biofidelity worldsid and es-2re hyundai - nhtsa · 2016. 11. 22. · 11 government/industry meeting...

38
Biofidelity Analysis of WorldSID and ES-2re Biofidelity Analysis of WorldSID and ES-2re Hyundai Meeting February 9, 2009 Jim Stricklin Transportation Research Center Inc. Dan Rhule National Highway Traffic Safety Administration Vehicle Research and Test Center

Upload: others

Post on 27-Jan-2021

3 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

  • Biofidelity Analysis ofWorldSID and ES-2reBiofidelity Analysis ofWorldSID and ES-2re

    Hyundai MeetingFebruary 9, 2009

    Jim StricklinTransportation Research Center Inc.

    Dan RhuleNational Highway Traffic Safety Administration

    Vehicle Research and Test Center

  • 2 Government/IndustryMeeting February 5, 2009

    Background

    Industry petitioned the Agency to include the WorldSID 50th in Part 572 and FMVSS 214

    the ISO biofidelity ranking system (ISO 9790) indicates that the WorldSID biofidelity is superior to ES-2reglobal harmonization

  • 3 Government/IndustryMeeting February 5, 2009

    Background (cont.)

    A collaborative project evaluating an improved WorldSID has been completed

    NHTSA worked closely with the WorldSID Task Group using 2 dummies provided by OSRPseveral improvements were made to the dummy during the evaluation

  • 4 Government/IndustryMeeting February 5, 2009

    Objectives

    Present the results of the WorldSID and ES-2re biofidelity rankings using an updated version of the NHTSA Biofidelity Ranking System (H. Rhule, 2002 Stapp)

    Share our observations relating to dummy design and performance

  • 5 Government/IndustryMeeting February 5, 2009

    Preview

    Review of Biofidelity Ranking System

    Summary of results

    Results of specific body regions

    Conclusions

  • 6 Government/IndustryMeeting February 5, 2009

    Biofidelity Ranking System

    ExternalBiofidelity

    InternalBiofidelity

    Biofidelity Ranking System

  • 7 Government/IndustryMeeting February 5, 2009

    External Biofidelity (EB)Ability to replicate human loading of its environment in a crash

    Measurements made externally to human and dummy

    VoF(t)

    F(t)

    F(t)

  • 8 Government/IndustryMeeting February 5, 2009

    Internal Biofidelity (IB)Ability to replicate human internal response in a crash

    Internal measurements used for injury criteria

    Voa(t)

    a(t)x(t)

    a(t)

  • 9 Government/IndustryMeeting February 5, 2009

    Ranked Body RegionsRanked Body Regions

    HEAD

    NECK

    SHOULDER

    THORAX

    ABDOMEN

    PELVIS

    ES-2re WorldSID

  • 10 Government/IndustryMeeting February 5, 2009

    DCV / CCV* (R)DCV / CCV* (R)Fo

    rce,

    Acc

    eler

    atio

    n, o

    r Def

    lect

    ion

    Time

    CadaverResponse

    Corridor(± STDEV)

    CadaverMean

    ti

    ΔCt

    DummyResponse

    ΔDt

    DCV ∑=

    n

    t 0(ΔDt)2=

    CCV (ΔCt)2∑=

    n

    t 0= RR==

    * Morgan et al. 1986* Morgan et al. 1986

  • 11 Government/IndustryMeeting February 5, 2009

    Bioranking (B) Calculation

    Average results fromTest Conditions

    1 to n= IBThorax

    Test Condition 1Avg. √R for all internal

    thorax responsemeasurements

    IBHeadIBShoulderIBThoraxIBAbdomenIBPelvis

    Test Condition 2Avg. √R for all internal

    thorax responsemeasurements

    ...Test Condition n

    Avg. √R for all internalthorax responsemeasurements

    Avg. of = Internal Biofidelity

    Thorax Internal Biofidelity

  • 12 Government/IndustryMeeting February 5, 2009

    Bio Rank Test Matrix & References

    ISO 9790 - Pelvis Test 2Pelvis Test 210 m/s Rigid Pendulum Pelvis ImpactISO 9790 - Pelvis Test 1Pelvis Test 16 m/s Rigid Pendulum Pelvis Impact

