biomass and combustion characteristics of secondary mixed deciduous forests in eastern ghats of...
TRANSCRIPT
Atmospheric Environment 35 (2001) 3085–3095
Biomass and combustion characteristics of secondary mixeddeciduous forests in Eastern Ghats of India
V. Krishna Prasada,*, Yogesh Kanta, Prabhat K. Guptab, C. Sharmab,A.P. Mitrab, K.V.S. Badarinatha
aNational Remote Sensing Agency, Department of Space, Government of India, Balanagar, Hyderabad 500 037, IndiabNational Physical Laboratory, Dr. K.S. Krishnan Road, New Delhi-110 012, India
Received 19 July 2000; received in revised form 17 January 2001; accepted 27 January 2001
Abstract
Biomass quantities at three different sites in tropical moist mixed secondary deciduous forests before and afterburning have been quantified in the forest patches cleared for shifting cultivation purposes. The main objective of the
experiments was to study the spatial variability in the amount of biomass burnt and the contribution of differentcomponents viz., bole, branch, and mixed leaf litter in the burning process affecting the combustion factors. Speciescomposition at the three sites varied with respect to each other. The total density of species before burning at the three
sites for more than 10 cm diameter were found to be 3192 (site 1), 1194 (site 2) and 1444 (site 3) stems/area, respectively.Analysis of the results from girth-class and density relationships suggests that nearly 80% of the stems occurred in therange from 10–40 cm girth for site one, 64.2% in 10–55 cm girth class for the site two and more than 80% of stems in
10–40 cm girth class for the site three, indicating very poor and secondary nature of the forest. The fire intensity is foundto be high for site one with 60 847 kJ s�1m�1, when compared to 31 086 and 42 789 kJ s�1m�1 for second and third sites,respectively. The values are comparatively higher than the mean value of 2566 kJ s�1m�1 reported for savanna fires.The individual combustion completeness suggested that among the different components of biomass, branch material
with less than 10 cm and upto 5 cm dbh contributed to more than 60% of combustion. Mixed leaf litter contributed toabout more than 50% of individual combustion completeness at all the sites, with third site having the highest (84%).The contribution of dry biomass material having more than 70 cm diameter is found to be very low indicating that most
of the trunks were burnt superficially. The overall combustion completeness suggested that mixed leaf litter and branchmaterial contributed to most of the combustion. Of all the three sites, site three had been found to be having highestcombustion completeness of about 30.04% when compared to 20.18% and 16.1% for first and second sites,
respectively. In the study, comparison of combustion factors for different vegetation types has also been made. # 2001Elsevier Science Ltd. All rights reserved.
Keywords: Biomass burning; Combustion factors; Tropical secondary mixed deciduous forests
1. Introduction
Biomass burning is widespread, especially in tropicsand serves to clear land for shifting cultivation, to
convert forests to agricultural and pastoral lands, and toremove the vegetation in order to promote agricultural
productivity and the growth of high yield grasses(Crutzen and Andreae, 1990). Biomass burning is animportant source of trace gas emissions, aerosols andhas important effects on atmospheric chemistry and the
radiation budget. More information on the biomassburning is necessary to better understand the sourcesand sinks of the atmospheric trace gases and their
atmospheric constituents. The importance of tracegases in the green house effect and their effects on
*Corresponding author. Tel./Fax: +91-40-3079677.
E-mail address: [email protected] (V.K. Prasad).
1352-2310/01/$ - see front matter # 2001 Elsevier Science Ltd. All rights reserved.
PII: S 1 3 5 2 - 2 3 1 0 ( 0 1 ) 0 0 1 2 5 - X
tropospheric chemistry has been reviewed in detail byearlier workers (Ramanathan et al., 1985; Crutzen, 1988;
Andreae, 1991). Further, results from the researchactivities conducted during the last two decades suggeststhat biomass burning has considerable effects on the
characteristics of the atmosphere and consequently onregional and global climate (Andreae et al., 1988;Crutzen and Andreae, 1990; Lacaux et al., 1996). Theimportance of biomass burning is well recognised in
International Global Atmospheric Chemistry (IGAC)and one of the initial IGAC activities, Biomass BurningExperiment (BIBEX): Impact on the Atmosphere and
Biosphere. The uncertainties with respect to quantifica-tion of trace gas emissions from land use changes aremainly attributed to lack of data on biomass quantities
that is susceptible for burning, exact amount of biomassburnt during different phase of combustion (combustionfactors) and changes in rates of deforestation and data
on secondary re-growth of the forests.Recent studies suggest that forests in India are likely
to come under increased pressure for meeting biomassdemands in the future. Clearing the forests for agri-
cultural use in tropical areas such as in India throughshifting cultivation is one of the most common processespracticed by the native people. In India, tropical
deciduous forests account for more than 40% of thedominating forest type when compared to other forests.These forests are prone to various types of biotic
pressures for meeting fuel wood and fodder demandsby the local people. The major sources of biomassburning in India is from shifting cultivation, accidentalfires, controlled burning, fire wood burning, burning
from agricultural residues, burning due to fire lines, etc.Although, there are no systematic surveys, with respectto the exact amount of biomass burnt from various
sources, considerable rough estimates exist in literature.It is estimated that, 63.5Mha of forests are prone toaccidental burns in India. Total biomass burnt annually
due to accidental fires is estimated to be 20.5Mha. TaskForce (1983) reported an annual area of 9956 km2 withrespect to shifting cultivation. National Land use and
Conservation Board, estimated, nearly 1.0Mha of forestarea to be affected annually due to shifting cultivation.Recent estimate in India by Forest Survey of India,(SFR, 1997), with respect to northeastern states suggest
that, 1875 km2 of forest area has been affected due toshifting cultivation. Biomass burning due to fire lines isestimated to be approximately 0.45–0.5Mha. Further,
