bishop hall jubilee school school report (2015/2016)6. equip students with the nine generic skills...
TRANSCRIPT
Bishop Hall Jubilee School
School Report
(2015/2016)
1
School Vision & Mission
Our Vision Running in the tradition of Christian education, our school aims at the holistic development of a
whole person, who is caring, self-confident, loving, embracing all that is good, true and beautiful. All
students will graduate as healthy individuals, both in mind and body. As our school motto goes “I
was not born to myself alone”, all Jubileans will be nurtured to love and serve the community.
Our Mission Bishop Hall Jubilee School was built to commemorate the Silver Jubilee of the consecration of the Rt.
Rev. Ronald Owen Hall as the (Anglican) Bishop of the Diocese of Hong Kong, Macao and South
China.
The mission of the school is to make available to boys and girls a sound secondary education
conducted on Christian principles as professed by Sheng Kung Hui.
We strive to exhort our students to emulate Bishop Hall, a great and godly man who dedicated his
whole life to serving the people of Hong Kong and China, in the spirit of his family motto – Non
nascor mihi solum (I was not born to myself alone), which is adopted as the school motto.
School Goals Our school values each student as a unique creation of God and is endowed with God’s gift. We aim
at creating a caring and positive learning environment so as to achieve the following school goals:
1. Incorporate Christian values and cultivate student’s moral and ethical consciousness to foster
students’ positive personal development.
2. Promote a culture of active service for others as a reflection of learning about the Christian faith
and school motto.
3. Nurture students in the spirit of the school’s core values of trustworthiness, perseverance, love,
self-motivation and self-discipline so as to help them become servant leaders.
4. Help students develop a global vision, appreciate the diversity of societies and cultures, and have
a better understanding of our community and the world.
5. Create a language rich environment to help students communicate effectively in both Chinese
and English.
6. Equip students with the nine generic skills (collaborative, communicative, creative, and critical
thinking skills, information technology skills, numeracy, problem solving skills,
self-management skills, study skills) to help them learn to become proactive and independent
learners who are able to work effectively in an increasingly interdependent and fast changing
world.
2
7. Encourage students to learn outside the classroom to broaden their horizons.
8. Provide opportunities for students to explore and stretch their potentials in both academic and
non-academic developments.
9. Appreciate the beauty and qualities of aesthetic expressions of different forms.
10. Understand the need for good physical and mental health in order to lead a healthy and balanced
life.
Our School
The school was founded in 1961. It is an EMI school with 30 classes. There are 30 classrooms,
5 laboratories, 2 computer rooms, a language room, a library, 4 other special rooms, a chapel, a roof
garden, an indoor activity hall, a playground and a school hall for students.
1. School Management Composition of the Incorporated Management Committee (IMC):
Members Sponsoring
Body
Principal Parent Teacher Alumni Independent
Number 7 1 2 2 1 1
2. Number of Days in a School Year with Regular Classes: 146
3. Number of Days with Learning Activities: 47
4. Lesson Time for the 8 Key Learning Areas 4.1 Percentage of Lesson Time for each KLA (F.1-F.3)
Key Learning Areas 13/14 14/15 15/16
Chinese Language Education 20.7 20.7 20.7
English Language Education 20.1 20.1 20.1
Mathematics Education 14.9 14.9 14.9
Personal, Social & Humanities Education 18.7 18.7 18.7
Science Education 12.9 12.9 12.9
Technology Education 2.3 2.3 2.3
Arts Education 6.3 6.3 6.3
Physical Education 4.0 4.0 4.0
3
4.2 Curriculum (2015 – 2016)
KLAs Subjects Subjects Offered in Different Forms (2015-16)
F.1 F.2 F.3 F.4 F.5 F.6
Chinese Language
Education
Chinese Language
Putonghua × × × ×
Chinese Literature × × × × ×
English Language
Education
English Language
English Literature × × ×
Mathematics Education
Mathematics
Mathematics Extended
Modules × × ×
Personal, Social &
Humanities Education
Business, Accounting &
Financial Studies
(BAFS)
× × ×
Chinese History
Economics × × ×
Geography
History
Liberal Studies
Religious Studies × × ×
Ethics × × ×
Tourism & Hospitality
Studies (THS) × × ×
Science Education
Integrated Science (I.S.) × × × ×
Biology × ×
Chemistry × ×
Physics × ×
Technology Education
Computer Literacy × × ×
Information &
Communication
Technology (ICT)
× × ×
Arts Education Visual Arts (V.A.)
Music × × ×
Physical Education Physical Education
(P.E.)
5. Class Organization
Level F1 F2 F3 F4 F5 F6 Total
No. of Classes 5 5 5 5 5 5 30
Boy 89 80 72 68 76 70 455
Girl 63 70 65 75 71 74 418
Total Enrolment 152 150 137 143 147 144 873
Percentage of S4 places filled by own S3 students: 100%
4
6. Our Teachers 6.1 Staff Establishment: 57.5 (including the Principal)
6.2 Teachers’ Professional Development
The average number of training hours undertaken by teacher: 41 hours
6.3 Principal’s Continuing Professional Development (CPD): 232 hours
6.4 Teachers’ Qualification
Percentage
PhD degree 3
Master’s degree 52
Bachelor’s degree 44
Tertiary non-degree 1
6.5 Teachers’ Experiences
Percentage
0-4 years 16
5-9 years 9
10-14 years 19
15 years or above 56
7. Review of Major Concerns (Achievements and Reflection)
Major Concern 1: Review and fine-tune the junior and senior curricula
7.1 Departments / Committees can make effective use of data in evaluating the objectives and
effectiveness of curricula and programs to improve student learning
7.1.1 Almost all subject departments and functional committees have made good use of the data
provided in evaluating the objectives and effectiveness of curricula and programs to improve
student learning. Regular sharing sessions were conducted by department and committee heads to
help improve their plans and implementation of programs. As revealed in the 4-point scale
school-based survey, the mean score is 2.8, which supports the fact that subject panels agreed that
they have internalized the use of PIE in curriculum evaluation and program implementation.
