bibliography - ulisboaahb/diss/referenceprocessing9.pdfbibliography 394 appelt, douglas, amichai...

Bibliography

Abraços, José. 1993. Resolução de Anáfora Pronominal. MA Dissertation.Universidade Nova de Lisboa, Departamento de Informática.

Abraços, José, and José Lopes. 1994. Extending DRT with a Focusing Mechanismfor Pronominal Anaphora and Ellipsis Resolution. In Proceedings, The15th International Conference on Computational Linguistics (COLING94),pp.1128-1132.

Akmajian, Adrian and Ray Jackendoff. 1970. Coreferentiality and Stress.Linguistic Inquiry, 1, pp.124-126.

Alshawi, Hiyan. 1987. Memory and Context for Language Interpretation.Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Alshawi, Hiyan, and Richard Crouch. 1992. Monotonic Semantic Interpretation. InProceedings, 30th Annual Meeting of the Association for ComputationalLinguistics (ACL92), pp.32-38.

Aone, Chinatsu, and Douglas McKee. 1993. A Language-Independent AnaphoraResolution System for Understanding Multilingual Texts. InProceedings, 31st Annual Meeting of the Association for ComputationalLinguistics (ACL93), pp.156-163.

Appelt, Douglas, Jerry Hobbs, John Bear, David Israel, Megumi Kameyama, AndyKehler, David Martin, Karen Myers, Mabry Tyson. 1995. SRIInternatonal FASTUS System MUC-6 Test Results and Analysis. InProceedings, 6th Message Understanding Conference (MUC-6). MorganKaufman, pp.207-220.

Bibliography

394

Appelt, Douglas, Amichai Kronfeld. 1987. A Computational Model of Referring.Proceedings, International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence(IJCAI87), pp.640-647.

Ariel, M. 1990. Accessing Noun-phrase Antecedents. London: Routledge.

Arka, I Wayan and Stephen Wechsler. 1996. Argument Structure and Linear Orderin Balinese Binding. Paper presented at the 1st LFG Conference, Grenoble,Rank Xerox.

ARPA. 1996. Proceedings, Sixth Message Understanding Conference (MUC6).Morgan Kaufman.

Asher, Nicholas. 1993. Reference to Abstract Objects in Discourse. Dordrecht:Kluwer.

Asher, Nicholas, and Alex Lascarides. 1998. Bridging. Journal of Semantics, 15,pp.83-113.

Asher, Nicholas and Hajime Wada. 1988. A Computational Account of Syntactic,Semantic and Discourse Principles for Anaphora Resolution. Journal ofSemantics, 6, pp.309-344.

van der Auwera, Johan. 1993. ‘Already’ and ‘Still’: Beyond Duality. Linguisticsand Philosophy, 16, pp.613-653.

Azzam, Saliha. 1996. Resolving Anaphors in Embedded Sentences. In Proceedings,34th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics(ACL96).

Azzam, Saliha, Kevin Humphreys and Robert Gaizauskas. 1998a. Evaluating aFocus-Based Approach to Anaphora Resolution. In Proceedings 36thAnnual Meeting of the Association of Computational Linguistics and 17thInternational Conference on Computational Linguistics (COLING-ACL98), pp.74-78.

Azzam, Saliha, Kevin Humphreys and Robert Gaizauskas. 1998b. “CoreferenceResolution in a Multilingual Information Extraction System”. InProceedings, Workshop on Linguistic Coreference. Granada.

Bach, Emmon and Barbara Partee. 1980. Anaphora and Semantic Structure. In K .J. Kreiman and A. E. Ojeda. eds. Papers from the Parasession onPronouns and Anaphora. Chicago Linguistics Society.

Bibliography

395

Backofen, Rolf, Tilman Becker, Jo Calder, Joanne Capstick, Luca Dini, JochenDörre, Gregor Erbach, Dominique Estival, Suresh Manandhar, Anne-Marie Mineur, Gertjan van Noord, Stephan Oepen, Hans Uszkoreit. 1996.Final Report of the EAGLES Formalisms Working Group. EAGLES-Expert Advisory Group on Language Engineering Standards.Luxemburg: CE.

Baldwin, Breck. 1997. CogNIAC: High Precision Coreference with LimitedKnowledge and Linguistic Resources. In Proceedings of the ACL/EACL97Workshop on Operational Factors in Practical, Robust AnaphoraResolution. Association for Computational Linguistics.

Bagga, Amit, Breck Baldwin. 1998a. Algorithms for Scoring Coreference Chains.In Proceedings, Workshop on Linguistic Coreference at 1st InternationalConference on Language Resoureces and Evaluation. Granada.

Bagga, Amit, Breck Baldwin. 1998b. Entity-Based Cross-Document CoreferencingUsing the Vector Space Model. In Proceedings, 36th Annual Meeting of theAssociation of Computational Linguistics and 17th InternationalConference on Computational Linguistics (COLING-ACL98), pp.79-85.

Barker, S. 1997. E-type Pronouns, DRT, Dynamic Semantics and theQuantifier/variable-binding model. Linguistics and Philosophy, 20,pp.195-228.

Barros, Flávia, and Anne DeRoeck. 1994. Resolving Anaphora in a PortableNatural Language Front End to Databases. Proceedings, 4th Conferenceon Applied Natural Language Processing, pp.119-124.

Barwise, Jon, and Robin Cooper. 1981. Generalized Quantifiers and NaturalLanguage. Linguistics and Philosophy, 4, pp.159-219.

van Benthem, Johan. 1986. Essays in Logical Semantics. Dordrecht: D. Reidel.

van Benthem, Johan. 1991. Linguistic Universals in Logical Semantics. InDietmar Zaefferrer. ed. Semantic Universals and Universal Semantics.Berlin: Foris.

van Benthem, Johan, and ter Meulen, Alice. eds. 1997. Handbook of Logic andLanguage. Cambridge MA: MIT Press.

Bolc, Leonard, Czuba Krysztof, Anna Kup´s´c, Malgorzata Marciniak, AgnieszkaMykowiecka, Adam Przepiórkowski. 1996. A Survey of Systems forImplementing HPSG Grammars. Technical. Institute of ComputerScience, Polish Academy of Sciences. Report 814.

Bibliography

396

Borsley, Robert. 1987. Subjects and Complements. Technical report CSLI-107-87.Stanford: CSLI Publications.

Bos, Johan, Elsbeth Mastenbroek, Scott McGlashan, Sebastian Millies, andManfred Pinkal. 1994. The Verbmobil Semantic Formalism.Saarbruecken: University of Saarland. Verbmobil Project, Report 6.

Bos, Johan, Elsbeth Mastenbroek, Scott McGlashan, Sebastian Millies, ManfredPinkal. 1994. A Compositional DRS-based Formalism for NLPApplications. International Workshop on Computational Semantics.

Bosch, Peter. 1983. Agreement and Anaphora: A Study of the Role of Pronouns i nSyntax and Discourse. New York: Academic Press.

Botley, Simon, Julia Glass, Tony McEnery, and Andrew Wilson. eds. 1996.Proceedings, Discourse Anaphora and Resolution Colloquium(DAARC96). Lancaster University, University Centre for ComputerCorpus Research on Language. Technical Papers, 8.

Branco, António. 1992. Construções Recíprocas e Construções de PredicaçãoRamificada - Análise Sintáctica e Semântica. MA Dissertation.University of Lisbon.

Branco, António. 1993. Reciprocal Sentences are Zoom Constructions. In Actas doIX Encontro Nacional da Associação Portuguesa de Linguística.Associação Portuguesa de Linguística, pp.81-98.

Branco, António. 1996. Branching Split Obliqueness at the Syntax-SemanticsInterface. In Proceedings, 16th International Conference onComputational Linguistics (COLING96). Copenhagen: Center forSprogteknologi, pp. 149-156.

Branco, António, and Palmira Marrafa. 1997. Subject-oriented and non Subject-oriented Long-distance Anaphora: an Integrated Approach. InProceedings, 11th Pacific-Asia Conference on Language, Information andComputation (PACLIC-96). Seoul: Kyung Hee University, pp.21-31.

Branco, António. 1998a. GwB, A Workbench for Natural Language Grammars.Universidade de Lisboa, Faculdade de Ciências, Departamento deInformática, Technical Report TR-98-7.

Bibliography

397

Branco, António. 1998b. Towards a Lean Constraint Based Implementation ofBinding Theory. In New Approaches to Discourse Anaphora: Proceedingsof the Second Colloquium on Discourse, Anaphora and AnaphorResolution. Lancaster: Lancaster University, UCREL Technical Papers,vol. 11, special issue, pp.54-67.

Branco, António. 1998c. The Logical Structure of Binding. In Proceedings, , 16thInternational Conference on Computational Linguistics and 36th AnnualMeeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (COLING-ACL98). Montreal: University of Montreal, pp.181-187.

Branco, António, and Palmira Marrafa. 1998. Long-Distance Reflexives and theBinding Square of Opposition. In Gert Webelhuth, Jean-Pierre Koeningand Andreas Kathol, eds. Lexical and Constructional Aspects ofLinguistics Explanation. Stanford: CSLI-Center for the Study of Languageand Information Press, chap. 11, pp.163-177.

Branco, António. forthcoming. A Workbench for Grammatical Knowledge andProcessing of Portuguese. In Proceedings, Workshop on ComputationalLinguistics, Lisbon, May 1998. Lisbon: Associação Portuguesa deLinguística.

Branquinho, João. 1992. Direct Reference, Cognitive Significance and FregeanSense. Doctoral dissertation. Oxford: University of Oxford.

Branquinho, João. 1996. Acerca da Forma Lógica de Afirmações de Existência.Universidade de Lisboa, ms.

Bredenkamp, Andrew. 1996. Towards a Binding Theory for Head-driven PhraseStructure Grammar. Doctoral dissertation. Essex: University of Essex.

Brennan, Susan, Marilyn Friedman and Carl Pollard. 1987. A CenteringApproach to Pronouns, In Proceedings, 25th Annual Meeting of theAssociation for Computational Linguistics (ACL87), pp.155-162.

Bresnan, Joan. 1998. The Emergence of the Unmarked Pronoun II. Ms. Stanford:Stanford University. Revised version of a paper presented at the HopkinsOptimality Theory Workshop, University of Maryland, Mayfest,Baltimore, May 9-12, 1997.

