barclays research macro - investment bank challenges from the migration of sales volume to...

11
Equity Research 21 June 2017 Barclays Capital Inc. and/or one of its affiliates does and seeks to do business with companies covered in its research reports. As a result, investors should be aware that the firm may have a conflict of interest that could affect the objectivity of this report. Investors should consider this report as only a single factor in making their investment decision. PLEASE SEE ANALYST CERTIFICATION(S) AND IMPORTANT DISCLOSURES BEGINNING ON PAGE 12. U.S. Autos & Auto Parts Ford/GM - Driving strategies along three dimensions CEOs of major auto companies today face the most difficult, multidimensional challenges ever seen in the industry. Yes, past CEOs had to deal with change but it was typically just along one dimension, occasionally two, as business cycles intruded. But now OEMs are faced with challenges along at least three dimensions. Near term, they need to manage the cycle challenges of the US SAAR plateau and the eventual downturn. Mid term, the challenge is to cost-effectively meet the megatrends of connected cars, Big Data, active safety, and electrified powertrains. Longer term, OEMs need to deal with #disruptivemoblity, a sharp shift from personal car ownership to purchasing transportation as a service. While we believe Ford has an edge in managing the cycle, we believe GM is ahead in the intermediate megatrends stage, and has an early lead in the longer term era of #disruptivemobility. Near term managing the US SAAR cycle, advantage Ford: We believe Ford currently has an advantage given better managed inventories / better pricing dynamics. Moreover, with a smaller, and more reined-in lease book, Ford Credit holds an advantage over GM Financial, which is newer to the prime financing/leasing business. That said, GM’s North America business has outperformed Ford in recent quarters. And we believe both companies can better manage through a downturn than investors give them credit albeit, the first couple quarters of the downturn will be rocky. Mid term managing the megatrends, advantage GM: In managing the key trends of increasing electrification, active safety and connectivity/Big Data, we believe GM has the lead. It is well positioned given its experimentation with Volt and Bolt in electrification, early adoption of OnStar (providing connectivity), and its extensive use of Mobileye for autonomous braking + its upcoming highway ‘autopilot’ launch in Super Cruise. And importantly, these experiences provide key learnings for longer-term initiatives. That said, both Ford and GM lag Tesla along most of these dimensions. Long term disruptivemobility, a lead for GM, but still early days: In the much longer-term game of #disruptivemobility, both Ford and GM have been much more active than most realize, preparing for the move to autonomous vehicles and mobility as a service. Yet they have taken sharply different approaches. GM has been more aggressive in early spending on Silicon Valley firms, with its investment in Lyft and purchase of Cruise Automation. Ford, by contrast, has been later and appears to have spent less to date, preferring to focus on niches in mobility (specifically van-based ride sharing) and on acquiring talented project leads (vs. existing software) to build out Level 4/5 software. At this point, GM is in the lead vs. Ford. But as it’s still early days in the race towards #disruptivemobility, it’s too early to call a winner. INDUSTRY UPDATE U.S. Autos & Auto Parts NEUTRAL Unchanged U.S. Autos & Auto Parts Brian A. Johnson +1 212 526 5627 [email protected] BCI, US Dan Levy, CFA +1 212 526 8047 [email protected] BCI, US Steven Hempel, CFA +1 312 609 7260 [email protected] BCI, US Research 7 June 2017 US Economics and Credit Strategy Technology-based change leaves retail looking overextended x It has become accepted wisdom that the traditional retail industry is facing significant challenges from the migration of sales volume to e-commerce channels. We examine the degree to which further significant retail bankruptcies would trigger a sharp reduction in industry capacity and employment. x We see a traditional retail industry with excess capacity. Employment has rebounded near to its prior cycle peaks amid a steady increase in physical footprint, just as technological trends seem poised to damage revenue. Capacity, as measured by store unit additions, has grown twice as fast as real sales since 2005. x Overcapacity is not driven by exuberance and the retail sector is not a candidate for the typical bubble-bust effect on the business cycle. Yet, technology-based structural change, in our view, leaves the traditional brick and mortar retail sector looking overextended nonetheless. x We estimate the amount of needed capacity withdrawal based on the industry’s mid-cycle return on assets (ROA), or the minimum return in non-recession years prior to when e-commerce began to heavily suppress ROAs. Applying our assumptions retailer by retailer in our company universe, we think that capacity needs to be reduced by 10-13% to get ROAs back to mid-cycle values. x We believe it is conceivable that bankruptcy proceedings at a large department store could lead to knock-off effects on other middle mall stores, regional banks, and non-retailers that lead to total job losses of around 300,000 in fairly short order. Abrupt adjustment in the retail industry could increase the severity or prolong any downturn in activity as capacity is withdrawn quickly. x Employment in the traditional retail sector across future business cycles may behave similarly to manufacturing in recent decades, where sharp reductions in employment during recessions were followed by little to no meaningful recovery thereafter. Michael Gapen +1 212 526 8536 [email protected] BCI, US Ryan Preclaw, CFA* +1 212 412 2249 [email protected] BCI, US www.barclays.com * This author is a member of the FICC Research department who is not subject to all of the independence and disclosure standards applicable to analysts who produce retail debt research reports under US FINRA Rule 2242. PLEASE SEE ANALYST CERTIFICATIONS AND IMPORTANT DISCLOSURES STARTING AFTER PAGE 8 200 Quantitative Portfolio Strategy Equity FICC Premier Events and Industry-Leading Equity Events Premier Events and 1,000s of Equity Events each year Thematic Research Barclays Research hosts nearly Providing exclusive access to… Policymakers Industry Experts Cross-Asset Expertise Analysts Corporate Management Teams …through Flagship Conferences Investor Field Trips Corporate Events Investor Meetings #energyrevolution #futureofmedia #disruptivemobility #corporatepurchases #creditsupply #retailtippingpoint #brexit #uspolicy #europeanelections Barclays Research BARCLAYS RESEARCH Stay up to date with the most relevant #themes across markets and asset classes. [email protected] Barclays Research Services For more information, please contact Macro Credit Our analysts strive to deliver differentiated market insights, actionable ideas and collaborative research across asset classes, through publications, global conferences, one-to-one analyst interactions and Premier Events.

