barb funk mid-east career and technology centers … presentation-barb funk.pdfbarb funk mid-east...
TRANSCRIPT
Ohio TIF Districts will implement Ohio Teacher Evaluation System in 2012-2013
USDOE allow flexibility, with a phase-in of student growth measures
Gave Mid-East the opportunity to work through some of the challenges and opportunities
In 2011, ODE “OTES Pilot Program”
◦ Building Directors selected 3 individuals to participate
◦ Attended state sponsored training
Union president
Two Building Directors
OAC/TIF Coordinator
Executive Director
All teachers will be evaluated using the Teacher Performance side of the OTES framework
All administrators evaluating teachers and principals will be credentialed evaluators
All teachers will develop and monitor one Student Learning Objective
In Spring 2012, Mid-East CTC developed an OTES team ◦ Executive Director
◦ Building Directors
◦ New Asst. Director-primary role is evaluation
◦ Asst. Director - role Curriculum and OAC/TIF
◦ Teacher Volunteers
◦ Added our trained teacher mentors
Developed our Professional Development Plan
In July 2012, ODE sponsored -SLO development grant ◦ CT instructor and OAC/TIF Coordinator to this training (Ohio
Valley ESC and Muskingum Valley ESC)
In August 2012, Mid-East began SLO PD with leadership teams creating a teacher-led training model for future use
Transformation Team Strategic Compensation Team OTES Team Formative Instructional Practices Team Assessment/Literacy Tech Team HSTW Site Coordinators All Administrators
Write and monitor one SLO
Pilot the SLO process
Allow for multiple opportunities for teachers to collaborate, discuss their questions and concerns
Share promising practices with one another
September 14th-Professional Development ◦ AM Focus on Teacher Performance – OTES Model
Shifts in our current evaluation tool and the OTES rubric
Self-Assessment and Teacher Evidence
Viewed videos of teachers and used pieces of the rubric
◦ PM focus on Student Growth – Student Learning Objectives
Achievement Vs. Progress
Complete the SLO Process
Follow the developed calendar or timeline
Attend Professional Development
◦ 1st Quarter: Rubric / Writing SLOs Focus
◦ 2nd Quarter: Monitoring Focus
◦ 3rd Quarter: CIA Focus
◦ 4th Quarter: Growth Target Data Focus and
Reflection
Mid-East Career and Technology Centers-SLO Timeline
Sept Complete Needs Assessment
Sept Determine student group
Sept Align to standards and create Student Learning Objective
Sept – Oct Develop/choose Beginning of the Year Assessment (Pre-assessment)
Sept – Oct Analyze and document Pre-Assessment Results
Sept – Oct Create Growth Target
October 19 Deadline: Complete and submit SLOs
Sept – Apr Monitor student progress toward Student Learning Objective and share
at Department and Collaborative Meetings
Nov – Jan Complete Revision Requests from SLO review
2nd Semester Key Date: New Student Enrollment cut-off
Jan 21 – Feb 4 Request your own Revision
TBD Administer Post-Assessments
May 15 Deadline: Complete Final Submission Form
Students enrolling after the 2nd semester begins will not be included in the data.
Students with attendance below 85% will not be included in the data.
Teacher Name: Jim O'Neill School: Mid East CTC - Zanesville Campus
SLO: Powerline I Assessment Name:
Student Name Baseline Growth Target Final Score Met Target
28 64 80 Yes
20 60 48 No
44 72 76 Yes
28 64 76 Yes
12 56
48 74 84 Yes
20 60 44 No
28 64 52 No
40 70 88 Yes
32 66 84 Yes
28 64 60 No
Growth Target=(100-PT)/2+PT Target Met=If(Baseline cell number>=final score cell number, “Yes”, “No”)
Appropriate alignment to HB555 and ORC with Value Added teachers
Categorize teachers into groups
Determine percentages to the three SG categories
Determine how we will implement local measures ◦ Shared attribution
◦ CT WebXams and Certifications appropriate measure of student growth
◦ Team SLO
◦ Number of SLO
Balance of Fairness for Teachers ◦ Multiple Measure used to measure Student Growth
◦ Level of Rigor, Validity and Reliability
Determine Approval Process ◦ Who serves on the SLO Review Committee
Academic Courses Value Added Vendor Approved LEA Decision (SLO)
A B C
English 10 Yes
English 11 Yes
English 12 No Yes
Modified 11 No Yes
Modified 12 No Yes
Algebra I Yes
Geometry Yes
Algebra II Yes
PreCalculus Yes
Calculus No Yes
Advanced Math No Yes
Business Math No Yes
Financial/Consumer Math No Yes
College Math No Yes
Modified Math No Yes
Pre-Algebra No Yes
Academic Courses Value Added Vendor Approved LEA Decision (SLO)
US History No
Government No
Recent Am. History No Yes
Modified Gov. No Yes
Biology Yes
Chemistry Yes
Advance Biology No Yes
Anatomy & Physiology No Yes
Forensic Science No Yes
Earth Science No Yes
Tech Science No Yes
Modified Biology No Yes
Modified Tech Science No Yes
Computers Apps No Yes
Workplace Skills No Yes
Public Speaking No Yes
CTE No Yes
Career Tech Instructors Level I Level II
WebXam Certification SLO
Auto Craig Reich SLO Yes
Carp Robby Robinson SLO Yes Yes
Weld Dave Irvin SLO Yes Yes
Diesel Rob Parker SLO Yes Yes
Custo Carol Riffle SLO No No
Bld Maint Curtis Felver SLO No No
NRC Brian Wilfong SLO Yes
Cosmeto Lenny Rosser SLO Yes
LPN Cindy Price SLO Yes
Dental Donna Keyes SLO Yes
Health Samra Mazzuli SLO Yes
Comp Sup Chris Horstman SLO Yes
BEST Colleen Smith SLO No No
CBI Eric Kerns SLO No No
Comm Art Bill Koch SLO Yes No
Career Con Dave Brown SLO X X X
Balancing the Fairness for Teachers
Using the Right Measures
Related as much as possible to the teacher
A few reliable, valid measures
Equitable weight of measures
Inform practice
Selecting and Approving Assessments
Analyze assessment data to set the target Past performance of students Standardized assessment Benchmark assessments Pre-Assessments Post-Assessments-Written, Portfolios, Authentic, Rubrics “Stretch” Opportunities
Plan how various assessment will be combined
Work with teachers across districts to develop common
assessments
Build Assessment Literacy Engage in a focused study
Teacher-Made Assessments: How to Connect Curriculum, Instruction and Student Learning by Christopher R. Gareis and Leslie W. Grant
Developing and Selecting Assessments of Student Growth for Use in Teacher Evaluations Systems by Joan Herman, Margaret Heritage, and Pete Goldschmidt. Assessment and Accountability Comprehensive Center.
Is This a Trick Question? A Short Guide to Writing Effective Test Questions by Ben Clay. Kansas Curriculum Center