biophotonics - fritz popp

7/24/2019 BioPhotonics - Fritz Popp

1/14

Keep tech application simple & focused. Do not bring in other things it does.

It just helps with energy.

Can we add to pc processor or ram for better performance? What about

directed tower at server for performance increase potential revenue

stream Isolate customers that want increased performance and stic! toweron that server how do we !now placement " is there

#io$hotonics% even tho we may be in the dar! we are swimming in a sea of light.

httpwww.view'one.comdna(.html)))))))))))))))I get lots of suggestions for stories, and I really appreciate them. But some of them are too

good to be true. An example of this was a story of a giant human skeleton -- maybe 40 feet

tall -- that was discoered by a !ussian archaeological team. "he story had photos and linksaccompanying it and looked promising. But when the links were researched they went in a

circle. #ach link used the other link as the source. $inally the elements of the photos turned

up and we recogni%ed a good &hotoshop 'ob had fooled eeryone.

I had this same experience this week when I was sent an article where a !ussian (again)

scientist, &'otr *ar'a'e, had managed to intercept communication from a +A molecule in

the form of ultraiolet photons -- light hat/s more, he claimed to hae captured this

communication from one organism (a frog embryo) with a laser beam and then transmitted it

to another organisms +A (a salamander embryo), causing the latter embryo to deelop into

a frog

But this was 'ust the beginning.

+r. *ar'a'e claims that this communication is not something that happens only inside the

indiidual cells or between one cell and another. e claims organisms use this 1light1 to 1talk1

to other organisms and suggested that this could explain telepathy and #2&. It was like

human beings already had their own wireless internet based on our +A. ow

I tried to find a scientific 'ournal that had this experiment. All I could

find were blogs and other websites that carried the same story, word

for word, without any references. "hat is until I stumbled on the

work of $rit%-Albert &opp 3right. "hen eerything I had 'ust readseemed ery plausible.

$rit%-Albert &opp thought he had discoered a cure for cancer. I/m

not coninced that he didn/t.

It was 5670, and &opp, a theoretical biophysicist at the 8niersity of

9arburg in *ermany, had been teaching radiology -- the interaction of electromagnetic (#9)

radiation on biological systems. &opp was too early to worry about things like cellphones and

microwae towers which are now commonly linked with cancers and leukemia. is world was
http://www.viewzone.com/dnax.htmlhttp://www.viewzone.com/dnax.html


2/14

much smaller.

e/d been examining two almost identical molecules: ben%o3apyrene, a polycyclic

hydrocarbon known to be one of the most lethal carcinogens to humans, and its twin (sae for

a tiny alteration in its molecular makeup), ben%o3epyrene. e had illuminated both molecules

with ultraiolet (8;) light in an attempt to find exactly what made these two almost identical

molecules so different.

Why Ultra-violet light?

&opp chose to work specifically with 8; light because of the experiments of a !ussian biologist

named Alexander *urwitsch who, while working with onions in 56


3/14

light at a specific fre>uency -- =?0 nm (nanometres) in the ultra-iolet range. &opp kept

wondering why a cancer-causing substance would be a light scrambler. e began reading the

scientific literature specifically about human biological reactions, and came across information

about a phenomenon called /photorepair/.

Photorepair

It is well known from biological laboratory experiments that if you blast a cell with 8; light so

that 66 per cent of the cell, including its +A, is destroyed, you can almost entirely repair the

damage in a single day 'ust by illuminating the cell with the same waelength at a much

weaker intensity. "o this day, scientists don/t understand this phenomenon, calledphotorepair,

but no one has disputed it.

&opp also knew that patients witheroderma

pigmentosum3right eentually die of skin cancer because

theirphotorepairsystem can/t repair solar damage. e was also

struck by the fact thatphotorepairworks most efficiently at =?0

nm -- the same fre>uency that the cancer-causing compoundsreact to and scramble.

