behavioral team report - chartcourse.com · when individual behavioral scores are compiled to...

Behavioral Team Report

TTISI TeamTTI Success Insights3-3-2017

Copyright © 2006-2016. Target Training International, Ltd.

IntroductionPredictable patterns of human nature can be accurately measured through behavioral assessments. A clear understanding of these predictablebehaviors can enable productive outcomes. When individual behavioral scores are compiled to examine members of a team, managers are able to seeareas of strength, pursue improvement opportunities, and secure the resources needed to deliver on organizational goals.

CONTENTS OF THE REPORT

Overview - A summary examining the composition of yourteam for both DISC and behavioral segmentationexpressed as a percentage.

Team composition - Defines the makeup of yourorganization by behavioral segment and shares the DISCgraphs of individuals on your team.

Behavioral segment analysis - Examines the individualswithin each segment, segment characteristics, ways tocommunicate, and ideal environment.

Group wheel plots - Identifies the natural, adapted, andmigrated styles of each team member.

Behavioral characteristics hierarchy - Compares individualscores to others on the team, team averages, andpopulation means.

TEAM MEMBER LIST

James AlireKate BibenVanessa BoettcherTom BogartRon BonnstetterAlec BonnstetterRick BowersJohn CarliCraig CasimirNick ChrisRodney CoxPhilip DaugsKayla DeVaultTodd FoxCandice FrazerEric GehrigSusan GinnErin HealyJill HeberlingDustin HebetsRichard HuntAnne KlinkAmy LaneFavor LarsonAnn LeitensdorferCarol MettenbrinkRyan MillerCherisse Mowry

Cassandra NelsonCindy RosserBrent RowlandSandra StonerTeresa TaylorBobby TyningKefei WangAdam Wong

1TTISI Team


Team DISC OverviewThe TTI Success Insights® wheel is a graphic representation of a team's behavioral make-up among the four quadrants of the DISC wheel.

FASTER

PAC

ED

PEOPLE ORIENTEDSL

OW

ER P

AC

ED

TASK ORIENTED

D

IS

C19% (7)

31% (11)22% (8)

28% (10)

OBSERVING DISC

Have you ever noticed:

Some people are forceful, direct, and results-oriented

Some are optimistic, fun, and talkative

Some are steady, patient, and relaxed

Some are precise, accurate, and detail-oriented

DEFINING DISC

DominanceHow you respond to problems and challenges

InfluenceHow you influence others to your point of view

SteadinessHow you respond to the pace of the environment

ComplianceHow you respond to rules and procedures

2TTISI Team


The TTI Success Insights® WheelThe wheel illustrates the blending of the four DISC styles, while demonstrating the similarities and differences in behavioral styles among the teammembers. This wheel shows the behavioral composition of a team, represented as percentages in each of the eight segments.

CONDUCTORPER

SUAD

ER

PROMOTER

RELATER

SUPPORTER

CO

OR

DIN

ATO

RAN

ALYZER

IMPLEMENTOR

D

D/I

I

I/S

S

S/C

C

C/D

8%

8%

19%11%

6%

33%

3%11%

BEHAVIORAL SEGMENT DEFINITIONS

CONDUCTOR - D - People who tend to be direct, decisive, and seekresults.

PERSUADER - D/I - People who tend to convince others by appealing toreason, understanding, or emotion.

PROMOTER - I - People who tend to verbalize many thoughts toinfluence outcomes.

RELATER - I/S - People who tend to take time, think positively, and arefocused on interpersonal relationships.

SUPPORTER - S - People who tend to be champions of sound ideas,working steadily and diligently to ensure a project is fully realized.

COORDINATOR - S/C - People who tend to be fact-oriented and adhereto proven methods to complete projects and tasks.

ANALYZER - C - People who tend to seek out accuracy in all activitiesand ensure the highest quality possible by gathering precise data.

IMPLEMENTOR - C/D - People who tend to assess, leverage facts andfigures, and advance toward a solution.

3TTISI Team

Coordinator Team Characteristics - (S/C)Coordinators tend to be fact-oriented and adhere to proven methods to complete projects and tasks. The following information will give the teammembers a clear understanding and appreciation of Coordinators.

