basic services publication - cogta.fs.gov.za
TRANSCRIPT
BASIC SERVICES PUBLICATION
COMPARATIVE INFORMATION ON BASIC SERVICES
2009 Disclaimer
This publication does not replace or underscore the need for official and national statistics on basic services published by Statistics South Africa, and as such is intended to support the information needed for planning.
2
Published by Department of Cooperative Governance and Traditional Affairs
87 Hamilton Street, Arcadia Pretoria
Private Bag X804, Pretoria, 001, South Africa
Telephone: +27 (0) 12 334 0600
Facsimile: +27 (0) 12 334 0904
ISBN: 978-0-620-45326-4
Website: www.dplg.gov.za
3
Table of Contents
Foreword by the Minister …………………………………………………………… 5
Acknowledgement …………………………………………………………………….. 6 Executive Summary ………………………………………………………………….. 8
1. Purpose of the Report 10
2. Scope of the Report 10
3. Finding Common Ground – Reporting on Basic Services 10
4. National Perspective 11
5. Provincial Perspective 12
Water: 5.1 Access to Basic and Higher Levels of Service 12
5.2 Household Water Backlog 14
5.3 Free Basic Water 16
Sanitation: 5.4 Access to Basic and Higher Levels of Service 18
5.5 Sanitation Backlog 20
5.6 Free Basic Sanitation 22
Electricity: 5.7 Access to Electricity 24
5.8 Electricity Backlog 26
5.9 Free Basic Energy 28
Refuse Removal: 5.10 Access to Refuse Removal 30
5.11 Refuse Removal Backlog 32
5.12 Free Basic Refuse Removal 34
6. Application and Use of Report 36
4
7. Annexures: Annexure A: Data Collection Methodology 37
Annexure B: Data Quality Improvement Programme 42
Annexure C: uHABS index 43
Annexure D: Access to Water 44
Annexure E: Free Basic Water 49
Annexure F: Access to Sanitation 54
Annexure G: Access to Electricity 59
Annexure H: Free Basic Energy 67
Annexure I: Refuse Removal 74
Annexure J: District and Municipality Name Reference 81
Annexure K: RSA Municipalities and District Management Areas 88
Annexure L: Spatial Distribution of Water Backlogs (CS 2007) 90
Annexure M: Spatial Distribution of Water Backlogs (DWEA 2008) 92
Annexure N: Spatial Distribution of Water Backlogs (Municipal Source 2008) 94
Annexure O: Average National Share of Water Backlogs 96
Annexure P: Spatial Distribution of Sanitation Backlogs (CS 2007) 98
Annexure Q: Spatial Distribution of Sanitation Backlogs (DWEA 2008) 100
Annexure R: Spatial Distribution of Sanitation Backlogs (Municipal Source 2008) 102
Annexure S: Average National Share of Sanitation Backlogs 104
Annexure T: Spatial Distribution of Electricity Backlogs (DME 2008) 106
Annexure U: Municipal Share of National Backlogs (DME 2008) 108
Annexure V: Spatial Distribution of Refuse Removal Backlogs (CS 2007) 110
Annexure W: Municipal Share of the National Refuse Backlogs (CS 2007) 112
Annexure X: Spatial Distribution of Households Served with Free Basic Energy
(Municipal Source 2008) 114
Annexure Y: Spatial Distribution of Households Served with Free Basic Water
(Municipal Source 2008) 116
5
Foreword by the Minister
As government strives to achieve universal access to basic services for all households by 2014, understanding our current status in the delivery of basic services is critical both in terms of reporting accurately to the nation and in developing appropriate strategies and interventions. The diverse nature of our municipalities, notably their financial and human capacity, requires a differentiated and targeted set of interventions and strategies to reduce service delivery backlogs and to cope with the demand for new services. At the same time, municipalities must be able to maintain existing services and infrastructure.
Ideally, our reporting systems should be seamless across the three spheres of government, and horizontally across sector departments. Unfortunately, in the absence of this ideal, and the fact that the census is ten years apart, our planning agencies and government have to rely on other measures. The processes and consultations that have culminated in this publication are one such measure to assist decision-makers and planners with a platform for consistent reporting on basic services in a consultative manner.
I have no doubt that this publication will grow annually both in its acceptance by key stakeholders and the content that it will publish.
It is also my understanding that this reference document will give us the confidence to collate the information from different sources with greater understanding and to also work from the same page when reporting on the status and progress with regard to service delivery in our country.
This publication should take government’s efforts to deliver a better quality of life for all South Africans a number of steps forward.
This publication embodies the ethos of the new Department of Cooperative Governance and Traditional Affairs to achieve a coherent, cohesive and integrated government for improved service delivery. The publication will go some way to improving the credibility of baseline information and will make an important contribution in determining what resources are required to facilitate service delivery. In its current form, the publication focuses on basic services initially and will be extended over time to include other sectors not currently covered as well other information sources deemed necessary by other institutions and the COGTA.
Minister for Cooperative Governance and Traditional Affairs
6
Acknowledgement The Department of Cooperative Governance and Traditional Affairs would also like to express its gratitude to the following organisations:
o Statistics SA for their guidance and support with the data analysis; o Municipalities; o Department of Water and Environmental Affairs (DWEA);
o Department of Energy (DE);
o Department of Sport and Recreation South Africa (SRSA);
o National Treasury (NT);
o South Africa Local Government Association (SALGA);
o Department of Human Settlements (DHS); and
o Participating members of the Data Quality Improvement Programme.
7
Abbreviations COGTA......................................... : Cooperative Governance and Traditional Affairs CIP............................................. : Comprehensive Infrastructure Planning CPP………………………………. : Comprehensive Planning Process CS………………………………… : Community Survey DE………………………………… : Department of Energy DEAT…………………………….. : Department Environmental Affairs and Tourism DHS………………………………. : Department of Human Settlements DMA’s……………………………. : District Management Areas DME……………………………… : Department of Minerals and Energy DUs………………………………. : District Units DWAF……………………………. : Department of Water Affairs and Forestry DWEA……………………………. : Department of Water and Environmental Affairs EAs………………………………. : Enumeration areas FBE………………………………. : Free Basic Energy FBR………………………………. : Free Basic Removal (Refuse Removal) FBS………………………………. : Free Basic Services FBSAN………………………........ : Free Basic Sanitation FBW……………………………… : Free Basic Water GHS……………………………… : General Household Survey IDPs……………………………… : Integrated Development Plan MIG………………………………. : Management Infrastructure Grant MS………………………………… : Master Sample NFCM......................................... : Non-Financial Census of Municipalities NFC………………………………. : Non-Financial Census NSS………………………………. : National Security Systems NT………………………………… : National Treasury PSUs.......................................... : Primary Sampling Units RDP .......................................... : Reconstruction and Development Programme SALGA………………………......... : South Africa Local Government Association SASQAF………………………… : South African Quality Assurance Framework SRSA…………………………….. : Sport and Recreation of South Africa Stats SA…………………………. : Statistics South Africa
8
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY This publication does not replace or underscore the need for official and national statistics on basic services published by the Statistics South Africa. The information on basic services is presented for each of the 231 local municipalities and the 6 metropolitan municipalities. The information is presented at a national, provincial and municipal perspective.
The main purpose of this publication is to get a sense of the various information sources, and an appreciation of the differences in its methodology. This will provide a basis for robust debate and further work on streamlining processes to measure more consistently the status and progress with regard to basic services, as we gear to achieve universal access by 2014. It will also serve as a reference for planning and resource allocation between the census years. There is a 10 year gap in the census information per municipality, making it difficult to plan and allocate resources for infrastructure in the years between censuses. The difference in methodology by which the data was captured is key in understanding the variances among the different sources of information. The General Household Survey and Community Survey use various sampling techniques. In the case of the General Household Survey (GHS), 30 000 dwelling units are covered and in case of the Community Survey 2007 (CS), the sample size was 17 098 Enumerator Areas (EA’s). The Department of Water and Environmental Affairs (DWEA) and the Department of Energy (DE) on the other hand use the 2001 census as a base, and update their data sets annually. The 2009 figure supplied by the municipalities for basic water and sanitation make up the municipal source data and were captured in a template via the comprehensive infrastructure planning process. A pre-populated template with service delivery information from mainly Stats SA was sent to municipalities. The municipalities corrected the information and returned the completed template to COGTA. In the case of free basic services, a similar method of making available a template to municipalities to complete is applied. Control measures and quality controls were applied to data on free basic services received from the municipalities (Annexure A, Data Collection Methodology). Understanding the need to start somewhere, given the contestation around service delivery statistics, a Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) between Statistics South Africa and the Department of Cooperative Governance and Traditional Affairs (COGTA) was signed on 06 June 2009. Prior to the signing of the MOU, officials from COGTA, Stats SA and sector departments worked as a collective on the various information sources, focusing on its methodology, limitations and purpose. In this way a shared understanding of variances among the various data sets has been presented in a very constructive manner that simply indicates where we are with regard to access to water, sanitation, electricity and refuse removal and the backlogs per municipality. Personnel from Stats SA, COGTA, relevant sector departments, National Treasury, South African Local Government Association (SALGA) and municipalities worked together under the umbrella of the Municipal Data Quality Improvement Programme to achieve this publication.
9
It is from this very basic presentation of service delivery information per municipality that our attention is drawn to some very interesting trends. The various information sources (GHS, 2008, CS 2007, DWEA, 2008, Municipalities, 2009) presented in this publication indicate that more than 80% of households in the country have access to water at a basic level of service which is a stand pipe within 200 metres from the household, as a minimum. With regard to sanitation more than 67% of households in the country have access to sanitation at a basic level of service which is a ventilated improved latrine per household, as a minimum. 72,7 % of households are connected to the grid (DME, 2008) and 59% of all households in the country have access to adequate refuse removal service at least once per week (CS, 2007). In terms of the percentage access of households to basic water, sanitation, electricity, and refuse removal the information for GHS (2007), CS (2007), DWEA (2008) and municipalities (2009) are variable, yet comparable in terms of the trends exhibited. The percentage variation among the various data sources may be due to: (i) differences in the date stamp, (ii) methodology by which the data was gathered by the different entities, (iii) variances in the total number of households and (iv) interpretation of service levels for water, sanitation, electricity and refuse removal and the application thereof. Comparative analysis of the backlog figures for water and sanitation indicate higher figures from municipal sources. Stats SA 2007, reporting 11,3% of households below a basic level of service, DWEA 2008, reporting 10,3% and Municipal sources reporting 19,3%. In terms of Free Basic Services, the information from Statistics SA underscores the coverage of free basic water, sanitation, electricity and refuse removal as reported by municipalities. The differences are attributable to ascertaining the actual number of indigent household per municipality and difference in methodology used to gather the data with regard to basic services. Whilst this publication deals with the quantification of the services backlog per sector, a parallel process addresses how individual households are experiencing all services. This is achieved through the development Universal Household Access to Basic Services (uHABS) Index. The uHABS index indicates service delivery progress with regard to water, sanitation, electricity and domestic refuse removal, as reported by households in the community survey 2007 (Annexure C). It is anticipated that this report will:
� Provide leadership on the measurement and monitoring of basic services and reporting on service delivery more accurately and more consistently.
� To communicate to communities, planning practitioners and decision-makers on the status and progress with regard to basic services.
10
1. Purpose of the Report
� The main purpose of this publication is to get a sense of the various information sources, and an appreciation of the differences in its methodology.
� Provide a base for robust debate and further work on streamlining processes to measure more consistently the status and progress with regard to basic services, as we gear to achieve universal access by 2014.
� Serve as an information source for planning and resource allocation between censuses.
2. Scope of the Report
� The report includes the status of basic services, namely water, sanitation, electricity and refuse removal for each municipality.
� Contextualise and understand the different data sources that exist.
3. Finding Common Ground for Reporting on Basic Services
The current practice is that national departments publish service delivery statistics pertaining to their mandate. While there is no specific legislation that prohibits this practice, a number of problems have been encountered, which are:
� Statistics on similar indicators tend to differ depending upon the reporting entity.
� There are no agreed upon standards for collecting and verifying data as well
as measuring performance, which affects the statistics and reporting derived from the data.
� There is no agreed upon approach regarding how the reporting of statistics
can be executed for the purpose of public consumption.
� The public and private sectors need to have a common statistical basis from which to plan and assess implementation programmes and progress. This cannot happen if the statistics are not authenticated or at least the process of data validation sanctioned by Stats SA has occurred.
� Against this background, it is clear that if publications with unreliable service
delivery statistics by more than one authority continue, the outcome will be further public confusion and will affect public confidence in statistics reported by government. The problem has already manifested itself on a number of occasions, resulting in members of the public, government and politicians
questioning the accuracy and consistency of government reporting with regard to service delivery statistics.
� As much as it is a constitutional mandate for each Ministry, sector
department, provincial department or municipality to discharge responsibility and accountability for their business mandate, including the publishing of statistics, there is a need to streamline and perfect the reporting system in a manner that will ensure integrity of statistics reported to government, the general public and the private sector.
� The COGTA in partnership with Stats SA seeks to find a solution to remedy
the problem of a lack of common methodologies towards the generation of statistics, to agree on a credible baseline and update data on basic services and infrastructure provision.
4. National Perspective
� One of the key priority projects of Government is the speeding up of community infrastructure with intensified efforts to accelerate universal access to water, sanitation and electricity. This implies that by 2014 there should be decent human settlements and access by all households to these services.
� 88,6% of the population in South Africa enjoyed access to piped water. All
provinces recorded an increase in the percentage of households that had access to piped water (based on the Community Survey, 2007).
� A little more than 60% of the households in South Africa had access to flush
toilets (based on the Community Survey, 2007). � Electricity for lighting has increased in all provinces, with 80% of households
in South Africa using electricity for lighting (based on the Community Survey, 2007).
� A total of 7,4 million households in South Africa had refuse removed at least
once a week (based on the Community Survey, 2007).
11
5. P
rovi
ncia
l Per
spec
tive
5.
1 W
ater
: Acc
ess
to b
asic
and
hig
her l
evel
s of
ser
vice
Ta
ble
1: W
ater
: acc
ess
to b
asic
and
hig
her l
evel
s of
ser
vice
STA
TIST
ICS
SOU
TH A
FRIC
A
PRO
VIN
CE
CEN
SUS
2001
G
ENER
AL
HO
USE
HO
LD
SUR
VEY
2007
C
OM
MU
NIT
Y SU
RVE
Y 20
07
DW
EA 2
008
MU
NIC
IPA
L SO
UR
CE
2008
To
tal n
o. o
f H
ouse
hold
s To
tal n
o. o
f ho
useh
olds
No.
of
hous
ehol
ds
rece
ivin
g ba
sic
and
high
er
leve
ls o
f se
rvic
e
Hou
seho
ld
acce
ss to
w
ater
, as
a pe
rcen
tage
Tota
l no.
of
hous
ehol
ds
No.
of
hous
ehol
ds
rece
ivin
g ba
sic
and
high
er
leve
ls o
f se
rvic
e
Hou
seho
ld
acce
ss to
w
ater
, as
a pe
rcen
tage
Tota
l no.
of
hous
ehol
ds
No.
of
hous
ehol
ds
rece
ivin
g ba
sic
and
high
er
leve
ls o
f se
rvic
e
Hou
seho
ld
acce
ss to
w
ater
, as
a pe
rcen
tage
Tota
l no.
of
hous
ehol
ds
No.
of
hous
ehol
ds
rece
ivin
g ba
sic
and
high
er
leve
ls o
f se
rvic
e
Hou
seho
ld
acce
ss to
w
ater
, as
a pe
rcen
tage
Eas
tern
Cap
e 1,
506,
540
1,79
5,87
2 1,
305,
000
72.7
%
1,58
4,78
7 1,
122,
309
70.8
%
1,59
8,99
4 1,
344,
360
84.1
%
1,63
4,64
2 1,
121,
554
68.6
%
Free
Sta
te
758,
112
873,
415
845,
000
96.7
%
802,
859
781,
072
97.3
%
795,
862
784,
524
98.6
%
770,
062
558,
953
72.6
%
Gau
teng
2,
889,
676
3,24
3,96
6 3,
163,
000
97.5
%
3,17
4,15
7 3,
108,
160
97.9
%
3,38
1,99
5 3,
272,
194
96.8
%
3,17
4,14
3 3,
118,
839
98.3
%
KwaZ
ulu-
Nat
al
2,23
3,49
8 2,
537,
156
2,11
6,00
0 83
.4%
2,
231,
975
1,77
0,75
3 79
.3%
2,
451,
294
2,00
2,39
0 81
.7%
2,
317,
293
1,66
5,68
3 71
.9%
Lim
popo
1,
194,
036
1,31
7,45
9 1,
095,
000
83.1
%
1,21
5,93
5 1,
017,
005
83.6
%
1,25
9,74
3 1,
007,
937
80.0
%
1,31
9,75
5 1,
043,
665
79.1
%
Mpu
mal
anga
83
0,98
7 88
8,40
6 78
7,00
0 88
.6%
94
0,31
4 85
6,26
3 91
.1%
90
2,51
5 79
3,50
4 87
.9%
1,
024,
416
829,
965
81.0
%
Nor
th W
est
898,
740
943,
782
843,
000
89.3
%
911,
121
819,
443
89.9
%
925,
893
827,
685
89.4
%
924,
430
713,
807
77.2
%
Nor
ther
n C
ape
259,
633
293,
701
278,
000
94.7
%
257,
130
243,
357
94.6
%
257,
279
237,
872
92.5
%
273,
887
256,
342
93.6
%
Wes
tern
Cap
e 1,
211,
414
1,36
7,17
1 1,
329,
000
97.2
%
1,35
9,87
4 1,
345,
008
98.9
%
1,42
2,72
5 1,
388,
941
97.6
%
1,37
1,21
7 1,
023,
531
74.6
%
Gra
nd T
otal
11
,782
,636
13
,260
,928
11
,761
,000
88
.7%
12
,478
,152
11
,063
,370
88
.7%
12
,996
,300
11
,659
,407
89
.7%
12
,809
,845
10
,332
,339
80
.7%
12
Goal
� All households to have basic level of water by 2014. Indicator
� Number of households receiving basic level of water supply. Definition
� Higher level of service includes piped water inside dwelling. � Basic level of service includes piped water inside yard and piped water within
200m.
Data source
� Stats SA, Census 2001. � Stats SA, GHS – July 2007 survey based on households. � Stats SA, Community Survey February 2007 based on households. � DWEA ,2008, data based on updated census 2001 (households). � Municipal Source, 2009, data gathered via comprehensive infrastructure
planning in April 2009. Interpretation
� In terms of the percentage of households that have access to basic water the data sets for GHS (2007), CS (2007), DWEA (2008) and Municipal Source (2009) are variable, yet comparable in terms of the trends exhibited.
� The percentage variation may be due to: (I) Date stamp of the data; (II) Methodology by which the data were gathered; (III) Total number of households varying per data set; and (IV) Interpretation of the service levels for water and the application
thereof. Data note/explanatory note
� Data include the local municipalities, metropolitan municipalities and exclude
the District Management Areas (DMAs). � Household access to water figures determined by adding, households receiving
piped water inside dwelling, piped water inside yard and piped water within 200m.
� Table 1 reflects a summation of the unit data contained in Annexure D. � Number of households for any given year may vary due to methodology or
demographic model used.
13
5.2
Hou
seho
ld W
ater
Bac
klog
s Ta
ble
2: W
ater
: Hou
seho
ld B
ackl
ogs
ST
ATI
STIC
S SO
UTH
AFR
ICA
C
ENSU
S 20
01
GEN
ERA
L H
OU
SEH
OLD
SU
RVE
Y 20
07
CO
MM
UN
ITY
SUR
VEY
2007
D
WEA
200
8 M
UN
ICIP
AL
SOU
RC
E 20
08
PRO
VIN
CE
To
tal n
o. o
f H
ouse
hold
s
Tota
l no.
of
hous
ehol
ds
No.
of
hous
ehol
ds
rece
ivin
g be
low
bas
ic
leve
l of
serv
ice
Hou
seho
lds
be
low
a
basi
c le
vel o
f se
rvic
e, a
s a
perc
enta
ge
Tota
l no.
of
hous
ehol
ds
No.
of
hous
ehol
ds
rece
ivin
g be
low
bas
ic
leve
l of
serv
ice
Hou
seho
lds
bel
ow a
ba
sic
leve
l of
ser
vice
, as
a
perc
enta
ge
Tota
l no.
of
hous
ehol
ds
No.
of
hous
ehol
ds
rece
ivin
g be
low
bas
ic
leve
l of
serv
ice
Hou
seho
lds
bel
ow a
ba
sic
leve
l of
ser
vice
, as
a
perc
enta
ge
Tota
l no.
of
hous
ehol
ds
No.
of
hous
ehol
ds
rece
ivin
g be
low
ba
sic
leve
l of
ser
vice
Hou
seho
lds
bel
ow a
ba
sic
leve
l of
ser
vice
, as
a
perc
enta
ge
East
ern
Cap
e 1,
506,
540
1,79
5,87
2 49
0,87
2 27
.3%
1,
584,
787
462,
478
29.2
%
1,59
8,99
4 25
4,63
4 15
.9%
1,
634,
642
513,
088
31.4
%
Free
Sta
te
758,
112
873,
415
28,4
15
3.3%
80
2,85
9 21
,787
2.
7%
795,
862
11,3
38
1.4%
77
0,06
2 21
1,10
9 27
.4%
Gau
teng
2,
889,
676
3,24
3,96
6 80
,966
2.
5%
3,17
4,15
7 65
,997
2.
1%
3,38
1,99
5 10
9,80
1 3.
2%
3,17
4,14
3 55
,304
1.
7%
Kw
aZul
u-N
atal
2,
233,
498
2,53
7,15
6 42
1,15
6 16
.6%
2,
231,
975
461,
222
20.7
%
2,45
1,29
4 44
8,90
4 18
.3%
2,
317,
293
651,
610
28.1
%
Lim
popo
1,
194,
036
1,31
7,45
9 22
2,45
9 16
.9%
1,
215,
935
198,
930
16.4
%
1,25
9,74
3 25
1,80
6 20
.0%
1,
319,
755
276,
090
20.9
%
Mpu
mal
anga
83
0,98
7 88
8,40
6 10
1,40
6 11
.4%
94
0,31
4 84
,051
8.
9%
902,
515
109,
011
12.1
%
1,02
4,41
6 19
4,45
1 19
.0%
Nor
th W
est
898,
740
943,
782
100,
782
10.7
%
911,
121
91,6
78
10.1
%
925,
893
98,2
08
10.6
%
924,
430
210,
623
22.8
%
Nor
ther
n C
ape
25
9,63
3 29
3,70
1 15
,701
5.
3%
257,
130
13,7
73
5.4%
25
7,27
9 19
,407
7.
5%
273,
887
17,5
45
6.4%
Wes
tern
Cap
e 1,
211,
414
1,36
7,17
1 38
,171
2.
8%
1,35
9,87
4 14
,866
1.
1%
1,42
2,72
5 33
,784
2.
4%
1,37
1,21
7 34
7,68
6 25
.4%
Gra
nd T
otal
11
,782
,636
13
,260
,928
1,
499,
928
11.3
%
12,4
78,1
52
1,41
4,78
2 11
.3%
12
,996
,300
1,
336,
893
10.3
%
12,8
09,8
45
2,47
7,50
6 19
.3%
14
Goal
� All households to have basic level of water by 2014. Indicator
� Number of households below basic level of water supply. Definition
� Below basic level constitutes a backlogs and includes, piped water further than 200m, springs, rain water tanks, dam/pool/stagnant water and water vendors.
Data source
� Stats SA, Census 2001. � Stats SA, GHS – July 2007 survey based on households. � Stats SA, Community Survey February 2007 based on households. � DWEA ,2008, data based on updated census 2001 (households). � Municipal Source , 2009, data gathered via comprehensive infrastructure
planning in April 2009. Interpretation
� In terms of the percentage of households with water backlog the data sets for
GHS (2007), CS (2007), DWEA (2008) and Municipal Source (2009) are variable, yet comparable in terms of the trends exhibited.
� The percentage variation may be due to:
(V) Date stamp of the data; (VI) Methodology by which the data were gathered; (VII) Total number of households varying per data set; and (VIII) Interpretation of what constitutes a backlog and the application
thereof
Data note/explanatory note � Data include the local municipalities, metropolitan municipalities and exclude
the DMAs. � Household water backlog figures determined by adding, piped water further
than 200m, springs, rain water tanks, dam/pool/stagnant water and water vendors.
� Table 2 reflects a summation of the unit data contained in Annexure D. � Number of households for any given year may vary due to methodology or
demographic model used.
15
CEN
SUS,
200
1
TOTA
L IN
DIG
ENTS
H
OU
SEH
OLD
S(C
ensu
s 20
01)
Indi
gent
Hou
seho
lds
Rec
eivi
ng F
BW
Indi
gent
Hou
seho
lds
Rec
eivi
ng F
BW
, as
a Pe
rcen
tage
Indi
gent
Hou
seho
lds
Rec
eivi
ng F
BW
Indi
gent
Hou
seho
lds
Rec
eivi
ng F
BW
, as
a
Perc
enta
ge
Indi
gent
Hou
seho
lds
Rec
eivi
ng F
BW
Indi
gent
Hou
seho
lds
Rec
eivi
ng F
BW
, as
a Pe
rcen
tage
East
ern
Cap
e93
9,77
625
0,69
626
.7%
327,
596
34.9
%48
1,72
351
.3%
Free
Sta
te42
5,04
921
2,87
250
.1%
203,
525
47.9
%42
5,00
310
0.0%
Gau
teng
967,
539
303,
297
31.3
%24
5,60
325
.4%
869,
396
89.9
%K
waZ
ulu-
Nat
al1,
162,
490
323,
305
27.8
%88
3,62
176
.0%
807,
798
69.5
%Li
mpo
po74
4,67
620
1,60
127
.1%
637,
350
85.6
%50
8,09
268
.2%
Mpu
mal
anga
444,
112
253,
834
57.2
%22
4,69
050
.6%
273,
630
61.6
%N
orth
Wes
t44
0,73
330
6,27
569
.5%
112,
161
25.4
%27
6,90
962
.8%
Nor
ther
n C
ape
118,
194
67,9
2457
.5%
85,0
1971
.9%
81,0
5268
.6%
Wes
tern
Cap
e29
0,21
335
7,65
512
3.2%
118,
341
40.8
%20
7,30
971
.4%
Tota
l5,
532,
782
2,27
7,45
941
.2%
2,83
7,90
651
.3%
3,93
0,91
371
.0%
Indi
gent
Hou
seho
lds
Rec
eivi
ng F
BW
NFC
M, 2
007
STA
TIST
ICS
SOU
TH A
FRIC
AM
UN
ICIP
AL
SOU
RC
E, 2
008
DW
EA, 2
008
PRO
VIN
CE
5.3
Free
Bas
ic W
ater
Tabl
e 3:
Fre
e B
asic
Wat
er
Not
e: In
dige
nt h
ouse
hold
is a
hou
seho
ld th
at q
ualif
ies
to re
ceiv
e so
me
or a
ll ba
sic
serv
ices
for f
ree
beca
use
they
hav
e no
inco
me
or a
low
inco
me.
Thes
e ho
useh
olds
mus
t hav
e be
en id
entif
ied
by th
e m
unic
ipal
ity a
nd a
ppea
r on
the
indi
gent
regi
ster
, in
line
with
the
mun
icip
al in
dige
nt p
olic
y.
16
Goal
All indigent households to have access to Free Basic Water by 2014.
Indicator
Number of indigent households receiving Free Basic Water.
Definition
An amount of water determined by government that should be provided free to poor households to meet basic needs, currently set at 6kl per month per household.
Data source
Stats SA, Census 2001. Stats SA, NFCM - 2007, Survey-based municipalities – Stats SA. Municipal Source – 2008, based on municipality reports. DWEA – 2008, data based on updated census 2001 (households).
Interpretation
Bearing in mind methodological differences among the three Departments, households with access to Free Basic Water vary significantly across all the three Departments (Municipal Source, DWEA and Stats SA).
Difference in data collection methodology could be one of the factors affecting the households’ differentials across all three Departments (Municipal Source, DWEA and Stats SA).
One of the reasons that account for differences between DWEA and Municipal Source figure is due to the fact that COGTA only counts households receiving measured (6 kl) water per policy prescription, whereas DWEA’s statistics is inclusive of households receiving water by other means other than piped household connections.
Some municipalities extend the provision of FBW to households that are not indigent and this explains why some municipalities have provided FBW to 100% or more of the identified indigent households.
The percentage of households served with FBW (Table 3) is measured against the total indigent households from the Census 2001, the reason for this, is that this was adopted as the target the department had to service with FBS by 2014.
Data note/explanatory note
The table reflects data from Stats SA, COGTA and DWEA. Table 3 reflects a summation of the municipal unit data contained in Annexure E. There are different probable scenarios why there are hyphened (-) data cells on
FBW Annexure E, firstly it might be that the municipality or district in question is not providing the service(s) (most likely on the beneficiary columns) or secondly that there was no data provided (most likely the total households or indigent columns).
17
5.4
Acc
ess
to S
anita
tion
Tabl
e 4:
Acc
ess
to S
anita
tion
STA
TIST
ICS
SOU
TH A
FRIC
A
CEN
SUS
2001
G
ENER
AL
HO
USE
HO
LD
SUR
VEY
2007
C
OM
MU
NIT
Y SU
RVE
Y 20
07
DW
EA 2
008
MU
NIC
IPA
L SO
UR
CE
2008
PRO
VIN
CE
To
tal n
o. o
f H
ouse
hold
s To
tal n
o. o
f ho
useh
olds
No.
of
hous
ehol
ds
rece
ivin
g ba
sic
and
high
er
leve
ls o
f se
rvic
e
Hou
seho
ld
acce
ss to
sa
nita
tion,
as
a
perc
enta
ge
Tota
l no.
of
hous
ehol
ds
No.
of
hous
ehol
ds
rece
ivin
g ba
sic
and
high
er
leve
ls o
f se
rvic
e
Hou
seho
ld
acce
ss to
sa
nita
tion,
as
a
perc
enta
ge
Tota
l no.
of
hous
ehol
ds
No.
of
hous
ehol
ds
rece
ivin
g ba
sic
and
high
er le
vels
of
ser
vice
Hou
seho
ld
acce
ss to
sa
nita
tion,
as
a
perc
enta
ge
Tota
l no.
of
hous
ehol
ds
No.
of
hous
ehol
ds
rece
ivin
g ba
sic
and
high
er le
vels
of
ser
vice
Hou
seho
ld
acce
ss to
sa
nita
tion,
as
a pe
rcen
tage
East
ern
Cap
e 1,
506,
540
1,79
5,87
2 89
1,00
0 49
.6%
1,58
4,79
1
729,
375
46.0
%
1,
598,
994
1,0
85,0
47
67.9
%
1
,634
,642
8
38,6
32
51.3
%
Free
Sta
te
758,
112
873,
415
632,
000
72.4
%
80
2,87
3
546,
654
68.1
%
79
5,86
2
530
,346
66
.6%
7
70,0
62
573
,545
74
.5%
Gau
teng
2,
889,
676
3,24
3,96
6 2,
843,
000
87.6
%
3,17
4,15
2
2,72
0,42
7 85
.7%
3,38
1,99
5
2
,956
,398
87
.4%
3,1
74,1
43
2
,942
,706
92
.7%
Kw
aZul
u-N
atal
2,
233,
498
2,53
7,15
6 1,
620,
000
63.9
%
2,23
1,94
7
1,25
2,64
7 56
.1%
2,45
1,29
4
1
,847
,136
75
.4%
2,3
17,2
93
1
,479
,775
63
.9%
Lim
popo
1,
194,
036
1,31
7,45
9 44
1,00
0 33
.5%
1,
215,
941
36
1,20
6 29
.7%
1,25
9,74
3
593
,994
47
.2%
1,3
19,7
55
515
,765
39
.1%
Mpu
mal
anga
83
0,98
7 88
8,40
6 50
4,00
0 56
.7%
940,
309
47
7,71
1 50
.8%
902,
515
5
42,9
17
60.2
%
1
,024
,416
5
73,5
74
56.0
%
Nor
th W
est
898,
740
943,
782
557,
000
59.0
%
91
1,12
0
486,
658
53.4
%
92
5,89
3
601
,452
65
.0%
9
24,4
30
484
,291
52
.4%
Nor
ther
n C
ape
25
9,63
3 29
3,70
1 23
1,00
0 78
.7%
257,
125
19
5,19
0 75
.9%
257,
279
1
98,2
95
77.1
%
273
,887
2
18,7
14
79.9
%
Wes
tern
Cap
e 1,
211,
414
1,36
7,17
1 1,
270,
000
92.9
%
1,35
9,87
0
1,25
9,97
2 92
.7%
1,42
2,72
5
1
,332
,028
93
.6%
1,3
71,2
17
1
,012
,460
73
.8%
Gra
nd T
otal
11
,782
,636
13
,260
,928
8,
989,
000
67.8
%
12,
478,
128
8
,029
,840
64
.4%
12,9
96,3
00
9,6
87,6
13
74.5
%
12
,809
,845
8,6
39,4
62
67.4
%
18
Goal
� All households to have basic level of sanitation by 2014.
Indicator
� Number of households having access to basic level of sanitation. Definition
� Higher level of service includes, flush toilet connected to sewerage system � Basic level of service includes flush toilet with septic tank and PIT latrine with
ventilation.
Data source
� Stats SA, Census 2001. � Stats SA, GHS – July 2007 survey based on households. � Stats SA, Community Survey February 2007 based on households. � DWEA , 2008, data based on updated census 2001 (households). � Municipal Source, 2009, data gathered via comprehensive infrastructure
planning in April 2009. Interpretation
� In terms of the percentage of households that have access to basic sanitation
the data sets for GHS (2007), CS (2007), DWEA (2008) and Municipal Source (2009) are variable, yet comparable in terms of the trends exhibited.
� The percentage variation may be due to: (IX) Date stamp of the data; (X) Methodology by which the data were gathered; (XI) Total number of households varying per data set; and (XII) Interpretation of the service levels for sanitation and the application
thereof. Data note/explanatory note
� Data include the local municipalities, metropolitan municipalities and exclude the DMAs.
� Household access to sanitation figures determined by adding, households using flush toilet connected to sewerage system, flush toilet with septic tank and PIT latrine with ventilation.
� Table 4 reflects a summation of the unit data contained in Annexure F. � Number of households for any given year may vary due to methodology or
19
demographic model used.
5.5
Sani
tatio
n B
ackl
ogs
Tabl
e 5:
San
itatio
n B
ackl
ogs
STA
TIST
ICS
SOU
TH A
FRIC
A
CEN
SUS
2001
G
ENER
AL
HO
USE
HO
LD S
UR
VEY
2007
C
OM
MU
NIT
Y SU
RVE
Y 20
07
DW
EA 2
008
MU
NIC
IPA
L SO
UR
CE
2008
PRO
VIN
CE
To
tal n
o. o
f H
ouse
hold
s
Tota
l no.
of
hous
ehol
ds
No.
of
hous
ehol
ds
rece
ivin
g be
low
a
basi
c le
vel
of s
ervi
ce
Hou
seho
ld
sani
tatio
n ba
cklo
gs,
as a
pe
rcen
tage
Tota
l no.
of
hous
ehol
ds
Com
mun
ity
Surv
ey
No.
of
hous
ehol
ds
rece
ivin
g be
low
a
basi
c le
vel
of s
ervi
ce
Hou
seho
ld
sani
tatio
n ba
cklo
gs,
as a
pe
rcen
tage
Tota
l no.
of
hous
ehol
ds
No.
of
hous
ehol
ds
rece
ivin
g be
low
a
basi
c le
vel
of s
ervi
ce
Hou
seho
ld
sani
tatio
n ba
cklo
gs,
as a
pe
rcen
tage
Tota
l no.
of
hous
ehol
ds
No.
of
hous
ehol
ds
rece
ivin
g be
low
a b
asic
le
vel o
f se
rvic
e
Hou
seho
ld
sani
tatio
n ba
cklo
gs,
as a
pe
rcen
tage
East
ern
Cap
e 1,
506,
540
1,79
5,87
2
889,
000
49.5
%
1,
584,
791
85
5,41
6 54
.0%
1,59
8,99
4
513,
947
32.1
%
1,
634,
642
79
6,01
0 48
.7%
Free
Sta
te
758,
112
873,
415
20
9,00
0 23
.9%
802,
873
25
6,21
9 31
.9%
795,
862
26
5,51
6 33
.4%
770,
062
19
6,51
7 25
.5%
Gau
teng
2,
889,
676
3,24
3,96
6
372,
000
11.5
%
3,
174,
152
45
3,72
5 14
.3%
3,38
1,99
5
425,
597
12.6
%
3,
174,
143
23
1,43
7 7.
3%
Kw
aZul
u-N
atal
2,
233,
498
2,53
7,15
6
892,
000
35.2
%
2,
231,
947
97
9,30
0 43
.9%
2,45
1,29
4
604,
158
24.6
%
2,
317,
293
83
7,51
8 36
.1%
Lim
popo
1,
194,
036
1,31
7,45
9
858,
000
65.1
%
1,
215,
941
85
4,73
5 70
.3%
1,25
9,74
3
665,
749
52.8
%
1,
319,
755
80
3,99
0 60
.9%
Mpu
mal
anga
83
0,98
7 88
8,40
6
337,
000
37.9
%
94
0,30
9
462,
598
49.2
%
90
2,51
5
359,
598
39.8
%
1,
024,
416
45
0,84
2 44
.0%
Nor
th W
est
898,
740
943,
782
37
2,00
0 39
.4%
911,
120
42
4,46
2 46
.6%
925,
893
32
4,44
1 35
.0%
924,
430
44
0,13
9 47
.6%
Nor
ther
n C
ape
25
9,63
3 29
3,70
1
26,0
00
8.9%
257,
125
61
,935
24
.1%
257,
279
58
,984
22
.9%
273,
887
55
,173
20
.1%
Wes
tern
Cap
e 1,
211,
414
1,36
7,17
1
67,0
00
4.9%
1,35
9,87
0
99,8
98
7.3%
1,42
2,72
5
90,6
97
6.4%
1,37
1,21
7
358,
757
26.2
%
Gra
nd T
otal
11
,782
,636
13
,260
,928
4,0
22,0
00
30.3
%
12
,478
,128
4,4
48,2
88
35.6
%
1
2,99
6,30
0
3,3
08,6
87
25.5
%
1
2,80
9,84
5
4
,170
,383
32
.6%
20
Goal
� All households to have basic level of sanitation by 2014. Indicator
� Number of households that have access to sanitation.
Definition
� Below basic level constitutes a backlog and includes chemical toilets, pit latrine without ventilation, bucket latrine and no sanitation facility.
Data source
� Stats SA, Census 2001. � Stats SA, GHS – July 2007 survey based on households. � Stats SA, Community Survey February 2007 based on households. � DWEA ,2008, data based on updated census 2001 (households). � Municipal Source, 2009 data gathered via comprehensive infrastructure
planning in April 2009.
Interpretation
� In terms of the percentage of households with sanitation backlog the data sets for GHS (2007), CS (2007), DWEA (2008) and Municipal Source (2009) are variable, yet comparable in terms of the trends exhibited.
� The percentage variation may be due to: (XIII) Date stamp of the data; (XIV) Methodology by which the data were gathered; (XV) Total number of households varying per data set; and (XVI) Interpretation of what constitutes a sanitation backlog and the
application thereof.
Data note/explanatory note
� Data includes the local municipalities, metropolitan municipalities and exclude the DMAs.
� Household sanitation backlog figures determined by adding households using chemical toilets, pit latrine without ventilation, bucket latrine and no sanitation facility.
� Table 5 reflects a summation of the unit data contained in Annexure F. � Number of households for any given year may vary due to methodology or
demographic model used.
21
5.6
Free
Bas
ic S
anita
tion
Tabl
e 6:
Fre
e B
asic
San
itatio
n
Indi
gent
hou
seho
lds
bene
fitin
g fr
om in
dige
nt s
uppo
rt s
yste
m S
ewer
age
and
Sani
tatio
n
ST
ATI
STIC
S SO
UTH
AFR
ICA
PRO
VIN
CE
NFC
M, 2
007
TO
TAL
IND
IGEN
TS
HO
USE
HO
LDS
In
dige
nt h
ouse
hold
s be
nefit
ing
Indi
gent
hou
seho
lds
bene
fitin
g , a
s a
Perc
enta
ge
East
ern
Cap
e 41
5,83
8 21
8,84
7 52
.6%
Free
Sta
te
215,
878
185,
074
85.7
%
Gau
teng
30
3,35
1 29
4,27
0 97
.0%
Kw
aZul
u-N
atal
69
5,79
4 17
6,16
7 25
.3%
Lim
popo
45
2,01
4 10
7,80
9 23
.9%
Mpu
mal
anga
25
9,65
3 10
9,75
5 42
.3%
Nor
th W
est
325,
823
112,
246
34.4
%
Nor
ther
n C
ape
81,8
27
64,4
98
78.8
%
Wes
tern
Cap
e 35
9,54
4 35
2,88
8 98
.1%
Tota
l 3,
109,
722
1,62
1,55
4 52
.1%
Not
e: In
dige
nt h
ouse
hold
is a
hou
seho
ld th
at q
ualif
ies
to re
ceiv
e so
me
or a
ll ba
sic
serv
ices
for f
ree
beca
use
they
hav
e no
inco
me
or a
low
inco
me.
Th
ese
hous
ehol
ds m
ust h
ave
been
iden
tifie
d by
the
mun
icip
ality
and
app
ear o
n th
e in
dige
nt re
gist
er, i
n lin
e w
ith th
e m
unic
ipal
indi
gent
pol
icy.
22
Goal
� All indigent households to have access to FBS by 2014. Indicator
� Total indigent households benefiting from free basic sanitation services. Data source
� Stats SA, NFCM - 2007, survey-based municipalities. Interpretation
� Table 4 above shows the proportion of indigent households identified by municipalities and indigent households benefiting from indigent support system for the year ended 30 June 2007. Of the 3,1 million indigent households, 1,6 million (52,1%) indigent households benefited from indigent support of sewerage and sanitation services.
Data note/explanatory note
� All data on table 4 ‘Sewerage and Sanitation’ are drawn from one source, namely NFCM, 2007.
23
5.7
Acc
ess
to E
lect
ricity
Ta
ble
7: A
cces
s to
Ele
ctric
ity
C
ENSU
S 20
01
DM
E 20
08
Prov
ince
To
tal n
o. o
f Hou
seho
lds
To
tal n
o. o
f hou
seho
lds
N
o. o
f hou
seho
lds
conn
ecte
d to
the
Grid
H
ouse
hold
acc
ess
to
elec
tric
ity, a
s a
perc
enta
ge
East
ern
Cap
e 1,
506,
540
1
,643
,689
9
67,9
17
58.9
%
Free
Sta
te
758,
112
813
,693
6
11,8
24
75.2
%
Gau
teng
2,
889,
676
3
,069
,373
2,3
54,8
65
76.7
%
Kw
aZul
u-N
atal
2,
233,
498
2
,369
,367
1,5
56,7
97
65.7
%
Mpu
mal
anga
1,
194,
036
868
,892
6
35,0
26
73.1
%
Nor
ther
n C
ape
830,
987
261
,082
2
14,2
79
82.1
%
Lim
popo
89
8,74
0
1,2
36,8
10
896
,747
72
.5%
Nor
th W
est
259,
633
904
,184
7
08,3
63
78.3
%
Wes
tern
Cap
e 1,
211,
414
1
,303
,591
1,1
23,0
25
86.1
%
Gra
nd T
otal
11
,782
,636
1
2,47
0,68
2
9,0
68,8
43
72.7
%
24
Goal
� All households to have access to electricity by 2014. Indicator
� Number of households connected to grid network. Definition
� Higher level of service includes connection to the grid. � Basic level of service includes 10 Amp connection.
Data source
� Stats SA, Census 2001. � DE, 2008, data based on updated census 2001 (households).
Interpretation
� Data from DE, 2008 is not comparable with GHS (2007) and CS (2007) due to differences by which the data has been grouped and reported on GHS (2008) and CS (2007) report in terms of household access to electricity for cooking, lighting and heating, separately. For the purpose of this report a distinction is made between household connection to grid and non-grid (use of wood, coal and gas), which constitutes a backlog.
Data note/explanatory note
� Data includes the local municipalities, metropolitan municipalities and exclude the DMAs.
� Household access to electricity figures determined by considering only households that are connected to the grid.
� Table 7 reflects a summation of the unit data contained in Annexure G. � The total number of households for any given year may vary due to
methodology or demographic model used. � A negative sign preceding unit data in Annexure G denotes households
electrified as a result of the housing programme and consequently, the number of households receiving access to basic and higher levels may be reflected as greater than the actual number of households reflected some of these municipalities.
25
5.8
Elec
tric
ity B
ackl
ogs
Tabl
e 8:
Ele
ctric
ity B
ackl
ogs
C
ENSU
S 20
01
DM
E 20
08
Prov
ince
To
tal n
o. o
f Hou
seho
lds
To
tal n
o. o
f hou
seho
lds
N
o. o
f hou
seho
lds
belo
w a
bas
ic le
vel
of s
ervi
ce
Elec
tric
ity B
ackl
ogs,
as
a p
erce
ntag
e
East
ern
Cap
e 1,
506,
540
1
,643
,689
6
75,7
72
41.1
%
Free
Sta
te
758,
112
813
,693
2
01,8
69
24.8
%
Gau
teng
2,
889,
676
3
,069
,373
7
14,5
08
23.3
%
Kw
aZul
u-N
atal
2,
233,
498
2
,369
,367
8
12,5
70
34.3
%
Mpu
mal
anga
1,
194,
036
868
,892
2
33,8
66
26.9
%
Nor
ther
n C
ape
830,
987
261
,082
46,8
03
17.9
%
Lim
popo
89
8,74
0
1,2
36,8
10
340
,064
27
.5%
Nor
th W
est
259,
633
904
,184
1
95,8
21
21.7
%
Wes
tern
Cap
e 1,
211,
414
1
,303
,591
1
80,5
66
13.9
%
Gra
nd T
otal
11
,782
,636
1
2,47
0,68
2
3,4
01,8
38
27.3
%
26
Goal
� All households to have access to electricity by 2014. Indicator
� Number of households not connected to grid network. Definition
� Below Basic electrical supply constitutes a backlog and includes households using any of the following:
� Gas; � Paraffin; � Wood; and � Coal.
Data source
� Stats SA, Census, 2001. � DE, 2008 data based on updated census 2001 (households).
Interpretation
� Data from DE, 2008 is not comparable with GHS (2007) and CS, 2007 due to differences by which the data have been grouped and reported on. The General Household Survey, 2008 and Community Survey, 2007 report in terms of household access to electricity for cooking, lighting and heating, separately. For the purpose of this report a distinction is made between household connection to grid and non-grid (use of wood, coal and gas) which constitutes a backlog.
Data note/explanatory note
� Data includes the local municipalities, metropolitan municipalities and exclude the DMAs.
� Household electricity backlogs figures determined by adding households using gas, paraffin, wood and coal.
� Table 8 reflects a summation of the unit data contained in Annexure G. � The total number of households for any given year may vary due to
methodology or demographic model used.
27
5.9
Free
Bas
ic E
nerg
y
Tabl
e 9:
Fre
e B
asic
Ene
rgy
N
umbe
r of i
ndig
ent h
ouse
hold
s be
nefit
ing
from
Fre
e B
asic
Ene
rgy
STA
TIST
ICS
SOU
TH A
FRIC
A
CEN
SUS,
200
1 N
FCM
, 200
7 M
UN
ICIP
AL S
OU
RC
E, 2
008
PRO
VIN
CE
TO
TAL
IND
IGE
NT
S H
OU
SEH
OL
DS
Indi
gent
hou
seho
lds r
ecei
ving
FB
E
Indi
gent
hou
seho
lds
rece
ivin
g FB
E
Hou
seho
lds
Rec
eivi
ng F
BE
Hou
seho
lds R
ecei
ving
FB
E, a
s a
Perc
enta
ge
East
ern
Cap
e 93
9,77
6 24
2,11
0 25
.8%
34
8,33
8 37
.1%
Free
Sta
te
425,
049
191,
101
45.0
%
481,
939
113.
4%
Gau
teng
96
7,53
9 29
7,20
5 30
.7%
80
0,06
4 82
.7%
Kw
aZul
u-N
atal
1,
162,
490
149,
228
12.8
%
277,
702
23.9
%
Lim
popo
74
4,67
6 87
,890
11
.8%
31
6,21
5 42
.5%
Mpu
mal
anga
44
4,11
2 64
,725
14
.6%
21
9,51
0 49
.4%
Nor
th W
est
440,
733
122,
987
27.9
%
97,8
95
22.2
%
Nor
ther
n C
ape
118,
194
60,1
23
50.9
%
88,9
83
75.3
%
Wes
tern
Cap
e 29
0,21
3 35
2,61
2 12
1.5%
59
5,49
8 20
5.2%
Tota
l 5,
532,
782
1,56
7,98
1 28
.3%
3,
226,
144
58.3
%
Not
e: In
dige
nt h
ouse
hold
is a
hou
seho
ld th
at q
ualif
ies
to re
ceiv
e so
me
or a
ll ba
sic
serv
ices
for f
ree
beca
use
they
hav
e no
inco
me
or a
low
inco
me.
Th
ese
hous
ehol
ds m
ust h
ave
been
iden
tifie
d by
the
mun
icip
ality
and
app
ear o
n th
e in
dige
nt re
gist
er, i
n lin
e w
ith th
e m
unic
ipal
indi
gent
pol
icy.
28
Goal
� All indigent households to have access to FBE by 2014. Indicator
� Total number of indigent households receiving FBE. Definition
� An amount of electricity determined by government that should be provided free to poor households to meet basic needs, currently set at 50kW per month per household.
Data source
� Stats SA, Census 2001. � Municipal Source, 2008, based on Municipality and Eskom reports. � Stats SA, NFCM - 2007, Survey based municipalities.
Interpretation
� Large percentage variation (51,4%) between the NFCM 2007 and COGTA 2008 data sets.
� The large scale percentage variation could be attributed to methodological difference in data collection.
� Some municipalities extend the provision of FBE to households that are not indigent and this explains why some municipalities have provided FBE to 100% or more of the identified indigent households.
� The percentage of households served with FBE (Table 9) is measured against the total number of indigent household from the Census 2001, the reason for this is that, this figure was adopted by the department as the target of households to be serviced with FBS by 2014.
Data note/explanatory note
� Data from both Departments dates. � The difference between the figures resulted from the different definitions and
reference period used to report the data. � Table 9 reflects a summation of the unit data contained in Annexure Free Basic
Energy. � There are different probable scenarios why there are hyphened (-) data cells on
FBE Annexure H, firstly it might be that the municipality or district in question is not providing the service(s) (most likely on the beneficiary columns) or secondly that there was no data provided (most likely the total households or indigent columns).
29
5.10
Ref
use
Rem
oval
Ta
ble
10: R
efus
e R
emov
al
ST
ATI
STIC
S SO
UTH
AFR
ICA
Prov
ince
To
tal n
o. o
f H
ouse
hold
s C
ensu
s 20
01
Tota
l no.
of h
ouse
hold
s G
ener
al H
ouse
hold
Sur
vey
(GH
S, 2
007)
No.
of h
ouse
hold
s re
ceiv
ing
basi
c an
d hi
gher
leve
ls o
f se
rvic
e (G
HS,
200
7)
Hou
seho
ld
acce
ss to
re
fuse
rem
oval
(G
HS,
200
7), a
s a
perc
enta
ge
Tota
l no.
of
hous
ehol
ds
Com
mun
ity
Surv
ey (C
S, 2
007)
No.
of
hous
ehol
ds
rece
ivin
g ba
sic
and
high
er le
vels
of
ser
vice
(CS,
20
07)
Hou
seho
ld
acce
ss to
re
fuse
rem
oval
(C
S, 2
007)
, as
a
perc
enta
ge
East
ern
Cap
e 1,
506,
540
1,79
5,87
2 68
5,00
0 38
.1%
1,58
3,80
2
586,
539
37.0
%
Free
Sta
te
758,
112
873,
415
651,
000
74.5
%
80
2,86
1
597,
249
74.4
%
Gau
teng
2,
889,
676
3,24
3,96
6 2,
756,
000
85.0
%
3,
174,
153
2,
691,
334
84.8
%
Kw
aZul
u-N
atal
2,
233,
498
2,53
7,15
6 1,
236,
000
48.7
%
2,
231,
961
1,
125,
159
50.4
%
Lim
popo
1,
194,
036
1,31
7,45
9 22
2,00
0 16
.9%
1,21
5,92
9
214,
605
17.6
%
Mpu
mal
anga
83
0,98
7 88
8,40
6 38
6,00
0 43
.4%
940,
314
37
2,53
0 39
.6%
Nor
th W
est
898,
740
943,
782
461,
000
48.8
%
91
1,12
6
478,
842
52.6
%
Nor
ther
n C
ape
25
9,63
3 29
3,70
1 22
8,00
0 77
.6%
257,
111
18
3,50
0 71
.4%
Wes
tern
Cap
e 1,
211,
414
1,36
7,17
1 1,
221,
000
89.3
%
1,35
9,86
4
1,22
8,57
6 90
.3%
G
rand
Tot
al
11,7
82,6
36
13,2
60,9
28
7,84
6,00
0 59
.2%
12,
477,
121
7,
478,
334
59.9
%
30
Goal
� All households to have access to refuse removal by 2014. Indicator
� Number of households receiving refuse removal service at least once a week.
Definition
� Higher level of service includes removal by local authorities/private company at least once a week.
� Basic level of service includes a communal skip.
Data source
� Stats SA, Census, 2001. � Stats SA, GHS, 2007 – July 2007 survey based on households. � Stats SA, Community Survey 2007, February 2007 based on households.
Interpretation
The GHS, 2007 and Community Survey 2007 are comparable as both data sets are from the same source and reflects data of the same year.
The percentage variation may be due to: (XVII) Methodology by which the data were gathered; (XVIII) Total number of households varying per data set; and (XIX) Interpretation of the service levels for refuse removal and the
application thereof.
Data note/explanatory note
� Data include the local municipalities, metropolitan municipalities and exclude the DMAs.
� Household access to refuse removal service figures are determined by considering only households receiving refuse removal service at least once a week.
� Table 11 reflects a summation of the unit data contained in Annexure I. � The total number of households for any given year may vary due to
methodology or demographic model used.
31
5.11
Ref
use
Rem
oval
Bac
klog
s Ta
ble
11: R
efus
e R
emov
al B
ackl
ogs
ST
ATI
STIC
S SO
UTH
AFR
ICA
Prov
ince
To
tal n
o. o
f H
ouse
hold
s C
ensu
s 20
01
Tota
l no.
of h
ouse
hold
s G
ener
al H
ouse
hold
Sur
vey
(GH
S, 2
007)
No.
of h
ouse
hold
s re
ceiv
ing
belo
w a
bas
ic le
vel o
f se
rvic
e (G
HS,
200
7)
Hou
seho
ld
acce
ss to
re
fuse
rem
oval
(G
HS,
200
7), a
s a
perc
enta
ge
Tota
l no.
of
hous
ehol
ds
Com
mun
ity S
urve
y 20
07 (C
S, 2
007)
No.
of
hous
ehol
ds
rece
ivin
g be
low
a
basi
c le
vel o
f se
rvic
e (C
S,
2007
)
Hou
seho
ld
refu
se re
mov
al
back
logs
CS,
20
07),
as a
pe
rcen
tage
East
ern
Cap
e 1,
506,
540
1,79
5,87
2
1,11
1,00
0
61.9
%
1,
583,
802
99
7,26
3 63
.0%
Free
Sta
te
758,
112
873,
415
22
2,00
0
25.4
%
80
2,86
1
205,
612
25.6
%
Gau
teng
2,
889,
676
3,24
3,96
6
488,
000
15
.0%
3,17
4,15
3
482,
819
15.2
%
Kw
aZul
u-N
atal
2,
233,
498
2,53
7,15
6
1,30
1,00
0
51.3
%
2,
231,
961
1,
106,
802
49.6
%
Lim
popo
1,
194,
036
1,31
7,45
9
1,09
6,00
0
83.2
%
1,
215,
929
1,
001,
324
82.4
%
Mpu
mal
anga
83
0,98
7 88
8,40
6
502,
000
56
.5%
940,
314
56
7,78
4 60
.4%
Nor
th W
est
898,
740
943,
782
48
3,00
0
51.2
%
91
1,12
6
432,
284
47.4
%
Nor
ther
n C
ape
25
9,63
3 29
3,70
1
65,0
00
22.1
%
25
7,11
1
73,6
11
28.6
%
Wes
tern
Cap
e 1,
211,
414
1,36
7,17
1
146,
000
10
.7%
1,35
9,86
4
131,
288
9.7%
Gra
nd T
otal
11
,782
,636
13
,260
,928
5
,414
,000
40
.8%
1
2,47
7,12
1
4
,998
,787
40
.1%
32
Goal
� All households to have access to refuse removal by 2014. Indicator
� Number of households receiving refuse removal service after a week or never.
Definition
� Below a basic service for refuse removal includes, removal by local authority/private company less often, communal refuse dump, own refuse dump, no rubbish disposal and other.
Data source
� Stats SA, Census 2001. � Stats SA, GHS – July 2007 survey based on households. � Stats SA, Community Survey 2007, February 2007 based on households.
Interpretation
� The GHS, 2007 and Community Survey 2007 are comparable as both data sets are from the same source and reflects data of the same year.
� The percentage variation may be due to: (XX) Total number of households varying per data set; and (XXI) Interpretation of what constitutes a refuse removal backlog and the
application thereof.
Data note/explanatory note
� Data include the local municipalities, metropolitan municipalities and exclude the DMA.
� Household refuse removal backlog figures determined by adding removal by local authority/private company less often, communal refuse dump, own refuse dump, no rubbish disposal and other.
� Table 10 reflects a summation of the municipal unit data contained in Annexure I. � The total number of households for any given year may vary due to methodology
or demographic model used.
