b 0 r 0 k s ; branching fraction and time dependent cp analysis at babar
DESCRIPTION
B 0 r 0 K s ; Branching Fraction and Time Dependent CP Analysis at BaBar. Ian Forster University of Liverpool. Introduction and Overview. Working with David Payne (University of Liverpool) CKM Matrix, CP violation and the Unitarity Triangle Event selection Maximum Likelihood fit - PowerPoint PPT PresentationTRANSCRIPT
Ian Forster - U. of Liverpool IoP 2005
1
B0 Ks; Branching Fraction and Time Dependent CP Analysis at
BaBar
Ian ForsterUniversity of Liverpool
Ian Forster - U. of Liverpool IoP 2005
2
Introduction and Overview
Working with David Payne (University of Liverpool)
CKM Matrix, CP violation and the Unitarity Triangle
Event selection Maximum Likelihood fit Branching fraction results CP fit validation
Ian Forster - U. of Liverpool IoP 2005
3
CKM Matrix and Unitarity Triangle
b
s
d
VVV
VVV
VVV
b
s
d
tbtstd
cbcscd
ubusud
'
'
'
0*** tbtdcbcdubud VVVVVV
|| *
*
cbcd
ubud
VV
VV
0 1
|| *
*
cbcd
tbtd
VV
VV
*
*
argcbcd
tbtd
VV
VV
Requirement of unitarity
This relation is depicted asa triangle in the complex plane
CKM matrix relates rotated quark states to physical states
Angles related to CKM matrix elements
Ian Forster - U. of Liverpool IoP 2005
4
f
ff A
A
p
qmS )sin()cos( mtSmtCACP
00 BqBpBL
])([])([
])([])([)(
00
00
CPCP
CPCPCP
ftBftB
ftBftBtA
00 BqBpBH tbtd
tbtd
B
B
VV
VV
p
q*
*
Ratio of CKM elementsIn Feynman diagrams
BB Mixing
(Equivalent factor for KK mixing if decay involves KS)
Particular B decays have physically interesting values of Im() eg: B0 J/Ks and decay modes dominated by ‘b-s penguin’ diagrams
CP violation due to Interference between Mixing and Decay
Ian Forster - U. of Liverpool IoP 2005
5
Measuring Sin2 From b-s Penguins
3.6 from s-penguin to sin2 (cc) No sign of direct CP asymmetry
b-s penguins showing signs of measuring a different value for b to cc decays (eg B0 JKs)
Interesting area of research at the moment
fS C= (1 - ||2) / (1 + ||2)
Ian Forster - U. of Liverpool IoP 2005
6
B0 0Ks
The two leading order Feynman diagrams. Penguin decay has weak phase able to measure the Unitarity Triangle
angle. We extract a measurement of by performing a time dependent CP analysis
using a maximum likelihood fit.
CKM suppressedTree diagram
Gluonic penguindominates
Ian Forster - U. of Liverpool IoP 2005
7
Initial Event Selection
|E| < 0.3 GeV mES > 5.18 GeV Cos(Thrust angle)<0.9 T < 20 ps, T < 2.5 ps
E = EB - EBEAM
Energy of the B
Energy of the beam
2*2BBEAMES pEm Center of mass
Momentum of B
Rest of event
B
(CM frame)
• BB pair hardly moving in CM frame• If something other than BB pair, decay will form back to back jets• A cut on the thrust of the event selects BB pairs
T is the time between the decay of the B’s
Thrust
Ian Forster - U. of Liverpool IoP 2005
8
Ntuple Level Selection
The 2 tracks from the are required to fail tight PID selections for e, p and K.
Invariant mass of these two tracks must be within 0.375GeV of the PDG mass (0.776GeV)
mES > 5.23GeV (on peak data), mES > 5.21GeV (off peak data)
Cosine of pointing angle < 0.997 Ks vertex must be displaced from the 0 vertex by
more than 3x the error on the distance. Mass of Ks must be within 0.13GeV of the PDG value
for the K0 (0.498GeV) Veto against D+- and K*+- by ensuring mass of Ks
combination are more than 0.055GeV and 0.04GeV away from the PDG masses of D+ and K*+.
