big diversion project
DESCRIPTION
Big Diversion Project. Content. The Partnership Defining diversion? Context – National and Regional The Big Diversion Project. Our Partnership. Northumberland Tyne and Wear NHS Foundation Trust Revolving Doors Agency Tees, Esk and Wear Valley NHS Foundation Trust. - PowerPoint PPT PresentationTRANSCRIPT
Big Diversion Project
Content
• The Partnership • Defining diversion? • Context – National and Regional • The Big Diversion Project
Our Partnership Northumberland Tyne and Wear NHS
Foundation Trust
Revolving Doors Agency
Tees, Esk and Wear Valley NHS Foundation Trust
Defining Diversion “Diversion” is a process whereby
people are assessed and their needs identified as early as possible in the offender pathway (including prevention and early intervention), thus informing subsequent decisions about where an individual is best placed to receive treatment, taking into account public safety, safety of the individual and punishment of an offence
The Bradley Report: Lord Bradley’s review of people with mental health problems or learning disabilities in the criminal justice system (2009) p.16
Resulting national developments
• Govt commitment to make Liaison and Diversion schemes available nationally by 2014
• Health care in Police custody to be commissioned by the NHS by 2015
• Roll- out of both initiatives already started
....and local involvement
Liaison and Diversion
Services Pathfinders
Newcastle
Cleveland, Durham and Darlington
North Shields
South Shields
Bedlington
Gateshead
Sunderland
Police early adopters
Alternatives to Custody
Durham Phase 2
NorthumbriaPhase 1
First Response
Team Tees
Middlesbrough and Stockton
MIND
WomenOutside Walls
Newcastle
South Tees
BDP Task • To research, review and make recommendations to
shape the future development of liaison and diversion services and supporting care pathways in the north east region for offenders.
• To provide commissioners with an instrument for self-assessment and a toolkit to ensure levelling up between and within localities and organisations in the north east.
Project Phases
Stage 1: Analysis
Stage 2: Service Development / new ways of working
Stage 3: Evaluation
Stage 4: Specification for service models (based on above)
BDP Timeline
• November 2011 – March 2012
Analysis
• May 2012 – April 2013
Service Development • July 2013 –
August 2013
Production of Service
Specifications Independent Evaluation of
Services
Analysis phase:Methodology and work to date
Sarah Anderson, Senior Development and Research Officer,
Community Police Courts
Prison
Community
Probation
e.g.•s.135/6•Police screening
e.g.•Court reports•Information to courts•MHTRs
CJLD Services
e.g.•Care pathways•MAPPA
People with MH or a LD
Priority issues
• Information flow• Identification (screening & assessment)• Care Pathways• Training• Partnership arrangements
Priority groups• Dual diagnosis• Minority groups• (Women)• Young adults in transition• Summary offenders• Offenders subject to community sentences• Short-term prisoners• Other emerging priority groups
Aims of the analysis
• What is there currently?–Map current regional provision
• What are the gaps?– Identify gaps in provision
• How could we do things better?– Identify national and regional best practice
Approach: the national picture
• Literature review• Expert interviews
Approach: the regional picture• Mapping stakeholders
across the pathway• Stakeholder interviews• Focus groups of staff and
service users• Surveys• Site visits• Documentary and
quantitative evidence• Stakeholder events
Work so far• 17 interviews with national
experts• Site visits to CJLD services• 37 interviews with regional
stakeholders• 1 focus group of prison
mental health team managers
• 2 service user focus groups• Surveys of probation staff
and court staff
Limitations
• Only five months available for analysis• Large number of relevant stakeholders• Focus on adults• Limited resources in terms of what can be done
next• Changing service landscape nationally with
significant uncertainty
Emerging picture(Headline findings)
• Problems identifying LD throughout system• Tension between police and health services over the use of s.136• Maximising coverage of CJLD services• Out of hours provision of support for both clients and professionals• Strengthening existing care pathways & opening new pathways• Increasing provision of information to courts• Sharing information across prison-community boundary and
incompatible IT systems• Overcoming barriers to release planning
Next Steps with the Big Diversion Project
Claire CairnsRegional Advisor (North East)
• Stock take of all information gathered• Identification of unmet needs/gaps in
provision• Recommendations for Phase 2 to
commissioners by 1 April 2012• Implementation of recommendations from
April 2012
What Next?
Service developments/rec
onfigurations (pilots)
Partnership processes(service
improvements)
Nature of Recommendations
Staying in Touch • Steve Moody – Project Manager [email protected]
• For the analysis [email protected]
Google – ‘Big Diversion Project North East’ for access to North East Offender Health BDP Website. This has latest information on BDP developments
Comments forms for ideas/suggestions not already discussed in the focus group discussions