gaining more visibility. President Maryanski felt it was a matter of planning, hard work and identification. He follows a schedule to contact people every four to eight weeks and looks for other opportunities to do so. Executive Vice Chancellor Klaich stated that there were areas of the College that demanded President Maryanski’s time. He questioned if annual meetings with each faculty member was an appropriate structural exercise. President Maryanski replied that his philosophy is that a president is not strictly external. It is important that faculty is onboard when a new institution is moving in different directions. He tries to meet with the instructional faculty once a semester and the administrative faculty once a year. He attempts to spend two hours per week walking around the offices for accessibility. Executive Vice Chancellor Klaich asked about the enrollment management plan. President Maryanski reported that it was erratic. Contributing factors were high school recruitment and a weak job performance by the Admissions’ Office. The department has made adjustments and more attention has been given to the recruiters.


Periodic Presidential Evaluation Committee Minutes 02/28-29/2008 2. Information Only-Initial Meeting with President Fred Maryanski – (continued)

President Maryanski said the budget is a challenge. The enrollment target was not met so the budget decision for hiring will be made at a time consistent with enrollment to avoid over-commitment. Chair Dobbins asked about working with the community colleges. President Maryanski said all identified programs have a path to NSC, and some students are joining in the third year. NSC continues to work with the community colleges to address student needs. Chair Dobbins asked where he could improve in the next two to three years and how the System and the Board could help. President Maryanski reported that there will be progress recruiting high school students this year. Developing the campus is a huge challenge and the Master Plan has to be put in place. A critical step will be the decision to proceed with either a master developer, or if NSC will take on that responsibility. President Maryanski continued that funding for the nursing building will be difficult because, academically, the School of Nursing has not reached the 80% pass mark on the Naturopathic Physicians Licensing Examinations to complete the accreditation process. Regent Crear observed that when budgets are reduced, marketing and advertising are the first areas affected, defeating the purpose of improved enrollment. NSC has to identify itself and explain what it is. Executive Vice Chancellor Klaich commended President Maryanski’s patience with the development of the land and the city of Henderson.

3. Information Only-Interviews and Open Comment Period – The Committee conducted interviews with individuals knowledgeable about the work of President Maryanski. The interviewees included, but were not limited to, a representative sample of vice presidents, deans, academic and administrative department heads, faculty, students and community and alumni leaders. An opportunity was allowed for other individuals to address the Committee regarding President Maryanski’s performance as President of NSC. Mr. Bob Cooper, Director, Economic Development Division, city of Henderson, reported that he worked in various areas for the city for a number of years. When the NSC concept was presented, he advocated for its development. A team of approximately 15 city staff helped the former NSC president with the site planning process. Mr. Cooper believed that President Maryanski is the most proactive President he has worked with. Some examples include communicating the College’s needs, identifying business for the campus, and relationships with developers and public/private partnerships. Mr. Cooper said that President Maryanski frequently


Periodic Presidential Evaluation Committee Minutes 02/28-29/2008 3. Information Only-Interviews and Open Comment Period – (continued)

contacts him with information about NSC. Mr. Cooper reported that members of the Chamber of Commerce speak positively about President Maryanski and selected him as Person of the Year in 2006. Regent Sisolak asked about President Maryanski’s negotiation efforts during the transference of 500 acres of land from the city to NSC. Mr. Cooper replied that he was calm and listened well. Chair Dobbins thanked Mr. Cooper for his comments. Ms. Selma Bartlett, Regional President, Bank of Nevada, said she was one of the founders who presented the plan for the College to the Board of Regents. She now serves on the Foundation and received the first $1 million donation from an anonymous friend. Ms. Bartlett said she was concerned that too many disciplines were being introduced at one time with no money to support them. She preferred more concentration on selected disciplines. Ms. Bartlett felt President Maryanski is very good and she would not replace him. She believed he is pulled in many directions, but overall, rated him an A minus. Mr. Spencer Stewart, Associate Vice President of College Relations, reported that he handles the advertising, marketing and government affairs. He interacts with President Maryanski on a daily basis, and their association is close in relation to his position. Mr. Stewart felt President Maryanski was a very good fit and brought a great deal of needed stability to the College. Mr. Stewart is impressed with President Maryanski’s willingness to learn and do what is right. He does not make the easy choice; he makes the right choice and compromises for the long-term. President Maryanski has committed to be at NSC for a number of years, is established and understands his role. He is involved with the community and does a great job listening. He embodies the mission and purpose of NSC. Mr. Stewart could not speak as well to the internal issues as far as academics, but President Maryanski does a good job securing the academic offerings. Regent Sisolak asked if it would be more difficult to enroll students if the mission was expanded. Mr. Stewart felt it was complicated to determine because NSC has had an unsteady history. There has been some uncontrolled publicity, but given the enrollment record and growth rate, it appears that NSC passed the initial phase of uncertainty. The public is beginning to see NSC as a viable institution offering a good education. Regent Sisolak asked about the programs growing too quickly. Mr. Stewart said it began with Nursing and Education and since 2002 the program offerings expanded. It is a balancing act; limited programs need to be balanced with others. There has been restructuring with the Bachelor of Applied Science Program and, with the budget



reduction, there has been a scale-back to offer a Bachelor of Applied Science in Management to dovetail with the 80 Associate of Applied Science Programs the colleges offer. Mr. Stewart felt there should be caution when offering academic programs, to be certain they are in concert with market demand. Chair Dobbins clarified that the Applied Science Program was downsized. Mr. Stewart agreed that it was scaled back. Executive Vice Chancellor Klaich suggested speaking with President Maryanski about this at the exit interview. Chair Dobbins asked if there was an integrated marketing program. Mr. Stewart said the College was in the process of firming it up. Right now the big project is achieving a content management solution within the web site, to respond to the growth of students, faculty and staff. It is difficult to determine how to decentralize many responsibilities that take place in a centralized framework, which is a large component of the integrated market plan. Chair Dobbins asked if the plan was in place. Mr. Stewart replied that it was fluid and moving in the right direction. Regent Sisolak observed that advertising was not purchased System-wide. He felt it would be best to have it orchestrated under one umbrella instead of each institution having separate advertising programs. Mr. Stewart agreed that the System has great purchasing power that is not utilized for advertising campaigns. Regent Crear concurred that mass purchasing would increase profits. Regent Sisolak asked if President Maryanski understood the value of marketing. Mr. Stewart felt he did. He was not sure if the NSC enrollment projections were too aggressive, or if an adequate amount of money was spent on marketing.

The meeting recessed at 9:54 a.m. and reconvened at 10:08 a.m. with all members present except Regent Alden.

Mr. Buster Neel, Vice President, Finance and Administration, has been with the College since December 2005. He has worked with President Maryanski for two years and communicates with him at least once a day. There are regular biweekly meetings. Mr. Neel believed that if the president is successful, the institution is successful. He felt that this evaluation process was related to making the College better and hoped his comments would be interpreted with that in mind. Mr. Neel thought the infrastructure of the basic services to students, faculty and others was initially lacking. Some in-roads were made, along with some difficult decisions. He did not think the best resource allocation choices were always made, especially in basic student support, counseling and advisement.



Regent Sisolak asked if the College grew too quickly. Mr. Neel agreed that the College grew rapidly, programs were created and mistakes were made. He felt decisions should be based on the right reasons; not to appease others. Some choices were made to avoid controversy. Regent Sisolak asked if that entailed System institutions or individuals. Mr. Neel said it was both, but primarily internal. Chair Dobbins asked about those decisions. Mr. Neel said some were collegiate, but others were made in a vacuum without consulting key advisors or consideration to long range planning. Mr. Neel continued that he suggested small group gatherings with President Maryanski and to date, there have been two. The attendees are the Provost, the Vice President of Multicultural Affairs, the Associate Vice President for College Relations, the Director of Development and the Vice President of Finance and Administration. Mr. Neel reported that there were executive staff meetings biweekly, consisting of 16 people. While the group is positive, it does not address problem-solving or real issues, nor are they overly productive. He felt that the smaller group conferences were more constructive. Executive Vice Chancellor Klaich inquired if the funds used for a new dean or director could have been shifted to the students for counseling and recruiting. Mr. Neel thought the funds could have been shifted to the students. Mr. Neel reported that NSC had experienced high personnel turnover and the student affairs position is not filled. He believed that Dr. Lesley Di Mare, Provost, is strong, intelligent and informed and that together, they can help President Maryanski. Mr. Neel suggested that President Maryanski utilize all available resources. Mr. Neel said that President Maryanski is very open. Mr. Neel was not sure that meeting with each team every month was the best use of time when the Provost is excluded. There are times when financial commitments are made without consulting the Provost or the Chief Financial Officer. Regent Sisolak asked if commitments were made between President Maryanski and the department, or the Provost and the department. Mr. Neel replied that it was between President Maryanski and the Dean. Mr. Neel is usually involved in the financial aspect after the fact. Chair Dobbins asked if this could have evolved because of a weak Provost. Mr. Neel thought it could have been the instigation, but there has been no change with the new Provost. Chair Dobbins requested an example. Mr. Neel said that, with the recent budget reductions, President Maryanski met with the dean of Education and instructed her to begin recruiting to fill a position, and the Provost was not consulted. Mr. Neel was not questioning the decision, but the process was not in place to determine the ramifications.



Ms. Brown said it sounded as if some people were left out of the process. Mr. Neel added that because of these commitments and lack of follow through, the institution is in a tight situation. Ms. Brown inquired if Mr. Neel discussed it with President Maryanski. Mr. Neel said that he and the Provost had an appointment with President Maryanski the following morning. Mr. Neel understood the President makes the final decisions, but he should have all the information, perspectives and input so that assessments are not made in a vacuum. Executive Vice Chancellor Klaich asked if the new cabinet meetings were aimed in the right direction. Mr. Neel felt it was a good start. Regent Sisolak asked how the budget cuts were done without working together. Mr. Neel said that, going into the year there were budget concerns, so 13 support positions were frozen. Ms. Brown observed that it seemed like President Maryanski was concerned about fulfilling the educational needs and that anxiety may be the reason for bypassing Mr. Neel. Regent Crear observed that minority faculty dropped from years 2004 to 2006. He wondered what that was attributed to and how it could be rectified. Mr. Neel replied that NSC is one of the more diverse campuses but, with a small campus, percentages can sometimes be misleading. Mr. Neel would rather look at a trend to see what is happening. There are 60 tenure track faculty, so making minor changes will impact the percentages. Regent Crear commented that there were only 12 minorities out of 47 members of the faculty. Ms. Brown asked if there was diversity on the corporate ladder. Mr. Neel stated that out of three vice presidents, one is Hispanic, one is female and one is a white male. There are three female deans. There is a level of diversity but it could improve. Ms. Brown said it was a disadvantage when the students do not see people who look like themselves. Mr. Neel said another point is that more representation is needed in the student body. Mr. Neel relayed the College’s efforts in hiring minorities and noted he was optimistic about new Director of Human Resources and felt she would make a difference in the process. Ms. Brown inquired about the size of the minority enrollment. Mr. Neel reported it was high and increasing, and it is a priority with President Maryanski. Mr. Bart Patterson, Chief Counsel, reported that, from a legal standpoint, a hiring decision is not based on race or other categories. He felt there would be an opportunity to speak with Dr. Renee Cantu, Vice President of Multicultural Affairs. Mr. Neel thought the College had an identity crisis in terms of where it was going and its vision. It will help to have goals for the next five years. Chair Dobbins thanked Mr. Neel for his comments.



