bisc best practice fo testing
DESCRIPTION
Fiber OpticTRANSCRIPT
7/17/2019 BISC Best Practice FO Testing
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/bisc-best-practice-fo-testing 1/75
Testing and troubleshooting
enterprise fiber-optic cabling
Presenter:
Neftali UsabalFluke Networks - LATAM
7/17/2019 BISC Best Practice FO Testing
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/bisc-best-practice-fo-testing 2/75
Agenda
• Testing Methods and Standards
– Why we test optical systems
– Terminology & types of testing
– Standards based testing requirements
• Cleaning and Inspection
•Attenuation (loss)Testing Overview (Tier 1)
• OTDR Testing Overview (Tier 2)
7/17/2019 BISC Best Practice FO Testing
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/bisc-best-practice-fo-testing 3/75
CERTIFICATION TESTING OF OPTICAL CABLING
• Product acceptance upon receipt
• Installation Acceptance following
deployment of system
• Accounting/Documentation of your
system for:
– As Built records
– Performance Benchmarking
– MAC & Rework
• Proof/Verification that the final system
meets design specifications and
contractual obligations
Efficient and properly performed certification testing will
ensure that you get paid fast and avoid callbacks!
7/17/2019 BISC Best Practice FO Testing
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/bisc-best-practice-fo-testing 4/75
Factors Affecting Signal Loss
• Intrinsic
• Splice Loss (non reflective event)
• Connector Loss (reflective event)
• Macrobending
• Microbending
7/17/2019 BISC Best Practice FO Testing
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/bisc-best-practice-fo-testing 5/75
Factors Affecting Performance
• Chromatic Dispersion
(Singlemode Fibers)
• Polarization Mode Dispersion
(Singlemode Fibers)
• Modal Dispersion (Multimode
Fibers)
7/17/2019 BISC Best Practice FO Testing
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/bisc-best-practice-fo-testing 6/75
Dispersion or pulse broadening
7/17/2019 BISC Best Practice FO Testing
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/bisc-best-practice-fo-testing 7/75
Testing Standards
• ANSI/TIA/568-C.1— Commercial Building Telecommunications Cabling
Standard.
• ANSI/TIA/568-C.3— Optical Fiber Cabling and Components Standard. Includes guidelines for Field-
Testing Length, Loss and Polarity of Optical Fiber Cabling Systems
• ANSI/TIA/-526-14-A— OFSTP-14A Optical Power Loss Measurement of Installed
Multimode Fiber Cable Plant (ANSI/TIA/EIA-526-14A-98)
• ANSI/TIA/526-7— OFSTP-7 Measurement of Optical Power Loss of
Installed Single-mode Fiber Cable Plant
(ANSI/TIA/EIA-526-7-98)
• ISO IEC 14763-3
– Defines testing methods and limits including definition of “test Reference Cords”
• TIA/TSB 4979 Methods for meeting Encircled Flux launch conditions
7/17/2019 BISC Best Practice FO Testing
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/bisc-best-practice-fo-testing 8/75
•Titled:
– Generic Telecommunications Cabling for Customer Premises –
Addendum 2, General Updates
– Published August 2012
• New application limits – 40GBASE-SR4 (100 m, 1.9 dB over OM3)
– 40GBASE-SR4 (150 m, 1.5 dB over OM4)
– 100GBASE-SR10 (100 m, 1.9 dB over OM3)
– 100GBASE-SR10 (150 m, 1.5 dB over OM4)
• Limits are getting tighter, CPR and MPD no longer good
enough
ANSI/TIA-568-C.0-2
7/17/2019 BISC Best Practice FO Testing
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/bisc-best-practice-fo-testing 9/75
•Was considered adequate for the time (2003)
• Test limits getting tighter
– 1000BASE-SX (2.6 dB over OM1)
– 10GBASE-SR (2.6 dB over OM3)
– Consultants tightening loss budgets
– Manufacturers tightening loss budgets
• ISO/IEC 14763-3 (2006) changed to MPD
– Modal Power Distribution
– Tighter than CPR
– Now also adopting Encircled Flux to replace MPD
ANSI/TIA-526-14-A
7/17/2019 BISC Best Practice FO Testing
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/bisc-best-practice-fo-testing 10/75
• Replaced with ANSI/TIA-526-14-B (Oct 2010) titled: – Optical Power Loss Measurements of Installed
Multimode Fiber Cable Plant
• Replaced Coupled Power Ratio with Encircled Flux
– More to come on this later!