33
5.12
Ref
use
Rem
oval
Ta
ble
12: F
ree
Bas
ic R
efus
e R
emov
al
In
dige
nt h
ouse
hold
s be
nefit
ing
from
indi
gent
sup
port
sys
tem
: Ref
use
Rem
oval
ST
ATI
STIC
S SO
UTH
AFR
ICA
N
FCM
200
7
PRO
VIN
CE
TOTA
L IN
DIG
ENTS
HO
USE
HO
LDS
Indi
gent
hou
seho
lds
bene
fitin
g In
dige
nt h
ouse
hold
s be
nefit
ing
as
a pe
rcen
tage
East
ern
Cap
e 41
5,83
8 22
0,78
3 53
.1%
Free
Sta
te
215,
878
187,
067
86.7
%
Gau
teng
30
3,35
1 29
4,39
3 97
.0%
Kw
aZul
u-N
atal
69
5,79
4 19
4,40
4 27
.9%
Lim
popo
45
2,01
4 68
,193
15
.1%
Mpu
mal
anga
25
9,65
3 11
0,11
5 42
.4%
Nor
th W
est
325,
823
142,
286
43.7
%
Nor
ther
n C
ape
81,8
27
64,5
34
78.9
%
Wes
tern
Cap
e 35
9,54
4 35
3,80
4 98
.4%
Tota
l 3,
109,
722
1,63
5,57
9 52
.6%
N
ote:
Indi
gent
hou
seho
ld is
a h
ouse
hold
that
qua
lifie
s to
rece
ive
som
e or
all
basi
c se
rvic
es fo
r fre
e be
caus
e th
ey h
ave
no in
com
e or
a lo
w in
com
e.
Thes
e ho
useh
olds
mus
t hav
e be
en id
entif
ied
by th
e m
unic
ipal
ity a
nd a
ppea
r on
the
indi
gent
regi
ster
, in
line
with
the
mun
icip
al in
dige
nt p
olic
y.
34
Goal � All indigent households to have access to FBS by 2014.
Indicator
� Total indigent households benefiting from refuse removal services. Definition
� The basic refuse removal service level is defined as the most appropriate level of waste removal service provided based on site specific circumstances. Such a basic level of service, be it in an urban or rural set-up, is attained when a municipality provides or facilitates waste removal through:
� On-site appropriate and regularly supervised disposal (applicable mainly to
remote rural areas with low density settlements and farms supervised by the waste management officer);
� Community transfer to central collection point (medium density settlements); � Organised transfer to central collection points and/or Kerbside collection (high
density settlements); and � Mixture of ‘b’ and ‘c’ above for the medium to high density settlements.
Data source
� Stats SA, NFCM - 2007, Survey based municipalities. � Table 12 reflects a summation of the municipal unit data contained in Annexure
Refuse removal.
Interpretation
� Table 5 above shows the proportion of indigent households identified by municipalities and indigent households benefiting from indigent support systems for the year ended 30 June 2007. Of the 3,1 million indigent households, 1.6 million (52,6%) indigent households benefited from indigent support of Refuse Removal services.
Data note/explanatory note
� All data on table 5 ‘Refuse Removal’ are drawn from one source, namely NFCM, 2007.
35
36
6. Application and Use of the Report � Provide leadership on the measurement and monitoring of basic services that is
transparent. � Share with communities, planning practitioners, decision-makers the status and
progress with regard to basic services. � Provide baseline information to planning practitioners. � Collectively improve reporting on service delivery more accurately and more
consistently. � Provide a basis to improve integrity of service delivery data across the spheres
of government.
37
ANNEXURE A: DATA COLLECTION METHODOLOGY This document outlines the comparisons between the data obtained from the following publications and departments: Non-Financial Census of Municipalities (NFC), General Household Survey (GHS), Community Survey (CS), the Department of Water and Environmental Affairs (DWEA), Department of Energy (DE) and the municipalities through the CIP process. The reporting outlines the methodology used in each of the publications stated below. It should be noted that the data may not be consistent for a number of reasons including the use of different data item definitions, classifications, scope, reference period, etc.
� General Household Survey (GHS) The sample design used by GHS was based on a Master Sample (MS) and was developed specifically for the households sample survey. A multi-stage stratified areas probability sample was used and stratification was done per province and according to district councils within provinces. Approximately 3 000 Primary Sampling Units (PSUs) were selected. In each selected PSU a systematic sample of ten dwelling units was drawn, thus, resulting in approximately 30 000 dwelling units. All households in the sampled dwelling were enumerated.
� Community Survey (CS) Community Survey (CS) uses two-stage stratified random sampling. Given that the main objective of the survey was to provide data at municipality level, each municipality was considered as an explicit stratum at the first stage. The second stage involved the selection of enumeration areas (EAs) within each municipality. EAs were used in drawing up the sample for the 2001 census. The systematic simple random sampling method was used to select EAs. Out of 80 787 EAs, 79 466 were considered for sampling. A total of 1 321 EAs, of which 919 were institutions and 402 were recreational areas, was excluded. The final selected sample size for the survey was 17 098 EAs, translating to 274 344 sampled District Units (DU).
� Department of Water and Environmental Affairs (DWEA ) In 1994 the Department of Water Affairs and Forestry (DWAF) received the mandate, through the White Paper on Water Supply and Sanitation Policy: “to ensure that all South Africans have equitable access to basic water supply and sanitation services” specifically focusing on basic services and rural development. In 1997 the Water Services Act changed this challenge to “ensure that all South Africans have equitable access to effective, economical and sustainable water supply and sanitation services”. This meant that higher levels of service needed to be addressed in addition to the basic services.
38
In order to understand the challenge, the Department mobilised a national team to gather information on water services and related issues. The purpose of this study was to serve as a platform to understand South Africa in all its water services related demographic aspects and to make the data available to all interested parties. The results of this were captured in a database, which is currently maintained and updated. The methodology used to update estimated population/household, water and sanitation services levels is discussed in some detail below: Population The estimated population figures are based on the results of Census 2001 and are updated by DWAF annually using Stats SA population growth parameters as follows: Using the census totals for 1996 and 2001, exponential growth of the population was assumed and the inter census growth rate, r, was obtained using the equation below: P t2 = P t1 * exp[r * (t2 – t1)] where 1 is the initial time and 2 is the final time. Hence, r = 0.2* log e (P 2001 / P 1996 ) The assumption was made that r (the growth rate obtained between the 1996 and 2001 datasets) had remained constant. Community level populations are projected from 2001 to 2009/current year and backwards towards 1994 (once off) using the calculated growth rate. Water Supply & Sanitation Service Levels DWAF negotiated with Stats SA to gather information on water and sanitation supply service levels to South Africans during the Census 1996 and 2001 as well as the Community Survey 2007 and annual General Household Surveys. The baseline water supply and sanitation service levels are updated by DWAF annually based on the following:
o Service levels are updated with the results of actual project delivery through implementation – MIG information;
o Should no actual project delivery figures be available, the delivery is calculated based on the financial allocation on municipal level (financial allocation / average unit cost = possible delivery based on the assumption that finances are used appropriately);
39
o Bucket system delivery is updated monthly based on actual delivery progress as provided by a management consultant responsible for project implementation; and
o Sanitation delivery figures are improved by quarterly inputs from the DWAF Sanitation Unit (based on information received from regional sanitation coordinators who are tasked with the responsibility of monitoring sanitation project implementation at local government level).
Actual water supply and sanitation service levels are used to derive/calculate the backlogs annually. DWAF ensures alignment with other stakeholders by comparison to other stakeholder data such as Stats, SA GHS & CS as well as DPLG and DBSA. People/households served with Free Basic Water are updated in real time (using a system developed by DWA) by Provincial Support Units (PSU’s) with delivery figures provided by Municipalities. Delivery is broken down into service levels: Above RDP, at RDP, below RDP and households/population with no access to formal water infrastructure.
� Department of Energy (DE) The number of households and backlog in electricity connections are based on the 2001 census figures. These figures were then used to calculate the estimated backlog as at October 2001. Actual connections, as provided by Eskom and the Department of Energy (DE) (Municipal Programme) for the period November 2001 and December 31 to March 2006, were deducted from estimated backlogs as at October 2006 to provide an estimated electrification backlog up to 31 March 2006 (Growth in household numbers of 2% were recommended by Stats SA). The Department has now revised the growth in household’s number i.e. 1% for rural municipalities and 2% for metros, bigger towns and municipalities that share its borders with other African countries. Every year the actual connections from the Eskom programme and the Municipality programme (per municipality) are deducted from the previous year’s figures. The electricity backlog status is released once per annum (beginning of each financial year) as electricity connections on both programmes run for a year and are aligned with (DE) financial year.
� Non-Financial Census of Municipalities The Non-Financial Census of Municipalities (NFCM) collects information directly from municipalities. The methods used for collection included personal visits, telephone calls, facsimiles, e-mails and post. All 283 municipalities were covered in this census for 2007. A response rate of 100% was attained. NFCM data are not necessarily
40
comparable with the Stats SA population census of 2001 and/or household survey data, mainly due to the following: o The data source is municipalities as opposed to households; and o The different definitions of 'household'. Most municipalities do not have a system
for identifying multiple households served by one billing unit or delivery point.
� Municipal Source
o Basic Services
The Municipal Comprehensive Infrastructure Plan (CIP) provides a strategic plan for addressing the long-term sustainability of infrastructure in a municipality. It is therefore closely linked to the availability of accurate data on assets and service levels in a municipality. It is thus crucial that the most recent, accurate data be used in compiling such plans. However, various studies, projects, and programmes are conducted in municipalities, by provinces, and even from a national perspective to provide planning information to various implementers of projects. The result of this is that some discrepancies may exist between data sets for different services. In compiling the CIPs the objective was to ensure that all such sources of data are aligned, and that the most recent data could be used. To this end, a process had been developed that was based upon the following principles: � The most recent data on service levels were obtained from Stats SA: the data at
ward level was used from the 2001 Census and this was augmented with summary data (at municipal level) from the 2007 Community Survey. A similar growth rate was assumed across all wards;
� All sector departments were asked to provide their latest backlog statistics and, where possible, these were then used to align the service level data;
� The data were then distributed to the municipalities, who were asked to update the data based upon local inputs;
� Apart from having to confirm (or adjust) these backlog figures, municipalities also had to identify projects that would address these backlogs; and
� The final data were then compared with national level statistics provided by sector departments (where available) again, and adjusted where required.
o Free Basic Services The FBS data collection questionnaire/template is updated and dispatched to local municipalities via facsimile, e-mail, post and other instances. Municipalities are then expected to complete the questionnaire with data depicting current status of FBS
41
beneficiaries. After the questionnaire is completed as a control measure, the Municipal Managers are expected to sign the questionnaire giving consent to the data provided by their officials. Where a selected unit does not respond in a given survey period, a value for the previous quarter is reported on. If data is subsequently provided, the previous value/figure is replaced with reported data. The data collection instrument used by COGTA in collecting FBW statistics is limited only to indigents receiving 6kl, thus those that have access to metered water supply. Indigent households who receive water through communal stand pipes, water tankers and boreholes are not included. COGTA then receives the questionnaire, before it is captured into an Excel data sheet, previous questionnaires are compared with the latest responses from municipalities. If any inconsistencies are detected municipalities are called upon to provide explanation as a means of verification. Once the cross-checking process is complete, data is captured into an Excel spreadsheet. Once data capturing is complete, a process of verifying whether the data was captured as depicted on questionnaires resumes thereafter to ensure that no data was entered incorrectly. After the verification process, the COGTA then analyses the data and report are compiled. Once reports are approved by the authorized management team, it is ready to be published.
42
ANNEXURE B: DATA QUALITY IMPROVEMENT PROGRAMME Overview The Municipal Data Quality Improvement Programme focuses on working towards producing and publishing a credible service delivery baseline and to update data on basic local government services and infrastructure delivery. This will result in evidence-based and more consistent reporting and monitoring of service delivery across all spheres of government. Objectives The objectives of the Programme are:
� to assess the quality and coverage of data from the registers and administrative
records of municipalities; � to develop processes of improving the quality of the registers and
administrative records data of municipalities to become sustainable sources for quality data;
� to strengthen the information management systems in municipalities so that they will become suitable for production of quality data; and
� to identify and adopt mechanisms for aligning the collection of data in the municipalities with the reporting requirements of the COGTA and other stakeholders.
Outcomes
The outcomes of the Programme are: � Sustained maintenance of the production of quality statistics on basic services
and infrastructure backlogs and progress; � improved data production systems and statistical skills in municipalities and in
the COGTA; � COGTA capacity to generate statistics that can be compared with related
statistics in the NSS; � COGTA capacity to generate quality statistics for internal departmental
use; � Credible service delivery baseline and update data in respect of basic services
and municipal infrastructure backlogs and progress; � Improved validity of allocation of resources; � improved service delivery planning and management decision-making; � IDPs with quality baseline and updated statistical information; and � credible government-wide information for reporting on, and monitoring of basic
services and municipal infrastructure backlogs.
43
ANNEXURE C: uHABS INDEX Universal Household Access to Basic Services (uHABS) Index. In parallel with the Data Quality Improvement Programme, COGTA has developed a Universal Household Access to Basic Services (uHABS) Index with assistance from the Support Programme for Accelerated Infrastructure Development (SPAID) ), which is a joint Presidency / Business Trust Initiative. The Index is being developed in recognition of the fact that an important aspect of the success or failure of the government’s programme of service delivery is the ways in which such efforts are communicated to stakeholders. Proactive and full communication breeds confidence that the issues of service delivery backlog are being consistently addressed, which will in turn garner support for service delivery efforts. The uHABS Index is a vital tool in ensuring that such communication happens clearly and effectively, in a way understood by all. The key objective for the uHABS index is therefore to be an indicator for independently measuring and communicating the extent and nature of basic service backlogs in communities and demonstrating progress in addressing these service backlogs. The index will enable a broad-based and consistent understanding of the challenges of and progress on the eradication of basic services infrastructure backlogs amongst defined audiences, and will also enable responsible authorities to participate in the uniform reporting framework. The uHABS Index indicates service delivery progress in respect of water, sanitation, electricity and domestic refuse removal, as reported by households. The Index is based on Stats SA data (Census, Community and Household Surveys). The use of the Stats SA data for the uHABS index has the advantage of representing the perspective of households and end-users with regards to what they perceive to be their level of access to services. It also has the advantage of providing trend data for district municipalities and provinces since 1996. The uHABS Index does not engage in any sourcing or cleaning up of data, but only utilises official data agreed and released by Stats SA. The presentation of performance and levels of access to basic services in the uHABS Index is based on the application of the minimum level for norms and standards in respect of service delivery as prepared by the COGTA and documented in this publication.
44
ANNEXURE D: ACCESS TO WATER
Tot
al
Hou
seho
lds
Hou
seho
ld
acce
ss to
wat
er
Hou
seho
ldac
cess
to
wat
er a
s a
perc
enta
ge
Hou
seho
lds
belo
w b
asic
le
vel o
f se
rvic
e/ba
cklo
gs
Hou
seho
lds
belo
w b
asic
leve
l of
ser
vice
/ ba
cklo
gs a
s a
perc
enta
ge
Tot
al
Hou
seho
lds
Hou
seho
ld
acce
ss to
wat
er
Hou
seho
ldac
cess
to
wat
er a
s a
perc
enta
ge
Hou
seho
lds
belo
w b
asic
le
vel o
f se
rvic
e/ba
cklo
gs
Hou
seho
lds
belo
w b
asic
leve
l of
ser
vice
/ ba
cklo
gs a
s a
perc
enta
ge
Tot
al
Hou
seho
lds
Hou
seho
ld
acce
ss to
wat
er
Hou
seho
ldac
cess
to w
ater
as
a
perc
enta
ge
Hou
seho
lds
belo
w b
asic
le
vel o
f se
rvic
e/ba
cklo
gs
Hou
seho
lds
belo
w b
asic
leve
l of
ser
vice
/ ba
cklo
gs a
s a
perc
enta
ge
Eas
tern
Cap
eA
mah
lath
i Loc
al M
unic
ipal
ity36
,389
29,6
07
81
.4%
6,78
2
18
.6%
36,9
20
29
,469
79
.8%
7,45
1
20
.2%
36,3
87
30
,271
83.2
%6,
116
16.8
%E
aste
rn C
ape
Bav
iaan
s Lo
cal M
unic
ipal
ity3,
738
3,52
9
94.4
%20
9
5.6%
4,21
9
4,
200
99.5
%19
0.5%
3,97
1
3,
961
99
.7%
10
0.
3%E
aste
rn C
ape
Blu
e C
rane
Rou
te L
ocal
Mun
icip
ality
9,65
6
8,
972
92
.9%
684
7.
1%10
,294
9,73
6
94
.6%
558
5.
4%9,
655
9,15
0
94.8
%50
5
5.2%
Eas
tern
Cap
eB
uffa
lo C
ity L
ocal
Mun
icip
ality
208,
389
20
4,15
1
98.0
%4,
238
2.0%
206,
454
19
5,94
9
94
.9%
10,5
05
5.
1%20
8,38
9
204,
489
98
.1%
3,90
0
1.
9%E
aste
rn C
ape
Cam
debo
o Lo
cal M
unic
ipal
ity8,
994
8,85
8
98.5
%13
6
1.5%
11,1
32
11
,132
10
0.0%
-
0.
0%8,
994
8,89
8
98.9
%96
1.1%
Eas
tern
Cap
eE
lund
ini L
ocal
Mun
icip
ality
35,5
54
14
,604
41.1
%20
,950
58.9
%35
,808
26,9
44
75.2
%8,
864
24.8
%35
,554
16,2
71
45
.8%
19,2
83
54
.2%
Eas
tern
Cap
eE
mal
ahle
ni L
ocal
Mun
icip
ality
31,1
96
25
,562
81.9
%5,
634
18.1
%30
,858
26,8
68
87.1
%3,
990
12.9
%31
,197
26,0
01
83
.3%
5,19
6
16
.7%
Eas
tern
Cap
eE
ngco
bo L
ocal
Mun
icip
ality
35,1
87
18
,001
51.2
%17
,186
48.8
%32
,821
22,6
52
69.0
%10
,169
31.0
%35
,186
18,6
05
52
.9%
16,5
81
47
.1%
Eas
tern
Cap
eG
arie
p Lo
cal M
unic
ipal
ity8,
207
7,96
1
97.0
%24
6
3.0%
8,89
9
8,
899
100.
0%-
0.0%
8,77
2
7,
022
80
.1%
1,75
0
19
.9%
Eas
tern
Cap
eG
reat
Kei
Loc
al M
unic
ipal
ity11
,958
10,8
87
91
.0%
1,07
1
9.
0%12
,152
12,1
52
100.
0%-
0.0%
11,9
57
11
,100
92.8
%85
7
7.2%
Eas
tern
Cap
eIk
wez
i Loc
al M
unic
ipal
ity2,
567
2,43
594
.9%
132
5.
1%2,
957
2,95
7
10
0.0%
-
0.
0%2,
567
-
0.
0%2,
567
100.
0%E
aste
rn C
ape
Inkw
anca
Loc
al M
unic
ipal
ity5,
302
5,00
7
94.4
%29
5
5.6%
5,74
4
5,
744
100.
0%-
0.0%
5,30
3
5,
291
99
.8%
12
0.
2%E
aste
rn C
ape
Ints
ika
Yet
hu L
ocal
Mun
icip
ality
43,5
02
22
,331
51.3
%21
,171
48.7
%41
,656
34,1
99
82.1
%7,
457
17.9
%43
,504
23,4
41
53
.9%
20,0
63
46
.1%
Eas
tern
Cap
eIn
xuba
Yet
hem
ba L
ocal
Mun
icip
ality
14,4
92
13
,595
93.8
%89
7
6.2%
17,0
54
17
,054
10
0.0%
-
0.
0%14
,491
14,3
97
99
.4%
94
0.
6%E
aste
rn C
ape
Kin
g S
abat
a D
alin
dyeb
o Lo
cal M
unic
ipal
ity93
,382
48,5
51
52
.0%
44,8
31
48
.0%
97,3
65
66
,517
68
.3%
30,8
48
31
.7%
93,3
84
49
,150
52.6
%44
,234
47.4
%E
aste
rn C
ape
Kou
ga L
ocal
Mun
icip
ality
19,0
83
18
,958
99.3
%12
5
0.7%
21,3
80
21
,152
98
.9%
228
1.
1%19
,084
18,9
96
99
.5%
88
0.
5%E
aste
rn C
ape
Kou
-Kam
ma
Loca
l Mun
icip
ality
10,3
71
9,
696
93
.5%
675
6.
5%10
,447
10,4
47
100.
0%-
0.0%
10,3
71
8,
802
84
.9%
1,56
9
15
.1%
Eas
tern
Cap
eLu
kanj
i Loc
al M
unic
ipal
ity49
,674
48,5
81
97
.8%
1,09
3
2.
2%47
,185
44,7
57
94.9
%2,
428
5.1%
49,6
73
48
,601
97.8
%1,
072
2.2%
Eas
tern
Cap
eM
akan
a Lo
cal M
unic
ipal
ity18
,864
18,4
44
97
.8%
420
2.
2%19
,164
18,7
00
97.6
%46
4
2.4%
18,8
66
18
,457
97.8
%40
9
2.2%
Eas
tern
Cap
eM
alet
swai
Loc
al M
unic
ipal
ity11
,443
11,2
58
98
.4%
185
1.
6%10
,257
10,2
57
100.
0%-
0.0%
11,4
44
11
,340
99.1
%10
4
0.9%
Eas
tern
Cap
eM
atat
iele
Loc
al M
unic
ipal
ity54
,207
38,9
22
71
.8%
15,2
8528
.2%
53,8
80
38
,169
70
.8%
15,7
11
29
.2%
54,2
09
39
,917
73.6
%14
,292
26.4
%E
aste
rn C
ape
Mbh
ashe
Loc
al M
unic
ipal
ity59
,704
14,7
47
24
.7%
44,9
57
75
.3%
56,1
61
42
,507
75
.7%
13,6
54
24
.3%
59,7
03
15
,824
26.5
%43
,879
73.5
%E
aste
rn C
ape
Mbi
zana
Loc
al M
unic
ipal
ity48
,407
2,18
3
4.5%
46,2
24
95
.5%
49,6
31
36
,169
72
.9%
13,4
62
27
.1%
48,4
07
3,
169
6.
5%45
,238
93.5
%E
aste
rn C
ape
Mhl
ontlo
Loc
al M
unic
ipal
ity49
,860
19,1
03
38
.3%
30,7
57
61
.7%
46,6
45
28
,883
61
.9%
17,7
62
38
.1%
49,8
62
19
,596
39.3
%30
,266
60.7
%E
aste
rn C
ape
Mnq
uma
Loca
l Mun
icip
ality
75,4
12
31
,410
41.7
%44
,002
58.3
%71
,531
57,9
99
81.1
%13
,532
18.9
%75
,409
31,6
23
41
.9%
43,7
86
58
.1%
Eas
tern
Cap
eN
dlam
be L
ocal
Mun
icip
ality
14,7
34
14
,186
96.3
%54
8
3.7%
17,3
79
16
,862
97
.0%
517
3.
0%14
,732
14,2
40
96
.7%
492
3.
3%E
aste
rn C
ape
Nel
son
Man
dela
Bay
Met
ropo
litan
Mun
icip
ality
276,
880
27
2,47
5
98.4
%4,
405
1.6%
284,
833
26
7,22
4
93
.8%
17,6
09
6.
2%32
5,93
2
259,
754
79
.7%
66,1
78
20
.3%
Eas
tern
Cap
eN
gqus
hwa
Loca
l Mun
icip
ality
25,5
65
23
,970
93.8
%1,
595
6.2%
22,9
59
21
,095
91
.9%
1,86
4
8.
1%25
,565
24,0
06
93
.9%
1,55
9
6.
1%E
aste
rn C
ape
Nko
nkob
e Lo
cal M
unic
ipal
ity34
,890
28,9
67
83
.0%
5,92
3
17
.0%
34,3
51
28
,586
83
.2%
5,76
5
16
.8%
34,8
89
29
,044
83.2
%5,
845
16.8
%E
aste
rn C
ape
Nta
bank
ulu
Loca
l Mun
icip
ality
27,9
31
11
,632
41.6
%16
,299
58.4
%29
,518
22,2
79
75.5
%7,
239
24.5
%27
,932
11,6
79
41
.8%
16,2
53
58
.2%
Eas
tern
Cap
eN
xuba
Loc
al M
unic
ipal
ity6,
277
5,84
8
93.2
%42
9
6.8%
7,01
47,
014
100.
0%-
0.0%
6,27
8
5,
970
95
.1%
308
4.
9%E
aste
rn C
ape
Nya
nden
i Loc
al M
unic
ipal
ity56
,851
20,9
89
36
.9%
35,8
62
63
.1%
59,1
79
36
,320
61
.4%
22,8
59
38
.6%
56,8
53
21
,226
37.3
%35
,627
62.7
%E
aste
rn C
ape
Por
t St J
ohns
Loc
al M
unic
ipal
ity30
,949
7,51
2
24.3
%23
,437
75.7
%30
,995
21,4
32
69.1
%9,
563
30.9
%30
,950
7,62
0
24.6
%23
,330
75.4
%E
aste
rn C
ape
Qau
keni
Loc
al M
unic
ipal
ity48
,702
16,6
57
34
.2%
32,0
45
65
.8%
54,7
28
48
,273
88
.2%
6,45
5
11
.8%
48,7
03
17
,344
35.6
%31
,359
64.4
%E
aste
rn C
ape
Sak
hisi
zwe
Loca
l Mun
icip
ality
15,6
24
12
,572
80.5
%3,
052
19.5
%15
,715
15,0
12
95.5
%70
3
4.5%
15,6
24
12
,861
82.3
%2,
763
17.7
%E
aste
rn C
ape
Sen
qu L
ocal
Mun
icip
ality
35,1
04
24
,294
69.2
%10
,810
30.8
%36
,368
24,5
13
67.4
%11
,855
32.6
%35
,106
26,8
90
76
.6%
8,21
6
23
.4%
Eas
tern
Cap
eS
unda
y's
Riv
er V
alle
y Lo
cal M
unic
ipal
ity9,
873
8,60
9
87.2
%1,
264
12.8
%10
,748
9,38
8
87
.3%
1,36
0
12
.7%
9,87
3
8,
661
87
.7%
1,21
2
12
.3%
Eas
tern
Cap
eTs
olw
ana
Loca
l Mun
icip
ality
8,06
7
7,
734
95
.9%
333
4.
1%8,
334
8,33
4
10
0.0%
-
0.
0%8,
066
7,92
2
98.2
%14
4
1.8%
Eas
tern
Cap
eU
mzi
mvu
bu L
ocal
Mun
icip
ality
47,8
02
29
,511
61.7
%18
,291
38.3
%46
,259
34,5
16
74.6
%11
,743
25.4
%47
,800
29,9
65
62
.7%
17,8
35
37
.3%
Free
Sta
teD
ihla
beng
Loc
al M
unic
ipal
ity31
,836
29,8
21
93
.7%
2,01
5
6.
3%36
,960
35,4
11
95.8
%1,
549
4.2%
31,8
34
30
,861
96.9
%97
3
3.1%
Free
Sta
teK
opan
ong
Loca
l Mun
icip
ality
15,4
40
14
,566
94.3
%87
4
5.7%
19,3
42
19
,210
99.3
%13
2
0.7%
15,4
41
15
,436
100.
0%5
0.
0%Fr
ee S
tate
Lets
emen
g Lo
cal M
unic
ipal
ity11
,588
10,3
18
89
.0%
1,27
0
11
.0%
13,4
60
13
,460
10
0.0%
-
0.
0%11
,588
11,1
09
95
.9%
479
4.
1%Fr
ee S
tate
Maf
ube
Loca
l Mun
icip
ality
14,0
04
13
,397
95.7
%60
7
4.3%
16,1
14
16
,114
10
0.0%
-
0.
0%14
,004
8,66
8
61.9
%5,
336
38.1
%Fr
ee S
tate
Mal
uti a
Pho
fung
Loc
al M
unic
ipal
ity97
,172
95,9
73
98
.8%
1,19
9
1.
2%97
,957
95,2
96
97.3
%2,
661
2.7%
97,1
73
96
,205
99.0
%96
8
1.0%
Free
Sta
teM
anga
ung
Loca
l Mun
icip
ality
202,
762
20
0,87
8
99.1
%1,
884
0.9%
202,
887
20
0,59
9
98
.9%
2,28
8
1.
1%16
9,95
4
105,
211
61
.9%
64,7
43
38
.1%
Free
Sta
teM
ants
opa
Loca
l Mun
icip
ality
15,9
84
15
,374
96.2
%61
0
3.8%
15,2
05
15
,205
10
0.0%
-
0.
0%15
,985
15,7
74
98
.7%
211
1.
3%Fr
ee S
tate
Mas
ilony
ana
Loca
l Mun
icip
ality
27,2
46
26
,871
98.6
%37
5
1.4%
18,2
11
18
,211
10
0.0%
-
0.
0%27
,246
13,7
09
50
.3%
13,5
37
49
.7%
Free
Sta
teM
atjh
aben
g Lo
cal M
unic
ipal
ity13
1,62
1
128,
872
97
.9%
2,74
9
2.
1%12
4,94
8
120,
493
96.4
%4,
455
3.6%
131,
622
71
,059
54.0
%60
,563
46.0
%Fr
ee S
tate
Met
sim
ahol
o Lo
cal M
unic
ipal
ity37
,319
37,2
63
99
.8%
56
0.
2%35
,464
35,4
64
100.
0%-
0.0%
37,3
17
21
,391
57.3
%15
,926
42.7
%Fr
ee S
tate
Moh
okar
e Lo
cal M
unic
ipal
ity10
,215
9,55
6
93.5
%65
9
6.5%
10,1
55
10
,155
10
0.0%
-
0.
0%10
,216
9,91
8
97.1
%29
8
2.9%
Free
Sta
teM
oqha
ka L
ocal
Mun
icip
ality
64,8
97
62
,988
97.1
%1,
909
2.9%
44,8
18
44
,818
10
0.0%
-
0.0%
64,8
97
64
,812
99.9
%85
0.1%
Free
Sta
teN
ala
Loca
l Mun
icip
ality
23,4
22
22
,067
94.2
%1,
355
5.8%
28,7
10
28
,710
10
0.0%
-
0.
0%23
,423
13,6
42
58
.2%
9,78
1
41
.8%
Free
Sta
teN
aled
i Loc
al M
unic
ipal
ity8,
279
8,11
2
98.0
%16
7
2.0%
8,37
2
8,
328
99.5
%44
0.5%
8,27
8
6,
028
72
.8%
2,25
0
27
.2%
Free
Sta
teN
gwat
he L
ocal
Mun
icip
ality
32,8
74
31
,127
94.7
%1,
747
5.3%
34,6
81
34
,681
10
0.0%
-
0.
0%32
,873
21,9
52
66
.8%
10,9
21
33
.2%
Free
Sta
teN
keto
ana
Loca
l Mun
icip
ality
16,7
47
15
,736
94.0
%1,
011
6.0%
15,9
65
15
,965
10
0.0%
-
0.
0%16
,749
9,28
6
55.4
%7,
463
44.6
%Fr
ee S
tate
Phu
mel
ela
Loca
l Mun
icip
ality
11,5
29
10
,348
89.8
%1,
181
10.2
%13
,178
12,9
69
98.4
%20
9
1.6%
11,5
31
11
,086
96.1
%44
5
3.9%
Free
Sta
teS
etso
to L
ocal
Mun
icip
ality
29,8
27
28
,471
95.5
%1,
356
4.5%
36,1
46
36
,146
10
0.0%
-
0.
0%29
,829
12,9
05
43
.3%
16,9
24
56
.7%
Free
Sta
teTo
kolo
go L
ocal
Mun
icip
ality
7,47
5
7,
059
94
.4%
416
5.
6%9,
859
9,85
9
10
0.0%
-
0.
0%7,
477
7,34
1
98.2
%13
6
1.8%
Free
Sta
teTs
wel
opel
e Lo
cal M
unic
ipal
ity12
,622
12,2
75
97
.3%
347
2.
7%13
,430
13,4
30
100.
0%-
0.0%
12,6
25
12
,560
99.5
%65
0.5%
Gau
teng
Joha
nnes
burg
Met
ropo
litan
Mun
icip
ality
1,16
5,01
41,
145,
162
98.3
%19
,852
1.7%
1,25
6,12
71,
218,
012
97
.0%
38,1
15
3.
0%1,
165,
012
1,14
7,77
2
98
.5%
17,2
40
1.
5%G
aute
ngTs
hwan
e M
etro
polit
an M
unic
ipal
ity68
6,64
1
667,
231
97
.2%
19,4
10
2.
8%67
5,25
6
650,
126
96.3
%25
,130
3.7%
686,
639
679,
417
98.9
%7,
222
1.1%
Gau
teng
Eku
rhul
eni M
etro
polit
an M
unic
ipal
ity84
9,34
7
840,
549
99
.0%
8,79
8
1.
0%93
1,20
8
900,
451
96.7
%30
,757
3.3%
849,
351
84
4,00
8
99.4
%5,
343
0.6%
AN
NEX
UR
E D
- H
OU
SEH
OLD
AC
CES
S TO
WA
TER
CO
MM
UN
ITY
SUR
VEY
2007
D
WA
E 20
08M
UN
ICIP
AL
SOU
RC
E 20
09
PRO
VIN
CE
NA
ME
OF
MU
NIC
IPA
LITY
45
Tot
al
Hou
seho
lds
Hou
seho
ld
acce
ss to
wat
er
Hou
seho
ldac
cess
to
wat
er a
s a
perc
enta
ge
Hou
seho
lds
belo
w b
asic
le
vel o
f se
rvic
e/ba
cklo
gs
Hou
seho
lds
belo
w b
asic
leve
l of
ser
vice
/ ba
cklo
gs a
s a
perc
enta
ge
Tot
al
Hou
seho
lds
Hou
seho
ld
acce
ss to
wat
er
Hou
seho
ldac
cess
to
wat
er a
s a
perc
enta
ge
Hou
seho
lds
belo
w b
asic
le
vel o
f se
rvic
e/ba
cklo
gs
Hou
seho
lds
belo
w b
asic
leve
l of
ser
vice
/ ba
cklo
gs a
s a
perc
enta
ge
Tot
al
Hou
seho
lds
Hou
seho
ld
acce
ss to
wat
er
Hou
seho
ldac
cess
to w
ater
as
a
perc
enta
ge
Hou
seho
lds
belo
w b
asic
le
vel o
f se
rvic
e/ba
cklo
gs
Hou
seho
lds
belo
w b
asic
leve
l of
ser
vice
/ ba
cklo
gs a
s a
perc
enta
ge
AN
NEX
UR
E D
- H
OU
SEH
OLD
AC
CES
S TO
WA
TER
CO
MM
UN
ITY
SUR
VEY
2007
D
WA
E 20
08M
UN
ICIP
AL
SOU
RC
E 20
09
PRO
VIN
CE
NA
ME
OF
MU
NIC
IPA
LITY
Gau
teng
Em
fule
ni L
ocal
Mun
icip
ality
196,
481
19
2,84
9
98.2
%3,
632
1.8%
225,
924
22
2,11
4
98
.3%
3,81
0
1.
7%19
6,47
8
194,
326
98
.9%
2,15
2
1.
1%G
aute
ngK
ungw
ini L
ocal
Mun
icip
ality
31,6
66
27
,281
86.2
%4,
385
13.8
%43
,150
39,7
72
92.2
%3,
378
7.8%
31,6
64
18
,599
58.7
%13
,065
41.3
%G
aute
ngLe
sedi
Loc
al M
unic
ipal
ity20
,479
19,6
40
95
.9%
839
4.
1%22
,214
20,4
42
92.0
%1,
772
8.0%
20,4
77
20
,250
98.9
%22
7
1.1%
Gau
teng
Mid
vaal
Loc
al M
unic
ipal
ity24
,266
22,8
09
94
.0%
1,45
7
6.
0%24
,120
24,1
20
100.
0%-
0.0%
24,2
65
23
,928
98.6
%33
7
1.4%
Gau
teng
Mog
ale
City
Loc
al M
unic
ipal
ity94
,290
91,2
30
96
.8%
3,06
0
3.
2%10
5,24
0
102,
896
97.8
%2,
344
2.2%
94,2
87
92
,902
98.5
%1,
385
1.5%
Gau
teng
Nok
eng
tsa
Taem
ane
Loca
l Mun
icip
ality
14,8
39
12
,943
87.2
%1,
896
12.8
%18
,389
17,3
29
94.2
%1,
060
5.8%
14,8
35
7,
610
51
.3%
7,22
5
48
.7%
Gau
teng
Ran
dfon
tein
Loc
al M
unic
ipal
ity40
,458
38,1
39
94
.3%
2,31
9
5.
7%45
,362
43,9
25
96.8
%1,
437
3.2%
40,4
58
40
,067
99.0
%39
1
1.0%
Gau
teng
Wes
tona
ria L
ocal
Mun
icip
ality
50,6
76
50
,327
99.3
%34
9
0.7%
35,0
05
33
,007
94
.3%
1,99
8
5.
7%50
,677
49,9
60
98
.6%
717
1.
4%K
waZ
ulu-
Nat
alA
baqu
lusi
Loc
al M
unic
ipal
ity39
,867
26,7
12
67
.0%
13,1
55
33
.0%
41,7
88
34
,243
81
.9%
7,54
5
18
.1%
36,0
59
26
,150
72.5
%9,
909
27.5
%K
waZ
ulu-
Nat
alD
annh
ause
r Lo
cal M
unic
ipal
ity18
,058
13,0
23
72
.1%
5,03
5
27
.9%
22,2
13
9,
225
41.5
%12
,988
58.5
%18
,056
17,1
53
95
.0%
903
5.
0%K
waZ
ulu-
Nat
aleD
umbe
Loc
al M
unic
ipal
ity15
,148
10,2
1567
.4%
4,93
332
.6%
17,5
48
15
,137
86
.3%
2,41
1
13
.7%
15,1
84
8,
660
57
.0%
6,52
4
43
.0%
Kw
aZul
u-N
atal
Em
adla
ngen
i Loc
al M
unic
ipal
ity5,
209
2,65
7
51.0
%2,
552
49.0
%7,
133
5,85
2
82
.0%
1,28
1
18
.0%
5,21
2
3,
372
64
.7%
1,84
0
35
.3%
Kw
aZul
u-N
atal
Em
nam
bith
i-Lad
ysm
ith L
ocal
Mun
icip
ality
50,2
61
39
,423
78.4
%10
,838
21.6
%59
,216
46,4
09
78.4
%12
,807
21.6
%50
,258
29,8
57
59
.4%
20,4
01
40
.6%
Kw
aZul
u-N
atal
End
umen
i Loc
al M
unic
ipal
ity13
,755
12,7
69
92
.8%
986
7.
2%14
,101
14,1
01
100.
0%-
0.0%
13,7
53
12
,966
94.3
%78
7
5.7%
Kw
aZul
u-N
atal
eThe
kwin
i Met
ropo
litan
Mun
icip
ality
833,
860
81
3,39
9
97.5
%20
,461
2.5%
914,
701
85
8,62
3
93
.9%
56,0
78
6.
1%93
1,81
6
672,
289
72
.1%
259,
527
27
.9%
Kw
aZul
u-N
atal
Ezi
ngol
eni L
ocal
Mun
icip
ality
10,9
53
8,
774
80
.1%
2,17
9
19
.9%
12,3
47
6,
717
54.4
%5,
630
45.6
%10
,952
9,37
0
85.6
%1,
582
14.4
%K
waZ
ulu-
Nat
alG
reat
er K
okst
ad L
ocal
Mun
icip
ality
14,3
23
13
,562
94.7
%76
1
5.3%
23,1
90
23
,190
10
0.0%
-
0.
0%14
,321
13,8
54
96
.7%
467
3.
3%K
waZ
ulu-
Nat
alH
ibis
cus
Coa
st L
ocal
Mun
icip
ality
50,6
50
44
,718
88.3
%5,
932
11.7
%59
,461
40,5
45
68.2
%18
,916
31.8
%50
,651
45,2
44
89
.3%
5,40
7
10
.7%
Kw
aZul
u-N
atal
Hla
bisa
Loc
al M
unic
ipal
ity29
,260
16,9
10
57
.8%
12,3
50
42
.2%
32,0
66
19
,547
61
.0%
12,5
19
39
.0%
29,2
58
18
,181
62.1
%11
,077
37.9
%K
waZ
ulu-
Nat
alIm
baba
zane
Loc
al M
unic
ipal
ity24
,559
10,8
96
44
.4%
13,6
63
55
.6%
26,9
80
12
,484
46
.3%
14,4
96
53
.7%
24,5
59
17
,652
71.9
%6,
907
28.1
%K
waZ
ulu-
Nat
alIm
pend
le L
ocal
Mun
icip
ality
7,33
7
5,
479
74
.7%
1,85
825
.3%
8,44
87,
510
88.9
%93
8
11.1
%7,
337
5,91
5
80.6
%1,
422
19.4
%K
waZ
ulu-
Nat
alIn
daka
Loc
al M
unic
ipal
ity21
,081
14,3
72
68
.2%
6,70
9
31
.8%
25,0
16
17
,998
71
.9%
7,01
8
28
.1%
21,0
80
16
,700
79.2
%4,
380
20.8
%K
waZ
ulu-
Nat
alIn
gwe
Loca
l Mun
icip
ality
22,2
89
8,
308
37
.3%
13,9
81
62
.7%
25,3
55
18
,190
71
.7%
7,16
5
28
.3%
22,2
88
10
,787
48.4
%11
,501
51.6
%K
waZ
ulu-
Nat
alJo
zini
Loc
al M
unic
ipal
ity38
,530
22,9
46
59
.6%
15,5
84
40
.4%
38,8
07
24
,083
62
.1%
14,7
24
37
.9%
38,5
29
27
,270
70.8
%11
,259
29.2
%K
waZ
ulu-
Nat
alK
wa
San
i Loc
al M
unic
ipal
ity4,
422
3,06
6
69.3
%1,
356
30.7
%5,
241
5,24
1
10
0.0%
-
0.
0%4,
420
3,49
2
79.0
%92
8
21.0
%K
waZ
ulu-
Nat
alK
waD
ukuz
a Lo
cal M
unic
ipal
ity44
,479
41,4
71
93
.2%
3,00
8
6.
8%47
,793
43,2
44
90.5
%4,
549
9.5%
44,4
81
42
,064
94.6
%2,
417
5.4%
Kw
aZul
u-N
atal
Man
deni
Loc
al M
unic
ipal
ity33
,704
27,3
70
81
.2%
6,33
4
18
.8%
33,0
64
24
,147
73
.0%
8,91
7
27
.0%
33,7
00
14
,809
43.9
%18
,891
56.1
%K
waZ
ulu-
Nat
alM
aphu
mul
o Lo
cal M
unic
ipal
ity19
,934
5,57
2
28.0
%14
,362
72.0
%25
,299
13,3
52
52.8
%11
,947
47.2
%19
,936
7,35
0
36.9
%12
,586
63.1
%K
waZ
ulu-
Nat
alM
bona
mbi
Loc
al M
unic
ipal
ity21
,633
13,5
52
62
.6%
8,08
1
37
.4%
21,8
50
17
,795
81
.4%
4,05
5
18
.6%
21,6
32
16
,525
76.4
%5,
107
23.6
%K
waZ
ulu-
Nat
alM
kham
bath
ini L
ocal
Mun
icip
ality
11,9
71
7,
100
59
.3%
4,87
1
40
.7%
14,3
75
10
,759
74
.8%
3,61
6
25
.2%
11,9
71
7,
427
62
.0%
4,54
4
38
.0%
Kw
aZul
u-N
atal
Mpo
fana
Loc
al M
unic
ipal
ity7,
803
6,43
9
82.5
%1,
364
17.5
%10
,914
10,5
1096
.3%
404
3.
7%7,
800
6,57
1
84.2
%1,
229
15.8
%K
waZ
ulu-
Nat
alM
sing
a Lo
cal M
unic
ipal
ity32
,592
7,05
7
21.7
%25
,535
78.3
%37
,006
18,2
03
49.2
%18
,803
50.8
%32
,592
12,7
63
39
.2%
19,8
29
60
.8%
Kw
aZul
u-N
atal
Mth
onja
neni
Loc
al M
unic
ipal
ity10
,672
7,05
1
66.1
%3,
621
33.9
%11
,564
10,1
05
87.4
%1,
459
12.6
%10
,671
7,18
4
67.3
%3,
487
32.7
%K
waZ
ulu-
Nat
alM
tuba
tuba
Loc
al M
unic
ipal
ity11
,339
10,5
25
92
.8%
814
7.
2%7,
195
7,19
5
10
0.0%
-
0.
0%11
,340
10,9
19
96
.3%
421
3.
7%K
waZ
ulu-
Nat
alN
dwed
we
Loca
l Mun
icip
ality
26,4
11
12
,047
45.6
%14
,364
54.4
%31
,419
20,8
48
66.4
%10
,571
33.6
%26
,408
14,1
10
53
.4%
12,2
98
46
.6%
Kw
aZul
u-N
atal
New
cast
le L
ocal
Mun
icip
ality
77,7
84
73
,251
94.2
%4,
533
5.8%
82,9
50
67
,678
81
.6%
15,2
72
18
.4%
77,7
85
76
,318
98.1
%1,
467
1.9%
Kw
aZul
u-N
atal
Nka
ndla
Loc
al M
unic
ipal
ity22
,387
16,1
00
71
.9%
6,28
7
28
.1%
27,7
25
18
,973
68
.4%
8,75
2
31
.6%
22,3
87
16
,465
73.5
%5,
922
26.5
%K
waZ
ulu-
Nat
alN
ongo
ma
Loca
l Mun
icip
ality
35,2
93
7,
366
20
.9%
27,9
27
79
.1%
36,7
01
30
,255
82
.4%
6,44
6
17
.6%
34,0
44
5,
036
14
.8%
29,0
08
85
.2%
Kw
aZul
u-N
atal
Nqu
thu
Loca
l Mun
icip
ality
32,1
71
21
,747
67.6
%10
,424
32.4
%34
,203
19,9
83
58.4
%14
,220
41.6
%32
,167
24,7
50
76
.9%
7,41
7
23
.1%
Kw
aZul
u-N
atal
Nta
mba
nana
Loc
al M
unic
ipal
ity14
,844
7,06
6
47.6
%7,
778
52.4
%14
,280
7,47
4
52
.3%
6,80
6
47
.7%
14,8
46
8,
258
55
.6%
6,58
8
44
.4%
Kw
aZul
u-N
atal
Okh
ahla
mba
Loc
al M
unic
ipal
ity28
,510
13,4
42
47
.1%
15,0
68
52
.9%
31,1
80
16
,762
53.8
%14
,418
46.2
%28
,509
22,2
67
78
.1%
6,24
2
21
.9%
Kw
aZul
u-N
atal
Ric
hmon
d Lo
cal M
unic
ipal
ity12
,678
10,4
12
82
.1%
2,26
6
17
.9%
14,2
41
11
,640
81
.7%
2,60
1
18
.3%
12,6
80
10
,596
83.6
%2,
084
16.4
%K
waZ
ulu-
Nat
alTh
e B
ig F
ive
Fals
e B
ay L
ocal
Mun
icip
ality
6,65
7
2,
547
38
.3%
4,11
0
61
.7%
7,19
1
5,
570
77.5
%1,
621
22.5
%6,
657
3,22
1
48.4
%3,
436
51.6
%K
waZ
ulu-
Nat
alTh
e M
sund
uzi L
ocal
Mun
icip
ality
134,
391
12
8,10
2
95.3
%6,
289
4.7%
149,
280
12
8,97
9
86
.4%
20,3
01
13
.6%
134,
391
12
9,20
0
96.1
%5,
191
3.9%
Kw
aZul
u-N
atal
Ubu
hleb
ezw
e Lo
cal M
unic
ipal
ity21
,086
7,59
3
36.0
%13
,493
64.0
%25
,395
18,5
16
72.9
%6,
879
27.1
%21
,085
11,8
41
56
.2%
9,24
4
43
.8%
Kw
aZul
u-N
atal
Ulu
ndi L
ocal
Mun
icip
ality
39,8
38
23
,176
58.2
%16
,662
41.8
%39
,109
33,6
84
86.1
%5,
425
13.9
%35
,295
17,6
45
50
.0%
17,6
50
50
.0%
Kw
aZul
u-N
atal
Um
doni
Loc
al M
unic
ipal
ity16
,382
15,6
66
95
.6%
716
4.
4%17
,660
15,7
30
89.1
%1,
930
10.9
%16
,386
16,0
50
97
.9%
336
2.
1%K
waZ
ulu-
Nat
alU
mhl
abuy
alin
gana
Loc
al M
unic
ipal
ity27
,006
13,0
29
48
.2%
13,9
77
51
.8%
30,2
22
12
,511
41
.4%
17,7
11
58
.6%
27,0
07
19
,651
72.8
%7,
356
27.2
%K
waZ
ulu-
Nat
aluM
hlat
huze
Loc
al M
unic
ipal
ity81
,007
77,4
37
95
.6%
3,57
0
4.
4%82
,478
81,4
82
98.8
%99
6
1.2%
81,0
05
77
,886
96.1
%3,
119
3.9%
Kw
aZul
u-N
atal
uMla
lazi
Loc
al M
unic
ipal
ity33
,966
17,2
27
50
.7%
16,7
39
49
.3%
44,0
34
31
,754
72
.1%
12,2
80
27
.9%
33,9
65
19
,894
58.6
%14
,071
41.4
%K
waZ
ulu-
Nat
aluM
ngen
i Loc
al M
unic
ipal
ity21
,589
20,4
26
94
.6%
1,16
3
5.
4%23
,167
23,1
52
99.9
%15
0.1%
21,5
888,
998
41
.7%
12,5
90
58
.3%
Kw
aZul
u-N
atal
uMsh
wat
hi L
ocal
Mun
icip
ality
22,1
08
15
,466
70.0
%6,
642
30.0
%27
,183
20,4
26
75.1
%6,
757
24.9
%22
,106
16,5
78
75
.0%
5,52
8
25
.0%
Kw
aZul
u-N
atal
Um
tshe
zi L
ocal
Mun
icip
ality
15,2
32
11
,343
74.5
%3,
889
25.5
%15
,371
15,3
71
100.
0%-
0.0%
15,2
32
12
,238
80.3
%2,
994
19.7
%K
waZ
ulu-
Nat
alU
Muz
iwab
antu
Loc
al M
unic
ipal
ity20
,315
12,0
63
59
.4%
8,25
2
40
.6%
21,9
38
15
,676
71
.5%
6,26
2
28
.5%
20,3
13
13
,796
67.9
%6,
517
32.1
%K
waZ
ulu-
Nat
alU
mvo
ti Lo
cal M
unic
ipal
ity26
,021
17,5
72
67
.5%
8,44
9
32
.5%
22,4
60
16
,460
73
.3%
6,00
0
26
.7%
26,0
18
19
,235
73.9
%6,
783
26.1
%K
waZ
ulu-
Nat
alU
mzi
mkh
ulu
Loca
l Mun
icip
ality
43,5
46
17
,489
40.2
%26
,057
59.8
%39
,143
21,3
87
54.6
%17
,756
45.4
%43
,545
17,8
30
40
.9%
25,7
15
59
.1%
Kw
aZul
u-N
atal
Um
zum
be L
ocal
Mun
icip
ality
40,5
78
15
,865
39.1
%24
,713
60.9
%44
,206
18,3
49
41.5
%25
,857
58.5
%40
,580
18,5
67
45
.8%
22,0
13
54
.2%
Kw
aZul
u-N
atal
UP
hong
olo
Loca
l Mun
icip
ality
25,7
42
15
,255
59.3
%10
,487
40.7
%28
,918
23,5
33
81.4
%5,
385
18.6
%22
,694
15,6
68
69
.0%
7,02
6
31
.0%
Kw
aZul
u-N
atal
Vul
ameh
lo L
ocal
Mun
icip
ality
12,7
44
5,
700
44
.7%
7,04
4
55
.3%
18,1
69
11
,792
64
.9%
6,37
7
35
.1%
12,7
44
5,
061
39
.7%
7,68
3
60
.3%
Lim
popo
Aga
nang
Loc
al M
unic
ipal
ity33
,827
26,2
49
77
.6%
7,57
8
22
.4%
35,5
18
29
,312
82
.5%
6,20
6
17
.5%
33,8
24
30
,342
89.7
%3,
482
10.3
%Li
mpo
poB
a-P
hala
borw
a Lo
cal M
unic
ipal
ity33
,791
33,1
44
98
.1%
647
1.
9%34
,799
34,7
99
100.
0%-
0.0%
33,7
9233
,559
99.3
%23
3
0.7%
Lim
popo
Bel
a-B
ela
Loca
l Mun
icip
ality
14,2
93
12
,451
87.1
%1,
842
12.9
%14
,002
14,0
02
100.
0%-
0.0%
14,2
90
13
,710
95.9
%58
0
4.1%
46
Tot
al
Hou
seho
lds
Hou
seho
ld
acce
ss to
wat
er
Hou
seho
ldac
cess
to
wat
er a
s a
perc
enta
ge
Hou
seho
lds
belo
w b
asic
le
vel o
f se
rvic
e/ba
cklo
gs
Hou
seho
lds
belo
w b
asic
leve
l of
ser
vice
/ ba
cklo
gs a
s a
perc
enta
ge
Tot
al
Hou
seho
lds
Hou
seho
ld
acce
ss to
wat
er
Hou
seho
ldac
cess
to
wat
er a
s a
perc
enta
ge
Hou
seho
lds
belo
w b
asic
le
vel o
f se
rvic
e/ba
cklo
gs
Hou
seho
lds
belo
w b
asic
leve
l of
ser
vice
/ ba
cklo
gs a
s a
perc
enta
ge
Tot
al
Hou
seho
lds
Hou
seho
ld
acce
ss to
wat
er
Hou
seho
ldac
cess
to w
ater
as
a
perc
enta
ge
Hou
seho
lds
belo
w b
asic
le
vel o
f se
rvic
e/ba
cklo
gs
Hou
seho
lds
belo
w b
asic
leve
l of
ser
vice
/ ba
cklo
gs a
s a
perc
enta
ge
AN
NEX
UR
E D
- H
OU
SEH
OLD
AC
CES
S TO
WA
TER
CO
MM
UN
ITY
SUR
VEY
2007
D
WA
E 20
08M
UN
ICIP
AL
SOU
RC
E 20
09
PRO
VIN
CE
NA
ME
OF
MU
NIC
IPA
LITY
Lim
popo
Blo
uber
g Lo
cal M
unic
ipal
ity35
,597
28,2
08
79
.2%
7,38
9
20
.8%
37,5
36
29
,776
79
.3%
7,76
0
20
.7%
35,6
00
33
,866
95.1
%1,
734
4.9%
Lim
popo
Elia
s M
otso
aled
i Loc
al M
unic
ipal
ity46
,841
23,0
79
49
.3%
23,7
62
50
.7%
50,0
04
42
,074
84
.1%
7,93
0
15
.9%
46,8
41
28
,673
61.2
%18
,168
38.8
%Li
mpo
poFe
takg
omo
Loca
l Mun
icip
ality
21,8
51
13
,791
63.1
%8,
060
36.9
%21
,174
19,3
51
91.4
%1,
823
8.6%
21,8
50
15
,045
68.9
%6,
805
31.1
%Li
mpo
poG
reat
er G
iyan
i Loc
al M
unic
ipal
ity57
,538
48,0
24
83
.5%
9,51
4
16
.5%
59,4
95
43
,118
72
.5%
16,3
77
27
.5%
57,5
41
23
,915
41.6
%33
,626
58.4
%Li
mpo
poG
reat
er L
etab
a Lo
cal M
unic
ipal
ity59
,539
55,3
32
92
.9%
4,20
7
7.
1%58
,095
44,6
79
76.9
%13
,416
23.1
%59
,540
57,2
02
96
.1%
2,33
8
3.
9%Li
mpo
poG
reat
er M
arbl
e H
all L
ocal
Mun
icip
ality
28,2
16
22
,029
78.1
%6,
187
21.9
%26
,937
24,9
08
92.5
%2,
029
7.5%
28,2
13
22
,736
80.6
%5,
477
19.4
%Li
mpo
poG
reat
er T
ubat
se L
ocal
Mun
icip
ality
66,6
12
48
,306
72.5
%18
,306
27.5
%60
,455
45,5
62
75.4
%14
,893
24.6
%66
,611
52,8
52
79
.3%
13,7
59
20
.7%
Lim
popo
Gre
ater
Tza
neen
Loc
al M
unic
ipal
ity89
,832
75,8
23
84
.4%
14,0
09
15
.6%
95,2
21
66
,048
69
.4%
29,1
73
30
.6%
89,8
31
53
,026
59.0
%36
,805
41.0
%Li
mpo
poLe
pele
-Nku
mpi
Loc
al M
unic
ipal
ity58
,484
42,8
68
73
.3%
15,6
16
26
.7%
56,6
35
36
,526
64
.5%
20,1
09
35
.5%
58,4
82
54
,169
92.6
%4,
313
7.4%
Lim
popo
Leph
alal
e Lo
cal M
unic
ipal
ity23
,744
20,3
51
85
.7%
3,39
3
14
.3%
26,6
10
25
,282
95
.0%
1,32
8
5.
0%33
,363
27,0
59
81
.1%
6,30
4
18
.9%
Lim
popo
Mak
hado
Loc
al M
unic
ipal
ity11
4,05
9
106,
043
93.0
%8,
016
7.0%
123,
099
90
,640
73
.6%
32,4
59
26
.4%
118,
632
81
,051
68.3
%38
,204
32.2
%Li
mpo
poM
akhu
duth
amag
a Lo
cal M
unic
ipal
ity53
,655
33,0
91
61
.7%
20,5
64
38
.3%
59,8
79
43
,133
72
.0%
16,7
46
28
.0%
53,6
55
39
,956
74.5
%13
,699
25.5
%Li
mpo
poM
arul
eng
Loca
l Mun
icip
ality
24,5
90
21
,446
87.2
%3,
144
12.8
%21
,486
21,4
86
100.
