THE PLANNING COUNCIL AND METROPOLITAN PLANNING ORGANIZATION FOR PINELLAS COUNTY

1. CALL TO ORDER AND INTRODUCTIONS (8:30 – 8:35)

2. APPROVAL OF MINUTES – MAY 16, 2016 (8:35 – 8:40)

3. FORWARD PINELLAS ACTIONS – JUNE 8, 2016 (8:40 – 8:45)

4. DUKE ENERGY TRAIL PROJECT STATUS (8:45 – 9:00)

5. SUN TRAIL PROGRAM (9:00 – 9:10)

6. COAST TO COAST CONNECTOR TRAIL URBAN-RURAL DESIGN OVERLAY STUDY (9:10 – 9:20)

7. BIKEPATH COUNTRY WAYFINDING (9:20 – 9:30)

8. SPOTlight EMPHASIS AREAS UPDATE (9:30 – 9:40)

A Vision for U.S. Highway 19 Corridor

Gateway Area Master Plan

Enhancing Beach Community Access

9. BPAC BUSINESS (9:40 – 9:55) A. Tri-County BPAC Meeting, May 18, 2016 Review | Action B. Dunedin Causeway Bridge PD&E Alternatives Workshop Update C. BP Settlement Fund Project Ideas D. Florida Bicycle Association (FBA) E. Pinellas Trails, Inc

10. AGENCY REPORTS (9:55 – 10:05)

11. OTHER BUSINESS (10:05 – 10:15) A. Membership B. Correspondence, Publications, Articles of Interest C. Suggestions for Future Agenda Topics D. Other

12. ADJOURNMENT (10:15)

**JULY MEETING CANCELLED**

NEXT BPAC MEETING – AUGUST 15, 2016

Public participation is solicited without regard to race, color, national origin, age, sex, religion, disability, or family status. Persons who require special accommodations under the Americans with Disabilities Act or persons who require translation services (free of charge) should contact the Office of Human Rights, 400 South Fort Harrison Avenue, Suite 300, Clearwater, Florida 33756; [(727) 464-4062 (V/TDD)] at least seven days prior to the meeting.

Appeals: Certain public meetings result in actions taken by the public board, commission or agency that may be appealed; in such case persons are advised that, if they decide to appeal any decision made at a public meeting/hearing, they will need a record of the proceedings, and, for such purposes, they may need to ensure that a verbatim record of the proceedings is made, which record includes the testimony and evidence upon which the appeal is to be based.

BICYCLE PEDESTRIAN ADVISORY

COMMITTEE (BPAC) MEETING AGENDA

June 20, 2016 – 8:30 a.m.

310 Court Street, 1st Floor Conf. Room

Clearwater, FL 33756

BPAC – June 20, 2016

2. Approval of Minutes

SUMMARY

The meeting summary for the May 16, 2016 meeting is attached for review and approval.

ATTACHMENT(S): BPAC Meeting Summary – May 16, 2016

ACTION: Approval of Meeting Summary

PINELLAS COUNTY BICYCLE PEDESTRIAN ADVISORY COMMITTEE MEETING SUMMARY

MAY 16, 2016 The following is a summary of the Forward Pinellas Bicycle Pedestrian Advisory Committee (BPAC) held on May 16, 2016 in the Pinellas County Planning Department Conference Room, First Floor, 310 Court Street, Clearwater, Florida. BPAC Members Present Brian Smith, Chairman At Large Citizen Representative Geri Raja, Vice Chair South County Citizens Representative Lucas Cruse St. Petersburg Bicycle Pedestrian Coordinator Casey Morse Pinellas County Public Works Edward Z. Hawkes Dunedin Citizen Representative Becky Afonso North County Citizen Representative, Oldsmar Lynn Bosco At Large Citizen Representative Michael Siebel At Large Citizen Representative Robert Yunk At Large Citizen Representative Anthony Matonti TBARTA Ron Rasmussen Pinellas Park Citizen Rep Jim Wedlake Seminole Citizen Rep Paul Kurtz At Large Citizen Rep Spencer Curtis (for Lyle Fowler) PC Parks & Conservation Resources (PCR) Chris Cochran PSTA Steve Lasky At Large Citizen Representative Chip Haynes Clearwater Citizen Representative Charlene Cobb Sunstar Paramedics Kimberly Cooper St. Petersburg Citizen Representative Jim Parent South Beaches Citizen Rep (St. Pete Bch) Bert Valery North Beaches Citizen Rep (Indian Rocks Beach) Ric Hartman CUTR Eric Gibson PSCO Annette Sala At Large Citizen Representative Win Dermody Clearwater Citizen Representative BPAC Members Absent Byron Hall Pinellas Park Citizen Rep Felicia Donnelly Clw BP Coordinator Megan Carmichael Dept of Health - Pinellas Camille Stupar St. Pete Citizen Rep Georgia Wildrick Largo Citizen Rep Charles Martin At Large Citizen Rep Tom Ferraro North County Citizen Rep Valerie Brookens City of Largo Tom McGinty School System Rep Others Present Donald Hall Clearwater Police Chief Lois Zajac Visitor George Hunt Pinellas Trails, Inc. Karen Gates Citizen, Gulfport Christopher Ross Citizen, Gulfport Ray Raja Citizen, South County Jan Hirschfield Pinellas Trails, Inc. Matt Weaver FDOT D7 Safety Eng Michelle Schofner ICON Consulting Christopher Speece FDOT District 7 Gina Harvey PC PW Traffic Eng Carolyn Kuntz MPO Staff Rodney Chatman MPO Section Manager Robert Feigel MPO Staff Susan Miller MPO Staff

BPAC MEETING MINUTES May 16, 2016 Page 2

1. CALL TO ORDER & INTRODUCTIONS Chairman Brian Smith, At Large Citizen Representative, called the meeting to order at 8:30 a.m. Those in attendance introduced themselves.

2. APPROVAL OF MINUTES

The meeting summary from the April 18, 2016 meeting was approved as provided in the agenda packet.

3. MPO ACTIONS

Mr. Rodney Chatman, MPO Section Manager, reviewed the MPO actions from the Board’s May 11, 2016 meeting. He noted the MPO recognized the retirement of Carolyn Kuntz, long-time staff member for her years of service to the MPO. During the PSTA activities update, it was noted that the Jolley Trolley will begin serving the northern coastal route seven days a week. The MPO received an update regarding the Transportation Alternatives (TA) Program prioritization process, approved the Unified Planning Work Program, and received a presentation by FDOT on the Complete Streets policy. Presentations were provided on the U.S. Highway 19 Corridor Safety Study and on modern roundabouts.

4. BICYCLE FACILITIES ON S.R. 699/GULF BOULEVARD

Mr. Matt Weaver, Safety Engineer FDOT District 7, addressed the BPAC and explained the limits of the state-owned section of Gulf Boulevard from Walsingham Road/S.R. 688 to the Pinellas Bayway/S.R. 682. Due to right-of-way limitations, drainage issues, and roadway capacity, bicycle accommodations vary in design, width, and surface conditions. The variation of bicycle facility design treatments highlights the need for safe and efficient infrastructure for bicyclist travel along Gulf Boulevard. Mr. Weaver provided detailed information regarding conceptual plans to create continuous bicycle accommodations along the entirely of S.R. 699/Gulf Boulevard that will include shared-lane markings, bike lane designations, and green pavement coloring for conflict areas at and around intersections. To emphasis the presence of bicyclists to motorists and enhance overall safety of the corridor. The BPAC took action to send a letter to FDOT endorsing the safety upgrades as outlined by Mr. Weaver regarding the use of green pavement for bicycle lane transition areas, with a copy to the MPO board. Mr. Bert Valery, North Beaches Citizen Representative, presented information about beach access areas and pedestrian access in Indian Rocks Beach within the County section of Gulf Boulevard. He highlighted the land uses on the east side, and noted the locations of the mid-block crossings, and the lack of crosswalks located at side streets. MPO staff agreed to meet with Mr. Valery to further discuss the potential locations for pedestrian crosswalks. This item will be included in the June BPAC agenda.

5. TRANSPORTATION ALTERNATIVES (TA) PROGRAM PROJECT RANKING CRITERIA

Mr. Robert Feigel, MPO Program Planner, provided background information regarding the Transportation Alternatives (TA) Program project prioritization process. In Pinellas, the TA projects are prioritized by all of the MPO advisory committees prior to adoption by the MPO Board. In anticipation of new project applications needing to be prioritized, the ranking criteria was updated from input from all of the advisory committees with additional recommendations from the MPO, PPC and City of St. Petersburg. After discussion, the BPAC took action to recommend approval of the Transportation Alternatives Program project ranking criteria.

BPAC MEETING MINUTES May 16, 2016 Page 3

6. TRI-COUNTY BPAC MEETING, MAY 18, 2016

The Tri-County BPAC last met on January 13, 2016, during which the group agreed to meet triennially. The next meeting is scheduled for Wednesday, May 18, 2016. Pinellas BPAC will host the meeting at the Johnson Community Library, 20159 18th Avenue South in St. Petersburg. Mr. Lucas Cruse, St. Petersburg Bicycle Pedestrian Coordinator, has graciously offered to lead a bike tour. Those interested should meet at 4 pm and return before the meeting begins at 6 pm. The meeting agenda was provided in the agenda packet, including a location map with a hyperlink for specific directions. Mr. Valery asked about options to fund the remaining gaps in the Pinellas Trail Loop, and it was noted that a discussion regarding the completion of the Duke Energy Trail will include funding information under the SUN Trails Program.

7. MPO SPOTLIGHT EMPHASIS AREAS UPDATE

The MPO/PPC listening sessions for the three emphasis areas have all been completed. The U.S. Highway 19 corridor meetings were held in April, and the beach access meeting was held in early May. At this time, data for baseline conditions are being collected for all emphasis areas, and additional meetings are being scheduled. Mr. Chatman mentioned that improved bicycle connections are being considered to link the Pinellas Trail with the Belleair Causeway along West Bay Drive as a type of complete streets project. That section of West Bay Drive is scheduled for resurfacing in FY 2020/21. Additional information about the emphasis areas will be provided at the June BPAC meeting.

8. BPAC BUSINESS

A. Fund Raising Project

Ms. Karen Gates, Pinellas County citizen, presented the Bike Life fundraising project. The Bike Life logo is available on a variety of promotional items, clothing, and accessories. In addition, 15% of all items sold with the Bike Life logo will be donated to capital improvements on the Pinellas Trail and Pinellas Trail Loop. During the discussion, BPAC members inquired about the BP settlement funds. The Pinellas Board of County Commissioners (BCC) will meet at the end of May to discuss how the funds should be spent. Mr. Chatman agreed to email information regarding the BP settlement to members.

B. Florida Bicycle Association (FBA)

Ms. Becky Afonso, North County Citizen Representative, also serves as the Executive Director for the Florida Bicycle Association (FBA). She shared the current strategy being used to reach members of the Florida House and gather support for the Vulnerable User Bill during the upcoming session. In addition, the FBA website provides links to a variety of regional resources and agencies.

C. Pinellas Trails, Inc.

Mr. Valery said the Pinellas Trail Auxiliary Ranger appreciation picnic was well attended last month. He then introduced Mr. Jan Hirschfield who was elected chairman at the last meeting of Pinellas Trails, Inc. Mr. Hirschfield spoke for a few minutes about PTInc.’s mission and focus, and added the group was interested in completing the Pinellas Trail Loop. Mr. Jim Wedlake, Seminole Citizen Representative, added information about the memorial fund program and how donations for the program are being handled.

9. AGENCY REPORTS

Updated information was provided for the following items:

BPAC MEETING MINUTES May 16, 2016 Page 4

Tri-County Trail / Starkey Wilderness Trail & Brooker Creek Trail Ms. Casey Morse, Pinellas County Public Works Engineering, said that construction had broken ground for the Pinellas section of the Tri-County Trail project, referred to as the Starkey Wilderness gap. This is a design-build project, and is expected to be completed in early 2017.

