beam dynamics

25
Beam Dynamics Gennady Stupakov DOE High Energy Physics Review June 2-4, 2004

Upload: wade-greene

Post on 31-Dec-2015

43 views

Category:

Documents


3 download

DESCRIPTION

Beam Dynamics. Gennady Stupakov DOE High Energy Physics Review June 2-4, 2004. Beam Dynamics Research in ARDA. Broad expertise in many areas: lattice design, collective effects, electron cloud, beam-beam interaction, FEL physics. Support of all major projects in the lab: PEP-II, NLC, LCLS. - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Beam Dynamics

Beam Dynamics

Gennady Stupakov

DOE High Energy Physics Review

June 2-4, 2004

Page 2: Beam Dynamics

Beam Dynamics Research in ARDA

• Broad expertise in many areas: lattice design, collective effects, electron cloud, beam-beam interaction, FEL physics.

• Support of all major projects in the lab: PEP-II, NLC, LCLS.

• Application of accelerator physics to other areas of research, e.g., weak gravitational lensing in astrophysics.

Page 3: Beam Dynamics

Outline

• Generation of short X-ray pulses in LCLS• Laser heater for LCLS• Dark currents in NLC structures• Model Independent Analysis (MIA) of PEP-II• Simulation of beam-beam interaction for PEP-II• Electron cloud effects in LER• Higher moments gravitation lensing

Page 4: Beam Dynamics

Linac Coherent Light Source (Linac Coherent Light Source (LCLSLCLS))

4th-Generation 4th-Generation XX-ray -ray SASE FEL Based on SASE FEL Based on

SLACSLAC Linac Linac• 14-GeV electrons14-GeV electrons• 1.2-1.2-m emittancem emittance• 200-fsec FWHM pulse200-fsec FWHM pulse• 2210103333 peak brightness peak brightness

There is a strong interest from potential users in shorter pulses of X-rays.

P. Emma, M. Cornacchia, K. Bane, Z. Huang, H. Schlarb (DESY), G. Stupakov, D. Walz, P. Emma, M. Cornacchia, K. Bane, Z. Huang, H. Schlarb (DESY), G. Stupakov, D. Walz, PRL, vol. 92, 2004.PRL, vol. 92, 2004.

Page 5: Beam Dynamics

2.6

mm

rm

s2.

6 m

m r

ms

0.1 mm (300 fs) rms0.1 mm (300 fs) rms

Access to Access to timetime coordinate coordinate along bunchalong bunch

LCLSLCLS BC2 bunch compressor chicane BC2 bunch compressor chicane (similar in other machines)(similar in other machines)

xx , h

oriz

onta

l pos

. (m

m)

, ho

rizon

tal p

os.

(mm

)

zz, longitudinal position (mm), longitudinal position (mm)

50 50 mm

Exploit Exploit Position-TimePosition-Time Correlation on Correlation on ee bunch at Chicane Center bunch at Chicane Center

Page 6: Beam Dynamics

ee

xx EE//E E ttxx

yy

Add thin slotted foil in center of chicane. The foil “spoils” Add thin slotted foil in center of chicane. The foil “spoils” emittance of the beam passing through it.emittance of the beam passing through it.

coulomb coulomb scattered scattered ee

unspoiled unspoiled ee

coulomb coulomb scattered scattered ee

15-15-m thick Be foilm thick Be foil22x=x=250250 mm

x,y ≈ 5 m

Page 7: Beam Dynamics

Track 200k macro-particles through entire Track 200k macro-particles through entire LCLSLCLS up to 14.3 GeV up to 14.3 GeV

EE//EE

200 fs200 fs

Page 8: Beam Dynamics

2 fs FWHM2 fs FWHM

zz 60 m 60 m

xx-ray -ray PowerPower

Genesis 1.3Genesis 1.3 FEL code FEL code

Page 9: Beam Dynamics

FEL instability needs very “FEL instability needs very “coldcold” ” ee-- beams (small beams (small ee and and EE-spread)-spread)Such a cold beam is subject to other “undesirable” instabilities in Such a cold beam is subject to other “undesirable” instabilities in the accelerator (the accelerator (CSRCSR, Longitudinal Space-Charge=, Longitudinal Space-Charge=LSCLSC, , wakefields)wakefields)Parmela simulations and TTF measurement indicate Parmela simulations and TTF measurement indicate E~3 keVE~3 keVAccelerated to 14 GeV and compressed ×36 Accelerated to 14 GeV and compressed ×36 →→E~E~1×101×10-5-5, , too too small to be useful in FEL (no effect on FEL gain when <small to be useful in FEL (no effect on FEL gain when <111010-4-4))

