bannister & i-435 tax increment financing planmall... · much of the existing mall would have...
TRANSCRIPT
D E V E L O P E R : C E R N E R P R O P E R T Y D E V E L O P M E N T
BANNISTER & I-435 TAX INCREMENT FINANCING PLAN
CITY OF KANSAS CITY, MISSOURI
2016 MEDFA Conference
REDEVELOPMENT AREA
HISTORY OF THE REDEVELOPMENT AREA
• The area was once the site of the Three Trails (Santa Fe, California, and Oregon Trails) and the Santa Fe Trail crossed the original property.
• Bannister Mall opened August 6, 1980. After nearly 27 years of operation, the mall closed on May 31, 2007.
• In 2002, the Three Trails TIF Plan proposed a regional retail center, featuring a Bass Pro Outdoor World at a cost of $83 million. Much of the existing mall would have been renovated.
• In 2007, the Plan was amended, instead proposing a $948 million, 3 phase mixed use plan, anchored by an 18,500 seat stadium to be used by the Kansas City Wizards.
Demolition of the mall began in 2009.
In 2011, the Plan was recast as an office and retail center called The Trails. The stadium was deleted.
• In 2013, the Bannister & I-435 TIF Plan was approved by the Council. It is the largest TIF in state history.
• The Plan calls for a $4.3 billion, over 4 million sf mixed-use office campus, consisting of office, daycare, retail, hotel, and data center space, along with parking and infrastructure on a 270+ acre site. Cerner plans to add $16,000 jobs.
• In addition, the Plan provides for a $6 million educational program and $2 million neighborhood program.
Public incentives approved:
•$774 million in TIF
•$317 million in SuperTIF
•$654 million in State supplemental TIF
• In addition, Cerner received a Mo Works incentive for new job creation.
PRIMARY REQUIRED FINDINGS
• But-for analysis - a finding that the area has not been subject to growth and development through investment by private enterprise and would not reasonably be anticipated to be developed without the adoption of tax increment financing.
• Cost-benefit analysis - a fiscal impact study on every affected political subdivision, and sufficient information from the developer to evaluate whether the project as proposed is financially feasible
• Blight, conservation, or economic development area
BUT FOR ANALYSIS
• Springsted conducted the but-for analysis for the TIF Commission, and concluded that, without public assistance, the project would realize a return of -7.89%. With assistance, the project is projected to realize a modest return of 3.81%.
COST BENEFIT ANALYSIS
• The cost benefit analysis, performed by Springsted, showed a positive impact on all taxing jurisdictions except the Metro Community Colleges.
STATUTORY BLIGHTING FACTORS
1. defective or inadequate street layout;
2. unsanitary or unsafe conditions;
3. deterioration of site improvements;
4. improper subdivision or obsolete platting;
5. the existence of conditions which endanger life or property by fire and other causes; or
6. any combination of such factors
BLIGHTING CONDITIONS
Because of the blighting factors, the area:
1. retards the provision of housing accommodations; or
2. constitutes an economic or social liability or a menace to the public health, safety, morals, or welfare in its present condition and use.
DETERIORATION OF SITE IMPROVEMENTS
DETERIORATION OF SITE IMPROVEMENTS
DETERIORATION OF SITE IMPROVEMENTS
UNSAFE CONDITION
UNSAFE CONDITION
DETERIORATING SITE IMPROVEMENTS
DETERIORATING SITE IMPROVEMENTS
DEFECTIVE/INADEQUATESTREET LAYOUT
DEFECTIVE/INADEQUATE STREET LAYOUT
DEFECTIVE/INADEQUATE STREET LAYOUT
DETERIORATING SITE IMPROVEMENTS
DETERIORATING SITE IMPROVEMENTS
DETERIORATING SITE IMPROVEMENTS
DETERIORATING SITE IMPROVEMENTS
DETERIORATING SITE IMPROVEMENTS
DEFECTIVE/INADEQUATE STREET LAYOUT
A-1 MOTEL
CAPITAL INN
Numerous blighting factors
=
conclusion of blighting conditions
BLIGHTING FACTORS FOR THE MOTELS
• Motels used as residences
• Swimming pool that was partly uncovered, creating danger of drowning
• Bullet holes in windows
• Blood stains on towels
• Mud and grime in rooms
• Cockroaches and spiders
• Rat in a pillow
MORE BLIGHT
•Numerous failed health inspections
•Numerous failed fire inspections
•Motels operating without state lodging licenses
• Poor exterior maintenance overall
•One motel was landlocked
• Three homeless camps in the wooded areas behind the motels
AND MORE BLIGHT
•Murder on site
•1,400 calls for police service and 219 criminal activities since 2008
•Prostitution, illegal drug activity and rape of a prostitute by a police officer
•Bus stop for 17 students—motel was residence for 3 registered sex offenders
CONCLUSION
The existing blighting factors:
1. Retard the provision of housing accommodations (no development or growth in the area)
2. Constitute an economic liability (underutilization, lack of reasonable taxes, increased cost to public service providers)
3. Constitute a social liability (murder, prostitution, drug activity, robberies, assaults)
4. Constitute a menace to the public health, safety, morals, or welfare in its present condition and use (numerous unsafe conditions, crime)
RENDERING OF FIRST TOWERS
TOWER 1 UNDER CONSTRUCTION
TOWER 2 UNDER CONSTRUCTION
BOTH TOWERS UNDER CONSTRUCTION
CAMPUS RENDERING