ANSI/TIA-526-14-A (2003)
7/17/2019 BISC Best Practice FO Testing
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/bisc-best-practice-fo-testing 11/75
Optical Test Equipment Summary
Type of
Test Equipment Investment Used For Required Tests For
VisualVFL,
Microscope,$300 - $4000 Verification Rarely
Continuity, Polarity,Cleanliness
Power & Attenuation
PowerMeter
$1K -$5k
Verification tomanually
determined lossbudgets
Sometimesas proxy for
Tier 1
Power, loss,continuity, polarity
Attenuation
Testing(Tier 1)
Optical
LossTestSet (OLTS) $6K - $13K
Certification to
performancestandards Always
End -to – end Loss,Continuity, length
polarity & comparesto performancestandards
OTDR
(Tier 2)OTDR $8K - $17K
Certification &Troubleshooting
to ensureinstallation
workmanship
Typical
Analyzes Events(splice & connector)
by measuring
reflectance
7/17/2019 BISC Best Practice FO Testing
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/bisc-best-practice-fo-testing 12/7512
Fiber inspection and cleaning
7/17/2019 BISC Best Practice FO Testing
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/bisc-best-practice-fo-testing 13/75
13
#1 Problem: Dirt!
• Contaminated connector end-faces: Leading cause of fiber linkfailures
• Particles of dust and debris trapped between fiber end facescause signal loss, back reflection, and damaged equipment
• Many Sources of contamination:
• Equipment rooms & Telecommunication rooms in filthy environments• Improper or insufficient cleaning tools, materials, procedures
• Debris and corrosion from poor quality adapter sleeves
• Hands of technicians
• Airborne
7/17/2019 BISC Best Practice FO Testing
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/bisc-best-practice-fo-testing 14/75
14
y o er nspec ng nFaces?
• To Prevent Damage• Debris will embed in glass when contaminated connectors are mated
• When embedded debris is removed, pit remains in glass as permanentdamage
• Pits cause signal loss and back reflection
• Debris causes other damage such as chips and scratches
7/17/2019 BISC Best Practice FO Testing
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/bisc-best-practice-fo-testing 15/75
Good Connector
Fingerprinton Connector
Dirty Connector
Inspection images
Real images as captured from the Fluke Networks Fiber Inspector™
7/17/2019 BISC Best Practice FO Testing
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/bisc-best-practice-fo-testing 16/75
COMMON MISCONCEPTIONS
• Protective caps keep end-faces clean - NO
– Caps are a source of contamination: mold-release compound from manufacturing
– End-faces are NOT clean when they comepre-terminated from the factory in a sealedbag
• Canned air will blast away dirt - NO – Is ineffective on smaller, static-chargedparticles
– Blows larger particles around rather thanremoving them
– Is ineffective on oils and compound
contaminants
• Isopropyl alcohol (IPA) is the best solvent – NO
– IPA does not work on non-polarcontaminants
Pulling lubricants, buffer gels, etc.