recent estimates suggest that shifting cultivation activ-ities in India in general and mixed deciduous forests inparticular are estimated to be increasing at a rapid rate
(SFR, 1997). With respect to amount of biomass burntin India, it is estimated that, 592Tg of dry matter isburnt annually (Ahuja, 1991), compared to globally
estimated burnt dry matter of 8700Tg (Andreae, 1990),accounting for about, 7% of the global value. Of the
592Tg, nearly 250Tg of biomass in the form of fuelwood, dung, charcoal and agricultural residues is
estimated to be utilized by rural and urban people forextraction of useful heat energy, while other 342Tg isattributed from sources such as natural fires (48.1 Tg),
prescribed fires (13.9 Tg), burning of agricultural resi-dues (214Tg), prescribed burning from pastures(24.8 Tg), and slash and burn agriculture (41.3 Tg).Despite implementing one of the largest afforestation
programs in the world, carbon dioxide emissions fromthe forestry sector in India are projected to increaseto 29.3million tones during 2000 and to 77.3 million
tones by 2020 (ALGAS, 1998). However, most of theestimates are based on empirical methods and actualfield based measurements with respect to different green
house gases from various sources in general and biomassburning in particular are absent. Thus field basedmeasurements with respect onsite biomass estimations
and combustion characteristics gain importance, whichprovide valuable information for calculating the emis-sion factors. As a part of Indian Space ResearchOrganization Geosphere-Biosphere Program (ISRO-
GBP) studies, for the first time in India, studies onbiomass burning have been initiated and two fieldcampaigns with respect to quantification of biomass
burned, trace gas emissions, aerosol and UV-B studiesare attempted. The results of the first field campaignhave been discussed elsewhere (Prasad et al., 2000a, b;
Kant et al., 2000). In the present paper, results obtainedfrom the second field campaign with respect to biomassand combustion characteristics from the shifting cultiva-tion areas are discussed.
2. Forests of the study area
Rampa agency forms hilly northern part of EastGodavari District, Andhra Pradesh, India (Fig. 1).
Maredumulli forms one of the small provinces amongthe seven other provinces, which are densely covered byforests and are inhabited by the local tribal people. The
tribal people of the study area practice shifting cultiva-tion known as ‘Podu’. The forests of the study areacorrespond to southern moist mixed deciduous forests as
classified by Champion and Seth (1968). Vegetation inthe study area is of mixed deciduous type and can bedivided into three storeys, viz., the top storey havingtrees of 20–25m height, intermediate with 10–20m
height and under-storey with trees and shrubs less than10m height. The top canopy is occupied by thedeciduous species and intermediate and under-storey
by evergreen to semi-evergreen species. The elevation ofthe study area varies from 400 to 600m. The forestsinhabit several small perennial streams. The soils are
well developed and are mostly loamy soils and richlycovered with humus. pH of the soils varies from 6.5 to
V.K. Prasad et al. / Atmospheric Environment 35 (2001) 3085–30953086
7.0. Grass cover is negligible. The perennial streams are
conspicuous with the presence of Mangifera indica L.and Syzygium cuminii L. The rainfall of the area is about1600mm with about 85 rainy days per annum. The
study area is dominated by hill tribes who practice theshifting cultivation regularly during the biomass burningperiod, which starts from early February and lasts till
the ending of May. Forests are clear-felled and thebiomass is consequently burnt for clearing of land forsowing. Mixed cropping is preferred and harvesting
starts by the month of October. After, harvesting, theplot is abandoned and another patch is selected to startthe cycle again. In the study area, the amount of the areaburnt for shifting cultivation purposes is in the form of
small patches ranging from 0.5 to 3 ha and the forestsdue to repeated short-revisit cycles (3–4 yr) are mostlysecondary in nature. As a part of second field campaign
on biomass burning, three experiments were conductedin the mixed deciduous forests during 5 May (Kotha-valasa-site 1), 8 May (Kuduru-I, site 2) and 10 May
(Kuduru-II, site 3), 2000. The villages are situated5–8 km distance from the place of Maredumulli. The
biomass at the sites were felled approximately 2weeksbefore burning, during the month of April.
3. Materials and methods
3.1. Botanical composition
Onsite botanical composition at three different siteswere noted prior to burning for studying the mixed
nature of vegetation.
3.2. Biomass estimations
3.2.1. Onsite biomass before burning}measurements byallometry and weighingThe onsite biomass that had been clear-felled and left
for burning has been estimated from 10m� 10mquadrat sample plots prior to burning. The biomassestimations with respect to different species for differentgirth classes at different sites have been made to quantify
the biomass. Using the girth measurements of differentspecies, the allometric regression equations relating girthto biomass for the individual species developed for
Indian forest species have been used (Singh and Misra,1979; Singh, 1990; Chaturvedi et al., 1991; Negi et al.,1991). The values have been reported for individual girth
classes starting from 10 cm diameter class and greaterthan 71 cm diameter. Also, within a plot, dead standingtrees, dead trees on the ground and stumps have been
sampled and weighed that have diameter >10 cm.
3.2.2. Onsite unburnt residues}after burningmeasurements by weighingThe onsite un-burnt residues have been measured
from 5m� 5m plots by weighing, and the values areused for computing the combustion factor.
3.2.3. Quantifying under storey and mixed litter biomass
Quadrats of 1m� 1m are laid and all vegetation lessthan 10 cm DBH has been measured within 1m� 1mquadrat. In the study, the results are reported as mixed
litter biomass (leaves+branch material less than 1 cmgirth) and branch biomass (>1 cm upto 10 cm girth).
3.3. Meteorological parameters
Along with the topographical conditions such asaltitude, slope, aspect, terrain conditions, and fuelcharacteristics such as species composition, plant
biomass, fuel moisture content, etc., meteorologicalparameters are particularly important as they governthe type of burning, viz., flaming and smoldering
conditions. Meteorological parameters, with respect towind direction, wind speed, air temperature, relative
Fig. 1. Location map.
