background screening trends – india · travel and hospitality 12 3 3 3 14 3 bfsi 35 38 13 35 39...
TRANSCRIPT
![Page 1: Background Screening Trends – India · TRAVEL AND HOSPITALITY 12 3 3 3 14 3 BFSI 35 38 13 35 39 12 4 HEALTHCARE AND PHARMACEUTICALS 18 4 4 13 7 ENGINEERING 0 0 22 0 0 IT 30 22 28](https://reader034.vdocuments.site/reader034/viewer/2022050602/5fa9ab597c883c41b51a5808/html5/thumbnails/1.jpg)
INFORMATION YOU NEED. PEOPLE YOU CAN TRUST.
Quantifying the trends and Qualifying the nature of Applicant fraud in IndiaApril to June 2016
TRENDS REPORT
Background Screening Trends – India
![Page 2: Background Screening Trends – India · TRAVEL AND HOSPITALITY 12 3 3 3 14 3 BFSI 35 38 13 35 39 12 4 HEALTHCARE AND PHARMACEUTICALS 18 4 4 13 7 ENGINEERING 0 0 22 0 0 IT 30 22 28](https://reader034.vdocuments.site/reader034/viewer/2022050602/5fa9ab597c883c41b51a5808/html5/thumbnails/2.jpg)
Trends Report – Q2 – 2016
Table of Contents
Dear Readers,
FOREWORD
As organizations fight for the best talentavailable in the marketplace, it has become anecessity for them to get the insights they needto hire people with the right skills andbackgrounds.
We are very happy that many organizations are utilizing our trends reports to model theirbackground screening programs and establishbest practices. Such a proactive approach tobackground screening is enabling companies tomake informed hiring decision, resulting inimproving the quality of hires.
We remain committed towards aligning Indianrecruitment and pre-employment screeningpractices with the best in the world.
Purushotam SavlaniManaging Director and SVPFirst Advantange
1.A. Discrepancy Percentage - By Quarter [Q1-11 to Q2-16]
1.B. Discrepancy Percentage - By Gender [Q1-16 Vs. Q2-16]
1.C. Discrepancy Percentage - By Age [Q2-16]
2.A. Discrepancy Percentage - By Industry [Q1-16 Vs. Q2-16]
2.B Discrepancy Percentage - By Industry by Age [Q2-16]
2.C. Discrepancy Percentage - By Industry by Component [Q1-16 Vs. Q2-16]
3.A. Discrepancy Percentage - By Component [Q3-15 to Q2-16]
3.B. Discrepancy Percentage - By Component by Gender [Q1-16 Vs. Q2-16]
4. Discrepancies - By Component across Zones in India and Abroad [Q1-16 Vs. Q2-16]
5. Discrepancies - By Top 6 States [Q1-16 Vs. Q2-16]
6.A. Employment Discrepancies - By Top 10 Cities [Q1-16 Vs. Q2-16]
6.B. Education Discrepancies - By Top 10 Cities [Q1-16 Vs. Q2-16]
6.C. Address Discrepancies - By Top 10 Cities [Q1-16 Vs. Q2-16]
7.A. Categorization of Discrepancies - By Component Employment [Q1-16 Vs. Q2-16]
7.B.1. Categorization of Discrepancies - By Component Education [Q1-16 Vs. Q2-16]
7.B.2. Discrepancies - By Education Level [Q1-16 Vs. Q2-16]
7.C. Categorization of Discrepancies - By Component Address [Q1-16 Vs. Q2-16]
8.A. Discrepancies - By Employee Category [Q3-15 to Q2-16]
8.B. Discrepancies - By Employee Category By Age [Q1-16]
8.C. Discrepancies - By Employee Category by Industry [Q1-16 Vs. Q2-16]
9. Verification Success% Vs. Unable to Verify% [Q4-15 Vs. Q1-16]
![Page 3: Background Screening Trends – India · TRAVEL AND HOSPITALITY 12 3 3 3 14 3 BFSI 35 38 13 35 39 12 4 HEALTHCARE AND PHARMACEUTICALS 18 4 4 13 7 ENGINEERING 0 0 22 0 0 IT 30 22 28](https://reader034.vdocuments.site/reader034/viewer/2022050602/5fa9ab597c883c41b51a5808/html5/thumbnails/3.jpg)
Case Level Discrepancy across industrial sectors like Retail, Healthcare & Pharma has shown a rise in Q2-16 in comparison to Q1-16
3
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY [Q2-16]
0
255075
100
78% 22%
In this regard, First Advantage helps you make the right decision by presenting essential facts about the current workplace scenario through this trend report. Here are some of the finding that might prove beneficial in the process of a talent search by any organisation:
As organisations have started to capture talent early on, the overall recruitment process cost is even higher and to be cost-efficient in such cases, knowing a candidate's background becomes all the more important. It helps mitigate risk and saves the time and money involved in hiring a candidate with a fraudulent background.
Talent occupies the most important position in any organization no matter what the current economic scenario may be. Irrespective of the continuously changing nature of recruitment process, the need for a good hire is indispensable. There has been a tremendous shift in the mindset of organisations as well as recruiters when it comes to talent today.
78% of the Discrepant Cases are males and remaining 22% are females
Out of the total occurrences of discrepancies a huge chunk of them have occurred in the Employment Component, followed by the Address Component and the Education Component
City-wise Bengaluru leads in Employment & Address related discrepancies & Mumbai leads in Education related discrepancies
Out of every 100 Education Discrepancies identified - 67 are from the Graduate level
Discrepancy rates for Employment and Address checks are very high in the Southern zone and Education checks are very high in the Northern zone in India
Highest number of discrepancies have been observed in the Associate level employees and in that too - the age bracket >= 22 to 30 years has the biggest chunk of discrepant cases at 46.6%
BACKGROUND SCREENING TRENDS - INDIA
Beng
alur
u
Nam
chi
![Page 4: Background Screening Trends – India · TRAVEL AND HOSPITALITY 12 3 3 3 14 3 BFSI 35 38 13 35 39 12 4 HEALTHCARE AND PHARMACEUTICALS 18 4 4 13 7 ENGINEERING 0 0 22 0 0 IT 30 22 28](https://reader034.vdocuments.site/reader034/viewer/2022050602/5fa9ab597c883c41b51a5808/html5/thumbnails/4.jpg)
4
GLOSSARY OF TERMS
GLOSSARY OF TERMS
First Advantage is conducting a background check for a candidate ABC [Case]
The check is authorized by a client say XYZ Corp. This Client belongs to the BFSI sector [Industry]
FOR EXAMPLE
Case(s)
Client
Industry
Fake
Component(s)
Check(s)
Employee Category
Possible Suspect
One case indicates one candidate. It is denoted by acase reference number which is unique to thatparticular candidate.
Screening carried out for various phases of thecandidate’s background like Employment, Education,Address, etc. are termed as Components.
The organization which authorizes First Advantageto conduct the verification.
The industry sector/segment under which the clientfalls. All abbreviations used are as per Indianstandards of industry bifurcation and are easilyaccessible via the internet.
A confirmation shared by authorized personnel/bodyon the authenticity of the document/university.
As per the client’s mandate, the screening components include latest Education and two previous Employments ofthe candidate. Here Education and Employment are Components & there are a total of three Checks - one Education[Check] and two Employment [Checks]
Depending on a predefined matrix followed by the client, either as standardized by First Advantage or a clientcustomized matrix - a disconnect identified [Discrepance] would be categorized as major or minor discrepancy,suspect, possible suspect, etc.
One case can have one or more than one check basedon the credentials being verified.
The designation at which the candidate worked/isworking [current employment] in the organization.
Any organization or company - whose credentialsmight not be genuine.