0%-
0.0%
24,5
91
22
,569
91.8
%2,
022
8.2%
Lim
popo
Mod
imol
le L
ocal
Mun
icip
ality
15,8
26
15
,087
95.3
%73
9
4.7%
21,0
14
17
,535
83
.4%
3,47
9
16
.6%
31,9
81
30
,556
95.5
%1,
425
4.5%
Lim
popo
Mog
alak
wen
a Lo
cal M
unic
ipal
ity75
,313
65,5
46
87
.0%
9,76
7
13
.0%
76,6
51
66
,294
86
.5%
10,3
57
13
.5%
75,3
12
72
,578
96.4
%2,
734
3.6%
Lim
popo
Mol
emol
e Lo
cal M
unic
ipal
ity27
,296
17,3
21
63
.5%
9,97
5
36
.5%
30,8
23
24
,869
80
.7%
5,95
4
19
.3%
27,2
96
21
,721
79.6
%5,
575
20.4
%Li
mpo
poM
ookg
opon
g Lo
cal M
unic
ipal
ity7,
673
5,85
9
76.4
%1,
814
23.6
%8,
940
7,83
5
87
.6%
1,10
5
12
.4%
7,67
3
7,
615
99
.2%
58
0.
8%Li
mpo
poM
usin
a Lo
cal M
unic
ipal
ity14
,202
13,2
22
93
.1%
980
6.
9%13
,076
13,0
76
100.
0%-
0.0%
14,6
46
13
,256
90.5
%2,
316
15.8
%Li
mpo
poM
utal
e Lo
cal M
unic
ipal
ity21
,074
18,2
70
86
.7%
2,80
4
13
.3%
20,7
75
20
,775
10
0.0%
-
0.
0%19
,329
9,77
1
50.5
%8,
762
45.3
%Li
mpo
poP
olok
wan
e Lo
cal M
unic
ipal
ity13
0,35
9
122,
680
94
.1%
7,67
9
5.
9%14
2,80
7
121,
833
85.3
%20
,974
14.7
%11
6,30
5
98,6
87
84
.9%
17,6
18
15
.1%
Lim
popo
Thab
azim
bi L
ocal
Mun
icip
ality
23,8
71
21
,968
92.0
%1,
903
8.0%
22,9
83
18
,733
81
.5%
4,25
0
18
.5%
115,
971
11
3,38
1
97.8
%2,
590
2.2%
Lim
popo
Thul
amel
a Lo
cal M
unic
ipal
ity13
7,85
2
126,
817
92
.0%
11,0
35
8.
0%14
1,72
9
106,
291
75.0
%35
,438
25.0
%13
4,58
6
86,3
70
64
.2%
47,4
63
35
.3%
Mpu
mal
anga
Alb
ert L
uthu
li Lo
cal M
unic
ipal
ity46
,036
38,7
65
84
.2%
7,27
1
15
.8%
45,3
48
38
,445
84
.8%
6,90
3
15
.2%
48,3
83
46
,870
96.9
%1,
513
3.1%
Mpu
mal
anga
Bus
hbuc
krid
ge L
ocal
Mun
icip
ality
124,
594
10
8,36
9
87.0
%16
,225
13.0
%11
8,77
3
81,6
75
68.8
%37
,098
31.2
%17
2,28
9
110,
327
64
.0%
61,9
62
36
.0%
Mpu
mal
anga
Del
mas
Loc
al M
unic
ipal
ity15
,129
13,7
44
90
.8%
1,38
5
9.
2%15
,419
14,9
33
96.8
%48
6
3.2%
15,1
28
8,
699
57
.5%
6,42
9
42
.5%
Mpu
mal
anga
Dip
ales
eng
Loca
l Mun
icip
ality
12,3
24
11
,772
95.5
%55
2
4.5%
10,7
35
10
,470
97
.5%
265
2.
5%12
,325
5,76
9
46.8
%6,
556
53.2
%M
pum
alan
gaD
r JS
Mor
oka
Loca
l Mun
icip
ality
56,8
76
40
,307
70.9
%16
,569
29.1
%60
,210
48,0
68
79.8
%12
,142
20.2
%56
,875
52,5
11
92
.3%
4,36
4
7.
7%M
pum
alan
gaE
mak
haze
ni L
ocal
Mun
icip
ality
12,1
28
11
,302
93.2
%82
6
6.8%
11,3
91
11
,183
98
.2%
208
1.
8%14
,623
7,16
3
49.0
%7,
460
51.0
%M
pum
alan
gaE
mal
ahle
ni L
ocal
Mun
icip
ality
105,
593
10
3,65
2
98.2
%1,
941
1.8%
87,9
72
86
,295
98
.1%
1,67
7
1.
9%10
5,59
4
95,8
78
90
.8%
9,71
6
9.
2%M
pum
alan
gaG
ovan
Mbe
ki L
ocal
Mun
icip
ality
79,1
90
77
,240
97.5
%1,
950
2.5%
70,9
14
70
,264
99
.1%
650
0.
9%79
,191
70,1
85
88
.6%
9,00
6
11
.4%
Mpu
mal
anga
Lekw
a Lo
cal M
unic
ipal
ity26
,686
26,0
09
97
.5%
677
2.
5%29
,424
28,7
3497
.7%
690
2.
3%26
,685
26,2
14
98
.2%
471
1.
8%M
pum
alan
gaM
bom
bela
Loc
al M
unic
ipal
ity13
7,35
3
125,
718
91
.5%
11,6
35
8.
5%13
0,51
1
111,
227
85.2
%19
,284
14.8
%16
8,91
6
111,
992
66
.3%
56,9
24
33
.7%
Mpu
mal
anga
Mkh
ondo
Loc
al M
unic
ipal
ity29
,927
23,9
04
79
.9%
6,02
3
20
.1%
33,9
21
22
,808
67
.2%
11,1
13
32
.8%
29,9
26
26
,464
88.4
%3,
462
11.6
%M
pum
alan
gaM
suka
ligw
a Lo
cal M
unic
ipal
ity31
,751
29,6
90
93
.5%
2,06
1
6.
5%34
,876
34,8
76
100.
0%-
0.0%
31,7
52
30
,066
94.7
%1,
686
5.3%
Mpu
mal
anga
Nko
maz
i Loc
al M
unic
ipal
ity78
,255
71,0
10
90
.7%
7,24
5
9.
3%85
,022
73,6
52
86.6
%11
,370
13.4
%78
,254
72,4
09
92
.5%
5,84
5
7.
5%M
pum
alan
gaS
eme
Loca
l Mun
icip
ality
21,6
04
20
,086
93.0
%1,
518
7.0%
21,0
40
18
,388
87
.4%
2,65
2
12
.6%
21,6
08
15
,417
71.3
%6,
191
28.7
%M
pum
alan
gaS
teve
Tsh
wet
e Lo
cal M
unic
ipal
ity50
,450
47,9
78
95
.1%
2,47
2
4.
9%41
,677
40,2
88
96.7
%1,
389
3.3%
50,4
50
48
,760
96.7
%1,
690
3.3%
Mpu
mal
anga
Thab
a C
hweu
Loc
al M
unic
ipal
ity28
,257
25,6
66
90
.8%
2,59
1
9.
2%25
,654
25,6
54
100.
0%-
0.0%
28,2
56
26
,629
94.2
%1,
627
5.8%
Mpu
mal
anga
Them
bisi
le L
ocal
Mun
icip
ality
65,3
95
63
,035
96.4
%2,
360
3.6%
62,7
86
59
,702
95
.1%
3,08
4
4.
9%65
,392
63,1
32
96
.5%
2,26
0
3.
5%M
pum
alan
gaU
mjin
di L
ocal
Mun
icip
ality
18,7
66
18
,016
96.0
%75
0
4.0%
16,8
42
16
,842
10
0.0%
-
0.
0%18
,769
11,4
80
61
.2%
7,28
9
38
.8%
Nor
th W
est
City
of M
atlo
sana
115,
970
11
3,04
0
97.5
%2,
930
2.5%
105,
989
10
5,83
899
.9%
151
0.
1%11
5,97
1
114,
910
99
.1%
1,06
1
0.
9%N
orth
Wes
tD
itsob
otla
Loc
al M
unic
ipal
ity38
,608
36,1
46
93
.6%
2,46
2
6.
4%40
,329
36,4
07
90.3
%3,
922
9.7%
43,9
77
26
,154
59.5
%17
,823
40.5
%N
orth
Wes
tG
reat
er T
aung
Loc
al M
unic
ipal
ity42
,952
40,8
80
95
.2%
2,07
2
4.
8%46
,449
27,5
37
59.3
%18
,912
40.7
%42
,955
42,6
07
99
.2%
348
0.
8%N
orth
Wes
tK
agis
ano
Loca
l Mun
icip
ality
19,8
88
15
,213
76.5
%4,
675
23.5
%21
,695
13,6
97
63.1
%7,
998
36.9
%19
,886
18,7
24
94
.2%
1,16
2
5.
8%N
orth
Wes
tK
getle
ngriv
ier L
ocal
Mun
icip
ality
10,5
33
9,
417
89
.4%
1,11
6
10
.6%
11,6
37
11
,637
10
0.0%
-
0.
0%11
,502
9,29
1
80.8
%2,
211
19.2
%N
orth
Wes
tLe
kwa-
Teem
ane
Loca
l Mun
icip
ality
9,95
4
8,
985
90
.3%
969
9.
7%12
,032
12,0
32
100.
0%-
0.0%
9,95
3
7,
024
70
.6%
2,92
9
29
.4%
Nor
th W
est
Loca
l Mun
icip
ality
of M
adib
eng
96,3
62
84
,443
87.6
%11
,919
12.4
%10
0,98
3
91,7
63
90.9
%9,
220
9.1%
96,3
62
88
,683
92.0
%7,
679
8.0%
Nor
th W
est
Maf
iken
g Lo
cal M
unic
ipal
ity68
,698
46,5
59
67
.8%
22,1
39
32
.2%
73,2
84
50
,894
69
.4%
22,3
90
30
.6%
68,6
96
66
,923
97.4
%1,
773
2.6%
Nor
th W
est
Mam
usa
Loca
l Mun
icip
ality
10,4
28
10
,033
96.2
%39
5
3.8%
11,8
32
11
,832
10
0.0%
-
0.
0%10
,431
10,3
04
98
.8%
127
1.
2%N
orth
Wes
tM
aqua
ssi H
ills
Loca
l Mun
icip
ality
20,3
30
19
,344
95.2
%98
6
4.8%
19,4
99
18
,965
97
.3%
534
2.
7%20
,328
20,2
02
99
.4%
126
0.
6%N
orth
Wes
tM
eraf
ong
City
Loc
al M
unic
ipal
ity88
,156
87,2
67
99
.0%
889
1.
0%65
,928
65,9
28
100.
0%-
0.
0%88
,157
62,2
02
70
.6%
25,9
55
29
.4%
Nor
th W
est
Mol
opo
Loca
l Mun
icip
ality
3,17
4
2,
572
81
.0%
602
19
.0%
4,07
1
4,
071
100.
0%-
0.0%
3,17
5
2,
988
94
.1%
187
5.
9%
47
Tot
al
Hou
seho
lds
Hou
seho
ld
acce
ss to
wat
er
Hou
seho
ldac
cess
to
wat
er a
s a
perc
enta
ge
Hou
seho
lds
belo
w b
asic
le
vel o
f se
rvic
e/ba
cklo
gs
Hou
seho
lds
belo
w b
asic
leve
l of
ser
vice
/ ba
cklo
gs a
s a
perc
enta
ge
Tot
al
Hou
seho
lds
Hou
seho
ld
acce
ss to
wat
er
Hou
seho
ldac
cess
to
wat
er a
s a
perc
enta
ge
Hou
seho
lds
belo
w b
asic
le
vel o
f se
rvic
e/ba
cklo
gs
Hou
seho
lds
belo
w b
asic
leve
l of
ser
vice
/ ba
cklo
gs a
s a
perc
enta
ge
Tot
al
Hou
seho
lds
Hou
seho
ld
acce
ss to
wat
er
Hou
seho
ldac
cess
to w
ater
as
a
perc
enta
ge
Hou
seho
lds
belo
w b
asic
le
vel o
f se
rvic
e/ba
cklo
gs
Hou
seho
lds
belo
w b
asic
leve
l of
ser
vice
/ ba
cklo
gs a
s a
perc
enta
ge
AN
NEX
UR
E D
- H
OU
SEH
OLD
AC
CES
S TO
WA
TER
CO
MM
UN
ITY
SUR
VEY
2007
D
WA
E 20
08M
UN
ICIP
AL
SOU
RC
E 20
09
PRO
VIN
CE
NA
ME
OF
MU
NIC
IPA
LITY
Nor
th W
est
Mor
etel
e Lo
cal M
unic
ipal
ity43
,209
38,0
20
88
.0%
5,18
9
12
.0%
51,3
15
41
,705
81
.3%
9,61
0
18
.7%
43,2
09
28
,248
65.4
%14
,961
34.6
%N
orth
Wes
tM
oses
Kot
ane
Loca
l Mun
icip
ality
60,5
57
57
,726
95.3
%2,
831
4.7%
69,7
65
56
,570
81
.1%
13,1
95
18
.9%
65,2
04
9,
889
15
.2%
55,3
15
84
.8%
Nor
th W
est
Nal
edi L
ocal
Mun
icip
ality
13,6
75
12
,670
92.7
%1,
005
7.3%
16,7
80
16
,780
10
0.0%
-
0.
0%13
,678
10,8
53
79
.3%
2,82
5
20
.7%
Nor
th W
est
Pot
chef
stro
om L
ocal
Mun
icip
ality
35,5
24
33
,281
93.7
%2,
243
6.3%
36,1
80
36
,180
10
0.0%
-
0.
0%35
,522
34,8
03
98
.0%
719
2.
0%N
orth
Wes
tR
amot
sher
e M
oilo
a Lo
cal M
unic
ipal
ity30
,302
27,1
28
89
.5%
3,17
4
10
.5%
36,2
23
34
,907
96
.4%
1,31
6
3.
6%30
,301
29,6
08
97
.7%
693
2.
3%N
orth
Wes
tR
atlo
u Lo
cal M
unic
ipal
ity23
,591
20,2
34
85
.8%
3,35
7
14
.2%
25,4
95
20
,279
79
.5%
5,21
6
20
.5%
23,5
92
22
,852
96.9
%74
0
3.1%
Nor
th W
est
Rus
tenb
urg
Loca
l Mun
icip
ality
146,
540
12
6,96
0
86.6
%19
,580
13.4
%13
4,75
3
130,
943
97.2
%3,
810
2.8%
146,
543
73
,173
49.9
%73
,370
50.1
%N
orth
Wes
tTs
wai
ng L
ocal
Mun
icip
ality
22,2
03
19
,723
88.8
%2,
480
11.2
%28
,492
27,6
63
97.1
%82
9
2.9%
22,2
00
21
,843
98.4
%35
7
1.6%
Nor
th W
est
Ven
ters
dorp
Loc
al M
unic
ipal
ity10
,467
9,80
2
93.6
%66
5
6.4%
13,1
62
12
,057
91
.6%
1,10
5
8.
4%12
,788
12,5
26
98
.0%
262
2.
0%N
orth
ern
Cap
e!K
heis
Loc
al M
unic
ipal
ity4,
487
4,13
9
92.2
%34
8
7.8%
4,28
1
3,
936
91.9
%34
5
8.1%
4,49
0
4,
155
92
.5%
335
7.
5%N
orth
ern
Cap
e//K
hara
Hai
s Lo
cal M
unic
ipal
ity20
,940
20,1
9496
.4%
746
3.6%
18,3
54
17
,183
93
.6%
1,17
1
6.
4%20
,938
17,2
89
82
.6%
3,64
9
17
.4%
Nor
ther
n C
ape
Dik
gatlo
ng L
ocal
Mun
icip
ality
10,0
12
8,
946
89
.4%
1,06
6
10
.6%
9,98
6
9,
725
97.4
%26
1
2.6%
10,0
14
9,
173
91
.6%
841
8.
4%N
orth
ern
Cap
eE
mth
anje
ni L
ocal
Mun
icip
ality
9,48
8
8,
969
94
.5%
519
5.
5%8,
976
8,93
7
99
.6%
39
0.
4%9,
487
9,48
7
100.
0%-
0.0%
Nor
ther
n C
ape
Gam
agar
a Lo
cal M
unic
ipal
ity7,
639
7,55
7
98.9
%82
1.1%
6,07
3
6,
059
99.8
%14
0.2%
9,17
4
8,
225
89
.7%
949
10
.3%
Nor
ther
n C
ape
Ga-
Seg
onya
na L
ocal
Mun
icip
ality
17,1
06
16
,838
98.4
%26
8
1.6%
19,5
77
13
,626
69
.6%
5,95
1
30
.4%
17,1
06
16
,982
99.3
%12
4
0.7%
Nor
ther
n C
ape
Han
tam
Loc
al M
unic
ipal
ity5,
819
5,46
5
93.9
%35
4
6.1%
5,77
8
5,
778
100.
0%-
0.0%
5,82
0
5,
620
96
.6%
200
3.
4%N
orth
ern
Cap
eK
ai !G
arib
Loc
al M
unic
ipal
ity17
,391
15,4
51
88
.8%
1,94
0
11
.2%
13,8
10
13
,810
10
0.0%
-
0.
0%24
,407
22,5
48
92
.4%
1,85
9
7.
6%N
orth
ern
Cap
eK
amie
sber
g Lo
cal M
unic
ipal
ity3,
881
3,71
8
95.8
%16
3
4.2%
2,98
2
2,
982
100.
0%-
0.0%
3,88
0
3,
730
96
.1%
150
3.
9%N
orth
ern
Cap
eK
aree
berg
Loc
al M
unic
ipal
ity2,
729
2,67
8
98.1
%51
1.9%
2,44
0
2,
440
100.
0%-
0.0%
2,72
7
2,
614
95
.9%
113
4.
1%N
orth
ern
Cap
eK
aroo
Hoo
glan
d Lo
cal M
unic
ipal
ity2,
985
2,54
8
85.4
%43
7
14.6
%3,
036
3,03
6
10
0.0%
-
0.
0%2,
982
2,98
2
100.
0%-
0.0%
Nor
ther
n C
ape
Kga
telo
pele
Loc
al M
unic
ipal
ity5,
258
5,00
3
95.2
%25
54.
8%3,
985
3,96
4
99
.5%
21
0.
5%5,
259
5,25
1
99.8
%8
0.
2%N
orth
ern
Cap
eK
hai-M
a Lo
cal M
unic
ipal
ity3,
787
3,66
5
96.8
%12
2
3.2%
3,02
5
3,
025
100.
0%-
0.0%
3,78
7
3,
680
97
.2%
107
2.
8%N
orth
ern
Cap
eM
agar
eng
Loca
l Mun
icip
ality
5,66
8
5,
237
92
.4%
431
7.
6%6,
047
5,65
2
93
.5%
395
6.
5%5,
668
5,41
3
95.5
%25
5
4.5%
Nor
ther
n C
ape
Mie
r Loc
al M
unic
ipal
ity1,
706
1,57
6
92.4
%13
0
7.6%
1,70
3
1,
703
100.
0%-
0.0%
1,70
3
1,
388
81
.5%
315
18
.5%
Nor
ther
n C
ape
Mos
haw
eng
Loca
l Mun
icip
ality
15,4
79
12
,431
80.3
%3,
048
19.7
%23
,819
15,8
23
66.4
%7,
996
33.6
%15
,479
14,7
27
95
.1%
752
4.
9%N
orth
ern
Cap
eN
ama
Kho
i Loc
al M
unic
ipal
ity15
,658
15,2
51
97
.4%
407
2.
6%11
,629
11,6
29
100.
0%-
0.0%
15,6
55
15
,347
98.0
%30
8
2.0%
Nor
ther
n C
ape
Pho
kwan
e Lo
cal M
unic
ipal
ity13
,770
12,4
95
90
.7%
1,27
5
9.
3%19
,577
17,6
37
90.1
%1,
940
9.9%
20,1
18
19
,152
95.2
%96
6
4.8%
Nor
ther
n C
ape
Ren
oste
rber
g Lo
cal M
unic
ipal
ity2,
721
2,65
3
97.5
%68
2.5%
2,57
5
2,
575
100.
0%-
0.0%
2,72
0
2,
350
86
.4%
370
13
.6%
Nor
ther
n C
ape
Ric
hter
svel
d Lo
cal M
unic
ipal
ity3,
954
3,89
3
98.5
%61
1.5%
2,63
5
2,
635
100.
0%-
0.0%
3,95
4
3,
893
98
.5%
61
1.
5%N
orth
ern
Cap
eS
iyan
cum
a Lo
cal M
unic
ipal
ity8,
852
8,12
0
91.7
%73
2
8.3%
9,70
3
9,
565
98.6
%13
8
1.4%
10,7
12
8,
604
80
.3%
2,10
8
19
.7%
Nor
ther
n C
ape
Siy
athe
mba
Loc
al M
unic
ipal
ity5,
069
4,91
0
96.9
%15
9
3.1%
4,26
14,
255
99.9
%6
0.1%
5,06
8
2,
959
58
.4%
2,10
9
41
.6%
Nor
ther
n C
ape
Sol
Pla
atjie
Loc
al M
unic
ipal
ity52
,118
51,8
02
99
.4%
316
0.
6%53
,256
52,7
13
99.0
%54
3
1.0%
52,1
22
52
,122
100.
0%-
0.0%
Nor
ther
n C
ape
Them
belih
le L
ocal
Mun
icip
ality
3,59
7
3,
567
99
.2%
30
0.
8%3,
667
3,38
9
92
.4%
278
7.
6%3,
595
2,64
1
73.5
%95
4
26.5
%N
orth
ern
Cap
eTs
ants
aban
e Lo
cal M
unic
ipal
ity7,
097
6,73
5
94.9
%36
2
5.1%
5,74
2
5,
524
96.2
%21
8
3.8%
7,09
9
6,
854
96
.5%
245
3.
5%N
orth
ern
Cap
eU
bunt
u Lo
cal M
unic
ipal
ity4,
277
4,17
8
97.7
%99
2.3%
4,24
9
4,
158
97.9
%91
2.1%
4,27
6
3,
674
85
.9%
602
14
.1%
Nor
ther
n C
ape
Um
sobo
mvu
Loc
al M
unic
ipal
ity5,
642
5,33
8
94.6
%30
4
5.4%
6,11
3
6,
113
100.
0%-
0.0%
5,64
7
5,
482
97
.1%
165
2.
9%W
este
rn C
ape
Bea
ufor
t Wes
t Loc
al M
unic
ipal
ity9,
149
8,78
1
96.0
%36
8
4.0%
10,8
04
10
,804
10
0.0%
-
0.
0%9,
152
7,89
8
86.3
%1,
254
13.7
%W
este
rn C
ape
Ber
griv
ier L
ocal
Mun
icip
ality
12,1
98
11
,979
98.2
%21
9
1.8%
14,7
39
14
,739
10
0.0%
-
0.
0%12
,193
11,6
28
95
.4%
565
4.
6%W
este
rn C
ape
Bito
u Lo
cal M
unic
ipal
ity12
,647
12,4
41
98
.4%
206
1.
6%11
,363
11,3
49
99.9
%14
0.1%
16,8
93
8,
968
53
.1%
7,92
5
46
.9%
Wes
tern
Cap
eB
reed
e R
iver
/Win
elan
ds L
ocal
Mun
icip
ality
21,8
58
21
,296
97.4
%56
2
2.6%
25,7
64
25
,764
10
0.0%
-
0.
0%21
,856
16,6
25
76
.1%
5,23
1
23
.9%
Wes
tern
Cap
eB
reed
e V
alle
y Lo
cal M
unic
ipal
ity36
,494
36,1
85
99
.2%
309
0.
8%41
,354
40,6
5398
.3%
701
1.7%
36,4
94
28
,944
79.3
%7,
550
20.7
%W
este
rn C
ape
Cap
e A
gulh
as L
ocal
Mun
icip
ality
7,61
5
7,
470
98
.1%
145
1.
9%9,
170
9,17
0
10
0.0%
-
0.
0%7,
615
6,67
3
87.6
%94
2
12.4
%W
este
rn C
ape
Ced
erbe
rg L
ocal
Mun
icip
ality
9,21
1
8,
862
96
.2%
349
3.
8%12
,863
12,8
02
99.5
%61
0.5%
9,21
4
7,
667
83
.2%
1,54
7
16
.8%
Wes
tern
Cap
eC
ape
Tow
n M
etro
polit
an M
unic
ipal
ity90
2,28
0
896,
829
99
.4%
5,45
1
0.
6%92
4,22
4
898,
880
97.3
%25
,344
2.7%
902,
272
66
5,66
6
73.8
%23
6,60
6
26.2
%W
este
rn C
ape
Dra
kens
tein
Loc
al M
unic
ipal
ity51
,613
51,0
47
98
.9%
566
1.
1%53
,044
50,7
94
95.8
%2,
250
4.2%
51,6
11
43
,277
83.9
%8,
334
16.1
%W
este
rn C
ape
Geo
rge
Loca
l Mun
icip
ality
42,7
93
42
,091
98.4
%70
2
1.6%
44,1
11
42
,000
95
.2%
2,11
1
4.
8%49
,899
30,3
99
60
.9%
19,5
00
39
.1%
Wes
tern
Cap
eH
esse
qua
Loca
l Mun
icip
ality
12,4
81
12
,312
98.6
%16
9
1.4%
15,2
60
15
,260
10
0.0%
-
0.
0%12
,481
8,02
8
64.3
%4,
453
35.7
%W
este
rn C
ape
Kan
nala
nd L
ocal
Mun
icip
ality
6,34
4
5,
966
94
.0%
378
6.
0%7,
393
7,39
3
10
0.0%
-
0.
0%6,
343
4,47
3
70.5
%1,
870
29.5
%W
este
rn C
ape
Kny
sna
Loca
l Mun
icip
ality
17,4
18
16
,589
95.2
%82
9
4.8%
18,1
31
18
,131
10
0.0%
-
0.
0%17
,416
12,6
19
72
.5%
4,79
7
27
.5%
Wes
tern
Cap
eLa
ings
burg
Loc
al M
unic
ipal
ity1,
966
1,84
1
93.6
%12
5
6.4%
2,30
8
2,
308
100.
0%-
0.0%
1,96
6
1,
808
92
.0%
158
8.
0%W
este
rn C
ape
Mat
zika
ma
Loca
l Mun
icip
ality
12,8
81
12
,794
99.3
%87
0.7%
17,5
68
17
,568
10
0.0%
-
0.0%
12,8
8211
,054
85.8
%1,
828
14.2
%W
este
rn C
ape
Mos
sel B
ay L
ocal
Mun
icip
ality
28,3
48
27
,643
97.5
%70
5
2.5%
24,6
90
24
,030
97
.3%
660
2.
7%28
,350
19,1
98
67
.7%
9,15
2
32
.3%
Wes
tern
Cap
eO
udts
hoor
n Lo
cal M
unic
ipal
ity17
,910
17,6
65
98
.6%
245
1.
4%21
,817
21,5
88
99.0
%22
9
1.0%
17,9
13
15
,559
86.9
%2,
354
13.1
%W
este
rn C
ape
Ove
rstra
nd L
ocal
Mun
icip
ality
21,9
53
21
,735
99.0
%21
8
1.0%
24,0
83
24
,083
10
0.0%
-
0.
0%21
,952
16,5
20
75
.3%
5,43
2
24
.7%
Wes
tern
Cap
eP
rince
Alb
ert L
ocal
Mun
icip
ality
2,74
8
2,
586
94
.1%
162
5.
9%3,
056
3,05
6
10
0.0%
-
0.
0%2,
748
2,08
8
76.0
%66
0
24.0
%W
este
rn C
ape
Sal
danh
a B
ay L
ocal
Mun
icip
ality
20,7
86
20
,698
99.6
%88
0.4%
23,0
81
23
,042
99
.8%
39
0.
2%20
,785
14,7
44
70
.9%
6,04
1
29
.1%
Wes
tern
Cap
eS
telle
nbos
ch L
ocal
Mun
icip
ality
36,4
13
35
,918
98.6
%49
5
1.4%
34,9
54
33
,790
96
.7%
1,16
4
3.
3%36
,413
29,1
42
80
.0%
7,27
1
20
.0%
Wes
tern
Cap
eS
war
tland
Loc
al M
unic
ipal
ity19
,939
19,7
69
99
.1%
170
0.
9%21
,153
20,6
62
97.7
%49
1
2.3%
19,9
38
15
,721
78.8
%4,
217
21.2
%W
este
rn C
ape
Sw
elle
ndam
Loc
al M
unic
ipal
ity6,
958
6,67
4
95.9
%28
4
4.1%
9,27
4
9,
274
100.
0%-
0.0%
6,95
7
5,
715
82
.1%
1,24
2
17
.9%
Wes
tern
Cap
eTh
eew
ater
sklo
of L
ocal
Mun
icip
ality
23,4
63
23
,223
99.0
%24
0
1.0%
28,8
01
28
,309
98
.3%
492
1.
7%23
,464
18,5
64
79
.1%
4,90
0
20
.9%
Wes
tern
Cap
eW
itzen
berg
Loc
al M
unic
ipal
ity24
,408
22,6
14
92
.6%
1,79
4
7.
4%23
,720
23,4
92
99.0
%22
8
1.0%
24,4
1020
,553
84.2
%3,
857
15.8
%To
tal
12,4
78,1
5211
,063
,370
88.7
%1,
414,
782
11.3
%12
,996
,300
11,6
59,4
07
89.7
%1,
336,
893
10.3
%12
,809
,845
10,3
32,3
3980
.7%
2,47
7,50
619
.3%
48
49
ANNEXURE E: FREE BASIC WATER
Tota
l Hou
seho
lds
Tota
l Ind
igen
ts
Hou
seho
lds
Tota
l Hou
seho
lds
Tota
l In
dige
ntH
ouse
hold
sVa
rianc
e( C
ensu
s vs
M
unic
)To
tal I
ndig
ent
Hou
seho
lds
Serv
ed
Tota
l Ind
igen
t H
ouse
hold
Ser
ved
as
a pe
rcen
tage
Oth
er h
ouse
hold
s Se
rved
Tota
l H
ouse
hold
s Se
rved
Tota
l Hou
seho
lds
serv
ed a
s a
perc
enta
ge
Eas
tern
Cap
eA
mat
ole
Dis
trict
Mun
icip
ality
Am
ahla
thi
34,7
20
24
,150
36,9
20
23
,853
29
7
14,7
61
61.1
%6,
155
20,9
16
86.6
%E
aste
rn C
ape
Cac
adu
Dis
trict
Mun
icip
ality
Bav
iaan
s3,
904
1,
648
4,21
9
-
-
-
0.0%
-
-
0.0%
Eas
tern
Cap
eC
acad
u D
istri
ct M
unic
ipal
ityB
lue
Cra
ne R
oute
9,58
0
5,11
9
10
,294
4,47
6
64
3
4,47
6
87
.4%
-
4,47
6
87
.4%
Eas
tern
Cap
eA
mat
ole
Dis
trict
Mun
icip
ality
Buf
falo
City
192,
161
10
2,09
0
206,
454
48
,086
54
,004
51
,322
50
.3%
55,1
31
106,
453
104.
3%E
aste
rn C
ape
Cac
adu
Dis
trict
Mun
icip
ality
Cam
debo
o10
,496
4,06
7
11
,132
4,20
2
(1
35)
4,09
9
10
0.8%
4,41
3
8,
512
209.
3%E
aste
rn C
ape
uKha
hlam
ba D
istri
ct M
unic
ipal
ityE
lund
ini
33,7
53
26
,200
35,8
08
-
26
,200
-
0.
0%16
,827
16
,827
64
.2%
Eas
tern
Cap
eC
hris
Han
i Dis
trict
Mun
icip
ality
Em
alah
leni
28,3
04
20
,767
30,8
58
3,
033
17,7
34
1,76
0
8.
5%-
1,
760
8.5%
Eas
tern
Cap
eC
hris
Han
i Dis
trict
Mun
icip
ality
Eng
cobo
31,4
34
23
,702
32,8
21
-
23
,702
-
0.
0%-
-
0.
0%E
aste
rn C
ape
uKha
hlam
ba D
istri
ct M
unic
ipal
ityG
arie
p8,
288
5,
196
8,89
9
-
5,19
6
-
0.
0%7,
717
7,71
7
14
8.5%
Eas
tern
Cap
eA
mat
ole
Dis
trict
Mun
icip
ality
Gre
at K
ei11
,513
7,70
0
12
,152
4,92
9
2,
771
4,60
2
59
.8%
6,58
1
11
,183
14
5.2%
Eas
tern
Cap
eC
acad
u D
istri
ct M
unic
ipal
ityIk
wez
i2,
756
1,
505
2,95
7
1,28
8
21
7
502
33
.4%
2,49
8
3,
000
199.
3%E
aste
rn C
ape
Chr
is H
ani D
istri
ct M
unic
ipal
ityIn
kwan
ca5,
490
3,
421
5,74
4-
3,42
1
-
0.
0%-
-
0.
0%E
aste
rn C
ape
Chr
is H
ani D
istri
ct M
unic
ipal
ityIn
tsik
a Y
ethu
40,8
84
31
,396
41,6
56
-
31
,396
-
0.
0%-
-
0.
0%E
aste
rn C
ape
Chr
is H
ani D
istri
ct M
unic
ipal
ityIn
xuba
Yet
hem
ba16
,075
8,63
8
17
,054
-
8,63
8
-
0.
0%-
-
0.
0%E
aste
rn C
ape
O.R
. Tam
bo D
istri
ct M
unic
ipal
ityK
ing
Sab
ata
Dal
indy
ebo
90,6
27
57
,850
97,3
65
62
,617
(4
,767
)
41,0
24
70.9
%17
,432
58
,456
10
1.0%
Eas
tern
Cap
eC
acad
u D
istri
ct M
unic
ipal
ityK
ou k
amm
a9,
979
3,
482
21,3
80
-
3,
482
-
0.0%
-
-
0.0%
Eas
tern
Cap
eC
acad
u D
istri
ct M
unic
ipal
ityK
ouga
19,5
49
6,
314
10,4
47
5,
887
427
5,
874
93.0
%-
5,
874
93.0
%E
aste
rn C
ape
Chr
is H
ani D
istri
ct M
unic
ipal
ityLu
khan
ji44
,973
26,9
42
47
,185
10,6
93
16,2
49
-
0.0%
8,15
4
8,
154
30.3
%E
aste
rn C
ape
Cac
adu
Dis
trict
Mun
icip
ality
Mak
ana
18,4
35
8,
573
19,1
64
12
,887
(4
,314
)
-
0.0%
-
-
0.0%
Eas
tern
Cap
euK
hahl
amba
Dis
trict
Mun
icip
ality
Mal
etsw
ai9,
818
5,
230
10,2
57
-
5,
230
-
0.0%
4,80
0
4,
800
91.8
%E
aste
rn C
ape
Alfr
ed N
zo D
istri
ct M
unic
ipal
ityM
atat
iele
47,4
39
34
,685
53,8
80
18
0,43
9
(1
45,7
54)
-
0.0%
-
-
0.0%
Eas
tern
Cap
eA
mat
ole
Dis
trict
Mun
icip
ality
Mbh
ashe
53,5
50
41
,333
56,1
61
38
,615
2,
718
4,24
1
10
.3%
6,64
6
10
,887
26
.3%
Eas
tern
Cap
eO
.R. T
ambo
Dis
trict
Mun
icip
ality
Mbi
zana
46,4
11
37
,011
49,6
31
35
,581
1,
430
11,1
7830
.2%
-
11,1
78
30.2
%E
aste
rn C
ape
O.R
. Tam
bo D
istri
ct M
unic
ipal
ityM
hlon
tlo44
,204
32,4
42
46
,645
30,1
53
2,28
9
13
,358
41
.2%
618
13
,976
43
.1%
Eas
tern
Cap
eA
mat
ole
Dis
trict
Mun
icip
ality
Mnq
uma
67,5
68
50
,605
71,5
31
17
,000
33
,605
-
0.
0%-
-
0.
0%E
aste
rn C
ape
Cac
adu
Dis
trict
Mun
icip
ality
Ndl
ambe
15,7
34
7,
855
17,3
79
9,
110
(1,2
55)
3,
887
49.5
%9,
117
13,0
04
165.
6%E
aste
rn C
ape
Nel
son
Man
dela
Met
ropo
litan
Mun
icip
ality
Nel
son
Man
dela
Met
ro26
5,37
5
109,
882
28
4,83
3
106,
682
3,20
0
10
6,68
2
97
.1%
-
106,
682
97.1
%E
aste
rn C
ape
Am
atol
e D
istri
ct M
unic
ipal
ityN
gqus
hwa
21,8
94
16
,737
22,9
59
-
16
,737
-
0.
0%-
-
0.
0%E
aste
rn C
ape
Am
atol
e D
istri
ct M
unic
ipal
ityN
konk
obe
36,7
51
23
,293
34,3
51
12
,840
10
,453
11
,740
50
.4%
-
11,7
40
50.4
%E
aste
rn C
ape
O.R
. Tam
bo D
istri
ct M
unic
ipal
ityN
taba
nkul
u26
,060
21,6
70
29
,518
-
21,6
70
-
0.0%
-
-
0.0%
Eas
tern
Cap
eA
mat
ole
Dis
trict
Mun
icip
ality
Nxu
ba6,
638
4,
341
7,01
4
3,84
8
49
3
4,79
0
11
0.3%
2,66
8
7,
458
171.
8%E
aste
rn C
ape
O.R
. Tam
bo D
istri
ct M
unic
ipal
ityN
yand
eni
55,0
95
41
,646
59,1
79
47
,187
(5
,541
)
27,6
00
66.3
%10
0
27,7
00
66.5
%E
aste
rn C
ape
O.R
. Tam
bo D
istri
ct M
unic
ipal
ityP
ort S
t. Jo
hns
29,5
02
22
,567
30,9
95
23
,732
(1
,165
)
12,6
75
56.2
%58
12
,733
56
.4%
Eas
tern
Cap
eO
.R. T
ambo
Dis
trict
Mun
icip
ality
Qau
keni
51,0
63
39
,311
54,7
28
-
39
,311
-
0.
0%-
-0.
0%E
aste
rn C
ape
Chr
is H
ani D
istri
ct M
unic
ipal
ityS
akhi
sizw
e62
,856
9,90
6
15
,715
-
9,90
6
-
0.
0%-
-
0.
0%E
aste
rn C
ape
uKha
hlam
ba D
istri
ct M
unic
ipal
ityS
enqu
34,2
85
24
,997
36,3
68
29
,887
(4
,890
)
2,86
2
11
.4%
18,6
70
21,5
32
86.1
%E
aste
rn C
ape
Cac
adu
Dis
trict
Mun
icip
ality
Sun
days
Riv
er V
alle
y10
,007
4,46
0
10
,748
-
4,46
0
-
0.
0%-
-
0.
0%E
aste
rn C
ape
Chr
is H
ani D
istri
ct M
unic
ipal
ityTs
olw
ana
7,93
5
5,25
1
8,
334
-
5,
251
-
0.0%
-
-
0.0%
Eas
tern
Cap
eA
lfred
Nzo
Dis
trict
Mun
icip
ality
Um
zim
vubu
46,0
93
36
,589
46,2
59
-
36
,589
-
0.
0%-
-
0.
0%Fr
ee S
tate
Thab
o m
ofut
sany
ana
Dis
trict
Mun
icip
ality
Dih
labe
ng33
,476
18,4
35
36
,960
2,74
2
15
,693
5,
785
31.4
%11
,756
17
,541
95
.2%
Free
Sta
teX
harie
p D
istri
ct M
unic
ipal
ityK
opan
ong
17,6
36
11
,551
19,3
42
5,
356
6,19
5
5,
356
46.4
%4,
669
10,0
25
86.8
%Fr
ee S
tate
Xha
riep
Dis
trict
Mun
icip
ality
Lets
emen
g12
,098
6,96
0
13
,460
-
6,96
0
-
0.
0%-
-
0.
0%Fr
ee S
tate
Nor
ther
n Fr
ee S
tate
Dis
trict
Mun
icip
ality
Maf
ube
14,8
11
9,
516
16,1
14
3,
007
6,50
9
3,
007
31.6
%10
,130
13
,137
13
8.1%
Free
Sta
teTh
abo
mof
utsa
nyan
a D
istri
ct M
unic
ipal
ityM
alut
i-a-P
hofu
ng92
,159
60,3
70
97
,957
70,3
96
(10,
026)
37
,419
62
.0%
36,2
74
73,6
93
122.
1%Fr
ee S
tate
Mot
heo
Dis
trict
Mun
ioci
palit
yM
anga
ung
188,
876
92
,832
202,
887
78
,250
14
,582
80
,728
87
.0%
75,2
87
156,
015
168.
1%Fr
ee S
tate
Mot
heo
Dis
trict
Mun
ioci
palit
yM
ants
opa
14,0
828,
852
15,2
05
-
8,
852
-
0.0%
15,0
00
15,0
00
169.
5%Fr
ee S
tate
Lejw
elep
utsw
a D
istri
ct M
unic
ipal
ityM
asilo
nyan
a20
,515
11,0
37
18
,211
6,81
2
4,
225
6,81
2
61
.7%
10,2
17
17,0
29
154.
3%Fr
ee S
tate
Lejw
elep
utsw
a D
istri
ct M
unic
ipal
ityM
atjh
aben
g12
8,71
6
65,3
85
12
4,94
8
-
65,3
85
-
0.0%
-
-
0.0%
Free
Sta
teN
orth
ern
Free
Sta
te D
istri
ct M
unic
ipal
ityM
etsi
mah
olo
33,7
33
14
,315
35,4
64
8,
081
6,23
4
6,
852
47.9
%19
,879
26
,731
18
6.7%
Free
Sta
teX
harie
p D
istri
ct M
unic
ipal
ityM
ohok
are
9,58
0
6,72
5
10
,155
2,98
9
3,
736
2,98
9
44
.4%
5,31
0
8,
299
123.
4%Fr
ee S
tate
Nor
ther
n Fr
ee S
tate
Dis
trict
Mun
icip
ality
Moq
haka
43,9
02
21
,196
44,8
18
9,
899
11,2
97
9,89
9
46
.7%
35,8
66
45,7
65
215.
9%Fr
ee S
tate
Lejw
elep
utsw
a D
istri
ct M
unic
ipal
ityN
ala
26,0
14
17
,569
28,7
10
4,
476
13,0
93
9,80
6
55
.8%
16,0
24
25,8
30
147.
0%Fr
ee S
tate
Mot
heo
Dis
trict
Mun
ioci
palit
yN
aled
i7,
686
4,
800
8,37
2
3,20
4
1,
596
3,20
4
66
.8%
4,17
2
7,
376
153.
7%Fr
ee S
tate
Nor
ther
n Fr
ee S
tate
Dis
trict
Mun
icip
ality
Ngw
athe
32,5
40
20
,290
34,6
81
12
,210
8,
080
12,2
10
60.2
%20
,447
32
,657
16
1.0%
Free
Sta
teTh
abo
mof
utsa
nyan
a D
istri
ct M
unic
ipal
ityN
keto
ana
15,0
39
10
,003
15,9
65
4,
762
5,24
1
4,
110
41.1
%7,
212
11,3
22
113.
2%Fr
ee S
tate
Thab
o m
ofut
sany
ana
Dis
trict
Mun
icip
ality
Phu
mel
ela
12,0
43
7,
519
13,1
78
1,
394
6,12
5
1,
394
18.5
%7,
872
9,26
6
12
3.2%
Free
Sta
teTh
abo
mof
utsa
nyan
a D
istri
ct M
unic
ipal
ityS
etso
to33
,623
23,2
5736
,146
10,0
19
13,2
38
10,8
20
46.5
%15
,956
26
,776
11
5.1%
Free
Sta
teLe
jwel
eput
swa
Dis
trict
Mun
icip
ality
Toko
logo
8,97
6
5,79
5
9,
859
-
5,
795
-
0.0%
-
-
0.0%
Free
Sta
teLe
jwel
eput
swa
Dis
trict
Mun
icip
ality
Tsw
elop
ele
12,5
54
8,
636
13,4
30
3,
451
5,18
5
3,
134
36.3
%7,
241
10,3
75
120.
1%G
aute
ngC
ity o
f Joh
anne
sbur
g M
etro
polit
an M
unic
ipal
ityC
ity o
f Joh
anne
sbur
g1,
050,
229
336,
700
1,
256,
127
119,
100
217,
600
119,
100
35.4
%-
11
9,10
0
35
.4%
Gau
teng
City
of T
shw
ane
Met
ropo
litan
Mun
icip
ality
City
of T
shw
ane
597,
520
16
6,46
8
675,
256
26
,785
13
9,68
3
26
,785
16
.1%
556,
687
583,
472
350.
5%G
aute
ngE
kurh
ulen
i Met
ropo
litan
Mun
icip
ality
Eku
rhul
eni
776,
470
28
3,90
3
931,
208
50
,860
23
3,04
3
50
,860
17
.9%
374,
387
425,
247
149.
8%
AN
NEX
UR
E E:
FR
EE B
ASI
C W
ATE
RM
UN
ICIP
AL
SOU
RC
E 20
08
DIS
TRIC
TPR
OVI
NC
EM
UN
ICIP
ALI
TY
STA
TIST
ICS
SOU
TH A
FRIC
A C
ENSU
S 20
01
50
Tota
l Hou
seho
lds
Tota
l Ind
igen
ts
Hou
seho
lds
Tota
l Hou
seho
lds
Tota
l In
dige
ntH
ouse
hold
sVa
rianc
e( C
ensu
s vs
M
unic
)To
tal I
ndig
ent
Hou
seho
lds
Serv
ed
Tota
l Ind
igen
t H
ouse
hold
Ser
ved
as
a pe
rcen
tage
Oth
er h
ouse
hold
s Se
rved
Tota
l H
ouse
hold
s Se
rved
Tota
l Hou
seho
lds
serv
ed a
s a
perc
enta
ge
AN
NEX
UR
E E:
FR
EE B
ASI
C W
ATE
RM
UN
ICIP
AL
SOU
RC
E 20
08
DIS
TRIC
TPR
OVI
NC
EM
UN
ICIP
ALI
TY
STA
TIST
ICS
SOU
TH A
FRIC
A C
ENSU
S 20
01
Gau
teng
Sed
iben
g D
istri
ct m
unic
ipal
ityE
mfu
leni
190,
237
87
,131
225,
924
11
,000
76
,131
11
,000
12
.6%
122,
914
133,
914
153.
7%G
aute
ngM
etsw
edin
g D
istri
ct M
unic
ipal
ityK
ungw
ini
34,1
69
13
,031
43,1
50
1,
587
11,4
44
1,58
7
12
.2%
18,2
62
19,8
49
152.
3%G
aute
ngS
edib
eng
Dis
trict
mun
icip
ality
Lese
di19
,709
8,32
9
22
,214
8,68
0
(3
51)
8,68
0
10
4.2%
11,2
43
19,9
23
239.
2%G
aute
ngS
edib
eng
Dis
trict
mun
icip
ality
Mid
vaal
20,8
40
7,
734
24,1
20
1,
100
6,63
4
1,
100
14.2
%9,
270
10,3
70
134.
1%G
aute
ngW
est R
and
Dis
trict
Mun
icip
ality
Mog
ale
City
89,6
87
30
,347
105,
240
1,
622
28,7
25
6,82
3
22
.5%
58,1
77
65,0
00
214.
2%G
aute
ngM
etsw
edin
g D
istri
ct M
unic
ipal
ityN
oken
g ts
a Ta
eman
e16
,833
5,47
9
18
,389
870
4,
609
870
15
.9%
-
870
15
.9%
Gau
teng
Wes
t Ran
d D
istri
ct M
unic
ipal
ityR
andf
onte
in40
,446
12,8
21
45
,362
4,52
2
8,
299
4,28
9
33
.5%
18,9
30
23,2
19
181.
1%G
aute
ngW
est R
and
Dis
trict
Mun
icip
ality
Wes
tona
ria51
,521
15,0
81
35
,005
14,9
00
181
14
,509
96
.2%
14,9
41
29,4
50
195.
3%K
waZ
ulu-
Nat
alZu
lula
nd D
istri
ct M
unic
ipal
ityA
baqu
lusi
37,0
64
22
,762
41,7
88
-
22
,762
3,
598
15.8
%-
3,
598
15.8
%K
waZ
ulu-
Nat
alA
maj
uba
Dis
trict
Mun
icip
ality
Dan
nhau
ser
19,4
81
14
,029
22,2
13
-
14
,029
-
0.
0%-
-
0.
0%K
waZ
ulu-
Nat
alZu
lula
nd D
istri
ct M
unic
ipal
ityeD
umbe
15,8
24
10
,765
17,5
48
11
,671
(9
06)
4,06
9
37
.8%
11,0
37
15,1
06
140.
3%K
waZ
ulu-
Nat
aluT
huke
la D
istri
ct M
unic
ipal
ityE
mna
mbi
thi/L
adys
mith
51,9
03
28
,086
7,13
312
,991
15,0
95
21,8
79
77.9
%-
21
,879
77
.9%
Kw
aZul
u-N
atal
iLem
be D
istri
ct M
unic
ipal
ityeN
dond
akus
uka
31,0
14
17
,655
59,2
16
-
17
,655
-
0.
0%3,
814
3,81
4
21
.6%
Kw
aZul
u-N
atal
uMzi
nyat
hi D
istri
ct M
unic
ipal
ityE
ndum
eni
13,1
33
6,
347
14,1
01
1,
845
4,50
2
-
0.
0%-
-
0.
0%K
waZ
ulu-
Nat
aleT
hekw
ini
eThe
kwin
i82
4,37
1
1,00
5,03
1
91
4,70
1
-
-
173,
213
17.2
%-
17
3,21
3
17
.2%
Kw
aZul
u-N
atal
Ugu
Dis
trict
Mun
icip
ality
Ezi
nqol
eni
11,4
43
7,
681
12,3
47
-
7,
681
-
0.0%
-
-
0.0%
Kw
aZul
u-N
atal
Sis
onke
Dis
trict
Mun
icip
allit
yG
reat
er K
okst
ad20
,566
13,2
86
23
,190
2,17
5
11
,111
-
0.
0%-
-
0.
0%K
waZ
ulu-
Nat
alU
gu D
istri
ct M
unic
ipal
ityH
ibis
cus
Coa
st55
,274
26,2
48
59
,461
433
25
,815
-
0.
0%-
-
0.
0%K
waZ
ulu-
Nat
alU
mkh
anya
kude
Dis
trict
Mun
icip
ality
Hla
bisa
27,2
79
16
,510
32,0
66
-
16
,510
-
0.
0%-
-
0.
0%K
waZ
ulu-
Nat
aluT
huke
la D
istri
ct M
unic
ipal
ityIm
baba
zane
23,2
83
17
,879
26,9
80
-
17
,879
16
,728
93
.6%
-
16,7
28
93.6
%K
waZ
ulu-
Nat
aluM
gung
undl
ovu
Dis
trict
Mun
icip
ality
Impe
ndle
7,46
3
5,73
6
8,
448
-
5,
736
-
0.0%
-
-
0.0%
Kw
aZul
u-N
atal
uThu
kela
Dis
trict
Mun
icip
ality
Inda
ka21
,475
17,7
26
25
,016
-
17,7
26
21,0
46
118.
7%-
21
,046
11
8.7%
Kw
aZul
u-N
atal
Sis
onke
Dis
trict
Mun
icip
allit
yIn
gwe
21,9
54
16
,797
25,3
55
-
16
,797
-0.
0%-
-
0.
0%K
waZ
ulu-
Nat
alU
mkh
anya
kude
Dis
trict
Mun
icip
ality
Jozi
ni34
,739
26,2
84
38
,807
-
26,2
84
-
0.0%
9,02
4
9,
024
34.3
%K
waZ
ulu-
Nat
alS
ison
ke D
istri
ct M
unic
ipal
lity
Kw
a S
ani
4,66
0
3,07
2
5,
241
-
3,
072
-
0.0%
-
-
0.0%
Kw
aZul
u-N
atal
iLem
be D
istri
ct M
unic
ipal
ityK
waD
ukuz
a45
,928
19,7
69
47
,793
-
19,7
69
-
0.0%
8,46
7
8,
467
42.8
%K
waZ
ulu-
Nat
aliL
embe
Dis
trict
Mun
icip
ality
Map
hum
ulo
22,4
29
16
,953
33,0
64
-
16
,953
-
0.
0%87
87
0.
5%K
waZ
ulu-
Nat
aluT
hung
ulu
Dis
trict
Mun
icip
ality
Mbo
nam
bi20
,438
11,4
09
25
,299
-
11,4
09
188
1.
6%-
18
8
1.6%
Kw
aZul
u-N
atal
uMgu
ngun
dlov
u D
istri
ct M
unic
ipal
ityM
kham
bath
ini
15,4
17
8,
232
21,8
50
-
8,
232
-
0.0%
-
-
0.0%
Kw
aZul
u-N
atal
uMgu
ngun
dlov
u D
istri
ct M
unic
ipal
ityM
ooi M
pofa
na10
,516
5,67
3
14
,375
5,75
8
(8
5)
5,75
8
10
1.5%
-
5,75
8
10
1.5%
Kw
aZul
u-N
atal
uMzi
nyat
hi D
istri
ct M
unic
ipal
ityM
sing
a32
,908
25,2
59
10
,914
-
25,2
59
-
0.0%
-
-
0.0%
Kw
aZul
u-N
atal
uThu
ngul
u D
istri
ct M
unic
ipal
ityM
thon
jane
ni12
,657
7,31
9
37
,006
430
6,
889
-
0.0%
1,45
8
1,
458
19.9
%K
waZ
ulu-
Nat
alU
mkh
anya
kude
Dis
trict
Mun
icip
ality
Mtu
batu
ba8,
286
3,
474
11,5
64
-
3,
474
-
0.0%
-
-
0.0%
Kw
aZul
u-N
atal
iLem
be D
istri
ct M
unic
ipal
ityN
dwed
we
30,6
45
20
,405
7,19
5
-
20,4
05
-
0.0%
3,04
63,
046
14.9
%K
waZ
ulu-
Nat
alA
maj
uba
Dis
trict
Mun
icip
ality
New
cast
le71
,999
40,5
78
31
,419
19,4
32
21,1
46
20,0
18
49.3
%-
20
,018
49
.3%
Kw
aZul
u-N
atal
uThu
ngul
u D
istri
ct M
unic
ipal
ityN
kand
la24
,910
18,1
24
82
,950
-
18,1
24
-
0.0%
555
55
5
3.1%
Kw
aZul
u-N
atal
Zulu
land
Dis
trict
Mun
icip
ality
Non
gom
a32
,473
23,2
56
27
,725
-
23,2
56
-
0.0%
-
-
0.0%
Kw
aZul
u-N
atal
uMzi
nyat
hi D
istri
ct M
unic
ipal
ityN
quth
u29
,698
24,0
19
36
,701
-
24,0
19
-
0.0%
-
-
0.0%
Kw
aZul
u-N
atal
uThu
ngul
u D
istri
ct M
unic
ipal
ityN
tam
bana
na13
,844
7,84
3
34
,203
11,0
00
(3,1
57)
1,
480
18.9
%-
1,
480
18.9
%K
waZ
ulu-
Nat
aluT
huke
la D
istri
ct M
unic
ipal
ityO
khah
lam
ba27
,978
19,7
82
14
,280
14,0
00
5,78
2
21
,647
10
9.4%
-
21,6
47
109.
4%K
waZ
ulu-
Nat
aluM
gung
undl
ovu
Dis
trict
Mun
icip
ality
Ric
hmon
d16
,021
8,14
1
31
,180
11,2
00
(3,0
59)
-
0.
0%-
-
0.
0%K
waZ
ulu-
Nat
alU
mkh
anya
kude
Dis
trict
Mun
icip
ality
The
Big
5 F
alse
Bay
7,11
7
3,89
4
14
,241
-
3,89
4
-
0.
0%4,
479
4,47
9
11
5.0%
Kw
aZul
u-N
atal
uMgu
ngun
dlov
u D
istri
ct M
unic
ipal
ityM
sund
uzi
135,
239
58
,354
7,19
1
-
58,3
54
-
0.0%
-
-
0.0%
Kw
aZul
u-N
atal
Sis
onke
Dis
trict
Mun
icip
allit
yU
buhl
ebez
we
23,1
07
16
,239
149,
280
12
0,00
0
(1
03,7
61)
-
0.0%
-
-
0.0%
Kw
aZul
u-N
atal
Zulu
land
Dis
trict
Mun
icip
ality
Ulu
ndi
34,9
57
23
,404
25,3
95
-
23
,404
-
0.
0%-
-
0.
0%K
waZ
ulu-
Nat
alU
gu D
istri
ct M
unic
ipal
ityU
mdo
ni16
,508
7,16
7
39
,109
3,35
7
3,
810
-
0.0%
-
-
0.0%
Kw
aZul
u-N
atal
Um
khan
yaku
de D
istri
ct M
unic
ipal
ityU
mhl
abuy
alin
gana
26,6
78
19
,889
17,6
60
-
19
,889
-
0.
0%7,
516
7,51
6
37
.8%
Kw
aZul
u-N
atal
uThu
ngul
u D
istri
ct M
unic
ipal
ityuM
hlat
huze
73,3
01
29
,818
30,2
22
51
3
29,3
05
23,9
00
80.2
%43
,313
67
,213
22
5.4%
Kw
aZul
u-N
atal
uThu
ngul
u D
istri
ct M
unic
ipal
ityU
mla
lazi
44,6
34
24
,355
82,4
78
1,
198
23,1
57
-
0.0%
3,31
2
3,
312
13.6
%K
waZ
ulu-
Nat
aluM
gung
undl
ovu
Dis
trict
Mun
icip
ality
uMng
eni
22,7
01
8,
898
44,0
34
1,
480
7,41
8
1,
480
16.6
%9,
066
10,5
46
118.
