Vol.:(0123456789)1 3

International Journal of Clinical Oncology (2019) 24:103–114 https://doi.org/10.1007/s10147-018-1319-y

ORIGINAL ARTICLE

Bevacizumab combined with platinum–taxane chemotherapy as first-line treatment for advanced ovarian cancer: a prospective observational study of safety and efficacy in Japanese patients (JGOG3022 trial)

Shinichi Komiyama1  · Kazuyoshi Kato2 · Yuki Inokuchi3 · Hirokuni Takano4 · Takashi Matsumoto5 · Atsushi Hongo6 · Mikiko Asai‑Sato7 · Atsushi Arakawa8 · Shoji Kamiura9 · Tsutomu Tabata10 · Nobuhiro Takeshima2 · Toru Sugiyama11

Received: 5 June 2018 / Accepted: 17 July 2018 / Published online: 20 July 2018 © The Author(s) 2018

AbstractBackground This was the first large-scale prospective observational Japanese study evaluating the safety and efficacy of bevacizumab combined with paclitaxel and carboplatin for newly diagnosed advanced ovarian cancer.Methods Patients were prospectively enrolled in the primary analysis cohort if they had Stage III or IV epithelial ovarian/fallopian tube/primary peritoneal cancer and were scheduled to receive paclitaxel plus carboplatin every 3 weeks in Cycles 1–6 and bevacizumab every 3 weeks in Cycles 2–22. Primary endpoints were bevacizumab-specific adverse events and adverse events ≥ Grade 3. Secondary endpoints were progression-free survival (PFS) and the response rate.Results Among 346 patients enrolled, 293 patients formed the primary analysis cohort. Regarding bevacizumab-specific adverse events ≥ grade 3, incidence rates of thromboembolic events (1.4%), gastrointestinal perforation (0.3%), fistula (0.7%), wound dehiscence (0%), and bleeding (0%) were very low. While incidence rates of hypertension (23.2%) and proteinuria (12.6%) were high, all such events were tolerable. No patient with prior bowel resection developed perforation or fistula. Median PFS was 16.3 months (95% CI 14.5–18.9). The response rate was 77.5% (95% CI 67.4–85.7). The response rate was 63.6% in patients with clear cell carcinoma, which tended to be better than previously reported. The median platinum-free interval was 11.5 months, and the platinum-resistant recurrence rate was 24.5%.Conclusions Combining bevacizumab with chemotherapy was tolerable and efficacy was acceptable in Japanese patients with advanced epithelial ovarian cancer. Bevacizumab seems to reduce platinum-resistant recurrence and is promising for clear cell carcinoma.

Keywords Advanced epithelial ovarian cancer · First-line chemotherapy · Bevacizumab · Paclitaxel plus carboplatin · Platinum-free interval

* Shinichi Komiyama shinkomiyama@gmail.com

1 Department of Gynecology, Toho University Ohashi Medical Center, 2-17-6, Meguro-ku, Tokyo 153-8515, Japan

2 Department of Gynecology, Cancer Institute Hospital, Tokyo, Japan

3 Department of Biostatistics, Kitasato Academic Research Organization, Kitasato University, Tokyo, Japan

4 Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, The Jikei University Kashiwa Hospital, Kashiwa, Japan

5 Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Ehime University School of Medicine, Matsuyama, Japan

6 Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology 2, Kawasaki Medical School, Okayama, Japan

7 Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Yokohama City University School of Medicine, Yokohama, Japan

8 Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Nagoya City University Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Nagoya, Japan

9 Department of Gynecologic Oncology, Osaka International Cancer Institute, Osaka, Japan

10 Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Mie University Faculty of Medicine, Tsu, Japan

11 Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Iwate Medical University, Morioka, Japan

104 International Journal of Clinical Oncology (2019) 24:103–114

1 3

Introduction

In Japan, it is estimated that 9804 new patients develop ovarian cancer every year and the estimated annual num-ber of deaths from this cancer is 4758, with its outcome being the worst among female genital tract cancers [1]. The underlying reasons are that about 90% of ovarian cancer is epithelial carcinoma, with approximately 50% of epithelial ovarian cancers being Stage III or Stage IV advanced disease at diagnosis [2].

Standard treatment for epithelial ovarian cancer (includ-ing fallopian tube cancer and primary peritoneal cancer) is doublet taxane plus platinum therapy. Various new drugs have been developed to improve the outcome of patients with advanced epithelial ovarian cancer. The molecular-targeting agent bevacizumab is a recombinant humanized monoclonal antibody directed against human vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF). Bevacizumab inhibits VEGF signaling by blocking the binding of VEGF to its receptors and reduces tumor growth by suppressing angiogenesis in tumor tissues. Two randomized controlled studies (GOG-0218 and ICON7) have shown that combining bevacizumab with paclitaxel and carboplatin as first-line therapy followed by maintenance bevacizumab monotherapy significantly prolongs the pro-gression-free survival time in patients with advanced epi-thelial ovarian cancer [3, 4]. In Japan, based on the results of the GOG-0218 study, bevacizumab was approved for advanced ovarian cancer in November 2013.