BACKGROUND SCREENING TRENDS - INDIA
![Page 5: Background Screening Trends – India · TRAVEL AND HOSPITALITY 12 3 3 3 14 3 BFSI 35 38 13 35 39 12 4 HEALTHCARE AND PHARMACEUTICALS 18 4 4 13 7 ENGINEERING 0 0 22 0 0 IT 30 22 28](https://reader034.vdocuments.site/reader034/viewer/2022050602/5fa9ab597c883c41b51a5808/html5/thumbnails/5.jpg)
5
1.A. Discrepancy Percentage - By Quarter [Q1-11 to Q2-16]
DIS
CRE
PAN
CY
PERC
ENTA
GE
OVERALL DISCREPANCY
Q1
Q2
Q3
Q4
Q1
Q2
Q3
Q4
Q1
Q2
Q3
Q4
11.0%
9.6%
8.1%
201320122011
Q1
2014Based on Discrepancy Vs. Verified Cases
Q2
11.0%
10.6%
9.6%
Q3
Case Level Trend from April to June 2016
10.2%
10.2%10.9%
10.0%9.8%
9.9%
9.3%
9.5%
8.7%
Q410.7%
Q111.4%
2015
Q212.3%
Q311.5%
Q411.4%
Q112.0%
2016
A study of the Case Level Quarterly Discrepancy Analysis for Q2-16 shows that the discrepancy percentage is at 11.0% [which goes to say that out of every 100 candidates who were screened by First Advantage - 11 candidates were found to have discrepancies in one or more than one component]
The discrepancy versus verified percentage for 2011, 2012 and 2013 was at 10 percent. In 2014 it had risen to 10.5 percent. In 2015 it has further risen to 11.6 percent
BACKGROUND SCREENING TRENDS - INDIA
11.0% Q2
![Page 6: Background Screening Trends – India · TRAVEL AND HOSPITALITY 12 3 3 3 14 3 BFSI 35 38 13 35 39 12 4 HEALTHCARE AND PHARMACEUTICALS 18 4 4 13 7 ENGINEERING 0 0 22 0 0 IT 30 22 28](https://reader034.vdocuments.site/reader034/viewer/2022050602/5fa9ab597c883c41b51a5808/html5/thumbnails/6.jpg)
6
OVERALL DISCREPANCY
Discrepancy Based on Gender
OVERALL CASES VERIFIED
76%
24%
OVERALL DISCREPANCY CASES
79%
21%
GENDER WISE DISCREPANCY %
13%
10%
Q1-16
OVERALL CASES VERIFIED
75%
25%
78%
22%
12%
9%
Q2-16
Case Level Trend from April to June 2016
1.B. Discrepancy Percentage - By Gender [Q1-16 Vs. Q2-16]
OVERALL DISCREPANCY CASES GENDER WISE DISCREPANCY %
75% of the overall cases verified by First Advantage, in the second quarter of 2016 were Males [which means out of every 100 cases verified - 75 were Males] and the remaining 25% were Females
In Q2-16, 78% of the Overall discrepancy cases were Males [which means out of every 100 discrepancy cases 78 were Males] and the remaining 22% were Females
In Q2-16, 12% of the Male verified cases were discrepant [which means of every 100 cases verified of the Male gender - 12 were found to be discrepant]. Likewise, 9% of the Female gender verified cases were discrepant
In comparison with Q1-16 – the trend for Q2-16 illustrates that both the Male discrepancy has decrease by 1% and female discrepancy has increase by 1%.
BACKGROUND SCREENING TRENDS - INDIA
![Page 7: Background Screening Trends – India · TRAVEL AND HOSPITALITY 12 3 3 3 14 3 BFSI 35 38 13 35 39 12 4 HEALTHCARE AND PHARMACEUTICALS 18 4 4 13 7 ENGINEERING 0 0 22 0 0 IT 30 22 28](https://reader034.vdocuments.site/reader034/viewer/2022050602/5fa9ab597c883c41b51a5808/html5/thumbnails/7.jpg)
7
Case Level Trend from April to June 2016
1.C. Discrepancy Percentage - By Age [Q2-16]
VERI
FIED
CA
SES%
DIS
CREP
AN
CY C
ASE
S%D
ISCR
EPA
NCY
Vs.
VERI
FIED
%
<= 21 years >= 22 to 30 years >= 31 to 40 years >= 41 to 50 years >= 51 years
5.6% 66.6% 24.5% 2.9% 0.4%
2.0% 61.2% 32.1% 3.7% 0.9%
4.1% 10.4% 14.8% 14.4% 24.5%
Please note: Cases wherein the date of birth is not mentioned have been excluded from the analysis. These cases have a 2.0% discrepancy
Highest number of cases have been verified for the >= 22 to 30 years [age bracket] candidates
Similarly highest number of discrepancies have been detected in the >= 22 to 30 years [age bracket] candidates
The discrepancy versus verified percentage is highest in the >= 51 years [age bracket] candidates at 24.5%, followed by >= 31 to 40 years [age bracket] candidates at 14.8%.
Discrepancy Trends
PERCENTAGE
BACKGROUND SCREENING TRENDS - INDIA
![Page 8: Background Screening Trends – India · TRAVEL AND HOSPITALITY 12 3 3 3 14 3 BFSI 35 38 13 35 39 12 4 HEALTHCARE AND PHARMACEUTICALS 18 4 4 13 7 ENGINEERING 0 0 22 0 0 IT 30 22 28](https://reader034.vdocuments.site/reader034/viewer/2022050602/5fa9ab597c883c41b51a5808/html5/thumbnails/8.jpg)
8
Today, background screening is notonly restricted to the traditionalsectors like IT, ITES, BFSI,Manufacturing, FMCG sectors, but hasalso shown rapid growth in Retail,Petroleum, Hospitality, Healthcare,Travel, Telecom, Education andEntertainment industries.
In fact, this concept of risk mitigationhas tempted even sectors like NGO,Research, KPO, etc. [basically nonprofit earning sectors] amongstothers, to join the bandwagon andengage in the best practices of duediligence.
Verified Cases% is based on Overall Verified Cases onlyDiscrepancy Cases% is based on Discrepancy Cases only Discrepancy Vs. Verified% is based on Discrepancy Vs. Verified Cases
Numbers in the graph indicate%
Verified% Discrepancy% Discrepancy Vs. Verified%
Q1-16 Q2-16
2.A. Discrepancy Percentage - Top 10 By Industry [Q1-16 Vs. Q2-16]
Discrepancy Trends
Case Level Trend from April to June 2016
BACKGROUND SCREENING TRENDS - INDIA
In Q2-16, the Discrepancy Vs. Verified trend in sectors like Retail and Healthcare & Pharma have shown an increase in comparison to the previous quarter.
