big bang busted!

5/20/2018 Big Bang Busted!

1/7

02/04/14 02.59Big Bang Busted!

Pagina 1 di 7http://thunderbolts.info/thunderblogs/archives/guests08/022108_guest_sjcrothers.htm

home thunderblogs forum picture of the day resources team updates contact us

Big Bang Busted!

(The Black Hole, the Big Bang, and Modern Physics)

02/21/08

There has been a deliberate suppression of important scientific papers by thecommunity of physicists and astronomers concerning the black hole, beginning withthe original paper by Karl Schwarzschild of 1916, evidently for vainglory, money andself-aggrandisement. I bring you free access to those papers, and others of

relevance, in the hope that this fraud can be exposed and physics restored to arational search for knowledge. The black hole has no foundation in theorywhatsoever. Neither Newton's theory nor Einstein's theory predict it. In fact, boththeories preclude it, contrary to what the orthodox relativists claim.

The so-called "Schwarzschild" solution is not due to Karl Schwarzschild at all. Theexperts have either not read Schwarzschild's 1916 memoir or have otherwiseignored it. Go hereto get Schwarzschild's original paper, in English. The so-called"Schwarzschild" solution is due to David Hilbert, itself a corruption of a solution firstderived by Johannes Droste in May 1916, whose paper has also been buried orignored at the convenience of the experts. It appears that the experts have not readHilbert either. Go hereto get a copy of Hilbert's erroneous derivation, in English.Hilbert's mistake spawned the black hole and the community of theoretical

physicists continues to elaborate on this falsehood, with a hostile shouting down ofany and all voices challenging them. Schwarzschild's solution has no black hole,and neither does Droste's solution. Schwarzschild's paper is a piece of flawlessmathematical physics, but Hilbert's is a poor show. And while you're at it you mightas well go hereto get a copy of Marcel Brillouin's 1923 paper, in English, in whichhe gives another valid solution and also simply and dramatically demonstrates thatthe black hole is nonsense. Brillouin's paper has also been ignored.

The expertsare alwaysquick to convenientlybrand anyone whoquestions theblack hole as a crackpot. Unfortunately for the experts that does not alter the facts.The experts must also include Schwarzschild himself as a crank since his paperinvalidates the black hole outright, as does Brillouin's, and Droste's. They must alsolabel Einstein a crackpot, because Einstein always rejected the idea of the black

hole, claiming in his research papers and other writings that it is not physical, andthat singularities in the field nullify the theory of General Relativity.

It is also commonly held by experts, for example, Hawking and Ellis, Misner, Thorneand Wheeler, S. Chandrasekhar, that the Michell-Laplace dark body is a kind ofblack hole, or an anticipation of the black hole, and that black holes can bemembers of binary systems and that black holes can collide. These claims arepatently false. Go herefor a copy of G. C. McVittie's conclusive arguments whichinvalidate these ridiculous claims. So if you are a scientific man you will read

Schwarzschild's paper, and those of Droste, Hilbert, and Brillouin. You have nolegitimate excuse not to, as they are given to you herein. This is nota question ofhistorical priority, as the orthodox relativist is apt to claim when confronted withreality, but one of fundamental science.

It is also claimed by the very same "experts" that General Relativity predicts that theUniverse is expanding. This is patently false. The mathematically rigorous proof that

" "

Artist's impression (cartoon) of a blackhole. CREDIT: Dave Smith and

Thunderbolts.info/Thunderblogs.

Guest's Archives

Chronological Archives

Archives by Author

Archives by Subject

Thunderblogs home

SUBSCRIBE

FREE update -

Weekly digest of Picture of

the Day, Thunderblog,Forum, Multimedia and

more.

