1

BANK INFORMATION SYSTEM DESIGN PROBLEM IN CENTRAL ELECTRONIC

EDUCATION AND HUMAN RESOURCES DEVELOPMENT TRAINING, FINANCE TRAINING

BOARD, MINISTRY OF FINANCE

NovitaAjeng Primantari1 , NurAeniHidayah, MMSI

2 , and SuciRatnawati, MTI

3

1Student of Information System Program, State Islamic University SyarifHidayatullah Jakarta

Tel: (021) 8855226 or 089654619697 , e - mail : nobitaajeng@gmail.com 2Staf Lecturer Faculty of Science and Technology , State Islamic University SyarifHidayatullah Jakarta

Tel: (021) 7493606 Fax : (021) 7493315 , email : nungkie04@yahoo.com 3Staf Lecturer Faculty of Science and Technology , State Islamic University SyarifHidayatullah Jakarta

Tel: (021) 7493606 Fax : (021) 7493315 , email : sratnaw69@gmail.com

ABSTRACT HRD Training Center, the Ministry of Finance is a unit of echelon II organization in charge of implementing the

education and training of rank and position hierarchy. HRD Training Center has three (3) subfields, one of

which is the subfields Evaluation and Performance Reporting that have an important role in the management of

Item Bank. Problems in the management of Item Bank which runs today is all in the preparation process of

testing instruments ranging from the writing process to the determination of a matter still use conventional

methods to manual where the use of computers as a tool only and is not contained therein automation process.

Besides, the bank matter contained in the HRD Training Center only store the test materials were analyzed qualitatively (theoretically). Based on the Item Bank development procedure, to obtain a good matter about the

qualitative analysis in addition to (theoretically) is also needed about the quantitative analysis (empirical) which

includes two measurement parameters, namely: the level of difficulty and distinguishing the grain problem, as

well as test quality analysis to test about the validity. To design a system wake of electronic information about

the bank is done by using the object-oriented development method with a model system development using Rapid

Application Development (RAD), for the design of systems using the Unified Modeling Language (UML).

Encoding system with ASP.NET platform using the C # programming language and the MVC architecture

(Model, View, Controller). While the database used is SQL Server 2008. The expected outcome of this system is

that it can help the process -writing, about qualitative analysis, test questions, about the quantitative analysis,

and determination of a matter that can be produced that have the characteristics of matter and can assist in the

effective management of Item Bank that meets the standard in Item Bank development.

Keywords: Electronic Test Bank Information Systems, Rapid Application Development ( RAD ), Unified

Modeling Language (UML)

1. INTRODUCTION

1.1 Background Centre for Education and Training Human

Resource Development (HRD Training Center)

has a role in fostering the education, training,

and human resource development in the field

of rank hierarchy, and leadership competencies, fostering the implementation of

tests of competence, as well as managing the

scholarship based on technical policy set by the

Head Finance Education and Training Agency.

HRD Training Center consists of three

subfields, one of which is the subfields

Evaluation and Performance Reporting

(Evalap) which has an important role, namely

managing the test material (matter) or also

called the management of Item Bank. During

which creates the problem in the Item Bank management in HRD Training Center is just a

Item Bank used as a collection point service

exam in the form of a folder on the computer,

where the process of making the test material

(matter) until the determination of a matter

done conventionally or manually, giving rise to

some problems.

These issues among others, in the process

of writing about a matter in which the maker of

one another that have different formats of

writing about as a result of the lack of

standardization of the format used so that management becomes more difficult matter.

A matter that has accumulated in the Item

Bank then scrutinized (review) by a team of

reviewers to discuss how to examine the test

items based on item-writing rules. About the

review process is time consuming especially

when the discussion to produce a good

question. Questions have subsequently been

examined by KasubbidEvalap to be issued in

the tests. The process of fixing this problem is

to use a standard estimate because there has been no standard for selecting items were

eligible to be issued in the tests.

According Sumardyono&Wiworo (2011),

Item Bank is a set of items was calibrated

2

(tested) both theoretically and empirically, and

contains important information that can be

easily used in the preparation of an assessment

instrument (test). Based on these definitions, it

is necessary to test the qualitative problem

(theoretically) and quantitative (empirical)

issued prior to the exam questions in order to

produce a valid assessment instrument

(saheeh).

Based on the research and interviews

conducted by the Head of the subfields Evalap HRD Training Center, a matter which is put

into Item Bank is only performed at the stage

of qualitative analysis. These issues have not

been made quantitative analysis that is not

known about the quality in terms of validity of

the items (items was) and characteristics of the

items were in the form and level of difficulty

distinguishing the grain problem .

1.2 Problem Formulation

Based on observations on systems that run on HRD Training Center, then the problem can

be identified as follows:

1. In the process of writing about , between

makers about the one with the other has a

different format of writing about as a result

there has been no standardized format is

used so that the management about the

problem more difficult.