V.K. Prasad et al. / Atmospheric Environment 35 (2001) 3085–3095 3087
humidity, and soil temperature have been measuredusing a portable weather station onsite.
3.4. Fire intensity
The intensity of fires has been studied as defined byByram (1959) and is expressed as kilojoules per second
per meter (kJ s�1m�1) of fire front (Trollope, 1981). Thefire intensity has been calculated as the numericalproduct of the available heat energy and the forward
rate of spread of fire front using the equation
I ¼ H�W�R;
where I is the Fire intensity (kJ s�1m�1), H the heatyield (kJ kg�1), W the mass of fuel consumed (kgm�2)and R the rate of spread of fire front. The vertical release
of heat energy during the fires as represented by flameheight had been subjectively estimated during theburning for the fires and is expressed in meters. The
values for different heat yield obtained for different
plant species is available in literature (Vimal and Tyagi,1984). Different heat yields have been used by Trollope
et al. (1996) for head and backfires. In the present study,for computing the fire intensity, heat yields for differentspecies have been averaged. The heat yield for different
deciduous and mixed deciduous species has beenreported in the range of 4290–5222 kcal kg�1. (Vimaland Tyagi, 1984). The release of heat energy during thefires as represented by the flame height has been
estimated visually and through field photographs. Theduration of the experiment from ignition was nearly2–212 h until the smoke emissions from the fuel bed
almost disappeared.
4. Results and discussion
The main objective of the ground based experimentswas to study the spatial variability in the amount of
biomass burnt from different sites and the contribution
Table 1
Site characteristicsa
Site parameters Site 1 Site 2 Site 3
Site characteristics
Site name Kotha Valasa Kuduru (I) Kuduru (II)
Latitude/longitude 178380N 178380N 178380N818450E 818440E 818440E
Date of experiment 5-05-2000 8-05-2000 10-05-2000
Elevation (ft) 1668 1730 1662
Slope class Intermediate Steep Intermediate
Area (m2) 4750 2950 3800
Total density of species 3192 1194 1444
(girth 10 to>70 above)
Biomass characteristics
Fuel Load (tons/ha) 41.6 29.5 31.5
Moisture content (%)
1. Mixed litter 23 26 37.5
(Leaves+branch material less than 5 cm)
2. Branches 32 42 18.7
(530 cm upto 5 cm)
3. Wood material 36.3 50 40
(>30 cm)
Meteorological parameters
Air temperature (8C) 38 41.1 38.3
Relative humidity (%) 43.6 31.5 42.2
Wind direction SW SW SW
Average wind speed (m s�1) 1.95 1.96 1.96
Fire characteristics
Fire intensity (kJ s�1m�1) 60 847 31 086 42 789
Flame length (m) 1–2 0.5–1.0 2–4
Flame height (m) 4.6 2.2 5.3
aFor the total area.
V.K. Prasad et al. / Atmospheric Environment 35 (2001) 3085–30953088
of different components viz., bole, branch, and mixedleaf litter in the burning process affecting the combus-
tion factors. The experimental days well coincided withthe burning period where most of the biomass is burntfor the purposes of land clearing. The detailed site
characteristics for the three sites are given in Table 1.The amount of area burnt at the site one had beenrelatively high accounting to about 4750m2 whencompared to the 1730 (site 2) and 1662m2 (site 3). Sites
1 and 3 had an intermediate slope (10–158) while Site 2was more steep (25–358). The dominant species compo-sition at the three sites along with the habitat and family
to which it belongs is enumerated in Table 2. Though thespecies composition at the three sites varied with respect
to each other, the most dominant species at all the threesites had been found to be Xylia xylocarpa (Roxb) Taubof family Mimosaceae. Along with Terminalia alata
Heyne ex Roth they together form more than 60–70% ofthe total importance value index (IVI) (Prasad et al.,2000c). The total density of species before burning at thethree sites for more than 10 cm diameter were found to
be 3192 (site 1), 1194 (site 2) and 1444 (site 3) stems/arearespectively. Analysis of the results from girth-class anddensity relationships suggests that nearly 80% of the
Table 2
Species composition at the three sites of the biomass burning
Species composition Family Habitat
Site 1. Kothavalasa
Xylia xylocarpa (Roxb.) Taub. Mimosaceae Semi-evergreen tree
Terminalia alata Heyne ex. Roth. Combretaceae Deciduous tree
Bombax ceiba Linn. Bombacaceae Deciduous tree
Schrebera swietenioides Roxb. Oleaceae Decidous tree
Pterocarpus marsupium Roxb. Fabaceae Deciduous tree
Vitex pubescens Vahl. Verbenaceae Semi-evergreen tree
Terminalia bellirica (Gaertn.) Roxb. Combretaceae Deciduous tree
Caeseria elliptica Willd. Flacourtiaceae Deciduous tree
Grewia tilaefolila Vahl. Tiliaceae Deciduous tree
Careya arborea Roxb. Barringtoniaceae Deciduous tree
