biomedical engineering design - lecture 6. orthoses

96
Orthoses Carrying Orthosis, Elbow Orthosis, ARMON Wb2308 Biomedical Engineering Design Faculty of Mechanical, Maritime, and Materials Engineering (3mE) Department of BioMechanical Engineering (BMechE) Just Herder [email protected]

Upload: tu-delft-opencourseware

Post on 25-May-2015

1.222 views

Category:

Education


6 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Biomedical Engineering Design - Lecture 6. Orthoses

Vermelding onderdeel organisatie

OrthosesCarrying Orthosis, Elbow Orthosis, ARMON

Wb2308 Biomedical Engineering Design

Faculty of Mechanical, Maritime, and Materials Engineering (3mE)Department of BioMechanical Engineering (BMechE)

Just Herder

[email protected]

Page 2: Biomedical Engineering Design - Lecture 6. Orthoses

November 14, 2005 2

Overview

• Carrying Orthosis• Elbow Orthosis• ARMON

Page 3: Biomedical Engineering Design - Lecture 6. Orthoses

November 14, 2005 3

Design guidelines

• Cosmetics: appearance, natural usage• Comfort: lightweight, ‘breathing’• Control: low mental and physical load

Page 4: Biomedical Engineering Design - Lecture 6. Orthoses

November 14, 2005 4

1. No shear forces!

Page 5: Biomedical Engineering Design - Lecture 6. Orthoses

November 14, 2005 5

2. Distance between interfaces!

Page 6: Biomedical Engineering Design - Lecture 6. Orthoses

November 14, 2005 6

3. Make interfaces adaptive!

Page 7: Biomedical Engineering Design - Lecture 6. Orthoses

November 14, 2005 7

4. Perforate the interfaces!

Page 8: Biomedical Engineering Design - Lecture 6. Orthoses

November 14, 2005 8

Design perspectives

• Motion directed design: starting with desired motion (or positions), add actuators later.

• Force directed design (FDD): start with desired forces (or force distributions), take care about motion later.

Same mechanics, different design perspective!

Page 9: Biomedical Engineering Design - Lecture 6. Orthoses

November 14, 2005 9

Example 1

Given situation

Desired situation

Page 10: Biomedical Engineering Design - Lecture 6. Orthoses

November 14, 2005 10

Example 1Solution according to motion directed design

Page 11: Biomedical Engineering Design - Lecture 6. Orthoses

November 14, 2005 11

Example 1Solution according to force directed design

Equilibrium through addition of appropriate forces

Page 12: Biomedical Engineering Design - Lecture 6. Orthoses

November 14, 2005 12

Example 1Solution according to force directed design

Equilibrium through addition of appropriate forces

Page 13: Biomedical Engineering Design - Lecture 6. Orthoses

November 14, 2005 13

Example 1Solution according to force directed design

Equilibrium through addition of appropriate forces

Page 14: Biomedical Engineering Design - Lecture 6. Orthoses

November 14, 2005 14

Example 1Solution according to force directed design

Equilibrium through addition of appropriate forces

Page 15: Biomedical Engineering Design - Lecture 6. Orthoses

November 14, 2005 15

Example 1Solution according to force directed design

Equilibrium through addition of appropriate forces

Page 16: Biomedical Engineering Design - Lecture 6. Orthoses

November 14, 2005 16

Example 1

Page 17: Biomedical Engineering Design - Lecture 6. Orthoses

November 14, 2005 17

Example 1Solution according to force directed design

Equilibrium through addition of appropriate forces

Page 18: Biomedical Engineering Design - Lecture 6. Orthoses

November 14, 2005 18

Example 1Solution according to force directed design

Continuous equilibrium through static balancing

Page 19: Biomedical Engineering Design - Lecture 6. Orthoses

November 14, 2005 19

Conclusion example 1

• Start with desired forces or force distribution• Make equilibrium with other forces • Select profitable force application points• Apply guidelines• Connect application points with minimal material• If mobility desired: static balancing