– IPA leaves a residue when not used properly
7/17/2019 BISC Best Practice FO Testing
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/bisc-best-practice-fo-testing 17/75
Cleaning with IBC Cleaners
• IBC™ OneClick Cleaners for cleaning different end
faces/connectors — no training required
• 1.25 mm LC and MU connector and end faces
• 2.5 mm SC, ST, FC, E2000 connector and end
faces
• MPO/MTP connector and end faces
• Cleans Ports on devices and patch panels
as well as Cords ….with an adapter
• Dry cleaning is less efficient for cleaning grease
(dried skin oil) than wet cleaning with a solvent and
swabs/cleaning cubes
7/17/2019 BISC Best Practice FO Testing
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/bisc-best-practice-fo-testing 18/75
CLEANING WITH SOLVENT PEN
• Start with a clean, lint-free wiping surface every time – Material left exposed accumulates ambient dust – Material used once should not be used again
• Use a minimal amount of specialized solvent
– Important that solvent be removed after cleaning – Move the end-face from the wet spot into a dry zone
Cleaning with a saturated wipe will not fully removesolvent
Cleaning with a dry wipe will not dissolve contaminantsand can generate static, attracting dust
• Proper handling and motion
– Apply gentle pressure with soft backing behind cleaningsurface – Hold end-face perpendicular to cleaning surface – No figure-8 motion as that’s for polishing only
• Inspect both end-faces of any connection before insertion
– If the first cleaning was not sufficient, then clean again until all
contamination is removed
7/17/2019 BISC Best Practice FO Testing
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/bisc-best-practice-fo-testing 19/75
Company Conf ident ial
Hands ON - Fiber Inspection• Tap TOOLS
• Tap FiberInspector
• Focus the image with the knobon the probe
• Press to “pause” or enter
the “still” mode
7/17/2019 BISC Best Practice FO Testing
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/bisc-best-practice-fo-testing 20/75
Company Conf ident ial
Hands On: Fiber Inspection• Tap SCALE ON
• Tap NEXT SCALE
• Drag fiber to center of scales
• Zoom on image
• Tap GRADE
• Tap GRADE again
7/17/2019 BISC Best Practice FO Testing
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/bisc-best-practice-fo-testing 21/75
Optical Loss Testing
7/17/2019 BISC Best Practice FO Testing
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/bisc-best-practice-fo-testing 22/75
• Double Ended Test – Absolute Loss measurement
• Compares Loss to industrystandards
– Pass/Fail Results
• Other helpful Capabilities – Length measurement
– Project/Loss budget Wizard
– Two fibers at a time – Bidirectional testing
– Set Referencing Wizard
Tier 1 Fiber Certification with OLTS
7/17/2019 BISC Best Practice FO Testing
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/bisc-best-practice-fo-testing 23/75
These things must be done correctly!• Use good/clean Test Reference Cords
– ISO/IEC 14763-3 (2006)
– Reference grade connectors were required
– Multimode ≤ 0.10 dB – Singlemode ≤ 0.20 dB
• Set Reference correctly!!
– Helps minimize uncertainty
– Eliminates “negative loss” incidents
• Proper Launch Conditions
– Encircled Flux Per TSB 4979
Managing Uncertainty
7/17/2019 BISC Best Practice FO Testing
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/bisc-best-practice-fo-testing 24/75
• In ISO/IEC 14763-3 (2006), cords were recognized as a source
of great uncertainty
• This standard reduced uncertainty by defining the
performance of the test cord connector
• Reference grade connectors were required
– Multimode ≤ 0.10 dB
– Singlemode ≤ 0.20 dB
Impact of test reference cords
0.75 dB0.10 dB
≤ 0.30 dB
0.75 dB0.20 dB
≤ 0.50 dB
7/17/2019 BISC Best Practice FO Testing
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/bisc-best-practice-fo-testing 25/75
• Sadly, most folks are setting a reference this way
• Issues – You have no idea what the loss is in the adapter
– Whatever it is, it’s subtracted from your measurement
– The uncertainty is horrendous – negative loss
Setting a Reference…What is done today
? dB
7/17/2019 BISC Best Practice FO Testing
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/bisc-best-practice-fo-testing 26/75
• So you end up with this
• Issues – You have no idea what the loss is in the adapter
– Whatever it is, it’s subtracted from your measurement
– The uncertainty is horrendous – negative loss
What is done today
x dB z dB
y dB
Measurement = x + y + z - ?