Mathematics Department made the best use of data for improving the assessment for learning.
Item analysis was conducted after each examination in order to understand the strengths and
weaknesses of student performances in different topics so that teachers could do follow-up
measures by re-teaching the topics in after-school classes and re-setting similar questions in the
next examination. Progress in student learning was positive. The successful attempts at some
departments will be further promoted to other departments so as to further promote assessment
for learning.
7.1.2 The core subjects made the best deliberate efforts at fine-tuning school-based curricula and to
implement them at the classroom level. The LS department had a comprehensive vertical
curriculum analysis by reviewing the necessary skills to be learnt by students in different forms.
5
The Chinese and English departments further fine-tuned their curricula of different papers in
order to cater for the self-directed teaching and learning strategies adopted since this academic
year. Feedback on student learning at the classroom level through peer lesson observation was
positive.
7.2 Students can apply higher order thinking skills in their studies and daily life
7.2.1 One of the strategies adopted by the school to enhance the higher order thinking skills is to do
it through the Self-directed Reading Scheme (SDRS) across subjects. The Chinese and English
departments set guided reading curriculum across different forms in order to promote
inferencing, comparison and critical thinking skills. Cross-curricular reading has been
promoted in school for years. Non-language subjects incorporate reading tasks into the
curriculum. For example, the Physics Department would suggest some related reading
materials to students before students conduct a mini project in order to promote reading across
the curriculum and apply the generic skills learnt to their daily life.
7.2.2 Most of the departments have emphasized higher order thinking skills and current issues in
their teaching and examinations. For some departments like LS, a holistic review has been
made to teach higher order thinking skills in a more systematic way. In junior forms, skills like
data studies, analyzing reasons from the views of different stakeholders, value judgment and
cause-and-effect relationship were taught. In senior forms, data description, cartoon
interpretation, comparison, conflicts among different stakeholders, giving suggestions and
evaluation skills were incorporated in teaching and examination papers. Yet, the extent of
incorporating higher order thinking skills in their studies and daily life varied in different
departments.
Major Concern 2: Cater for students’ diverse learning needs
7.3 Student learning motivation and classroom engagement can be enhanced
7.3.1 After some years of attempts made to develop school-based pre-lesson and reflective/
consolidation learning skills, the school has made good initiative in the four core subjects,
Chinese Language, English Language, Mathematics and Liberal Studies, to introduce the
pedagogy of self-directed learning in S1 this year. Student training of how to lead group
discussions was provided. Teacher sharing and lesson observations were arranged to enhance
staff development. Both teachers and students, as evidenced by the school-based survey,
appreciated the initiative. Student participation at the classroom level has been improved.
7.3.2 Teacher sharing sessions were deliberately arranged at staff meetings to enhance staff sharing
and staff development, particularly in relation to the school major concern and school
development. Useful tips were given on how to build up class ethos, implement self-directed
learning and flipped classrooms, as well as applying apps in classroom teaching. An additional
staff-training workshop was organized at a hall assembly to demonstrate how to lead students in
6
group discussions in order to enhance teachers’ capacity in implementing self-directed learning.
Teachers also took opportunities to attend self-directed open lessons offered by other schools.
After attending the open lessons, teachers came back and took their initiatives to try new
pedagogy in their own classrooms, and in turn, shared their experiences at staff meetings. All
these were positive steps taken by teachers to further enhance student learning motivation.
7.4 Differentiated teaching in after-school classes can be effectively implemented to address
students’ learning needs
7.4.1 One of the strategies to cater for students’ diverse learning needs is to support them by offering
after-school classes, with refined structured curriculum. The school has deployed both human
and financial resources for the core subjects, either by reduced teaching and non-teaching loads
of teachers of these subjects, or by deploying human and financial resources so that these
subjects could outsource more training from professional service providers or experienced
ex-teachers so that our teachers could be released of time to teach and fine-tune after-school
classes and curriculum by themselves to help run after-school classes. Positive feedback by
students has been received as shown in the school-based survey.
7.4.2 More than 90% of teachers agreed that the teaching contents of after-school classes have been
improved and they are useful to help student learn. However, the enhancement classes provided
by the Chinese Language Department need further follow-up and refinement.
7.5 A variety of experiences can be provided to enrich students’ life experiences
7.5.1 Integrating off-campus subject-related activities in the teaching curriculum have been
internalized in most subjects after some years’ efforts. Apart from the form-based co-curricular
activities in S1 PSHE-based Co-curricular learning days, S2 Science Investigation Project and S3
Chinese and English Life Writing Project, other academic departments also further organized
increasing co-curricular activities and joined inter-school competitions to enrich students’ life
experiences. A variety of subject-related activities ranging from alumni sharing their life
experiences in jobs or studies to excursions and inter-school competitions continued to be offered
by more departments, such as the Inter-school Basic Law Competition by Liberal Studies
Department, or hotel visits by the Tourism and Hospitality Studies Department, etc.