5%K
waZ
ulu-
Nat
aluM
gung
undl
ovu
Dis
trict
Mun
icip
ality
uMsh
wat
hi27
,324
15,8
41
23
,167
-
15,8
41
-
0.0%
-
-
0.0%
Kw
aZul
u-N
atal
uThu
kela
Dis
trict
Mun
icip
ality
Um
tshe
zi13
,978
7,41
6
27
,183
-
7,41
6
4,
770
64.3
%-
4,
770
64.3
%K
waZ
ulu-
Nat
alU
gu D
istri
ct M
unic
ipal
ityuM
uziw
aban
tu19
,524
14,2
04
15
,371
-
14,2
04
-
0.0%
-
-
0.0%
Kw
aZul
u-N
atal
uMzi
nyat
hi D
istri
ct M
unic
ipal
ityU
mvo
ti23
,002
13,1
52
21
,938
-
13,1
52
-
0.0%
-
-
0.0%
Kw
aZul
u-N
atal
Sis
onke
Dis
trict
Mun
icip
allit
yU
mzi
mkh
ulu
36,6
77
27
,946
22,4
60
-
27
,946
-
0.
0%-
-
0.
0%K
waZ
ulu-
Nat
alU
gu D
istri
ct M
unic
ipal
ityU
mzu
mbe
38,8
89
29
,079
39,1
43
-
29
,079
-
0.
0%-
-
0.
0%K
waZ
ulu-
Nat
alZu
lula
nd D
istri
ct M
unic
ipal
ityuP
hong
olo
26,9
54
16
,892
44,2
061,
248
15,6
44
-
0.0%
-
-
0.0%
Kw
aZul
u-N
atal
Am
ajub
a D
istri
ct M
unic
ipal
ityU
trech
t6,
739
3,
828
28,9
18
-
3,
828
-
0.0%
-
-
0.0%
Kw
aZul
u-N
atal
Ugu
Dis
trict
Mun
icip
ality
Vul
ameh
lo16
,805
11,4
60
18
,169
-
11,4
60
-
0.0%
-
-
0.0%
Lim
popo
Cap
ricor
n D
istri
ct M
unic
ipal
ityA
gana
ng32
,533
23,4
56
35
,518
27,0
61
(3,6
05)
-
0.
0%-
-
0.
0%Li
mpo
poM
opan
i Dis
trict
Mun
icip
ality
Ba-
Pha
labo
rwa
33,5
71
15
,353
34,7
99
-
15
,353
-
0.
0%-
-
0.
0%Li
mpo
poW
ater
burg
Dis
trict
Mun
icip
ality
Bel
a B
ela
14,1
70
5,
818
14,0
02
3,
301
2,51
7
3,
301
56.7
%4,
524
7,82
5
13
4.5%
51
Tota
l Hou
seho
lds
Tota
l Ind
igen
ts
Hou
seho
lds
Tota
l Hou
seho
lds
Tota
l In
dige
ntH
ouse
hold
sVa
rianc
e( C
ensu
s vs
M
unic
)To
tal I
ndig
ent
Hou
seho
lds
Serv
ed
Tota
l Ind
igen
t H
ouse
hold
Ser
ved
as
a pe
rcen
tage
Oth
er h
ouse
hold
s Se
rved
Tota
l H
ouse
hold
s Se
rved
Tota
l Hou
seho
lds
serv
ed a
s a
perc
enta
ge
AN
NEX
UR
E E:
FR
EE B
ASI
C W
ATE
RM
UN
ICIP
AL
SOU
RC
E 20
08
DIS
TRIC
TPR
OVI
NC
EM
UN
ICIP
ALI
TY
STA
TIST
ICS
SOU
TH A
FRIC
A C
ENSU
S 20
01
Lim
popo
Cap
ricor
n D
istri
ct M
unic
ipal
ityB
loub
erg
35,1
76
25
,869
37,5
36
28
,478
(2
,609
)
19,5
97
75.8
%35
,403
55
,000
21
2.6%
Lim
popo
Gre
ater
Sek
hukh
une
Dis
trict
Mun
icip
ality
Feta
kgom
o19
,022
13,5
19
50
,004
2,58
1
10
,938
15
,908
11
7.7%
-
15,9
08
117.
7%Li
mpo
poM
opan
i Dis
trict
Mun
icip
ality
Gre
ater
Giy
ani
53,2
92
36
,486
21,1
74
21
,007
15
,479
15
,795
43
.3%
-
15,7
95
43.3
%Li
mpo
poG
reat
er S
ekhu
khun
e D
istri
ct M
unic
ipal
ityG
reat
er G
robl
ersd
al48
,951
32,4
56
59
,495
979
31
,477
38
,909
11
9.9%
-
38,9
09
119.
9%Li
mpo
poM
opan
i Dis
trict
Mun
icip
ality
Gre
ater
Let
aba
53,7
47
37
,449
58,0
95
-
37
,449
-
0.
0%-
-
0.
0%Li
mpo
poG
reat
er S
ekhu
khun
e D
istri
ct M
unic
ipal
ityG
reat
er M
arbl
e H
all
26,5
51
16
,904
26,9
37
2,
958
13,9
46
20,2
67
119.
9%-
20
,267
11
9.9%
Lim
popo
Gre
ater
Sek
hukh
une
Dis
trict
Mun
icip
ality
Gre
ater
Tub
atse
56,2
34
39
,451
60,4
55
39
,000
45
1
41,6
10
105.
5%-
41
,610
10
5.5%
Lim
popo
Mop
ani D
istri
ct M
unic
ipal
ityG
reat
er T
zane
en97
,425
59,1
63
95
,221
30,0
29
29,1
34
17,6
68
29.9
%58
,432
76
,100
12
8.6%
Lim
popo
Cap
ricor
n D
istri
ct M
unic
ipal
ityLe
pelle
-Nku
mpi
52,9
28
34
,684
56,6
35
46
,786
(1
2,10
2)
-
0.0%
-
-
0.0%
Lim
popo
Wat
erbu
rg D
istri
ct M
unic
ipal
ityLe
phal
ale
28,3
59
14
,994
26,6
10
5,
522
9,47
2
7,
898
52.7
%7,
590
15,4
88
103.
3%Li
mpo
poV
hem
be D
istri
ct M
unic
ipal
ityM
akha
do11
3,22
2
72,9
56
12
3,09
9
75,4
69
(2,5
13)
12
3,10
0
16
8.7%
6,12
4
12
9,22
4
17
7.1%
Lim
popo
Gre
ater
Sek
hukh
une
Dis
trict
Mun
icip
ality
Mak
hudu
tham
aga
54,0
33
40
,747
59,8
79-
40,7
47
45,7
42
112.
3%-
45
,742
11
2.3%
Lim
popo
Mop
ani D
istri
ct M
unic
ipal
ityM
arul
eng
23,0
50
14
,716
21,4
86
8,
296
6,42
0
-
0.
0%-
-
0.
0%Li
mpo
poW
ater
burg
Dis
trict
Mun
icip
ality
Mod
imol
le20
,964
9,36
4
21
,014
2,50
0
6,
864
2,50
0
26
.7%
4,23
0
6,
730
71.9
%Li
mpo
poW
ater
burg
Dis
trict
Mun
icip
ality
Mog
alak
wen
a70
,134
44,1
55
76
,651
-
44,1
55
3,65
6
8.
3%6,
914
10,5
70
23.9
%Li
mpo
poC
apric
orn
Dis
trict
Mun
icip
ality
Mol
emol
e28
,944
19,8
81
30
,823
21,8
37
(1,9
56)
-
0.
0%-
-
0.
0%Li
mpo
poW
ater
burg
Dis
trict
Mun
icip
ality
Moo
kgop
ong
9,56
9
3,19
5
8,
940
1,
330
1,86
5
1,
330
41.6
%3,
562
4,89
2
15
3.1%
Lim
popo
Vhe
mbe
Dis
trict
Mun
icip
ality
Mus
ina
13,9
78
7,
983
13,0
76
4,
688
3,29
5
13
,073
16
3.8%
-
13,0
73
163.
8%Li
mpo
poV
hem
be D
istri
ct M
unic
ipal
ityM
utal
e18
,447
12,1
90
20
,775
13,8
83
(1,6
93)
20
,625
16
9.2%
13,3
38
33,9
63
278.
6%Li
mpo
poC
apric
orn
Dis
trict
Mun
icip
ality
Pol
okw
ane
135,
638
70
,199
142,
807
10
4,28
9
(3
4,09
0)
102,
061
145.
4%28
,300
13
0,36
1
18
5.7%
Lim
popo
Wat
erbu
rg D
istri
ct M
unic
ipal
ityTh
abaz
imbi
25,0
37
9,
360
22,9
83
-
9,
360
2,57
9
27
.6%
-
2,57
9
27
.6%
Lim
popo
Vhe
mbe
Dis
trict
Mun
icip
ality
Thul
amel
a12
8,44
7
84,2
89
14
1,72
9
82,6
04
1,68
5
14
1,73
1
16
8.1%
14,6
39
156,
370
185.
5%M
pum
alan
gaG
ert S
iban
de D
istri
ct m
unic
ipal
ityA
lber
t Lut
huli
41,2
34
27
,778
45,3
48
10
,358
17
,420
1,46
65.
3%3,
534
5,00
0
18
.0%
Mpu
mal
anga
Ehl
anze
ni D
istri
ct M
unic
ipal
ityB
ushb
uckr
idge
109,
322
79
,527
118,
773
-
79
,527
-
0.
0%-
-
0.
0%M
pum
alan
gaN
kang
ala
Dis
trict
mun
icip
ality
Del
mas
13,9
54
6,
699
15,4
19
4,
061
2,63
8
2,
476
37.0
%6,
812
9,28
8
13
8.6%
Mpu
mal
anga
Ger
t Sib
ande
Dis
trict
mun
icip
ality
Dip
ales
eng
9,58
1
5,65
5
10
,735
568
5,
087
568
10
.0%
7,95
9
8,
527
150.
8%M
pum
alan
gaN
kang
ala
Dis
trict
mun
icip
ality
Dr J
S M
orok
a54
,339
35,8
39
60
,210
-
35,8
39
-
0.0%
-
-
0.0%
Mpu
mal
anga
Nka
ngal
a D
istri
ct m
unic
ipal
ityE
mal
ahle
ni82
,298
28,9
80
11
,391
9,63
0
19
,350
8,
978
31.0
%48
,022
57
,000
19
6.7%
Mpu
mal
anga
Ger
t Sib
ande
Dis
trict
mun
icip
ality
Gov
an M
beki
67,6
29
28
,014
87,9
72
17
,259
10
,755
17
,259
61
.6%
-
17,2
59
61.6
%M
pum
alan
gaN
kang
ala
Dis
trict
mun
icip
ality
Em
akha
zeni
10,9
37
4,
397
70,9
14
82
0
3,57
7
82
0
18.6
%12
,403
13
,223
30
0.7%
Mpu
mal
anga
Ger
t Sib
ande
Dis
trict
mun
icip
ality
Lekw
a26
,198
11,4
87
29
,424
-
11,4
87
3,24
6
28
.3%
15,0
89
18,3
35
159.
6%M
pum
alan
gaE
hlan
zeni
Dis
trict
Mun
icip
ality
Mbo
mbe
la12
2,50
4
56,5
09
13
0,51
1
91,2
37
(34,
728)
16
8,88
6
29
8.9%
-
168,
886
298.
9%M
pum
alan
gaG
ert S
iban
de D
istri
ct m
unic
ipal
ityM
khon
do28
,918
17,3
87
33
,921
-
17,3
87
-
0.0%
-
-
0.0%
Mpu
mal
anga
Ger
t Sib
ande
Dis
trict
mun
icip
ality
Msu
kalig
wa
30,3
02
15
,289
34,8
76
16
,000
(7
11)
3,66
5
24
.0%
23,9
6627
,631
180.
7%M
pum
alan
gaE
hlan
zeni
Dis
trict
Mun
icip
ality
Nko
maz
i75
,584
49,6
81
85
,022
-
49,6
81
-
0.0%
-
-
0.0%
Mpu
mal
anga
Ger
t Sib
ande
Dis
trict
mun
icip
ality
Pix
ley
Ka
Sem
e18
,412
12,2
34
21
,040
6,32
7
5,
907
6,32
7
51
.7%
4,80
9
11
,136
91
.0%
Mpu
mal
anga
Nka
ngal
a D
istri
ct m
unic
ipal
ityS
teve
Tsh
wet
e37
,115
12,5
18
41
,677
13,1
97
(679
)
9,
307
74.3
%27
,508
36
,815
29
4.1%
Mpu
mal
anga
Ehl
anze
ni D
istri
ct M
unic
ipal
ityTh
aba
Chw
eu26
,818
10,2
72
25
,654
-
10,2
72
-
0.0%
-
-
0.0%
Mpu
mal
anga
Nka
ngal
a D
istri
ct m
unic
ipal
ityTh
embi
sile
58,2
35
34
,706
62,7
86
-
34
,706
10
3
0.3%
58,1
04
58,2
07
167.
7%M
pum
alan
gaE
hlan
zeni
Dis
trict
Mun
icip
ality
Um
jindi
15,9
10
6,
893
16,8
42
1,
589
5,30
4
1,
589
23.1
%5,
374
6,96
3
10
1.0%
Nor
th W
est
Cen
tral D
istri
ct M
unic
ipal
ityD
itsob
otla
36,4
31
20
,153
105,
989
28
2
19,8
71
4,22
4
21
.0%
-
4,22
4
21
.0%
Nor
th W
est
Bop
hirim
a D
istri
ct M
unic
ipal
ityG
reat
er T
aung
42,0
18
29
,607
40,3
29
18
3
29,4
24
-
0.0%
540
54
0
1.8%
Nor
th W
est
Bop
hirim
a D
istri
ct M
unic
ipal
ityK
agis
ano
21,4
96
15
,472
46,4
49
-
15
,472
-
0.
0%-
-
0.
0%N
orth
Wes
tB
ojan
ala
Dis
trict
Mun
icip
ality
Kge
tleng
rivie
r10
,497
5,77
7
21
,695
2,47
8
3,
299
2,47
8
42
.9%
2,02
4
4,
502
77.9
%N
orth
Wes
tB
ophi
rima
Dis
trict
Mun
icip
ality
Lekw
a-Te
eman
e11
,578
6,00
0
11
,637
-
6,00
0
-
0.
0%-
-
0.
0%N
orth
Wes
tB
ojan
ala
Dis
trict
Mun
icip
ality
Mad
iben
g10
0,45
747
,418
12,0
32
7,
241
40,1
77
7,24
1
15
.3%
43,0
24
50,2
65
106.
0%N
orth
Wes
tC
entra
l Dis
trict
Mun
icip
ality
Maf
iken
g67
,579
35,7
24
10
0,98
3
21,6
75
14,0
49
21,6
75
60.7
%17
,000
38
,675
10
8.3%
Nor
th W
est
Bop
hirim
a D
istri
ct M
unic
ipal
ityM
amus
a10
,751
6,78
1
73
,284
2,90
2
3,
879
4,02
2
59
.3%
-
4,02
2
59
.3%
Nor
th W
est
Sou
ther
n D
istri
ct M
unic
ipal
ityM
aqua
ssi H
ills
17,3
02
10
,582
11,8
32
4,
362
6,22
0
65
7
6.2%
-
657
6.
2%N
orth
Wes
tS
outh
ern
Dis
trict
Mun
icip
ality
Mat
losa
na11
2,11
9
46,1
31
19
,499
-
46,1
31
36,9
32
80.1
%39
,839
76
,771
16
6.4%
Nor
th W
est
Sou
ther
n D
istri
ct M
unic
ipal
ityM
eraf
ong
99,7
01
26
,286
65,9
28
5,
179
21,1
07
5,17
9
19
.7%
-
5,17
9
19
.7%
Nor
th W
est
Bop
hirim
a D
istri
ct M
unic
ipal
ityM
olop
o3,
799
2,
640
4,07
1
-
2,64
0
-
0.
0%-
-
0.
0%N
orth
Wes
tB
ojan
ala
Dis
trict
Mun
icip
ality
Mor
etel
e43
,938
26,3
61
51
,315
-
26,3
61
-
0.0%
-
-
0.0%
Nor
th W
est
Boj
anal
a D
istri
ct M
unic
ipal
ityM
oses
Kot
ane
62,9
40
36
,897
69,7
65
46
,518
(9
,621
)
-
0.0%
-
-
0.0%
Nor
th W
est
Bop
hirim
a D
istri
ct M
unic
ipal
ityN
aled
i15
,254
8,16
7
16
,780
5,65
0
2,
517
5,65
0
69
.2%
4,68
1
10
,331
12
6.5%
Nor
th W
est
Sou
ther
n D
istri
ct M
unic
ipal
ityP
otch
efst
room
34,0
28
12
,280
36,1
80
6,
358
5,92
2
5,
750
46.8
%24
,000
29
,750
24
2.3%
Nor
th W
est
Cen
tral D
istri
ct M
unic
ipal
ityR
amot
sher
e M
oilo
a32
,401
20,9
6136
,223
-
20,9
61
13,1
81
62.9
%-
13
,181
62
.9%
Nor
th W
est
Cen
tral D
istri
ct M
unic
ipal
ityR
atlo
u22
,719
17,1
37
25
,495
-
17,1
37
-
0.0%
-
-
0.0%
Nor
th W
est
Boj
anal
a D
istri
ct M
unic
ipal
ityR
uste
nbur
g11
6,66
5
43,0
70
13
4,75
3
10,3
00
32,7
70
2,55
2
5.
9%-
2,
552
5.9%
Nor
th W
est
Cen
tral D
istri
ct M
unic
ipal
ityTs
wai
ng25
,641
16,4
57
28
,492
952
15
,505
95
2
5.8%
14,7
53
15,7
05
95.4
%N
orth
Wes
tS
outh
ern
Dis
trict
Mun
icip
ality
Ven
ters
dorp
11,4
26
6,
832
13,1
62
1,
627
5,20
5
1,
668
24.4
%3,
865
5,53
3
81
.0%
Nor
ther
n C
ape
Siy
anda
Dis
trict
Mun
icip
ality
! Khe
is
3
,997
1,
816
4,28
1
914
90
2
914
50
.3%
-
914
50
.3%
52
Tota
l Hou
seho
lds
Tota
l Ind
igen
ts
Hou
seho
lds
Tota
l Hou
seho
lds
Tota
l In
dige
ntH
ouse
hold
sVa
rianc
e( C
ensu
s vs
M
unic
)To
tal I
ndig
ent
Hou
seho
lds
Serv
ed
Tota
l Ind
igen
t H
ouse
hold
Ser
ved
as
a pe
rcen
tage
Oth
er h
ouse
hold
s Se
rved
Tota
l H
ouse
hold
s Se
rved
Tota
l Hou
seho
lds
serv
ed a
s a
perc
enta
ge
AN
NEX
UR
E E:
FR
EE B
ASI
C W
ATE
RM
UN
ICIP
AL
SOU
RC
E 20
08
DIS
TRIC
TPR
OVI
NC
EM
UN
ICIP
ALI
TY
STA
TIST
ICS
SOU
TH A
FRIC
A C
ENSU
S 20
01
Nor
ther
n C
ape
Siy
anda
Dis
trict
Mun
icip
ality
//Kha
ra H
ais
1
7,65
1 6,
497
18,3
54
5,
503
994
6,
625
102.
0%-
6,
625
102.
0%N
orth
ern
Cap
eFr
ance
s B
aard
Dis
trict
Mun
icip
ality
Dik
gatlo
ng
9
,815
5,
667
9,98
6
6,48
4
(8
17)
6,48
4
11
4.4%
-
6,48
4
11
4.4%
Nor
ther
n C
ape
Pix
ley
Ka
Sem
e D
istri
ct M
unic
ipal
ityE
mth
anje
ni
8
,835
3,
842
8,97
6
3,67
2
17
0
3,67
2
95
.6%
-
3,67
2
95
.6%
Nor
ther
n C
ape
Kga
laga
di D
istri
ct M
unic
ipal
ityG
amag
ara
6,6
83
2,18
8
6,
073
1,
990
198
1,
990
91.0
%-
1,
990
91.0
%N
orth
ern
Cap
eK
gala
gadi
Dis
trict
Mun
icip
ality
Ga-
Seg
onya
na
17,
799
10,4
93
19
,577
1,61
0
8,
883
334
3.
2%16
,000
16
,334
15
5.7%
Nor
ther
n C
ape
Nam
akw
a D
istri
ct M
unic
ipal
ityH
anta
m
5
,521
2,
111
5,77
8
996
1,
115
996
47
.2%
3,07
8
4,
074
193.
0%N
orth
ern
Cap
eS
iyan
da D
istri
ct M
unic
ipal
ityK
ai !
Gar
ib
18,
050
6,02
1
13
,810
2,17
3
3,
848
2,17
3
36
.1%
2,07
9
4,
252
70.6
%N
orth
ern
Cap
eN
amak
wa
Dis
trict
Mun
icip
ality
Kam
iesb
erg
3,2
39
1,23
8
2,
982
96
2
276
96
2
77.7
%2,
704
3,66
6
29
6.1%
Nor
ther
n C
ape
Pix
ley
Ka
Sem
e D
istri
ct M
unic
ipal
ityK
aree
berg
2,4
30
1,07
8
2,
440
1,
231
(153
)
1,
231
114.
2%-
1,
231
114.
2%N
orth
ern
Cap
eN
amak
wa
Dis
trict
Mun
icip
ality
Kar
oo H
oogl
and
3,1
68
1,26
0
3,
036
90
0
360
90
0
71.4
%1,
203
2,10
3
16
6.9%
Nor
ther
n C
ape
Siy
anda
Dis
trict
Mun
icip
ality
Kga
telo
pele
3,9
11
1,36
23,
985
1,
952
(590
)
2,
606
191.
3%65
4
3,26
0
23
9.4%
Nor
ther
n C
ape
Nam
akw
a D
istri
ct M
unic
ipal
ityK
hai-M
a
3
,363
1,
146
3,02
5
1,44
9
(3
03)
1,39
5
12
1.7%
-
1,39
5
12
1.7%
Nor
ther
n C
ape
Fran
ces
Baa
rd D
istri
ct M
unic
ipal
ityM
agar
eng
5,8
11
3,53
7
6,
047
2,
548
989
2,
548
72.0
%3,
372
5,92
0
16
7.4%
Nor
ther
n C
ape
Siy
anda
Dis
trict
Mun
icip
ality
Mie
r
1
,596
83
2
1,70
3
552
28
0
552
66
.3%
576
1,
128
135.
6%N
orth
ern
Cap
eK
gala
gadi
Dis
trict
Mun
icip
ality
Mos
haw
eng
2
0,28
1 14
,975
23,8
19
20
,000
(5
,025
)
20,0
00
133.
6%-
20
,000
13
3.6%
Nor
ther
n C
ape
Nam
akw
a D
istri
ct M
unic
ipal
ityN
ama
Kho
i
12,
094
3,63
8
11
,629
4,59
6
(9
58)
4,52
2
12
4.3%
6,83
3
11
,355
31
2.1%
Nor
ther
n C
ape
Fran
ces
Baa
rd D
istri
ct M
unic
ipal
ityP
hokw
ane
1
7,09
2 9,
207
19,5
77
4,
400
4,80
7
2,
546
27.7
%-
2,
546
27.7
%N
orth
ern
Cap
eP
ixle
y K
a S
eme
Dis
trict
Mun
icip
ality
Ren
oste
rber
g
2
,473
1,
391
2,57
5
808
58
3
808
58
.1%
-
808
58
.1%
Nor
ther
n C
ape
Nam
akw
a D
istri
ct M
unic
ipal
ityR
icht
ersv
eld
2,8
74
977
2,
635
80
9
168
80
9
82.8
%-
80
9
82.8
%N
orth
ern
Cap
eP
ixle
y K
a S
eme
Dis
trict
Mun
icip
ality
Siy
ancu
ma
9,2
29
4,33
2
9,
703
3,
392
940
3,
392
78.3
%4,
620
8,01
2
18
4.9%
Nor
ther
n C
ape
Pix
ley
Ka
Sem
e D
istri
ct M
unic
ipal
ityS
iyat
hem
ba
4
,182
1,
944
4,
261
2,
114
(170
)
2,
114
108.
7%-
2,
114
108.
7%N
orth
ern
Cap
eFr
ance
s B
aard
Dis
trict
Mun
icip
ality
Sol
Pla
atjie
5
1,10
4 19
,756
53,2
56
9,
865
9,89
1
9,
865
49.9
%40
,685
50
,550
25
5.9%
Nor
ther
n C
ape
Pix
ley
Ka
Sem
e D
istri
ct M
unic
ipal
ityTh
embe
lihle
3,4
90
1,48
7
3,
667
1,
192
295
1,
200
80.7
%-
1,
200
80.7
%N
orth
ern
Cap
eS
iyan
da D
istri
ct M
unic
ipal
ityTs
ants
aban
e
5
,840
2,
450
5,74
2
2,48
0
(3
0)
2,47
4
10
1.0%
-
2,47
4
10
1.0%
Nor
ther
n C
ape
Pix
ley
Ka
Sem
e D
istri
ct M
unic
ipal
ityU
bunt
u
4
,267
1,
910
4,24
9
1,56
0
35
0
1,56
0
81
.7%
-
1,56
0
81
.7%
Nor
ther
n C
ape
Pix
ley
Ka
Sem
e D
istri
ct M
unic
ipal
ityU
mso
bom
vu
5
,909
3,
330
6,11
3
2,34
7
98
3
2,34
7
70
.5%
2,81
5
5,
162
155.
0%W
este
rn C
ape
Cen
tral K
aroo
Dis
trict
Mun
icip
ality
Bea
ufor
t Wes
t9,
103
73
9
10,8
04
2,
957
(2,2
18)
3,
698
500.
4%-
3,
698
500.
4%W
este
rn C
ape
Wes
t Coa
st D
istri
ct M
unic
ipal
ityB
ergr
ivie
r13
,362
2,55
7
14
,739
-
2,55
7
-
0.
0%-
-
0.
0%W
este
rn C
ape
Ede
n D
istri
ct M
unic
ipal
ityB
itou
8,94
4
2,88
1
11
,363
-
2,88
1
2,
036
70.7
%-
2,
036
70.7
%W
este
rn C
ape
Cap
e W
inel
ands
Dis
trict
Mun
icip
ality
Bre
ede
Riv
er W
inel
ands
21,2
15
6,
122
25,7
64
4,
048
2,07
4
3,
589
58.6
%9,
521
13,1
10
214.
1%W
este
rn C
ape
Cap
e W
inel
ands
Dis
trict
Mun
icip
ality
Bre
ede
Val
ley
35,0
96
8,
746
41,3
54
5,
422
3,32
4
5,
422
62.0
%13
,769
19
,191
219.
4%W
este
rn C
ape
Ove
rber
g D
istri
ct M
unic
ipal
ityC
ape
Agu
lhas
7,65
3
1,80
3
9,
170
1,
950
(147
)
7,
637
423.
6%5,
133
12,7
70
708.
3%W
este
rn C
ape
Wes
t Coa
st D
istri
ct M
unic
ipal
ityC
eder
berg
11,2
20
3,
123
12,8
63
-
3,
123
-
0.0%
-
-
0.0%
Wes
tern
Cap
eC
ity o
f Cap
e To
wn
City
of C
ape
Tow
n77
8,23
7
183,
997
92
4,22
4
101,
294
82,7
03
-
0.0%
-
-
0.0%
Wes
tern
Cap
eC
ape
Win
elan
ds D
istri
ct M
unic
ipal
ityD
rake
nste
in46
,266
9,90
9
53
,044
29,3
96
(19,
487)
30
,024
30
3.0%
-
30,0
24
303.
0%W
este
rn C
ape
Ede
n D
istri
ct M
unic
ipal
ityG
eorg
e36
,191
10,3
47
44
,111
10,1
53
194
12
,723
12
3.0%
30,2
77
43,0
00
415.
6%W
este
rn C
ape
Ede
n D
istri
ct M
unic
ipal
ityH
asse
qua
12,6
64
3,
192
15,2
60
4,
051
(859
)
4,
051
126.
9%15
,705
19
,756
61
8.9%
Wes
tern
Cap
eE
den
Dis
trict
Mun
icip
ality
Kan
nala
nd6,
156
2,
190
7,39
3
-
2,19
0
1,
263
57.7
%2,
617
3,88
0
17
7.2%
Wes
tern
Cap
eE
den
Dis
trict
Mun
icip
ality
Kny
sna
14,9
72
4,
316
18,1
31
10
,500
(6
,184
)
1,57
2
36
.4%
13,2
48
14,8
20
343.
4%W
este
rn C
ape
Cen
tral K
aroo
Dis
trict
Mun
icip
ality
Lain
gsbu
rg1,
945
82
4
2,30
8
751
73
73
9
89.7
%25
9
998
12
1.1%
Wes
tern
Cap
eW
est C
oast
Dis
trict
Mun
icip
ality
Mat
zika
ma
14,4
97
1,
176
17,5
68
1,
400
(224
)
1,
134
96.4
%6,
366
7,50
0
63
7.8%
Wes
tern
Cap
eE
den
Dis
trict
Mun
icip
ality
Mos
sel B
ay20
,258
4,91
3
24
,690
6,10
3
(1
,190
)
6,54
5
13
3.2%
30,8
50
37,3
95
761.
1%W
este
rn C
ape
Ede
n D
istri
ct M
unic
ipal
ityO
udts
hoor
n18
,413
5,03
9
21
,817
3,61
1
1,
428
3,61
1
71
.7%
9,59
5
13
,206
26
2.1%
Wes
tern
Cap
eO
verb
erg
Dis
trict
Mun
icip
ality
Ove
rstra
nd19
,020
4,81
4
24
,083
2,46
8
2,
346
2,56
0
53
.2%
22,5
95
25,1
55
522.
5%W
este
rn C
ape
Cen
tral K
aroo
Dis
trict
Mun
icip
ality
Prin
ce A
lber
t2,
614
2,
978
3,05
6
928
2,
050
928
31
.2%
-
928
31
.2%
Wes
tern
Cap
eW
est C
oast
Dis
trict
Mun
icip
ality
Sal
danh
a B
ay18
,923
4,12
0
23
,081
4,60
4
(4
84)
4,90
0
11
8.9%
-
4,90
0
11
8.9%
Wes
tern
Cap
eC
ape
Win
elan
ds D
istri
ct M
unic
ipal
ityS
telle
nbos
ch35
,124
5,90
9
34
,954
8,94
8
(3
,039
)
8,94
8
15
1.4%
-
8,94
8
15
1.4%
Wes
tern
Cap
eW
est C
oast
Dis
trict
Mun
icip
ality
Sw
artla
nd18
,758
3,17
1
21
,153
3,55
9
(3
88)
3,83
5
12
0.9%
-
3,83
5
12
0.9%
Wes
tern
Cap
eO
verb
erg
Dis
trict
Mun
icip
ality
Sw
elle
ndam
7,61
9
2,08
8
9,
274
1,
758
330
1,
758
84.2
%4,
200
5,95
8
28
5.3%
Wes
tern
Cap
eO
verb
erg
Dis
trict
Mun
icip
ality
Thee
wat
ersk
loof
24,3
63
6,
978
28,8
01
6,
029
949
5,
872
84.2
%-
5,
872
84.2
%W
este
rn C
ape
Cap
e W
inel
ands
Dis
trict
Mun
icip
ality
Witz
enbe
rg20
,459
5,47
5
23
,720
3,18
9
2,
286
3,17
2
57
.9%
5,75
1
8,
923
163.
0%TO
TAL
11,8
03,3
545,
532,
782
12,9
96,3
002,
512,
799
2,69
0,25
32,
837,
906
51.3
%2,
561,
749
5,39
9,65
597
.6%
Not
e: In
dige
nt h
ouse
hold
is a
hou
seho
ld th
at q
ualif
ies
to re
ceiv
e so
me
or a
ll ba
sic
serv
ices
for f
ree
beca
use
they
hav
e no
inco
me
or a
low
inco
me.
Thes
e ho
useh
olds
mus
t hav
e be
en id
entif
ied
by th
e m
unic
ipal
ity a
nd a
ppea
r on
the
indi
gent
regi
ster
, in
line
with
the
mun
icip
al in
dige
nt p
olic
y.
53
54
ANNEXURE F: ACCESS TO SANITATION
PRO
VIN
CE
MU
NIC
IPA
LITY
Tot
al H
ouse
hold
s H
ouse
hold
acc
ess
to s
anita
tion
Hou
seho
ld a
cces
s to
sa
nita
tion
as a
pe
rcen
tage
Hou
seho
lds
belo
w
basi
c le
vel o
f se
rvic
e/ b
ackl
ogs
Hou
seho
lds
belo
w
basi
c le
vel o
f se
rvic
e/ b
ackl
ogs
as a
per
cent
age
Tot
al H
ouse
hold
sH
ouse
hold
acc
ess
to s
anita
tion
Hou
seho
ldac
cess
to
sani
tatio
n as
a
perc
enta
ge
Hou
seho
lds
belo
w
basi
c le
vel o
f se
rvic
e/ b
ackl
ogs
Hou
seho
lds
belo
w b
asic
leve
l of
ser
vice
/ ba
cklo
gs a
s a
perc
enta
ge
Tot
al H
ouse
hold
s H
ouse
hold
acc
ess
to s
anita
tion
Hou
seho
ld a
cces
s to
sa
nita
tion
as a
pe
rcen
tage
Hou
seho
lds
belo
w b
asic
leve
l of
ser
vice
/ ba
cklo
gs
Hou
seho
lds
belo
w b
asic
leve
l of
ser
vice
/ ba
cklo
gs a
s a
perc
enta
ge
Eas
tern
Cap
eA
mah
lath
i Loc
al M
unic
ipal
ity36
,388
16,3
46
44
.9%
20,0
42
55
.1%
36,9
20
17,0
65
46
.2%
19,8
55
53
.8%
36,3
87
16,7
15
45
.9%
19,6
72
54
.1%
Eas
tern
Cap
eB
avia
ans
Loca
l Mun
icip
ality
3,73
9
2,93
4
78.5
%80
5
21
.5%
4,21
9
2,
521
59.8
%1,
698
40
.2%
3,97
1
3,
677
92
.6%
294
7.
4%E
aste
rn C
ape
Blu
e C
rane
Rou
te L
ocal
Mun
icip
ality
9,65
6
6,80
6
70.5
%2,
850
29
.5%
10,2
94
5,77
8
56
.1%
4,51
6
43.9
%9,
655
6,93
1
71.8
%2,
724
28.2
%E
aste
rn C
ape
Buf
falo
City
Loc
al M
unic
ipal
ity20
8,38
7
14
4,33
9
69.3
%64
,048
30.7
%20
6,45
4
18
0,14
8
87.3
%26
,306
12.7
%20
8,38
9
15
1,91
1
72.9
%56
,478
27.1
%E
aste
rn C
ape
Cam
debo
o Lo
cal M
unic
ipal
ity8,
994
8,
624
95
.9%
370
4.1%
11,1
32
9,06
0
81
.4%
2,07
2
18.6
%8,
994
8,65
6
96.2
%33
8
3.8%
Eas
tern
Cap
eU
mzi
mvu
bu L
ocal
Mun
icip
ality
47,8
02
11
,577
24.2
%36
,225
75.8
%46
,259
31
,931
69.0
%14
,328
31.0
%47
,800
16
,187
33.9
%31
,613
66.1
%E
aste
rn C
ape
Elu
ndin
i Loc
al M
unic
ipal
ity35
,552
11,0
51
31
.1%
24,5
01
68
.9%
35,8
08
15,1
90
42
.4%
20,6
18
57
.6%
35,5
54
13,8
51
39
.0%
21,7
03
61
.0%
Eas
tern
Cap
eE
mal
ahle
ni L
ocal
Mun
icip
ality
31,1
95
7,
320
23
.5%
23,8
75
76
.5%
30,8
58
20,7
31
67
.2%
10,1
27
32
.8%
31,1
97
9,96
2
31.9
%21
,235
68.1
%E
aste
rn C
ape
Eng
cobo
Loc
al M
unic
ipal
ity35
,187
4,93
9
14.0
%30
,248
86.0
%32
,821
13
,087
39.9
%19
,734
60.1
%35
,186
6,
858
19
.5%
28,3
28
80
.5%
Eas
tern
Cap
eG
arie
p Lo
cal M
unic
ipal
ity8,
211
6,
377
77
.7%
1,83
4
22.3
%8,
899
5,38
1
60
.5%
3,51
8
39.5
%8,
772
7,41
9
84.6
%1,
353
15.4
%E
aste
rn C
ape
Gre
at K
ei L
ocal
Mun
icip
ality
11,9
58
4,
933
41.3
%7,
025
58.7
%12
,152
7,
059
58.1
%5,
093
41
.9%
11,9
57
5,30
2
44.3
%6,
655
55.7
%E
aste
rn C
ape
Ikw
ezi L
ocal
Mun
icip
ality
2,56
7
1,37
3
53.5
%1,
194
46
.5%
2,95
7
1,
062
35.9
%1,
895
64
.1%
2,56
7
31
6
12
.3%
2,25
1
87
.7%
Eas
tern
Cap
eIn
kwan
ca L
ocal
Mun
icip
ality
5,30
1
4,83
4
91.2
%46
7
8.
8%5,
744
5,12
6
89
.2%
618
10.8
%5,
303
4,11
9
77.7
%1,
184
22.3
%E
aste
rn C
ape
Ints
ika
Yet
hu L
ocal
Mun
icip
ality
43,5
01
4,
132
9.
5%39
,369
90.5
%41
,656
20
,275
48.7
%21
,381
51.3
%43
,504
9,
011
20
.7%
34,4
93
79
.3%
Eas
tern
Cap
eIn
xuba
Yet
hem
ba L
ocal
Mun
icip
ality
14,4
91
13
,437
92.7
%1,
054
7.
3%17
,054
13
,684
80.2
%3,
370
19
.8%
14,4
91
14,0
15
96
.7%
476
3.
3%E
aste
rn C
ape
Kin
g S
abat
a D
alin
dyeb
o Lo
cal M
unic
ipal
ity93
,384
31,4
81
33
.7%
61,9
03
66
.3%
97,3
65
66,3
11
68
.1%
31,0
54
31
.9%
93,3
84
41,0
16
43
.9%
52,3
68
56
.1%
Eas
tern
Cap
eK
ouga
Loc
al M
unic
ipal
ity19
,084
16,0
84
84
.3%
3,00
0
15.7
%21
,380
16
,693
78.1
%4,
687
21
.9%
19,0
84
16,1
24
84
.5%
2,96
0
15
.5%
Eas
tern
Cap
eK
ou-K
amm
a Lo
cal M
unic
ipal
ity10
,373
8,47
4
81.7
%1,
899
18
.3%
10,4
47
9,62
0
92
.1%
827
7.9%
10,3
71
8,86
5
85.5
%1,
506
14.5
%E
aste
rn C
ape
Luka
nji L
ocal
Mun
icip
ality
49,6
74
34
,435
69.3
%15
,239
30.7
%47
,185
33
,963
72.0
%13
,222
28.0
%49
,673
36
,455
73.4
%13
,218
26.6
%E
aste
rn C
ape
Mak
ana
Loca
l Mun
icip
ality
18,8
65
14
,922
79.1
%3,
943
20
.9%
19,1
64
11,9
64
62
.4%
7,20
0
37.6
%18
,866
15
,130
80.2
%3,
736
19.8
%E
aste
rn C
ape
Mal
etsw
ai L
ocal
Mun
icip
ality
11,4
44
8,
326
72
.8%
3,11
827
.2%
10,2
579,
988
97.4
%26
9
2.
6%11
,444
8,
858
77
.4%
2,58
6
22
.6%
Eas
tern
Cap
eM
atat
iele
Loc
al M
unic
ipal
ity54
,210
12,4
55
23
.0%
41,7
55
77
.0%
53,8
80
33,5
19
62
.2%
20,3
61
37
.8%
54,2
09
13,4
85
24
.9%
40,7
24
75
.1%
Eas
tern
Cap
eM
bhas
he L
ocal
Mun
icip
ality
59,7
05
4,
223
7.
1%55
,482
92.9
%56
,161
23
,699
42.2
%32
,462
57.8
%59
,703
6,
721
11
.3%
52,9
82
88
.7%
Eas
tern
Cap
eM
biza
na L
ocal
Mun
icip
ality
48,4
08
2,
051
4.
2%46
,357
95.8
%49
,631
25
,863
52.1
%23
,768
47.9
%48
,407
8,
640
17
.8%
39,7
67
82
.2%
Eas
tern
Cap
eM
hlon
tlo L
ocal
Mun
icip
ality
49,8
59
10
,078
20.2
%39
,781
79.8
%46
,645
25
,298
54.2
%21
,347
45.8
%49
,862
16
,646
33.4
%33
,216
66.6
%E
aste
rn C
ape
Mnq
uma
Loca
l Mun
icip
ality
75,4
09
15
,982
21.2
%59
,427
78.8
%71
,531
28
,865
40.4
%42
,666
59.6
%75
,409
19
,944
26.4
%55
,465
73.6
%E
aste
rn C
ape
Ndl
ambe
Loc
al M
unic
ipal
ity14
,733
10,6
29
72
.1%
4,10
4
27.9
%17
,379
13
,750
79.1
%3,
629
20
.9%
14,7
32
8,06
0
54.7
%6,
672
45.3
%E
aste
rn C
ape
Ngq
ushw
a Lo
cal M
unic
ipal
ity25
,563
4,48
5
17.5
%21
,078
82.5
%22
,959
15
,176
66.1
%7,
783
33
.9%
25,5
65
11,2
07
43
.8%
14,3
58
56
.2%
Eas
tern
Cap
eN
konk
obe
Loca
l Mun
icip
ality
34,8
90
10
,217
29.3
%24
,673
70.7
%34
,351
19
,019
55.4
%15
,332
44.6
%34
,889
10
,573
30.3
%24
,316
69.7
%E
aste
rn C
ape
Nel
son
Man
dela
Bay
Met
ropo
litan
Mun
icip
ality
276,
879
243,
711
88
.0%
33,1
68
12
.0%
284,
833
236,
208
82
.9%
48,6
25
17
.1%
325,
932
259,
754
79
.7%
66,1
78
20
.3%
Eas
tern
Cap
eN
taba
nkul
u Lo
cal M
unic
ipal
ity27
,933
1,86
9
6.7%
26,0
64
93
.3%
29,5
1819
,329
65.5
%10
,189
34.5
%27
,932
11
,239
40.2
%16
,693
59.8
%E
aste
rn C
ape
Nxu
ba L
ocal
Mun
icip
ality
6,27
6
3,19
2
50.9
%3,
084
49
.1%
7,01
4
7,
014
100.
0%-
0.0%
6,27
8
3,
245
51
.7%
3,03
3
48
.3%
Eas
tern
Cap
eN
yand
eni L
ocal
Mun
icip
ality
56,8
52
6,
830
12
.0%
50,0
22
88
.0%
59,1
79
40,1
36
67
.8%
19,0
43
32
.2%
56,8
53
12,8
33
22
.6%
44,0
20
77
.4%
Eas
tern
Cap
eP
ort S
t Joh
ns L
ocal
Mun
icip
ality
30,9
51
8,
345
27
.0%
22,6
06
73
.0%
30,9
95
28,1
40
90
.8%
2,85
5
9.2%
30,9
50
8,81
0
28.5
%22
,140
71.5
%E
aste
rn C
ape
Qau
keni
Loc
al M
unic
ipal
ity48
,701
6,05
4
12.4
%42
,647
87.6
%54
,728
29
,145
53.3
%25
,583
46.7
%48
,703
9,
927
20
.4%
38,7
76
79
.6%
Eas
tern
Cap
eS
akhi
sizw
e Lo
cal M
unic
ipal
ity15
,625
6,33
1
40.5
%9,
294
59
.5%
15,7
15
12,2
54
78
.0%
3,46
1
22.0
%15
,624
7,
379
47
.2%
8,24
5
52
.8%
Eas
tern
Cap
eS
enqu
Loc
al M
unic
ipal
ity35
,106
11,3
27
32
.3%
23,7
79
67
.7%
36,3
68
17,2
70
47
.5%
19,0
98
52
.5%
35,1
06
19,0
45
54
.2%
16,0
61
45
.8%
Eas
tern
Cap
eS
unda
y's
Riv
er V
alle
y Lo
cal M
unic
ipal
ity9,
873
6,
209
62
.9%
3,66
4
37.1
%10
,748
7,
045
65.5
%3,
703
34
.5%
9,87
3
6,
335
64
.2%
3,53
8
35
.8%
Eas
tern
Cap
eTs
olw
ana
Loca
l Mun
icip
ality
8,06
5
2,64
3
32.8
%5,
422
67
.2%
8,33
4
6,
680
80.2
%1,
654
19
.8%
8,06
6
3,
411
42
.3%
4,65
5
57
.7%
Free
Sta
teD
ihla
beng
Loc
al M
unic
ipal
ity31
,837
24,6
59
77
.5%
7,17
8
22.5
%36
,960
25
,546
69.1
%11
,414
30.9
%31
,834
25
,034
78.6
%6,
800
21.4
%Fr
ee S
tate
Kop
anon
g Lo
cal M
unic
ipal
ity15
,440
12,5
45
81
.3%
2,89
5
18.8
%19
,342
15
,308
79.1
%4,
034
20.9
%15
,441
12
,555
81.3
%2,
886
18.7
%Fr
ee S
tate
Lets
emen
g Lo
cal M
unic
ipal
ity11
,588
9,58
7
82.7
%2,
001
17
.3%
13,4
60
8,87
8
66
.0%
4,58
2
34.0
%11
,588
9,
845
85
.0%
1,74
3
15
.0%
Free
Sta
teM
afub
e Lo
cal M
unic
ipal
ity14
,005
12,4
83
89
.1%
1,52
2
10.9
%16
,114
14
,294
88.7
%1,
820
11
.3%
14,0
04
12,9
96
92
.8%
1,00
8
7.
2%Fr
ee S
tate
Mal
uti a
Pho
fung
Loc
al M
unic
ipal
ity97
,174
35,4
00
36
.4%
61,7
74
63
.6%
97,9
57
65,0
88
66
.4%
32,8
69
33
.6%
97,1
73
38,5
20
39
.6%
58,6
53
60
.4%
Free
Sta
teM
anga
ung
Loca
l Mun
icip
ality
202,
765
142,
601
70
.3%
60,1
64
29
.7%
202,
887
154,
333
76
.1%
48,5
54
23
.9%
169,
954
153,
460
90
.3%
16,4
94
9.
7%Fr
ee S
tate
Man
tsop
a Lo
cal M
unic
ipal
ity15
,986
9,67
2
60.5
%6,
314
39
.5%
15,2
05
5,07
3
33
.4%
10,1
32
66
.6%
15,9
85
13,3
50
83
.5%
2,63
5
16
.5%
Free
Sta
teM
asilo
nyan
a Lo
cal M
unic
ipal
ity27
,243
17,8
97
65
.7%
9,34
6
34.3
%18
,211
5,
480
30.1
%12
,731
69.9
%27
,246
18
,000
66.1
%9,
246
33.9
%Fr
ee S
tate
Mat
jhab
eng
Loca
l Mun
icip
ality
131,
622
105,
134
79
.9%
26,4
88
20
.1%
124,
948
96,0
29
76
.9%
28,9
19
23
.1%
131,
622
105,
312
80
.0%
26,3
10
20
.0%
Free
Sta
teM
etsi
mah
olo
Loca
l Mun
icip
ality
37,3
19
33
,030
88.5
%4,
289
11
.5%
35,4
64
31,7
29
89
.5%
3,73
5
10.5
%37
,317
33
,366
89.4
%3,
951
10.6
%Fr
ee S
tate
Moh
okar
e Lo
cal M
unic
ipal
ity10
,215
6,24
1
61.1
%3,
974
38
.9%
10,1
55
6,23
2
61
.4%
3,92
3
38.6
%10
,216
6,
290
61
.6%
3,92
6
38
.4%
Free
Sta
teM
oqha
ka L
ocal
Mun
icip
ality
64,8
96
60
,093
92.6
%4,
803
7.
4%44
,818
41
,181
91.9
%3,
637
8.1%
64,8
9759
,918
92.3
%4,
979
7.7%
Free
Sta
teN
ala
Loca
l Mun
icip
ality
23,4
24
8,
190
35
.0%
15,2
34
65
.0%
28,7
10
5,63
6
19
.6%
23,0
74
80
.4%
23,4
23
8,25
2
35.2
%15
,171
64.8
%Fr
ee S
tate
Nal
edi L
ocal
Mun
icip
ality
8,27
9
7,39
7
89.3
%88
2
10
.7%
8,37
2
5,
987
71.5
%2,
385
28
.5%
8,27
8
7,
396
89
.3%
882
10
.7%
Free
Sta
teN
gwat
he L
ocal
Mun
icip
ality
32,8
73
25
,493
77.5
%7,
380
22
.5%
34,6
81
20,3
19
58
.6%
14,3
62
41
.4%
32,8
73
25,7
34
78
.3%
7,13
9
21
.7%
Free
Sta
teN
keto
ana
Loca
l Mun
icip
ality
16,7
48
5,
067
30
.3%
11,6
81
69
.7%
15,9
65
1,45
8
9.
1%14
,507
90.9
%16
,749
5,
346
31
.9%
11,4
03
68
.1%
Free
Sta
teP
hum
elel
a Lo
cal M
unic
ipal
ity11
,529
6,12
6
53.1
%5,
403
46
.9%
13,1
78
3,44
3
26
.1%
9,73
5
73.9
%11
,531
9,
542
82
.8%
1,98
9
17
.2%
Free
Sta
teS
etso
to L
ocal
Mun
icip
ality
29,8
27
13
,789
46.2
%16
,038
53.8
%36
,146
12
,594
34.8
%23
,552
65.2
%29
,829
14
,073
47.2
%15
,756
52.8
%Fr
ee S
tate
Toko
logo
Loc
al M
unic
ipal
ity7,
479
3,
293
44
.0%
4,18
6
56.0
%9,
859
2,12
3
21
.5%
7,73
6
78.5
%7,
477
3,33
2
44.6
%4,
145
55.4
%Fr
ee S
tate
Tsw
elop
ele
Loca
l Mun
icip
ality
12,6
24
7,
957
63
.0%
4,66
7
37.0
%13
,430
9,
615
71.6
%3,
815
28
.4%
12,6
25
11,2
24
88
.9%
1,40
1
11
.1%
Gau
teng
City
of J
ohan
nesb
urg
Met
ropo
litan
Mun
icip
ality
1,16
5,01
4
1,06
7,03
4
91
.6%
97,9
80
8.
4%1,
256,
127
1,
120,
100
89.2
%13
6,02
7
10.8
%1,
165,
012
1,
095,
432
94.0
%69
,580
6.0%
Gau
teng
City
of T
shw
ane
Met
ropo
litan
Mun
icip
ality
686,
641
511,
850
74
.5%
174,
791
25
.5%
675,
256
556,
439
82
.4%
118,
817
17
.6%
686,
639
686,
620
100.
0%19
0.0%
Gau
teng
Eku
rhul
eni M
etro
polit
an M
unic
ipal
ity84
9,34
8
73
4,62
3
86.5
%11
4,72
5
13.5
%93
1,20
8
83
6,63
4
89.8
%94
,574
10.2
%84
9,35
1
74
7,63
1
88.0
%10
1,72
0
12.0
%
AN
NEX
UR
E F
- HO
USE
HO
LD A
CC
ESS
TO S
AN
ITA
TIO
NM
UN
ICIP
AL
SOU
RC
E 20
09D
WEA
200
8C
OM
MU
NIT
Y SU
RVE
Y 20
07
55
PRO
VIN
CE
MU
NIC
IPA
LITY
Tot
al H
ouse
hold
s H
ouse
hold
acc
ess
to s
anita
tion
Hou
seho
ld a
cces
s to
sa
nita
tion
as a
pe
rcen
tage
Hou
seho
lds
belo
w
basi
c le
vel o
f se
rvic
e/ b
ackl
ogs
Hou
seho
lds
belo
w
basi
c le
vel o
f se
rvic
e/ b
ackl
ogs
as a
per
cent
age
Tot
al H
ouse
hold
sH
ouse
hold
acc
ess
to s
anita
tion
Hou
seho
ldac
cess
to
sani
tatio
n as
a
perc
enta
ge
Hou
seho
lds
belo
w
basi
c le
vel o
f se
rvic
e/ b
ackl
ogs
Hou
seho
lds
belo
w b
asic
leve
l of
ser
vice
/ ba
cklo
gs a
s a
perc
enta
ge
Tot
al H
ouse
hold
s H
ouse
hold
acc
ess
to s
anita
tion
Hou
seho
ld a
cces
s to
sa
nita
tion
as a
pe
rcen
tage
Hou
seho
lds
belo
w b
asic
leve
l of
ser
vice
/ ba
cklo
gs
Hou
seho
lds
belo
w b
asic
leve
l of
ser
vice
/ ba
cklo
gs a
s a
perc
enta
ge
AN
NEX
UR
E F
- HO
USE
HO
LD A
CC
ESS
TO S
AN
ITA
TIO
NM
UN
ICIP
AL
SOU
RC
E 20
09D
WEA
200
8C
OM
MU
NIT
Y SU
RVE
Y 20
07
Gau
teng
Em
fule
ni L
ocal
Mun
icip
ality
196,
479
177,
053
90
.1%
19,4
26
9.
9%22
5,92
4
20
9,72
2
92.8
%16
,202
7.2%
196,
478
179,
204
91
.2%
17,2
74
8.
8%G
aute
ngK
ungw
ini L
ocal
Mun
icip
ality
31,6
65
19
,102
60.3
%12
,563
39.7
%43
,150
29
,013
67.2
%14
,137
32.8
%31
,664
20
,864
65.9
%10
,800
34.1
%G
aute
ngLe
sedi
Loc
al M
unic
ipal
ity20
,480
17,1
96
84
.0%
3,28
4
16.0
%22
,214
17
,026
76.6
%5,
188
23
.4%
20,4
77
17,3
10
84
.5%
3,16
7
15
.5%
Gau
teng
Mid
vaal
Loc
al M
unic
ipal
ity24
,266
21,9
05
90
.3%
2,36
1
9.7%
24,1
20
23,0
80
95
.7%
1,04
0
4.3%
24,2
65
22,2
72
91
.8%
1,99
3
8.
2%G
aute
ngM
ogal
e C
ity L
ocal
Mun
icip
ality
94,2
86
81
,922
86.9
%12
,364
13.1
%10
5,24
0
88
,188
83.8
%17
,052
16.2
%94
,287
84
,203
89.3
%10
,084
10.7
%G
aute
ngN
oken
g ts
a Ta
eman
e Lo
cal M
unic
ipal
ity14
,838
10,0
13
67
.5%
4,82
5
32.5
%18
,389
14
,077
76.6
%4,
312
23
.4%
14,8
35
7,61
0
51.3
%7,
225
48.7
%G
aute
ngR
andf
onte
in L
ocal
Mun
icip
ality
40,4
59
34
,108
84.3
%6,
351
15
.7%
45,3
62
39,5
60
87
.2%
5,80
2
12.8
%40
,458
34
,175
84.5
%6,
283
15.5
%G
aute
ngW
esto
naria
Loc
al M
unic
ipal
ity50
,676
45,6
21
90
.0%
5,05
5
10.0
%35
,005
22
,559
64.4
%12
,446
35.6
%50
,677
47
,385
93.5
%3,
292
6.5%
Kw
aZul
u-N
atal
Aba
qulu
si L
ocal
Mun
icip
ality
39,8
68
20
,325
51.0
%19
,543
49.0
%41
,788
33
,804
80.9
%7,
984
19
.1%
36,0
59
17,7
36
49
.2%
18,3
23
50
.8%
Kw
aZul
u-N
atal
Dan
nhau
ser
Loca
l Mun
icip
ality
18,0
58
6,
186
34
.3%
11,8
72
65
.7%
22,2
13
9,31
3
41
.9%
12,9
00
58
.1%
18,0
56
8,91
4
49.4
%9,
142
50.6
%K
waZ
ulu-
Nat
aleD
umbe
Loc
al M
unic
ipal
ity15
,146
6,18
040
.8%
8,96
6
59.2
%17
,548
17,2
74
98
.4%
274
1.6%
15,1
84
12,4
34
81
.9%
2,75
0
18
.1%
Kw
aZul
u-N
atal
Em
adla
ngen
i Loc
al M
unic
ipal
ity5,
211
2,
338
44
.9%
2,87
3
55.1
%7,
133
4,19
5
58
.8%
2,93
8
41.2
%5,
212
2,52
0
48.3
%2,
692
51.7
%K
waZ
ulu-
Nat
alE
mna
mbi
thi-L
adys
mith
Loc
al M
unic
ipal
ity50
,259
30,9
06
61
.5%
19,3
53
38
.5%
59,2
16
37,0
97
62
.6%
22,1
19
37
.4%
50,2
58
36,3
64
72
.4%
13,8
94
27
.6%
Kw
aZul
u-N
atal
End
umen
i Loc
al M
unic
ipal
ity13
,755
11,2
72
81
.9%
2,48
3
18.1
%14
,101
13
,626
96.6
%47
5
3.
4%13
,753
11
,497
83.6
%2,
256
16.4
%K
waZ
ulu-
Nat
aleT
hekw
ini M
etro
polit
an M
unic
ipal
ity83
3,85
9
62
6,84
2
75.2
%20
7,01
7
24.8
%91
4,70
1
74
8,62
8
81.8
%16
6,07
3
18.2
%93
1,81
6
70
2,04
9
75.3
%22
9,76
7
24.7
%K
waZ
ulu-
Nat
alE
zing
olen
i Loc
al M
unic
ipal
ity10
,953
4,21
3
38.5
%6,
740
61
.5%
12,3
47
12,3
47
10
0.0%
-
0.
0%10
,952
4,
747
43
.3%
6,20
5
56
.7%
Kw
aZul
u-N
atal
Gre
ater
Kok
stad
Loc
al M
unic
ipal
ity14
,321
10,2
98
71
.9%
4,02
3
28.1
%23
,190
23
,190
100.