STRENGTHS AND WEAKNESSES

POTENTIAL STRENGTHS

Work for a leader and a causeMake tough decisions without letting emotions interfereFollow projects through to completionIdentify problems, rules, errors, and proceduresImplement and fine-tune the plan

POTENTIAL WEAKNESSES

Become stubborn under stressDownplay accomplishmentsSuppress feelingsCommunicate indirectlyResist change without reasoning

BEHAVIORAL ATTRIBUTES

Task Oriented People Oriented

Slower Paced Faster Paced

VALUE TO THE ORGANIZATION

Objective outlookLooks for logical solutionsConscientious and steady

21.28%of the Population

12/3633% of the Team

WORDS THAT WORK

ProvenStandardOrganized

WORDS THAT DON'T WORK

UnfamiliarHecticIncomplete

4TTISI Team


Coordinator Team DISC Graphs - (S/C)

COORDINATOR TEAM

Kate BibenAlec BonnstetterNick ChrisPhilip DaugsErin HealyAnne KlinkAmy LaneCarol MettenbrinkRyan MillerCherisse MowryBrent RowlandKefei Wang

100

90

80

70

60

50

40

30

20

10

0

D

7

I

38

S

83

C

91%

K. B

iben

100

90

80

70

60

50

40

30

20

10

0

D

43

I

36

S

66

C

61%

A. B

onns

tette

r

100

90

80

70

60

50

40

30

20

10

0

D

22

I

8

S

84

C

93%

N. C

hris

100

90

80

70

60

50

40

30

20

10

0

D

13

I

12

S

92

C

93%

P. D

augs

100

90

80

70

60

50

40

30

20

10

0

D

17

I

6

S

94

C

100%

E. H

ealy

100

90

80

70

60

50

40

30

20

10

0

D

15

I

62

S

76

C

81%

A. K

link

100

90

80

70

60

50

40

30

20

10

0

D

12

I

36

S

84

C

91%

A. L

ane

100

90

80

70

60

50

40

30

20

10

0

D

28

I

8

S

92

C

82%

C. M

ette

nbrin

k

100

90

80

70

60

50

40

30

20

10

0

D

13

I

12

S

95

C

91%

R. M

iller

100

90

80

70

60

50

40

30

20

10

0

D

8

I

58

S

85

C

81%

C. M

owry

100

90

80

70

60

50

40

30

20

10

0

D

43

I

12

S

74

C

81%

B. R

owla

nd

100

90

80

70

60

50

40

30

20

10

0

D

41

I

32

S

68

C

62%

K. W

ang

5TTISI Team


Promoter Team Characteristics - (I)Promoters tend to verbalize many thoughts to influence outcomes. The following information will give the team members a clear understanding andappreciation of Promoters.


POTENTIAL STRENGTHS

See the "big picture" and communicate itPeople-orientedPromote the team throughout the organizationBring the team togetherAdvocate for new ideas and products


Emphasize fun over efficiencyOvervalue the skills of othersOverly optimistic about team abilitiesInattentive to detailReact based on emotions





Verbalize feelingsSpontaneityGood mixer


7/3619% of the Team

WORDS THAT WORK

FlexibleExcitingInspiring


OrdinaryQuietStrict

6TTISI Team


Promoter Team DISC Graphs - (I)

PROMOTER TEAM

James AlireTom BogartRodney CoxJill HeberlingAnn LeitensdorferCassandra NelsonSandra Stoner

100

90

80

70

60

50

40

30

20

10

0

D

64

I

84

S

24

C

32%

J. A

lire

100

90

80

70

60

50

40

30

20

10

0

D

32

I

96

S

65

C

16%

T. B

ogar

t

100

90

80

70

60

50

40

30

20

10

0

D

37

I

84

S

63

C

28%

R. C

ox

100

90

80

70

60

50

40

30

20

10

0

D

35

I

93

S

62

C

26%

J. H

eber

ling

100

90

80

70

60

50

40

30

20

10

0

D

37

I

88

S

65

C

16%

A. L

eite

nsdo

rfer

100

90

80

70

60

50

40

30

20

10

0

D

35

I

92

S

68

C

14%

C. N

elso

n

100

90

80

70

60

50

40

30

20

10

0

D

22

I

92

S

68

C

32%

S. S

tone

r

7TTISI Team


Relater Team Characteristics - (I/S)Relaters tend to take time, think positively, and are focused on interpersonal relationships. The following information will give the team members a clearunderstanding and appreciation of Relaters.