Chloroxylon swietenia DC Rutaceae Deciduous tree
Cipadessa baccifera (Roth.) Miq. Meliaceae Bushy shrub
Combretum roxburghii Spr. Combretaceae Liane
Site 2. Kuduru I
Xylia xylocarpa (Roxb.) Taub. Mimosaceae Semi-evergreen tree
Hymenodictyon excelsum (Roxb.) Wall. ex Roxb. Rubiaceae Deciduous tree
Pterocarpus marsupium Roxb. Fabaceae Deciduous tree
Dillenia pentagyna Roxb. Dilleniaceae Deciduous tree
Protium serratum (Coleb.) Engler Bursearaceae Semi-evergreen tree
Lagaestroemia parviflora Roxb. Anacardiaceae Deciduous tree
Haldenia cordifolia (Roxb.) Ridsd. Rubiaceae Deciduous tree
Helicteres isora L. Sterculiaceae Shrub
Grewia hirsuta Vahl. Tiliaceae Under-shrub
Caeseria elliptica Willd. Flacourtiaceae Deciduous tree
Cipadessa baccifera (Roth.) Miq. Burseraceae Bushy shrub
Site 3. Kuduru II
Xylia xylocarpa (Roxb.) Taub. Mimosaceae Semi-evergreen tree
Syzygium cuminii (Linn.) Skeels Myrtaceae Evergreen tree
Bridelia retusa (Linn.) Skeels Myrtaceae Evergreen tree
Lannea coromandelica (Hott.) Merr. Anacardiaceae Deciduous tree
Hymenodictyon excelsum (Roxb.) Wall. Ex. Roxb. Rubiaceae Deciduous tree
Diospyros melanoxylon Roxb. Ebnaceae Decidous tree
Melastoma malabathricum Linn. Melastomaceae Semi-evergreen tree
Protium serratum (Coleb.) Engler. Burseraceae Semi-evergreen tree
Lagaestromia parviflora Roxb. Lythraceae Deciduous tree
Lannea coromandelica (Houtt) Merr. Anacardiaceae Deciduous tree
Caeseria elliptica Willd. Flacourtiaceae Deciduous tree
V.K. Prasad et al. / Atmospheric Environment 35 (2001) 3085–3095 3089
Table 3
Biomass estimations for different girth-classes and onsite biomass susceptible for burning
Girth classes Density
(stems/area)
Bole
(kgs)
Branch (kgs) Leaf
(kgs)
Root
(kgs)
Above ground
(kgs)
Density weighted
(kgs)
Total aboveground and
below ground (kgs)
Density weighted
total (kgs)
Site 1. Kothavalasa
10–25 1064 0.33 2.5 2.61 2.27 5.44 5788.16 7.71 8203.44
26–40 1520 0.38 2.99 3.02 2.68 6.39 9721.8 90.7 13786.4
41–55 304 0.45 3.6 3.65 3.31 7.7 2340.8 11.01 3347.04
56–70 152 0.46 3.71 3.74 3.4 7.91 1202.3 11.31 1719.12
>71 above 152 0.53 4.3 4.35 4.0 9.18 1395.36 1318 2003.36
Total 3192 } } } } } 20439.4 52.28 29059.36
Mixed litter biomass
(Leaves+branch material less than 1 cm)
} } } } } } 4500 } }
Branch biomass (>1 cm upto 10 cm) } } } } } } 6100 } }
Total } } } } } } 31.0 tons } }
Site 2. Kuduru (I)
10–25 541 0.28 2.11 2.14 1.8 4.53 2450.73 6.33 3424.53
26–40 113 0.4 3.15 3.18 2.84 6.73 760.49 9.57 1081.41
41–55 113 0.44 3.5 3.56 3.2 7.5 847.50 10.7 1209.1
56–70 142 0.47 3.79 3.82 3.48 8.08 1147.36 11.56 1641.52
>71 above 285 0.59 4.81 4.85 4.5 10.25 2921.25 14.75 4203.75
Total 1194 } } } } } 8127.33 11 560.31
Mixed litter biomass
(Leaves+branch material less than 1 cm)
} } } } } } 1400
Branch biomass (>1 cm upto 10 cm) } } } } } } 2800
Total } } } } } } 12.3 tons
Site 2 Kuduru (II)
10–25 532 0.33 2.56 2.59 2.24 5.48 2915.36 7.72 4107.04
26–40 684 0.4 3.5 2.84 3.18 6.74 4610.16 9.92 6785.28
41–55 114 0.44 3.54 3.23 3.57 7.21 821.94 10.78 1228.92
56–70 38 0.46 3.71 3.4 3.74 7.57 287.66 11.31 429.78
>71 above 76 0.49 3.91 3.6 3.94 8.0 608 11.94 907.44
Total 1444 9243.12 13 458.46
Mixed litter biomass
(Leaves+branch material less than 1 cm)
} } } } } } 1700 } }
Branch biomass (>1 cm upto 10 cm) } } } } } } 1100 } }
Total } } } } } } 12.0 tons } }
V.K.Prasadet
al./Atm
ospheric
Enviro
nment35(2001)3085–3095
3090
stems occurred in the range from 10 to 40 cm girth forfirst site, 64.2% between 10 and 55 cm girth class for the
second site and more than 80% of the stems in the girthclass between 10 and 40 girth for the third site,indicating very poor and secondary nature of the forest.
The density weighted above ground biomass for threedifferent sites are found to be 20.4, 8.1 and 9.2 tons,respectively, (Table 3). Using the area weighted aboveground biomass values obtained in the study and
including the biomass for mixed litter and branchbiomass (>1 up to 10 cm), extrapolating the values forone hectare plot suggests values of 41.6, 29.5 and 31.5
t/ha biomass for first, second and third sites, respec-tively. The detailed comparison of biomass data withrespect to different forest types from India, in compar-
ison to biomass values of the present study are given inTable 4. Fuel moisture content is one of the importantfactors that influence the burning efficiency and thus the
total emissions. The moisture content of the fuels hadbeen estimated gravimetrically by collecting 20 randomsamples from each site for different fuels, viz., trees(dbh>30 cm), branch material (530 up to�5 cm) and
mixed leaf litter (leaves+small branches less than 5 cm)prior to burning. The fuel moisture content has beencalculated and expressed on dry matter basis (Table 5).
