banking integration and technology update - · pdf filebanking integration and technology...
TRANSCRIPT
Banking Integration and Technology Update
Damien DugauquierSWIFT Commercial Manager, Corporatese: [email protected]
Mark SuttonTreasury Advisory Group, Asia Pacific, Citi
Agenda
2
• Banking Integration− Challenges & Issues− Current Trends
• SWIFT− Overview− Corporate Connectivity & Why Corporates Are Joining SWIFT
• CGI and ISO 20022 XML Messaging− Common Global Implementation Group− Why XML Messaging Enables Greater Efficiencies
• Citi Interactive Solutions− A New Approach
Banking Integration – Challenges & Issues
3
The multi-banking corporate to bank landscape comprises of a plethora of different network, security and file format options, which create complexity, inefficiency and cost.
Corporates
Internet
Host 2 Host
Outsource
Proprietary
https
sftp
AS2
VPN
Leased Line
pgp
ssl
Entrust
Proprietary
MT101
IDOC
PAYMUL
Proprietary
Local
Channel
Connection
Security
File Format
Centralization of treasury and
operations Automation of
processing and reconciliation
Centralization of treasury and
operations Automation of
processing and reconciliation
Consolidation of connectivity channels
Simplify technical solution and reduce potential failure points by replacing
various bank-proprietary connectivity channels with single secure, robust and scalable bank-neutral network, such as
SWIFTNet.
Rationalisation of banking relationships
Reduce the integration effort and achieve greater consistency of
services by consolidating Treasury and SSC activity around fewer banking partners offering wide
geographical and functional footprint.
Harmonisation of file formats
Achieve efficiency by building the process around strategic file format.
This can be either existing core format or new industry standards,
such as ISO 20022 XML
Corporate
ERP
TMSISO20022
Industry Standard Connectivity
▲ Flexibility to select banking partners
▲ Scalable and Interoperable
▲ Single File Format
▲ Single channel
Ban
kS
yste
ms
Ban
kS
yste
ms
Ban
kS
yste
ms
Ban
kS
yste
ms
Ban
kS
yste
ms
Ban
kS
yste
ms
▼ Multiple Banking Relationships
▼ Expensive and Complex
▼ Multiple File Formats
▼ Multiple Channels
Corporate
Proprietary Bank Connectivity
ERP
TMS
PAYMUL
EDIFACT
ANSI
Host to Host
Internet Banking
FTP
Internet
Internet
Ban
kS
yste
ms
Ban
kS
yste
ms
Ban
kS
yste
ms
Ban
kS
yste
ms
Ban
kS
yste
ms
Ban
kS
yste
ms
Reducing integration points and harmonising formats are key to achieving higher centralisation and automation for corporates and the public sector.
Best Practices to Achieve Centralisation and Automation
4
A member-owned cooperative by and for the financial services industry
A platform to exchange financial information securely and reliably
Brings financial community together to work collaboratively to shape market practice, define standards and
debate issues of mutual interest
1 0 , 0 0 0 + C U S T O M E R S S P R E A D O V E R 2 1 2 C O U N T R I E S
O V E R 2 0 M I L L I O N M E S S A G E S / D AY 9 9 . 9 9 9 % AVA I L A B I L I T Y
COMMUNITY PLATFORM STANDARDS
About SWIFT
Corporate
Accountspayable
Accountsreceivable
Treasury
Other
Standardised gateway
Corporate
e-banking Y
host to host X
e-banking Z
VAN
Internet
Leased line
Accountspayable
Accountsreceivable
Treasury
Other
Multiple bank channels Single, standardised gateway
• Global visibility on cash• Cost reduction• Increased control and security• Reduced risk with automation
• Poor global visibility on cash• High cost• Impossible to centralise• Challenge of multiple connectivity channels and
formats
BenefitsMultiple channels to reach multiple banks, a single standardised gateway
Finance operations without SWIFT
How we can help
Giving you the peace of mind
Provide visibility to cash
Optimize working capital
Reduce cost and risk
Provide flexibility and scalability
Enhance STP through automation
Provide Security, resilience and compliance
Addition of new banking partners and entities with peace of mind
0
200
400
600
800
1000
1200
1400
2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013
Num
ber o
f cor
pora
te g
roup
s
Asia Pacific
10% #1
How many corporates are connected to SWIFT?