"his was where &opp made his logical leap. If the carcinogens only

react to this fre>uency, it must somehow be linked tophotorepair.

If so, this would mean that there must be some kind of light in the

body responsible forphotorepair. A compound must cause cancer

because it permanently blocks this light and scrambles it,

sophotorepaircan/t work anymore. It seemed logical, but was it true@

Light inside the body

&opp was freaked out by this. e wrote about it in a paper and a prestigious medical 'ournal

agreed to publish it.

ot long after that, &opp was approached by a student named Bernhard !uth, who asked

&opp to superise his work for his doctoral dissertation. &opp told !uth he was prepared to do

so if the student could show that light was emanating from the human body.

"his meeting was fortuitous for &opp because !uth happened to be an excellent experimental

physicist. !uth thought the idea was ridiculous, and immediately set to work building

e>uipment to proe &opp/s hypothesis wrong.

ithin two years, !uth had constructed a machine resembling a big -ray detector which useda photomultiplier to count light, photon by photon. #en today, it is still one of the best pieces

of e>uipment in the field. "he machine had to be highly sensitie because it had to measure

what &opp assumed would be extremely weak emissions.


4/14

In an old documentaryfilm taken in thelaboratory at theInternational Institute of

Biophysics !r" Poppopens a chamber aboutthe si#e of a bread bo$" %eplaces a fresh cuttingfrom a plant and a

&ooden match in a plastic container inside the darkchamber and closed the light proof door"

Immediately he s&itches on the photomultiplyerand the image sho&s up on a computer screen" 'hematch stick is black &hile the green glo&ingsilhouette of the leaves is clearly visible"

!r" Popp e$claims (We no& kno& today

that man is essentially a being of light"(

In 567, they were ready for their first test with cucumber seedlings. "he photomultiplier

showed that photons, or light waes, of a surprisingly high intensity were being emitted fromthe seedlings. In case the light had to do with an effect of photosynthesis, they decided that

their next test -- with potatoes -- would be to grow the seedling plants in the dark. "his time,

when the seedlings were placed in the photomultiplier, they registered an een higher

intensity of light. hat/s more, the photons in the liing systems they/d examined were more

coherent than anything they/d eer seen.

&opp began thinking about light in nature. Cight was present in plants and was used during

photosynthesis. hen we eat plant foods, he thought, it must be that we take up the photons

and store them.

hen we consume broccoli, for example, and digest it, it is metabolised into carbon dioxide(DEuencies, from the lowest to the highest.

"his energy is the driing force for all the molecules in our body. Before any chemical reaction

can occur, at least one electron must be actiated by a photon with a certain waelength and

enough energy.


5/14

"he biochemist and obel &ri%e winner Cehninger mentions in his textbook that some

reactions in the liing cell happen >uite a lot faster than what corresponds to =7D

temperature. "he explanation seems to be that the body purposely directs chemical reactions

by means of electromagnetic ibrations (biophotons).

Photons )Light* control everything in the cell

&hotons switch on the body/s processes like an

orchestra conductor bringing each indiidual

instrument into the collectie sound. At different

fre>uencies, they perform different functions. &opp

found that molecules in the cells responded to certain

fre>uencies, and that a range of ibrations from the

photons caused a ariety of fre>uencies in other

molecules of the body.

"his theory has been supported by +r. ;el'ko ;el'koic

who now heads the Denter for 9ultidisciplinary!esearch and #ngineering, Institute of uclear

2ciences ;inca. 2he dared to ask the >uestion that

has foreer pu%%led cellular biologists: hat is it that

enabled the tens of thousands of different kinds of

molecules in the organism to recogni%e their specific targets@ Ciing processes depend on

selectie interactions between particular molecules, and that is true for basic metabolism to

the subtlest nuances of emotion. It/s like trying to find a friend in a ery big ery crowded

ballroom in the dark.

"he conentional picture of a cell een now is that of a bag of molecules dissoled in water.

