avetmiss master class 2
DESCRIPTION
Presentation on Data Provisioning from HTAN ConferenceTRANSCRIPT
AVETMISS Master Class
for funding claims in NSW
and some future directions
Martyn WebsterBSc (Comp) University of NSW
Corporate ITQantas & Fosters
First Strike SolutionsCustomised MS-Access databases
Enquiry Mate for TrainersVET Student Records System
For those who don’t know me...
Introduction What’s in the NAT files? Special rules for NSW DEC New features of the APL page site Reporting of non-funded students AVETMISS 7: evolution or revolution? What “National Student Identifier”? Is the MySkills web site the ultimate answer?
Agenda
Change is the only constant I assume you are already experts Not a comprehensive tutorial... More a grab-bag of interesting special cases ..and then some musing about the future
Introduction
NAT file structure Under the bonnet Provider Student No must be consistent Location Id must also be consistent
What’s in the NAT files?
What’s in the NAT files?File Official Name Actual Contents
NAT00010.txt Provider RTO details
NAT00020.txt Locations Training Venues (Sites)
NAT00030.txt Course Qualifications/Courses
NAT00060.txt Unit/Module Unit/Module
NAT00080.txt Client Student
NAT00085.txt Client Contact Student Contact
NAT00090.txt Disability Student Disabilities
NAT00100.txt Prior Education Student Prior Education
NAT00120.txt
Enrolment Unit/Module Dates & Outcomes
NAT00130.txt
Qualification Qualifications Issued/Failed
NAT00180.txt (Not Used) Empty file
What’s in the NAT files?
File Actual Contents
NAT.zip All 11 NAT files (compressed)
What’s in the NAT files?
Under the bonnet
What’s in the NAT files?
Under the bonnet
What’s in the NAT files?
Under the bonnet
What’s in the NAT files?
Under the bonnet
What’s in the NAT files?
Under the bonnet
What’s in the NAT files?
http://www.ncver.edu.au/avetmiss/21067.html
What’s in the NAT files?
Outcome Codes under AVETMISS 6.1
What’s in the NAT files?
In NSW:66 – Did not start(blank) – Not yet available70, 90, 52, 54 not valid for claims
What happened to:53 - Recognition of current competency granted54 - Recognition of current competency not granted?
Note the change in terminology for outcome 30
Provider Student No must be consistent
What’s in the NAT files?
Location Id must also be consistent
What’s in the NAT files?
Your self-validation is not your own Claiming for groups of students When has a unit really started? TCID delay dilemma fixed New rules for Credit Transfer APL contract rules vs APL system rules When the first assessment is also the last Processing a withdrawal Course/Site Identifiers The “training plan completed” flag Future funding models
Special rules for NSW DEC
Your self-validation is not your own
Special rules for NSW DEC
“Nothing was your own except the few cubic centimetres inside your skull.”
George Orwell “1984”
Every self-validation process is logged and recorded for several years at least.
Those records can be used to evaluate your administrative capability in retrospect.
More attempts and more errors are considered a sign of administrative problems.
That record has been used in very superfluous ways to influence funding allocations.
Claiming for groups of students
Special rules for NSW DEC
DEC request that providers submit claims for multiple students when possible.
Unless you have groups of students who consistently complete (or fail to complete) units on the same day, this is problematic.
Re-assessment, absences and other delays make tracking the claim stages impractical.
Our advice is to not even try (in most cases).
When has a unit really started?
Special rules for NSW DEC
When the student has undertaken some assessable activity... and you can prove it!
How to tell if a distance student has started a unit or a course
Reporting all units as started in the initial claim is very risky ... (even if it’s true).
TCID delay dilemma fixed
Special rules for NSW DEC
Initial claims due within 28 days if the later of:
The student starting a unit
OR
The funding being approved (i.e. the TCID being allocated)
So that headache has been cleared up at least
New rules for Credit Transfer
Special rules for NSW DEC
Credit Transfer (outcome 60) is not a payable outcome
All stage payments will be reduced on a pro-rata basis (but how is it calculated exactly?)
If CT is involved, the initial claim must include all units that will be granted CT and all units.
Units not yet started must be given estimated future start dates.
Refer to NSW Training Market: Fact Sheet #38
APL contract rules vs APL system rules
Special rules for NSW DEC
Two different sets of rules:
APL Contract Mid-way claim is due within 28 days of completing an assessment activity in half of the non-CT units in the course
APL Page Mid-way claim is LATE if not lodged within 28 days of the start of the last reported unit.
Only the APL Contract matters...
But easier if you can keep to the claim system rules too.
When the first assessment is also the last
Special rules for NSW DEC
A strategy to mitigate late lodgements due to remote or external assessors delaying delivery of assessments:
• Designate a properly qualified “chief assessor”.
• Add a cover sheet to each assessment document.
• The “chief assessor” signs off and dates each outcome, checking that everything has been done correctly and perhaps moderating selected results.
• The sign-off date then becomes the official date the student was deemed competent by the RTO, allowing you to avoid late lodgements and also add rigour to your assessment process.