However, bevacizumab has various specific adverse effects, including gastrointestinal perforation and thrombo-embolism, and management of such adverse events is impor-tant when treating ovarian cancer [3, 4]. It was recently reported that there are racial differences in the safety and efficacy of cytotoxic anticancer drugs and molecular-target-ing agents, with the differences seeming larger for molecu-lar-targeting agents [5–8]. While there is concern about such racial differences for bevacizumab, there have not been any reports about use of bevacizumab in Asian patients with ovarian cancer, including Japanese patients. Therefore, we performed the present study to evaluate the safety and effi-cacy of bevacizumab combined with standard treatment using paclitaxel and carboplatin in Japanese patients who had advanced epithelial ovarian cancer.

Materials and methods

Patients

The subjects were Japanese patients aged 20 years old or older who met the following inclusion criteria: (1)

patients with a diagnosis of International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) Stage III/IV epithelial ovarian cancer/fallopian tube cancer/primary peritoneal cancer based on the findings at initial debulking surgery who were scheduled to receive first-line chemotherapy, or patients with Stage III/IV epithelial ovarian cancer/fallo-pian tube cancer/primary peritoneal cancer by cytological diagnosis or histological and imaging diagnosis who had undergone interval debulking surgery after neoadjuvant chemotherapy and were scheduled to receive postoperative chemotherapy, (2) patients who gave informed consent to platinum-based combination chemotherapy and concomi-tant bevacizumab, (3) patients in whom the period from primary debulking surgery (PDS) or interval debulking surgery (IDS) to the initiation of bevacizumab was at least 28 days, (4) patients with an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status of 0–2, (5) patients with adequate function of the bone marrow and major organs, and (6) patients who gave written informed consent to participation in this study.

Major exclusion criteria were as follows: (1) patients with a history of bevacizumab treatment, (2) patients with gastro-intestinal perforation or fistula, (3) patients who had received abdominal radiotherapy, (4) patients with severe infectious complications, (5) patients with uncontrolled hypertension, (6) patients with arterial thromboembolism (e.g., cerebral infarction or myocardial infarction), (7) patients with venous thromboembolism (e.g., deep vein thrombosis and/or pul-monary embolism), and (8) patients with proteinuria of 2+ or more.

All patients received written information about this study and submitted written consent before enrollment.

Study design

This was a single-arm, prospective, observational study, which was conducted in the setting of routine clinical prac-tice without any special interventions. Since the safety and efficacy of bevacizumab combined with chemotherapy have not been confirmed in Japanese patients with advanced ovar-ian cancer, dosage and administration, premedication, dose reduction/interruption/discontinuation, and examinations (including imaging studies) were all performed according to the GOG-0218 study in principle [3].

Patients who were scheduled to receive bevacizumab concomitantly with platinum-based combination chemo-therapy after PDS or IDS were included in the observa-tion cohort of this study before enrollment. After patients were enrolled, ineligible patients were excluded and all remaining patients were regarded as eligible patients. Of all eligible patients, patients who received at least one dose of bevacizumab were classified as treated patients. Of all treated patients, those who were scheduled to receive

105International Journal of Clinical Oncology (2019) 24:103–114

1 3

“bevacizumab throughout treatment” (as in the GOG-0218 study) were included in the primary analysis cohort. Specifically, they received paclitaxel (175 mg/m2) plus carboplatin [area under the curve (AUC) = 6 mg/mL/min] (paclitaxel plus carboplatin) every 3 weeks for cycles 1–6, with bevacizumab (15 mg/kg) being administered every 3 weeks for cycles 2–22. Patients who were enrolled but received bevacizumab concomitantly with chemotherapy other than paclitaxel plus carboplatin were also included in the exploratory analysis cohort (Fig. 1).

The primary endpoints were related to the safety of bevacizumab, including the incidence rates of bevaci-zumab-specific adverse events (gastrointestinal perfora-tion, fistula, delayed wound healing, bleeding, thromboem-bolism, hypertension, proteinuria, congestive heart failure, and reversible posterior encephalopathy syndrome) and the incidence rate of all adverse events ≥ Grade 3 in the primary analysis cohort. The secondary endpoints were related to efficacy, including the progression-free survival time (PFS) and the response rate in the primary analysis cohort. Exploratory endpoints were the incidence rates of important bevacizumab-specific adverse events and all adverse events ≥ Grade 3 in the exploratory analysis cohort.

