bacteria project

17
Soil Collection of Cultured bacteria on R2A and TSA media for Antibiotic Properties Pérez-Ayala, Michelle C. 1 , Figueroa-Monsanto, Héctor L. 2, Department of Biology, University of Puerto Rico at Cayey 1 , Department of Chemistry, University of Puerto Rico at Cayey 2

Upload: h3ctorfig

Post on 08-Aug-2015

19 views

Category:

Science


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Bacteria Project

Soil Collection of Cultured bacteria on R2A and TSA media for Antibiotic Properties

Pérez-Ayala, Michelle C.1, Figueroa-Monsanto, Héctor L.2,

Department of Biology, University of Puerto Rico at Cayey1, Department of Chemistry, University of Puerto Rico at Cayey2

Page 2: Bacteria Project

Soil Collection from Rhizosphere:First Soil Collection

• Figure 1 and 2. Surrounding lake and flora. Animals commonly pass through (e.g. chickens, ducks and dogs).

• Figure 3. Whole from where the soil was collected about an inch deep with roots and grass.

Figure 1. Figure 3. Figure 2.

Page 3: Bacteria Project

Soil collection area :Second Soil Collection

Figure 4. Collection Area

• Moist terrain • 25˚C • Grass • Animals: dogs, cats,

chickens & “iguanas”• Plants: cannon tree &

coriander plants (“cilantro”).

Figure 4.

Page 4: Bacteria Project

Soil Collection Area Characteristics

• Table 1. Shows the characteristics of both soil collections areas.

• It shows that there is a probability of finding bacteria in the gathered soil.

Table 1.

Page 5: Bacteria Project

Weight and Dilution of Soil

• Figure 5. Approximately, 1.033±0.001 grams of the soil sample was weighted and diluted in six tubes (100, 10-1, 10-2, 10-3, 10-4 and 10-5).

Figure 5.

Page 6: Bacteria Project

Weight and Dilution of Soil:First Soil Collection

Figure 6. a, Shows the TSA 100 colonies. b, R2A 100 bacteria colonies are shown.

Figure 6. a, b

Page 7: Bacteria Project

Purification of Bacteria

From the first soil collection, The TSA 100 colony morphology is shown in Table 2.

Table 2.

Page 8: Bacteria Project

Purification of Bacteria

Table 3. shows the morphology for R2A 100 bacteria.

Table 3.

Page 9: Bacteria Project

Weight and Dilution of Soil:Second Soil Collection

Figure 7. TSA Morphology

1) Gray apparel- dull2) Cloudy3) Irregular shape4) Flat volume

Figure 7. Shows TSA Colony

Page 10: Bacteria Project

Weight and Dilution of Soil

Figure 8. R2A Morphology

1) Circle like(donut)2) Dull yellow3) Lifted volume

Figure 8. Shows R2A Colony

Page 11: Bacteria Project

Gram Staining:First Soil Collection

Figure 9. a, b, Shows that the R2A 100 colonies are gram positive and Rods.

Figure 9. a, b,

Page 12: Bacteria Project

Gram Staining

Figure 10. c, d, Shows the Rods gram positive bacteria for TSA 100 .

Figure 10. c, d,

Page 13: Bacteria Project

Gram Staining:Second Soil Collection

Figure 11. a, b, Shows the Rods gram positive bacteria for TSA 100 .

Figure 11. a, b,

Page 14: Bacteria Project

Freezing:First Soil Collection

a, b,

c, d,

• Figure 12. a, Freezing of TSA bacteria. b, TSA back up. c, R2A frozen bacteria. d, R2A back up.

• Each tube had 1.5 mL of broth, 0.2 mL of glycerol and the R2A/ TSA colonies.

Figure 12. a, b, c, d,

Page 15: Bacteria Project

Electrophoresis

• The R2A copies of the PCR were positive for the 16S gene, according to the electrophoresis gel in Figure13. a, b, This shows that the DNA copies belonged to a bacteria.

• a, HLFM30R01A b, MCPA30R01A

Figure 13.a,b,

Page 16: Bacteria Project

Antibiotic production test

M. Luteous was inhibited only by TSA 100, according to Figure 14 a,b,. E. coli on Figure 12. c,d, was not inhibited neither by TSA 100 nor by R2A 100. This shows that TSA bacteria might have an antibiotic property on M. Luteous.

Figure 14. a, b,

Page 17: Bacteria Project

Acknowledgments

• Dr. Michael Rubin• Giovanni Cruz• Edwin Alvarado• Mariceli Fernández

• Dr. Enida Díaz• Dr. Elena González• Dr. Robert Ross• Raquel Montañez