Page 20: Biomedical Engineering Design - Lecture 6. Orthoses

November 14, 2005 20

Shoulder orthosisa.k.a WILMER Carrying Orthosis

Page 21: Biomedical Engineering Design - Lecture 6. Orthoses

November 14, 2005 21

Shoulder orthosisa.k.a WILMER Carrying Orthosis

Present solutionsdo not work

Page 22: Biomedical Engineering Design - Lecture 6. Orthoses

November 14, 2005 22

Shoulder orthosisa.k.a WILMER Carrying Orthosis

Page 23: Biomedical Engineering Design - Lecture 6. Orthoses

November 14, 2005 23

Shoulder orthosisa.k.a WILMER Carrying Orthosis

Result:

Flail arm

Subluxation

Page 24: Biomedical Engineering Design - Lecture 6. Orthoses

November 14, 2005 24

Shoulder orthosisa.k.a WILMER Carrying Orthosis

Page 25: Biomedical Engineering Design - Lecture 6. Orthoses

November 14, 2005 25

Shoulder orthosisa.k.a WILMER Carrying Orthosis

Cool 1989

Page 26: Biomedical Engineering Design - Lecture 6. Orthoses

November 14, 2005 26

Shoulder orthosisa.k.a WILMER Carrying Orthosis

Page 27: Biomedical Engineering Design - Lecture 6. Orthoses

November 14, 2005 27

Shoulder orthosisa.k.a WILMER Carrying Orthosis

Page 28: Biomedical Engineering Design - Lecture 6. Orthoses

November 14, 2005 28

Shoulder orthosisa.k.a WILMER Carrying Orthosis

Page 29: Biomedical Engineering Design - Lecture 6. Orthoses

November 14, 2005 29

Shoulder orthosisa.k.a WILMER Carrying Orthosis

Made out of stainless steel tube

Page 30: Biomedical Engineering Design - Lecture 6. Orthoses

November 14, 2005 30

Shoulder orthosisa.k.a WILMER Carrying Orthosis

• Neutralization of subluxation

• Suppression of oedema

• Reduced pain

• Protection

• Allows passive motion

• Low mass

• Comfortable

• Invisible

• Easy donning and doffing

Page 31: Biomedical Engineering Design - Lecture 6. Orthoses

November 14, 2005 31

Carrying orthosis

Page 32: Biomedical Engineering Design - Lecture 6. Orthoses

November 14, 2005 32

Elbow Orthosis

Page 33: Biomedical Engineering Design - Lecture 6. Orthoses

November 14, 2005 33

Elbow Orthosis

State of the Art…

Page 34: Biomedical Engineering Design - Lecture 6. Orthoses

November 14, 2005 34

Use of springs

Mass-to-mass (counterweight)

Mass-to-spring (counterspring)

Page 35: Biomedical Engineering Design - Lecture 6. Orthoses

November 14, 2005 35

Elbow Orthosis

Page 36: Biomedical Engineering Design - Lecture 6. Orthoses

November 14, 2005 36

Elbow Orthosis

Page 37: Biomedical Engineering Design - Lecture 6. Orthoses

November 14, 2005 37

Elbow Orthosis

Page 38: Biomedical Engineering Design - Lecture 6. Orthoses

November 14, 2005 38

Elbow Orthosis

G

F

F

G

Page 39: Biomedical Engineering Design - Lecture 6. Orthoses

November 14, 2005 39

Elbow Orthosis

Page 40: Biomedical Engineering Design - Lecture 6. Orthoses

November 14, 2005 40

Elbow Orthosis

Page 41: Biomedical Engineering Design - Lecture 6. Orthoses

November 14, 2005 41

Elbow Orthosis

Page 42: Biomedical Engineering Design - Lecture 6. Orthoses

November 14, 2005 42

Elbow Orthosis

Page 43: Biomedical Engineering Design - Lecture 6. Orthoses

November 14, 2005 43

Elbow Orthosis

• Restores (some) elbow function• Comfortable• Low mass• Invisible• Cosmetically pleasing• Easy donning and doffing• Straightforward fitting procedure• Automatic locking device

Page 44: Biomedical Engineering Design - Lecture 6. Orthoses

November 14, 2005 44

Elbow Orthosis

Page 45: Biomedical Engineering Design - Lecture 6. Orthoses

November 14, 2005 45

Anglepoise (Carwardine, 1934)

Page 46: Biomedical Engineering Design - Lecture 6. Orthoses

November 14, 2005 46

Example 2: Neuromuscular diseases

600 variants identifiedMuscular Dystrophies (Duchenne DMD)Motor Neuron Diseases (Spinal Muscular Atrophy SMA)Inflammatory MyopathiesNeuromuscular Junction DiseasesEndocrine AbnormalitiesPeripheral Nerve DiseasesMetabolic Diseases of Muscle