7.5.2 The Gifted Education Team has tried to make good use of the Talent Pool developed two years
ago to nominate pull-out programs with enriched / accelerated curricula for students with high
ability. In the last academic year, 4 teams of students from both junior and senior forms were
trained on a regular basis for the Hong Kong Student Science Project Competition. The training,
which included discussion and experiment, is done almost every day after school. The experience
aroused students’ interest in inter-school competitions as revealed in their initiative to take part in
the inter-school competition again this year. Two of our F.4 students have joined HKUST Dual
Program (Life Science – Level 1) last year. This is an accelerated program of HKDSE Biology.
7
They both obtained a certificate of Merit and are eligible for the Level 2 course, which is of Year
1 University level. Last year our school nominated 13 students from F.2 to F.5 to HKAGE.
Twelve of them were accepted as a member. Another student, Chan Wing Tung of F.5E, has
demonstrated outstanding performance in the HKAGE course (Glimpses of Modern
Biotechnology). She is also eligible for the membership of the HKAGE.
Major Concern 3: Raise the moral and ethical standard of students and nurture good habits
7.6 Systematic and holistic life planning education can be designed and implemented to promote
students’ career and life development so that students can acquire knowledge, attitudes and
values in self-understanding and aspiration planning in further studies and work
7.6.1 Life planning is a process of fostering students’ self-understanding and reflective habits of
mind in order to equip students with the knowledge, skills and attitudes in accordance with the
interests, abilities and aspiration planning in further studies and work of students. The school has
made deliberate attempts to design and implement systematic and holistic life planning education
last year. The Student Support Coordination Committee identified and coordinated different
moral and ethical needs programs for S1 to S6 students during the pre-term staff meeting and
these programs were implemented by different committees in class teacher periods and
assemblies throughout the year with centralized coordination and under certain themes. For
example, class teacher periods, coordinated by the Life Planning Committee, were implemented
under the themes of “Dream – Dare to dream” for S1, “Possibilities – Possible Jobs” for S2,
“Career Planning and Management” for S3 and “Career Exploration Engagement and Career
Planning” for S4-6. The better coordination shows an improvement in the school’s holistic life
planning education, but at the same time, the programs’ details need to be fine-tuned.
7.6.2 The Guidance Committee and Discipline Committee put efforts to prepare teaching materials
for class teacher periods to promote and nurture good learning habits and class ethos building.
More than 90% of teachers and students showed positive feedback to the arrangements and they
also found the materials useful for promoting good learning habits among students. The S1
Co-curricular Learning Team also included two sessions in S1 to teach students how to integrate
knowledge from different disciplines and organize different information by using graphic
organizers. The implementation of S1 Self-directed Learning since this academic year, in fact, is
another strategy to promote and nurture good learning habits in the long run, though the
effectiveness is still pending.
7.7 The perception of school and community commitment can be cultivated and students display
the characteristics of a servant leader
7.7.1 The school has made strenuous efforts to encourage students to serve the school and
community and learn to become a servant leader. The school systematically planned ample
service opportunities for students of different forms to participate. The objectives from S1 to S3
8
are to build self-confidence and pro-activeness and develop an atmosphere of collaboration, to
nurture service habits of students, and to promote a culture of service to others and appreciate the
diversities in our community respectively. For S4-S5, the Service Committee aimed at nurturing
students’ care for the needs of the disadvantaged and to cultivate a sense of empathy for others.
Through these activities and experience, students have learnt to become a real service learner.
The concept of servant leadership was further promoted by inviting enthusiastic servant leaders
to share their experiences and vision of serving at assemblies. The direction set received positive
feedback by all stakeholders.
7.7.2 The whole-school approach of coordinating the social service opportunities for students
effectively allowed most of our students to participate actively in school and community service.
With the help of S1 Class Teachers, all S1 students have learnt to serve their own class and
classmates with programs like greening project, etc. S2 students were given opportunities to
serve the school in significant school events like Sports Days, PTA Days, S1 Admission
Interviews, Music and Dance Night, etc. throughout the year. S3 students were engaged in a
service learning experience in the community by being involved in the Sister School Scheme to
offer social services to Mary Rose School to help the mentally handicapped students in various
activities and to participate in at least one flag-selling day. S4 and S5 students were given
training to acquire more in-depth service training so as to help themselves cultivate a sense of
empathy for others. They joined social service and training workshops offered by The Hong
Kong Federation of Youth Groups, New Life Psychiatric Rehabilitation Association, and Special
Olympics Hong Kong, as well as visited homeless people and Experience Food Collection and
Donation Service co-organized by Action Health. Through these activities, students have learnt
the real meaning of social service. They have also learnt to be more concerned about some of the
critical social problems in Hong Kong.
7.7.3 Deliberate attempts were made to recognize students’ efforts in social service. At assemblies,
students were given opportunities to share with their schoolmates what they had learnt and done
after some social service activities. Certificates of merits were issued to students who had
completed the social service at Mary Rose School. The Mr. Stephen Ng Scholarship (Social
Service) was set up to appreciate the outstanding achievements made by our students in social
service. The school is going to set up a more systematic scheme to recognize the efforts and
achievements made by our students in social service in the near future.