Upload: vanhanh

Post on 22-Apr-2018

216 views

Category:

Documents


2 download

TRANSCRIPT

Equity Research 21 June 2017

Barclays Capital Inc. and/or one of its affiliates does and seeks to do business with companies covered in its research reports. As a result, investors should be aware that the firm may have a conflict of interest that could affect the objectivity of this report. Investors should consider this report as only a single factor in making their investment decision. PLEASE SEE ANALYST CERTIFICATION(S) AND IMPORTANT DISCLOSURES BEGINNING ON PAGE 12.

U.S. Autos & Auto Parts

Ford/GM - Driving strategies along three dimensions CEOs of major auto companies today face the most difficult, multidimensional challenges ever seen in the industry. Yes, past CEOs had to deal with change – but it was typically just along one dimension, occasionally two, as business cycles intruded. But now OEMs are faced with challenges along at least three dimensions. Near term, they need to manage the cycle challenges of the US SAAR plateau – and the eventual downturn. Mid term, the challenge is to cost-effectively meet the megatrends of connected cars, Big Data, active safety, and electrified powertrains. Longer term, OEMs need to deal with #disruptivemoblity, a sharp shift from personal car ownership to purchasing transportation as a service. While we believe Ford has an edge in managing the cycle, we believe GM is ahead in the intermediate megatrends stage, and has an early lead in the longer term era of #disruptivemobility.

Near term – managing the US SAAR cycle, advantage Ford: We believe Ford currently has an advantage given better managed inventories / better pricing dynamics. Moreover, with a smaller, and more reined-in lease book, Ford Credit holds an advantage over GM Financial, which is newer to the prime financing/leasing business. That said, GM’s North America business has outperformed Ford in recent quarters. And we believe both companies can better manage through a downturn than investors give them credit – albeit, the first couple quarters of the downturn will be rocky.

Mid term – managing the megatrends, advantage GM: In managing the key trends of increasing electrification, active safety and connectivity/Big Data, we believe GM has the lead. It is well positioned given its experimentation with Volt and Bolt in electrification, early adoption of OnStar (providing connectivity), and its extensive use of Mobileye for autonomous braking + its upcoming highway ‘autopilot’ launch in Super Cruise. And importantly, these experiences provide key learnings for longer-term initiatives. That said, both Ford and GM lag Tesla along most of these dimensions.

