biological considerations at fish passage projects in the missoula area

38
Biological considerations at fish passage projects in the Missoula area Pat Saffel FWP Fish Manager Missoula

Upload: millie

Post on 07-Jan-2016

34 views

Category:

Documents


4 download

DESCRIPTION

Biological considerations at fish passage projects in the Missoula area. Pat Saffel FWP Fish Manager Missoula. This Presentation sort of a “welcoming”. Diverse examples of projects around Missoula B iological considerations Assessments One fish screen project - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Biological considerations at fish passage projects in the Missoula area

Biological considerations at fish passage projects in the Missoula area

Pat SaffelFWP Fish Manager

Missoula

Page 2: Biological considerations at fish passage projects in the Missoula area

This Presentationsort of a “welcoming”

• Diverse examples of projects around Missoula– Biological considerations– Assessments

• One fish screen project– Complex up and downstream passage

• Three upstream fish passage projects– Hydro dam, low-head dam & diversion

• Wrap up with general themes, sneak in a video?

Page 3: Biological considerations at fish passage projects in the Missoula area

This Presentationsort of a “welcoming”

• Diverse examples of projects around Missoula– Biological considerations– Assessments

• One fish screen project– Complex up and downstream passage

• Three upstream fish passage projects– Hydro dam, low-head dam & diversion

• Wrap up with general themes, sneak in a video?

Page 4: Biological considerations at fish passage projects in the Missoula area

This Presentationsort of a “welcoming”

• Diverse examples of projects around Missoula– Biological considerations– Assessments

• One fish screen project– Complex up and downstream passage

• Three upstream fish passage projects– Hydro dam, low-head dam & diversion

• Wrap up with general themes, sneak in a video?

Page 5: Biological considerations at fish passage projects in the Missoula area

Questions with Fish Screens

• Is a fish in the stream better than one in the ditch?– Usually, but how much better?– Worth the cost?

Page 6: Biological considerations at fish passage projects in the Missoula area

EF Rock Creek Fish Screen

Irrigation season: May – SepOutflow: seepage - 200+ cfs

200 cfs capacity$700,000

Atrophied channel5 cfs summer flow

Page 7: Biological considerations at fish passage projects in the Missoula area
Page 8: Biological considerations at fish passage projects in the Missoula area

Biological Considerations

• Reservoir population

• Canal salvage history

• EF Rock Cr. fish populations & habitat

• Return spawners

Page 9: Biological considerations at fish passage projects in the Missoula area

Biological Considerations

• Reservoir population

• Canal salvage history

• EF Rock Cr. fish populations & habitat

• Return spawners

Page 10: Biological considerations at fish passage projects in the Missoula area

Biological Considerations

• Reservoir population

• Canal salvage history

• EF Rock Cr. fish populations & habitat

• Return spawners

Page 11: Biological considerations at fish passage projects in the Missoula area

Biological Considerations

• Reservoir population

• Canal salvage history

• EF Rock Cr. fish populations & habitat

• Return spawners

Page 12: Biological considerations at fish passage projects in the Missoula area

Monitoring at EF Rock Creek

• Hopefully answer how much better a fish in the creek is than one in the ditch – after the fact…

• Trap & mark fish that are screened– How many fish are put back into the creek?

• Trap returning adults– How many fish screened return as adults?– Move above dam?

Page 13: Biological considerations at fish passage projects in the Missoula area

Monitoring at EF Rock Creek

• Hopefully answer how much better a fish in the creek is than one in the ditch – after the fact…

• Trap & mark fish that are screened– How many fish are put back into the creek?

• Trap returning adults– How many fish screened return as adults?– Move above dam?

Page 14: Biological considerations at fish passage projects in the Missoula area

TrapsUpstreamDownstream

Page 15: Biological considerations at fish passage projects in the Missoula area
Page 16: Biological considerations at fish passage projects in the Missoula area
Page 17: Biological considerations at fish passage projects in the Missoula area

Questions with Upstream Passage

• How many fish are being impeded?

• Where do they want to go?– Are you passing fish to the correct location\population?– Will they survive?

• What kind of passage?– Volitional or selective– Passage structures

Page 18: Biological considerations at fish passage projects in the Missoula area

Questions with Upstream Passage

• How many fish are being impeded?

• Where do they want to go?– Are you passing fish to the correct location\population?– Will they survive?

• What kind of passage?– Volitional or selective– Passage structures

Page 19: Biological considerations at fish passage projects in the Missoula area

Questions with Upstream Passage

• How many fish are being impeded?

• Where do they want to go?– Are you passing fish to the correct location\population?– Will they survive?

• What kind of passage?– Volitional or selective– Passage structures

Page 20: Biological considerations at fish passage projects in the Missoula area

Milltown Dam

Page 21: Biological considerations at fish passage projects in the Missoula area

About 200,000 fish of 12 spp. blocked each year

Page 22: Biological considerations at fish passage projects in the Missoula area
Page 23: Biological considerations at fish passage projects in the Missoula area

Radial GateBlackfoot R.

Clark Fork R.

Page 24: Biological considerations at fish passage projects in the Missoula area

Two Ladders?

Page 25: Biological considerations at fish passage projects in the Missoula area

Silver Lake

Silver Lake System

Page 26: Biological considerations at fish passage projects in the Missoula area

DeHaan et al. 2009

Page 27: Biological considerations at fish passage projects in the Missoula area

DeHaan et al. 2009

Page 28: Biological considerations at fish passage projects in the Missoula area

DeHaan et al. 2009

Page 29: Biological considerations at fish passage projects in the Missoula area

Biological Considerations

• Both creeks could be contributing bull trout to Silver Lake, with adults wanting to return

• What is the origin of bull trout in Silver Lake?– Prioritize passage efforts between the two creeks

Page 30: Biological considerations at fish passage projects in the Missoula area

DeHaan et al. 2009

Page 31: Biological considerations at fish passage projects in the Missoula area

Silver Lake/Storm Lake Creek Bull Trout Passage Project

• In 2012: Tagged/ moved 8 adults (and 13 sub-adults)

• At least 7 adults moved upstream

• Large redds found

• Manual passage for now - hybridization concerns with rainbow

Page 32: Biological considerations at fish passage projects in the Missoula area

• West Fork Clearwater• Had ~ 30 redds

• Emily-A Dam• Migration route blocked

Lake Inez Fish Barrier (aka, Emily-A Dam)

Emily-A Dam

Page 33: Biological considerations at fish passage projects in the Missoula area

• Many radio-tagged fish went to WF Clearwater

Lake Inez Fish Barrier (aka, Emily-A Dam)

Emily-A Dam

Page 34: Biological considerations at fish passage projects in the Missoula area
Page 35: Biological considerations at fish passage projects in the Missoula area

Bull trout caught at dam, not in trap

Page 36: Biological considerations at fish passage projects in the Missoula area

Restoring Migration

VIDEO

Page 37: Biological considerations at fish passage projects in the Missoula area

General Themes• Many factors reduce numbers of fish (e.g., EF Rock Creek),

understanding the biology improves a project’s chance of success (e.g., Silver Lake)

• The fewer life-stages and habitat problems involved the more likely to succeed (e.g., upstream passage of adults vs. downstream passage of juveniles).

• Passage to suitable biological and physical habitat can be very successful (e.g., Emily-A Dam).

• More information is needed to understand what affects a project’s effectiveness (e.g., fish screen projects).

Page 38: Biological considerations at fish passage projects in the Missoula area