awareness monitoring should not be routine

26
Awareness Monitoring should not be routine. Jamie Sleigh

Upload: rodd

Post on 21-Jan-2016

16 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

DESCRIPTION

Awareness Monitoring should not be routine. Jamie Sleigh. Awareness / Recall: Epidemiology. Sweden: 11785 patients 0.18% (paralysed) vs 0.1% (not) Sandin Lancet 2000 55;707 Australia : 10811 patients 0.11% Myles, BJA 2000;84:6-10 USA: 19575 patients - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Awareness Monitoring should not be routine

Awareness Monitoring should

not be routine.

Jamie Sleigh

Page 2: Awareness Monitoring should not be routine

Awareness / Recall: Epidemiology• Sweden: 11785 patients

– 0.18% (paralysed) vs 0.1% (not) Sandin Lancet 2000 55;707

• Australia: 10811 patients – 0.11% Myles, BJA 2000;84:6-10

• USA: 19575 patients – 0.13% Sebel et al, Anesth Analg. 2004 Sep;99(3):833

= 26000 cases/yr in USA=20/yr Waikato

• High-risk patients having relaxant GA with incidence as high as 1%

Page 3: Awareness Monitoring should not be routine

Awareness: Urban Myths

• High on patient concerns (The attitude of the general public towards preoperative assessment and risks associated with general anesthesia. Matthey P,Can J Anaesth. 2001 Apr;48(4):333-9.

• If blinded, a routine GA BIS 40-60 only half the time….

• Clinical judgement is useless…• Midazolam is useless…• Need to ask 3 days later?!!• ½ post intubation• Painful/distressing awareness 1/5, Anaesth 2003;58:962

Page 4: Awareness Monitoring should not be routine

Is this incidence acceptable?

Page 5: Awareness Monitoring should not be routine

Advantages of BISguided anaesthesia

• BIS Drug Dosage (19%) , & PONV(32%)

–?NOT overall cost (Liu, A 2004)

• BIS and desflurane – 2.7% vs 3.6% – Wake up 7 vs 9 min!

– Discharged 127 vs 195 min!

• Propofol dose 40% if use BIS (Gurses A+A 2004)

Page 6: Awareness Monitoring should not be routine

BIS “Rx of Awareness”

• Reduction in the incidence of awareness using BIS monitoring. Ekman et al, AAS Jan 2004

– 4945 pts + muscle relaxation: BIS 40-60.– Historical control 7826 pts

• Awareness BISguided = 0.04% – 2 patients during induction – BIS>60 >10min– 8-20% patients have BIS >60 for 4min

vs

• Awareness MISguided = 0.18%

Page 7: Awareness Monitoring should not be routine

Bispectral index monitoring to prevent awareness

during anaesthesia: the B-Aware RCT Myles, Lancet 2004

• 2503 high-risk patients recruited

• Patients interviewed at 3 intervals: 6 h, at 36 h and 30 days

• Awareness Rate: – BIS=2 (0.17%) vs

– Routine=11 (0.91%)

• Odds Ratio 0.18 (NNT is 138)• Episodes awareness in BIS group when: BIS = 55-59

and 79-82.

Page 8: Awareness Monitoring should not be routine

Conclusions and Comments

• BIS monitoring risk of awareness by 82% in high-risk adults having relaxant GA.

• Cost = US$ 16 per surgical procedure, (NNT of 138), i.e. to prevent one case of awareness in a high-risk population is about US$ 2208.

• (Cost of CPR > US$ 500 000)

Page 9: Awareness Monitoring should not be routine

BUT…

• No difference in painful awareness (if 2 patients removed from routine group)

• 36 ”possible awareness” episodes reported (20 BIS & 16 routine ) and when included no difference between groups

• Same incidence of intra-operative dreaming, (62 BIS and 83 routine)

Page 10: Awareness Monitoring should not be routine

There are cracks in the edifice

Page 11: Awareness Monitoring should not be routine

A man’s gotta know his limitations.

Page 12: Awareness Monitoring should not be routine

59yr NIDDM, Desflurane 2%, Remi 6g/min

BISEMG

Page 13: Awareness Monitoring should not be routine

People lose responsiveness at different BIS values.Kuizenga et al Anesthesiology. 2001;95:607-15, Br J Anaesth. 2001 Mar;86(3):354-60.

Page 14: Awareness Monitoring should not be routine

Detection of awareness in surgical patients with EEG-based indices — bispectral index and patient state index. Schneider et al Br. J. Anaesth. 2003 91: 329

• “Despite significant differences between mean values at responsiveness and non-responsiveness for BIS and PSI, neither measure may be sufficient to detect awareness in an individual

patient, reflected by a Pk less than below 70%.”

Page 15: Awareness Monitoring should not be routine

“Wide variation in the awake values and considerable overlap between consciousness and unconsciousness... further improvement is required” AAI vs BIS during propofol-remifentanil

anaesthesia. Kreuer Br J Anaesth 2003; 91: 336

THETWIGHLIGHT

ZONE

Page 16: Awareness Monitoring should not be routine

Low values of BIS in awake patients?

Page 17: Awareness Monitoring should not be routine

BIS goes down during recovery! B

IS

Time

Page 18: Awareness Monitoring should not be routine

The Bispectral Index Declines During

Neuromuscular Block in Fully Awake Persons Anesth Analg. 2003 Aug;97(2):488-91, Messner M, et al

• “There were no significant changes in the raw EEG ….

• recorded EEG parameters (power, median

frequency) remained stable in a range compatible with the awake state.

• The suppression ratio was zero at all times.”

Page 19: Awareness Monitoring should not be routine

BIS tracks (some) drug effects well

Page 20: Awareness Monitoring should not be routine

BIS tracks (some) drug effects badly N2O Increases BIS (Rampil Anesthesiology. Sept;1998)

N2O

BIS

Page 21: Awareness Monitoring should not be routine

…and some effects

both well and badly at the same

time!

TELL ME WHY!

BIS

BIS

End Tidal Desflurane

End Tidal Desflurane

Page 22: Awareness Monitoring should not be routine

BIS vs Brain Metabolism

Quantitative EEG Correlations with Brain Glucose Metabolic Rate during Anesthesia in Volunteers Alkire, Anesthesiology 1998

BIS = CORTICAL ACTIVITY

ACTIVITY AROUSAL

Page 23: Awareness Monitoring should not be routine

Causes of Decreased Cortical activity

• Sleep

• Sedative Drugs

• Metabolic– Hypothermia– Uraemia – Acidosis

• Illnesses– Any CNS disease– Sepsis

Page 24: Awareness Monitoring should not be routine

CORTICAL ACTIVITY

RO

US

AB

ILIT

Y

AWAKE

COMA/ANAESTHESIA

SLOW-WAVESLEEP

REM SLEEP/DELIRIUM

Page 25: Awareness Monitoring should not be routine

CONCLUSIONS

• Recall is uncomfortably common...• It is negligent not to use EEG

monitoring for sick/weird patients• EEG is unnecessary for non-

paralysed patients• Look at the frigging RAW EEG

waveform!!!!• Isolated forearm is the proper test

for awareness.

Page 26: Awareness Monitoring should not be routine

Advice to would-be EEG manufacturers

• Have a narrow range of values at LOC• Have a simple, transparent, algorithm• Have a fast response• Have a clear EEG trace• Have a stable number, if the patient is stable• Market on which drugs it works, & on which it

doesn’t.• Relate the number to real cortical neurophysiology.• Have a belt and braces (IFT)