Long term – disruptivemobility, a lead for GM, but still early days: In the much longer-term game of #disruptivemobility, both Ford and GM have been much more active than most realize, preparing for the move to autonomous vehicles and mobility as a service. Yet they have taken sharply different approaches. GM has been more aggressive in early spending on Silicon Valley firms, with its investment in Lyft and purchase of Cruise Automation. Ford, by contrast, has been later and appears to have spent less to date, preferring to focus on niches in mobility (specifically van-based ride sharing) and on acquiring talented project leads (vs. existing software) to build out Level 4/5 software. At this point, GM is in the lead vs. Ford. But as it’s still early days in the race towards #disruptivemobility, it’s too early to call a winner.

INDUSTRY UPDATE

U.S. Autos & Auto Parts NEUTRAL Unchanged

U.S. Autos & Auto Parts Brian A. Johnson +1 212 526 5627 [email protected] BCI, US Dan Levy, CFA +1 212 526 8047 [email protected] BCI, US Steven Hempel, CFA +1 312 609 7260 [email protected] BCI, US

Research 7 June 2017

US Economics and Credit Strategy

Technology-based change leaves retail looking overextended It has become accepted wisdom that the traditional retail industry is facing

significant challenges from the migration of sales volume to e-commerce channels. We examine the degree to which further significant retail bankruptcies would trigger a sharp reduction in industry capacity and employment.

We see a traditional retail industry with excess capacity. Employment has rebounded near to its prior cycle peaks amid a steady increase in physical footprint, just as technological trends seem poised to damage revenue. Capacity, as measured by store unit additions, has grown twice as fast as real sales since 2005.

Overcapacity is not driven by exuberance and the retail sector is not a candidate for the typical bubble-bust effect on the business cycle. Yet, technology-based structural change, in our view, leaves the traditional brick and mortar retail sector looking overextended nonetheless.

We estimate the amount of needed capacity withdrawal based on the industry’s mid-cycle return on assets (ROA), or the minimum return in non-recession years prior to when e-commerce began to heavily suppress ROAs. Applying our assumptions retailer by retailer in our company universe, we think that capacity needs to be reduced by 10-13% to get ROAs back to mid-cycle values.

We believe it is conceivable that bankruptcy proceedings at a large department store could lead to knock-off effects on other middle mall stores, regional banks, and non-retailers that lead to total job losses of around 300,000 in fairly short order. Abrupt adjustment in the retail industry could increase the severity or prolong any downturn in activity as capacity is withdrawn quickly.

Employment in the traditional retail sector across future business cycles may behave similarly to manufacturing in recent decades, where sharp reductions in employment during recessions were followed by little to no meaningful recovery thereafter.

Michael Gapen +1 212 526 8536 [email protected] BCI, US Ryan Preclaw, CFA* +1 212 412 2249 [email protected] BCI, US www.barclays.com

* This author is a member of the FICC Research

department who is not subject to all of the

independence and disclosure standards

applicable to analysts who produce retail debt

research reports under US FINRA Rule 2242.

PLEASE SEE ANALYST CERTIFICATIONS AND IMPORTANT DISCLOSURES STARTING AFTER PAGE 8

200

QuantitativePortfolioStrategy

Equity

FICC Premier Events and Industry-Leading Equity Events

Premier Events and 1,000sof Equity Events each year

Thematic Research

Barclays Research hosts nearly Providing exclusive access to…

Policymakers

Industry Experts

Cross-Asset Expertise

Analysts

Corporate ManagementTeams

…through

Flagship Conferences

Investor Field Trips

Corporate Events

Investor Meetings

#energyrevolution #futureofmedia

#disruptivemobility

#corporatepurchases #creditsupply

#retailtippingpoint

#brexit

#uspolicy

#europeanelections

Barclays Research

BAR

CLA

YS RESEA

RC

H

Stay up to date with the most relevant #themesacross markets and asset classes.

[email protected]

Barclays Research ServicesFor m

ore information, please contact

Macro

Credit

Our analysts strive to deliver differentiatedmarket insights, actionable ideas andcollaborative research across asset classes,through publications, global conferences,one-to-one analyst interactions andPremier Events.

Barclays Live

The client facing web portal of Barclays Researchfranchise consistently voted #1 in Web-BasedAnalytical Tools by Institutional Investor All-Americasince 2008.

Barclays Live App

Work seamlessly on your phone,tablet and desktop

Watchlist

Customized research andcharts in your tiles

You Might Like

Suggested research andpersonalized reading lists

Analytics

Relative value analysis, yieldcurves, historical market data,

and quantitative models

Markets

Monitor market data acrossasset classes

Multimedia

Infographics, reportsand videos

Flagship Publications

Equity Gilt Study

Now in its 62nd year, the Equity GiltStudy provides multi-disciplinarycommentary on longer-termmarket trends, analyzing assetreturns across different marketsand geographies.

