bergenfield workshop on common core and parcc

37
{ Literacy Work Aligned with Common Core Standards, Depths of Knowledge, & PARCC atty McGee, Coordinator of Professional Learning in Literacy orthern Valley Curriculum Center [email protected]

Upload: pattymcgee

Post on 01-Jul-2015

162 views

Category:

Education


1 download

DESCRIPTION

Bergenfield K-12 workshop on DOK, CCSS, and PARCC

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Bergenfield workshop on common core and parcc

{

Literacy Work Aligned with Common Core Standards, Depths of Knowledge, &

PARCC

Patty McGee, Coordinator of Professional Learning in LiteracyNorthern Valley Curriculum [email protected]

Page 2: Bergenfield workshop on common core and parcc

Thank you for… Participating actively in the work Listening with the intent to learn Offering your own thoughts and ideas Supporting the learning of others Being present – silence phones, etc.

Norms

Page 3: Bergenfield workshop on common core and parcc

JigsawRead the article and be prepared to talk abou the following questions:

1. What does the author want you to know or understand?

2. What is evidence of this understanding?

3. What do you think about this?

Page 5: Bergenfield workshop on common core and parcc

{Complex Thinking and the Common Core

Depth of Knowledge

Page 6: Bergenfield workshop on common core and parcc

Why Depth of Knowledge (DoK)?

Mechanism to ensure that:

• The intent of the standard and the level of student demonstration required by

that standard matches the assessment items

• Teachers are teaching to a level that will promote student achievement

Page 7: Bergenfield workshop on common core and parcc

It’s NOT about the verb...

The Depth of Knowledge is NOT determined by the verb (Bloom’s Taxonomy), but by the context in which the verb is used and the depth of thinking required.

Page 8: Bergenfield workshop on common core and parcc

Same Verb—Three Different DOK Levels

DOK 1- Describe three characteristics of metamorphic rocks. (Requires simple recall)

DOK 2- Describe the difference between metamorphic and igneous rocks. (Requires cognitive processing to determine the differences in the two rock types)

DOK 3- Describe a model that you might use to represent the relationships that exist within the rock cycle. (Requires deep understanding of rock cycle and a determination of how best to represent it)

Page 9: Bergenfield workshop on common core and parcc

Same Verb—Three Different DOK LevelsDOK 1- Describe what a theme is. (Requires simple

recall)

DOK 2- Describe the difference theme and plot. (Requires cognitive processing to determine the differences in the two literary elements)

DOK 3- Describe the common theme in two texts and critique which author better addresses the theme. (Requires deep understanding of theme, evidence, and craft using more complex thinking to create something original)

Page 10: Bergenfield workshop on common core and parcc

Same Verb—Three Different DOK LevelsDOK 1- Describe what a primary source is. (Requires

simple recall)

DOK 2- Describe the difference between primary source and a secondary source. (Requires cognitive processing to determine the differences in two elements)

DOK 3- Describe how you might use a primary source and a secondary source to better understand a particular event in history. (Requires deep understanding of use of sources and an explanation of ‘how’)

Page 11: Bergenfield workshop on common core and parcc

DOK is about complexity

Page 13: Bergenfield workshop on common core and parcc

• Requires recall of information, such as a fact, definition, term, or performance of a simple process or procedure

• Answering a Level 1 item can involve following a simple, well-known procedure or formula

DOK Level 1: Recall and Reproduction

Page 14: Bergenfield workshop on common core and parcc

Skills/Concepts: DOK Level 2• Includes the engagement of some mental processing beyond recalling or reproducing a response

• Items require students to make some decisions as to how to approach the question or problem

• Actions imply more than one mental or cognitive process/step

Page 15: Bergenfield workshop on common core and parcc

Strategic Thinking: Level 3

• Requires deep understanding exhibited through planning, using evidence, and more demanding cognitive reasoning

• The cognitive demands are complex and abstract

• A guiding question with more than one possible answer and requires students to justify the response

Page 16: Bergenfield workshop on common core and parcc

Extended Thinking: Level 4

• Requires high cognitive demand and is very complex

• Students are expected to make connections, relate ideas within the content or among content areas, and devise one approach among many alternatives on how the situation can be solved

• Due to the complexity of cognitive demand, DOK 4 often requires an extended period of time

Page 17: Bergenfield workshop on common core and parcc

“Wings” by Macklemore & Ryan Lewis

Page 18: Bergenfield workshop on common core and parcc

Using our shared reading of “Wings”, what work could we do at each level of DOK? Turn & talk…

Level 1:

Level 2:

Level 3:

Level4:

DOK in Action

Page 19: Bergenfield workshop on common core and parcc

Understanding the Common Core Standards

Page 20: Bergenfield workshop on common core and parcc

What do the standards say? What are some highlights and

important parts? What should we infer? What should we avoid? How does this align with current

instruction? How does it differ?

Studying Each Strand: Questions for Consideration

Page 21: Bergenfield workshop on common core and parcc

Tier 1, 2, 3 Words

Tier 1: the most basic words, found often in conversation, rarely require instruction (tired, run, dog, warm)

Tier 2: high utility and found most often in written text, have a powerful impact on verbal functioning (contradict, freedom, devour)

Tier 3: infrequently used words, often limited to specific topic or domain, best used when a need arises (stamen, petal, leaf, photosynthesis)

Page 22: Bergenfield workshop on common core and parcc

A Test for Tier 2 vs. Tier 3 Words:

If you can predict the words likely to be used in a specific text, it is probably a Tier 3.If you can’t it is probably a

Tier 2.

Page 23: Bergenfield workshop on common core and parcc

A Glimpse at PARCC

Page 24: Bergenfield workshop on common core and parcc

Goal of Assessment – The PARCC assessments will enable teachers, schools, students and their parents to gain important insights into how well critical knowledge, skills and abilities essential for young people to thrive in college and careers are being mastered.

The PARCC Assessment Review

24

Page 25: Bergenfield workshop on common core and parcc

CCSS & PARCC Frameworks

Page 26: Bergenfield workshop on common core and parcc

PARCConline.org

Page 27: Bergenfield workshop on common core and parcc

The Practice Test

Page 28: Bergenfield workshop on common core and parcc

PARCC Comprehensive Accessibility Policies

28

Features for All

Students

Accessibility Features*

Identified in advance

Accommodations**

Page 29: Bergenfield workshop on common core and parcc

Accessibility Features for All Students

29

Page 30: Bergenfield workshop on common core and parcc

30

Accessibility Features Identified in Advance

Page 31: Bergenfield workshop on common core and parcc

Accommodations for Students with Disabilities

Page 32: Bergenfield workshop on common core and parcc

32

Presentation Accommodations

Page 33: Bergenfield workshop on common core and parcc

Response Accommodations

Page 34: Bergenfield workshop on common core and parcc

Other Proposed Accommodations

Page 35: Bergenfield workshop on common core and parcc

PARCC is designed to reward quality instruction aligned to the

Standards,so the assessment is worthy of

preparationrather than a distraction from good

work.

What kind of instruction is rewarded by your

assessments?

Assess your Assessments

35

Page 36: Bergenfield workshop on common core and parcc

Nvcc.nvnet.orghttp://tinyurl.com/pattycontentareabinder

Resources

Page 37: Bergenfield workshop on common core and parcc

Wrapping it up…

What shifts do you notice in the standards?

What themes have emerged in our conversations and reading?

What are the next steps from here?