Page 1
BENEFITS AND OVERVIEW OF THE ELECTRONIC REPORTING TOOL
(ERT)
Paul BakerMACTEC
Page 2
Overview
IntroductionEmissions Reporting Tool OverviewConclusions
2
Page 3
Introduction
Test PlanTest ReportEmission Factor DevelopmentWhy ERT
3
Page 4
What is ERT
Microsoft Access ApplicationMethods
Methods 1 through 4, 3A, 5, 6C, 7E, 10, 17, 25A, 26A, 29, 101, 101A, 201A, 202, CTM-039 & CTM-040
PollutantsFilterable PM, Condensable PM, PM10, PM2.5, CO, Chlorine, Chloride, HCl, Total Chloride, NOx, SO2, Metals (Sb, As, B, Be, Cd, Cr, Co, Cu, Pb, Mn, Hg, Ni, P, Se, Ag, Thand Zn), TOC (as C, CH4, C2H6, C3H8)
Electronic Test Report4
Page 5
ERT Provides
Key informationCoordinationData qualityStandards
5
Page 6
ERT Reduces
WorkloadRequired resourcesRedundancy
6
Page 7
How ERT is used by the Source
Test planTest report
7
Page 8
Test Plan – Facility/Tester Screen
8
Page 9
Test Plan – Permit/SCC Screen
9
Page 10
Test Plan – Attachments Screen
10
Page 11
Test Report – Field Data Spreadsheet
11
Page 12
Test Report – Import Screen
12
Page 13
Test Report – Results Screen
13
Page 14
Test Report – Emissions Screen
14
Page 15
How ERT is used by EPA
Test plan reviewTest reportData quality evaluation
15
Page 17
ERT Data Quality Questions
17
Page 19
Source Benefits
Streamlined test plansStandard Report
19
Page 20
States Benefits
Standard reportQ/AImproved emission factors
20
Page 21
ERT Data Applications
WebFireNon-emission factor data flowLegacy systemsAIRS/AFSEmission inventory Emission standards dataState limits (non-Federal, SIP)Federal NSPS, MACT, NSR/PSD
21
Page 22
Planned Improvements
ANPR electronic submission requirementsData definition standardsCDXCROMERRExpanded test methods
22
Page 23
Conclusions
Paper replacementCritical dataCommunicationStandardsEfficientImproved emission factors
23