Ms. Patricia Ring, Registrar and Director of Admissions, reported that she has been with the College since November 2005. It is a small campus and everyone takes on multiple roles. She was assigned the commencement ceremony planning and President Maryanski allowed her to make it her own. She felt his approach was the same for individual jobs. He is open to new ideas and listens well. He does a weekly walk and speaks with staff. She felt they have a good working relationship. Regent Sisolak asked about the mission and expansion. Ms. Ring said there is no School of Business, but there is a huge Business Program. She felt that the Nursing, Education and Business Programs could be grown. Chair Dobbins asked why she was given Admissions. Ms. Ring explained that a consultant looked at the area and the decision was made to move the director into a new position, temporarily bring Admissions under the Registrar’s Office, and separate Recruitment out from that. Recruitment reports to the Provost. Recruiting is a problem right now because there is no leader, plan or vision.

The meeting recessed at 11:03 a.m. and reconvened at 11:10 a.m. with all members present except for Regent Alden.

Dr. Erika Beck, Dean, College of Liberal Arts and Sciences (LAS), oversees all the programs, excluding Teaching, Nursing, and Academic Affairs. She has been with the College since its inception and works closely with President Maryanski. She is on the Executive Faculty Committee. Regent Sisolak asked what programs were in effect when the College began. Dr. Beck replied that there were programs in Nursing, Education, English, History, Psychology, Biology and Environmental Science. The LAS programs were on the books. There is now a Speech Pathology Masters program.

Regent Sisolak asked if other areas expanded quickly. Dr. Beck said there has been expansion in some areas, such as the Bachelor of Applied Science. She said the same programs have been maintained with the exception of law enforcement, which opened in 2003. Liberal Arts and Sciences educate 75% of the secondary education students and 50% of every student on campus. NSC responded readily to community needs and interests, which was necessary. Dr. Beck felt NSC over committed itself without aligning the resources and decision making, which has been problematic. Regent Sisolak asked who made the decision to expand programs when there are limited funds. Dr. Beck was unsure, but felt it was probably the President and the Provost. Chair Dobbins asked if there was a committee discussion about the bachelor



program. Dr. Beck replied that some discussion took place, but it did not include the full faculty, which also led to some difficulty. Chair Dobbins asked if there was a perceived need for the expansion of the bachelors program. Dr. Beck felt it was mainly the outside community. Because the resources are limited, careful thought has to be exercised. Regent Sisolak asked about enrollment response to these programs. Dr. Beck replied that it was very low. Regent Crear asked about the NSC vision. Dr. Beck said she had a good sense of the vision before, but it has become fractured and confusing. Some areas have a very clear vision. Regent Crear inquired about a vision from the President’s office. Dr. Beck felt there probably was, but was unsure about it being communicated to the campus at all levels. Regent Crear asked how it could be changed. Dr. Beck said it should start from the ground floor up. A vision strictly from the top is ineffective. Some academic planning processes have been initiated and will hopefully work out well, but everyone must be included. Chair Dobbins asked about the last time there was strategic planning process for the entire campus. Dr. Beck did not believe there was one for the whole campus. Regent Crear asked if Dr. Beck felt that she could express her opinion. Dr. Beck reported that she has a voice as an academic dean. Regent Crear asked about hiring staff. Dr. Beck said her area has a strategic planning group that meets and talks about the priorities, needs and numbers. The group agrees upon the applicant requirements that will be given to the Provost. Dr. Beck then meets with the Provost and the Vice President of Finance and Administration to make the presentation. The Provost and Vice President meet with the President to make decisions for the entire campus. Budgetary approval then comes from the Finance and Administration office and is taken to Human Resources. The faculty committee reviews the applications. They choose five finalists for phone interviews and from those, three candidates are recommended for interviews. She does not directly play a role in the recruiting process. Dr. Beck stated she and the Provost have separate interviews with the candidates when they come to the campus. She and the Provost make the final decision and the President signs the paperwork. Regent Sisolak asked about each student seeing an advisor. Dr. Beck confirmed that there are advisors for the individual schools which are a direct line of feedback from the student to the advisor to the dean. However, the area is understaffed. It is easier for the student in their last two years because they are assigned a faculty advisor. Chair Dobbins asked if there was a faculty slot for another advisor. Dr. Beck indicated there was, but there are some serious resource issues. She added that there are very overworked areas on campus. Chair Dobbins thanked Dr. Beck for her input. Assemblyman Morse Arberry Jr. reported that President Maryanski initially called to introduce himself, and he still keeps in contact. He felt that President Maryanski is very conscientious, cared about diversity and is effective in Carson City.



Regent Crear asked about his perception of NSC. Assemblyman Arberry replied that he was not supportive in the beginning, but is now onboard and would like see NSC flourish. He has not heard any negatives and felt it was a good college. He explained that NSC would satisfy the nursing and teaching shortages, and voids not provided by other campuses. NSC is another option for students who want to go to college. Regent Crear asked if the campus had an identity crisis. Assemblyman Arberry felt it did because of its location. Young adult students want a campus environment. NSC does not have that atmosphere just yet, but when it does it will make a positive difference with its own identity. He would rate President Maryanski a nine to nine and one-half because he cares about the students. The Committee thanked Assemblyman Arberry for his attendance and comments. Provost Lesley Di Mare said she joined NSC on July 1, 2007, and oversees Academic and Student Affairs. She has open interaction with President Maryanski and feels that he listens well. Everyone is working towards becoming a team. Provost Di Mare said that since her arrival she has been reviewing programs for funding, progress and diversity. She felt NSC was moving in the right direction and has a high number of diverse faculty, students and staff.

Chair Dobbins asked if the College was over extended and was there a need to expand. Provost Di Mare felt that NSC was over extended. Some programs slated to move forward are not funded appropriately. She had concerns about a group of degrees that were approved by the Board in June with no faculty to support them. Faculty lines would have to be taken from Nursing, and Education. Liberal Arts and Sciences has too many part-time instructors, and Education has two degree programs that cannot move forward because of inadequate funding. Regent Sisolak remarked that the program recommendations came from the College for the Board of Regents’ approval and questioned if there was a communications breakdown. Provost Di Mare replied she was not employed at NSC at the time. Provost Di Mare explained that it is the Provost’s responsibility to analyze the resources and recommend putting forth degree programs to the president. If programs are moved forward without faculty lines, there will be no students in the classes. Regent Sisolak asked who forced the programs. Executive Vice Chancellor Klaich clarified that these programs had a genesis at the College of Southern Nevada and there were discussions about them being there or at NSC. He was sure they came to NSC fully grown. He assumed that Provost Di Mare felt those programs could not be accomplished and might hurt some of the core programs. Provost Di Mare remarked that those comments were insightful. She added that there was contact from



Northwest Accrediting Agency reporting that those programs were not going to be accredited due to the lack of faculty and resources. Regent Sisolak asked for details about the thought process. Executive Vice Chancellor Klaich said the System assumes a share of the process, which could have had better planning. There was not enough good information presented to the Board to make an informed decision. Executive Vice Chancellor Klaich said there will be a policy change brought to the Board to avoid these problems. Regent Crear asked about the policy and mission of NSC. Provost Di Mare said the College was established to provide programs in Nursing and Education for the state. There will also be a variety of other degrees that will take graduates into agencies and organizations. Regent Crear asked if President Maryanski communicates the vision of NSC. Provost Di Mare stated there was confusion about the mission from the different campuses. She suggested it might be best to ask others due to her short-term employment. Regent Crear asked about the amount of autonomy she was allowed. Provost Di Mare felt that her position should have more autonomy. There is difficulty when programs are pushed from the top down. It upsets the faculty because there is no discussion or consultation, which results in resistance. The programming has to fall in line with the articulated mission. Regent Sisolak was concerned about financial costs because of limited resources and no new money. Provost Di Mare agreed it was problematic and there has to be a realignment of current finances. Regent Crear asked about consolidating areas. Provost Di Mare said that with the budget cuts, the Bachelor of Applied Science and the School of Fine Arts were brought to a close. She recommended focusing on Nursing, Education and Liberal Arts and Sciences. The Business Administration Degree Program developed on its own, with 161 students. This is the type of program that should be brought before the Board. Regent Sisolak asked if these programs were discussed with President Maryanski. Provost Di Mare said there have been many discussions but a president has the right to take time to develop trust in the Provost. She felt President Maryanski hears and listens but some topics return. She has weekly one-on-one discussions with him and is free to say what is on her mind. Chair Dobbins asked if Speech Pathology fits or draws resources away from the real mission. Provost Di Mare thought the masters may have been approached a bit too soon. Right now there are no lines to move the degree forward. The other issue is it has not been accredited by one of the agencies, which is not the College’s failing.



It is being pursued, but has been met with resistance. Provost Di Mare said there are 21 to 25 students waiting, but they cannot hold out much longer. Chair Dobbins explained that while there is a demand, there is a six-to-one faculty-to-student ratio at the master’s level. The program is probably as expensive as Nursing. Chair Dobbins requested more information about the communication link and suggestions for change. Provost Di Mare replied that she has one-on-one meetings with the deans, and the President has the same one-on-one meetings. This may result with each sending a different message. She has encouraged President Maryanski to meet with her and the deans and he is willing to do that. Provost Di Mare felt there should be a closer relationship between herself, Mr. Neel and the President. She requested monthly meetings between them but to date, none have occurred. Cabinet meetings recently began, which should make a positive difference.

Regent Crear asked if there were efforts and strides made to create a diversified and multicultural environment with the faculty, staff and student environment. Provost Di Mare felt the College was moving in the right direction. Three programs are in place: Upward Bound, Crossroads and Talent Discovery. The recruiters are very sensitive to make presentations to groups from different and diverse backgrounds. Provost Di Mare felt the College could become a Hispanic serving institution, which will address a very wide range of diversity; even more than Hispanics. She thought that Multicultural Affairs had a number of contacts in the community, allowing the College to address the needs of a culturally diverse campus. It is an area that has to be worked at constantly. Regent Crear reported that minority faculty enrollment has been up and down. He would like to see some spikes in the numbers. Provost Di Mare responded that there are target hires or hires of opportunity. President Maryanski is very committed to diversity. Regent Crear asked if she would take the job today knowing President Maryanski. Provost Di Mare thought that she and President Maryanski were working well towards an understanding of moving the institution forward. She would take the position today. She has learned a lot and felt very fortunate. Regent Crear asked if she has the support to succeed. Provost Di Mare said in some areas yes, and others no. Ms. Brown asked if it was a matter of time to develop trust for making changes. Provost Di Mare responded that it is a possibility and added that everyone has to work together. Chair Dobbins asked if there was a realignment of resources, a team environment, communication of issues and the addition of a building, would this help move the College forward. Provost Di Mare indicated that it would and noted that focus would be required.



Ms. Brown reiterated that Provost Di Mare’s concerns would be more direct communication between the President and herself, and less with the deans. Provost Di Mare liked that the President had communication with the deans, but the one-on-ones seemed to work at cross purposes. He attends the Deans’ Council, which many presidents would not. Essential to her were meetings between Mr. Neel, the President and herself. Chair Dobbins asked who the recruiters reported to. Provost Di Mare said that right now it is her, until the Vice President for Student Affairs is hired. Chair Dobbins felt that could be an answer to the lower enrollment last year. Provost Di Mare said there was no retention recruitment plan when she arrived. The Admissions Office was taking up to six weeks to evaluate a transcript, there was no follow-up and orientations were not going well. Improvements have been designed for those areas. Regent Crear asked about President Maryanski’s strongest and weakest points. Provost Di Mare admired that he cared about education and students. She felt his weakest points were making tough decisions, carrying them out, and listening to his staff.