Brito, Ana Maria. 1990. Próprio as a Local and Long Distance AnaphoricExpression in Portuguese. In Actas do Workshop sobre Anáfora, Ofir, 29-30 September. Associação Portuguesa de Linguística, pp.116-138.

Bibliography

398

Byron, Donna, and Amanda Stent. 1998. A Preliminary Model of Centering i nDialog. In Proceedings, 36th Annual Meeting of the Association ofComputational Linguistics and 17th International Conference onComputational Linguistics (COLING-ACL98). Montreal: Université deMontreal, pp.1475-1477.

Cantrall, William. 1974. Viewpoint, Reflexives, and the Nature of Noun Phrase.The Hague: Mouton.

Caramazza, Alfonso, Ellen Grober, Catherine Garvey, and Jack Yates. 1977.Comprehension of Anaphoric Pronouns. Journal of Verbal Learning andVerbal Behavior, 16, pp.601-609.

Carbonell, Jaime, and Ralf Brown. 1988. Anaphora Resolution: A Multi-strategyApproach, In Proceedings, The 12th International Conference onComputational Linguistics (COLING88), pp.96-101.

Carter, David. 1987. Interpreting Anaphors in Natural Language Texts. EllisHorwood.

Carter, David. 1990. Control Issues in Anaphor Resolution. Journal of Semantics, 7,pp.435-454.

Chierchia, Gennaro. 1995. Dynamics of Meaning: Anaphora, Presupposition, andthe Theory of Grammar. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.

Chomsky, Noam. 1980. On Binding. Linguistic Inquiry, 11. pp1-46.

Chomsky, Noam. 1981. Lectures on Government and Binding. Dordrecht: Foris.

Chomsky, Noam. 1986. Knowledge of Language. Its Nature, Origin and Use. NewYork: Praeger.

Coelho, Helder. 1979. A Program Conversing in Portuguese Providing a LibraryService. Doctoral dissertation. Edinburgh: University of Edinburgh.

Coelho, Helder. 1980. Elementos para uma Engenharia da Linguagem. Lisbon:Laboratório Nacional de Engenharia Civil.

Cole, Peter, and L. Sung. 1994. Head Movement and Long-Distance Reflexives.Linguistic Inquiry, 25, pp.355-406.

Cole, Peter and C. Wang. 1996. Antecedents and Blockers of Long-DistanceReflexives: the Case of Chinese Ziji. Linguistic Inquiry, 27, pp.357-390.

Bibliography

399

Connoly, Dennis, John Burger and David Day. 1994. A Macine Learning Approachto Anaphoric Reference. In Proceedings of the International Conference“New Methods in Language Processing”. Manchester, pp.255-261.

Cohen, Robin. 1984. A Computational Theory of the Function of Clue Words i nArgument Understanding. In Proceedings, 22nd Annual Meeting of theAssociation for Computational Linguistics (ACL84), pp.251-258.

Cooper, Robin. 1983. Quantification and Syntactic Theory. Dordrecht: Reidel.

Cooper, Robin, Richard Crouch, Jan van Eijck, Chris Fox, Josef van Genabith, JanJaspars, Hans Kamp, Manfred Pinkal, Massimo Poesio, Stephen Pulman,Espen Vestre. 1994a. The Sate of the Art in Computational Semantics:Evaluating the Descriptive Capabilites of Semantic Theories. Edinburgh:University of Edinburgh.

Cooper, Robin, Richard Crouch, Jan van Eijck, Chris Fox, Josef van Genabith, JanJaspars, Hans Kamp, Manfred Pinkal, Massimo Poesio, Stephen Pulman,Espen Vestre. 1994b. Harmonizing the Approaches. Edinburgh:University of Edinburgh.

Cooper, Robin, Kuniaki Mukai and John Perry. 1990. Situation Theory and ItsApplications. Stanford: CSLI-Centre for the Study of Language andInformation. Lecture Notes 22.

Copestake, Ann, Dan Flickinger, and Stefan Oepen. 1998. Practical HPSGGrammar Engineering. Saarbrücken: 10th European Summer School i nLogic, Language and Information. Course Notes.

Copestake, Ann, Dan Flickinger, and Ivan Sag. 1998. Minimal RecursionSemantics: an Introduction. Saarbrücken: 10th European Summer Schoolin Logic, Language and Information. Course Notes.

Correa, Nelson. 1988. A Binding Rule for Government-binding Parsing. InProceedings, 12th International Conference on Computational Linguistics(COLING88), pp.123-129.

Creary, Lewis, and Carl Pollard. 1985. A Computational Semantics for NaturalLanguage. In Proceedings, 23rd Annual Meeting of the Association forComputational Linguistics, pp.172-179.

Bibliography

400

Cristea, Dan, Nancy Ide and Laurent Romary. 1998. Veins Theory: a Model ofGlobal Discourse Cohesion and Coherence. In Proceedings, 36th AnnualMeeting of the Association of Computational Linguistics and 17thInternational Conference on Computational Linguistics (COLING-ACL98), pp.281-285.

Crysmann, Berthold. 1997. Cliticization in European Portuguese Using ParallelMorpho-Syntactic Constraints. In Miriam Butt and Tracy Holloway King.eds. Proceedings, LFG97 Conference. Stanford: CSLI-Centre for the Studyof Language and Information Publications.

Crysmann, Berthold. Forthcoming. Licensing Proclisis in European Portuguese.In Francis Corblin, Jean-Marie Marandin and Carmen Dobrovie-Sorin.eds. Empirical Issues in Formal Syntax and Semantics. Selected papersfrom the Colloque de Syntaxe et de Sémantique de Paris (CSSP 1997). PeterLang Publ.

Culy, Christopher. 1997. Logophoric Pronouns and Point of View. Linguistics, 35,pp.845-859.

Dagan, Ido, and Alon Itai. 1990. Automatic Processing of Large Corpora for theResolution of Anaphora References. In Proceedings, 13th InternationalConference on Computational Linguistics (COLING90), pp.1-3.

Dagan, Ido, John Justeson, Shalom Lappin, Herbert Leass, and Amnon Ribak, 1995.Syntax and Lexical Statistics in Anaphora Resolution, Applied ArtificialIntelligence, 9.

Dale, Robert. 1989. Cooking Up Referring Expressions. In Proceedings, 27thAnnual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics(ACL89), pp.68-75.

Dale, Robert. 1996. The Role of the Gricean Maxims in the Generation of ReferringExpressions. In Working Notes for the AAAI Spring Symposium onComputational Implicature: Computational Approaches to Interpreting andGenerating Conversational Implicature. Stanford, pp.16-20.

Dalrymple, Mary. 1993. The Syntax of Anaphoric Binding. Stanford: CSLI- Centrefor the Study of Language and Information.

Dell, Gary, Gail McKoon and Roger Ratcliff. 1983. The Activation of AntecedentInformation during the Processing of Anaphoric Reference in Reading.Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 22, pp.121-132.

Bibliography

401

Di Eugenio, Barbara. 1990. Centering Theory and the Italian Pronominal System.In Proceedings, 13th International Conference on ComputationalLinguistics (COLING90), pp.270-275.

Di Eugenio, Barbara. 1996. The Discourse Functions of Italian Subjects: aCentering Approach. In Proceedings, 16th International Conference onComputational Linguistics (COLING96), pp.352-357.

Donnellan, Keith. 1966. Reference and Definite Description. Philosophical Review,60, pp. 281-304.

Dopkins, Stephen, and Johanna Nordlie. 1995. Processes of Anaphor Resolution. InR. F. Lorch and E. J. O’Brien. eds. Sources of Coherence in Reading.Hillsdale: Lawrence Erlbaum, pp.145-157.

Dorrepal, Joke. 1995. An Alternative to the Binding Theory. In Gosse Bouma andGertjan van Noord eds. Papers from the Fourth CLIN Meeting.Groningen: Rijksuniversiteit Groningen.

Dowty, David. 1994. The Role of Negative Polarity and Control Marking in NaturalLanguage Reasoning. In Mandy Harvey and Lynn Santelmann. eds.Proceedings of Semantics and Linguistic Theory IV (SALT IV). Ithaca:Cornell University.

van Eijck, Jan, and Hans Kamp. 1997. Representing Discourse in Context. In vanBenthem and ter Meulen, eds. 1997, pp.179-238.

Elworthy, David. 1995. A Theory of Anaphoric Interpretation. Linguistics andInquiry, 18, 297-332.

Engelkamp, Judith, Gregor Erbach and Hans Uszkoreit. 1992. Handling LinearPrecedence Constraints by Unification. In Proceedings, 30th AnnualMeeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics, pp.201-208.

Erbach, Gregor. 1995a. ProFIT, Prolog with Features, Inheritance and Templates.In Proceedings, 7th Conference of the European Chapter of the Associationfor Computational Linguistics (EACL95).

Erbach, Gregor. 1995b. ProFIT 1.54 User’s Guide. Ms. University of Saarland.

Erbach, Gregor, Mark van der Kraan, Suresh Manandhar, Herbert Ruessink,Wojciech Skut, Craig Thiersch. 1995. Extending UnificationFormalisms. Paper presented at the 2nd Language EngineeringConvention, London.

Bibliography

402

Erman, L., P. London and S. Fickas. 1981. The Design and an Example of HearsayIII. In Proceedings, International Joint Conference of ArtificialIntelligence (IJCAI 7).

Eschenbach, Carole, Christopher Habel, Michael Herweg, Klaus Rehkämper. 1989.Remarks on Plural Anaphora. In Proceedings, 27th Annual Meeting of theAssociation for Computational Linguistics (ACL89), pp.161-167.

Evans, Gareth. 1977. Pronouns, Quantifiers and Relative Clauses. CanadianJournal of Philosophy, 7, 467-536.

Evans, Gareth. 1980. Pronouns. Linguistic Inquiry, 2, 337-362.

Festas, Maria Isabel. 1994. Auto-avaliação da Compreensão da Leitura. Doctoraldissertation. Coimbra: Universidade de Coimbra, Faculdade dePsicologia e Ciências da Educação.

Filgueiras, Miguel. 1984. Compreensão de Linguagem Natural por Computador:Uma Metodologia. Doctoral dissertation. Lisbon: Universidade Nova deLisboa.

Filgueiras, Miguel. 1986. Cooperating Rewrite Processes for Natural-languageAnalysis. Journal of Logic Programming, 4, pp.279-298.