Adverse events were evaluated according to the Com-mon Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) Version 4.03 [9] and the frequency of the most severe

grade of each event in each patient during all treatment cycles was calculated.

The tumor response and disease progression were evalu-ated by computed tomography (CT) or magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) according to the new Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumours (revised RECIST guideline, ver-sion 1.1) [10] by each investigator. Disease progression was not judged only from changes in the serum CA-125 level. PFS was calculated as the interval from the date of enroll-ment to the date of detecting progressive disease (PD) or the date of all-cause death (whichever was earlier). The response rate was calculated as the percentage of patients in the analysis cohort with a measurable lesion in whom the best overall response according to RECIST was a complete response (CR) or partial response (PR). The platinum-free interval (PFI) was defined as the period from the last date of administration of a platinum-containing drug to the date when disease progression was observed by imaging.

Statistical analysis

PFS and PFI were estimated using the Kaplan–Meier method. The standard error was calculated by the Green-wood formula, and the confidence interval of the median survival time was calculated with the method of Brookmeyer and Crowley. The confidence interval (CI) of the response rate was calculated using the Clopper–Pearson method.

Fig. 1 Flow chart for selection of the cohorts. The ineligible patients included three patients with venous thromboembolism, one patient with Stage IIB disease, and one patient with metastatic ovarian cancer (primary colon cancer). AUC area under the curve (mg/mL/min), q3w every 3 weeks

106 International Journal of Clinical Oncology (2019) 24:103–114

1 3

If 300 patients were available for analysis, it was cal-culated that there was a probability ≥ 95% of detecting at least one patient who had an adverse event with the true incidence rate of ≥ 1.0%. Therefore, 300 patients were enough to evaluate safety adequately. It was also assumed that PFS evaluated by the investigators in the present study would be similar to PFS in the bevacizumab throughout treatment group of the GOG-0218 study. Accordingly, if 300 patients were enrolled (with a dropout rate assumed to be 10%) and the enrollment period was 24 months, with the observation period being 12 months from the date of the enrolling the last patient, it was pre-dicted that about 160 PFS events would be observed and PFS could be estimated with sufficient accuracy that the 95% CI of the median PFS would be within ± 4 months of the actual median PFS. Therefore, the enrollment target for this study was set at 300 patients.

Statistical analyses were performed using SAS soft-ware (version 9.4 SAS Institute Inc., Cary, NC, USA).

This study was conducted in compliance with the Declaration of Helsinki and according to the “Japanese ethical guidelines for epidemiological studies”. The study protocol was approved by Institutional Review Boards of all participating medical facilities.

This study was registered with the University Hospi-tal Medical Information Network (UMIN) Clinical Trials Registry in Japan (UMIN000013164).

Results

From April 2014 to February 2016, 346 Japanese patients with advanced epithelial ovarian cancer/fallopian tube cancer/primary peritoneal cancer were enrolled at 79 member institutions of the Japanese Gynecologic Oncol-ogy Group (JGOG). Follow-up was terminated in Feb-ruary 2017 and data were locked in October 2017. Of the 346 patients enrolled, ineligible patients and patients who did not receive bevacizumab were excluded, and the remaining 333 patients were classified as treated patients. They were divided into the primary analysis cohort (n = 293) and the exploratory analysis cohort (n = 40) (Fig.  1). The reasons for discontinuation of bevacizumab at the time of data cut-off were completion of the planned treatment schedule (34.8%), progression of the primary disease (26.6%), serious adverse events (14.0%), refusal by the patient because of adverse events (5.5%), and refusal by the patient for reasons other than adverse events (3.8%). At data cut-off, bevacizumab was still being administered to 15.0% of the patients. Patient characteristics are listed in Table 1.