    ISO 9790 - Abdomen Test 3 & Pelvis Test 10

    Wayne State Sled Test6.8 m/s Rigid Wall Sled

    ISO 9790 - Thorax Test 5 & Pelvis Test 7

    Heidelberg Sled Test6.8 m/s Rigid Wall Sled

    ISO 9790 - Thorax Test 1Thorax Test 14.3 m/s Rigid Pendulum Lateral Thorax Impact

    ISO 9790 - Neck Test 3 & Shoulder Test 3Neck Test 312.2 g Restrained Occupant Sled

    ISO 9790 - Neck Test 1 & Shoulder Test 2Neck Test 17.2 g Restrained Occupant Sled

    ISO 9790 - Head Test 1Head Test 1200 mm Rigid Lateral Head DropReferenceTest NameTest Condition

  • 13 Government/IndustryMeeting February 5, 2009

    Bio Rank Test Matrix & References (cont.)

    Maltese et al. 2002NHTSA HS FP8.9 m/s Flat Padded Wall Sled

    Maltese et al. 2002NHTSA LS RPO6.7 m/s Rigid Pelvis Offset Sled

    Maltese et al. 2002NHTSA LS RAO6.7 m/s Rigid Abdomen Offset Sled

    Maltese et al. 2002NHTSA LS FP6.7 m/s Flat Padded Wall SledMaltese et al. 2002NHTSA LS FR6.7 m/s Flat Rigid Wall Sled

    Shaw et al. 2006NHTSA Thorax Test2.5 m/s Rigid Pendulum Lateral and Oblique Thorax Impact

    Bolte et al. 2003NHTSA Shoulder Test4.4 m/s Padded Pendulum Lateral and Oblique Shoulder Impact

    ReferenceTest NameTest Condition

    ≈ 90 Impactor Tests

    ≈ 40 Sled Tests w/ 2 occupant

    sled buck

  • 14 Government/IndustryMeeting February 5, 2009

    0.0

    0.5

    1.0

    1.5

    2.0

    2.5

    3.0

    3.5

    4.0

    4.5

    5.0

    Neck Shoulder Thorax Abdomen Pelvis Overall

    √R

    WorldSIDES-2re

    External Biofidelity

    Better Biofidelity

    Ext

    erna

    l Bio

    rank

    (EB

    )

    1.9

    3.23.5

    2.7

  • 15 Government/IndustryMeeting February 5, 2009

    0.0

    0.5

    1.0

    1.5

    2.0

    2.5

    3.0

    3.5

    4.0

    4.5

    5.0

    Head Should er Th orax Ab domen Pelvis * O verall

    √R

    W orld S IDES-2re

    * W /O Abdom en

    Internal Biofidelity

    Better Biofidelity

    * w/o Abdomen

    Inte

    rnal

    Bio

    rank

    (IB)

    1.6 1.7

  • 16 Government/IndustryMeeting February 5, 2009

    Head

    ES-2re WorldSID

  • 17 Government/IndustryMeeting February 5, 2009

    Head Response Summary

    1.020.33Peak ResultantHead AccelerationISO 9790 Head Test 1 - 200 mmRigid Lateral Head Drop

    ES-2reWorldSID

    Response Comparison (√R)MeasurementTest Condition

    Head Internal Response Summary

    0.0

    0.5

    1.0

    1.5

    2.0

    2.5

    3.0

    3.5

    4.0

    4.5

    5.0

    Head

    W orldSIDES-2re

    .3

    1.0

  • 18 Government/IndustryMeeting February 5, 2009

    Neck

    ES-2re WorldSID

  • 19 Government/IndustryMeeting February 5, 2009

    *The data for this test is from Byrnes et al., 2002 Stapp Conference

    Neck Response Summary

    2.851.15Peak Flexion Angle (º)

    1.590.25Peak Horizontal Displacementof Head cg Relative to Sled (mm)ISO 9790 Neck Test 312.2 g Sled Test