7/17/2019 BISC Best Practice FO Testing
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/bisc-best-practice-fo-testing 27/75
• Let’s take an example
• Issues – You have no idea what the loss is in the adapter
– Whatever it is, it’s subtracted from your measurement
– The uncertainty is horrendous – negative loss
What is done today
0.75 dB
7/17/2019 BISC Best Practice FO Testing
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/bisc-best-practice-fo-testing 28/75
• Let’s take an example
• Issues – You have no idea what the loss is in the adapter
– Whatever it is, it’s subtracted from your measurement
– The uncertainty is horrendous – negative loss
What is done today
0.3 dB 0.3 dB
0.1 dB
Measurement = 0.3 + 0.1 + 0.3 – 0.75
= -0.05 dB
7/17/2019 BISC Best Practice FO Testing
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/bisc-best-practice-fo-testing 29/75
• ANSI/TIA describes this as Method A
• Not for enterprise cabling systems – Used in long haul measurements
– Uncertainty of one connector not considered critical?
What is done today
? dB
7/17/2019 BISC Best Practice FO Testing
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/bisc-best-practice-fo-testing 30/75
• For testing an installed fiber optical link, should always use
the 1 Jumper Reference Method
• Does require the test equipment to have interchangeable
adapters on the INPUT ports
What is done today
emove rom por
7/17/2019 BISC Best Practice FO Testing
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/bisc-best-practice-fo-testing 31/75
• It’s ok to remove the fiber from the input ports
• You cannot remove the fiber from the output port, doing so
will invalidate the reference you just made
emove rom poronly
7/17/2019 BISC Best Practice FO Testing
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/bisc-best-practice-fo-testing 32/75
• To the INPUT ports
Connect known good cord
7/17/2019 BISC Best Practice FO Testing
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/bisc-best-practice-fo-testing 33/75
• To the INPUT ports
Connect known good cord
7/17/2019 BISC Best Practice FO Testing
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/bisc-best-practice-fo-testing 34/75
• How do I know if those cords are good?
Connect known good cord
f h d
7/17/2019 BISC Best Practice FO Testing
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/bisc-best-practice-fo-testing 35/75
• Connect them together using a singlemode adapter and
measure the loss
Verifying the cords
ISO/IEC 14763-3
• ≤ 0.1 dB for Multimode
• ≤ 0.2 dB for Singlemode
ANSI/TIA-568-C.0
• ≤ 0.75 dB?
Cabling Vendors
• ≤ 0.50 dB?
Why not save this as proof of good test reference cords?
*
* This can be up to 0.15 dB for LC
f d l
7/17/2019 BISC Best Practice FO Testing
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/bisc-best-practice-fo-testing 36/75
• ISO/IEC 14763-3
– 1 Jumper method (0.1 dB for Multimode and 0.2 dB for Singlemode)
• ANSI/TIA-568-C.0
– Does not call out test reference cord values (≤ 0.75 dB?)
– You are expected to specify this
–
• Require documentation of TRCs
Test Reference Cord Values
?
7/17/2019 BISC Best Practice FO Testing
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/bisc-best-practice-fo-testing 37/75
onnec o e er op c
7/17/2019 BISC Best Practice FO Testing
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/bisc-best-practice-fo-testing 38/75
• ANSI/TIA-568-C.0
• First and last connections ≤ 0.75 dB
• All other connections ≤ 0.75 dB
onnec o e er op clink
≤ 0.75 dB ≤ 0.75 dB
L h di i
7/17/2019 BISC Best Practice FO Testing
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/bisc-best-practice-fo-testing 39/75
• Diagrams shown to visualize the issue as best as possible
Launch conditions
Source 1
Over filled
Source 2
Under filled
assessmen
7/17/2019 BISC Best Practice FO Testing
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/bisc-best-practice-fo-testing 40/75
assessmenimprovement
Source 1
Over filled
Source 2
Under filled
EF specifies power throughout core using multiple control radii.