Safety

Adverse events in the primary analysis cohort included Grade 2, 3, and 4 hypertension (23.2, 22.9 and 0.3%, respectively), Grade 2 and 3 proteinuria (17.1 and 12.6%), Grade 2 bleeding (2.7%), Grade 2 and 3 thromboembolic events (1.0 and 1.4%), Grade 2 and 3 gastrointestinal perforation (0.3 and 0.3%), Grade 2 wound dehiscence (1.0%), and Grade 3 fistula (0.7%). The incidence rates of bleeding, thromboembolic events, gastrointestinal perforation, wound dehiscence, and fistula were lower in this study than in previous reports, while the incidence rates of hypertension and proteinuria were higher in this study. No patient developed congestive heart failure or posterior reversible encephalopathy syndrome. Grade 3 or more severe neutropenia, febrile neutropenia, anemia, thrombocytopenia, fatigue, malaise, allergic reactions, peripheral neuropathy, and nausea were observed in this study. However, these events and their frequencies were within the known range of adverse events for paclitaxel plus carboplatin (Table 2). None of the 49 patients who received bowel resection developed gastrointestinal per-foration or fistula. The incidence rates of bevacizumab-specific adverse events in the primary analysis cohort were compared during combination therapy with bevacizumab and paclitaxel plus carboplatin versus during maintenance bevacizumab monotherapy. This comparison showed that the incidence rate of hypertension was higher during com-bination therapy and the incidence rate of proteinuria was higher during maintenance therapy, while there was no difference in the incidence rates of gastrointestinal perfo-ration and thromboembolic events between the two treat-ment periods. Hypertension of any grade occurred in 93 patients (31.7%) before 6 months of bevacizumab treat-ment and occurred in 73 patients (21.9%) after 6 months of treatment, with the median time to onset being 1.2 months (range 0–16.5 months). Grade 3 or higher hypertension occurred in 41 patients (14.0%) before 6 months of bev-acizumab treatment and occurred in 32 patients (9.6%) after 6 months of treatment. In contrast, proteinuria of any grade occurred in 39 patients (13.3%) before 6 months of bevacizumab treatment and occurred in 107 patients (32.1%) after 6 months of treatment, with the median time to onset being 5.0 months (range 0–17.5 months). Grade 3 or higher proteinuria occurred in 8 patients (2.7%) before 6 months of bevacizumab treatment and occurred in 33 patients (9.9%) after 6 months of treatment (Table 3; Fig. 2). Incidence rates of bevacizumab-specific adverse events in the exploratory analysis cohort were similar to those in the primary analysis cohort (Table 4).

107International Journal of Clinical Oncology (2019) 24:103–114

1 3

Table 1 Characteristics of the patients

Treated patientsn = 333

Primary analysis cohortn = 293

Explora-tory analysis cohortn = 40

Age Median  (range) 58 (21–83) 58 (27–83) 62 (21–75)

 Age ≥ 70  n (%) 51 (15.3) 42 (14.3) 9 (22.5)

ECOG PSa

 0  n (%) 274 (82.3) 243 (82.9) 31 (77.5)

 1  n (%) 50 (15.0) 44 (15.0) 6 (15.0)

 2  n (%) 8 (2.4) 5 (1.7) 3 (7.5)

 Unknown  n (%) 1 (0.3) 1 (0.3) 0

Primary site Ovary  n (%) 268 (80.5) 234 (79.9) 34 (85.0)

 Fallopian tube  n (%) 34 (10.2) 32 (10.9) 2 (5.0)

 Peritoneum  n (%) 31 (9.3) 27 (9.2) 4 (10.0)

FIGO stageb

 IIIA  n (%) 10 (3.0) 7 (2.4) 3 (7.5)

 IIIB  n (%) 36 (10.8) 29 (9.9) 7 (17.5)

 IIIC  n (%) 191 (57.4) 168 (57.3) 23 (57.5)

 IV  n (%) 96 (28.8) 89 (30.4) 7 (17.5)

Histologyc

 Serous  n (%) 220 (66.1) 193 (65.9) 27 (67.5)

 Clear cell  n (%) 43 (12.9) 36 (12.3) 7 (17.5)

 Endometrioid  n (%) 34 (10.2) 31 (10.6) 3 (7.5)

 Mucinous  n (%) 9 (2.7) 8 (2.7) 1 (2.5)

 Other or not specified  n (%) 27 (8.1) 25 (8.5) 2 (5.0)

Surgery PDS  n (%) 224 (67.3) 199 (67.9) 25 (62.5)

 NAC → IDS  n (%) 109 (32.7) 94 (32.1) 15 (37.5)

108 International Journal of Clinical Oncology (2019) 24:103–114

1 3

Efficacy

With regard to efficacy in the primary analysis cohort, median PFS was 16.3 months (95% CI 14.5–18.9) (Fig. 3a). Subgroup analysis of the primary cohort is displayed in Table 5.

In 89 patients with measurable lesions, the response rate was 77.5% (95% CI 67.4–85.7). Subgroup analysis stratified by tumor histology showed that the response rate was high in patients with serous and endometrioid carcinoma, but the rate was low in those with clear cell carcinoma and other rare histological types (Table 6).

In the primary analysis cohort, the platinum-free inter-val (PFI) was evaluated for 196 patients who completed platinum-based chemotherapy. It was found that disease progression occurred after < 6 months in 24.5% (resist-ant), from 6 to < 12 months in 23.5% (partially sensitive), and after ≥ 12 months or not at all in 42.4% (fully sensi-tive) (Table 7). The median PFI was 11.5 months (95% CI 10.1–14.5) (Fig. 3b).