And through bumping into one another by chance -- random collisions -- those molecules that

hae complementary shapes lock onto to each other so the appropriate biochemical reactions

can take place. "his /lock and key/ model has been refined to a more flexible (and realistic)

/induced fit/ hypothesis that allows each molecule to change shape slightly to fit the other

better after they get in touch, but the main idea remains the same.

It is supposed to explain how en%ymes can recogni%e their respectie substrates, how

antibodies in the immune system can grab onto specific foreign inaders and disarm them. By

extension, that/s how proteins can /dock/ with different partner proteins, or latch onto specific

nucleic acids to control gene expression, or assemble into ribosomes for translating proteins,

or other multi-molecular complexes that modify the genetic messages in arious ways. Butwith thousands -- or een hundreds of thousands of reactions happening each second in 'ust

one cell this seems pushing the 1mechanical1 concept a bit too far.

hat has been proposed is that somehow each molecule sends out a uni>ue electromagnetic

field that can 1sense1 the field of the complimentary molecule. It/s as if there is a 1dance1 in

the cellular medium and the molecules moe to the rythm. "he music is supplied by the

biophoton.


6/14

(+el,kovic and osic proposed that molecularinteractions are electrical in nature and they takeplace over distances that are large compared &iththe si#e of molecules" osic later introduced the

idea of dynamic electromagnetic field interactionsthat molecules recogni#e their particular targetsand vice versa by electromagnetic resonance" Inother &ords the molecules send out specificfre.uencies of electromagnetic &aves &hich not

only enable them to /see/ and /hear/ each other asboth photon and phonon modes e$ist for

electromagnetic &aves but also to influence eachother at a distance and become ineluctably dra&nto each other if vibrating out of phase )in acomplementary &ay*"(-- "he !eal Bioinformatics

!eolution: &roteins and ucleic Acids 2inging to EneAnother@ (&aper aailable at reportFi-sis.org.uk)

('here are about 011111 chemical reactions

happening in every cell each second" 'he chemicalreaction can only happen if the molecule &hich is

reacting is e$cited by a photon""" 2nce the photonhas e$cited a reaction it returns to the field and isavailable for more reactions""" We are s&imming inan ocean of light"(

"hese /biophoton emission/, as &opp called them, proided an ideal communication system for

the transfer of information to many cells across the organism. But the single most important

>uestion remained: where was the light coming from@

A particularly gifted student talked him into another experiment. It is known that when

ethidium bromide is applied to samples of +A, it insinuates itself in between the base pairs

of the double helix, causing +A to unwind. "he student suggested that, after applying the

chemical, they measure the light coming from the sample. &opp found that the greater the

concentration of ethidium, the more the +A unraelled, but also the stronger the intensity of

light. Donersely, the less he used, the less light was emitted.


7/14

e also found that +A could send out a wide range of fre>uencies, some of which seemed to

be linked to certain functions. If +A stored this light, it would naturally emit more light on

being un%ipped.

"hese and other studies proed to &opp that one of the most essential sources of light and

biophoton emissions was +A. +A was like the master tuning fork of the body. It would

strike a particular fre>uency and certain molecules would follow. It was also possible, he

realised, that he had stumbled upon the missing link in current +A theory that could account

for perhaps the greatest miracle of all in human biology -- how a single cell can turn into a

fully formed human being.

%o& cells (talk( to eachother

hen you get a cut or scratch on your skin, the cells

that are in'ured somehow signal the surrounding

healthy cells to begin reproducing copies of

themseles to fill in and mend the opening. hen the

skin is back to normal, a signal is sent to the cells totell them to stop reproducing. 2cientists hae

wondered exactly how this works.

ith biophoton emissions, &opp belieed he had an

answer to this >uestion. "his phenomenon of

coordination and communication could only occur in a

holistic system with one central orchestrator. &opp

showed in his experiments that these weak light emissions were sufficient to orchestrate the

body/s repairs. "he emissions had to be low intensity because these communications took

place on a ery small, intracellular, >uantum leel. igher intensities would hae an effect

only in the world of the large and would create too much 1noise1 to be effectie.