0%-
0.0%
14,3
21
10,5
81
73
.9%
3,74
0
26
.1%
Kw
aZul
u-N
atal
Hib
iscu
s C
oast
Loc
al M
unic
ipal
ity50
,649
23,2
60
45
.9%
27,3
89
54
.1%
59,4
61
51,6
59
86
.9%
7,80
2
13.1
%50
,651
25
,079
49.5
%25
,572
50.5
%K
waZ
ulu-
Nat
alH
labi
sa L
ocal
Mun
icip
ality
29,2
60
7,
098
24
.3%
22,1
62
75
.7%
32,0
66
14,7
18
45
.9%
17,3
48
54
.1%
29,2
58
9,32
0
31.9
%19
,938
68.1
%K
waZ
ulu-
Nat
alIm
baba
zane
Loc
al M
unic
ipal
ity24
,559
6,71
8
27.4
%17
,841
72.6
%26
,980
18
,375
68.1
%8,
605
31
.9%
24,5
59
11,5
43
47
.0%
13,0
16
53
.0%
Kw
aZul
u-N
atal
Impe
ndle
Loc
al M
unic
ipal
ity7,
339
1,
196
16
.3%
6,14
383
.7%
8,44
8
8,
140
96.4
%30
8
3.
6%7,
337
2,86
4
39.0
%4,
473
61.0
%K
waZ
ulu-
Nat
alIn
daka
Loc
al M
unic
ipal
ity21
,082
8,96
6
42.5
%12
,116
57.5
%25
,016
22
,796
91.1
%2,
220
8.
9%21
,080
16
,005
75.9
%5,
075
24.1
%K
waZ
ulu-
Nat
alIn
gwe
Loca
l Mun
icip
ality
22,2
90
4,
228
19
.0%
18,0
62
81
.0%
25,3
55
11,3
79
44
.9%
13,9
76
55
.1%
22,2
88
11,6
43
52
.2%
10,6
45
47
.8%
Kw
aZul
u-N
atal
Jozi
ni L
ocal
Mun
icip
ality
38,5
29
15
,540
40.3
%22
,989
59.7
%38
,807
23
,290
60.0
%15
,517
40.0
%38
,529
17
,051
44.3
%21
,478
55.7
%K
waZ
ulu-
Nat
alK
wa
San
i Loc
al M
unic
ipal
ity4,
420
2,
489
56
.3%
1,93
1
43.7
%5,
241
5,24
1
10
0.0%
-
0.
0%4,
420
3,67
4
83.1
%74
6
16.9
%K
waZ
ulu-
Nat
alK
waD
ukuz
a Lo
cal M
unic
ipal
ity44
,481
27,3
10
61
.4%
17,1
71
38
.6%
47,7
93
36,6
30
76
.6%
11,1
63
23
.4%
44,4
81
30,4
34
68
.4%
14,0
47
31
.6%
Kw
aZul
u-N
atal
Man
deni
Loc
al M
unic
ipal
ity33
,702
15,1
70
45
.0%
18,5
32
55
.0%
33,0
64
28,6
55
86
.7%
4,40
9
13.3
%33
,700
14
,809
43.9
%18
,891
56.1
%K
waZ
ulu-
Nat
alM
aphu
mul
o Lo
cal M
unic
ipal
ity19
,933
616
3.1%
19,3
17
96
.9%
25,2
99
11,8
20
46
.7%
13,4
79
53
.3%
19,9
36
1,65
0
8.3%
18,2
86
91
.7%
Kw
aZul
u-N
atal
Mbo
nam
bi L
ocal
Mun
icip
ality
21,6
32
6,
012
27
.8%
15,6
20
72
.2%
21,8
50
13,9
72
63
.9%
7,87
8
36.1
%21
,632
10
,816
50.0
%10
,816
50.0
%K
waZ
ulu-
Nat
alM
kham
bath
ini L
ocal
Mun
icip
ality
11,9
69
7,
053
58
.9%
4,91
6
41.1
%14
,375
7,
199
50.1
%7,
176
49
.9%
11,9
71
8,98
5
75.1
%2,
986
24.9
%K
waZ
ulu-
Nat
alM
pofa
na L
ocal
Mun
icip
ality
7,80
1
5,40
2
69.2
%2,
399
30
.8%
10,9
147,
619
69.8
%3,
295
30.2
%7,
800
6,13
5
78.7
%1,
665
21.3
%K
waZ
ulu-
Nat
alM
sing
a Lo
cal M
unic
ipal
ity32
,594
7,44
3
22.8
%25
,151
77.2
%37
,006
26
,213
70.8
%10
,793
29.2
%32
,592
13
,056
40.1
%19
,536
59.9
%K
waZ
ulu-
Nat
alM
thon
jane
ni L
ocal
Mun
icip
ality
10,6
71
3,
443
32
.3%
7,22
8
67.7
%11
,564
8,
247
71.3
%3,
317
28
.7%
10,6
71
3,73
4
35.0
%6,
937
65.0
%K
waZ
ulu-
Nat
alM
tuba
tuba
Loc
al M
unic
ipal
ity11
,339
7,43
7
65.6
%3,
902
34
.4%
7,19
5
6,
508
90.5
%68
7
9.
5%11
,340
7,
485
66
.0%
3,85
5
34
.0%
Kw
aZul
u-N
atal
Ndw
edw
e Lo
cal M
unic
ipal
ity26
,406
3,49
5
13.2
%22
,911
86.8
%31
,419
16
,150
51.4
%15
,269
48.6
%26
,408
5,
883
22
.3%
20,5
25
77
.7%
Kw
aZul
u-N
atal
New
cast
le L
ocal
Mun
icip
ality
77,7
84
56
,107
72.1
%21
,677
27.9
%82
,950
74
,850
90.2
%8,
100
9.
8%77
,785
63
,989
82.3
%13
,796
17.7
%K
waZ
ulu-
Nat
alN
kand
la L
ocal
Mun
icip
ality
22,3
87
2,
546
11
.4%
19,8
41
88
.6%
27,7
25
13,4
98
48
.7%
14,2
27
51
.3%
22,3
87
3,73
6
16.7
%18
,651
83.3
%K
waZ
ulu-
Nat
alN
ongo
ma
Loca
l Mun
icip
ality
35,2
93
9,
580
27
.1%
25,7
13
72
.9%
36,7
01
25,1
26
68
.5%
11,5
75
31
.5%
34,0
44
8,17
0
24.0
%25
,874
76.0
%K
waZ
ulu-
Nat
alN
quth
u Lo
cal M
unic
ipal
ity32
,167
7,41
9
23.1
%24
,748
76.9
%34
,203
27
,527
80.5
%6,
676
19
.5%
32,1
67
8,89
3
27.6
%23
,274
72.4
%K
waZ
ulu-
Nat
alN
tam
bana
na L
ocal
Mun
icip
ality
14,8
44
3,
698
24
.9%
11,1
46
75
.1%
14,2
80
8,46
3
59
.3%
5,81
7
40.7
%14
,846
7,
562
50
.9%
7,28
4
49
.1%
Kw
aZul
u-N
atal
Okh
ahla
mba
Loc
al M
unic
ipal
ity28
,508
6,28
8
22.1
%22
,220
77.9
%31
,180
20
,509
65.8
%10
,671
34.2
%28
,509
14,1
36
49
.6%
14,3
73
50
.4%
Kw
aZul
u-N
atal
Ric
hmon
d Lo
cal M
unic
ipal
ity12
,680
3,95
0
31.2
%8,
730
68
.8%
14,2
41
6,38
1
44
.8%
7,86
0
55.2
%12
,680
6,
910
54
.5%
5,77
0
45
.5%
Kw
aZul
u-N
atal
The
Big
Fiv
e Fa
lse
Bay
Loc
al M
unic
ipal
ity6,
658
5,
317
79
.9%
1,34
1
20.1
%7,
191
7,19
1
10
0.0%
-
0.
0%6,
657
5,50
7
82.7
%1,
150
17.3
%K
waZ
ulu-
Nat
alTh
e M
sund
uzi L
ocal
Mun
icip
ality
134,
391
94,2
44
70
.1%
40,1
47
29
.9%
149,
280
103,
163
69
.1%
46,1
17
30
.9%
134,
391
110,
153
82
.0%
24,2
38
18
.0%
Kw
aZul
u-N
atal
Ubu
hleb
ezw
e Lo
cal M
unic
ipal
ity21
,083
7,56
3
35.9
%13
,520
64.1
%25
,395
15
,916
62.7
%9,
479
37
.3%
21,0
85
10,2
35
48
.5%
10,8
50
51
.5%
Kw
aZul
u-N
atal
Ulu
ndi L
ocal
Mun
icip
ality
39,8
37
18
,883
47.4
%20
,954
52.6
%39
,109
32
,955
84.3
%6,
154
15
.7%
35,2
95
14,3
43
40
.6%
20,9
52
59
.4%
Kw
aZul
u-N
atal
Um
doni
Loc
al M
unic
ipal
ity16
,384
11,6
12
70
.9%
4,77
2
29.1
%17
,660
15
,454
87.5
%2,
206
12
.5%
16,3
86
12,4
04
75
.7%
3,98
2
24
.3%
Kw
aZul
u-N
atal
Um
hlab
uyal
inga
na L
ocal
Mun
icip
ality
27,0
05
12
,795
47.4
%14
,210
52.6
%30
,222
17
,447
57.7
%12
,775
42.3
%27
,007
15
,048
55.7
%11
,959
44.3
%K
waZ
ulu-
Nat
aluM
hlat
huze
Loc
al M
unic
ipal
ity81
,006
44,0
87
54
.4%
36,9
19
45
.6%
82,4
78
58,4
00
70
.8%
24,0
78
29
.2%
81,0
05
62,4
13
77
.0%
18,5
92
23
.0%
Kw
aZul
u-N
atal
uMla
lazi
Loc
al M
unic
ipal
ity33
,965
8,57
5
25.2
%25
,390
74.8
%44
,034
17
,901
40.7
%26
,133
59.3
%33
,965
14
,484
42.6
%19
,481
57.4
%K
waZ
ulu-
Nat
aluM
ngen
i Loc
al M
unic
ipal
ity21
,589
14,7
23
68
.2%
6,86
6
31.8
%23
,167
20
,827
89.9
%2,
340
10.1
%21
,588
10
,309
47.8
%11
,279
52.2
%K
waZ
ulu-
Nat
aluM
shw
athi
Loc
al M
unic
ipal
ity22
,110
8,29
5
37.5
%13
,815
62.5
%27
,183
16
,532
60.8
%10
,651
39.2
%22
,106
12
,212
55.2
%9,
894
44.8
%K
waZ
ulu-
Nat
alU
mts
hezi
Loc
al M
unic
ipal
ity15
,230
10,2
12
67
.1%
5,01
8
32.9
%15
,371
15
,371
100.
0%-
0.0%
15,2
32
10,6
26
69
.8%
4,60
6
30
.2%
Kw
aZul
u-N
atal
UM
uziw
aban
tu L
ocal
Mun
icip
ality
20,3
14
5,
484
27
.0%
14,8
30
73
.0%
21,9
38
20,2
44
92
.3%
1,69
4
7.7%
20,3
13
7,34
9
36.2
%12
,964
63.8
%K
waZ
ulu-
Nat
alU
mvo
ti Lo
cal M
unic
ipal
ity26
,018
14,0
58
54
.0%
11,9
60
46
.0%
22,4
60
16,5
53
73
.7%
5,90
7
26.3
%26
,018
17
,025
65.4
%8,
993
34.6
%K
waZ
ulu-
Nat
alU
mzi
mkh
ulu
Loca
l Mun
icip
ality
43,5
45
9,
897
22
.7%
33,6
48
77
.3%
39,1
43
26,8
97
68
.7%
12,2
46
31
.3%
43,5
45
20,7
43
47
.6%
22,8
02
52
.4%
Kw
aZul
u-N
atal
Um
zum
be L
ocal
Mun
icip
ality
40,5
79
7,
833
19
.3%
32,7
46
80
.7%
44,2
06
31,2
12
70
.6%
12,9
94
29
.4%
40,5
80
16,2
97
40
.2%
24,2
83
59
.8%
Kw
aZul
u-N
atal
UP
hong
olo
Loca
l Mun
icip
ality
25,7
40
14
,283
55.5
%11
,457
44.5
%28
,918
24
,780
85.7
%4,
138
14
.3%
22,6
94
14,3
97
63
.4%
8,29
7
36
.6%
Kw
aZul
u-N
atal
Vul
ameh
lo L
ocal
Mun
icip
ality
12,7
44
3,
762
29
.5%
8,98
2
70.5
%18
,169
11
,854
65.2
%6,
315
34
.8%
12,7
44
5,82
6
45.7
%6,
918
54.3
%Li
mpo
poA
gana
ng L
ocal
Mun
icip
ality
33,8
26
6,
768
20
.0%
27,0
58
80
.0%
35,5
18
13,5
38
38
.1%
21,9
80
61
.9%
33,8
24
7,18
5
21.2
%26
,639
78.8
%Li
mpo
poB
a-P
hala
borw
a Lo
cal M
unic
ipal
ity33
,792
18,0
14
53
.3%
15,7
78
46
.7%
34,7
99
29,7
63
85
.5%
5,03
6
14.5
%33
,792
18,2
21
53
.9%
15,5
71
46
.1%
Lim
popo
Bel
a-B
ela
Loca
l Mun
icip
ality
14,2
91
11
,519
80.6
%2,
772
19
.4%
14,0
02
14,0
02
10
0.0%
-
0.
0%14
,290
11
,634
81.4
%2,
656
18.6
%Li
mpo
poB
loub
erg
Loca
l Mun
icip
ality
35,5
98
13
,707
38.5
%21
,891
61.5
%37
,536
15
,589
41.5
%21
,947
58.5
%35
,600
14
,064
39.5
%21
,536
60.5
%
56
PRO
VIN
CE
MU
NIC
IPA
LITY
Tot
al H
ouse
hold
s H
ouse
hold
acc
ess
to s
anita
tion
Hou
seho
ld a
cces
s to
sa
nita
tion
as a
pe
rcen
tage
Hou
seho
lds
belo
w
basi
c le
vel o
f se
rvic
e/ b
ackl
ogs
Hou
seho
lds
belo
w
basi
c le
vel o
f se
rvic
e/ b
ackl
ogs
as a
per
cent
age
Tot
al H
ouse
hold
sH
ouse
hold
acc
ess
to s
anita
tion
Hou
seho
ldac
cess
to
sani
tatio
n as
a
perc
enta
ge
Hou
seho
lds
belo
w
basi
c le
vel o
f se
rvic
e/ b
ackl
ogs
Hou
seho
lds
belo
w b
asic
leve
l of
ser
vice
/ ba
cklo
gs a
s a
perc
enta
ge
Tot
al H
ouse
hold
s H
ouse
hold
acc
ess
to s
anita
tion
Hou
seho
ld a
cces
s to
sa
nita
tion
as a
pe
rcen
tage
Hou
seho
lds
belo
w b
asic
leve
l of
ser
vice
/ ba
cklo
gs
Hou
seho
lds
belo
w b
asic
leve
l of
ser
vice
/ ba
cklo
gs a
s a
perc
enta
ge
AN
NEX
UR
E F
- HO
USE
HO
LD A
CC
ESS
TO S
AN
ITA
TIO
NM
UN
ICIP
AL
SOU
RC
E 20
09D
WEA
200
8C
OM
MU
NIT
Y SU
RVE
Y 20
07
Lim
popo
Elia
s M
otso
aled
i Loc
al M
unic
ipal
ity46
,840
7,99
6
17.1
%38
,844
82.9
%50
,004
25
,429
50.9
%24
,575
49.1
%46
,841
13
,498
28.8
%33
,343
71.2
%Li
mpo
poFe
takg
omo
Loca
l Mun
icip
ality
21,8
51
4,
653
21
.3%
17,1
98
78
.7%
21,1
74
11,6
32
54
.9%
9,54
2
45.1
%21
,850
4,
902
22
.4%
16,9
48
77
.6%
Lim
popo
Gre
ater
Giy
ani L
ocal
Mun
icip
ality
57,5
37
10
,493
18.2
%47
,044
81.8
%59
,495
23
,723
39.9
%35
,772
60.1
%57
,541
11
,867
20.6
%45
,674
79.4
%Li
mpo
poG
reat
er L
etab
a Lo
cal M
unic
ipal
ity59
,540
14,4
73
24
.3%
45,0
67
75
.7%
58,0
95
20,2
74
34
.9%
37,8
21
65
.1%
59,5
40
14,6
61
24
.6%
44,8
79
75
.4%
Lim
popo
Gre
ater
Mar
ble
Hal
l Loc
al M
unic
ipal
ity28
,215
7,73
0
27.4
%20
,485
72.6
%26
,937
15
,635
58.0
%11
,302
42.0
%28
,213
10
,193
36.1
%18
,020
63.9
%Li
mpo
poG
reat
er T
ubat
se L
ocal
Mun
icip
ality
66,6
11
9,
932
14
.9%
56,6
79
85
.1%
60,4
55
27,4
20
45
.4%
33,0
35
54
.6%
66,6
11
12,8
75
19
.3%
53,7
36
80
.7%
Lim
popo
Gre
ater
Tza
neen
Loc
al M
unic
ipal
ity89
,832
25,5
59
28
.5%
64,2
73
71
.5%
95,2
21
35,5
32
37
.3%
59,6
89
62
.7%
89,8
31
31,7
94
35
.4%
58,0
37
64
.6%
Lim
popo
Lepe
le-N
kum
pi L
ocal
Mun
icip
ality
58,4
84
22
,057
37.7
%36
,427
62.3
%56
,635
28
,353
50.1
%28
,282
49.9
%58
,482
22
,105
37.8
%36
,377
62.2
%Li
mpo
poLe
phal
ale
Loca
l Mun
icip
ality
23,7
46
9,
101
38
.3%
14,6
45
61
.7%
26,6
10
14,2
16
53
.4%
12,3
94
46
.6%
33,3
63
25,1
12
75
.3%
8,25
1
24
.7%
Lim
popo
Mak
hado
Loc
al M
unic
ipal
ity11
4,05
9
25
,971
22.8
%88
,088
77.2
%12
3,09
9
43
,386
35.2
%79
,713
64.8
%11
8,63
2
32
,523
27.4
%86
,109
72.6
%Li
mpo
poM
akhu
duth
amag
a Lo
cal M
unic
ipal
ity53
,655
8,23
615
.3%
45,4
1984
.7%
59,8
79
23,5
36
39
.3%
36,3
43
60
.7%
53,6
55
8,47
8
15.8
%45
,177
84.2
%Li
mpo
poM
arul
eng
Loca
l Mun
icip
ality
24,5
88
8,
716
35
.4%
15,8
72
64
.6%
21,4
86
12,6
32
58
.8%
8,85
4
41.2
%24
,591
8,
965
36
.5%
15,6
26
63
.5%
Lim
popo
Mod
imol
le L
ocal
Mun
icip
ality
15,8
27
10
,250
64.8
%5,
577
35
.2%
21,0
14
10,3
95
49
.5%
10,6
19
50
.5%
31,9
81
30,5
56
95
.5%
1,42
5
4.
5%Li
mpo
poM
ogal
akw
ena
Loca
l Mun
icip
ality
75,3
15
26
,592
35.3
%48
,723
64.7
%76
,651
38
,591
50.3
%38
,060
49.7
%75
,312
30
,144
40.0
%45
,168
60.0
%Li
mpo
poM
olem
ole
Loca
l Mun
icip
ality
27,2
95
5,
330
19
.5%
21,9
65
80
.5%
30,8
23
16,2
17
52
.6%
14,6
06
47
.4%
27,2
96
5,40
7
19.8
%21
,889
80.2
%Li
mpo
poM
ookg
opon
g Lo
cal M
unic
ipal
ity7,
675
6,
031
78
.6%
1,64
4
21.4
%8,
940
8,32
0
93
.1%
620
6.9%
7,67
3
6,
197
80
.8%
1,47
6
19
.2%
Lim
popo
Mus
ina
Loca
l Mun
icip
ality
14,2
04
10
,095
71.1
%4,
109
28
.9%
13,0
76
11,8
33
90
.5%
1,24
3
9.5%
14,6
46
4,01
5
27.4
%10
,631
72.6
%Li
mpo
poM
utal
e Lo
cal M
unic
ipal
ity21
,074
2,68
8
12.8
%18
,386
87.2
%20
,775
16
,934
81.5
%3,
841
18
.5%
19,3
29
5,29
9
27.4
%14
,030
72.6
%Li
mpo
poP
olok
wan
e Lo
cal M
unic
ipal
ity13
0,36
1
52
,190
40.0
%78
,171
60.0
%14
2,80
7
78
,127
54.7
%64
,680
45.3
%11
6,30
5
56
,413
48.5
%59
,892
51.5
%Li
mpo
poTh
abaz
imbi
Loc
al M
unic
ipal
ity23
,872
16,8
80
70
.7%
6,99
2
29.3
%22
,983
16
,550
72.0
%6,
433
28
.0%
115,
971
92,7
60
80
.0%
23,2
11
20
.0%
Lim
popo
Thul
amel
a Lo
cal M
unic
ipal
ity13
7,85
3
26
,225
19.0
%11
1,62
881
.0%
141,
729
42,3
67
29
.9%
99,3
62
70
.1%
134,
586
36,8
97
27
.4%
97,6
89
72
.6%
Mpu
mal
anga
Alb
ert L
uthu
li Lo
cal M
unic
ipal
ity46
,036
14,7
69
32
.1%
31,2
67
67
.9%
45,3
48
22,2
32
49
.0%
23,1
16
51
.0%
48,3
83
29,0
44
60
.0%
19,3
39
40
.0%
Mpu
mal
anga
Bus
hbuc
krid
ge L
ocal
Mun
icip
ality
124,
594
16,6
35
13
.4%
107,
959
86
.6%
118,
773
38,5
30
32
.4%
80,2
43
67
.6%
172,
289
110,
328
64
.0%
61,9
61
36
.0%
Mpu
mal
anga
Del
mas
Loc
al M
unic
ipal
ity15
,128
11,5
93
76
.6%
3,53
5
23.4
%15
,419
11
,771
76.3
%3,
648
23
.7%
15,1
28
8,69
9
57.5
%6,
429
42.5
%M
pum
alan
gaD
ipal
esen
g Lo
cal M
unic
ipal
ity12
,324
8,75
1
71.0
%3,
573
29
.0%
10,7
35
7,42
3
69
.1%
3,31
2
30.9
%12
,325
3,
569
29
.0%
8,75
6
71
.0%
Mpu
mal
anga
Dr J
S M
orok
a Lo
cal M
unic
ipal
ity56
,875
12,0
68
21
.2%
44,8
07
78
.8%
60,2
10
19,4
03
32
.2%
40,8
07
67
.8%
56,8
75
16,7
53
29
.5%
40,1
22
70
.5%
Mpu
mal
anga
Em
akha
zeni
Loc
al M
unic
ipal
ity12
,127
10,6
47
87
.8%
1,48
0
12.2
%11
,391
9,
691
85.1
%1,
700
14
.9%
14,6
23
10,4
72
71
.6%
4,15
1
28
.4%
Mpu
mal
anga
Em
alah
leni
Loc
al M
unic
ipal
ity10
5,59
1
67
,927
64.3
%37
,664
35.7
%87
,972
74
,361
84.5
%13
,611
15.5
%10
5,59
4
87
,009
82.4
%18
,585
17.6
%M
pum
alan
gaG
ovan
Mbe
ki L
ocal
Mun
icip
ality
79,1
91
74
,859
94.5
%4,
332
5.
5%70
,914
56
,309
79.4
%14
,605
20.6
%79
,191
64
,585
81.6
%14
,606
18.4
%M
pum
alan
gaLe
kwa
Loca
l Mun
icip
ality
26,6
86
21
,807
81.7
%4,
879
18
.3%
29,4
24
19,6
47
66
.8%
9,77
7
33.2
%26
,685
21
,918
82.1
%4,
767
17.9
%M
pum
alan
gaM
bom
bela
Loc
al M
unic
ipal
ity13
7,35
2
66
,094
48.1
%71
,258
51.9
%13
0,51
171
,429
54.7
%59
,082
45.3
%16
8,91
6
32
,412
19.2
%13
6,50
4
80.8
%M
pum
alan
gaM
khon
do L
ocal
Mun
icip
ality
29,9
28
17
,633
58.9
%12
,295
41.1
%33
,921
17
,519
51.6
%16
,402
48.4
%29
,926
20
,693
69.1
%9,
233
30.9
%M
pum
alan
gaM
suka
ligw
a Lo
cal M
unic
ipal
ity31
,750
24,0
13
75
.6%
7,73
7
24.4
%34
,876
31
,783
91.1
%3,
093
8.
9%31
,752
24
,566
77.4
%7,
186
22.6
%M
pum
alan
gaN
kom
azi L
ocal
Mun
icip
ality
78,2
53
35
,312
45.1
%42
,941
54.9
%85
,022
55
,110
64.8
%29
,912
35.2
%78
,254
36
,679
46.9
%41
,575
53.1
%M
pum
alan
gaS
eme
Loca
l Mun
icip
ality
21,6
05
15
,995
74.0
%5,
610
26
.0%
21,0
40
15,5
68
74
.0%
5,47
2
26.0
%21
,608
14
,006
64.8
%7,
602
35.2
%M
pum
alan
gaS
teve
Tsh
wet
e Lo
cal M
unic
ipal
ity50
,449
43,0
55
85
.3%
7,39
4
14.7
%41
,677
34
,693
83.2
%6,
984
16
.8%
50,4
50
44,2
52
87
.7%
6,19
8
12
.3%
Mpu
mal
anga
Thab
a C
hweu
Loc
al M
unic
ipal
ity28
,258
18,9
95
67
.2%
9,26
3
32.8
%25
,654
20
,987
81.8
%4,
667
18
.2%
28,2
56
19,8
98
70
.4%
8,35
8
29
.6%
Mpu
mal
anga
Them
bisi
le L
ocal
Mun
icip
ality
65,3
94
5,
048
7.
7%60
,346
92.3
%62
,786
20
,328
32.4
%42
,458
67.6
%65
,392
14
,592
22.3
%50
,800
77.7
%M
pum
alan
gaU
mjin
di L
ocal
Mun
icip
ality
18,7
68
12
,510
66.7
%6,
258
33
.3%
16,8
42
16,1
33
95
.8%
709
4.2%
18,7
69
14,0
99
75
.1%
4,67
0
24
.9%
Nor
th W
est
City
of M
atlo
sana
115,
970
91,9
48
79
.3%
24,0
22
20
.7%
105,
989
84,5
08
79
.7%
21,4
81
20
.3%
115,
971
92,3
24
79
.6%
23,6
47
20
.4%
Nor
th W
est
Dits
obot
la L
ocal
Mun
icip
ality
38,6
09
24
,127
62.5
%14
,482
37.5
%40
,329
25
,104
62.2
%15
,225
37.8
%43
,977
28
,298
64.3
%15
,679
35.7
%N
orth
Wes
tG
reat
er T
aung
Loc
al M
unic
ipal
ity42
,953
15,1
40
35
.2%
27,8
13
64
.8%
46,4
49
25,9
68
55
.9%
20,4
81
44
.1%
42,9
55
16,0
40
37
.3%
26,9
15
62
.7%
Nor
th W
est
Kag
isan
o Lo
cal M
unic
ipal
ity19
,890
5,07
9
25.5
%14
,811
74.5
%21
,695
11
,195
51.6
%10
,500
48.4
%19
,886
6,
051
30
.4%
13,8
35
69
.6%
Nor
th W
est
Kge
tleng
rivie
r Loc
al M
unic
ipal
ity10
,532
7,70
2
73.1
%2,
830
26
.9%
11,6
37
10,1
30
87
.0%
1,50
7
13.0
%11
,502
10
,066
87.5
%1,
436
12.5
%N
orth
Wes
tLe
kwa-
Teem
ane
Loca
l Mun
icip
ality
9,95
2
7,97
6
80.1
%1,
976
19
.9%
12,0
32
9,87
5
82
.1%
2,15
7
17.9
%9,
953
8,12
7
81.7
%1,
826
18.3
%N
orth
Wes
tLo
cal M
unic
ipal
ity o
f Mad
iben
g96
,362
41,8
55
43
.4%
54,5
07
56
.6%
100,
983
60,3
16
59
.7%
40,6
67
40
.3%
96,3
62
42,7
63
44
.4%
53,5
99
55
.6%
Nor
th W
est
Maf
iken
g Lo
cal M
unic
ipal
ity68
,699
22,8
94
33
.3%
45,8
05
66
.7%
73,2
84
39,5
30
53
.9%
33,7
54
46
.1%
68,6
96
24,0
70
35
.0%
44,6
26
65
.0%
Nor
th W
est
Mam
usa
Loca
l Mun
icip
ality
10,4
27
7,
985
76
.6%
2,44
2
23.4
%11
,832
5,
972
50.5
%5,
860
49
.5%
10,4
31
7,98
9
76.6
%2,
442
23.4
%N
orth
Wes
tM
aqua
ssi H
ills
Loca
l Mun
icip
ality
20,3
31
11
,369
55.9
%8,
962
44
.1%
19,4
99
9,06
0
46
.5%
10,4
39
53
.5%
20,3
28
11,4
38
56
.3%
8,89
0
43
.7%
Nor
th W
est
Mer
afon
g C
ity L
ocal
Mun
icip
ality
88,1
56
69
,536
78.9
%18
,620
21.1
%65
,928
60
,162
91.3
%5,
766
8.
7%88
,157
62
,202
70.6
%25
,955
29.4
%N
orth
Wes
tM
olop
o Lo
cal M
unic
ipal
ity3,
174
1,
671
52
.6%
1,50
3
47.4
%4,
071
4,07
1
10
0.0%
-0.
0%3,
175
1,82
7
57.5
%1,
348
42.5
%N
orth
Wes
tM
oret
ele
Loca
l Mun
icip
ality
43,2
09
7,
276
16
.8%
35,9
33
83
.2%
51,3
15
23,4
06
45
.6%
27,9
09
54
.4%
43,2
09
7,38
8
17.1
%35
,821
82.9
%N
orth
Wes
tM
oses
Kot
ane
Loca
l Mun
icip
ality
60,5
57
14
,259
23.5
%46
,298
76.5
%69
,765
29
,832
42.8
%39
,933
57.2
%65
,204
20
,671
31.7
%44
,533
68.3
%N
orth
Wes
tN
aled
i Loc
al M
unic
ipal
ity13
,673
11,2
24
82
.1%
2,44
9
17.9
%16
,780
16
,780
100.
0%-
0.0%
13,6
78
11,4
12
83
.4%
2,26
6
16
.6%
Nor
th W
est
Pot
chef
stro
om L
ocal
Mun
icip
ality
35,5
25
30
,646
86.3
%4,
879
13
.7%
36,1
80
32,9
86
91
.2%
3,19
4
8.8%
35,5
22
30,7
56
86
.6%
4,76
6
13
.4%
Nor
th W
est
Ram
otsh
ere
Moi
loa
Loca
l Mun
icip
ality
30,3
02
8,
223
27
.1%
22,0
79
72
.9%
36,2
23
22,2
29
61
.4%
13,9
94
38
.6%
30,3
01
9,07
9
30.0
%21
,222
70.0
%N
orth
Wes
tR
atlo
u Lo
cal M
unic
ipal
ity23
,591
2,08
1
8.8%
21,5
10
91
.2%
25,4
95
11,5
37
45
.3%
13,9
58
54
.7%
23,5
92
2,17
4
9.2%
21,4
18
90
.8%
Nor
th W
est
Rus
tenb
urg
Loca
l Mun
icip
ality
146,
542
90,9
11
62
.0%
55,6
31
38
.0%
134,
753
92,0
41
68
.3%
42,7
12
31
.7%
146,
543
73,1
73
49
.9%
73,3
70
50
.1%
Nor
th W
est
Tsw
aing
Loc
al M
unic
ipal
ity22
,200
7,91
5
35.7
%14
,285
64.3
%28
,492
18
,220
63.9
%10
,272
36.1
%22
,200
8,
231
37
.1%
13,9
69
62
.9%
Nor
th W
est
Ven
ters
dorp
Loc
al M
unic
ipal
ity10
,466
6,84
1
65.4
%3,
625
34
.6%
13,1
62
8,53
0
64
.8%
4,63
2
35.2
%12
,788
10
,212
79.9
%2,
576
20.1
%N
orth
ern
Cap
e!K
heis
Loc
al M
unic
ipal
ity4,
489
3,
222
71
.8%
1,26
7
28.2
%4,
281
2,98
5
69
.7%
1,29
6
30.3
%4,
490
3,45
877
.0%
1,03
2
23
.0%
Nor
ther
n C
ape
//Kha
ra H
ais
Loca
l Mun
icip
ality
20,9
38
17
,037
81.4
%3,
901
18
.6%
18,3
54
15,6
78
85
.4%
2,67
6
14.6
%20
,938
17
,951
85.7
%2,
987
14.3
%N
orth
ern
Cap
eD
ikga
tlong
Loc
al M
unic
ipal
ity10
,015
8,42
1
84.1
%1,
594
15
.9%
9,98
6
6,
726
67.4
%3,
260
32
.6%
10,0
14
8,55
5
85.4
%1,
459
14.6
%
57
PRO
VIN
CE
MU
NIC
IPA
LITY
Tot
al H
ouse
hold
s H
ouse
hold
acc
ess
to s
anita
tion
Hou
seho
ld a
cces
s to
sa
nita
tion
as a
pe
rcen
tage
Hou
seho
lds
belo
w
basi
c le
vel o
f se
rvic
e/ b
ackl
ogs
Hou
seho
lds
belo
w
basi
c le
vel o
f se
rvic
e/ b
ackl
ogs
as a
per
cent
age
Tot
al H
ouse
hold
sH
ouse
hold
acc
ess
to s
anita
tion
Hou
seho
ldac
cess
to
sani
tatio
n as
a
perc
enta
ge
Hou
seho
lds
belo
w
basi
c le
vel o
f se
rvic
e/ b
ackl
ogs
Hou
seho
lds
belo
w b
asic
leve
l of
ser
vice
/ ba
cklo
gs a
s a
perc
enta
ge
Tot
al H
ouse
hold
s H
ouse
hold
acc
ess
to s
anita
tion
Hou
seho
ld a
cces
s to
sa
nita
tion
as a
pe
rcen
tage
Hou
seho
lds
belo
w b
asic
leve
l of
ser
vice
/ ba
cklo
gs
Hou
seho
lds
belo
w b
asic
leve
l of
ser
vice
/ ba
cklo
gs a
s a
perc
enta
ge
AN
NEX
UR
E F
- HO
USE
HO
LD A
CC
ESS
TO S
AN
ITA
TIO
NM
UN
ICIP
AL
SOU
RC
E 20
09D
WEA
200
8C
OM
MU
NIT
Y SU
RVE
Y 20
07
Nor
ther
n C
ape
Em
than
jeni
Loc
al M
unic
ipal
ity9,
489
8,
352
88
.0%
1,13
7
12.0
%8,
976
6,35
4
70
.8%
2,62
2
29.2
%9,
487
8,62
1
90.9
%86
6
9.1%
Nor
ther
n C
ape
Gam
agar
a Lo
cal M
unic
ipal
ity7,
640
6,
595
86
.3%
1,04
5
13.7
%6,
073
5,64
5
93
.0%
428
7.0%
9,17
4
7,
602
82
.9%
1,57
2
17
.1%
Nor
ther
n C
ape
Ga-
Seg
onya
na L
ocal
Mun
icip
ality
17,1
06
6,
674
39
.0%
10,4
32
61
.0%
19,5
77
14,2
89
73
.0%
5,28
8
27.0
%17
,106
9,
492
55
.5%
7,61
4
44
.5%
Nor
ther
n C
ape
Han
tam
Loc
al M
unic
ipal
ity5,
817
4,
654
80
.0%
1,16
3
20.0
%5,
778
4,41
6
76
.4%
1,36
2
23.6
%5,
820
5,62
5
96.6
%19
5
3.4%
Nor
ther
n C
ape
Kai
!Gar
ib L
ocal
Mun
icip
ality
17,3
89
13
,675
78.6
%3,
714
21
.4%
13,8
10
12,4
38
90
.1%
1,37
2
9.9%
24,4
07
21,5
36
88
.2%
2,87
1
11
.8%
Nor
ther
n C
ape
Kam
iesb
erg
Loca
l Mun
icip
ality
3,88
3
2,89
5
74.6
%98
8
25
.4%
2,98
2
2,
639
88.5
%34
3
11
.5%
3,88
0
3,
649
94
.0%
231
6.
0%N
orth
ern
Cap
eK
aree
berg
Loc
al M
unic
ipal
ity2,
729
1,
292
47
.3%
1,43
7
52.7
%2,
440
1,57
5
64
.5%
865
35.5
%2,
727
2,72
7
100.
0%-
0.0%
Nor
ther
n C
ape
Kar
oo H
oogl
and
Loca
l Mun
icip
ality
2,98
2
2,43
0
81.5
%55
2
18
.5%
3,03
6
1,
658
54.6
%1,
378
45
.4%
2,98
2
2,
982
10
0.0%
-
0.
0%N
orth
ern
Cap
eK
gate
lope
le L
ocal
Mun
icip
ality
5,25
6
4,82
6
91.8
%43
0
8.
2%3,
985
3,90
1
97
.9%
84
2.
1%5,
259
4,83
8
92.0
%42
1
8.0%
Nor
ther
n C
ape
Kha
i-Ma
Loca
l Mun
icip
ality
3,78
7
2,99
3
79.0
%79
4
21
.0%
3,02
5
3,
025
100.
0%-
0.0%
3,78
7
3,
666
96
.8%
121
3.
2%N
orth
ern
Cap
eM
agar
eng
Loca
l Mun
icip
ality
5,66
7
4,56
280
.5%
1,10
5
19.5
%6,
047
5,25
186
.8%
796
13.2
%5,
668
4,58
6
80.9
%1,
082
19.1
%N
orth
ern
Cap
eM
ier L
ocal
Mun
icip
ality
1,70
5
1,09
3
64.1
%61
2
35
.9%
1,70
3
1,
395
81.9
%30
8
18
.1%
1,70
3
73
5
43
.2%
968
56
.8%
Nor
ther
n C
ape
Mos
haw
eng
Loca
l Mun
icip
ality
15,4
78
5,
905
38
.2%
9,57
3
61.8
%23
,819
9,
599
40.3
%14
,220
59.7
%15
,479
3,
374
21
.8%
12,1
05
78
.2%
Nor
ther
n C
ape
Nam
a K
hoi L
ocal
Mun
icip
ality
15,6
57
12
,505
79.9
%3,
152
20
.1%
11,6
29
10,8
80
93
.6%
749
6.4%
15,6
55
15,0
13
95
.9%
642
4.
1%N
orth
ern
Cap
eP
hokw
ane
Loca
l Mun
icip
ality
13,7
71
10
,927
79.3
%2,
844
20
.7%
19,5
77
14,0
06
71
.5%
5,57
1
28.5
%20
,118
15
,180
75.5
%4,
938
24.5
%N
orth
ern
Cap
eR
enos
terb
erg
Loca
l Mun
icip
ality
2,72
0
1,65
6
60.9
%1,
064
39
.1%
2,57
5
1,
845
71.7
%73
0
28
.3%
2,72
0
1,
709
62
.8%
1,01
1
37
.2%
Nor
ther
n C
ape
Ric
hter
svel
d Lo
cal M
unic
ipal
ity3,
954
3,
292
83
.3%
662
16.7
%2,
635
2,42
2
91
.9%
213
8.1%
3,95
4
3,
747
94
.8%
207
5.
2%N
orth
ern
Cap
eS
iyan
cum
a Lo
cal M
unic
ipal
ity8,
852
6,
132
69
.3%
2,72
0
30.7
%9,
703
6,82
3
70
.3%
2,88
0
29.7
%10
,712
7,
300
68
.1%
3,41
2
31
.9%
Nor
ther
n C
ape
Siy
athe
mba
Loc
al M
unic
ipal
ity5,
069
4,
338
85
.6%
731
14.4
%4,
261
3,17
4
74
.5%
1,08
7
25.5
%5,
068
2,80
4
55.3
%2,
264
44.7
%N
orth
ern
Cap
eS
ol P
laat
jie L
ocal
Mun
icip
ality
52,1
20
46
,209
88.7
%5,
911
11
.3%
53,2
56
46,6
84
87
.7%
6,57
2
12.3
%52
,122
47
,721
91.6
%4,
401
8.4%
Nor
ther
n C
ape
Them
belih
le L
ocal
Mun
icip
ality
3,59
5
2,66
8
74.2
%92
725
.8%
3,66
7
2,
422
66.0
%1,
245
34.0
%3,
595
2,64
1
73.5
%95
4
26.5
%N
orth
ern
Cap
eTs
ants
aban
e Lo
cal M
unic
ipal
ity7,
097
5,
197
73
.2%
1,90
0
26.8
%5,
742
4,82
1
84
.0%
921
16.0
%7,
099
5,21
7
73.5
%1,
882
26.5
%N
orth
ern
Cap
eU
bunt
u Lo
cal M
unic
ipal
ity4,
276
3,
399
79
.5%
877
20.5
%4,
249
2,47
4
58
.2%
1,77
5
41.8
%4,
276
3,56
3
83.3
%71
3
16.7
%N
orth
ern
Cap
eU
mso
bom
vu L
ocal
Mun
icip
ality
5,64
4
4,24
1
75.1
%1,
403
24
.9%
6,11
3
5,
170
84.6
%94
3
15
.4%
5,64
7
4,
422
78
.3%
1,22
5
21
.7%
Wes
tern
Cap
eB
eauf
ort W
est L
ocal
Mun
icip
ality
9,14
8
8,95
0
97.8
%19
8
2.
2%10
,804
10
,712
99.1
%92
0.9%
9,15
2
7,
898
86
.3%
1,25
4
13
.7%
Wes
tern
Cap
eB
ergr
ivie
r Loc
al M
unic
ipal
ity12
,197
11,8
50
97
.2%
347
2.8%
14,7
39
14,2
39
96
.6%
500
3.4%
12,1
93
11,6
28
95
.4%
565
4.
6%W
este
rn C
ape
Bito
u Lo
cal M
unic
ipal
ity12
,644
11,2
80
89
.2%
1,36
4
10.8
%11
,363
10
,256
90.3
%1,
107
9.
7%16
,893
8,
968
53
.1%
7,92
5
46
.9%
Wes
tern
Cap
eB
reed
e R
iver
/Win
elan
ds L
ocal
Mun
icip
ality
21,8
55
20
,247
92.6
%1,
608
7.
4%25
,764
24
,190
93.9
%1,
574
6.
1%21
,856
16
,625
76.1
%5,
231
23.9
%W
este
rn C
ape
Bre
ede
Val
ley
Loca
l Mun
icip
ality
36,4
93
34
,157
93.6
%2,
336
6.
4%41
,354
37
,670
91.1
%3,
684
8.
9%36
,494
28
,944
79.3
%7,
550
20.7
%W
este
rn C
ape
Cap
e A
gulh
as L
ocal
Mun
icip
ality
7,61
7
7,23
1
94.9
%38
6
5.
1%9,
170
8,63
3
94
.1%
537
5.9%
7,61
5
6,
673
87
.6%
942
12
.4%
Wes
tern
Cap
eC
eder
berg
Loc
al M
unic
ipal
ity9,
213
8,
226
89
.3%
987
10.7
%12
,863
10,8
03
84
.0%
2,06
0
16.0
%9,
214
7,66
7
83.2
%1,
547
16.8
%W
este
rn C
ape
City
of C
ape
Tow
n M
etro
polit
an M
unic
ipal
ity90
2,27
9
83
7,45
2
92.8
%64
,827
7.2%
924,
224
867,
855
93
.9%
56,3
69
6.
1%90
2,27
2
66
5,66
6
73.8
%23
6,60
6
26.2
%W
este
rn C
ape
Dra
kens
tein
Loc
al M
unic
ipal
ity51
,613
49,0
33
95
.0%
2,58
0
5.0%
53,0
44
49,7
82
93
.9%
3,26
2
6.1%
51,6
11
43,2
77
83
.9%
8,33
4
16
.1%
Wes
tern
Cap
eG
eorg
e Lo
cal M
unic
ipal
ity42
,792
36,8
90
86
.2%
5,90
2
13.8
%44
,111
40
,804
92.5
%3,
307
7.
5%49
,899
30
,399
60.9
%19
,500
39.1
%W
este
rn C
ape
Hes
sequ
a Lo
cal M
unic
ipal
ity12
,482
11,8
98
95
.3%
584
4.7%
15,2
60
13,8
02
90
.4%
1,45
8
9.6%
12,4
81
8,88
6
71.2
%3,
595
28.8
%W
este
rn C
ape
Kan
nala
nd L
ocal
Mun
icip
ality
6,34
3
5,49
7
86.7
%84
6
13
.3%
7,39
3
6,
499
87.9
%89
4
12
.1%
6,34
3
4,
473
70
.5%
1,87
0
29
.5%
Wes
tern
Cap
eK
nysn
a Lo
cal M
unic
ipal
ity17
,417
12,9
95
74
.6%
4,42
2
25.4
%18
,131
16
,467
90.8
%1,
664
9.
2%17
,416
10
,084
57.9
%7,
332
42.1
%W
este
rn C
ape
Lain
gsbu
rg L
ocal
Mun
icip
ality
1,96
6
1,80
9
92.0
%15
7
8.
0%2,
308
2,30
8
10
0.0%
-
0.
0%1,
966
1,80
8
92.0
%15
8
8.0%
Wes
tern
Cap
eM
atzi
kam
a Lo
cal M
unic
ipal
ity12
,882
11,6
16
90
.2%
1,26
6
9.8%
17,5
68
15,3
69
87
.5%
2,19
9
12.5
%12
,882
11
,054
85.8
%1,
828
14.2
%W
este
rn C
ape
Mos
sel B
ay L
ocal
Mun
icip
ality
28,3
49
27
,176
95.9
%1,
173
4.
1%24
,690
23
,295
94.3
%1,
395
5.
7%28
,350
19
,198
67.7
%9,
152
32.3
%W
este
rn C
ape
Oud
tsho
orn
Loca
l Mun
icip
ality
17,9
12
16
,039
89.5
%1,
873
10
.5%
21,8
17
19,5
1589
.4%
2,30
2
10.6
%17
,913
6,
165
34.4
%11
,748
65.6
%W
este
rn C
ape
Ove
rstra
nd L
ocal
Mun
icip
ality
21,9
52
21
,571
98.3
%38
1
1.
7%24
,083
23
,840
99.0
%24
3
1.
0%21
,952
16
,520
75.3
%5,
432
24.7
%W
este
rn C
ape
Prin
ce A
lber
t Loc
al M
unic
ipal
ity2,
748
2,
382
86
.7%
366
13.3
%3,
056
2,95
7
96
.8%
99
3.
2%2,
748
2,08
8
76.0
%66
0
24.0
%W
este
rn C
ape
Sal
danh
a B
ay L
ocal
Mun
icip
ality
20,7
85
20
,065
96.5
%72
0
3.
5%23
,081
23
,081
100.
0%0
0.0%
20,7
85
14,7
44
70
.9%
6,04
1
29
.1%
Wes
tern
Cap
eS
telle
nbos
ch L
ocal
Mun
icip
ality
36,4
11
34
,924
95.9
%1,
487
4.
1%34
,954
33
,323
95.3
%1,
631
4.
7%36
,413
29
,142
80.0
%7,
271
20.0
%W
este
rn C
ape
Sw
artla
nd L
ocal
Mun
icip
ality
19,9
38
18
,817
94.4
%1,
121
5.
6%21
,153
19
,817
93.7
%1,
336
6.
3%19
,938
15
,721
78.8
%4,
217
21.2
%W
este
rn C
ape
Sw
elle
ndam
Loc
al M
unic
ipal
ity6,
959
6,
592
94
.7%
367
5.3%
9,27
4
8,
778
94.7
%49
6
5.
3%6,
957
5,71
5
82.1
%1,
242
17.9
%W
este
rn C
ape
Thee
wat
ersk
loof
Loc
al M
unic
ipal
ity23
,464
20,9
73
89
.4%
2,49
1
10.6
%28
,801
25
,784
89.5
%3,
017
10
.5%
23,4
64
18,5
64
79
.1%
4,90
0
20
.9%
Wes
tern
Cap
eW
itzen
berg
Loc
al M
unic
ipal
ity24
,411
22,3
02
91
.4%
2,10
9
8.6%
23,7
20
22,2
49
93
.8%
1,47
1
6.2%
24,4
10
20,5
53
84
.2%
3,85
7
15
.8%
Tota
l12
,478
,128
8,02
9,84
0
13
6.2%
4,44
8,28
8
10
0.8%
12,9
96,3
00
9,68
7,61
3
16
7.8%
3,30
8,68
7
69
.2%
12,8
09,8
45
8,
639,
462
144.
1%4,
170,
383
92.9
%
58
59
ANNEXURE G: ACCESS TO ELECTRICITY
Prov
ince
Mun
icip
ality
DM
E, 2
008
Tota
lH
ouse
hold
s
DM
E, 2
008
Hou
seho
ldA
cces
s to
G
rid
DM
E, 2
008
Hou
seho
ldA
cces
s to
Grid
as
a
perc
enta
ge
DM
E, 2
008
Hou
seho
lds
belo
w b
asic
le
vel o
f ser
vice
/b
ackl
ogs
DM
E, 2
008
Hou
seho
lds
belo
w b
asic
le
vel o
f ser
vice
/b
ackl
ogs
as a
pe
rcen
tage
Eas
tern
Cap
eA
mah
lath
i Loc
al M
unic
ipal
ity38
,082
23,8
81
62.7
%14
,201
37.3
%E
aste
rn C
ape
Bav
iaan
s Lo
cal M
unic
ipal
ity4,
285
3,
557
83.0
%72
8
17
.0%
Eas
tern
Cap
eB
lue
Cra
ne R
oute
Loc
al M
unic
ipal
ity10
,457
7,58
9
72
.6%
2,86
8
27.4
%E
aste
rn C
ape
Buf
falo
City
Loc
al M
unic
ipal
ity21
5,15
1
13
3,33
8
62.0
%81
,813
38.0
%E
aste
rn C
ape
Cam
debo
o Lo
cal M
unic
ipal
ity11
,402
10,2
69
90.1
%1,
133
9.
9%E
aste
rn C
ape
Um
zim
vubu
Loc
al M
unic
ipal
ity95
,910
23,3
42
24.3
%72
,568
75.7
%E
aste
rn C
ape
Elu
ndin
i Loc
al M
unic
ipal
ity36
,704
11,4
28
31.1
%25
,276
68.9
%E
aste
rn C
ape
Em
alah
leni
Loc
al M
unic
ipal
ity28
,513
23,2
02
81.4
%5,
312
18
.6%
Eas
tern
Cap
eE
ngco
bo L
ocal
Mun
icip
ality
34,1
06
14
,909
43
.7%
19,1
97
56
.3%
Eas
tern
Cap
eG
arie
p Lo
cal M
unic
ipal
ity9,
089
9,
451
104.
0%-3
63
-4
.0%
Eas
tern
Cap
eG
reat
Kei
Loc
al M
unic
ipal
ity12
,550
9,03
1
72
.0%
3,51
9
28.0
%E
aste
rn C
ape
Ikw
ezi L
ocal
Mun
icip
ality
3,02
5
2,20
1
72
.7%
825
27.3
%E
aste
rn C
ape
Inkw
anca
Loc
al M
unic
ipal
ity5,
948
5,
598
94.1
%35
0
5.
