b4: migrating towards fully virtual...
TRANSCRIPT
B4: Migrating towards fully virtual
environments
Speakers: Gordon Flack
Assistant Director of ICT Alliance Homes Lee Richardson
Systems Engineer Together Housing Group
Migrating Towards Fully Virtualised Environments
Gordon Flack
Assistant Director (ICT)
Alliance Homes
• A community-based social enterprise based in North Somerset.
• Have an annual turnover of more than £28 million, employ around 280 staff
and work in partnership with local, regional and national agencies.
• Own around 6,500 properties and provide housing and housing-related
support to 8,000 people.
• Established in 2006 to manage homes transferred from North Somerset
Council.
About Alliance Homes Group
The Group consists of three areas:
About Alliance Homes Group
Alliance Homes provides housing management
services.
Alliance Ventures provides repairs, maintenance
and green energy initiatives, including our
successful PV panel project.
Alliance Living provides care and support services.
Our mission is to create hope for people and communities, through
developing opportunities, tackling inequalities and delivering service
excellence.
It can be summarised as creating hope though:
Our Mission
In the beginning
• Hardware estate inherited from the Council.
• Quality of kit = less than desirable
• Dell PCs of varying ages
• Windows XP
• Out of warranty
The Old Kit
The Support Burden
• Expensive support overhead
– Patching
– Memory upgrades
– Defrag; scandisk; temp file removal
– Crossed fingers!
• Lots of repeat calls, lots of repeat actions, lots of frustrations
Why Virtualise? • Some experience of server virtualisation.
• Report from NCC into Green IT
• Reduce the TCO of desktop infrastructure
• Shared experience of the benefits from others
• Perceived cost benefits over fat client solution
• Improved mobility for front line staff
Making the Case for Change
• Financial case wasn’t strong
• Some key drivers
– The VAT increases in January 2011
– Bringing our repairs contract in-house
• Need to upgrade OS and Office
Shopping Around
• Site Visit to other RPs
• Undertook an OJEU procurement to find the best solution.
• VM vs Citrix
• Implementation of Citrix using XenApp with Citrix Access Gateway
The New Kit
The Implementation
• Keeping users on board
– Team meetings
– Staff conference
• Communicate the project plan
• Communicate the rollout plan
The Pitfalls
• Microsoft Licensing – Visio & Project
• Video streaming quality is less
• Single log-in
• More difficult to cater for individual needs
• Difficulties in implementing Xen Desktop
The Upsides
• Improved performance across all applications
• Reduced support calls – Less travelling to sites – Provisioning of apps faster – Provisioning of new kit is quicker.
• Less energy used • Citrix Access Gateway
Was it Worth the Investment?
• Support calls reduced = more time spent on planned projects
• User satisfaction maintained at high level
• Faster performance on key business systems
• Staff are more productive, with many accessing systems from home
Next Steps
• P2V on legacy servers
• About 75% complete
• Project to complete by March 2015
Impartial advice from a supportive
community
Desktop Virtualisation
• Stuart Curran
• Lee Richardson
www.togetherhousing.co.uk
Why....?
• New Group Housing Management System
• Flexible Working
• Small team / large geographic area
• We wanted to do it !
Plan....
• Didn’t believe the hype
• VMWare View already in use
• Develop our own performance criteria
• Make the decision based on our experience
• Flexible approach
Performance....?
• IOPS IOPS IOPS ??
• 5 major Vendors
• User experience measures
• Stress tested against OUR criteria
• Transparency
How....?
• Built Desktop images based on ICT knowledge
• Used existing kit with Windows 7 install
• 10 staff
• 700 endpoints
• 47 sites
• 6 weeks
• Including 5 new Customer Service Centres
Benefits....?
• Obvious
– Application Upgrades
– Roaming experience
– Flexible working
– Re-create “broken” machines
– Minimum disruption
• Nice surprise
– Real time reprovisioning
Devil in disguise....?
• Reliance on WAN
• Reliance on SAN
• Reliance on DR
• Increased user expectation