"he number of photons emitted seemed to be linked to the organism/s position on the

eolutionary scale -- the more complex the organism, the fewer photons were emitted.

!udimentary animals and plants tended to emit 500 photonsGcm


8/14

&opp tried out his machine on a series of cancer patients. In eery instance, these patients

had lost those natural periodic rhythms as well as their coherence. "he lines of internal

communication were scrambled. "hey had lost their connection with the world. In effect, their

light was going out.

Hust the opposite is seen with multiple sclerosis: 92 is a state of too much order. &atients with

this disease are taking in too much light, thereby inhibiting their cells/ ability to do their 'ob.

"oo much cooperatie harmony preented flexibility and indiiduality -- like too many soldiers

marching in step as they cross a bridge, causing it to collapse. &erfect coherence is an optimal

state between chaos and order. ith too much cooperation, it is as though indiidual

members of the orchestra are no longer able to improise. In effect, 92 patients are drowning

in light.

&opp also examined the effects of stress. In a stressed state, the rate of biophoton emissions

goes up -- a defence mechanism designed to restore the patient/s e>uilibrium.

&opp now recogni%ed that what he/d been experimenting with was een more than a cure for

cancer or *estaltbildung. ere was a model which proided a better explanation than the

current neo-+arwinist theory for how all liing things eole on the planet. !ather than a

system of fortunate but ultimately random error, if +A uses fre>uencies of eery ariety as

an information tool, this suggests instead a feedback system of perfect communication

through waes that encode and transfer information.

(3ood vibes( means coherent light

&opp came to reali%e that light in the body might een hold the key to health and illness. In

one experiment, he compared the light from free-range hens/ eggs with that from penned-in,

caged hens. "he photons in the former were far more coherent than those in the latter.

&opp went on to use biophoton emissions as a tool for measuring the >uality of food. "hehealthiest food had the lowest and most coherent intensity of light. Any disturbance in the

system increased the production of photons. ealth was a state of perfect subatomic

communication, and ill health was a state of communication breakdown. e are ill when our

waes are out of synch.

Bio &hoton emission detection is currently used commercially in the food industry. Agricultural

science is looking at Bio-photon emissions to determine plant health for the purposes of food

>uality control. Biophotonen is a company working for deelopment and practical applications

of biophotonics. "he work is based on a ariety of patents. 1Biophotonen1 soles practical

problems of food industry, enironmental industry, cosmetics, etc.

2ff-shoots of !r" Popp/s discovery

In the 5670s +r. ;el'ko ;el'koic, who now heads the Denter for9ultidisciplinary !esearch and #ngineering, Institute of uclear 2ciences ;inca,

also discoered a method for predicting which of the hundreds of new chemicals

made by the rapidly expanding chemical industry were carcinogenic, by


9/14

calculating certain electronic, biophotonic properties of the molecules. "hismethod was soon found e>ually applicable to predicting organic chemicals that

were mutagenic, or toxic, and een those that were antibiotic, or cytostatic

(anticancer). ;el'koic/s institute in Belgrade has since teamed up with other#uropean laboratories to apply the same method to drug discoery, especially

against AI+2 disease.

Biophoton 'herapy

Biophoton therapy is the application of light to

particular areas of the skin for healing

purposes. "he light, or photons, that areemitted by these units are absorbed by the

skin/s photoreceptors and then trael throughthe body/s nerous system to the brain, where

they help regulate what is referred to as our

human bio-energy. By stimulating certain areasof the body with specific >uantities of light,

biophoton therapy can help reduce pain as well as aid in arious healingprocesses throughout the body.

"he theory behind biophoton therapy is based on the work of +r. $ran% 9orelland has been expanded by the work of +octors C.D. ;incent and $.A. &opp, who

theori%ed that light can affect the electromagnetic oscillation, or waes of thebody and regulate en%yme actiity.