In Q2-16, total number of cases Verified were highest for the BFSI sector at 35% [i.e. out of every 100 cases Verified – 35 were from the BFSI sector] followed by IT sector at 30%
Likewise highest number of discrepancy cases are in the BFSI sector at 38% [i.e. out of every 100 discrepancy cases – 38 were from BFSI sector] followed by IT at 24%
The discrepancy %, that is the number of cases [Discrepancy Vs. Verified] based on industries, has a totally different story to say, with Retail leading at 27% [i.e. out of every 100 Retail verified – 27 cases were discrepant], Telecom at 22% followed by Healthcare & Pharma at 18%. A surprise element in Engineering sector shows a high discrepancy percent at 14% but the percentage can be sort of misleading as the number of cases verified for Engineering sector is pretty less in comparison
FMCG 0
2
4
ITES/BPO 36
53
5
TELE-COMMUNICATION
105
1534
5
22
RETAIL 1
0
1
1
20 27
TRAVEL ANDHOSPITALITY
1233
3
14
3
BFSI 35
3813
3539
12
4 HEALTHCARE AND
PHARMACEUTICALS 184
4
137
ENGINEERING 0
0 22
0
0
IT30
2228
924
9
2
7
1
2
1
1
13MANUFACTURING
1 2
4
14
![Page 9: Background Screening Trends – India · TRAVEL AND HOSPITALITY 12 3 3 3 14 3 BFSI 35 38 13 35 39 12 4 HEALTHCARE AND PHARMACEUTICALS 18 4 4 13 7 ENGINEERING 0 0 22 0 0 IT 30 22 28](https://reader034.vdocuments.site/reader034/viewer/2022050602/5fa9ab597c883c41b51a5808/html5/thumbnails/9.jpg)
The Discrepancy Vs. Verified% by Age and by Industry is an another interesting analytics
The overall discrepancy trend shows that the >= 51 years age bracket is the highest at 24.5% [which means of every 100 cases verified in this age bracket - 24 cases are discrepant]
Most of the other industrial sectors like ITES/BPO, Telecom, Healthcare & Pharma, IT and Manufacturing show a high trend in the >= 51 years age bracket
Engineering shows a high discrepancy trend in >= 22 to 30 years age bracket
As confirmed in page number 7, cases wherein the date of birth is not mentioned have been excluded from the analysis. The same is applicable to all the above mentioned sectors as well
9
Check Level Trend from April to June 2016
2.B. Discrepancy Percentage - By Industry by Age [Q2-16]
<= 21 years
>= 22 to 30 years
>= 31 to 40 years
>= 41 to 50 years
>= 51 years
Discrepancy Trends
Based on Discrepancy Vs. Verified%
FMCG shows a high discrepancy trend in >= 41 to 50 years age bracket
OVERALL
4.1%
10.4%
14.8%
14.4%
24.5%
2.0%
11.0%
BFSI
5.3%
10.8%
16.4%
16.1%
20.0%
4.1%
12.2%
ENGINEERING
0.0%
16.7%
15.8%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
13.7%
FMCG
0.0%
13.8%
15.7%
30.8%
0.0%
0.0%
2.0%
HEALTHCARE &PHARMA
4.8%
17.6%
17.9%
17.6%
61.5%
38.9%
17.8%
IT
0.3%
7.9%
12.1%
14.7%
30.4%
4.2%
8.6%
ITES /BPO
5.7%
5.2%
7.7%
8.2%
32.1%
0.5%
6.0%
MANUFACTURING
0.7%
3.5%
13.6%
9.7%
16.7%
0.0%
4.1%
RETAIL
27.0%
26.9%
48.4%
44.4%
66.7%
1.6%
27.1%
TELECOMM
7.0%
21.6%
22.6%
26.2%
27.3%
0.0%
21.6%
TRAVEL &HOSPITALITY
5.2%
14.1%
12.9%
12.9%
26.7%
0.0%
12.3%
Not considered in Analysis
Discrepancy Vs. Verified%
DIS
CREP
AN
CY V
s. V
ERIF
IED
%
80.0%
70.0%
60.0%
50.0%
40.0%
30.0%
20.0%
10.0%
0.0%
90.0%
100.0%
BACKGROUND SCREENING TRENDS - INDIA
![Page 10: Background Screening Trends – India · TRAVEL AND HOSPITALITY 12 3 3 3 14 3 BFSI 35 38 13 35 39 12 4 HEALTHCARE AND PHARMACEUTICALS 18 4 4 13 7 ENGINEERING 0 0 22 0 0 IT 30 22 28](https://reader034.vdocuments.site/reader034/viewer/2022050602/5fa9ab597c883c41b51a5808/html5/thumbnails/10.jpg)
10
2.C. Discrepancy Percentage - By Top 10 Industry By Component [Q1-16 Vs. Q2-16]
Based on Discrepancy Vs. Verified Checks
BFSI Engineering
FMCG Healthcare and Pharmaceuticals
17.7%
0.4%
0.7%
IT
6.7%
2.1%
0.6% ITES / BPO
Employment Address Education Employment Address Education
Employment Address Education Employment Address Education
Employment Address Education Employment Address Education
Q2-
1610.5%
4.5%
1.6%
22.9%
0.0%
0.0%
8.5%
2.3%
0.9%
11.4%
3.3%
0.8%
11.6%
4.8%
1.6%
24.2%
0.0%
0.0%
12.7%
0.8%
3.9%
10.9%
0.8%
1.0%
5.7%
2.5%
0.6%
11.9%
3.0%
0.8%
Discrepancy Trends
Check Level Trend from April to June 2016
BACKGROUND SCREENING TRENDS - INDIA
Q1-
16
Q1-
16Q
2-16
Q1-
16
Q2-
16Q
1-16
Q2-
16
Q2-
16Q
1-16
Q1-
16Q
2-16
![Page 11: Background Screening Trends – India · TRAVEL AND HOSPITALITY 12 3 3 3 14 3 BFSI 35 38 13 35 39 12 4 HEALTHCARE AND PHARMACEUTICALS 18 4 4 13 7 ENGINEERING 0 0 22 0 0 IT 30 22 28](https://reader034.vdocuments.site/reader034/viewer/2022050602/5fa9ab597c883c41b51a5808/html5/thumbnails/11.jpg)
2.C. Discrepancy Percentage - By Top 10 Industry By Component [Q1-16 Vs. Q2-16]
11
Check Level Trend from April to June 2016
Based on Discrepancy Vs. Verified Checks
Manufacturing
Employment Address Education
Retail
Employment Address
8.7%
1.4%
0.8%
21.3%
19.5%
2.2%
Education
24.2%
2.6%
3.0%Travel and Hospitality
Employment Address Education
Telecommunication
Employment Address Education
7.7%
10.3%
1.5%
Q2-
16Q
1-16
10.1%
7.0%
0.5%
8.3%
11.0%
0.9%
23.9%
15.5%
3.4%
25.6%
3.4%
1.6%
Discrepancy Trends
BACKGROUND SCREENING TRENDS - INDIA
In Q2-16, Employment discrepancies vs. verifications have recorded an increase in most of the above mentioned sectors in comparison to Q1-16. The maximum increase was recorded in the Healthcare & Pharma sector [from 10.9% in Q1-16 to 17.7% in Q2-16] followed by IT sector [from 5.7% in Q1-16 to 6.7% in Q2-16]. It has shown a fall in FMCG sector [from 12.7% in Q1-16 to 8.5% in Q2-16]
While the maximum increase in Address discrepancies vs. verifications was recorded in the Retail sector [from 15.5% in Q1-16 to 19.5% in Q2-16], the highest drop was observed in the Manufacturing sector [from 7.0% in Q1-16 to 1.4% in Q2-16]
The maximum increase in Education discrepancies vs. verifications was observed in the Travel & Hospitality sector [from 1.6% in Q1-16 to 3.0% in Q2-16], while the highest drop was in the FMCG sector [from 3.9% in Q1-16 to 0.9% in Q2-16]
Q2-
16Q
1-16
Q2-
16Q
1-16
Q2-
16Q
1-16
![Page 12: Background Screening Trends – India · TRAVEL AND HOSPITALITY 12 3 3 3 14 3 BFSI 35 38 13 35 39 12 4 HEALTHCARE AND PHARMACEUTICALS 18 4 4 13 7 ENGINEERING 0 0 22 0 0 IT 30 22 28](https://reader034.vdocuments.site/reader034/viewer/2022050602/5fa9ab597c883c41b51a5808/html5/thumbnails/12.jpg)
1.A. Discrepancy Percentage - By Quarter [Q1-11 to Q2-16]
1.B. Discrepancy Percentage - By Gender [Q1-16 Vs. Q2-16]
1.C. Discrepancy Percentage - By Age [Q2-16]
2.A. Discrepancy Percentage - By Industry [Q1-16 Vs. Q2-16]
2.B Discrepancy Percentage - By Industry by Age [Q2-16]
2.C. Discrepancy Percentage - By Industry by Component [Q1-16 Vs. Q2-16]
3.A. Discrepancy Percentage - By Component [Q3-15 to Q2-16]
3.B. Discrepancy Percentage - By Component by Gender [Q1-16 Vs. Q2-16]
4. Discrepancies - By Component across Zones in India and Abroad [Q1-16 Vs. Q2-16]
5. Discrepancies - By Top 6 States [Q1-16 Vs. Q2-16]
6.A. Employment Discrepancies - By Top 10 Cities [Q1-16 Vs. Q2-16]
6.B. Education Discrepancies - By Top 10 Cities [Q1-16 Vs. Q2-16]
6.C. Address Discrepancies - By Top 10 Cities [Q1-16 Vs. Q2-16]
7.A. Categorization of Discrepancies - By Component Employment [Q1-16 Vs. Q2-16]
7.B.1. Categorization of Discrepancies - By Component Education [Q1-16 Vs. Q2-16]
7.B.2. Discrepancies - By Education Level [Q1-16 Vs. Q2-16]
7.C. Categorization of Discrepancies - By Component Address [Q1-16 Vs. Q2-16]
8.A. Discrepancies - By Employee Category [Q3-15 to Q2-16]
8.B. Discrepancies - By Employee Category By Age [Q1-16]
8.C. Discrepancies - By Employee Category by Industry [Q1-16 Vs. Q2-16]
9. Verification Success% Vs. Unable to Verify% [Q4-15 Vs. Q1-16]
12
Based on Discrepancy checks only
Check Level Trend from April to June 2016
3.A. Discrepancy Percentage - By Component [Q3-15 to Q2-16]
ADDRESSEMPLOYMENT
OTHERSEDUCATION
Note:
Q3-15
56.3%
14.3%
4.8%
24.6%
Q2-16
61.5%
10.3%
5.4%
22.8%
Q1-16
59.5%
11.4%
5.3%
23.8%
Q4-15
59.3%
12.3%
5.1%
23.2%
Discrepancy Trends
BACKGROUND SCREENING TRENDS - INDIA
Employment component has always had the highest number of discrepancies in comparison to other components. 60% discrepancies are formed by it in this quarter [which means out of every 100 discrepancies identified – 60 are of the Employment Component]
At times, discrepancies tagged byFirst Advantage are used ashighlighters, which may serve astriggers for further investigation andmight not necessarily signify a fraudor discrepancy in the literal sense.