9%E
aste
rn C
ape
Ints
ika
Yet
hu L
ocal
Mun
icip
ality
49,4
32
14
,304
28
.9%
35,1
28
71
.1%
Eas
tern
Cap
eIn
xuba
Yet
hem
ba L
ocal
Mun
icip
ality
17,6
49
15
,227
86
.3%
2,42
3
13.7
%E
aste
rn C
ape
Kin
g S
abat
a D
alin
dyeb
o Lo
cal M
unic
ipal
ity98
,786
57,3
45
58.0
%41
,441
42.0
%E
aste
rn C
ape
Kou
ga L
ocal
Mun
icip
ality
21,2
57
17
,681
83
.2%
3,57
6
16.8
%E
aste
rn C
ape
Kou
-Kam
ma
Loca
l Mun
icip
ality
10,2
21
8,
257
80.8
%1,
964
19
.2%
Eas
tern
Cap
eLu
kanj
i Loc
al M
unic
ipal
ity48
,878
41,6
13
85.1
%7,
265
14
.9%
Eas
tern
Cap
eM
akan
a Lo
cal M
unic
ipal
ity19
,668
14,4
34
73.4
%5,
234
26
.6%
Eas
tern
Cap
eM
alet
swai
Loc
al M
unic
ipal
ity10
,471
6,29
4
60
.1%
4,17
7
39.9
%E
aste
rn C
ape
Mat
atie
le L
ocal
Mun
icip
ality
5,76
4
5,89
8
10
2.3%
-134
-2.3
%E
aste
rn C
ape
Mbh
ashe
Loc
al M
unic
ipal
ity58
,003
14,5
62
25.1
%43
,441
74.9
%E
aste
rn C
ape
Mbi
zana
Loc
al M
unic
ipal
ity50
,482
16,6
66
33.0
%33
,817
67.0
%E
aste
rn C
ape
Mhl
ontlo
Loc
al M
unic
ipal
ity46
,688
25,5
24
54.7
%21
,164
45.3
%E
aste
rn C
ape
Mnq
uma
Loca
l Mun
icip
ality
74,1
61
30
,238
40.8
%43
,922
59.2
%E
aste
rn C
ape
Ndl
ambe
Loc
al M
unic
ipal
ity17
,182
11,6
57
67.8
%5,
526
32
.2%
Eas
tern
Cap
eN
gqus
hwa
Loca
l Mun
icip
ality
23,8
91
16
,074
67
.3%
7,81
8
32.7
%E
aste
rn C
ape
Nko
nkob
e Lo
cal M
unic
ipal
ity35
,531
27,8
75
78.5
%7,
656
21
.5%
Eas
tern
Cap
eN
elso
n M
ande
la B
ay M
etro
polit
an M
unic
ipal
i t29
3,70
1
23
3,63
2
79.5
%60
,069
20.5
%E
aste
rn C
ape
Nta
bank
ulu
Loca
l Mun
icip
ality
29,7
35
6,
337
21.3
%23
,398
78.7
%E
aste
rn C
ape
Nxu
ba L
ocal
Mun
icip
ality
7,22
6
8,83
3
12
2.2%
-1,6
08
-2
2.2%
Eas
tern
Cap
eN
yand
eni L
ocal
Mun
icip
ality
61,5
64
27
,306
44
.4%
34,2
58
55
.6%
Eas
tern
Cap
eP
ort S
t Joh
ns L
ocal
Mun
icip
ality
31,7
16
16
,831
53
.1%
14,8
85
46
.9%
Eas
tern
Cap
eQ
auke
ni L
ocal
Mun
icip
ality
55,6
24
24
,753
44
.5%
30,8
71
55
.5%
Elec
tric
ity D
eliv
ery
Stat
us, 2
008
AN
NEX
UR
E G
- H
OU
SEH
OLD
AC
CES
S TO
ELE
CTR
ICIT
Y
60
Prov
ince
Mun
icip
ality
DM
E, 2
008
Tota
lH
ouse
hold
s
DM
E, 2
008
Hou
seho
ldA
cces
s to
G
rid
DM
E, 2
008
Hou
seho
ldA
cces
s to
Grid
as
a
perc
enta
ge
DM
E, 2
008
Hou
seho
lds
belo
w b
asic
le
vel o
f ser
vice
/b
ackl
ogs
DM
E, 2
008
Hou
seho
lds
belo
w b
asic
le
vel o
f ser
vice
/b
ackl
ogs
as a
pe
rcen
tage
Elec
tric
ity D
eliv
ery
Stat
us, 2
008
AN
NEX
UR
E G
- H
OU
SEH
OLD
AC
CES
S TO
ELE
CTR
ICIT
Y
Eas
tern
Cap
eS
akhi
sizw
e Lo
cal M
unic
ipal
ity13
,874
11,6
10
83.7
%2,
264
16
.3%
Eas
tern
Cap
eS
enqu
Loc
al M
unic
ipal
ity37
,245
22,2
64
59.8
%14
,982
40.2
%E
aste
rn C
ape
Sun
day'
s R
iver
Val
ley
Loca
l Mun
icip
ality
11,0
67
7,
415
67.0
%3,
652
33
.0%
Eas
tern
Cap
eTs
olw
ana
Loca
l Mun
icip
ality
8,64
8
7,49
2
86
.6%
1,15
6
13.4
%Fr
ee S
tate
D
ihla
beng
Loc
al M
unic
ipal
ity36
,468
25,7
65
70.7
%10
,703
29.3
%Fr
ee S
tate
K
opan
ong
Loca
l Mun
icip
ality
19,3
05
14
,332
74
.2%
4,97
2
25.8
%Fr
ee S
tate
Le
tsem
eng
Loca
l Mun
icip
ality
13,2
49
11
,478
86
.6%
1,77
1
13.4
%Fr
ee S
tate
M
afub
e Lo
cal M
unic
ipal
ity16
,183
12,0
43
74.4
%4,
140
25
.6%
Free
Sta
te
Mal
uti a
Pho
fung
Loc
al M
unic
ipal
ity99
,804
66,0
87
66.2
%33
,718
33.8
%Fr
ee S
tate
M
anga
ung
Loca
l Mun
icip
ality
208,
354
170,
130
81
.7%
38,2
24
18
.3%
Free
Sta
te
Man
tsop
a Lo
cal M
unic
ipal
ity15
,208
12,4
88
82.1
%2,
720
17
.9%
Free
Sta
te
Mas
ilony
ana
Loca
l Mun
icip
ality
18,8
42
13
,269
70
.4%
5,57
3
29.6
%Fr
ee S
tate
M
atjh
aben
g Lo
cal M
unic
ipal
ity13
2,81
8
87
,734
66
.1%
45,0
84
33
.9%
Free
Sta
te
Met
sim
ahol
o Lo
cal M
unic
ipal
ity35
,628
29,5
82
83.0
%6,
046
17
.0%
Free
Sta
te
Moh
okar
e Lo
cal M
unic
ipal
ity10
,386
6,90
6
66
.5%
3,48
0
33.5
%Fr
ee S
tate
M
oqha
ka L
ocal
Mun
icip
ality
45,8
35
36
,853
80
.4%
8,98
2
19.6
%Fr
ee S
tate
N
ala
Loca
l Mun
icip
ality
28,5
25
21
,680
76
.0%
6,84
4
24.0
%Fr
ee S
tate
N
aled
i Loc
al M
unic
ipal
ity8,
363
6,
099
72.9
%2,
264
27
.1%
Free
Sta
te
Ngw
athe
Loc
al M
unic
ipal
ity35
,449
29,5
84
83.5
%5,
864
16
.5%
Free
Sta
te
Nke
toan
a Lo
cal M
unic
ipal
ity16
,457
12,0
44
73.2
%4,
413
26
.8%
Free
Sta
te
Phu
mel
ela
Loca
l Mun
icip
ality
13,1
67
8,
691
66.0
%4,
476
34
.0%
Free
Sta
te
Set
soto
Loc
al M
unic
ipal
ity36
,161
30,1
14
83.3
%6,
048
16
.7%
Free
Sta
te
Toko
logo
Loc
al M
unic
ipal
ity9,
769
7,
795
79.8
%1,
973
20
.2%
Free
Sta
te
Tsw
elop
ele
Loca
l Mun
icip
ality
13,7
23
9,
148
66.7
%4,
574
33
.3%
Gau
teng
City
of J
ohan
nesb
urg
Met
ropo
litan
Mun
icip
al1,
133,
970
91
2,84
9
80.5
%22
1,12
1
19.5
%G
aute
ngC
ity o
f Tsh
wan
e M
etro
polit
an M
unic
ipal
ity63
3,64
3
48
7,97
677
.0%
145,
667
23
.0%
Gau
teng
Eku
rhul
eni M
etro
polit
an M
unic
ipal
ity33
,105
14,7
04
44.4
%18
,400
55.6
%G
aute
ngE
mfu
leni
Loc
al M
unic
ipal
ity83
8,92
0
59
9,93
2
71.5
%23
8,98
8
28.5
%G
aute
ngK
ungw
ini L
ocal
Mun
icip
ality
21,7
05
15
,978
73
.6%
5,72
7
26.4
%G
aute
ngLe
sedi
Loc
al M
unic
ipal
ity33
,302
22,7
70
68.4
%10
,532
31.6
%G
aute
ngM
idva
al L
ocal
Mun
icip
ality
15,7
15
10
,477
66
.7%
5,23
8
33.3
%G
aute
ngM
ogal
e C
ity L
ocal
Mun
icip
ality
20,3
24
18
,984
93
.4%
1,33
9
6.6%
Gau
teng
Nok
eng
tsa
Taem
ane
Loca
l Mun
icip
ality
206,
528
169,
927
82
.3%
36,6
00
17
.7%
Gau
teng
Ran
dfon
tein
Loc
al M
unic
ipal
ity92
,232
70,9
24
76.9
%21
,307
23.1
%G
aute
ngW
esto
naria
Loc
al M
unic
ipal
ity39
,930
30,3
43
76.0
%9,
587
24
.0%
Kw
aZul
u-N
atal
Aba
qulu
si L
ocal
Mun
icip
ality
40,0
51
21
,164
52
.8%
18,8
87
47
.2%
61
Prov
ince
Mun
icip
ality
DM
E, 2
008
Tota
lH
ouse
hold
s
DM
E, 2
008
Hou
seho
ldA
cces
s to
G
rid
DM
E, 2
008
Hou
seho
ldA
cces
s to
Grid
as
a
perc
enta
ge
DM
E, 2
008
Hou
seho
lds
belo
w b
asic
le
vel o
f ser
vice
/b
ackl
ogs
DM
E, 2
008
Hou
seho
lds
belo
w b
asic
le
vel o
f ser
vice
/b
ackl
ogs
as a
pe
rcen
tage
Elec
tric
ity D
eliv
ery
Stat
us, 2
008
AN
NEX
UR
E G
- H
OU
SEH
OLD
AC
CES
S TO
ELE
CTR
ICIT
Y
Kw
aZul
u-N
atal
Dan
nhau
ser
Loca
l Mun
icip
ality
21,5
44
13
,159
61
.1%
8,38
6
38.9
%K
waZ
ulu-
Nat
aleD
umbe
Loc
al M
unic
ipal
ity16
,843
6,58
2
39
.1%
10,2
61
60
.9%
Kw
aZul
u-N
atal
Em
adla
ngen
i Loc
al M
unic
ipal
ity6,
906
2,
520
36.5
%4,
386
63
.5%
Kw
aZul
u-N
atal
Em
nam
bith
i-Lad
ysm
ith L
ocal
Mun
icip
ality
56,3
46
37
,977
67
.4%
18,3
69
32
.6%
Kw
aZul
u-N
atal
End
umen
i Loc
al M
unic
ipal
ity13
,694
9,39
7
68
.6%
4,29
6
31.4
%K
waZ
ulu-
Nat
aleT
hekw
ini M
etro
polit
an M
unic
ipal
ity88
6,00
3
71
8,50
5
81.1
%16
7,49
8
18.9
%K
waZ
ulu-
Nat
alE
zing
olen
i Loc
al M
unic
ipal
ity11
,912
7,68
4
64
.5%
4,22
8
35.5
%K
waZ
ulu-
Nat
alG
reat
er K
okst
ad L
ocal
Mun
icip
ality
21,8
93
13
,636
62
.3%
8,25
7
37.7
%K
waZ
ulu-
Nat
alH
ibis
cus
Coa
st L
ocal
Mun
icip
ality
57,3
91
44
,410
77
.4%
12,9
80
22
.6%
Kw
aZul
u-N
atal
Hla
bisa
Loc
al M
unic
ipal
ity29
,971
11,2
20
37.4
%18
,752
62.6
%K
waZ
ulu-
Nat
alIm
baba
zane
Loc
al M
unic
ipal
ity25
,682
17,9
25
69.8
%7,
757
30
.2%
Kw
aZul
u-N
atal
Impe
ndle
Loc
al M
unic
ipal
ity8,
179
6,
537
79.9
%1,
643
20
.1%
Kw
aZul
u-N
atal
Inda
ka L
ocal
Mun
icip
ality
23,8
29
12
,083
50
.7%
11,7
46
49
.3%
Kw
aZul
u-N
atal
Ingw
e Lo
cal M
unic
ipal
ity23
,786
6,98
7
29
.4%
16,7
98
70
.6%
Kw
aZul
u-N
atal
Jozi
ni L
ocal
Mun
icip
ality
37,3
94
5,
223
14.0
%32
,171
86.0
%K
waZ
ulu-
Nat
alK
wa
San
i Loc
al M
unic
ipal
ity4,
918
2,
260
45.9
%2,
658
54
.1%
Kw
aZul
u-N
atal
Kw
aDuk
uza
Loca
l Mun
icip
ality
46,5
14
42
,597
91
.6%
3,91
7
8.4%
Kw
aZul
u-N
atal
Man
deni
Loc
al M
unic
ipal
ity32
,285
19,5
82
60.7
%12
,703
39.3
%K
waZ
ulu-
Nat
alM
aphu
mul
o Lo
cal M
unic
ipal
ity24
,698
5,48
9
22
.2%
19,2
09
77
.8%
Kw
aZul
u-N
atal
Mbo
nam
bi L
ocal
Mun
icip
ality
21,3
37
10
,918
51
.2%
10,4
18
48
.8%
Kw
aZul
u-N
atal
Mkh
amba
thin
i Loc
al M
unic
ipal
ity13
,995
6,65
3
47
.5%
7,34
2
52.5
%K
waZ
ulu-
Nat
alM
pofa
na L
ocal
Mun
icip
ality
10,7
04
5,
448
50.9
%5,
256
49
.1%
Kw
aZul
u-N
atal
Msi
nga
Loca
l Mun
icip
ality
36,2
49
4,
183
11.5
%32
,067
88.5
%K
waZ
ulu-
Nat
alM
thon
jane
ni L
ocal
Mun
icip
ality
11,2
75
6,
284
55.7
%4,
991
44
.3%
Kw
aZul
u-N
atal
Mtu
batu
ba L
ocal
Mun
icip
ality
8,73
9
7,73
4
88
.5%
1,00
5
11.5
%K
waZ
ulu-
Nat
alN
dwed
we
Loca
l Mun
icip
ality
30,7
51
6,
473
21.1
%24
,277
78.9
%K
waZ
ulu-
Nat
alN
ewca
stle
Loc
al M
unic
ipal
ity79
,354
67,1
83
84.7
%12
,171
15.3
%K
waZ
ulu-
Nat
alN
kand
la L
ocal
Mun
icip
ality
26,9
96
3,
199
11.8
%23
,797
88.2
%K
waZ
ulu-
Nat
alN
ongo
ma
Loca
l Mun
icip
ality
35,2
13
17
,212
48
.9%
18,0
01
51
.1%
Kw
aZul
u-N
atal
Nqu
thu
Loca
l Mun
icip
ality
28,6
14
12
,122
42
.4%
16,4
92
57
.6%
Kw
aZul
u-N
atal
Nta
mba
nana
Loc
al M
unic
ipal
ity13
,865
3,87
6
28
.0%
9,98
9
72.0
%K
waZ
ulu-
Nat
alO
khah
lam
ba L
ocal
Mun
icip
ality
29,7
49
15
,494
52
.1%
14,2
55
47
.9%
Kw
aZul
u-N
atal
Ric
hmon
d Lo
cal M
unic
ipal
ity13
,980
7,92
9
56
.7%
6,05
1
43.3
%K
waZ
ulu-
Nat
alTh
e B
ig F
ive
Fals
e B
ay L
ocal
Mun
icip
ality
6,86
6
2,09
1
30
.4%
4,77
5
69.6
%K
waZ
ulu-
Nat
alTh
e M
sund
uzi L
ocal
Mun
icip
ality
146,
835
120,
683
82
.2%
26,1
52
17
.8%
Kw
aZul
u-N
atal
Ubu
hleb
ezw
e Lo
cal M
unic
ipal
ity23
,890
8,86
2
37
.1%
15,0
28
62
.9%
62
Prov
ince
Mun
icip
ality
DM
E, 2
008
Tota
lH
ouse
hold
s
DM
E, 2
008
Hou
seho
ldA
cces
s to
G
rid
DM
E, 2
008
Hou
seho
ldA
cces
s to
Grid
as
a
perc
enta
ge
DM
E, 2
008
Hou
seho
lds
belo
w b
asic
le
vel o
f ser
vice
/b
ackl
ogs
DM
E, 2
008
Hou
seho
lds
belo
w b
asic
le
vel o
f ser
vice
/b
ackl
ogs
as a
pe
rcen
tage
Elec
tric
ity D
eliv
ery
Stat
us, 2
008
AN
NEX
UR
E G
- H
OU
SEH
OLD
AC
CES
S TO
ELE
CTR
ICIT
Y
Kw
aZul
u-N
atal
Ulu
ndi L
ocal
Mun
icip
ality
41,8
61
32
,781
78
.3%
9,07
9
21.7
%K
waZ
ulu-
Nat
alU
mdo
ni L
ocal
Mun
icip
ality
17,0
39
12
,307
72
.2%
4,73
2
27.8
%K
waZ
ulu-
Nat
alU
mhl
abuy
alin
gana
Loc
al M
unic
ipal
ity28
,955
1,84
0
6.
4%27
,115
93.6
%K
waZ
ulu-
Nat
aluM
hlat
huze
Loc
al M
unic
ipal
ity74
,851
58,1
74
77.7
%16
,677
22.3
%K
waZ
ulu-
Nat
aluM
lala
zi L
ocal
Mun
icip
ality
42,8
71
17
,470
40
.8%
25,4
01
59
.2%
Kw
aZul
u-N
atal
uMng
eni L
ocal
Mun
icip
ality
22,8
48
18
,892
82
.7%
3,95
6
17.3
%K
waZ
ulu-
Nat
aluM
shw
athi
Loc
al M
unic
ipal
ity26
,464
19,8
51
75.0
%6,
613
25
.0%
Kw
aZul
u-N
atal
Um
tshe
zi L
ocal
Mun
icip
ality
14,6
06
14
,073
96
.3%
533
3.7%
Kw
aZul
u-N
atal
UM
uziw
aban
tu L
ocal
Mun
icip
ality
21,2
85
12
,177
57
.2%
9,10
8
42.8
%K
waZ
ulu-
Nat
alU
mvo
ti Lo
cal M
unic
ipal
ity21
,937
8,66
1
39
.5%
13,2
76
60
.5%
Kw
aZul
u-N
atal
Um
zim
khul
u Lo
cal M
unic
ipal
ity40
,416
16,3
82
40.5
%24
,035
59.5
%K
waZ
ulu-
Nat
alU
mzu
mbe
Loc
al M
unic
ipal
ity42
,686
14,1
85
33.2
%28
,500
66.8
%K
waZ
ulu-
Nat
alU
Pho
ngol
o Lo
cal M
unic
ipal
ity27
,673
13,4
60
48.6
%14
,213
51.4
%K
waZ
ulu-
Nat
alV
ulam
ehlo
Loc
al M
unic
ipal
ity17
,624
5,26
3
29
.9%
12,3
62
70
.1%
Lim
popo
Aga
nang
Loc
al M
unic
ipal
ity35
,536
16,9
00
47.6
%18
,636
52.4
%Li
mpo
poB
a-P
hala
borw
a Lo
cal M
unic
ipal
ity34
,018
28,3
57
83.4
%5,
661
16
.6%
Lim
popo
Bel
a-B
ela
Loca
l Mun
icip
ality
13,6
14
9,
399
69.0
%4,
214
31
.0%
Lim
popo
Blo
uber
g Lo
cal M
unic
ipal
ity37
,481
24,1
33
64.4
%13
,348
35.6
%Li
mpo
poE
lias
Mot
soal
edi L
ocal
Mun
icip
ality
20,7
44
12
,797
61
.7%
7,94
8
38.3
%Li
mpo
poFe
takg
omo
Loca
l Mun
icip
ality
50,0
23
44
,615
89
.2%
5,40
8
10.8
%Li
mpo
poG
reat
er G
iyan
i Loc
al M
unic
ipal
ity57
,730
42,5
28
73.7
%15
,203
26.3
%Li
mpo
poG
reat
er L
etab
a Lo
cal M
unic
ipal
ity54
,897
36,0
37
65.6
%18
,860
34.4
%Li
mpo
poG
reat
er M
arbl
e H
all L
ocal
Mun
icip
ality
58,6
84
41
,317
70
.4%
17,3
67
29
.6%
Lim
popo
Gre
ater
Tub
atse
Loc
al M
unic
ipal
ity59
,457
37,6
50
63.3
%21
,808
36.7
%Li
mpo
poG
reat
er T
zane
en L
ocal
Mun
icip
ality
94,9
53
72
,223
76
.1%
22,7
30
23
.9%
Lim
popo
Lepe
le-N
kum
pi L
ocal
Mun
icip
ality
56,5
84
37
,863
66.9
%18
,721
33.1
%Li
mpo
poLe
phal
ale
Loca
l Mun
icip
ality
25,8
39
19
,735
76
.4%
6,10
4
23.6
%Li
mpo
poM
akha
do L
ocal
Mun
icip
ality
120,
753
86,0
60
71.3
%34
,693
28.7
%Li
mpo
poM
akhu
duth
amag
a Lo
cal M
unic
ipal
ity26
,708
24,5
17
91.8
%2,
191
8.
2%Li
mpo
poM
arul
eng
Loca
l Mun
icip
ality
21,7
16
16
,475
75
.9%
5,24
1
24.1
%Li
mpo
poM
odim
olle
Loc
al M
unic
ipal
ity19
,363
12,2
50
63.3
%7,
114
36
.7%
Lim
popo
Mog
alak
wen
a Lo
cal M
unic
ipal
ity75
,096
74,4
44
99.1
%65
2
0.
9%Li
mpo
poM
olem
ole
Loca
l Mun
icip
ality
30,7
90
25
,849
84
.0%
4,94
2
16.0
%Li
mpo
poM
ookg
opon
g Lo
cal M
unic
ipal
ity7,
704
5,
333
69.2
%2,
371
30
.8%
Lim
popo
Mus
ina
Loca
l Mun
icip
ality
13,0
38
7,
806
59.9
%5,
231
40
.1%
Lim
popo
Mut
ale
Loca
l Mun
icip
ality
19,0
59
9,
588
50.3
%9,
472
49
.7%
63
Prov
ince
Mun
icip
ality
DM
E, 2
008
Tota
lH
ouse
hold
s
DM
E, 2
008
Hou
seho
ldA
cces
s to
G
rid
DM
E, 2
008
Hou
seho
ldA
cces
s to
Grid
as
a
perc
enta
ge
DM
E, 2
008
Hou
seho
lds
belo
w b
asic
le
vel o
f ser
vice
/b
ackl
ogs
DM
E, 2
008
Hou
seho
lds
belo
w b
asic
le
vel o
f ser
vice
/b
ackl
ogs
as a
pe
rcen
tage
Elec
tric
ity D
eliv
ery
Stat
us, 2
008
AN
NEX
UR
E G
- H
OU
SEH
OLD
AC
CES
S TO
ELE
CTR
ICIT
Y
Lim
popo
Pol
okw
ane
Loca
l Mun
icip
ality
140,
746
106,
374
75
.6%
34,3
71
24
.4%
Lim
popo
Thab
azim
bi L
ocal
Mun
icip
ality
22,3
93
10
,250
45
.8%
12,1
43
54
.2%
Lim
popo
Thul
amel
a Lo
cal M
unic
ipal
ity13
9,88
4
94
,248
67
.4%
45,6
36
32
.6%
Mpu
mla
nga
Alb
ert L
uthu
li Lo
cal M
unic
ipal
ity43
,806
25,5
96
58.4
%18
,210
41.6
%M
pum
lang
aB
ushb
uckr
idge
Loc
al M
unic
ipal
ity11
9,16
3
10
2,01
8
85.6
%17
,145
14.4
%M
pum
lang
aD
elm
as L
ocal
Mun
icip
ality
14,7
84
9,
175
62.1
%5,
609
37
.9%
Mpu
mla
nga
Dip
ales
eng
Loca
l Mun
icip
ality
10,4
70
7,
996
76.4
%2,
474
23
.6%
Mpu
mla
nga
Dr J
S M
orok
a Lo
cal M
unic
ipal
ity59
,158
54,9
90
93.0
%4,
168
7.
0%M
pum
lang
aE
mak
haze
ni L
ocal
Mun
icip
ality
10,7
37
8,
816
82.1
%1,
922
17
.9%
Mpu
mla
nga
Em
alah
leni
Loc
al M
unic
ipal
ity82
,725
57,1
69
69.1
%25
,556
30.9
%M
pum
lang
aG
ovan
Mbe
ki L
ocal
Mun
icip
ality
68,1
41
46
,064
67
.6%
22,0
77
32
.4%
Mpu
mla
nga
Lekw
a Lo
cal M
unic
ipal
ity27
,821
23,6
40
85.0
%4,
181
15
.0%
Mpu
mla
nga
Mbo
mbe
la L
ocal
Mun
icip
ality
125,
924
88,6
27
70.4
%37
,297
29.6
%M
pum
lang
aM
khon
do L
ocal
Mun
icip
ality
30,7
66
17
,570
57
.1%
13,1
96
42
.9%
Mpu
mla
nga
Msu
kalig
wa
Loca
l Mun
icip
ality
32,7
79
16
,204
49
.4%
16,5
75
50
.6%
Mpu
mla
nga
Nko
maz
i Loc
al M
unic
ipal
ity79
,238
49,0
31
61.9
%30
,206
38.1
%M
pum
lang
aS
eme
Loca
l Mun
icip
ality
19,8
80
12
,123
61
.0%
7,75
7
39.0
%M
pum
lang
aS
teve
Tsh
wet
e Lo
cal M
unic
ipal
ity40
,004
29,7
19
74.3
%10
,284
25.7
%M
pum
lang
aTh
aba
Chw
eu L
ocal
Mun
icip
ality
23,2
66
16
,485
70
.9%
6,78
1
29.1
%M
pum
lang
aTh
embi
sile
Loc
al M
unic
ipal
ity64
,269
59,1
52
92.0
%5,
117
8.
0%M
pum
lang
aU
mjin
di L
ocal
Mun
icip
ality
15,9
61
10
,651
66
.7%
5,31
0
33.3
%N
orth
Wes
tC
ity o
f Mat
losa
na10
3,06
4
85
,229
82
.7%
17,8
35
17
.3%
Nor
th W
est
Dits
obot
la L
ocal
Mun
icip
ality
39,2
88
29
,250
74
.4%
10,0
38
25
.6%
Nor
th W
est
Gre
ater
Tau
ng L
ocal
Mun
icip
ality
45,7
65
39
,949
87
.3%
5,81
7
12.7
%N
orth
Wes
tK
agis
ano
Loca
l Mun
icip
ality
25,3
91
16
,678
65
.7%
8,71
3
34.3
%N
orth
Wes
tK
getle
ngriv
ier L
ocal
Mun
icip
ality
11,2
34
7,
130
63.5
%4,
104
36
.5%
Nor
th W
est
Lekw
a-Te
eman
e Lo
cal M
unic
ipal
ity11
,848
9,17
6
77
.5%
2,67
1
22.5
%N
orth
Wes
tLo
cal M
unic
ipal
ity o
f Mad
iben
g10
1,66
5
77
,923
76
.6%
23,7
42
23
.4%
Nor
th W
est
Maf
iken
g Lo
cal M
unic
ipal
ity72
,830
55,5
56
76.3
%17
,274
23.7
%N
orth
Wes
tM
amus
a Lo
cal M
unic
ipal
ity11
,659
10,7
29
92.0
%93
0
8.
0%N
orth
Wes
tM
aqua
ssi H
ills
Loca
l Mun
icip
ality
18,8
50
14
,938
79
.2%
3,91
1
20.8
%N
orth
Wes
tM
eraf
ong
City
Loc
al M
unic
ipal
ity62
,203
37,9
93
61.1
%24
,211
38.9
%N
orth
Wes
tM
olop
o Lo
cal M
unic
ipal
ity4,
013
1,
763
43.9
%2,
250
56
.1%
Nor
th W
est
Mor
etel
e Lo
cal M
unic
ipal
ity47
,491
40,8
17
85.9
%6,
674
14
.1%
Nor
th W
est
Mos
es K
otan
e Lo
cal M
unic
ipal
ity68
,053
60,2
19
88.5
%7,
834
11
.5%
Nor
th W
est
Nal
edi L
ocal
Mun
icip
ality
16,5
22
11
,187
67
.7%
5,33
5
32.3
%
64
Prov
ince
Mun
icip
ality
DM
E, 2
008
Tota
lH
ouse
hold
s
DM
E, 2
008
Hou
seho
ldA
cces
s to
G
rid
DM
E, 2
008
Hou
seho
ldA
cces
s to
Grid
as
a
perc
enta
ge
DM
E, 2
008
Hou
seho
lds
belo
w b
asic
le
vel o
f ser
vice
/b
ackl
ogs
DM
E, 2
008
Hou
seho
lds
belo
w b
asic
le
vel o
f ser
vice
/b
ackl
ogs
as a
pe
rcen
tage
Elec
tric
ity D
eliv
ery
Stat
us, 2
008
AN
NEX
UR
E G
- H
OU
SEH
OLD
AC
CES
S TO
ELE
CTR
ICIT
Y
Nor
th W
est
Pot
chef
stro
om L
ocal
Mun
icip
ality
35,3
76
29
,074
82
.2%
6,30
2
17.8
%N
orth
Wes
tR
amot
sher
e M
oilo
a Lo
cal M
unic
ipal
ity35
,321
26,7
53
75.7
%8,
568
24
.3%
Nor
th W
est
Rat
lou
Loca
l Mun
icip
ality
24,8
49
21
,162
85
.2%
3,68
7
14.8
%N
orth
Wes
tR
uste
nbur
g Lo
cal M
unic
ipal
ity12
8,73
3
10
3,86
0
80.7
%24
,873
19.3
%N
orth
Wes
tTs
wai
ng L
ocal
Mun
icip
ality
27,7
62
18
,877
68
.0%
8,88
5
32.0
%N
orth
Wes
tV
ente
rsdo
rp L
ocal
Mun
icip
ality
12,2
68
10
,100
82
.3%
2,16
8
17.7
%N
orth
ern
Cap
e!K
heis
Loc
al M
unic
ipal
ity4,
284
2,
851
66.5
%1,
433
33
.5%
Nor
ther
n C
ape
//Kha
ra H
ais
Loca
l Mun
icip
ality
18,4
68
16
,211
87
.8%
2,25
7
12.2
%N
orth
ern
Cap
eD
ikga
tlong
Loc
al M
unic
ipal
ity10
,417
7,14
9
68
.6%
3,26
8
31.4
%N
orth
ern
Cap
eE
mth
anje
ni L
ocal
Mun
icip
ality
9,51
1
7,85
4
82
.6%
1,65
7
17.4
%N
orth
ern
Cap
eG
amag
ara
Loca
l Mun
icip
ality
4,18
4
4,57
3
10
9.3%
-390
-9.3
%N
orth
ern
Cap
eG
a-S
egon
yana
Loc
al M
unic
ipal
ity18
,957
22,6
42
119.
4%-3
,685
-19.
4%N
orth
ern
Cap
eH
anta
m L
ocal
Mun
icip
ality
5,96
7
4,61
2
77
.3%
1,35
5
22.7
%N
orth
ern
Cap
eK
ai !G
arib
Loc
al M
unic
ipal
ity14
,816
11,5
48
77.9
%3,
268
22
.1%
Nor
ther
n C
ape
Kam
iesb
erg
Loca
l Mun
icip
ality
3,12
8
2,45
7
78
.5%
672
21.5
%N
orth
ern
Cap
eK
aree
berg
Loc
al M
unic
ipal
ity2,
650
2,
014
76.0
%63
6
24
.0%
Nor
ther
n C
ape
Kar
oo H
oogl
and
Loca
l Mun
icip
ality
3,25
3
2,09
8
64
.5%
1,15
5
35.5
%N
orth
ern
Cap
eK
gate
lope
le L
ocal
Mun
icip
ality
4,18
0
3,48
2
83
.3%
698
16.7
%N
orth
ern
Cap
eK
hai-M
a Lo
cal M
unic
ipal
ity3,
032
2,
235
73.7
%79
7
26
.3%
Nor
ther
n C
ape
Mag
aren
g Lo
cal M
unic
ipal
ity6,
317
4,
724
74.8
%1,
593
25
.2%
Nor
ther
n C
ape
Mie
r Loc
al M
unic
ipal
ity1,
731
97
0
56.0
%76
1
44
.0%
Nor
ther
n C
ape
Mos
haw
eng
Loca
l Mun
icip
ality
20,0
66
17
,578
87
.6%
2,48
8
12.4
%N
orth
ern
Cap
eN
ama
Kho
i Loc
al M
unic
ipal
ity12
,041
10,7
30
89.1
%1,
311
10
.9%
Nor
ther
n C
ape
Pho
kwan
e Lo
cal M
unic
ipal
ity18
,563
13,1
43
70.8
%5,
420
29
.2%
Nor
ther
n C
ape
Ren
oste
rber
g Lo
cal M
unic
ipal
ity2,
702
2,
179
80.6
%52
3
19
.4%
Nor
ther
n C
ape
Ric
hter
svel
d Lo
cal M
unic
ipal
ity2,
879
2,
449
85.1
%43
0
14
.9%
Nor
ther
n C
ape
Siy
ancu
ma
Loca
l Mun
icip
ality
9,99
0
6,26
3
62
.7%
3,72
7
37.3
%N
orth
ern
Cap
eS
iyat
hem
ba L
ocal
Mun
icip
ality
4,52
5
3,67
0
81
.1%
855
18.9
%N
orth
ern
Cap
eS
ol P
laat
jie L
ocal
Mun
icip
ality
56,5
93
44
,396
78
.4%
12,1
97
21
.6%
Nor
ther
n C
ape
Them
belih
le L
ocal
Mun
icip
ality
3,78
3
3,37
1
89
.1%
412
10.9
%N
orth
ern
Cap
eTs
ants
aban
e Lo
cal M
unic
ipal
ity7,
980
6,
718
84.2
%1,
262
15
.8%
Nor
ther
n C
ape
Ubu
ntu
Loca
l Mun
icip
ality
4,60
4
3,41
8
74
.2%
1,18
7
25.8
%N
orth
ern
Cap
eU
mso
bom
vu L
ocal
Mun
icip
ality
6,46
1
4,94
5
76
.5%
1,51
5
23.5
%W
este
rn C
ape
Bea
ufor
t Wes
t Loc
al M
unic
ipal
ity9,
931
9,
477
95.4
%45
4
4.
6%W
este
rn C
ape
Ber
griv
ier L
ocal
Mun
icip
ality
12,9
19
11
,096
85
.9%
1,82
3
14.1
%W
este
rn C
ape
Bito
u Lo
cal M
unic
ipal
ity9,
672
7,
946
82.2
%1,
726
17
.8%
65
Prov
ince
Mun
icip
ality
DM
E, 2
008
Tota
lH
ouse
hold
s
DM
E, 2
008
Hou
seho
ldA
cces
s to
G
rid
DM
E, 2
008
Hou
seho
ldA
cces
s to
Grid
as
a
perc
enta
ge
DM
E, 2
008
Hou
seho
lds
belo
w b
asic
le
vel o
f ser
vice
/b
ackl
ogs
DM
E, 2
008
Hou
seho
lds
belo
w b
asic
le
vel o
f ser
vice
/b
ackl
ogs
as a
pe
rcen
tage
Elec
tric
ity D
eliv
ery
Stat
us, 2
008
AN
NEX
UR
E G
- H
OU
SEH
OLD
AC
CES
S TO
ELE
CTR
ICIT
Y
Wes
tern
Cap
eB
reed
e R
iver
/Win
elan
ds L
ocal
Mun
icip
ality
23,1
01
20
,094
87
.0%
3,00
7
13.0
%W
este
rn C
ape
Bre
ede
Val
ley
Loca
l Mun
icip
ality
37,6
54
33
,264
88
.3%
4,39
0
11.7
%W
este
rn C
ape
Cap
e A
gulh
as L
ocal
Mun
icip
ality
8,19
4
7,12
6
87
.0%
1,06
8
13.0
%W
este
rn C
ape
Ced
erbe
rg L
ocal
Mun
icip
ality
11,4
37
9,
029
78.9
%2,
408
21
.1%
Wes
tern
Cap
eC
ity o
f Cap
e To
wn
Met
ropo
litan
Mun
icip
ality
855,
621
736,
170
86
.0%
119,
451
14
.0%
Wes
tern
Cap
eD
rake
nste
in L
ocal
Mun
icip
ality
49,0
37
40
,074
81
.7%
8,96
3
18.3
%W
este
rn C
ape
Geo
rge
Loca
l Mun
icip
ality
39,2
26
33
,363
85
.1%
5,86
3
14.9
%W
este
rn C
ape
Hes
sequ
a Lo
cal M
unic
ipal
ity13
,813
13,0
22
94.3
%79
1
5.
7%W
este
rn C
ape
Kan
nala
nd L
ocal
Mun
icip
ality
6,70
5
4,98
0
74
.3%
1,72
5
25.7
%W
este
rn C
ape
Kny
sna
Loca
l Mun
icip
ality
16,2
66
13
,914
85
.5%
2,35
2
14.5
%W
este
rn C
ape
Lain
gsbu
rg L
ocal
Mun
icip
ality
2,11
8
1,78
1
84
.1%
337
15.9
%W
este
rn C
ape
Mat
zika
ma
Loca
l Mun
icip
ality
15,5
59
12
,653
81
.3%
2,90
7
18.7
%W
este
rn C
ape
Mos
sel B
ay L
ocal
Mun
icip
ality
22,1
49
22
,313
10
0.7%
-164
-0.7
%W
este
rn C
ape
Oud
tsho
orn
Loca
l Mun
icip
ality
20,0
11
16
,487
82
.4%
3,52
4
17.6
%W
este
rn C
ape
Ove
rstra
nd L
ocal
Mun
icip
ality
20,5
99
17
,471
84
.8%
3,12
8
15.2
%W
este
rn C
ape
Prin
ce A
lber
t Loc
al M
unic
ipal
ity2,
810
2,
805
99.8
%5
0.
2%W
este
rn C
ape
Sal
danh
a B
ay L
ocal
Mun
icip
ality
20,6
53
18
,756
90
.8%
1,89
7
9.2%
Wes
tern
Cap
eS
telle
nbos
ch L
ocal
Mun
icip
ality
31,7
40
28
,892
91
.0%
2,84
8
9.0%
Wes
tern
Cap
eS
war
tland
Loc
al M
unic
ipal
ity19
,213
17,5
19
91.2
%1,
694
8.
8%W
este
rn C
ape
Sw
elle
ndam
Loc
al M
unic
ipal
ity8,
271
7,
698
93.1
%57
3
6.
9%W
este
rn C
ape
Thee
wat
ersk
loof
Loc
al M
unic
ipal
ity25
,452
19,8
65
78.1
%5,
586
21
.9%
Wes
tern
Cap
eW
itzen
berg
Loc
al M
unic
ipal
ity21
,440
17,2
31
80.4
%4,
209
19
.6%
Tota
l12
,470
,682
9,06
8,84
3
72
.7%
3,40
1,83
8
27
.3%
66
67
ANNEXURE H: FREE BASIC ENERGY
Tota
l Hou
seho
lds
Tota
l Ind
igen
t H
ouse
hold
sTo
tal
Hou
seho
lds
Tota
l In
dige
ntH
ouse
hold
s
Eas
tern
Cap
eA
mat
ole
Dis
trict
Mun
icip
ality
Am
ahla
thi
34,7
20
24,1
50
36
,920
23,8
53
5,
824
-
-
5,
824
24.1
%E
aste
rn C
ape
Cac
adu
Dis
trict
Mun
icip
ality
Bav
iaan
s3,
904
1,64
8
4,21
9
-
17
0
1,
217
-
1,38
7
84
.2%
Eas
tern
Cap
eC
acad
u D
istri
ct M
unic
ipal
ityB
lue
Cra
ne R
oute
9,58
0
5,
119
10
,294
4,47
6
-
-
-
-
0.0%
Eas
tern
Cap
eA
mat
ole
Dis
trict
Mun
icip
ality
Buf
falo
City
192,
161
102,
090
20
6,45
4
48
,086
13,4
57
48
,086
-
61
,543
60.3
%E
aste
rn C
ape
Cac
adu
Dis
trict
Mun
icip
ality
Cam
debo
o10
,496
4,
067
11
,132
4,20
2
1,19
7
2,18
7
-
3,
384
83.2
%E
aste
rn C
ape
uKha
hlam
ba D
istri
ct M
unic
ipal
ityE
lund
ini
33,7
53
26,2
00
35
,808
-
86
7
20
9
33
0
1,40
6
5.
4%E
aste
rn C
ape
Chr
is H
ani D
istri
ct M
unic
ipal
ityE
mal
ahle
ni28
,304
20
,767
30,8
58
3,
033
68
0
88
5
-
1,56
5
7.
5%E
aste
rn C
ape
Chr
is H
ani D
istri
ct M
unic
ipal
ityE
ngco
bo31
,434
23
,702
32,8
21
-
3,11
3
6,20
6
-
9,
319
39.3
%E
aste
rn C
ape
uKha
hlam
ba D
istri
ct M
unic
ipal
ityG
arie
p8,
288
5,19
6
8,89
9
-
1,
738
6,
050
-
7,78
8
14
9.9%
Eas
tern
Cap
eA
mat
ole
Dis
trict
Mun
icip
ality
Gre
at K
ei11
,513
7,
700
12
,152
4,92
9
1,10
5
3,80
0
-
4,
905
63.7
%E
aste
rn C
ape
Cac
adu
Dis
trict
Mun
icip
ality
Ikw
ezi
2,75
6
1,
505
2,
957
1,
288
43
7
1,
288
2,
532
4,25
7
28
2.9%
Eas
tern
Cap
eC
hris
Han
i Dis
trict
Mun
icip
ality
Inkw
anca
5,49
0
3,
421
5,
744
-
535
-
-
535
15
.6%
Eas
tern
Cap
eC
hris
Han
i Dis
trict
Mun
icip
ality
Ints
ika
Yet
hu40
,884
31
,396
41,6
56
-
7,70
9
571
-
8,
280
26.4
%E
aste
rn C
ape
Am
atol
e D
istri
ct M
unic
ipal
ityIn
xuba
16,0
75
4,34
1
17,0
54
3,
848
2,
155
2,
010
-
4,16
5
95
.9%
Eas
tern
Cap
eC
hris
Han
i Dis
trict
Mun
icip
ality
Inxu
ba Y
ethe
mba
90,6
27
8,63
8
97,3
65
-
2,16
7
-
-
2,16
7
25
.1%
Eas
tern
Cap
eO
.R. T
ambo
Dis
trict
Mun
icip
ality
Kin
g S
abat
a D
alin
dyeb
o9,
979
57,8
50
21
,380
62,6
17
6,
899
16
0
-
7,05
9
12
.2%
Eas
tern
Cap
eC
acad
u D
istri
ct M
unic
ipal
ityK
ou k
amm
a19
,549
3,
482
10
,447
-
27
2
1,
348
-
1,62
0
46
.5%
Eas
tern
Cap
eC
acad
u D
istri
ct M
unic
ipal
ityK
ouga
44,9
73
6,31
4
47,1
85
5,
887
1,
708
3,
961
-
5,66
9
89
.8%
Eas
tern
Cap
eC
hris
Han
i Dis
trict
Mun
icip
ality
Luka
nji
18,4
35
26,9
42
19
,164
10,6
93
7,
163
16
,736
-
23
,899
88.7
%E
aste
rn C
ape
Cac
adu
Dis
trict
Mun
icip
ality
Mak
ana
9,81
8
8,
573
10
,257
12,8
87
4,
384
85
-
4,46
9
52
.1%
Eas
tern
Cap
euK
hahl
amba
Dis
trict
Mun
icip
ality
Mal
etsw
ai47
,439
5,
230
53
,880
-
44
4
5,
540
-
5,98
4
11
4.4%
Eas
tern
Cap
eA
lfred
Nzo
Dis
trict
Mun
icip
ality
Mat
atie
le53
,550
36
,589
56,1
61
18
0,43
9
1,32
2
473
1,00
2
2,
797
7.6%
Eas
tern
Cap
eA
mat
ole
Dis
trict
Mun
icip
ality
Mbh
ashe
46,4
11
41,3
33
49
,631
38,6
15
2,
797
-
-
2,79
7
6.
8%E
aste
rn C
ape
O.R
. Tam
bo D
istri
ct M
unic
ipal
ityM
biza
na44
,204
37
,011
46,6
45
35
,581
1,43
1
102
886
2,
419
6.5%
Eas
tern
Cap
eO
.R. T
ambo
Dis
trict
Mun
icip
ality
Mhl
ontlo
67,5
68
32,4
42
71
,531
30,1
53
9,
124
-
299
9,
423
29.0
%E
aste
rn C
ape
Am
atol
e D
istri
ct M
unic
ipal
ityM
nqum
a15
,734
50
,605
17,3
79
17
,000
535
-
-
535
1.
1%E
aste
rn C
ape
Cac
adu
Dis
trict
Mun
icip
ality
Ndl
ambe
265,
375
7,85
5
284,
833
9,11
0
4,05
9
2,76
6
-
6,
825
86.9
%E
aste
rn C
ape
Nel
son
Man
dela
Met
ropo
litan
mun
icip
ality
Nel
son
Man
dela
Met
ropo
litan
mun
icip
ality
21,8
9410
9,88
222
,959
106,
241
7999
,240
-
99,3
1990
.4%
Eas
tern
Cap
eA
mat
ole
Dis
trict
Mun
icip
ality
Ngq
ushw
a36
,751
16
,737
34,3
51
-
9,91
8
2,18
3
-
12
,101
72.3
%E
aste
rn C
ape
Am
atol
e D
istri
ct M
unic
ipal
ityN
konk
obe
26,0
60
23,2
93
29
,518
12,8
40
10
,467
1,74
0
-
12
,207
52.4
%E
aste
rn C
ape
O.R
. Tam
bo D
istri
ct M
unic
ipal
ityN
taba
nkul
u6,
638
21,6
70
7,
014
-
582
-
36
2
944
4.
4%E
aste
rn C
ape
O.R
. Tam
bo D
istri
ct M
unic
ipal
ityN
yand
eni
55,0
95
41,6
46
59
,179
47,1
87
3,
286
-
-
3,
286
7.9%
Eas
tern
Cap
eO
.R. T
ambo
Dis
trict
Mun
icip
ality
Por
t St.
John
s29
,502
22
,567
30,9
95
23
,732
4,83
5
-
51
4,88
6
21
.7%
Eas
tern
Cap
eO
.R. T
ambo
Dis
trict
Mun
icip
ality
Qau
keni
51,0
63
39,3
11
54
,728
-
1,
735
-
11
9
1,85
4
4.
7%E
aste
rn C
ape
Chr
is H
ani D
istri
ct M
unic
ipal
ityS
akhi
sizw
e62
,856
9,
906
15
,715
-
1,
512
-
-
1,
512
15.3
%E
aste
rn C
ape
uKha
hlam
ba D
istri
ct M
unic
ipal
ityS
enqu
34,2
85
24,9
97
36
,368
29,8
87
12
,092
99
-
12
,191
48.8
%E
aste
rn C
ape
Cac
adu
Dis
trict
Mun
icip
ality
Sun
days
Riv
er V
alle
y10
,007
4,
460
10
,748
-
3,
331
-
-
3,
331
74.7
%E
aste
rn C
ape
Chr
is H
ani D
istri
ct M
unic
ipal
ityTs
olw
ana
7,93
5
5,
251
8,
334
-
633
3,33
3
-
3,
966
75.5
%E
aste
rn C
ape
Alfr
ed N
zo D
istri
ct M
unic
ipal
ityU
mzi
mvu
bu46
,093
34
,685
46,2
59
-
1,99
2
-
72
8
2,72
0
7.
8%Fr
ee S
tate
Thab
o m
ofut
sany
ana
Dis
trict
Mun
icip
ality
Dih
labe
ng33
,476
18
,435
36,9
60
2,
742
5,
666
2,
742
-
8,40
8
45
.6%
Free
Sta
teX
harie
p D
istri
ct M
unic
ipal
ityK
opan
ong
17,6
36
11,5
51
19
,342
5,35
9
1,66
5
4,85
4
-
6,
519
56.4
%Fr
ee S
tate
Xha
riep
Dis
trict
Mun
icip
ality
Lets
emen
g12
,098
6,
960
13
,460
1,52
7
3,72
7
5,25
4
75
.5%
Free
Sta
teN
orth
ern
Free
Sta
te D
istri
ct M
unic
ipal
ityM
afub
e14
,811
9,
516
16
,114
3,00
7
3,85
9
13,4
87
-
17,3
46
18
2.3%
Free
Sta
teTh
abo
mof
utsa
nyan
a D
istri
ct M
unic
ipal
ityM
alut
i-a-P
hofu
ng92
,159
60
,370
97,9
57
70
,396
5,01
3
68,0
00
-
73,0
13
12
0.9%
Free
Sta
teM
othe
o D
istri
ct M
unio
cipa
lity
Man
gaun
g18
8,87
6
92
,832
202,
887
78,2
50
22
,194
165,
779
-
18
7,97
320
2.5%
Free
Sta
teM
othe
o D
istri
ct M
unio
cipa
lity
Man
tsop
a14
,082
8,
852
15
,205
-
2,
249
2,
925
-
5,17
4
58
.5%
Free
Sta
teLe
jwel
eput
swa
Dis
trict
Mun
icip
ality
Mas
ilony
ana
20,5
15
11,0
37
18
,211
6,81
2
5,37
9
5,50
7
-
10
,886
98.6
%
Tota
lH
ouse
hold
sse
rved
as
a pe
rcen
tage
AN
NEX
UR
E H
: FR
EE B
ASI
C E
NER
GY
PRO
VIN
CE
MU
NIC
IPA
LITY
STA
TIST
ICS
SOU
TH A
FRIC
A
CEN
SUS
2001
MU
NIC
IPA
L SO
UR
CE
2008
DIS
TRIC
TES
KO
M (E
skom
su
pplie
d ar
eas)
MU
NIC
IPA
LITY
(Mun
icip
al s
uppl
ied
area
s)
Alte
rnat
ive
Sour
ce o
f En
ergy
(Mun
icip
alSo
urce
)
Tota
lH
ouse
hold
sse
rved
68
Tota
l Hou
seho
lds
Tota
l Ind
igen
t H
ouse
hold
sTo
tal
Hou
seho
lds
Tota
l In
dige
ntH
ouse
hold
s
Tota
lH
ouse
hold
sse
rved
as
a pe
rcen
tage
AN
NEX
UR
E H
: FR
EE B
ASI
C E
NER
GY
PRO
VIN
CE
MU
NIC
IPA
LITY
STA
TIST
ICS
SOU
TH A
FRIC
A
CEN
SUS
2001
MU
NIC
IPA
L SO
UR
CE
2008
DIS
TRIC
TES
KO
M (E
skom
su
pplie
d ar
eas)
MU
NIC
IPA
LITY
(Mun
icip
al s
uppl
ied
area
s)
Alte
rnat
ive
Sour
ce o
f En
ergy
(Mun
icip
alSo
urce
)
Tota
lH
ouse
hold
sse
rved
Free
Sta
teLe
jwel
eput
swa
Dis
trict
Mun
icip
ality
Mat
jhab
eng
128,
716
65,3
85
12
4,94
8
-
17,5
05
19
,000
-
36
,505
55.8
%Fr
ee S
tate
Nor
ther
n Fr
ee S
tate
Dis
trict
Mun
icip
ality
Met
sim
ahol
o33
,733
14
,315
35,4
64
8,
081
3,
575
8,
081
-
11,6
56
81
.4%
Free
Sta
teX
harie
p D
istri
ct M
unic
ipal
ityM
ohok
are
9,58
0
6,
725
10
,155
2,98
9
1,55
1
985
920
3,
456
51.4
%Fr
ee S
tate
Nor
ther
n Fr
ee S
tate
Dis
trict
Mun
icip
ality
Moq
haka
43,9
02
21,1
96
44
,818
9,89
9
2,15
2
9,86
4
-
12
,016
56.7
%Fr
ee S
tate
Lejw
elep
utsw
a D
istri
ct M
unic
ipal
ityN
ala
26,0
14
17,5
69
28
,710
4,47
6
1,69
2
9,80
5
-
11
,497
65.4
%Fr
ee S
tate
Mot
heo
Dis
trict
Mun
ioci
palit
yN
aled
i7,
686
4,80
0
8,37
2
3,20
4
1,01
1
-
-
1,01
1
21
.1%
Free
Sta
teN
orth
ern
Free
Sta
te D
istri
ct M
unic
ipal
ityN
gwat
he32
,540
20
,290
34,6
81
12
,210
-
28
,798
-
28
,798
141.
9%Fr
ee S
tate
Thab
o m
ofut
sany
ana
Dis
trict
Mun
icip
ality
Nke
toan
a15
,039
10
,003
15,9
65
4,
762
6,
768
4,
199
-
10,9
67
10
9.6%
Free
Sta
teTh
abo
mof
utsa
nyan
a D
istri
ct M
unic
ipal
ityP
hum
elel
a12
,043
7,
519
13
,178
1,39
4
3,40
9
2,64
3
-
6,
052
80.5
%Fr
ee S
tate
Thab
o m
ofut
sany
ana
Dis
trict
Mun
icip
ality
Set
soto
33,6
23
23,2
57
36
,146
10,0
19
21
,364
10,0
88
-
31,4
52
13
5.2%
Free
Sta
teLe
jwel
eput
swa
Dis
trict
Mun
icip
ality
Toko
logo
8,97
6
5,
795
9,
859
-
1,04
2
2,21
4
-
3,
256
56.2
%Fr
ee S
tate
Lejw
elep
utsw
a D
istri
ct M
unic
ipal
ityTs
wel
opel
e12
,554
8,
636
13
,430
3,45
17,
566
3,
134
-
10,7
00
12
3.9%
Gau
teng
City
of J
ohan
nesb
urg
Met
ropo
litan
Mun
icip
ality
City
of J
ohan
nesb
urg
1,05
0,22
9
336,
700
1,
256,
127
11
9,10
0
119,
038
30
5,33
7
-
424,
375
12
6.0%
Gau
teng
City
of T
shw
ane
Met
ropo
litan
Mun
icip
ality
City
of T
shw
ane
597,
520
166,
468
67
5,25
6
26
,785
5,05
4
26,7
85
-
31,8
39
19
.1%
Gau
teng
Eku
rhul
eni M
etro
polit
an M
unic
ipal
ityE
kurh
ulen
i met
ropo
litan
mun
icip
ality
776,
470
283,
903
93
1,20
8
43
,254
210,
089
52
,650
-
26
2,73
9
92.5
%G
aute
ngS
edib
eng
Dis
trict
mun
icip
ality
Em
fule
ni19
0,23
7
87
,131
225,
924
11,0
00
10
,491
4,22
7
-
14
,718
16.9
%G
aute
ngM
etsw
edin
g D
istri
ct M
unic
ipal
ityK
ungw
ini
34,1
69
13,0
31
43
,150
1,58
7
9,48
0
12,8
12
-
22,2
92
17
1.1%
Gau
teng
Sed
iben
g D
istri
ct m
unic
ipal
ityLe
sedi
19,7
09
8,32
9
22,2
14
8,
680
92
8,68
0
-
8,
772
105.
3%G
aute
ngS
edib
eng
Dis
trict
mun
icip
ality
Mid
vaal
20,8
40
7,73
4
24,1
20
1,
100
81
540
-
62
1
8.0%
Gau
teng
Wes
t Ran
d D
istri
ct M
unic
ipal
ityM
ogal
e C
ity89
,687
30
,347
105,
240
1,62
2
4,92
4
113
-
5,
037
16.6
%G
aute
ngM
etsw
edin
g D
istri
ct M
unic
ipal
ityN
oken
g ts
a Ta
eman
e16
,833
5,
479
18
,389
870
3,01
2
870
-
3,
882
70.9
%G
aute
ngW
est R
and
Dis
trict
Mun
icip
ality
Ran
dfon
tein
40,4
46
12,8
21
45
,362
4,52
2
274
19,0
81
-
19,3
55
15
1.0%
Gau
teng
Wes
t Ran
d D
istri
ct M
unic
ipal
ityW
esto
naria
51,5
21
15,0
81
35
,005
14,9
00
1,
534
4,
900
-
6,
434
42.7
%K
waZ
ulu
Nat
alZu
lula
nd D
istri
ct M
unic
ipal
ityA
baqu
lusi
37,0
64
22,7
62
41
,788
-
86
6
3,
169
-
4,03
5
17
.7%
Kw
aZul
u N
atal
Am
ajub
a D
istri
ct M
unic
ipal
ityD
annh
ause
r19
,481
14
,029
22,2
13
-
2,65
0
120
-
2,
770
19.7
%K
waZ
ulu
Nat
alZu
lula
nd D
istri
ct M
unic
ipal
ityeD
umbe
15,8
24
10,7
65
17
,548
11,6
71
1
-
-
1
0.
0%K
waZ
ulu
Nat
aluT
huke
la D
istri
ct M
unic
ipal
ityE
mna
mbi
thi/L
adys
mith
51,9
03
28,0
86
7,
133
12
,991
1,75
6
5,85
2
2,10
0
9,
708
34.6
%K
waZ
ulu
Nat
aliL
embe
Dis
trict
Mun
icip
ality
eNdo
ndak
usuk
a31
,014
17
,655
59,2
16
-
2,53
6
-
-
2,53
6
14
.4%
Kw
aZul
u N
atal
uMzi
nyat
hi D
istri
ct M
unic
ipal
ityE
ndum
eni
13,1
33
6,34
7
14,1
01
1,
859
-
2,07
0
-
2,
070
32.6
%K
waZ
ulu
Nat
aleT
hekw
ini
eThe
kwin
i82
4,37
1
31
8,60
5
914,
701
-
1,
708
55
,902
-
57
,610
18.1
%K
waZ
ulu
Nat
alU
gu D
istri
ct M
unic
ipal
ityE
zing
olen
i11
,443
7,
681
12
,347
-
42
7
-
-
42
7
5.6%
Kw
aZul
u N
atal
Sis
onke
Dis
trict
Mun
icip
allit
yG
reat
er K
okst
ad20
,566
13
,286
23,1
90
2,
175
-
2,17
5
-
2,
175
16.4
%K
waZ
ulu
Nat
alU
gu D
istri
ct M
unic
ipal
ityH
ibis
cus
Coa
st55
,274
26
,248
59,4
61
43
3
2,
635
-
-
2,
635
10.0
%K
waZ
ulu
Nat
alU
mkh
anya
kude
Dis
trict
Mun
icip
ality
Hla
bisa
27,2
79
16,5
10
32
,066
-
1,
197
-
2,01
1
3,
208
19.4
%K
waZ
ulu
Nat
aluT
huke
la D
istri
ct M
unic
ipal
ityIm
baba
zane
23,2
83
17,8
79
26
,980
-
11
,237
-
1,
500
12,7
37
71
.2%
Kw
aZul
u N
atal
uMgu
ngun
dlov
u D
istri
ct M
unic
ipal
ityIm
pend
le7,
463
5,73
6
8,44
8
-
1,
044
-
-
1,
044
18.2
%K
waZ
ulu
Nat
aluT
huke
la D
istri
ct M
unic
ipal
ityIn
daka
21,4
75
17,7
26
25
,016
-
1,
385
-
1,00
0
2,
385
13.5
%K
waZ
ulu
Nat
alS
ison
ke D
istri
ct M
unic
ipal
lity
Ingw
e21
,954
16
,797
25,3
55
-
3,94
9
-
-
3,94
9
23
.5%
Kw
aZul
u N
atal
Um
khan
yaku
de D
istri
ct M
unic
ipal
ityJo
zini
34,7
39
26,2
84
38
,807
-
96
1
-
3,38
8
4,
349
16.5
%K
waZ
ulu
Nat
alS
ison
ke D
istri
ct M
unic
ipal
lity
Kw
a S
ani
4,66
0
3,
072
5,
241
-
208
-
-
208
6.
8%K
waZ
ulu
Nat
aliL
embe
Dis
trict
Mun
icip
ality
Kw
aDuk
uza
45,9
28
19,7
69
47
,793
-
1,
972
5,
500
-
7,47
2
37
.8%
Kw
aZul
u N
atal
iLem
be D
istri
ct M
unic
ipal
ityM
aphu
mul
o22
,429
16
,953
33,0
64
-
883
-
3,
223
4,10
6
24
.2%
Kw
aZul
u N
atal
uThu
ngul
u D
istri
ct M
unic
ipal
ityM
bona
mbi
20,4
38
11,4
09
25
,299
-
2,
435
-
-
2,
435
21.3
%K
waZ
ulu
Nat
aluM
gung
undl
ovu
Dis
trict
Mun
icip
ality
Mkh
amba
thin
i15
,417
8,
232
21
,850
-
1,
511
-
-
1,
511
18.4
%K
waZ
ulu
Nat
aluM
gung
undl
ovu
Dis
trict
Mun
icip
ality
Moo
i Mpo
fana
10,5
16
5,67
3
14,3
75
5,
758
-
5,12
4
-
5,
124
90.3
%K
waZ
ulu
Nat
aluM
ziny
athi
Dis
trict
Mun
icip
ality
Msi
nga
32,9
08
25,2
59
10
,914
-
34
1
-
3,77
8
4,
119
16.3
%K
waZ
ulu
Nat
aluT
hung
ulu
Dis
trict
Mun
icip
ality
Mth
onja
neni
12,6
57
7,31
9
37,0
06
43
0
46
4
47
9
-
943
12
.9%
69
Tota
l Hou
seho
lds
Tota
l Ind
igen
t H
ouse
hold
sTo
tal
Hou
seho
lds
Tota
l In
dige
ntH
ouse
hold
s
Tota
lH
ouse
hold
sse
rved
as
a pe
rcen
tage
AN
NEX
UR
E H
: FR
EE B
ASI
C E
NER
GY
PRO
VIN
CE
MU
NIC
IPA
LITY
STA
TIST
ICS
SOU
TH A
FRIC
A
CEN
SUS
2001
MU
NIC
IPA
L SO
UR
CE
2008
DIS
TRIC
TES
KO
M (E
skom
su
pplie
d ar
eas)
MU
NIC
IPA
LITY
(Mun
icip
al s
uppl
ied
area
s)
Alte
rnat
ive
Sour
ce o
f En
ergy
(Mun
icip
alSo
urce
)
Tota
lH
ouse
hold
sse
rved
Kw
aZul
u N
atal
Um
khan
yaku
de D
istri
ct M
unic
ipal
ityM
tuba
tuba
8,28
6
3,
474
11
,564
-
50
-
-
50
1.