Of all the components, the moisture content for trunks
>30 cm is found to be high accounting to more than60%. Comparison of moisture content for different
components suggests relatively high moisture contentfor site two than site one and three. This is attributed tothe small showers of rain that occurred during the
previous day of the experiment. The fires during theburning were mainly of surface fires. Wind directionduring all the days was from southwest direction. Exceptfor the relative humidity, which had been relatively low
at the second site, all other meteorological parameterswere observed to be relatively constant during the threedays. The entire fuel bed were scattered in such as way
that the bigger logs were interspersed with the dryleaves so as to catch fires. The time of burning during allthe three days was around 13:00 h, so that the moisture
and dew accumulated during the early morning getscompletely vaporized. The mixed litter biomass andbranch biomass (>1 cm upto 10 cm) was relatively high
at the site one followed by two and three, respectively.Though trees with girth greater than 50 cm areinterspersed along with the mixed litter and branches,during the burning, only dried leaves along with mixed
litter and branches less than 10 cm caught fire andspread rapidly.The fire intensity measured as a function of available
heat energy, mass of fuel consumed and rate of spread of
Table 4
Biomass data for different forest types of India (Adapted and modified from Ravindranath et al., 1993)
S.no. Forest type Biomass (t/ha) References
1.a Tropical dry deciduous 93.6 Singh (1990)
2. Tropical semievergreen 468.0 Swamy (1989)
3. Tropical moist deciduous 409.3 Swamy (1989)
Littoral and Swamp 213.8 Singh, V.P. (1989)
2.a Tropical dry deciduous 115.5 Sharma et al. (1990)
4.b Tropical dry deciduous 77.0 Singh and Misra (1979)
5.b Dry deciduous 44.0 Singh et al. (1990)
6. Tropical thorn forests 40.0 Ravindranath et al. (1993)
7. Tropical dry evergreen forests 40.0 Ravindranath et al. (1993)
8. Sub-tropical broadleaved hill forest 108.7 Toky and Ramakrishnan (1982)
9.b Mixed dry deciduous 13.7–613.6 Gupta and Bharadwaj (1993)
10.b Mixed dry deciduous 22.1–31.2 Misra Rajiv et al. (1998)
11. Subtropical pine 210.8 Chaturvedi and Singh (1984)
12. Subtropical dry evergreen 159.7 Ravindranath et al. (1993)
13. Montane wet temperate 237.67 Yadava (1986)
14. Himalayan moist temperate 562.2 Rana (1985)
15. Himalayan moist temperate 169.1 Ravindranath et al. (1993)
16. Subalpine and alpine 127.4 Ravindranath et al. (1993)
17.c Tropical secondary mixed deciduous forests 41.6 (site 1) Present study
29.5 (site 2)
31.5 (site 3)
aDenotes values for maximum biomass.bDenotes values for above ground biomass.cDenotes above ground biomass including litter.
V.K. Prasad et al. / Atmospheric Environment 35 (2001) 3085–3095 3091
fire front suggested higher heat yields for site one with
60 847 kJ s�1m�1, when compared to 31 086 and42 789 kJ s�1m�1 for second and third sites, respectively.The fire intensity values obtained in the present study
are comparatively higher than the mean value of2566 kJ s�1m�1 reported for savanna fires (Trollopeet al., 1996). Contrary to the fire intensity, the fire
characteristics, viz., flame length and flame height werefound to be relatively high for site three than one andtwo. The flame height at all the three sites remained
below 6m, where only in certain cases the fires reachedto a height of 7–8m when the foliage of the dried leavesof the interspersed trees caught fires from the spreadingbranches.
In the present study, we followed the nomenclaturegiven by Carrvalho et al. (1998), for describing thecombustion completeness. For computing the combus-
tion completeness, the post-burn surveys were con-ducted in the small burn plots to estimate the unburntfuel material selecting the similar plots in each case.
Detailed data with respect to dry biomass (Mdry),individual combustion completeness (ZðindÞ%) mass ofdry biomass burned (MdryðburnÞ) and overall combustion
completeness (ZðgÞ%) averaged for 20 sites for 5m� 5mplots for the three sites are given in Table 6. Analysis ofthe results with respect to (ZðindÞ%) suggest that amongthe different components of biomass, branch material
with less than 10 cm dbh and upto 5 cm contributed tomore than 60% of (ZðindÞ%). Among the different sites,the third site has the highest (ZðindÞ%) (89%). Mixed leaf
litter contributed to about more than 50% of (ZðindÞ%) at
all the sites, with third site having highest (ZðindÞ%)(84%). (ZðindÞ%) decreased with increasing girth for allthe sites. The contribution of dry biomass material
having more than 70 cm diameter is found to be very lowindicating that most of the trunks were burnt super-ficially. Analysis of the results with respect to overall
combustion completeness (ZðgÞ%) suggest that mixed leaflitter and branch material contributed to most of thecombustion. Of all the three sites, site three had the
highest combustion completeness of about 30.04% whencompared to 20.18% and 16.1% for first and secondsites, respectively. The highest combustion completenessobserved in the third site is mainly attributed to the high
amount of biomass burned in mixed leaf litter class andalso in the girth classes ranging from 10 to 40 dbh. Theoverall combustion for all the three sites thus is found to
be below 30%.Biomass densities, fractions of biomass above ground,
fractions of biomass which burns and combustion