Filgueiras, Miguel. 1989. Linguagem Natural e Representação do Conhecimento.Lisbon: Universidae de Lisboa. MA course notes.

Fodor, Janet, and Ivan Sag. 1982. Referential and Quantificational Indefinites.Linguistics and Philosophy, 5, pp.355-398.

Fong, Sandiway. 1990. Free Indexation: Combinatorial Analysis and aCompositional Algorithm. In Proceedings, 28th Annual Meeting of theAssociation for Computational Linguistics (ACL90), pp.105-110.

Francez, N. and J. Berg. 1994. A Multi-Agent Extension of DRT. In H. Bunt and G .Jäeger, eds., Proceedings, München Workshop on the Formal Semanticsand Progmatics of Dialogue (Mundial 97). Tilburg: University of Tilburg,pp.81-90.

Frank, Anette, and Uwe Reyle. 1995. Principle Based Semantics for HPSG. InProceedings, 7th Conference of the European Chapter of the Association forComputational Linguistics (EACL95), pp.9-16.

Fraurud, Kari. 1990. Definiteness and the Processing of Noun Phrases in NaturalDiscourse. Journal of Semantics, 7, pp.395-433.

Bibliography

403

Freitas, Sérgio, and José Lopes. 1996. Solving the Reference to Mixable Entities.Paper presented at Indirect Anaphora Workshop, Lancaster University,July, 19th.

Frege, Gotlob. 1884. Die Grundlagen der Arithmetik. Eine logisch-mathematischeUntersuchung über den Begriff der Zahl. Breslau, W. Koebner. Reprintpublished by: Georg Olms, Hildesheim, 1961.

Gaizauskas, R., T. Wakao, K. Humphreys, H. Cunningham, Y. Wilks. 1996.University of Sheffield: Description of the LaSIE System as Used for MUC-6. In Proceedings, 6th Message Understanding Conference (MUC-6).Morgan Kaufman, pp.207-220.

Gaizauskas, Robert and Kevin Humphreys. Forthcoming. Quantitative Evaluationof Coreference Algorithms in an Information Extraction System. InSimon Botley and Tony McEnery. eds. Discourse Anaphora and AnaphorResolution. University College of London Press.

Garnham, Alan. 1989. Integrating Information in Text Comprehension: theInterpretation of Anaphoric Noun Phrases. In Greg Carlson and MichaelTanenhaus. eds. Linguistic Structure in Language Processing.Dordrecht: Kluwer, pp.359-399.

Garnham, Alan and Jane Oakhill. 1989. The Everyday Use of AnaphoricExpressions: Implications for the ‘Mental Models’ Theory of TextComprehension. In Noel Sharkey, ed. Models of Cognition: A Review ofCognitive Science. Norwood: Ablex Publishing Corp. 1, Chap. 4, pp.78-112.

Gawron, Jean Mark, and Stanley Peters. 1990a. Anaphora and Quantification i nSituation Semantics. Stanford: CSLI-Centre for the Study of Language andInformation Publications.

Gawron, Jean Mark, and Stanley Peters. 1990b. Some Puzzles about Pronouns. InRobin Cooper, Kuniaki Mukai, and John Perry. eds. Situation Theory andIts Applications. Stanford: CSLI-Center for the Study of Language andInformation Publications. Vol. 1, chap. 16, pp.395-432.

Gazdar, Gerald, Ewan Klein, Geoffrey Pullum, and Ivan Sag. 1985. GeneralizedPhrase Structure Grammar. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.

Ge, Nyiu, John Hale, and Eugene Charniak. 1998. A Statistical Approach toAnaphora Resolution. In Proceedings, 6th Workshop on Very-largeCorpora, ACL.

Bibliography

404

Geach, Peter. 1962. Reference and Generality: An Examination of Some Medievaland Modern Theories. Ithaca: Cornell University Press (Third Reviewededition, 1980).

Genabith, Joseph, Stella Markantonatou, Louisa Sadler, and Mark and Verhagen.1994. English HPSG in ALEP. In Stella Markantonatou and LouisaSadler. eds. 1994, pp.91-116.

Gernsbacher, Morton, and David Hargreaves. 1988. Accessing SentenceParticipants: The Advantage of First Mention. Journal of Memory andLanguage, 27, pp.699-717.

Giorgi, Alessandra, Fabio Pianesi and Giorgio Satta. 1990. A ComputationalApproach to Binding Theory. In Proceedings, 13rd InternationalConference on Computational Linguistics (COLING90), pp.1-6.

Givón, T. 1992. The Grammar of Referential Coherence as Mental ProcessingInstructions. Linguistics, 30, pp.5-55.

Gray, William. 1990. Formal Operational Thought. In W. F. Overton. ed.Reasoning, Necessity and Logic: Developmental Perspectives. Hillsdale:Lawrence Erlbaum, Chap.11, pp.227-253.

Greene, Steven, Gail McKoon, and Roger Ratcliff. 1992. Pronoun Resolution andDiscourse Models. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning,Memory and Cognition. vol.18, pp.266-283.

Grishman, Ralph, and Beth Sundheim. 1996. Message Understanding Conference -6: A Brief History. In Proceedings, 16th International Joint Conference ofArtificial Intelligence (IJCAI96), pp.466-471.

Groenendijk. J., M. Stokhof, and F. Veltman. 1997. Coreference and Modality i nthe Context of Multi-Speacker Dialogue. In H. Kamp and B. Partee, eds.,Proceedings, 1995 Workshop on Context Dependence. Stutgart: IMS.

Grosz, Barbara. 1977. The Representation and Use of Focus in a System forUnderstanding Dialogs. In Proceedings, 5th International JointConference on Artificial Intelligence (IJCAI77), pp.67-76.

Grosz, Barbara. 1982. Focusing and Description in Natural Language Dialogues.In Aravind Joshi, Bonnie Webber and Ivan Sag. eds. Elements ofDiscourse Understanding, pp.84-105.

Bibliography

405

Grosz, Barbara, Aravind Joshi, and Scott Weinstein. 1983. Providing a UnifiedAccount of Definite Noun Phrases in Discourse. In Proceedings, 21stAnnual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics(ACL83), pp.44-50.

Grosz, Barbara, Aravind Joshi, and Scott Weinstein. 1995. Centering: AFramework for Modeling the Local Coherence of Discourse,Computational Linguistics, 21, pp.203-226.

Grosz, Barbara, and Candace Sidner. 1986. Attention, Intentions, and the Structureof Discourse. Computational Linguistics, 12, pp.175-204.

Grosz, Barbara, and Candace Sidner. 1998. Lost Intuitions and ForgottenIntentions. In Walker, Joshi and Prince, eds. 1998a.

Guenthner, Franz, and Hubert Lehmann. 1983. In Proceedings, 1st Conference ofthe European Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics(EACL83), pp.144-151.

Guindon, Raymonde. 1985. Anaphora Resolution: Short-term Memory andFocusing. In Proceedings, 23rd Annual Meeting of the Association forComputational Linguistics (ACL85), pp.218-227.

Gundel, Jeanette. 1998. Centering Theory and the Givenness Hierarchy: Towards aSynthesis. In Walker, Joshi and Prince. eds. 1998, pp.183-198.

Gundel, Jeanette, Nancy Hedberg and Ron Zacharski. 1993. Cognitive Status andthe Form of Referring Expressions in Discourse. Language, 69, pp.274-307.

Haegeman, Liliane. 1991. Introduction to Government and Binding Theory.Oxford: Basil Blackwell.

Hahn, Udo, and Michael Strube. 1996. Incremental Centering and CenterAmbiguity. In Proceedings, 18th Annual Conference of the CognitiveScience Society (CogSci96).

Hahn, Udo and Michael Strube. 1997. Centering in-the-Large: ComputingReferential Discourse Segments. In Proceedings, 35th Annual Meeting ofthe Associatio for Computational Linguistics and 8th Conference of theEuropean Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics(ACL/EACL97), pp.104-111.

Bibliography

406

Halvorsen, Per-Kristian. 1988. Situation Semantics and Semantic Interpretationin Constraint-based Grammars. In Proceedings of the InternationalConference on Fifth Generation Computer Systems. Tokyo: Institute forNew Generation Systems, pp.471-478.

Hardt. Daniel. 1996. Centering in Dynamic Semantics. In Proceedings, 16thInternational Conference on Computational Linguistics (COLING96).Copenhagen: Center for Sprogteknologi, pp.519-524.

Harper, Mary. 1992. Ambiguous Noun Phrases in Logical Form. ComputationalLinguistics, 18, pp.419-465.

Heim, Irene. 1990. E-type and Donkey Anaphora. Linguistics and Philosophy, 13,137-177.

Heim, Irene. 1982. The Semantics of Definite and Indefinite Noun Phrases.Doctoral dissertation. Amherst: University of Massachusetts.

Hellan, Lars. 1988. Anaphora in Norwegian and the Theory of Grammar.Dordrecht: Foris Publications.

Hellan, Lars. 1991. Containment and Connectedness Anaphors. In Jan Koster andEric Reuland. eds. 1991a, pp.27-48.

Henadeerage, Kumara. 1998. Anaphoric Binding in Colloquial Sinhala. InMiriam Butt and Tracy Holloway King. eds. Proceedings of the LFG98Conference. Stanford: CSLI- Centre for the Study of Language andInformation Publications.

Higginbotham, James. 1983. Logical Form, Binding, and Nominals. LinguisticInquiry, 14, pp.395-420.

Hintikka, Jaakko. 1970. On Attributions of ‘Self-knowledge’. The Journal ofPhilosophy, 67, pp.73-87.

Hirst, Graeme. 1981. Discourse-Oriented Anaphora Resolution in NaturalLanguage Understanding: A Review. American Journal ofComputational Linguistics, 7, pp.85-98.

Hitzeman, Janet, and Massimo Poesio. 1998. Long Distance Pronominalisationand Global Focus. In Proceedings, 36th Annual Meeting of the Associationof Computational Linguistics and 17th International Conference onComputational Linguistics (COLING-ACL98), pp.550-556.

Hobbs, Jerry. 1978. Resolving Pronoun References. Lingua, 44, pp.311-338.

Bibliography

407

van Hoeck, Karen. 1997. Anaphora and Conceptual Structure. Chicago: TheUniversity of Chicago Press.

Huang, C.-C. James and C.-C. Jane Tang. 1991. The Local Nature of the Long-Distance Reflexive in Chinese. In Jan Koster and E. Reuland. eds. 1991a,pp.263-282.

