b014 peer eval eet 105
DESCRIPTION
B014 Peer Eval EET 105TRANSCRIPT
EET 105 Team Presentations Tuesday, June 7, 2011Self Evaluation (Due June 10, 2011- Include your final time and effort report
(Billable Hours) on back of page if appropriate)
Name: ________________________________________________
Email address: __________________________________________
Presentation Title or Topic: _______________________________
1. In preparing for this presentation: (choose one only)
I did most of the work, because I already knew about, or wanted to know about the topic or company.
Everyone on our team did about the same amount of preparation or research.
I didn’t really do much, because this was not the project that I really wanted to do, but I could not find others interested in doing my topic or company.
2. My presentation skills are: (choose one only)
Excellent! I have had a lot of experience doing presentations and I feel comfortable doing them. I feel my presentation was equal to or better than most given today.
Pretty Good. I was comfortable doing the presentation, and feel that it was interesting and of value to the class.
Generally Good. I was somewhat uncomfortable in front of my class mates, and could have done a better job if I had not felt uncomfortable. I feel that over all, the class responded well to my presentation.
I am comfortable doing presentations in my own language, but just need some more practice in English!
I hate doing presentations! I feel very uncomfortable doing them, and need to develop some strategies to make it work better!Comments or suggestions:
I rate my presentation as __________points out of a possible 10 points.
I rate my team’s overall presentation as _________ points out of a possible 10 pointsEET 105 Team Presentations Tuesday, June 7, 2011
1
Peer Evaluation Due June 10, 2011
Evaluator’s name:__________________________________Your name is for Lynda’s records only! (To show your participation in this
project)Your name will be deleted before copies of the peer evaluations are given to the
presenters
Team 1: Latrail, Dennis, Brian
Presentation Title or Topic: Vehicle Electronics, Metrology, Power DistributionOverall, I felt the content of this presentation was: (choose one only)
Very useful and interesting to me.
Somewhat useful and interesting to me.
This is not a company or topic that interests me.
Rate each team member out of a possible 30 points:Name Excellent Good Needs WorkLatrail Content & Clarity of Message 5 4 3 2 1
Audience Appeal & Presentation 5 4 3 2 1 Originality 5 4 3 2 1
Total Points____________X 2 = _____________30 points maximum
Name Excellent Good Needs WorkDennis Content & Clarity of Message 5 4 3 2 1
Audience Appeal & Presentation 5 4 3 2 1 Originality 5 4 3 2 1
Total Points____________X 2 = _____________30 points maximum
Name Excellent Good Needs WorkBrian Content & Clarity of Message 5 4 3 2 1
Audience Appeal & Presentation 5 4 3 2 1 Originality 5 4 3 2 1
Total Points____________X 2 = _____________30 points maximum
2
EET 105 Team Presentations Tuesday, June 7, 2011Peer Evaluation Due June 10, 2011
Evaluator’s name:__________________________________Your name is for Lynda’s records only! (To show your participation in this
project)Your name will be deleted before copies of the peer evaluations are given to the
presenters
Team 2: Jennifer, Carl, Joshua, Troy, Thomas
Presentation Title or Topic: Comparison of BMET field service tech and 3rd party provider and in house hospital BMET
Overall, I felt the content of this presentation was: (choose one only)
Very useful and interesting to me.
Somewhat useful and interesting to me.
This is not a company or topic that interests me.