    1.000.40Peak Flexion Angle (º)

    2.49*1.22Peak Vertical Displacementof Head cg Relative to T1 (mm)

    3.251.22Peak Horizontal Displacementof Head cg Relative to T1 (mm)ISO 9790 Neck Test 17.2 g Sled Test

    ES-2WorldSID

    Response Comparison (√R)MeasurementTest Condition

    Neck External Response Summary

    0.0

    0.5

    1.0

    1.5

    2.0

    2.5

    3.0

    3.5

    4.0

    4.5

    5.0

    Neck

    W orldSIDES-2re

    .8

    2.5

  • 20 Government/IndustryMeeting February 5, 2009

    Shoulder

    ES-2re WorldSID

  • 21 Government/IndustryMeeting February 5, 2009

    Shoulder

    ES-2re

  • 22 Government/IndustryMeeting February 5, 2009

    Shoulder

    WorldSID

  • 23 Government/IndustryMeeting February 5, 2009

    Shoulder Response Summary

    1.831.59Pendulum X-axis Force (kN)

    3.440.54Pendulum Y-axis Force (kN)NHTSA (Bolte) 4.4 m/s30º Pendulum Impact

    1.960.84Pendulum X-axis Force (kN)

    2.961.26Pendulum Y-axis Force (kN)NHTSA (Bolte) 4.4 m/s15º Pendulum Impact

    1.100.87Pendulum Force (kN)NHTSA (Bolte) 4.4 m/sLateral Pendulum Impact

    1.470.24Peak Horizontal Displacementof T1 Relative to Sled (mm)ISO 9790 Shoulder Test 27.2 g Sled Test

    ES-2reWorldSID

    Response Comparison (√R)MeasurementTest Condition

    Shoulder External Response Summary

    0.0

    0.5

    1.0

    1.5

    2.0

    2.5

    3.0

    3.5

    4.0

    4.5

    5.0

    Shou lder

    W orldSIDES-2re

    .8

    1.9

  • 24 Government/IndustryMeeting February 5, 2009

    Shoulder Response Summary

    2.843.61Shoulder Y-axis Displacement (mm)NHTSA (Bolte) 4.4 m/s30º Pendulum Impact

    1.721.70Shoulder Y-axis Displacement (mm)NHTSA (Bolte) 4.4 m/s15º Pendulum Impact

    1.111.55Shoulder Y-axis Displacement (mm)NHTSA (Bolte) 4.4 m/sLateral Pendulum Impact

    ES-2reWorldSID

    Response Comparison (√R)MeasurementTest Condition

    Shoulder Internal Response Summary

    0.0

    0.5

    1.0

    1.5

    2.0

    2.5

    3.0

    3.5

    4.0

    4.5

    5.0

    Shou lder

    W orldSIDES-2re

    2.3

    1.9

  • 25 Government/IndustryMeeting February 5, 2009

    ThoraxES-2re WorldSID

  • 26 Government/IndustryMeeting February 5, 2009

    ThoraxES-2re Rib Module

    back

    front

    Linear Guide

  • 27 Government/IndustryMeeting February 5, 20092.832.57Thorax Plate ForceNHTSA (Maltese) 8.9 m/s Padded Flat Wall Sled