E-BOOK

http://www.thunderboltsproject.com/Thunderbolts/Ebooks.htmlhttp://thunderbolts.info/thunderblogs/index.htmhttp://thunderbolts.info/thunderblogs/archives/archive_index.htmhttp://thunderbolts.info/thunderblogs/archives/guests08/guestarchive.htmhttp://thunderbolts.info/home.htmhttp://thunderbolts.info/thunderblogs/index.htmhttp://thunderbolts.info/thunderbolts_forum.htmhttp://thunderbolts.info/tpod/00current.htmhttp://thunderbolts.info/resources.htmhttp://thunderbolts.info/team.htmhttp://thunderbolts.info/progress.htmmailto:[email protected],[email protected],[email protected]://www.thunderboltsproject.com/Thunderbolts/Ebooks.htmlhttp://www.thunderboltsproject.com/Thunderbolts/summary.htmlhttp://thunderbolts.info/thunderblogs/index.htmhttp://thunderbolts.info/thunderblogs/archives/subject.htmhttp://thunderbolts.info/thunderblogs/archives/archive_index.htmhttp://thunderbolts.info/thunderblogs/archives/chrono.htmhttp://thunderbolts.info/thunderblogs/archives/guests08/guestarchive.htmhttp://www.sjcrothers.plasmaresources.com/McVittie.pdfhttp://www.sjcrothers.plasmaresources.com/brillouin.pdfhttp://www.sjcrothers.plasmaresources.com/hilbert.pdfhttp://www.sjcrothers.plasmaresources.com/schwarzschild.pdfmailto:[email protected],[email protected],[email protected]://thunderbolts.info/progress.htmhttp://thunderbolts.info/team.htmhttp://thunderbolts.info/resources.htmhttp://thunderbolts.info/tpod/00current.htmhttp://thunderbolts.info/thunderbolts_forum.htmhttp://thunderbolts.info/thunderblogs/index.htmhttp://thunderbolts.info/home.htm


2/7



.

Also listed below are my own research papers in which I derive, on the standardmanifold with boundary, the general solution to Einstein's field equations for thestatic, vacuum field of the point-mass in all its configurations, confirmingSchwarzschild's solution, Droste's solution, and Brillouin's solution as particularcases, and that black holes are not consistent with General Relativity, as so wellnoted by Schwarzschild, Brillouin, and Droste, contrary to common contemporaryexpert opinion. The point-mass is itself a fictitious object and is to be rightlyconsidered as the centre of mass of an extended body.

Here are some important papers that deal with the Black Hole and the Big

Bang. They prove that these theories are not consistent with General

Relativity and have no basis in theory whatsoever.

1. On the Gravitational Field of A Sphere of Incompressible Fluid According toEinstein's Theory.

Another masterful 1916 paper by Karl Schwarzschild, also suppressed by therelativistists.

2. The field of a single centre in EINSTEIN'S theory of gravitation, and the motion ofa particle in that field.Droste's 1917 paper in which he derives for the first time the metric obtained later

and corrupted by Hilbert, erroneously attributed to Schwarzschild by the experts.There is no black hole.

3. On the Theory of Gravitation.Hermann Weyl's 1917 paper in which he obtains Droste's solution by anothermethod. I am currently translating this paper into English from the German. Here isan incomplete and rather rough translation, but still with all the facts. I will improve itif and when I get an opportunity.

4. Black Holes: The Legacy of Hilbert's Error.A brilliant paper by Leonard S. Abrams which demonstrates the invalidity of theHilbert solution and the black hole.

5. The Total Space-Time for the Point Charge and its Consequences for BlackHoles.

Another brillant paper by Abrams demonstrating the invalidity of the Reissner-Nordstrom black hole.

6. The Total Space-Time of a Point-Mass when !"0, and its Consequences for theLake-Roeder Black Hole.Yet another interesting paper by Abrams in which he also demonstrates theinvalidity of the aforesaid black hole (but his arguments are incomplete).

7. On a paper by J. Smoller and B. Temple.A first-class demonstration by Nikias Stavroulakis (2002) that the black hole isuniversally inconsistent with General Relativity. The paper by Smoller and Temple

shows that black holes never form in solutions of the Oppenheimer-Volkoff

equations, but they do not treat of the black hole concept in general. Stavroulakisdoes.

8. On the Principles of General Relativity and the S#(4)-invariant Metrics.A very well argued paper showing that the standard manifold with boundary isinadmissible and that a gravitating body cannot collapse to a material point.Stavroulakis also discusses in detail the invalidity of the implicit transformationsroutinely employed by the orthodox relativists.