Hudson-D’Zumura, Susan and Michael Tannenhaus. 1998. AssigningAntecedents to Ambiguous Pronouns: The Role of the Center of Attention asthe Default Assignment. In Walker, Joshi and Prince, eds. 1998, pp.199-226.

Huls, Carla, Edwin Bos, and Wim Claassen. 1995. Automatic Referent Resolutionof Deictic and Anaphoric Expressions. Computational Linguistics, 21,pp.59-79.

Humphreys, Kevin, Robert Gaizauskas and Saliha Azzam. 1997. Event Coreferencefor Information Extraction. In Proceedings of the ACL/EACL97 Workshopon Operational Factors in Practical, Robust Anaphora Resolution.Association for Computational Linguistics

Iida, Masayo, Christopher Manning, Peter O'Neil and Ivan Sag. 1994. The LexicalIntegrity of Japanese Causatives. Ms., Stanford: Stanford University,paper presented at the 68th Meeting of the Linguistic Society of America.

Ingria, Robert, and David Stallard. 1989. A Computational Mechanism forPronominal Reference. In Proceedings, 27th Annual Meeting of theAssociation of Computational Linguistics (ACL89), pp.262-271.

Jackendoff, Ray. 1972. Semantic Interpretation in Generative Grammar.Cambridge: MIT Press.

Jackendoff, Ray. 1992. Mme. Tussaud Meets the Binding Theory. NaturalLanguage and Linguistic Theory, 10, pp.1-31.

Johnson, Mark. 1995. Constraint-based Natural Language Parsing. Barcelona: 7thEuropean Summer School in Logic, Language and Information. CourseNotes.

Johnson, Mark, and Martin Kay. 1990. Semantic Abstraction and Anaphora. InProceedings, 13th International Conference on Computational Linguistics(COLING90), pp.17-27.

Bibliography

408

Johnson, Mark, and Ewan Klein. 1990. Discourse, Anaphora and Parsing. . InProceedings, 28th Annual Meeting of the Association of ComputationalLinguistics. Pittsburgh: University of Pitsburgh, pp.197-302.

Joshi, Aravind and Steve Kuhn. 1979. Centered Logic: The Role of Entity CenteredSentence Representation in Natural Language Inferencing. InProceedings, 6th International Joint Conference on ArtificialIntelligence, pp.435-439.

Joshi, Aravind, Bonnie Webber, and Ivan Sag. 1982. Elements of DiscourseUnderstanding. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Joshi, Aravind, and Scott Weinstein. 1981. Control of Inference: Role of SomeAspects of Discourse Structure-Centering. In Proceedings, 7thInternational Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence (IJCAI81),pp.3855-3859.

Joshi, Aravind, and Scott Weinstein. 1998. Formal Systems for Complexity andControl of Inference: A Reprise and Some Hints. In Walker, Joshi andPrince. 1998a, pp.31-38.

Kameyama, Megumi. 1997. Recognizing Referential Links: An InformationExtraction Perspective. In Proceedings of the ACL/EACL97 Workshop onOperational Factors in Practical, Robust Anaphora Resolution.Association for Computational Linguistics.

Kameyama, Megumi. 1998. Intra-sentential Centering: a Case Study. In Walker,Joshi and Prince. eds. 1998, pp.89-114.

Kamp, Hans. 1981. A Theory of Thruth and Semantic Representation. In JeroenGroenendijk, Theo Janssen and Martin Stokhof. eds. Formal Methods i nthe Study of Language. Amsterdam: Mathematisch Centrum.

Kamp, Hans, and Uwe Reyle. 1993. From Discourse to Logic: Introduction toModeltheoretic Semantics of Natural Language, Formal Logic andDiscourse Representation Theory. Dordrecht: Kluwer.

Kaplan, Ronald. 1995. The Formal Architecture of Lexical-Functional Grammar.In Mary Dalrymple, Ronald Kaplan, John Maxwell, and Annie Zaenen.eds. Formal Issues in Lexical-Functional Grammar. Stanford: CSLIPublications. Chap. 1.

Bibliography

409

Kaplan, Ronald, and Joan Bresnan. 1982. Lexical-Functional Grammar: AFormal System for Grammatical Representation. In Joan Bresnan. ed.The Mental Representation of Grammatical Relations. Cambridge: MITPress, pp.173-281.

Kaplan, Ronald, and John Maxwell. 1988. An Algorithm for FunctionalUncertainty. In Proceedings, 12th International Conference onComputational Linguistics (COLING88), pp.297-302. Also In MaryDalrymple, Ronald Kaplan, John Maxwell, and Annie Zaenen. 1995.Formal Issues in Lexical-Functional Grammar. Standford: CSLI- Centrefor the Study of Language and Information Publications. Lecture Notesn.47, pp.177-197.

Kartunnen, Lauri. 1976. Discourse Referents. In J. McCawley. ed. Syntax andSemantics, 7. New York: Academic Press.

Kasper, Walter, Marc Moens and Henk Zeevat. 1991. Anaphora Resolution i nACORD. Edinburgh: University of Edinburgh, Centre for CognitiveScience. Research Paper EUCCS/RP-47.

Kay, Martin. 1984. Functional Unification Grammar: A Formalism for MachineTranslation. In Proceedings, 22nd Annual Meeting of the Association ofComputational Linguistics and 10th International Conference onComputational Linguistics (COLING-ACL84), pp.75-78.

Keenan, Edward, and Bernard Comrie. 1977. Noun Prase Acessibility andUniversal Grammar. Linguistic Inquiry, 8, pp.63-99.

Kehler, Andrew. 1997. Current Theories of Centering for Pronoun Interpretation: ACritical Evaluation, Computational Linguistics, 23, pp.467-475.

Kennedy, Christopher, and Branimir Boguraev. 1996. Anaphora for Everyone:Pronominal Anaphora Resolution without a Parser. In 16th InternationalConference on Computational Linguistics (COLING96), pp.113-118.

Kintsch, Walter, and Teun van Dijk. 1978. Toward a Model of Text Comprehensionand Production. Psychological Review, 85, pp.363-394.

König, Ekkehard. 1991. Concessive Relations as the Dual of Causal Relations. InDietmar Zaefferer. ed. Semantic Universals and Universal Semantics.Berlin: Foris.

Bibliography

410

Koening, Jean-Pierre. 1998. Inside-out Constraints and Description Languages forHPSG. In Gert Webelhuth, Jean-Pierre Koenig and Andreas Kathol. eds.Lexical and Constructional Aspects of Linguistic Explanation. Stanford:CSLI Publications, pp.265-280.

Koster, Jan, and Eric Reuland. eds. 1991a. Long-Distance Anaphora. Cambridge:Cambridge University Press.

Koster, Jan, and E. Reuland, eds. 1991b. Long-Distance Anaphora. Cambridge:Cambridge University Press.

Kracht, Marcus. 1993. Mathematical Aspects of Command Relations. InProceedings, 6th Conference of the European Chapter of the Association ofComputational Linguistics (EACL93), pp.240-249.

Kuno, Susumo. 1987. Functional Syntax: Anaphora, Discourse and Empathy.Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.

Lappin, Shalom. 1989. Donkey Pronouns Unbound. Theoretical Linguistics, 15,pp.263-286.

Lappin, Shalom and Nissim Francez. 1994. E-type Pronouns, I-sums, and DonkeyAnaphora. Linguistics and Philosophy, 17, pp.391-428.

Lappin, Shalom, and Michael McCord. 1990a. A Syntactic Filter on PronominalAnaphora for Slot Grammar. In Proceedings, 28th Annual Meeting of theAssociation for Computational Linguistics (ACL90), pp.135-142.

Lappin, Shalom, and Michael McCord. 1990b. Anaphora Resolution in SlotGrammar, Computational Linguistics, 16, pp.197-212.

Lappin, Shalom, and Herbert Leass. 1994. An Algorithm for Pronominal AnaphoraResolution, Computational Linguistics, 20, pp.535-561.

Lasnik, Howard. 1986. On the Necessity of Binding Conditions. In R. Freidin. ed.Principles and Parameters in Comparative Grammar. MIT Press.Reprinted in Howard Lasnik, 1989, pp.149-167.

Howard Lasnik. 1989. Essays on Anaphora. Dordrecht: Kluwer.

Latecki, Longin. 1991. An Indexing Technique for Implementing CommandRelations. In Proceedings, 5th Conference of the European Chapter of theAssociation of Computational Linguistics (EACL91), pp.51-56.

Bibliography

411

Lebeaux, David. 1983. A Distributional Difference between Reciprocals andReflexives. Linguistic Inquiry. 14, pp.723-730.

van der Lely, Heather and Linda Stollwerck. 1997. Binding Theory andGrammatical Specific Language Impairment in Chldren. Cognition, 62,pp.245-290.

Levinson, Stephen. 1983. Pragmatics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Levinson, Stephen. 1991. Pragmatic Reduction of the Binding ConditionsRevisited. Journal of Linguistics, 27, pp.107-161.

Link, Godehard. 1983. The Logical Analysis of Plural and Mass Terms: a Lattice-theoretical Approach. in R. Bäuerle, C, Schwarze and A. Stechow. eds.Meaning, Use and Interpretation of Language. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter,pp.302-323.

Litman, Diane. 1985. Plan Recognition and Discourse Analysis: An IntegratedApproach for Understanding Dialogues.. Rochester NY:University ofRochester. Technical Report n.170.

Löbner, Sebastian. 1987. Quantification as a Major Module of Natural LanguageSemantics. In Jeroen Groenendijk, Dick de Jongh and Martin Stokhof,eds., Studies in DRT and the Theory of Generalized Quantifiers. Foris,Dordrecht, pp.53-85.

Löbner, Sebastian. 1989. German schon-erst-noch: an Integrated Analysis.Linguistics and Philosophy, 12, pp.167-212.

Löbner, Sebastian. 1999. Why German schon and noch are Still Duals: A Reply tovan der Auwera. Linguistics and Philosophy, 22, pp.45-107.

Lopes, José. 1986. Conceptualização de um Sistema Interlocutor Automático.Doctoral dissertation. Lisbon: Universidade Técnica de Lisboa.

Lund, K., C. Burgess and R. Atchley. 1995. Semantic and Associative Priming i nHigh-dimensional Semantic Space. In Proceedings, 17th AnnualConference of the Cognitive Science Society, pp.660-665.