POTENTIAL STRENGTHS

Possess strong commitment to teamListen activelyOffer understanding and friendshipCreate an environment where people feel significantProtect and value people and things


Freeze under stressAvoid confrontationAccept the current situationAgree with the opinions of othersHold grudges





Cooperative member of the teamPositive sense of humorTenacious


4/3611% of the Team

WORDS THAT WORK

EasygoingSimpleResponsive


ComplexAbstractAnalytical

8TTISI Team


Relater Team DISC Graphs - (I/S)

RELATER TEAM

Kayla DeVaultTodd FoxSusan GinnBobby Tyning

100

90

80

70

60

50

40

30

20

10

0

D

15

I

88

S

92

C

22%

K. D

eVau

lt

100

90

80

70

60

50

40

30

20

10

0

D

8

I

93

S

89

C

28%

T. F

ox

100

90

80

70

60

50

40

30

20

10

0

D

26

I

93

S

84

C

8%

S. G

inn

100

90

80

70

60

50

40

30

20

10

0

D

34

I

65

S

62

C

61%

B. T

ynin

g

9TTISI Team


Implementor Team Characteristics - (C/D)Implementors tend to assess, leverage facts and figures and advance toward a solution. The following information will give the team members a clearunderstanding and appreciation of Implementors.


POTENTIAL STRENGTHS

Aware and sensitive to the cost of errors and mistakesShare creative ideasFinish tasks quicklyExpect high performance standardsUse time well


Under-appreciate other team membersMake decisions inconsistentlyDisregard the feelings of team membersOveruse facts and figuresTake on too much within the team





Looks for logical solutionsRequires fact-based ideasExcellent troubleshooter


4/3611% of the Team

WORDS THAT WORK

FunctionActionData


RelaxPerceptionAssume

10TTISI Team


Implementor Team DISC Graphs - (C/D)

IMPLEMENTOR TEAM

Candice FrazerEric GehrigRichard HuntAdam Wong

100

90

80

70

60

50

40

30

20

10

0

D

74

I

45

S

12

C

72%

C. F

raze

r

100

90

80

70

60

50

40

30

20

10

0

D

62

I

37

S

45

C

62%

E. G

ehrig

100

90

80

70

60

50

40

30

20

10

0

D

88

I

5

S

45

C

91%

R. H

unt

100

90

80

70

60

50

40

30

20

10

0

D

66

I

32

S

36

C

72%

A. W

ong

11TTISI Team


Conductor Team Characteristics - (D)Conductors tend to be direct, decisive and seek results. The following information will give the team members a clear understanding and appreciation ofConductors.


POTENTIAL STRENGTHS

Forward-looking and competitiveEnergized by direct answersComfortable with power and authoritySeeking problems to solveDriven toward results


Poor or selective listeningMake decisions without all of the factsLack tact and diplomacyUse fear as a motivatorOver delegate and under instruct





Results drivenChallenges the status quoVenturesome, ambitious


3/368% of the Team

WORDS THAT WORK

QuickAdvantageDecisive


InconsistentFollow DirectionsPatient

12TTISI Team


Conductor Team DISC Graphs - (D)

CONDUCTOR TEAM

Vanessa BoettcherRon BonnstetterDustin Hebets

100

90

80

70

60

50

40

30

20

10

0

D

100

I

34

S

24

C

46%

V. B

oettc

her

100

90

80

70

60

50

40

30

20

10

0

D

100

I

68

S

8

C

26%

R. B

onns

tette

r

100

90

80

70

60

50

40

30

20

10

0

D

92

I

56

S

32

C

35%

D. H

ebet

s

13TTISI Team


Persuader Team Characteristics - (D/I)Persuaders tend to convince others by appealing to reason, understanding, or emotion. The following information will give the team members a clearunderstanding and appreciation of Persuaders.


POTENTIAL STRENGTHS

Optimistic about team goalsIndependent and autonomousEngage others in projects and tasksGet results through team membersPromote and accept changes


Do not manage time or deadlines wellDo not follow up and follow through as neededTake on too many responsibilities at oncePush their agendaBe overly enthusiastic





Represents company in organizationsAbility to handle many activitiesInnovative


3/368% of the Team

WORDS THAT WORK

AmazingUnprecedentedExtraordinary


StandardizedStructuredUniform

14TTISI Team


Persuader Team DISC Graphs - (D/I)

PERSUADER TEAM

Rick BowersFavor LarsonCindy Rosser

100

90

80

70

60

50

40

30

20

10

0

D

86

I

88

S

7

C

28%

R. B

ower

s

100

90

80

70

60

50

40

30

20

10

0

D

100

I

96

S

7

C

8%

F. L

arso

n

100

90

80

70

60

50

40

30

20

10

0

D

100

I

94

S

24

C

5%

C. R

osse

r

15TTISI Team


Supporter Team Characteristics - (S)Supporters tend to be champions of sound ideas, working steadily and diligently to ensure a project is fully realized. The following information will givethe team members a clear understanding and appreciation of Supporters.


