Blackjack Creek Mitigation Site Restoration and Management ... ?· Blackjack Creek Mitigation Site Restoration…

Download Blackjack Creek Mitigation Site Restoration and Management ... ?· Blackjack Creek Mitigation Site Restoration…

Post on 04-Aug-2018




0 download

Embed Size (px)


<ul><li><p>Blackjack Creek Mitigation Site </p><p>Restoration and Management Plan </p><p>Wildlands of Washington, Inc. </p><p>June 2006 </p><p>Note from the author: </p><p>This document was prepared for Wildlands of Washington, Inc., a mitigation banking </p><p>company based in western Washington State. </p><p>Preparation included: </p><p> Site research into the existing site conditions (soils, vegetation, topography); </p><p> Preparation of the proposed mitigation design; </p><p> Close communication with the client to properly capture project intent; </p><p> Several iterations of draft submittals and incorporation of revisions based on client </p><p>comments; </p><p> Preparation of supporting tables (figures and appendices provided by others); and </p><p> Finalization of document for submittal to state and federal agencies (e.g. U.S. </p><p>Army Corps of Engineers, WA Department of Ecology). </p><p>Because of this documents proprietary nature, the full table of contents is shown, but only </p><p>select sections are provided. </p><p>Janice Cessna </p></li><li><p>June 16, 2006 Blackjack Creek Mitigation Site </p><p>Wildlands of Washington, Inc. Restoration and Management Plan </p><p>1</p><p>Table of Contents </p><p>Executive Summary ...3 </p><p>Project Purpose4 </p><p>Mitigation Approach...4 </p><p>Mitigation Site Goals and Objectives...5 </p><p>Mitigation Site Description5 </p><p>Site Details .5 </p><p>Site Selection Rationale ...6 </p><p>Constraints of the Site ..5 </p><p>Existing/Baseline Conditions .6 </p><p>Site Plan and Design ...11 </p><p>Description .5 </p><p>Water Regime 6 </p><p>Grading Plans ...5 </p><p>Planting Plans ...6 </p><p>Wetland Functions Comparison.4 </p><p>Mitigation Acreages and Perimeter Buffer 5 </p><p>Performance Standards ..15 </p><p>Monitoring Plan ...18 </p><p>Monitoring Schedule...18 </p><p>Monitoring Methods20 </p><p>Maintenance, Monitoring and Contingency Plans ..21 </p><p>Financial Assurances and Site Protection..21 </p><p>References ..22 </p></li><li><p>June 16, 2006 Blackjack Creek Mitigation Site </p><p>Wildlands of Washington, Inc. Restoration and Management Plan </p><p>2</p><p>List of Tables Table 1 Proposed Mitigation Acreage without Perimeter Buffer XX </p><p>Table 2 Proposed Mitigation Acreage with Perimeter Buffer ....XX </p><p>Table 3 Monitoring Schedule for Blackjack Creek Mitigation Site .19 </p><p>List of Figures Figure 1 - Vicinity Map </p><p>Figure 2 - Site Overview Map </p><p>Figure 3 Zoning Map </p><p>Figure 4 - Wetland Delineation </p><p>Figure 5 - Groundwater Well Locations </p><p>Figure 6 - Natural Resource Conservation Service Soils </p><p>Figure 7 - FEMA Floodplains </p><p>List of Appendices Appendix A Existing Conditions map </p><p>Appendix B Cultural Resources Report by Landau Associates </p><p>Appendix C Phase I Environmental Site Assessment by Landau Associates </p><p>Appendix D Wetland Delineation Report by Landau Associates </p><p>Appendix E Blackjack Creek Mitigation Site groundwater data </p><p>Appendix F Grading Plan, Planting Plan, and Details sheets </p><p>Appendix G Wetland Rating Form: Blackjack Creek Mitigation Site After Implementation </p></li><li><p>June 16, 2006 Blackjack Creek Mitigation Site </p><p>Wildlands of Washington, Inc. Restoration and Management Plan </p><p>3</p><p>Water Regime The proposed Mitigation Site will experience the same flooding frequency and duration that </p><p>occurs now. Groundwater will remain the primary year-round water source with surface flow </p><p>from Blackjack Creek contributing a significant portion only in the winter season. Therefore, no </p><p>water rights are needed. No mass grading, culvert installation, or water control structures are </p><p>proposed in the project design. </p><p>As described earlier in the existing conditions, the dredged creek spoils currently serve as a </p><p>physical barrier to initial floodwaters within Blackjack Creek. By removing the spoils, the creek </p><p>will have an entirely open connection to its floodplain within the project site. Some spoils, </p><p>however, will be left in place as upland islands for greater habitat diversity. These will be </p><p>approximately twenty-five square feet (approx. 5 by 5) or less and scattered intermittently </p><p>along the creek length with approximately several hundred feet between each. </p><p>Removal of drain tiles and plugging of drainage ditches will restore the natural hydrologic cycle </p><p>within the site by discontinuing the current expedited drainage routes. The groundwater table </p><p>will likely rise closer to the ground surface, becoming more readily available throughout the year </p><p>and sustaining a saturated perennial wetland system. Existing herbaceous species dominated by </p><p>facultative grasses will transition to domination by obligate sedges and rushes. </p><p>Because no volume or flow analysis has been conducted on Blackjack Creek, a quantification of </p><p>the potential water table rise is not presented. However, the review of the existing conditions </p><p>within the southeast forested wetland as discussed earlier in the existing