2. Author submit questions directly about the

matter hardcopy, so form must be typed

again by officers about the recipient and allows the leakage problem.

3. About the review process was done by

using a moderator (discuss) that take a long

time

4. About the standard setting process using

approximate because there has been no

standard for selecting items were eligible to

be issued in the tests.

5. Problem is put into question bank is only

performed at the stage of qualitative

analysis. The matter has not been made

quantitative analyzes that do not yet have good characteristics items were empirically.

From the identification of the issues

mentioned above, the problem can be

formulated as follows:

1. How to analyze and design the Test Bank

Information Systems Elektronikdi HRD

Training CenterFinancial Training Agency

The Ministry of Finance ?

2. How to make Test Bank Information

Systems Elektronikdi HRD Training

CenterFinancial Training Agency, the Ministry of Finance in accordance with the

procedure question bank development ?

1.3 Limitation

In order for this research is more focused

and directed, the research conducted by the

extent of the problem as follows:

1. Research conducted only in HRD

Training Center, Financial Training

Agency, Ministry of Finance and

Reporting on Performance Evaluation

subfields.

2. Just save the questions for the test and

the type of service used is a matter of multiple choice questions.

3. Analysis of the quality of the validity of

the test using the test questions, while

analysis of grain about quantitative

measurement includes two parameter,

namely: the level of difficulty and

distinguishing the grain problem.

4. Electronic information system question

bank is used by the admin, maker matter,,

reviewer, testee, and Kasubbid

Performance Evaluation and Reporting ( KasubbidEvalap ).

5. Method development is a model system

used Rapid Application Development

(RAD) with the system design using the

Unified Modeling Language (UM) ,

which is used in the development and

tools using ASP.NET systems with

programming languages C # and MVC

architecture (Model , View , Controller) .

While the database use SQL Server 2008

and IIS 7 as a web server. 6. This study was only done to

implementation.

2. THEORITICAL BASIS

2.1 Definition of Information System

Ladjamuddin (2005) defines that the

information system is a set of organizational

procedures when implemented will provide

information for decision makers and to control or

organization.

2.2 Definition of Item Bank

Item Bank has the sense of a large

collection of test items that measure a field

instruction (teaching) specific (Kartowagiran,

quoted in Sandman, 2004). According to Wright

and Bell in Puspendik (2009), Item Bank

development goal is to assess the quality of the

question itself can be determined from the test

items in it if it meets certain criteria that will be

used in the assembly of an assay.

2.3 Analysis of Test Quality

Analysis of the quality of the test is a step

that is taken to determine the degree of quality

of a test, either as a whole or the grain problem

3

that become part of the test (Arifin, 2011).

Analysis of test quality with regard to the

question of whether the test as a measuring

instrument actually measures what should be

measured. The question refers to the subject

matter, namely validity.

2.3.1 Validation or validity of the Items

The validity of the assessment tool to the

provisions of the draft which was considered so

really assess what it should be assessed. If one

wants to know which test items that cause the problem as a whole is bad because it has a low

validity, then it can be searched with a validity

problem.

For questions form an objective score for an

item commonly given to 1 (for items answered

correctly) and 0 (items answered incorrectly).

One way to determine the validity of the

measuring instrument is to use a product

moment correlation proposed by Pearson as

follows (Arikunto, 2012):

Where:

rxy = correlation coefficient

n = number of subjects

X = score of the items was

Y = total score

Here's a table of correlation coefficients scale

validity index (Depdiknas, 2010). Table 1.Correlation Coefficient Validity

Index

Source: Depdiknas, 2010

2.4 Item Analysis

Analysis of the grain problem or item

analysis is the assessment test questions in order to obtain the questions that have adequate

quality (Sudjana, 2010). Item analysis was

conducted to determine whether or not a matter

of function (Surapranata, 2009). The analysis is

generally done in two ways, namely qualitative

analysis (qualitative control) and quantitative

analysis (quantitative control) (Surapranata,

2009).

2.4.1 Qualitative Analysis of Grain Problem

Qualitative analysis is often also referred to

as logical validity (logical validity) is a study intended to analyze the problem in terms of

technical, content, and editorial (Surapranata,

2009). Testing this theoretical question is

technically called the review questions or

study questions (item review).

In the matter of grain analyzed

qualitatively, about the use of the review

format will greatly assist and facilitate

implementation procedures. About the study

format is used as a basis for analyzing the

grain problem. Here's a review of the format

of multiple choice questions (Depdiknas,

2010).

Table 2.Aspects of Assessing Multiple Choice

Questions No. Aspect Examined

A.