8
Per corporate group turnover & banking partners
Corporates by annual turnover (USD)
Corporates by number of banking partners
$1-10Bn28%
>$10Bn31%
<$1Bn41%
>20 banks13%
10 to 20 banks21%
5 to 9 banks29%
<5 banks37%
>$10Bn30%
$1-10Bn34%
<$1Bn36%
63% of SWIFT-connected corporates deal with 5 banks or more
64% of SWIFT-connected corporates have a turnover >$1Bn
Corporate group connectivity
9
Standards and formats
Messaging FIN FileAct InterAct
SWIFT MTsISO 20022
Domestic formatsISO 20022
• MT 101 for payments
• MT 940 / 942 account statements
• MT 300 FX confirmations
Example • ACH files• Supplier
payments • Direct debits • Salary payments• Domestic bulk
payments
• Exceptions & investigations
ApplicationTreasury and Risk
ManagementCash Management Exceptions and
Investigations
FIN & FileAct
MT 798Documents
• Letter of Credits• Bank
Guarantees• Supporting
documentation
Trade Finance
Overview standards and messaging
2ND TIER
Integration Portfolio
Standard Mgmt.• MyStandards
Reference data• Swiftref/BWO
SWIFT messaging platform / Standards• ISO 15022 : MT
messages • ISO 20022: MX
messages
Business flows• Cash mgmt.• Liquidity mgmt.• FX confirmation• Trade / BPO• Treasury• E-statements
Connectivity portfolio
Identity management• 3SKey
Sanctions• ScreeningAccord• Matching• AffirmationsRegulations• Trade reporting
Integration
Training• SWIFT4Corporates• Lite2
Services Portfolio• RFP• integration• Bank onboarding• Standards review
Overview of value-added solutions
Corporate Connectivity
• Aggregation of accounts worldwide• Intra-day / end of day balance• Cash forecasting for borrowing and
investment activities
• Payment factories (A/P consolidation)
• Treasury centralisation • Consolidation of Bank relationships
• Secure and agnostic connectivity to banks
• Compliance to new regulations
Centralisation and consolidation
Multibank cash reporting
Compliance and risk management
• Straight-through-processing• Low TCO
Automation
Finance in SSC Corporate‐to‐bank requirements SWIFT
Manage payments for the group
Manage collections for the group
Provide reporting internally
New revenue from better cash management
Actual cost savings
Opportunity cost savings
Risk management
Building your business case
In short: why are corporates joining SWIFT?
13
SWIFT Corporate Connectivity – Flexibility & Choice
14
SWIFT connectivity methods should be evaluated based on features, and costs to ensure the right fit for the corporate.
Internet
Service bureau or Member/Concentrator
VPN
Internetor VPN
Web serverWork flow
SWIFTAlliance
SWIFT
Network partners
VPN
VPN
Direct Connection
Very large volumes of messages and files
Manage your own SWIFT connection
Service Bureau
SWIFT Alliance Lite 2
Large volumes of messages and files
Outsource SWIFT connection
Volume no longer restricted
Solution does not rely on another third-party
Main Characteristics Popularity Indicative Cost
30% €15–50k
per annum
Main Characteristics Popularity Indicative Cost
Main Characteristics Popularity Indicative Cost
29% €10–25k
per annum
41% €5–10k
per annum*Source: SWIFT: based on new
corporate customers in APAC since Jan 2013
ERP
SWIFT Infrastructure
Paymentfactory
Shared Service Centre
FIN (individual messages)Payments (MT101) and statements (MT940/2) and FX confirmations
FileAct (File transfer)Transport any format; payments files, iDOC, ISO 20022, ACHs, BAI formats etc
SWIFTNet
ERP(s)ERP(s)
Treasury Workstation
Bank
Bank
Bank
Bank
Bank
Cash & Treasury
Classic SWIFT Implementation Model
Destination Architecture: Selecting the Optimum Solution Model
16
Each corporate operating model sets unique priorities for banking channel services. Citi has developed a rich set of solutions tailored for specific client needs.
Local or Decentralised
Model
Centralised Treasury
Shared Service Centre
CitiDirect BE
CitiConnect
SAP ERP Integrator
Financial ServicesNetwork
Operating Structure Integration Options Considerations
Rationalise
Workflow
Approvals
CentralizedProcessing
HarmonizedFormats
The Pros and Cons – Proprietary Connectivity vs. SWIFT
Pros▲ Once investment made, lower service and usage fees
▲ No extensive agreements
▲ Fewer hops make connectivity troubleshooting easier
Cons▼ Multiple bank connections result in higher maintenance costs
▼ May need to maintain multiple standards in connectivity, security
17
There are considerations for both bank proprietary and SWIFTNet connectivity, including the number of connection points, implementation timeline, cost efficiency etc.