Rate each team member out of a possible 30 points:Name Excellent Good Needs Work
Jennifer Content & Clarity of Message 5 4 3 2 1 Audience Appeal & Presentation 5 4 3 2 1
Originality 5 4 3 2 1 Total Points____________X 2 = _____________30 points maximum
Name Excellent Good Needs WorkCarl Content & Clarity of Message 5 4 3 2 1
Audience Appeal & Presentation 5 4 3 2 1 Originality 5 4 3 2 1
Total Points____________X 2 = _____________30 points maximum
Name Excellent Good Needs WorkJoshua Content & Clarity of Message 5 4 3 2 1
Audience Appeal & Presentation 5 4 3 2 1 Originality 5 4 3 2 1
Total Points____________X 2 = _____________30 points maximum
3
Name Excellent Good Needs WorkTroy Content & Clarity of Message 5 4 3 2 1
Audience Appeal & Presentation 5 4 3 2 1 Originality 5 4 3 2 1
Total Points____________X 2 = _____________30 points maximum
Name Excellent Good Needs WorkThomas Content & Clarity of Message 5 4 3 2 1
Audience Appeal & Presentation 5 4 3 2 1 Originality 5 4 3 2 1
Total Points____________X 2 = _____________30 points maximum
4
EET 105 Team Presentations Tuesday, June 7, 2011Peer Evaluation Due June 10, 2011
Evaluator’s name:__________________________________
Your name is for Lynda’s records only! (To show your participation in this project)
Your name will be deleted before copies of the peer evaluations are given to the presenters
Team 3: Steve, Alex, AlbertPresentation Title or Topic: NW Hospital, BMET DepartmentOverall, I felt the content of this presentation was: (choose one only)
Very useful and interesting to me.
Somewhat useful and interesting to me.
This is not a company or topic that interests me.
Rate each team member out of a possible 30 points:Name Excellent Good Needs WorkSteve Content & Clarity of Message 5 4 3 2 1
Audience Appeal & Presentation 5 4 3 2 1 Originality 5 4 3 2 1
Total Points____________X 2 = _____________30 points maximum
Name Excellent Good Needs WorkAlex Content & Clarity of Message 5 4 3 2 1
Audience Appeal & Presentation 5 4 3 2 1 Originality 5 4 3 2 1
Total Points____________X 2 = _____________30 points maximum
Name Excellent Good Needs WorkAlbert Content & Clarity of Message 5 4 3 2 1
Audience Appeal & Presentation 5 4 3 2 1 Originality 5 4 3 2 1
Total Points____________X 2 = _____________30 points maximum
5
EET 105 Team Presentations Tuesday, June 7, 2011Peer Evaluation Due June 10, 2011
Evaluator’s name:__________________________________
Your name is for Lynda’s records only! (To show your participation in this project)
Your name will be deleted before copies of the peer evaluations are given to the presenters
Team 4: Clinton, Brent, Chris, JimPresentation Title or Topic: Automation Control: Marel automation seafood processing
Overall, I felt the content of this presentation was: (choose one only) Very useful and interesting to me.
Somewhat useful and interesting to me.
This is not a company or topic that interests me.
Rate each team member out of a possible 30 points:Name Excellent Good Needs WorkClinton Content & Clarity of Message 5 4 3 2 1
Audience Appeal & Presentation 5 4 3 2 1 Originality 5 4 3 2 1
Total Points____________X 2 = _____________30 points maximum
Name Excellent Good Needs WorkBrent Content & Clarity of Message 5 4 3 2 1
Audience Appeal & Presentation 5 4 3 2 1 Originality 5 4 3 2 1
Total Points____________X 2 = _____________30 points maximum
Name Excellent Good Needs WorkChris Content & Clarity of Message 5 4 3 2 1
Audience Appeal & Presentation 5 4 3 2 1 Originality 5 4 3 2 1
Total Points____________X 2 = _____________30 points maximum
Name Excellent Good Needs WorkJim Content & Clarity of Message 5 4 3 2 1
6
Audience Appeal & Presentation 5 4 3 2 1 Originality 5 4 3 2 1
Total Points____________X 2 = _____________30 points maximum
EET 105 Team Presentations Tuesday, June 7, 2011Peer Evaluation Due June 10, 2011
Evaluator’s name:__________________________________Your name is for Lynda’s records only! (To show your participation in this
project)Your name will be deleted before copies of the peer evaluations are given to the
presenters
Team 5: Tyler, Reginald, Khiem, Kris, Samuel
Presentation Title or Topic: Seattle City LightOverall, I felt the content of this presentation was: (choose one only)
Very useful and interesting to me.
Somewhat useful and interesting to me.
This is not a company or topic that interests me.