Global Outlook

Published quarterly, the GlobalOutlook provides an assessmentof macro themes across all majoreconomies and outlines theirlikely implications for globalfinancial markets.

Top Picks

Barclays Equity Research’s“Top Picks” represent the singlebest alpha-generating investmentidea within each industry, takenfrom among the Overweight-ratedstocks within that industry.

#1Web-BasedAnalytical Tools

Voted

Global Economics Weekly

Global Macro Daily

Analysts60+ economists, rates, FXand commodities strategists

Macro ResearchAn integrated offering across economics, rates, FX, commodities, and publicpolicy combining short-term daily commentary with long-term thematic ideasacross developed and emerging economies.

REGULARS DEEP DIVES

MOST POPULAR EVENTS

62Premier Events

Macro Events

July 1, 2016 – June 30, 2017UK Referendum Timeline and Process

The Future of US Trade Policy

China Investor Trip

Mexico Macro Field Trip

Sterling Markets Outlook Roundtable — Referendum Time

Roundtable: Oil & Geopolitics in the Middle East

Flagship Publications

Thinking MacroEmerging Markets Weekly

FX and EM Macro StrategyQuarterly

Global Rates Weekly

Global Outlook

DIGESTS

Three Questions

The House ViewThe Blue Drum

Thoughts for the Week Ahead

form the backbone of the Barclaysglobal macro franchise.

Economics InterestRates

ForeignExchange

Commodities

Public Policy

MA

CR

O R

ESEAR

CH

#uspolicy

#liquiditysqueeze#chinadebt

#europeanelections #missingflation

#blockchain

Thematic Research

#brexit

#brazilrisks

For more inform

ation, please contactresearchservices@

barclays.comBarclays Research Services

60+

MacroResearch

Economics

InterestRates

EmergingMarkets

ForeignExchange

Commodities

PublicPolicy

OASIS

Identify opportunities and themes in FX volatility andperform complex analysis across multiple asset classes.

Keyword: oasis VolT

Analyze foreign exchange trade volume andpositioning trends.

Keyword: volt

TRENDS

View a snapshot of the technical condition of the FXand commodities markets.

Keyword: trends Inflation-Linked Toolkit

Monitor inflation-linked analytics through our suiteof calculators and curve/charting tools.

Keyword: ILHRA

Macro Analytic ToolsFull suite of macro analytic toolsincluding charting tools,calculators, market monitors,volatility and trends analysis

Chart

Access hundreds of multi-currencycurves and historical charts across

financial markets for pre-traderelative value analysis.

Keyword: chart

Barclays Macro Events

The dedicated Barclays Live Sales team providestutorials and updates for clients on how to useBarclays Live.

Monthly Barclays Live Web events that highlight newfeatures and analysis around Macro market themes.

CreditResearch

Flagship Publications

Analyst Coverage (as of 19 June 2017)

US Europe AsiaLatAm+EEMEA

Credit Strategy

Credit ResearchOffering strategy and fundamental research with thematic views, trade ideasand Premier Events across a wide range of credit products and geographies.

Across investment grade and high yield,including coverage of

Our suite of daily, weekly, bi-weekly, and quarterly publicationsprovides thematic research and trade ideas.

European Credit Alpha Barclays Tuesday Credit Call

CDS Index Option Dashboard

AAA Investor

Global Credit Outlook

Daily Research Summary

CDS Index PositioningU.S. Credit Alpha

~70

Premier Events

Credit Events

July 1, 2016 – June 30, 2017New Look Investor Meeting

Repsol Investor Roundtable

China Economic Update & Implications for Autos & Metals Corporates

Chemicals Credit Review with S&P

European Telecoms Regulatory Outlook

European Banks Roundtable Dinner

450+~47%

270+~29%

70~7%

110+~12%

Sovereigns40+~4%

Issuersglobally

hybrid capital, loans, CLO,EM corporate, cross-currencyrelative value, derivatives andselect securitized products.

MOST POPULAR EVENTS

CR

EDIT R

ESEAR

CH

Thematic Research

#retailtippingpoint #creditsupply

#energyrevolution

#fallenangels

#chinadebt

For more inform

ation, please contact

HighGrade

HighYield

Municipals

Derivatives

Sovereigns

#corporatepurchases

[email protected]

Barclays Research Services

credit analysts and strategists cover...