9
8. Performance of Students 8.1 HKDSE 2015-16
144 students took part in the HKDSE 2016, with 77.8% of students attained the minimum
university requirements for degree programmes at 33222 or better. The best three subjects
achieving a high percentage of level 4 or above ranging from 85.7% to 72.7% are History,
Biology and Mathematics (Compulsory Part) respectively. The best result attained was 35 points
in the best 5 subjects. Students attaining JUPAS offers are on the rise since the first HKDSE in
2012. This year, 79.9% of students were awarded JUPAS offers, 13.2% of students further their
studies overseas and all of our students further their studies in tertiary institutions.
8.2 JUPAS Offers of F.6 Graduates (2015-16) JUPAS Offers Percentage
Students with JUPAS offers 79.9%
Students with Bachelor’s degree JUPAS offers 62.5%
Students with Sub-degree JUPAS offers 17.4%
8.3 Distribution by Local Institutions (2015-16)
Local Institutions Number
The University of Hong Kong 21
The Chinese University of Hong Kong 17
The Hong Kong University of Science and Technology 7
The Hong Kong Polytechnic University 25
City University of Hong Kong 17
Hong Kong Baptist University 7
The Education University of Hong Kong 6
Lingnan University 3
The Open University of Hong Kong 2
Hong Kong Shue Yan University 3
Hang Seng Management College 5
Caritas Institute of Higher Education 2
Tung Wah College 1
Hospital Authority 1
Vocational Training Council 7
Hong Kong Universal Education 1
10
9. Academic Development 9.1 Students’ Reading Habit 9.1.1 Frequency of Borrowing Reading materials from the School Library by Students:
F.1-3
13/14 14/15 15/16
Once a week or more frequently 40% 23% 15%
Once every two weeks 25% 17% 12%
Once a month 25% 30% 35%
Less than once per month 10% 30% 35%
Never 0% 0% 3%
F.4-7
13/14 14/15 15/16
Once a week or more frequently 11% 9% 7%
Once every two weeks 29% 19% 15%
Once a month 40% 37% 36%
Less than once per month 12% 30% 32%
Never 8% 5% 10%
9.1.2 Average No. of Reading Materials Borrowed from the School Library per Student per
Year:
13/14 14/15 15/16
Key Stage (F.1 - 3) 20 17 15
Key Stage (F.4 - 7) 15 15 12
10. Student Participation in Co-curricular Activities 10. 1 Provision of Co-curricular Activities 10.1.1 No. of ECA clubs / interest groups in the following 5 categories
Categories 13/14 14/15 15/16
Academic 8 9 9
Sports 12 13 13
Art 8 8 7
Interest 5 13 4
Social services 11 11 11
10.1.2 Total number of learning activities* organized by KLA subjects
13/14 14/15 15/16
Key Stage (F.1 - 3) 120 124 124
Key Stage (F.4 - 7) 122 126 129
*Learning activates including:
Assembly & Morning Assembly, C-Day’s Activities, School Team Training, Lunch Time
Concert and Others (such as Sports Day, Swimming Gala, Chinese Week, English Week,
Drama, etc.)
11
10.2 Student Participation in Inter-school Events
Hong Kong Schools Music Festival, Hong Kong Schools Speech Festival, Hong Kong
Schools Drama Festival, School Dance Festival, Inter-school / inter-port sports events
organized by the Hong Kong Schools Sports Federation / Hong Kong Sports Association
for the Mentally Handicapped
No. of Students 13/14 14/15 15/16
Key Stage (F.1-3) 54.5%
(262 students)
63.3%
(299 students)
67.2%
(310 students)
Key Stage (f.4-7) 25.6%
(129 students)
40%
(185 students)
39.1%
(173 students)
10.3 Student participation in Uniform / Social and Voluntary Services Groups
HK Girl Guides Association, the Girl’s Brigade HK, HK Red Cross, Scout Association of
HK, HK Air Cadet Corps, Civil Aid Service Cadet Corps, HK Adventure Brigade, HK Sea
Cadet Corp’s, St. John Ambulance Brigade, the Boy’s Brigade HK, HK Road Safety
Association, the Community Youth Club, Junior Police Call
No. of Students 13/14 14/15 15/16
Key Stage (F.1-3) 26.8%
(129 students)
20.3%
(96 students)
6.7%
(31 students)
Key Stage (F.4-7) 36.1%
(182 students)
32%
(148 students)
6.6%
(29 students)
12
10.4 Participation in External Events
Bishop Hall Jubilee School
External Awards 2015 - 2016
Academic
Events Awards (No. of awards)
Canadian English Writing Invitational Contest Gold Award
Bronze Award
中國中學生作文大賽 2016 - 香港賽區
金獎 (2)
銅獎 (2)
優異獎 (2)
紅牆花縱作文比賽 季軍 (1)
第 31 屆中學生閱讀報告比賽 優異獎 (1)
第六屆全港中國歷史研習獎勵計劃 三等獎 (1)
嘉許獎 (1)
Mathematics
Events Awards (No. of awards)
2015 OLYMPRIX Mathematics Olympiad Selection
Contest (International Chern Cup)
Gold (1)
Silver (1)
Merit (5)
First Runner Up (1)
Second Runner Up (1)
The 33rd
Hong Kong Mathematics Olympiad (HKMO) Third Class Honour (2)
2016 International Competitions and Assessments for
Schools (ICAS) – Maths.
