beyond belly aches - kellogg's nutrition healthcare ... · cho definitions chemical mono-,...
TRANSCRIPT
Joanne Slavin, PhD, RD University of Minnesota
Beyond Belly Aches: The implementation of FODMAPs
in clinical practice
Nutritional Solutions CNE, South Africa
- 11 April 2013 -
© Copyright of Kellogg Company of South Africa (Pty) Ltd. All rights to this website are owned by or controlled for these purposes by
Kellogg Company of South Africa (Pty) Ltd and the material contained herein is intended to be used by registered users for the purposes
of the practice of Nutrition and Dietetics only. Unregistered users are not authorised to copy, reproduce, republish, download, post,
broadcast or transmit any material contained herein in any way of whatsoever without written consent of the copyright owner. 2013.
Outline
1. Introduction
2. Definitions
3. Examples of FODMAPs
4. Benefits of FODMAPs
5. FODMAPs as prebiotics
6. Research limitations
7. Tolerance to FODMAPs
8. FODMAPs and IBS
9. Conclusions
1. Introduction
Introduction
Gibson PR, Shepherd SJ. Am J Gastro 2012; 107: 659
2. Definitions
CHO definitions
Chemical Mono-, di-, oligo-, polysaccharides
Nutritional Absorbable
Digestible
Fermentable
Non-fermentable
Physiological Low-glycaemic, non-glycaemic
A wide range of characteristics…
Fermentable CHO
• Incompletely digested and partially
absorbed in small intestine
- Bonds resistant to digestive enzymes
• Fermented by bacteria in large intestine
- Short Chain Fatty Acids (SCFAs)
- Gases such as H2, CH4, CO2
• And/or excreted in faeces
FODMAPs
Acronym that stands for
Fermentable Oligo-, Di-, and Monosaccharides, And Polyols (FODMAP) Term coined in 2005 by Australian researchers who theorize that foods containing these carbohydrates worsen symptoms of digestive disorders: Irritable Bowel Syndrome (IBS) and Inflammatory Bowel Disease (IBD)
Gibson PR, Shepherd SJ. Aliment Pharmacol Ther 2005; 21: 1399 - 1409
Classifications
Four categories of Fermentable Carbohydrates
1. Oligosaccharides Fructo-oligosaccharides (FOS)
Galacto-oligosaccharides (GOS)
2. Dissacharides Lactose
3. Monosaccharides Fructose
4. Polyols Sorbitol, mannitol, xylitol
Absorption
1. Oligosaccharides Can’t digest chemical bond
2. Dissacharides Lactose in lactose intolerant
Lactulose because beta bond can’t be split
3. Monosaccharides Free fructose is slowly absorbed when consumed
alone
4. Polyols Incompletely absorbed
FODMAPs have different absorptive patterns and physiological effects and shouldn’t be grouped together
3. Examples of FODMAPs
Oligosaccharides
FOS or Fructans
• Degree of polymerisation (DP): 2 – 9 units
• Inulin: DP > 10 units
• Isolated sources of FOS / inulin
- Chicory root, Jerusalem artichoke
• Food sources of FOS / inulin
- Peach, watermelon, Jerusalem artichoke, brussels sprouts, fennel, garlic, leek, onion, wheat, rye, barley, legumes, lentils, chickpeas
Oligosaccharides
Other Oligosaccharides
• GOS
- Found in human milk
- Isolated and added to infant formula and other foods
• Stachyose, raffinose, verbascose
- Found naturally in legumes
- Efforts to remove because of
intestinal gas concerns
Dissacharides
• Lactose: glucose + galactose
• Only a FODMAP when there is insufficient intestinal lactase activity
• Lactase deficiency more common in certain ethnicities
- Asian, Hispanic, African American
• Highest lactose exposure from milk
- Also found in ice-cream, yoghurt , custard, soft cheeses
- Studies show that yoghurt is better tolerated in many
Monossacharides
• Free fructose
• Simple sugar and requires no digestion
• When consumed in higher quantities than glucose, absorption is impaired and malabsorption may occur
• Can be purchased and added to foods and drinks – low glycaemic
• Foods naturally high in fructose include:
- Apple, pear, mango, cherry, watermelon, asparagus,
Jerusalem artichokes, sugarsnap peas, honey
Polyols
• Examples of polyols
- Erythritol, xylitol, sorbitol, mannitol, lactitol, isomalt, maltitol,
polyglycitol syrup
• Slowly absorbed, only about a third absorbed
• Naturally occurring in
- Apples, pears, cherries, prunes, avocado, mushrooms
• Added to
- Sugar-free mints, chewing gum and sweets
4. Benefits of FODMAPs
Added to foods
• FODMAPs are used as sugar and fat replacers in:
- Hard sweets
- Chocolate
- Cookies and other baked goods