EF provides tight tolerance on mode power distribution in the outer radii
enabling improved agreement between EF-compliant test instruments.
TIA TSB 4979
7/17/2019 BISC Best Practice FO Testing
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/bisc-best-practice-fo-testing 41/75
• Titled:
– Practical Considerations for Implementation of Multimode Launch
Conditions in the Field
• TSB = Telecommunications System Bulletin
– Not an official standard
– An advisory document
– Chances are will end up in ANSI/TIA-568-D.3
• Helps users understand Encircled Flux and the options forimplementing it
TIA-TSB-4979
rac ca mp emen a on o
7/17/2019 BISC Best Practice FO Testing
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/bisc-best-practice-fo-testing 42/75
• Option 1
– Use an external mode controller
– Replaces the mandrels
rac ca mp emen a on oEF
rac ca mp emen a on o
7/17/2019 BISC Best Practice FO Testing
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/bisc-best-practice-fo-testing 43/75
• Option 2 -Matched source and test referencecord
rac ca mp emen a on oEF
er er er ca on
7/17/2019 BISC Best Practice FO Testing
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/bisc-best-practice-fo-testing 44/75
• At a minimum, use a mandrel
–This does not yield the controlled launchcondition the industry desires that is EncircledFlux
• Don’t use a VCSEL source – Too much variability
– Not standards compliant
• Consider investing in fiber optic test
equipment that allows a 1 JumperReference – reduced uncertainty
• Verify your Test Reference Cords – Save the results and make it part of your
documentation
• If Encircled Flux is a contractualrequirement, or you care about getting as
many “passes” as possible: – Reference TIA/TSB 4979
• EF Mode Controllers
• DTX-EFM2
• CertiFiber Pro
er er er ca onSummary
7/17/2019 BISC Best Practice FO Testing
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/bisc-best-practice-fo-testing 45/75
46
OTDR TEsting
7/17/2019 BISC Best Practice FO Testing
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/bisc-best-practice-fo-testing 46/75
What is An OTDR?
-OptiFiber Pro OTDR
10.6 x 5.0 x 2.5
inches
5.7 inches
touchscreen display Taptive ™
gesture based
user interface
EventMap8-hour battery life
Singlemode,
Multimode and
Quad modules
What Does An OTDR Do?
7/17/2019 BISC Best Practice FO Testing
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/bisc-best-practice-fo-testing 47/75
48
What Does An OTDR Do?
OTDR Port
Connector
Processing
& Control
Color
Display
Directional
Coupler
Very SensitivePhoto
Detector
Two
Laser
Diodes
• Sends pulses of light out
• Keeps checking for
reflected light
• The farther the light goes,the more time it takes to
come back
• When light hits a
connection, an extra spike
of light reflects back
• The farther the light goes,
the more loss it encounters,
so less comes back
(measures length)
(measures fiber loss)
(finds connections)
OTDR
Fiber
Under
Test
Optical Fiber
Electrical
OTDR in Action
7/17/2019 BISC Best Practice FO Testing
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/bisc-best-practice-fo-testing 48/75
49
OTDR in Action
The OTDR measures reflected energy and
NOT the transmitted light level.
Distance
Loss
7/17/2019 BISC Best Practice FO Testing
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/bisc-best-practice-fo-testing 49/75
50
OTDR Technology
• Rayleigh Scattering
• Fresnel Reflection
7/17/2019 BISC Best Practice FO Testing
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/bisc-best-practice-fo-testing 50/75
51
Scattering, (Rayleigh
Scattering) occurs whentransmitted light energy is
higher than what the glass
molecules can absorb and
the energy is released in all
directions. It is the major
loss factor in fiber.
Backscattering occurs
from about 0.0001%
of the light being
reflected back to the
OTDR.