Bank Proprietary Host-to-Host Connectivity Solutions SWIFTNet Connection
Pros▲ One connection. Service Bureau manages connectivity to SWIFT
and through SWIFT to banks
▲ Cost efficient on-boarding and migration of banks
▲ Proven reliability with over 99.99% availability, robust security
Cons▼ Agreements required by banks and SWIFT (and Service Bureau,
where appropriate)
▼ Network charges will be applied by SWIFT under the standard model – sender pays
Internetor VPN
Bank 3
Bank 2
VPN
VPN
VPN
Alliance Lite 2
Internet or VPN
VPN
Bank 3
Bank 2
VPN
VPN Service Bureau
Direct
SAP Financial Services Network – Outsourcing Integration
SAP® Financial Services Network is an innovative cloud-based network that offers a single connection point across multiple services, businesses, and financial institutions. It provides secure connectivity and tight process integration on a platform that accommodates future integration needs. This scalable network can deliver existing services while supporting the development and deployment of new ones.
18
Corporations Banks
Pro
cess
ing
Sys
tem
s
Con
nect
or
ER
PC
onne
ctor
ER
P
Direct
Networks
Platform Services
SAP Cloud
SAP Financial Services Network
Pay
men
ts
Sta
tem
ents
Rem
ittan
ce
Cre
ditC
ards
Mon
itorin
g&
Ale
rting
Oth
er S
ervi
ces
Business Cockpit
TMS Middleware
orFTP Server
ISO 20022 for corporate-to-bank exchange
More than 60 banksreceiving
ISO 20022 paymentinitiation
messages
Around90 members
(corporates and banks)defining
common global implementation
guidelineshttp://www.swift.com/CGI
CGI Drivers
CGI is driven by customer demand for multibank coordination of implementations
– Intended specifically for global, multi-country, multi-bank and multi-instrument implementations that the participating banks can commonly accept as ONE of their implementations.
– Focused on the general message structure and then successful creation of individual transactions that can be executed by the participating banks.
– Published and endorsed from appropriate communities. – Engaged through active corporate partnership.
“A corporate can use the same message structure for all their payments with all of their transaction banks reaching any payment system across the globe.”
ISO 20022 - Payments
Corporate A
Bank 1 Bank 2
ISO 20022 instruction templates Corporate B
Credit Transfers / Direct Debits / MandatesE
xcep
tions
& In
vest
igat
ions
Cre
dit T
rans
fer I
nitia
tion
Exc
eptio
ns &
Inve
stig
atio
ns
Dire
ct D
ebit
Initi
atio
n
Adv
ice
& S
tate
men
t
Adv
ice
& S
tate
men
t
Exceptions & Investigations
Acc
ount
Rep
ortin
g R
eque
st
Not
ifica
tion
to R
ecei
ve
Cha
nge/
Verif
y A
ccou
nt Id
entif
icat
ion
Man
date
s
Cre
dito
r Pay
men
t Act
ivat
ion
Req
uest
Cre
dito
r Pay
men
t Act
ivat
ion
Req
uest
Ban
k A
ccou
nt M
anag
emen
tChange / Verify Account Identification
Creditor Payment Activation Request
Ban
k S
ervi
ces
Billi
ng
Ban
k S
ervi
ces
Billi
ng
ISO 20022 XML Messaging – Enabling Greater Efficiency
Collaboration – All the key stakeholders have been actively involved in the evolution
Commitment – Both the banks and the vendors have committed to supporting the XML messaging following the initial corporate requirements
Governance Model – The standard sits firmly with the control of ISO, with UN/CEFACT agreeing to support the same standard
Corporate Position – To have a generic open standard that will be supported by any bank enabling a consistent automated process workflow to be established
Industry Foundations
The Benefits
Simplified Business Rules: The original layer of payment level business rules used to filter data contained in the master vendor record has been moved from the corporate to the bank domain
Data Overpopulation: This new concept allows you to effectively provide your master vendor record data within the ISO XML messaging format. This unique concept allows you to build a single common global template, subject to agreement from your partner banks
Portability and Reduced Integration Costs: Through the achievement of a single common global template, it will provide the opportunity to have a plug and play financial message that removes a common barrier to changing or adding banks – the high cost of integration
Improved Operational and Financial Efficiencies: ISO 20022 XML allows simplification through standardisation. With a common implementation, there is a golden opportunity to streamline internal processes, improve monitoring and controls and increase visibility to optimise the use of all balances
ISO 20022 XML Messaging: Salient Points
Standardisation: ISO 20022 XML messaging provides the unique opportunity to standardise both the A/P and A/R processes, through using a single global financial messaging format.