Rate each team member out of a possible 30 points:Name Excellent Good Needs WorkTyler Content & Clarity of Message 5 4 3 2 1
Audience Appeal & Presentation 5 4 3 2 1 Originality 5 4 3 2 1
Total Points____________X 2 = _____________30 points maximum
Name Excellent Good Needs WorkReginald Content & Clarity of Message 5 4 3 2 1
Audience Appeal & Presentation 5 4 3 2 1 Originality 5 4 3 2 1
Total Points____________X 2 = _____________30 points maximum
Name Excellent Good Needs WorkKhiem Content & Clarity of Message 5 4 3 2 1
Audience Appeal & Presentation 5 4 3 2 1 Originality 5 4 3 2 1
Total Points____________X 2 = _____________30 points maximum
Name Excellent Good Needs WorkKris Content & Clarity of Message 5 4 3 2 1
7
Audience Appeal & Presentation 5 4 3 2 1 Originality 5 4 3 2 1
Total Points____________X 2 = _____________30 points maximum
Name Excellent Good Needs WorkSamuel Content & Clarity of Message 5 4 3 2 1
Audience Appeal & Presentation 5 4 3 2 1 Originality 5 4 3 2 1
Total Points____________X 2 = _____________30 points maximum
8
Your Grade to Date: Latrail
6/7 possible weekly reports (5 points each)*
ResearchPaper 1 15 points
Interview report15 points
Presentationcritique5 points
Presentation35 points
15 5 29
* Weekly Reports:Introduction- LyndaLibrary, Sustainability (Christian Rusby) √Metrology (Dennis Lewis), Industrial automation (Jon Matthison) √ Nano tech (Alissa Agnello) Nano Manufacturing (Chad Goodwin) √Medical Manufacturing (Chris Walton)Field Trip- Link Light RailFAA (Margarita Choi), BMET (Dennis McMahon)
Grade to date: 49%Presentation: I really enjoyed your presentation- your beginning quotes from Kelvin were great!
Your Grade to Date: Dennis
9
6/7 possible weekly reports (5 points each)*
ResearchPaper 1 15 points
Interview report15 points
Presentationcritique5 points
Presentation35 points
25 15 15 5 31
* Weekly Reports:Introduction- LyndaLibrary, Sustainability (Christian Rusby) √Metrology (Dennis Lewis), Industrial automation (Jon Matthison) √Nano tech (Alissa Agnello) Nano Manufacturing (Chad Goodwin) √Medical Manufacturing (Chris Walton) √Field Trip- Link Light RailFAA (Margarita Choi), BMET (Dennis McMahon)
Grade to date 91%
I was a little unsure about the content of your presentation- it like more of an ad for UTI and Wyotech than a presentation about electronics terchnologies.
Your Grade to Date: Brian6/7 possible Research Interview Presentation Presentation
10
weekly reports (5 points each)*
Paper 1 15 points
report15 points
critique5 points
35 points
30 15 15 5 32
* Weekly Reports:Introduction- Lynda√Library, Sustainability (Christian Rusby) √Metrology (Dennis Lewis), Industrial automation (Jon Matthison) √Nano tech(Alissa Agnello) Nano Manufacturing (Chad Goodwin) √Medical Manufacturing (Chris Walton) √Field Trip- Link Light Rail√FAA (Margarita Choi), BMET (Dennis McMahon) √
Grade to date: 97%
You did a great presentation- it was clear and very interesting!
Your Grade to Date: Jennifer
6/7 possible Research Interview Presentation Presentation
11
weekly reports (5 points each)*
Paper 1 15 points
report15 points
critique5 points
35 points
30 15 15 5 32
* Weekly Reports:Introduction- Lynda√Library, Sustainability (Christian Rusby)Metrology (Dennis Lewis), Industrial automation (Jon Matthison) √Nano tech(Alissa Agnello) Nano Manufacturing (Chad Goodwin) √Medical Manufacturing (Chris Walton) √Field Trip- Link Light Rail√FAA (Margarita Choi), BMET (Dennis McMahon) √
Grade to date: 97%
Good work all quarter! I really enjoyed your presentation, your team did an excellent job of supporting each other, and the way to rotated speakers kept it very interesting.
