b014 peer eval eet 105

38
EET 105 Team Presentations Tuesday, June 7, 2011 Self Evaluation (Due June 10, 2011- Include your final time and effort report (Billable Hours) on back of page if appropriate) Name: ________________________________________________ Email address: __________________________________________ Presentation Title or Topic: _______________________________ 1. In preparing for this presentation: (choose one only) I did most of the work, because I already knew about, or wanted to know about the topic or company. Everyone on our team did about the same amount of preparation or research. I didn’t really do much, because this was not the project that I really wanted to do, but I could not find others interested in doing my topic or company. 2. My presentation skills are: (choose one only) Excellent! I have had a lot of experience doing presentations and I feel comfortable doing them. I feel my presentation was equal to or better than most given today. Pretty Good. I was comfortable doing the presentation, and feel that it was interesting and of value to the class. Generally Good. I was somewhat uncomfortable in front of my class mates, and could have done a better job if I 1

Upload: jander-9

Post on 11-Jan-2016

224 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

DESCRIPTION

B014 Peer Eval EET 105

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: B014 Peer Eval EET 105

EET 105 Team Presentations Tuesday, June 7, 2011Self Evaluation (Due June 10, 2011- Include your final time and effort report

(Billable Hours) on back of page if appropriate)

Name: ________________________________________________

Email address: __________________________________________

Presentation Title or Topic: _______________________________

1. In preparing for this presentation: (choose one only)

I did most of the work, because I already knew about, or wanted to know about the topic or company.

Everyone on our team did about the same amount of preparation or research.

I didn’t really do much, because this was not the project that I really wanted to do, but I could not find others interested in doing my topic or company.

2. My presentation skills are: (choose one only)

Excellent! I have had a lot of experience doing presentations and I feel comfortable doing them. I feel my presentation was equal to or better than most given today.

Pretty Good. I was comfortable doing the presentation, and feel that it was interesting and of value to the class.

Generally Good. I was somewhat uncomfortable in front of my class mates, and could have done a better job if I had not felt uncomfortable. I feel that over all, the class responded well to my presentation.

I am comfortable doing presentations in my own language, but just need some more practice in English!

I hate doing presentations! I feel very uncomfortable doing them, and need to develop some strategies to make it work better!Comments or suggestions:

I rate my presentation as __________points out of a possible 10 points.

I rate my team’s overall presentation as _________ points out of a possible 10 pointsEET 105 Team Presentations Tuesday, June 7, 2011

1

Page 2: B014 Peer Eval EET 105

Peer Evaluation Due June 10, 2011

Evaluator’s name:__________________________________Your name is for Lynda’s records only! (To show your participation in this

project)Your name will be deleted before copies of the peer evaluations are given to the

presenters

Team 1: Latrail, Dennis, Brian

Presentation Title or Topic: Vehicle Electronics, Metrology, Power DistributionOverall, I felt the content of this presentation was: (choose one only)

Very useful and interesting to me.

Somewhat useful and interesting to me.

This is not a company or topic that interests me.

Rate each team member out of a possible 30 points:Name Excellent Good Needs WorkLatrail Content & Clarity of Message 5 4 3 2 1

Audience Appeal & Presentation 5 4 3 2 1 Originality 5 4 3 2 1

Total Points____________X 2 = _____________30 points maximum

Name Excellent Good Needs WorkDennis Content & Clarity of Message 5 4 3 2 1

Audience Appeal & Presentation 5 4 3 2 1 Originality 5 4 3 2 1

Total Points____________X 2 = _____________30 points maximum

Name Excellent Good Needs WorkBrian Content & Clarity of Message 5 4 3 2 1

Audience Appeal & Presentation 5 4 3 2 1 Originality 5 4 3 2 1

Total Points____________X 2 = _____________30 points maximum

2

Page 3: B014 Peer Eval EET 105

EET 105 Team Presentations Tuesday, June 7, 2011Peer Evaluation Due June 10, 2011

Evaluator’s name:__________________________________Your name is for Lynda’s records only! (To show your participation in this

project)Your name will be deleted before copies of the peer evaluations are given to the

presenters

Team 2: Jennifer, Carl, Joshua, Troy, Thomas

Presentation Title or Topic: Comparison of BMET field service tech and 3rd party provider and in house hospital BMET

Overall, I felt the content of this presentation was: (choose one only)

Very useful and interesting to me.

Somewhat useful and interesting to me.