POTENTIAL STRENGTHS

Focus on team activitiesComfort others and show patiencePerform well in team environmentsConform to established proceduresAdd stability to the team


Lack a sense of urgencyDo the work themselves, rather than delegateResist team-initiated changesHesitate to move forwardDo not forgive faults or mistakes





Negotiates conflictsDependable team playerConsistent and steady


2/366% of the Team

WORDS THAT WORK

ConsistentUsualSecure


UnexpectedUrgentConfrontation

16TTISI Team


Supporter Team DISC Graphs - (S)

SUPPORTER TEAM

Craig CasimirTeresa Taylor 100

90

80

70

60

50

40

30

20

10

0

D

14

I

63

S

87

C

61%

C. C

asim

ir

100

90

80

70

60

50

40

30

20

10

0

D

8

I

64

S

87

C

64%

T. T

aylo

r

17TTISI Team


Analyzer Team Characteristics - (C)Analyzers tend to seek out accuracy in all activity and are careful to gather precise data to ensure the highest quality possible. The following informationwill give the team members a clear understanding and appreciation of Analyzers.


POTENTIAL STRENGTHS

Operate in a self-disciplined mannerAccurate and preciseUse facts to support their opinion and causeMaintain high standards for self and subordinatesThink critically


Do the work themselves and do not delegateLean on team leader or supervisorHesitate to act without sufficient factsKeep their feelings to themselvesConceal new ideas





Will gather data for decision makingComprehensive problem solvingAccurate and intuitive


1/363% of the Team

WORDS THAT WORK

FactualPreciseVerified


ImagineEducated guessExperimental

18TTISI Team


Analyzer Team DISC Graphs - (C)

100

90

80

70

60

50

40

30

20

10

0

D

58

I

7

S

65

C

91%

J. C

arli

19TTISI Team


Wheel Segment DefinitionsThe following matrix illustrates the blending of the four DISC styles into eight segments. Each segment contains a definition and the percentage of teammembers in the respective segment. Segments are deliberately located beside the segment that has the opposing style.

CONDUCTOR - D (8%)

People who tend to be direct, decisive, and seek results.

PERSUADER - D/I (8%)

People who tend to convince others by appealing to reason,understanding, or emotion.

PROMOTER - I (19%)

People who tend to verbalize many thoughts to influence outcomes.

RELATER - I/S (11%)

People who tend to take time, think positively, and are focused oninterpersonal relationships.

SUPPORTER - S (6%)

People who tend to be champions of sound ideas, working steadilyand diligently to ensure a project is fully realized.

COORDINATOR - S/C (33%)

People who tend to be fact-oriented and adhere to proven methodsto complete projects and tasks.

ANALYZER - C (3%)

People who tend to seek out accuracy in all activities and ensure thehighest quality possible by gathering precise data.

IMPLEMENTOR - C/D (11%)

People who tend to assess, leverage facts and figures, and advancetoward a solution.

20TTISI Team


Team Member OverviewThe following matrix illustrates the blending of the four DISC styles into eight segments. Each segment contains team members and the percentage ofteam members in the respective segment. Segments are deliberately located beside the segment that has the opposing style.

CONDUCTOR (8%)Vanessa BoettcherRon BonnstetterDustin Hebets

PERSUADER (8%)Rick BowersFavor LarsonCindy Rosser

PROMOTER (19%)James AlireTom BogartRodney CoxJill HeberlingAnn LeitensdorferCassandra NelsonSandra Stoner

RELATER (11%)Kayla DeVaultTodd FoxSusan GinnBobby Tyning

SUPPORTER (6%)Craig CasimirTeresa Taylor

COORDINATOR (33%)Kate BibenAlec BonnstetterNick ChrisPhilip DaugsErin HealyAnne KlinkAmy Lane

Carol MettenbrinkRyan MillerCherisse MowryBrent RowlandKefei Wang

ANALYZER (3%)John Carli

IMPLEMENTOR (11%)Candice FrazerEric GehrigRichard HuntAdam Wong

21TTISI Team


Team Member CharacteristicsThe following matrix illustrates the blending of the four DISC styles into eight segments. Each segment contains team member characteristics and thepercentage of team members in the respective segment. Segments are deliberately located beside the segment that has the opposing style.

