big raccoon creek watershed tmdl stakeholder meeting june 26, 2013

47
Big Raccoon Creek Watershed TMDL Stakeholder Meeting June 26, 2013

Upload: ross-carter

Post on 04-Jan-2016

219 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Big Raccoon Creek Watershed TMDL Stakeholder Meeting June 26, 2013

Big Raccoon CreekWatershed TMDL

Stakeholder Meeting

June 26, 2013

Page 2: Big Raccoon Creek Watershed TMDL Stakeholder Meeting June 26, 2013

Agenda

• Watershed Overview

• Listing Information

• Allowable Loads

• TMDL Allocations

• Implementation

• TMDL Process

Page 3: Big Raccoon Creek Watershed TMDL Stakeholder Meeting June 26, 2013

Watershed Overview

Page 4: Big Raccoon Creek Watershed TMDL Stakeholder Meeting June 26, 2013

Big Raccoon Creek Watershed•Located above Cecil M. Harden Lake•Drains 215 square miles•Counties

-Boone-Hendricks -Montgomery-Putnam-Parke

•Municipalities- Advance-New Ross-Ladoga-Roachdale

Page 5: Big Raccoon Creek Watershed TMDL Stakeholder Meeting June 26, 2013
Page 6: Big Raccoon Creek Watershed TMDL Stakeholder Meeting June 26, 2013

Land Use

Page 7: Big Raccoon Creek Watershed TMDL Stakeholder Meeting June 26, 2013
Page 8: Big Raccoon Creek Watershed TMDL Stakeholder Meeting June 26, 2013
Page 9: Big Raccoon Creek Watershed TMDL Stakeholder Meeting June 26, 2013

Listing Information

Page 10: Big Raccoon Creek Watershed TMDL Stakeholder Meeting June 26, 2013

Historic Sampling

• Fixed Station Data 1999-2013• Probabilistic Sampling 1999, 2004, 2009• Second Year Study in 2005• Lake Data in 1991, 1997, 1999• Cyanobacteria and Microcystin Beach Sampling in

2011 and 2012

Page 11: Big Raccoon Creek Watershed TMDL Stakeholder Meeting June 26, 2013

Draft 2012 303(d) Listings• Approximately 81 stream miles impaired:

62 stream miles Impaired Biotic Community (IBC)

36 stream miles E. coli

Cecil M. Harden Lake for Mercury and PCBs

Page 12: Big Raccoon Creek Watershed TMDL Stakeholder Meeting June 26, 2013

Assessment of Water Quality• Fish Community and Water Chemistry Sampling in 2005

28 sites for fish community

28 sites sampled for water chemistry

Data used for IBCTMDL development

Page 13: Big Raccoon Creek Watershed TMDL Stakeholder Meeting June 26, 2013

Biological Data

• 20% (6/28) sites had Impaired Biological Communities

Page 14: Big Raccoon Creek Watershed TMDL Stakeholder Meeting June 26, 2013

Scoring Indices

IBI QHEIExcellent 53-60 ≥ 70

Good 45-52 55-69Fair 35-44 43-54Poor 23-34 30-42

Very Poor 0-22 < 30

Page 15: Big Raccoon Creek Watershed TMDL Stakeholder Meeting June 26, 2013

Chemistry DataNo obvious

chemical impairments

DO=13.3

DO=3.5TP=0.68

DO=2.1

DO=3.5

DO=2.5TP=0.33TSS=74

Page 16: Big Raccoon Creek Watershed TMDL Stakeholder Meeting June 26, 2013

Assessment of Water Quality• E. coli sampling performed by IDEM in 2010

15 sites for E. coli Sampled 5 consecutive

weeks Data used for E. coli

TMDL development

Page 17: Big Raccoon Creek Watershed TMDL Stakeholder Meeting June 26, 2013

E. coli Data• Geometric mean calculated for each site

– All 15 sites reported as not meeting the standard in 2010

• Highest geometric mean = 2214.3– Site WLV160-0038

• Lowest geometric mean = 543.13– Site WLV160-0035

• Highest single sample = 2419.6– Every site

• Lowest single sample = 191.8– Site WLV160-0015

Page 18: Big Raccoon Creek Watershed TMDL Stakeholder Meeting June 26, 2013

• IBI - Index of Biotic Integrity ≥ 36 (WQS)

• Dissolved Oxygen - ≥ 4.0 mg/L (WQS)

• Total Phosphorus - ≤ 0.30 mg/L (U.S. EPA)

• Total Suspended Solids - ≤ 30.0 mg/L (IN NPDES permitting)

Impaired Biological Communities (IBC) Results

Page 19: Big Raccoon Creek Watershed TMDL Stakeholder Meeting June 26, 2013
Page 20: Big Raccoon Creek Watershed TMDL Stakeholder Meeting June 26, 2013