This is not a company or topic that interests me.

Rate each team member out of a possible 30 points:Name Excellent Good Needs Work

Jennifer Content & Clarity of Message 5 4 3 2 1 Audience Appeal & Presentation 5 4 3 2 1

Originality 5 4 3 2 1 Total Points____________X 2 = _____________30 points maximum

Name Excellent Good Needs WorkCarl Content & Clarity of Message 5 4 3 2 1

Audience Appeal & Presentation 5 4 3 2 1 Originality 5 4 3 2 1

Total Points____________X 2 = _____________30 points maximum

Name Excellent Good Needs WorkJoshua Content & Clarity of Message 5 4 3 2 1

Audience Appeal & Presentation 5 4 3 2 1 Originality 5 4 3 2 1

Total Points____________X 2 = _____________30 points maximum

3

Page 4: B014 Peer Eval EET 105

Name Excellent Good Needs WorkTroy Content & Clarity of Message 5 4 3 2 1

Audience Appeal & Presentation 5 4 3 2 1 Originality 5 4 3 2 1

Total Points____________X 2 = _____________30 points maximum

Name Excellent Good Needs WorkThomas Content & Clarity of Message 5 4 3 2 1

Audience Appeal & Presentation 5 4 3 2 1 Originality 5 4 3 2 1

Total Points____________X 2 = _____________30 points maximum

4

Page 5: B014 Peer Eval EET 105

EET 105 Team Presentations Tuesday, June 7, 2011Peer Evaluation Due June 10, 2011

Evaluator’s name:__________________________________

Your name is for Lynda’s records only! (To show your participation in this project)

Your name will be deleted before copies of the peer evaluations are given to the presenters

Team 3: Steve, Alex, AlbertPresentation Title or Topic: NW Hospital, BMET DepartmentOverall, I felt the content of this presentation was: (choose one only)

Very useful and interesting to me.

Somewhat useful and interesting to me.

This is not a company or topic that interests me.

Rate each team member out of a possible 30 points:Name Excellent Good Needs WorkSteve Content & Clarity of Message 5 4 3 2 1

Audience Appeal & Presentation 5 4 3 2 1 Originality 5 4 3 2 1

Total Points____________X 2 = _____________30 points maximum

Name Excellent Good Needs WorkAlex Content & Clarity of Message 5 4 3 2 1

Audience Appeal & Presentation 5 4 3 2 1 Originality 5 4 3 2 1

Total Points____________X 2 = _____________30 points maximum

Name Excellent Good Needs WorkAlbert Content & Clarity of Message 5 4 3 2 1

Audience Appeal & Presentation 5 4 3 2 1 Originality 5 4 3 2 1

Total Points____________X 2 = _____________30 points maximum

5

Page 6: B014 Peer Eval EET 105

EET 105 Team Presentations Tuesday, June 7, 2011Peer Evaluation Due June 10, 2011

Evaluator’s name:__________________________________

Your name is for Lynda’s records only! (To show your participation in this project)

Your name will be deleted before copies of the peer evaluations are given to the presenters

Team 4: Clinton, Brent, Chris, JimPresentation Title or Topic: Automation Control: Marel automation seafood processing

Overall, I felt the content of this presentation was: (choose one only) Very useful and interesting to me.

Somewhat useful and interesting to me.

This is not a company or topic that interests me.

Rate each team member out of a possible 30 points:Name Excellent Good Needs WorkClinton Content & Clarity of Message 5 4 3 2 1

Audience Appeal & Presentation 5 4 3 2 1 Originality 5 4 3 2 1

Total Points____________X 2 = _____________30 points maximum

Name Excellent Good Needs WorkBrent Content & Clarity of Message 5 4 3 2 1

Audience Appeal & Presentation 5 4 3 2 1 Originality 5 4 3 2 1

Total Points____________X 2 = _____________30 points maximum

Name Excellent Good Needs WorkChris Content & Clarity of Message 5 4 3 2 1

Audience Appeal & Presentation 5 4 3 2 1 Originality 5 4 3 2 1

Total Points____________X 2 = _____________30 points maximum

Name Excellent Good Needs WorkJim Content & Clarity of Message 5 4 3 2 1

6

Page 7: B014 Peer Eval EET 105

Audience Appeal & Presentation 5 4 3 2 1 Originality 5 4 3 2 1

Total Points____________X 2 = _____________30 points maximum

EET 105 Team Presentations Tuesday, June 7, 2011Peer Evaluation Due June 10, 2011

Evaluator’s name:__________________________________Your name is for Lynda’s records only! (To show your participation in this

project)Your name will be deleted before copies of the peer evaluations are given to the

presenters

Team 5: Tyler, Reginald, Khiem, Kris, Samuel

Presentation Title or Topic: Seattle City LightOverall, I felt the content of this presentation was: (choose one only)

Very useful and interesting to me.