Micro-Bunching InstabilitiesMicro-Bunching Instabilities

Final long. phase Final long. phase space at 14 GeV for space at 14 GeV for

initial 15-initial 15-m, 1% seed m, 1% seed

Page 10: Beam Dynamics

Laser Heater for Landau DampingLaser Heater for Landau Damping

50 cm50 cm

~120 cm~120 cm

Laser-electron interaction in undulator induces energy Laser-electron interaction in undulator induces energy modulation (at 800 nm) modulation (at 800 nm) 40 keV rms 40 keV rmsInside weak chicane for laser access and time-coordinate Inside weak chicane for laser access and time-coordinate smearing (emittance growth negligible)smearing (emittance growth negligible)

10 per. undulator10 per. undulator

800 nm, 1.2 MW800 nm, 1.2 MWZ. Huang, M. Borland (ANL), P. Emma, J. Wu, R. Carr,Z. Huang, M. Borland (ANL), P. Emma, J. Wu, R. Carr, C. Limborg, G. Stupakov, J. Welch, C. Limborg, G. Stupakov, J. Welch,

submitted to PRSTAB.submitted to PRSTAB.

Page 11: Beam Dynamics

laser spot similar to laser spot similar to ee spot: spot:

PP00 = 1.2 MW = 1.2 MW

ww00 = 350 = 350 mm

xx,,yy 200 200 mm

laser spot much bigger than laser spot much bigger than ee spot: spot:

PP00 = 37 MW = 37 MW

ww00 3 mm 3 mm

xx,,yy 200 200 mm

800-nm structure then gets smeared by chicane: 800-nm structure then gets smeared by chicane: zz xx''221/2 1/2 ||xx|| >> >>

40 keV rms40 keV rms

small spotsmall spot

large spotlarge spot

Page 12: Beam Dynamics

ww00 = 350 = 350 m, m, PP00 = 1.2 MW = 1.2 MW

ww00 = 3 mm, = 3 mm, PP00 = 37 MW = 37 MW

small spotsmall spot

double-horndouble-horn

Page 13: Beam Dynamics

Simulation of Dark Current in NLC Structures

• What is the effect of dark current on the main linac bunch?

• How much current is captured? How far does it propagate? To what energy is it accelerated?

• Relation between dark current and breakdowns?

Page 14: Beam Dynamics

Simulation of dark currentsin the H60VG3 disk loaded RF structure for different locations of the emission points (large current – blue, small current – red).

Eacc=65 MeV/m.

K. Bane, V. Dolgashev, G. Stupakov.

Page 15: Beam Dynamics

Geometry

Integrated kick to the bunch vs. accelerating phase

e- BNS phase e+ BNS phase

Beam Kick due to Dark Current

Kick is normalized to average generated current of 1 mA.

J. Wu, V. Dolgashev

Page 16: Beam Dynamics

Low-Beta Optics for PEP-II Future Upgrades

y* = 7mm (CDR 15-20mm) lattices for both rings have been designed with adequate dynamic apertureHER

LER

The lattice has been tested in the High Energy Ring and beam lifetime appears no problem

Y. Nosochkov

Page 17: Beam Dynamics

Model-Independent Analysis (MIA) for PEP-II Performance Improvement

• Betatron oscillations are resonantly excited in the ring and the beam position is measured at every BPM location turn by turn. FFT translates this into 8 numbers at each location, (x1, y1), … (x4, y4) (conjugate linear orbits). One then extracts, from these 4 orbits, not only the phase advances but the transfer matrix components R12, R32, R14, R34

• Fitting those Rik elements into the lattice model greatly improves the accuracy of the model. Y. Yan,Y. Cai

Page 18: Beam Dynamics

MIA Figured out BPM Errors

x(measured) = gx x(beam) + xy y(beam)

y(measured) = gy y(beam) + yx x(beam)

Page 19: Beam Dynamics

MIA helped to bring LER working tune to near half integer

Without MIA, near half integer working tune large beta beat was observed.