conditions section offers </p><p>a glimpse of the future habitat. In this area, saturation is at or within a few inches of the ground </p><p>surface year-round, as demonstrated in Landau Associates wetland delineation report. </p><p>Additionally, small pockets of water ponds in low spots during the winter months. </p><p>The groundwater monitoring wells will be kept in place and maintained during the </p><p>implementation of this Restoration and Management Plan, as well as through the duration of the </p><p>monitoring and maintenance periods. The wells will likely be preserved and occasionally </p><p>monitored for a time after final project acceptance by responsible agencies. </p><p>Grading Plans Proposed grading will be limited to the removal existing spoils along Blackjack Creek and </p><p>removal of the existing site access road east of the creek bridge. Both areas will supply fill </p><p>material for use on-site as ditch plugs and upland hummocks. This process involves </p><p>approximately 2000 cubic yards of material. Because the volume of available spoil material will </p><p>not be sufficient to facilitate filling of all on-site ditches, plugs will only be placed at key </p><p>intersections with Blackjack Creek, thereby blocking site drainage and impounding water within </p><p>the site interior. However, the southwest ditch and the long perimeter ditch running along the </p><p>south and east boundary, will remain intact since impacting their function would have significant </p><p>impacts to neighboring properties. In the future, should Wildlands succeed in acquiring the </p><p>adjacent parcels, these ditches will be abandoned. </p></li><li><p>June 16, 2006 Blackjack Creek Mitigation Site </p><p>Wildlands of Washington, Inc. Restoration and Management Plan </p><p>4</p><p>Remaining spoil material will be used to create hummocks of varying dimensions across the </p><p>rehabilitated wetland. Proposed locations and approximate dimensions are depicted on the </p><p>Grading Plan and Details (Appendix F). Also depicted is the removal of all culverts and concrete </p><p>slab bridges. The existing bridge crossing Blackjack Creek will remain for site access purposes. </p><p>All extracted items will be disposed of offsite. No major invasive vegetation removal is planned </p><p>during construction. Any incidental invasive species material removed during project </p><p>implementation will be removed from the site. </p><p>After the grading and demolition work is completed, removal of the drain tiles will occur. </p><p>Unfortunately, the tiles precise locations are not known. In order to find and successfully </p><p>remove these, a small dozer or similar machine with ripping tines will make passes parallel to </p><p>Blackjack Creek on both sides. No equipment or surface disturbance will occur within ten feet of </p><p>the top of bank. </p><p>Focusing the ripping area to this vicinity will limit large-scale disturbance to the site by limiting </p><p>the ripping to an area already disturbed by grading activities. While the tiles will remain across </p><p>the remaining Mitigation Site, their function will be halted through this localized disruption and </p><p>removal. Any tiles brought to the surface will be collected and disposed offsite. </p><p>Planting Plans Care will be taken during implementation of the grading plan elements to minimize existing </p><p>vegetation disturbance. There will be no or very limited impacts to existing scrub-shrub or </p><p>forested communities. However, disturbance to herbaceous vegetation will occur during the spoil </p><p>relocation described above. Any healthy wetland herbaceous species that can be reasonably </p><p>salvaged will be removed from the excavation area and either returned after grading is complete, </p><p>or transplanted to a similarly disturbed location elsewhere on site. </p><p>Aside from replacing salvaged material, Wildlands will also plant native species that are known </p><p>to occur in the area and are appropriate for the site. Herbaceous emergent wetland and grass </p><p>species will be installed for immediate post-construction erosion control and wetland habitat </p><p>while woody vegetation matures. Species include Slough sedge (Carex obnupta), Tufted </p><p>hairgrass (Deschampsia caespitosa), and Scirpus lacustris (Softstem bulrush). </p><p>As for woody species, the existing scrub-shrub and forested wetland communities on site and </p><p>within the surrounding landscape indicates a mosaic of similar vegetation would be appropriate. </p><p>Existing topography and groundwater have created wetter areas in the middle and north areas of </p><p>the site. These will be planted with a scrub-shrub community dominated by Sweet gale (Myrica </p><p>gale), Western bog laurel (Kalmia macrophylla), and Labrador tea (Ledum groenlandicum). </p><p>Other species include Willow (Salix spp.), Salal (Gaultheria shallon), False azalea (Menziesia </p><p>ferruginea), and Swamp rose (Rosa pisocarpa). Shrub species will be installed at a density of </p><p>500 stems per acre. </p><p>The drier areas, primarily to the south and southeast, will be vegetated with a Western redcedar </p><p>(Thuja plicata) and Western hemlock (Tsuga heterophylla) dominated community. It will be </p><p>planted at 500 stems per acre including 275 trees and 225 shrubs per acre. </p></li><li><p>June 16, 2006 Blackjack Creek Mitigation