benchmarking biomedical

47

Click here to load reader

Upload: patrick-lynch

Post on 19-Jun-2015

3.238 views

Category:

Technology


3 download

DESCRIPTION

Comparing the efficiency and effectiveness of medical equipment repair programs in hospitals is a challenge. No two programs are the same. This presentation demonstrates a simple way to compare large, small, urban or rural hospitals.

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Benchmarking Biomedical

BENCHMARKING BIOMEDICAL Patriick Lynch plync

Patrick K. Lynch, CCE, CBET

ch@G

MI3.com

April 5, 2009MD Expo (www.mdpublishing.com)Phoenix, AZ

m

1

Page 2: Benchmarking Biomedical

Patriick Lynch plyncch@

GM

I3.comm

2

Page 3: Benchmarking Biomedical

Patriick Lynch plyncch@

GM

I3.comm

3

Page 4: Benchmarking Biomedical

Patriick Lynch plyncch@

GM

I3.comm

4

Page 5: Benchmarking Biomedical

Patriick Lynch plyncch@

GM

I3.comm

5

Page 6: Benchmarking Biomedical

Patriick Lynch plyncch@

GM

I3.comm

6

Page 7: Benchmarking Biomedical

WHY BENCHMARK?

Administration

Patrick L

Prove the value of a departmentcompare to others in your network

Lynch plynch@compare to others in your networkidentify areas for future improvement

Self-assessment

@G

MI3.com

Self assessmentInternal means for Clinical Engineering to evaluate to others in the field.evaluate to others in the field.

7

Page 8: Benchmarking Biomedical

WHY BENCHMARK? (2)

StaffingProvides an alternative to the old FTE Model

Patrick LProvides an alternative to the old FTE Model

Job Securityd t t d t di f hi h l l

Lynch plynch@

demonstrates understanding of higher level metrics and control of your responsibilities

Pay

@G

MI3.com

PayValue of more productive employees and operationsoperations. 8

Page 9: Benchmarking Biomedical

WHO NEEDSTOTOBENCHMARK?

SizeUnder 100 beds100 300 b d? 100 to 300 beds300 to 500 beds500 l b d

Patrick L

500 plus beds

Metro / Rural

Lynch plynch@

Metro / RuralLarge CitySmall city

@G

MI3.com

Small cityRuralCritical AccessCritical AccessDistance to city of 500,000?

9

Page 10: Benchmarking Biomedical

WHO NEEDSTO

TeachingTOBENCHMARK? (2)

eac gUniversityMedical Schoolnon teaching(2) non-teaching

SystemSIngle hospital

Patrick L

SIngle hospital plus outpatientMultiple hospitals locallyMultiple hospitals, multiple cities

Lynch plynch@Multiple hospitals, multiple citiesSpecialty vs. general hospital

CardiacChild '

@G

MI3.com

Children'sSurgicalCancerPsych 10

Page 11: Benchmarking Biomedical

WHO NEEDS TOBENCHMARK? BENCHMARK? (3)

Private vs. publicVeteransPrivate

Patrick LPrivate

County

Lynch plynch@@G

MI3.com

11

Page 12: Benchmarking Biomedical

THINGS TO CONSIDER

Costcost of biomed program

Customer Satisfactionuptime

Patrick Luptime

incidentsoverall satisfaction

Lynch plynch@

customersclinical departmentsadministration

@G

MI3.com

administrationother support departmentsrisk management

12

Page 13: Benchmarking Biomedical

THINGS TO CONSIDER (2)( )

Regulatory Compliance

V l Add dValue Addeduser training

annual required

Patrick L

new employeerefresher operator

special projects

Lynch plynch@

building / expansiondisaster plans

committees

@G

MI3.com

EOCInfection ControlCapital EquipmentCapital Equipment

13

Page 14: Benchmarking Biomedical

WHAT TO MEASURE

# of Beds# of Surgeries# of Rad Rooms

Patrick L

# of ICU Beds# of monitored beds

Lynch plynch@

# of medical devicesAdjusted DischargesValue of Equipment

@G

MI3.com

Value of EquipmentCost of OperationsUptimeUptime

14

Page 15: Benchmarking Biomedical

WHAT TO MEASURE (2)( )

Failure rateFailure rate

# of workorders# of PM workorders

% ti

Patrick L

% on time# of Corrective Workorders# closed

Lynch plynch@

% closed

hospital demographicsSquare Footage

@G

MI3.com

q ggeographyservicespublic/privatepublic/privateurban/rural

15

Page 16: Benchmarking Biomedical

THE MAIN PROBLEMS

1 We are all different.1. We are all different.2. We ask for information that does not exist.3 We haven’t decided what metrics matter

Patrick L3. We haven t decided what metrics matter.