Your Grade to Date: Carl6/7 possible Research Interview Presentation Presentation
12
weekly reports (5 points each)*
Paper 1 15 points
report15 points
critique5 points
35 points
30 15 15 5 31
* Weekly Reports:Introduction- Lynda√Library, Sustainability (Christian Rusby) √Metrology (Dennis Lewis), Industrial automation (Jon Matthison) √Nano tech(Alissa Agnello) Nano Manufacturing (Chad Goodwin) √Medical Manufacturing (Chris Walton) √Field Trip- Link Light Rail√FAA (Margarita Choi), BMET (Dennis McMahon)
Grade to date- 96
Good work all quarter! I really enjoyed your presentation, your team did an excellent job of supporting each other, and the way to rotated speakers kept it very interesting.
Your Grade to Date: Joshua
13
6/7 possible weekly reports (5 points each)*
ResearchPaper 1 15 points
Interview report15 points
Presentationcritique5 points
Presentation35 points
30 15 15 5
* Weekly Reports:Introduction- Lynda√Library, Sustainability (Christian Rusby) √Metrology (Dennis Lewis), Industrial automation (Jon Matthison) √Nano tech(Alissa Agnello)Nano Manufacturing (Chad Goodwin) √Medical Manufacturing (Chris Walton) √Field Trip- Link Light Rail√FAA (Margarita Choi), BMET (Dennis McMahon)
Final Grade- 97%
Good work all quarter! I really enjoyed your presentation, your team did an excellent job of supporting each other, and the way to rotated speakers kept it very interesting.
Your Grade to Date: Troy
6/7 possible weekly reports (5 points each)*
ResearchPaper 1 15 points
Interview report15 points
Presentationcritique5 points
Presentation35points
20 15 15 5 33
14
5* Weekly Reports:Introduction- Lynda√Library, Sustainability (Christian Rusby) √Metrology (Dennis Lewis), Industrial automation (Jon Matthison)Nano tech(Alissa Agnello) Nano Manufacturing (Chad Goodwin)Medical Manufacturing (Chris Walton) √Field Trip- Link Light RailFAA (Margarita Choi), BMET (Dennis McMahon) √
Your grade to date- 88%
Good work all quarter! I really enjoyed your presentation, your team did an excellent job of supporting each other, and the way to rotated speakers kept it very interesting.
Your Grade to Date: Thomas
6/7 possible weekly reports (5 points each)*
ResearchPaper 1 15 points
Interview report15 points
Presentationcritique5 points
Presentation35 points
15 15 pts 5 27
15
* Weekly Reports:Introduction- Lynda√Library, Sustainability (Christian Rusby) √Metrology (Dennis Lewis), Industrial automation (Jon Matthison)Nano techn(Alissa Agnello) Nano Manufacturing (Chad Goodwin)Medical Manufacturing (Chris Walton)Field Trip- Link Light RailFAA (Margarita Choi), BMET (Dennis McMahon) √
Your grade to date- 62%
I really enjoyed your presentation, your team did an excellent job of supporting each other, and the way to rotated speakers kept it very interesting.
Your Grade to Date: Steve6/7 possible weekly reports (5 points each)*
ResearchPaper 1 15 points
Interview report15 points
Presentationcritique5 points
Presentation35 points
10 pts 15 pts 5 26
* Weekly Reports:
16
Introduction- LyndaLibrary, Sustainability (Christian Rusby)Metrology (Dennis Lewis), Industrial automation (Jon Matthison)Nano tech(Alissa Agnello) Nano Manufacturing (Chad Goodwin) √Medical Manufacturing (Chris Walton) √Field Trip- Link Light RailFAA (Margarita Choi), BMET (Dennis McMahon)
Your grade to date is 56%
Your presentation was quite good, your slides were good, and you interacted with the class well.