These tags/requirements are purelybased on client criteria.
In Q2-16 - discrepancies related to Employment, Address and Education components were at 61.5%, 10.3% and 5.4% respectively
The remaining discrepancies of 22.8%, were related to Criminal, Document Investigation, Database, Reference, etc. [clubbed under Others] checks
The Employment related discrepancies have increased from 59.5% in Q1-16 to 61.5% in Q2-16
The Address related discrepancies have decreased from 11.4% in Q1-16 to 10.3% in Q2-16
The Education related discrepancies have increased from 5.3% in Q1-16 to 5.4% in Q2-16
![Page 13: Background Screening Trends – India · TRAVEL AND HOSPITALITY 12 3 3 3 14 3 BFSI 35 38 13 35 39 12 4 HEALTHCARE AND PHARMACEUTICALS 18 4 4 13 7 ENGINEERING 0 0 22 0 0 IT 30 22 28](https://reader034.vdocuments.site/reader034/viewer/2022050602/5fa9ab597c883c41b51a5808/html5/thumbnails/13.jpg)
13
3.B. Discrepancy Percentage - By Component By Gender [Q1-16 Vs. Q2-16]
*It refers to some of the Components included in the ‘Others’ category.Based on Discrepancy Vs. Verified Checks.
ADDRESSEMPLOYMENT
81%
19%
72%
28%
EDUCATION
86%
14%
61-2Q
CRIMINAL*
92%
8%
REFERENCE*
100%
0%
ADDRESSEMPLOYMENT
81%
19%
76%
24%
EDUCATION
86%
14%
61-1Q
CRIMINAL*
94%
6%
REFERENCE*
64%
36%
Discrepancy Trends
Check Level Trend from April to June 2016
DATABASE*
79%
21%
DATABASE*
88%
12%
92%
8%
DOCUMENTINVESTIGATION*
83%
17%
DOCUMENTINVESTIGATION*
Q2-16 Trends: In the Employment discrepancy checks - Males form the biggest chunk at 81% [which means out of every 100 Employment discrepancy checks - 81 are Males and 19 are Females]
In Address discrepancy checks, Males are at 72% and Females are at 28%
In the Education discrepancy checks - Males form 86% and the remaining 14% are Females
In the Criminal discrepancy checks - Males form 92% and the remaining 8% are Females
BACKGROUND SCREENING TRENDS - INDIA
61-2Q
61-1Q
![Page 14: Background Screening Trends – India · TRAVEL AND HOSPITALITY 12 3 3 3 14 3 BFSI 35 38 13 35 39 12 4 HEALTHCARE AND PHARMACEUTICALS 18 4 4 13 7 ENGINEERING 0 0 22 0 0 IT 30 22 28](https://reader034.vdocuments.site/reader034/viewer/2022050602/5fa9ab597c883c41b51a5808/html5/thumbnails/14.jpg)
14
4. Discrepancies- By Component Across Zones in India and Abroad [Q1-16 Vs. Q2-16]
Based on Discrepancy checks only.
The highlighting factors:
Discrepancy rates for Employment and Address checks are very high in the Southern zone
Discrepancy rates for Education checks are very high in the Northern zone
Q1-16
Q2-16
Abroad 9% AbroadAbroad 17%
EMPLOYMENT
SOUTH
EAST
NORTH
WEST
24%
39%
25%EMPLOYMENT
SOUTH
EAST
NORTH
WEST
23%
38%
26%EDUCATION
SOUTH
EAST
NORTH
WEST
35%
17% 15%4%
16%SOUTH
EAST
NORTH
WEST
28%
46%
15% 10%ADDRESS
0%
Abroad 7% AbroadAbroad 15%
EMPLOYMENT
SOUTH
EAST
NORTH
WEST
24%
39%
25%EMPLOYMENT
SOUTH
EAST
NORTH
WEST
25%
38%
25%EDUCATION
SOUTH
EAST
NORTH
WEST
34%
15% 21%5%
15%SOUTH
EAST
NORTH
WEST
25%
49%
14% 11%ADDRESS
0%
Discrepancy Trends
Check Level Trend from April to June 2016
The discrepancy trend across zones in India and abroad has displayed an interesting spectrum and has remained constant except for a couple of surprises:
Employment discrepancy trend has remained consistent across zones except for a slight increase of 1% in the West Zone in comparison to the previous quarter
Address discrepancy trend has increased significantly from 25% in Q1-16 to 28% in Q2-16 in the North
Education discrepancies shows an increase in the South, West & North Zones
BACKGROUND SCREENING TRENDS - INDIA
![Page 15: Background Screening Trends – India · TRAVEL AND HOSPITALITY 12 3 3 3 14 3 BFSI 35 38 13 35 39 12 4 HEALTHCARE AND PHARMACEUTICALS 18 4 4 13 7 ENGINEERING 0 0 22 0 0 IT 30 22 28](https://reader034.vdocuments.site/reader034/viewer/2022050602/5fa9ab597c883c41b51a5808/html5/thumbnails/15.jpg)
TAMIL NADU
6%
TAMIL NADU
7%
KARNATAKA
22%
KARNATAKA
22%
5. Discrepancies - By Top 6 States [Q1-16 Vs. Q2-16]
Discrepancy Trends
Check Level Trend from April to June 2016
15
Based on Discrepancy checks only.
Q2-16
Q1-16
ANDHRA PRADESH
12%
ANDHRA PRADESH
12%
MAHARASHTRA
20%
MAHARASHTRA
19%
NEW DELHI
6%
NEW DELHI
6%
UTTAR PRADESH
7%
UTTAR PRADESH
7%
In Q2-16, State-wise discrepancies, Karnataka state leads at 22% [which means out of every 100 discrepant checks, 22 were from Karnataka State]
Maharashtra closely follows at 20% and Andhra Pradesh is at 12%.
BACKGROUND SCREENING TRENDS - INDIA
![Page 16: Background Screening Trends – India · TRAVEL AND HOSPITALITY 12 3 3 3 14 3 BFSI 35 38 13 35 39 12 4 HEALTHCARE AND PHARMACEUTICALS 18 4 4 13 7 ENGINEERING 0 0 22 0 0 IT 30 22 28](https://reader034.vdocuments.site/reader034/viewer/2022050602/5fa9ab597c883c41b51a5808/html5/thumbnails/16.jpg)
3%2%
3%3%
4%2%
4%
Hyderabad
Pune
Kanpur
Lucknow
5% Bengaluru
6.A. Employment Discrepancies - By Top 10 Cities [Q1-16 Vs. Q2-16]
Discrepancy Trends
Check Level Trend from April to June 2016
Based on Discrepancy checks only.
Based on Discrepancy checks only.
