banditos presentation

Upload: jpeterson1

Post on 30-May-2018

218 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

  • 8/14/2019 Banditos Presentation

    1/52

    Examination of Wave BandExamination of Wave BandPattern Feature observed inPattern Feature observed in

    MASTER Airborne Imagery overMASTER Airborne Imagery overthe northwest coast of Montereythe northwest coast of Monterey

    A.K.A. Band-itos

    Kamil E. Armaiz-Nolla, Iva V. Gerasimenko & Michael J. Glotter

    Student Airborne Research Program

  • 8/14/2019 Banditos Presentation

    2/52

    OverviewOverview::Introduction

    Motivation

    Objectives Methods

    Hypothesis 1: Langmuir Circulation (LC)

    Background

    Langmuir circulation in Monterey Bay and data analysis

    Results

    Hypothesis 2: Internal Waves (IW)

    Background

    Internal waves in Monterey Bay and data analysis

    Results

    MASTER & In-situ data

    Background

    Regions of interest (ROI)

    Chlorophyll

    Hypothesis 3: Atmospheric driven processes

    Bands are not completely atmospheric: SAR In-situ

    Conclusions

    Future Work

  • 8/14/2019 Banditos Presentation

    3/52

    IntroductionIntroduction

    On July 22nd 2009 MASTER data was obtained from theDC-8 flying laboratory over the Monterey Bay region,and an unusual banded wave structure was observed

    in the North-West corner of the bay, approximatelyhalf a kilometer off-shore. This structure consisted of

    alternating dark and light bands, 350 meters wide and1500 meters long.

  • 8/14/2019 Banditos Presentation

    4/52

    Wave Band Pattern FeatureWave Band Pattern Feature(MASTER true color image)(MASTER true color image)

  • 8/14/2019 Banditos Presentation

    5/52

    Wave Band Pattern FeatureWave Band Pattern Feature(MASTER Enhanced image [Square root: linear 2%])(MASTER Enhanced image [Square root: linear 2%])

  • 8/14/2019 Banditos Presentation

    6/52

    Motivation for studyMotivation for study

    The physical conditions in the ocean are animportant factor when it comes to the rateand extent of the phytoplankton growth.

    The bands observed can alter physicalconditions in some way that could affect the

    biology of the area. It is important tounderstand the nature of those bands andto see whether or not their presenceintroduces any significant changes.

  • 8/14/2019 Banditos Presentation

    7/52

    ObjectiveObjective

    Explain the wave band pattern feature andexamine each of the possibilities in light ofthe data obtained from MASTER and in-situ

    sampling from the boat in order to

    MethodsMethods

    Programs used for data analysis: ENVI,MS Excel Spreadsheet, MATLAB andGoogle Earth.

  • 8/14/2019 Banditos Presentation

    8/52

    Hypothesis I : LangmuirHypothesis I : Langmuirllcells

    Reason for consideration: Langmuircells form distinct bands on the

    surface of the ocean, and occurfrequently whenever wind conditionsare suitable.

  • 8/14/2019 Banditos Presentation

    9/52

    Langmuir cellsLangmuir cells

    Smith, AccessScience @McGraw

  • 8/14/2019 Banditos Presentation

    10/52

    What Is a Langmuir Cell?What Is a Langmuir Cell?

    A form of circulation in the near-surface water oflakes and oceans found under windy conditions.

    At the narrow downwellingzone streaks ofbubbles, seaweed, or foam form lines runningroughly parallel to the wind. Water beneaththem flows downward, drawing these materialsto depths as great as 100 m or more.

    The downwelling zones tend to be narrow andintense compared to the broader, gentlerupwelling regions in between.

  • 8/14/2019 Banditos Presentation

    11/52

    Data CollectionData Collection

  • 8/14/2019 Banditos Presentation

    12/52

    Data CollectionData Collection

    Surface Winds Coupled Ocean/ Atmosphere

    Mesoscale Prediction System(COAMPS)

    Measured at 10 m above surface

    3 km resolution

    Surface Currents

    Southern California Coastal OceanObserving System (SCCOOS)

    6 km resolution

  • 8/14/2019 Banditos Presentation

    13/52COAMPS Real-Time Forecasts for

  • 8/14/2019 Banditos Presentation

    14/52SCCOOS- 6 km

  • 8/14/2019 Banditos Presentation

    15/52

  • 8/14/2019 Banditos Presentation

    16/52

    Observations: July 22 Flight,Observations: July 22 Flight,21:00Strong Surface Winds initiates Surfac

    Currents

    Surface Winds drive currents

    Strong Surface Winds initiates surfaceSurface Currents about 20o to the left ofBands parallel with surface currents

