benchmarking and accreditation in health informatics

33
Benchmarking and Benchmarking and Accreditation in Health Accreditation in Health Informatics Informatics Mike Sinclair – National Project Manager John Rayner – Club Chairman

Upload: winda

Post on 11-Jan-2016

42 views

Category:

Documents


3 download

DESCRIPTION

Benchmarking and Accreditation in Health Informatics. Mike Sinclair – National Project Manager John Rayner – Club Chairman. Agenda. Overview of Project Deliverables Consultation & Communication The Benchmarking Information Pack The Benchmarking Club Accreditation Professionalism. - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Benchmarking and Accreditation in Health Informatics

Benchmarking and Benchmarking and Accreditation in Health Accreditation in Health

Informatics Informatics

Mike Sinclair – National Project ManagerJohn Rayner – Club Chairman

Page 2: Benchmarking and Accreditation in Health Informatics

Agenda

• Overview of Project• Deliverables• Consultation & Communication• The Benchmarking Information Pack• The Benchmarking Club• Accreditation• Professionalism

Page 3: Benchmarking and Accreditation in Health Informatics

The story so far…

• Work initiated by C&C programme• First pilot 14/12/07• Benchmarking information pack (BIP)

developed• National consultation,

communication and collaboration• Benchmarking Club established• Developing OBS and OBC for

Accreditation Scheme

Page 4: Benchmarking and Accreditation in Health Informatics

The story so far…

• First Pilot– Barts and The London– South East Coast– THIS

• Second Pilot– North Mersey HIS– South Staffs and Shropshire NHS Trust– Oxford HIS– Moorfields Eye Hospital– Humber Mental Health NHS Trust

Page 5: Benchmarking and Accreditation in Health Informatics

National Piloting and Testing

Links with DH / NHSpolicy changes

National Standards

International and Industry Benchmarks

E-Gov’nment & publicSector alignment

Governance & Controls

In a

Fra

me

wor

k …

..

Future Considerations& External Links

Governance FrameworkStrategic and Developmental PlanningMaturity DifferentialsStakeholder relationsLeadership (strategic)

Two National Pilots: 5 + 5 Informatics Services

Operational ModelPolicies and ProceduresCore service documentation(Strategy, Business Plan, Comms Plan etc..)Value for Money

Operational Indicators & Controls

ITIL Measures and StandardsOther service metricsSkill levels and measuresCostRoutine service toolkits(IG etc)

Service Metrics)Wider NHS Consultation and External validation

Benchmarking Club Developed (HiBC)

Accreditation

Benchmarking Framework & Processes Communication

Pro

jec

t Ma

na

ge

me

nt &

Me

tho

do

log

y E

ng

ag

em

en

t

National Project

Benchmarking Information Pack (BIP)

National fit (CQC, Monitor, DH, etc..)

Workable and practical scheme (OBC & OBS)

CFH Alignment: NIMM, LISA, ORAM, Investment S.

HIS Benchmarking and AccreditationProject Overview

Application: incremental/aligned with HIBC.

Web Tools and Best Practice Library

Page 6: Benchmarking and Accreditation in Health Informatics

HISBA Project Deliverables

• Develop Benchmarking for I.S.– Scheme;– Tools;– Support.

• Develop Accreditation– Standards, Process, Support

Page 7: Benchmarking and Accreditation in Health Informatics

HIS Benchmarking and Accreditation ProjectThree Layer Model

Page 8: Benchmarking and Accreditation in Health Informatics

Consultation and Communication

• National Workshops & Meetings– July 07, Nov 07, April 08, May08– HC2008 – Assist regional meetings– London IM Forum

• HIS Benchmarking Club– Established June 08– Workshop Sept 08

• Individual Organisational Follow-ups

Page 9: Benchmarking and Accreditation in Health Informatics

• NHS/DH– Healthcare Commission (CQC and Monitor tba)

– National Audit bodies

• External– Tribal Group– PWC– Gartner– SOCITIM

Consultation and Communication

Page 10: Benchmarking and Accreditation in Health Informatics

CFH Connections

• IM&T Planning Guidance (Operating Framework)

• PCT Support & Development Tool (LISA)

• Benefits management tool (ORAM)• National Infrastructure Maturity Model

(NIMM)• Investment Survey

Page 11: Benchmarking and Accreditation in Health Informatics

Starting to Align Initiatives

LISA•Local health community (LHC) focus•Prepares readiness for IM&T enabled change•PCT accountability for IM&T strategic planning•Alignment of IM&T strategy with LHC transformation goals

NIMM• IT Infrastructure maturity model• Considers technology and IT

management of IT infrastructure• Focus is on capabilities not

specific products• Allows as is benchmarking and

target planning in order to create a roadmap for coordinated infrastructure improvement

ORAM• Assists IM&T Programme

Managers to assess organisational readiness to implement IM&T enabled change

• Planning & delivery of programmes & projects

• Programme & Project governance

• Benefits realisation & lessons learned

HiBC• Framework for health informatics benchmarking• Identifies areas for service improvement• Promotes understanding of benefits & risks of

alternative models• Address issues of information governance &

accreditation• Compares performance of informatics services

CUIPSPGIG Tool kitCFH GPGNHS EWAsITILMSPOthers..