1

Materials

Matter in accordance with the indicators

2. Homogeneous and logical choice answers

3. There is only one answer key

B.

4.

Construction

The subject matter defined by concise, clear, and

unequivocal

5. The formulation of the subject matter and choice

the answer is a statementrequired course

6. Subject matter does not guide

answer key

7. The subject matter of the free and the statement

is a double negative

9. Images, graphs, tables, diagrams, orlike clear and

functioning

10. Do not use the answer choicesstatement " all of the

above wrong / right "and the like

11. Choice answers in the form of number /

timearranged in order of largesmall numbers or

chronological

12. Those items do not depend on the answer

about previous

C Language / Culture

13. Using appropriate languagewith the rules of

Indonesian.

14. Using communicative language

15.

16.

Not use the language of the applicable Local/

taboo

Not repeat the answer choices word/ the same

group of words , except is an integral

understandin

Source: Depdiknas, 2010

Processing qualitative data obtained from the study of items with the format of the study

items were then measured by a Guttman scale.

The data analysis results by means of (Purwanto,

2002):

K = 𝐹

𝑁 𝑥 𝐼 𝑥 𝑅𝑥100%

Description: K = Percentage eligibility criteria

F = Total overall score

N = the highest scores in the study

I = number of aspects are assessed

R = Number of Reviewers

From the analysis of the percentage of the

study eligibility criteria sheet will be compared

with the interpretation of the following criteria:

Table 3.Interpretation Criteria

Source: Riduwan, 2010

Validity Index Specification

0,8 – 1,0 Very High

0,6 –0,8 High

0,4 –0,6 Enough

0,2 – 0,4 Low

0–0,2 Very Low

Percentage Remarks

0–20 Very Not Worthy

21–40 Improper

41–60 Self-Worth

61– 80 Worthy

81–100 Very Worthy

4

2.4.2 Item-Analysis of Quantitative

Quantitative analysis about the emphasis on

the analysis of the internal characteristics of

the test data obtained through empirical

(Surapranata, 2009).Internal characteristics

include parameters quantitatively intended

difficulty level and distinguishing the grain

problem.

2.4.2.1 Level of Difficulty

The level of difficulty is about the

opportunity to answer a question correctly in a certain level of ability commonly expressed

by the index (Arifin , 2011) . Here is a

formula to find P. (Arikunto, 2012).

JS

BP

Dimana :

P = Index of difficulty

B = Number of test takers who answered the

question correctly

JS = Total number of test takers Here's a table of classification difficulty

index (Depdiknas, 2010).

Table 4.Difficulty Index Difficulty Index Description

0,00 – 0,30 Difficult Problem

Category

0,31 – 0,70 Moderate Problem

Category

0,71 – 1,00 Easy Problem Category

Source: Depdiknas, 2010

2.4.2.2 Discriminating Power

Differentiator is how much power the

ability to distinguish between items was

testee who know the answers correctly and

with the testeecan not answer that question

(or answer to any testee) (Suherman , 2003) .

To calculate the distinguishing each item on

the following formula can be used (Arikunto,

2012):

BA

B

B

A

A PPJ

B

J

BDP

Where:

J = Number of test takers

JA = Number of participants over the group

JB =Number of participants under the

group

BA = Number of participants who answered

the group over the matter correctly.

BB = Number of participants under the

group who answered the question correctly

PA = Proportion of participants who answered correctly the top group

PB = Theproportion of participants who

answered correctly under the group

Here's a table distinguishing

classification (Arifin, 2011):

Table 5.Classification of Discriminating

Power

Discriminating Power Description

0,00 – 0,20 Poor

0,21 – 0,40 Satisfactory

0,41 - ,70 Good

0,71 – 1,00 Excelllent

Source: Arifin, 2011

3. RESEARCH METHODOLOGY

3.1 Research Framework

In conducting the study, the authors

conducted stages of activities to follow the action

plan set out in the following frameworks: Mulai

Metode Observasi

Metode Wawancara

Studi Pustaka

Definisi Lingkup

Analisis Sistem

Perancangan

Sistem

Implementasi

Sistem

Analisis Masalah

Analisis Persyaratan

Functional

Requirements

Nonfunctional

Requirements

Analisis Keputusan

Alur Sistem

Rancangan Sistem

Basis Data

Rancangan

Antarmuka

Pemrograman

Pengujian Black

Box

Rich Picture

Problems,

Opportunities,

Objectives, and

Constraits Matrix

Use Case

Diiagram

Activity Diagram

Class Diagram

Sequence

Diagram

Normalisasi

Visio

ASP.NET MVC

dengan Bahasa

Pemrograman C#

SQL Server 2008

Selesai

Metode Pengembangan

Sistem

RDBMS

Studi Literatur

Metode

Pengumpulan Data

Kesimpulan dan

Saran

Rapid Application

Development

(Whitten, 2004)