factors for different vegetation types as reviewed byCooke and Wilson (1996) along with vegetation typesincluding tropical deciduous and tropical mixed decid-
uous forests of India are shown in Table 7. After cuttingand felling, fires may consume relatively a small fraction(�10–20%) of the biomass (Hao et al., 1990). Carrvalhoet al. (1998) reported combustion completeness of about
20.47% from a detailed biomass burning study con-ducted in Amazonian rain forest in Brazil. Fearnsideet al. (1992a) estimated that about 27.6% of the above
Table 5
Moisture content and total dry weight at the three sites
Description Mfresh (%) Mfresh
(tons)
Moisture
content (%)
Mdry
(tons)
Site 1. Kothavalasa
Trunks (DBH>30 cm 68.28 32.0 36.3 20.4
Branch material530 cm upto�5 cm 19.23 6.30 32 6.1
Mixed leaf litter (Leaves+small branches less than 5 cm diameter 12.47 5.84 23 4.5
Total 100 44.14 } }
Site 2. Kuduru-I
Trunks (DBH>30 cm 70.7 16.2 50 8.1
Branch material DBH530 cm upto �5 cm 21.09 4.83 42 2.8
Mixed leaf litter (Leaves+small branches less than 5 cm diameter 8.25 1.89 26 1.4
Total 100 22.9 } }
Site 3. Kuduru-II
Trunks (DBH>30 cm 65.6 15.3 40 9.2
Branch material DBH530 cm upto�5 cm 8.96 2.09 18.7 1.1
Mixed leaf litter (Leaves+small branches less than 5 cm diameter 25.3 5.92 37.5 1.1
Total 100 22.9 } }
V.K. Prasad et al. / Atmospheric Environment 35 (2001) 3085–30953092
ground biomass was burned at an experimental site in
the Amazonian primary forests. In contrast to the forestfires, in case of Savanna fires, the burnt material mainlyconsists of grasses along with sparse trees. The fraction
of grass burned in tropical Savanna fires has beenestimated to be 84% in Nigeria (Hopkins, 1965), 67 and98% in Ivory Coast (Delmas, 1982; Lamotte, 1985).Different workers used different values of combustion
factors in estimating the trace gas emissions frombiomass burning globally. Seiler and Crutzen (1980)used the value of 25% in estimating the global scale
emissions of green house gases from biomass burning. Inestimating the global scale emissions of green house gasemissions from biomass burning, the parameter of b for
secondary (fallow) forests (fraction of above ground thatis burnt) is assumed to be larger than that of primary(non-fallow) forests due to smaller sizes of vegetation. In
a detailed study on the regional releases of CO2 andother trace gases to the atmosphere from fires in the
tropics, based on FAO statistics, Hao et al. (1990)
adopted a value of b equal to 0.3 (30%) for primaryforests and 0.4 (40%) for secondary forests, realizing theuncertainty of the values to be around 30%. Again with
respect to the uncertainty, Hao et al. (1990) inferredthat, uncertainty is not critical as most of the biomassburning takes place in Savanna regions. In this regard, itmay be noted that though the forests of the study were
mainly of secondary nature, the combustion factor inthe initial burns didnot exceeded more than 30%.Analysis of the results for overall burning for each of
the sites suggest that partitioning of the biomass fuels indifferent vegetation classes (girth components) is a majorcontributing factor affecting the combustion process.
Further, it is concluded that more studies in the tropicalregions with respect to biomass and combustioncharacteristics will help in improving the regional
estimates of biomass burned and resulting trace gasemissions.
Table 6
Averaged data for 5� 5m (20 plots) for individual and overall combustion completeness for the three sites of the experimenta
Girth classes (DBH) MðdrybiomassÞ (kg) ZðindÞ (%) MdryðburnÞ (kg) ZðgÞ (%)
Site 1. Kothavalasa
10–25 36.3 26.2 9.51 6.83
26–40 60.6 16.3 9.87 7.09
41–55 14.6 4.2 0.613 0.44
56–70 7.58 4.3 0.32 0.22
70 above 8.88 2.7 0.23 0.16
Branch material DBH510 cm up to �5 cm 4.7 73 3.43 2.46
Mixed leaf litter (Leaves+small branches less than 5 cm diameter 6.5 64 4.16 2.98
Total 139.16 20.18
Site 2. Kuduru–I
10–25 20.95 14.1 3.05 4.62
26–40 12.8 11.3 1.44 2.18
41–55 7.1 8.1 0.57 0.86
56–70 7.7 4.2 0.32 0.48
70 above 9.92 2.6 0.25 0.37
Branch material DBH510 cm up to �5 cm diameter 2.5 62 2.31 3.50
Mixed leaf litter (Leaves+small branches less than 5 cm diameter 5.0 54 2.7 4.09
Total 65.97 } } 16.1
Site 3. Kuduru-II
10–25 20.56 26.2 5.38 6.26
26–40 31.95 17.3 5.52 6.42
41–55 7.2 16.0 1.15 1.33
56–70 7.5 11.2 4.325 5.03
70 above 8.0 3.1 0.24 0.28
Branch material DBH510 cm up to �5 cm 4.7 89 4.18 4.86
Mixed leaf litter (Leaves+small branches less than 5 cm diameter 6.0 84 5.04 5.86
Total 85.91 } } 30.04
aMdry the dry biomass ; ZðindÞ (%) the individual combustion completeness; MdryðburnÞ the mass of dry biomass burned; ZðgÞ (%) the
overall combustion completeness.
V.K. Prasad et al. / Atmospheric Environment 35 (2001) 3085–3095 3093
Acknowledgements
We are grateful to Dr. D.P. Rao, Director, NRSA,Prof. S.K. Bhan, Dy. Director, NRSA, Prof. A.K.Raychaudhary, Director, NPL, Prof. B.H. Subbaraya,Program Director, ISRO-GBP, Shri. P. Rajaratnam,
Dy. Program Director, ISRO-GBP, Dr. A.K. Sarkar,Head, Chemistry Section, NPL, Dr. K. Lal, Head,Material Characterization Division, NPL for their
encouragement. The help provided by Dr. P. SivaramaKrishna, Director, SAKTI, NGO, during the fieldexperiment is gratefully acknowledged. We sincerely
thank anonymous reviewer for his critical comments andsuggestions on the manuscript.
References
Ahuja, D.R., 1991. Estimating regional anthrapogenic emis-
sions of green house gases. In: Khoshoo, T.N., Sharma, M.
(Eds.), Indian Geosphere Biosphere. Haranand Publications,
New Delhi, pp. 131–162.