Distinction (5)
Credit (20)
Merit (6)
International Mathematical Olympiad Preliminary
Selection Contest – Hong Kong 2016 Merit (1)
KMC International Mathematics Contest 2016 -
Preliminary Round Third Class Honour (6)
2016 Pan Asia Pacific International Mathematics
Invitation Competition Third Prize (1)
The Hong Kong Youth Mathematical Challenge 2015 Champion (1)
Second Runner up (2)
13
Hong Kong Mathematical and Creative
Problem-Solving Competition
Champion (1)
Gold (1)
Silver (3)
Bronze (3)
Merit (2)
Speech
Events Awards (No. of awards)
English Speech Festival 2015-16
First (2)
Second (2)
Third (6)
第六十七屆香港學校朗誦節
粵語朗誦
冠軍 (1)
亞軍 (5)
季軍 (6)
優良 (20)
良好 (3)
普通話朗誦
冠軍(2)
亞軍(6)
季軍(7)
優良(31)
良好(5)
Music, Dance & Drama Events Awards (No. of awards)
The 68th
Hong Kong School Music Festival 1st Runner Up (3)
2015 Hong Kong Youth Music Interflows Silver Award (1)
Bronze Award (2)
Oriental Concentus Choir Competition2015 Silver Award
The 5th
Winter Choral Festival Silver (2)
The 20th St Cecilia International Music Competition
2015
Distinction (Heat) (1)
1st Runner Up (Final) (1)
14
第五十二屆學校舞蹈節
優等獎 (2)
甲級獎 (1)
乙級獎 (1)
第 44 屆全港公開舞蹈比賽 金獎 (2)
English Drama Festival 2016 Outstanding Performer (1)
2015-2016 校際戲劇節
中文話劇組
傑出合作獎 (1)
傑出舞台效果獎 (1)
傑出演員獎 (1)
Sports Events Awards (No. of awards)
HKSSF Inter-school Football Competition 2015-16 Sportsmanship Award (1)
HKSSF Inter-school Basketball Competition 2015-16
(Girls) (Division III) (Kowloon 1)
Overall Campion (1)
Champion (1)
4th
Position (1)
2nd
Runner up (1)
HKSSF Inter-school Table Tennis Competition 2015-2016
Division Three (Kowloon) 4
th Position (1)
HK Island & Kln Secondary Schools Competition -
BOCHK Indoor Rowing Cup 2015 - 2016
2nd
Runner-up (1)
5th
Position (1)
8th
Position (1)
Hong Kong Indoor Cycling Championship –
Artistic 2015-2016
Champion (1)
2nd
Runner-up (1)
Pacers Athletics Club Youth Athletics Championships
(2nd
Station) 2016
2nd
Runner-up (2)
4th
Position (1)
HKSSF Inter-School Athletics Championships –
Division Three (Area One)
Champion (3)
1st Runner-up (1)
2nd
Runner-up (1)
4th
Position (2)
HKSSF Inter-school Cross Country Championships
Division Two 10
th Position
2015 Hong Kong Junior Squash Championships 4th
Place
2015-2016 HKSSF Inter-school Swimming Championships
Division Three (K1)
1st Runner-up (2)
2nd
Runner-up (6)
4th
Position (1)
Pacers Athletics Club Youth Athletics Championships
(Autumn) 2015
Champion (1)
2nd
Runner-up (1)
4th
Position (1)
SKH Holy Carpenter Secondary School 50th
Anniversary
Swimming Gala 1
st Runner-up (1)
15
Others
Events Awards (No. of awards)
The Harvard Book Prize 2016 First (1)
Second (2)
Hong Kong Secondary Schools Debating Competition Best Debater (1)
基本法辯論比賽 最佳辯論員 (1)
星島辯論比賽 最佳交互發問 (2)
Elsie Tu Education Fund - Most Improved Student
Scholarship 2015 Excellent (1)
認識基本法 善德全港中學校際問答比賽 優異 (10)
Hong Kong Outstanding Students Award Outstanding Student Award (1)
新生精神康復會 ( 拍住上@330 ) 短片創作比賽 中學組 亞軍(1)
第十六屆全港學界普通話傳藝比賽
初中組 主持人亞軍(2)
初中組散文 優良(2)
初中組詩歌 優良(1)
Future Stars – Upward Mobility Scholarship 2016 Scholarship (2)
2015/2016 年度『九龍城區傑出學生選舉』 優異獎 (1)
2016/17 年度領展『第一代大學生獎學金』 獎學金 (1)
CUHK Chung Chi College: Admission Scholarship Scholarship (1)
Outstanding HKCC Freshman Scholarship 2015/16 (Hong Kong Polytechnic University)
Scholarship (1)
Sir Edward Youde Memorial Prizes 2015/16 Scholarship (1)
香港理工大學『青少年企業領袖訓練課程(第十五屆) 』
獎學金計劃 獎學金 (1)
萬鈞教育基金『青少年領袖獎勵計劃 2016』 獎學金
HKICPA BAFS Scholarship Scholarship (1)
16
11. Capacity Enhancement Grant (2015-2016)
Capacity Enhancement Grant received: $574,415.00
Expenditure: $377,389.50
Balance being Surplus C/F: $197,025.50
1. School Dance Team instructor $61,920.00
2. Cantonese Speech training coach fees $9,900.00
3. Putonghua Speech training coach fees $14,850.00
4. English Speech Festival training coach fees $33,340.50
5. Indoor Rowing training coach fees $4,480.00
6. Squash training coach fees $5,724.00
7. Table-tennis training coach fees $10,000.00
8. Basketball training coach fees $12,000.00
9. Chinese DSE Exam Preparation classes instructor fees $42,100.00
10. Chinese Drama instructor fees $40,500.00
11. English Drama instructor fees $14,900.00
12. Wind Band instructor fees $18,150.00
13. Orchestra instructor fees $23,925.00
14. Math Competition training course instructor fees $10,000.00
15. English Debate Course fees $69,600.00
16. Badminton Team $6,000.00
1. Dance Team
The Folk Dance Team hired a dance tutor with the CEG. There are more than 20 students performing in
the Dance Team. They have performed at Speech Day and Music and Dance Night. They have also won 2
Honour Awards, 1 Highly Commended Award and 1 Commended Award in the 52nd School Dance
Festival, 2 Gold Awards in the 44th Open Dance Contest. The dancers enjoyed the rehearsals and gave
high quality performances.