LuperFoy, Susann. 1996. A Computational Approach to Indirect AnaphoraProcessing. extended abstract of the paper presented at Indirect AnaphoraWorkshop, Lancaster, Lancaster University, July 19th.

Bibliography

412

MacDonald, Maryellen, and Brian MacWhinney. 1990. Measuring Inhibition andFaciltation from Pronouns. Journal of Memory and Language, 29, pp.469-492.

Manning, Christopher. 1996. Argument Structure as a Locus for Binding Theory.Paper presented at the 1st International LFG Colloquium. Grenoble,France.

Manning, Christopher and Ivan Sag. 1995. Dissociations between ArgumentStructure and Grammatical Relations. Ms. Paper presented at theTübingen Workshop on HPSG, July 21-23. Tübingen.

Manning, Christopher and Ivan Sag. 1998. Dissociations between ArgumentStructure and Grammatical Relations. In Gert Webelhuth, Jean-PierreKoening and Andreas Kathol, eds. Lexical and Constructional Aspects ofLinguistics Explanation. Stanford: CSLI-Center for the Study of Languageand Information Press, chap. 5, pp.63-78.

Manzini, Rita, and Kenneth Wexler. 1987. Parameters, Binding Theory andLearnability. Linguistic Inquiry, 18, pp.413-444.

Marácz, Laszlo. 1989. Asymmetries in Hungarian. Doctoral dissertation.University of Groningen.

Markantonatou, Stella, and Louisa Sadler. eds. 1994. Grammatical Formalisms:Issues in Migration and Expressivity. Luxemburg: CEC.

Marrafa, Palmira. 1993. Predicação Secundária e Predicados Complexos emPortuguês. Doctoral dissertation. Lisbon: Universidade de Lisboa.

McCarthy, Joseph, and Wendy Lehnert. 1995. Using Decision Trees for CoreferenceResolution. In Proceedings, International Joint Conference on ArtificialIntelligence (IJCAI95), pp.1050-1055.

Menuzzi, Sérgio. 1996. 3rd Person Possessives in Brazilian Portuguese: On theSyntax-Discourse Relation. In Botley et al. e ds. 1996, pp.211-222.

Merlo, Paola. 1993. For an Incremental Computation of Intra-sententialCoreference. In Proceedings, International Joint Conference on ArtificialIntelligence (IJCAI93), pp.1216-1221.

Bibliography

413

Meurers, Walt. 1994. On Implementing an HPSG Theory: Aspects of the LogicalArchitecture, the Formalization, and the Implementation of Head-DrivenPhrase Structure Grammars. In Erhard Hinrichs, Walt Meurers, andTsuneko Nakawa. Partial-VP and Split-Np Topicalization in German -An HPSG Analysis and its Implementation. Arbeitspapiere des SFB 340,n. 58. University of Tübingen.

Meurers, Walt, and Guido Minnen. 1999. Off-line Constraint Propagation forEfficient HPSG Processing. In Gert Webelhuth, Jean-Pierre Koenig andAndreas Kathol. eds. Lexical and Constructional Aspects of LinguisticExplanation. Stanford: CSLI- Centre for the Study of Language andInformation Publications, pp.299-314.

Millies, Sebastian, and Manfred Pinkal. 1993. Linking One SemanticInterpretation System to Different Syntactic Formalisms. In Pinkal,Manfred, Remko Scha and Lenhart Schubert. eds. Semantic Formalismsin Natural Language Processing. Wadern, Germany: IBFI GmbH.Dagstuhl-Seminar-Report 57.

Miller, George, Richard Beckwith, Christiane Fellbaum, Derek Gross, andKatherine Miller. 1993. Five Papers on WordNet. Princeton: PrincetonUniversity, Cognitive Science Laboratory. Technical Report CSL 43.

Milward, David. 1996. Integrating Situations into a Theory of Discourse Anaphora.Saarbrücken: Universität des Saarlandes. CLAUS-Report n. 74.

Mitkov, Ruslan. 1995. Un Uncertainty Reasoning Approach for AnaphoraResolution. In Proceedings of the Natural Language Processing PacificRim Symposium (NLPRS95), pp.149-154.

Mitkov, Ruslan. 1996a. Anaphor Resolution in Natural Language Processing andMachine Translation. In Botley et al. eds. 1996, pp.6-27.

Mitkov, Ruslan. 1996b. Anaphor Resolution: A Combination of Linguistic andStatistical Approaches, in Botley et al. eds. 1996, pp.76-85.

Mitkov, Ruslan. 1996c. Anaphora and Machine Translation. MachineTranslation Review, n. 4.

Mitkov, Ruslan. 1997a. How far are We from (semi-) Automatic Annotation ofAnaphoric Links in Corpora?. In Proceedings of the ACL/EACL97Workshop on Operational Factors in Practical, Robust AnaphoraResolution. Association for Computational Linguistics.

Bibliography

414

Mitkov, Ruslan. 1997b. Factors in Anaphora Resolution: They are not the onlyThings that Matter. A Case-study based on two Different Approaches. InProceedings of the ACL/EACL97 Workshop on Operational Factors i nPractical, Robust Anaphora Resolution. Association for ComputationalLinguistics.

Mitkov, Ruslan. 1998a. Robust Pronoun Resolution with Limited Knowledge. InProceedings, 36th Annual Meeting of the Association of ComputationalLinguistics and 17th International Conference on ComputationalLinguistics (COLING-ACL98), pp.869-875.

Mitkov, Ruslan. 1998b. Anaphora Resolution: Recent Developments, FutureDirections. Ms. Tutorial presented at COLING-ACL98.

Mitkov, Ruslan. 1998c. Evaluating Anaphora Resolution Approaches. In NewApproaches to Discourse Anaphora: Proceedings of the Second Colloquiumon Discourse, Anaphora and Anaphor Resolution. Lancaster: LancasterUniversity, UCREL Technical Papers, vol. 11, special issue,

Mitkov, Ruslan, Lamia Belguith and Malgorzata Stys. 1998. Multilingual RobustAnaphora Resolution. In Proceedings, Third International Conference onEmpirical Methods in Natural Language Processing (EMNLP-3).Association for Computational Linguistics, pp.7-16.

Mitkov, Ruslan, and Paul Schmidt. Forthcoming. On the Complexity ofPronominal Anaphora Resolution in Machine Translation. In CarlosMartin-Vide. ed. Mathematical and Computational Analysis of NaturalLanguage. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishers.

Moore, Robert. 1989. Unification-Based Semantic Interpretation. In Proceedings,27th Annual Meeting of the Association of Computational, Vancouver:University of British Columbia, pp.33-41.

Marácz, Laszlo. 1989. Asymmetries in Hungarian. Doctoral dissertation.University of Groningen.

Moser, Megan, and Johanna Moore. 1996. Toward a Synthesis of Two Accounts ofDiscourse Structure. Computational Linguistics, 22, pp.409-420.

Neale, Stephen. 1990. Descriptions. Cambridge MA: MIT Press.

Neidle, Carol. 1994. Lexical Functional Grammar. In Encyclopedia of Languageand Linguistics. New York: Pergamon Press.

Bibliography

415

Nerbonne, John. 1989. Constraint-based Semantics. In Paul Dekker and MartinStokhof. eds. Proceedings of the 8th Amsterdam Colloquium. Amsterdam:Institute for Logic, Language, and Information, pp.425-444.

Netter, Klaus. 1996. Functional Categories in an HPSG for German. Doctoraldissertation. Saarbruecken: Universitär des Saarlandes.

O’Brien, Edward, and Jason Albrecht. 1991. The Role of Context in AccessingAntecedents in Text. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning,Memory and Cognition, 17, pp.94-102.

O’Brien, Edward, Gary Raney, Jason Albrecht and Keith Rayner. 1997. ProcessesInvolved in the Resolution of Explicit Anaphors. Discourse Processes, 32,pp.1-24.

O’Brien, Edward, Pamela Plewes and Jason Albrecht. 1990. Antecdent RetrievalProcesses. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory andCognition, 16, pp.241-249.

Okumura, Manabu, and Kouji Tamoura. 1996. Zero Pronoun Resolution i nJapanese Discourse Based on Centering Theory. In Proceedings, 17thInternational Conference on Computational Linguistics (COLING96),pp.871-876.

Oliva, Karel. 1994. HPSG Lexicon Without Lexical Rules. In Proceedings, 15thInternational Conference on Computational Linguistics (COLING94),pp.823-826.

Ostertag, Gary. 1998. Definite Descriptions: A Reader. Cambridge MA: MIT Press.

Palmer, Frank. 1995. Grammatical Roles and Relations. London: CambridgeUniversity Press.

Paraboni, Ivandré, and Vera Lima. 1998. Possessive Pronominal AnaphorResolution in Portuguese Written Tetxts. In Proceedings, 36th AnnualMeeting of the Association of Computational Linguistics and 17thInternational Conference on Computational Linguistics (COLING-ACL98), pp.1010-1014.

Parsons, Terence. 1999. The Traditional Square of Opposition. In Edward Zalta.ed.. Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/square.

Bibliography

416

Partee, Barbara and Emmon Bach. 1984. Quantification, Pronouns, and VPAnaphora. In Jeroen Groenendijk, Theo Janssen, and Martin Stokhof.eds. Truth, Interpretation and Information. Dordrecht: Foris, pp.99-130.

Passoneau, Rebecca, and Diane Litman, 1994. Empirical Analysis of ThreeDimensions of Spoken Discourse: Segmentation, Coherence andLinguistic Devices. In Donia Scott and Eduard Hovy. eds. Computationaland Conversational Discourse: Burning Issues - An InterdisciplinaryAccount. Heidelberg: Springer Verlag.

Pereira, Fernando. 1981. Extraposition Grammars. Computational Linguistics, 7,pp.243-256.

Pereira, Fernando, and Stuart Shieber. 1987. Prolog and Natural LanguageAnalysis. Stanford: CSLI-Centre for the Study of Language andInformation. Lecture Notes n.10.

Perlmutter, David and Scott Soames. 1979. Syntactic Argumentation and theStructure of English. Berkeley: University of California Press.

Pianesi. Fabio. 1991. Indexing and Referential Dependencies within BindingTheory: a Computational Framework. In Proceedings, 5th Conference ofthe European Chapter of the Association of Computational Linguistics(EACL93), pp.39-44.