    Strong Surface Winds initiatesSurface Currents Surface Winds drive currents

    Surface Currents about 20o to the leftof wind

    Strong Surface Winds initiatesSurface Currents Surface Winds drive currents

    Surface Currents about 20o to the leftof wind

    Bands parallel with surfacecurrents

    Observations: July 22 Flight,Observations: July 22 Flight,

  • 8/14/2019 Banditos Presentation

    17/52

    Wind Driven LangmuirWind Driven LangmuirCirculationCirculation

    Strong Surface Winds initiatesSurface Currents

    Surface Currents about 20o to the leftof wind

    Bands parallel with surface

    currents

    Strong Surface Winds initiatesSurface Currents

    Strong winds able to breachthreshold to begin Langmuir Circulation,at which point momentum takes over

    Surface Currents about 20o to the leftof wind

    Bands parallel with surfacecurrents

    Strong Surface Winds initiatesSurface Currents

    Strong winds able to breachthreshold to begin Langmuir Circulation,at which point momentum takes over

    Surface Currents about 20o to the leftof wind

    Allows currents to align withbands

    Bands parallel with surface

    Strong Surface Winds initiatesSurface Currents

    Strong winds able to breachthreshold to begin Langmuir Circulation,at which point momentum takes over

    Surface Currents about 20o to the leftof wind

    Bands parallel with surfacecurrents

    Strong Surface Winds initiatesSurface Currents

    Strong winds able to breachthreshold to begin Langmuir Circulation,at which point momentum takes over

    Surface Currents about 20o to the leftof wind

    Allows currents to align withbands

    Bands parallel with surface

    Strong Surface Winds initiatesSurface Currents

    Strong winds able to breachthreshold to begin Langmuir Circulation,at which point momentum takes over

    Surface Currents about 20o to the leftof wind

    Allows currents to align withbands

    Bands parallel with surface

  • 8/14/2019 Banditos Presentation

    18/52

    Langmuir Cell ScalingLangmuir Cell Scaling

    General spacing ranging from ascale of a few millimeters tohundreds of meters (Phillips,

    2005)Cell Spacing generally 2-2.5x the

    mixed layer depth (Smith, 1992)

    Mixed layer depth in this part ofMonterey Bay about 10-30 m

    Langmuir cells 20-75 m wide

  • 8/14/2019 Banditos Presentation

    19/52

  • 8/14/2019 Banditos Presentation

    20/52

    Hypothesis II: InternalHypothesis II: InternalW vWaves

    Reason for consideration: Internal waves are seenon the surface of the water as a series ofalternating dark and light bands and are often

    observed in the satellite imagery. Internal wavesare known to occur in Monterey Bay, and arethought to originate from internal tides in theMonterey Canyon.

  • 8/14/2019 Banditos Presentation

    21/52

    DescloitreNASA, 2003

    SAR

  • 8/14/2019 Banditos Presentation

    22/52

    SAR

  • 8/14/2019 Banditos Presentation

    23/52

  • 8/14/2019 Banditos Presentation

    24/52

    SAR ImagerySAR Imagery

  • 8/14/2019 Banditos Presentation

    25/52

    Internal WavesInternal Waves

    Many past images from SyntheticAperture Radar (SAR) with similarbanded formations

    Scaling on the order of 1 kmSAR identifies rough and smooth

    patches on surface, strong

    indicators of internal waves

  • 8/14/2019 Banditos Presentation

    26/52

    Monterey Bay TopographyMonterey Bay Topography

    www.mbari.

  • 8/14/2019 Banditos Presentation

    27/52

    Cross-shore Internal WavesCross-shore Internal Waves

    Ryan et al., 2005

    Directioncorresponds withbelow-surface

  • 8/14/2019 Banditos Presentation

    28/52

    Longshore WavesLongshore Waves

    Directioncontradicts below-

    surface

  • 8/14/2019 Banditos Presentation

    29/52

    MASTER and In-situ chlorophyllMASTER and In-situ chlorophyllmeasurementsmeasurements

    Each of the theories proposed suggests somedegree of mixing of colder, nutrient rich layerswith upper nutrient-poor layers, which can affectthe rate of growth of phytoplankton in the area.

    By examining the MASTER and in-situ datacollected from the boat, we can determinewhether or not there exists a difference in the

    chlorophyll content between the bands.

    MASTER d I i li

  • 8/14/2019 Banditos Presentation

    30/52

    MASTER and In-situ samplingMASTER and In-situ samplingWhy use fluorescence to estimate chlorophyll

    concentrations? Fluorescence:

    One of the main pathways for the deactivation of photosystem II(PS II) which is responsible for over 95% of chlorophyllfluorescence.

    Responsible for the splitting of water molecules and the formationof oxygen.

    Since photosystem I (PS I) is weakly fluorescent, PSI together withPS II are known as the "light" reactions as they require lightenergy to proceed.

    The amount of fluorescence is a complicated function of light

    captured by chlorophyll and the rate of electron flow between PS IIand PS I.