Duke Energy Florida Trail Ms. Morse explained the Duke Energy Trail project was divided into two sections for design and construction. The section from S.R. 590/North East Coachman Road to Sunset Point Road is scheduled and funded for design and construction in FY 2017. The section from Sunset Point Road to the Enterprise overpass is scheduled for construction later this year. Chairman Smith reminded the BPAC the remaining Pinellas Trail Loop sections were eligible for SUN Trails Program funding, and that Public Works would be submitting the application.

Court Street/Chestnut Street Railroad Crossing Ms. Morse said the RRFBs (rectangular rapid flashing beacons) had been installed for the Pinellas Trail crossings at Court and Chestnut Streets in downtown Clearwater. BPAC members noted the motorists do not notice the beacons, and motorist compliance was low, and suggested additional signs or other enhancement be added to improve motorists compliance when the device is activated.

Elfers Trail Spur Mr. Chatman said the restoration and stabilization required to repair the erosion to the Elfers Trail Spur across the Anclote River would be a shared project, and the County would supply materials and City of Tarpon Springs would supply labor. He noted that this will be a temporary solution until a long-term solution is developed.

Belleair Road/U.S. Highway 19 Intersection Trail Crossing Mr. Weaver announced that the signage has been updated for the trail crossing at Belleair and U.S. Highway 19, but moving the crosswalk closer to the corner may take a couple months.

Orange Street Overpass The project to replace the two spans of the Orange Street overpass for the Pinellas Trail is currently in the design/bid phase.

Honeymoon Island State Park Ped/Bike Path The funds to install a ped/bike path within Honeymoon Island State Park have been included in the FDOT budget.

St. Petersburg Bike Share Program Mr. Cruse indicated the St. Petersburg Council approved the funding for the bike share program, and the next step would be finalization of the project. The mayor would be participating in a Bike to Work Day ride on Friday, May 20, 2016. Anyone interested is encouraged to meet at Williams Park at 7 a.m. to ride.

Mr. Chatman said that FDOT announced it would not be installing a roundabout at Alternate U.S. Highway 19 in downtown Palm Harbor. A pedestrian crossing between Florida Avenue and Nebraska Avenue will be added.

10. OTHER BUSINESS

A. Membership

Chairman Smith noted the vacancies on the Committee had been filled. There was no further discussion regarding membership.

BPAC MEETING MINUTES May 16, 2016 Page 5

B. Correspondence, Publications, Articles of Interest

Chairman Smith noted the Greenways Foundation newsletter had been morphed into The Trail Tracker, and encouraged everyone to sign up to receive the newsletter.

C. Suggestions for Future Agenda Topics

There were no specific items suggested for future agendas.

D. Other

Mr. Chatman indicated the MPO was working with the Health Department through a safety grant to provide safety devices and improve education. One of the projects developed a brochure regarding RRFBs, which will be distributed with the Discover Pinellas Trail and Bicycle Lanes brochure. Mr. Mike Siebel, At Large Citizen Representative, announced that this coming Wednesday will mark the 40th anniversary bike ride from California to Washington, DC as part of the Bike Centennial Across America ride. He congratulated Mr. Chip Haynes, Clearwater Citizen Representative, who participated in that ride, for such an accomplishment. The Bike Centennial group is now Adventure Cycling. Chairman Smith informed the BPAC that the Friends of the Brooker Creek are beginning to plan a reception when the Pinellas section of the Tri-County Trail project (the Starkey Wilderness gap) for a grand opening celebration.

11. ADJOURNMENT

Chairman Smith adjourned the meeting at 10:20 am. The next meeting is scheduled for Monday, June 20, 2016. He reminded everyone the Tri-County BPAC would be held on May 18th.

BPAC – June 20, 2016

3. Forward Pinellas Actions – June 8, 2016

SUMMARY

The June 8, 2016 Action Sheet is provided for your information. A staff member will review actions taken by the Forward Pinellas Board at the meeting.

ATTACHMENT(S): Action Sheet – June 8, 2016

ACTION: None Required, Informational Item Only

THE PLANNING COUNCIL AND METROPOLITAN PLANNING ORGANIZATION FOR PINELLAS COUNTY

310 Court Street, 2nd Floor, Clearwater, Florida 33756 ● (727) 464-8250; Fax (727) 464-8212

Action Sheet June 8, 2016

1. CALL TO ORDER

Chairman Kennedy called the meeting to order.

2. INVOCATION AND PLEDGE Commissioner Tornga conducted services.

3. CITIZENS TO BE HEARD Joe Farrell of the Pinellas Realtor Organization addressed the Board to express support of the TBX project.

4. CONSENT AGENDA The Chairman asked that consent agenda item 4C be removed and acted upon as a separate item. Subsequently, the Board approved the consent agenda, which included the May 11, 2016 meeting minutes from the MPO and PPC; a resolution authorizing an agreement for 2016/17 between the MPO and the Commission for the Transportation Disadvantaged and authorizing the MPO Chair to sign all future documents necessary to receive Transportation Disadvantaged Trust Funds; the appointments of Tawnya Martino, Michael Dowling and Ricardo Feliciano as alternate representatives and Dave Newell as the FDOT representative on the LCB; the appointments of Councilmember Gabby McGee, City of Oldsmar, and Councilman Bob Cundiff, City of Clearwater, as representatives on the School Transportation Safety Committee (STST); FY16 Q2 financial statement; Countywide Planning Authority (CPA) Actions for May 2016; and a resolution approving the Title VI Program. CONSENT AGENDA ITEM 4C – Approval of CAC Bylaws Proposed Changes Following discussion by the Executive Director to highlight the bylaws changes and clarify the corrections needed to remove any reference to the Pinellas County Planning Department, the Board discussed the need to remove the question on the CAC application that references an individual’s criminal convictions. The Board approved the proposed changes to the CAC bylaws, as amended, to remove any references to the Pinellas County Planning Department. Pending verification of Pinellas County’s application form procedures, the CAC application will be amended and brought back to the Board for approval in July.

5. PUBLIC HEARING ITEM METROPOLITAN PLANNING ORGANIZATION A. Adoption of the FY 2016/17 – 2020/21 Transportation Improvement Program (TIP)

Following a staff presentation and public hearing, the Board adopted the TIP by roll call vote. PINELLAS PLANNING COUNCIL B. Subthreshold Countywide Plan Map Amendment

1. Case CW 16-17 – City of St. Petersburg Following a brief staff presentation and public hearing, the Board recommended approval of the amendment.

6. PRESENTATION AND/OR ACTION ITEMS A. PSTA Activities Report – Update

Mayor Bujalski, the PSTA representative, provided an update on PSTA-related activities, noting PSTA is working on a sustainable approach to bus replacements with a recommendation from staff to focus on fuel economy goals rather than a specific technology policy. Additional funding sources for bus replacements are still be considered. Public meetings continue to be held regarding the October service changes. Cassandra Borchers,

Chief Development Officer for PSTA, addressed questions concerning these changes and their ability to effectuate increased efficiency, advising which routes would likely be affected.

B. TBX Presentation – MPO Support Action Following a presentation by Debbie Hunt, FDOT Director of Transportation Development, the Board discussed the project and directed staff to draft a resolution of support to include the talking points as outlined on the handout in the member’s back-up materials. The Board approved the motion, with one dissent, to authorize the Executive Director to prepare a resolution of support with the talking points for the Chairman’s signature prior to the Hillsborough County MPO’s public hearing on June 22, 2016. CITIZENS TO BE HEARD Dayna Lazarus addressed the Board to express opposition to the TBX project.

C. Autonomous Vehicles - Presentation Ming Gao, FDOT staff, presented information regarding automated vehicles. He advised the fourth annual Florida Automated Vehicles Summit will be held in Tampa at the Marriott Waterside Hotel on November 29-30, 2016.

D. Bicycle Facilities on S.R. 699/Gulf Boulevard - Presentation Matt Weaver, FDOT staff, presented an overview of the conceptual plans for bicycle facility improvements on Gulf Boulevard, which will be implemented in the upcoming fiscal year for the state-maintained portion of Gulf Boulevard using safety funds. FDOT will work with Pinellas County on possible continuation of the treatments in the county-maintained portion.

E. Pasco U.S. 19 Concept – Presentation Richard Gehring, Pasco County staff, presented on the West Market Area Plan and future plans for the U. S. 19 corridor in Pasco County.

F. Transportation Alternatives Criteria Ranking – MPO Action Following an update by staff, the Board approved the Transportation Alternatives Program ranking criteria.

G. LCB Recommendation Regarding Transportation Disadvantaged Service Plan Annual Update – MPO Action Following staff review, the Board approved the Transportation Disadvantaged Service Plan Annual Update.

7. REPORTS/UPDATES A. Director’s Report

1. SPOTlight Update Forward Pinellas Executive Director provided an update regarding the response letter received from FDOT with regard to the U.S. 19 corridor. Blanton advised of progress being made on scoping analysis activities for US 19, the Gateway/Mid-County area and Enhancing Beach Community Access.

2. Approval of S. R. 60 Multimodal Implementation Strategy Scope of Services – Joint Action Following staff review, the Board approved the draft of the S.R. 60 Multimodal Implementation Scope of Services, pending refinements as necessary to stay within budget, to be brought back in July in final form for approval.

3. FY 16 Mid-Year Budget Report and Amendment – Joint Action Following staff presentation, the Board approved the FY 16 budget amendment.

4. Annual and Five-Year Work Programs for FY 17 and FY 17 through 21 – Draft The staff and Board reviewed the draft Annual and Five-Year Work Programs to be brought back in July in final form for approval.

5. PPC and MPO FY 16 Audit Services – Update Forward Pinellas Executive Director provided an update on the status of moving to one auditing company. Authorization for extension of contracts for two auditing firms to conduct the MPO and PPC FY 16 audit will be presented to the Board for approval in July.

8. INFORMATIONAL ITEMS

A. Tampa Bay TMA Meeting of June 3, 2016

A summary of the TMA meeting was included in the members’ folders. Forward Pinellas Executive Director elaborated on the public commentary that occurred at the meeting with regard to noticing of the public meeting and the TBX project.

B. Correspondence and Planner Advisory Committee (PAC) Action Sheet (Draft) The draft of the PAC Action Sheet was included in the agenda packet.

C. Committee Vacancies There are no committee vacancies at this time.

D. Other The fatalities map was included in the agenda packet.

BPAC – June 20, 2016

4. Duke Energy Trail Project Status

SUMMARY

Envisioned in 1999, the Pinellas Trail Loop would provide a unique opportunity for pedestrians and cyclists from the existing Pinellas Trail at John Chesnut Sr. Park to Weedon Island Preserve in northeast St. Petersburg. Utilizing a utility corridor controlled by Duke Energy Florida, completing a multi-use trail on the east side of the county opens access to several popular destinations and activities within the highly urbanized and auto-centric area. In December 2015, the Pinellas County Board of County Commissioners (BCC) voted unanimously to execute an agreement with Duke Energy, allowing over 20 miles of utility corridor to be used for a non-motorized trail. In exchange for the use of the property, Duke Energy was given naming rights for those segments of trail. The current Capital Improvement Program (CIP) includes funding for construction of the Duke Energy Trail segment from Sunset Point Road to the Enterprise pedestrian overpass which began in mid-March 2016. The segment from the existing Duke Energy Trail section from Belleair Road to S.R. 590/N.E. Coachman Road to Sunset Point Road is funded for design and construction in FY 2016/17. The short gap from Bright House Field to N.E. Coachman Road/S.R. 590, is scheduled for design in FY 2016/17, and for construction in late 2017. Project Manager Dan Glaser has agreed to provide information regarding the status of the Duke Energy Trail project, and to answer any questions that BPAC members may have.