Both LER and HER have been brought to work at near half integer working tunes ([x]=0.516) since May 2003. beat is small, linear coupling is fine, IP tilt angle is fine.

Blue: ideal lattice Red: measured by MIA

Page 20: Beam Dynamics

Simulation of Beam-Beam Lifetime in the Low Energy Ring of PEP-II

min16

5125.0

x

min1

5081.0

x

min

5152.0

x

min100

5142.0

x

• Nonlinear lattice included in the simulation additional tobeam-beam interaction• The core distribution is not disturbed much by the nonlinearity in the ring whilethe tail is strongly effected. • Lifetime is consistent with observation in the machine

Y. Cai

Page 21: Beam Dynamics

Specific luminosity, peak-normalized

0.0

0.2

0.4

0.6

0.8

1.0

1.2

0 50 100 150 200 250 300

HERIP_X knob (microns)

Lsp

/ L

sp (

x=0)

0.06/0.06 mA/b0.38/0.25 mA/b

.096 / .060 mA/b, sim

Specific luminosity, peak-normalized

0.0

0.2

0.4

0.6

0.8

1.0

1.2

0 50 100 150 200 250 300

HERIP_X knob (microns)

Lsp

/ L

sp (

x=0)

0.06/0.06 mA/b0.38/0.25 mA/b

.096 / .060 mA/b, sim

Vertical HEB size (peak-normalized)

0.80

0.90

1.00

1.10

1.20

1.30

1.40

1.50

1.60

0 50 100 150 200 250 300

HERIP_X knob (microns)

Sp

ot

size

rat

io

1.19/0.69 mA/b

1.5/0.9 mA/b, by2

1.38 / 0.87 mA/b, sim

Vertical HEB size (peak-normalized)

0.80

0.90

1.00

1.10

1.20

1.30

1.40

1.50

1.60

0 50 100 150 200 250 300

HERIP_X knob (microns)

Sp

ot

size

rat

io

1.19/0.69 mA/b

1.5/0.9 mA/b, by2

1.38 / 0.87 mA/b, sim

Simulation BBI - Benchmark Against Experiments at PEP-II

Electron beam was scanned horizontally across the positron beam as the luminosity and beam sizes were recorded.

Largest beam blowup seen in y-

W. Kozanecki, J. Seeman, Y. Cai, and I. Narsky

Page 22: Beam Dynamics

Electron Cloud and Cyclotron Resonances in Positron Ring

No solenoid 10 Gauss 20 Gauss

Simulation of generating electron cloud in the presence of solenoid field is carried out recently for the PEP-II.

Resonance condition: bunch spacing is equal to half cyclotron period in dipole magnetic field

Y. Cai, M. Pivi, M. A. Furman, Phys. Rev. ST Accel. Beams, 7, 024402 (2004)

Page 23: Beam Dynamics

Higher Moments Gravitational Lensing

~103 Mpc

J. Irwin, M. Shmakova

Page 24: Beam Dynamics

Light Deflection from a Concentrated Mass

2

0 0 0 0

4 4 41

MG MG MG x xx

x x x x x x

-1 -0.5 0.5 1

-1

-0.5

0.5

1

-1 -0.5 0.5 1

-1

-0.5

0.5

1

2

0 0 0 0

4 4 ( )1

( )

MG MG x i y x i yx i y

x x i y x x x

-1 -0.5 0.5 1

-1

-0.5

0.5

1

-1 -0.5 0.5 1

-1

-0.5

0.5

1

Quad and sextupole orientation are correlated!

QuadrupoleSextupole

Page 25: Beam Dynamics

Clumping StudiesCurved galaxies among all “strong” galaxies from Hubble Deep Field North. Lines join curved galaxies separated by less than 290 pixels.

“Curved” means proper orientation ofsextupole and quadrupole components(“star” symbols).

“Aligned” shape