Figure 1. Research Framework

4. DISCUSSION

4.1 Definition of Scope

To further focus of this study, the authors

limit the scope of the problem and research on

HRD Training Centre, Ministry of Finance ,

Performance Evaluation and Reporting

subfields . In the management of question bank

which runs today still have obstacles ranging

from writing about the matter until the

determination. As at the time of writing there is

a problem where the system can not accommodate the writing process so that the

matter in accordance with the manufacturer's

standard questions with each other have

different formats of writing about. Similarly

when reviewing a matter that requires a

relatively long time because each item on each

one to be discussed together to produce a

decent question, and the determination of the

feasibility of a matter which is still based on

estimates and not on procedures in accordance

with the applicable rules.

5

The application is within the scope of an intranet

system because the system can only be accessed is

limited to the internal network at the Training Center

of the Ministry of Finance. Electronic information

system question bank goes online as a matter of trial

process also involves testee of various Training

Center. For that all activities are conducted online

and distributed data directly. The design of the

system helps the processing and storage of data at

start -writing process review questions (qualitative

item analysis), test questions, a quantitative analysis about the matter until the determination.

4.2 System Analysis

4.2.1 Problem Analysis

After the collection of data through

observation, interviews regarding the

management of the system test material (matter)

running on HRD Training Center, Financial

Training Agency, Ministry of Finance, which

runs the system still uses the conventional

system which is manual and not following the

procedures in the development of a Item Bank.

The system starts when the lecturers as the

makers write exam questions using Microsoft

Excel. The format of writing about the maker about one another that sometimes different due

to the lack of standardization of the format used

so that the management of the matter in Item

Bank becomes more difficult.

A matter that has accumulated in the Item

Bank then scrutinized (review) by a team of

reviewers. About the review process or about

the qualitative analysis carried out in HRD

Training Center was done by using a moderator,

where there is one person as arbitrator. Each

itemswere discussed together with some

reviewers. This process is done in several stage, so a lot of the time required in the process of

review questions.

When the exam will be held, the clerk will

hand over the receiver about a matter that has

been studied to KasubbidEvalap determination

to do about. The process of setting this matter

based on the results of a review of a matter that

has been done before. The questions that have

been reviewed (study) is qualitatively good , but

not necessarily in the field is also good .

Therefore, there needs to be a matter of empirical testing.

Analysis of the system are visualized in the

following picture rich modeling.

Sub Bidang Evaluasi dan Pelaporan Kinerja

Petugas Penerima Soal

Tim Reviewer

Petugas Penggandaan Soal Petugas Pengetik Soal

Kepala Pusdiklat

7. Menyerahkan soal untuk direview

14. Menyerahkan soal untuk

diketik dan dicetak 18. Menyerahkan master soal untuk

dilakukan penggandaan

5. Simpan soal ke dalam Bank soal

Pembuat Soal

6. Ambil soal untuk direview

BANK SOAL

9. Menyerahkan soal yang telah direview

10. Simpan soal yang telah direview

11. Ambil soal untuk

dilakukan penetapan soal

12. Menyerahkan soal untuk dilakukan

penetapan soal

Kasubbid Evalap

4. Penulisan soal

menggunakan Microsoft

Excel

8. Melakukan Review Soal

13. Penetapan

kelayakan soal

ujian15. Pengetikan dan Pencetakan

master soal

16. Menyerahkan master soal

1. Menugaskan pelaksana

untuk menyusun konsep

surat permintaan naskah

ujian

Pelaksana

2. Menyusun konsep

surat permintaan naskah

ujian

Surat

permintaan

pembuatan

naskah ujian

Naskah Soal

Ujian

Naskah soal

ujian

Naskah soal yang

telah direview

17. Simpan Master Soal

Naskah soal yang

telah direview

Master Soal

Kasubbid Evalap

3. Pengecekan surat

Pengembalian surat

Figure 2.Rich PictureSystems Analysis Walk

Based on the problems above artifacts

on a running can cover the needs of the manufacturing process until the matter of

fixing the problems. Figure following a

procedure which is a question bank electronic

systems that will be developed at HRD

Training Center.system, it is necessary that the

proposed system

Pembuat Soal

Simpan Data

Reviewer

Kasubbid Evaluasi dan

Pelaporan Kinerja

(Kasubbid Evalap)

Admin

Manajemen Data (Manj. Jabatan, Manj.

Pusdiklat, Manj. Tipe Soal, Manj. Materi,

Manj. Soal, Manj. Data Kisi-Kisi, Manj.