4. We haven’t decided what is the definition of:

Lynch plynch@of:Unacceptable

Poor

@G

MI3.com

AdequateGood

Excellent 16

Page 17: Benchmarking Biomedical

PROBLEMS

Scope of servicesAnesthesiaLaboratoryImaging

Patrick Lg g

CTMRINuclear Medicine

Lynch plynch@Nuclear MedicinePETRadiation TherapyUltrasound

@G

MI3.com

UltrasoundDialysisSterilizers

C llNurse Call 17

Page 18: Benchmarking Biomedical

PROBLEMS (2)( )

WhWhereLocation in the US is often cited as a complicator

Patrick L

Contract or in-house

Geography - city or widespread

Leader - BMET, engineer,

Lynch plynch@

business

Reporting StructureIT

@G

MI3.com

AdministrationFacilities

18

Page 19: Benchmarking Biomedical

PROBLEMS (3)( )

Data AvailabilityCost of equipment not Cost of equipment not recordedDocumentation of

Patrick L

Biomedical Activities not recorded

easy if all costs are in

Lynch plynch@ya single budget or a single contract

@G

MI3.com

19

Page 20: Benchmarking Biomedical

OTHER THOUGHTS/ FACTORS

Length of time department in businessg pCompare costs to other industriesChargeback Structure

Patrick L

Length of time manager in placeCMMS

Lynch plynch@@G

MI3.com

20

Page 21: Benchmarking Biomedical

TRADITIONAL BENCHMARK CALCULATIONS:P

atrick LLynch plynch@@G

MI3.com

21

Page 22: Benchmarking Biomedical

S iTHE ANSWER

Service

Patri

Value

ick Lynch plync

Ratio

ch@G

MI3.comm

22

Page 23: Benchmarking Biomedical

SERVICE VALUE RATIO

Patriick Lynch plyncch@

GM

I3.comm

23

Page 24: Benchmarking Biomedical

SERVICE VALUE RATIO

Patriick Lynch plyncch@

GM

I3.comm

24

Page 25: Benchmarking Biomedical

SERVICE VALUE RATIO IN ACTION

FOR A SINGLE ITEM OF EQUIPMENT

Cost of CT Scanner - $1,000,000Annual Service Contract - $150 000

PatriAnnual Service Contract $150,000

SVR = $150,000/$1,000,000 = 15%

ick Lynch plyncch@G

MI3.comm

25

Page 26: Benchmarking Biomedical

SERVICE VALUE RATIO IN ACTION

FOR A SINGLE ITEM OF EQUIPMENT

Cost of CT Scanner - $1,000,000Annual Service Contract - $150 000

PatriAnnual Service Contract $150,000

SVR = $150,000/$1,000,000 = 15%

ick Lynch plyncch@G

MI3.com

Cost of a thermometer - $400.00Annual cost of all maintenance = $35 00 m

26

Annual cost of all maintenance $35.00 SVR = $35 / $400 = 8.75%

Page 27: Benchmarking Biomedical

SERVICE VALUE RATIO IN ACTION

FOR A SINGLE DEPARTMENT

Patriick Lynch plync

Cost of Equipment in Central Supply - $290,000Annual cost of Maintenance - $20,000

ch@G

MI3.com

SVR = $20,000/190,000 = 6.90%

m

27

Page 28: Benchmarking Biomedical

SERVICE VALUE RATIO IN ACTION

FOR A SINGLE CONTRACT

Patri

Cost of Anesthesia Machines = $3,600,000

ick Lynch plyncCost of Anesthesia Machines $3,600,000Cost of Annual Service Contract = $432,000SVR = $432,000/$3,600,000 = 12%

ch@G

MI3.comm

28

Page 29: Benchmarking Biomedical

SERVICE VALUE RATIO IN ACTION

FOR A SINGLE HOSPITAL

Patri

Cost of Equipment = $113,000,000

ick Lynch plyncq pAnnual Biomedical Budget = $5,200,000SVR = $5,200,000/$113,000,000 = 5.13%

ch@G

MI3.comm

29

Page 30: Benchmarking Biomedical

SERVICE VALUE RATIO IN ACTION

FOR A SINGLE VENDOR

Cost of Equipment (Patient Beds) = $12 000 000

PatriCost of Equipment (Patient Beds) = $12,000,000

Annual costs from HillRom (contract + PM + parts) = $2,220,000

ick Lynch plync

SVR = $2,200,000/$12,000,000 = 18.5%

ch@G

MI3.comm

30

Page 31: Benchmarking Biomedical

SERVICE VALUE RATIO IN ACTION

FOR A SINGLE TYPE OF EQUIPMENT

Patri

Cost of all Infusion Pumps = $2,400,000$

ick Lynch plync

Annual sum of Maintenance costs = $264,000SVR = $264,000/$2,400,000 = 11%

ch@G

MI3.comm

31

Page 32: Benchmarking Biomedical

SERVICE VALUE RATIO

Patriick Lynch plyncch@

GM

I3.comm

32

Page 33: Benchmarking Biomedical

THE MAIN PROBLEMS ANSWERED

1. We are all different. Use Metric that adjusts for variables.

2. We ask for information that does not exist. Use a Metric that uses FEW, easily accessible

Patrick L, y

numbers.3. We haven’t decided what metrics matter.