CONDUCTOR (8%)

CompetitiveDirect

Results-OrientedActs with Urgency

Change AgentStrong Willed

PERSUADER (8%)

Quick to ChangeIndependent

OptimisticConfident

CharismaticInfluential

PROMOTER (19%)

TrustingConvincing

InspiringOutgoingCordial

Cheerful

RELATER (11%)

Good SupporterTeam Player

PersistentCooperativeEmpathetic

Compassionate

SUPPORTER (6%)

AccommodatingReflectivePersistentComposed

DependableGood Listener

COORDINATOR (33%)

Slow to ChangeSelf-Disciplined

ExecutorLogical

RealisticProcess-Oriented

ANALYZER (3%)

PreciseAccurate

Focus on QualityCritical Listener

Non-Verbal CommunicatorDetail oriented

IMPLEMENTOR (11%)

CreativeThorough thinker

Task-OrientedFact-BasedSelectiveInventive

22TTISI Team


Ideal Environment for Team MembersThe following matrix illustrates the blending of the four DISC styles into eight segments. Each segment contains the ideal environment for the team andthe percentage of team members in the respective segment. Segments are deliberately located beside the segment that has the opposing style.

CONDUCTOR (8%)

Bold and Aggressive ActionsChallenging Assignments

Expedites ActionFirm and Quick Decision Making

Results-Oriented

PERSUADER (8%)

EnthusiasmPersuasive Communications

Results Through PeopleTesting of New Ideas

Competition with Others

PROMOTER (19%)

People ContactSolutions to "People Problems"

Optimistic OutlookVerbalizes Thoughts and Ideas

Varied Activities

RELATER (11%)

TeamworkCoaching and Counseling

Service to OthersHarmonious Work Environment

Assistance to Customers

SUPPORTER (6%)

Logical ThinkingSystematic Routine

Relaxed PaceTeam Participation

Security

COORDINATOR (33%)

Adherence to StandardsRoutine Work

Guidelines to FollowFacts and Data to Analyze

Diplomacy and Cooperation

ANALYZER (3%)

High Quality StandardsProcedures to Follow

Clean and Tidy WorkstationAccuracy

Analysis of Facts and Data

IMPLEMENTOR (11%)

Logical DecisionsStudying and Solving Problems

Efficient MethodologyEffective Time-Management

Fact-based Solutions

23TTISI Team


Words That Don't Work with Team MembersThe following matrix illustrates the blending of the four DISC styles into eight segments. Each segment contains the words that don't work with the teamand the percentage of team members in the respective segment. Segments are deliberately located beside the segment that has the opposing style.

CONDUCTOR (8%)

InconsistentFollow Directions

Patient

PERSUADER (8%)

StandardizedStructured

Uniform

PROMOTER (19%)

OrdinaryQuietStrict

RELATER (11%)

ComplexAbstract

Analytical

SUPPORTER (6%)

UnexpectedUrgent

Confrontation

COORDINATOR (33%)

UnfamiliarHectic

Incomplete

ANALYZER (3%)

ImagineEducated guess

Experimental

IMPLEMENTOR (11%)

RelaxPerception

Assume

24TTISI Team


Team Member Characteristics

CONDUCTORPER

SUAD

ER

PROMOTER

RELATER

SUPPORTER

CO

OR

DIN

ATO

RAN

ALYZER

IMPLEMENTORCompetitive

Direct

Results-Oriented

Acts with Urgency

Change Agent

Strong Willed

Quick to C

hangeIndependent

Opt i m

isticC

onfidentC

har is matic

Inf lu ential

Trus

ting

Convincin

g

Inspirin

g

Outg

oing

Cordial

Chee

rful

Good SupporterTeam Player

PersistentCooperativeEmpathetic

CompassionateAccommodating

Reflective

Persistent

Composed

Dependable

Good Listener

Slow

to C

hang

eSe

lf-D

isc i

plin

edEx

ecut

orLo

gica

lR

ealis

ticPr

oces

s-O

r ient

ed

Precise

Acc

urate

Focu

s o

n Qua

lity

Critica

l Liste

ner

Non-

Verba

l C

ommunica

tor

Detail o

riente

d CreativeThorough thinker

Task-OrientedFact-BasedSelectiveInventive

8.3%

8.3%

19.4%

11.1%

5.6%

33.3%

2.8%11.1%

25TTISI Team


Ideal Environment for Team Members

CONDUCTORPER

SUAD

ER

PROMOTER

RELATER

SUPPORTER

CO

OR

DIN

ATO

RAN

ALYZER

IMPLEMENTOR

Bold and Aggressive Actions

Challenging Assignments

Expedites Action

Firm and Quick Decision Making

Results-OrientedEnthu siasm

Persuasive Co m

munications

Results Through PeopleTesting of N

ew Ideas

Com

petiti on with O

thers

People

Contac

t

Solutions to "P

eo

ple P

roble

ms"