2. 粵語朗誦
為了分擔中文科老師訓練粵語朗誦比賽的工作,聘請「香港普通話朗誦藝術中心」的專業導師虞老
師及林老師下午四時到校進行朗誦訓練。
虞老師及林老師在 2015 年 10 月至 12 月,工作時數 18 小時,訓練學生 38 人。由「創造空間撥款
計劃」支付薪酬 9,900 元。
透過這次「多元學習撥款計劃」取得以下效果:
1. 能減輕中文科老師的工作負擔 (平均每人教導約 1 位學生)。
2. 參賽學生表現:參賽學生取得 1 冠 5 亞 6 季 19 優良 4 良好的成績。
3. 學生及老師的意見:虞老師及林老師做事負責,常根據學生表現,加時練習,幫助學生提
高朗誦水平。
17
3. Putonghua Speech
為了分擔普通話科老師訓練普通話朗誦比賽的工作,聘請「香港普通話朗誦藝術中心」的專業
導師袁疆才老師下午四時到校進行朗誦訓練。
袁疆才老師在 2015 年 10 月至 12 月,工作時數 27 小時,訓練學生 50 人。由「創造空間撥款計
劃」支付薪酬 14850 元。
透過這次「創造空間撥款計劃」取得以下效果:
1. 能減輕普通話科老師的工作負擔。
2. 參賽學生表現:參賽學生取得 2 冠軍 6 亞軍 7 季軍 34 優良 3 良好的成績。
3. 學生及老師的意見:袁老師十分專業,能發掘同學的潛能, 並提高他們朗誦的能力。若
學生參加訓練時間更多更用心,付出時間練習,比賽成績更佳。
4. English Speech
Capacity Enhancement Grant has been spent on the employment of an instructor for the coaching of
the English Speech Festival this year. By encouraging students to take part in the competition, we
hoped to boost their confidence in their English speaking ability and also engender a sense of pride.
There were altogether 54 participants involved in a variety of events, namely solo verse speaking,
dramatic duologue, solo prose reading, public speaking and choral speaking. Students’ experience
was greatly enriched as they got to compete with counterparts of all abilities from different schools.
Two championships, two first runners-up and six second runners-up were attained.
5. Basketball Team, Table-tennis, Squash Team, and Indoor Rowing Team
Capacity Enhancement Grant has been used to subsidize instructor fees for the basketball team,
table-tennis squash team, and indoor rowing team to provide regular training for those team members
who have all participated in competitions.
A summary of the number of students involved is given below:
Courses Number of Students
1. Basketball team 26
2. Table-tennis 26
3. Squash team 12
4. Indoor rowing team 10
Total 74
Feedback from students and results attained by them were positive. All of the students found the training
useful and practical. Their knowledge and experience in those sports events were enhanced throughout
training and participation in competitions. They had good performances in the competitions.