Mumbai
Chennai
Hyderabad
Bengaluru
New Delhi
Gurgaon
Pune
Noida
Kolkata
Navi Mumbai
16
Bengaluru, Mumbai and Hyderabad are the metro cities which have topped in Employment related discrepancies in Q2-16
6.B. Education Discrepancies - By Top 10 Cities [Q1-16 Vs. Q2-16]
Mumbai, Namchi and New Delhi are the cities topping the Education related discrepancies in Q2-16
Mumbai
Namchi
New Delhi
Q2-16
10%
9%
11%
Q1-16
3%
3%
Q2-16
19%
14%
3%
2%
9%
6%
6%
5%
4%
6%
Q1-16
19%
13%
3%
1%
8%
7%
7%
6%
4%
6%
4%
Jhansi
Pilani
15%
8%
10%
3%
4%
2%
BACKGROUND SCREENING TRENDS - INDIA
![Page 17: Background Screening Trends – India · TRAVEL AND HOSPITALITY 12 3 3 3 14 3 BFSI 35 38 13 35 39 12 4 HEALTHCARE AND PHARMACEUTICALS 18 4 4 13 7 ENGINEERING 0 0 22 0 0 IT 30 22 28](https://reader034.vdocuments.site/reader034/viewer/2022050602/5fa9ab597c883c41b51a5808/html5/thumbnails/17.jpg)
2%2%
4%2%
5%5%
6%6%
10%11%
11%9%
Gurgaon
Pune
Mumbai
Vishakhapatnam
Hyderabad
Bengaluru
6.C. Address Discrepancies - By Top 10 Cities [Q1-16 Vs. Q2-16]
Discrepancy Trends
Check Level Trend from April to June 2016
17BACKGROUND SCREENING TRENDS - INDIA
Bengaluru, Hyderabad and New Delhi are the metro cities which have topped in Address related discrepancies in Q2-16
Based on Discrepancy checks only.
Chennai
Kolkata
Secunderabad
Q2-16Q1-16
3%3%
7%6%
New Delhi
3%3%
2%1%
![Page 18: Background Screening Trends – India · TRAVEL AND HOSPITALITY 12 3 3 3 14 3 BFSI 35 38 13 35 39 12 4 HEALTHCARE AND PHARMACEUTICALS 18 4 4 13 7 ENGINEERING 0 0 22 0 0 IT 30 22 28](https://reader034.vdocuments.site/reader034/viewer/2022050602/5fa9ab597c883c41b51a5808/html5/thumbnails/18.jpg)
7%INCORRECT
SUPERVISORDETAILS
8%INCORRECT
SUPERVISORDETAILS
Q2-
16Q
1-16
7.A. Categorization of Discrepancies - By Component Employment [Q1-16 Vs. Q2-16]
Discrepancy Trends
Check Level Trend from April to June 2016
17BACKGROUND SCREENING TRENDS - INDIA 18
Based on Discrepancy checks onlyOther False Employment includes Active Employee, Not a Direct Employee, Inflated Compensation, Not eligible for rehire, etc.
20%
19%
EXIT FORMALITIESNOT COMPLETED/
ABSCONDING
29%
INCORRECT TENURE
INCORRECT TENURE
29%
16%
16%
OTHER FALSE EMPLOYMENT
OTHER FALSE EMPLOYMENT
Q2-
16Q
1-16
3%
4%
POSSIBLE SUSPECT COMPANY
POSSIBLE SUSPECT COMPANY
INFLATEDDESIGNATION
11%
13%
INFLATEDDESIGNATION
EXIT FORMALITIESNOT COMPLETED/
ABSCONDING
Employment screening involvesconfirming the accuracy of thecandidate's claims about his/herprevious employment records, withthe HR and/or Supervisor [preferablythe last Reporting Manager] of theprevious employer/s. The verificationsare conducted based on thedocumentary proofs ( i.e. copy ofsalary slip, relieving letter, experienceletter, etc. ) submitted by thecandidate.
The HR verification would ideallyinclude questions about the tenure,designation, salary, reason forleaving, exit formalities, etc.
The Supervisor verification is morefocused on the skills, performance,strengths, weaknesses and areas ofimprovement, etc. of the candidate.
In addition to the above, it alsoinvolves an intensive research on thenet, and/or physical verificationsconducted to ascertain the existenceof the company.
In Q2-16, as usual, 'Incorrect Tenure' has topped the graph at 29%. It is followed by ‘Exit Formalities Not Completed/Absconding' at 19% & ‘Other False Employment' at 16%
Q2-
16Q
1-16
Q2-
16Q
1-16
Q2-
16Q
1-16
6%NEGATIVE HR/SUPERVISOR
FEEDBACK
NEGATIVE HR/SUPERVISOR
FEEDBACK6%
Q2-
16Q
1-16
FAKE DOCUMENT/NOT AN EMPLOYEE
FAKE DOCUMENT/NOT AN EMPLOYEE6%
7%
Q2-
16Q
1-16
Q2-
16Q
1-16
![Page 19: Background Screening Trends – India · TRAVEL AND HOSPITALITY 12 3 3 3 14 3 BFSI 35 38 13 35 39 12 4 HEALTHCARE AND PHARMACEUTICALS 18 4 4 13 7 ENGINEERING 0 0 22 0 0 IT 30 22 28](https://reader034.vdocuments.site/reader034/viewer/2022050602/5fa9ab597c883c41b51a5808/html5/thumbnails/19.jpg)
7.B.1. Categorization of Discrepancies - By Component Education [Q1-16 Vs. Q2-16]
Discrepancy Trends
Check Level Trend from April to June 2016
17BACKGROUND SCREENING TRENDS - INDIA 19
Based on Discrepancy checks only
Abbreviations:
[AICTE] All India Council for Technical Education[CHEA] Council for Higher Education Accreditation
[DIUS] Department for Innovation, Universities and Skills, UK[PCTIA] Private Career Training Agency of British Columbia
31%
2%
41%
6%
Fake DocumentsSuspect University/Institute/Board
Fake University/Institute/BoardDid not officially complete the course
Non Accredited University by CHEA* DIUS** PCTIA***
Q2-16
19%
37%
2%
41%
6%
15%
[UGC] University Grants Commission
A study of Education discrepancies shows a very interesting spectrum in the Q1-16 Vs. Q2-16 trends
The discrepancy trend for:
Fake Document, by far, forms the biggest chunk at 41% in Q2-16 followed by Suspect Institution at 31%
Fake Institution related discrepancies have remained consistent at 6%
Discrepancies like ‘Did not officially complete the course’ has increased significantly
Q1-16
![Page 20: Background Screening Trends – India · TRAVEL AND HOSPITALITY 12 3 3 3 14 3 BFSI 35 38 13 35 39 12 4 HEALTHCARE AND PHARMACEUTICALS 18 4 4 13 7 ENGINEERING 0 0 22 0 0 IT 30 22 28](https://reader034.vdocuments.site/reader034/viewer/2022050602/5fa9ab597c883c41b51a5808/html5/thumbnails/20.jpg)
Discrepancy Trends
Check Level Trend from April to June 2016
17BACKGROUND SCREENING TRENDS - INDIA 20
7.B.2. Discrepancies - By Education Level [Q1-16 Vs. Q2-16]
Based on Education Discrepancy checks only.
GRADUATE POST GRADUATE UNDER GRADUATE
27%
6%Q2-16
67%
28%
7%Q1-16
65%
Education discrepancies at theGraduate level have always beentrending on a very high percentage,quarter on quarter, as compared to thePost Graduate and Under Graduatelevels.
Discrepancy by Education level of the candidate is another talking point of the Education verifications conducted by First Advantage
In Q2-16, the discrepancy percentage in the Graduate level has increased from 65% in Q1-16 to 67% in Q2-16 [which means out of every 100 Education discrepancies identified – 67 are for the Graduate level]
The discrepancy trend for Post Graduate level has slightly decreased from 28% in Q1-16 to 27% in Q2-16
The discrepancy trend for Under Graduate level has decreased by 1%
![Page 21: Background Screening Trends – India · TRAVEL AND HOSPITALITY 12 3 3 3 14 3 BFSI 35 38 13 35 39 12 4 HEALTHCARE AND PHARMACEUTICALS 18 4 4 13 7 ENGINEERING 0 0 22 0 0 IT 30 22 28](https://reader034.vdocuments.site/reader034/viewer/2022050602/5fa9ab597c883c41b51a5808/html5/thumbnails/21.jpg)
Discrepancy Trends
Check Level Trend from April to June 2016
17BACKGROUND SCREENING TRENDS - INDIA 21
7.C. Categorization of Discrepancies - By Component Address [Q1-16 Vs. Q2-16]
Based on Discrepancy checks only.