Emerging Markets Weekly

EM Corporate CreditTop Picks

155

330+

EMCorporate

issuers across EMEA

Credit Analytic ToolsFull suite of macro analytic tools including charting tools, calculators, market monitors and screeners

Chart

Access hundreds of multi-currency relative value curves and historical time series across financial marketsfor pre-trade analysis.

Barclays Credit Workshops

Alongside our workshops, the dedicated Barclays LiveSales team provides tutorials and updates for clientson how to use Barclays Live and the content availablefor your analysis and monitoring of the Credit markets.

The Workshop series focuses on relevant credit themeswith guest speakers throughout the year. These WebExcalls feature relative value themes, current trade ideas and our fundamental views.

Keyword: chart

Credit Center

Access all relevant analytics and research acrossa single issuer and its sector peers in one application.

Keyword: cc Bond Screening Tool

Multi-input bond screener for easy identificationof the bonds fitting your customized criteria.

Keyword: BST

Equity Research 3 April 2017

Barclays Capital Inc. and/or one of its affiliates does and seeks to do business with companies covered in its research reports. As a result, investors should be aware that the firm may have a conflict of interest that could affect the objectivity of this report. Investors should consider this report as only a single factor in making their investment decision.

This research report has been prepared in whole or in part by equity research analysts based outside the US who are not registered/qualified as research analysts with FINRA. PLEASE SEE ANALYST CERTIFICATION(S) AND IMPORTANT DISCLOSURES BEGINNING ON PAGE 51.

European & US Telecommunications

Potential on both sides of the pond In this detailed report we compare and contrast the key regulatory, competitive and investment themes in the US and Europe. We see a more positive regulatory outlook and incentive to invest in the US (borne out by M&A/Capex trends). ROCE is very similar as higher US NOPAT is offset by higher capital employed. This is balanced by rising competitive forces in the US, whereas European competition is much more stable (with pricing 2x lower). We still see T-Mobile US (and DT in Europe) as best placed to create value, and our deep dive on Vodafone vs. Verizon shows Vodafone in a more favourable light. Cable appears attractive in both markets, and for Towers we see the US remaining more advanced, but both US and Europe screen well.

Regulation – US regulatory approach appears more pro-investment than Europe. Both regulatory authorities are keen to stimulate investment to support economic growth. Feedback from the recent Digital Regulation Forum highlights clear differences between actions and words, with the US continuously stressing a “lighter touch”, and raising hopes for consolidation. In stark contrast, Europe, although wanting investment, still appears fixated on lower price, and a “carrot and stick” approach.

Competition – US competition ramping, Europe steady. We believe the US is entering a phase of increased competition, especially in Wireless (incumbents and new cable offerings), whereas in Europe the tone is more balanced. We note revenue and EBITDA per pop is 2x in the US vs. Europe, which implies relative downside for the US. Fibre is a focus in both markets, and we see signs of inflationary pricing in Europe.

5G and investment – US continues to out-invest Europe 2:1. Given the regulatory and competitive backdrop above, it is unsurprising to see the US Telcos attempt to invest (and possibly consolidate) their way out of a rising competitive environment; US capex/pop is also 2x higher than in Europe. Transformational deals such as AT&T/Time Warner for Content and elevated investments in 5G/Virtualisation are evidence of this “raising the bar”. European Telcos are typically taking a “wait and see” approach (with Fibre an exception) – some are “de-equitizing” their positions via asset disposals.

Valuation and Returns – ROCE is key. US and European Telcos trade on similar EBITDA/FCF multiples, even if Europe offers a higher dividend yield. When looking at returns, we see the US Telcos offering NOPAT 60% higher than European peers. However, capital employed is ca60-70% higher (spectrum and tangible fixed assets), giving ROCE of ca7% including goodwill, or ca10% excluding goodwill.

Stock implications. We see TMUS ideally placed as a “king-maker” asset in the US, with the asset making up 35% of our DT SOTP value. Together these two represent our Top Picks. We prefer Vodafone over Verizon, concluding that both face operational strategic challenges, but see the risk/reward more skewed positively for Vodafone. A review of AMX and TEF shows both face ongoing challenges in 2017). Our positive stance on the Cable and Tower space continues, with both US and Europe offering opportunities.