Jadwal)

Login dan Logout

TesteeUbah Password

Login dan Logout

Login dan Logout Login dan Logout

Sistem Informasi Bank Soal

Elektronik

Membuat Soal (Unduh Kisi,

Manajemen Soal), Melihat Notifikasi

Jadwal

Pengaturan Uji Coba Soal dan Analisis

Kuantitatif Soal (Melihat Pedoman

Analisis Kuantitatif soal, analisa soal,

penetapan soal, dan download master

soal), Melihat Notifikasi Jadwal

Manajemen User ( Pengaturan Akun,

Pengaturan Peranan)

Server

Analisis Kualitatif Soal (Melihat Pedoman

Analisis Kualitatif Soal, Review Soal), Melihat

Notifikasi Jadwal

Ubah Password

Ubah Password

Uji Coba Soal

Ubah Password

Ubah Password

Login dan Logout

Figure 3.Rich Picture Analysis System Proposal

6

4.1 System Design

4.2.1 Flow of System

4.2.1.1 Use Case Diagram

Figure 3.Use Case Diagram of the Proposed

System InItem Bank Electronic Information

Systems

4.2.1.2 Activity Diagram

1. Activity Diagram of Use Case Review Problem

Figure 5.Activity Diagram of Use Case Review

Problem

2. Activity Diagram of Use Case Trial Conduct

Problem

Figure 6.Activity Diagram of Use Case Trial

Conduct Problem

4.2.1.3 Class Diagram

Figure 7.Class Diagram Electronic Test Bank

Information Systems

7

4.2.1.4 Sequence Diagram

1. Sequence Diagram Review Sub Menu Problem

Figure 8.Sequence Diagram Review Sub Menu

Problem

2. Sequence Diagram Analysis Sub Menu Problem

Figure 9. Sequence Sequence Diagram Analysis Sub

Menu Problem

4.2.1.5 Relational Database Managemen

System(RDBMS)

UserProfile

PK NoPegawai

FK1 KodeJabatanFK2 KodeMatpel Username NamaLengkap TglLahirFK3 KodePusdiklat Email StatusAkun Privelege

Jabatan

PK KodeJabatan

NamaJabatan

MataPelajaran

PK KodeMatpel

NamaMatpel Deskripsi

Materi

PK KodeMateri

FK1 KodeMatpel NamaMateri KegBelajar

KisiSoal

PK KodeKisi

FK1 KodeMatpel NamaFile Deskripsi [Document] TipeFile

Soal

PK KodeSoal

FK1 KodeMatpelFK2 KodeTipe NamaSoal StatusReview StatusAnalisis

ButirSoal

PK SeqNo

NoButirFK1 KodeSoalFK2 KodeMateri IsiSoal PilA PilB PilC PilD Kunci BobotSoal StatusReview TglReview StatPenetapan TglPenetapan KelompokAtas KelompokBawah Validitas TingkatKesukaran DayaPembeda Review SkorReview

Ujicoba

PK KodeUjicoba

FK1 KodeSoal TglUjicoba Lama WaktuPelaksanaan StatusUjicoba StatusPenetapan

TesteeDetail

PK TesteeID

FK1 NoPegawaiFK2 KodeUjiCoba Jawaban Skor SkorDetails StatusUjian

TipeSoal

PK KodeTipe

TipeSoalDesc

Pusdiklat

PK KodePusdiklat

NamaPusdiklat CreatedBy CreatedDate LastUpdatedBy LastUpdatedDate

Jadwal

PK KodeJadwal

NamaJadwal Tahun

AuditLog

PK AuditId

CreatedBy CreatedDate LastUpdatedBy LastUpdatedDate TabelModifiedFK1 NoPegawai

JadwalUser

PK KodeJadwalUser

FK1 KodeJadwalFK2 NoPegawai Tanggal Kegiatan

Figure 10.Relation Database Design Question

Bank

4.4.1 Interface Design At this stage, the design view (interface) web

pages . The design of the interface is expected to

allow the admin, maker of matter, reviewer,

testee, and KasubbidEvalap in running electronic

information system question bank. Here is Figure

an interface design question bank electronic

information systems,

1) Home Page KasubbidEvalap

This page is the initial view when entering

the main page (Home) to KasubbidEvalap

on Question Bank Electronic Information

Systems. .

8

Selamat Datang, Kasubbid Evalap Home Pengaturan Uji Coba Soal Analisis Kuantitatif SoalSIBSE PPSDM

LOGO Sistem Informasi Bank Soal Elektronik

Pusdiklat PSDM, Kementerian Keuangan

Selamat Datang

Silahkan Pilih Menu yang Akan Dikerjakan Pada Sistem Informasi Bank Soal Elektronik

FOOTER

Setting Profil

Figure 14. Draft Home Page

KasubbidEvalap

2) Item Review Form Page Problem

Items about the review process uses aspects

of the study of the form table, multiple-

choice items were done with menchecklist

point on the form. Point checklist will be

calculated using a Guttman scale. The

results will be displayed in the form of a

review and the review scores.