NOT RESIDING AT ADDRESS PERIOD OF STAY
Q2-16
98%
Q1-16
99%
1%
Address discrepancies have shown a consistent trend
‘Period of Stay’ forms the biggest chunk of discrepancies at 98% [which means out of every 100 Address discrepancy checks - 98 are for ‘ Period of Stay’]
2% of the Address discrepancies are for ‘Not residing at Address’ [which goes to say that out of every 100 Address discrepancies – 2 is for ‘Not residing at Address’]
Address checks are conducted basedon the supporting documents andaddresses shared by the candidate inhis/her background verification form.The checks focus on basically twothings - one is the period of stay atthe given address and secondwhether he/she is actually a residentof the given address or not.
Most of these verifications arephysical verifications - conducted byFADV field associates paying a visit to the given address - which makes the verification all the more concreteand precise.
2%
![Page 22: Background Screening Trends – India · TRAVEL AND HOSPITALITY 12 3 3 3 14 3 BFSI 35 38 13 35 39 12 4 HEALTHCARE AND PHARMACEUTICALS 18 4 4 13 7 ENGINEERING 0 0 22 0 0 IT 30 22 28](https://reader034.vdocuments.site/reader034/viewer/2022050602/5fa9ab597c883c41b51a5808/html5/thumbnails/22.jpg)
3%
APPRENTICETRAINEE/ INTERN
Discrepancy Trends
Case Level Trend from April to June 2016
17BACKGROUND SCREENING TRENDS - INDIA 22
8.A. Discrepancies - By Employee Category [Q3-15 to Q2-16]
Based on Discrepancy cases only.
ASSOCIATE MIDDLEMANAGEMENT
FIRST LEVELSUPERVISOR
Q2-16
11%
68%
17%
2%2%
Q1-16
12%
65%
19%
2%
2%12%
63%
20%
2%
Q4-15
SENIORMANAGEMENT
Q3-15
12%
65%
19%
2%3%
In Q2-16 - Associate level discrepancy continues to top the graph at 68% [which means out of every 100 discrepancy cases - 68 are from the Associate level]
It is followed by Middle Management at 17% and First Level Supervisor at 11%. The graph depicts the Senior Management level discrepancies at 2%
The Hierarchy Matrix graph is a quickinsight into the discrepancy byEmployee category [all levels].
The trend has remained consistent forall levels in the last four quarters.
![Page 23: Background Screening Trends – India · TRAVEL AND HOSPITALITY 12 3 3 3 14 3 BFSI 35 38 13 35 39 12 4 HEALTHCARE AND PHARMACEUTICALS 18 4 4 13 7 ENGINEERING 0 0 22 0 0 IT 30 22 28](https://reader034.vdocuments.site/reader034/viewer/2022050602/5fa9ab597c883c41b51a5808/html5/thumbnails/23.jpg)
Discrepancy Trends
Case Level Trend from April to June 2016
17BACKGROUND SCREENING TRENDS - INDIA 23
8.B. Discrepancies - By Employee Category By Age [Q2-16]
<= 21 years 0.1%
>= 22 to 30 years 2.4%
>= 31 to 40 years 0.2%
>= 41 to 50 years 0.0%
0.8%
46.6% 5.9%
4.6%
0.4%
18.3%
1.4%
0.0% 0.1% 0.0%
0.1%
1.0%
0.5%
5.9%
9.6%
1.4%
APPRENTICETRAINEE/INTERN
ASSOCIATE FIRST LEVELSUPERVISOR
SENIORMANAGEMENT
MIDDLEMANAGEMENT
8.C. Discrepancies - By Employee Category By Industry [Q1-16 Vs. Q2-16]
>= 51 years 0.0% 0.0%0.4% 0.1%0.2%
AGE WISE BYEMPLOYEE CATEGORY
Based on Discrepancy cases only.
Based on Discrepancy cases only.
NEW
INDUSTRYApprentice/
Trainee/InternAssociate First-level
SupervisorMiddle
ManagementSenior
Management
Engineering
FMCG
Healthcare and Pharmaceuticals
IT
ITES/BPO
Manufacturing
Retail
Telecommunication
Travel and Hospitality
Q2-16
BFSI
Q2-16 Q2-16 Q2-16 Q2-16
The discrepancy – by Employee Category by Age Level analysis depicts interesting details which basically links both the candidate's age and designation
Maximum discrepancies have been observed at the Associate level at 46.6% [which means out of every 100 discrepant cases - 47 are from the Associate level in the >= 22 to 30 years age bracket]. Similarly the First Level Supervisors has the highest number of discrepancies in the >= 22 to 30 years age bracket
Another very interesting permutation and combination of Employee Category and age bracket comes to light in the Senior and Middle Management level and age comparison - the discrepancies are highest in the age >= 31 to 40 years age bracket. An obvious reason for this of course could be - the average time span an employee would take to reach the higher rungs of the ladder [levels] in an organization
2.88%
0.00%
2.38%
0.51%
0.77%
0.99%
1.64%
1.67%
0.65%
0.59%
Q1-16
3.14%
0.00%
8.06%
0.84%
0.94%
0.57%
3.16%
0.00%
1.33%
0.88%
25.80%
40.00%
23.81%
17.64%
7.96%
7.92%
32.79%
31.67%
13.09%
9.17%
Q1-16
29.93%
35.71%
37.10%
14.44%
8.84%
10.76%
34.74%
40.58%
12.72%
8.50%
12.33%
20.00%
23.81%
17.89%
8.99%
9.90%
4.92%
18.33%
8.57%
6.51%
Q1-16
13.58%
0.00%
27.42%
12.97%
10.68%
10.76%
15.79%
14.49%
11.68%
6.74%
56.06%
40.00%
45.24%
58.76%
80.15%
78.55%
57.38%
46.67%
76.31%
80.47%
Q1-16
51.13%
64.29%
25.81%
68.41%
78.05%
75.35%
44.21%
42.03%
73.45%
80.65%
2.93%
0.00%
4.76%
5.20%
2.13%
2.64%
3.28%
1.67%
1.38%
3.25%
Q1-16
2.21%
0.00%
1.61%
3.35%
1.49%
2.55%
2.11%
2.90%
0.81%
3.23%
![Page 24: Background Screening Trends – India · TRAVEL AND HOSPITALITY 12 3 3 3 14 3 BFSI 35 38 13 35 39 12 4 HEALTHCARE AND PHARMACEUTICALS 18 4 4 13 7 ENGINEERING 0 0 22 0 0 IT 30 22 28](https://reader034.vdocuments.site/reader034/viewer/2022050602/5fa9ab597c883c41b51a5808/html5/thumbnails/24.jpg)
Discrepancy Trends
Check Level Trend from April to June 2016
17BACKGROUND SCREENING TRENDS - INDIA 24
9. Verification Success % Vs. Unable to Verify % [Q1-16 Vs. Q2-16]
Checks Completed
Pure Verifications
Cannot be verified
Inaccessible for verification
Information to proceed notreceived from client
Stop Check
Verification not required
Unable to verify
97.23%
0.78%
0.57%
0.15%
Q2-16
Success Percentage
Q2-16
98.73%
Based on Checks completed.