Somewhat useful and interesting to me.

This is not a company or topic that interests me.

Rate each team member out of a possible 30 points:Name Excellent Good Needs WorkTyler Content & Clarity of Message 5 4 3 2 1

Audience Appeal & Presentation 5 4 3 2 1 Originality 5 4 3 2 1

Total Points____________X 2 = _____________30 points maximum

Name Excellent Good Needs WorkReginald Content & Clarity of Message 5 4 3 2 1

Audience Appeal & Presentation 5 4 3 2 1 Originality 5 4 3 2 1

Total Points____________X 2 = _____________30 points maximum

Name Excellent Good Needs WorkKhiem Content & Clarity of Message 5 4 3 2 1

Audience Appeal & Presentation 5 4 3 2 1 Originality 5 4 3 2 1

Total Points____________X 2 = _____________30 points maximum

Name Excellent Good Needs WorkKris Content & Clarity of Message 5 4 3 2 1

7

Page 8: B014 Peer Eval EET 105

Audience Appeal & Presentation 5 4 3 2 1 Originality 5 4 3 2 1

Total Points____________X 2 = _____________30 points maximum

Name Excellent Good Needs WorkSamuel Content & Clarity of Message 5 4 3 2 1

Audience Appeal & Presentation 5 4 3 2 1 Originality 5 4 3 2 1

Total Points____________X 2 = _____________30 points maximum

8

Page 9: B014 Peer Eval EET 105

Your Grade to Date: Latrail

6/7 possible weekly reports (5 points each)*

ResearchPaper 1 15 points

Interview report15 points

Presentationcritique5 points

Presentation35 points

15 5 29

* Weekly Reports:Introduction- LyndaLibrary, Sustainability (Christian Rusby) √Metrology (Dennis Lewis), Industrial automation (Jon Matthison) √ Nano tech (Alissa Agnello) Nano Manufacturing (Chad Goodwin) √Medical Manufacturing (Chris Walton)Field Trip- Link Light RailFAA (Margarita Choi), BMET (Dennis McMahon)

Grade to date: 49%Presentation: I really enjoyed your presentation- your beginning quotes from Kelvin were great!

Your Grade to Date: Dennis

9

Page 10: B014 Peer Eval EET 105

6/7 possible weekly reports (5 points each)*

ResearchPaper 1 15 points

Interview report15 points

Presentationcritique5 points

Presentation35 points

25 15 15 5 31

* Weekly Reports:Introduction- LyndaLibrary, Sustainability (Christian Rusby) √Metrology (Dennis Lewis), Industrial automation (Jon Matthison) √Nano tech (Alissa Agnello) Nano Manufacturing (Chad Goodwin) √Medical Manufacturing (Chris Walton) √Field Trip- Link Light RailFAA (Margarita Choi), BMET (Dennis McMahon)

Grade to date 91%

I was a little unsure about the content of your presentation- it like more of an ad for UTI and Wyotech than a presentation about electronics terchnologies.

Your Grade to Date: Brian6/7 possible Research Interview Presentation Presentation

10

Page 11: B014 Peer Eval EET 105

weekly reports (5 points each)*

Paper 1 15 points

report15 points

critique5 points

35 points

30 15 15 5 32

* Weekly Reports:Introduction- Lynda√Library, Sustainability (Christian Rusby) √Metrology (Dennis Lewis), Industrial automation (Jon Matthison) √Nano tech(Alissa Agnello) Nano Manufacturing (Chad Goodwin) √Medical Manufacturing (Chris Walton) √Field Trip- Link Light Rail√FAA (Margarita Choi), BMET (Dennis McMahon) √

Grade to date: 97%

You did a great presentation- it was clear and very interesting!