Table 1 (continued)

Treated patientsn = 333

Primary analysis cohortn = 293

Explora-tory analysis cohortn = 40

Surgical outcome Optimal  n (%) 177 (53.2) 148 (50.5) 29 (72.5)

 Suboptimal  n (%) 156 (46.8) 145 (49.5) 11 (27.5)

Bowel resection Yes  n (%) 49 (14.7) 37 (12.6) 12 (30.0)

 No  n (%) 284 (85.3) 256 (87.4) 28 (70.0)

Platinum-based chemotherapy Paclitaxel + carboplatin  n (%) 293 (88.0) 293 (100.0) 0

 Docetaxel + carboplatin  n (%) 13 (3.9) 0 13 (32.5)

 Dose-dense paclitaxel + carboplatin  n (%) 22 (6.6) 0 22 (55.0)

 Other  n (%) 5 (1.5) 0 5 (12.5)

Bevacizumab exposure Median no. of cycles  n (range) 17 (1–40) 17 (1–40) 16.5 (1–25)

 Median duration  Month (range) 12.7 (0–29.5) 12.7 (0–29.5) 12.7 (0–20)

 Administration delayed by AE  n (%) 185 (55.6) 155 (52.9) 30 (75.0)

 Skipped  n (%) 38 (11.4) 35 (11.9) 3 (7.5)

 Dose modification  n (%) 3 (0.9) 3 (1.0) 0

AE adverse eventa Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status (PS)b FIGO staging system 1988c WHO classification 2003

109International Journal of Clinical Oncology (2019) 24:103–114

1 3

Discussion

Compared with the incidence rates revealed by previous studies performed in Europe and the United States, includ-ing phase 3 clinical studies (GOG-0218 and ICON7) [3, 4] and a large-scale prospective observational study (ROSiA) [11], the incidence rates of gastrointestinal perforation/fistula, thromboembolic events, and bleeding were lower

in the present study (JGOG3022), while incidence rates of hypertension and proteinuria were higher. In particular, gastrointestinal perforation and thromboembolic events were markedly less frequent in this study. These results suggest that bevacizumab is relatively safe for Japanese patients with advanced ovarian cancer, if administered according to the inclusion and exclusion criteria used in this study. Additional analysis of data from the GOG-0218 study showed that a history of bowel resection is a risk fac-tor for gastrointestinal perforation [12]. However, 12.6% of patients in the primary analysis cohort and 14.7% of all patients had a history of bowel resection in the present study, and none of them developed gastrointestinal perfo-ration or fistula. Therefore, prior bowel resection does not seem to be a risk factor for gastrointestinal perforation in Japanese patients.

On the other hand, the incidence rate of hypertension was higher in this study than in the GOG-0218 study and was similar to that in the ROSiA study. We found that hyper-tension occurred earlier after the start of treatment than in the ROSiA study, suggesting that antihypertensive therapy should be started earlier in Japanese patients. Proteinuria may be due to cumulative toxicity and there is no effective treatment, which means it should be managed carefully as a dose-limiting factor. However, hypertension and proteinuria were both tolerable in the present study. Thus, there were

Table 2 All adverse events in the primary analysis cohort (n = 293)

a Non-central nervous system (CNS) bleedingb Venous thromboembolism

Grade

n (%)

1 2 3 4 5

Neutropenia – – 54 (18.4%) 151 (51.5%) 0Febrile neutropenia – – 12 (4.1%) 2 (0.7%) 0Anemia – – 27 (9.2%) 2 (0.7%) 0Thrombocytopenia – – 30 (10.2%) 5 (1.7%) 0Fatigue – – 6 (2.0%) 0 0Malaise – – 1 (0.3%) 0 0Allergic reaction – – 4 (1.4%) 0 0Peripheral neuropathy – – 10 (3.4%) 0 0Nausea – – 6 (2.0%) 0 0Hypertension 24 (8.2%) 68 (23.2%) 67 (22.9%) 1 (0.3%) 0Proteinuria 51 (17.4%) 50 (17.1%) 37 (12.6%) 0 0Bleedinga 3 (1.0%) 8 (2.7%) 0 0 0Thromboembolic eventsb 2 (0.7%) 3 (1.0%) 4 (1.4%) 0 0Gastrointestinal perforation 0 1 (0.3%) 1 (0.3%) 0 0Wound dehiscence 1 (0.3%) 3 (1.0%) 0 0 0Fistula 0 0 2 (0.7%) 0 0Congestive heart failure 0 0 0 0 0Posterior reversible encepha-

lopathy syndrome0 0 0 0 0

Table 3 Incidence rates of bevacizumab-specific adverse events ≥ Grade 3 in the primary analysis cohort during combined therapy and maintenance therapy

a Non-central nervous system (CNS) bleedingb Venous thromboembolism

Paclitaxel and carbo-platin + bevacizumab (%)

Bevacizumab maintenance (%)

Hypertension 14.0 9.2Proteinuria 2.7 9.9Bleedinga 0 0Thromboembolic eventsb 0.7 0.7Gastrointestinal perforation 0 0.3Wound dehiscence 0 0Fistula 0.3 0.3

110 International Journal of Clinical Oncology (2019) 24:103–114

1 3

differences in the profile and incidence rates of adverse events between Japanese and Western patients that may be due to racial differences, although the reasons are currently unclear. In a previous study of bevacizumab for lung cancer, the incidence rate of hypertension was also higher in Japa-nese patients than in Western patients [5].