The meeting recessed at 12:22 p.m. and reconvened at 1:04 p.m. with all members present except Regent Alden.

Ms. Nicole Norian, Director, Human Resources, explained that she has been with NSC since August 2007 and reported to Mr. Neel. Her interaction with President Maryanski has been recruitment, policy interpretations and process issues. She works with him intermittently, as required. Chair Dobbins inquired about President Maryanski’s role. Ms. Norian reported that he meets with new employees and makes a point of walking around to speak to employees. He is very approachable. When it was a small organization, people would just go directly to him. With growth and more structure, systems and procedures will have to be put in place where that will not happen. Ms. Norian felt it was part of a growing institution to allow everyone to do their job. Both Provost Di Mare and Mr. Neel are very knowledgeable. She felt that President Maryanski should give them the opportunity to serve in their leadership roles, which will then give him the opportunity to go out and be more of a spokesperson for the campus. Regent Crear asked where someone would go if there was a problem with President Maryanski. Ms. Norian said any harassment or discrimination problem would go to the Affirmative Action Officer, Dr. Renee Cantu. The Equal Employment Opportunity function falls within the Human Resources Department. Ms. Norian noted further that complaints requiring investigation would be defined in the policy, which NSC is just



beginning to write. Regent Sisolak inquired if everybody understood the reporting line, especially when it comes to harassment and discrimination. Ms. Norian felt it was not clear. Regent Crear asked if there was a clear line of communication to President Maryanski. Ms. Norian responded that there was always access to him. Regent Crear inquired about the Executive Committee. Ms. Norian felt it was very strong. Though not a member, she attended a meeting and found it open and engaging. Regent Crear asked if she interacted with Dr. Cantu for diversity. Ms. Norian replied that they worked together on various projects. In response to Regent Crear’s question, Ms. Norian noted that she viewed the College’s vision and mission collectively. The vision is recognizing what NSC is and where it is going. The mission and vision need clarity so everyone will be in alignment. Ms. Norian felt there was confusion, especially during the budget cuts, in conjunction with some programs. If the mission was clear, decisions would have been supported without them being questioned after the fact. Ms. Norian thought it was the responsibility of the President to create that clarity. She would like to orient all employees to the mission and vision so they can make a connection. Chair Dobbins thanked Ms. Norian. Mr. Brian Chongtai, Director, Information Technology, oversees the technology on campus and reports to Mr. Neel. His dealings with the President are typically impromptu. He sees President Maryanski during his weekly walks. Mr. Chongtai added that he has a yearly, one-on-one, meeting with President Maryanski. Chair Dobbins inquired about an IT Committee. Mr. Chongtai replied that he chairs that committee, which meets quarterly.

Chair Dobbins asked about the President’s strengths. Mr. Chongtai agreed with President Maryanski’s ideas concerning public/private partnerships and expanding the campus. Mr. Chongtai felt the President has a good understanding of technology and how it is used to make the College more efficient. Regent Crear asked if he was familiar with the iNtegrate project. Mr. Chongtai responded that he sits on an iNtegrate sub-committee. Regent Crear asked about the vision of the campus. Mr. Chongtai envisions a community with residents and commercial areas mixed in with the academic areas. The College is basically a community that can sustain itself. The mission is to educate the residents of Nevada. President Maryanski has quarterly town hall meetings to emphasize the vision.



Regent Crear asked about staff. Mr. Chongtai reported that he has two and one-half full time employees and four student workers. Chair Dobbins asked how frequently the equipment was upgraded. Mr. Chongtai replied that they were upgraded every three to four years.

The meeting recessed at 1:35 p.m. and reconvened at 1:37 p.m. with all members present except for Regent Alden.

Ms. Joan McGee, Dean, School of Fine Arts, started in 2006 and in 2007 became Dean of the School of Fine Arts. On July 1, 2008 she will return to teaching because the School of Fine Arts will close. Ms. McGee does not interact with the President often, but is a member of the Executive Committee. She felt that President Maryanski was very likeable and easy to get along with. Ms. McGee is disturbed by either the lack of planning, leadership, or vision that goes into hiring people that do a good job, and then are terminated. Ms. McGee does not believe enough thought was put into hiring some people and some of those decisions could be, and have been, damaging to the College. Most of the Applied Science Programs are vanishing because they are not needed or there is no money. The mission of NSC is to educate the next generation of professionals for the state of Nevada. Without expanding the programs, she questioned where the students will go for their degrees. Ms. McGee felt more thought should have been put into the School of Fine Arts before she was hired as Dean. She is tenured but there are three others in different areas being terminated because they are not. Regent Crear questioned if there was a lack of leadership or responsibility. Ms. McGee believed it was a lack of leadership. President Maryanski has to make the decision of what to cut. Chair Dobbins was interested in hearing where Ms. McGee might get the $1.5 million for the budget cut. Ms. McGee was disturbed that the operating budget was not being cut, but three people were being terminated. She expected that more could have been done with the operating budgets, even for Nursing and Teaching. Ms. Brown asked if the decisions were based on the advice of Mr. Neel. Ms. McGee assumed he was involved. Regent Crear asked if students were enrolled in these programs. Ms. McGee said these were not student academic classes but more administrative classes. Regent Crear said that President Maryanski redirected some possibilities to meet the needs of the mandate. He stated that the budget cuts have been very difficult and the presidents are under very tough constraints. Ms. McGee expressed concern about the strategic planning for the future. Regent Crear asked how President Maryanski would be rated. Ms. McGee would rate President Maryanski a seven with his strength being accessibility. He could improve his leadership and strategic planning.




Mr. Michael Milek, Interim Director, Student Financial Services, has been with NSC since January 2007. He said President Maryanski is great. He is open to conversation and feedback with faculty and staff. He walks around the campus and speaks to everyone. President Maryanski has good connections with the community, business entities, the city of Henderson and other NSHE institutions. Mr. Milek reports to Provost Di Mare until a vice Provost is hired. Regent Sisolak asked what President Maryanski has done to improve the scholarship programs. Mr. Milek reported that new scholarship programs have been introduced. President Maryanski works with the Urban League and the Latin Chamber of Commerce concerning grant programs. If a student is awarded a scholarship from either, NSC will match the grant dollar for dollar. He will make that offer available to any organization NSC teams with. There is also the Henderson Community Foundation that provides funds to students. Regent Sisolak asked if there was corporate funding for financial aid. Mr. Milek has not seen anything lately, but President Maryanski and the Director of the Foundation visit donors for solicitations and to get the NSC name out to the community.


Dr. Francine Mayfield, Dean, School of Education, reported being with the College since its inception. She interacts with President Maryanski on a monthly basis and at the Executive Committee meetings. Dr. Mayfield felt that President Maryanski is committed to the College. He is kind and very accessible. President Maryanski has a vision for the College and has conveyed that vision as far as “this is what the vision is” but it stopped at that point. It has not been actualized or followed through with specific and constant action plans. Regent Sisolak asked what direction NSC was moving in when it began and was it growing at a steady pace. Dr. Mayfield replied the direction began with Teaching and Nursing. As for the teaching/education pace, until teachers are paid more, it will be a difficult career choice. NSC has grown too fast and should focus on those two areas. Regent Sisolak asked if Education was extended, would students be interested. Dr. Mayfield felt that recruiting would have to expand.

Dr. Mayfield explained that Speech Pathology has a very good enrollment for the undergraduate program, but more resources are needed. The graduate program was put through for approval and accreditation. In midstream the accreditation standards were changed. It is not yet on the books. Regent Sisolak asked who made decisions to



allocate the resources. Dr. Mayfield said that was driven by community need as defined by the school district. There were approximately 35 applicants to come into the Speech Pathology Program. It is expensive but there are connections with outside agencies ready to allow NSC students to go into those facilities. It was a joint decision between herself, President Maryanski, and the former Provost. Regent Sisolak asked about interaction with the Financial Aid Office. Dr. Mayfield said they work collaboratively with scholarships.


Mr. Russell Raker, Development Officer, has been employed with NSC for five months. He came out of retirement after being in the fund-raising field for 46 years, with 22 years in higher education. Mr. Raker has daily communication with President Maryanski. He has met with members of the community and the Foundation Board. He is assisting the transformation of the Foundation to go from a reporting organization to an actively fund-raising board. Regent Crear asked how President Maryanski supported the fund-raising efforts. Mr. Raker thought that President Maryanski was curious about a comprehensive fund-raising program because he has never been involved in one. He supports it and is eager to learn how and to establish appropriate ways of making it happen. The fund-raising program needs to be jump-started. There is no annual giving program because there are no alumni. He inherited 89 donors. His goal is to have a solid 1,000 annual donors. Mr. Raker continued that President Maryanski set appointments and personally introduced him to the Foundation Board. Both he and President Maryanski work together to make contacts with new individuals in the community. Mr. Raker makes contacts with foundations and individuals in and out of the state. Mr. Raker felt there would be large donors in the future because President Maryanski has a regular pattern of contacting people. There is a process for cultivation, from first contact to making a gift, which can be anywhere from 18 to 36 months. The President may be dealing with someone for 36 months, but has not made a request. Regent Crear asked about the external perception of NSC. Mr. Raker reported that 90% have not heard of the College and the other 10% are convinced it is the College of Southern Nevada. They have no idea it is a four year college. There is a lack of marketing and public relations. There are no handout materials and no money for them. He had to raise his own money for the operations of the Foundation.



Executive Vice Chancellor Klaich asked what Mr. Raker would reply to someone asking about the vision of NSC. Mr. Raker responded that it depended on the area of contact. He explained that in the case of nursing, he visited physicians in the community. They expressed disappointment with the shortage and quality of nurses. A major attempt should be to produce good students to fill the nursing void in southern Nevada. Success will keep the medical costs down and give access to good medical care. Mr. Raker recently visited a high school consisting largely of substitute teachers. He did not see a dedication with some of them. He met most of the faculty at the School of Education at NSC and thought they and the student teachers were doing a good job. Regent Sisolak asked if NSC was expanding its mission. Mr. Raker reported that it was not affecting his ability to raise money. Looking at NSC’s student body, almost 50% are the first to go to college. Of that group, 30% to 40% are two or three nationalities. There is more cultural diversity at NSC compared to any other college he has worked at because NSC offers hope to students. Mr. Raker heard there is a commitment to produce graduates that are highly qualified to meet teaching and nursing shortages, and to graduate students to be successful in good careers for southern Nevada.

The meeting recessed at 2:41 p.m. and reconvened at 2:42 with all members present except Regent Alden.

Mr. Louis Dubois, Controller, has been with NSC for three years and before that at UNLV and the System for approximately 30 years. Interaction with President Maryanski is regular. At a business level, he sees either President Maryanski or Mr. Neel. Chair Dobbins asked about President Maryanski’s management style. Mr. Dubois reported that he tries to keep staff informed and up to date with complete information, including the vision and the mission of the College. Regent Crear asked what the vision was. Mr. Dubois replied that presently, the short-term vision is to get through the budget crunch. The long-term is that President Maryanski works closely with the community to meet their need and to provide nurses and teachers. There is an underlying desire to interact with the community and meet the needs of Henderson and southern Nevada. Regent Sisolak asked if Mr. Dubois was involved with the budget cuts. Mr. Dubois responded that the decisions were a consensus primarily of the deans, the academic leadership, top management and Mr. Neel.