Your Grade to Date: Jennifer

6/7 possible Research Interview Presentation Presentation

11

Page 12: B014 Peer Eval EET 105

weekly reports (5 points each)*

Paper 1 15 points

report15 points

critique5 points

35 points

30 15 15 5 32

* Weekly Reports:Introduction- Lynda√Library, Sustainability (Christian Rusby)Metrology (Dennis Lewis), Industrial automation (Jon Matthison) √Nano tech(Alissa Agnello) Nano Manufacturing (Chad Goodwin) √Medical Manufacturing (Chris Walton) √Field Trip- Link Light Rail√FAA (Margarita Choi), BMET (Dennis McMahon) √

Grade to date: 97%

Good work all quarter! I really enjoyed your presentation, your team did an excellent job of supporting each other, and the way to rotated speakers kept it very interesting.

Your Grade to Date: Carl6/7 possible Research Interview Presentation Presentation

12

Page 13: B014 Peer Eval EET 105

weekly reports (5 points each)*

Paper 1 15 points

report15 points

critique5 points

35 points

30 15 15 5 31

* Weekly Reports:Introduction- Lynda√Library, Sustainability (Christian Rusby) √Metrology (Dennis Lewis), Industrial automation (Jon Matthison) √Nano tech(Alissa Agnello) Nano Manufacturing (Chad Goodwin) √Medical Manufacturing (Chris Walton) √Field Trip- Link Light Rail√FAA (Margarita Choi), BMET (Dennis McMahon)

Grade to date- 96

Good work all quarter! I really enjoyed your presentation, your team did an excellent job of supporting each other, and the way to rotated speakers kept it very interesting.

Your Grade to Date: Joshua

13

Page 14: B014 Peer Eval EET 105

6/7 possible weekly reports (5 points each)*

ResearchPaper 1 15 points

Interview report15 points

Presentationcritique5 points

Presentation35 points

30 15 15 5

* Weekly Reports:Introduction- Lynda√Library, Sustainability (Christian Rusby) √Metrology (Dennis Lewis), Industrial automation (Jon Matthison) √Nano tech(Alissa Agnello)Nano Manufacturing (Chad Goodwin) √Medical Manufacturing (Chris Walton) √Field Trip- Link Light Rail√FAA (Margarita Choi), BMET (Dennis McMahon)

Final Grade- 97%

Good work all quarter! I really enjoyed your presentation, your team did an excellent job of supporting each other, and the way to rotated speakers kept it very interesting.

Your Grade to Date: Troy

6/7 possible weekly reports (5 points each)*

ResearchPaper 1 15 points

Interview report15 points

Presentationcritique5 points

Presentation35points

20 15 15 5 33

14

Page 15: B014 Peer Eval EET 105

5* Weekly Reports:Introduction- Lynda√Library, Sustainability (Christian Rusby) √Metrology (Dennis Lewis), Industrial automation (Jon Matthison)Nano tech(Alissa Agnello) Nano Manufacturing (Chad Goodwin)Medical Manufacturing (Chris Walton) √Field Trip- Link Light RailFAA (Margarita Choi), BMET (Dennis McMahon) √

Your grade to date- 88%

Good work all quarter! I really enjoyed your presentation, your team did an excellent job of supporting each other, and the way to rotated speakers kept it very interesting.

Your Grade to Date: Thomas

6/7 possible weekly reports (5 points each)*

ResearchPaper 1 15 points

Interview report15 points

Presentationcritique5 points

Presentation35 points

15 15 pts 5 27

15

Page 16: B014 Peer Eval EET 105

* Weekly Reports:Introduction- Lynda√Library, Sustainability (Christian Rusby) √Metrology (Dennis Lewis), Industrial automation (Jon Matthison)Nano techn(Alissa Agnello) Nano Manufacturing (Chad Goodwin)Medical Manufacturing (Chris Walton)Field Trip- Link Light RailFAA (Margarita Choi), BMET (Dennis McMahon) √

Your grade to date- 62%

I really enjoyed your presentation, your team did an excellent job of supporting each other, and the way to rotated speakers kept it very interesting.

Your Grade to Date: Steve6/7 possible weekly reports (5 points each)*

ResearchPaper 1 15 points

Interview report15 points

Presentationcritique5 points

Presentation35 points

10 pts 15 pts 5 26

* Weekly Reports:

16

Page 17: B014 Peer Eval EET 105

Introduction- LyndaLibrary, Sustainability (Christian Rusby)Metrology (Dennis Lewis), Industrial automation (Jon Matthison)Nano tech(Alissa Agnello) Nano Manufacturing (Chad Goodwin) √Medical Manufacturing (Chris Walton) √Field Trip- Link Light RailFAA (Margarita Choi), BMET (Dennis McMahon)

Your grade to date is 56%

Your presentation was quite good, your slides were good, and you interacted with the class well.