Site </p><p>Wildlands of Washington, Inc. Restoration and Management Plan </p><p>5</p><p>This community will also be planted on the hummocks scattered within the scrub-shrub area, </p><p>however, fewer shrub species will be included. The total density planted per acre will also be </p><p>500, but the amount of trees and shrubs will be 305 and 195 per acre, respectively. </p><p>Vegetation sources will vary depending upon vegetation type. Herbaceous emergent and grass </p><p>species will be installed using seed. Woody vegetation will be container stock, bare root, and/or </p><p>live stakes. Choice of plant material type and size will depend upon availability of plant material </p><p>at the time of implementation. However, plant sizes for the container stock will be restricted to a </p><p>combination of four-inch pots/tree tubes and one-gallon containers. Live stake installation will </p><p>be limited to willow and cottonwood species, with the majority installed along Blackjack Creeks </p><p>banks. </p><p>The Planting Plan with planting and seeding schedules can be reviewed in Appendix F. A </p><p>general use seed mix will be applied on all areas disturbed by grading at rate of 40 pounds/acre. </p><p>Harrowing or roughing of the seeding surface after installation will be done to limit predation by </p><p>fauna. At least some natural recruitment is expected from existing alder, cottonwood, and willow </p><p>species on the site. Volunteers have been accounted for in the Performance Standard section </p><p>below. No irrigation or soil amendments will be installed or utilized; during years of normal </p><p>precipitation, reliance on existing groundwater will be sufficient for vegetation establishment. </p><p>The perimeter buffer around the Mitigation Site boundary will receive the same rehabilitation </p><p>and enhancement actions as the interior mitigation area including vegetation with the same </p><p>species and densities. As-built plans documenting post-construction site conditions will be </p><p>submitted to the reviewing agency in January 2008. These plans will document grading, planting, </p><p>seeding, and any other implementation requirements per the approved Restoration and </p><p>Management Plan. </p><p>Wetland Functions Comparison As part of Landau Associates wetland delineation (Appendix D), a rating was completed on the </p><p>Mitigation Sites existing wetland complex. This included all forested, scrub-shrub, and </p><p>emergent components of the sites wetland. The Depressional and Flat Wetland section of the </p><p>Washington State Wetlands Rating System for Western Washington (Ecology 2004) was used to </p><p>quantify the wetland functions. Overall, it rated as a Category III with a total of 44 points. </p><p>Landau explains this score is influenced not only by intensive cattle grazing on and off-site, but </p><p>also by low vegetation structure and community interspersion. </p><p>Similarly, a wetland rating was completed on the proposed Mitigation Sites rehabilitated and </p><p>enhanced wetland complex at the end of its 5-year implementation and monitoring schedule as </p><p>outlined in later sections. This assumes that the entire site will be constructed as a whole, which </p><p>may or may not occur depending on mitigation needs within the Blackjack Creek area. </p><p>The same Depressional and Flat Wetland rating section was utilized, although the HGM Class is </p><p>slightly different. With the restored floodplain connectivity and hydrologic processes from the </p><p>proposed removal of existing creek side spoils, HGM becomes a Depressional with Riverine </p></li><li><p>June 16, 2006 Blackjack Creek Mitigation Site </p><p>Wildlands of Washington, Inc. Restoration and Management Plan </p><p>6</p><p>versus the original simple Depressional class. Regardless of the slight change, the Mitigation Site </p><p>was rated as whole wetland complex using the Depressional and Flat Wetland section. A copy of </p><p>the wetland rating worksheets can be found in Appendix G. The proposed complex rated as a </p><p>Category II with a total of 69 points. </p><p>Monitoring Plan Monitoring Schedule A combination of formal and informal monitoring of the proposed compensation site will occur </p><p>through the fifth year following construction (Year 5) of each individual compensatory </p><p>mitigation area. Informal monitoring will occur periodically to document changes in the site </p><p>over time and to provide information to the natural resource entity responsible for long-term site </p><p>management. Formal monitoring will occur in Years 1 and 3 while informal monitoring may </p><p>occur periodically every year. Informal monitoring will occur in addition to formal monitoring </p><p>in some years. More frequent informal monitoring may be warranted because of specific site </p><p>conditions or site-specific goals. For example, greater frequency may be necessary to track the </p><p>re-colonization of invasive weeds or report results from management treatments that are needed. </p><p>The site will be monitored according to the schedule listed in Table 3. </p><p> Table 1. Monitoring Schedule for Individual Mitigation Cells (authors note abbreviated for client confidentiality) </p><p>Objective Measurement Year(s) When </p><p>Measured </p><p>1A. Grading and Hydroperiod </p><p>1 -4 . As-built topographic survey...</p></li></ul>


View more >