Their achievements are given below:
Teams Events Awards
Basketball
HKSSF Inter-school Basketball
Competition 2015/2016 Division
Girls Overall Champion (will be promoted to
Division Two 2016/2017),
18
Three (Kowloon 1) Girls A Grade Overall 4th
Position,
Girls B Grade Overall 2nd
Runner-up,
Girls C Grade Overall Champion
Table-tennis
HKSSF Inter-school Table-tennis
Competition 2015/2016 Division
Three (Kowloon)
Girls Overall ranked 7th
Position out of 48,
Girls B Grade Overall 4th
Position
Girls C Grade Overall 6th
Position
HKSSF Inter-school Table-tennis
Competition 2015/2016 Division
Three (Kowloon 2)
Boys Overall ranked 7th
Position out of 25
schools,
Boys A Grade Overall 7th
Position,
Boys B Grade Overall 5th
Position,
Boys C Grade Overall 5th
Position
Squash
2015 Hong Kong Junior Squash
Championships
Boys Under 13
3rd
Runner-up
Indoor
Rowing
HK Island & Kln Secondary
Schools Competition - BOCHK
Indoor Rowing Cup 2015 - 2016
Boys A Grade 5th
Position,
Boys A Grade 2nd
Runner-up, 8th
Position
6. Chinese DSE Exam Preparation Class
由於學生已一整天上課,再連續個多小時地補習,會容易感到疲倦,因此小組討論能讓課堂氣氛變
得較爲輕鬆和互動。教學方法主要是小組討論和提問。先讓學生自己閲讀和思考一下,然後才一起
討論。而一些表達個人意見或開放式題目,會先與學生討論回答步驟,再讓學生自己作答,而學生作
答後,任教老師會一一批改,讓學生了解自己作答的強與弱。
學生的學習動機和態度大都是良好的,他們都是抱著讓中文更上一層樓的心態學習,因此上課時都
很專心,也能夠完成老師的要求。而有些學生更於課程完結後表示,希望老師能安排多一點閲讀練
習,讓學生於課程完結後也能自己學習。
7. Chinese Drama
Capacity Enhancement Grant has been used to subsidize Chinese Drama Club fees for our students who
join the Hong Kong School Drama Festival 2016. Forty F1 to F5 students have taken part in the HKSDF
and benefitted from the grant. The CEG Grant was used to hire a professional drama instructor to teach
and train the students to perform in HKSDF. Feedback from students and results attained by them were
relatively positive. They won the Award for Outstanding Cooperation and Award for Outstanding Stage
Effect. F4 Yan Tung won the Outstanding Performer. However, due to the personality of the instructor,
most students found him difficult to work with. Two sides to one coin - this made students contribute
more and enhance their knowledge and skills in related professions.
8. English Drama
Target groups benefitted from the grant
Capacity Enhancement Grant has been used to subsidize drama instructor fees for our students of the
English Drama Club who share a passion in acting. In 2015-16, a drama instructor from Shakespeare for
19
All was employed to coach drama to 30 students ranging from F.1 to F.5.
Purposes of the program
The drama coach conducted weekly drama sessions as a facilitator to guide them to create a drama script
and ultimately to execute it in the EMI Interschool Drama Competition and performance in a school
assembly. Last year, the creation of the play was an adaptation of the original script from Death Takes the
Train by D. M. Larson, with continual modification over the course of the year. Since the entire play and
preparatory work was conducted in English, this ultimately proved to be a very useful tool in improving
students’ English language ability as well as promoting their interest in pursuing English media.
Feedback and Results
Feedback from students and results attained by them were positive. Tam Yi Ling Coco from F.4 got the
Outstanding Performer Award in the EMI Interschool Competition and the whole crew gained invaluable
and rewarding stage experience. The drama-coaching program aroused students’ interests in stage
production and enhanced their English Language skills through application in real life.
9. Wind Band
The CEG was used to hire a conductor to conduct the Wind Band for students playing wind instruments.
We have over 20 students taking part this year. They participated in the Music Office Interflow
competition and obtained a Silver Award. They have also performed in Music and Dance Night. They
have learnt a number of songs. The Wind Band has rehearsed effectively.
10. Orchestra
The CEG was used to hire a conductor to conduct the Orchestra for students playing wind and string
instruments. We have more than 40 students taking part in the Orchestra this year. The strings students
participated in the Music Office Interflow 2015 and won a Bronze Award in both the String Orchestra and
Symphony Orchestra category. The conductor also trained a group of String Ensemble participants and took
part in the Hong Kong School Music Festival. The Orchestra also performed in the Music and Dance Night
by themselves and with the Senior Mixed Voice Choir and Junior Choir in the Finale as well.
11. Mathematics Competition Course
Instructors were employed to train students to participate in recognized Mathematics contests and to
reduce teachers’ workload so that they can concentrate their efforts in teaching and learning of the
curriculum. Students’ feedback was positive, with 3.7 points out of a 4-point scale.
12. English Debate
Capacity Enhancement Grant has been used to subsidize the weekly course of the English Debating Team.
Between October 2015 and May 2016, a weekly debating course was offered to 13 students in F.2-4.
Students were selected to join the team on grounds of their sense of responsibility and willingness to
explore beyond classroom learning, instead of experience and de-facto English standard because the first
two qualities are considered more important for maximizing the value of the money spent and the smooth
operation of the team.
20
Purposes of the Course
Winning was not the primary goal this year as most of them were inexperienced prior to this course.
Experience accumulation and adaptation of the format were instead paramount. Regular exposure to
English debating is deemed conducive to the development of students’ public speaking skills, impromptu
speaking skills, logical thinking skills, elaboration and exemplification skills, and a stronger awareness of
current and controversial issues. The coach also incorporated activities into the course to introduce
elements of activity-based learning. Meanwhile, we also paid the coach for bringing students to various
friendly debates and formal competitions as a form of experiential learning for students to acquire and
reflect upon hands-on experience.
Feedback
Feedback from students was positive. They consider the coach committed and inspirational, and the
friendly debates precious chances to know students from other schools and witness the discrepancy
between the English standard of those students and theirs. They also found it useful to dig into both sides
of controversial issues and collaborate with fellow schoolmates while preparing for debate speeches.
Some initially shy students gradually gained more confidence and were willing to go on stage and
represent our school. Most of them expressed their inclination to remain on the team next year.
Results
Each member of the team represented the school at least once in two rounds of the Hong Kong Secondary
Schools Debating Competitions and five friendly debates. Out of these debates, we got two Best Debater
Awards and won one debate. With such experience acquired and failures reflected upon, the goal next
year will be to win more debates.