Piatelli-Palmarini, Massimo. ed. 1979. Théorie du langage. Théorie del'Apprentisage. Le débat entre Jean Piaget et Noam Chomsky. Paris:Éditions du Seuil.

Poesio, Massimo. 1998. Cross-speaker Anaphora and Dialogue Acts. InProceedings, Workshop on Mutual Knowledge, Common Ground andPublic Information. Saarbruecken: 10th European Summer School i nLogic, Language and Information.

Poesio, Massimo, and Reinhard Muskens. 1997. The Dynamics of DiscourseSituations. In Proceedings, 11th Amsterdam Colloquium. Amsterdam:University of Amsterdam, ILLC.

Poesio, Massimo, and Renata Vieira. Forthcoming. A Corpus-based Investigationof Definite Description Use. Computational Linguistics.

Poesio, Massimo, Renata Vieira and Simone Teufel. 1997. Resolving BridgingReferences in Unrestricted Text. In Proceedings, ACL/EACL97 Workshopon Operational Factors in Practical, Robust Anaphora Resolution.Association for Computational Linguistics.

Bibliography

417

Poesio, Massimo, Sabine im Walde and Chris Brew. 1998. Lexical Clustering andDefinite Description Interpretation. In Proceedings, AAAI SpringSymposium on Learning for Discourse, pp.82-89.

Pollard, Carl, and Ivan Sag. 1987. Information-Based Syntax and Semantics.Stanford: CSLI-Centre for the Study of Language and InformationPublications. Lecture notes n.13.

Pollard, Carl, and Ivan Sag. 1992. Anaphors in English and the Scope of BindingTheory. Linguistic Inquiry, 23, pp.261-303.

Pollard, Carl, and Ivan Sag. 1994. Head-Driven Phrase Structure Grammar.Stanford: CSLI-Center for the Study of Language and Information. AlsoChicago: The University of Chicago Press.

Popescu-Belis, Andrei, Isabelle Robba. 1997. Cooperation between Pronoun andReference Resolution for Unrestricted Texts. In Proceedings,ACL/EACL97 Workshop on Operational Factors in Practical, RobustAnaphora Resolution. Association for Computational Linguistics.

Popescu-Belis, Andrei, Isabelle Robba, and Gérard Sabah. 1998. ReferenceResolution beyond Coreference: a Conceptual Frame and its Application.In Proceedings, 36th Annual Meeting of the Association of ComputationalLinguistics and 17th International Conference on ComputationalLinguistics (COLING-ACL98), pp.1046-1052.

Progovac, Ljiljana. 1993. Long-Distance Reflexives: Movement to Infl versusRelativized SUBJECT. Linguistic Inquiry, 24, pp.755-772.

Pu, Ming-Ming. 1996. Cognitive Constraints, Discourse Structure and Anaphora.In Botley et al. eds.. 1996

Quine, Willard. 1966. The Variable. In The Ways of Paradox and Other Essays.Cambridge MA: Harvard University Press, chap. 27, pp.272-282.

Ravnholt, Ole. 1996. Grammatical Cues and “Referential Distance” in theRetrieval of Antecedents in Discourse. In Botley et al. eds. 1996, pp.41-63.

Reichman, R. 1985. Getting Computers to Talk like You and Me. Cambridge MA:MIT Press.

Reinhart, Tanya. 1981. Definite NP Anaphora and C-command Domains.Linguistic Inquiry, 12, pp.605-635.

Bibliography

418

Reinhart, Tanya. 1983. Coreference and Bound Anaphora: A Restatement of theAnaphora Questions. Linguistics and Philosophy, 6, pp.47-88.

Reinhart, Tanya. 1987. Specifier and Operator Binding. In Eric Reuland and Aliceter Meulen. eds. The Representation of (In)definiteness. Cambridge MA:MIT Press.

Reinhart, Tanya and Eric Reuland. 1993. Reflexivity. Linguistic Inquiry, 24,pp.657-720.

Reiter, Ehud, and Robert Dale. 1992. A Fast Algorithm for the Generation ofReferring Expressions. In Proceedings, 14th International Conference onComputational Linguistics (COLING92), pp.232-238.

Reyle, Uwe. 1993a. Dealing with Ambiguities by Underspecification: Construction,Representation and Deduction. Journal of Semantics, 10, pp.123-179.

Reyle, Uwe. 1993b. Dealing with Ambiguities by Underspecification: A First OrderCalculus for Unscoped Representations. In Proceedings of the EigthAmsterdam Colloquium. Amsterdam: ILLC.

Rich, Elaine, and Susann LuperFoy. 1988. An Architecture for AnaphoraResolution, In Proceedings, 2nd Conference on Applied Natural LanguageProcessing, pp.18-24.

Rico Pérez, C. 1994. Resolución de la Anáfora Disicursiva Mediante una Estategiade Inspiración Vectoral. In Proceedings, Conference of the SociedadEspañola para el Procesamiento del Lenguaje Natural (SEPLN94).Cordoba.

Riehemann, Susanne. 1995. The HPSG Formalism. Course notes. Stanford:Stanford University.

Roberts, Craige. 1987. Modal Subordination, Anaphora and Distributivity. Doctoraldissertation. Amherst MA: University of Amherst.

Roberts, Craige. 1989. Modal Subordination and Pronominal Anaphora i nDiscours. Linguistics and Philosophy, 12, pp.683-721.

Roberts, Graige. 1998. The Place of Centering in a General Theory of AnaphoraResolution. In Walker, Joshi and Prince. eds. 1998a.

Bibliography

419

Rocha, Marco. 1997. Supporting Anaphor Resolution in Dialogues with a Corpus-based Probabilistic Model. In Proceedings of the ACL/EACL97 Workshopon Operational Factors in Practical, Robust Anaphora Resolution.Association for Computational Linguistics.

Rocha, Marco. 1998a. The Antecedent-likelihood Theory: an Ethodology to Analyseand Resolve Anaphora in Dialogues. University of Sussex. CognitiveScience Research Papers.

Rocha, Marco. 1998b. A Description of an Annotation Scheme to Analyse Anaphorain Dialogues. University of Sussex. Cognitive Science Research Papers.

Russel, S. and P. Norvig. 1995. Artificial Intelligence: a Modern Approach. New-Jersey: Prentice-Hall.

Safir, Ken. 1992. Implied Non-Coreference and the Pattern of Anaphora.Linguistics and Philosophy, 15, pp.1-52.

Sag, Ivan, and Daniele Godard. 1994. Extraction of de-phrases from the French NP.In Gonzàlez. ed. Proceedings of the North Eastern Linguistics Society.pp.519-541.

Sag, Ivan, and Jorge Hankamer. 1984. Toward a Theory of Anaphoric Processing.Linguistics and Phlosophy, 325-345.

Saggion, Horácio and Ariadne Carvalho. 1996. Definite Anaphora in PortugueseAbstracts. In Botley et al. eds. 1996, pp.245-252.

Salmon, Nathan. 1992. Reflections on Reflexivity. Linguistics and Philosophy, 15,pp.53-63.

Salton, G. 1989. Automatic Text Processing: The Transformation, Analysis, andRetrieval of Information by Computer. Reading MA: Addison-Wesley.

Sells, Peter. 1987. Aspects of Logophoricity. Linguistic Inquiry, 18, pp.445-479.

Shieber, Stuart. 1986. An Introduction to Unification-based Approaches toGrammar. Stanford: CSLI- Centre for the Study of Language andInformation Publications. Lecture Notes n. 4.

Smessaert, Hans. 1997. Aspectual Duality Regained. In Paul Dekker, MartinStokhof and Yde Venema. eds. Proceedings of the 11th AmsterdamColloquium. Amsterdam: University of Amsterdam, ILLC/Department ofPhilosophy, pp.271-276.

Bibliography

420

Steenbergen, Marlies van. 1991. Long-Distance Binding in Finnish. In Jan Kosterand Eric Reuland. eds. 1991a, pp.231-244.

Sidner, Candace. 1981. Focusing for Interpretation of Pronouns. American Journalof Computational Linguistics, 7, pp.217-231.

Siekmann, Jörg. 1992. Unification Theory and Natural Language Processing.Colchester: 4th European Summer School in Logic, Language andInformation. Course Notes.

Sijtsma, Wietske, and Olga Zweekhorst. 1993. Comparison and Review ofCommercial Natural Language Interfaces. In Proceedings, 5th TwenteWorkshop on Language Technology (TWLT5). Enschende, TheNetherlands, pp.43-58.

Smyth, Ronald, and Craig Chambers. 1996. Parallelism Effects on PronounResolution in Discourse Contexts. In Botley et al. eds. 1996, pp.268-280.

Stevenson, Rosemary. 1996. Mental Models, Propositions, and the Comprehensionof Pronouns. In Jane Oakhill and Alan Garnham. eds. Mental Models i nCognitive Science. Sussex: Psychology Press.

Strand, Kjetil. 1996. A Taxonomy of Linking Relations. Paper presented at IndirectAnaphora Workshop, Lancaster University, July 19th.

Strube, Michael. 1996. Processing Complex Sentences in the Centering Framework.In Proceedings, 34th Annual Meeting of the Association of Computational(ACL96).

Strube, Michael. 1998. Never Look Back: an Alternative to Centering. InProceedings, 36th Annual Meeting of the Association of ComputationalLinguistics and 17th International Conference on ComputationalLinguistics (COLING-ACL98), pp.1252-1257.

Strube, Michael, and Udo Hahn. 1995. ParseTalk about Sentence- and Text-levelAnaphora. In Proceedings, 7th European Conference of the EuropeanChapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics (EACL95),pp.237-244.

Bibliography

421

Stuckardt, Roland. 1996a. Anaphor Resolution and the Scope of SyntacticConstraints. In Proceedings, 16th International Conference onComputational Linguistics (COLING96), pp.937-942.Stuckardt, Roland.1996b. An Interdependency-sensitive Approach to Anaphor resolution. InSimon Botley, Julia Glass, Tony McEnery, and Andrew Wilson. eds..Proceedings, Discourse Anaphora and Resolution Colloquium(DAARC96). Lancaster University, University Centre for ComputerCorpus Research on Language. Technical Papers, 8, pp.400-413.

Suri, Linda, and Kathleen McCoy. 1994. RAFT/RAPR and Centering: AComparison and Discussion of Problems Related to Processing ComplexSentences. Computational Linguistics, 20, pp.301-317.