- Ice-cream
- Yoghurt
- Jams and preserves
- Chewing gum
Benefits
• Reduced energy value
- 1 – 3.5 kcal / g or 4.2 – 14.6 kJ / g (sucrose provides 17 kJ / g)
• Low glycaemic response
• Non-cariogenic
• Prebiotic effects
• Other potential health benefits
5. FODMAPs as prebiotics
Gut microbiota
Gut microbiota influence metabolism and body composition
Vrieze et al. Diabetologia 2010; 53: 606 - 613
Gut microbiota
• Low grade inflammation contributes to the development of
obesity
• Gut microflora alter energy metabolism
• Gut microflora play a role in immunity
Cani PD, Delzenne NM. Curr Phar Des 2009; 15: 1546 - 1558
Gut microbiota
• Some evidence suggests fibre fermentation in the gut provides
physiological benefits such as:
- Increased mineral absorption
- Stimulation of beneficial microbes (prebiotic)
- Decrease survival of pathogenic bacteria through reduction in pH
- Providing nourishment to colonocytes (SCFAs, butyrate) for increased
cell growth and maintenance
Slavin JL. J Am Diet Assoc 2008; 108: 1716 - 1731
Definition
“Prebiotics are non-digestible food ingredients that beneficially affect the host by selectively stimulating the growth and / or
activity of one or a limited number of bacteria in the colon and thus improve host health”
• Neither hydrolysed nor absorbed in the upper part of the GI tract
• Selective substrate for one or a limited number of beneficial bacteria
• Able to alter the colonic flora in favour of a healthier composition
Brownawell AM. J Nutr 2012; 142: 962 - 974
Prebiotics
• Not an accepted in vitro method to determine ‘Prebiotic Index’
• Only FOS and GOS qualify
Roberfroid M. J Nutr 2007; 137: 830S-837S
Prebiotics
Figueroa-Gonzalez I et al. J Sci Food Agric 2011; 91: 1341
• The main candidates for prebiotic status are:
- Inulin
- FOS
- GOS
- Soy-oligosaccharides
- Xylo-oligosaccharides
- Isomalto-oligosaccharides
- Polydextrins
Prebiotics
• No prospective, cohort studies that link changes in microbiota
with health outcomes
- Faecal samples not collected in epidemiological studies
• Disagreement on how to quantitatively measure in human studies
• Prebiotic standard protocols needed
Brownawell AM, Caers W, Gibson GR, Kendall CW, Lewis KO, Ringel Y, Slavin JL. J Nutr 2012; 14(5): 962 - 974
Long term restriction of FODMAPs may lead to a decrease in prebiotic intake
6. Research Limitations
Faecal samples
Limitations to faecal samples
• Not practical in epidemiological studies
• No accepted standard
- Stool weights
- Stool chemistry
- Microflora – methods, what is best?
- Stool frequency – easy to collect
- Quality of life – used in IBS trials
Grabitske , Slavin JL Review Paper. Cr Rev Food Sci Nutr 2009; 49: 327 - 360
Side effects
Side effects of gut fermentation
• Abdominal pain / cramps
• Bloating
• Distention
• Flatulence / borborygmi
• Laxation
- Stool weights
- Stool chemistry
• Diarrhoea
Grabitske , Slavin JL Review Paper. Cr Rev Food Sci Nutr 2009; 49: 327 - 360
Methodology
Subjective methods
• Symptom questionnaires where subjects report the severity or intensity of GI
symptoms and frequency and consistency of bowel movements
• Need to define bloating, diarrhoea, flatulence and need to describe rating scale
• Vary greatly among studies / subjects
Grabitske , Slavin JL Review Paper. Cr Rev Food Sci Nutr 2009; 49: 327 - 360
Further to research limitations, FODMAP recommendations have mainly been based on clinical observations and not trials
7. Tolerance to FODMAPs
Factors Factors affecting the tolerance to FODMAPs
• FODMAP characteristics
• Diet
- Consumption pattern – amount, frequency, food / beverages
- Background FODMAPs
- Drug treatments – antibiotics, laxatives
• Host
- Age, gender, psyche, composition of microbiota, diseases, GI transit time, enzyme activity,
visceral sensitivity
Cummings et al. Brit J Nutr 2001; 85 (Suppl 1): S59-60
Assessment FODMAPs Assessment
Direct
• Objective
- Stool samples
- Anal gas
- Abdominal girth
• Subjective
- Questionnaires: symptoms, bowel movements, intensity
Grabitske , Slavin JL Review Paper. Cr Rev Food Sci Nutr 2009; 49: 327 - 360
Assessment FODMAPs Assessment
Indirect
• Malabsorption
- Intubation and ileostomy
- Breath hydrogen - fermentation
• Other
- Blood glucose, SCFAs
- Faecal pH, carbohydrates
Grabitske , Slavin JL Review Paper. Cr Rev Food Sci Nutr 2009; 49: 327 - 360