Selamat Datang Reviewer

Nomor Soal : 1

Kembali

Checklist No. Aspek yang Ditelaah

1.

A. Materi

LOGO Sistem Informasi Bank Soal Elektronik

Pusdiklat PSDM, Kementerian Keuangan

Review Butir Soal

Home Analisa Kualitatif SoalSIBSE PPSDM

Materi Butir Soal

Soal :

Kunci Jawaban

A.

B.

C.

D.

Check Un-Check All

Prev Next

Soal Sesuai Indikator

Pilihan Jawaban Homogen dan Logis2,

B. Konstruksi

A. Pokok Soal Dirumuskan dengan Singkat

Setting Profil

Figure 12.Draft Review Item-Page Form

3) Problem Analysis Page

KasubbidEvalap who want to do an analysis

about sub- menu to select the analysis

questions that are on the menu about the

quantitative analysis. The trial results were

analyzed quantitatively covering about

validity, level of difficulty, and

distinguishing the grain problem.

Pilih Kode Uji Coba

Lihat Analisa Soal Berdasarkan Uji Coba Soal

Lihat Analisa

Nama Peserta

Nama Peserta 1

Nama Peserta 2

No. 1

1

1

No. 2

1

0

No. 3

1

No. 4

1

1

No. 5

1

No. 6

0

1

No. 7

0

No. 8

1

0

No. 9

0

0

No. 10

1

0

No. 11

0

1

No. 12

1

0

No. 13

0

1

No. 14

1

0

No. 15

0

1

No. 16

1

0

Skor Total

13

12

Nama Peserta 3

Nama Peserta 14

0

1

0

0

1

1

0 1

0 1

1

0

1

1

0

0

0

1

1

0

0

0

1

1

1

0

0

1

1

1

11

10

s

q 0

0 0

0

0 0

5

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0 0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

14

2

Total Kelompok Atas

Total Kelompok Bawah

0.55

11

Jelek

11

0

11

11

11

11

11

11

11

11

11

11

11

11

11

11

11

11

11

11

11

11

11

11 11

11

Nilai Validitas

Validitas Soal

0

Sangat

Rendah

0

Sangat

Rendah

0

Sangat

Rendah

11

Sangat

Rendah

0

Sangat

Rendah

0

Sangat

Rendah

Sangat

Rendah

0

Sangat

Rendah

0

Sangat

Rendah

0

Sangat

Rendah

0

Sangat

Rendah

0

Sangat

Rendah

0

Sangat

Rendah

0

Sangat

Rendah

0

Sangat

Rendah

0

Sangat

Rendah

0

Selamat Datang Kasubbid Evalap Home Pengaturan Uji Coba Soal Analisa Kuantitatif SoalSIBSE PPSDM

0

11

0 0

0 11 11

0

LOGO Sistem Informasi Bank Soal Elektronik

Pusdiklat PSDM, Kementerian Keuangan

Daya Pembeda

Kategori Daya Pembeda Jelek

0 0

Jelek

0 0 0

Jelek

0

Jelek

0

Jelek

0

Jelek

0 0

Jelek

0

Jelek

0

Jelek

0

Jelek

0

Jelek

0

Jelek

14

2

Kat. Daya Pembeda

Tingkat Kesukaran

0.4

Mudah

0.3

Cukup

0.7

Cukup

0.5

Cukup

0.4

Baik

0.2

Cukup

0.3

Cukup

0.4

Cukup

0.5

Baik

0.2

Cukup Baik

0.5 0.6

Baik

Kategori Kesukaran

Keputusan

Sukar

Dtolak

Mudah

Ditolak

Mudah

Dtolak

0.5

Dtolak

Mudah

Dtolak

Mudah

Dtolak Dtolak

Mudah

Dtolak

Mudah

Dtolak

Mudah

Dtolak

Mudah

Dtolak

Mudah

Dtolak

Mudah

Dtolak

Mudah

Dtolak

Mudah

Dtolak

Mudah

Dtolak

12

1

Jelek Jelek

Baik Cukup Baik

Mudah

0

0 0

0

Jelek Jelek

Setting Profil

Figure 16. Draft Page Analysis Problem

4.4.2 TampilanAplikasi

1. Home PageKasubbidEvalap

Figure 14. Home PageKasubbidEvalap

2. Item Review Form Page Problem

Figure 15. Item Review Form Page Problem

3. Problem Analysis Page

Figure 16.Problem Analysis Page

5. CLOSING

1. Conclusion

Based on the results of the discussion, it

generates some conclusions as follows: 1. The system developed based question

bank development procedures that

include a qualitative analysis about

which includes review (review ) about

based on the lattice and exam -writing, as

well as quantitative analysis of matter

that serves as a test instrument using the

formula about the validity, power

differentiator, and level of difficulty.