Optimist

ic Outl

ook

Verbalizes Tho

ughts

and

Idea

s

Varied A

ctivit

ies

TeamworkCoaching and CounselingService to OthersHarmonious Work Environment

Assistance to CustomersLogical Thinking

Systematic Routine

Relaxed Pace

Team Participation

Security

Adhe

renc

e to

Sta

ndar

dsR

outin

e W

ork

Gui

delin

es to

Fol

low

Fact

s an

d D

ata

to A

naly

zeD

iplo

mac

y an

d C

oope

ratio

n

High

Qua

lity Stan

dards

Proc

edure

s to F

ollow

Clea

n and

Tidy

Work

station

Accu

racy

Analy

sis of

Facts

and Data

Logical DecisionsStudying and Solving ProblemsEfficient MethodologyEffective Time-ManagementFact-based Solutions

8.3%

8.3%

19.4%

11.1%

5.6%

33.3%

2.8%11.1%

26TTISI Team


Words That Don't Work with Team Members

CONDUCTORPER

SUAD

ER

PROMOTER

RELATER

SUPPORTER

CO

OR

DIN

ATO

RAN

ALYZER

IMPLEMENTORInconsistent

Follow Directions

Patient

StandardizedStructured

Unif orm

Ordi

nary

Quiet

Strict

ComplexAbstract

AnalyticalUnexpected

Urgent

Confrontation

Unf

amilia

rH

ect ic

Inco

mp l

ete

Imag

ine

Educ

ate

d guess

Expe

rimen

tal

RelaxPerception

Assume

8.3%

8.3%

19.4%

11.1%

5.6%

33.3%

2.8%11.1%

27TTISI Team


Group Wheel Natural

FASTER

PAC

ED

PEOPLE ORIENTED

SLO

WER

PA

CED

TASK ORIENTED

CONDUCTOR

PERSU

AD

ER

PROMOTER

RELATER

SUPPORTER

CO

OR

DIN

ATO

R

ANALYZER

IMPLEMENTOR

1

2

3

45

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

1617

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

2526

27

28

29

30

31

323334

35

36

37

38

39

40

4142

43

44

45

46

47

484950

51

52

53

54

55

56

57

5859

60

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13 14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

2223

24

25

2627

28

29

30

31

32

33

34

35

36

NaturalLeader

TEAM MEMBERS1: James Alire2: Kate Biben3: Vanessa Boettcher4: Tom Bogart5: Alec Bonnstetter6: Ron Bonnstetter7: Rick Bowers *8: John Carli9: Craig Casimir

10: Nick Chris11: Rodney Cox12: Philip Daugs13: Kayla DeVault14: Todd Fox15: Candice Frazer16: Eric Gehrig17: Susan Ginn18: Erin Healy19: Jill Heberling20: Dustin Hebets21: Richard Hunt22: Anne Klink23: Amy Lane24: Favor Larson25: Ann Leitensdorfer26: Carol Mettenbrink27: Ryan Miller28: Cherisse Mowry29: Cassandra Nelson30: Cindy Rosser31: Brent Rowland32: Sandra Stoner33: Teresa Taylor34: Bobby Tyning35: Kefei Wang36: Adam Wong

28TTISI Team


Group Wheel Adapted

FASTER

PAC

ED

PEOPLE ORIENTED

SLO

WER

PA

CED

TASK ORIENTED

CONDUCTOR

PERSU

AD

ER

PROMOTER

RELATER

SUPPORTER

CO

OR

DIN

ATO

R

ANALYZER

IMPLEMENTOR

1

2

3

45

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

1617

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

2526

27

28

29

30

31

323334

35

36

37

38

39

40

4142

43

44

45

46

47

484950

51

52

53

54

55

56

57

5859

60

1

2

3

4

5

6 78

9

10

11

12

13 14

15

16

17

18

19

2021

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

32

33

34

35

36

AdaptedLeader

TEAM MEMBERS1: James Alire2: Kate Biben3: Vanessa Boettcher4: Tom Bogart5: Alec Bonnstetter6: Ron Bonnstetter7: Rick Bowers *8: John Carli9: Craig Casimir

10: Nick Chris11: Rodney Cox12: Philip Daugs13: Kayla DeVault14: Todd Fox15: Candice Frazer16: Eric Gehrig17: Susan Ginn18: Erin Healy19: Jill Heberling20: Dustin Hebets21: Richard Hunt22: Anne Klink23: Amy Lane24: Favor Larson25: Ann Leitensdorfer26: Carol Mettenbrink27: Ryan Miller28: Cherisse Mowry29: Cassandra Nelson30: Cindy Rosser31: Brent Rowland32: Sandra Stoner33: Teresa Taylor34: Bobby Tyning35: Kefei Wang36: Adam Wong