ATTACHMENT(S): Map of Pinellas Trail Loop

ACTION: None Required, Informational Item Only

eacnwo4 .-.>; _-'

»1' -- - -..»»--, ^w

^

<. r*

,^e-

Y-^<. *.^,

t<yI

a,^-y

\ tT^

^1^

^f./

\f^-f %.^'

m.^1-^*<

f

- ^y» ^../'

-1.^ f

w v» ^I

^^ ri

1 I i. .if, ^

r.»-t

"^rf

. K t ..''-*^. <r'.^.-.

.J.I- -<. *

. -.t sf ^

. ?L rtiV

. >-»--'4 i f .X i'^

y^

CT ^ 01.e

^.i-s0 < -';"' 1 t.

9 , y s

<..;!,r", f ~

I. 1 *»-p»1

.. (' :,- 4»_l r

JJ L,: i<'

*1~ 1»<

n-'^-ftf3^

c

f . J>fcfJQ 1-.-4.-i-i

^ Fampe^ f

If

. ^'

^ n. 1 T <a6. Qsv.

f *

,jj^<-;- ^ n. ^y

^ 9

r i

.../-1-'s^ ~t~frI

.f

i-.UJ. K~^;*h

rf

|T'1I a'

*r^..^i

. ta/* ^

^-t A^ It .'

-.^ft <

.t ffvif

-^ _hit) .^r

a,am* h '--5l'-kf -A

»

.^k. > '..

4 ^Mn-w

(

1/

"."

.^~ y

flM.

f .»' ,»

TrailExisting & Programmed Tampa

(I

\ Bay1

- Community Tiaiis Connections .^s^fcDuke Efieigy TuilTrail Gapes[>. Existing Overpass

.<PinellasTrai '^

u -nGap-not gap (existing!Gap-Exreting underpass /t-;

/i^

-'I '"*.-/.Th-County Trail / Coast to Coast (F301) f

^ '-\

^ @»

\ "sssff^T! "-rfds: tt^s^. ", .rt ^\i» t

-tl Pinel»^^l

-"-s .V1»;

v .tI n .».'I ^

BPAC – June 20, 2016

5. Sun Trail Program

SUMMARY

In 2015, the Florida legislature agreed to set aside funds each year for the development and construction of paved shared use non-motorized trail projects - SUN Trails. The SUN Trails Program (www.floridasuntrail.com) was created to connect existing local and/or regional systems and close existing gaps by coordinating efforts across the state. The 275-mile Coast-to-Coast Trail was chosen as the first system to be funded for construction. Each year FDOT will allocate $25 M from auto tag fees to fund SUN Trail projects, from which 1/3 will be spent on finishing the Coast to Coast Connector Trail, 1/3 will be spent on the next identified regional trail priority, and the remaining 1/3 will be provided to individual trails within the regional system. The next regional trail to be prioritized for funding was selected at the Florida Greenways and Trails Council meeting on Thursday, March 31, 2016 in Tallahassee. The Council selected three from the remaining seven regional trails with the St. John’s River to Sea Loop receiving the highest priority, the Capital City to the Sea Trails receiving second highest priority, and the Southwest Coastal Regional Trail (which includes the remaining Duke Energy Trail gaps) was third. FDOT will be working with the MPO's and local governments to determine which trail segments and phases of work for the St. John's River-to-Sea Loop will be ready to be programmed for funding beginning this summer. FDOT will continue to evaluate project phases along the Coast to Coast Connector Trail for new funding, and will also be selecting individual trails in other parts of the state to receive SUN Trail funding. Pinellas County Public Works has agreed to submit an application to fund the design and construction of the remaining gaps in the Duke Energy Trail, as a segment of the Southwest Coastal Regional Trail, through the individual trail category. Additional information will be provided at the BPAC meeting. ATTACHMENT(S): Regional Priority Trail Connectors 2016 Southwest Coast Regional Connector SUN Trail Process Eligibility Selection

ACTION: None Required, Informational Item Only

ESCAMBIA

SANTAROSA OKALOOSAWALTON

LEON

JEFFERSON

MADISON HAMILTONCALHOUN

HOLMESJACKSON

NASSAUWASHINGTON GADSDEN

BAYSUWANNEE

TAYLORLIBERTY

DUVALCOLUMBIA

BAKER

FRANKLIN

ALACHUA

WAKULLAST

JOHNSLAFAYETTE

CLAYBRADFORDGULF

UNION

LEVY

VOLUSIAMARION

GILCHRIST PUTNAMDIXIEFLAGLER

CITRUSSUMTER

SEMINOLE

PASCO

HILLSBOROUGH

BREVARD

HERNANDO

HARDEEMANATEE

ST LUCIE

PINELLASINDIANRIVER

PALMBEACHHENDRY

SARASOTA DESOTOMARTIN

GLADESCHARLOTTE

COLLIER

LEE

BROWARD

MIAMI-DADEMONROE

ORANGE

OKEECHOBEE

HIGHLANDS

OSCEOLA

LAKE

POLK

¬«20

¬«60

¬«30¬«71

¬«5

¬«10

¬«90

¬«91

¬«400

¬«200

¬«25

¬«55

¬«70

¬«8

¬«15

¬«9

¬«93

§¦195

§¦110

§¦595

§¦275

§¦10

§¦10

§¦4

§¦295

§¦75

§¦95

§¦95

§¦75

£¤23

£¤1B

£¤90£¤221£¤98

£¤19A

£¤301

£¤231

£¤41B

£¤1

£¤41

£¤129

£¤92

£¤98B

£¤331

£¤27

£¤17

£¤192

£¤90A

£¤19

£¤29

£¤319 £¤27A

£¤441

Crestview Marianna

TallahasseeLive Oak

PanamaCity

Beach

LakeCitySt.

Marks Perry

Gainesville

Palatka

CrossCity Hawthorne

OcalaDelandDunnellonWildwood

BushnellOrlando Cape

Canaveral

Melbourne

TampaLakeWales

St.Petersburg

SarasotaOkeechobee

Ft. Myers

Ft.Lauderdale

Key West

FernandinaBeach

PensacolaJacksonville

St.Augustine

CarrabellePortSt. Joe

FlaglerBeach

DaytonaBeach

CedarKey

TitusvilleCocoa

DunedinPalm Bay

VeroBeachPortSt. Lucie

Venice

Boynton BeachBocaRaton

Naples

Miami

PortCharlotte

Key Largo¬°

LegendCoast to Coast Regional Connector - 250 milesHeart of Florida Regional Connector - 135 milesNortheast Coast Regional Connector / East Coast Greenway - 200 milesSouthwest Coast Regional Connector 225 milesNature Coast Regional Connector - 175 milesOld Florida Regional Connector - 100 milesGreat Northwest Coast Regional Connector - 275 milesRiver of Grass Greenway - 100 milesTropical Terminus / East Coast Greenway - 250 milesFlorida Keys Overseas Heritage Trail - 100 milesSt Johns River to Sea Regional Connector - 90 milesAll Aboard Florida Regional Connector - 230 MilesCapital City to the Sea Trails - 85 MilesNortheast Florida Regional Connector - 130 MilesOther Priority Trails

Atlant icOcean

Gulf ofMexico

TITLE Data Source: FDEP OGTBasemap courtesy of Florida Department of TransportationPrepared Date: July 7, 2015This map is for display purpose only. Any other use is not advised.Engineering - Landscape Architecture - Planning - GIS

Regional PriorityRegional PriorityTrail ConnectorsTrail Connectors

GEORGIA

ALABAMA

MISSISSIPPI

50 0 50

Miles

Northeast FloridaNortheast FloridaRegional ConnectorRegional Connector

St. Johns River to SeaSt. Johns River to SeaRegional ConnectorRegional Connector

Tropical Terminus /Tropical Terminus /East Coast GreenwayEast Coast Greenway

Florida KeysFlorida KeysOverseas Heritage TrailOverseas Heritage Trail

River of GrassRiver of GrassGreenwayGreenway

Southwest CoastSouthwest CoastRegional ConnectorRegional Connector

Heart of FloridaHeart of FloridaRegional ConnectorRegional Connector

Nature CoastNature CoastRegional ConnectorRegional Connector

Great Northwest CoastGreat Northwest CoastRegional ConnectorRegional Connector

Coast to CoastCoast to CoastRegional ConnectorRegional ConnectorOld FloridaOld Florida

Regional ConnectorRegional Connector

Printing Date: 7/7/2015 11:53:44 AMFile:\\FILE-TPA\projects\8586\004\GIS\MXD\20150629-RegionalPriorityTrailConnectors-2-11x17.mxd

Northeast CoastNortheast CoastRegional Connector / Regional Connector / East Coast GreenwayEast Coast Greenway

Capital City toCapital City tothe Sea Trailsthe Sea Trails

All AboardAll AboardFlorida RegionalFlorida Regional

ConnectorConnector

1

Contact: Robin Birdsong(850) 414-4922Robin.Birdsong@dot.state.fl.uswww.FloridaSunTrail.com

SUN Trail Program Process for FundingIndividual Trail Projects

SUN Trail Program Eligibility Criteria Individual Trail ProjectsThere are four eligibility criteria a project must meet to receive consideration for SUN Trail funding. Is the project envisioned as a paved component of the Florida Greenways and Trails System (FGTS) Priority Land Trail Network, and therefore the SUN Trail Network?

Is the project identified as a priority by the applicable jurisdiction?•If the project is within a boundary of a Metropolitan Planning Organization (MPO), it must be a MPO priority.•ForareasoutsideofaMPOboundary,theprojectisidentifiedpriorityofthecounty(inclusive of their municipalities), tribal government, federal or state managing agency.

Has an entity formally committed to operation and maintenance of the project?

Is the project consistent with the applicable comprehensive plan or the long-term management plan?

•Identificationofpurpose,locationandgoalsoftheproject.•Consistentwiththecommunity’svision,plans,andpolicies.•Consistentwithtransparentpublicinvolvementprocedures.

Project Identification

Project Prioritization

•IdentifiedpriorityofMetropolitanPlanningOrganization(MPO).•Identifiedpriorityofthecounty(inclusiveoftheirmunicipalities),tribal government, federal or state managing agency.

Project Selection & Programming

•PriorityListandprojectdetailssubmittedtoFDOTDistrictby applicable entity.•Districtprojectevaluationanddevelopmentofdraftfundingscenario.•DevelopmentofStatewidedraftprioritizationscenario.•Uponapproval,projectsareprogrammedintoappropriatefiscalyearof thefiveyearTentativeWorkProgram.

SUN Trail Program Selection Criteria Individual Trail ProjectsIndividual Trail Projects may not meet all of the selection criteria. The selection criteria will not be usedtocalculateanumericalrankingofIndividualTrailProjects.IndividualTrailProjectswiththegreateststrengthswilladvancemorequickly.Project enhances the safety of bicyclists, pedestrians and motorists.•Project includes a safety component.•Projectislocatedwithinanareaidentifiedasahazardousbiking/walkingzoneoranareawith significantnumbersofsafetyconcerns.•Project implements bicycle and pedestrian safety action plan.Project is recognized as having regional, state or national importance.•Project is a component of a Regional Trail System prioritized by the Florida Greenways and TrailsCouncil.•Project is a component of a NationalRecreationTrail,EastCoastGreenway or a trail that has other national importance.•Projectimplementsanadoptedregionalbike,pedestrianortrailmasterplan.Additional financial contribution committed to the project.•Projectfundsareleveragedbymultiplepublic/privatesourcesofinvestmentsdedicatedtothis specifictrailsegment(i.e.federal,state,local,non-profit,privatelandownercontributions).Ifso, whatisthepercentageofmatch?Whatisthesourceofthematchingfunds?•Project fundsareleveragedbyatleastoneadditionalpublic/privatesourceofinvestmentdedicated tothisspecifictrailsegment(i.e.federal,state,tribal,local,non-profit,privatelandowner contributions).Ifso,whatisthepercentageofmatch?Whatisthesourceofthematchingfunds?