2. Electronic question bank system is a web

-based system developed using ASP.NET platform with the C #

programming language and the MVC

9

architecture (Model, View, Controller )

and SQL Server 2008 database that

serves as a tool question bank and test

instruments for the questions that are

owned so as to assist in the management

tasks for the exam questions.

3. The system is expected to be on target

applications and in accordance with the

requirements for internal analysis was

adjusted HRD Training Center.

2. Suggestion

Based on the research and analysis that has

been done, there are suggestions that can be

taken, including:

1. Developed systems still have limitations in

accommodating the types of problems

other than multiple choice. It would be

better if this system is developed further so

as to accommodate other types of

problems such as essays, right from

wrong, and about the match.

2. Systems developed an electronic question

bank used to load only a matter for the

official exam. It would be better if the

system is also used to load the exam

questions for the other.

3. The system developed has not been able to

provide an option for KasubbidEvalap if

you want to use another instrument test

formula. It would be better if the system is

able to provide a choice in selecting the

formula to be used.

4. The system developed has yet to find a

feature about the reliability and power

Spieler grain problem. The system should

be equipped with a calculation to find

reliability and power humbug about the

matter so that the characteristics of a more

complete and decisions for problem

determination can be done better.

5. For further research to develop this system

by adding a statistical report on the matter

that has not been or have been reviewed

(review ), or a matter that has not been

tested and established as a matter about

which to test or about the dropped /

discarded.

6. The system developed can be developed

using other programming languages ,

programming languages either web or

desktop -based.

REFERENCE

Amburawu,

2010.AplikasiPanduanMengerjakanSoalUntukUj

ianNasional SMP Berbasis

Web.JurnalTeknikInformatikaUniversitasMercub

uana.

Anonim.tanpatahun.BBM

Suplemen/AnalisisButirSoaldanBank Soal.

https://www.google.co.id/#psj=1&q=BBM+suple

men+%2F+analisis+butir+soal+dan+bank+soaldi

unduhpada 27 Agustus 2013. Antonius,N.2010. CodeIgniter: Cara

MudahMembangunAplikasi PHP. Jakarta:

Mediakita.

Arifin, Zainal.2011.Evaluasi PembelajaranPrinsip,

Teknik, Prosedur.

Bandung:PTRemajaRosdakarya.

Arikunto, Suharsimi.2012.Dasar-Dasar

EvaluasiPendidikanEdisi 2. Jakarta: PT

BumiAksara.

Badrun Kartowagiran.2011. PenulisanButirSoal.

MakalahdisampaikanpadaPelatihanAssesmenPembelajaranbagiDosenMuda UPI, di Pascasarjana

UNY, Yogyakarta padatanggal 3-7 Oktober

2011.

BPPK. 2013. BahanAjarDiklatPenyusunanSoal

(BPPK). Jakarta:

PusdiklatKeuanganUmumKementerianKeuangan

.

Eko, N dan Sri S.

2011.PengembanganPirantiPenyusunSoalUjianB

erbasis WEB Untuk Mata

PelajaranSekolahMenegahPertama.JurnalPenelitian IPTEK-KOM.

Endang, P danMasduki. 2010.

AsesmenPembelajaran SD.Jakarta:

DirektoratJenderalPendidikanTinggi –

Depdiknas.

Faisal.2013 (terjemahan Tom Dykstra).Implementasi

Entity Framework Pada ASP.NET

MVC.http://www.asp.net/mvc/tutorials/getting-

started-with-ef-using-mvc) diunduhpada 16 Juli

2013.

Hariyanto, Bambang.

2004.RekayasaBerorientasiObyek. Bandung: Informatika.

Jay, Ronald C. and Swerdlik, Mark E.

2010.Psychological Testing and Assestment,

Seventh Edition. New York: The McGraw-Hill

Companies, Inc.

Jogiyanto. 2008.

MetodologiPenelitianSistemInformasi.

Yogyakarta: Penerbit ANDI.

Kadir, Abdul. 2009.

DasarPerancangandanImplementasi Database

Relasional. Yogyakarta: PenerbitAndi. Kartowagiran, dkk. 2010. Identifikasi Need

Assesment: StudiAwalModelPengembangan

Bank SoalBerbasis Guru di Provinsi DIY. Jurnal

10

of PascasarjanaUniversitasNegeri

Yogyakarta.Vol 40, pp.45-58.

Kusumo, Ario. S. 2007. ASP.NET 2.0 dengan VB

2005. Jakarta: PT Elex Media Komputindo.

Ladjamudin AL. 2005.

AnalisadanDesainSistemInformasi.Edisi 1.