Over 1 mln. people affected in USASMA alone 12 .. 40 per mln of the adult populationNeonatal from 40 per mln (USA) to 200 per mln (SA)

Page 47: Biomedical Engineering Design - Lecture 6. Orthoses

November 14, 2005 47

Spinal Muscular Atrophy (SMA)

Inherited

Affects motor neurons voluntary muscles

Senses not affected, normal or above-average intellect

Incurable

Progressive

Page 48: Biomedical Engineering Design - Lecture 6. Orthoses

November 14, 2005 48

Spinal Muscular Atrophy (SMA)

Hips Trunk

Respiration

Page 49: Biomedical Engineering Design - Lecture 6. Orthoses

November 14, 2005 49

Spinal Muscular Atrophy (SMA)

Hips Trunk

Respiration

Legs

Shoulders

Page 50: Biomedical Engineering Design - Lecture 6. Orthoses

November 14, 2005 50

Spinal Muscular Atrophy (SMA)

Hips Trunk

Respiration

NeckElbows

Legs

Shoulders

Page 51: Biomedical Engineering Design - Lecture 6. Orthoses

November 14, 2005 51

Two of our volunteers!Academic degree

Head support

Scoliosis, A had surgery, B not

Wheelchair bound

Arm on armrest

Good sense of touch

Slight deformationsin hands

A B

Page 52: Biomedical Engineering Design - Lecture 6. Orthoses

November 14, 2005 52

Design CriteriaSystem preference

1: Separate Manipulators

2: PoweredOrthoses

3: PassiveOrthoses

Weston

ManusARM

MULOS WREXFocal TOP

UniversalRadialGolden

Arm

Page 53: Biomedical Engineering Design - Lecture 6. Orthoses

November 14, 2005 53

Available assistive devices

1. Rehabilitation robotic manipulators

No use of hand functionControl by joystick

TNO MANUS

Page 54: Biomedical Engineering Design - Lecture 6. Orthoses

November 14, 2005 54

Available assistive devices

2. Powered orthotic devices

Use of hand functionControl by joystick

Page 55: Biomedical Engineering Design - Lecture 6. Orthoses

November 14, 2005 55

Available assistive devices

3. Passive orthotic devices: static balance

Use of hand functionNo separate control

FOCAL

Universal Healthcare Systems

Page 56: Biomedical Engineering Design - Lecture 6. Orthoses

November 14, 2005 56

Design CriteriaBased on home visits

“Your page turner is ready…”

• Independence• Personal Hygiene• Cooking, eating• Computer work

• Social activities• Have dinner• Shake hands

• Trunk balance• Arm rest essential

• Inconspicuous!

© Contact (VSN)

Page 57: Biomedical Engineering Design - Lecture 6. Orthoses

November 14, 2005 57

Clinically driven approachRange of motion for desired activities

EP

EA

EP

EA

Elevation plane

Elevation angle

FP

FA

FP

FA

Flexion plane

Flexion angle

EA and FP most important

0 .. 135 deg

0 .. 90 deg

0 .. 90 deg

0 .. 150 deg

Page 58: Biomedical Engineering Design - Lecture 6. Orthoses

November 14, 2005 58

Springs and masses

rL

mka

k1

a1

k2a2

r2

r1

mgL=rka r1k1a1= r2k2a2

Page 59: Biomedical Engineering Design - Lecture 6. Orthoses

November 14, 2005 59

Conception framework

Parameter variation

Rotation

Shift

Kinematic inversion

Resultant spring

Res. spring element

Similarity mass-spring

k1a1r1 = k2a2r2

k1a1 = k2a2kres = Σki

mg = ka

Page 60: Biomedical Engineering Design - Lecture 6. Orthoses

November 14, 2005 60

Herder and Tuijthof (1998)

Anthropomobile balanced arm

Page 61: Biomedical Engineering Design - Lecture 6. Orthoses

November 14, 2005 61

Herder and Tuijthof (1998)

Anthropomobile balanced arm

Page 62: Biomedical Engineering Design - Lecture 6. Orthoses

November 14, 2005 62

Herder and Tuijthof (1998)