Q1-16
98.56%
Inactive
1.27%
97.04%
0.72%
0.67%
0.12%
Q1-16
1.44%
First Advantage's Verifications success percentage is as high as 99% approximately [98.56% in Q1-16 vs. 98.73% in Q2-16]
Only a miniscule 1% of the checks are tagged as Unable To Verify wherein the Verifying authorities refuse to provide verifications in spite of several requests
This success percentage includes 1%of checks which are tagged asCannot be Verified, Inaccessible forVerification, Information to proceednot received from Client, StopCheck, Verification not Required,Inactive, etc
Reasons are varied like Company/University ceased to exist,Company not maintainingex-employee records, Companyshifted years before, Client wouldnot like to continue with thecandidate's verification for reasonsbest known to them, etc
These tagging are based on thesimple logic that if First Advantagecannot verify them then no otherBackground Screening company willbe able to procure the verificationgiven the same scenario
In Q2-16 similar to the Q1-16 trend – only 1% of the checks have been tagged as Unable to Verify [UTV]. Certain organizations/verifying authorities do not provide verifications [as in their own verbatim] - it is not one of their priorities, what a candidate does after he/she leaves their organization is least of their concerns. Other major reasons for not being able to procure verifications could be time constraints and lack of awareness of due diligence of the verifier, etc
Also there are certain clients whowould rather have checks closed as'Unable to Verify' post the requisitenumber of attempts as they are in arush to onboard the candidates.
![Page 25: Background Screening Trends – India · TRAVEL AND HOSPITALITY 12 3 3 3 14 3 BFSI 35 38 13 35 39 12 4 HEALTHCARE AND PHARMACEUTICALS 18 4 4 13 7 ENGINEERING 0 0 22 0 0 IT 30 22 28](https://reader034.vdocuments.site/reader034/viewer/2022050602/5fa9ab597c883c41b51a5808/html5/thumbnails/25.jpg)
CONCLUSION Highlights Discrepancy Analysis [Q2-16]
25
ETHICAL VERIFICATIONS & VALUES NO BLOATING NUMBERS
BACKGROUND SCREENING TRENDS - INDIA
Although background screening in India is not a mandate like in the US and other developed countries – the awareness and importance of screening backgrounds is growing at a very fast pace. It is being basically seen as risk mitigating tool which forearms employers and helps weeding out negative resources
A quarter on quarter [QOQ] study [Q1-16 Vs. Q2-16] has shown a slight decrease in discrepancy vis a vis verified percentage from 12.0% in Q1-16 to 11.0% in Q2-16
Only 1% of the checks worked upon by First Advantage have ended up as ‘Unable to Verify’. This gives us more reason to cheer as Verifying Authorities across locations are now more willing to support the concept of background screening by providing verifications
As the awareness is growing it is also serving as a deterrent for a candidate to fake information and at the same time is encouraging them to be more open with sharing information irrespective of the information being negative or positive
Employers are feeling a lot more confident – since they are equipped with more inside information of the candidate whom they are planning to take on board and are also happy to have the option of making choices and deciding who would be more apt for their organization
Credentials of candidates are not just screened, care is also taken to acquire
verification only from authorized personnel of the HR departments or officially
designated email ids of companies. Rest you can add as it is. Call
recordings in the verification process is aroutine practice to maintain and ensure ourquality. Vendor credentials are scrutinized
and cross verified before engaging in apartnership. First Advantage is incompliance with FCPA and FCRA
regulations. First Advantage also ensuresscreening of its employees in compliance
with the British Standard 7858 guidelines.
The First Advantage Trends Report and itsstudy is purely based on discrepancies as per
the Client and First Advantage definedcriteria. The data percentages do not include
checks which Cannot Be Verified or areInaccessible For Verification due to genuine
reasons, where a company does not holdex-employee records/Organization
/Institute has ceased its operation so records are not available for verification.
![Page 26: Background Screening Trends – India · TRAVEL AND HOSPITALITY 12 3 3 3 14 3 BFSI 35 38 13 35 39 12 4 HEALTHCARE AND PHARMACEUTICALS 18 4 4 13 7 ENGINEERING 0 0 22 0 0 IT 30 22 28](https://reader034.vdocuments.site/reader034/viewer/2022050602/5fa9ab597c883c41b51a5808/html5/thumbnails/26.jpg)
ABOUT US
About First Advantage
Verifications Offered:
26
First Advantage provides comprehensive screening solutions including employeescreening, vendor screening, consumer screening and ‘know your customer’offering. First Advantage supports thousands of clients globally, includinghundreds of Fortune 1000 companies, by providing integrated, single-sourcesolutions that feature quality products and business practices, con�gurabletechnology, helpful compliance and managed services, and highly responsiveclient support
First Advantage, a talent acquisition solutions provider, offers companies aroundthe globe solutions to improve their decision making and process for talentacquisition across the employment continuum. Custom tailored for each client,the solutions address recruiting, screening and assessment, on-boarding, andre-screening. As employers tackle the challenges of recruitment and talentmanagement, they turn to First Advantage for integrated solutions
First Advantage provides a comprehensive suite of global talent acquisitionsolutions designed to reduce time, cost and risk associated with candidaterecruiting, applicant tracking, screening, assessments and ongoing retentionprocesses. In India, First Advantage offers Background Screening Servicesand Assessments.
BACKGROUND SCREENING TRENDS - INDIA
First Advantage combines industryexpertise with information to createproducts and services thatorganizations worldwide use to makesmarter business decisions. FirstAdvantage is a leading provider oftalent acquisition solutions includingemployment background screening,occupational health check-upservices, applicant tracking systems,recruiting solutions, behavioral andskills assessments, and business taxconsulting services. More informationabout First Advantage can be foundat www.FADV.com.
AssessmentsEducationEmploymentCriminalAddressIdentityDatabaseHealthFinancial CredibilityCV ValidationGlobal ChecksSocial Media ChecksOwner / Proprietor
![Page 27: Background Screening Trends – India · TRAVEL AND HOSPITALITY 12 3 3 3 14 3 BFSI 35 38 13 35 39 12 4 HEALTHCARE AND PHARMACEUTICALS 18 4 4 13 7 ENGINEERING 0 0 22 0 0 IT 30 22 28](https://reader034.vdocuments.site/reader034/viewer/2022050602/5fa9ab597c883c41b51a5808/html5/thumbnails/27.jpg)
27
45000+Worldwide clients
Screenings
54million
6millionChecks annually
in India
275600+
2500+Customers in
India
Offices in13 countries
Employees
A TALENT ACQUISITION SOLUTION PROVIDER
As part of our growing offering of solutions for theemployment continuum in Asia-Pacific, First Advantagehas launched a complete suite of talent acquisitionsolutions including Behavioral and Skill Assessments,Applicant Tracking System, Candidate RelationshipManagement, and on-boarding solutions.
Verify Direct launched in 2009 is the first-ever Asia-Pacific-widecontributory database driven online background screening service.It covers all industries and provides instant verifications throughsecured online transactions 24/7. This online service facilitates fasterverification of facts submitted by candidates seeking employment,loans or for any other legitimate business purpose, with relatively less documentation compared to the current, more conventionalmethods of verifying such facts.
First Advantage combines industry expertise with information to create products and services that organizations worldwide use to make smarter business decisions. First Advantage is a leading provider of talent acquisition solutions, including employment background screening, occupational health check-up services, applicant tracking systems, recruiting solutions, behavioral and
skills assessments, and business tax consulting services. More information about First Advantage can be found atwww.fadv.com Verifications Offered.
BACKGROUND SCREENING TRENDS - INDIA
![Page 28: Background Screening Trends – India · TRAVEL AND HOSPITALITY 12 3 3 3 14 3 BFSI 35 38 13 35 39 12 4 HEALTHCARE AND PHARMACEUTICALS 18 4 4 13 7 ENGINEERING 0 0 22 0 0 IT 30 22 28](https://reader034.vdocuments.site/reader034/viewer/2022050602/5fa9ab597c883c41b51a5808/html5/thumbnails/28.jpg)
Accountable and
Empowered
28BACKGROUND SCREENING TRENDS - INDIA
Outside In
OUR CULTURE AND BEHAVIOR
OUR VISION AND MISSION
MISSION
We will transform our clients, process of determining trustworthiness for employment, residential, social and vendor decisions
We will achieve this by creating innovative, customer centric solutions and a simple, positive applicant experience
Our solutions will be delivered globally, with excellence and high integrity, by engaged, collaborative and empoweredprofessionals.