Page 12: Benchmarking and Accreditation in Health Informatics

The Benchmarking Information Pack 1. Introduction 2. SD (Service Description) 3. CSF (Critical Success Factors)

Leadership

Governance

Development and Improvement Planning

Long-term Resource Framework

4. BSC (Balanced Score Card)Resources

Customer focus

Business Processes

Workforce Development

5. SC (Individual Service Categories)IM&T Planning

Information Services

ICT System Operation, Service Support and Delivery

Information Governance

6. Standards and References

7. Summary of scores

Page 13: Benchmarking and Accreditation in Health Informatics

BIP Development

• Developing context and guidance • Look at ‘user perspectives’• Weighting and aggregation / scoring• Constraints and dependencies• Increased availability and access• Analysis and Reporting• Alignment/integration with standards

Page 14: Benchmarking and Accreditation in Health Informatics

Phased approach…

• Benchmarking Club providing / hosting the National Benchmarking scheme

• The national HIS accreditation scheme

Page 15: Benchmarking and Accreditation in Health Informatics

HiBC (The Club)…

• NHS HIS Benchmarking Club– 97 organisations registered– 58 registered on the website– BIP finalised, download & upload– Committee meetings– Number of in year projects– Club library– Legal input, Club status, FIO, SLA

Page 16: Benchmarking and Accreditation in Health Informatics

In-year projects…

• Service level costing

• Infrastructure

• Customer service / satisfaction

• Equality and diversity

Page 17: Benchmarking and Accreditation in Health Informatics

The National Scheme

• Approx 600 providers– In-house– Managed– Shared– JV

• Introduced 1st April 2009– Mandatory?– Subscriptions?– BIP and annual projects

Page 18: Benchmarking and Accreditation in Health Informatics

The National Accreditation Scheme

• Potential model– Using the BIP and the Club– Local site visits– Survey team– Report and recommendation

• Accrediting body– Independent from the process– Will recognise good practice– Award time limited accreditation

Page 19: Benchmarking and Accreditation in Health Informatics

Accreditation

• The license to operate

• Renewable

• What happens to unlicensed providers??

Page 20: Benchmarking and Accreditation in Health Informatics

Accreditation Processes

• UKCHIP • British Computer Society• National Computer Centre• SOCITM• UKAS• Pathology Accreditation Service• HAQU / CHKS• Royal College(s) / RSM• DH Information Accreditation Scheme

Page 21: Benchmarking and Accreditation in Health Informatics

How an accreditation scheme might work

Independent Scheme Owner

Support

Standards

Certification

The United Kingdom Accreditation Service (UKAS) is the sole national accreditation body recognised by government to assess, against

internationally agreed standards, organisations that provide certification, testing, inspection and

calibration services.

Standards used to define the scheme –

Subject to ongoing refinement and national

agreement

Visit www.dh.gov.uk/accreditation for more information.

The Process of testing the

standards, and validating

organisational status/position.

Certification Organisation(s)

[Based on DH Information Accreditation Scheme]

Getting people up to standard, and

supporting movement from

one level to another

Page 22: Benchmarking and Accreditation in Health Informatics

The Benefits of Accreditation

Page 23: Benchmarking and Accreditation in Health Informatics

Benefit to the Provider..Benefit to the Provider..

• Increase in professional reputation• More competitive and attractive to Commissioners• Increase market share• High staff morale and lower staff turnover• Viewed as an attractive employer• Better protection against legal action• Greater freedom to operate and increased

opportunity• Authorised to use the brand (wear the badge)• Marketing tool• Attract high calibre staff

Page 24: Benchmarking and Accreditation in Health Informatics

Benefit to the CommissionerBenefit to the Commissioner

• Assurance through third party attestation• Increase public and patient confidence levels• More likely to be compliant with legislation and

Health & Safety conscious• Receive high quality services at low cost• Knowing that provider works to approved standards• Greater opportunity to provide assurance to NEDs• Implications for CNST liabilities• Less reliance on local processes to assess HIS

providers

Page 25: Benchmarking and Accreditation in Health Informatics

Benefits to the service user..Benefits to the service user..

• High level of confidence of service delivery

• Appropriate systems and processes in place for escalation, customer enquiries and assistance

• Compliance with good up to date practices

• Customer oriented• Know what to expect

Page 26: Benchmarking and Accreditation in Health Informatics

Accreditation and the road to professionalism….

Page 27: Benchmarking and Accreditation in Health Informatics

Professionalism.....Professionalism.....

• The process by which a profession arises from a trade or occupation.

Page 28: Benchmarking and Accreditation in Health Informatics

Professionalism

• Supported by the HIR• A Maturity Model ?

Page 29: Benchmarking and Accreditation in Health Informatics

Professionalism

• Levers & Drivers:-– The public perception & expectation;– Public Safety;– Public good; – Ethics & Behaviour;– Recognised Body of Knowledge,

Page 30: Benchmarking and Accreditation in Health Informatics

How is professionalism How is professionalism achieved?achieved?

• Prolonged academic training• Formal qualifications• Membership of a professional or

regulatory body• Licensing authorities• Professional codes of Practice

Page 31: Benchmarking and Accreditation in Health Informatics

RegulationRegulation

• Regulation enforced by statute distinguishes a profession from other occupations represented by trade groups who aspire to professional status for their members.

• In all countries, professions have their regulatory or professional bodies, whose function is to define, promote, oversee, support and regulate the affairs of its members. For some professions there may be several such bodies.

Page 33: Benchmarking and Accreditation in Health Informatics

Thank you

The Health Informatics Service is hosted by Calderdale & Huddersfield NHS Foundation Trust and supports healthcare organisations across Yorkshire and The Humber