big data and competition - lingnan university · determination on unfair competition •...
TRANSCRIPT
Big Data and Competition—A Practitioner’s Observations
Ken Dai, Partner of Dentons Shanghai
Co-Chair, Antitrust & Competition Team of Dentons China
Lingnan Competition Policy Forum
December 16th, 2017, Hong Kong
Dentons 2
Big data is the new oil for
future social development.
——Big Data R&D Initiative(2013)
Dentons 3
Outline
3 Observation and Looking Forward
2 Big Data and Unfair Competition
1 Big Data and Abuse of Market Dominance
Dentons 4
Big Data and Abuse of
Market Dominance
Dentons 5
I. “Cainiao” Data Standoff
A. Background
May, 2017
Cainiao required its
cooperation partner to
provide consumers’ data,
but was rejected.
May 27
Cainiao notified
proposed close of data
interface in the name of
data security.June 1
Cainiao closed the data
interface, and excluded
the option of its partner’s
service on Ali’s platform.
June 3
Cainiao reconciled with
its partner under the
intervention of the
regulatory authority.
Dentons 6
I. “Cainiao” Data Standoff
B. Market Dominant Position Determination
• Almost 100% market share in the express networking platform market within China.
Market Share
Market Power
• More than 50% parcels are handled on Cainiao’s
platform, with a number of 16.7 billion in 2016.
• Cainiao has certain control over its downstream
express couriers.
Entry Barriers
• Costs and risks are high for the market entry.
Cainiao53.5%
Others46.5%
Dentons 7
I. “Cainiao” Data Standoff
C. Abuse of Market Dominant Position?
Applying Unreasonable Trading Conditions
Refusing to Grant Access to Data
Requiring Exclusive Trading with Designated Counterparty
• Cainiao required the information of all the parcels to be handled on the platform of Cainiao.
• Cainiao required that it should be the only channel to inform users of parcels.
• Cainiao’s close of data interface may constitute refusal to deal.
• Cainiao excluded the option of its partner’s service on Ali’s
platform, thereby users can only choose the express couriers
designated by Cainiao.
Dentons 8
I. “Cainiao” Data Standoff
D. Data Security as “Valid Justification (正当理由)”?
Considerations
• Actual and potential adverse impacts on market competition.
• Personal information protection required by law.
• Necessity for providing services.
• Limits of necessity for providing primaryservices.
Dentons 9
Big Data and
Unfair Competition
Dentons 10
Business operators shall, in market
transactions, follow the principles of
voluntariness, equality, fairness, good
faith and observe the generally
recognized business ethics.
Article 2 of the Anti-Unfair Competition Law
Dentons 11
I. Sina Weibo vs. Maimai (2016)
A. Factual Information
In cooperation period After cooperation period
• Crawling massive Sina users’ data
beyond the contract.
• Matching users of Maimai with users
of Sina for marketing purpose.
• Continuing to use
Sina users’ data
without both Sina and
users’ consent.
• Decision of the first-instance: Maimai’s conducts have violated Art. 2 of the
AUCL, Maimai should compensate Sina RMB 2 million (USD302,576).
• Decision of the second-instance upheld the original judgment.
Dentons 12
I. Sina Weibo vs. Maimai (2016)
B. Highlights of Court’s Decision
Determination on Competition Relationship
Regardless of the specific service models, both Sina Weibo and Maimai provide social-
networking services with overlaps on user groups, business modes and business scopes.
• Sina Weibo provides social media platform for users to create, share and
query information; and has both web and mobile clients.
• Maimai is a social networking application especially for employment and
working; and maimai only has mobile clients.
Dentons 13
I. Sina Weibo vs. Maimai (2016)
B. Highlights of Court’s Decision
Determination on Unfair Competition
• Data resource has been an important competitive advantage
with huge commercial value for Internet enterprises.
• Maimai’s crawling of Sina users’ data without consent has
violated business ethics, and harmed the interests of both
Sina and its users.
• Maimai’s matching of data is unjustified and does not
covered by common practice in the Internet sector.
• Impact on consumers’ interests is also an important
consideration for the determination of unfair competition.
Dentons 14
II. Dianping vs. Baidu (2016)
A. Factual Information
• Dianping provides Internet users with information about catering and other
service providers, consumers’ comments, and coupons etc. Users can get
the location and the route to the service providers with the website’s support.
• When Internet users searching catering or other service providers on Baidu
Map or Baidu Zhidao, Baidu would provide them with the information in a full
text crawled from Dianping’s website.
• Decision of the first-instance: Baidu’s conducts have violated Art. 2 of the AUCL, Baidu
should compensate Dianping RMB 3 million (USD453,864).
• Decision of the second-instance upheld the original judgment.
Dentons 15
II. Dianping vs. Baidu (2016)
B. Highlights of Court’s Decision
Determination on Competition Relationship
• The determination of competition relationship shall not be limited to the same industry or sector.
The essence of competition is competing for trading counterparties / consumers.
Application of Art 2. of the AUCL
• There is no specific provision on such conduct by laws and regulations.
• Other business operators have suffered actual damage due to such conduct.
• Such conduct is unfair and should be held accountable due to its violation of the principles
of good faith, as well as the generally recognized business ethics.
Dentons 16
II. Dianping vs. Baidu (2016)
B. Highlights of Court’s Decision
Determination on Unfair Competition
• Dianping’s interests is harmed
Users’ comments are one of the most important core competences for Dianping. Baidu’s
providing on its websites has diminished users’ accessing on Dianping’s websites.
• Baidu’s conduct is unfair
——Users’ comments on Dianping’s websites are collected by Dianping with huge input,
therefore Dianping enjoys rights over such comments.
——Baidu’s full-text use of data exceeds the limits of necessity.
——Baidu’s compliance with the Robots Protocol does not justify its improper use of data.
Dentons 17
Observation and
Looking Forward
Dentons 18
• Data becomes more and more important competition factorin the era of DT
• Competition for Data will become more intensified
• Data vs. Market Definition or Competition Relationship
• Data vs. Market Power or Market Dominant Position
• Data vs. Essential Facility
• Data Access vs. Data Security
• More Novel Cases Coming
Dentons 19
Thank you !
Ken Dai
| Vice Chair of Antitrust Committee of Shanghai Bar Association
Adjunct Professor of Jiaotong University
Councilor of Asia Competition Association
Columnist of Forbes China
| Mobile: 139 1611 3437
| E-mail: [email protected]
| WeChat: kenamour