Transparencyand
IntegrityCollaboration
Results Focused
ChangeAgents
![Page 29: Background Screening Trends – India · TRAVEL AND HOSPITALITY 12 3 3 3 14 3 BFSI 35 38 13 35 39 12 4 HEALTHCARE AND PHARMACEUTICALS 18 4 4 13 7 ENGINEERING 0 0 22 0 0 IT 30 22 28](https://reader034.vdocuments.site/reader034/viewer/2022050602/5fa9ab597c883c41b51a5808/html5/thumbnails/29.jpg)
29BACKGROUND SCREENING TRENDS - INDIA
VDI SERVICES FOR BUSINESS:BETTER HIRES / BETTER BUSINESS
VDI SERVICES FOR INDIVIDUALS:KNOW MORE / RISK LESS
Companies: Database:
Pre-Matrimonial Screening: Resume Veri�cation:
Driver/ Maid/Guard Veri�cation: Tenant Veri�cation:
VERIFY DIRECT INTERNATIONALPOWERED BY FIRST ADVANTAGE
For more information contact us at :+1800.103.5563
VerifyDirectTM is a leading platform offering a full spectrum of premium quality online background screening and risk mitigationsolutions to businesses as well as individuals. A global market leader servicing customers across 150 countries worldwide, FirstAdvantage provides over 54 million checks verifications annually
Safe, secure, easy to use, quick and affordable, VerifyDirectTM is a simplified portal delivering the same value and robust services tosmall and mid-sized businesses ( SMBs ) and consumers. In India, First Advantage & VerifyDirect operate out of state-of-the-artoffices in Mumbai, Bangalore, Delhi & Chennai with about 4500+ employees
Background screening includes checks on employment, education, criminal history & address amongst others which can be orderedonline via value deal packages or a la carte.
Make smart hiring decisions by verifying credentials of candidatesand employees. Your workplace gets safer, more productive andyou save on replacement cost.
Ascertain important information about your future partner. Sayno to fake identities. Say no to being duped in marriage.
Protect your family and your belongings. Verify the identity andaddress of the people that have access to your house and life.
Determine the identity of the person who lives in your house. Anessential service for property owners, hostels and real estateagents.
Get an edge over other job-seekers. Get hired faster. Verify yourresume and get First Advantage certified.
Reduce time and costs associated with candidate veification. Ourdatabase gives you quick search access to employment details ofthousands of ex-employees from several multinational firms.
![Page 30: Background Screening Trends – India · TRAVEL AND HOSPITALITY 12 3 3 3 14 3 BFSI 35 38 13 35 39 12 4 HEALTHCARE AND PHARMACEUTICALS 18 4 4 13 7 ENGINEERING 0 0 22 0 0 IT 30 22 28](https://reader034.vdocuments.site/reader034/viewer/2022050602/5fa9ab597c883c41b51a5808/html5/thumbnails/30.jpg)
The power of afew can influence the behaviour of many!Does your organization have a positive Leadership Impact Score?It’s time to find out!
We at First Advantage empowerOrganization to build strong leadership with
Executive Advantage™Leadership Screening Solutions
You Can Choose From Well-Thought-Out Screening Packages That Deliver A Deeper Level Of Background
The Risks We Help You Mitigate
Here Is Our Offering
Risk brand integrity & goodwill
Financial risk Regulatorycompliance issues
Data / IP Theft
Assault / Harassment damages
Negative media Loss of customers & business
Poor organizational climate
A far-reaching background check
Led by senior personnel
Via expert research methodologies
In a fully compliant manner, abiding by existing laws
Presented in a comprehensive Dossier Report
The Companies Act 2013 issued by the Ministry of Corporate Affairs lays onus on the Directors of the Board of a Company to ensure that Indepen-dent Directors & Key Managerial Personnel appointed are persons of integrity and possess relevant expertise and experience.
Screening for leadership by first advantage
Executive Advantage™Leadership Screening Solutions
Information To Fit Your Specific Needs
![Page 31: Background Screening Trends – India · TRAVEL AND HOSPITALITY 12 3 3 3 14 3 BFSI 35 38 13 35 39 12 4 HEALTHCARE AND PHARMACEUTICALS 18 4 4 13 7 ENGINEERING 0 0 22 0 0 IT 30 22 28](https://reader034.vdocuments.site/reader034/viewer/2022050602/5fa9ab597c883c41b51a5808/html5/thumbnails/31.jpg)
Sue Ann Vaz (Head - Leadership Screening Solutions) at +91 9819000777 or
email [email protected] to schedule a complimentary consultation with our experts!
NASSCOM
National Securities Depository Limited
Partnership Indian Association of Professional Background Screeners
Memberships
Organizations With The Highest Quality Leaders Are 13 Times More Likely To Outperform Their Competition In Key Bottom-Line Metrics (source: www.entrepreneur.com)
Integrity
Adverse information
People issues
Philanthropy
Know Your Leaders!
Management style
Litigation history
Body of work
Industry feedback
Criminal records
Social Media activity / alerts
Gap analysis
Embezzlement / Laundering
Compliance & Regulatory check
Academic & Professional Credentials
Why Us?
IAM – InfoSec Assessment Methodology
IEM – InfoSec Evaluation Methodology
RWSP (Real World Security Practitioner) Challenge Winner
Workplace Drug and Alcohol Testing – Certified Collector and Breath Alcohol Technician Certified Information Privacy
Professional (including Information Technology CIPP/IT)
ISO/IEC 27001:2005 certification
HR-XML Consortium – Founding Member
DOT Collector Training Instructor
7 Six Sigma Blackbelts
Accuvant Certified Environment (ACE)
American Association of Medical Review Officer Trainer
Privacy Mark – Japan RCSA(Recruitment and Consulting Services Association) – Australia CPP – Certified Protection Professional
Retailers Association of India
FICCI
CII
Certifications
Executive Advantage™Leadership Screening Solutions
We conduct 6 Million checks annually in India
We have conducted 55+ Million screenings
We are a trusted partner to over 45,000 companies worldwide
We adhere to and practice a ‘tolerance for noncompliance' policy ensuring complete authenticity and auditability.
We are compliant with FCPA, FCRA and other local and international regulations
Choose The Leaders Your Organization Deserves. Choose The Best!
Get TheExecutive Advantage!
Reach
Screening for leadership by first advantage
![Page 32: Background Screening Trends – India · TRAVEL AND HOSPITALITY 12 3 3 3 14 3 BFSI 35 38 13 35 39 12 4 HEALTHCARE AND PHARMACEUTICALS 18 4 4 13 7 ENGINEERING 0 0 22 0 0 IT 30 22 28](https://reader034.vdocuments.site/reader034/viewer/2022050602/5fa9ab597c883c41b51a5808/html5/thumbnails/32.jpg)
32
Call +91 80 4252 9400email [email protected] fadv.com/apac
First Advantage - IndiaInterface 7, 1st Floor
Link Road, Malad (West)Mumbai 400 064
+91 22 4069 7000
First Advantage Pvt. Ltd.
Inventor Bldg, Ground FloorInternational Tech Park Ltd (ITPL)Whitefield Road, Bangalore - 560066
+91 80 4252 9400
BACKGROUND SCREENING TRENDS - INDIA
![Page 33: Background Screening Trends – India · TRAVEL AND HOSPITALITY 12 3 3 3 14 3 BFSI 35 38 13 35 39 12 4 HEALTHCARE AND PHARMACEUTICALS 18 4 4 13 7 ENGINEERING 0 0 22 0 0 IT 30 22 28](https://reader034.vdocuments.site/reader034/viewer/2022050602/5fa9ab597c883c41b51a5808/html5/thumbnails/33.jpg)
As the trusted partner of over 45,000organizations worldwide, we at FirstAdvantage provide easy-to-understandbackground screening results so you canconfidently make decisions about prospectiveemployees, vendors and renters. Not onlydoes this safeguard your brand, but you alsoarrive at dramatically better backgroundinsights- insights you can rely on
It’s time to partner with First Advantage. Nowin 27 locations, 13 countries and conductingover 54 million international backgroundscreens on 16.8 million applicants annually
Trusted Knowledge. Exceptional People.