Anthropomobile balanced arm

Desired: not fixed

Page 63: Biomedical Engineering Design - Lecture 6. Orthoses

November 14, 2005 63

Herder and Tuijthof (1998)

Anthropomobile balanced arm

Page 64: Biomedical Engineering Design - Lecture 6. Orthoses

November 14, 2005 64

Herder and Tuijthof (1998)

Anthropomobile balanced arm

Superposition: degrees of freedom associated withlower spring are balanced

mL1=r1k1a1

Page 65: Biomedical Engineering Design - Lecture 6. Orthoses

November 14, 2005 65

Herder and Tuijthof (1998)

Anthropomobile balanced arm

Superposition: additionaldegree of freedom

Page 66: Biomedical Engineering Design - Lecture 6. Orthoses

November 14, 2005 66

Herder and Tuijthof (1998)

Anthropomobile balanced arm

mL2=r2k2a2

mL1=r1k1a1

Page 67: Biomedical Engineering Design - Lecture 6. Orthoses

November 14, 2005 67

Herder and Tuijthof (1998)

Anthropomobile balanced arm

Four degrees of freedom

Two zero-free-length springsfor perfect static balance

Page 68: Biomedical Engineering Design - Lecture 6. Orthoses

November 14, 2005 68

Anthropomobile balanced arm

Variable stiffness control

McKibben actuators

Statically balanced

Inherently safe

Page 69: Biomedical Engineering Design - Lecture 6. Orthoses

November 14, 2005 69

Attached towheelchair

Attached to the user’s trunk

Hybrid form withadditional segment

Insufficientmobility

Respitatoryhamper

Excessivecomplexity

Conceptual designMechanism alongside the user’s arm

Page 70: Biomedical Engineering Design - Lecture 6. Orthoses

November 14, 2005 70

Conceptual designForce analysis revisited

Page 71: Biomedical Engineering Design - Lecture 6. Orthoses

November 14, 2005 71

m g1

Conceptual designForce analysis revisited

Page 72: Biomedical Engineering Design - Lecture 6. Orthoses

November 14, 2005 72

m g1

FsFe

Fe and Fs constant Fs by shoulder

Conceptual designForce analysis revisited

Page 73: Biomedical Engineering Design - Lecture 6. Orthoses

November 14, 2005 73

Fem g2

Conceptual designForce analysis revisited

Page 74: Biomedical Engineering Design - Lecture 6. Orthoses

November 14, 2005 74

Fem g2

Fccm

CCM

Fe and m2g constantFccm for complete arm

Conceptual designForce analysis revisited

Page 75: Biomedical Engineering Design - Lecture 6. Orthoses

November 14, 2005 75

BiomechanicsChange of Design Paradigm

Balancing 2-link 4DoF arm Balancing a point mass!

Fccm

CCM

Page 76: Biomedical Engineering Design - Lecture 6. Orthoses

November 14, 2005 76

No longer alongside arm Arm rest maintainedInconspicuous

Conceptual designBased on CCM principle

AnglepoiseDesk Lamp (Carwardine, 1934)

Page 77: Biomedical Engineering Design - Lecture 6. Orthoses

November 14, 2005 77

Fccm

Single fittingOnly normal forces

Conceptual designBased on CCM principle

No longer alongside arm Arm rest maintainedInconspicuous

Page 78: Biomedical Engineering Design - Lecture 6. Orthoses

November 14, 2005 78

mL2=r2k2a2

mL1=r1k1a1

Conceptual designWorking principle

Page 79: Biomedical Engineering Design - Lecture 6. Orthoses

November 14, 2005 79Herder, Tomazio, and Cardoso, 2001

Patent pending

Anti-gravity system rather than pick-and-place robot

Conceptual designSide view

Herder et al.

Page 80: Biomedical Engineering Design - Lecture 6. Orthoses

November 14, 2005 80Herder, Tomazio, Cardoso, Gil and Koopman, 2002

Herder et al.

ARMON (Mark I) Preliminary clinical testing

Patent pending

Page 81: Biomedical Engineering Design - Lecture 6. Orthoses

November 14, 2005 81

ARMON (Mark I) Patient performing important ADL with device

Herder, Tomazio, Cardoso, Gil and Koopman, 2002

Patent pending

Sergio Tomazio and Luis Cardoso

recieving the Premio Engenheiro

Jaime Philipeaward

JorineKoopman

Ms B.