Bank Agnostic:Building on the work of the CGI, a harmonisation exercise provides the unique opportunity to establish a single interpretation of the payment message, which provides a bank agnostic and therefore more portable interface.ISO 20022 XML removes the complexity and cost that exists today in the file format space.
Low Cost Environment:
Through a combination of establishing a core messaging template, the work of the CGI and the richness of the XML message, there is a clear opportunity to establish a truly low cost, low maintenance cash management environment.
Functionality: ISO 20022 XML supports all payment methods, including domestic and urgent wires, domestic ACH, cheques and provides compliance with SEPA..
Trends: Citi now has over 500 clients live processing in excess of 3.4m transactions per month across 91 countries. Over 40% of our H2H file based activity is now via ISO 20022 XML messaging, with a clear market trend that corporates are looking to adopt because of the clear benefits around simplification through standardisation.
Case Studies
HuaweiISO 20022
Testimonial
Global Payment Centre
Accounts Payable & Receivable
Treasury OR
AC
LE -
Sun
gard
The technology transformation project at Huawei has been a vital step in achieving our strategic growth plans. Working with SWIFT has been a positive experience, enabling us to demonstrate industry best practices in banking and
connectivity and provide leadership for other Chinese multinationals
“ “Cash management
Entity2SWIFT
Infrastructure SWIFTNet
Entity1Bank
Bank
Bank
Bank
Bank
IPLA
CSV
CSV
SFTP: multiple systemsCostly, complex and unstable
Host-to-Host: Insufficient to cover all banksLimited to certain number of banks and any
change generates incremental cost
Payroll: Time consuming Manual processing of spreadsheet in some
cases
Pain points
• Standardised output from back-office
• Conversion to appropriate format
• Payments channeled over SWIFT to banking partners and bank statements
received
New set-up
ISO20022
MT101/940
Entity3 CSV
Cash management
26
Case Study Shared Service Center in Malaysia
A B O U T
Testimonial
Accounts payable and treasury
Caterpillar
“We recognised the need to establish a standard approach to connectivity across the business, including both treasury and accounts
payableMartin Bina
Treasury Operations Manager, EMEA Caterpillar Inc.
MT 101 / ISO 20022 pain
“
Payments
Citi Interactive Solutions
29
A New Approach…..
Trade Module - Benchmarking
The Benefits
Liquidity Module - Concentration
The Benefits
Citi believes that sustainability is good business practice. We work closely with our clients, peer financial institutions, NGOs and other partners to finance solutions to climate change, develop industry standards, reduce our own environmentalfootprint, and engage with stakeholders to advance shared learning and solutions. Highlights of Citi’s unique role in promoting sustainability include: (a) releasing in 2007 a Climate Change Position Statement, the first US financial institution to doso; (b) targeting $50 billion over 10 years to address global climate change: includes significant increases in investment and financing of renewable energy, clean technology, and other carbon-emission reduction activities; (c) committing to anabsolute reduction in GHG emissions of all Citi owned and leased properties around the world by 10% by 2011; (d) purchasing more than 234,000 MWh of carbon neutral power for our operations over the last three years; (e) establishing in2008 the Carbon Principles; a framework for banks and their U.S. power clients to evaluate and address carbon risks in the financing of electric power projects; (f) producing equity research related to climate issues that helps to inform investorson risks and opportunities associated with the issue; and (g) engaging with a broad range of stakeholders on the issue of climate change to help advance understanding and solutions.
Citi works with its clients in greenhouse gas intensive industries to evaluate emerging risks from climate change and, where appropriate, to mitigate those risks.
efficiency, renewable energy and mitigation
[TRADEMARK SIGNOFF: add the appropriate signoff for the relevant legal vehicle]
© 2014 Citigroup Global Markets Inc. Member SIPC. All rights reserved. Citi and Citi and Arc Design are trademarks and service marks of Citigroup Inc. or its affiliates and are used and registered throughout the world.
