barbara livoreil 1,2 , andrew pullin 1 , carsten neßhöver , marie vandewalle ,
DESCRIPTION
Bridging the communication gap between evaluation and decision - making : the Network of Knowledge approach for Europe. Barbara Livoreil 1,2 , Andrew Pullin 1 , Carsten Neßhöver , Marie Vandewalle , Ilse Geizjendorffer , Rob Jongman. 1. 2. Table of contents. Introduction - PowerPoint PPT PresentationTRANSCRIPT
Bridging the communication gap between evaluation and decision-
making: the Network of Knowledge approach for Europe
Barbara Livoreil1,2, Andrew Pullin1, Carsten Neßhöver, Marie Vandewalle,
Ilse Geizjendorffer, Rob Jongman
1 2
Table of contents
• Introduction• the KNEU (NoK) project• what is a network of knowledge• scale, why this NoK, types of knowledge
• The actors
• The prototype process
• Next steps
www.biodiversityknowledge.eu
KNEU Partnership UFZ, Germany (Coordination) NERC-CEH, UK RBINS,Belgium CIIMAR, Portugal NIOZ, Netherlands FRB, France ALTERRA, Netherlands UNIVIE, Austria NINA, Norway CSIC, Spain MTA IEB HAS, Hungary ECNC, Netherlands Bangor University, United Kingdom EVINBO, Belgium EAA, Austria SYKE, Finland BEC, Ireland VLIZ, Belgium
= Ca 40 experts
18 Partners
3
INTRODUCTION
Livoreil et al.version 13– Jan 2012
3
What is a Network of Knowledge?
Scale of the network: within the KNEU project, and globally (ipbes)
Why using a NoK rather than have a list of trusted experts?
What type of knowledge, types of knowledge and susceptibility to bias (challenges of confidence, risk in decision-making)
INTRODUCTION
Livoreil et al.version 13– Jan 2012
THE ACTORS
THE ACTORS
REQUESTERS REQUESTERS
Political institutions (DGs), ministries, European and national agencies, European or international conventions, private sector and its umbrella organisations , NGOs
KCB KNOWLEDGE COORDINATING BODY
NoKKNOWLEDGE COORDINATING
BODY
KNOWLEDGE HOLDERS / PROVIDERS
Scientists, practitioners, administrations, companies, NGOs, indigenous and local people, scientific societies, institutes, governmental agencies, consultants…)
Livoreil et al.Version 9 – Sept 2011
REVIEWERS(PEER)-
REVIEWERS
WORKING GROUPS
Ad-hoc WORKING GROUPS
SCOPING GROUP
SCOPING GROUP
THE PROTOTYPE
THE STEPS
Evidence-based framework
Expert consultation
Adaptive management
REQUEST
RESULTS
DIALOGUE & SCOPING
TENDER PROCESS
CLOSING & FOLLOW-UP
PREPARING
CONDUCTING
FINALISING
Other method
AGREEMENT ON TEAM AND PROTOCOL
PROCESSING KNOWLEDGE
PEER-REVIEW OF RESULTS
FINAL REPORT
18Livoreil et al.version 13– Jan 2012
PREPARING: DIALOGUE & SCOPING
SCOPE, SCALE, TOPIC….
PROBLEMS/CONCERNS INTO QUESTIONS
SUBQUESTIONS
FEASIBILITY
COSTS, RESOURCES
EXPERTS
Livoreil et al.Version 10 – Sept 2011
FINAL REQUESTready for call for tender
DIALOGUEREQUESTER
KCB
SCOPING*
SCOPING GROUP
KCBSearch terms, scale…
Available knowledge and experts
Scoping group helps adapting request and evaluating feasibility based on : a. consultation (scopjng) of
knowledge databases (direct or via NoK)
b. quick consultation of NoK (experts)
c. Evaluation quantity of experts available
Publication databases
Proj
ect m
anag
emen
t
22Livoreil et al.version 13– Jan 2012
INITIAL REQUEST
CONSENSUS
SEVERAL ROUNDS OF CONSULTATION / ANSWERS
EXPERT CONSULTATIONCOMPLETING LIST OF
EXPERTS AND/OR SELECTING EXPERTS
Preliminary list of knowledge & experts from scopingFINAL REQUEST and APPROVED PROTOCOL
WORKING GROUP
Go to stepFINALISING
DRAFT REPORTRECOMMENDATIONS
LIMITATIONS
COMPREHSENSIVE LIST OF KNOWLEDGE + OPEN
CONSULTATION (open-access)
MAPPING KNOWLEDGE
NARRATIVE SYNTHESIS
QUANTITATIVE SYNTHESIS (meta-analysis)
APPRAISAL OF QUALITY OF KNOWLEDGE
EVIDENCE BASED METHOD
+
WG keeps KCB aware of advancement and possible problems encountered
www NoKREQUESTER KCB
CONDUCTING
28
IDENTIFY GAPS & UNCERTAINTIESPARTICIPATORY MODELLING
SCENARIO BUILDING
PRACTITIONER & STEKEHOLDER CONSULTATION
COMPREHENSIVE LIST OF KNOWLEDGE
POLICY/MANAGEMENT PLANLEARNING CYCLE
ADAPTIVE MANAGEMENT
Livoreil et al.version 13– Jan 2012
DISSEMINATION
POST-OPERATORY FEEDBACKSEVALUATIONS
FINALISING: CLOSING & FOLLOW-UP
31Livoreil et al.version 13– Jan 2012
Evidence-based framework
Expert consultation
Adaptive management
REQUEST
RESULTS
DIALOGUE & SCOPING
TENDER PROCESS
CLOSING & FOLLOW-UP
Other method
AGREEMENT ON TEAM AND PROTOCOL
PROCESSING KNOWLEDGE
PEER-REVIEW OF RESULTS
FINAL REPORT
REQUESTERS
NoKKNOWLEDGE COORDINATING
BODY
KNOWLEDGE HOLDERS PROVIDERS
The next steps
The prototype will be tested with 3 case studies
• Marine: seagrass• Conservation: green infrastructure• Agriculture: biofuels?
EEEN and Nok, EEEN and IPBES…
How to cooperate ?
GET INVOLVED
Comment the prototypeJoin our 1st conference (May 2012)
Get involved in our case studiesRegister your expertise
www.biodiversityknowledge.eu