4%K
waZ
ulu
Nat
aliL
embe
Dis
trict
Mun
icip
ality
Ndw
edw
e30
,645
20
,405
7,19
5
-
60
3
-
353
95
6
4.7%
Kw
aZul
u N
atal
Am
ajub
a D
istri
ct M
unic
ipal
ityN
ewca
stle
71,9
99
40,5
78
31
,419
19,4
32
9,
795
47
5
-
10,2
70
25
.3%
Kw
aZul
u N
atal
uThu
ngul
u D
istri
ct M
unic
ipal
ityN
kand
la24
,910
18
,124
82,9
50
-
710
-
1,
600
2,31
0
12
.7%
Kw
aZul
u N
atal
Zulu
land
Dis
trict
Mun
icip
ality
Non
gom
a32
,473
23
,256
27,7
25
-
419
543
96
2
4.1%
Kw
aZul
u N
atal
uMzi
nyat
hi D
istri
ct M
unic
ipal
ityN
quth
u29
,698
24
,019
36,7
01
-
4,26
6
-
-
4,26
6
17
.8%
Kw
aZul
u N
atal
uThu
ngul
u D
istri
ct M
unic
ipal
ityN
tam
bana
na13
,844
7,
843
34
,203
11,0
00
2,
500
4,
880
-
7,38
0
94
.1%
Kw
aZul
u N
atal
uThu
kela
Dis
trict
Mun
icip
ality
Okh
ahla
mba
27,9
78
19,7
82
14
,280
14,0
00
2,
206
-
1,00
0
3,
206
16.2
%K
waZ
ulu
Nat
aluM
gung
undl
ovu
Dis
trict
Mun
icip
ality
Ric
hmon
d16
,021
8,
141
31
,180
11,2
00
6,
594
80
0
-
7,39
4
90
.8%
Kw
aZul
u N
atal
Um
khan
yaku
de D
istri
ct M
unic
ipal
ityTh
e B
ig 5
Fal
se B
ay7,
117
3,89
4
14,2
41
-
476
-
48
3
959
24
.6%
Kw
aZul
u N
atal
uMgu
ngun
dlov
u D
istri
ct M
unic
ipal
ityTh
e M
sund
uzi
135,
239
58,3
54
7,
191
-
1,98
9
23,9
05
-
25,8
94
44
.4%
Kw
aZul
u N
atal
Sis
onke
Dis
trict
Mun
icip
allit
yU
buhl
ebez
we
23,1
07
16,2
39
14
9,28
0
12
0,00
01,
581
-
2,00
0
3,
581
22.1
%K
waZ
ulu
Nat
alZu
lula
nd D
istri
ct M
unic
ipal
ityU
lund
i34
,957
23
,404
25,3
95
-
1,79
7
9,88
9
-
11
,686
49.9
%K
waZ
ulu
Nat
alU
gu D
istri
ct M
unic
ipal
ityU
mdo
ni16
,508
7,
167
39
,109
3,35
7
1,24
6
-
2,
000
3,24
6
45
.3%
Kw
aZul
u N
atal
Um
khan
yaku
de D
istri
ct M
unic
ipal
ityU
mhl
abuy
alin
gana
26,6
78
19,8
89
17
,660
-
-
-
3,
935
3,93
5
19
.8%
Kw
aZul
u N
atal
uThu
ngul
u D
istri
ct M
unic
ipal
ityuM
hlat
huze
73,3
01
29,8
18
30
,222
513
6,00
2
951
-
6,
953
23.3
%K
waZ
ulu
Nat
aluT
hung
ulu
Dis
trict
Mun
icip
ality
Um
lala
zi44
,634
24
,355
82,4
78
1,
198
1,
733
67
1
-
2,40
4
9.
9%K
waZ
ulu
Nat
aluM
gung
undl
ovu
Dis
trict
Mun
icip
ality
uMng
eni
22,7
01
8,89
8
44,0
34
1,
480
1,
918
6,
800
-
8,71
8
98
.0%
Kw
aZul
u N
atal
uMgu
ngun
dlov
u D
istri
ct M
unic
ipal
ityuM
shw
athi
27,3
24
15,8
41
23
,167
3,95
2
-
2,
000
5,95
2
37
.6%
Kw
aZul
u N
atal
uThu
kela
Dis
trict
Mun
icip
ality
Um
tshe
zi13
,978
7,
416
27
,183
-
61
7
2,
672
1,
800
5,08
9
68
.6%
Kw
aZul
u N
atal
Ugu
Dis
trict
Mun
icip
ality
uMuz
iwab
antu
19,5
24
14,2
04
15
,371
-
7,
606
55
88
6
8,54
7
60
.2%
Kw
aZul
u N
atal
uMzi
nyat
hi D
istri
ct M
unic
ipal
ityU
mvo
ti23
,002
13
,152
21,9
38
-
1,58
5
-
-
1,58
5
12
.1%
Kw
aZul
u N
atal
Sis
onke
Dis
trict
Mun
icip
allit
yU
mzi
mkh
ulu
36,6
77
27,9
46
22
,460
-
2,
786
-
279
3,06
5
11
.0%
Kw
aZul
u N
atal
Ugu
Dis
trict
Mun
icip
ality
Um
zum
be38
,889
29
,079
39,1
43
-
8,56
2
-
32
7
8,88
9
30
.6%
Kw
aZul
u N
atal
Zulu
land
Dis
trict
Mun
icip
ality
uPho
ngol
o26
,954
16
,892
44,2
06
1,
248
1,
703
87
3
62
2,63
8
15
.6%
Kw
aZul
u N
atal
Am
ajub
a D
istri
ct M
unic
ipal
ityU
trech
t6,
739
3,82
8
28,9
18
-
-
-
-
0.
0%K
waZ
ulu
Nat
alU
gu D
istri
ct M
unic
ipal
ityV
ulam
ehlo
16,8
05
11,4
60
18
,169
-
21
0
-
-
21
0
1.8%
Lim
popo
Cap
ricor
n D
istri
ct M
unic
ipal
ityA
gana
ng32
,533
23
,456
35,5
18
27
,061
2,17
4
-
-
2,17
4
9.
3%Li
mpo
poM
opan
i Dis
trict
Mun
icip
ality
Ba-
Pha
labo
rwa
33,5
71
15,3
53
34
,799
-
7,
305
3,
968
-
11,2
73
73
.4%
Lim
popo
Wat
erbu
rg D
istri
ct M
unic
ipal
ityB
ela-
Bel
a14
,170
5,
818
14
,002
3,30
1
110
3,24
7
4,52
4
7,
881
135.
5%Li
mpo
poC
apric
orn
Dis
trict
Mun
icip
ality
Blo
uber
g35
,176
25
,869
37,5
36
28
,478
2,40
4
3,10
9
-
5,
513
21.3
%Li
mpo
poG
reat
er S
ekhu
khun
e D
istri
ct M
unic
ipal
ityFe
takg
omo
19,0
22
13,5
19
50
,004
2,5
81
2,80
6
-
-
2,80
6
20
.8%
Lim
popo
Mop
ani D
istri
ct M
unic
ipal
ityG
reat
er G
iyan
i53
,292
36
,486
21,1
74
21
,007
18,5
49
-
18,5
49
50
.8%
Lim
popo
Gre
ater
Sek
hukh
une
Dis
trict
Mun
icip
ality
Gre
ater
Gro
bler
sdal
48
,951
32
,456
59,4
95
979
1,
007
1,
260
-
2,26
7
7.
0%Li
mpo
poM
opan
i Dis
trict
Mun
icip
ality
Gre
ater
Let
aba
53,7
47
37,4
49
58
,095
-5,
258
5,
000
-
10,2
58
27
.4%
Lim
popo
Gre
ater
Sek
hukh
une
Dis
trict
Mun
icip
ality
Gre
ater
Mar
ble
Hal
l26
,551
16
,904
26,9
37
2
,958
2,
377
24
,472
-
26
,849
158.
8%Li
mpo
poG
reat
er S
ekhu
khun
e D
istri
ct M
unic
ipal
ityG
reat
er T
ubat
se56
,234
39
,451
60,4
55
39
,000
8,
124
-
580
8,
704
22.1
%Li
mpo
poM
opan
i Dis
trict
Mun
icip
ality
Gre
ater
Tza
neen
97,4
25
59,1
63
95
,221
30,0
29
16
,180
131
-
16
,311
27.6
%Li
mpo
poC
apric
orn
Dis
trict
Mun
icip
ality
Lepe
le-N
kum
pi52
,928
34
,684
56,6
35
46
,786
14,1
94
-
-
14
,194
40.9
%Li
mpo
poW
ater
burg
Dis
trict
Mun
icip
ality
Leph
alal
e28
,359
14
,994
26,6
10
5,
522
1,
808
3,
306
-
5,11
4
34
.1%
Lim
popo
Vhe
mbe
Dis
trict
Mun
icip
ality
Mak
hado
113,
222
72,9
56
12
3,09
9
75
,469
11,8
79
6,
713
74
8
19,3
40
26
.5%
Lim
popo
Gre
ater
Sek
hukh
une
Dis
trict
Mun
icip
ality
Mak
hudu
tham
aga
54,0
33
40,7
47
59
,879
-
8,
076
26
,434
-
34
,510
84.7
%Li
mpo
poM
opan
i Dis
trict
Mun
icip
ality
Mar
ulen
g23
,050
14
,716
21,4
86
8,
296
8,
791
4,
170
-
12,9
61
88
.1%
Lim
popo
Wat
erbu
rg D
istri
ct M
unic
ipal
ityM
odim
olle
20,9
64
9,36
4
21,0
14
2,
500
-
3,03
6
6,06
0
9,
096
97.1
%Li
mpo
poW
ater
burg
Dis
trict
Mun
icip
ality
Mog
alak
wen
a70
,134
44
,155
76,6
51
-
35,7
23
7,
669
-
43,3
92
98
.3%
Lim
popo
Cap
ricor
n D
istri
ct M
unic
ipal
ityM
olem
ole
28,9
44
19,8
81
30
,823
21,8
37
8,
272
-
-
8,
272
41.6
%Li
mpo
poW
ater
burg
Dis
trict
Mun
icip
ality
Moo
kgop
ong
9,56
9
3,
195
8,
940
1,
330
2,
266
7,
562
-
9,82
8
30
7.6%
70
Tota
l Hou
seho
lds
Tota
l Ind
igen
t H
ouse
hold
sTo
tal
Hou
seho
lds
Tota
l In
dige
ntH
ouse
hold
s
Tota
lH
ouse
hold
sse
rved
as
a pe
rcen
tage
AN
NEX
UR
E H
: FR
EE B
ASI
C E
NER
GY
PRO
VIN
CE
MU
NIC
IPA
LITY
STA
TIST
ICS
SOU
TH A
FRIC
A
CEN
SUS
2001
MU
NIC
IPA
L SO
UR
CE
2008
DIS
TRIC
TES
KO
M (E
skom
su
pplie
d ar
eas)
MU
NIC
IPA
LITY
(Mun
icip
al s
uppl
ied
area
s)
Alte
rnat
ive
Sour
ce o
f En
ergy
(Mun
icip
alSo
urce
)
Tota
lH
ouse
hold
sse
rved
Lim
popo
Vhe
mbe
Dis
trict
Mun
icip
ality
Mus
ina
13,9
78
7,98
3
13,0
76
4,
688
23
5
1,
983
-
2,21
8
27
.8%
Lim
popo
Vhe
mbe
Dis
trict
Mun
icip
ality
Mut
ale
18,4
47
12,1
90
20
,775
13,8
83
1,
063
-
927
1,
990
16.3
%Li
mpo
poC
apric
orn
Dis
trict
Mun
icip
ality
Pol
okw
ane
135,
638
70,1
99
14
2,80
7
10
4,28
9
10,9
82
5,
000
3,
391
19,3
73
27
.6%
Lim
popo
Wat
erbu
rg D
istri
ct M
unic
ipal
ityTh
abaz
imbi
25,0
37
9,36
0
22,9
83
1,
342
2,
579
1,
157
5,07
8
54
.3%
Lim
popo
Vhe
mbe
Dis
trict
Mun
icip
ality
Thul
amel
a12
8,44
7
84
,289
141,
729
82,6
04
13
,723
-
4,
541
18,2
64
21
.7%
Mpu
mal
anga
Ger
t Sib
ande
Dis
trict
mun
icip
ality
Alb
ert L
uthu
li41
,234
27
,778
45,3
48
18
,708
1,73
4
1,22
5
-
2,
959
10.7
%M
pum
alan
gaE
hlan
zeni
Dis
trict
Mun
icip
ality
Bus
hbuc
krid
ge10
9,32
2
79
,527
118,
773
-
63
,227
-
4,
100
67,3
27
84
.7%
Mpu
mal
anga
Nka
ngal
a D
istri
ct m
unic
ipal
ityD
elm
as13
,954
6,
699
15
,419
4,06
1
2,31
5
8,00
1
-
10
,316
154.
0%M
pum
alan
gaG
ert S
iban
de D
istri
ct m
unic
ipal
ityD
ipal
esen
g9,
581
5,65
5
10,7
35
56
8
56
7
1,
340
-
1,90
7
33
.7%
Mpu
mal
anga
Nka
ngal
a D
istri
ct m
unic
ipal
ityD
r JS
Mor
oka
54,3
39
35,8
39
60
,210
-
2,
430
76
1
-
3,19
1
8.
9%M
pum
alan
gaN
kang
ala
Dis
trict
mun
icip
ality
Em
alah
leni
82,2
98
28,9
80
11
,391
9,63
0
-
9,
630
-
9,63
0
33
.2%
Mpu
mal
anga
Ger
t Sib
ande
Dis
trict
mun
icip
ality
Gov
an M
beki
67,6
29
28,0
14
87
,972
17,2
59
1,
864
17,2
59
-
19,1
23
68
.3%
Mpu
mal
anga
Nka
ngal
a D
istri
ct m
unic
ipal
ityH
ighl
and
10,9
37
4,39
7
70,9
14
82
0
73
820
-
89
3
20.3
%M
pum
alan
gaG
ert S
iban
de D
istri
ct m
unic
ipal
ityLe
kwa
26,1
98
11,4
87
29
,424
-
1,
121
13
,540
-
14
,661
127.
6%M
pum
alan
gaE
hlan
zeni
Dis
trict
Mun
icip
ality
Mbo
mbe
la12
2,50
4
56
,509
130,
511
91,2
37
5,
309
10
7
-
5,41
6
9.
6%M
pum
alan
gaG
ert S
iban
de D
istri
ct m
unic
ipal
ityM
khon
do28
,918
17
,387
33,9
21
-
1,06
2
3,23
7
-
4,
299
24.7
%M
pum
alan
gaG
ert S
iban
de D
istri
ct m
unic
ipal
ityM
suka
ligw
a30
,302
15
,289
34,8
76
16
,000
371
5,70
0
-
6,
071
39.7
%M
pum
alan
gaE
hlan
zeni
Dis
trict
Mun
icip
ality
Nko
maz
i75
,584
49
,681
85,0
22
-
12,3
24
50
0
-
12,8
24
25
.8%
Mpu
mal
anga
Ger
t Sib
ande
Dis
trict
mun
icip
ality
Pix
ley
Ka
Sem
e18
,412
12
,234
21,0
40
5,
710
1,
441
5,
710
-
7,15
1
58
.5%
Mpu
mal
anga
Nka
ngal
a D
istri
ct m
unic
ipal
ityS
teve
Tsh
wet
e37
,115
12
,518
41,6
77
13
,197
174
9,86
4
-
10
,038
80.2
%M
pum
alan
gaE
hlan
zeni
Dis
trict
Mun
icip
ality
Thab
a C
hweu
26,8
18
10,2
72
25
,654
1,91
8
18,2
14
-
20,1
32
19
6.0%
Mpu
mal
anga
Nka
ngal
a D
istri
ct m
unic
ipal
ityTh
embi
sile
58,2
35
34,7
06
62
,786
-
11
,268
1,97
2
-
13
,240
38.1
%M
pum
alan
gaE
hlan
zeni
Dis
trict
Mun
icip
ality
Um
jindi
15,9
10
6,89
3
16,8
42
1,
589
7
10
,325
-
10
,332
149.
9%N
orth
Wes
tC
entra
l Dis
trict
Mun
icip
ality
Dits
obot
la36
,431
20
,153
105,
989
282
1,28
5
142
-
1,
427
7.1%
Nor
th W
est
Bom
pirim
a D
istri
ct M
unic
ipal
ityG
reat
er T
aung
42,0
18
29,6
07
40
,329
183
3,00
0
399
-
3,
399
11.5
%N
orth
Wes
tB
ompi
rima
Dis
trict
Mun
icip
ality
Kag
isan
o21
,496
15
,472
46,4
49
-
3,59
4
-
-
3,59
4
23
.2%
Nor
th W
est
Bon
jana
la D
istri
ct M
unic
ipal
ityK
getle
ngriv
ier
10,4
97
5,77
7
21,6
95
2,
478
54
-
-
54
0.
9%N
orth
Wes
tB
ompi
rima
Dis
trict
Mun
icip
ality
Lekw
a-Te
eman
e11
,578
6,
000
11
,637
-
2,
218
-
-
2,
218
37.0
%N
orth
Wes
tB
onja
nala
Dis
trict
Mun
icip
ality
Loca
l Mun
icip
ality
of M
adib
eng
100,
457
47,4
18
12
,032
7,24
1
22,7
49
-
-
22
,749
48.0
%N
orth
Wes
tC
entra
l Dis
trict
Mun
icip
ality
Maf
iken
g67
,579
35
,724
100,
983
21,6
75
32
5
-
-
32
5
0.9%
Nor
th W
est
Bom
pirim
a D
istri
ct M
unic
ipal
ityM
amus
a10
,751
6,
781
73
,284
2,90
2
2,07
8
85
-
2,
163
31.9
%N
orth
Wes
tS
outh
ern
Dis
trict
Mun
icip
ality
Maq
uass
i Hill
s17
,302
10
,582
11,8
32
4,
362
1,
057
83
-
1,14
0
10
.8%
Nor
th W
est
Sou
ther
n D
istri
ct M
unic
ipal
ityM
atlo
sana
112,
119
46,1
31
19
,499
-
2,
437
19
,143
-
21
,580
46.8
%N
orth
Wes
tS
outh
ern
Dis
trict
Mun
icip
ality
Mer
afon
g ci
ty
99,7
01
26,2
86
65
,928
5,17
9
744
450
-
1,
194
4.5%
Nor
th W
est
Bom
pirim
a D
istri
ct M
unic
ipal
ityM
olop
o3,
799
2,64
0
4,07
1
-
39
1
-
-
39
1
14.8
%N
orth
Wes
tB
onja
nala
Dis
trict
Mun
icip
ality
Mor
etel
e43
,938
26
,361
51,3
15
-
17,9
39
-
-
17
,939
68.1
%N
orth
Wes
tB
onja
nala
Dis
trict
Mun
icip
ality
Mos
es K
otan
e62
,940
36
,897
69,7
65
46
,518
2,92
4
-
-
2,92
4
7.
9%N
orth
Wes
tB
ompi
rima
Dis
trict
Mun
icip
ality
Nal
edi
15,2
54
8,16
7
16,7
80
5,
650
24
3
5,
245
12
6
5,61
4
68
.7%
Nor
th W
est
Sou
ther
n D
istri
ct M
unic
ipal
ityP
otch
efst
room
34,0
28
12,2
80
36
,180
6,35
8
-
4,
311
-
4,31
1
35
.1%
Nor
th W
est
Cen
tral D
istri
ct M
unic
ipal
ityR
amot
sher
e M
oilo
a32
,401
20
,961
36,2
23
-
33
-
-
33
0.2%
Nor
th W
est
Cen
tral D
istri
ct M
unic
ipal
ityR
atlo
u22
,719
17
,137
25,4
95
2,
532
-
-
2,
532
14.8
%N
orth
Wes
tB
onja
nala
Dis
trict
Mun
icip
ality
Rus
tenb
urg
116,
665
43,0
70
13
4,75
3
10
,300
2,10
0
204
-
2,
304
5.3%
Nor
th W
est
Cen
tral D
istri
ct M
unic
ipal
ityTs
wai
ng25
,641
16
,457
28,4
92
95
2
1,
485
-
-
1,
485
9.0%
Nor
th W
est
Sou
ther
n D
istri
ct M
unic
ipal
ityV
ente
rsdo
rp11
,426
6,
832
13
,162
1,62
7
519
-
-
519
7.
6%N
orth
ern
Cap
eS
iyan
da D
istri
ct M
unic
ipal
ity! K
heis
3,
997
1,81
6
4,28
1
914
949
545
-
1,
494
82.3
%N
orth
ern
Cap
eS
iyan
da D
istri
ct M
unic
ipal
ity//K
hara
Hai
s
1
7,65
1 6,
497
18
,354
5,50
3
145
5,31
6
-
5,
461
84.1
%N
orth
ern
Cap
eFr
ance
s B
aard
Dis
trict
Mun
icip
ality
Dik
gatlo
ng
9,81
5 5,
667
9,
986
6,
484
91
5
88
0
-
1,79
5
31
.7%
71
Tota
l Hou
seho
lds
Tota
l Ind
igen
t H
ouse
hold
sTo
tal
Hou
seho
lds
Tota
l In
dige
ntH
ouse
hold
s
Tota
lH
ouse
hold
sse
rved
as
a pe
rcen
tage
AN
NEX
UR
E H
: FR
EE B
ASI
C E
NER
GY
PRO
VIN
CE
MU
NIC
IPA
LITY
STA
TIST
ICS
SOU
TH A
FRIC
A
CEN
SUS
2001
MU
NIC
IPA
L SO
UR
CE
2008
DIS
TRIC
TES
KO
M (E
skom
su
pplie
d ar
eas)
MU
NIC
IPA
LITY
(Mun
icip
al s
uppl
ied
area
s)
Alte
rnat
ive
Sour
ce o
f En
ergy
(Mun
icip
alSo
urce
)
Tota
lH
ouse
hold
sse
rved
Nor
ther
n C
ape
Pix
ley
Ka
sem
e D
istri
ct M
unic
ipal
ityE
mth
anje
ni
8,83
5 3,
842
8,
976
3,
672
51
3
3,
380
-
3,89
3
10
1.3%
Nor
ther
n C
ape
Kga
laga
di D
istri
ct M
unic
ipal
ityG
amag
ara
6,
683
2,18
8
6,07
3
1,99
0
991
988
-
1,
979
90.4
%N
orth
ern
Cap
eK
gala
gadi
Dis
trict
Mun
icip
ality
Ga-
Seg
onya
na
1
7,79
9 10
,493
19,5
77
1,
610
9,
888
34
4
-
10,2
32
97
.5%
Nor
ther
n C
ape
Nam
akw
a D
istri
ct M
unic
ipal
ityH
anta
m
5,52
1 2,
111
5,
778
99
6
84
4
85
4
-
1,69
8
80
.4%
Nor
ther
n C
ape
Siy
anda
Dis
trict
Mun
icip
ality
Kai
! G
arib
18,
050
6,02
1
13,8
10
2,
173
1,
149
1,
379
-
2,52
8
42
.0%
Nor
ther
n C
ape
Nam
akw
a D
istri
ct M
unic
ipal
ityK
amie
sber
g
3,23
9 1,
238
2,
982
96
2
16
8
2,
860
-
3,02
8
24
4.6%
Nor
ther
n C
ape
Pix
ley
Ka
sem
e D
istri
ct M
unic
ipal
ityK
aree
berg
2,
430
1,07
8
2,44
0
1,23
1
1,00
2
328
-
1,
330
123.
4%N
orth
ern
Cap
eN
amak
wa
Dis
trict
Mun
icip
ality
Kar
oo H
oogl
and
3,
168
1,26
0
3,03
6
900
586
500
-
1,
086
86.2
%N
orth
ern
Cap
eS
iyan
da D
istri
ct M
unic
ipal
ityK
gate
lope
le
3,91
1 1,
362
3,
985
1,
952
-
1,95
2
-
1,
952
143.
3%N
orth
ern
Cap
eN
amak
wa
Dis
trict
Mun
icip
ality
Kha
i-Ma
3,
363
1,14
6
3,02
5
1,44
9
728
566
-
1,
294
112.
9%N
orth
ern
Cap
eFr
ance
s B
aard
Dis
trict
Mun
icip
ality
Mag
aren
g
5,81
1 3,
537
6,
047
2,
548
1,18
0
863
-
2,
043
57.8
%N
orth
ern
Cap
eS
iyan
da D
istri
ct M
unic
ipal
ityM
ier
1,
596
832
1,70
3
552
602
-
-
602
72
.4%
Nor
ther
n C
ape
Kga
laga
di D
istri
ct M
unic
ipal
ityM
osha
wen
g
2
0,28
1 14
,975
23,8
19
20
,000
11,5
66
-
-
11
,566
77.2
%N
orth
ern
Cap
eN
amak
wa
Dis
trict
Mun
icip
ality
Nam
a K
hoi
12,
094
3,63
8
11,6
29
4,
596
1,
080
3,
307
-
4,38
7
12
0.6%
Nor
ther
n C
ape
Fran
ces
Baa
rd D
istri
ct M
unic
ipal
ityP
hokw
ane
17,
092
9,20
7
19,5
77
4,
400
1,
807
3,
534
-
5,34
1
58
.0%
Nor
ther
n C
ape
Pix
ley
Ka
sem
e D
istri
ct M
unic
ipal
ityR
enos
terb
erg
2,
473
1,39
1
2,57
5
808
721
57
-
77
8
55.9
%N
orth
ern
Cap
eN
amak
wa
Dis
trict
Mun
icip
ality
Ric
hter
svel
d
2,87
4 97
7
2,
635
80
9
46
8
2,
948
-
3,41
6
34
9.6%
Nor
ther
n C
ape
Pix
ley
Ka
sem
e D
istri
ct M
unic
ipal
ityS
iyan
cum
a
9,22
9 4,
332
9,
703
3,
392
82
9
3,
308
-
4,13
7
95
.5%
Nor
ther
n C
ape
Pix
ley
Ka
sem
e D
istri
ct M
unic
ipal
ityS
iyat
hem
ba
4,18
2 1,
944
4,
261
2,
114
1,
736
23
5
30
0
2,27
1
11
6.8%
Nor
ther
n C
ape
Fran
ces
Baa
rd D
istri
ct M
unic
ipal
ityS
ol P
laat
je
5
1,10
4 19
,756
53,2
56
9,
865
28
1
9,
865
-
10,1
46
51
.4%
Nor
ther
n C
ape
Pix
ley
Ka
sem
e D
istri
ct M
unic
ipal
ityTh
embe
lihle
3,
490
1,48
7
3,66
7
1,19
235
9
-
-
35
9
24.1
%N
orth
ern
Cap
eS
iyan
da D
istri
ct M
unic
ipal
ityTs
ants
aban
e
5,84
0 2,
450
5,
742
2,
480
2,
142
10
-
2,15
2
87
.8%
Nor
ther
n C
ape
Pix
ley
Ka
sem
e D
istri
ct M
unic
ipal
ityU
bunt
u
4,26
7 1,
910
4,
249
1,
560
87
4
1,
015
-
1,88
9
98
.9%
Nor
ther
n C
ape
Pix
ley
Ka
sem
e D
istri
ct M
unic
ipal
ityU
mso
bom
vu
5,90
9 3,
330
6,
113
2,
347
1,
816
31
0
-
2,12
6
63
.8%
Wes
tern
Cap
eC
entra
l Kar
oo D
istri
ct M
unic
ipal
ityB
eauf
ort W
est
9,10
3
2,
978
10
,804
2,95
7
150
3,48
2
-
3,
632
122.
0%W
este
rn C
ape
Wes
t Coa
st D
istri
ct M
unic
ipal
ityB
ergr
ivie
r13
,362
2,
557
14
,739
-
8
-
-
8
0.
3%W
este
rn C
ape
Ede
n D
istri
ct M
unic
ipal
ityB
itou
8,94
4
2,
881
11
,363
-
1,
879
9,
595
-
11,4
74
39
8.3%
Wes
tern
Cap
eC
ape
Win
elan
ds D
istri
ct M
unic
ipal
ityB
reed
e R
iver
/Win
elan
ds21
,215
6,
122
25
,764
3,82
1
-
4,
713
-
4,71
3
77
.0%
Wes
tern
Cap
eC
ape
Win
elan
ds D
istri
ct M
unic
ipal
ityB
reed
e V
alle
y35
,096
8,
746
41
,354
5,42
2
154
5,42
2
-
5,
576
63.8
%W
este
rn C
ape
Ove
rber
g D
istri
ct M
unic
ipal
ityC
ape
Agu
lhas
7,65
3
1,
803
9,
170
1,
950
92
0
4,
856
-
5,77
6
32
0.4%
Wes
tern
Cap
eW
est C
oast
Dis
trict
Mun
icip
ality
Ced
erbe
rg11
,220
3,
123
12
,863
-
25
4,77
6
-
4,
801
153.
7%W
este
rn C
ape
City
of C
ape
Tow
nC
ity o
f Cap
e To
wn
778,
237
183,
997
92
4,22
410
1,29
4
150,
207
27
6,20
2
-
426,
409
23
1.7%
Wes
tern
Cap
eC
ape
Win
elan
ds D
istri
ct M
unic
ipal
ityD
rake
nste
in46
,266
9,
909
53
,044
16,3
04
95
6
16
,304
-
17
,260
174.
2%W
este
rn C
ape
Ede
n D
istri
ct M
unic
ipal
ityG
eorg
e36
,191
10
,347
44,1
11
10
,153
179
24,8
47
-
25,0
26
24
1.9%
Wes
tern
Cap
eE
den
Dis
trict
Mun
icip
ality
Has
sequ
a12
,664
3,
192
15
,260
4,05
1
334
19,1
56
-
19,4
90
61
0.6%
Wes
tern
Cap
eE
den
Dis
trict
Mun
icip
ality
Kan
nala
nd6,
156
2,19
0
7,39
3
-
69
6
30
1
-
997
45
.5%
Wes
tern
Cap
eE
den
Dis
trict
Mun
icip
ality
Kny
sna
14,9
72
4,31
6
18,1
31
10
,500
429
5,90
7
-
6,
336
146.
8%W
este
rn C
ape
Cen
tral K
aroo
Dis
trict
Mun
icip
ality
Lain
gsbu
rg1,
945
707
2,30
8
769
279
497
-
77
6
109.
8%W
este
rn C
ape
Wes
t Coa
st D
istri
ct M
unic
ipal
ityM
atzi
kam
a14
,497
1,
176
17
,568
1,40
0
-
1,
410
-
1,41
0
11
9.9%
Wes
tern
Cap
eE
den
Dis
trict
Mun
icip
ality
Mos
sel B
ay20
,258
4,
913
24
,690
6,10
3
433
22,6
86
-
23,1
19
47
0.6%
Wes
tern
Cap
eE
den
Dis
trict
Mun
icip
ality
Oud
tsho
orn
18,4
13
5,03
9
21,8
17
3,
611
11
3
1,
380
-
1,49
3
29
.6%
Wes
tern
Cap
eO
verb
erg
Dis
trict
Mun
icip
ality
Ove
rstra
nd19
,020
4,
814
24
,083
2,46
8
41
2,
464
-
2,50
5
52
.0%
Wes
tern
Cap
eC
entra
l Kar
oo D
istri
ct M
unic
ipal
ityP
rince
Alb
ert
2,61
4
82
4
3,
056
92
8
16
792
8
-
1,09
5
13
2.9%
Wes
tern
Cap
eW
est C
oast
Dis
trict
Mun
icip
ality
Sal
danh
a B
ay18
,923
4,
120
23
,081
4,60
4
629
4,50
0
-
5,
129
124.
5%W
este
rn C
ape
Cap
e W
inel
ands
Dis
trict
Mun
icip
ality
Ste
llenb
osch
35,1
24
5,90
9
34,9
54
8,
923
1,
609
7,
890
-
9,49
9
16
0.8%
Wes
tern
Cap
eW
est C
oast
Dis
trict
Mun
icip
ality
Sw
artla
nd18
,758
3,
171
21
,153
3,55
9
916
3,61
8
-
4,
534
143.
0%
72
Tota
l Hou
seho
lds
Tota
l Ind
igen
t H
ouse
hold
sTo
tal
Hou
seho
lds
Tota
l In
dige
ntH
ouse
hold
s
Tota
lH
ouse
hold
sse
rved
as
a pe
rcen
tage
AN
NEX
UR
E H
: FR
EE B
ASI
C E
NER
GY
PRO
VIN
CE
MU
NIC
IPA
LITY
STA
TIST
ICS
SOU
TH A
FRIC
A
CEN
SUS
2001
MU
NIC
IPA
L SO
UR
CE
2008
DIS
TRIC
TES
KO
M (E
skom
su
pplie
d ar
eas)
MU
NIC
IPA
LITY
(Mun
icip
al s
uppl
ied
area
s)
Alte
rnat
ive
Sour
ce o
f En
ergy
(Mun
icip
alSo
urce
)
Tota
lH
ouse
hold
sse
rved
Wes
tern
Cap
eO
verb
erg
Dis
trict
Mun
icip
ality
Sw
elle
ndam
7,61
9
2,
088
9,
274
1,
758
12
0
5,
738
-
5,85
8
28
0.6%
Wes
tern
Cap
eO
verb
erg
Dis
trict
Mun
icip
ality
Thee
wat
ersk
loof
24,3
63
6,97
8
28,8
01
6,
029
1,
402
4,
783
-
6,18
5
88
.6%
Wes
tern
Cap
eC
ape
Win
elan
ds D
istri
ct M
unic
ipal
ityW
itzen
berg
20,4
59
5,47
5
23,7
20
3,
189
81
3
1,
584
-
2,39
7
43
.8%
Tota
l11
,803
,354
5,53
2,78
212
,996
,300
2,49
9,17
61,
287,
440
1,87
0,75
367
,951
3,22
6,14
458
.3%
Not
e: In
dige
nt h
ouse
hold
is a
hou
seho
ld th
at q
ualif
ies
to re
ceiv
e so
me
or a
ll ba
sic
serv
ices
for f
ree
beca
use
they
hav
e no
inco
me
or a
low
inco
me.
Thes
e ho
useh
olds
mus
t hav
e be
en id
entif
ied
by th
e m
unic
ipal
ity a
nd a
ppea
r on
the
indi
gent
regi
ster
, in
line
with
the
mun
icip
al in
dige
nt p
olic
y. 73
74
ANNEXURE I: ACCESS TO REFUSE REMOVAL
Tot
al
Hou
seho
lds
Hou
seho
ld a
cces
s to
refu
se re
mov
al
serv
ice
Hou
seho
ldac
cess
to
refu
se re
mov
al
serv
ice
as a
pe
rcen
tage
Hou
seho
lds
belo
w
basi
c le
vel o
f ser
vice
/ ba
cklo
gs
Hou
seho
lds
belo
w
basi
c le
vel o
f se
rvic
e/ b
ackl
ogs
as a
per
cent
age
Eas
tern
Cap
eA
mah
lath
i Loc
al M
unic
ipal
ity36
,390
4,42
9
12
.2%
31,9
61
87.8
%E
aste
rn C
ape
Bav
iaan
s Lo
cal M
unic
ipal
ity3,
739
2,
926
78.3
%81
3
21.7
%E
aste
rn C
ape
Blu
e C
rane
Rou
te L
ocal
Mun
icip
ality
9,65
5
7,78
3
80
.6%
1,87
2
19
.4%
Eas
tern
Cap
eB
uffa
lo C
ity L
ocal
Mun
icip
ality
208,
387
14
7,48
7
70.8
%60
,900
29
.2%
Eas
tern
Cap
eC
amde
boo
Loca
l Mun
icip
ality
8,99
5
8,48
9
94
.4%
506
5.
6%E
aste
rn C
ape
Um
zim
vubu
Loc
al M
unic
ipal
ity47
,802
1,92
3
4.
0%45
,879
96
.0%
Eas
tern
Cap
eE
lund
ini L
ocal
Mun
icip
ality
35,5
53
2,
107
5.9%
33,4
46
94.1
%E
aste
rn C
ape
Em
alah
leni
Loc
al M
unic
ipal
ity31
,196
2,68
4
8.
6%28
,512
91
.4%
Eas
tern
Cap
eE
ngco
bo L
ocal
Mun
icip
ality
35,1
87
1,
796
5.1%
33,3
91
94.9
%E
aste
rn C
ape
Gar
iep
Loca
l Mun
icip
ality
8,20
9
6,44
7
78
.5%
1,76
2
21
.5%
Eas
tern
Cap
eG
reat
Kei
Loc
al M
unic
ipal
ity11
,958
4,75
2
39
.7%
7,20
6
60
.3%
Eas
tern
Cap
eIk
wez
i Loc
al M
unic
ipal
ity2,
567
2,
212
86.2
%35
5
13.8
%E
aste
rn C
ape
Inkw
anca
Loc
al M
unic
ipal
ity5,
302
4,
200
79.2
%1,
102
20.8
%E
aste
rn C
ape
Ints
ika
Yet
hu L
ocal
Mun
icip
ality
43,5
01
66
1
1.
5%42
,840
98
.5%
Eas
tern
Cap
eIn
xuba
Yet
hem
ba L
ocal
Mun
icip
ality
14,4
92
12
,559
86.7
%1,
933
13.3
%E
aste
rn C
ape
Kin
g S
abat
a D
alin
dyeb
o Lo
cal M
unic
ipal
ity93
,382
21,7
55
23
.3%
71,6
27
76.7
%E
aste
rn C
ape
Kou
ga L
ocal
Mun
icip
ality
19,0
82
16
,670
87.4
%2,
412
12.6
%E
aste
rn C
ape
Kou
-Kam
ma
Loca
l Mun
icip
ality
10,3
75
6,
082
58.6
%4,
293
41.4
%E
aste
rn C
ape
Luka
nji L
ocal
Mun
icip
ality
49,6
75
29
,740
59.9
%19
,935
40
.1%
Eas
tern
Cap
eM
akan
a Lo
cal M
unic
ipal
ity18
,863
17,7
75
94
.2%
1,08
8
5.
8%E
aste
rn C
ape
Mal
etsw
ai L
ocal
Mun
icip
ality
11,4
43
9,
264
81.0
%2,
179
19.0
%E
aste
rn C
ape
Mat
atie
le L
ocal
Mun
icip
ality
54,2
08
5,
472
10.1
%48
,736
89
.9%
Eas
tern
Cap
eM
bhas
he L
ocal
Mun
icip
ality
59,7
06
2,
467
4.1%
57,2
39
95.9
%E
aste
rn C
ape
Mbi
zana
Loc
al M
unic
ipal
ity48
,408
612
1.3%
47,7
96
98.7
%E
aste
rn C
ape
Mhl
ontlo
Loc
al M
unic
ipal
ity49
,861
1,51
1
3.
0%48
,350
97
.0%
Eas
tern
Cap
eM
nqum
a Lo
cal M
unic
ipal
ity75
,412
6,83
8
9.
1%68
,574
90
.9%
Eas
tern
Cap
eN
dlam
be L
ocal
Mun
icip
ality
14,7
33
13
,596
92.3
%1,
137
7.7%
Eas
tern
Cap
eN
gqus
hwa
Loca
l Mun
icip
ality
25,5
64
1,
545
6.0%
24,0
19
94.0
%E
aste
rn C
ape
Nko
nkob
e Lo
cal M
unic
ipal
ity34
,890
6,43
5
18
.4%
28,4
55
81.6
%E
aste
rn C
ape
Nel
son
Man
dela
Bay
Met
ropo
litan
Mun
icip
ality
275,
892
21
2,46
1
77.0
%63
,431
23
.0%
Eas
tern
Cap
eN
taba
nkul
u Lo
cal M
unic
ipal
ity27
,930
349
1.2%
27,5
81
98.8
%E
aste
rn C
ape
Nxu
ba L
ocal
Mun
icip
ality
6,27
7
4,72
4
75
.3%
1,55
3
24
.7%
Eas
tern
Cap
eN
yand
eni L
ocal
Mun
icip
ality
56,8
51
67
7
1.
2%56
,174
98
.8%
Eas
tern
Cap
eP
ort S
t Joh
ns L
ocal
Mun
icip
ality
30,9
50
58
5
1.
9%30
,365
98
.1%
Eas
tern
Cap
eQ
auke
ni L
ocal
Mun
icip
ality
48,7
01
1,
235
2.5%
47,4
66
97.5
%E
aste
rn C
ape
Sak
hisi
zwe
Loca
l Mun
icip
ality
15,6
25
3,
302
21.1
%12
,323
78
.9%
Eas
tern
Cap
eS
enqu
Loc
al M
unic
ipal
ity35
,104
3,75
9
10
.7%
31,3
45
89.3
%E
aste
rn C
ape
Sun
day'
s R
iver
Val
ley
Loca
l Mun
icip
ality
9,87
3
7,56
9
76
.7%
2,30
4
23
.3%
Eas
tern
Cap
eTs
olw
ana
Loca
l Mun
icip
ality
8,06
4
1,66
1
20
.6%
6,40
3
79
.4%
CO
MM
UN
ITY
SUR
VEY
2007
REF
USE
REM
OVA
L D
ELIV
ERY
STA
TUS,
200
7A
NN
EXU
RE
I - H
OU
SEH
OLD
AC
CES
S TO
REF
USE
REM
OVA
L
PRO
VIN
CE
MU
NIC
IPA
LITY
75
Tot
al
Hou
seho
lds
Hou
seho
ld a
cces
s to
refu
se re
mov
al
serv
ice
Hou
seho
ldac
cess
to
refu
se re
mov
al
serv
ice
as a
pe
rcen
tage
Hou
seho
lds
belo
w
basi
c le
vel o
f ser
vice
/ ba
cklo
gs
Hou
seho
lds
belo
w
basi
c le
vel o
f se
rvic
e/ b
ackl
ogs
as a
per
cent
age
CO
MM
UN
ITY
SUR
VEY
2007
REF
USE
REM
OVA
L D
ELIV
ERY
STA
TUS,
200
7A
NN
EXU
RE
I - H
OU
SEH
OLD
AC
CES
S TO
REF
USE
REM
OVA
L
PRO
VIN
CE
MU
NIC
IPA
LITY
Free
Sta
teD
ihla
beng
Loc
al M
unic
ipal
ity31
,835
25,8
33
81
.1%
6,00
2
18
.9%
Free
Sta
teK
opan
ong
Loca
l Mun
icip
ality
15,4
42
12
,644
81.9
%2,
798
18.1
%Fr
ee S
tate
Lets
emen
g Lo
cal M
unic
ipal
ity11
,590
7,41
5
64
.0%
4,17
5
36
.0%
Free
Sta
teM
afub
e Lo
cal M
unic
ipal
ity14
,005
11,9
14
85
.1%
2,09
1
14
.9%
Free
Sta
teM
alut
i a P
hofu
ng L
ocal
Mun
icip
ality
97,1
72
26
,982
27.8
%70
,190
72
.2%
Free
Sta
teM
anga
ung
Loca
l Mun
icip
ality
202,
761
16
3,06
1
80.4
%39
,700
19
.6%
Free
Sta
teM
ants
opa
Loca
l Mun
icip
ality
15,9
85
12
,831
80.3
%3,
154
19.7
%Fr
ee S
tate
Mas
ilony
ana
Loca
l Mun
icip
ality
27,2
43
15
,776
57.9
%11
,467
42
.1%
Free
Sta
teM
atjh
aben
g Lo
cal M
unic
ipal
ity13
1,62
2
117,
284
89
.1%
14,3
38
10.9
%Fr
ee S
tate
Met
sim
ahol
o Lo
cal M
unic
ipal
ity37
,319
35,2
56
94
.5%
2,06
3
5.
5%Fr
ee S
tate
Moh
okar
e Lo
cal M
unic
ipal
ity10
,216
6,84
1
67
.0%
3,37
5
33
.0%
Free
Sta
teM
oqha
ka L
ocal
Mun
icip
ality
64,8
95
58
,602
90.3
%6,
293
9.7%
Free
Sta
teN
ala
Loca
l Mun
icip
ality
23,4
23
19
,519
83.3
%3,
904
16.7
%Fr
ee S
tate
Nal
edi L
ocal
Mun
icip
ality
8,27
9
6,55
3
79
.2%
1,72
6
20
.8%
Free
Sta
teN
gwat
he L
ocal
Mun
icip
ality
32,8
70
27
,730
84.4
%5,
140
15.6
%Fr
ee S
tate
Nke
toan
a Lo
cal M
unic
ipal
ity16
,748
10,5
33
62
.9%
6,21
5
37
.1%
Free
Sta
teP
hum
elel
a Lo
cal M
unic
ipal
ity11
,530
8,17
6
70
.9%
3,35
4
29
.1%
Free
Sta
teS
etso
to L
ocal
Mun
icip
ality
29,8
27
16
,565
55.5
%13
,262
44
.5%
Free
Sta
teTo
kolo
go L
ocal
Mun
icip
ality
7,47
7
3,59
7
48
.1%
3,88
0
51
.9%
Free
Sta
teTs
wel
opel
e Lo
cal M
unic
ipal
ity12
,622
10,1
37
80
.3%
2,48
5
19
.7%
Gau
teng
City
of J
ohan
nesb
urg
Met
ropo
litan
Mun
icip
ality
40,4
58
28
,775
71.1
%11
,683
28
.9%
Gau
teng
City
of T
shw
ane
Met
ropo
litan
Mun
icip
ality
50,6
76
43
,938
86.7
%6,
738
13.3
%G
aute
ngE
kurh
ulen
i Met
ropo
litan
Mun
icip
ality
94,2
87
75
,662
80.2
%18
,625
19
.8%
Gau
teng
Em
fule
ni L
ocal
Mun
icip
ality
849,
349
74
9,86
8
88.3
%99
,481
11
.7%
Gau
teng
Kun
gwin
i Loc
al M
unic
ipal
ity24
,265
18,8
01
77
.5%
5,46
4
22
.5%
Gau
teng
Lese
di L
ocal
Mun
icip
ality
686,
640
51
8,66
0
75.5
%16
7,98
0
24
.5%
Gau
teng
Mid
vaal
Loc
al M
unic
ipal
ity1,
165,
016
1,05
1,07
9
90
.2%
113,
937
9.8%
Gau
teng
Mog
ale
City
Loc
al M
unic
ipal
ity20
,479
16,4
57
80
.4%
4,02
2
19
.6%
Gau
teng
Nok
eng
tsa
Taem
ane
Loca
l Mun
icip
ality
196,
481
16
7,38
9
85.2
%29
,092
14
.8%
Gau
teng
Ran
dfon
tein
Loc
al M
unic
ipal
ity14
,837
6,32
7
42
.6%
8,51
0
57
.4%
Gau
teng
Wes
tona
ria L
ocal
Mun
icip
ality
31,6
65
14
,378
45.4
%17
,287
54
.6%
Kw
aZul
u-N
atal
Aba
qulu
si L
ocal
Mun
icip
ality
25,7
41
5,
028
19.5
%20
,713
80
.5%
Kw
aZul
u-N
atal
Dan
nhau
ser
Loca
l Mun
icip
ality
5,21
1
1,51
8
29
.1%
3,69
3
70
.9%
Kw
aZul
u-N
atal
eDum
be L
ocal
Mun
icip
ality
18,0
58
2,
149
11.9
%15
,909
88
.1%
Kw
aZul
u-N
atal
Em
adla
ngen
i Loc
al M
unic
ipal
ity77
,784
56,6
90
72
.9%
21,0
94
27.1
%K
waZ
ulu-
Nat
alE
mna
mbi
thi-L
adys
mith
Loc
al M
unic
ipal
ity12
,680
1,17
5
9.
3%11
,505
90
.7%
Kw
aZul
u-N
atal
End
umen
i Loc
al M
unic
ipal
ity24
,558
225
0.9%
24,3
33
99.1
%K
waZ
ulu-
Nat
aleT
hekw
ini M
etro
polit
an M
unic
ipal
ity43
,544
2,21
1
5.
1%41
,333
94
.9%
Kw
aZul
u-N
atal
Ezi
ngol
eni L
ocal
Mun
icip
ality
20,3
15
2,
274
11.2
%18
,041
88
.8%
Kw
aZul
u-N
atal
Gre
ater
Kok
stad
Loc
al M
unic
ipal
ity4,
423
1,
575
35.6
%2,
848
64.4
%
76
Tot
al
Hou
seho
lds
Hou
seho
ld a
cces
s to
refu
se re
mov
al
serv
ice
Hou
seho
ldac
cess
to
refu
se re
mov
al
serv
ice
as a
pe
rcen
tage
Hou
seho
lds
belo
w
basi
c le
vel o
f ser
vice
/ ba
cklo
gs
Hou
seho
lds
belo
w
basi
c le
vel o
f se
rvic
e/ b
ackl
ogs
as a
per
cent
age
CO
MM
UN
ITY
SUR
VEY
2007
REF
USE
REM
OVA
L D
ELIV
ERY
STA
TUS,
200
7A
NN
EXU
RE
I - H
OU
SEH
OLD
AC
CES
S TO
REF
USE
REM
OVA
L
PRO
VIN
CE
MU
NIC
IPA
LITY
Kw
aZul
u-N
atal
Hib
iscu
s C
oast
Loc
al M
unic
ipal
ity10
,953
45
0.
4%10
,908
99
.6%
Kw
aZul
u-N
atal
Hla
bisa
Loc
al M
unic
ipal
ity6,
656
1,
000
15.0
%5,
656
85.0
%K
waZ
ulu-
Nat
alIm
baba
zane
Loc
al M
unic
ipal
ity28
,508
1,58
1
5.
5%26
,927
94
.5%
Kw
aZul
u-N
atal
Impe
ndle
Loc
al M
unic
ipal
ity7,
802
3,
996
51.2
%3,
806
48.8
%K
waZ
ulu-
Nat
alIn
daka
Loc
al M
unic
ipal
ity50
,260
25,7
52
51
.2%
24,5
08
48.8
%K
waZ
ulu-
Nat
alIn
gwe
Loca
l Mun
icip
ality
19,9
35
57
0.3%
19,8
78
99.7
%K
waZ
ulu-
Nat
alJo
zini
Loc
al M
unic
ipal
ity27
,007
246
0.9%
26,7
61
99.1
%K
waZ
ulu-
Nat
alK
wa
San
i Loc
al M
unic
ipal
ity22
,290
993
4.5%
21,2
97
95.5
%K
waZ
ulu-
Nat
alK
waD
ukuz
a Lo
cal M
unic
ipal
ity33
,703
9,37
7
27
.8%
24,3
26
72.2
%K
waZ
ulu-
Nat
alM
ande
ni L
ocal
Mun
icip
ality
22,3
87
1,
522
6.8%
20,8
65
93.2
%K
waZ
ulu-
Nat
alM
aphu
mul
o Lo
cal M
unic
ipal
ity26
,407
96
0.
4%26
,311
99
.6%
Kw
aZul
u-N
atal
Mbo
nam
bi L
ocal
Mun
icip
ality
11,3
40
2,
925
25.8
%8,
415
74.2
%K
waZ
ulu-
Nat
alM
kham
bath
ini L
ocal
Mun
icip
ality
134,
391
94
,878
70.6
%39
,513
29
.4%
Kw
aZul
u-N
atal
Mpo
fana
Loc
al M
unic
ipal
ity21
,588
13,1
51
60
.9%
8,43
7
39
.1%
Kw
aZul
u-N
atal
Msi
nga
Loca
l Mun
icip
ality
32,1
68
2,
496
7.8%
29,6
72
92.2
%K
waZ
ulu-
Nat
alM
thon
jane
ni L
ocal
Mun
icip
ality
33,9
66
4,
259
12.5
%29
,707
87
.5%
Kw
aZul
u-N
atal
Mtu
batu
ba L
ocal
Mun
icip
ality
29,2
61
21
1
0.
7%29
,050
99
.3%
Kw
aZul
u-N
atal
Ndw
edw
e Lo
cal M
unic
ipal
ity44
,481
23,6
92
53
.3%
20,7
89
46.7
%K
waZ
ulu-
Nat
alN
ewca
stle
Loc
al M
unic
ipal
ity26
,019
5,98
9
23
.0%
20,0
30
77.0
%K
waZ
ulu-
Nat
alN
kand
la L
ocal
Mun
icip
ality
10,6
71
2,
552
23.9
%8,
119
76.1
%K
waZ
ulu-
Nat
alN
ongo
ma
Loca
l Mun
icip
ality
39,8
66
12
,921
32.4
%26
,945
67
.6%
Kw
aZul
u-N
atal
Nqu
thu
Loca
l Mun
icip
ality
13,7
56
10
,806
78.6
%2,
950
21.4
%K
waZ
ulu-
Nat
alN
tam
bana
na L
ocal
Mun
icip
ality
81,0
05
34
,765
42.9
%46
,240
57
.1%
Kw
aZul
u-N
atal
Okh
ahla
mba
Loc
al M
unic
ipal
ity15
,233
8,59
3
56
.4%
6,64
0
43
.6%
Kw
aZul
u-N
atal
Ric
hmon
d Lo
cal M
unic
ipal
ity11
,970
1,08
2
9.
0%10
,888
91
.0%
Kw
aZul
u-N
atal
The
Big
Fiv
e Fa
lse
Bay
Loc
al M
unic
ipal
ity38
,530
6,32
8
16
.4%
32,2
02
83.6
%K
waZ
ulu-
Nat
alTh
e M
sund
uzi L
ocal
Mun
icip
ality
7,34
0
146
2.0%
7,19
4
98
.0%
Kw
aZul
u-N
atal
Ubu
hleb
ezw
e Lo
cal M
unic
ipal
ity14
,320
9,39
6
65
.6%
4,92
4
34
.4%
Kw
aZul
u-N
atal
Ulu
ndi L
ocal
Mun
icip
ality
35,2
93
27
5
0.
8%35
,018
99
.2%
Kw
aZul
u-N
atal
Um
doni
Loc
al M
unic
ipal
ity12
,744
253
2.0%
12,4
91
98.0
%K
waZ
ulu-
Nat
alU
mhl
abuy
alin
gana
Loc
al M
unic
ipal
ity39
,835
8,18
1
20
.5%
31,6
54
79.5
%K
waZ
ulu-
Nat
aluM
hlat
huze
Loc
al M
unic
ipal
ity21
,633
1,57
9
7.
3%20
,054
92
.7%
Kw
aZul
u-N
atal
uMla
lazi
Loc
al M
unic
ipal
ity14
,845
88
0.
6%14
,757
99
.4%
Kw
aZul
u-N
atal
uMng
eni L
ocal
Mun
icip
ality
22,1
10
2,
191
9.9%
19,9
19
90.1
%K
waZ
ulu-
Nat
aluM
shw
athi
Loc
al M
unic
ipal
ity50
,647
17,1
81
33
.9%
33,4
66
66.1
%K
waZ
ulu-
Nat
alU
mts
hezi
Loc
al M
unic
ipal
ity21
,081
1,83
6
8.
7%19
,245
91
.3%
Kw
aZul
u-N
atal
UM
uziw
aban
tu L
ocal
Mun
icip
ality
40,5
80
59
0.1%
40,5
21
99.9
%K
waZ
ulu-
Nat
alU
mvo
ti Lo
cal M
unic
ipal
ity32
,591
223
0.7%
32,3
68
99.3
%K
waZ
ulu-
Nat
alU
mzi
mkh
ulu
Loca
l Mun
icip
ality
21,0
86
1,
374
6.5%
19,7
12
93.5
%K
waZ
ulu-
Nat
alU
mzu
mbe
Loc
al M
unic
ipal
ity16
,384
7,77
9
47
.5%
8,60
5
52
.5%
77
Tot
al
Hou
seho
lds
Hou
seho
ld a
cces
s to
refu
se re
mov
al
serv
ice
Hou
seho
ldac
cess
to
refu
se re
mov
al
serv
ice
as a
pe
rcen
tage
Hou
seho
lds
belo
w
basi
c le
vel o
f ser
vice
/ ba
cklo
gs
Hou
seho
lds
belo
w
basi
c le
vel o
f se
rvic
e/ b
ackl
ogs
as a
per
cent
age
CO
MM
UN
ITY
SUR
VEY
2007
REF
USE
REM
OVA
L D
ELIV
ERY
STA
TUS,
200
7A
NN
EXU
RE
I - H
OU
SEH
OLD
AC
CES
S TO
REF
USE
REM
OVA
L
PRO
VIN
CE
MU
NIC
IPA
LITY
Kw
aZul
u-N
atal
UP
hong
olo
Loca
l Mun
icip
ality
15,1
47
1,
844
12.2
%13
,303
87
.8%
Kw
aZul
u-N
atal
Vul
ameh
lo L
ocal
Mun
icip
ality
833,
858
73
0,59
6
87.6
%10
3,26
2
12
.4%
Lim
popo
Aga
nang
Loc
al M
unic
ipal
ity33
,826
249
0.7%
33,5
77
99.3
%Li
mpo
poB
a-P
hala
borw
a Lo
cal M
unic
ipal
ity33
,792
13,8
16
40
.9%
19,9
76
59.1
%Li
mpo
poB
ela-
Bel
a Lo
cal M
unic
ipal
ity14
,291
10,8
83
76
.2%
3,40
8
23
.8%
Lim
popo
Blo
uber
g Lo
cal M
unic
ipal
ity35
,597
3,34
6
9.
4%32
,251
90
.6%
Lim
popo
Elia
s M
otso
aled
i Loc
al M
unic
ipal
ity46
,840
3,60
9
7.
7%43
,231
92
.3%
Lim
popo
Feta
kgom
o Lo
cal M
unic
ipal
ity21
,851
1,32
8
6.
1%20
,523
93
.9%
Lim
popo
Gre
ater
Giy
ani L
ocal
Mun
icip
ality
57,5
37
7,
413
12.9
%50
,124
87
.1%
Lim
popo
Gre
ater
Let
aba
Loca
l Mun
icip
ality
59,5
39
5,
389
9.1%
54,1
50
90.9
%Li
mpo
poG
reat
er M
arbl
e H
all L
ocal
Mun
icip
ality
28,2
16
3,
632
12.9
%24
,584
87
.1%
Lim
popo
Gre
ater
Tub
atse
Loc
al M
unic
ipal
ity66
,612
4,70
7
7.
1%61
,905
92
.9%
Lim
popo
Gre
ater
Tza
neen
Loc
al M
unic
ipal
ity89
,830
11,5
21
12
.8%
78,3
09
87.2
%Li
mpo
poLe
pele
-Nku
mpi
Loc
al M
unic
ipal
ity58
,482
7,38
9
12
.6%
51,0
93
87.4
%Li
mpo
poLe
phal
ale
Loca
l Mun
icip
ality
23,7
44
6,
126
25.8
%17
,618
74
.2%
Lim
popo
Mak
hado
Loc
al M
unic
ipal
ity11
4,05
9
9,99
8
8.
8%10
4,06
1
91
.2%
Lim
popo
Mak
hudu
tham
aga
Loca
l Mun
icip
ality
53,6
55
72
0
1.
3%52
,935
98
.7%
Lim
popo
Mar
ulen
g Lo
cal M
unic
ipal
ity24
,589
1,95
9
8.