It took some uency. #entually,

they would form the International Institute of Biophysics, composed of 5 groups of scientists

from international centres around the world.

&opp and his new colleagues went on to study the light emissions from seeral organisms of

the same species, first in an experiment with a type of water flea of the genus +aphnia. hat

they found was nothing short of astonishing. "ests with a photomultiplier showed that the

water fleas were sucking up the light emitted from each other. &opp tried the same

experiment on small fish and got the same result. According to his photomultiplier, sunflowers

were like biological acuum cleaners, moing in the direction of the most solar photons to

hooer them up. #en bacteria swallowed photons from the media they were put in.

ommunication bet&een organisms

"hus, it dawned on &opp that these emissions had a

purpose outside of the body. ae resonance wasn/t

only being used to communicate inside the body, but

between liing things as well. "wo healthy beings


10/14

engaged in /photon sucking/, as he called it, by exchanging photons. &opp realised that this

exchange might unlock the secret of some of the animal kingdom/s most persistent

conundrums: how schools of fish or flocks of birds create perfect and instantaneous

coordination. 9any experiments on the homing ability of animals demonstrate that it has

nothing to do with following habitual trails, scents or een the #9 fields of the earth, but

rather some form of silent communication that acts like an inisible rubber band, een when

the animals are separated by miles of distance.

$or humans, there was another possibility. If we could take in the photons of other liing

things, we might also be able to use the information from them to correct our own light if it

went awry.

!eath 'ransmission via the Paranormal (Light( hannel

2ome extremely interesting experiments were performed by ;.&. Ja%nacheye et

al regarding the paranormal transmission of death by light inter-organismcommunication.

Briefly, two groups of cells were selected from the same cell culture and one

sample placed on each side of a window 'oining two enironmentally shieldedrooms. "he cell cultures were in >uart% containers. Ene cell culture was used as

the initiation sample and was sub'ected to a deadly mechanism - irus, germ,chemical poison, irradiation, ultraiolet rays, etc. "he second cell culture was

obsered, to ascertain any transmitted effects from the culture sample being

killed.

hen the window was made of ordinary glass, the second sample remained alie

and healthy. hen the window was made of >uart%, the second sample sickenedand died with the same symptoms as the primary sample.

"he experiments were done in darkness, and oer ,000 were reported by

Ja%nacheye and his colleagues. "he onset of induced complementary sickness


11/14

and death in the second culture followed a reasonable time -- say two to fourhours -- behind sickness and death in the primary culture.

"he ma'or transmission difference between window glass and >uart% is that>uart% transmits both ultraiolet and infrared well, while glass is relatiely

opa>ue to ultraiolet and infrared. Both >uart% and glass transmit isible light."hus glass is a suppressor of the paranormal channel, while >uart% is not.

In 560, estern researchers found that cells could be killed in darkness withultraiolet radiation, kept shielded from isible light for twenty-four hours or

longer, and then if radiated with isible light the cells would start reiing by

hundreds of thousands een though they had been clinically dead.

2pecifically, eery cell emits mitogenetic radiation in the ultraiolet range twice:when it is born and when it dies. "he 8; photon emitted at death contains the

exact irtual state pattern of the condition of the cell at death. "he healthy cells

are bombarded with death messages from those that are dying, and this diffusesthe death pattern throughout the healthy culture, eentually kindling into the

same death pattern there.

3;.&. Ja%nacheye et al, 1+istant Intercellular Interactions in a 2ystem of "wo

"issue Dultures,1 &sychoenergetic 2ystems, ;ol. 5, o. =, 9arch 567, pp 545-

54


12/14

"o &opp, homoeopathy was another example of photon sucking.

e had begun to think of it as a /resonance absorber/.

omoeopathy rests upon the notion that like is treated with like. A

plant extract that at full strength can cause hies in the body is

used in an extremely diluted form to get rid of it. If a rogue

fre>uency in the body can produce certain symptoms, it follows

that a high dilution of a substance which can produce the samesymptoms would also carry that fre>uency. Cike a resonating

tuning fork, a suitable homoeopathic solution might attract and

then absorb the abnormal oscillations, allowing the body to return

to normal health.