INDUSTRY UPDATE

European Telecom Services POSITIVE Unchanged

U.S. Telecom Services NEUTRAL Unchanged

European Telecom Services Maurice Patrick +44 (0)20 3134 3622 [email protected] Barclays, UK Mathieu Robilliard +44 (0)20 3134 3288 [email protected] Barclays, UK Daniel Morris +44 (0)20 7773 2113 [email protected] Barclays, UK Simon Coles +44 (0)20 3555 4519 [email protected] Barclays, UK

U.S. Telecom Services Amir Rozwadowski +1 212 526 4043 [email protected] BCI, US Matt Bienkowski +1 212 526 2308 [email protected] BCI, US Justine Humenansky +1 212 526 5080 [email protected] BCI, US

U.S. Cable & Satellite Communications Kannan Venkateshwar +1 212 528 7054 [email protected] BCI, US

EQU

ITY RESEA

RC

H

Equity Research

Analyst Coverage (as of 19 June 2017)

USContinental

Europe UK Canada

Event analysis and deep dives into stock ideas and sector themes spanningmore than 1,700 companies under coverage across the Americas and Europe.

60 43

EventsBARCLAYS SELECT SERIES INDUSTRY LEADING CONFERENCES

1,00357%

34720%

945%

24514%

Stocks

LatAm634%

CEO Energy-Power

Global Consumer Staples

Global Financial Services

Building & Building Products

European Payments& Fintech Forum

European Retail Forum

Global Technology, Media andTelecommunications (TMT)

Industrial Select

Global HealthcareGlobal Automotive

Equity Research Energy | European Integrated Oil & Refining

16 March 2017

BP

Not just any downstream

The coming five years should be transformative for BP. In the upstream, sector leading volume growth ambitions of 5% pa to 2021 look achievable and combined with greater efficiency should yield much improved results. Yet it is the plans for the downstream that have the potential to deliver the biggest positive surprise to the market, with our own pre-tax FCF forecasts for the division some 50% below the top end of BP’s numbers presented in its latest strategy plan. This Full Signal report focuses on that downstream business, analysing how achievable these plans are by using a comparison with a wider marketing focused peer group. Our conclusion is that a successful roll-out of a convenience offering – such as the Marks & Spencer’s partnership in the UK – should enable BP to increase its profit per barrel sold, which we estimate is currently 40% below the peer group average, and go a long way to delivering on the group’s FCF aspirations. It would be easy to overcomplicate the investment case for BP, but for us the attraction is in the simplicity. If the dividend is sustainable, then the shares, which offer a 7% yield, remain meaningfully undervalued and we expect to see a differentiated performance, particularly from 2H 2017 as a number of the larger projects start up. We continue to rate the shares Overweight with a 625p/sh price target.

Downstream potential to surprise: The purpose of this report is to focus on the potential of the downstream to deliver FCF aspirations essentially twice our current projections. Using a different peer group to normal we look at what can be achieved in terms of margin per barrel and margin per site in the fuels marketing business. On our estimates an uplift in per-barrel profitability of $1.5/bl, or 70%, would enable BP to meet the figures presented in the strategy update. Although a significant step up, this would not be stand-out within the convenience and fuel retailing sector.

Two paths to 800p/sh upside: Whilst we have chosen not to change any numbers within this report given what we see as the need to have evidence of delivery, we have lifted our upside case to 800p from 740p previously. We see two potential paths to this upside case. First is the incorporation of the full downstream guidance into our numbers. The second is the incorporation of approximately one-third of the upside combined with a recovery in the oil price by 2020 towards our upside case of $85/bl.

BP.L: Financial and Valuation Metrics EPS GBP

FY Dec 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018

EPS 0.40A 0.21A 0.10E 0.42E 0.49E Previous EPS 0.40A 0.21A 0.10E 0.42E 0.49E P/E 11.5 21.7 45.2 10.8 9.4 Source: Barclays Research, Consensus numbers are from Thomson Reuters.