ALGAS, (Asia Least-cost Greenhouse Gas Abatement Strat-
egy) India, 1998. ADB-GEF-UNDP: Asian Development
Bank, Manila, 238pp.
Andreae, M.O., 1990. Biomass burning in the Tropics : impact
on environmental quality and global climate. Paper presented
at the Chapman Conference on Global Biomass Burning,
19–23 March, Williamsburg, VA, USA.
Andreae, M.O., 1991. Biomass burning: its history, use, and
distribution and it’s impact on the environmental quality and
global climate. In: Levine, J.S. (Ed.), Biomass Burning:
Atmospheric, Climatic and Biospheric Implications. MIT
Press, Cambridge, MA, pp. 1–21.
Andreae, M.O., Browell, E., Garstang, M., Gregory, G.L.,
Harris, R.C., Hill, G.F., Jacob, D.J., Pereira, M.C., Sachse,
G., Setzer, A., Silva Dias, P.L., Talbot, R.T., Torres, A.L.,
Wofsy, S.C., 1988. Biomass burning emissions and associated
haze layers over Amazonia. Journal of Geophysical Research
93, 1509–1527.
Byram, G.M., 1959. Combustion of forest fuels. In: Davis, K.P.
(Ed.), Forest Fire: Control and Use. McGraw Hill, New
York, pp. 23–48.
Carrvalho Jr., J.A., Higuchi, N., Arjujo, T.M., Santos, J.C.,
1998. Combustion completeness in a rainforest clearing
experiment in Manaus, Brazil. Journal of Geophysical
Research 103 (D11), 13195–13199.
Champion, H.G., Seth, S.K., 1968. A Revised Survey of the
Forest Types of India. Govt-of India Publications, New
Delhi. pp. 132–148.
Chaturvedi, A.N., Shuba, B., Behl, H.M., 1991.Biomass
assessment for shrubs. Indian Forester 17, 12–14.
Chaturvedi, O.P., Singh, J.S., 1984. Potential biomass energy
from all aged chirpine forest of Kumaun Himalaya. Biomass
5, 161–165.
Cooke, W.F., Wilson, J.N., 1996. Global black carbon
aerosol model. Journal of Geophysical Research 101 (D14),
19395–19409.
Crutzen, P.J., 1988. Tropospheric ozone: an overview. In:
Isaksen, I.S. (Ed.), Tropospheric Ozone: Regional and
Global Scale Interactions. Reidel, Dordrecht, pp. 3–32.
Table 7
Comparison of biomass densities and combustion efficiencies for various vegetation typesa
Vegetation type Biomass density (kgC/m2) a b
1. Tropical evergreen rain forest 10 0.81 0.3
2. Tropical/subtropical evergreen seasonal broadleaf forest 5 0.81 0.3
3. Sub-tropical evergreen forest 10 0.81 0.3
4. Temperate-sub-polar evergreen rain forest 8.6 0.75 0.4
5. Temperate-evergreen seasonal broad-leaved forest 8 0.73 0.4
6. Evergreen broad-leaved sclerophyllous forest 4.3 0.73 0.4
7. Tropical-subtropical evergreen needle leaved forest 5.1 0.75 0.35
8. Temperate sub-polar evergreen needle leaved forest. 5.1 0.73 0.28
9. Tropical-sub-tropical evergreen needle leaved forest. 2 0.75 0.4
10. Cold deciduous forests with evergreens 5.8 0.75 0.35
11. Cold deciduous forests without evergreens 5.8 0.75 0.3
12. Dimorphic forest woodland 8 0.71 0.35
13. Evergreen broad-leaved sclerophyllous forest 2 0.64 0.4
14. Evergreen needle leaved woodland 5 0.73 0.28
15. Tropical/subtropical drought deciduous 5 0.75 0.4
16. Deciduous woodland 10 0.75 0.3
17. Tropical mixed deciduous secondary forest
Site 1 0.29b 0.73 0.20b
Site 2 0.18b 0.70 0.16b
Site 3 0.142b 0.68 0.30b
a (a is above ground fraction of the biomass and b is fraction of a which actually burns).b Including litter biomass.
V.K. Prasad et al. / Atmospheric Environment 35 (2001) 3085–30953094
Crutzen, P.J., Andreae, M.O., 1990. Biomass burning in the
Tropics: impact on atmospheric chemistry and biogeochem-
ical cycles. Science 250, 1669–1678.
Delmas, R., 1982. On the emission of carbon, nitrogen and
sulphur in atmosphere during bushfires in Intertropical
Savanna zones. Geophysical Research Letter 9, 761–764.
Fearnside, P.M., 1992a. Greenhouse gas emissions from
deforestation in the Brazilian Amazon. Carbon emissions
and sequestration in forests: case studies from developing
countries, Vol. 2. Lawrence Berkeley Lab. Report, LBL-
32758, 73pp.
Gupta, S.R., Bhardwaj, B.B., 1993. Biomass and productivity
of forest ecosystems of Shiwalik hills. Journal of Tree Science
12 (2), 57–63.
Hao, W.M., Liu, M.H., Crutzen, P.J., 1990. Estimates of
annual and regional release of CO2 and other trace gases to
the atmosphere from fires in the tropics. Based on the FAO
statistics for the period 1975–1980. In: Goldammer, J.G.
(Ed.), Fire in Tropical Biota. Ecosystem Processes and
Global Challenges. Ecological Studies, Vol. 84. Springer,
Berlin, pp. 440–462.
Hopkins, B., 1965. Observations on Savanna burning in the
Olokemeji Forest Reserve, Nigeria. Journal of Applied
Ecology 2, 367–381.
Kant, Y., Ghosh, A.B., Sharma, M.C., Gupta, P.K., Prasad,
K.V., Badarinath, K.V.S., Mitra, A.P., 2000. Studies on
aerosol optical depth in biomass burning areas using satellite
and ground based observations. Infrared Physics and
Technology 41, 21–28.