&opp thought that electro-magnetic molecular signalling might

een explain acupuncture. According to "raditional Dhinese

9edicine, the human body has a system of meridians, running

deep in the tissues, through which flows an inisible energy the

Dhinese call ch/i, or the life force. "he ch/i supposedly enters the

body through these acupuncture points and flows to deeper organ

structures (which do not correspond to those in estern biology),

proiding energy (or the life force). Illness occurs when this

energy is blocked at any point along the pathways. According to

&opp, the meridian system transmits specific energy waes to

specific %ones of the body.

!esearch has shown that many of the acupuncture points hae a

dramatically reduced electrical resistance compared with the

surrounding skin (50 kilo-ohms and = mega-ohms, respectiely).

Erthopaedic surgeon +r !obert Becker, who has done a great dealof research on #9 fields in the body, designed a special electrode

recording deice that rolls along the body like a pi%%a cutter. is

many studies hae shown electrical charges on eery one of the people tested corresponding

to the Dhinese meridian points.

3#xtracted from "he $ield: "he Kuest for the 2ecret $orce of the 8nierse, by Cynne

9c"aggart

Light in human consciousness

I mention this latest work for those who may wish to explore the boundaries of photonresearch and theory. In a ground-breaking paper with the lengthy title of 1Erchestrated

Eb'ectie !eduction of Kuantum Doherence in Brain 9icrotubules: "he /Erch E!/ 9odel for

Donsciousness1 by 2tuart ameroff and !oger &enrose, the brain is described as a >uantum

computer whose main architecture are the cytoskeletal microtubules and other structures

within each of the brain/s neurons.

If you examine a neuron, you will see that there are many hollow tubes surrounding the axon.

"hese microtubuleshae been thought of as a kind of scaffold to support the nere fiber. But


13/14

they are now getting a second look as the possible architecture of our consciousness.

"he particular characteristics of microtubules that make them suitable for >uantum effects

include their crystal-like lattice structure, hollow inner core, organi%ation of cell function and

capacity for information processing. According to the researchers, their si%e appears perfectly

designed to transmit photons in the 8; range.

3Above4 2chematic of central region of neuron (distal axon and dendrites not shown),

showing parallel arrayed microtubules interconnected by 9A&s. 9icrotubules in axons are

lengthy and continuous, whereas in dendrites they are interrupted and of mixed polarity.

Cinking proteins connect microtubules to membrane proteins including receptors on dendritic

spines.

('raditionally vie&ed as the cell/s /bone-like/

scaffolding microtubules and other cytoskeletalstructures no& appear to fill communicative andinformation processing roles" 'heoretical modelssuggest ho& conformational states of tubulins

&ithin microtubule lattices can interact &ith

neighboring tubulins to represent propagate andprocess information as in molecular-level /cellularautomata/ computing systems"(-- ameroff andatt, 56?uantum theory. In their model, >uantum coherence emerges, and is isolated in brain

microtubules until a threshold related to >uantum graity is reached. "he resultant self-


14/14

collapse creates an instantaneous 1now1 eent. 2e>uences of such eents create a flow of

time, and consciousness.

+on/t worry if you can/t understand this. It/s heay reading but it does show that the

existence of internal photons -- inner light -- is ery real and is the basis of irtually all

human cellular and systemic function.

Dould the !ussian scientists really hae changed a salamander embryo into a frog with lasers@I prefer to wait until the actual details of the experiment are published and reiewed -- but I

am much less apt to dismiss this as fiction now that I know about our inner lights.

biophotonics - fritz popp

Documents