Processing a withdrawal
Special rules for NSW DEC
Steps vary by state. In NSW...
• Any units partly completed given Withdrawn (40) outcome.
• Any units not started given a Did Not Start (66) outcome.
• Create a NAT00130 (Qualification) record with “N” in the Certificate Issued field.
• Claims process returns a DROPOUT result... (harsh?)
Course/Site Identifiers
Special rules for NSW DEC
Allocated to one or more students with the same:
• Year of study
• Course (qualification code)
• Site (identified by a separately registered Site Id)
• Delivery method
They may be allocated by DEC or by the RTO via the APL page, depending on the funding arrangements.
Added to the end of the NAT00120 record in NSW.
Booking Id is a related but different identifier.
The “training plan completed” flag
Special rules for NSW DEC
Another NSW specific addition to the NAT00120 records.
Indicates if a training plan has been fully developed.
Only required for apprenticeships/traineeship courses.
Can be “Y” or “N” in the initial claim.
Should be “Y” by the mid-way claim.
...but is anybody checking?
Future funding models
Special rules for NSW DEC
Fee-Help for VET at Cert III level coming... but when and how? (Uses the HEIMS reporting system)
NWDF employer / ISC channelled funding models. (Use adhoc monthly reporting systems on spreadsheets)
The controversial 'student-entitlement' model now ratified bythe NSSC. Debate over how to implement in each state.
The Victorian “adjustment” - seriously reduce funding hourly rate for some (down to $1.50/hour) and increase others, but let the providers set the actual price. TAFEs are doubleplusunhappy!
New students listed until the initial claim
Specify the units for a funded qualification
Course/Site Id self-creation and download
Correcting of student name (once only)
New up-to-date Fact Sheets and FAQs
New features of the APL page site
www.training.nsw.gov.au
Not happening in NSW(neither ASQA or NSW DEC require it this year)
Annually in ACT
Quarterly in SA
Monthly in QLD(some funding schemes require reporting of all activity)
Monthly CQR in SA and WA
It won’t happen overnight, but...
Reporting of non-funded students
Removal of redundant statistical fields Additional fields XML format put on hold – too much change? New conventions for unit code updates Cracks in the competency identifiers?
AVETMISS 7: evolution or revolution?
Removal of redundant statistical fields
AVETMISS 7: evolution or revolution?
ASGC location codes officially ignored in AVETMISS 6.1but most state funding bodies systems still expect it.
Many are already ignored due to accuracy issues...and they can be derived from reference data anyway.
Candidates for removal: ASGC location code (already gone in theory) ANZSCO occupation code Field of Education Qualification Names & Unit/Module Names (the codes should be enough)
Additional fields
AVETMISS 7: evolution or revolution?
Employer detailsExisting worker flagState student number (LUI, VSN)Internal provider course codeQualification start and end datesSoftware name and version
XML format put on hold – too much change?
AVETMISS 7: evolution or revolution?
XML is the (relatively) new format for storing data in text files.
Widely used because it allows for forward and backwardcompatibility of data and exchange of files across countries, sectors, platforms and applications.
Even Office 2007 and 2010 use it (under the bonnet).
The change from fixed width text to XML may be too much of atechnical challenge.
It has now been ruled out for AVETMISS 7 but may be consideredagain for future releases.
New conventions for unit code updates
AVETMISS 7: evolution or revolution?
NSSC decided that there were too many superficial changes causing new competency codes after complaints from providers.
ISCs directed to retain existing codes unless there is a functional change to a unit. Newly created codes will not have the letter suffix at all.
Some ISCs are doing this but others are not. There is some confusion about the change because it has not been clearly and widely explained.
Practitioners producing mapping documents not happy with the loss of document version control.
Cracks in the competency identifiers?
AVETMISS 7: evolution or revolution?
The Certificate III in Plumbing horror story.
One unit was removed and another unit changed code (but not content) to the code of the removed unit!
Is this the start of a break-down or just an isolated incident?
Student numbering is the new reality show(the bureaucrats just can’t get enough of them)
NSI officially part of AQTF 2007 The NSI will cover the VET area only Perpetually deferred VSN experience revealed a few challenges The NSI is the key enabling mechanism for
reform of the national VET records system
What “National Student Identifier”?
CQR systems operate in WA and SA(all RTOs report monthly the essential data for all certificates and statements issued)
NCVER now talking about extending MySkills(to a national parchment register like CQR)
A national register would have many benefits Fixes the “30-year retention” problem Fixes the “forged parchment” problem Fixes the “lost parchment” problem Fixes the “missing statistical data” problem Lower data collection burden than AVETMISS
Is the MySkills web site the ultimate answer?
Change is the only constant My tips for keeping up to date... Linked-In “The social network for grown-
ups” Subscribe to newsletters DEC Workshops HTAN: Your local RTO network ACPET and VELG seminars & conferences
Here, at the end of all things...
Please visit us at the Enquiry Mate for Trainers display in the marketplace
Keep in contact