© 2014 Citigroup Global Markets Limited. Authorized and regulated by the Financial Services Authority. All rights reserved. Citi and Citi and Arc Design are trademarks and service marks of Citigroup Inc. or its affiliates and are used andregistered throughout the world.
© 2014 Citibank, N.A. All rights reserved. Citi and Citi and Arc Design are trademarks and service marks of Citigroup Inc. or its affiliates and are used and registered throughout the world.
© 2014 Citigroup Inc. All rights reserved. Citi and Citi and Arc Design are trademarks and service marks of Citigroup Inc. or its affiliates and are used and registered throughout the world.
© 2014 [Name of Legal Vehicle] [Name of regulatory body.] All rights reserved. Citi and Citi and Arc Design are trademarks and service marks of Citigroup Inc. or its affiliates and are used and registered throughout the world.
IRS Circular 230 Disclosure: Citigroup Inc. and its affiliates do not provide tax or legal advice. Any discussion of tax matters in these materials (i) is not intended or written to be used, and cannot be used or relied upon, by you for the purpose of avoid ing any tax penalties and (ii) may have been written in connection with the "promotion or marketing" of any transaction contemplated hereby ("Transaction"). Accordingly, you shou ld seek advice based on your particular circumstances from an independent tax advisor.
In any instance where distribution of this communication is subject to the rules of th e US Commodity Futures Trading Commission (“CFTC”), this communication constitutes an invitation to consider entering into a derivatives transaction under U .S. CFTC Regulations §§ 1.71 and 23.605, where applicable, but is not a binding offer to buy/sell any financial instrument.
Any terms set forth herein are intended for discussion purposes only and are subject to the final terms as set forth in separate defini tive wri tten agreements. This presentation is not a commitment to lend, syndicate a financing, underwrite or purchase securities, or commit capital nor does i t obligate us to enter into such a commitment, nor are we acting as a fiduciary to you. By accepting this presentation, subject to applicable law or regulation, you agree to k eep confidential the information contained herein and the existence of and proposed terms for any Transaction.
Prior to entering into any Transaction, you should determine, without reliance upon us or our affil iates, the economic risks and merits (and independently determine that you are able to assume these risks) as well as the legal, tax and accounting characterizations and consequences of any such Transaction. In this regard, by accepting this presentation, you acknowledge that (a) we are not in the business of providing (and you are not relying on us for) legal, tax or accounting advice, (b) there may be legal, tax or accounting risks associated with any Transaction, (c) you should receive (and rely on) separate and qualified legal, tax and accounting advice and (d) you should apprise senior management in your organization as to such legal, tax and accounting advice (and any r isks associated with any Transaction) and our disclaimer as to these matters. By acceptance of these materials, you and we hereby agree that from the commencement of discussions with respect to any Transaction, and notwithstanding any other provision in this presentation, we hereby confirm that no participant in any Transaction shal l be limited from disclosing the U .S. tax treatment or U.S. tax structure of such Transaction.
We are required to obtain, verify and record certain information that identifies each entity that enters into a formal business relationship with us. We will ask for your complete name, street address, and taxpayer ID number. We may also request corporate formation documents, or other forms of identification, to verify information provided.
Any prices or levels contained herein are preliminary and indicative only and do not represent bids or offers. T hese indications are provided solely for your information and consideration, are subject to change at any time without notice and are not intended as a sol icitation with respect to the purchase or sale of any instrument. The information contained in this presentation may include results of analyses from a quantitative model which represent potential future events that may or may not be realized, and is not a complete analysis of every material fact representing any product. Any estimates included herein constitute our judgment as of the date hereof and are subject to change without any notice. We and/or our affil iates may make a market in these instruments for our cus tomers and for our own account. Accordingly, we may have a position in any such instrument at any time.
Although this material may contain publicly avai lable information about Citi corporate bond research, fixed income strategy or economic and market analysis, Citi pol icy (i ) prohibits employees from offering, directly or indirec tly, a favorable or negative research opinion or offer ing to change an opinion as consideration or inducement for the receipt of business or for compensation; and ( ii) prohibits analysts from being compensated for specific recommendations or views contained in research reports. So as to reduce the potential for conflicts of interest, as well as to reduce any appearance of conflicts of interest, Citi has enacted policies and procedures designed to lim it communications between its investment banking and research personnel to specifically prescribed circumstances.