biocompatibility, fda and iso 10993

Upload: ring-master

Post on 01-Jun-2018

294 views

Category:

Documents


1 download

TRANSCRIPT

  • 8/9/2019 Biocompatibility, FDA and ISO 10993

    1/33

    B iocompatib i l i ty, FDA and ISO 10993 

    Steven S. Saliterman, MD, FACPDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, University of Minnesotawww.tc.umn.edu/~drsteve

  • 8/9/2019 Biocompatibility, FDA and ISO 10993

    2/33

    Steven S. Saliterman, MD, FACP

    Medical Microdevices

    Microni t, Galambos, Affymetrix,, Lifescan, Medtronic

  • 8/9/2019 Biocompatibility, FDA and ISO 10993

    3/33

    Steven S. Saliterman, MD, FACP

    Biocompatibility

    Biocompatibility testing answers two

    fundamental questions: Is the material safe?

    Does it have the necessary physical andmechanical properties for its proposed function?

    The extent to which a material needs to becharacterized depends on: Type of material,

    End use of the device (is it a medical device?), Function of the material within the device.

     Availability of existing data on the material.

  • 8/9/2019 Biocompatibility, FDA and ISO 10993

    4/33

    Steven S. Saliterman, MD, FACP

    Biofouling Biofouling is the process whereby functioning of a

    BioMEMS device is interfered with by the biologicalresponse of the host. This commonly occurs when macrophages and

    foreign body giant cells (FBGCs) attach to theimplanted device, accumulate, grow and interfere

    with normal operation. Surface coating of biomaterials seems one good

    approach to lessen the inflammatory response,lessen macrophage adhesion and FBGCs growth,

    and improve wound healing. The foreign body response by the host is largely

    independent of the material’s being polymeric,ceramic or metallic; being hydrophobic orhydrophilic; or being hard or soft.

  • 8/9/2019 Biocompatibility, FDA and ISO 10993

    5/33

    Steven S. Saliterman, MD, FACP Voskerician, G., et al., Biomaterials 24(11), 2003

    SEM photomicrographs showing fusion of macrophagesinto foreign body giant cells: Individual macrophage aggregation on silicon dioxide (day 7) (left).

    Enlarging giant cell with fusion of cytoplasm and consolidation ofnuclei (day 14) (right).

    Foreign Body Giant Cells

  • 8/9/2019 Biocompatibility, FDA and ISO 10993

    6/33

    Steven S. Saliterman, MD, FACP

    Biocompatibility needs to be considered at the onset of

    design: Use known biocompatible materials.

    Individual components as well as overall packaging areimportant.

    Material testing is performed to determine toxicity ofthe material, leachable substances and degradationproducts.

    The FDA relies on ISO 10993 Standard and has

    additional recommended steps. Outsourcing testing may be required for most

    institutions and companies.

  • 8/9/2019 Biocompatibility, FDA and ISO 10993

    7/33

    Steven S. Saliterman, MD, FACP

    ISO Definition of a Medical Device

     Any instrument, apparatus, appliance, material

    or other article, including software, whetherused alone or in combination, intended by themanufacturer to be used for human beingssolely or principally for the following purposes:

    Diagnosis, prevention, monitoring, treatment oralleviation of disease;

    Diagnosis, monitoring, treatment, alleviation of orcompensation for an injury or handicap;

    Investigation, replacement or modification of theanatomy or of a physiological process;

    Control of conception.

  • 8/9/2019 Biocompatibility, FDA and ISO 10993

    8/33

    Steven S. Saliterman, MD, FACP

    The ISO 10993 Standard

    The ISO 10993 International Standard pertains

    to: Surface devices on the skin, mucosal membranes,

    breached or compromised surfaces.

    External communicating devices with blood, tissue,bone, dentin.

    Implantable devices.

    Its purpose is to protect humans and to serveas a framework for selecting tests to evaluate

    biological responses. In so doing consideration has been given to

    minimize the number and exposure of testanimals.

  • 8/9/2019 Biocompatibility, FDA and ISO 10993

    9/33

    Steven S. Saliterman, MD, FACP

    Flowchart for Biocompatibility

    Subparts ISO 10993 & FDA Evaluation Tests

    Not all medical devices require ISO 10993

    testing, including the following: Lab-on-a-chip (LOC) devices,

    Micro total chemical analysis systems (µTAS) usedin laboratory instrumentation,

    Point-of-care systems or hand-held devices that donot contact or penetrate the skin,

    MEMS devices used in medical imaging machines.