Yogyakarta: GrahaIlmu.

Lilis. 2011. AnalisisButirSoalUlanganAkhir

Semester Gasal IPA Kelas IX SMP di

KabupatenGrobogan. SkripsiJurusanBiologi

FMIPA UniversitasNegeri Semarang. Katz, J. E., dan Aspden, P. (1997). A nation of

strangers. Communications of the ACM, 40(12),

81-86.

Martin, Joe. danTomson, Brett. BelajarSendiri

ASP.NET. Yogyakarta: PenerbitAndi.

Munadi, Sudji, (tanpatahun)

AnalisisValidasiSoalTesHasilBelajarPadaPelak

sanaan Program Pembelajaran di

FakultasTeknikUniversitasNegeri

Yogyakarta.Jurnal FT UniversitasNegeri

Yogyakarta. Munawar.2005. Pemodelan Visual Dengan UML.

Yogyakarta: PenerbitGrahaIlmu.

PrabowodanHerlawati. 2011. Menggunakan UML.

Bandung: PenerbitInformatika Bandung.

Pressman RS. 2002. RekayasaPerangkatLunak.

Yogyakarta: PenerbitAndi.

Priyatno, Duwi. 2010. PahamAnalisaStatistik Data

denganSPSS. Jakarta: PT. BukuSeru.

ProsidingPertemuanIlmiah XXIV HFI Jateng& DIY.

Muntoha, Mohammad.2010.Pengembangan

SistemEvaluasiPembelajaranBerbasis Web (Web Based Larning Assessment

System).Semarang, Jawa Tengah. pp 195- 199.

Retnawati, Heri, (tanpatahun) Pengembangan Bank

SoalMatematika. Yogyakarta. JurnalMatematika

FMIPA UNY Yogyakarta.

Riduwan. 2012. SkalaPengukuranVariabel-

VariabelPenelitian. Bandung: Alfabeta.

Rizky, Soetam. 2009. Learning By Sample ASP.NET

3.5. Jakarta : PT PrestasiPustakaKarya.

Sambas Ali MuhidindanMaman Abdurrahman,

2007.AnalisisKorelasi, Regresi,

danJalurdalamPenelitian. Bandung: CV PustakaSetia.

Sholiq.2006.Pemodelan

SistemInformasiBerorientasiObyekdenganUML.

Yogyakarta: GrahaIlmu.

Sudjana, Nana.2010.Penilaian Hasil Proses

BelajarMengajar.Bandung: PT

RemajaRosdakarya.

Suhanto, Agus. 2008. Mengenal ASP.NET MVC

Edisi Beta. Jakarta: Indonesia .NET Developer

Community.

Sugiyono, 2004.MetodePenelitianAdministrasi. Jakarta: CV. Alfabeta.

Sugiyono. 2010. MetodePenelitianKuantitatif,

Kualitatifdan R & D. Bandung: Alfabeta.

Sukardi.2009.Evaluasi

PendidikanPrinsipdanOperasionalnya.

Jakarta:PTBumiAksara.

SumardyonodanWiworo. 2011.

PengembangandanPengelolaan Bank

SoalMatematika di KKG/MGMP. Jakarta:

BadanPengembanganSumberDayaManusiaPend

idikandanPenjaminanMutuPendidikan –

KementerianPendidikan.

Sungkowo.2010. PanduanBahanUjiBerbasis TIK

PSB-SMA. Jakarta:DirektoratPembinaan SMA. Supranata,

Sumarna.2009.Analisis,Validitas,Reliabilitas,

danInterpretasiHasilTesImplementasiKurikulum

2004. Bandung: PT RemajaRosdakarya.

Suryabrata, Sumadi. 1997.Pengembangan

TesHasilBelajar. Jakarta: PT Raja

GrafindoPersada.

WahanaKomputer, 2008. BelajarPemrograman C#.

Yogyakarta: PenerbitAndi.

Wahana Komputer.2010.Short course SQL Server

2008 Express.Semarang: C.V Andi Offset. Whitehorn, Mark and Marklyn, Bill. 2003. Inside

Relational Database. Jakarta: PenerbitErlangga.

Whitten JL, Bentley LD, Dittman KC. 2004.Metode

DesaindanAnalisisSistemedisi 6. Penerjemah:

Tim Penerjemah ANDI, editor. Yogyakarta:

Penerbit ANDI. Terjemahandari: System

Analysis and Design Methods.

Widodo, Sri Wasono. 2012. "RancangBangun

Media DiklatInteraktifTipe Hypertext Tool

untukSimulasiAnalisisButirSoaldalamDiklat

Guru Pemandu LPMP Jawa Tengah". LaporanPenelitianPengembangan,

diajukandalamrangkakegiatanpengembanganpro

fesiWidyaiswara.