Regarding efficacy, the median PFS was 16.3 months in this study, which was not inferior to either the GOG-0218 study [3] or the GOG-0262 study [13], during which beva-cizumab was administered concomitantly with standard treatment using paclitaxel plus carboplatin to similar patient populations as in this study. Since the present study was a single-arm observational study, simple comparison with the results of the phase 3 clinical studies is not appropriate. However, at least we can conclude that concomitant admin-istration of bevacizumab with paclitaxel plus carboplatin is a useful regimen for Japanese patients. The data obtained in this may be considered inadequate because the number of PFS events was lower than expected, but conversely the

inhibitory effect on recurrence was greater than expected. In Japan, dose-dense paclitaxel with carboplatin is often selected as first-line therapy for patients with advanced epi-thelial ovarian cancer. Henceforth, we will be able to choose bevacizumab with paclitaxel plus carboplatin or dose-dense paclitaxel with carboplatin for these patients, by taking into consideration individual background factors and the adverse event profile.

Subgroup analysis showed that PFS was shorter and the response rate was lower in patients with clear cell carcinoma than in patients with serous or endometrioid carcinoma. Many ovarian clear cell carcinomas show intrinsic resist-ance to platinum-based chemotherapy, which may influence the results of studies [14, 15]. Retrospective studies showed that the response rate of patients with clear cell carcinoma to first-line taxane plus platinum chemotherapy was 20–50% [16], while the only prospective large-scale phase 3 clinical study of first-line chemotherapy for ovarian clear cell car-cinoma (JGOG3017/GCIG) revealed that the response rate

Fig. 2 a Cumulative number of patients developing hypertension (all grade). b Cumulative number of patients developing proteinuria (all grade)

111International Journal of Clinical Oncology (2019) 24:103–114

1 3

to paclitaxel and carboplatin was 46.7% in 15 patients with measurable lesions [17]. Although the response rate was low in these studies, we obtained a higher response rate of 63.6% for clear cell carcinoma in the present study. It has already been reported that bevacizumab has potential activity against

clear cell carcinoma in vitro [18]. These findings suggest that combining bevacizumab with paclitaxel plus carboplatin increases the anticancer activity against clear cell carcinoma. Among Japanese patients with epithelial ovarian cancer, 23–25% have clear cell carcinoma, which is a significantly larger proportion than among Western patients (5–10%) [12, 17, 19]. This suggests that addition of bevacizumab to pacli-taxel plus carboplatin for patients with clear cell carcinoma could be a very important treatment strategy in Japan.

It has been reported that the platinum-resistant recur-rence rate is generally 32–40% in patients with advanced epithelial ovarian cancer at their first recurrence [20, 21], while the platinum-resistant recurrence rate was 24.5% in this study. Therefore, it is possible that combining bevaci-zumab with paclitaxel plus carboplatin could decrease the platinum-resistant recurrence rate. Recurrence eventually affects 70–80% of patients with advanced epithelial ovar-ian cancer [2, 22], with platinum sensitivity and primary PFI being repowered as prognostic factors for recurrent epi-thelial ovarian cancer [22, 23]. Furthermore, it is currently reported that the concept of “platinum sensitivity” based on the platinum-free interval may also be applicable to patients who have been previously treated with bevacizumab plus platinum-based chemotherapy [24]. Accordingly, a benefi-cial decrease of the platinum-resistant recurrence rate and prolongation of PFI could possibly be achieved in clinical practice.

In conclusion, this was the first large-scale prospective study performed in Japan to evaluate the significance of combining bevacizumab with paclitaxel plus carboplatin to treat newly diagnosed advanced epithelial ovarian cancer. The results suggested that bevacizumab is safe and effective in Japanese patients. Combined therapy with bevacizumab could possibly decrease platinum-resistant recurrence and prolong PFI. It may also be more effective for clear cell carcinoma than standard treatment.