Lacaux, J.P., Delmas, R., Jambert, C., Kuhlbusch, T.A.J.,
1996. NOx emissions from African Savanna fires. Journal of
Geophysical Research 101 (D19), 23 585–23 595.
Lamotte, M., 1985. Some aspects of studies on Savanna
ecosystems. Tropical Ecology 26, 89–98.
Misra Rajiv, D.P., Bankhwal, R.K., Pacholi, V.P., Singh, V.P.,
1998. Biomass status of mixed dry deciduous forest of
Shiwalik hills in Haryana. Indian Forester 211, 287–291.
Negi, J.D.S., Sharma, S.C., Lepacha, S.T.S., 1991. Biomass and
nutrient accumulation (Inventory) in shrub land ecosystem of
Garhwal. Indian Forester 117 (8), 635–641.
Prasad, K.V., Gupta, P.K., Kant, Y., Sharma, C., Rajagopal,
T., Badarinath, K.V.S., Mitra, A.P., 2000a. GHG emissions
from biomass burning in India}estimates from satellite and
ground based measurements. Paper presented at the Work-
shop on GHG Inventories for the Asia-Pacific Region,
March 9–10, 2000, Shonan Village Center/IGES, Japan.
Prasad, K.V., Gupta, P.K., Kant, Y., Sharma, C., Sarkar,
A.K., Badarinath, K.V.S., Mitra, A.P., 2000b. NOx Emis-
sions from biomass burning of shifting cultivation areas
from tropical deciduous forests}estimates from ground
based measurements. Atmospheric Environment 34 (20),
3271–3280.
Prasad, K.V., Rajagopal, T., Kant, Y., Badarinath, K.V.S.,
2000c. Quantification of carbon fluxes in tropical deciduous
forests using satellite data. Advances in Space Research.
COSPAR-2000 26 (7), 1101–1104.
Ramanathan, V., Cicerone, R.J., Singh, H.B., Kiehl, J.T., 1985.
Trace gas trends and their potential role in climate change.
Journal of Geophysical Research 90, 5547–5566.
Rana, B.S., 1985. Biomass and net primary productivity in
different forest ecosystems along an altitudinal gradient in
Kumaun Himalaya. Ph.D thesis, Kumaun University,
Nainital, India.
Ravindranath, N.H., Somashekhar, B.S., Gadgil, M., 1993.
Carbon flows in Indian forests. Ministry of Environment and
Forests, Govt. of India.
Seiler, W., Crutzen, P.J., 1980. Estimates of gross and net fluxes
of carbon between the biosphere and atmosphere from
biomass burning. Climatic Change 2, 207–247.
Sharma, R.B., Chandra, M., Singh, K.P., 1990. Variations in
forest biomass and productivity. In: Singh, J.S., Singh, K.P.,
Agrawal, M. (Eds.), Environmental Degradation of Obra–
Renukoot–Singrauli area and its impact on natural and
derived ecosystems. Final Technical Report, Man and
Biosphere (MAB) Project, Banaras Hindu University,
Varanasi, India.
SFR (State of Forest Report). 1997. Ministry of Forests and
Environment, Dehradun, India.
Singh, K.P., Misra, R., 1979. Structure and functioning
of natural, modified and silvicultural ecosystems in
eastern Uttar Pradesh. Final Technical Report (1975–1978).
160pp. MAB research project, Banaras Hindu University,
Varanasi.
Singh, V.P., 1989. Mangrove forests of Andaman Islands}
their structure, status and future prospects. In: Ramprakash,
(Ed.), Advances in Forestry Research in India, Vol. 4.
International Book Distributors, Dehradun, pp. 149–164.
Singh, L., 1990. Biomass, production and nutrient dynamics in
a dry tropical forest. Ph.D thesis. Banaras Hindu University,
Varanasi, India. pp. 214.
Singh, R., Singh, R.K., Singh, K., 1990. Effect of different
plant covers on soil characteristics. Indian Forester 116,
795–802.
Swamy, H.R., 1989. Study of organic productivity, nutrient
cycling and small watershed hydrology in natural forests
and in monoculture plantations in Chiklamgalur District,
Karnataka. Final Report, Sri Jagadguru Chandrashekara
Bharati Memorial College, Sringeri, India.
Task Force. 1983. Report of the Task Force on Shifting
Cultivation in India. Ministry of Agriculture, New Delhi.
Toky, O.P., Ramakrishnan, P.S., 1982. Secondary succession
subsequent to slash and burn agriculture (Jhum) at higher
elevations of Meghalaya in North-East India. I. Species
diversity, biomass and litter production. In: Ramakrishnan,
P.S. (Ed.), Ecological Implications of Jhum Cultivation on
the Ecosystem Functions of Subtropical Humid Forest
Stands. MAB project Report, Vol. 1, Dept. of Botany,
North East Hill University, Shillong, India, pp.141–157.
Trollope, W.S.W., 1981. Recommended terms, definitions and
units to be used in fire ecology in South Africa. Proceedings
of Grassland Society South Africa 16, 107–109.
Trollope, W.S.W., Trollope, L.A., Potgieter, A.L.F., Zambatis,
N., 1996. SAFARI-92 characterization of biomass and
fire behavior in the small experimental burns in Kruger
National Park. Journal of Geophysics Research 101 (D19),
23 531–23 539.
Vimal, O.P., Tyagi, P.D., 1984. Energy from Biomass. Agricole
Publishing Co., New Delhi. pp. 138–149.
Yadava, K., 1986. Ecological studies on forest ecosystem of
Manipur. Final technical report, Action Oriented Himalayan
Ecodevelopment Research Project, Department of Life
Sciences, Manipur University, Imphal, India.
V.K. Prasad et al. / Atmospheric Environment 35 (2001) 3085–3095 3095