  • 8/9/2019 Biocompatibility, FDA and ISO 10993

    10/33

    Steven S. Saliterman, MD, FACP

    Characterization Methods Identification of a materials constituents and:

    Changes of the material over time, Changes with exposure to different environments,

    Lot-to-lot consistency for manufacturing purposes.

    Methodologies: Infrared spectral analysis (IR), Thermal analysis,

    Density analysis,

    Molecular weight distribution,

    Mechanical properties,

    Surface properties,

    Extract Characterization.

  • 8/9/2019 Biocompatibility, FDA and ISO 10993

    11/33

    Steven S. Saliterman, MD, FACP

    Infrared Spectral Analysis (IR)

     Albert, DE, Medical Device Technology,

    Octo Media Ltd, June 2004

  • 8/9/2019 Biocompatibility, FDA and ISO 10993

    12/33

    Steven S. Saliterman, MD, FACP

    Purified Water Extracts

     Albert, DE, Medical Device Technology,

    Octo Media Ltd, June 2004

  • 8/9/2019 Biocompatibility, FDA and ISO 10993

    13/33

    Steven S. Saliterman, MD, FACP

    Isopropyl Alcohol Extracts

     Albert, DE, Medical Device Technology,

    Octo Media Ltd, June 2004

  • 8/9/2019 Biocompatibility, FDA and ISO 10993

    14/33

    Steven S. Saliterman, MD, FACP

    Cytotoxicity

    Cytotoxicity refers to cell damage caused by

    materials, either by direct contact or byleachable substances (extracts).

    Cell damage may occur by a variety of means

    including activation of the complement system. The complement system involves a number of

    serum factors that are activated in the presence of

    antigen-antibody binding, bacteria and viruses, or

    foreign materials.

  • 8/9/2019 Biocompatibility, FDA and ISO 10993

    15/33

    Steven S. Saliterman, MD, FACP

    Mouse Fibroblast Cells

    Normal Cytotoxicity

    Image Courtesy of NAMSA

  • 8/9/2019 Biocompatibility, FDA and ISO 10993

    16/33

    Steven S. Saliterman, MD, FACP

    Sensitization

    Sensitization refers to a materials ability to

    induce specific delayed-type hypersensitivity inthe body upon initial exposure:

    Haptens,

    Langerhans cells and T-cell lymphocytes, Lymphokines.

    Testing:

    Guinea pig maximization test (GPMT), Closed-patch test (Buehler test),

    Murine Local Lymph Node Assay.

  • 8/9/2019 Biocompatibility, FDA and ISO 10993

    17/33

    Steven S. Saliterman, MD, FACP

    Guinea Pig Maximization Test

  • 8/9/2019 Biocompatibility, FDA and ISO 10993

    18/33

  • 8/9/2019 Biocompatibility, FDA and ISO 10993

    19/33

    Steven S. Saliterman, MD, FACP

    Dermal Irritation

  • 8/9/2019 Biocompatibility, FDA and ISO 10993

    20/33

    Steven S. Saliterman, MD, FACP

    Systemic Toxicity Systemic toxicity (body at large):

     Acute toxicity - within 24 hours, Subacute toxicity - single dose or multiple

    doses of a test sample during a period from 14to 28 days,

    Subchronic toxicity - at 90 days, but notexceeding 10% of the life cycle of the device,

    Chronic toxicity - single or multiple exposures

    to medical devices, materials and extractsduring at least 10% of their lifespan of the testanimal.

  • 8/9/2019 Biocompatibility, FDA and ISO 10993

    21/33

    Steven S. Saliterman, MD, FACP

    Genotoxicity, Carcinogenicity and

    Reproduction

    Genotoxicity - DNA damage to somatic cells

    and second generation effects throughdamage to germ cells.

    Carcinogenicity toxicity – observation of testanimals for a major portion of their life span for

    development of cancer. This observation mayoccur during or after exposure to testsubstances.

    Reproductive toxicity - reproduction, fertility

    and teratogenicity (the ability to cause birthdefects).