Rayleigh Scattering
7/17/2019 BISC Best Practice FO Testing
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/bisc-best-practice-fo-testing 51/75
52
Coupling loss air gap
causes loss of light
transmitted
Fresnel Reflection occurs
when light traveling in one
material encounters a
different density material
(like air). Up to 8% of the
light is reflected back to
the source while the restcontinues out of the
material.
Fresnel Reflection
What is reflectance?
7/17/2019 BISC Best Practice FO Testing
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/bisc-best-practice-fo-testing 52/75
What is reflectance?
An air gap between the end faces of a fiber
also cause Fresnel reflections to occur.
7/17/2019 BISC Best Practice FO Testing
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/bisc-best-practice-fo-testing 53/75
What do those numbers mean?
Reflectance is the preferred term when characterizing a single
connector.• It is a measure of the amount of power reflected by a connection.
• It includes one connector
• It is always negative.
• Smaller is better (e.g. -35dB is better than -20dB) Refl10log
P reflected
P incident
Return Loss is the preferred term when characterizing an entire link
• It is a measure of the amount of power NOT reflected by a link.
• Includes all connections and fiber
• It is always positive.
• Bigger is better (e.g. +35dB is better than +20dB)
reflected
incident
P
P log10ORL
Why should you care?
7/17/2019 BISC Best Practice FO Testing
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/bisc-best-practice-fo-testing 54/75
Why should you care?
High reflectance causes increased Bit Error Rates
(CRC errors) on the network
7/17/2019 BISC Best Practice FO Testing
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/bisc-best-practice-fo-testing 55/75
56
What Do OTDR Test RESULTS Look Like?
l ( )
7/17/2019 BISC Best Practice FO Testing
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/bisc-best-practice-fo-testing 56/75
Test Example: Tier 2 (OTDR)TR
MC X
XX X
Backbone Cables
Horizontal Cables
OTDRcharacterizes linkdetails
ven a e
7/17/2019 BISC Best Practice FO Testing
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/bisc-best-practice-fo-testing 57/75
58
ven a efrom OTDR
EventMap Event Table
EVENTMAP
7/17/2019 BISC Best Practice FO Testing
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/bisc-best-practice-fo-testing 58/75
EVENTMAP
• Easy to understand map of thephysical infrastructure
• Icons represent events.
• Passing reflective event
• Failing reflective event• Hidden reflective event
• Passing loss event
• Failing loss event
• Hidden event’s loss is added toprevious event’s loss
Typical OTDR TEST RESULT
7/17/2019 BISC Best Practice FO Testing
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/bisc-best-practice-fo-testing 59/75
60
Typical OTDR TEST RESULT
Backscatter
Reflection
Reflective Event
7/17/2019 BISC Best Practice FO Testing
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/bisc-best-practice-fo-testing 60/75
61
Reflective Event
Connector
Loss Event
7/17/2019 BISC Best Practice FO Testing
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/bisc-best-practice-fo-testing 61/75
62
Loss Event
Non-reflective eventSplice or severe bend
End Event
7/17/2019 BISC Best Practice FO Testing
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/bisc-best-practice-fo-testing 62/75
63
End Event
End of Fiber
Gainer Event
7/17/2019 BISC Best Practice FO Testing
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/bisc-best-practice-fo-testing 63/75
64
Gainer Event
50 micron fiber connected to a 62.5 micron fiber
Gainer
GHOST EVENT
7/17/2019 BISC Best Practice FO Testing
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/bisc-best-practice-fo-testing 64/75
65
Ghosts
Dynamic Range
7/17/2019 BISC Best Practice FO Testing
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/bisc-best-practice-fo-testing 65/75
66
Dynamic Range
• Determines the length of fiber that can be tested
• Provided as a dB value
• Larger values mean longer distance (typically for telcos)
… and a larger dead zone
• Premises OTDR’s do not need a large dynamic range …
and benefit with a small dead zone
• Pulse needs to be wide enough to get to
the end of the fiber
Dynamic Range
7/17/2019 BISC Best Practice FO Testing
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/bisc-best-practice-fo-testing 66/75
67
Dynamic Range
Measurement
Dynamic
Range
Initial backscatter level at OTDR front connector
Dynamic range is the maximum attenuation level that the test
equipment can recognize and therefore may be used to
determine how long of a fiber can be measured.