Table 4 Incidence rates of adverse events ≥ Grade 3 in the primary analysis cohort and the exploratory analysis cohort

a Venous thromboembolism

Adverse events ≥ Grade 3 (%)

Treated patients Primary analysis cohort

Exploratory analysis cohort

Neutropenia 70.0 70.0 70.0Febrile neutropenia 5.4 4.8 10.0Anemia 14.7 9.9 50.0Thrombocytopenia 13.8 11.9 27.5Fatigue 2.4 2.0 5.0Malaise 0.3 0.3 0Allergic reaction 1.2 1.4 0Peripheral neuropathy 3.9 3.4 7.5Nausea 1.8 2.0 0Hypertension 22.2 23.2 15.0Proteinuria 13.5 12.6 20.0Bleeding 0 0 0Thromboembolic

eventsa1.2 1.4 0

Gastrointestinal per-foration

0.3 0.3 0

Wound dehiscence 0 0 0Fistula 0.6 0.7 0Congestive heart

failure0 0 0

Posterior reversible encephalopathy syndrome

0 0 0

112 International Journal of Clinical Oncology (2019) 24:103–114

1 3

Fig. 3 a Progression-free survival in the primary analysis cohort. The median progression-free survival (PFS) time was 16.3  months (95% CI 14.5–18.9). b Platinum-free interval in the primary analy-sis cohort. The median platinum-free interval (PFI) was 11.5 months

(95% CI 10.1–14.5) and the platinum-resistant recurrence rate (pro-portion of patients with disease progression after < 6  months) was 24.5%

113International Journal of Clinical Oncology (2019) 24:103–114

1 3

Acknowledgements This study was funded by Chugai Pharmaceuti-cal Co., Ltd. We thank the women who participated in the study and their families, the staff of Kitasato Academic Research Organization (the data and statistical analysis center for JGOG3022), and the 79 participating JGOG member institutions.

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest SK and TM have received speaker’s honoraria from Chugai Pharmaceutical. TT, NT, and TS have received speaker’s

honoraria from Chugai Pharmaceutical and AstraZeneca. The other authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.

Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Crea-tive Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creat iveco mmons .org/licen ses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribu-tion, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.

Table 5 Subgroup analysis of progression-free survival (PFS) in the primary analysis cohort

NE not estimablea Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status (PS)b FIGO staging system 1988c WHO classification 2003

PFS

n Event Median (month) 95% CI 1-year PFS rate (%)

95% CI

All patients 293 129 16.3 14.5–18.9 72.5 65.8–78.1Age < 60 157 70 15.5 13.7–21.0 74.4 65.1–81.6 ≥ 60 136 59 16.3 14.4–19.0 70.4 60.0–78.5

ECOG PSa

 0 243 100 17.5 14.5–20.0 76.3 69.1–82.1 1.2 49 29 14.4 10.9–19.8 56.6 39.7–70.4

FIGO stageb

 Stage III 204 81 18.1 15.8–21.0 75.4 67.1–81.8 Stage IV 89 48 14.1 13.0–15.5 67.3 55.0–76.9

Surgery PDS 179 65 20.1 15.0–22.8 74.4 65.6–81.3 NAC-IDS 92 51 14.7 13.0–17.9 69.7 57.1–79.3

Surgical outcome Optimal 148 50 20.8 16.7–26.5 77.6 67.5–84.9 Suboptimal 145 79 14.1 13.1–15.5 68.7 59.3–76.4

Histologyc

 Serous 193 78 17.1 14.7–19.8 76.9 68.6–83.2 Endometrioid 31 12 13.1 12.0–NE 64.8 39.7–81.5 Clear cell 36 22 12.3 8.3–15.3 50.5 31.1–67.0

Table 6 Response rate stratified by tumor histology in patients with measurable lesions from the primary analysis cohort

a WHO classification 2003

n Response rate

% 95% CI

All cases 89 77.5 67.4–85.7Serousa 60 81.7 69.6–90.5Endometrioida 10 80 44.4–97.5Clear cella 11 63.6 30.8–89.1Othersa 8 62.5 24.5–91.5

Table 7 Recurrence and platinum sensitivity in the primary analysis cohort (n = 196)

a Progression after < 6 monthsb Progression from 6 to < 12 monthsc Progression after ≥ 12 months or no progression

n %

Resistanta 48 24.5Partially sensitiveb 46 23.5Fully sensitivec 83 42.4Censored (< 6 months) 10 5.1Censored (6 to < 12 months) 9 4.6

114 International Journal of Clinical Oncology (2019) 24:103–114

1 3

References

1. Cancer Registry and Statistics (2018) Cancer Information Ser-vice, National Cancer Center, Japan. https ://ganjo ho.jp/reg_stat/stati stics /dl/index .html. Accessed Mar 2018

2. Matulonis UA, Sood AK, Fallowfield L et al (2016) Ovarian cancer. Nat Rev Dis Primers 2:16061. https ://doi.org/10.1038/nrdp.2016.61

3. Burger RA, Brady MF, Bookman MA et al (2011) Incorporation of bevacizumab in the primary treatment of ovarian cancer. N Engl J Med 365:2473–2483

