bearing capacity and settlement of deep foundations - hm · pdf filebearing capacity and...
TRANSCRIPT
www.geotecnia.unb.br/gpfees
Bearing Capacity and Settlement of Deep Foundations
Summer Term 2015 Hochschule Munchen
Fakultat Bauingenieurwesen
www.geotecnia.unb.br/gpfees
LAYOUT
Bearing Capacity: Theory and Design Table Data
Settlement: Theory and Design Table Data
2/57
www.geotecnia.unb.br/gpfees
Theoretical Methods for Bearing Capacity
• Undrained behavior – total stress method
(short time)
Saturated clays
Alfa method
Nc ≈ 9 (≈5≤ Nc ≤ ≈9)
• Drained behavior – effective stress method
(long time)
Unsaturated clays and sands
Beta method
Nq function of ´
3/57
www.geotecnia.unb.br/gpfees
• Short Time - Undrained
4/57
www.geotecnia.unb.br/gpfees
Poulos et al. 2001
• Factor
Ca = .Cu
5/57
www.geotecnia.unb.br/gpfees
• Long Time - Drained
b
6/57
www.geotecnia.unb.br/gpfees
7
• Factor b
Poulos (1989)
7/57
www.geotecnia.unb.br/gpfees
• Factor b
Poulos et al. 2001
8/57
www.geotecnia.unb.br/gpfees
• Factor b
Poulos et al. 2001
9/57
www.geotecnia.unb.br/gpfees
10
• Bearing capacity
factor Nq
(Poulos Berezantzev)
10/57
www.geotecnia.unb.br/gpfees
11
• Recomendations from
Prof. H.G. Poulos
sa KK and ´
11/57
www.geotecnia.unb.br/gpfees
Practical Usage Tables
• Stas and Kullawhy / and K/K0 Values
• Table 5: Lateral unit friction for driven piles
• Table 6: Lateral unit friction for bored piles
• Table 7.3: ultimate lateral unit friction for driven piles in sand
• Table 7.6: ultimate unit point resistance for driven piles in sand
• Table 9: Unit point resistance
(fs = unit lateral friction.; fb = unit point resistance
12/57
www.geotecnia.unb.br/gpfees
13
• Stas & Kulhawy (1984)
13/57
www.geotecnia.unb.br/gpfees
14
14/57
www.geotecnia.unb.br/gpfees
15/57
www.geotecnia.unb.br/gpfees
16/57
www.geotecnia.unb.br/gpfees
17/57
www.geotecnia.unb.br/gpfees
18/57
www.geotecnia.unb.br/gpfees
Recognized Brazilian Empirical Methods via SPT
• Aoki & Velloso, 1975 (general)
• Décourt & Quaresma, 1978 & 1996 (general)
• Antunes & Cabral, 1986 (CFA piles)
• Décourt empirical equations for Drilled caissons
Standard Penetration Test (SPT)
19/57
www.geotecnia.unb.br/gpfees
20
• Aoki & Velloso (1975)
20/57
www.geotecnia.unb.br/gpfees
Original Values
21/57
www.geotecnia.unb.br/gpfees
Some sugestions after publication
22/57
www.geotecnia.unb.br/gpfees
• Décourt & Quaresma (1978) & (1996)
23/57
www.geotecnia.unb.br/gpfees
24/57
www.geotecnia.unb.br/gpfees
()
(b)
Soil Type TYPE OF PILE
Bored Bored
with fluid
CFA Pali
radice
injected
Micropile
injected
Clays 0.80 0.90 1.0 1.5 3.0
Intermediate 0.65 0.75 1.0 1.5 3.0
Sands 0.50 0.60 1.0 1.5 3.0
Soil Type TYPE OF PILE
Bored Bored
with fluid
CFA Pali
radice
injected
Micropile
injected
Clays 0.85 0.85 0.30 0.85 1.0
Intermediate 0.60 0.60 0.30 0.60 1.0
Sands 0.50 0.50 0.30 0.50 1.0
b
..