Tang, C.-C. Jane. 1989. Chinese Reflexives. Natural Language and LinguisticTheory, 7, pp.93-121.

Toman, Jindrich. 1991. Anaphors in Binary Trees: an Analysis of CzechReflexives. In Jan Koster and Eric Reuland. eds. 1991a, pp.151-171.

UCREL. 1998. The UCREL Anaphoric Annotation Scheme. University Centre forComputer Corpus Researchon Language. University of Lancaster.http://www.comp.lancs.ac.uk/computing/research/ucrel/annotaion.htm.

Uszkoreit, Hans. 1986. Categorial Unification Grammar. In Proceedings, 11thInternational Conference on Computational Linguistics (COLING96),pp.187-194.

Uszkoreit, Hans. 1990. Unification in Linguistics. Leuven: 2nd European SummerSchool on Language, Logic, and Information. Course Notes.

Uszkoreit, Hans. 1991. Strategies for Adding Control Information to DeclarativeGrammars. In Proceedings, 26th Annual Meeting of the Association forComputational Linguistics (ACL91), pp.237-245.

Uszkoreit, Hans. 1993. Recent Developments in Unification-Based NaturalLanguage Parsing. Utrecht: 5th European Summer School on Language,Logic, and Information. Course Notes.

Uszkoreit, Hans. 1996. A Note on the Essence of HPSG and its Role i nComputational Linguistics. In Hans Uszkoreit’s homepage.http://www.coli.uni-sb.de/~hansu/.

Bibliography

422

Vilain, M., J. Burger, J. Aberden, D. Connoly and L. Hirschman. 1996. A Model-theoretic Coreference Scoring Scheme. In Proceedings of MUC-6. MorganKaufmann, pp 45-52.Walker, Marilyn. 1996. Limited Attention andDiscourse Structure. In Computational Linguistics, 22, pp.255-264.

Walker, Marilyn. 1998. Centering, Anaphora Resolution, and Discourse Structure.In Walker, Joshi, and Prince. eds. 1998a, pp.401-436.

Walker, Marilyn, Aravind Joshi, and Ellen Prince. eds. 1998a. Centering InDiscourse. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Walker, Marilyn, Aravind Joshi, and Ellen Prince. 1998b. Centering in NaturallyOccurring Discourse: An Overview. In Walker, Joshi and Prince. eds.1998a, pp. 1-30.Wang, J-H. 1990. Ziji - A Chinese Long-Distance Anaphor.Unpublished manuscript. Carnegie Mellon University.

Webber, Bonnie. 1982a. So What Can We Talk about Now?. In M. Brady and R .Berwick. eds. Computational Models of Discourse. Cambridge MA: MITPress, pp.331-371.

Webber, Bonnie. 1982b. Discourse Model Synthesis: Preliminaries to Reference. InAravind Joshi, Bonnie Webber and Ivan Sag. eds. Elements of DiscourseUnderstanding. Chap.13, pp.283-299.

Webber, Bonnie. 1988. Discourse Deixis: Reference to Discourse Segments. InProceedings, 26th Annual Meeting of the Association for ComputationalLinguistics, pp.113-122.

Williams, Sandra, Mark Harvey and Keith Preston. 1996. Rule-based ReferenceResolution for Unrestricted Text Using Part-of-Speech Tagging and NounPhrase Parsing. In Botley et al. eds. 1996, pp.441-455.

Xue, Ping, Carl Pollard, and Ivan Sag. 1994. A New Perspective on Chinese Ziji. InProceedings of the West Coast Conference on Formal Linguistics, 13.Stanford: CSLI- Centre for the Study of Language and InformationPublications.

Zaefferer. Dietmar. ed. 1991. Semantic Universals and Universal Semantics.Berlin: Foris.

Zribi-Hertz, Anne. 1980. Coréférences et Pronoms Réfléchis: Notes sur le Contrastelui/lui-même en Français. Lingvisticae Investigationes. 5, pp.131-179.

Zribi-Hertz, Anne. 1989. Anaphor Binding and Narrative Point of View: EnglishReflexive Pronouns in Sentence and Discourse. Language. 65, pp.695-727.

Index of Names

Aberden, J., 59, 60, 62, 63Akmajian, Adrian, 48Alshawi, Hiyan, 42Aone, Chinatsu, 68Arka, I Wayan, 115, 116Asher, Nicholas, 30, 39, 40, 41, 47, 53, 54, 89,

176, 193A-Subject principle, 117Attentional Transitions in Centering

Theory, 75Azzam, Saliha, 68, 82, 87Bach, Emmon, 97, 236Backofen, Rolf, 222, 232, 263, 265, 269Bagga, Amit, 60, 61, 71Bahasa, 117Baldwin, Breck, 60, 61, 64, 71Balinese, 115, 116, 125Barwise, Jon, 147, 195Becker Tilman, 222, 232, 263, 265, 269Beckwith, Richard, 66Belguith, Lamia, 48, 56, 68Berg, J., 70BFP Algorithm for Centering Theory, 76Binding constraints, 145, 153, 154, 155Binding Domains Principle

clause I, 250clause II, 251clause III, 252

Binding Theory, 104, 145, 221BNF of ProFIT terms, 270

Boguraev, Branimir, 64Bolc, Leonard, 263, 269Borsley, Robert, 107Bosch, Peter, 302Branco, António, 102, 321Bredenkamp, Andrew, 221Brennan, Susan, 76, 78Bresnan, Joan, 105, 232Brew, Chris, 66, 67, 206Brito, Ana Maria, 131Brown, Ralf, 39, 40, 42, 47, 49, 51, 66, 82Burger, J., 59, 60, 62, 63Burger, John, 54Calder, Jo, 222, 232, 263, 265, 269Cantrall, William, 100Capstick, Joanne, 222, 232, 263, 265, 269Carbonell, Jaime, 39, 40, 41, 47, 49, 51, 66Chambers, Craig, 48, 85, 86Charniak, Eugene, 57Chierchia, Gennaro, 46, 47, 177, 259Chinese, 69, 118, 125, 129, 136, 139, 140, 142,

143, 144, 306Chomsky, Noam, 97, 104, 129, 187, 222, 223,

225, 226, 228, 229, 234, 235, 289,292

Chomsky's algorithm for binding, 223Cole, Peter, 129, 139Comrie, Bernard, 106, 305Connoly, Denis, 59, 60, 62, 63Connoly, Dennis, 54

Index of Names

424

Constraints of Centering Theory, 74Cooper, Robin, 147, 177, 194, 195, 218Correa, Nelson, 224, 225, 226, 228, 229, 233,

234, 237, 238, 252COSUBCAT Principle, 253Crouch, Richard, 177, 194, 195Crysmann, Berthold, 281Cunningham, H., 49, 66Czech, 141Dagan, Ido, 48, 57Dale, Robert, 306Dalrymple, Mary, 95, 120, 221, 230, 231,

233, 234Day, David, 54Di Eugenio, Barbara, 84Dini, Luca, 222, 232, 263, 265, 269Donnellan, Keith, 131Dopkins, Stephen, 308Dörre, Jochen, 222, 232, 263, 265, 269Dowty, David, 47DRT Construction Rule for pronouns, 180,

189Elworthy, David, 195English, 27, 44, 51, 52, 66, 68, 69, 95, 101,

104, 113, 123, 125, 130, 131, 134,137, 140, 160, 203, 217, 246, 269,274, 304, 306, 345

Erbach, Gregor, 222, 232, 263, 265, 269, 270,277

Erman, L., 42Eschenbach, Carola, 243Estival, Dominique, 222, 232, 263, 265, 269Evans

Gareth, 199Evans, Gareth, 162, 195Fellbaum, Christiane, 66Finnish, 139, 140Fong, Sandiway, 224Fox, Chris , 177, 194, 195, 218Francez, N., 70, 177, 199, 200, 201Francez, Nissim, 70, 177, 199, 200, 201Frank, Anette, 107, 216, 218, 219, 241, 248,

274Frege, Gotlob, 24Freitas, Sérgio, 199French, 68, 138, 139, 140Friedman, Marilyn, 76, 78Gaizauskas, Robert, 49, 56, 66, 67, 68, 87Garnham, Alan, 49, 89, 303Gawron, Jean Mark, 186, 187

Gazdar, Gerald, 237Ge, Nyiu, 57Geach, Peter, 175Genabith, Joseph, 265General format for phase quantification,

150Giorgi, Alessandra, 131, 138, 165, 225Givón, T, 310Godard, Daniele, 107Gray, William, 316Greene, Steven, 81, 89Grishman, Ralph, 59Groenendijk, Jeroen, 70Gross, Derek, 66Grosz, Barbara, 25, 72, 74, 75GSI(R,pt), 150Gundel, Jeanette, 81, 299, 300, 301, 308, 310Habel, Christopher, 243Hahn, Udo, 51, 80Hajime Wada, 39Hale, John, 57Hankamer, Jorge, 30, 175Harper, Mary, 182Harvey, Mark, 64Hedberg, Nancy, 81, 308, 310Heim, Irene, 175, 199, 201Hellan, Lars, 96, 120Henadeerage, Kumara, 134, 135Herbert Leass, 42Herweg, Michael, 243Higginbotham, James, 101Hindi, 117Hintikka, Jaakko, 131Hirschman, L., 59, 60, 62, 63Hitzeman, Janet, 79, 80Hobbs, Jerry, 43, 65Huang, C.-C. James, 129Humphreys, Kevin, 49, 56, 66, 67, 68, 87Hungarian, 141Icelandic, 96, 112, 113, 139, 140, 141ID Schema 0, 249Iida, Masayo, 113, 114, 115im Walde, Sabine, 66, 67, 206Indo-European languages, 306Ingria, Robert, 224, 225, 226Itai, Alon, 48, 57Italian, 84, 131, 138Jackendoff, Ray, 48, 97Japanese, 108, 113, 115, 116, 117, 125, 306Jaspars, Jan, 177, 194, 195, 218

Index of Names

425

Johnson, Mark, 226, 227, 228, 229, 230, 231,232, 233, 234, 237, 238, 239, 259

Johnson's algorithm for binding, 227Joshi, Aravind, 72, 74Kameyama, Megumi, 65, 82Kamp, Hans, 29, 30, 174, 175, 176, 177, 179,