Noise
dB
Length00
Dead Zone
7/17/2019 BISC Best Practice FO Testing
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/bisc-best-practice-fo-testing 67/75
68
• A dead zone is like when
your eyes need to recover
from looking at the bright
sun or theflash of a camera
• It can be reduced by using
a lower pulse width, but itwill decrease the dynamic
range.
Two Types of Dead Zones
7/17/2019 BISC Best Practice FO Testing
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/bisc-best-practice-fo-testing 68/75
69
Two Types of Dead Zones
• Typically occurs in a tracewhenever there is aconnector
• The OTDR receiver goes“blind” from the strong
reflection
•Includes duration of thereflection and recoverytime for the receiver.
Eventdead zone
Attenuationdead zone
Attenuation Dead Zone
7/17/2019 BISC Best Practice FO Testing
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/bisc-best-practice-fo-testing 69/75
vs. Event Dead Zone• Event Dead Zone is the minimum distance the
OTDR can detect an event after the preceding
event
• OFP Typical Event Dead Zone is:
• 0.5m @ 850 nm, 3 ns, -40 dB Reflectance
• 0.7m @ 1300 nm, 3 ns -40 dB Reflectance
• 0.6m @ 1310 nm, 3 ns, -50 dB Reflectance
• 0.6 m @ 1550 nm, 3 ns, -50 dB Reflectance
Attenuation Dead Zone
7/17/2019 BISC Best Practice FO Testing
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/bisc-best-practice-fo-testing 70/75
vs. Event Dead Zone• Attenuation Dead Zone is the minimum
distance between two events on an OTDRwhere the OTDR can assess the event loss
• OFP Typical Attenuation Dead Zone is:
• 2.2m @ 850 nm, 3 ns, -40 dB Reflectance• 4.5m @ 1300 nm, 3 ns -40 dB Reflectance
• 3.6m @ 1310 nm, 3 ns, -50 dB Reflectance
• 3.6 m @ 1550 nm, 3 ns, -50 dB Reflectance
s ng aFib
7/17/2019 BISC Best Practice FO Testing
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/bisc-best-practice-fo-testing 71/75
72
gFiber
LaunchFiber
Will give loss of the
first connector
TailFiber
Will give loss of thelast connector
Launch & TAIL Fiber
7/17/2019 BISC Best Practice FO Testing
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/bisc-best-practice-fo-testing 72/75
73
• A must for measuring the loss of thefirst and last connector in a fiber link
• Launch fiber must be significantly longer than the
attenuation dead zone of the OTDR
• With short dead zones you can use a short launchfiber
Launch Fiber Compensation
7/17/2019 BISC Best Practice FO Testing
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/bisc-best-practice-fo-testing 73/75
74
p
Getting to Systems Acceptance
7/17/2019 BISC Best Practice FO Testing
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/bisc-best-practice-fo-testing 74/75
Getting to Systems Acceptance
• Verification Testing
– Typically performed after MC,IC and / or HC connectorinstallation
– Improves attenuation testingtime
• Attenuation Testing – Final System Verification
– Certifies Loss is withinPerformance Standardrequirements
• OTDR Testing – Tests links and point
discontinuities
Support Resources
7/17/2019 BISC Best Practice FO Testing
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/bisc-best-practice-fo-testing 75/75
Support Resources
• Knowledge Base:
– http://myaccount.flukenetworks.com/f net/en-us/supportAndDownloads/kb
• Technical Assistance Center24 x 7 assistance:
– USA: 1-800-283-5853
• Resources for “Experts” – Designers:
http://www.flukenetworks.com/expertise/role/Architects-Consultants-Designers
– Installers:http://www.flukenetworks.com/expertise/role/guide-to-contract-installers-and-installation