..
slateralL
pbaseP
qAQ
qAQ
1996 modification
25/57
www.geotecnia.unb.br/gpfees
• Tropical collapsible soil of Brasília
(few load tests @ experimental site)
26/57
www.geotecnia.unb.br/gpfees
Some important remarks from Brazilian practice
• Bored Piles: It is common to allow only 20% of the total capacity of the pile to be resisted by its base
Rbase + Rlateral = Rtotal, Rbase < 20% Rtotal
• Injected Piles: It is common to neglect full base resistance;
• Drilled caissons: It is common to neglect full lateral resistance
27/57
www.geotecnia.unb.br/gpfees
28
• Antunes & Cabral (1986)
4
......
2
21
DNLDNQ SPTSPTult
bb
where: D = pile diameter; L = pile length, NSPT = SPT blow counts; Qult = ultimate bearing capacity of the pile; and b1.NSPT and b2. NSPT are in kPa.
Empirical parameters for Antunes & Cabral (1996) methodology.______________________________________________Soil Type b1 (%) b2 (non dim)______________________________________________Sand 4.0 to 5.0 2.0 to 2.5Silt 2.5 to 3.5 1.0 to 2.0Clay 2.0 to 3.5 1.0 to 1.5_____________________________________________
28/57
www.geotecnia.unb.br/gpfees
• Cunha et al. (2006): Tropical soil of the Brazilian Center (pile load tests in Brasília and Goiânia) CFA piles
0
1000
2000
3000
0 1000 2000 3000
Estimated Ultimate Load (kN)
Me
as
ure
d U
ltim
ate
Lo
ad
(k
N) 45º Line
+10% Error Line
-10% Error Line
Aoki-Velloso (Adjusted)
Décourt-Quaresma (Adjusted)
Antunes-Cabral (Adjusted)
Kárez-Rocha (Adjusted)
Gotlieb et al. (Adjusted)
Final adjusted empirical parameters for Décourt & Quaresma and Antunes & Cabral methodologies.______________________________________________Soil Type b1 (%) b2 D bD
______________________________________________Sand 4.4 2.2 -- --Silt 2.9 1.4 -- --Clay 2.6 1.2 -- --Any Soil Type -- -- 0.21 1.13_____________________________________________
29/57
www.geotecnia.unb.br/gpfees
Qallowable at base = qbf x Abase (soil)
Qallowable at base = Ab x qba, where qba ≤ 0.33 fck (rock)
or qba ≤ 1/5 to 1/8 qu (rock)
• Drilled Caissons
Décourt et al, (1996)
• Décourt (1992): Generalized usage: quc = NSPT/40 (MPa)
Décourt (1995): Saturated clays, not laterized
quc = 0,08NSPT (MPa)
where quc = ultimate unit point resistance
NSPT = Blow counts from Standard Penetration Test (SPT)
30/57
www.geotecnia.unb.br/gpfees
Piles under Traction
• Unit values of resistance
fb = 0 (base), 0.7 ≤ fs-traction/fs-compression ≤ 1.0
pile weight must be included
• RLt/RLc (De Nicola e Randolph (1993)
31/57
www.geotecnia.unb.br/gpfees
End Bearing via CPT Test 32/57
www.geotecnia.unb.br/gpfees
Pile Group • Efficiency
Clays: η ≈ 1 for large center to center spacings (floating and end bearing piles)
η < 1 for low center to center spacings (floating piles)
Sands: η ≈ ≥ 1 floating and end bearing piles
33/57
www.geotecnia.unb.br/gpfees
• Empirical Formulae
34/57
www.geotecnia.unb.br/gpfees
• Floating Pile in Clay
Group capacity is the lower result of:
• ∑ individual capacities
• Capacity of a “composite block”
of soil and piles
More realistically:
35/57
www.geotecnia.unb.br/gpfees