2

Contact: Robin Birdsong(850) 414-4922Robin.Birdsong@dot.state.fl.uswww.FloridaSunTrail.com

SUN Trail Program Selection Criteria (continued)Project blends transportation modes by completing, improving or enhancing existing facilities to improve mobility.• ProjectimplementsCompleteStreetsobjectivesandinitiatives.• Project implements Safe Routes to Schools objectives and initiatives.• Project provides a direct connection to regional transit systems, including rail stations, express

or local bus routes.• Projectislocatedwithinadesignatedmulti-modaldistrict.• Project has the potential to reduce vehicular congestion.• ProjectimprovesaccessinaBicycleFriendlyCommunityorBicycle Friendly University, asdesignatedbytheLeagueofAmericanBicyclists.

• ProjectimprovesaccessinadesignatedWalkFriendlyCommunity,asdesignatedbythePedestrianandBicycleInformationCenter.

Construction Readiness.• Projectisreadyforimmediateconstruction.Allpre-constructionphasesarecomplete.• Project is capable near term development. The design is nearly complete and permitting isunderway.Thisprojectincludespre-construction.

• The project proposal is feasible but construction will occur in the future.Project has a high level of documented public support.• Measurable public support and community involvement.• The greater community supports the project as demonstrated by recently adopted

proclamations or resolutions expressing commitment.• Demonstrationofsupportisconsistentacrossmultipleentitiesrepresentingthegreater

community, rather than a select few interest groups.• Recent community surveys provide indication of need and support.

Project has a significant immediate impact to the quality of life by enhancing economic opportunities and providing connectivity to destinations.• Projectconnectstoorthroughfederal,stateorlocalconservation/recreationareas.• Project connects people to jobs, businesses or civic resources.• Project is located along or connects to a Florida Scenic Highway.• Project is part of a public/privatepartnershipwheredevelopers,linearcorridorowners,small

businesses, corporations, foundations or private sector partners are directly supportingthe project.

• Project is locatedwithinaRuralEconomicDevelopmentInitiative(REDI)communitydefinedpursuanttoSection288.0656,F.S.

• Project is locatedwithinaRuralAreaofOpportunity(RAO)definedpursuanttoSection288.0656,F.S.

Project enhances or preserves environmental resources.• Project ensurestheFloridaEcologicalGreenwayNetwork(FEGN)maximizesprotectionofhighprioritylinkages;locationiswithinaPriority1or2CriticalLinkageasidentifiedbytheFEGN.

• Project restores or mitigates impacts of environmental degradation.• Project incorporates water quality or drainage improvements.• Project incorporates conservation initiatives to restore or maintain connectivity by reducingvehicle-causedwildlifemortality.

• Environmentalimpactassessmentorstatementdoesnotidentifyspecificissues.• Environmental approval and permitting process is complete.

Project facilitates a system of interconnected trails by closing a gap in the SUN Trail Network.• Project connectstwoormoreexistingtrailswithintheSUNTrailNetwork.Project includes cost-saving elements.• Potential for overall cost savings for completing the project in conjunction with another project(i.e.new/resurfacingroadway,redevelopment/newdevelopmentproject,trailphase/extendingtrail project).

BPAC – June 20, 2016

6. Coast to Coast Connector Trail Urban-Rural Design Overlay Study

SUMMARY

The Florida Coast to Coast Connector Trail is an effort by various state and regional stakeholders to provide a safe and continuous multi-use trail from the Gulf of Mexico to the Atlantic Ocean through Central Florida. This statewide trail will total 275 miles, and span nine counties. More than 75%, or over 200 miles, of the trail already exists and is open to the public. The Connector will link communities between St. Petersburg and Titusville and establish a major bicycle-pedestrian route to allow residents and visitors to explore Central Florida. In 2014, the Florida State Legislature provided $50 million in funding over a 5-year period to complete the "gaps" between existing trails to form this continuous multi-use trail across the state. The Coast-to-Coast Connector is part of the Florida Greenways and Trails System plan, recognizing the economic impact to communities along trails, the growing popularity of eco-tourism, and public support for trails. The Tampa Bay Regional Planning Council (TBRPC), along with the East Central Florida Regional Planning Council, received funds through the Florida Department of Economic Opportunity’s Technical Assistance Grant Program to develop a framework for design continuity and recognition for the Coast to Coast Connector. The study recommends a unifying color scheme, wayfinding signage options, and design standards for things like mile markers, railings, landscaping, overpasses and other amenities. As SUNTrail funds cannot be used to provide amenities, it has been suggested that the Transportation Alternatives (TA) Program could be utilized to fund supportive amenities. The Urban-Rural Design Overlay Study, dated May 2016, can be found at the link below: http://c2cconnector.org/wp-content/uploads/2015/11/C2C_Overlay_Report_May_2016_web2.pdf

ATTACHMENT(S): Coast to Coast Connector Trail map

ACTION: None Required, Informational Item Only

Withlacoochee State Forest

StarkeyWildernessPreserve

Merritt Island National Wildlife

Refuge

CanaveralNational

Seashore

Winter GardenWebster

Center HillOrlando

S E M I N O L ES E M I N O L E

The Green Swamp

§¦275P O L KP O L K

L A K EL A K E

V O L U S I AV O L U S I A

O R A N G EO R A N G E

P A S C OP A S C OB R E V A R DB R E V A R D

C I T R U SC I T R U S

S U M T E RS U M T E R

H I L L S B O R O U G HH I L L S B O R O U G H

H E R N A N D OH E R N A N D O

P I N E L L A SP I N E L L A SLargo

Tampa

DeBary

Sanford

Dunedin

Clermont

Bushnell

Saint LeoDade City

Kissimmee

Inverness

Lake Mary

Clearwater

Windermere

TitusvilleBrooksville

Winter Park

WeekiWachee

Tarpon Springs

Cape Canaveral

St. Petersburg

§¦75

§¦95

§¦4

§¦275

§¦75

0 25 5012.5 Miles

The remaining phases andassociated costs are estimates

provided by metropolitan planning organizations and local governments.

These estimates are subject to change as new information

becomes available.Date updated: 10/27/2014

Existing Coast to Coast ConnectorFunded for construction

Conservation LandsSegment Gap ±

Total Estimated Miles: 250Coast to Coast Connector

Remaining estimated funding need: $63.3 Million

Total Gap Estimated Miles: 69

STARKEY GAPEast Lake Rd/Keystone Rd IntersectionPD&E, Design, and Construction: $3,939,300Pinellas/Pasco Co. Line N. of SR 54PD&E/Design: $460,000

GOOD NEIGHBOR GAPSuncoast Trail to existing Good Neighbor TrailPD&E/Design: $1,034,000

GAP NAMEPhase(s) to be funded in 2014/2015

SOUTH SUMTER CONNECTOR GAP*Feasibility Study: $350,000Withlacoochee State Trail to Van Fleet State Trail*Alignment Study Area Under Consideration

SOUTH LAKE GAPVan Fleet ST to Villa City RdDesign: $3,500,000SR 33 to Silver Eagle RdDesign: $843,000

ORANGE GAPClarcona - Ocoee Rd to W. Orange TrailDesign: $306,000N. Hiawassee Rd. to N. of SR414 on SR441PD&E: $250,000

SEMINOLE/VOLUSIA GAPWayside Park over US 17/92 BridgeUS17/92 Bridge to Lake Monroe ParkDesign: $682,000

EAST CENTRAL GAPVolusia County Line to Aurantia RdConstruction: $7,356,000

SPACE COAST DOWNTOWN CONNECTOR GAPGarden St. (SR406) to Max Brewer CausewayFeasibility Study: $100,000

To be funded for construction W/ 14/15 fundsSegment Gap, Alignment Undetermined! ! !

BPAC – June 20, 2016

7. Bikepath Country Wayfinding

SUMMARY

The Pinellas County Parks and Conservation Resources (PCR) Department has recently replaced all of the 27 trail location signs along the Fred Marquis Pinellas Trail. These new smart signs, developed by Bikepath Country, LLC and Blue Bite, offer improved user orientation and wayfinding via a new trail sponsorship program. Zephyrhills® Brand 100% Natural Spring Water is the first national company to commit to the sponsorship program for the County of Pinellas. Sponsorship funds will fund sign maintenance, the smart technology components and the upkeep and beautification of the Pinellas Trail. The smart signs allow the users to access relevant information such as weather updates, near, nearby food establishments and local activities through their smart phone. Additional benefits such as distance traveled or exercise routine progress are also available. Mr. Lyle Fowler, PCR Operations Manager, will present this new sponsorship program to the BPAC. ATTACHMENT(S): Bikepath Country LLC presentation March 16, 2016 BCC meeting

ACTION: None Required, Informational Item Only

Program

Bikepath Country is the only company of its kind to specialize in sponsorship of trails and greenways. The socially responsible partnership program allows companies and organizations to sponsor one or multiple new signs.

The sponsorship program and smart signs become a partnership between the municipality and Bikepath Country. Bikepath Country works closely with municipalities to select sponsorship opportunities that work for the trails, choosing options that work with the natural environment and provide a benefit to the end user.

Sign Locations

Toured path to inspect sign location & GPS locations.

Sole Source Contract

Responded to SOLE SOURCE CONTRACT, awarded to Bikepath Country Florida LLC. Sole Source includes 30% of the net revenue going back to the county and the signs under

this contract become part of the county's property.

Removal of 27 signs

Sign Locations

Sign Before & After

Sales sponsors / media kits

Local Sales: Daniels and Company

NATIONAL SALES.

-  When working with Bikepath Country, the trail owner can be as engaged as desired. If less engagement is preferred, Bikepath Country is equipped to coordinate the entire project, selecting designers and printers, getting sponsors, installing amenities and developing a maintenance plan.

25th Anniversary

Placed 25th anniversary information alerting information about event in signs.

Create a Smart Trail Trail users can tap or scan the mTAGs with their mobile device to obtain relevant information such as weather updates, nearby restaurants and local activities related to their location along the trail. The mTAGs can also be used for fitness challenges, with users tapping or scanning in at the start of their exercise routine and doing so at each sign along the way. At the end of the workout, the user will be able to see how far they have traveled and how they’ve done compared to others.

Beacons

Made Pinellas trail smart trail with BLUE BITE MEDIA deploying essa Beacons at all 27 signs furthering mobile experience.

Tap or Scan the mTAG to gain access to useful and relevant content as users explore the trail.

Users will continue to reference the mobile experiences long after the initial tap.

mTag

Using the mTag

Trail Information

Joined ST. PETE CHAMBER to expose local clients to sponsor a sign and mobile exposure opportunities.

Planning an event with the chamber to introduce program & bright spot Monday exclusive email to 1,600 members .

BPAC – June 20, 2016

8. SPOTlight Emphasis Areas Update

SUMMARY

During May, Forward Pinellas staff held productive listening sessions for Enhancing Beach Community Access and the Gateway/Mid-County Master Plan, and presented a summary of the Beach Community Access discussion and survey results at the recent Barrier Islands Governmental Council (BIG-C) meeting. All listening session feedback will be shared via the new web site. In addition, staff held meetings with representatives of the Florida Department of Transportation (FDOT), Pinellas County, City of Largo, City of St. Petersburg and private businesses to get input on a scope of work for the Gateway/Mid-County Master Plan. Forward Pinellas is currently drafting the scope of services, and will be seeking funding support from the key agency partners for the master plan. The FDOT’s response to the Metropolitan Planning Organization’s (MPO) February letter on the US 19 interchanges is attached. Forward Pinellas staff plans to work closely with FDOT in the design phase for these projects, and looks forward to participating in the Value Engineering Study for the US 19 segment from north of CR 95 to north of Nebraska Avenue. Related to the US 19 emphasis area, Forward Pinellas and Pinellas County Planning staff met recently with a consultant team to develop a scope of services for an economic analysis of the US 19 corridor, which will take into consideration countywide economic trends and conditions. A notice to proceed for this joint project with Pinellas County will occur in July following a review by the Board. ATTACHMENT(S): FDOT Response Letter re US Highway 19, dated May 16, 2016

ACTION: None Required, Informational Item Only

M^ r^S^r^

"^- ya

. .