Always $$$$$$$$$$$

Lynch plynch@Always $$$$$$$$$$$4. We haven’t decided what is the definition of:

Unacceptable SVR greater than 15%Poor SVR greater than 12%

@G

MI3.com

Poor SVR greater than 12%Adequate SVR less than 12%

Good SVR less than 8%E ll t SVR l th 6%Excellent SVR less than 6% 33

Page 34: Benchmarking Biomedical

ADVANTAGESAutomatically adjusts for differences in size, scope, contracts, outsourced.

E il ibl b f iliEasily accessible by any facility

Scalable - it applies and compares . . . single item

Item List priceItem Annual cost

single manufacturerManufacturer List PriceManufacturer Annual Cost

Patrick L

single equipment typeEquipment Type List PriceEquipment Type Annual Cost

single department

Lynch plynch@

single departmentDepartment Equipment List PriceDepartment Annual Cost

single hospitalHospital Equipment List Price

@G

MI3.com

Hospital Equipment List PriceHospital Annual Cost

single systemSystem Equipment List PriceS A l CSystem Annual Cost 34

Page 35: Benchmarking Biomedical

1) LIST PRICE OF ALL ASSETS MAINTAINED

Start with estimates and get more specific over time

A li f

Patrick L

Average list of every asset$12,000

Average list of each type

Lynch plynch@Average list of each typeInfusion Pump - $5,000

Specific list of each model

@G

MI3.com

Specific list of each modelAlaris - $7,000Abbott - $4,000

35

Page 36: Benchmarking Biomedical

2) ANNUAL COST OF MAINTAINING ALL ASSETS)

I l d ALL COSTSInclude ALL COSTS

Include PM, repair, overhead, etc.

Examples-

Patrick L

LaborBenefitsTraining

Lynch plynch@gOn-callTest EquipmentCalibrations

@G

MI3.com

CalibrationsOutside LaborOutside partsService ContractsService ContractsSecretarial and supervisory costs

36

Page 37: Benchmarking Biomedical

DISADVANTAGES

Examines only costs

Patrick LExamines only costs

Simplicity may cause it to be rejected by

Lynch plynch@it to be rejected by some

@G

MI3.com

37

Page 38: Benchmarking Biomedical

RESULTSP

atrick L

12% 20% M f t C t t

Lynch plynch@

12% - 20% - Manufacturer Contract9% - 15% - 3rd Party Contract

@G

MI3.com

8% - 12% - Outsourced In-house4% - 8% - In-house programsp g

38

Page 39: Benchmarking Biomedical

THE NEXT STEPWrite a paper defining Write a paper defining the process.Conduct comparative Conduct comparative studies to validate the methodology.

Patrick Lt e et odology.

Make adjustments as necessary.

Lynch plynch@yPromote to Biomedical field.

@G

MI3.com

Develop additional metrics for customer satisfaction, etc. 39

Page 40: Benchmarking Biomedical

SERVICE VALUE RATIO

Patriick Lynch plyncch@

GM

I3.comm

40

Page 41: Benchmarking Biomedical

MAIN TOPIC Patriick Lynch plyncch@

GM

I3.comm

41

Page 42: Benchmarking Biomedical

A REAL-LIFE EXAMPLE OF THE USE OF SVR TO ANALYZE A GROUP OF EQUIPMENT

Patrick L

Let’s examine all of our

Lynch plynch@Let s examine all of our Warming Blankets to see if we have any lemons. . .

@G

MI3.com

we have any lemons. . .

42

Page 43: Benchmarking Biomedical

Patrick LLynch plynch@@

GM

I3.com

43

Page 44: Benchmarking Biomedical

Patrick LLynch plynch@@

GM

I3.com

44

Page 45: Benchmarking Biomedical

Patrick LLynch plynch@@

GM

I3.com

45

Page 46: Benchmarking Biomedical

Patrick LLynch plynch@@

GM

I3.com

46

Page 47: Benchmarking Biomedical

MAIN TOPIC Patriick Lynch plyncch@

GM

I3.comm

47