29TTISI Team


Group Wheel Migration

FASTER

PAC

ED

PEOPLE ORIENTED

SLO

WER

PA

CED

TASK ORIENTED

CONDUCTOR

PERSU

AD

ER

PROMOTER

RELATER

SUPPORTER

CO

OR

DIN

ATO

R

ANALYZER

IMPLEMENTOR

1

2

3

45

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

1617

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

2526

27

28

29

30

31

323334

35

36

37

38

39

40

4142

43

44

45

46

47

484950

51

52

53

54

55

56

57

5859

60

1

1

2

N21

3 3

4N15

A21

5

6 6

7

7

8

8

9 9

A15

12

13 13 14 14

15 15

16

16

17 19

20

20

21

21

22

22

23

24

24

25

26

2627

28

28

29

3030

31

33

33 34

34

35

35

3636

AdaptedLeader

NaturalLeader

TEAM MEMBERS1: James Alire

2/N21: Kate Biben3: Vanessa Boettcher

4/N15: Tom BogartA21/5: Alec Bonnstetter

6: Ron Bonnstetter7: Rick Bowers *8: John Carli9: Craig Casimir

A21/N21: Nick ChrisA15/N15: Rodney Cox

12/N21: Philip Daugs13: Kayla DeVault14: Todd Fox15: Candice Frazer16: Eric Gehrig

A15/17: Susan GinnA21/N21: Erin Healy

19/N15: Jill Heberling20: Dustin Hebets21: Richard Hunt22: Anne Klink

23/N21: Amy Lane24: Favor Larson

25/N15: Ann Leitensdorfer26: Carol Mettenbrink

A21/27: Ryan Miller28: Cherisse Mowry

29/N15: Cassandra Nelson30: Cindy Rosser

31/N21: Brent RowlandA15/N15: Sandra Stoner

33: Teresa Taylor34: Bobby Tyning35: Kefei Wang36: Adam Wong

30TTISI Team


Behavioral Hierarchy DefinedTwelve behavioral factors that are critical to team success are measured in this assessment. Comprehending each phrase and its definition drives acommon language that will enable you to compare individual scores, the team average, and the population means on subsequent pages.

Analysis of Data - Information is maintained accurately for repeatedexamination as required.

Competitiveness - Tenacity, boldness, assertiveness and a "will towin" in all situations.

Consistency - The ability to do the job the same way.

Customer Relations - A desire to convey your sincere interest inthem.

Follow Up and Follow Through - A need to be thorough.

Following Policy - Complying with the policy or if no policy, complyingwith the way it has been done.

Frequent Change - Moving easily from task to task or being asked toleave several tasks unfinished and easily move on to the new task withlittle or no notice.

Frequent Interaction with Others - Dealing with multiple interruptionson a continual basis, always maintaining a friendly interface with others.

Organized Workplace - Systems and procedures followed for success.

People Oriented - Spending a high percentage of time successfullyworking with a wide range of people from diverse backgrounds toachieve "win-win" outcomes.

Urgency - Decisiveness, quick response and fast action.

Versatility - Bringing together a multitude of talents and a willingness toadapt the talents to changing assignments as required.

31TTISI Team


The Bell Curve DefinedUnderstanding how to read a bell curve and standard deviation will enable you to clearly analyze the composition of your team.

For example, if the assessment scores of 100 people are collected andused in a normal probability distribution, 68 people, representing 68%of the 100 assessment scores, should fall within one standard deviationof the mean. Thirty four percent will be one standard deviation abovethe mean and 34% will be one standard deviation below the mean.The remaining 32% of people will be two or more standard deviationsaway from the mean. Sixteen percent will be two or more standarddeviations above the mean and 16% will be two or more standarddeviations below the mean.

The bell curve, known as a normal distribution, is the most commontype of distribution for a population. The highest point on the curve,represents the highest population of people, or the mean of the group.The standard deviation is a number used to show how data is spreadout from the mean, representing a percentage of the total datacollected.

16% 34% 34% 16%

Two or more standard deviations below the mean

One standard deviation below the mean

One standard deviation above the mean

Two or more standard deviations above the mean

32TTISI Team


Behavioral Style Comparison

Behavioral Characteristics

Following Policy

Consistency

People Oriented

Follow Up and Follow Through

Analysis of Data

Customer Relations

Frequent Interaction withOthersFrequent Interaction withOthers

Organized Workplace

Versatility

Frequent Change

Competitiveness

Urgency

Team

Avg

.