Your Grade to Date: Alex

6/7 possible weekly reports (5 points each)*

ResearchPaper 1 15 points

Interview report15 points

Presentationcritique5 points

Presentation35 points

25 rejected 5 28

* Weekly Reports:Introduction- Lynda√

17

Page 18: B014 Peer Eval EET 105

Library, Sustainability (Christian Rusby) √Metrology (Dennis Lewis), Industrial automation (Jon Matthison)Nano tech(Alissa Agnello) Nano Manufacturing (Chad Goodwin) √Medical Manufacturing (Chris Walton) √Field Trip- Link Light Rail√FAA (Margarita Choi), BMET (Dennis McMahon)

Final grade to date: 58%

Your presentation was quite good. You did a good job of comparing the different BMET fields with medical manufacturing. I enjoyed listening to you!

Your Grade to Date: Albert

6/7 possible weekly reports (5 points each)*

ResearchPaper 1 15 points

Interview report15 points

Presentationcritique5 points

Presentation35 points

30 15 15 5 26

* Weekly Reports:Introduction- Lynda√Library, Sustainability (Christian Rusby) √

18

Page 19: B014 Peer Eval EET 105

Metrology (Dennis Lewis), Industrial automation (Jon Matthison) √Nano tech(Alissa Agnello) Nano Manufacturing (Chad Goodwin) √Medical Manufacturing (Chris Walton) √Field Trip- Link Light Rail√FAA (Margarita Choi), BMET (Dennis McMahon)

Grade to date: 91%

You worked well with your team on the presentation!

Your Grade to Date: Clinton6/7 possible weekly reports (5 points each)*

ResearchPaper 1 15 points

Interview report15 points

Presentationcritique5 points

Presentation35 points

30 15 15 5 34

* Weekly Reports:Introduction- Lynda√Library, Sustainability (Christian Rusby) √Metrology (Dennis Lewis), Industrial automation (Jon Matthison) √

19

Page 20: B014 Peer Eval EET 105

Nano tech(Alissa Agnello) Nano Manufacturing (Chad Goodwin) √Medical Manufacturing (Chris Walton) √Field Trip- Link Light Rail√FAA (Margarita Choi), BMET (Dennis McMahon)

Grade to date- 99%

Your team did a great presentation; you were enthusiastic and had great information. I loved it!

Your Grade to Date: Brent

6/7 possible weekly reports (5 points each)*

ResearchPaper 1 15 points

Interview report15 points

Presentationcritique5 points

Presentation35 points

30 15 15 5 34

* Weekly Reports:Introduction- Lynda√Library, Sustainability (Christian Rusby) √Metrology (Dennis Lewis), Industrial automation (Jon Matthison) √

20

Page 21: B014 Peer Eval EET 105

Nano tech(Alissa Agnello) Nano Manufacturing (Chad Goodwin) √Medical Manufacturing (Chris Walton) √Field Trip- Link Light Rail√FAA (Margarita Choi), BMET (Dennis McMahon) √

Grade to date- 99%Your team did a great presentation; you were enthusiastic and had great information. I loved it!

Your Grade to Date: Jim

6/7 possible weekly reports (5 points each)*

ResearchPaper 1 15 points

Interview report15 points

Presentationcritique5 points

Presentation35 points

30 15 5 28

* Weekly Reports:Introduction- Lynda√Library, Sustainability (Christian Rusby) √Metrology (Dennis Lewis), Industrial automation (Jon Matthison) √Nano tech(Alissa Agnello) Nano Manufacturing (Chad Goodwin) √Medical Manufacturing (Chris Walton) √

21

Page 22: B014 Peer Eval EET 105

Field Trip- Link Light Rail√FAA (Margarita Choi), BMET (Dennis McMahon) √

Your grade to date: 78%

Your team did a great presentation; you were enthusiastic and had great information. I loved it!