    (Letelier & Abbott, 1996)

  • 8/14/2019 Banditos Presentation

    31/52

    ( )

  • 8/14/2019 Banditos Presentation

    32/52

    ENVI-Band 6 (0.714 m)Enhanced in [Zoom] Gaussian

    Close-up

  • 8/14/2019 Banditos Presentation

    33/52

    Close-upENVI-Band 6 (0.714 m)

    Enhanced in [Zoom] Gaussian6 DARK Bands

    5 LIGHT Bands

  • 8/14/2019 Banditos Presentation

    34/52

  • 8/14/2019 Banditos Presentation

    35/52

  • 8/14/2019 Banditos Presentation

    36/52

  • 8/14/2019 Banditos Presentation

    37/52

    DarkLight

  • 8/14/2019 Banditos Presentation

    38/52

    Temperature, salinity and chlorophyll for in-situ data on July 24,

  • 8/14/2019 Banditos Presentation

    39/52

    Temperature, salinity and chlorophyll for in situ data on July 24,2009 in regions of interest from MASTER imagery of July 22,

    2009.

    Data only includes regions of interest over which the ship sampled: Dark 3 (cyan), Light 3

    H th i III At h i d iH th i III At h i d i

  • 8/14/2019 Banditos Presentation

    40/52

    Why wind driven: Wind speed: wind speeds need to be exceptionally

    low to be ONLY oceanographic driven.

    Crest orientation: the wave forms appear to be in linewith the wind direction and perpendicular to the

    continental shelf slope.When comparing to SAR data, it is compelling that it

    could be atmospheric with effects on upper ocean andinfluencing the phytoplankton distribution.

    They could be wind waves because they are located inan area where coastal features produce a coastal jet.

    Hypothesis III: Atmospheric drivenHypothesis III: Atmospheric drivenprocessesprocesses

    Al l bl k b !Al l bl k b !

  • 8/14/2019 Banditos Presentation

    41/52

    The yeastThe yeastthat makes thethat makes the

    bread risebread rise

    Algal bloom kaboom!Algal bloom kaboom!The atmospheric effects could set up the right conditions causingupwelling. A couple of days later the phytoplankton come up to the

    surface and we see a bloom.On around July 28, a drop in CO2 was detected by the mooringsensors.

  • 8/14/2019 Banditos Presentation

    42/52B

    lunt

    STRONG

    STRONG

    STRONG WIN

    STRONG WIN

    weak

    weak

    weak

    weak

    weak weak

    weak

    weakweak

    weakweak

    weakweak

    weakweak

    weak

    weak

    weak

    weak

    weak

    weak

    STRONG WIND

    STRONG WINDweak

    STRONGweak wind STRONGweak wind

    STRONG

    STRONG

  • 8/14/2019 Banditos Presentation

    43/52

    Supercritical Flow and ShockSupercritical Flow and ShockWavesWaves

    Supersonic Bullet,Mythealias, 2007

    Undular Bore

  • 8/14/2019 Banditos Presentation

    44/52

    Point Ao NuevoPoint Ao Nuevo

    Burk and Haack,

    Monterey

    Point Ao Nuevo

    S iti l At h iSupercritical Atmospheric

  • 8/14/2019 Banditos Presentation

    45/52

    Supercritical AtmosphericSupercritical AtmosphericWaves

    Burk and Haack,GOES-9 visible image,

    B d C t b P lB d C t b P l

  • 8/14/2019 Banditos Presentation

    46/52

    Bands Cannot be PurelyBands Cannot be PurelyAtmos heric:Atmospheric:

    B d C t b P lBands Cannot be Purely

  • 8/14/2019 Banditos Presentation

    47/52

    Bands Cannot be PurelyBands Cannot be PurelyAtmos hericAtmos heric

    i f fF i T f f

  • 8/14/2019 Banditos Presentation

    48/52

    Fourier Transform ofFourier Transform ofChlorophyll Content (ShipChlorophyll Content (Ship

    Peaks in Chlorophyll from FourierPeaks in Chlorophyll from Fourier

  • 8/14/2019 Banditos Presentation

    49/52

    Peaks in Chlorophyll from FourierPeaks in Chlorophyll from FourierTransformTransform

    Same

    location,

  • 8/14/2019 Banditos Presentation

    50/52

  • 8/14/2019 Banditos Presentation

    51/52

    Future WorkFuture Work

    More work needs to be done comparingin-situ observations to airborne imagery,including low level atmospheric data aswell as comprehensive sampling of water

    within the bands.Compare MASTER imagery with SAR data

    for further understanding of thefrequency and formation of the wave

    band pattern feature.Extensive research to determine the

    physical conditions in Monterey Bay that

    Acknowledgements:Acknowledgements:

  • 8/14/2019 Banditos Presentation

    52/52

    Acknowledgements:Acknowledgements: Student Airborne Research Program and its staff Dr. George Seielstad, Dr.

    Alexandra Novak, Mr. Richard Shetter, Mr. Adam Webster, Mr. David VanGilst and Ms. Jane Peterson.

    Dr. John Ryan, Monterey Bay Aquarium Research Institute

    Dr. Henry Fuelberg and Walter Sessions, Florida State University

    Dr. Gregory Carmichael, University of Iowa

    Dr. Susan Ustin and Shawn Kefauver, UC Davis

    Dr. Nicholas Clinton, NASA Ames Research Center