    2.935.59Thorax Plate ForceNHTSA (Maltese) 6.7 m/s Rigid Pelvis Offset Sled

    4.223.81Thorax Plate ForceNHTSA (Maltese) 6.7 m/s Rigid Abdomen Offset Sled

    2.504.21Thorax Plate ForceNHTSA (Maltese) 6.7 m/s Padded Flat Wall Sled

    3.103.24Thorax Plate ForceNHTSA (Maltese) 6.7 m/s Rigid Flat Wall Sled

    1.421.25Thorax Plate ForceISO 9790 6.8 m/s Heidelberg Sled

    4.923.39Pendulum ForceNHTSA (Shaw) 2.5 m/s 30º Pendulum Impact

    1.701.97Pendulum ForceNHTSA (Shaw) 2.5 m/s Lateral Pendulum Impact

    2.291.27Pendulum ForceISO 9790 Thorax Test 1 4.3 m/s Pendulum Impact

    ES-2reWorldSID

    Response Comparison (√R)MeasurementTest Condition

    Thorax External Response Summary

    0.0

    0.5

    1.0

    1.5

    2.0

    2.5

    3.0

    3.5

    4.0

    4.5

    5.0

    Thorax

    W orldSIDES-2re

    3.02.9

  • 28 Government/IndustryMeeting February 5, 2009

    Thorax Response Summary

    2.950.70Peak lateral acceleration of the impacted rib

    4.224.01Peak Lateral Acceleration of Lower Spine

    6.866.03Peak Lateral Acceleration of Upper SpineISO 9790 6.8 m/s Heidelberg Sled

    2.952.80Thorax DisplacementNHTSA (Shaw) 2.5 m/s 30ºPendulum Impact

    1.131.43Thorax DisplacementNHTSA (Shaw) 2.5 m/s Lateral Pendulum Impact

    2.641.66Upper Spine Lateral AccelerationISO 9790 Thorax Test 14.3 m/s Pendulum Impact