Your Grade to Date: Alex
6/7 possible weekly reports (5 points each)*
ResearchPaper 1 15 points
Interview report15 points
Presentationcritique5 points
Presentation35 points
25 rejected 5 28
* Weekly Reports:Introduction- Lynda√
17
Library, Sustainability (Christian Rusby) √Metrology (Dennis Lewis), Industrial automation (Jon Matthison)Nano tech(Alissa Agnello) Nano Manufacturing (Chad Goodwin) √Medical Manufacturing (Chris Walton) √Field Trip- Link Light Rail√FAA (Margarita Choi), BMET (Dennis McMahon)
Final grade to date: 58%
Your presentation was quite good. You did a good job of comparing the different BMET fields with medical manufacturing. I enjoyed listening to you!
Your Grade to Date: Albert
6/7 possible weekly reports (5 points each)*
ResearchPaper 1 15 points
Interview report15 points
Presentationcritique5 points
Presentation35 points
30 15 15 5 26
* Weekly Reports:Introduction- Lynda√Library, Sustainability (Christian Rusby) √
18
Metrology (Dennis Lewis), Industrial automation (Jon Matthison) √Nano tech(Alissa Agnello) Nano Manufacturing (Chad Goodwin) √Medical Manufacturing (Chris Walton) √Field Trip- Link Light Rail√FAA (Margarita Choi), BMET (Dennis McMahon)
Grade to date: 91%
You worked well with your team on the presentation!
Your Grade to Date: Clinton6/7 possible weekly reports (5 points each)*
ResearchPaper 1 15 points
Interview report15 points
Presentationcritique5 points
Presentation35 points
30 15 15 5 34
* Weekly Reports:Introduction- Lynda√Library, Sustainability (Christian Rusby) √Metrology (Dennis Lewis), Industrial automation (Jon Matthison) √
19
Nano tech(Alissa Agnello) Nano Manufacturing (Chad Goodwin) √Medical Manufacturing (Chris Walton) √Field Trip- Link Light Rail√FAA (Margarita Choi), BMET (Dennis McMahon)
Grade to date- 99%
Your team did a great presentation; you were enthusiastic and had great information. I loved it!
Your Grade to Date: Brent
6/7 possible weekly reports (5 points each)*
ResearchPaper 1 15 points
Interview report15 points
Presentationcritique5 points
Presentation35 points
30 15 15 5 34
* Weekly Reports:Introduction- Lynda√Library, Sustainability (Christian Rusby) √Metrology (Dennis Lewis), Industrial automation (Jon Matthison) √
20
Nano tech(Alissa Agnello) Nano Manufacturing (Chad Goodwin) √Medical Manufacturing (Chris Walton) √Field Trip- Link Light Rail√FAA (Margarita Choi), BMET (Dennis McMahon) √
Grade to date- 99%Your team did a great presentation; you were enthusiastic and had great information. I loved it!
Your Grade to Date: Jim
6/7 possible weekly reports (5 points each)*
ResearchPaper 1 15 points
Interview report15 points
Presentationcritique5 points
Presentation35 points
30 15 5 28
* Weekly Reports:Introduction- Lynda√Library, Sustainability (Christian Rusby) √Metrology (Dennis Lewis), Industrial automation (Jon Matthison) √Nano tech(Alissa Agnello) Nano Manufacturing (Chad Goodwin) √Medical Manufacturing (Chris Walton) √
21
Field Trip- Link Light Rail√FAA (Margarita Choi), BMET (Dennis McMahon) √
Your grade to date: 78%
Your team did a great presentation; you were enthusiastic and had great information. I loved it!
Your Grade to Date: Tyler
6/7 possible weekly reports (5 points each)*
ResearchPaper 1 15 points
Interview report15 points
Presentationcritique5 points
Presentation35 points
25 15 15 5 32
* Weekly Reports:Introduction- Lynda√Library, Sustainability (Christian Rusby) √Metrology (Dennis Lewis), Industrial automation (Jon Matthison)Nano tech(Alissa Agnello)Nano Manufacturing (Chad Goodwin)Medical Manufacturing (Chris Walton) √Field Trip- Link Light Rail
22
FAA (Margarita Choi), BMET (Dennis McMahon) √
Your grade to date: 92%
Tyler, you did a great job on introducing your team’s topic ‘City Light’. You are a good speaker, and I really enjoyed listening to you!