Stock Rating OVERWEIGHT Unchanged

Industry View POSITIVE Unchanged

Price Target GBP 6.25 Unchanged

Price (14-Mar-2017) GBP 4.57 Potential Upside/Downside +36.8% Tickers BP/ LN / BP.L

Market Cap (GBP mn) 89877 Shares Outstanding (mn) 19560.29 Free Float (%) 99.31 52 Wk Avg Daily Volume (mn) 34.1 52 Wk Avg Daily Value (GBP mn) 146.96 Dividend Yield (%) 7.0 Return on Equity TTM (%) 0.12 Current BVPS (GBP) 3.97 Source: Thomson Reuters

Price Performance Exchange-LSE 52 Week range GBP 5.21-3.35

Link to Barclays Live for interactive charting

European Integrated Oil & Refining Lydia Rainforth, CFA +44 (0)20 3134 6669 [email protected] Barclays, UK

Joshua Stone +44 (0)20 3134 6694 [email protected] Barclays, UK

Danni Li +44 (0)20 3134 5636 [email protected] Barclays, UK

Barclays Capital Inc. and/or one of its affiliates does and seeks to do business with companies covered in its research reports. As a result, investors should be aware that the firm may have a conflict of interest that could affect the objectivity of this report. Investors should consider this report as only a single factor in making their investment decision.

This research report has been prepared in whole or in part by equity research analysts based outside the US who are not registered/qualified as research analysts with FINRA. PLEASE SEE ANALYST CERTIFICATION(S) AND IMPORTANT DISCLOSURES BEGINNING ON PAGE 30

Our Product Mix

Full Signal #futureofmedia

Single Stock Thematic UK Transatlantic

For more inform

ation, please contactresearchservices@

barclays.comBarclays Research Services

senior analysts in the Americas senior analysts in Europe cover...

pan European stocksunder coverage witha core strength in the UK

~600

TransatlanticCollaborationOur brand for in-depth

fundamental singlestock research

Tracking the mostrelevant market themes

UK Mid & Small Cap

Market-leading directoryspanning 245 UK stocks A fresh perspective on

today’s global sectors

Company PagesAccess company research,upside/downside scenario rangesand company financials, includingthree-year forecasts across incomestatement, balance sheet andcashflow.

Size of the bubble denotes total market capitalizationof our coverage stocks in each industry.

Top PicksBarclays Equity Research’s“Top Picks” represent the singlebest alpha-generating investmentidea within each industry, takenfrom among the Overweight-ratedstocks within that industry.

Equity Industries Under Coverage

Retail

Healthcare

Technology

IndustrialsEnergy

Consumer

BasicIndustries

FinancialServices

Internet& Media

Power &Utilities

Telecoms

(as of 28 June 2017)

QU

AN

TITATIV

E POR

TFOLIO

STRA

TEGY

Quantitative Portfolio Strategy

Unique ContentFor over two decades, the Barclays Quantitative Portfolio Strategy team has used its extensive researchand portfolio management experience to provide our clients with research that is:

Providing our clients with innovative insights into all aspectsof the investment process, across asset classes.

Objective

Analysis based on rigorous and innovativeempirical studies and models.

No subjective views: “let the data speak”

Practical

Realistic and implementable research findingsin response to questions from practitioners

Academically Recognized

Published in key industry journals

Broad in Nature

Covering all major asset classes includingcross-asset research and aimed

at a variety of institutional clientsJournal of Portfolio Management / Journal of Fixed

Income / Journal of Alternative Investments

QPS Annual Councils

Hosted annually by Barclays

The Americas Advisory Council in New York and the EuropeanAdvisory Council in London provide a great opportunity fortwo-way dialogue with large institutional investors.

Extensive ResearchSpanning major steps of the investment process

AssetAllocation

BenchmarkCustomisation

Choice ofInvestment

Style

For more inform

ation, please contactresearchservices@

barclays.comBarclays Research Services

RiskBudgeting

London

New York

Agenda highlights new QPS research for the past year. QPS analystsmoderate discussions with e-voting in an effort to get client feedback.

QPS Research Categories

Choice ofInvestment Style Properties of systematic investment styles

Value of security selection vs asset allocation

Smart beta in fixed income markets

Bespoke PortfolioOptimization Tools Maximum Likelihood Scenario Definition

Try and Hold model for long-horizon credit portfolios

Optimal Risk Budgeting with Skill (ORBS)

Portfolio ConstructionMethodologies

Portfolio/index hedging and replication

Topical studies on ESG investing, Risk Parity, FX hedging, Diversification,Factor Modelling, Style Premia

Duration Times Spread (DTS) — a new risk measure introduced by QPSthat became industry standard

Analysis of Manager’sPerformance Algorithmic Evaluation of Returns for comparing performance and risk of a given

hedge fund to its peers

Studies of active manager performance and of the value of skill in differentenvironments

Measure of Manager Skill for identifying hedge funds performance persistence

Analytics and Sector/Issuer/Issue LevelPeriodic Scorecards Excess Spread to Peers (ESP) — relative value in credit markets

Equity Momentum in Credit (EMC) — identifying value in corporate bondsof an issuer based on momentum of its equity

Modeling liquidity in bond markets: Liquidity Cost Scores (LCS), Trade EfficiencyScores and Price Impact Measure

Issuance Rate model — underweighting issuers or sectors with increasing leverage

Global Rates Carry — selecting sovereign markets with higher promised yield

Spread per unit of Debt To Earning Ratio (SPiDER) — relative value in equityand credit markets

Bond in Equity Asset Momentum (BEAM) — ranking equities based on momentumof corporate bonds of the same issuer

Published Books Our QPS team haspublished three booksover the last 10 yearsreflecting our client-driven research.