0%22
,630
92
.0%
Lim
popo
Mod
imol
le L
ocal
Mun
icip
ality
15,8
27
8,
743
55.2
%7,
084
44.8
%Li
mpo
poM
ogal
akw
ena
Loca
l Mun
icip
ality
75,3
14
16
,977
22.5
%58
,337
77
.5%
Lim
popo
Mol
emol
e Lo
cal M
unic
ipal
ity27
,295
3,86
0
14
.1%
23,4
35
85.9
%Li
mpo
poM
ookg
opon
g Lo
cal M
unic
ipal
ity7,
672
4,
499
58.6
%3,
173
41.4
%Li
mpo
poM
usin
a Lo
cal M
unic
ipal
ity14
,202
9,40
6
66
.2%
4,79
6
33
.8%
Lim
popo
Mut
ale
Loca
l Mun
icip
ality
21,0
73
99
8
4.
7%20
,075
95
.3%
Lim
popo
Pol
okw
ane
Loca
l Mun
icip
ality
130,
360
47
,341
36.3
%83
,019
63
.7%
Lim
popo
Thab
azim
bi L
ocal
Mun
icip
ality
23,8
72
11
,393
47.7
%12
,479
52
.3%
Lim
popo
Thul
amel
a Lo
cal M
unic
ipal
ity13
7,85
4
19,3
03
14
.0%
118,
551
86.0
%M
pum
alan
gaA
lber
t Lut
huli
Loca
l Mun
icip
ality
46,0
34
6,
108
13.3
%39
,926
86
.7%
Mpu
mal
anga
Bus
hbuc
krid
ge L
ocal
Mun
icip
ality
124,
595
5,
172
4.2%
119,
423
95.8
%M
pum
alan
gaD
elm
as L
ocal
Mun
icip
ality
15,1
29
11
,476
75.9
%3,
653
24.1
%M
pum
alan
gaD
ipal
esen
g Lo
cal M
unic
ipal
ity12
,325
9,53
6
77
.4%
2,78
9
22
.6%
Mpu
mal
anga
Dr J
S M
orok
a Lo
cal M
unic
ipal
ity56
,876
2,64
6
4.
7%54
,230
95
.3%
Mpu
mal
anga
Em
akha
zeni
Loc
al M
unic
ipal
ity12
,128
8,61
3
71
.0%
3,51
5
29
.0%
Mpu
mal
anga
Em
alah
leni
Loc
al M
unic
ipal
ity10
5,59
3
60,0
60
56
.9%
45,5
33
43.1
%M
pum
alan
gaG
ovan
Mbe
ki L
ocal
Mun
icip
ality
79,1
92
65
,666
82.9
%13
,526
17
.1%
Mpu
mal
anga
Lekw
a Lo
cal M
unic
ipal
ity26
,685
19,8
94
74
.6%
6,79
1
25
.4%
Mpu
mal
anga
Mbo
mbe
la L
ocal
Mun
icip
ality
137,
352
38
,142
27.8
%99
,210
72
.2%
Mpu
mal
anga
Mkh
ondo
Loc
al M
unic
ipal
ity29
,926
12,5
72
42
.0%
17,3
54
58.0
%M
pum
alan
gaM
suka
ligw
a Lo
cal M
unic
ipal
ity31
,751
21,7
11
68
.4%
10,0
40
31.6
%M
pum
alan
gaN
kom
azi L
ocal
Mun
icip
ality
78,2
54
22
,044
28.2
%56
,210
71
.8%
78
Tot
al
Hou
seho
lds
Hou
seho
ld a
cces
s to
refu
se re
mov
al
serv
ice
Hou
seho
ldac
cess
to
refu
se re
mov
al
serv
ice
as a
pe
rcen
tage
Hou
seho
lds
belo
w
basi
c le
vel o
f ser
vice
/ ba
cklo
gs
Hou
seho
lds
belo
w
basi
c le
vel o
f se
rvic
e/ b
ackl
ogs
as a
per
cent
age
CO
MM
UN
ITY
SUR
VEY
2007
REF
USE
REM
OVA
L D
ELIV
ERY
STA
TUS,
200
7A
NN
EXU
RE
I - H
OU
SEH
OLD
AC
CES
S TO
REF
USE
REM
OVA
L
PRO
VIN
CE
MU
NIC
IPA
LITY
Mpu
mal
anga
Sem
e Lo
cal M
unic
ipal
ity21
,606
12,3
01
56
.9%
9,30
5
43
.1%
Mpu
mal
anga
Ste
ve T
shw
ete
Loca
l Mun
icip
ality
50,4
51
39
,198
77.7
%11
,253
22
.3%
Mpu
mal
anga
Thab
a C
hweu
Loc
al M
unic
ipal
ity28
,256
16,4
73
58
.3%
11,7
83
41.7
%M
pum
alan
gaTh
embi
sile
Loc
al M
unic
ipal
ity65
,394
6,68
9
10
.2%
58,7
05
89.8
%M
pum
alan
gaU
mjin
di L
ocal
Mun
icip
ality
18,7
67
14
,229
75.8
%4,
538
24.2
%N
orth
Wes
tC
ity o
f Mat
losa
na11
5,97
0
102,
443
88
.3%
13,5
27
11.7
%N
orth
Wes
tD
itsob
otla
Loc
al M
unic
ipal
ity38
,607
21,1
11
54
.7%
17,4
96
45.3
%N
orth
Wes
tG
reat
er T
aung
Loc
al M
unic
ipal
ity42
,953
2,70
7
6.
3%40
,246
93
.7%
Nor
th W
est
Kag
isan
o Lo
cal M
unic
ipal
ity19
,888
191
1.0%
19,6
97
99.0
%N
orth
Wes
tK
getle
ngriv
ier L
ocal
Mun
icip
ality
10,5
35
4,
999
47.5
%5,
536
52.5
%N
orth
Wes
tLe
kwa-
Teem
ane
Loca
l Mun
icip
ality
9,95
3
8,54
8
85
.9%
1,40
5
14
.1%
Nor
th W
est
Loca
l Mun
icip
ality
of M
adib
eng
96,3
61
29
,374
30.5
%66
,987
69
.5%
Nor
th W
est
Maf
iken
g Lo
cal M
unic
ipal
ity68
,698
13,4
55
19
.6%
55,2
43
80.4
%N
orth
Wes
tM
amus
a Lo
cal M
unic
ipal
ity10
,430
6,06
8
58
.2%
4,36
2
41
.8%
Nor
th W
est
Maq
uass
i Hill
s Lo
cal M
unic
ipal
ity20
,330
15,2
84
75
.2%
5,04
6
24
.8%
Nor
th W
est
Mer
afon
g C
ity L
ocal
Mun
icip
ality
88,1
56
62
,247
70.6
%25
,909
29
.4%
Nor
th W
est
Mol
opo
Loca
l Mun
icip
ality
3,17
4
109
3.4%
3,06
5
96
.6%
Nor
th W
est
Mor
etel
e Lo
cal M
unic
ipal
ity43
,209
35,9
34
83
.2%
7,27
5
16
.8%
Nor
th W
est
Mos
es K
otan
e Lo
cal M
unic
ipal
ity60
,557
54,7
90
90
.5%
5,76
7
9.
5%N
orth
Wes
tN
aled
i Loc
al M
unic
ipal
ity13
,677
10,9
22
79
.9%
2,75
5
20
.1%
Nor
th W
est
Pot
chef
stro
om L
ocal
Mun
icip
ality
35,5
24
28
,027
78.9
%7,
497
21.1
%N
orth
Wes
tR
amot
sher
e M
oilo
a Lo
cal M
unic
ipal
ity30
,302
5,53
6
18
.3%
24,7
66
81.7
%N
orth
Wes
tR
atlo
u Lo
cal M
unic
ipal
ity23
,591
337
1.4%
23,2
54
98.6
%N
orth
Wes
tR
uste
nbur
g Lo
cal M
unic
ipal
ity14
6,54
3
68,0
19
46
.4%
78,5
24
53.6
%N
orth
Wes
tTs
wai
ng L
ocal
Mun
icip
ality
22,2
01
4,
596
20.7
%17
,605
79
.3%
Nor
th W
est
Ven
ters
dorp
Loc
al M
unic
ipal
ity10
,467
4,14
5
39
.6%
6,32
2
60
.4%
Nor
ther
n C
ape
!Khe
is L
ocal
Mun
icip
ality
52,1
19
47
,848
91.8
%4,
271
8.2%
Nor
ther
n C
ape
//Kha
ra H
ais
Loca
l Mun
icip
ality
5,25
4
4,81
0
91
.5%
444
8.
5%N
orth
ern
Cap
eD
ikga
tlong
Loc
al M
unic
ipal
ity15
,478
71
0.
5%15
,407
99
.5%
Nor
ther
n C
ape
Em
than
jeni
Loc
al M
unic
ipal
ity3,
596
2,
396
66.6
%1,
200
33.4
%N
orth
ern
Cap
eG
amag
ara
Loca
l Mun
icip
ality
3,88
1
3,11
7
80
.3%
764
19
.7%
Nor
ther
n C
ape
Ga-
Seg
onya
na L
ocal
Mun
icip
ality
15,6
56
14
,489
92.5
%1,
167
7.5%
Nor
ther
n C
ape
Han
tam
Loc
al M
unic
ipal
ity4,
276
3,
302
77.2
%97
4
22.8
%N
orth
ern
Cap
eK
ai !G
arib
Loc
al M
unic
ipal
ity7,
094
5,
507
77.6
%1,
587
22.4
%N
orth
ern
Cap
eK
amie
sber
g Lo
cal M
unic
ipal
ity3,
786
3,
092
81.7
%69
4
18.3
%N
orth
ern
Cap
eK
aree
berg
Loc
al M
unic
ipal
ity5,
069
4,
165
82.2
%90
4
17.8
%N
orth
ern
Cap
eK
aroo
Hoo
glan
d Lo
cal M
unic
ipal
ity5,
643
4,
610
81.7
%1,
033
18.3
%N
orth
ern
Cap
eK
gate
lope
le L
ocal
Mun
icip
ality
5,66
8
4,06
9
71
.8%
1,59
9
28
.2%
Nor
ther
n C
ape
Kha
i-Ma
Loca
l Mun
icip
ality
9,48
9
7,54
0
79
.5%
1,94
9
20
.5%
Nor
ther
n C
ape
Mag
aren
g Lo
cal M
unic
ipal
ity17
,105
4,25
4
24
.9%
12,8
51
75.1
%
79
Tot
al
Hou
seho
lds
Hou
seho
ld a
cces
s to
refu
se re
mov
al
serv
ice
Hou
seho
ldac
cess
to
refu
se re
mov
al
serv
ice
as a
pe
rcen
tage
Hou
seho
lds
belo
w
basi
c le
vel o
f ser
vice
/ ba
cklo
gs
Hou
seho
lds
belo
w
basi
c le
vel o
f se
rvic
e/ b
ackl
ogs
as a
per
cent
age
CO
MM
UN
ITY
SUR
VEY
2007
REF
USE
REM
OVA
L D
ELIV
ERY
STA
TUS,
200
7A
NN
EXU
RE
I - H
OU
SEH
OLD
AC
CES
S TO
REF
USE
REM
OVA
L
PRO
VIN
CE
MU
NIC
IPA
LITY
Nor
ther
n C
ape
Mie
r Loc
al M
unic
ipal
ity4,
487
2,
871
64.0
%1,
616
36.0
%N
orth
ern
Cap
eM
osha
wen
g Lo
cal M
unic
ipal
ity3,
953
3,
257
82.4
%69
6
17.6
%N
orth
ern
Cap
eN
ama
Kho
i Loc
al M
unic
ipal
ity2,
983
2,
074
69.5
%90
9
30.5
%N
orth
ern
Cap
eP
hokw
ane
Loca
l Mun
icip
ality
7,63
9
7,24
8
94
.9%
391
5.
1%N
orth
ern
Cap
eR
enos
terb
erg
Loca
l Mun
icip
ality
8,85
2
7,14
8
80
.8%
1,70
4
19
.2%
Nor
ther
n C
ape
Ric
hter
svel
d Lo
cal M
unic
ipal
ity5,
821
5,
106
87.7
%71
5
12.3
%N
orth
ern
Cap
eS
iyan
cum
a Lo
cal M
unic
ipal
ity20
,939
19,1
54
91
.5%
1,78
5
8.
5%N
orth
ern
Cap
eS
iyat
hem
ba L
ocal
Mun
icip
ality
17,3
89
7,
773
44.7
%9,
616
55.3
%N
orth
ern
Cap
eS
ol P
laat
jie L
ocal
Mun
icip
ality
13,7
69
8,
093
58.8
%5,
676
41.2
%N
orth
ern
Cap
eTh
embe
lihle
Loc
al M
unic
ipal
ity1,
706
98
6
57
.8%
720
42
.2%
Nor
ther
n C
ape
Tsan
tsab
ane
Loca
l Mun
icip
ality
10,0
12
6,
042
60.3
%3,
970
39.7
%N
orth
ern
Cap
eU
bunt
u Lo
cal M
unic
ipal
ity2,
728
2,
196
80.5
%53
2
19.5
%N
orth
ern
Cap
eU
mso
bom
vu L
ocal
Mun
icip
ality
2,71
9
2,28
2
83
.9%
437
16
.1%
Wes
tern
Cap
eB
eauf
ort W
est L
ocal
Mun
icip
ality
9,14
9
8,47
6
92
.6%
673
7.
4%W
este
rn C
ape
Ber
griv
ier L
ocal
Mun
icip
ality
12,1
96
10
,574
86.7
%1,
622
13.3
%W
este
rn C
ape
Bito
u Lo
cal M
unic
ipal
ity12
,645
11,9
84
94
.8%
661
5.
2%W
este
rn C
ape
Bre
ede
Riv
er/W
inel
ands
Loc
al M
unic
ipal
ity21
,856
14,7
03
67
.3%
7,15
3
32
.7%
Wes
tern
Cap
eB
reed
e V
alle
y Lo
cal M
unic
ipal
ity36
,496
27,7
06
75
.9%
8,79
0
24
.1%
Wes
tern
Cap
eC
ape
Agu
lhas
Loc
al M
unic
ipal
ity7,
616
6,
776
89.0
%84
0
11.0
%W
este
rn C
ape
Ced
erbe
rg L
ocal
Mun
icip
ality
9,21
2
5,67
5
61
.6%
3,53
7
38
.4%
Wes
tern
Cap
eC
ity o
f Cap
e To
wn
Met
ropo
litan
Mun
icip
ality
902,
277
84
9,94
3
94.2
%52
,334
5.
8%W
este
rn C
ape
Dra
kens
tein
Loc
al M
unic
ipal
ity51
,615
36,8
91
71
.5%
14,7
24
28.5
%W
este
rn C
ape
Geo
rge
Loca
l Mun
icip
ality
42,7
92
39
,931
93.3
%2,
861
6.7%
Wes
tern
Cap
eH
esse
qua
Loca
l Mun
icip
ality
12,4
81
10
,180
81.6
%2,
301
18.4
%W
este
rn C
ape
Kan
nala
nd L
ocal
Mun
icip
ality
6,34
4
4,56
9
72
.0%
1,77
5
28
.0%
Wes
tern
Cap
eK
nysn
a Lo
cal M
unic
ipal
ity17
,416
16,3
46
93
.9%
1,07
0
6.
1%W
este
rn C
ape
Lain
gsbu
rg L
ocal
Mun
icip
ality
1,96
5
1,50
2
76
.4%
463
23
.6%
Wes
tern
Cap
eM
atzi
kam
a Lo
cal M
unic
ipal
ity12
,879
9,48
4
73
.6%
3,39
5
26
.4%
Wes
tern
Cap
eM
osse
l Bay
Loc
al M
unic
ipal
ity28
,347
26,7
65
94
.4%
1,58
2
5.
6%W
este
rn C
ape
Oud
tsho
orn
Loca
l Mun
icip
ality
17,9
13
15
,670
87.5
%2,
243
12.5
%W
este
rn C
ape
Ove
rstra
nd L
ocal
Mun
icip
ality
21,9
52
21
,496
97.9
%45
6
2.1%
Wes
tern
Cap
eP
rince
Alb
ert L
ocal
Mun
icip
ality
2,74
8
2,21
7
80
.7%
531
19
.3%
Wes
tern
Cap
eS
alda
nha
Bay
Loc
al M
unic
ipal
ity20
,785
19,9
37
95
.9%
848
4.
1%W
este
rn C
ape
Ste
llenb
osch
Loc
al M
unic
ipal
ity36
,411
31,9
17
87
.7%
4,49
4
12
.3%
Wes
tern
Cap
eS
war
tland
Loc
al M
unic
ipal
ity19
,939
17,3
22
86
.9%
2,61
7
13
.1%
Wes
tern
Cap
eS
wel
lend
am L
ocal
Mun
icip
ality
6,95
6
5,79
3
83
.3%
1,16
3
16
.7%
Wes
tern
Cap
eTh
eew
ater
sklo
of L
ocal
Mun
icip
ality
23,4
64
20
,475
87.3
%2,
989
12.7
%W
este
rn C
ape
Witz
enbe
rg L
ocal
Mun
icip
ality
24,4
10
12
,244
50.2
%12
,166
49
.8%
Tota
l12
,477
,121
7,47
8,33
4
59
.9%
4,99
8,78
7
40.1
%
80
81
ANNEXURE J: DISTRICT AND MUNICIPALITY NAME REFERENCE
PRO
VIN
CE
NA
ME
OF
MU
NIC
IPA
LITY
NA
ME
OF
DIS
TRIC
TE
aste
rn C
ape
Am
ahla
thi L
ocal
Mun
icip
ality
Am
atol
e D
istri
ct m
unic
ipal
ityE
aste
rn C
ape
Bav
iaan
s Lo
cal M
unic
ipal
ityC
acad
u D
istri
ct m
unic
ipal
ityE
aste
rn C
ape
Blu
e C
rane
Rou
te L
ocal
Mun
icip
ality
Cac
adu
Dis
trict
mun
icip
ality
Eas
tern
Cap
eB
uffa
lo C
ity L
ocal
Mun
icip
ality
Am
atol
e D
istri
ct m
unic
ipal
ityE
aste
rn C
ape
Cam
debo
o Lo
cal M
unic
ipal
ityC
acad
u D
istri
ct m
unic
ipal
ityE
aste
rn C
ape
Elu
ndin
i Loc
al M
unic
ipal
ityU
khah
lam
ba D
istri
ct m
unic
ipal
ityE
aste
rn C
ape
Em
alah
leni
Loc
al M
unic
ipal
ityC
hris
Han
i Dis
trict
mun
icip
ality
Eas
tern
Cap
eE
ngco
bo L
ocal
Mun
icip
ality
Chr
is H
ani D
istri
ct m
unic
ipal
ityE
aste
rn C
ape
Gar
iep
Loca
l Mun
icip
ality
Ukh
ahla
mba
Dis
trict
mun
icip
ality
Eas
tern
Cap
eG
reat
Kei
Loc
al M
unic
ipal
ityA
mat
ole
Dis
trict
mun
icip
ality
Eas
tern
Cap
eIk
wez
i Loc
al M
unic
ipal
ityC
acad
u D
istri
ct m
unic
ipal
ityE
aste
rn C
ape
Inkw
anca
Loc
al M
unic
ipal
ityC
hris
Han
i Dis
trict
mun
icip
ality
Eas
tern
Cap
eIn
tsik
a Y
ethu
Loc
al M
unic
ipal
ityC
hris
Han
i Dis
trict
mun
icip
ality
Eas
tern
Cap
eIn
xuba
Yet
hem
ba L
ocal
Mun
icip
ality
Chr
is H
ani D
istri
ct m
unic
ipal
ityE
aste
rn C
ape
Kin
g S
abat
a D
alin
dyeb
o Lo
cal M
unic
ipal
ityO
.R.T
ambo
Dis
trict
mun
icip
ality
Eas
tern
Cap
eK
ouga
Loc
al M
unic
ipal
ityC
acad
u D
istri
ct m
unic
ipal
ityE
aste
rn C
ape
Kou
-Kam
ma
Loca
l Mun
icip
ality
Cac
adu
Dis
trict
mun
icip
ality
Eas
tern
Cap
eLu
kanj
i Loc
al M
unic
ipal
ityC
hris
Han
i Dis
trict
mun
icip
ality
Eas
tern
Cap
eM
akan
a Lo
cal M
unic
ipal
ityC
acad
u D
istri
ct m
unic
ipal
ityE
aste
rn C
ape
Mal
etsw
ai L
ocal
Mun
icip
ality
Ukh
ahla
mba
Dis
trict
mun
icip
ality
Eas
tern
Cap
eM
atat
iele
Loc
al M
unic
ipal
ityA
lfred
Nzo
Dis
trict
mun
icip
ality
Eas
tern
Cap
eM
bhas
he L
ocal
Mun
icip
ality
Am
atol
e D
istri
ct m
unic
ipal
ityE
aste
rn C
ape
Mbi
zana
Loc
al M
unic
ipal
ityO
.R.T
ambo
Dis
trict
mun
icip
ality
Eas
tern
Cap
eM
hlon
tlo L
ocal
Mun
icip
ality
O.R
.Tam
bo D
istri
ct m
unic
ipal
ityE
aste
rn C
ape
Mnq
uma
Loca
l Mun
icip
ality
Am
atol
e D
istri
ct m
unic
ipal
ityE
aste
rn C
ape
Ndl
ambe
Loc
al M
unic
ipal
ityC
acad
u D
istri
ct m
unic
ipal
ityE
aste
rn C
ape
Nel
son
Man
dela
Bay
Met
ropo
litan
Mun
icip
Nel
son
Man
dela
Met
ropo
litan
Mun
icip
ality
Eas
tern
Cap
eN
gqus
hwa
Loca
l Mun
icip
ality
Am
atol
e D
istri
ct m
unic
ipal
ityE
aste
rn C
ape
Nko
nkob
e Lo
cal M
unic
ipal
ityA
mat
ole
Dis
trict
mun
icip
ality
Eas
tern
Cap
eN
taba
nkul
u Lo
cal M
unic
ipal
ityO
.R.T
ambo
Dis
trict
mun
icip
ality
Eas
tern
Cap
eN
xuba
Loc
al M
unic
ipal
ityA
mat
ole
Dis
trict
mun
icip
ality
Eas
tern
Cap
eN
yand
eni L
ocal
Mun
icip
ality
O.R
.Tam
bo D
istri
ct m
unic
ipal
ityE
aste
rn C
ape
Por
t St J
ohns
Loc
al M
unic
ipal
ityO
.R.T
ambo
Dis
trict
mun
icip
ality
Eas
tern
Cap
eQ
auke
ni L
ocal
Mun
icip
ality
O.R
.Tam
bo D
istri
ct m
unic
ipal
ityE
aste
rn C
ape
Sak
hisi
zwe
Loca
l Mun
icip
ality
Chr
is H
ani D
istri
ct m
unic
ipal
ityE
aste
rn C
ape
Sen
qu L
ocal
Mun
icip
ality
Ukh
ahla
mba
Dis
trict
mun
icip
ality
Eas
tern
Cap
eS
unda
y's
Riv
er V
alle
y Lo
cal M
unic
ipal
ityC
acad
u D
istri
ct m
unic
ipal
ityE
aste
rn C
ape
Tsol
wan
a Lo
cal M
unic
ipal
ityC
hris
Han
i Dis
trict
mun
icip
ality
Eas
tern
Cap
eU
mzi
mvu
bu L
ocal
Mun
icip
ality
Alfr
ed N
zo D
istri
ct m
unic
ipal
ityFr
ee S
tate
Dih
labe
ng L
ocal
Mun
icip
ality
Thab
o M
ofut
sany
ane
Dis
trict
mun
icip
ality
NA
ME
OF
MU
NIC
IPA
LITY
AN
D D
ISTR
ICT
REF
EREN
CE
AN
NEX
UR
E J
- DIS
TRIC
T A
ND
MU
NIC
IPA
LITY
NA
ME
REF
EREN
CE
82
PRO
VIN
CE
NA
ME
OF
MU
NIC
IPA
LITY
NA
ME
OF
DIS
TRIC
TN
AM
E O
F M
UN
ICIP
ALI
TY A
ND
DIS
TRIC
T R
EFER
ENC
E A
NN
EXU
RE
J - D
ISTR
ICT
AN
D M
UN
ICIP
ALI
TY N
AM
E R
EFER
ENC
E
Free
Sta
teK
opan
ong
Loca
l Mun
icip
ality
Xha
riep
Dis
trict
mun
icip
ality
Free
Sta
teLe
tsem
eng
Loca
l Mun
icip
ality
Xha
riep
Dis
trict
mun
icip
ality
Free
Sta
teM
afub
e Lo
cal M
unic
ipal
ityN
orth
ern
Free
Sta
te D
istri
ct m
unic
ipal
ityFr
ee S
tate
Mal
uti a
Pho
fung
Loc
al M
unic
ipal
ityTh
abo
Mof
utsa
nyan
e D
istri
ct m
unic
ipal
ityFr
ee S
tate
Man
gaun
g Lo
cal M
unic
ipal
ityM
othe
o D
istri
ct m
unic
ipal
ityFr
ee S
tate
Man
tsop
a Lo
cal M
unic
ipal
ityM
othe
o D
istri
ct m
unic
ipal
ityFr
ee S
tate
Mas
ilony
ana
Loca
l Mun
icip
ality
Lejw
elep
utsw
a D
istri
ct m
unic
ipal
ityFr
ee S
tate
Mat
jhab
eng
Loca
l Mun
icip
ality
Lejw
elep
utsw
a D
istri
ct m
unic
ipal
ityFr
ee S
tate
Met
sim
ahol
o Lo
cal M
unic
ipal
ityN
orth
ern
Free
Sta
te D
istri
ct m
unic
ipal
ityFr
ee S
tate
Moh
okar
e Lo
cal M
unic
ipal
ityX
harie
p D
istri
ct m
unic
ipal
ityFr
ee S
tate
Moq
haka
Loc
al M
unic
ipal
ityN
orth
ern
Free
Sta
te D
istri
ct m
unic
ipal
ityFr
ee S
tate
Nal
a Lo
cal M
unic
ipal
ityLe
jwel
eput
swa
Dis
trict
mun
icip
ality
Free
Sta
teN
aled
i Loc
al M
unic
ipal
ityM
othe
o D
istri
ct m
unic
ipal
ityFr
ee S
tate
Ngw
athe
Loc
al M
unic
ipal
ityN
orth
ern
Free
Sta
te D
istri
ct m
unic
ipal
ityFr
ee S
tate
Nke
toan
a Lo
cal M
unic
ipal
ityTh
abo
Mof
utsa
nyan
e D
istri
ct m
unic
ipal
ityFr
ee S
tate
Phu
mel
ela
Loca
l Mun
icip
ality
Thab
o M
ofut
sany
ane
Dis
trict
mun
icip
ality
Free
Sta
teS
etso
to L
ocal
Mun
icip
ality
Thab
o M
ofut
sany
ane
Dis
trict
mun
icip
ality
Free
Sta
teTo
kolo
go L
ocal
Mun
icip
ality
Lejw
elep
utsw
a D
istri
ct m
unic
ipal
ityFr
ee S
tate
Tsw
elop
ele
Loca
l Mun
icip
ality
Lejw
elep
utsw
a D
istri
ct m
unic
ipal
ityG
aute
ngC
ity o
f Joh
anne
sbur
g M
etro
polit
an M
unic
ipC
ity o
f Joh
anne
sbur
g M
etro
polit
an M
unic
ipal
ityG
aute
ngC
ity o
f Tsh
wan
e M
etro
polit
an M
unic
ipal
ityC
ity o
f Tsh
wan
e M
etro
polit
an M
unic
ipal
ityG
aute
ngE
kurh
ulen
i Met
ropo
litan
Mun
icip
ality
Eku
rhul
eni M
etro
polit
an M
unic
ipal
ityG
aute
ngE
mfu
leni
Loc
al M
unic
ipal
ityS
edib
eng
Dis
trict
mun
icip
ality
Gau
teng
Kun
gwin
i Loc
al M
unic
ipal
ityM
etsw
edin
g D
istri
ct M
unic
ipal
ityG
aute
ngLe
sedi
Loc
al M
unic
ipal
ityS
edib
eng
Dis
trict
mun
icip
ality
Gau
teng
Mid
vaal
Loc
al M
unic
ipal
ityS
edib
eng
Dis
trict
mun
icip
ality
Gau
teng
Mog
ale
City
Loc
al M
unic
ipal
ityW
est R
and
Dis
trict
Mun
icip
ality
Gau
teng
Nok
eng
tsa
Taem
ane
Loca
l Mun
icip
ality
Met
swed
ing
Dis
trict
Mun
icip
ality
Gau
teng
Ran
dfon
tein
Loc
al M
unic
ipal
ityW
est R
and
Dis
trict
Mun
icip
ality
Gau
teng
Wes
tona
ria L
ocal
Mun
icip
ality
Wes
t Ran
d D
istri
ct M
unic
ipal
ityK
waZ
ulu-
Nat
alA
baqu
lusi
Loc
al M
unic
ipal
ityZu
lula
nd D
istri
ct m
unic
ipal
ityK
waZ
ulu-
Nat
alD
annh
ause
r Lo
cal M
unic
ipal
ityA
maj
uba
Dis
trict
mun
icip
ality
Kw
aZul
u-N
atal
eDum
be L
ocal
Mun
icip
ality
Zulu
land
Dis
trict
mun
icip
ality
Kw
aZul
u-N
atal
Em
adla
ngen
i Loc
al M
unic
ipal
ityA
maj
uba
Dis
trict
mun
icip
ality
Kw
aZul
u-N
atal
Em
nam
bith
i-Lad
ysm
ith L
ocal
Mun
icip
ality
Uth
ukel
a D
istri
ct m
unic
ipal
ityK
waZ
ulu-
Nat
alE
ndum
eni L
ocal
Mun
icip
ality
Um
ziny
athi
Dis
trict
mun
icip
ality
Kw
aZul
u-N
atal
eThe
kwin
i Met
ropo
litan
Mun
icip
ality
eThe
kwin
i Met
ropo
litan
Mun
icip
ality
Kw
aZul
u-N
atal
Ezi
ngol
eni L
ocal
Mun
icip
ality
Ugu
Dis
trict
mun
icip
ality
Kw
aZul
u-N
atal
Gre
ater
Kok
stad
Loc
al M
unic
ipal
ityS
ison
ke D
istri
ct m
unic
ipal
ityK
waZ
ulu-
Nat
alH
ibis
cus
Coa
st L
ocal
Mun
icip
ality
Ugu
Dis
trict
mun
icip
ality
Kw
aZul
u-N
atal
Hla
bisa
Loc
al M
unic
ipal
ityU
mkh
anya
kude
Dis
trict
mun
icip
ality
83
PRO
VIN
CE
NA
ME
OF
MU
NIC
IPA
LITY
NA
ME
OF
DIS
TRIC
TN
AM
E O
F M
UN
ICIP
ALI
TY A
ND
DIS
TRIC
T R
EFER
ENC
E A
NN
EXU
RE
J - D
ISTR
ICT
AN
D M
UN
ICIP
ALI
TY N
AM
E R
EFER
ENC
E
Kw
aZul
u-N
atal
Imba
baza
ne L
ocal
Mun
icip
ality
Uth
ukel
a D
istri
ct m
unic
ipal
ityK
waZ
ulu-
Nat
alIm
pend
le L
ocal
Mun
icip
ality
UM
gung
undl
ovu
Dis
trict
mun
icip
ality
Kw
aZul
u-N
atal
Inda
ka L
ocal
Mun
icip
ality
Uth
ukel
a D
istri
ct m
unic
ipal
ityK
waZ
ulu-
Nat
alIn
gwe
Loca
l Mun
icip
ality
Sis
onke
Dis
trict
mun
icip
ality
Kw
aZul
u-N
atal
Jozi
ni L
ocal
Mun
icip
ality
Um
khan
yaku
de D
istri
ct m
unic
ipal
ityK
waZ
ulu-
Nat
alK
wa
San
i Loc
al M
unic
ipal
ityS
ison
ke D
istri
ct m
unic
ipal
ityK
waZ
ulu-
Nat
alK
waD
ukuz
a Lo
cal M
unic
ipal
ityiL
embe
Dis
trict
mun
icip
ality
Kw
aZul
u-N
atal
Man
deni
Loc
al M
unic
ipal
ityiL
embe
Dis
trict
mun
icip
ality
Kw
aZul
u-N
atal
Map
hum
ulo
Loca
l Mun
icip
ality
iLem
be D
istri
ct m
unic
ipal
ityK
waZ
ulu-
Nat
alM
bona
mbi
Loc
al M
unic
ipal
ityU
thun
gulu
Dis
trict
mun
icip
ality
Kw
aZul
u-N
atal
Mkh
amba
thin
i Loc
al M
unic
ipal
ityU
Mgu
ngun
dlov
u D
istri
ct m
unic
ipal
ityK
waZ
ulu-
Nat
alM
pofa
na L
ocal
Mun
icip
ality
UM
gung
undl
ovu
Dis
trict
mun
icip
ality
Kw
aZul
u-N
atal
Msi
nga
Loca
l Mun
icip
ality
Um
ziny
athi
Dis
trict
mun
icip
ality
Kw
aZul
u-N
atal
Msu
nduz
i Loc
al M
unic
ipal
ityU
Mgu
ngun
dlov
u D
istri
ct m
unic
ipal
ityK
waZ
ulu-
Nat
alM
thon
jane
ni L
ocal
Mun
icip
ality
Uth
ungu
lu D
istri
ct m
unic
ipal
ityK
waZ
ulu-
Nat
alM
tuba
tuba
Loc
al M
unic
ipal
ityU
mkh
anya
kude
Dis
trict
mun
icip
ality
Kw
aZul
u-N
atal
Ndw
edw
e Lo
cal M
unic
ipal
ityiL
embe
Dis
trict
mun
icip
ality
Kw
aZul
u-N
atal
New
cast
le L
ocal
Mun
icip
ality
Am
ajub
a D
istri
ct m
unic
ipal
ityK
waZ
ulu-
Nat
alN
kand
la L
ocal
Mun
icip
ality
Uth
ungu
lu D
istri
ct m
unic
ipal
ityK
waZ
ulu-
Nat
alN
ongo
ma
Loca
l Mun
icip
ality
Zulu
land
Dis
trict
mun
icip
ality
Kw
aZul
u-N
atal
Nqu
thu
Loca
l Mun
icip
ality
Um
ziny
athi
Dis
trict
mun
icip
ality
Kw
aZul
u-N
atal
Nta
mba
nana
Loc
al M
unic
ipal
ityU
thun
gulu
Dis
trict
mun
icip
ality
Kw
aZul
u-N
atal
Okh
ahla
mba
Loc
al M
unic
ipal
ityU
thuk
ela
Dis
trict
mun
icip
ality
Kw
aZul
u-N
atal
Ric
hmon
d Lo
cal M
unic
ipal
ityU
Mgu
ngun
dlov
u D
istri
ct m
unic
ipal
ityK
waZ
ulu-
Nat
alTh
e B
ig F
ive
Fals
e B
ay L
ocal
Mun
icip
ality
Um
khan
yaku
de D
istri
ct m
unic
ipal
ityK
waZ
ulu-
Nat
alU
buhl
ebez
we
Loca
l Mun
icip
ality
Sis
onke
Dis
trict
mun
icip
ality
Kw
aZul
u-N
atal
Ulu
ndi L
ocal
Mun
icip
ality
Zulu
land
Dis
trict
mun
icip
ality
Kw
aZul
u-N
atal
Um
doni
Loc
al M
unic
ipal
ityU
gu D
istri
ct m
unic
ipal
ityK
waZ
ulu-
Nat
alU
mhl
abuy
alin
gana
Loc
al M
unic
ipal
ityU
mkh
anya
kude
Dis
trict
mun
icip
ality
Kw
aZul
u-N
atal
uMhl
athu
ze L
ocal
Mun
icip
ality
Uth
ungu
lu D
istri
ct m
unic
ipal
ityK
waZ
ulu-
Nat
aluM
lala
zi L
ocal
Mun
icip
ality
Uth
ungu
lu D
istri
ct m
unic
ipal
ityK
waZ
ulu-
Nat
aluM
ngen
i Loc
al M
unic
ipal
ityU
Mgu
ngun
dlov
u D
istri
ct m
unic
ipal
ityK
waZ
ulu-
Nat
aluM
shw
athi
Loc
al M
unic
ipal
ityU
Mgu
ngun
dlov
u D
istri
ct m
unic
ipal
ityK
waZ
ulu-
Nat
alU
mts
hezi
Loc
al M
unic
ipal
ityU
thuk
ela
Dis
trict
mun
icip
ality
Kw
aZul
u-N
atal
UM
uziw
aban
tu L
ocal
Mun
icip
ality
Ugu
Dis
trict
mun
icip
ality
Kw
aZul
u-N
atal
Um
voti
Loca
l Mun
icip
ality
Um
ziny
athi
Dis
trict
mun
icip
ality
Kw
aZul
u-N
atal
Um
zim
khul
u Lo
cal M
unic
ipal
ityS
ison
ke D
istri
ct m
unic
ipal
ityK
waZ
ulu-
Nat
alU
mzu
mbe
Loc
al M
unic
ipal
ityU
gu D
istri
ct m
unic
ipal
ityK
waZ
ulu-
Nat
alU
Pho
ngol
o Lo
cal M
unic
ipal
ityZu
lula
nd D
istri
ct m
unic
ipal
ityK
waZ
ulu-
Nat
alV
ulam
ehlo
Loc
al M
unic
ipal
ityU
gu D
istri
ct m
unic
ipal
ityLi
mpo
poA
gana
ng L
ocal
Mun
icip
ality
Cap
ricor
n D
istri
ct m
unic
ipal
ity
84
PRO
VIN
CE
NA
ME
OF
MU
NIC
IPA
LITY
NA
ME
OF
DIS
TRIC
TN
AM
E O
F M
UN
ICIP
ALI
TY A
ND
DIS
TRIC
T R
EFER
ENC
E A
NN
EXU
RE
J - D
ISTR
ICT
AN
D M
UN
ICIP
ALI
TY N
AM
E R
EFER
ENC
E
Lim
popo
Ba-
Pha
labo
rwa
Loca
l Mun
icip
ality
Mop
ani D
istri
ct m
unic
ipal
ityLi
mpo
poB
ela-
Bel
a Lo
cal M
unic
ipal
ityW
ater
berg
Dis
trict
mun
icip
ality
Lim
popo
Blo
uber
g Lo
cal M
unic
ipal
ityC
apric
orn
Dis
trict
mun
icip
ality
Lim
popo
Elia
s M
otso
aled
i Loc
al M
unic
ipal
ityG
reat
er S
ekhu
khun
e D
istri
ct M
unic
ipal
ityLi
mpo
poFe
takg
omo
Loca
l Mun
icip
ality
Gre
ater
Sek
hukh
une
Dis
trict
Mun
icip
ality
Lim
popo
Gre
ater
Giy
ani L
ocal
Mun
icip
ality
Mop
ani D
istri
ct m
unic
ipal
ityLi
mpo
poG
reat
er L
etab
a Lo
cal M
unic
ipal
ityM
opan
i Dis
trict
mun
icip
ality
Lim
popo
Gre
ater
Mar
ble
Hal
l Loc
al M
unic
ipal
ityG
reat
er S
ekhu
khun
e D
istri
ct M
unic
ipal
ityLi
mpo
poG
reat
er T
ubat
se L
ocal
Mun
icip
ality
Gre
ater
Sek
hukh
une
Dis
trict
Mun
icip
ality
Lim
popo
Gre
ater
Tza
neen
Loc
al M
unic
ipal
ityM
opan
i Dis
trict
mun
icip
ality
Lim
popo
Lepe
le-N
kum
pi L
ocal
Mun
icip
ality
Cap
ricor
n D
istri
ct m
unic
ipal
ityLi
mpo
poLe
phal
ale
Loca
l Mun
icip
ality
Wat
erbe
rg D
istri
ct m
unic
ipal
ityLi
mpo
poM
akha
do L
ocal
Mun
icip
ality
Vhe
mbe
Dis
trict
mun
icip
ality
Lim
popo
Mak
hudu
tham
aga
Loca
l Mun
icip
ality
Gre
ater
Sek
hukh
une
Dis
trict
Mun
icip
ality
Lim
popo
Mar
ulen
g Lo
cal M
unic
ipal
ityM
opan
i Dis
trict
mun
icip
ality
Lim
popo
Mod
imol
le L
ocal
Mun
icip
ality
Wat
erbe
rg D
istri
ct m
unic
ipal
ityLi
mpo
poM
ogal
akw
ena
Loca
l Mun
icip
ality
Wat
erbe
rg D
istri
ct m
unic
ipal
ityLi
mpo
poM
olem
ole
Loca
l Mun
icip
ality
Cap
ricor
n D
istri
ct m
unic
ipal
ityLi
mpo
poM
ookg
opon
g Lo
cal M
unic
ipal
ityW
ater
berg
Dis
trict
mun
icip
ality
Lim
popo
Mus
ina
Loca
l Mun
icip
ality
Vhe
mbe
Dis
trict
mun
icip
ality
Lim
popo
Mut
ale
Loca
l Mun
icip
ality
Vhe
mbe
Dis
trict
mun
icip
ality
Lim
popo
Pol
okw
ane
Loca
l Mun
icip
ality
Cap
ricor
n D
istri
ct m
unic
ipal
ityLi
mpo
poTh
abaz
imbi
Loc
al M
unic
ipal
ityW
ater
berg
Dis
trict
mun
icip
ality
Lim
popo
Thul
amel
a Lo
cal M
unic
ipal
ityV
hem
be D
istri
ct m
unic
ipal
ityM
pum
alan
gaA
lber
t Lut
huli
Loca
l Mun
icip
ality
Ger
t Sib
ande
Dis
trict
mun
icip
ality
Mpu
mal
anga
Bus
hbuc
krid
ge L
ocal
Mun
icip
ality
Ehl
anze
ni D
istri
ct m
unic
ipal
ityM
pum
alan
gaD
elm
as L
ocal
Mun
icip
ality
Nka
ngal
a D
istri
ct m
unic
ipal
ityM
pum
alan
gaD
ipal
esen
g Lo
cal M
unic
ipal
ityG
ert S
iban
de D
istri
ct m
unic
ipal
ityM
pum
alan
gaD
r JS
Mor
oka
Loca
l Mun
icip
ality
Nka
ngal
a D
istri
ct m
unic
ipal
ityM
pum
alan
gaE
mak
haze
ni L
ocal
Mun
icip
ality
Nka
ngal
a D
istri
ct m
unic
ipal
ityM
pum
alan
gaE
mal
ahle
ni L
ocal
Mun
icip
ality
Nka
ngal
a D
istri
ct m
unic
ipal
ityM
pum
alan
gaG
ovan
Mbe
ki L
ocal
Mun
icip
ality
Ger
t Sib
ande
Dis
trict
mun
icip
ality
Mpu
mal
anga
Lekw
a Lo
cal M
unic
ipal
ityG
ert S
iban
de D
istri
ct m
unic
ipal
ityM
pum
alan
gaM
bom
bela
Loc
al M
unic
ipal
ityE
hlan
zeni
Dis
trict
mun
icip
ality
Mpu
mal
anga
Mkh
ondo
Loc
al M
unic
ipal
ityG
ert S
iban
de D
istri
ct m
unic
ipal
ityM
pum
alan
gaM
suka
ligw
a Lo
cal M
unic
ipal
ityG
ert S
iban
de D
istri
ct m
unic
ipal
ityM
pum
alan
gaN
kom
azi L
ocal
Mun
icip
ality
Ehl
anze
ni D
istri
ct m
unic
ipal
ityM
pum
alan
gaS
eme
Loca
l Mun
icip
ality
Ger
t Sib
ande
Dis
trict
mun
icip
ality
Mpu
mal
anga
Ste
ve T
shw
ete
Loca
l Mun
icip
ality
Nka
ngal
a D
istri
ct m
unic
ipal
ityM
pum
alan
gaTh
aba
Chw
eu L
ocal
Mun
icip
ality
Ehl
anze
ni D
istri
ct m
unic
ipal
ityM
pum
alan
gaTh
embi
sile
Loc
al M
unic
ipal
ityN
kang
ala
Dis
trict
mun
icip
ality
85
PRO
VIN
CE
NA
ME
OF
MU
NIC
IPA
LITY
NA
ME
OF
DIS
TRIC
TN
AM
E O
F M
UN
ICIP
ALI
TY A
ND
DIS
TRIC
T R
EFER
ENC
E A
NN
EXU
RE
J - D
ISTR
ICT
AN
D M
UN
ICIP
ALI
TY N
AM
E R
EFER
ENC
E
Mpu
mal
anga
Um
jindi
Loc
al M
unic
ipal
ityE
hlan
zeni
Dis
trict
mun
icip
ality
Nor
th W
est
City
of M
atlo
sana
Sou
ther
n D
istri
ct m
unic
ipal
ityN
orth
Wes
tD
itsob
otla
Loc
al M
unic
ipal
ityC
entra
l Dis
trict
mun
icip
ality
Nor
th W
est
Gre
ater
Tau
ng L
ocal
Mun
icip
ality
Bop
hirim
a D
istri
ct m
unic
ipal
ityN
orth
Wes
tK
agis
ano
Loca
l Mun
icip
ality
Bop
hirim
a D
istri
ct m
unic
ipal
ityN
orth
Wes
tK
getle
ngriv
ier L
ocal
Mun
icip
ality
Boj
anal
a D
istri
ct m
unic
ipal
ityN
orth
Wes
tLe
kwa-
Teem
ane
Loca
l Mun
icip
ality
Bop
hirim
a D
istri
ct m
unic
ipal
ityN
orth
Wes
tLo
cal M
unic
ipal
ity o
f Mad
iben
gB
ojan
ala
Dis
trict
mun
icip
ality
Nor
th W
est
Maf
iken
g Lo
cal M
unic
ipal
ityC
entra
l Dis
trict
mun
icip
ality
Nor
th W
est
Mam
usa
Loca
l Mun
icip
ality
Bop
hirim
a D
istri
ct m
unic
ipal
ityN
orth
Wes
tM
aqua
ssi H
ills
Loca
l Mun
icip
ality
Sou
ther
n D
istri
ct m
unic
ipal
ityN
orth
Wes
tM
eraf
ong
City
Loc
al M
unic
ipal
ityS
outh
ern
Dis
trict
mun
icip
ality
Nor
th W
est
Mol
opo
Loca
l Mun
icip
ality
Bop
hirim
a D
istri
ct m
unic
ipal
ityN
orth
Wes
tM
oret
ele
Loca
l Mun
icip
ality
Boj
anal
a D
istri
ct m
unic
ipal
ityN
orth
Wes
tM
oses
Kot
ane
Loca
l Mun
icip
ality
Boj
anal
a D
istri
ct m
unic
ipal
ityN
orth
Wes
tN
aled
i Loc
al M
unic
ipal
ityB
ophi
rima
Dis
trict
mun
icip
ality
Nor
th W
est
Pot
chef
stro
om L
ocal
Mun
icip
ality
Sou
ther
n D
istri
ct m
unic
ipal
ityN
orth
Wes
tR
amot
sher
e M
oilo
a Lo
cal M
unic
ipal
ityC
entra
l Dis
trict
mun
icip
ality
Nor
th W
est
Rat
lou
Loca
l Mun
icip
ality
Cen
tral D
istri
ct m
unic
ipal
ityN
orth
Wes
tR
uste
nbur
g Lo
cal M
unic
ipal
ityB
ojan
ala
Dis
trict
mun
icip
ality
Nor
th W
est
Tsw
aing
Loc
al M
unic
ipal
ityC
entra
l Dis
trict
mun
icip
ality
Nor
th W
est
Ven
ters
dorp
Loc
al M
unic
ipal
ityS
outh
ern
Dis
trict
mun
icip
ality
Nor
ther
n C
ape
!Khe
is L
ocal
Mun
icip
ality
Siy
anda
Dis
trict
mun
icip
ality
Nor
ther
n C
ape
//Kha
ra H
ais
Loca
l Mun
icip
ality
Siy
anda
Dis
trict
mun
icip
ality
Nor
ther
n C
ape
Dik
gatlo
ng L
ocal
Mun
icip
ality
Fran
ces
Baa
rd D
istri
ct m
unic
ipal
ityN
orth
ern
Cap
eE
mth
anje
ni L
ocal
Mun
icip
ality
Pix
ley
ka S
eme
Dis
trict
mun
icip
ality
Nor
ther
n C
ape
Gam
agar
a Lo
cal M
unic
ipal
ityK
gala
gadi
Dis
trict
Mun
icip
ality
Nor
ther
n C
ape
Ga-
Seg
onya
na L
ocal
Mun
icip
ality
Kga
laga
di D
istri
ct M
unic
ipal
ityN
orth
ern
Cap
eH
anta
m L
ocal
Mun
icip
ality
Nam
akw
a D
istri
ct m
unic
ipal
ityN
orth
ern
Cap
eK
ai !G
arib
Loc
al M
unic
ipal
ityS
iyan
da D
istri
ct m
unic
ipal
ityN
orth
ern
Cap
eK
amie
sber
g Lo
cal M
unic
ipal
ityN
amak
wa
Dis
trict
mun
icip
ality
Nor
ther
n C
ape
Kar
eebe
rg L
ocal
Mun
icip
ality
Pix
ley
ka S
eme
Dis
trict
mun
icip
ality
Nor
ther
n C
ape
Kar
oo H
oogl
and
Loca
l Mun
icip
ality
Nam
akw
a D
istri
ct m
unic
ipal
ityN
orth
ern
Cap
eK
gate
lope
le L
ocal
Mun
icip
ality
Siy
anda
Dis
trict
mun
icip
ality
Nor
ther
n C
ape
Kha
i-Ma
Loca
l Mun
icip
ality
Nam
akw
a D
istri
ct m
unic
ipal
ityN
orth
ern
Cap
eM
agar
eng
Loca
l Mun
icip
ality
Fran
ces
Baa
rd D
istri
ct m
unic
ipal
ityN
orth
ern
Cap
eM
ier L
ocal
Mun
icip
ality
Siy
anda
Dis
trict
mun
icip
ality
Nor
ther
n C
ape
Mos
haw
eng
Loca
l Mun
icip
ality
Kga
laga
di D
istri
ct M
unic
ipal
ityN
orth
ern
Cap
eN
ama
Kho
i Loc
al M
unic
ipal
ityN
amak
wa
Dis
trict
mun
icip
ality
Nor
ther
n C
ape
Pho
kwan
e Lo
cal M
unic
ipal
ityFr
ance
s B
aard
Dis
trict
mun
icip
ality
Nor
ther
n C
ape
Ren
oste
rber
g Lo
cal M
unic
ipal
ityP
ixle
y ka
Sem
e D
istri
ct m
unic
ipal
ity
86
PRO
VIN
CE
NA
ME
OF
MU
NIC
IPA
LITY
NA
ME
OF
DIS
TRIC
TN
AM
E O
F M
UN
ICIP
ALI
TY A
ND
DIS
TRIC
T R
EFER
ENC
E A
NN
EXU
RE
J - D
ISTR
ICT
AN
D M
UN
ICIP
ALI
TY N
AM
E R
EFER
ENC
E
Nor
ther
n C
ape
Ric
hter
svel
d Lo
cal M
unic
ipal
ityN
amak
wa
Dis
trict
mun
icip
ality
Nor
ther
n C
ape
Siy
ancu
ma
Loca
l Mun
icip
ality
Pix
ley
ka S
eme
Dis
trict
mun
icip
ality
Nor
ther
n C
ape
Siy
athe
mba
Loc
al M
unic
ipal
ityP
ixle
y ka
Sem
e D
istri
ct m
unic
ipal
ityN
orth
ern
Cap
eS
ol P
laat
jie L
ocal
Mun
icip
ality
Fran
ces
Baa
rd D
istri
ct m
unic
ipal
ityN
orth
ern
Cap
eTh
embe
lihle
Loc
al M
unic
ipal
ityP
ixle
y ka
Sem
e D
istri
ct m
unic
ipal
ityN
orth
ern
Cap
eTs
ants
aban
e Lo
cal M
unic
ipal
ityS
iyan
da D
istri
ct m
unic
ipal
ityN
orth
ern
Cap
eU
bunt
u Lo
cal M
unic
ipal
ityP
ixle
y ka
Sem
e D
istri
ct m
unic
ipal
ityN
orth
ern
Cap
eU
mso
bom
vu L
ocal
Mun
icip
ality
Pix
ley
ka S
eme
Dis
trict
mun
icip
ality
Wes
tern
Cap
eB
eauf
ort W
est L
ocal
Mun
icip
ality
Cen
tral K
aroo
Dis
trict
mun
icip
ality
Wes
tern
Cap
eB
ergr
ivie
r Loc
al M
unic
ipal
ityW
est C
oast
Dis
trict
mun
icip
ality
Wes
tern
Cap
eB
itou
Loca
l Mun
icip
ality
Ede
n D
istri
ct m
unic
ipal
ityW
este
rn C
ape
Bre
ede
Riv
er/W
inel
ands
Loc
al M
unic
ipal
ityC
ape
Win
elan
ds D
istri
ct M
unic
ipal
ityW
este
rn C
ape
Bre
ede
Val
ley
Loca
l Mun
icip
ality
Cap
e W
inel
ands
Dis
trict
Mun
icip
ality
Wes
tern
Cap
eC
ape
Agu
lhas
Loc
al M
unic
ipal
ityO
verb
erg
Dis
trict
mun
icip
ality
Wes
tern
Cap
eC
eder
berg
Loc
al M
unic
ipal
ityW
est C
oast
Dis
trict
mun
icip
ality
Wes
tern
Cap
eC
ity o
f Cap
e To
wn
Met
ropo
litan
Mun
icip
aliC
ity o
f Cap
e To
wn
Met
ropo
litan
Mun
icip
ality
Wes
tern
Cap
eD
rake
nste
in L
ocal
Mun
icip
ality
Cap
e W
inel
ands
Dis
trict
Mun
icip
ality
Wes
tern
Cap
eG
eorg
e Lo
cal M
unic
ipal
ityE
den
Dis
trict
mun
icip
ality
Wes
tern
Cap
eH
esse
qua
Loca
l Mun
icip
ality
Ede
n D
istri
ct m
unic
ipal
ityW
este
rn C
ape
Kan
nala
nd L
ocal
Mun
icip
ality
Ede
n D
istri
ct m
unic
ipal
ityW
este
rn C
ape
Kny
sna
Loca
l Mun
icip
ality
Ede
n D
istri
ct m
unic
ipal
ityW
este
rn C
ape
Lain
gsbu
rg L
ocal
Mun
icip
ality
Cen
tral K
aroo
Dis
trict
mun
icip
ality
Wes
tern
Cap
eM
atzi
kam
a Lo
cal M
unic
ipal
ityW
est C
oast
Dis
trict
mun
icip
ality
Wes
tern
Cap
eM
osse
l Bay
Loc
al M
unic
ipal
ityE
den
Dis
trict
mun
icip
ality
Wes
tern
Cap
eO
udts
hoor
n Lo
cal M
unic
ipal
ityE
den
Dis
trict
mun
icip
ality
Wes
tern
Cap
eO
vers
trand
Loc
al M
unic
ipal
ityO
verb
erg
Dis
trict
mun
icip
ality
Wes
tern
Cap
eP
rince
Alb
ert L
ocal
Mun
icip
ality
Cen
tral K
aroo
Dis
trict
mun
icip
ality
Wes
tern
Cap
eS
alda
nha
Bay
Loc
al M
unic
ipal
ityW
est C
oast
Dis
trict
mun
icip
ality
Wes
tern
Cap
eS
telle
nbos
ch L
ocal
Mun
icip
ality
Cap
e W
inel
ands
Dis
trict
Mun
icip
ality
Wes
tern
Cap
eS
war
tland
Loc
al M
unic
ipal
ityW
est C
oast
Dis
trict
mun
icip
ality
Wes
tern
Cap
eS
wel
lend
am L
ocal
Mun
icip
ality
Ove
rber
g D
istri
ct m
unic
ipal
ityW
este
rn C
ape
Thee
wat
ersk
loof
Loc
al M
unic
ipal
ityO
verb
erg
Dis
trict
mun
icip
ality
Wes
tern
Cap
eW
itzen
berg
Loc
al M
unic
ipal
ityC
ape
Win
elan
ds D
istri
ct M
unic
ipal
ity
87
88
ANNEXURE K: RSA MUNICIPALITIES AND DISTRICT MANAGEMENT AREAS
89
90
ANNEXURE L: SPATIAL DISTRIBUTION OF WATER BACKLOGS (CS 2007)
91
92
ANNEXURE M: SPATIAL DISTRIBUTION OF WATER BACKLOGS (DWEA 2008)
93
94
ANNEXURE N: SPATIAL DISTRIBUTION OF WATER BACKLOGS (MUNICIPAL SOURCE 2008)
95
96
ANNEXURE O: AVERAGE NATIONAL SHARE OF WATER BACKLOGS
97
98
ANNEXURE P: SPATIAL DISTRIBUTION OF SANITATION BACKLOGS (CS 2007)
99
100
ANNEXURE Q: SPATIAL DISTRIBUTION OF SANITATION BACKLOGS (DWEA 2008)
101
102
ANNEXURE R: SPATIAL DISTRIBUTION OF SANITATION BACKLOGS (MUNICIPAL SOURCE 2008)
103
104
ANNEXURE S: AVERAGE NATIONAL SHARE OF SANITATION BACKLOGS
105
106
ANNEXURE T: SPATIAL DISTRIBUTION OF ELECTRICITY BACKLOGS (DME 2008)
107
108
ANNEXURE U: MUNICIPAL SHARE OF NATIONAL BACKLOGS (DME 2008)
109
110
ANNEXURE V: SPATIAL DISTRIBUTION OF REFUSE REMOVAL BACKLOGS (CS 2007)
111
112
ANNEXURE W: MUNICIPAL SHARE OF THE NATIONAL REFUSE BACKLOGS (CS 2007)
113
114
ANNEXURE X: SPATIAL DISTRIBUTION OF HOUSEHOLDS SERVEDWITH FREE BASIC ENERGY(MUNICIPAL SOURCE 2008)
115
116
ANNEXURE Y: SPATIAL DISTRIBUTION OF HOUSEHOLDS SERVEDWITH FREE BASIC WATER(MUNICIPAL SOURCE 2008)
117