Efficiency ~ 25%
Pointing angle is theAngle between the Displacement vectorBetween the 0 and The Ks and the Ks Momentum vector
Ian Forster - U. of Liverpool IoP 2005
9
Backgrounds
Split into two fundamental categories; Charmed and Charmless. Charmed Backgrounds
Identified with MC. Split up into B+ and B0 with all sub-modes collected together
into two non-parametric PDF’s Charmless modes contributing < 1 event included in the PDF’s
Charmless Backgrounds Identified with Generic MC all modes contributing > 1 event. Modeled with non-parametric PDF.
Almost all of the events in our selection are continuum ~99%!!
B Backgrounds
Continuum Background
Ian Forster - U. of Liverpool IoP 2005
10
Maximum Likelihood Fit
mES E Neural Net Output
(NNO) Cos(qHELICITY) T Mass
NNO: Inputs to the neural net are:• Fisher: combines neutral and charged, 0th and 2nd order Legendre monomials• Sum of the transverse momentum• Cosine of angle between direction of B and the thrust axis• Cosine of angle between direction of B and the z axis• Cosine of angle between thrust axis of B and the z axis
Discriminating Variables
Ian Forster - U. of Liverpool IoP 2005
11
Results of BF Fit
BF(B0 0Ks) = (5.1 +/-1.0+/-1.2) x 10-6
Float a non-resonant B0 Ks component with flat helicity distribution
Evidence for B0 0Ks at the 3.6s level Presented at ICHEP 2004
(Dataset – 227 million BB pairs corresponding to 205 fb-1 int. luminosity)
Ian Forster - U. of Liverpool IoP 2005
12
CP Fit Validations
Total Continuum Continuum + BBkg
B0 J/ Ks studyFit CP parameters to values consistent with theory
B0 D+- studyAlso fit CP parameters to values consistent with theory
Validation fits use the nominal fit but selecting the mass of The J/ or D+ instead of the 0
Plots of variableMes
Ian Forster - U. of Liverpool IoP 2005
13
Summary
Have measured evidence for the decay B0 0Ks
Result went to ICHEP in the summer PRL in pipeline
Time dependent CP analysis Fit two control samples and appear to
get expected CP result Aim to have CP analysis for summer
Ian Forster - U. of Liverpool IoP 2005
14
Types of CP violation
Direct CP Violation CP violation in decay
Indirect CP Violation CP violation in mixing – when CP is conserved the
mass eigenstates are CP eigenstates.
CP Violation in the interference between mixing and decay – The one we are interested in for this analysis!
1f
f
A
A Ratio of decay amplitudes
Ian Forster - U. of Liverpool IoP 2005
15
Which BSM models could account for the difference in Sin(2)?
Assume difference comes from New Physics 3 quark SM naturally produces a CP odd phase in
the CKM matrix There is no reason to think only one CP violating
phase exists outside the SM 2 Higgs doublets – 1 new phase SUSY – 10’s of new phases LR symmetry – up to 6 new phases
Browder and Soni: hep-ph/0410192
Ian Forster - U. of Liverpool IoP 2005
16
Vertexing
Reconstruct Brec vertex from charged Brec daughters
Determine BTag vertex from charged tracks not belonging to Brec Brec vertex and momentum beam spot Y(4S) momentum
Average Dz resolution is 180 mm From measurement of Dz we calculate
DT, the time between the decay of the B’s This gives us the time dependent analysis
Beam spot
Interaction Point
BREC Vertex
BREC daughters
BREC direction
BTAG direction
TAG Vertex
TAG tracks
z
Ian Forster - U. of Liverpool IoP 2005
17
B Flavour Tagging
Lepton: Charge of fastest electron (muon) with p* > 1.0 (1.1) GeV/c
Kaon : Net charge of identified kaons 0 (Also non-identified leptons and kaons, soft
pions from D*’s, etc)
b sc
e- , -
K-
Overall 67.5 +/- 0.5 % efficient
Ian Forster - U. of Liverpool IoP 2005
18
B Background modes