*<K

Florida Department of TransportationRICK SCOTT JIM BOXOLD1201 N.McKinley DriveGOVERNOR SECRfcTARYTampa,FI 33612

May 16,2016

Mr. Whit Blanton, FAICPExecutive Director / ^ /

Pinellas County MPO/PPC310 Court StreetClearwater, FL 33756

Re: FDOT Reply to Pinellas County MPO Executive Director Request Concerning U.S. 19

Dear Whit:

Thank you for your letter dated February 26, 2016 regarding the Metropolitan PlanningOrganization/Pinellas Planning Council's (MPO/PPC) initiative to develop a vision for theU.S. 19 corridor. You indicated the development of a vision would include the development ofboth land-use and transportation goals through developing consensus among the corridorstakeholders to help guide decision makers. The Department looks forward to participating inthis process as Pinellas County MPO moves forward.

Allow me to provide comments and responses to each of your questions in the same order theywere presented on your letter.

1. Capacity Projects: The two capacity projects on the subject corridor, U.S. 19 fromnorth of Nebraska Avenue to south ofTimberlane Road (FPID 433797-1) and U.S.19 from south of Timberlane Road to south of Lake Street (FPID 433796-1), arecurrently in the design phase. Although neither project is funded for right-of-wayacquisition or construction; contracts were executed before we were made aware ofyour request. However, the design process has just begun and the Department willcontinue close coordination with all stakeholders, City staff, County staff, and MPO.

2. Construction Sequence: U.S. 19 from north of C.R. 95 to north of NebraskaAvenue (FPID 433799-1) is scheduled to start design in 2017. The right-of-wayacquisition phase is currently partially funded in 2021. Once remaining funds are ^allocated, the Department will pursue construction phases for all remaining projectsin a sequential order from south to north. Therefore, FPID 433799-1 will startconstruction prior to the construction for FPIDs 433797-1 and 433796-1 consistentwith MPO priorities.

3. Value Engineering: The Department regularly completes Value Engineering (VE)Studies for projects of this size as an effort to identify opportunities for cost savingmeasures and improvements within the project limits. The VE study for FPID433799-1 will take place early in the design process. The VE studies for FPIDs

www.dot.statc.fl.us

Whit Blanton, Pinellas County MPOMay 16, 2016Page 3 of 3

433799-1 will take place early in the design process. The VE studies for FPIDs256774-2 and 256774-3 (including the Curlew Road interchange) were completedlast year and copies are provided herein for your reference.

4. Stakeholder Coordination: The Department actively participates and coordinateswith local partners including the Pinellas County MPO and PSTA to ensure all modesof transportation are properly accommodated and mobility needs are addressedthroughout the corridor. During project design phases, the County and City staff, andfrequently MPO staff are afforded the opportunity to review all plans submittalsthrough the Department's electronic review comments (ERC) system. We lookforward to your active participation in the design process.

Pasco County MPO has not prioritized funding for grade separated interchanges for the US 19corridor in Pasco County. However, the Pasco Long Range Transportation Plan acknowledgescapacity improvements to Little Road have an insignificant impact relieving traffic on U.S. 19,and the capacity needs of the corridor should not be ignored. Traffic volumes fluctuate from yearto year, and cyclically as a result of economic trends.

Over the last ten years, the Average Annualized Daily Traffic on U.S. 19 has not fallen below63,500 vehicles per day. U.S. 19 consistently ranks as one of the highest crash corridors forvehicles, cyclists and pedestrians; and as such, the corridor needs to be addressed. Onceprogrammed, the Department will address the congestion and safety needs appropriately and incoordination with our partners. Partnering with Pasco County Public Transportation to establishbus service cross-county is a commendable endeavor to address mobility across jurisdictionalboundaries.

Under the Department's Complete Streets Policy (adopted in 2014), we will routinely plan,design, construct, reconstruct and operate a context sensitive system of "complete streets" tobalance mobility needs while respecting adjacent land uses and redevelopment efforts. It isimportant for all stakeholders to understand a "complete streets" approach is not apredetermined prescription, but rather a collaborative process often resulting in a wide range ofphysical outcomes.

As with all of our projects, the Department will take a context sensitive design approach to theU.S. 19 corridor based on the primary and secondary purposes of the corridor, surrounding landuse context, community access needs and regional mobility goals. As you know, theDepartment and the MPO have been jointly participating in the Pedestrian and Bicycle SafeAccess to Transit Study for US 19 which was presented to the MPO Board on May 11. Thepurpose of this study is to help identify opportunities to improve safety, accessibility and mobilityfor adjacent communities throughout the design phases for the ongoing and planned capacityprojects. The Department is happy to continue to provide updates to the MPO Board on thestatus of these projects and how results of the study are supporting the design process. Pleaserefer to the study website for a complete listing of documents and materials:httD://www.tamDabavtrafficsafetv.com,/D7BPAT/US19Corridqr/. We are confident the ongoingstudy and design efforts completed in partnership with the MPO/PPC, PSTA and the City andCounty will help us deliver an outstanding transportation product to the citizens of PinellasCounty.

'VWV .tlot.jt\l^.r:.Un

0w

-0s s

3^ S

^S

iS:

3Q

)I

0B

i0

^ o

a3

3 S

^ §

". <"

era

3-

5P(D

=.

(D-<

s-

it 111

11?

cr

tuh-

»0

3^

en

^i

m r

3Q

0)

<.

-tl

3N

Jv>

<3)

<j00

r+.-

».0

It liiill

h-»

c Q.

0)

a>

=v

I--0

t

.^

(D CO

CD

3-«

, a:

fD

^'?ro

(D^ "

-^-0

;: 3-iu

(D0

).o

(\0

)0

3-

</»

-+1

ft1\

3 =;

0c

-n-Q

". (

D0

3n

a.

T3

2S

»-i'^

-0

U1 0

CT

3c

i-h U

itii-s

l5-

-^$

3 ^-ta

.3

-ro

^2

S^*>

W G

O-0 0

=3

^-

^Q

.o)

5"-

3 £U3

® S

^ssll

30)

c1\3

ff

3.

03

=0

1-a

3 ff

.

3Q

.Q.

Oi

0) ff

oi a

. 5

-~J

^..0

3^i =

T^&

^4

^il s

iilis

^ I

-^.

<.

uc (

5y

S ff

CD

(/5.

2.JM ^

t?

(00

) ..

**<

I

c.

D0

3.

a. o-

w<

^ =

.5

~~J

(D3

=;-^

1f^

c(D

^ ^+

3(D

0~

a o

^ ^

.o 5

.0»

0C

D3

ct--

53

3=

,.3

^ c.

f-^-

(DC

Q3

-ff. .^.

-tu

0(D

(D _

.Q

. 1?

8"1

S1

(D^

5- =

0

I-^

Q*<

03 £

CD

-a.

Qi:

-h

c"

5(D

^0

T3

<1-

1-

-<s

03

'c^®

0^

CD

*<Q

.&S

BV

)(0

S3

c0

c0

.

=3;

0)

33

.^§n.

-0^ w

8<

o3

o?

0f^

3.

03

^t^

£.

lllil

0)

31-

t-p

003

37

-m

M&

^.

(D(D

ca

~n

5-:

^0

2.-

0(D

^-

c0

r&?

§3

<C

D(D

38

^ 3'

ro o

) 30 T3

=5=

- 3

3Q

.C

D0

3ig

.^g

3-t 0)

S3

0fh

3-

$C

D».o

r0)

0S

..(D

Cff)

3c

3-

30

^||a^

(D

(D-4

. <I>

-±(D

0C

Di-h

BPAC – June 20, 2016

9A-E. BPAC Business

A. Summary Review of Tri-County BPAC Meeting, May 18, 2016

The Tri-County BPAC held its triannual meeting on Wednesday, May 18, 2016 at the Johnson Community Library in St. Petersburg. There were approximately 30 persons in attendance, with nearly 20 representatives from Pinellas. The majority of the group voted to recommend trail facilities be included in any future design and construction of the Howard Frankland Bridge. The meeting summary and proposed motion are attached. ATTACHMENT: Summary of Tri-County BPAC meeting May 18, 2016

Motion for Trail Facilities on Howard Frankland Bridge

ACTION: As Deemed Appropriate Based on Discussion

B. Dunedin Causeway Bridge PD&E Alternatives Workshop Update

The BPAC received a presentation in December 2014 regarding alternative designs for the Dunedin Causeway Bridge replacement. A summary of March 29, 2016 alternatives presentation is attached for your information. The next workshop was held on June 8, 2016. Additional information will be presented at the meeting. ATTACHMENT: Summary of Dunedin Causeway PD&E Workshop 032916

ACTION: None Required, Informational Item Only

C. BP Settlement Funds Project Ideas

The Pinellas County Board of County Commissioners (BCC) has decided to continue resident input regarding the future use of the BP settlement funds. Please consider providing input through a brief survey available at www.pinellascounty.org/BPideas. See attached press release for additional information. ATTACHMENT: Press Release re: Pinellas BP Funds 060716

ACTION: None Required, Informational Item Only D. Florida Bicycle Association (FBA)

The Florida Bicycle Association (FBA), created in 1997, is an advocacy organization focused on protecting and improving the bicycling environment and policies in Florida. The FBA is actively involved in Tallahassee, works with the Florida Department of Transportation (FDOT), and partners with many other organizations and agencies. Safety education is one of FBA’s priorities, and several publications and programs provide education and training for cyclists, motorists, law enforcement, educators and the general public. For more information, see the website, floridabicycle.org. Ms. Becky Afonso, FBA Executive Director, will provide an update regarding FBA activities along with a brief legislative update.

E. Pinellas Trails, Inc. A representative from Pinellas Trails, Inc. may take this opportunity to provide updated information for the BPAC.

TRI-COUNTY BICYCLE PEDESTRIAN ADVISORY COMMITTEE

MEETING SUMMARY May 18, 2016 1. The Tri-County BPAC was called to order at 6 p.m. Pinellas BPAC Chairman Brian Smith introduced himself, and asked everyone in attendance to please state their names and affiliation.

2. No public comments were offered at this time.

3. The summary from the January 13, 2016 Tri-County BPAC meeting was approved as provided.

4. St. Petersburg Bike Share Program Mr. Lucas Cruse, St. Petersburg Bicycle Pedestrian Coordinator, explained the City’s goal of connecting people and places by multi-modal options and improving non-motorized travel. He provided information regarding the St. Petersburg Bike Share Program including number of docking stations along Central Avenue, number of bicycles per station, and locations for satellite stations as the program expands.

5. Bike/Walk Tampa Bay Ms. Julie Bond, Bike/Walk Tampa Bay Program Director, introduced herself and explained she is an avid walker and bicyclist, and that her husband is also very active in bicycling groups, races, and tours. She explained that Bike/Walk Tampa Bay was a new regional coalition formed to improve the safety of pedestrians and bicyclists in the area. The program focuses on the 5 (five) E’s: education, encouragement, enforcement, engineering, and evaluation. Anyone interested is welcome to get involved, volunteer, or otherwise support Bike Walk Tampa Bay, please contact Julie Bond, (813) 974-9799 or check out www.bikewalktampabay.org for more information.