36
• Floating pile in Sand Driven Piles: η = 1 in design (η maximum for s/d between 1.3 & 2) Bored Piles: η ≈ 0.7 • Summary:
36/57
www.geotecnia.unb.br/gpfees
Definition of Settlement
L
b
• Total • Differential • Angular distortion
37/57
www.geotecnia.unb.br/gpfees
Types of Settlement
• Immediate, drained or Short Time
Sands, drained soils and unsaturated soils
• Undrained or Long Time
Saturated Clays, undrained soils
38/57
www.geotecnia.unb.br/gpfees
Poulos et al. 2001
Day, 2000
39/57
www.geotecnia.unb.br/gpfees
40/57
www.geotecnia.unb.br/gpfees
Load Transference Mechanism
• Elastic Shortening
41/57
www.geotecnia.unb.br/gpfees
• Bulb of Pressure (Martins, 1945)
(Bowles, 1988):
FPelTOTAL
Friction Base
42/57
www.geotecnia.unb.br/gpfees
• Elastic method of Poulos & Davis (1990): Mindlin´s Equation
43/57
www.geotecnia.unb.br/gpfees
44 44
a) Equations & general procedure
44/57
www.geotecnia.unb.br/gpfees
b) Load transferred to base
45/57
www.geotecnia.unb.br/gpfees
Theoretical graphics
46/57
www.geotecnia.unb.br/gpfees
47 47
47/57
www.geotecnia.unb.br/gpfees
48 48
c) Settlement of isolated pile
RRRII
RRRII
dE
IP
dE
IP
bKB
hKF
s
BB
s
FF
...
...
0
0
48/57
www.geotecnia.unb.br/gpfees
49/57
www.geotecnia.unb.br/gpfees
Gibsian or stratified soils
50/57
www.geotecnia.unb.br/gpfees
General remarks
• Major part of settlement is IMMEDIATE settlement, typically > 80 %;
• Effect of pile compressibility is most important for long slender piles;
• For long compressible piles, settlement is not influenced by the nature of the bearing stratum tip;
• For piles of normal proportions, the load - settlement behaviour is substantially linear at normal working loads;
• Nonlinearity becomes important for piles which derive much of their load capacity from base resistance eg large diameter drilled piers.
51/57
www.geotecnia.unb.br/gpfees
52 52
Parameters for the Elastic Method
• Poulos & Davis (1990)
and Poulos (1999)
52/57
www.geotecnia.unb.br/gpfees
53 53
53/57
www.geotecnia.unb.br/gpfees
Method of the Equivalent Raft
54/57
www.geotecnia.unb.br/gpfees
55/57
www.geotecnia.unb.br/gpfees
Method of the Equivalent Pile
56/57
www.geotecnia.unb.br/gpfees
REFERENCES
• Velloso, D.A. & Lopes, R.F. (2002). Fundações-Volume 2 (Fundações Profundas). Editora COPPE-UFRJ. 472 p.
• Day, R.W. (2006). Foundation Engineering Handbook. ASCE Press
• Bowles, J.E. (1988). Foundation Analysis and Design. McGraw Hill Company. New York. 4th. Edition. 1004 p.
• Hachich et al. (1996). Fundações: Teoria e Prática. Editora PINI Ltda. São Paulo, 1ª. Versão. 751 p.
• Poulos, H.G. (1999). Analysis and Design of Pile Foundations. Handouts from the Foundation Course – Univ. of Sydney
• Poulos, H.G. & Davis, E. H. (1990) Pile Foundation Analysis and Design. Robert E. Krieker Pub. Company, Inc., Florida, 397 p.
• Cunha, R.P. (1996). Foundations. Handouts from the Foundation Course - Universidade de Brasília, 477 p.
• Poulos, H.G, Carter, J.P., Small, J.C. (2001). Foundations and Retaining Structures. XV ICSMGE, Instanbul, State of Art
57/57