70

68

67

64

60

60

57

57

51

50

48

43

R. Bow

ers

30

32

75

27

25

45

90

20

95

90

100

95

J. Alire

40

38

75

37

25

65

90

25

85

80

70

75

K. Bibe

n

98

95

65

87

90

62

40

90

30

18

10

10

V. Boe

ttche

r

52

52

40

60

65

48

40

65

60

68

100

90

T. Bog

art

55

52

85

40

25

65

90

15

70

68

40

35R. B

onns

tetter

30

35

60

33

40

35

70

30

85

90

100

100

A. Bon

nstet

ter

85

75

50

80

80

65

40

80

40

40

50

40

J. Carl

i

85

80

40

83

100

40

10

100

25

28

50

40

C. Cas

imir

82

80

85

73

60

88

70

55

45

38

20

15

N. Chr

is

100

100

55

90

100

58

10

100

15

15

30

20

Mean

69

65

68

63

55

66

62

52

53

52

47

43





Team Leader

33TTISI Team


Behavioral Style Comparison Continued


Following Policy

Consistency

People Oriented


Analysis of Data

Customer Relations


Organized Workplace

Versatility

Frequent Change

Competitiveness

Urgency

Team

Avg

.

70

68

67

64

60

60

57

57

51

50

48

43

R. Bow

ers

30

32

75

27

25

45

90

20

95

90

100

95

R. Cox

62

55

85

47

25

72

90

20

65

62

40

35

P. Dau

gs

100

100

55

93

100

58

20

100

15

12

20

15

K. DeV

ault

68

68

100

53

25

82

90

20

50

50

20

15

T. Fo

x

65

68

100

50

25

78

90

20

60

52

10

10C. F

razer

60

55

50

60

70

38

50

75

70

62

80

85

E. Geh

rig

70

62

45

73

80

55

40

80

45

52

70

60

S. Ginn

60

62

100

43

20

75

90

10

60

60

30

20

E. Hea

ly

100

100

55

90

100

55

10

100

10

12

20

15

J. Heb

erling

60

55

85

43

25

68

90

20

70

65

40

35

Mean

69

65

68

63

55

66

62

52

53

52

47

43





Team Leader

34TTISI Team




Following Policy

Consistency

People Oriented


Analysis of Data

Customer Relations


Organized Workplace

Versatility

Frequent Change

Competitiveness

Urgency

Team

Avg

.

70

68

67

64

60

60

57

57

51

50

48

43

R. Bow

ers

30

32

75

27

25

45

90

20

95

90

100

95

D. Heb

ets

42

45

50

50

45

50

50

45

60

72

100

90

R. Hun

t

72

72

35

77

100

28

10

100

30

42

100

70

A. Klin

k

82

80

80

77

70

70

70

65

50

38

20

20

A. Lan

e

98

95

65

87

90

65

40

90

30

18

20

15F.

Larso

n

20

28

75

17

20

32

90

10

100

100

100

100

A. Leit

ensd

orfer

58

52

85

43

25

70

90

15

65

65

40

35

C. Mett

enbr

ink

100

100

55

97

100

55

10

100

10

18

30

20

R. Mille

r

100

100

55

93

100

58

20

100

15

12

20

15

C. Mow

ry

88

88

75

83

75

68

50

75

35

25

10

10

Mean

69

65

68

63

55

66

62

52

53

52

47

43





Team Leader

35TTISI Team




Following Policy

Consistency

People Oriented


Analysis of Data

Customer Relations


Organized Workplace

Versatility

Frequent Change

Competitiveness

Urgency

Team

Avg

.

70

68

67

64

60

60

57

57

51

50

48

43

R. Bow

ers

30

32

75

27

25

45

90

20

95

90

100

95

C. Nels

on

55

52

85

40

25

65

90

15

70

68

40

35

C. Ros

ser

25

30

75

23

20

38

90

10

90

95

100

90

B. Row

land

90

88

50

97

100

48

20

100

25

28

50

35

S. Ston

er

65

62

85

47

25

85

90

25

70

60

30

30T.

Taylo

r

82

80

85

73

60

85

70

55

45

38

10

10

B. Tyn

ing

78

68

70

67

60

75

70

55

55

50

40

35

K. Wan

g

85

75

50

80

80

65

40

80

40

40

50

40

A. Won

g

70

62

40

73

85

42

40

85

55

52

70

75

Mean

69

65

68

63

55

66

62

52

53

52

47

43





Team Leader

36TTISI Team


behavioral team report - chartcourse.com · when individual behavioral scores are compiled to...

Documents