6. SUN Trails Program (Shared Use Nonmotorized) Trail Program Mr. Smith provided a brief history of the SUN Trails Program, and how the various existing trail systems across the State could be connected, coordinated, and developed. An opportunity to connect those trails by identifying existing gaps between systems resulted in a commitment by the Florida Legislature to provide $25M annually for design and construction of regional trails. The Florida Department of Transportation (FDOT) has organized the funds necessary and structured the framework for a process not only to prioritize specific corridors, but to assist with guidelines, standards, and wayfinding components for trail building. Mr. Anthony Matonti, Tampa Bay Area Regional Transportation Authority (TBARTA), introduced himself and explained his interest and involvement in bicycling and livable communities, and his personal history of living in Florida, and reasons for moving to Pinellas County. Mr. Matonti then provided information regarding TBARTA’s involvement in the regional coordination of the MPO’s and also the regional trails systems. The applications to apply for individual trail projects have been released, and are due by June 20, 2016. For more information, please check out the website for SUN Trail Network Program, http://fgtf.org/suntrails/, or contact your District Trail Coordinator.

7. Roundtable Forum A. Hillsborough County

Ms. Michele Ogilvie, Hillsborough County MPO, provided a brief update for the following items from the Hillsborough BPAC: Vision Zero, Tampa Hillsborough Master Trail Plan, and the George Road Health Impact Assessment. She added that the public meeting process was quite interesting.

B. Pasco County Mr. Allen Howell, Pasco County MPO, provided a brief review of a few items being discussed with the Pasco BPAC: the Coastal Anclote Trail, the Withlacoochee Trail Connector, the Starkey Gap in the Coast to Coast Trail, and the Orange Belt Trail.

C. Pinellas County Mr. Smith, Pinellas BPAC Chairman, provided details regarding the following items being discussed by the Pinellas BPAC: the Elfers Trail Spur, completing the Pinellas Trail Loop (north & south gaps in the Duke Energy Trail), the replacement of the spans for the Orange Street overpass, educational brochure for Rectangular Rapid Flashing Beacons (RRFBs), and the construction of the Tri-County Trail Connection (Starkey Wilderness Trail and Brooker Creek Trail).

D. Other Items of Interest May is National Bicycle Month, and Friday, May 20th is Bike to Work Day. Both St. Petersburg and Pasco BPAC will be organizing bicycle group rides to work that day.

8. NEW BUSINESS Mr. Cruse requested the Tri-County BPAC support trail facilities on the Howard Frankland Bridge/I-275. The motion was passed, and will be forwarded to the individual MPO’s for their consideration.

9. NEXT TRI-COUNTY BPAC MEETING – September 20, 2016 Pasco will host the next meeting of the Tri-County BPAC on Tuesday, September 20, 2016. The location will be announced at a later date.

10. ADJOURNMENT The meeting was adjourned at 7:45 pm. We sincerely appreciate everyone’s participation.

TRI-COUNTY BICYCLE PEDESTRIAN ADVISORY COMMITTEE

Motion 05-18-16

To: Pinellas Bicycle Pedestrian Advisory Committee RE: Trail facilities on Howard Frankland Bridge At the May 18, 2016 meeting of the Pinellas, Pasco and Hillsborough Bicycle Pedestrian Advisory Committees, a request was made in the form of a motion to include trail facilities in any future design of the Howard Frankland Bridge/I-275. The Howard Frankland Bridge is part of the I-275 system and a regionally significant corridor connecting downtown Tampa with St. Petersburg. The average daily traffic counts on the Bridge total more than five (5) times the traffic on the Gandy Bridge and three (3) times the average traffic on the Courtney Campbell Causeway/S.R. 60. During the discussion, the Tri-County group noted the Howard Frankland Bridge serves Carillon, a regional employment and activity center and that the corridor is routinely congested during peak travel hours. Providing multi-use trail facilities on the Howard Frankland Bridge would allow additional non-motorized commuter options for employees and greater mobility opportunities for all activities within the Carillon area. It should also be noted that the Howard Frankland Bridge, the Gandy Bridge and the Courtney Campbell Causeway are the only east-west roadway corridors across the waters of Tampa Bay. With the appropriate design, provision for non-motorized access could reduce motorized traffic congestion, improve quality of life and walking/bicycling access. Therefore, as the Tri-County Bicycle Pedestrian Advisory Committee passed the motion overwhelmingly at its May 18, 2016 meeting, the request will be passed through the Pinellas Bicycle Pedestrian Advisory Committee for discussion before action is taken.

1

Summary of the March 29, 2016 Public Alternatives Workshop for the Dunedin Causeway Bridges PD&E Study and

Comments Received in Response to the Alternatives Presented

Pinellas County conducted a Public Alternatives Workshop (Workshop) for the Dunedin Causeway Bridges PD&E Study on March 29, 2016 from 5:00 pm to 7:30 pm at the Hale Community Center, 330 Douglas Avenue, Dunedin, Florida. The purpose of the meeting was to provide an opportunity for the community to review and comment on the alternatives currently being considered. The alternatives Workshop was advertised in the Tampa Bay Times, Suncoast News, Dunedin Beacon and Florida Administrative Register. Meeting notifications were mailed to elected officials, agencies, property owners near the proposed improvements, and other interested parties. Meeting notices were also mailed with the City of Dunedin utility bills.

Three hundred sixty-four (364) persons signed in at the meeting. Attendees were given a project brochure, a questionnaire and a project comment form at the sign-in table. An informative project video was shown continuously in the Small Activity Room during the Workshop. Specific alternatives and their potential impacts were presented at the Workshop. Three replacement alternatives, Low-Level Movable, Mid-Level Movable and High-Level Fixed Bridges, plus the No-Build Alternative were presented for the Main Bridge. A new Low-Level Fixed Bridge and the No-Build Alternative were presented for the Tide Relief Bridge. At the bridge aesthetics displays, attendees were given the opportunity to view 360 degree simulations of the bridge alternatives on virtual reality headsets. Project aerials, as well as environmental, engineering, and aesthetic boards, were on display at the meeting. Project team members were available to answer questions and take comments. All forms could be completed at the meeting and dropped in the comment boxes or completed later and mailed to the Project Manager. All materials on display were uploaded to the project website, www.pinellascounty.org/dunedincauseway, following the meeting.

A total of eighty-eight (88) written comments and 3 questionnaires were received at the Workshop, via email, and by US mail during the comment period. Many of the comments specifically stated a preference for a particular option or an aesthetic treatment. Please note that these preferences will not be tallied as “votes”, but will be considered as preferences as the project study progresses. Results are shown in the Summary of Results section below.

Website / Questionnaire

Pinellas County hosted a page on the County website for the Dunedin Causeway Bridges PD&E Study. As part of the community outreach, a questionnaire was provided on the website to solicit preferences and comments from the community. Additionally, each Workshop attendee was given a copy of the questionnaire when they signed in at the Workshop. The questionnaire could be completed and returned at the Workshop or completed on-line. A total of three hundred four (304) responses were submitted on the project website during the comment period. Of those 304, 297 completed all or a portion of the questionnaire and 72 provided specific comments. Tables summarizing the results of the questionnaire are included in the Summary of Results section below. The comments received are included in the Specific Concerns and Comments section below.

In addition to bridge alternative preferences, the community was given the option of selecting one of two aesthetics options for the proposed bridge replacements: the Florida Vernacular theme or the Modern theme. Since vehicular turnarounds are being proposed under the east end of the

2

Tide Relief Bridge and under both ends of the Mid-Level Movable and High-Level Fixed alternatives for the Main Bridge, the questionnaire asked if responders were in favor or opposed to the turnarounds. All results are shown below under Summary of Results.

Summary of Results

The questionnaire asked participants to rank the bridge alternatives for both the main and Tide Relief Bridges in order of preference. The rankings were weighted and scored through the survey program on the website. The preferences stated on written comment forms and through emails were added to the questionnaire results and weighted similarly. Table 1 and Table 2 below show the results by alternative.

Table 1 - Main Bridge

Rank Alternative 1 2 3 4

Total Responses

Score

Low-Level Movable Bridge

33.86% 27.53% 35.13% 3.48%

107 87 111 11 316 2.92

Mid-Level Movable Bridge

31.70% 43.79% 22.22% 2.29%

97 134 68 7 306 3.05

High-Level Fixed Bridge

35.65% 9.46% 14.51% 40.38%

113 30 46 128 317 2.40

No-Build 20.48% 10.92% 17.41% 51.20%

60 32 51 150 293 2.01

Source: Pinellas County website – May 19, 2016

As you can see in the preferences for the Main Bridge, the Mid-Level Movable Bridge had the highest overall score. The High-Level Fixed Bridge appears to be the most controversial. As indicated by the individual rankings, this alternative had the highest #1 rankings, but also the highest #4 rankings which indicates that though many people support this alternative, even more were in opposition to it. The low-level and Mid-Level Movable Bridges were very close in score and preference, with approximately 75% of respondents ranking the mid-level bridge as #1 or #2 and approximately 61% ranking the low-level bridge as #1 or #2. This indicates that the majority of those responding preferred a lower profile, movable bridge to the High-Level Fixed Bridge. There is limited support for the No Build alternative.

Table 2 - Tide Relief Bridge

Rank Alternative 1 2

Total Responses

Score

Low-Level Fixed Bridge

74.65% 25.35%

212 72 284 1.75

No-Build 29.89% 70.11%

84 197 281 1.30

Source: Pinellas County website – May 19, 2016

3

Results for the Tide Relief Bridge show overwhelming support for the Low-Level Fixed Bridge.

In addition to bridge alternative preferences, the community was given the option of selecting one of two aesthetics options for the proposed bridge replacements: the Florida Vernacular theme and the Modern theme. Results are shown below.

Table 3 - Bridge Aesthetics

Alternative Florida

Vernacular Modern Total

Percent 82.15% 17.85%

Responses 244 53 297

Source: Pinellas County website – May 19, 2016

Results indicate overwhelming preference for the Florida Vernacular style. Many of the written comments stated that they would like to see the bridges maintain the local, old Florida aesthetic look.

Vehicular turnarounds are being proposed under the east end of the Tide Relief Bridge and under both ends of the Mid-Level Movable and High-Level Fixed alternatives for the Main Bridge. The questionnaire asked if responders were in favor or opposed to the turnarounds. Results are shown below.

Table 4 - Vehicle Turnarounds

Vehicle Turnarounds

In Favor of Opposed to Total

Percent 67.35% 32.65%

Responses 196 95 291

Source: Pinellas County website – May 19, 2016

Results indicate that respondents support the vehicle turnarounds two to one.

Specific Concerns and Issues

Comments on specific concerns and issues were included on written comment forms, in emails, and on questionnaires. A summary of the concerns and issues by topic follows.

Recreation

High-level bridge would be difficult for pedestrians, bicyclists and joggers, and especially discourage older walkers and bicyclists

Please make pedestrian/bicycle lanes wider, mark as the rest of the Pinellas Trail, and add seating area

Allow fishing from bridges and have good lighting

Incorporate boat ramps under the high bridge concept

The proposed turnaround areas are situated in areas which are highly popular fishing spots. If the turnarounds must be installed, I feel that it is integral to keep dedicated fishing areas under the bridges as well

Keep bike/ped trails clean.

Temporary bridge would remove boat launch area and shallow safe bathing area on the south

4

Need walkways on both sides of both bridges

Safety

The turnarounds lend themselves to petty illegal activities at night, grafitti, vagrancy and perhaps worse because they are somewhat hidden from view. Barriers should be in place around the rims to prevent driving over the seawall into the water.

A movable bridge could pose a health risk to residents if fire rescue and ambulances are held up by the open bridge.

The turnaround in Clearwater is a nightmare. It seems like a poor plan to make another like it.