Your Grade to Date: Tyler

6/7 possible weekly reports (5 points each)*

ResearchPaper 1 15 points

Interview report15 points

Presentationcritique5 points

Presentation35 points

25 15 15 5 32

* Weekly Reports:Introduction- Lynda√Library, Sustainability (Christian Rusby) √Metrology (Dennis Lewis), Industrial automation (Jon Matthison)Nano tech(Alissa Agnello)Nano Manufacturing (Chad Goodwin)Medical Manufacturing (Chris Walton) √Field Trip- Link Light Rail

22

Page 23: B014 Peer Eval EET 105

FAA (Margarita Choi), BMET (Dennis McMahon) √

Your grade to date: 92%

Tyler, you did a great job on introducing your team’s topic ‘City Light’. You are a good speaker, and I really enjoyed listening to you!

Your Grade to Date: Reginald

6/7 possible weekly reports (5 points each)*

ResearchPaper 1 15 points

Interview report15 points

Presentationcritique5 points

Presentation35 points

15 15 15 5 26

* Weekly Reports:Introduction- Lynda√Library, Sustainability (Christian Rusby) √Metrology (Dennis Lewis), Industrial automation (Jon Matthison)Nano tech(Alissa Agnello) Nano Manufacturing (Chad Goodwin) √Medical Manufacturing (Chris Walton)Field Trip- Link Light RailFAA (Margarita Choi), BMET (Dennis McMahon)

23

Page 24: B014 Peer Eval EET 105

Grade to date: 76%

You need a little practice talking to groups of people. Your presentation content was good, but you didn’t seem to have much interaction with your audience.

Your Grade to Date: Khiem

6/7 possible weekly reports (5 points each)*

ResearchPaper 1 15 points

Interview report15 points

Presentationcritique5 points

Presentation35 points

30 15 15 5 26

* Weekly Reports:Introduction- Lynda√Library, Sustainability (Christian Rusby) √Metrology (Dennis Lewis), Industrial automation (Jon Matthison) √Nano tech(Alissa Agnello) Nano Manufacturing (Chad Goodwin)Medical Manufacturing (Chris Walton) √Field Trip- Link Light Rail√FAA (Margarita Choi), BMET (Dennis McMahon) √

24

Page 25: B014 Peer Eval EET 105

Grade to date: 91%

I was a little disappointed in your presentation- I had hoped that you would contrast a BMET or avionics tech job with what the others shared about City Light. I know you aren’t interested in City Light, and starting your presentation by saying so made it even worse. Your reading the slides was also quite hard to follow. I’m sure you would have done better under different circumstances.

Your Grade to Date: Kris

6/7 possible weekly reports (5 points each)*

ResearchPaper 1 15 points

Interview report15 points

Presentationcritique5 points

Presentation35 points

30 15 15 5 33

* Weekly Reports:Introduction- Lynda√Library, Sustainability (Christian Rusby) √Metrology (Dennis Lewis), Industrial automation (Jon Matthison) √Nano tech(Alissa Agnello) Nano Manufacturing (Chad Goodwin) √Medical Manufacturing (Chris Walton)Field Trip- Link Light Rail√FAA (Margarita Choi), BMET (Dennis McMahon) √

Grade to date: 98% 4.0

25

Page 26: B014 Peer Eval EET 105

Good presentation- you were clear and easy to follow, and you interacted very well with the class!

Your Grade to Date: Samuel

6/7 possible weekly reports (5 points each)*

ResearchPaper 1 15 points

Interview report15 points

Presentationcritique5 points

Presentation35 points

20 15 5 33

* Weekly Reports:Introduction- Lynda√Library, Sustainability (Christian Rusby)Metrology (Dennis Lewis), Industrial automation (Jon Matthison) √Nano tech(Alissa Agnello) Nano Manufacturing (Chad Goodwin)Medical Manufacturing (Chris Walton)Field Trip- Link Light Rail√FAA (Margarita Choi), BMET (Dennis McMahon) √

Your grade to date: 73%

26

Page 27: B014 Peer Eval EET 105

I really enjoyed your presentation. Your enthusiasm is contagious! You interacted very well with the class, and fielded questions very well!

Your Grade to Date: Anthony

6/7 possible weekly reports (5 points each)*

ResearchPaper 1 15 points

Interview report15 points

Presentationcritique5 points

Presentation35 points

10

* Weekly Reports:Introduction- Lynda√Library, Sustainability (Christian Rusby) √Metrology (Dennis Lewis), Industrial automation (Jon Matthison)Nano tech(Alissa Agnello) Nano Manufacturing (Chad Goodwin)Medical Manufacturing (Chris Walton)Field Trip- Link Light RailFAA (Margarita Choi), BMET (Dennis McMahon)

27