Results Wide range of study characteristics
• Protocol
- FODMAPs in foods, beverages, tablets and gum
- Fasted and non-fasted conditions
- Meal / snack replacement or with meal / snack
- Adapted or unadapted
- Background FODMAPs – low to high
• Measurement of endpoints
- Stool collections
- Questionnaires, diaries or interviews - description of effects, intensity (none to severe, normal to considerably
more than usual, acceptable)
Grabitske , Slavin JL Review Paper. Cr Rev Food Sci Nutr 2009; 49: 327 - 360
Tolerance data Summary of tolerance data
Dietary fibre Up to 80 g / day in vegetarians
No upper limit
Polydextrose 50 g / day
FOS 10 – 15 g / day
Diarrhoea at 40 g / day
Fructose Tolerance problems when fed in isolation
Sugar alcohols No effect dose – 20 – 50 g / day
Laxation threshold – 50 – 70 g / day
Grabitske , Slavin JL Review Paper. Cr Rev Food Sci Nutr 2009; 49: 327 - 360
Tolerance data
Bonnema et al. J Am Diet Assoc 2010; 110: 865 - 868
GI tolerance of chicory inulin products
• Fed short (oligofructose) and long chain inulin to human subjects
at breakfast (n=26)
- 5 g well tolerated
- 10 g of short chain increased GI symptoms compared to control
- Most frequently reported symptoms were flatulence followed by
bloating
8. FODMAPs and IBS
IBS
• IBS is a common chronic GI disorder that involves problems with
motility and sensitivity
• Experience pain, bloating, irregular bowel pattern including
constipation, diarrhoea, resulting in decreased quality of life
• Affects 20% of women in North America
- Recommendation to reduce FODMAPs
Gibson PR, Shepherd SJ. Am J Gastro 2012; 107: 657 - 666
Dietary strategy
Gibson PR, Shepherd SJ. Am J Gastro 2012; 107: 662
Dietary strategy
Gibson PR, Shepherd SJ. Am J Gastro 2012; 107: 662
IBS
Symptom response with low FODMAP diet vs. standard IBS diet
• Compared symptoms between standard IBS dietary advice (n=39) vs. low FODMAP
(n=43)
• More in FODMAP group (76%) than standard diet (54%) were satisfied with
symptoms
• FODMAP group had less bloating, abdominal pain and flatulence than standard diet
Staudacher et al. J Hum Nutr Diet 2011; 24: 487 - 495
FODMAPs may increase adverse symptoms in patients with IBS
IBS
Fermentable carbohydrate restriction reduced Bifidobacteria and
symptoms in IBS
• Randomised controlled trial in IBS patients
• Intervention group were asked to reduced fructans (wheat, onions), GOS (legumes),
polyols (pears, sugar-free gum), lactose (milk) and excess fructose (honey)
• Symptoms improved in intervention group but Bifidobacteria in faeces was
significantly less
Staudacher et al. J Nutr 2012; 142: 1510 - 1518
Restriction of FODMAPs could result in reduced prebiotic intake, affecting beneficial gut flora
9. Conclusions
Conclusions
• FODMAPs may increase adverse GI symptoms in patients with
IBS
• Concerns with the FODMAP concept
- Recommendations based on clinical observations, not research trials
- Efficacy of FODMAP concept not documented
- Grouping of all FODMAPs together, although perhaps easier for the
patient, ignores physiological differences among FODMAPs
Conclusions
• Safety of long term FODMAP restriction has not been reported
and such dietary restrictions could decrease consumption of:
- Prebiotics (oligosaccharides)
- Low GI carbohydrate foods (fructose)
- Nutrient-rich foods (dairy)
- Low energy foods (polyols)
Evidence base
Gibson PR, Shepherd SJ. Am J Gastro 2012; 107: 663
References Bonnema et al. J Am Diet Assoc 2010; 110: 865 - 868
Brownawell AM. J Nutr 2012; 142: 962 – 974
Brownawell AM, Caers W, Gibson GR, Kendall CW, Lewis KO, Ringel Y, Slavin JL. J Nutr 2012; 14(5): 962 - 974
Cani PD, Delzenne NM. Curr Phar Des 2009; 15: 1546 – 1558
Cummings et al. Brit J Nutr 2001; 85 (Suppl 1): S59-60
Figueroa-Gonzalez et al. J Sci Food Agric 2011; 91: 1341
Gibson PR, Shepherd SJ. Am J Gastro 2012; 107:657 - 666
Gibson PR, Shepherd SJ. Aliment Pharmacol Ther 2005; 21: 1399 – 1409
Grabitske , Slavin JL Review Paper. Cr Rev Food Sci Nutr 2009; 49: 327 - 360
Marcason W. J Acad Nutr Diet 2012; 1696
Roberfroid M. J Nutr 2007; 137: 830S – 837S
Slavin JL. J Am Diet Assoc 2008; 108: 1716 – 1731
Staudacher et al. J Hum Nutr Diet 2011; 24: 487 – 495
Staudacher et al. J Nutr 2012; 142: 1510 - 1518
Vrieze et al. Diabetologia 2010; 53: 606 - 613
Thank you