Sergio Luis

Page 82: Biomedical Engineering Design - Lecture 6. Orthoses

November 14, 2005 82

Conceptual designFrontal view

Page 83: Biomedical Engineering Design - Lecture 6. Orthoses

November 14, 2005 83

Preliminary clinical testingMoving arm sideways

Herder, Tomazio, Cardoso, Gil and Koopman, 2002

Page 84: Biomedical Engineering Design - Lecture 6. Orthoses

November 14, 2005 84

Preliminary clinical testingMoving arm sideways

Herder, Tomazio, Cardoso, Gil and Koopman, 2002

Page 85: Biomedical Engineering Design - Lecture 6. Orthoses

November 14, 2005 85

Preliminary clinical testingInterference with fixed arm rest!

Herder, Tomazio, Cardoso, Gil and Koopman, 2002

Page 86: Biomedical Engineering Design - Lecture 6. Orthoses

November 14, 2005 86

Preliminary clinical testingFitting unbalance!

CCM

Herder, Tomazio, Cardoso, Gil and Koopman, 2002

Page 87: Biomedical Engineering Design - Lecture 6. Orthoses

November 14, 2005 87

Preliminary clinical testingWhen very weak: friction!

Herder, Tomazio, Cardoso, Gil and Koopman, 2002

Page 88: Biomedical Engineering Design - Lecture 6. Orthoses

November 14, 2005 88

Conclusion Arm Support

Achievements:• CCM principle works well• Aesthetics and control highly appreciated

Problems to be solved:• Interference with fixed arm rest• Fitting unbalance• Friction

Page 89: Biomedical Engineering Design - Lecture 6. Orthoses

November 14, 2005 89

ARMON (Mark II)Team: 2 ME and 2 IDE students

( ) 0det ==

JJqx

Sabine Gal (IDE)

Wendy van Stralen (ME)

Tonko Antonides (IDE)

Pieter Lucieer (ME)

Herder, Stralen, Lucieer, Gal and Antonides, 2004

Page 90: Biomedical Engineering Design - Lecture 6. Orthoses

November 14, 2005 90

Wendy (ME)

ARMON (Mark II)Complete device and close up of fitting

Herder, Stralen, Lucieer, Gal and Antonides, 2004

Patent pending

Page 91: Biomedical Engineering Design - Lecture 6. Orthoses

November 14, 2005 91

ARMON (Mark II)Patients with the device

Herder, Stralen, Lucieer, Gal and Antonides, 2004

Patent pending

Page 92: Biomedical Engineering Design - Lecture 6. Orthoses

November 14, 2005 92

ARMON (Mark III)Testing of pre-production prototype

Herder, Vrijlandt, Antonides, Cloosterman, 2005

Patent pending

Niels Vrijlandt and Tonko Antonides at work

Ms B.

Page 93: Biomedical Engineering Design - Lecture 6. Orthoses

November 14, 2005 93

Patent pending

ARMON (Mark III)First commercial product

Herder, Vrijlandt, Antonides, Cloosterman, 2005

www.microgravityproducts.com

Page 94: Biomedical Engineering Design - Lecture 6. Orthoses

November 14, 2005 94

Development of ARMON

• Mark I: • Proof of novel CCM balancing principle• Single fitting and aesthetics highly

appreciated

• Mark II: • Improved range of motion, no interference• Actively adjustable gravity balancing• Improved appearance and fitting design

• Mark III: • Further improved balancing quality and

reduced friction• Reduced box volume, general sophistication

Page 95: Biomedical Engineering Design - Lecture 6. Orthoses

November 14, 2005 95

Thank you for your attention

Eelke drinking a glass of water with ARMON Mark II

Page 96: Biomedical Engineering Design - Lecture 6. Orthoses

November 14, 2005 96

Acknowledgment

• MSc Students: Sergio Tomazio, Luis Cardoso, JorineKoopman, Clara Gil Guerrero, Wendy van Stralen, Pieter Lucieer, Sabine Gal, Tonko Antonides

• Physician: Imelda de Groot MD• Patients: In total over 12 patients tried the device• Patient organization: Dutch Neuromuscular Disease

Association (VSN)• Company: Microgravity Products (MGP), Niels

Vrijlandt, Tonko Antonides, Marijn Cloosterman, formanufacturing the prototypes and images.