Ms. Lori Navarrette, Associate Dean, School of Education, has been at NSC for one and one-half years. She teaches and has administrative responsibilities. As faculty, she meets with President Maryanski once per semester and once a year. She interacts with him informally five times per month and formally three times a month. She felt President Maryanski was personable. He walks around to touch base with everyone; a people President; a visible, reserved leader. He has deans, provosts and other administrative peers whose leadership is more extroverted than his own. He has been very supportive of the School of Education. Ms. Navarrette stated that she would like President Maryanski to remain President. Regent Sisolak asked if Nursing and Education were moving at a respectable rate. Ms. Navarrette thought there could always be more to build both programs. Recruitment and publicity are needed. Faculty is innovative but they are spread very thin. She is an associate dean doing work that students could do. She could use that time to write grants. Regent Sisolak asked if she would be more valuable in the field. Ms. Navarrette felt she could do so much more in-service and pre-service, and be out in the schools more as a co-teacher. Regent Sisolak asked her to rate the President. She rated him a seven. Chair Dobbins expressed appreciation for her participation. Mr. James LaBuda, former Vice Provost of Student Experience, has been with NSC for four years and has now transferred to a faculty position. He felt that there is not enough staff for the student experience requirements, which was impacted by budget cuts. The College cannot grow until additional staff is hired. Mr. LaBuda continued that President Maryanski is supportive. Areas for improvement are the projected growth of NSC and its direction. The campus needs to be developed and statewide goals have to be considered. Students want degree programs and a collegiate campus atmosphere. Regent Crear asked if there was a clear vision as directed by President Maryanski. Mr. LaBuda said the immediate plans are construction of the buildings. There is no time line for specifics. NSC has great things to offer like Nursing, Teaching and Business. Regent Sisolak asked if the degree programs were expanded too quickly. Mr. LaBuda thought some were, but the need was there. The bachelors program ran into difficulty with accreditation. The students were not pulled in as expected, especially when it appeared that there was a need. It does not seem that it was sequenced well. It was promoted, but the response was not there. Ms. Angela Brommel, Director, NSC Bookstore Operations, started teaching part-time at NSC in 2003. President Maryanski makes rounds throughout the buildings at least once a week. If she has a question she will email him. While there is communication



with him, an issue may take time to resolve. He will do some research and then respond. Ms. Brommel rated President Maryanski a seven out of ten. She felt the original mission was a four year state college with a liberal arts education specifically targeting students who may not be prepared or confident to achieve an education. It was centered on the immediate community pulling in students who would not have the opportunity otherwise. Regent Sisolak asked about specific programs to focus on. Ms. Brommel replied that it was Nursing and Education. Chair Dobbins asked what it would take for President Maryanski to rate a ten. Ms. Brommel said he is not a strong public speaker. He may make decisions that over-extend the College financially. She cannot teach a class unless it is on the books. Putting the School of Fine Arts on the books was a leap, and then it was announced that there was never a School of Fine Arts, which was very disappointing. There was no open discussion to talk about it, nor was there an explanation. It was announced on the website and was a disappointment for the College, and to her. She felt that President Maryanski was quietly stubborn. Chair Dobbins asked how the budget cuts were communicated. Ms. Brommel believed there were a series of emails explaining the situation and then there was a meeting. Mr. Neel, Provost Di Mare and President Maryanski spoke. President Maryanski discussed where NSC was going. Ms. Brommel said she is not exactly sure what the mission is, or what is being done to go forward. Ms. Brown asked if she was kept current on affairs. Ms. Brommel said the website and newsletters inform her about campus events. There are meetings with the President every semester. The Committee thanked Ms. Brommel for her input. Regent Sisolak commented that he did not understand all the walking around. Ms. Brown explained that President Maryanski goes to different areas and interacts with employees. Chair Dobbins commented that it was great visibility, but President Maryanski may do a little too much. Regent Sisolak stated that he got different reactions from the interviewees; that it was great, or he did not have anything to do. Regent Crear said it is usually a big deal to call on the president. Chair Dobbins explained that that the people at NSC feel they can go speak to the President, which is very unusual at a university, and cannot be sustained as the College grows.


Dr. Andy Kuniyuki, Associate Dean, School of Liberal Arts and Sciences, joined NSC in 2003, as a part-time biology instructor and expanded the role to four courses per semester. He was hired, full time, in 2005. Along with his duties, he stands-in and



assists in other areas. Since the spring of 2007 to the present, he teaches three biology courses merged into one so the students can graduate. He is also at Agassi Prep teaching trigonometry once a week. Chair Dobbins asked about interactions with President Maryanski. Dr. Kuniyuki said he is a nice guy and visits often, meaning that he walks through the buildings to see what is happening. Regent Sisolak asked how Dr. Kuniyuki would rate President Maryanski. Dr. Kuniyuki rated President Maryanski a three. Chair Dobbins asked why the rating was so low. Dr. Kuniyuki explained that people in the valley do not know what NSC is all about. There is not a clear understanding of the mission of the College. The people do not know NSC exists. A student recently reported that the Dean of Dentistry at UNLV does not know anything about NSC. The Dean did not feel that the NSC student could handle the courses at UNLV. This information was shared with Dr. Beck and was then taken to Provost Di Mare. Regent Sisolak asked how supportive President Maryanski was of projects. Dr. Kuniyuki said some projects were not originally on the books, so there is no funding. To enter into the Nursing or Education Programs, the first two years must be satisfied with Liberal Arts, and 80% of the FTE of the College is taught by Liberal Arts. In the fall of 2007, 65% of Liberal Arts was taught by part-timers. The accreditation team said the ratio of full-time to part-time needs improvement.

The meeting recessed at 4:24 p.m. and reconvened at 4:25 p.m. with everyone present except Regent Alden.

The Open Forum participants joined the meeting and introduced themselves: Ms. Chelsie Adams, Assistant to the Dean of Liberal Arts and Sciences, Ms. Angela Brommel, Director of the Bookstore Operations, Mr. Matt Garland, Human Resources Consultant, Mr. Daniel Grassian, Chair of Humanities and Assistant Professor of English, Ms. Lori Navarrette, Associate Dean of Education, Ms. Nicole Norian, Director of Human Resources, Dr. Francine Mayfield, Dean, School of Education, Ms. Patricia Ring, Registrar and Director of Admissions, Dr. Tony Scinta, Chair of Social Sciences and Assistant Professor of Psychology, Ms. Cindy Stella, Acting Coordinator for Liberal Arts and Sciences. Chair Dobbins requested input about the President, including interactions, as examples. Mr. Matt Garland said he came from UNLV, where he worked for 18 years. He moved to NSC because of the growth opportunity. Regent Crear asked about his perception of NSC, how it fits in the community and how it is perceived. Mr. Garland said it is young and expanding. UNR and UNLV are moving towards being research intensive institutions. NSC fills the gap, especially with Nursing and Education.



Regent Sisolak asked if the mission of the College was defined. Dr. Scinta felt it needed clarity. Mr. Grassian agreed with Dr. Scinta and added that NSC is going through the process of having a larger mission outside the College. He does not feel the community is fully aware that NSC exists and the budget does not afford the luxury of marketing. Ms. Navarrette added that NSC is being confused with Sierra Nevada. Ms. Adams is not sure the vision is consistent throughout the College. Ms. Stella felt that the President should be dynamic enough to make an impression in the community and do more networking to get NSC into the forefront. Regent Sisolak asked if President Maryanski has made in-roads to get the name out in Las Vegas, or was it mainly Henderson. Ms. Stella was unsure because she is not aware of the outreach, but the name is being delivered in Henderson. Chair Dobbins asked for comments about the message of NSC being delivered in Las Vegas. Ms. Norian said the Chamber of Commerce distributes information to new residents but no information about NSC is included. NSC should have visibility. Public relations and strategy is missing and a public relations officer is needed. Dr. Mayfield added that the Executive Committee was presented with a marketing group approximately 2 1/2 years ago. The plan and initiation was there, but is it unclear if it played out. Ms. Brommel said staff is confined by the budget and support was spent in undeveloped areas. She suggested that money be spent on marketing. Regent Sisolak asked if high school students were aware of NSC. Dr. Mayfield replied that every counselor from every high school in the Clark County School District comes to the College, yearly. However, the counselors were not at NSC this year. Regent Sisolak observed that there were no pamphlets, handouts or information for NSC at Durango High School, but other colleges were represented. Dr. Mayfield said there were flyers and brochures published which took an inordinate amount of time. They came out after the season. Regent Sisolak said in the initial planning, there were students supporting NSC because it was geographically close. Ms. Brown explained that with NSC, it was also logistics. In the Las Vegas valley area people are sensitive to what is next door. The end result is that some people look at NSC as another country. Ms. Brown recommended that everyone be a cheerleader. She sees President Maryanski at various events, but he is only one person. Even with a marketing plan, support is needed. Ms. Brommel agreed, and added that curriculum would also be an enhancement to attracting students. Students would drive longer distances if the Academic Department had the support staff to grow areas. She said some majors have only one or two instructors.



Ms. Adams said she attends NSC because of the quality education and the instructors. Dr. Mayfield said historically, students are attracted to NSC, but without quality they will be lost, which stresses the need for resources. Ms. Brommel said there are areas on campus where instructors are limited. Regent Sisolak asked if instructors should be taken from pockets that are not doing well. Ms. Brommel suggested that it might be practical to look at core curriculum hours. Mr. Grassian said, in addition to pockets of excellence, there are strong areas that could grow. Dr. Mayfield added that there is an opportunity with new hires to bring up programs that are well thought out, researched and backed by faculty; the top up rather than the top down. There were programs that did not have the support of the faculty and the mission. Programs need to grow and expand in a thoughtful way. It would be realistic to capitalize on what NSC has. Ms. Norian said from the human resources’ perspective the appeal is the new, growing institution and workforce; planning and developing for a workforce to grow over 20 years. Understanding the mission, vision and strategic plan is essential for accomplishing this.

The meeting recessed at 5:02 p.m. and reconvened at 9:04 a.m. on Friday, February 29, 2008, with all members present.