    ES-2reWorldSID

    Response Comparison (√R)MeasurementTest Condition

    Thorax Internal Response Summary

    0.0

    0.5

    1.0

    1.5

    2.0

    2.5

    3.0

    3.5

    4.0

    4.5

    5.0

    Thorax

    W orldSIDES-2re

    2.02.4

  • 29 Government/IndustryMeeting February 5, 2009

    AbdomenES-2re WorldSID

  • 30 Government/IndustryMeeting February 5, 2009

    AbdomenES-2re Rib Abdomen

  • 31 Government/IndustryMeeting February 5, 2009

    Abdomen Response Summary

    3.242.83Abdomen Plate ForceNHTSA (Maltese) 8.9 m/s Padded Flat Wall Sled

    3.953.71Abdomen Plate ForceNHTSA (Maltese) 6.7 m/s Rigid Pelvis Offset Sled

    5.280.94Abdomen Plate ForceNHTSA (Maltese) 6.7 m/s Rigid Abdomen Offset Sled

    1.051.61Abdomen Plate ForceNHTSA (Maltese) 6.7 m/s Padded Flat Wall Sled

    0.580.60Abdomen Plate ForceNHTSA (Maltese) 6.7 m/s Rigid Flat Wall Sled

    2.081.72Abdomen Plate ForceISO 9790 6.8 m/s Wayne State Sled

    ES-2reWorldSID

    Response Comparison (√R)MeasurementTest Condition

    Abdomen External Response Summary

    0.0

    0.5

    1.0

    1.5

    2.0

    2.5

    3.0

    3.5

    4.0

    4.5

    5.0

    Abdom en

    W orldSIDES-2re

    1.9

    2.7

  • 32 Government/IndustryMeeting February 5, 2009

    Abdomen Response Summary

    NA2.89Mid-Abdominal DeflectionNHTSA (Maltese) 8.9 m/s Padded Flat Wall Sled

    NA2.79Mid-Abdominal DeflectionNHTSA (Maltese) 6.7 m/s Rigid Pelvis Offset Sled

    NA1.78Mid-Abdominal DeflectionNHTSA (Maltese) 6.7 m/s Rigid Abdomen Offset Sled

    NA1.64Mid-Abdominal DeflectionNHTSA (Maltese) 6.7 m/s Padded Flat Wall Sled

    NA2.75Mid-Abdominal DeflectionNHTSA (Maltese) 6.7 m/s Rigid Flat Wall Sled

    ES-2reWorldSID

    Response Comparison (√R)MeasurementTest Condition

    Abdomen Internal Response Summary

    0.0

    0.5

    1.0

    1.5

    2.0

    2.5

    3.0

    3.5

    4.0

    4.5

    5.0

    Abdom en

    W orldSIDES-2re

    2.4

  • 33 Government/IndustryMeeting February 5, 2009

    PelvisES-2re

    WorldSID

  • 34 Government/IndustryMeeting February 5, 2009

    Pelvis Response Summary

    4.823.77Pelvis Plate ForceNHTSA (Maltese) 8.9 m/s Padded Flat Wall Sled

    1.491.60Pelvis Plate ForceNHTSA (Maltese) 6.7 m/s Rigid Pelvis Offset Sled

    2.144.06Pelvis Plate ForceNHTSA (Maltese) 6.7 m/s Rigid Abdomen Offset Sled

    2.132.13Pelvis Plate ForceNHTSA (Maltese) 6.7 m/s Padded Flat Wall Sled

    2.441.77Pelvis Plate ForceNHTSA (Maltese) 6.7 m/s Rigid Flat Wall Sled

    1.631.61Pelvis Plate ForceISO 9790 Pelvis Test 10 - 6.8 m/s Wayne State Sled

    7.896.76Peak Pelvis Plate ForceISO 9790 Pelvis Test 7 - 6.8 m/s Heidelberg Sled

    15.293.50Peak Pendulum ForceISO 9790 Pelvis Test 2 - 10 m/s Lateral Pendulum Impact

    5.390.23Peak Pendulum ForceISO 9790 Pelvis Test 1 - 6 m/s Lateral Pendulum Impact

    ES-2reWorldSID

    Response Comparison (√R)MeasurementTest Condition

    Pelvis External Response Summary

    0.0

    0.5

    1.0

    1.5

    2.0

    2.5

    3.0

    3.5

    4.0

    4.5

    5.0

    Pelvis

    W orldSIDES-2re

    2.8

    4.8

  • 35 Government/IndustryMeeting February 5, 2009

    Pelvis Response Summary

    1.091.26Pelvis Lateral AccelerationNHTSA (Maltese) 8.9 m/s Padded Flat Wall Sled

    2.621.94Pelvis Lateral AccelerationNHTSA (Maltese) 6.7 m/s Rigid Pelvis Offset Sled

    1.091.16Pelvis Lateral AccelerationNHTSA (Maltese) 6.7 m/s Rigid Abdomen Offset Sled

    1.692.09Pelvis Lateral AccelerationNHTSA (Maltese) 6.7 m/s Padded Flat Wall Sled

    1.721.53Pelvis Lateral AccelerationNHTSA (Maltese) 6.7 m/s Rigid Flat Wall Sled

    1.003.98Peak Pelvis Lateral AccelerationISO 9790 Pelvis Test 10 - 6.8 m/s Wayne State Sled

    1.500.35Peak Pelvis Lateral AccelerationISO 9790 Pelvis Test 7 - 6.8 m/s Heidelberg Sled

    ES-2reWorldSID

    Response Comparison (√R)MeasurementTest Condition

    Pelvis Internal Response Summary

    0.0

    0.5

    1.0

    1.5

    2.0

    2.5

    3.0

    3.5

    4.0

    4.5

    5.0

    Pelvis

    W orldSIDES-2re

    1.81.5

  • 36 Government/IndustryMeeting February 5, 2009

    Conclusions

    WSID overall internal and external biofidelityis better than ES-2re

    WSID shoulder has improved ROM, measures displacement

    WSID shoulder & thorax have more realistic motion and improved external oblique biofidelic response

    0.0

    0.5

    1.0

    1.5

    2.0

    2.5

    3.0

    3.5

    4.0

    4.5

    5.0

    O verall

    W orldSIDES-2re

    1.9

    3.2

    External Biofidelity

    0.0

    0.5

    1.0

    1.5

    2.0

    2.5

    3.0

    3.5

    4.0

    4.5

    5.0

    O verall

    W orldSIDES-2re

    1.6 1.7

    Internal Biofidelity

  • 37 Government/IndustryMeeting February 5, 2009

    Conclusions (cont.)

    WSID Durability, R&R and Usability are acceptable

    The WorldSID 50th male dummy is an improved side impact test dummy

    WSID abdomen measures displacement

  • 38 Government/IndustryMeeting February 5, 2009

    Thank You