9. A Statical Smooth Extension of Schwarzschild's Metric.This is an early paper by Stavroulakis (1974) in which he disproves the black hole ingeneral, by eliminating the manifold with boundary from all consideration, andobtains the metric for an extended spherically symmetric body.

10. Non-Euclidean Geometry and Gravitation.

An e-book series for

teachers, general readers

and specialists alike.

VIDEO FAVORITES

(FREE viewing)

Thunderbolts of the Gods

Symbols of an Alien Sky

MULTIMEDIA

Our NEW Multimedia page

explores may diverse topics

not traditionaly covered by

the Thunderbolts Project.

PREDICTIONS

Follow the predictions of the

Electric Universe.

http://www.thunderbolts.info/predictions.htmhttp://www.thunderbolts.info/online_videos.htmhttp://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Wnv7v_c3l2chttp://video.google.com.au/videoplay?docid=4773590301316220374http://www.thunderboltsproject.com/Thunderbolts/Ebooks.htmlhttp://www.ptep-online.com/index_files/2006/PP-05-13.PDFhttp://www.sjcrothers.plasmaresources.com/Stavroulakis-3.pdfhttp://www.sjcrothers.plasmaresources.com/Stavroulakis-2.pdfhttp://www.ptep-online.com/theometria/Stavroulakis-1.pdfhttp://www.sjcrothers.plasmaresources.com/Abrams-LR-hole.pdfhttp://www.sjcrothers.plasmaresources.com/Abrams1996.pdfhttp://www.sjcrothers.plasmaresources.com/Abrams1989.pdfhttp://www.sjcrothers.plasmaresources.com/Weyl-2.pdfhttp://www.sjcrothers.plasmaresources.com/Droste.pdfhttp://www.sjcrothers.plasmaresources.com/Schwarzschild2.pdf


3/7



.Physics.

Here are some important papers dealing with the localisation of gravitational

energy.

11. Mechanics. - On the Analytical Expression that must be given to theGravitational Tensor in Einstein's Theory.

A very nice paper by T. Levi-Civita in 1917, one of the inventors of Tensor Calculus,showing that Einstein's pseudo-tensor is nonsense because it leads to therequirement for a first-order, intrinsic, differential invariant, which, as is well knownto the pure mathematicians, does not exist! This too has been ignored by therelativists.

12. How far can one get with a Linear Field Theory of Gravitation in Flat Space-Time?.

An interesting treatment by Hermann Weyl (1944) demonstrating that the standardlinearization of Einstein's equations is inadmissible because it leads to therequirement of a tensor, which, except for the trivial case of being zero, does nototherwise exist! It is in English. Another important paper ignored by the orthodoxphysicists.

My papers.

1. On the General Solution to Einstein's Vacuum Field and its Implications forRelativistic Degeneracy.

A derivation of the general solution for the simple 'point-mass'. It also demonstratesthat the Hilbert solution (invariably and incorrectly called the "Schwarzschildsolution" in the textbooks and the bulk of the research literature) does not admit ablack hole, and that black holes are nonsense. It is impossible for a black hole to bederived from Schwarzschild's true solution without violating the geometry of hissolution (which is precisely what the orthodox relativists have always done to gettheir black holes and big bangs). This paper was published in Progress inPhysics. Karl Schwarzschild's original paper (in English) can be obtained here.

2. On the Ramifications of the Schwarzschild Space-Time Metric.

A derivation of the general solution for the point-charge, the rotating point-mass,and the rotating point-charge. It also demonstrates that the Reissner-Nordstrmsolution, the Kerr solution, and the Kerr-Newman solution, do not admit black holes,and that black holes are nonsense. This paper was published in Progress inPhysics.

3. On the Geometry of the General Solution for the Vacuum Field.

A detailed discussion of the significance of the coordinate radius rin the metric forthe vacuum field. I show that rin general is neither a radius nor a coordinate in thegravitational field and is in fact only a real-valued parameter, and that the properradius and the radius of curvature, both functions of r, and which are not the samein Einstein's gravitational field, are the relevant radial quantities in Einstein'sgravitational field. The assumption by Hilbert and the conventional relativists that r

is 'the' radius in the gravitational field is a grave error, as is the assumption that 0

big bang busted!

Documents