Mr. Mark Howard, CEO, Mountain View Hospital, joined the meeting by teleconference. He said the hospital was concerned about the nursing shortage so a $25,000 donation was made to NSC. Mr. Howard has a scholarship in his daughter’s memory, which raised over $400,000 for NSC. Mr. Howard reported that when they met, President Maryanski immediately placed him on the NSC Advisory Board. President Maryanski asks for his advice, keeps him informed and calls often. Regent Alden asked if President Maryanski’s low key approach works. Mr. Howard realized that the President is demure but he has strength and produces results. Regent Crear asked about the perception of NSC in the community. Mr. Howard felt it was getting stronger, especially in nursing. He thought that NSC was more like a college, with over 2,000 students. The second and third group of students that graduate will make the difference. Regent Sisolak asked how President Maryanski interacts with the students. Mr. Howard replied that he extends himself to offer them confidence. Mr. Howard is impressed with NSC processing the accelerated Nursing Program to 18 months. Chair Dobbins thanked Mr. Howard for his time and comments. Dr. Gregory Robinson, Director, Library Services, began at NSC in 2003 and reports to the Provost. Interactions with President Maryanski are minimal; one or two meetings a year and when the President walks around the buildings. Regent Sisolak asked if the



wandering was productive. Dr. Robinson felt it was not. Chair Dobbins asked if that could be an opportunity to talk about new ideas. Dr. Robinson did not feel it was the appropriate time. Dr. Robinson continued that the library is not a priority while other buildings are being constructed, so there may not be a new library for 10 years. There are two small libraries that seat 50 each, which are usually full. Dr. Robinson would like more, and expressed this to President Maryanski and Provost Di Mare. Regent Sisolak asked if a joint enterprise with the community library would help. Dr. Robinson looked into it, but it has its pros and cons. It never went beyond the idea stage. Regent Alden asked if he understood the budget process. Dr. Robinson understood the process and other priorities within the College. Regent Alden asked how President Maryanski’s low key approach affected his job. Dr. Robinson said the President was not a person we get behind. Essentially, the teams are the schools. When looking to be associated with an organization he teams with Dr. Beck and Provost Di Mare. Being low key is a kind of mediocrity. Regent Crear asked who “we” are and what does “behind” mean. Dr. Robinson said he interacts with faculty and has a good sense of their pulse. He talks regularly with all the different schools. He indicated “we” referred to the faculty. He can speak more specifically to LAS faculty because he is primarily in the Dawson Building and shares committees with that faculty. When referring to “behind” he refers to what group defines the College, which are the schools themselves. Dr. Robinson felt things were more defined by a former president but the faculty was smaller at that time. He no longer feels that is the case. Chair Dobbins stated that as the College grows, so does the administrative functions and organization structure. With expansion there are specific purposes with each of the vice presidents. It is important for everyone to be behind them, to know the mission, and their piece of the goals. Dr. Robinson accepted that comment as an organizational strategy which may be a normal shift for a growing college. Regent Sisolak asked about the image of NSC and the President. Dr. Robinson said NSC is still fighting for identity. There were terrible times with website development. It could be growing pains. The image of President Maryanski is that of a nice man, low key. He is not particularly assertive, strong or dynamic enough to keep the College moving along to excel. Regent Sisolak asked if the College was accepted more in Henderson rather than Las Vegas. Dr. Robinson said students come from all areas. He does not see Henderson’s identity tied in with the College yet. There are good efforts going on with the community.



Regent Sisolak asked about recruiting. Dr. Robinson knows the College has been low on recruiting staff and resources for that area. He felt orientation sessions were amateurish and not very successful. Ms. Brown reiterated the comment that President Maryanski’s walking visit is negative. She was surprised because most employees do not think they know their boss. Dr. Robinson responded that the President is low key. His charisma level is a little low. The conversations are uncomfortable because there are periods of silence. The meeting is not productive nor is trust established at that time. Chair Dobbins thanked Dr. Robinson for his input. Dr. Connie Carpenter, Dean, School of Nursing, has been with NSC since 2002. She reported that nursing has 150 students in the regular and accelerated tracts, supported by 22 faculty. There are two departments: Nursing and Occupational Science. Dr. Carpenter’s interaction with President Maryanski is through committee work, council meetings and one-on-one meetings a least once a semester, if not more. The meetings are usually very positive. He has been involved and helpful with grants and federally directed funds received by the program. Regent Sisolak asked about the amount of FTE in Nursing. Dr. Carpenter explained that the FTE also includes pre-nursing. She felt the FTE was ahead of Education and slightly behind LAS. Regent Sisolak asked the amount of nursing students in the pipeline when it is full. Dr. Carpenter reported 120 each year, which would be 240 students. That is the limit because there are not enough classrooms. Regent Sisolak asked the average age of the nursing students. Dr. Carpenter stated that the average age is approximately 30 years old. Regent Alden asked about President Maryanski being low key. Dr. Carpenter related to it and added that he is well-liked by the faculty. He gets along with the nursing staff and his demeanor works well. Regent Sisolak asked about the perception of NSC. Dr. Carpenter felt it was not well known and that public relations could improve. Ms. Brown asked if the recruiters go into the high schools. Dr. Carpenter replied they did, but most students are older and not in high school. The accelerated students have their bachelor’s degree and come from all over the country. Regent Crear asked about the mission of the College. Dr. Carpenter stated it was to educate the next professionals for the state of Nevada.



Chair Dobbins asked about input on the budget decisions. Dr. Carpenter replied that she has total input. A five year budget was put in place but, with the current budget cuts, it has been difficult to follow. Chair Dobbins thanked Dr. Carpenter. Mr. Thomas Madison, Director of Facilities, has been with NSC since 2007. His interaction with President Maryanski is very limited. He is not on any committees or cabinets and works through Mr. Neel. Mr. Madison felt there is no communication and he does not understand the vision of the College. Hard work is going towards putting the Master Plan in place and selecting a company to take on that task. An RFQ is being developed, along with the items to negotiate in the RFQ. He has had a difficult time getting feedback. Mr. Madison does not feel that President Maryanski understands what the Director of Facilities does. Executive Vice Chancellor Klaich explained that development of the property is critical to the College and requested more detail. Mr. Madison continued that the Master Plan and development of the campus will have a large impact, comprised of partnering with the city, along with their funding. When there is a meeting with the city, NSC has no agenda or plan. Mr. Madison is unsure what President Maryanski wants developed for the property. Executive Vice Chancellor Klaich suggested it may not be a surprise given that they are out to bid looking for a master developer to help with the vision for the entire property. It has been narrowed down to two or three developers who, when one is chosen, will be working with him on a daily basis. Mr. Madison thought it should not be left solely to him. He put the RFP together, laid everything out and took it to the UNLV Purchasing Department. It was then decided to go with an RFQ. As it was developed, drafts were sent out for comments, feedback and help. There were no comments until the group was in a meeting with the city. Chair Dobbins asked about Mr. Neel’s participation. Mr. Madison replied that he has weekly meetings with Mr. Neel and discussed the RFQ with him in detail. There were questions about prioritization because of the money situation, but when it came time to meet with the city, the information was like a surprise to President Maryanski. Some examples are to look at the infrastructure and the utilities. There are issues on the hill. There is not enough water pressure. There are a lot of civil issues that are fundamental to the property. In the meeting with the city, President Maryanski would rearrange things without the opportunity to explain why they were prioritized the way they were. It is very frustrating. Chair Dobbins asked if these matters got addressed. Mr. Madison reported that they have not been addressed. There will not be enough money to address them. Executive Vice Chancellor Klaich asked if Mr. Madison could speak with President Maryanski about the matter. Mr. Madison reported that he tried, but President Maryanski told him that the central plan utilities were at the bottom of the list. Regent Sisolak asked if the city felt that NSC was proceeding haphazardly. Mr. Madison responded that the city controls the agenda. Executive Vice Chancellor Klaich



questioned to what extent that agenda may not be consistent with the NSC agenda. Mr. Madison responded that was part of the problem of not knowing what the President wants. Mr. Madison stated that he does not have confidence. Chair Dobbins asked if President Maryanski could have had private conversations with the city. Mr. Madison was unsure of any prior conversations. Ms. Brown asked if the city knew there was a division. Mr. Madison was not certain if there was a division. Regent Sisolak asked if he would take the job today. Mr. Madison responded that he probably would not. He sees the potential and feels he has a lot to offer, but it is not being utilized. Mr. Madison continued that his relationship with the President is not adversarial. President Maryanski is very nice, but he cannot get the opportunity to talk to him. Chair Dobbins asked if he expressed his feelings to the President. Mr. Madison explained that there are five different categories to purchase with the money available. There are certain real estate economic questions to ask; to find out how much land is needed to accomplish the academic mission, the civil and drainage issues, no utility service available, there is not enough water pressure, and no access to electrical grids. These fundamental questions have to be answered up front. Chair Dobbins inquired about the master planner getting the answers to those questions. Mr. Madison agreed that would happen but, there is not enough money to do everything. Chair Dobbins suggested that perhaps the master planner would have solutions and creative ways of development with the dollars available. Mr. Madison responded that ultimately that would be preferable.

Regent Sisolak explained that the list has to be prioritized and Mr. Madison does not feel he is getting input in terms of those priorities to produce the RFQ. Mr. Madison agreed that he was not receiving the input. Executive Vice Chancellor Klaich inquired if he spoke to Mr. Neel. Mr. Madison said they had a serious discussion and Mr. Neel said he took these concerns to President Maryanski. Regent Alden thanked Mr. Madison for his participation.

The meeting recessed at 10:28 a.m. and reconvened at 10:29 a.m. with all members present.

Chair Dobbins asked for comments. Ms. Brown said she did not understand how a division was not realized. Regent Sisolak said there have been questions pertaining to who is running the project. He thought the System took it back from the city. Ms. Brown said it sounded as if the city was in control. Regent Sisolak felt that Mr. Madison was honest and felt awkward about commenting. Regent Alden said there seemed to be a general theme with a detachment between the President and some people who report directly to him and some he indirectly communicates with. President Maryanski is friendly and works hard, but the evaluation needs to reflect critical comments to improve the future. The interviewees do not feel incriminated by speaking their mind, which is a positive reflection on President Maryanski.



Regent Crear said that with any company there are people who are ecstatic, and some who do not agree. There is obviously room for improvement in some areas, but, being a new campus, everyone is going through a trial and error period. The evaluation needs to reflect those issues of improvement about the overall operation and success of where the campus is going. There are pluses and minuses. Regent Sisolak felt that adjustments had to be made with the growth of the campus. Casual meetings with the President will probably not take place. Regent Crear observed that responsibility will fall on Provost Di Mare and Mr. Neel. Regent Sisolak felt that some NSC faculty and staff did not realize they should be seeing them instead of the President. Ms. Brown stated that a lot depends on company philosophy. Visibility can be a sign of support to some employees. The supervisor cannot be undermined. Chair Dobbins added that Provost Di Mare is strong and should not be undermined. Regent Sisolak said the construction issues must be addressed. Chair Dobbins felt that by UNLV asking for an RFQ, it pointed out that NSC did not know what they wanted. Executive Vice Chancellor Klaich asked about the RFQ. Regent Sisolak explained that Mr. Madison said to look at the infrastructure. Infrastructure is the main thing because it is long-term. Is there adequate water pressure for 500 acres; enough electric grids; will there be enough sewer lines? What is the best for the developer is not necessarily the best for the College because he will be developing the commercial side. Regent Crear pointed out that there is a lot requested from the presidents. There is a level of dependency on the people who have the expertise. Regent Crear would not go before the city without thoroughly going through the notes. Ms. Brown does not understand why President Maryanski would be that involved with the facilities when there are experts. Regent Sisolak pointed out that there would be three interests to this construction - the city, commercial and NSC. The city of Henderson knows what it is doing. Executive Vice Chancellor Klaich thought it was going exactly the right way, but is now a little nervous. Chair Dobbins recommended having this discussion with President Maryanski when he returns. Regent Crear suggested asking Mr. Neel as well. Chair Dobbins stated Mr. Neel would be returning to the meeting at 1:00 p.m. The Faculty Senate joined the meeting and introduced themselves: Dr. Kevin Graziano, Assistant Professor of Education, has been with NSC for four years, a Faculty Senator for three years and is Parliamentarian of the Faculty Senate. Dr. Kebret Kebede, Assistant Professor of Biology, has been with NSC since 2005 and is Vice Chair of the Faculty Senate. Dr. Lawrence Rudd, Assistant Professor of Education, is the Faculty Senate Chair. Ms. Ruby Wertz, Nursing Faculty, has been at NSC for three years; on the Faculty Senate for one year and is Secretary of the Faculty Senate.