Allowable Loads

Page 21: Big Raccoon Creek Watershed TMDL Stakeholder Meeting June 26, 2013

The Definition of a TMDL

• The sum of allowable loads from point sources, waste load allocations (WLA) and nonpoint sources, load allocations (LA) plus a margin of safety (MOS)

TMDL = ∑WLA + ∑LA + MOS

Page 22: Big Raccoon Creek Watershed TMDL Stakeholder Meeting June 26, 2013

Allocations

• Waste load Allocation (WLA)– WLAs are the contributions from point sources– Point sources are easier to identify since they have

a discharge point or direct outlet to the stream– Point sources have some type of monitoring or

information and are therefore easier to assign loadings

Page 23: Big Raccoon Creek Watershed TMDL Stakeholder Meeting June 26, 2013

Allocations• Load Allocation (LA)

– LAs are the pollutant contributions from nonpoint sources, which are not directly regulated

– "Diffuse" pollution, generated from large areas with no particular point of pollutant origin, but rather from many individual places

– Pollution that cannot be traced to a regulated direct outlet or discharge point

Page 24: Big Raccoon Creek Watershed TMDL Stakeholder Meeting June 26, 2013

Big Raccoon Creek Point Sources

Page 25: Big Raccoon Creek Watershed TMDL Stakeholder Meeting June 26, 2013

Big Raccoon Creek Nonpoint Sources

Page 26: Big Raccoon Creek Watershed TMDL Stakeholder Meeting June 26, 2013

TMDL Allocation Development

Page 27: Big Raccoon Creek Watershed TMDL Stakeholder Meeting June 26, 2013

TMDL Allocations

• Clean Water Act requires that TMDL be allocated as follows:– TMDL = WLA + LA + MOS– Waste load allocations (WLA) for “point sources”

(regulated under NPDES)– Load allocations (LA) for nonpoint sources – MOS for margin of safety

Page 28: Big Raccoon Creek Watershed TMDL Stakeholder Meeting June 26, 2013

Big Raccoon Creek TMDL Allocations

• Waste load Allocations– 4 NPDES facilities with sanitary component– 1 CFO

• Demaree Farms Partnership: WLA= 0

– Illicitly connected on-site systems (i.e., straight pipe dischargers) are zero

Page 29: Big Raccoon Creek Watershed TMDL Stakeholder Meeting June 26, 2013

Big Raccoon Creek TMDL Allocations

Waste Load Allocations for E. coli– Advance WWTP: 0.14 (Billion/Day)– New Ross WWTP: 1.23 (Billion/Day)– Roachdale WWTP: 0.59 (Billion/Day)– Ladoga WWTP: 0.93 (Billion/Day)

Page 30: Big Raccoon Creek Watershed TMDL Stakeholder Meeting June 26, 2013

Big Raccoon Creek TMDL Allocations

Load Allocations– Agricultural Run-off– Failing Septic Systems– Livestock– Stream Bank Erosion– Urban Run-off– Wildlife

Page 31: Big Raccoon Creek Watershed TMDL Stakeholder Meeting June 26, 2013

Allocation Development• Data used to develop allocation

– Precipitation• National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA)

weather station

– Flow• U.S. Geological Survey (USGS) Flow Gage

– Modeling Using IDEM Data• Spreadsheet modeling tool• Traditional modeling

Page 32: Big Raccoon Creek Watershed TMDL Stakeholder Meeting June 26, 2013

Precipitation

• Many sources of pollution are impacted by precipitation

• A path for pollutants to enter a waterbody is through rain and snow melt

• Information on precipitation used with the Load Duration Curve (LDC) will give a better overall sense of flow conditions in stream

Page 33: Big Raccoon Creek Watershed TMDL Stakeholder Meeting June 26, 2013
Page 34: Big Raccoon Creek Watershed TMDL Stakeholder Meeting June 26, 2013

Flow

• The long history of flow gages provides a valuable tool in evaluating water quality data

• USGS flow gages provide a consistent high quality source of flow information

• The large network of flow gages means that finding a representative flow gage is possible

Page 35: Big Raccoon Creek Watershed TMDL Stakeholder Meeting June 26, 2013

Load Duration Curve

IDEM Data & USGS Gage 03340800 Flow DataUpstream Drainage Area is 27.38 Square Miles

Moist Conditions

Dry Conditons

Mid-Range Flows

Low Flows

High Flows

Page 36: Big Raccoon Creek Watershed TMDL Stakeholder Meeting June 26, 2013

E. coli Load Reductions Needed

HUC 12 RankingMaximum

[CFU/100mL]

E. coli Load Reduction Needed(Billion organisms/

Day)