181, 184, 187, 194, 195, 196, 198,218

Kaplan, Ronald, 230, 232Kay, Martin, 209Keenan, Edward, 106, 305Kennedy, Christopher, 64Klein four-group, 316Klein, Ewan, 237, 259, 316Koening, Jean-Pierre, 234Korean, 117Koster, Jan, 141Krysztof, Czuba, 263, 269Kuhn, Steve, 72Kuno, Susumo, 94, 99, 100, 303Kup´s´c, Anna, 263, 269Lango, 117, 118Lappin, Shalom, 42, 43, 47, 50, 54, 56, 57, 64,

65, 177, 199, 200, 201Lascarides, Alex, 193Lasnik, Howard, 94, 103, 106Leass, Herbert, 57Lebeaux, David, 102Levinson, Stephen, 30, 103, 304Lima, Vera, 42Link, Godehard, 158, 199, 243Litman, Diane, 83London, P., 30Lopes, José, 199Lund, K., 67LuperFoy, Susann, 39, 40, 41, 42, 47, 53, 54,

55, 66Malayalam, 117Manandhar, Suresh, 222, 232, 263, 265, 269Manning, Christopher, 107, 108, 109, 110,

111, 112, 113, 114, 115, 117, 125Manzini, Rita, 95, 96, 138Marácz, Laszlo, 141Marciniak, Malgorzata, 263, 269Markantonatou, Stella, 265Maxwell, John, 232McCord, Michael, 43McKee, Douglas, 68McKoon, Gail, 81, 89Merlo, Paola, 238

Michael Strube, 51, 80, 82, 88, 89Miller, George, 66Miller, Katherine, 66Mineur, Anne-Marie, 222, 232, 263, 265, 269Mitkov, Ruslan, 43, 44, 47, 48, 49, 52, 54, 55,

56, 63, 64, 68Mukai, Kuniaki, 177, 194, 195, 218Mykowiecka, Agnieszka, 263, 269Neale, Stephen, 199Neidle, Carol, 230Netter, Klaus, 209Nordlie, Johanna, 308Norvig, P., 42Norwegian, 120, 123, 125, 140, 141O-binding, 104Obliqueness-command (o-command), 98Oepen, Stephan, 222, 232, 263, 265, 269O-freeness, 104Okumura, Manabu, 82Oliva, Karel, 283, 349O'Neil, Peter, 113, 114, 115Ostertag, Gary, 184Palmer, Frank, 117Paraboni, Ivandré, 42Parsons, Terence, 146Partee, Barbara, 97, 236Passoneau, Rebecca, 83Pereira, Fernando, 237, 271Perlmutter, David, 94Perry, John, 177, 194, 195, 218Peters, Stanley, 186, 187Phase Pr , 152Pianesi, Fabio, 165, 225Piatelli -Palmarini, Massimo, 316Pinkal, Manfred, 177, 194, 195Poesio, Massimo, 58, 66, 67, 70, 79, 80, 177,

193, 194, 195, 206, 218Pollard, Carl, 43, 76, 78, 94, 97, 98, 99, 101,

104, 107, 108, 111, 119, 137, 142,209, 216, 217, 218, 219, 220, 222,226, 234, 237, 240, 241, 242, 243,273, 274, 292

Popescu-Belis, Andrei, 68Portuguese, 44, 51, 69, 101, 104, 121, 122,

123, 125, 130, 134, 135, 136, 137,138, 139, 140, 143, 169, 203, 231,246, 269, 273, 274, 278, 281, 292,296, 297, 307, 321, 322, 345

Preston, Keith, 64Prince, Ellen, 72, 74

Index of Names

426

Principle Z, 119, 143Progovac, Ljiljana, 129Przepiórkowski, Adam, 263, 269Pullum, Geoffrey, 237Pulman, Stephen, 177, 194, 195, 218QA, 153

QB, 154

QC, 155

Quine, Willard, 17QZ, 155

Ratcliff, Roger, 81, 89Rehkämper, Klaus, 243Reinhart, Tanya, 97, 103, 173, 175, 203Reiter, Ehud, 306, 307Reuland, Eric, 138, 141, 173, 221Reyle, Uwe, 107, 174, 176, 177, 179, 181,

184, 187, 195, 196, 198, 216, 218,219, 241, 248, 274

Ribak, Amnon, 57Rich, Elaine, 39, 40, 41, 42, 47, 53, 54, 55, 65Rico Pérez, C., 54Roberts, Craige, 74Rules of Centering Theory, 75Russel, S., 42Russian, 117Sadler, Louisa, 265Safir, Ken, 99, 123, 124Sag, Ivan, 30, 43, 94, 97, 98, 99, 101, 104,

107, 108, 109, 110, 111, 112, 113,114, 115, 117, 119, 125, 137, 142,175, 209, 216, 217, 218, 219, 220,221, 222, 226, 234, 237, 240, 241,242, 243, 273, 274, 292

Salton, G., 59Satta, Giorgio, 165, 225Sells, Peter, 99, 112Semantics Principle, 219, 248Shieber, Stuart, 209, 271Sidner, Candace, 25, 28, 72, 75Sinhala, 134, 135Smyth, Ronald, 48, 85, 86Soames, Scott, 94sort anaph, 242

sort binding, 242Stallard, David, 224, 225, 226Steenbergen, Marlies van, 139Stokhof, Martin, 70Stollwerck, Linda, 308Strand, Kjetil, 193Strube, Michael, 51, 80, 82, 88, 89Stuckardt, Roland, 165Stys, Malgorzata, 48, 56, 68Sundheim, Beth, 59Tamoura, Kouji, 82Tang, C.-C. Jane, 129, 136Tannenhaus, Michael, 73ter Meulen, Alice, 24Teufel, Simone, 66, 67, 206Toba Batak, 108, 109, 112, 113, 114, 115,

116, 125Toman, Jindrich, 141Uszkoreit, Hans, 208, 209, 222, 232, 263, 265,

269van Benthem, Johan, 24, 315, 316van der Lely, Heather, 308van Eijck, Jan, 29, 30, 174, 175, 176, 177,

179, 184, 194, 195, 218van Genabith, Josef, 177, 194, 195, 218van Noordt, Gertjan, 222, 232, 263, 265, 269Veltman, Frank, 70Verhagen, Mark, 265Vestre, Espen, 177, 194, 195, 218Vieira, Renata, 58, 66, 67, 193, 206Vietnamese, 106, 304Vilain, M., 59, 60, 62, 63Wakao, T., 49, 66Walker, Marilyn, 72, 74, 80, 83, 87, 89Wang, J.-H., 139, 144Webber, Bonnie, 31, 74, 175Wechsler, Stephen, 115, 116Weinstein, Scott, 72, 74Wexler, Kenneth, 95, 96, 138Wilks, Y., 49, 66Williams, Sandra, 64Xue, Ping, 69, 119, 142, 143, 144Zacharski, Ron, 81, 308, 310Zribi -Hertz, Anne, 99, 100, 138

Index of Languages







143, 144, 306Chomsky, Noam, 97, 104, 129, 187, 222, 223,

225, 226, 228, 229, 234, 235, 289,292


Index of Languages

428





104, 113, 123, 125, 130, 131, 134,137, 140, 160, 203, 217, 246, 269,274, 304, 306, 345

Erbach, Gregor, 222, 232, 263, 265, 269, 270,277


Gareth, 199Evans, Gareth, 162, 195Fellbaum, Christiane, 66Finnish, 139, 140Fong, Sandiway, 224Fox, Chris, 177, 194, 195, 218Francez, N., 70, 177, 199, 200, 201Francez, Nissim, 70, 177, 199, 200, 201Frank, Anette, 107, 216, 218, 219, 241, 248,




Index of Languages

429

Johnson, Mark, 226, 227, 228, 229, 230, 231,232, 233, 234, 237, 238, 239, 259


181, 184, 187, 194, 195, 196, 198,218







193, 194, 195, 206, 218Pollard, Carl, 43, 76, 78, 94, 97, 98, 99, 101,

104, 107, 108, 111, 119, 137, 142,209, 216, 217, 218, 219, 220, 222,226, 234, 237, 240, 241, 242, 243,273, 274, 292


123, 125, 130, 134, 135, 136, 137,138, 139, 140, 143, 169, 203, 231,246, 269, 273, 274, 278, 281, 292,296, 297, 307, 321, 322, 345


Index of Languages

430


QB, 154

QC, 155



184, 187, 195, 196, 198, 216, 218,219, 241, 248, 274


107, 108, 109, 110, 111, 112, 113,114, 115, 117, 119, 125, 137, 142,175, 209, 216, 217, 218, 219, 220,221, 222, 226, 234, 237, 240, 241,242, 243, 273, 274, 292






Index of Definitions







143, 144, 306Chomsky, Noam, 97, 104, 129, 187, 222, 223,

225, 226, 228, 229, 234, 235, 289,292


Index of Languages

432





104, 113, 123, 125, 130, 131, 134,137, 140, 160, 203, 217, 246, 269,274, 304, 306, 345

Erbach, Gregor, 222, 232, 263, 265, 269, 270,277


Gareth, 199Evans, Gareth, 162, 195Fellbaum, Christiane, 66Finnish, 139, 140Fong, Sandiway, 224Fox, Chris, 177, 194, 195, 218Francez, N., 70, 177, 199, 200, 201Francez, Nissim, 70, 177, 199, 200, 201Frank, Anette, 107, 216, 218, 219, 241, 248,




Index of Languages

433

Johnson, Mark, 226, 227, 228, 229, 230, 231,232, 233, 234, 237, 238, 239, 259


181, 184, 187, 194, 195, 196, 198,218







193, 194, 195, 206, 218Pollard, Carl, 43, 76, 78, 94, 97, 98, 99, 101,

104, 107, 108, 111, 119, 137, 142,209, 216, 217, 218, 219, 220, 222,226, 234, 237, 240, 241, 242, 243,273, 274, 292


123, 125, 130, 134, 135, 136, 137,138, 139, 140, 143, 169, 203, 231,246, 269, 273, 274, 278, 281, 292,296, 297, 307, 321, 322, 345


Index of Languages

434


QB, 154

QC, 155



184, 187, 195, 196, 198, 216, 218,219, 241, 248, 274


107, 108, 109, 110, 111, 112, 113,114, 115, 117, 119, 125, 137, 142,175, 209, 216, 217, 218, 219, 220,221, 222, 226, 234, 237, 240, 241,242, 243, 273, 274, 292






bibliography - ulisboaahb/diss/referenceprocessing9.pdfbibliography 394 appelt, douglas, amichai...

Documents