Dr. Rudd has the most contact with President Maryanski as Chair of the Faculty Senate. He meets with him monthly to discuss the agenda and at other times when necessary. President Maryanski provides him administrative updates concerning the Faculty Senate. Regent Crear asked about the mission of the College. Ms. Wertz said it would be to serve the community of southern Nevada. Regent Sisolak asked about the NSC perception. Ms. Wertz’s experience has been very positive. Dr. Graziano said he often hears that it is a community college and it has been viewed as part of CSN. He stated that NSC should be viewed as itself. Dr. Kebede added that the College does not have enough visibility. It will be a significant milestone to have the Liberal Arts building and an actual campus. Dr. Rudd said those who want to attend NSC think it is a great niche. Dr. Graziano stated the College might be viewed as new because new policies are being written. He felt it was necessary to work with the public relations office, marketing and recruiting. Ms. Wertz agreed that recognition would help. Dr. Graziano said that Nursing and Education faculty are out in the field at hospitals and schools. Regent Alden asked about President Maryanski’s pluses and minuses. Dr. Rudd said accessibility was good. Dr. Kebede said that he met with each faculty member personally. Dr. Rudd said he sometimes comes through the building and stops to talk. Chair Dobbins inquired about interaction and developing policies. Dr. Graziano reported that the policies written within the Faculty Senate are shared with the entire College, the deans and the Provost. It does not go to President Maryanski until it passes through the Senate and is voted on. It then goes to the President for his approval and signature. Dr. Rudd reported that he works with Provost Di Mare on these issues as an intermediary. Dr. Graziano felt the Provost was informing the President on the latest developments. Regent Crear asked about the President’s leadership. Ms. Wertz felt he communicated well, with a relaxed leadership style, yet he takes charge, or action, when it is necessary. He is a good listener and follows through. Dr. Rudd agreed that he was a good leader. Chair Dobbins requested a rating from 1 to 10. Ms. Wertz rated the President an eight or a nine. Dr. Graziano rated him seven because he has limited interaction with the President. Dr. Rudd said he was committed to the College and rated him an eight. Regent Crear asked how President Maryanski managed with the Board of Regents. Dr. Rudd thought he handled the most recent budget crisis well. President Maryanski called several town hall meetings to share information. It involved the entire College. Comments from faculty were welcomed. The process was well thought out.



Dr. Graziano referred back to one of President Maryanski’s strengths which was instilling the “I Teach” core values, which he introduced. The problem for NSC is marketing and visibility. He did not know who was responsible for this project. Ms. Wertz felt President Maryanski wanted to focus on producing the best students. Dr. Graziano added he was very good at praise and words of encouragement. Ms. Wertz said he follows-up and responds to his emails. Regent Crear asked about the relationship between the Provost and the President. Ms. Wertz felt it was good, but she is new to the school. Dr. Rudd thought administration worked well together. Dr. Graziano said that faculty is comfortable walking through the executive suites. Chair Dobbins thanked the attendees. The Classified Employee Council representatives joined the meeting and introduced themselves: Ms. Stacey Adams, Assistant to the Provost, Ms. Pam Allsop, Assistant to the Associate Vice President for College Relations, Ms. Elizabeth De La Torre, Student Support and Issues, Ms. Holly Primka, Administrative Assistant to the Vice President of Administration and Finance, Mr. Arturo Torres, Administrative Assistant, Registrar’s Office. Regent Crear asked about President Maryanski’s leadership. Mr. Torres enjoys working with the President. Ms. Primka said President Maryanski is a nice man but would like him to take more action and be more active. He is a good listener, but at times nothing happens with the information. As far as the Council, he has listened and cooperated in every way. Ms. Primka does not feel President Maryanski always listens to budget suggestions. Positions were created that do not make sense. The College is new and growing, and bad decisions can hold NSC back financially. Ms. Adams added that some positions caused concern for both the finance and academic areas. Regent Crear wondered if it was an executive making a decision or a series of bad decisions. Ms. Adams responded that the decisions were not necessarily bad, just not conducive to the College. Regent Crear inquired if President Maryanski was qualified. Ms. Primka felt he was qualified but needed more oversight. Ms. Adams agreed and added that he needed guidance and direction. She believed that NSC was in the same position that it was three years ago by re-evaluating the same things. Regent Sisolak asked if there was a way for their concerns to reach President Maryanski. Ms. Primka stated that she expressed her concerns to Mr. Neel and was certain the message was delivered to President Maryanski. Regent Sisolak asked if Mr. Neel reported back to her. Ms. Primka replied that Mr. Neel does not report back to her. Ms. Brown asked if Ms. Primka follows up with Mr. Neel once something has been said that the President should respond to. Ms. Primka replied that she felt uncertain questioning the outcome.



Regent Sisolak inquired about the reputation of the College. Ms. Adams thought there was progress. Regent Sisolak asked the definition of the community. Ms. Adams stated that Clark County and other partnerships with NSHE institutions would be included, not just Henderson. Regent Sisolak questioned if the Nevada community felt it was part of the College. Ms. De La Torre stated that students attend NSC from all areas of the city. She heard rumors from an administrator that NSC will not exist in two years. Regent Alden assured the group that the rumor was false.

The meeting recessed at 11:45 a.m. and reconvened at 11:47 a.m. with all members present. Dr. Rene Cantu, Vice President, Multicultural Affairs, has been at NSC since 2003. He reported that when President Maryanski arrived in 2005, the campus was in question, concerning the budget, and funding was not secured for the building. The College needed stability and vision, which President Maryanski provided. He clarified that the vision is to prepare the next generation of professionals for the state of Nevada. There are now over 2,000 students who have passed accreditation and President Maryanski is the reason for it. He is a quiet, but strong man. Dr. Cantu reported that Multicultural Affairs and Diversity was not strong at one time. Today, 45% of the student body is of minority backgrounds. One third of the executive staff is representative of a minority group, including deans. Thirty-four percent of full-time faculty is representative of a minority group. Professional staff, who are mid-level managers, are approximately 63% representative of a minority group. When President Maryanski arrived, the policy and procedures were not totally in place and there was discussion of quality versus diversity. The best qualified and most diverse faculty staff is what NSC is looking for and the best people are being hired. Dr. Cantu continued that, in terms of strength and balance, President Maryanski has many facets. He is collaborative and makes a point of meeting with everyone on the campus, once a year, one-on-one. Regent Crear asked if the tools were available for doing an effective job. Dr. Cantu responded that, within the limited budget, the tools have been provided. He has a voice at the table and is allowed to create his area without limitations. There is the Diversity Coalition, and these voices have helped diversity within the curriculum. It has been a tremendous experience working side-by-side with President Maryanski. Regent Sisolak asked about the perception of the College. Dr. Cantu felt it was good. Fully half of the students are from Las Vegas as opposed to 23% to 24% from Henderson. Other students are from out of state. There have been transfers from UNLV and CSN. Students do not get lost at NSC.



Regent Crear asked where President Maryanski could improve. Dr. Cantu said he does not force his opinion on anyone, but he could communicate better to get his ideas across. Initially, he and President Maryanski got a bad start. Dr. Cantu then asked for a chance, which President Maryanski granted. Working for him has been a highlight. Chair Dobbins asked about a rating. Dr. Cantu rated President Maryanski nine and one-half. Chair Dobbins asked about the President’s relationship with the staff. Dr. Cantu said that cabinet meetings were recommended, which have taken place. There have been excellent conversations covering some tough topics. The smaller cabinet is better and accomplishes more than the Executive Committee. President Maryanski listens to everyone and finds a point of balance to make decisions. Chair Dobbins inquired about the input on the budget cuts. Dr. Cantu said President Maryanski, in conjunction with the team, laid down certain principals of not directly impacting students and not cutting the number of courses offered. There were some programs that were cut: Community-Based Learning, the Office for Learning and Teaching Excellence, the College of Fine Arts and the Applied Science Bachelors Program. Those programs were not fully developed.

The meeting recessed at 12:14 p.m. and reconvened at 12:23 with all members present.

Chair Dobbins requested comments on the major issues. He thought communication between the executive staff seemed to be an issue. Regent Sisolak sensed there are two groups: faculty and non-faculty. Faculty seems to be supportive and on track. The reporting line is unclear, especially with Provost Di Mare and Mr. Neel. Regent Sisolak observed that it is Mr. Neel’s people who do not feel they are getting answers. Regent Sisolak was concerned when the Classified Council remarked that NSC was where it was three years ago. He felt there was some truth to that. Executive Vice Chancellor Klaich said management by walking around will not work as the College grows. Regent Sisolak thought it was inappropriate to make casual contact without the supervisor being in attendance because it undermines their authority and sends a message that they can be bypassed. Ms. Brown said once the College grows, he cannot walk the campus and get his job done. Executive Vice Chancellor Klaich felt the Committee should express this to President Maryanski. Ms. Brown concurred because some people felt that President Maryanski was in their way. Regent Alden suggested a message that there is room for improvement. Regent Crear said one theme, whether valid or not, is President Maryanski is not making key decisions. Indecision is worse than the wrong decision. Chair Dobbins specified that the perception is that he is not making decisions and, whether it is



true or not, it has to be addressed. Executive Vice Chancellor Klaich did not understand having time to walk around but not having time to sit and embark upon some important decision making. Regent Crear said all decisions have to be made, not just some. Chair Dobbins was concerned that everyone was aware of the financial mistakes caused by the expansion and introduction of programs. They know what is happening but there is still dissention. An outside person needs to come in and go through the strategic planning process to help everybody get over those issues. Regent Crear said that with the shift taking place, it would be a good time to look at the business plan. Executive Vice Chancellor Klaich felt there should be more System support for President Maryanski as it relates to these programs. He thought President Maryanski did not feel comfortable going to the Board with potential problems. Regent Sisolak asked who made the decisions. Executive Vice Chancellor Klaich thought President Maryanski was pulled in many directions and reacted to pressure. Chief Counsel Patterson added that President Maryanski is probably one of the best team players in the System. Regent Sisolak said he has to learn to say “no” when it is in the best interest of NSC. In fairness to the Board, the whole story was not presented. Regent Sisolak did not feel that Dr. Jane Nichols, Vice Chancellor, Student and Academic Affairs, was aware of what these programs did to NSC. Executive Vice Chancellor Klaich will do some research for the answer to the bachelors program.

Regent Crear believed that, overall, President Maryanski seemed to know what is happening. He felt a unified vision should be explored, examined and flushed out so everyone is onboard. Regent Sisolak felt the development of the campus, the marketing program and the recruiters have to be addressed.

Executive Vice Chancellor Klaich pointed out that the question of the vision was asked to most interviewees, with the answers being divided. He thought it was tied to the marketing point. Chair Dobbins asked if the System had assistance for the marketing program. Executive Vice Chancellor Klaich said each campus does their own. He felt the grand opening of the new building might be the next phase of a marketing plan for NSC. Regent Sisolak suggested that the city of Henderson might become involved with a marketing project. Regent Sisolak would like to have President Maryanski’s office located at the Dawson campus for exposure to the students. He also thought it was a huge disservice to call a five year old College new, with 2,000 students. Regent Alden expressed discontent with the comment that upper administration said the College would be closed in one and one-half to two years.