If the drawbridge gets stuck open, what about safety of residents and visitors. Should not be a drawbridge.

Declare the current bridge to be permanently fixed in the open position. Reduce\schedule the number of bridge openings to improve the chances that the bridge

will continue to function properly until improvements have been made. Safety of bridges is most important Concern about safety of wildlife and people due to raising the Tide Relief Bridge thereby

allowing faster and larger boats Would like speed controls on the bridges, and 15 mph speed limit with speed bumps

from Tide Relief Bridge to entrance of Honeymoon Island State Park Widen bridges to include breakdown lanes

Traffic

Widening the bridge approach seems likely to increase the traffic speed and traffic noise. Please consider some sort of traffic calming devices to slow traffic speed and reduce traffic noise

Important to not cut off traffic flow to the small businesses on the opposite side of Gary Circle; easy access is important

Bridges

There really is no need to have a bridge in this location that allows high profile boats access – boats have the option to go around

Should consider a fixed bridge 55 feet high, not as offensive or costly Tide Relief Bridge - Please move the starting point on the east as far to the west as

possible. Have you considered other alternatives such as a tunnel or ‘water bridge’, or a turntable

bridge Place new Main Bridge north of its current location High level bridge would eliminate the need for staffing and would allow all boats to use

the waterway 24/7/365 The construction cost savings, maintenance and operational costs are much lower for

High-Level Fixed Bridge. It is does not stop traffic flow and would allow emergency vehicle access

Do not want a bridge like Clearwater beaches bridge system. Why spend taxpayer money on a bridge that only leads to a park? Improvements proposed for Tide Relief Bridge would increase noise levels, decrease air

quality, and electric poles would block our view of the gulf High level bridge would destroy the old Florida that exists in the area now

5

Environmental

Please leave the wildlife areas alone. No turn around in these areas. Keep as natural as possible to protect wildlife Temporary bridge and new access road would encroach on Rotary Park, a dedicated

bird sanctuary

Quality of Life / Aesthetics

Keep old Florida charm and aesthetic appearance for Dunedin, keep and protect what we have

Do some nice concrete work on side of bridge that is original for Dunedin, make bridge aesthetically pleasing.

High-level bridge would take away the local beach feeling and obstruct views Causeway is becoming an eyesore, overcrowded, speeding traffic, noise and trash As little obstruction of view as possible One of the few public beaches without parking meters where everyone can afford to

enjoy the fishing, swimming and water sports Add landscape improvements Avoid solid wall structures as they lend themselves to graffiti

Other Would have liked a breakdown of expenses so that we laypeople would have a better

idea of why the movable bridges cost nearly twice as much as the high fixed bridge The Workshop on March 29 was very well done!! We especially appreciated the

completeness of the information Declare eminent domain for the condos, demo and remove return land (like Clearwater

Kapok Park) or use condos for state run resort similar to Edward Ball in Wakulla Springs, use current bridge for light vehicles scooters, motor cycles, golf carts, bicycles, pedestrians etc. save $$$$ provide cleaner environment. When bridge finally deemed unsafe for any travel, demo it and provide ferry service

Please make sure that time considerations are a key point of RFQ's and evaluations for selection of contractors.

On-line survey should have displayed costs, images, etc. Use old bridge as large fishing piers to help bring money to the city Found the Workshop lacking information regarding RSA residents; we need a meeting

with residents Consider tolling the bridge Need better communication between bridge operator and EMS staff in emergencies

Immediate Release June 7, 2016 Contact for Media Only Julian Hills Public Information Specialist (727) 464-4600

BP settlement funds: Pinellas County wants your project ideas

In its continued effort to engage citizens, the Pinellas County Board of County Commissioners is inviting residents to provide additional input regarding the future use BP settlement funds by completing a short survey, available at www.pinellascounty.org/BPideas. In May, Commissioners took part in a facilitated discussion to determine guiding principles for use of the funds. They did so after conducting a citizen engagement survey and receiving public feedback from more than 800 residents on how the funds should be spent. Over the next several weeks, the Board will gather more defined project ideas through this second survey that residents can complete by June 30. Project ideas should be closely tied to the following Guiding Principles:

Funded projects should be aligned with the Board’s Doing Things Strategic Plan, and should be planned or funded by Dec. 31, 2017.

BP funds will be used for one-time only expenditures that have a substantial and visible community impact.

Funded projects should support Pinellas’ economic and environmental sustainability, and/or create a sense of place.

Unincorporated area projects throughout the county will be given priority. Use of County funding for projects within a city will require city participation.

About the BP Settlement Funds: In July 2015, the county accepted a settlement from BP of $7.1 million. The settlement represents a one-time revenue source. Once these funds are expended, there will not be any additional related monies. The Board of County Commissioners values citizen input on this unique funding source. This effort aligns with the Board’s strategic plan goal of delivering first class services to the public and customers.

###

Our Vision: To Be the Standard for Public Service in America

BPAC – June 20, 2016

10. Agency Reports

SUMMARY

The BPAC is tasked with reviewing and advising the MPO on bicycle and pedestrian-related system development, and related issues and priorities. The Committee also may assist communities with development of bikeway and pedestrian facilities, recommend safer bicycling and walking provisions, and promote a safer roadway environment. Updated information on the following programs or projects of interest to the BPAC will be provided at the meeting.

Tri-County Trail Project – Starkey Wilderness Trail and Brooker Creek Trail

Court Street / Chestnut Street RR Crossing and Trail Crossings

Elfers Trail Spur

Belleair Road / U.S. Highway 19 Trail Crossing

Orange Street Overpass

St. Petersburg Bike Share Program

Gulf Boulevard Pedestrian Crossings ATTACHMENT(S): LRTP 2040 Trails and Bike Facilities map, 2014

ACTION: None Required, Informational Item Only

MOVING PEOPLE, PROVIDING CHOICES 19

2040 Pinellas LRTP | Summary Report

BPAC – June 20, 2016

11A-D. Other Business

A. Membership

There are no current vacancies on the BPAC membership list.

ATTACHMENT: BPAC Membership List – June 2016

ACTION: None Required, Informational Item Only

B. Correspondence, Publications, Articles of Interest

FHWA Fastlane, May 20, 2016: National Bike to Work

FHWA Fastlane, June 2, 2016: Protecting Pedestrians with Connected Vehicle Technology

Dunedin Beacon- 4th of July Midnight Run, May 26, 2016

Clearwater Beacon- One-Way Street Proposal, May 26, 2016

Palm Harbor Beacon- Tarpon Woods Pedestrian Bridge, June 9, 2016

C. Suggestions for Future Agenda Topics

This item is provided to allow Committee members to suggest topics for future BPAC agendas.

D. Other

If any member has other business to discuss, they may address it under this item.

6/20/16

BICYCLE PEDESTRIAN ADVISORY COMMITTEE MEMBERSHIP LIST Voting St. Petersburg Area (St. Pete/Gulfport/So Pasadena/Tierra Verde)

1. Camille Stupar (01/13/16) 2. Kimberly Cooper (10/13/99) 3. Geri Raja (VC) (09/09/09)

Clearwater Area

4. Chip Haynes (04/13/11) 5. Robert Yunk (02/09/05) 6. Win Dermody (03/12/14)

Dunedin Area

7. Ed Hawkes (11/18/98)

Pinellas Park and Mid-County

8. Ronald Rasmussen (12/13/06) 9. Byron Virgil Hall, Jr., (12/13/06)

Largo Area

10. Frank Lopez (04/13/16) 11. Georgia Wildrick (08/16/06)

North County Area (Tarpon Springs/Palm Harbor/Ozona/Oldsmar/Safety Harbor)

12. Tom Ferraro (04/09/03) 13. Becky Afonso (10/08/14)

At Large Area

14. Paul Kurtz (12/11/13) 15. Mike Siebel (03/14/12) 16. Brian Smith (Chairman) (12/12/12) 17. Lynn Bosco (11/14/12) 18. Steve Lasky (11/14/12) 19. Charles Martin (04/08/09) 20. Annette Sala (03/12/14)

Seminole Area

21. Jim Wedlake (05/12/10)

Beach Communities

22. Bert Valery (10/1983-10/1998) (reappointed 07/10/02) 23. Jim Parent (04/13/16)

Technical Support

1. County Traffic Department (Tom Washburn – primary, Gina Harvey and Casey Morse – alternates)

2. County Parks and Conservation Resources (Lyle Fowler – primary, Spencer Curtis – alternate) 3. PSTA Chris Cochran (Chris Cochran – primary; Heather Sobush and Kristina Tranel –

alternates) 4. City of Clearwater (Felicia Donnelly) 5. City of St. Petersburg (Lucas Cruse as representative and Cheryl Stacks as alternate) 6. City of Largo (Valerie Brookens as representative and Christine McLachlan as alternate) 7. Pinellas County School System (Tom McGinty) 8. TBARTA (Anthony Matonti – primary; Michael Case 1st alternate and Ramond Chiramonte 2nd

alternate) 9. Pinellas County Health Department (Megan Carmichael) 10. CUTR (Julie Bond as representative and Richard Hartman as alternate) 11. Sunstar Paramedics (Charlene Cobb, Community Outreach Coordinator) Sheriff's Office /Police/Law Enforcement Representatives

1. Pinellas Park Police Dept. 2. St Petersburg Police Dept. 3. Largo Police Dept. 4. Sheriff’s Office – Deputy Eric Gibson 5. Clearwater Police Dept. Non-Voting Technical Support

(Chris Speece – FDOT)

*Dates signify appointment

WELCOME TO THE FASTLANE: THE OFFICIAL BLOG OF THE U.S. SECRETARY OF TRANSPORTATION

ON NATIONAL BIKE DAY, FOCUS ON CONNECTED NETWORKS!

posted by Dan Goodman, Federal Highway Administration Office of Human Environment Livability

May 20, 2016

On any given day, nearly half of all trips in the U.S.

are less than two miles long. Because this is National

Bike Month, and today is National Bike to Work

Day, it is a good time to remember that bicycling is

an efficient, fun, healthy, environmentally friendly

and economically viable way to get to work. Many

USDOT employees will take advantage of this

special day to ride to work, in hopes of inspiring

others to follow suit.

Although U.S. bike commuter numbers are growing,

many potential cyclists are uncomfortable riding on

roads with heavy traffic but no dedicated bike

facilities. Well-designed interconnected bike

networks allow cyclists of all ages and abilities to

safely travel to work, school, and other destinations

by bike. Bikeways can include on-street bike lanes

and separated bike lanes, as well as shared-use

paths.

The Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) supports

a flexible approach to roadway design to get the best

outcomes. This includes the installation of bicycle lanes

when roads are resurfaced. It is an efficient and cost-

effective way for communities to create connected bike

networks. Including bicycle lanes in resurfacing projects

can improve roadway conditions and safety at very low

cost relative to the funds already being spent on

resurfacing projects. Resurfacing occurs several times

over the life of a paved road and taking advantage of

such opportunities to develop a connected bicycle

network ensures cost savings and less time to

completion.

This is only one of many ways communities can expand and improve their bikeway networks. Connected bicycle

networks provide increased transportation options, enhance access to jobs, schools and essential services, and

increase the utility of our existing transportation network.

Wherever you are in the United States today, have a safe and fun National Bike to Work Day – and stay engaged

on social media with #BikeToWorkDay2016!

U.S. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 1200 NEW JERSEY AVENUE, SE WASHINGTON, DC 20590 855-368-4200

www.transportation.gov/fastlane/national-bike-work-day-focus-connected-networks

Deputy Transportation Secretary Mendez thanks USDOT cyclists for staying safe

on #BiketoWorkDay

WELCOME TO THE FASTLANE: THE OFFICIAL BLOG OF THE U.S. SECRETARY OF TRANSPORTATION

PROTECTING PEDESTRIANS WITH CONNECTED VEHICLE TECHNOLOGY posted by Transportation Secretary Anthony Foxx

June 2, 2016

When it comes to vehicle safety, we often envision protecting the lives of vehicle occupants traveling inside a vehicle. But while roadway fatalities have successfully declined in recent years, the number of pedestrian and bicyclist fatalities have increased.