% Load Reduction to meet WQS

Little Raccoon Creek

1 2419.6 10,000 97.50

Byrd Branch 2 2419.6 9,810 98.91

Town of New Ross

3 2419.6 4,030 97.39

Headwaters of Big Raccoon

Creek4 2419.6 2,400 93.98

Cornstalk Creek 5 2419.6 1,750 93.9

North Ramp Creek

6 2419.6 1,670 90.04

Haw Creek 7 2419.6 964 86.04

Page 37: Big Raccoon Creek Watershed TMDL Stakeholder Meeting June 26, 2013

Phosphorus and TSS Load Reductions Needed

HUC 12 RankingMaximum

[mg/L]

TP Load Reduction Needed

(lbs/ Day)

% Load Reduction to meet WQS

Headwaters Big Raccoon Creek

1 0.68 0.88 55.88

Little Raccoon Creek

2 0.33 0.24 9.09

HUC 12Maximum

[mg/L]

TSS Load Reduction Needed

(lbs/ Day)

% Load Reduction to meet WQS

Little Raccoon Creek

74 90 59.46

Page 38: Big Raccoon Creek Watershed TMDL Stakeholder Meeting June 26, 2013

Implementation

Page 39: Big Raccoon Creek Watershed TMDL Stakeholder Meeting June 26, 2013

Implementation• Implementation of TMDL expected to occur

via current and future activities such as:– Vegetated filter strips– Stream fencing (animal exclusion)– Control of failing septic systems– Conservation tillage– Urban conservation practices– Additional agricultural conservation practices

Page 40: Big Raccoon Creek Watershed TMDL Stakeholder Meeting June 26, 2013

Current & Past ProjectsConservation Funding

• Clean Water Indiana (CWI)• Environmental Quality Incentives Program

(EQIP)• Conservation Reserve Program (CRP)• Wildlife Habitat Cost-share Program (WHCP)• Section 319 Nonpoint Source Water Quality

Funding • Game Bird Habitat Development Program

(GHDP)• Wildlife Habitat Incentive Program (WHIP)• Conservation Stewardship Program (CSP)• Wetland Reserve Program (WRP)

LARE Grants• Critical Area Plantings• Grade Stabilization Structures• Livestock Watering Facilities• Grassed Waterways• Tree Plantings• Pasture and Hay Planting

Page 41: Big Raccoon Creek Watershed TMDL Stakeholder Meeting June 26, 2013

Potential Priority Implementation AreasSubwatershed PPIA

RankPotential Implementation Actions

Little Raccoon Creek 1 Filter Strips, Inspection and Maintenance of WWTPs, Conservation Farming Practices

Byrd Branch 2 Septic System Replacement, Riparian Buffers, Critical Area Planting

Town of New Ross 3 Grassed Waterways, Filter Strips, Conservation Farming Practices

Headwaters of Big Raccoon Creek

4 Manure Handling, Storage, Treatment, and Disposal; Stream Fencing, Inspection and Maintenance of WWTPs

Cornstalk Creek 5 Septic System Replacement, Grassed Waterways, Conservation Farming Practices

North Ramp Creek 6 Filter Strips, Grassed Waterways, Conservation Farming Practices

Haw Creek 7 Septic System Replacement, Conservation Farming Practices, Filter Strips

Page 42: Big Raccoon Creek Watershed TMDL Stakeholder Meeting June 26, 2013

BMP Implementation Areas

Grazing Land ManagementAlternative Watering Systems

Increase Riparian BuffersLivestock Exclusion Fencing

Page 43: Big Raccoon Creek Watershed TMDL Stakeholder Meeting June 26, 2013

Grassed WaterwaysReduce Sediment Loads

BMP Implementation Areas

Page 44: Big Raccoon Creek Watershed TMDL Stakeholder Meeting June 26, 2013

TMDL Process

Page 45: Big Raccoon Creek Watershed TMDL Stakeholder Meeting June 26, 2013

Big Raccoon CreekWatershed TMDL Schedule

• Monitoring: Spring 2010

• Draft TMDL Meeting: Summer 2013

• 30-day Comment Period: Summer 2013 (www.idem.IN.gov/nps/2652.htm)

• Final TMDL Report Submittal to U.S. EPA: Fall 2013

Page 46: Big Raccoon Creek Watershed TMDL Stakeholder Meeting June 26, 2013

Who Fixes It?

• You!

• But there is help…

Page 47: Big Raccoon Creek Watershed TMDL Stakeholder Meeting June 26, 2013

TMDL Project ManagerAli MeilsTMDL Project ManagerOffice of Water QualityIndiana Department of Environmental Management100 N. Senate Ave.Indianapolis, Indiana 46204-2251

Phone: (317) 308-3204Fax: (317) 308-3219E-mail: [email protected]://www.idem.IN.gov/nps/2652.htm