  • 8/9/2019 Biocompatibility, FDA and ISO 10993

    22/33

    Steven S. Saliterman, MD, FACP

    Genotoxicity

    Gene or point mutations, small deletions,

    mitotic recombination or microscopicallyvisible chromosome changes.

    Studies available:

     Ames bacterial reverse mutation assay,

    Mouse lymphoma assay,

    Chinese hamster ovary cells, Mouse bone marrow micronucleus test.

  • 8/9/2019 Biocompatibility, FDA and ISO 10993

    23/33

    Steven S. Saliterman, MD, FACP Image Courtesy of NAMSA

  • 8/9/2019 Biocompatibility, FDA and ISO 10993

    24/33

    Steven S. Saliterman, MD, FACP

    Implantation

    Tests for assessment of the local

    effects of implant material on livingtissue.

    Comparison is made with reactions

    observed to medical devices whoseclinic acceptability has already beenestablished.

    Short term vs. long term studies.Solid vs. non-solid materials.

  • 8/9/2019 Biocompatibility, FDA and ISO 10993

    25/33

    Steven S. Saliterman, MD, FACP

    Histological Changes

    Image Courtesy of NAMSA

  • 8/9/2019 Biocompatibility, FDA and ISO 10993

    26/33

    Steven S. Saliterman, MD, FACP

    Hemocompatibility

    Hemocompatiblity tests evaluate the

    effects of medical devices or materialsthat are in contact (or indirect contact)

    with blood, on blood components.

    Hemolysis is the abnormal breakdown of

    blood cells.

    Thrombosis is the clotting of blood with

    obstruction of a blood vessel and potential

    for embolization.

  • 8/9/2019 Biocompatibility, FDA and ISO 10993

    27/33

    Steven S. Saliterman, MD, FACP

    Toxin Exposure

    Normal Red and White Blood Cells White Blood Cell Karyorrhexis

    Image Courtesy of NAMSA

  • 8/9/2019 Biocompatibility, FDA and ISO 10993

    28/33

    Steven S. Saliterman, MD, FACP

    Degradation

    Degradation is the unwanted breakdown

    of implanted BioMEMS materials. Ideally in an implanted device all

    materials of degradation are ultimately

    removed by the body without toxicity.

    Polymer degradation.

    Ceramic degradation. Metal and alloy electrochemical effects,

  • 8/9/2019 Biocompatibility, FDA and ISO 10993

    29/33

    Steven S. Saliterman, MD, FACP

    Polymer Degradation

    Chemical bond scission due to hydrolytic and

    oxidative processes. Enzymes, proteins and other cellular activity

    can alter the rate and nature of degradation.

    Ultraviolet cleavage of chemical bonds. Gamma and electron radiation that cause

    embrittlement, discoloration and thermalinstability.

    Metal induced degradation from impurities,additives or hybrid construction

  • 8/9/2019 Biocompatibility, FDA and ISO 10993

    30/33

    Steven S. Saliterman, MD, FACP

    Biocompatibility of Polymers

    Properties of polymers that determine theirbiocompatibility through protein absorption,cell adhesion, cytotoxicity, blood compatibility,and tissue compatibility include: Interfacial free energy,

    Balance between hydrophilicity and hydrophobicityon the surface,

    Chemical structure and functional groups,

    The type and density of surface charge,

    Molecular weight of the polymer, Conformational flexibility of the polymer,

    Surface topography and roughness.

  • 8/9/2019 Biocompatibility, FDA and ISO 10993

    31/33

  • 8/9/2019 Biocompatibility, FDA and ISO 10993

    32/33

    Steven S. Saliterman, MD, FACP

    Summary

    Biocompatibility testing answers two

    fundamental questions: Is the material safe?

    Does it have the necessary physical andmechanical properties for its proposed function?

    Biofouling is the process whereby functioningof a BioMEMS device is interfered with by thebiological response of the host.

    The ISO 10993 Standard is to protect humansand to serve as a framework for selecting teststo evaluate biological responses.

  • 8/9/2019 Biocompatibility, FDA and ISO 10993

    33/33

    Steven S. Saliterman, MD, FACP

    ISO 10993 Subparts discussed:

    Characterization Cytotoxicity

    Sensitization

    Irritation System Toxicity

    Genotoxicity

    Implantation Hemocompatibility

    Degradation