Chair Dobbins was impressed with the Faculty Senate, the town hall meetings and the way the budget cuts were handled. Executive Vice Chancellor Klaich thought the Faculty Senate felt that President Maryanski cared. Mr. Neel reentered the meeting. Regent Alden asked if there was input from the executive group regarding the budget reductions. Mr. Neel said it was centralized to him, President Maryanski and the Provost, who had some consultation with the deans. Regent Alden inquired about the decision of not raising student fees. Mr. Neel replied that going into this fiscal year there were issues with enrollment, so steps were taken early on. When the budget cuts came, some safety measures were already in place. Regent Alden requested an explanation of curtailing the marketing program. Mr. Neel explained the group felt that some marketing can be done in spurts and therefore it might be easier to raise one-time money to address those needs, rather than using on-going money. Regent Sisolak asked if any of this has been done. Mr. Neel said something is planned for the summer of 2008. Regent Sisolak asked about recruiting. Mr. Neel said the full complement of three recruiters is part of marketing. He felt confident that when the student affairs position is filled there will be a real change with student enrollment. A strong, long range plan for recruiting has yet to be established. Regent Sisolak asked if he felt NSC was a new institution. Mr. Neel said NSC is not new, but it is the youngest. There has got to be a better job of getting the NSC name out there. He felt there were some internal infrastructure matters to resolve. Regent Sisolak asked about the location of the president’s office in the new building. Mr. Neel said the building was reduced to 42,500 square feet from 100,000 square feet. When it opens it will be over capacity. The next building that could open in the fall of 2011 may be the location of the President’s office. Regent Sisolak asked if there was a clear articulation between NSC and the city. Mr. Neel said there have been representative groups from both areas. NSC is in the process of hiring a master planning group. Regent Sisolak asked if Mr. Madison received open communication concerning the planning. Mr. Neel reported that there have been breakdowns. He and Mr. Madison meet weekly, but pertinent information is not always available. Ms. Brown asked on what side the breakdowns were. Mr. Neel said some meetings took place outside the institution where everyone was not involved and information was not passed on. Regent Crear asked about the role President Maryanski should play in the development of the campus construction and dealing with the city. Mr. Neel replied that the President sets the overall tone and vision. There are other individuals who are capable



of working out the details to bring to the President for his final approval. Mr. Neel viewed the President’s role as working with the mayor and the city council. Regent Crear asked if President Maryanski clearly set the tone for those achievements. Mr. Neel stated that it has gone back and forth. It is on the way, but not there yet. Regent Crear asked if President Maryanski has the capability to create the tunnel towards that direction. Mr. Neel commented that to provide that vision requires convincing communication and information. NSC has fallen short. We can all do a better job. Chair Dobbins asked how it could be corrected. Mr. Neel would like to see another level of regular meetings take place, in terms of decision making and sharing pertinent information. The Executive Council also needs to go back and share with their groups. A better job could always be done at the highest level. Chair Dobbins asked if he could approach President Maryanski. Mr. Neel replied that he could go to him for anything, but there is not always a resolution. Mr. Neel said there are times that decisions are needed. Chair Dobbins requested an example. Mr. Neel said going into the budget year he made recommendations about reallocations. Mr. Neel said that, in his opinion, some resources were not being utilized in the best way possible. This went on for some time, right up to the budget cuts. It was then that they got answered. Executive Vice Chancellor Klaich stressed the importance of Mr. Neel having a clear budget plan for NSC. Regent Sisolak asked where the money came from for the School of Fine Arts. Mr. Neel said the budget was put together and ready to go. The School of Fine Arts’ decision was made at the last minute. Some operating budgets and the reserve accounts were adjusted. Regent Sisolak asked who made that decision knowing the budget constraints. Mr. Neel said President Maryanski made the decision himself. Regent Sisolak asked if there was any discussion. Mr. Neel reported that it was discussed and suggested it was inappropriate to President Maryanski. Regent Sisolak asked about the masters and bachelors programs. Mr. Neel reported that they were in place and seemed to become part of the general allocation process. It was carved out of the amount from the state. They just became a priority. Chair Dobbins asked about the RFP being changed to an RFQ. Mr. Neel said the purchasing function is handled by UNLV and they recommended going to an RFQ for flexibility. It has been slow. The downside of the RFQ is it does not include the financial component. It is on track and will be completed eight months after the firm is hired. The firm will help develop a financial plan. The other component is the 500 acres. The best judgment is that it would take 300 acres for the campus of 20,000 students. There are various other opportunities for the remaining 200 acres. The company chosen will help prioritize everything. The Committee thanked Mr. Neel for his comments.



Mr. Randy Garcia, CEO, Investment Counsel of Nevada, joined the meeting by teleconference. He reported that he is on the NSC Foundation and meets with President Maryanski regularly. He works with a number of institutions and the Clark County School District.

Mr. Garcia felt President Maryanski was a no-nonsense man, a doer, who is focused on, and understands, the issues. He does not over-commit or over-promise. Mr. Garcia has no negatives concerning President Maryanski. Regent Sisolak asked about President Maryanski’s interaction with the Foundation. Mr. Garcia reported it is a consistent, positive, cooperative relationship. Chair Dobbins inquired about President Maryanski engaging the board at meetings and outside Foundation meetings. Mr. Garcia stated President Maryanski does it in a low key way and he makes his needs known. Regent Sisolak asked if he was too low key. Mr. Garcia did not feel it was necessary to be dynamic to get the job done. Chair Dobbins thanked Mr. Garcia for his participation.

Mr. Bruce Spotleson, Publisher, Greenspun Media Group, explained that his opinion of President Maryanski is qualified because he does not know him well. In the world of academia a balance is required. He thought that President Maryanski probably had that stability to be out as an ambassador representing the College.

Regent Sisolak asked if NSC has been marketed correctly. Mr. Spotleson said NSC does not have a large budget for marketing. It is difficult to get more students without a marketing campaign.

The meeting recessed at 2:03 p.m. and reconvened at 2:10 p.m. with all members present.

Ms. Annie Macias, Nevada State Student Alliance Business Manager, has been with NSC since 2007. She has a strong background in Student Affairs and Financial Aid. Mr. Neel asked her to take on another role as Special Assistant to the Vice President of Finance. Ms. Macias said President Maryanski is very good at giving everyone exposure to the growth of the campus. She stated that President Maryanski makes an effort to reach out to students and work with them. He is very visible with staff and faculty. Ms. Macias assisted in writing of the RFP for the Master Planning Committee. What had to be done was not clear. They met for seven or eight months to develop the RFP without any guidance. It was a frustrating process. She sat with the city and the executive team from NSC. The city came to the meetings with an agenda and was strong at the table. NSC was not prepared. It is difficult to understand where NSC is going. She felt that President Maryanski should be taking the lead. Regent Crear asked



if there was anyone else who could take leadership of the Master Plan. Ms. Macias thought it could be delegated to either Mr. Neel, the Provost or Mr. Madison. Chair Dobbins asked if there was a circumstance with a student where an issue was not resolved. Ms. Macias reported there were gay, lesbian and bisexual students who wanted to have an event. They were told that it was not in the budget. They were frustrated. Ms. Macias went to the Individuals for Partnership and the answer was the same. When she explained the situation to President Maryanski he nodded his head. Chair Dobbins asked what he should have done. Ms. Macias thought President Maryanski might have sat everyone down for a discussion. Ms. Brown felt it should have been taken to the Multicultural Department for resolution. Chair Dobbins thanked Ms. Macias for her input. Nevada State Student Alliance and NSC students joined the meeting and introduced themselves: Ms. Carrie Bass, Ms. Ashley Brown, Mr. Ryan Crowell, Mr. Zhiai Feng, Ms. Tori Glass, Mr. Kavon Jones, Ms. Krystal Martinez, Mr. Cameron Robinson and Ms. Velanie Williams. Mr. Crowell reported that he is Student Body President and attends the executive staff meetings. There are agendized items for students’ issues which can be taken directly to the President. He sees President Maryanski around Dawson once a week intermingling with students.

President Maryanski works well with the student government and is presently brainstorming themes for an Earth Day project. Mr. Crowell added that President Maryanski made a point to explain the budget cuts. Chair Dobbins asked if any issue was difficult to resolve with President Maryanski. Mr. Crowell said he had no problem with the President. He is reserved and not forceful, but he carries a big stick if a mistake is made. Regent Crear asked if the students know who President Maryanski is. Ms. Glass said some are not sure, but they have heard his name. One student wanted to speak with President Maryanski and he was very receptive. Other students say he is very responsive. Mr. Jones said he attends various events. Ms. Martinez said he has been receptive, helpful, and comes to meetings. Ms. Williams has talked to President Maryanski on many occasions. He takes a personal interest in the students. He read her article in the school newspaper. Mr. Feng said President Maryanski knows his name and speaks to him. Ms. Bass said President Maryanski always speaks to her and remembers her name. Regent Sisolak asked if there were more Henderson or Clark County students attending NSC. Ms. Ashley Brown said they are from both areas.



Chair Dobbins asked the students why they chose to attend NSC. Mr. Crowell said he relocated because there was a job offer, and the low cost of tuition. Ms. Ashley Brown said NSC was very close to home. She did not want to be on a large campus. Mr. Feng replied it was the tuition and NSC offered the degree he was seeking. Regent Sisolak asked how NSC recruited at high schools. Ms. Ashley Brown said they did well because they convinced her to go to NSC rather than to UNLV. Mr. Jones said he was recruited from high school and the recruiter helped him find a job. Regent Sisolak asked if there were areas where President Maryanski could improve. Mr. Robinson said the College is stretched thin. He did not think any other areas should be added. Current programs should be built up. Mr. Crowell would like more full-time professors in the History Department so he can take History Honors Society to become nationally accredited. More teachers will be needed for the new building. Regent Sisolak asked if anyone would be interested in doing some recruitment in the high schools. Mr. Jones said he would be interested. Ms. Ashley Brown said there were scheduling conflicts and there was a lack of interest from student ambassadors.

Regent Crear asked about the perception of NSC. Ms. Bass said there is confusion. Some people think NSC has a Cheyenne campus. Chair Dobbins thanked everyone for their participation.

Senator Dina Titus said she has seen President Maryanski on several different levels; as a representative of higher education lobbying the legislature and at the Finance Committee. Henderson is a large part of her district so there was particular interest in the College. Dr. Rho Hudson, her sister, teaches at NSC and was on the search committee that hired President Maryanski. Senator Titus continued that President Maryanski has been an effective advocate with the legislature. He has grown the campus physically, with quality programs and hiring. Progress was made with limited resources in a short amount of time. Work has been done towards accreditation. The outreach and vision of the campus, for what it is and who it serves, is effective. Regent Sisolak asked how President Maryanski did at the legislature. Senator Titus reported that it was difficult to determine because the System Office clamps down on the local presidents and holds them back a bit. Certainly, when President Maryanski did testify and speak with people one-on-one, he did a fine job. He has a quiet manner but that can be welcomed at the legislature. Regent Crear asked if President Maryanski has done a good job positioning the College from its original mission in relation to the other campuses. Senator Titus replied that it was a challenge. For a while NSC did not want the competition in Education and



Nursing. The community college has had tremendous growth and needs as many resources as possible. Set in that climate, President Maryanski did an effective job. NSC is starting to create that needed middle tier, which has allowed the university to focus more on research and graduate education. NSC is making the argument that it produces nurses and teachers, which are critically needed in the community. Senator Titus felt President Maryanski’s relationships with the community are good, especially with the city of Henderson. Most people in the valley see this as a Henderson enterprise so maybe he should associate with the elite of Henderson. Regent Sisolak asked if the College should begin veering away from being just a Henderson college. Senator Titus explained that it started out that way for political reasons, not educational reasons. Promises were not delivered. She felt the greatest hindrance is being located on the other side of Henderson and, until growth happens, that will be a problem. Senator Titus recommended emphasis on distance learning and teaching classes at high schools around the valley. The more outreach, the less it will be seen as just a Henderson College. Regent Sisolak asked how President Maryanski would rate among other presidents. Senator Titus responded that he was in the top half and maybe higher. Some of the other presidents have advantages that he does not possess.