4. Perren TJ, Swart AM, Pfisterer J, at al (2011) A phase 3 trial of bevacizumab in ovarian cancer. N Engl J Med 365:2484–2496

5. Niho S, Kunitoh H, Nokihara H et al (2012) Randomized phase II study of first-line carboplatin–paclitaxel with or without beva-cizumab in Japanese patients with advanced non-squamous non-small-cell lung cancer. Lung Cancer 76:362–367

6. Ando M, Okamoto I, Yamamoto N et al (2006) Predictive factors for interstitial lung disease, antitumor response, and survival in non-small-cell lung cancer patients treated with gefitinib. J Clin Oncol 24:2549–2556

7. du Bois A, Floquet A, Kim JW et al (2014) Incorporation of pazo-panib in maintenance therapy of ovarian cancer. J Clin Oncol 32:3374–3382

8. Chen Z, Zhong B, Lun X et al (2015) Specific safety profile of bevacizumab in Asian patients with advanced NSCLC: a meta-analysis. Medicine (Baltimore) 94:e975

9. Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) Version 4.03. https ://ctep.cance r.gov/proto colde velop ment/elect ronic _appli catio ns/ctc.htm#ctc_40. Accessed Mar 2018

10. Eisenhauer EA, Therasse P, Bogaerts J et  al (2009) New response evaluation criteria in solid tumours: revised RECIST guideline (version 1.1). Eur J Cancer 45:228–247

11. Oza AM, Selle F, Davidenko I et al (2017) Efficacy and safety of bevacizumab-containing therapy in newly diagnosed ovar-ian cancer: ROSiA Single-Arm Phase 3B Study. Int J Gynecol Cancer 27:50–58

12. Burger RA, Brady MF, Bookman MA et al (2014) Risk fac-tors for GI adverse events in a phase III randomized trial of bevacizumab in first-line therapy of advanced ovarian can-cer: a Gynecologic Oncology Group Study. J Clin Oncol 32:1210–1217

13. Chan JK, Brady MF, Penson RT et al (2016) Weekly vs. every-3-week paclitaxel and carboplatin for ovarian cancer. N Engl J Med 374:738–748

14. Sugiyama T, Kamura T, Kigawa J et al (2000) Clinical charac-teristics of clear cell carcinoma of the ovary: a distinct histo-logic type with poor prognosis and resistance to platinum-based chemotherapy. Cancer 88:2584–2589

15. Chan JK, Teoh D, Hu JM et al (2008) Do clear cell ovarian car-cinomas have poorer prognosis compared to other epithelial cell types? A study of 1411 clear cell ovarian cancers. Gynecol Oncol 109:370–376

16. Takano M, Tsuda H, Sugiyama T (2012) Clear cell carcinoma of the ovary: is there a role of histology-specific treatment? J Exp Clin Cancer Res 31:53. https ://doi.org/10.1186/1756-9966-31-53

17. Sugiyama T, Okamoto A, Enomoto T et al (2016) Randomized phase III trial of irinotecan plus cisplatin compared with paclitaxel plus carboplatin as first-line chemotherapy for ovarian clear cell carcinoma: JGOG3017/GCIG Trial. J Clin Oncol 34:2881–2887

18. Mabuchi S, Kawase C, Altomare DA et  al (2010) Vascular endothelial growth factor is a promising therapeutic target for the treatment of clear cell carcinoma of the ovary. Mol Cancer Ther 9:2411–2422

19. Saito T, Takahashi F, Katabuchi H (2017) Annual Report of the Committee on Gynecologic Oncology, Japan Society of Obstetrics and Gynecology: Patient Annual Report for 2014 and Treatment Annual Report for 2009. J Obstet Gynaecol Res 43:1667–1677

20. Prat J (2012) New insights into ovarian cancer pathology. Ann Oncol 23(Suppl 10):x111–7

21. Hanker LC, Loibl S, Burchardi N et al (2012) The impact of sec-ond to sixth line therapy on survival of relapsed ovarian can-cer after primary taxane/platinum-based therapy. Ann Oncol 23:2605–2612

22. Bookman MA, Tyczynski JE, Espirito JL et al (2017) Impact of primary platinum-free interval and BRCA1/2 mutation status on treatment and survival in patients with recurrent ovarian cancer. Gynecol Oncol 146:58–63

23. Lheureux S, Karakasis K, Kohn EC et al (2015) Ovarian cancer treatment: the end of empiricism? Cancer 121:3203–3203

24. Pignata S, Lorusso D, Joly F et al (2018) Chemotherapy plus or minus bevacizumab for platinum-sensitive ovarian cancer patients recurring after a bevacizumab containing first line treatment: the randomized phase 3 trial: MITO16B-MaNGO OV2B-ENGOT OV17. J Clin Oncol 36(suppl):abstr 5506