Your Grade to Date: Reginald
6/7 possible weekly reports (5 points each)*
ResearchPaper 1 15 points
Interview report15 points
Presentationcritique5 points
Presentation35 points
15 15 15 5 26
* Weekly Reports:Introduction- Lynda√Library, Sustainability (Christian Rusby) √Metrology (Dennis Lewis), Industrial automation (Jon Matthison)Nano tech(Alissa Agnello) Nano Manufacturing (Chad Goodwin) √Medical Manufacturing (Chris Walton)Field Trip- Link Light RailFAA (Margarita Choi), BMET (Dennis McMahon)
23
Grade to date: 76%
You need a little practice talking to groups of people. Your presentation content was good, but you didn’t seem to have much interaction with your audience.
Your Grade to Date: Khiem
6/7 possible weekly reports (5 points each)*
ResearchPaper 1 15 points
Interview report15 points
Presentationcritique5 points
Presentation35 points
30 15 15 5 26
* Weekly Reports:Introduction- Lynda√Library, Sustainability (Christian Rusby) √Metrology (Dennis Lewis), Industrial automation (Jon Matthison) √Nano tech(Alissa Agnello) Nano Manufacturing (Chad Goodwin)Medical Manufacturing (Chris Walton) √Field Trip- Link Light Rail√FAA (Margarita Choi), BMET (Dennis McMahon) √
24
Grade to date: 91%
I was a little disappointed in your presentation- I had hoped that you would contrast a BMET or avionics tech job with what the others shared about City Light. I know you aren’t interested in City Light, and starting your presentation by saying so made it even worse. Your reading the slides was also quite hard to follow. I’m sure you would have done better under different circumstances.
Your Grade to Date: Kris
6/7 possible weekly reports (5 points each)*
ResearchPaper 1 15 points
Interview report15 points
Presentationcritique5 points
Presentation35 points
30 15 15 5 33
* Weekly Reports:Introduction- Lynda√Library, Sustainability (Christian Rusby) √Metrology (Dennis Lewis), Industrial automation (Jon Matthison) √Nano tech(Alissa Agnello) Nano Manufacturing (Chad Goodwin) √Medical Manufacturing (Chris Walton)Field Trip- Link Light Rail√FAA (Margarita Choi), BMET (Dennis McMahon) √
Grade to date: 98% 4.0
25
Good presentation- you were clear and easy to follow, and you interacted very well with the class!
Your Grade to Date: Samuel
6/7 possible weekly reports (5 points each)*
ResearchPaper 1 15 points
Interview report15 points
Presentationcritique5 points
Presentation35 points
20 15 5 33
* Weekly Reports:Introduction- Lynda√Library, Sustainability (Christian Rusby)Metrology (Dennis Lewis), Industrial automation (Jon Matthison) √Nano tech(Alissa Agnello) Nano Manufacturing (Chad Goodwin)Medical Manufacturing (Chris Walton)Field Trip- Link Light Rail√FAA (Margarita Choi), BMET (Dennis McMahon) √
Your grade to date: 73%
26
I really enjoyed your presentation. Your enthusiasm is contagious! You interacted very well with the class, and fielded questions very well!
Your Grade to Date: Anthony
6/7 possible weekly reports (5 points each)*
ResearchPaper 1 15 points
Interview report15 points
Presentationcritique5 points
Presentation35 points
10
* Weekly Reports:Introduction- Lynda√Library, Sustainability (Christian Rusby) √Metrology (Dennis Lewis), Industrial automation (Jon Matthison)Nano tech(Alissa Agnello) Nano Manufacturing (Chad Goodwin)Medical Manufacturing (Chris Walton)Field Trip- Link Light RailFAA (Margarita Choi), BMET (Dennis McMahon)
27