In 2014, there were 4,884 pedestrians killed and an estimated 65,000 injured in traffic crashes in the United States. On average, a pedestrian was killed every 2 hours and injured every 8 minutes in traffic crashes.

As such, I declared pedestrian and bicyclist safety a top priority for the USDOT and the deployment of connected vehicle technology has the potential to yield significant safety benefits for all pedestrians including cyclists, people in wheelchairs, children in strollers and passengers getting on and off of

buses.

Our research into vehicle-to-pedestrian (V2P) communication focuses on improving the safety and mobility of all of these transportation system users. The technology involves detecting the presence of pedestrians in or near the roads. Such pedestrian detection systems can be implemented in vehicles, in the infrastructure, or with pedestrians themselves to provide warnings to drivers, pedestrians, or both. Perhaps the simplest and most apparent warning system for pedestrians is a handheld device, which would enable messages to be exchanged between pedestrians and road infrastructure such as traffic signals.

The USDOT has several research efforts underway that are researching the benefits of pedestrian collision warning applications.

For example, the Department’s University Transportation Centers program awarded grants to the University of Iowa’s Safety Research Using Simulation (SAFER-SIM) and the University of Minnesota’s Roadway Safety Institute to research apps that will increase pedestrian safety. Iowa’s SAFER-SIM is exploring the use of connected vehicle technology to provide timely warning to pedestrians via their mobile devices. Relatively little is known about effective interventions to reduce the harmful effects of mobile device use on pedestrian road-crossing behavior. This study focuses on improving pedestrian safety and reducing impairment from distraction during road-crossing behavior.

Minnesota’s Roadway Safety Institute has developed a smartphone-based mobile accessible pedestrian signal (MAPS) app to provide “walk” phase information to visually impaired pedestrians at signalized intersections. This app, which has been successfully tested with many subjects at a number of sites, consists of a spatial database in the “cloud,” wireless communication, and a text-to-speech interface. Researchers also have incorporated routing information into MAPS to alert blind pedestrians as they approach a work zone on the sidewalk.

In addition, the Department’s Intelligent Transportation Systems Joint Program Office is funding regional pilots of connected vehicle technology in New York City; Tampa, Florida; and Wyoming. The pilots in New York City and Tampa will feature V2P technology such as MAPS and an app that warns transit bus operators when pedestrians, within the crosswalk of a signalized intersection, are in the intended path of the bus.

The Federal Transit Administration (FTA) is also exploring the use of V2P technology to reduce pedestrian incidents involving transit vehicles. One such app will alert transit bus drivers and pedestrians at major bus stops when passengers are in harm’s way as buses pull into and out of a bus stop. The FTA will be testing its pedestrian apps in Cleveland, Ohio.

Connected vehicles are expected to be on our roads before the end of the decade. As the number of equipped vehicles increases, so too do the benefits—extending well beyond the transportation field itself. As we integrate the technology into our cars, our roads, and our communities, we move more toward a connected society that unites transportation with other data-driven systems and energy, public safety, and other coordinated public services—improving our overall livability. This is only the beginning.

U.S. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 1200 NEW JERSEY AVENUE, SE WASHINGTON, DC 20590 855-368-4200

www.transportation.gov/fastlane/protecting-pedestrians-connected-vehicle-technology

DUNEDIN BEACON

History Notes

THE STORY OF THE MIDNIGHT RUN

by Vinnie Luisi

May 26, 2016

Who would think that the “Peanut Race” held in Dunedin would be

celebrating its 37th anniversary this Fourth of July. The Dunedin race, now

known as the Annual Kiwanis-Virginia Street Dermatology Midnight Run,

started from that very first race.

The midnight race is actually one year older than the annual Tampa Bay

Times Turkey Trot held each year on Thanksgiving Day.

It all started in early 1979 at the height of the “running craze” when Kiwanis

member Henry Hardin, former track coach at Madeira Beach High School,

suggested a new fundraiser for the Dunedin Kiwanis Club. At that time the Kiwanis had two major fundraisers during

the year – the Annual Pancake Breakfast and the Annual Peanut Sales Event. These events were done to raise funds for

local support for schools, children and special events. Because the Kiwanis were identified so much with the peanut sales,

Henry decided to call the first race the “Peanut Run.”

The “Peanut Run” was very different from the race that now takes place at midnight on the Fourth of July. The first race

had about 1,000 runners including runners from the Dunedin Track team. The Kiwanis were very happy with the turnout

but were slightly unprepared for that many runners. The race also took place in the spring and started at sunset not at

midnight. The 10K course started and finished at the Dunedin High School track and circled around Fairway Estates.

Unfortunately, there were not a lot of course directional signs and enough volunteers to steer the runners in the right

direction and some of the lead runners made a wrong turn and had to turn around to get back on the proper course.

The next year, 1980, Henry decided to change the 10K course to make it better for everybody and got permission to

start the race on the corner of Causeway Boulevard, running to Honeymoon State Park and back to the finish line in the

Causeway Plaza. The biggest change was to start it at midnight on July 3 to celebrate the Fourth of July. Since that year

the event has basically stayed the same but has added a few changes so more individuals could be involved. After Henry

Hardin retired from organizing the event, Kiwanis member Joe Garrison, and later race director Chuck Winscott, took

control of the race. In 2005, the Kiwanis decided to change the format and allowed runners to participate in a 1-mile

race/walk, a 5K run instead of a 3K, and the original 10K race, all starting at staggered times.

In the 36 years, the race has never been canceled, although in 2005 the races were delayed for a while after a bottle

rocket landed in the Causeway Boat Marina and started a fire on two boats that the fire department rushed to and

extinguished, causing a lot of smoke and some confusion when to start the race.

In 2012, over 2,600 runners participated in the race, which is the largest turnout for the midnight run to date. Since the

race started in 1979, the Kiwanis have raised almost $700,000, which is given back to the community through ways

such as the Dunedin Water Spray Park, school events, and many other organizations that help children within the

community. This year, the Dunedin Museum has entered a 5K team composed of staff and board members called “The

Dunedin Museum Run-Raisers,” so cheer for the team in their green and white shirts as they pass by you, and make

sure you also thank all the volunteers and sponsors who take time to help make this traditional event possible.

If you are interested in running this year, stop by the Dunedin Museum, the Chamber of Commerce, and City Hall to

pick up an application, or go online to the 37th Annual, Kiwanis-Virginia Street Dermatology Midnight Run to fill out an

application. See you at the race.

Vinnie Luisi is director of the Dunedin Historical Museum.

Copyright © Tampa Bay Newspapers:

All rights reserved

www.tbnweekly.com/pubs/dunedin_beacon/content_articles/052616_dun-06.txt

SUBMITTED Participants in the 2009 Midnight Run will celebrate its

37th anniversary this year.

CLEARWATER BEACON

May 26, 2016

CLEARWATER HOSTS PUBLIC MEETING ON ONE-WAY STREET PROPOSAL

CLEARWATER – In efforts to improve traffic flow on Clearwater Beach, the city of Clearwater has

proposed making Coronado and Hamden drives on Clearwater Beach one-way-pairs, meaning that

each road would be changed so traffic in one direction only will be accommodated.

Residents are invited to join city staff and officials for a public meeting from 5 to 8 p.m. on June 2 at

the Clearwater Community Sailing Center, 1001 Gulf Blvd.

Questions about this traffic solution proposal can be directed to the city’s Traffic Engineering

department at 727-562-4750.

ISLAND ESTATES CONSTRUCTION UPDATES NOW ONLINE

CLEARWATER – Construction is proceeding forward on replacement of four Island Estates bridges

in Clearwater. Two bridges are on Island Way (between Skiff Point and Palm Island Southeast), and

two are on Harbor Passage (from Island Way to Snug Island and also Harbor Island).

Construction updates are now available online at myclearwater.com/islandwaybridges. Monthly

updates will be made online. Construction began in 2015 and is expected to last through April 2017.

For more information about these or other city projects, call the city’s Engineering Department at

727-562-4750.

Copyright © Tampa Bay Newspapers:

All rights reserved

www.tbnweekly.com/pubs/clearwater_beacon/content_articles/052616_clw-04.txt

PALM HARBOR BEACON

PEDESTRIAN BRIDGE IN THE WORKS FOR TARPON WOODS

by Kathryn Williams

June 9, 2016

PALM HARBOR – The Tarpon Woods community will have a new pedestrian bridge built to increase public safety in the next

year or so.

Tim Clark, project manager with the Pinellas County Public Works Transportation Division, is leading the project he said he’s

proud to work on.

The current bridge, going over Brooker Creek into the Tarpon Woods community, has no sidewalk, even though there is a

sidewalk on the north and south side of the bridge.

“If you ever go out there, you’ll see the roadway curves to the left and disappears,” Clark said. “Right now people walk in the

road.”

Residents of the area have been pushing for a way to increase pedestrian safety at the bridge for some time.

“Many years ago, we received many citizen requests for pedestrian improvements,” Clark said.

The Capital Improvement Program, CIP, a 10-year planning program, takes into account problems discovered by county staff

and residents. 80 percent funded by Penny for Pinellas and is based on public safety and improvement. The main objectives of

the CIP are identify and examine current and future infrastructure needs, to preserve and improve infrastructure in Pinellas

County, and improve financial planning.

Residents like Tarpon Woods Action Committee President Ray Jacobs, have been pushing for the bridge for some time.

In 2007, Jacobs said there were talks about improving the bridge, and in 2008 there was a push to have the fix approved.

However, with the economic downturn during that time, the project was sidelined.

“In 2012, all of the permits expired,” Jacobs said, forcing everyone involved to start the project from scratch. From there,

Jacobs got into contact with Clark, and received regular updates from him on the status of the project.

A three-phase program was then implemented in Tarpon Woods, according to Clark.

Phase one and two consisted of sidewalk and curbing improvements from Eastlake Road to the golf course entrance, and later

all the way down Tanglewood Trail to the side street of Ruen.

Phase three, is the pedestrian bridge, Clark’s project.

“It’s going to be a 6-foot-wide structure, attached to the current [bridge],” Clark said.

The pile driving that will have happen to create the support for the bridge will have to occur from the existing bridge,

disturbing normal traffic flows. Clark said they hope to keep that to a minimum though, and it doesn’t impact traffic for long.

Clark estimates the project will cost $570,000.

Currently, the plan is going through the proper processes through the county to make sure it is feasible, and the project

design should be completed soon, Clark said.

With it still having to go through the bid and advertising process, Clark said it would be another year before the project is

finished.

“There are processes in there that take several months to complete,” Clark said.

Clark said, with school out soon, and the schools available for meetings, he and the design engineer hope to have a

neighborhood information session to inform the Tarpon Woods residents of what they will be doing and learn about other

issues in their area.

Clark is excited to get the word out, and work on a project that he believes will have an enormous impact.

For his next projects, Clark hopes to perform structural maintenance and rehabilitation on the Bayside Bridge to expand its

longevity, to improve pedestrian safety at the 102nd Avenue and 113th Street intersection, and replacing the floating

pontoon docks at the Belleair Causeway Ramp Park this year.

Next year, he hopes to improve the pavement at major intersections, add turn lanes to improve the flow of traffic and

improve the safety at intersection crossings.

Clark said he loves his work.

“I love doing these projects that improve public safety,” Clark said.

Copyright © Tampa Bay Newspapers: All rights reserved

www.tbnweekly.com/pubs/palm_harbor_beacon/content_articles/060916_phb-03.txt