Regent Alden asked if President Maryanski has any weaknesses. Senator Titus felt he was increasing his outreach with tours of the new building. He demonstrated what can be accomplished when funds are cut back. Regent Sisolak asked if the Foundation was viewed as belonging to Henderson. Senator Titus believed that is how it is perceived. Regent Crear asked if President Maryanski has been indecisive or non-responsive. Senator Titus does not underestimate someone low key. He was effective for getting the planning money for the new nursing building. Chair Dobbins asked if he was the primary person who worked on that. Executive Vice Chancellor Klaich reported that President Maryanski was the primary person. His building came in slightly under budget and rather than just sitting on it, he went back to the powers that be and requested using the money for Phase II.

1. Information Only-Discussion of the Evaluation Committee Process – (continued)

Regent Sisolak asked if it was necessary to take action on Agenda Item #1. Chief Counsel Patterson clarified that some items are denoted action in case it is required, but it is not necessary to take action on Agenda Item #1.



Chair Dobbins reported that there was a letter from Dr. Rho Hudson, Assessment and Evaluation Coordinator, NSC (on file in the Board office). Chief Counsel Patterson added that there was another letter from the Latin Chamber of Commerce which was particularly complimentary to President Maryanski concerning diversity (on file in the Board office).

4. Information Only-Preparation of Committee Report – The Committee discussed its findings and the proposed contents of the evaluation report. The Committee discussed and recommended that the Chair’s report include providing constructive feedback so that the President may know how colleagues, Regents and key leaders in the community view his efforts, including areas of strength as well as areas that may be improved upon.

Regent Sisolak commented that the students who attended the meeting were from student government and employees of the College; not necessarily the common student. Chair Dobbins recalled the student’s comments that President Maryanski interacted with them. Regent Sisolak felt that President Maryanski cared about students but thought he did not understand his impact on them. He would like more students to have an opportunity to meet him. Executive Vice Chancellor Klaich felt that if this raises a theme and if it is a growth experience, this may be the juncture to revisit time management and allocation as the institution grows. He recommended less management by walking around and more exposure to other areas. Chair Dobbins said the College has moved and the organizational structure and climate has to change to be more like a college. There is a great opportunity to open the new building and refocus the resources to what this College is envisioned to be. President Maryanski has organizational and communication flaws, but he has established stability for the College and he will move it forward. Regent Crear said there are some constructive areas to work on to enhance the overall goals of the College. The goal has to be established through the vision, which President Maryanski should create with his team. Chair Dobbins felt he has to empower his team. He said that with the different aspects, the College has come a long way, but now has to go to the next level. He recommended someone from the outside coming in to do the strategic plan. He felt the opening of a new building is of major importance. Regent Sisolak observed that the Foundation has to be expanded beyond Henderson. Las Vegas has to get involved. Ms. Brown said separating from Henderson will be difficult. Regent Sisolak said financial support from the Las Vegas Boulevard is needed for the NSC Foundation. Ms. Brown explained that the hotels do not see Education and Nursing as a benefit to them.


Periodic Presidential Evaluation Committee Minutes 02/28-29/2008 4. Information Only-Preparation of Committee Report – (continued)

Regent Crear stated that overall, President Maryanski’s philosophy and management style may not be everything, but there should be more empowerment and holding others more accountable. He needs to be more decisive and respond to people. President Maryanski’s expertise may not be in construction management, but it is a huge area that cannot have any mistakes.

Regents Alden and Crear left the meeting. 5. Public Comment (Agenda Item #6) – Dr. Scinta was unsure about the evaluation

process and compared it to his own evaluation as a teacher. He wondered, with the low turnout on Thursday, February 28, 2008, if there were legal reasons for doing the Open Forum the way it was done. Regent Sisolak reported that most of it is dictated by statute. Executive Vice Chancellor Klaich said there were short-comings and there are ways to improve it. The real goal is to make it better within the Open Meetings Law.

Regent Sisolak said people had comments and were very open. He appreciated that. Dr. Scinta said one of his personal surprises is how impressed he is with the faculty at NSC. Chair Dobbins was amazed that the Faculty Senate is talking about promotions and tenure. Putting that together is a big deal. Dr. Scinta thanked the Committee for their time.

4. Information Only-Preparation of Committee Report – (continued) Chair Dobbins said it takes a sustained effort to do the marketing and bring people in

from outside of Henderson. Regent Sisolak wondered if people from Las Vegas were invited to the Fifth Anniversary dinner, including county dignitaries. Executive Vice

Chancellor Klaich said it seemed that the students are the marketing campaign. He felt it important to focus and find the reason they chose NSC. Regent Sisolak said they could be student ambassadors to go into the high schools.

Ms. Brown said when Mr. Neel spoke about the budget issue it seemed apparent that

structure is needed, and the administrators should be included. The Provost had apprehension about being bypassed. Ms. Brown continued that President Maryanski should not go directly to the deans absent their leader; the Provost. She felt that walking around needed to be curtailed somewhat with a refocus of energy towards the students.

Regent Alden returned to the meeting.

Ms. Brown thought there had to be some mending between Mr. Madison and President Maryanski. She felt the city will pick up on bad relations. Chief Counsel Patterson observed that it does not sound as if the NSC team is on the same page before going into the meeting. Ms. Brown stated that no one should be blind sided. Regent Sisolak suggested that perhaps Mr. Hank Stone, System Counsel, might get involved.


Periodic Presidential Evaluation Committee Minutes 02/28-29/2008 4. Information Only-Preparation of Committee Report – (continued)

Regent Alden thought that President Maryanski should restructure to communicate effectively with the administrative cabinet, repair relationships with people below the executive board level, be strongly affiliated with the Foundation and be prepared for the meetings between NSC and the city of Henderson. Regent Alden felt his relationship with the students was good.

6. Information Only-Final Meeting with President Fred Maryanski (Agenda Item #5) – The Committee met with President Maryanski and discussed the preliminary results of the evaluation.

Chair Dobbins explained to President Maryanski that he would like to summarize the Committee results. He will speak about the positives and highlight the suggestions. Chair Dobbins reported that overall, the Committee felt the input was good. The belief is that this is the prototype for what needs to happen in the state of Nevada. He continued that a positive is where the College was, where it is and where it is going. Chair Dobbins reported that the people from the city and the legislature are pleased that he is involved in the community, is moving the College forward and appreciate his labors for the planning of the nursing building. Everybody mentioned his walking around and talking to people. People felt he was approachable and cares about students, faculty and staff. Reading one of the student’s articles in the newspaper and discussing it with her made a lasting impression. There is merit for working with the endowments, the Urban League, and the Latin Chamber and for securing matching scholarship money. Chair Dobbins continued that everyone felt the Foundation was very important to move the College to the next level. The Committee looked at the external relationships, which can be improved by more involvement in the Las Vegas area. He is an excellent team member and the System feels he is the easiest President to work with. Chair Dobbins reported that there are items the Committee felt President Maryanski should change in order to move the College forward. Making decisions to please everyone is impossible. One of the critical issues is the structure of the administration. When it was small it was important to go around and motivate people, but with stronger vice presidents it may be time to consider the communication system within and empower and delegate others to do more. The numbers will be higher when the building opens. The Committee recommended going back to the smaller cabinet meetings that will strengthen the executive staff, the vice presidents and the Provost. The Provost is strong and knows what needs to be done. Chair Dobbins stated that it is important to solidify that everyone knows they have input in the budget process. They need to recognize how and why it is done. Chair Dobbins complimented the steps taken for the budget cuts. People felt like they were heard and understood. He felt there was a great relationship with the Faculty Senate.


Periodic Presidential Evaluation Committee Minutes 02/28-29/2008 6. Information Only-Final Meeting with President Fred Maryanski (Agenda Item #5) –

(continued) Chair Dobbins explained that everyone seemed to know that Nursing and Teaching was the reason they were at NSC. There have been occurrences, like the bachelors, masters, and the School of Fine Arts, that are derisive issues on the campus. Those areas were discussed almost 60% of the time. The System Office assumed some of the responsibility. The campus needs to get over this poison and move forward. The belief is that there should be a strategic planning process from outside sources to refocus NSC on a three-to-five year plan. People will realize they have a voice, know the mission, and with the budget process, link into the strategic plan. They may not agree, but they will be more comfortable to move forward. Chair Dobbins stated there was concern about referring to NSC as a new college. It is five years old and it has a mission. It costs money, but an integrated marketing plan will help. Regent Sisolak added that there is an identity crisis. The college is not Henderson State College, it is Nevada State College. Chair Dobbins stated that when speaking about the Foundation, it is in its infancy. It is difficult to jump start. There is a belief that it should expand from Henderson into the entire valley. It has to go to the next level. Regent Sisolak suggested acquiring some second tier people on the Foundation. Chair Dobbins said an important issue is the development of the campus Master Plan. There were mixed messages on how it is going. The Committee would like to make sure of where the College wants to be and to either take the lead, or assign someone to take the lead. The city is forceful, and hopefully the RFQ will produce a master planner that will help. Chair Dobbins suggested a reallocation of time. Walking around is important, but there are other important things to do, like working with the Foundation. Regent Sisolak said President Maryanski impresses the students. He does not think President Maryanski totally grasps how popular he is with students and how he touches their lives. He would like President Maryanski to affect students more. It is a huge recruiting tool because they will repeat that story. He is concerned that there was a Student Ambassador Program which went by the wayside. The students made it clear to the Committee that the high school students would be more open to listening to them. Regent Sisolak asked if the Henderson city officials and mayor will be attending the Fifth Anniversary Event. President Maryanski said they will be attending. Regent Sisolak asked if Clark County had a table. President Maryanski did not believe they would be in attendance. Regent Sisolak said that many were omitted. Regent Alden said a major area of concern is marketing. Opening a new building is a major event. There is a sense of urgency with the Foundation, to reach out to all of southern Nevada and to expand the Foundation Board. In the long range planning with


Periodic Presidential Evaluation Committee Minutes 02/28-29/2008 6. Information Only-Final Meeting with President Fred Maryanski (Agenda Item #5) –

(continued) the city, there has been a breakdown in communication. Regent Sisolak said there was a mixed message with the development of the campus and the procedures with the city and that the city is in charge. It appears to be a communication issue. Chair Dobbins said some people believe that President Maryanski makes every decision on the campus and if there is not a decision, then the President is indecisive. By empowering the executive staff members, and sending people to the correct person like the Provost, it will stop that perception. Whether it is true or not, it is a perception that has to be dealt with. Ms. Brown said every manager struggles with empowerment. She pointed out that many spoke of President Maryanski’s calm demeanor. His hands-on approach will become difficult as the College grows. Regent Alden reported that an employee made a statement that a high level employee commented that the College would not be here in one and one-half to two years. Chair Dobbins requested President Maryanski’s input. President Maryanski thanked the Committee for their insightfulness. He was not surprised by the report and felt the analysis was correct. The School of Fine Arts was a mistake. He consulted with the deans, but it was a hasty mistake. The bachelors was not a mistake; it was not executed properly. It probably required more of his attention to detail. NSC can recover from this procedurally. President Maryanski felt that it was good to have ideas and goals. Work may be required to be sure that everyone understands what NSC is and what direction it is going. He agreed with having an external facilitator for the strategic plan. Concerning the Foundation, it can be improved and he will ask people for their help. President Maryanski felt the analysis was very good and there are some things to work on and room for improvement. He appreciated the hard work of the Committee. Chair Dobbins added that NSC has a great story to tell.

The meeting adjourned at 4:59 p.m. Prepared by: Nancy Stone Administrative Assistant IV Submitted for approval by: Scott G. Wasserman Chief Executive Officer of the Board of Regents


board of regents and its periodic presidential...

Documents