Copyright © 2007Princeton University Press

Copyright © 2012Wiley Financial

Copyright © 2015 Barclays

PERSONAL USE ONLYAll information contained herein shall only be used by the recipient for his/her own personal reference. Any other use, including any disclosure or distribution to of any information to any third party, requires the express written permission of Barclays. Barclays will not treat unauthorized recipients of this information as its clients.

FOR INFORMATION PURPOSES ONLYThis information has been prepared by the Research Department within the Investment Bank of Barclays Bank PLC and, where relevant, is distributed by Barclays Bank PLC and/or one or more of its affiliates (collectively and each individually, “Barclays”). The information, analytic tools, and/or models referenced herein (and any reports or results derived from their use) are intended for informational purposes only and should not be regarded as an offer to sell or a solicitation of an offer to buy the products or securities to which it applies. No representation is made that any returns will be achieved through their use.

INFORMATION PROVIDED MAY NOT BE ACCURATE OR COMPLETE AND MAY BE SOURCED FROM THIRD PARTIESAll information, whether proprietary to Barclays or a third party, is provided "as is" and Barclays makes no express or implied warranties, and expressly disclaims all warranties of merchantability or fitness for a particular purpose or use with respect to any data included herein. Other than disclosures relating to Barclays, the information contained herein has been obtained from sources that Barclays believes to be reliable, but Barclays makes no representations that the information contained herein or the output of any of the analytic tools or models referenced herein is accurate, reliable, complete, or appropriate for use by all investors in all locations. Further, Barclays does not guarantee the accuracy or completeness of information contained herein which is obtained from, or is based upon, trade and statistical services or other third party sources. Because of the possibility of human and mechanical errors as well as other factors, Barclays is not responsible for any errors or omissions in the information contained herein or in any of the analytic tools or models referenced herein (or any reports or results derived from their use). Barclays is not responsible for, and makes no warranties whatsoever as to, the content of any third-party web site accessed via a hyperlink contained herein and such information is not incorporated by reference.

INFORMATION PROVIDED IS NOT INDICATIVE OF FUTURE RESULTSAny data on past performance, modelling or back-testing contained herein is not necessarily indicative of future results. All levels, prices and spreads are historical and do not represent current market levels, prices or spreads, some or all of which may have changed. The information referenced herein or any of the reports or results derived from any analytic tools or models referenced herein are not intended to predict actual results and no assurances are given with respect thereto.

NO LIABILITYTo the extent permitted by law, in no event shall Barclays, nor any affiliate, nor any of their respective officers, directors, partners, employees or third party licensors have any liability for (a) any special, punitive, indirect, or consequential damages; or (b) any lost profits, lost revenue, loss of anticipated savings or loss of opportunity or other financial loss, even if notified or advised of the possibility of such damages or potential loss, arising from any use of the information provided herein.

NO ADVICEThe information provided does not constitute investment advice or take into account the individual financial circumstances or objectives of the clients who receive it. You should consult with your own accounting, legal or other advisors as to the adequacy of this information for your purposes.

NO USE FOR VALUATION PURPOSESNo data or price information should be used for any valuation, trading, settlement, accounting purposes or other related functions.

NOT AVAILABLE IN ALL JURISDICTIONSNot all products or services mentioned are available in all jurisdictions. No offers, sales, resales, or delivery of any products or services described herein or any offering materials relating to any such products or services may be made in or from any jurisdiction except in circumstances which will result with compliance with any applicable laws and regulations and which will not impose any obligations on Barclays.

INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY© Copyright Barclays Bank PLC (2017). All rights reserved. No part of this document may be reproduced or redistributed in any manner without the prior written permission of Barclays.

Barclays Bank PLC is registered in England No. 1026167. Registered office 1 Churchill Place, London, E14 5HP.

Disclaimer