13. Badminton Team
Capacity Enhancement Grant has been used to subsidize instructor fees to provide regular training for
those team members who all have participated in competitions.
A summary of the number of students involved is given below:
Courses Number of Students
Badminton Team 27
Feedback from students and results attained by them were positive. All of the students found the training
useful and practical. Their knowledge and experience in those sports events were enhanced throughout
training and participation in competitions.
21
FINANCIAL SUMMARY 2015-2016
Income Expenditure Surplus/(Deficit)
$ $ $
I. Government Funds
(a) EOEBG Baseline Reference 2,040,682.21 1,784,505.24 422,981.46
School & Class Grant - Other Income 166,804.49 / /
(b) School Specific Grant
Administration Grant 3,906,294.00 2,833,325.86 1,072,968.14
(Employees' Compensation) 3,021.69 3,021.69 /
Noise Abatement Grant 517,267.00 453,505.37 63,761.63
Composite Information Technology Grant 419,709.00 289,819.90 129,889.10
Capacity Enhancement Grant 574,415.00 377,389.50 197,025.50
Sub-total: 7,628,193.39 5,741,567.56 1,886,625.83
(c) Non-EOEBG Funds
Sub-total: 47,651,448.91 46,400,206.26 1,251,242.65
Government Funds Total: 55,279,642.30 52,138,469.82 3,137,868.48
II. School Funds
(a) Tong Fai 141,120.00 640.00 140,480.00
(b) Other Income 1,691,947.95 1,470,535.61 221,412.34
(c) Donation for 55th Anniversary Celebration 160,000.00 / 160,000.00
(d) Donation for Chapel Refurbishment/SIP 538,235.00 264.00 537,971.00
School Funds Total: 2,531,302.95 1,471,439.61 1,059,863.34
Balance B/F (Government Funds) 2,685,591.94
Balance B/F (School Funds) 462,665.35
(1) Surplus of Government Funds 3,141,172.48
(2) Surplus of School Funds
1,059,863.34
Total surplus for 15/16 school year 7,349,293.11
22
School-based After-school Learning and Support Programmes 2015/16 s.y.
School-based Grant - Programme Report
Name of School: Bishop Hal l Jubi lee School
Project Coordinator: Mr. Leung Che Keung Contact Telephone No.: 2336 3034
A. The number of benefitting students (count by heads) under this programme is 36 (including A. 10 CSSA recipients, B. 18 SFAS full-grant recipients and C. 8 _under school’s discretionary quota)
B. Information on Activities under the Programmes
*Name / Type of activity
Actual no. of participating eligible students #
Average attendance
rate
Period/Date activity held
Actual expenses ($)
Method(s) of evaluation (e.g. test, questionnaires,
etc.)
Name of partner/ service provider
(if applicable)
Remarks if any (e.g. students’ learning and affective outcome)
A B C
F.1 Physical Training 6 13 4 100% Sept – Oct 15 1260 Questionnaire
Music Training Course 1 0 0 100% Oct 15 – May 16 3355 Questionnaire
Sat school tutorial course 3 4 4 100% Oct 15 – May 16 9900 Questionnaire
Public Exam Preparation 0 1 0 100% Feb 16 130 Questionnaire
Total no. of activities: _4_
@No. of participation counts 10 18 8
Total Expenses 14645
**Total no. of participation
counts
36
Note: * Name/type of activities are categorized as follows: tutorial service, learning skill training, languages training, visits, art /culture activities, sports, self-confidence development, volunteer service,
adventure activities, leadership training, and communication skills training courses. @ Participation count: refers to the aggregate no. of benefitted students participating in each activity listed above. ** Total no. of participation count: the aggregate of (A) + (B) + (C)
# Eligible students: students in receipt of CSSA (A), SFAS full grant (B)and disadvantaged students identified by the school under the 10% discretionary quota (C
23
C. Project Effectiveness
In general, how would you rate the achievements of the activities conducted to the benefitted eligible students:
Please put a “” against the most appropriate box. Improved No
Change Declining
Not Applicable Significant Moderate Slight
Learning Effectiveness
a) Students’ motivation for learning
b) Students’ study skills
c) Students’ academic achievement
d) Students’ learning experience outside classroom
e) Your overall view on students’ learning effectiveness
Personal and Social Development
f) Students’ self-esteem
g) Students’ self-management skills
h) Students’ social skills
i) Students’ interpersonal skills
j) Students’ cooperativeness with others
k) Students’ attitudes toward schooling
l) Students’ outlook on life m) Your overall view on students’ personal and social
development
Community Involvement
n) Students’ participation in extracurricular and voluntary activities
o) Students’ sense of belonging
p) Students’ understanding on the community
q) Your overall view on students’ community involvement
24
D. Comments on the project conducted
Problems/difficulties encountered when implementing the project
(You may tick more than one box)
unable to identify the eligible students (i.e., students receiving CSSA, SFAS full grant); difficult to decide on the 10% discretionary quota; eligible students unwilling to join the programmes; the quality of service provided by partner/service provider not satisfactory; tutors inexperienced and student management skills unsatisfactory; the amount of administrative work leads to apparent increase on teachers’ workload; complicated to fulfill the requirements for handling funds disbursed by EDB; the reporting requirements too complicated and time-consuming; Others (Please specify):
E. Do you have any feedback from students and their parents? Are they
satisfied with the service provided? (optional)